2.1. Study Area
The Taganrog Bay, the Lower Don and the Don Delta are key areas on the transit route of large-tonnage long-distance tankers from the Azov and Black Seas deep into Russia. More than 200 thousand water transport units pass through the Don Delta every year, which corresponds to the traffic of the Finland Gulf and contributes to the accumulation of PAHs group carcinogenic substances in the soils of coastal areas [
44]. The danger of this process is due to the concentration within the coastal zone of the Taganrog Bay, residential, agricultural, recreational and natural areas. The high functionality of coastal zones is a common feature for the southern regions of Russia. The study area soils are affected by a number of industrial factories working in the coal mining, ferrous metallurgy, chemical and energy areas, including the largest power plant in the south of Russia Novocherkasska Power Station, as the main pollution source by PAHs and heavy metals in the south of Russia, in addition [
45,
46].
For the purposes of soil monitoring in coastal areas, 97 monitoring sites were established (
Figure 1). The location of the monitoring sites makes it possible to analyze the sources of entry, migration flows, and accumulation zones of pollutants in the eluvial, trans super aquatic, and super aquatic landscapes of the Lower Don–Taganrog Bay system.
The valley of the Lower Don is characterized by the presence of a wide floodplain with an abundance of emersed and meadow vegetation. The Don Delta is represented by several sandy islands, densely indented by gently sloping depressions of dried-up old riverbeds. The branches and channels of the delta have natural channel shafts at a height of up to 1.5 m above the low water level. The total area of the modern river Don delta is about 540 km2. The northern coast of the Taganrog Bay is characterized by the predominance of abrasion and erosion processes, the southern part, from the Dolgaya Spit, is characterized by relatively more intense accumulative processes. The floodplain and coastal landscapes of the Lower Don and the Taganrog Bay are represented by alternating reservoirs, overgrown willows, floodplain meadows, sand dunes, beaches and spits, parks, gardens, and other tree plantations.
The sources of PAHs origin in the soil were determined on the basis of diagnostic ratios: (1) fluoranthene/(fluoranthene + pyrene) (<0.4—petrogenic, 0.4–0.5—pyrolysis of coal, wood, >0.6 spills of gasoline, diesel fuel); (2) benz(a)anthracene/(benz(a)anthracene + chrysene) (<0.2—petrogenic, 0.2–0.45—coal pyrolysis, >0.45 automobile emissions) [
3]. According to this scale, the studied landscapes soils were classified as natural or anthropogenically transformed natural landscapes.
2.2. Sampling and Pretreatment
The basis of the soil cover in the study area is formed by hydromorphic and semi-hydromorphic soils on alluvial deposits in the floodplains of the river. Don and small rivers, alluvial-marine deposits of the Don delta, leman deposits at the boundary of estuaries of large rivers, and marine deposits of the Taganrog Bay, represented by an extensive group of Fluvisols. The soil sampling sites were located in the territory of the Don river delta and their location is presented at the map (
Figure 1). The most common soil type in the studied area is Fluvisols Salic. For this soil type, it was set at 97 monitoring sites. These soils are located mainly on the territory of the Lower Don and its delta, as well as in the coastal zone of the Kagalnik River. A distinctive feature of these soils was the high intensity of soil formation under conditions of regular moistening by surface and ground waters, constant modern sedimentation, and variability in the morphological structure and physicochemical properties presented in the
Table 2. The floodplain and coastal landscapes of the study area are dominated by: Fluvisols Tidalic were found on the northern coast of the Taganrog bay. For this soil type, it was set at 26 monitoring sites. Fluvisols Calcaric were located on the south coast and on the territory of the Miussky Estuary. For this soil type, it was set at 12 monitoring sites. Fluvisols Humic were represented in the southern part of the Don River Delta and in the mouth area of the Kagalnik River. For this soil type, it was set at 5 monitoring sites. Under the conditions of pulsating water, as well as a result of surge phenomena, Tidalic Fluvisols prevail within the Don River delta. For this soil type, it was set at 1 monitoring site. On the southern coast of the bay, Solonchaks Gleyic are common in depressions on marine and alluvial deposits. For this soil type, it was set at 3 monitoring sites. Under automorphic conditions, soil-forming rocks are loess-like deposits and shell rock outcrops, on which Calcic Chernozems (for this soil type, it was set at 4 monitoring sites), Mollic Leptosols (for this soil type, it was set at 2 monitoring sites), Rendzic Leptosols (for this soil type, it was set at 1 monitoring site) were formed. Technosols were formed on technogenic deposits within urban areas, as a special anthropogenically modified soils. For this soil type, it was set at 9 monitoring sites. The total number of soil samples in the current study was 97 soil sites.
Soil sampling was carried out to a depth of 0–20 cm by the envelope method. From each monitoring site with an area of 10 m2, 5 soil samples weighing 1 kg were taken from each corner of the monitoring site, as well as in the middle. Subsequently, the soil was mixed to create one average sample. The selected soil was dried in air, cleaned of plant residues, crushed in a mortar, and sifted through a sieve with a diameter of 1 mm.
Physicochemical properties of the studied soil samples were analyzed according to Theory and Practice of the Chemical Analysis of Soils [
47]: pH was determined by potentiometry in suspension of soil/water ratio of 1:2.5; exchangeable bases were determined with 1 M NH4OAc. Total organic carbon (Corg) was determined by wet combustion with potassium dichromate and concentrated sulfuric acid according to the Tyurin method (which is very similar to the WalkleyBlack method [
4]). Carbonates were determined by acid neutralization [
47]. Particle size distribution was determined by the pipette method with pyrophosphate preparation [
48].
The soil properties of the study area vary widely (CV > 50%), which is a consequence of the soil cover heterogeneity. However, the studied soils are predominantly characterized by a weakly alkaline reaction of the medium (CV < 5%), and are generally characterized by a medium loamy granulometric composition (
Table 2).
2.3. Chemical Analysis
For the extraction of PAHs, soil samples were weighed by 1 g. To remove the interfering lipid fraction, the soil sample was subjected to saponification by boiling for 3 h in a 2% KOH (Aquatest, Rostov-on-Don, Russia) solution (30 mL) in a water bath with a reflux condenser. Extraction of PAHs was carried out with
n-hexane (Aquatest) [
49]. For that purpose, a 15 mL of hexane was poured into the sample and placed on a shaker. After 10 min, the hexane supernatant was carefully poured into a separating funnel. The operation was repeated three times. After that step, on a separating funnel, the layers of hexane were separated from the residual fraction of the alcohol solution of alkali. For mechanical purification and removal of residual liquid, the extract was filtered through a paper filter with anhydrous sodium sulfate. Next, the hexane’s extract was evaporated on a rotary evaporator. After evaporation, the precipitate was dissolved in 1 mL of acetonitrile [
50]. The dry residue was dissolved in 1 mL of acetonitrile.
Samples were analyzed for PAHs with an Agilent 1260 Infinity (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) equipped with a fluorescence detector following the ISO 13877-2005 requirements [
51]. The HPLC system was fitted with reversed phase column Hypersil BDS C18 (Agilent Technologies) (125 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm). A mixture of acetonitrile (Criochrome, Moscow, Russia) (75%) and bidistilled water (25%) was used as the liquid phase at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min
−1. The volume of injected extract was 20 µL. In the present study it was determined the content of 15 priority PAHs. Of these, low molecular weight: 2-ring naphthalene and 3-ringed (acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, biphenyl, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene), and high molecular weight: 4-ringed (fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo(a)anthracene, chrysene), 5-ringed (benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene) and 6-ring benz(g,h,i)perylene.
The efficiency of target PAHs extraction from soils was determined using a matrix spike method by preparing calibration curves [
52]. The fresh soil sample as well as air-dried soil sample (1 g) was placed into a round-bottom flask and benzo(a)pyrene standard solution in acetonitrile was added to give the target PAHs concentrations of 2, 4, 6, 8, 16 or 32 μkg kg
−1. After evaporating the solvent for 30 min under a hood under ambient conditions, the PAHs-spiked soil samples were incubated for 24 h at 4 °C. The samples were then analyzed by the saponification method described above with consequent HPLC analysis.
Quality control of every HPLC detection was performed according to Agilent Application Solution [
52]. Individual standard solutions were purchased from the Sigma-Aldrich (Merch) (Burlington, MA, USA). A calibration standard of PAH mixture was injected after every six samples to correct for drift in retention time within a run. After preparation of calibration curve for every detected PAH the coefficient of detection was counted:
The content of PAH in the test samples was determined by the external standard method [
51]. The content of PAH in the soil was calculated from the equation:
where Cs is the content of PAH in the soil sample (μg kg
−1); Sst and Si are the PAHs peak areas for the standard solution and the sample, respectively; Cst is the concentration of the standard PAH solution (μg kg
−1); k is the recovery factor of PAH from the sample; V is the volume of the acetonitrile extract (mL); and m is the mass of the sample (g).
The certified reference materials and calibration curves were used for calculation of the limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantification (LOQ), which counted 2–200 μg kg
−1. For the developed methods of extracting the target PAH in the soil, a random component of the measurement error was estimated, which for the concentration range of 2–200 μg kg
−1 was 3.5–14%. Detection limits for individual PAH compounds are presented in the
Supplementary Table S1 and Figure S1.
Solvents and reagents were HPLC grade and included ethanol (96%, analytical grade) (Aquatest,),
n-hexane (99%, analytical grade) (Aquatest), potassium hydrate (98%, analytical grade) (Aquatest), acetonitrile (99.9%, analytical grade) (Cryochrome), NaOH (97%, analytical grade) (Aquatest), and anhydrous Na
2SO
4 (Aquatest). The total 15 priority PAHs standards in acetonitrile with concentration 200 µg cm
−3 produced by Merch Burlington, MA, USA (Priority pollutant PAHs (in acetonitrile) NIST
® SRM
® 1647f) was used to prepare total PAHs standard solutions for HPLC analyses. For every target PAH the individual standard was used for determination (
Supplementary Table S1 and Figures S1 and S2). The analytical standards were purchased from the Sigma-Aldrich (Merch) was used as the internal analytical standard.
The degree of soil contamination was assessed based on the gradation proposed by Maliszewska-Kordybach [
26]: up to 200 µg kg
−1—not polluted, 200–600 µg kg
−1—slightly polluted, 600–1000 µg kg
−1—polluted, above 1000 µg kg
−1—heavily polluted. This gradation was based on the results of a large-scale monitoring of soils in agricultural areas of Poland. Due to the fact that PAHs content in arable soils is usually lower than in fallow soils [
53], taking into account the PAHs average concentrations in the soils of natural areas (
Table 1), soils with pollutant concentrations below 600 µg kg
−1 were taken as background in this study. The threshold level of PAHs exposure correspondent to the minimal carcinogenic risk, was taken into account: the sum of low-molecular-weight PAHs < 312 µg kg
−1, and high-molecular-weight < 655 µg kg
−1 [
8]. Moreover, the hygienic standards for soil quality adopted in Russia for benzo(a)pyrene, as the most dangerous PAHs representative with level of maximum permissible concentration (MPC) in soil 20 µg kg
−1 [
54]. Additionally, the results were compared with global data on the background content of PAHs in soils (
Table 1).