Next Article in Journal
Short-Term Ocean Rise Effects on Shallow Groundwater in Coastal Areas: A Case Study in Juelsminde, Denmark
Next Article in Special Issue
Organic Carbon in the Bottom Sediments of Lake Baikal: Geochemical Processes of Burial and Balance Values
Previous Article in Journal
Design of Cost-Effective and Sustainable Treatments of Old Landslides Adapted to the Moroccan Road Network: A Case Study of Regional Road R410 Crossing the Rifan Structural Domain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fungal-Based Remediation in the Treatment of Anthropogenic Activities and Pharmaceutical-Pollutant-Contaminated Wastewater
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Background Content of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons during Monitoring of Natural and Anthropogenically Transformed Landscapes in the Coastal Area Soils

1
Academy of Biology and Biotechnology behalf D.I. Ivanovskyi, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don 344090, Russia
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Rostov State Medical University, Rostov-on-Don 344022, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(13), 2424; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132424
Submission received: 18 May 2023 / Revised: 22 June 2023 / Accepted: 27 June 2023 / Published: 30 June 2023

Abstract

:
The large-scale studies of the Lower Don and the Taganrog Bay coastal zone were carried out to determine the background concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils. The content of 15 priority PAHs was determined by saponification method with HPLC detection and varied widely from 77 µg kg−1 to 16,017 µg kg−1 with mean and median values of 1040 µg kg−1 and 406 µg kg−1, respectively. PAHs’ highest concentration level was observed in the soils of the Don River delta and industrial areas of Taganrog city affected by pyrogenic contamination sources. Background monitoring sites were mostly represented with hydromorphic (Fluvisols Salic and Tidalic Fluvisols) and automorphic (Rendzic Leptosols, Mollic Leptosols) soil types in the study area. The PAHs content in the soils of the background plots did not exceed 600 µg kg−1, with a share of low-molecular-weight PAHs: about 50%. Benzo(a)pyrene content did not exceed the maximum permissible concentration (20 µg kg−1), and low-molecular-weight compounds did not exceed the threshold level for the impact of polyarenes. In automorphic soils, naphthalene and phenanthrene (35–54%) dominated in the composition of the low-molecular-weight PAHs compounds, and only phenanthrene (59–70%) dominated in hydromorphic soils.

1. Introduction

The soil is the main depositing component of landscapes, acting as a biogeochemical barrier, preventing the migration of pollutants into adjacent environments, and living organisms. Soil buffering capacity in relation to pollutants is strictly limited and depends on soil type and biodiversity. As pollutants accumulate in the soil, its ecological functions are disturbed, which leads to destabilization of the ecosystem and the formation of secondary pollution sources. In this regard, an important task is to monitor the ecological state of soils, especially in relation to the most dangerous chemical pollutants. These substances include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are assigned to the class of widespread carcinogens [1], 16 of which are listed as priority pollutants by the US Environmental Agency [2]. The massive appearance of PAHs in environmental objects is mainly associated with the pyrolysis of hydrocarbon materials, emissions from vehicles, oil spills and oil products [3]. Due to the diversity and ubiquitous presence of PAHs sources, their accumulation in soils is inevitable. PAHs in the aerosols form are able to spread to the long distances through the atmosphere, covering polar and tropical zones [4,5,6]. In China, the annual atmospheric emissions of 16 priority PAHs reach approximately 100 thousand tons [7]. At the same time, by weight, approximately 97% of PAHs are concentrated in soils and only 3% belong to the aquatic and air objects [8].
PAHs are hydrophobic substances characterized by a low migratory activity with accumulation ability in the upper soil horizons firstly [9]. PAHs migration in soils occurs in combination with water-soluble organic matter [10]. Under the action of physical forces, up to 70% of hydrocarbons are washed out of contaminated soils within a few months after pollution, which leads to the secondary accumulation of these substances in the surface and ground waters [11]. About 19% of total annual PAHs emission are released to the sea through soil erosion [7]. Compared to land areas, coastal areas are a dynamic system with an active soil and water exchange, which enhances the migratory capacity of PAHs in the environment [12]. Among the integral factors contributing to the mass transfer of PAHs in aboveground-aquatic ecosystems are currents, wave processes and upwelling, leading to erosion of the coastline or re-suspension of coastal sediments that leads, accordingly, the return of pollutants to the water column with subsequent redeposition [13]. In coastal PAHs-contaminated areas where seafood is a staple food, their consumption is a key contributor to overall cancer risk [14]. PAHs’ transfer from soil to the marine environment is critical for environmental monitoring and research into the global biochemical cycle of pollutants [7]. As a result, monitoring the ecological state of soils in coastal areas is especially relevant in relation to multifunctional zones, with active economic and industrial activities, near areas with recreational and environmental status.
The study of the ecological state of coastal territories is complicated by the lack of generally accepted background values for the 16 priority PAHs content in soils. In general, the problem of determining background values concerns all soil types without exception but is more significant for the coastal zone. Conduction of the monitoring studies of automorphic soils at the local or global level is sufficient to study the quantitative and qualitative PAHs composition in zonal soils of territories with a minimum technogenic load or a special protected status. For hydromorphic soils, especially with local monitoring, this methodological approach is ineffective. Due to the high dynamics of mass transfer processes, under conditions of heterogeneous soil cover, variations in the total PAHs content can exceed 100% within one reserve [15,16]. Despite the variability, the reviews present the results of the PAHs content in the soils of natural zones (Table 1). Table 1 presents some information about the soils involved in agricultural turnover, as well as rural and suburban settlements located remotely from point emission sources. In the soils of natural territories and in soils with a low total content of PAHs (<500), naphthalene and phenanthrene accumulate mainly, the share of which in the priority PAHs sum can reach 80% [4,17]. PAHs are one kind of widespread carcinogens, approximately 97% of which by weight are concentrated in soils. About 19% of total annual PAHs emission are released to the sea through soil erosion. Coastal areas are a dynamic system with an active soil and water exchange. In coastal PAHs-contaminated areas where seafood is a staple food, their consumption is a key contributor to overall cancer risk. PAHs transfer from soil to the marine environment is critical for environmental monitoring [3,5,10,17].
The purpose of this work was to determine the background content of PAHs during monitoring of coastal soils of natural and anthropogenically transformed landscapes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Taganrog Bay, the Lower Don and the Don Delta are key areas on the transit route of large-tonnage long-distance tankers from the Azov and Black Seas deep into Russia. More than 200 thousand water transport units pass through the Don Delta every year, which corresponds to the traffic of the Finland Gulf and contributes to the accumulation of PAHs group carcinogenic substances in the soils of coastal areas [44]. The danger of this process is due to the concentration within the coastal zone of the Taganrog Bay, residential, agricultural, recreational and natural areas. The high functionality of coastal zones is a common feature for the southern regions of Russia. The study area soils are affected by a number of industrial factories working in the coal mining, ferrous metallurgy, chemical and energy areas, including the largest power plant in the south of Russia Novocherkasska Power Station, as the main pollution source by PAHs and heavy metals in the south of Russia, in addition [45,46].
For the purposes of soil monitoring in coastal areas, 97 monitoring sites were established (Figure 1). The location of the monitoring sites makes it possible to analyze the sources of entry, migration flows, and accumulation zones of pollutants in the eluvial, trans super aquatic, and super aquatic landscapes of the Lower Don–Taganrog Bay system.
The valley of the Lower Don is characterized by the presence of a wide floodplain with an abundance of emersed and meadow vegetation. The Don Delta is represented by several sandy islands, densely indented by gently sloping depressions of dried-up old riverbeds. The branches and channels of the delta have natural channel shafts at a height of up to 1.5 m above the low water level. The total area of the modern river Don delta is about 540 km2. The northern coast of the Taganrog Bay is characterized by the predominance of abrasion and erosion processes, the southern part, from the Dolgaya Spit, is characterized by relatively more intense accumulative processes. The floodplain and coastal landscapes of the Lower Don and the Taganrog Bay are represented by alternating reservoirs, overgrown willows, floodplain meadows, sand dunes, beaches and spits, parks, gardens, and other tree plantations.
The sources of PAHs origin in the soil were determined on the basis of diagnostic ratios: (1) fluoranthene/(fluoranthene + pyrene) (<0.4—petrogenic, 0.4–0.5—pyrolysis of coal, wood, >0.6 spills of gasoline, diesel fuel); (2) benz(a)anthracene/(benz(a)anthracene + chrysene) (<0.2—petrogenic, 0.2–0.45—coal pyrolysis, >0.45 automobile emissions) [3]. According to this scale, the studied landscapes soils were classified as natural or anthropogenically transformed natural landscapes.

2.2. Sampling and Pretreatment

The basis of the soil cover in the study area is formed by hydromorphic and semi-hydromorphic soils on alluvial deposits in the floodplains of the river. Don and small rivers, alluvial-marine deposits of the Don delta, leman deposits at the boundary of estuaries of large rivers, and marine deposits of the Taganrog Bay, represented by an extensive group of Fluvisols. The soil sampling sites were located in the territory of the Don river delta and their location is presented at the map (Figure 1). The most common soil type in the studied area is Fluvisols Salic. For this soil type, it was set at 97 monitoring sites. These soils are located mainly on the territory of the Lower Don and its delta, as well as in the coastal zone of the Kagalnik River. A distinctive feature of these soils was the high intensity of soil formation under conditions of regular moistening by surface and ground waters, constant modern sedimentation, and variability in the morphological structure and physicochemical properties presented in the Table 2. The floodplain and coastal landscapes of the study area are dominated by: Fluvisols Tidalic were found on the northern coast of the Taganrog bay. For this soil type, it was set at 26 monitoring sites. Fluvisols Calcaric were located on the south coast and on the territory of the Miussky Estuary. For this soil type, it was set at 12 monitoring sites. Fluvisols Humic were represented in the southern part of the Don River Delta and in the mouth area of the Kagalnik River. For this soil type, it was set at 5 monitoring sites. Under the conditions of pulsating water, as well as a result of surge phenomena, Tidalic Fluvisols prevail within the Don River delta. For this soil type, it was set at 1 monitoring site. On the southern coast of the bay, Solonchaks Gleyic are common in depressions on marine and alluvial deposits. For this soil type, it was set at 3 monitoring sites. Under automorphic conditions, soil-forming rocks are loess-like deposits and shell rock outcrops, on which Calcic Chernozems (for this soil type, it was set at 4 monitoring sites), Mollic Leptosols (for this soil type, it was set at 2 monitoring sites), Rendzic Leptosols (for this soil type, it was set at 1 monitoring site) were formed. Technosols were formed on technogenic deposits within urban areas, as a special anthropogenically modified soils. For this soil type, it was set at 9 monitoring sites. The total number of soil samples in the current study was 97 soil sites.
Soil sampling was carried out to a depth of 0–20 cm by the envelope method. From each monitoring site with an area of 10 m2, 5 soil samples weighing 1 kg were taken from each corner of the monitoring site, as well as in the middle. Subsequently, the soil was mixed to create one average sample. The selected soil was dried in air, cleaned of plant residues, crushed in a mortar, and sifted through a sieve with a diameter of 1 mm.
Physicochemical properties of the studied soil samples were analyzed according to Theory and Practice of the Chemical Analysis of Soils [47]: pH was determined by potentiometry in suspension of soil/water ratio of 1:2.5; exchangeable bases were determined with 1 M NH4OAc. Total organic carbon (Corg) was determined by wet combustion with potassium dichromate and concentrated sulfuric acid according to the Tyurin method (which is very similar to the WalkleyBlack method [4]). Carbonates were determined by acid neutralization [47]. Particle size distribution was determined by the pipette method with pyrophosphate preparation [48].
The soil properties of the study area vary widely (CV > 50%), which is a consequence of the soil cover heterogeneity. However, the studied soils are predominantly characterized by a weakly alkaline reaction of the medium (CV < 5%), and are generally characterized by a medium loamy granulometric composition (Table 2).

2.3. Chemical Analysis

For the extraction of PAHs, soil samples were weighed by 1 g. To remove the interfering lipid fraction, the soil sample was subjected to saponification by boiling for 3 h in a 2% KOH (Aquatest, Rostov-on-Don, Russia) solution (30 mL) in a water bath with a reflux condenser. Extraction of PAHs was carried out with n-hexane (Aquatest) [49]. For that purpose, a 15 mL of hexane was poured into the sample and placed on a shaker. After 10 min, the hexane supernatant was carefully poured into a separating funnel. The operation was repeated three times. After that step, on a separating funnel, the layers of hexane were separated from the residual fraction of the alcohol solution of alkali. For mechanical purification and removal of residual liquid, the extract was filtered through a paper filter with anhydrous sodium sulfate. Next, the hexane’s extract was evaporated on a rotary evaporator. After evaporation, the precipitate was dissolved in 1 mL of acetonitrile [50]. The dry residue was dissolved in 1 mL of acetonitrile.
Samples were analyzed for PAHs with an Agilent 1260 Infinity (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) equipped with a fluorescence detector following the ISO 13877-2005 requirements [51]. The HPLC system was fitted with reversed phase column Hypersil BDS C18 (Agilent Technologies) (125 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm). A mixture of acetonitrile (Criochrome, Moscow, Russia) (75%) and bidistilled water (25%) was used as the liquid phase at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1. The volume of injected extract was 20 µL. In the present study it was determined the content of 15 priority PAHs. Of these, low molecular weight: 2-ring naphthalene and 3-ringed (acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, biphenyl, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene), and high molecular weight: 4-ringed (fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo(a)anthracene, chrysene), 5-ringed (benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene) and 6-ring benz(g,h,i)perylene.
The efficiency of target PAHs extraction from soils was determined using a matrix spike method by preparing calibration curves [52]. The fresh soil sample as well as air-dried soil sample (1 g) was placed into a round-bottom flask and benzo(a)pyrene standard solution in acetonitrile was added to give the target PAHs concentrations of 2, 4, 6, 8, 16 or 32 μkg kg−1. After evaporating the solvent for 30 min under a hood under ambient conditions, the PAHs-spiked soil samples were incubated for 24 h at 4 °C. The samples were then analyzed by the saponification method described above with consequent HPLC analysis.
Quality control of every HPLC detection was performed according to Agilent Application Solution [52]. Individual standard solutions were purchased from the Sigma-Aldrich (Merch) (Burlington, MA, USA). A calibration standard of PAH mixture was injected after every six samples to correct for drift in retention time within a run. After preparation of calibration curve for every detected PAH the coefficient of detection was counted:
The content of PAH in the test samples was determined by the external standard method [51]. The content of PAH in the soil was calculated from the equation:
Cs = k Si × Cst × V/(Sst × m),
where Cs is the content of PAH in the soil sample (μg kg−1); Sst and Si are the PAHs peak areas for the standard solution and the sample, respectively; Cst is the concentration of the standard PAH solution (μg kg−1); k is the recovery factor of PAH from the sample; V is the volume of the acetonitrile extract (mL); and m is the mass of the sample (g).
The certified reference materials and calibration curves were used for calculation of the limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantification (LOQ), which counted 2–200 μg kg−1. For the developed methods of extracting the target PAH in the soil, a random component of the measurement error was estimated, which for the concentration range of 2–200 μg kg−1 was 3.5–14%. Detection limits for individual PAH compounds are presented in the Supplementary Table S1 and Figure S1.
Solvents and reagents were HPLC grade and included ethanol (96%, analytical grade) (Aquatest,), n-hexane (99%, analytical grade) (Aquatest), potassium hydrate (98%, analytical grade) (Aquatest), acetonitrile (99.9%, analytical grade) (Cryochrome), NaOH (97%, analytical grade) (Aquatest), and anhydrous Na2SO4 (Aquatest). The total 15 priority PAHs standards in acetonitrile with concentration 200 µg cm−3 produced by Merch Burlington, MA, USA (Priority pollutant PAHs (in acetonitrile) NIST® SRM® 1647f) was used to prepare total PAHs standard solutions for HPLC analyses. For every target PAH the individual standard was used for determination (Supplementary Table S1 and Figures S1 and S2). The analytical standards were purchased from the Sigma-Aldrich (Merch) was used as the internal analytical standard.
The degree of soil contamination was assessed based on the gradation proposed by Maliszewska-Kordybach [26]: up to 200 µg kg−1—not polluted, 200–600 µg kg−1—slightly polluted, 600–1000 µg kg−1—polluted, above 1000 µg kg−1—heavily polluted. This gradation was based on the results of a large-scale monitoring of soils in agricultural areas of Poland. Due to the fact that PAHs content in arable soils is usually lower than in fallow soils [53], taking into account the PAHs average concentrations in the soils of natural areas (Table 1), soils with pollutant concentrations below 600 µg kg−1 were taken as background in this study. The threshold level of PAHs exposure correspondent to the minimal carcinogenic risk, was taken into account: the sum of low-molecular-weight PAHs < 312 µg kg−1, and high-molecular-weight < 655 µg kg−1 [8]. Moreover, the hygienic standards for soil quality adopted in Russia for benzo(a)pyrene, as the most dangerous PAHs representative with level of maximum permissible concentration (MPC) in soil 20 µg kg−1 [54]. Additionally, the results were compared with global data on the background content of PAHs in soils (Table 1).

2.4. Data Analysis

Statistical data processing was carried out in the programs STATISTICA 7.0 and Sigmaplot 12.5. Cartographic material received using the QGIS 3.10 program. To determine the features of the spatial distribution for individual PAHs compounds, considering landscape features, soil properties, and typical differences in the emission source, a factor analysis was carried out. Due to anomalously high concentrations of PAHs, the monitoring site No. 70 was excluded from the calculation. In the future, this site was allocated to a separate cluster. Removal of factors was carried out by the method of principal components with the redistribution of variance using the Varimax tool row.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. PAHs Concentration

The content of individual PAHs compounds varied widely in the studied area, which indicated the anthropogenic origin of pollutants in soils. At the same time, high-molecular PAHs compounds formed as a result of technogenic processes have been characterized by variability above 190%. As the PAHs variability increased, as an increase in the difference between the mean value and the median has been established, which indicates the presence of the pollutants point sources in the Don River delta (Table 3).
The median values of the pollutants concentration in the soil characterized the content of PAHs in the soils of natural landscapes since most of the monitoring sites are located in the native landscapes. According to the median values, phenanthrene and fluoranthene predominated in the soils of the study area. The concentrations of most PAHs corresponded to the average content of polyarenes in temperate soils according to Wilcke [4]. Nevertheless, there was an excess of the median concentration for low-molecular-weight naphthalene, fluorene, phenanthrene by 3.2–5.4 times, and high-molecular pyrene and benzo[g,h,i]perylene by 1.5–1.6 times, which is most likely a specific feature of highly productive coastal areas. Under natural conditions, low-molecular-weight and four-ring PAHs can be formed due to the mineralization of soil organic matter [54,55]. The genesis of high-molecular-weight PAHs in soils of native landscapes was similar to that of low-molecular-weight ones. At the same time, the pedogenic pathway for the formation of five- and six-ring compounds was more likely under reducing conditions, watered soil horizons, which is typical for coastal landscape soils [56]. The productivity of plant communities, the composition of stagnant biomass, the position of the site in the relief, the granulometric composition of the soil, the process of cryogenesis and pyrogenesis are the main factors regulating the pedogenic type of PAHs formation [4,57,58]. The average PAHs concentrations in the soils of the studied coastal areas often exceeded those for the soils of the temperate zone [4].

3.2. PAHs Spatial Distribution

The total content of 15 priority PAHs in the soils of the study area varied from 77 µg kg−1 to 16,017 µg kg−1. The soils of the Don River Delta and the south coast of the Taganrog Bay had the lowest content of PAHs in soils. The most polluted site was confined to the northern coast of the Taganrog Bay (no. 70) (Figure 2). Here, the total content of PAHs exceeded 16,000 µg kg−1, of which more than half was accounted for by five- and six-ringed compounds. The high content of PAHs was noted in the southeastern part of the Don River Delta (up to 8862 µg kg−1). In both cases, the coastal zone was characterized by the activity of water transport. The monitoring site was located on the territory of the spit, and, most likely, high concentrations of pollutants were accumulated due to the impact of small-scale shipping within the coastal zone [59]. At the same time, a long-distance tanker channel operates within the Don River Delta. In general, PAHs content in the soils of the Don River Delta was higher than in the soils of the river’s coastal areas and the Taganrog Bay, which is consistent with the studies of Andrade et al. [60]. The soils of the deltas are characterized by an increased ability to accumulate toxic organic compounds and a reduced ability to degrade them (mainly due to constant changes in the redox conditions in the soil profile) [11]. About 70% of the studied monitoring sites soils were close to the natural territories of the world various regions in terms of the PAHs total content (Table 1) and were classified as uncontaminated (<600 µg kg−1). Of these, in a quarter of soil samples, the pollutants content was less than 200 µg kg−1. These concentrations were less than in the background soils of the eastern and central [26], western, and northern Europe [19], but exceeded the average values for PAHs content in soils of the temperate zone [4].
Soil pollution was typical only for industrial areas for the Taganrog city territory and reached up to 4309 µg kg−1 of PAHs total amount. In the soils of the coast recreational area, which are part of the city, it has been determined the low concentrations of PAHs. This indicated the possibility of using the soils of recreational areas as a background [6].
The relationship between the PAHs total content and the amount of individual polyarenes in soils has been established. As the total content of PAHs in the soils of the study area increased, an interconnected increase in the concentration of almost all polyarenes has been observed, except for naphthalene, which is most likely due to its pedogenic origin. For other low-molecular-weight PAHs such as fluorene, anthracene, acenaphthene and acenaphthylene, the correlation coefficient values indicated the duality of their origin from natural and technogenic sources (r < 0.7). The highest values of the correlation coefficient are characteristic of high-molecular-weight PAHs (r > 0.84), especially fluoranthene and benzo(a)anthracene (r > 0.95), indicating their technogenic origin (Table 4).

3.3. Source Analysis

The results of calculating the PAHs diagnostic ratios showed that the soils of the studied coastal area are subjected to the technogenic effect to one degree or another. The accumulation of pollutants in soils often occurs under the several sources effect. At the same time, the soils of the monitoring sites are grouped depending on the predominant routes of PAHs entry (Figure 3). The first group provides information about merged sites with natural source of PAHs origin was represented by soils within the delta of the river Don, characterized by the influx of pollutants mainly with fuel spills. Fuel spills within the territory of the delta were accumulated due to the presence of a shipping channel through which the transit of large-tonnage long-distance tankers are carried out [44]. The second provides information about merged sites with fuel pyrolysis source of PAHs origin was the most extensive group. For this group of soils, the input of PAHs was mainly due to the combustion of fuels (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The third group provides information about merged sites with fuels spills source of PAHs origin was represented by slightly polluted soils located near the Tsimlyansk reservoir, river Kagalnik and the southern coast of the Taganrog Bay.
The calculation of diagnostic ratios was based on the fact that PAHs always enter the soil as part of a mixture. The ratio of individual (marker) pollutants to each other in the initial hydrocarbon feedstock before and after its combustion, as well as the form of substance intake indicates the most probable PAHs genesis [3,11,61]. Soils are capable of self-purification from PAHs pollution mainly under the microorganism’s activity [46,62]. The rate of this process mainly depends on soil properties. In this regard, the identification of pollutants origin sources is possible either with a real long-term continuous technogenic impact, or with a one-time exposure to a source with subsequent immediate sampling for further chemical analysis. To clarify the PAHs origin sources, the methods of multivariate statistical analysis have been often used [29,63,64,65].
Taking into account the Kaiser criterion, two factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 were identified. Together, the obtained factors describe 77.1% of the total variance. The contribution of Factor 1 to the resulting model was 63.6%, factor 2–13.5%. Factor 1 was loaded with three-rings, except for anthracene, as well as four-ring fluoranthene, benzo(a)anthracene, and five- and six-ring PAHs. Pyrene and chrysene made a significant contribution to the second Factor 2 (Figure 5).
The relationship between the coordinates of Factor 1 and the PAHs content in soils, as well as Factor 2 mainly with soil properties, was established (Table 5). Consequently, Factor 1 characterized the technogenic component in the model (the source of pollutants and its intensity), and Factor 2 characterized the natural components (soil properties, landscape characteristics, etc.). At the same time, despite the greater contribution of Factor 1 to the model, the new coordinates were differentiated with respect to Factor 2 that indicated the soil properties’ effect on the PAHs spatial distribution.
Based on the results of the factor analysis, the soils of the monitoring sites were grouped in space depending on the emission source type, its intensity, and soil properties. The distribution of soil clusters obtained in the course of factor analysis (Figure 6) was consistent with the grouping of soils in space relative to the pollutant’s sources (Figure 4). At the same time, the soil group affected by the pyrogenic source of PAHs (group 2 in Figure 4) was subdivided into two subgroups (clusters 1 and 3 in Figure 6). The total PAHs content in the soils of these subgroups varied greatly (Figure 2). However, higher concentrations of pollutants were noted in the soils of cluster 3, which is associated with the proximity of the monitoring sites to the impact zones of the industrial territory of Taganrog city (sites no. 78–84) (Figure 6) and Novocherkassk Power Station (sites no. 1–4), as well as large, populated areas located at sites no. 5–8, 66 [45,46].
Considering the spatial distribution of the pollutants content in soils, as well as the sources of their probable input, it can be concluded that with a similar genesis of polyarenes in terms of the 15 PAHs total content, soils are often heterogeneous in space. At a relatively close location (up to 2 km), the concentrations of pollutants in the soils of monitoring sites can differ by tens or even hundreds of times (Figure 7). This is primarily due to the typical features of the soil cover, mainly the content of the finely dispersed fraction, organic carbon, and exchangeable Ca2+. The specificity of coastal areas background monitoring lies in the difficultly predictable processes of soil particles mass transfer with subsequent redeposition of pollutants in soils or their removal outside the studied landscapes [13].

3.4. Background Content of PAHs in Soils

Acceptance of the monitoring site soils as a local background is possible provided that the criteria for the ecological state of soil standards in relation to PAHs have been satisfied. Based on the data obtained, as well as the literature data, the following indicators were proposed for determining the soils of background areas: (1) the total content of priority PAHs should not exceed the upper threshold of uncontaminated soils (600 µg kg−1) according to international standards [8,26,53] and the background level of various countries of the world [15,16,42,43,63]; (2) the ratio of low-molecular-weight PAHs to high-molecular-weight should be higher or close to 1, due to the fact that 2- and 3-ring compounds are formed under the natural conditions [4,17]; (3) the soil of the background monitoring site should be located at a distance from the pollution source, predicting a mass-transfer of the pollutant particles [6,21,43,65,66]; (4) the results of the diagnostic ratios calculation should indicate a pedogenic or biogenic source of PAHs intake [65].
For the main soil types of the Lower Don and the Taganrog Bay, background monitoring sites have been identified that can serve as a standard for priority PAHs content: Fluvisols Salic (site no. 64), Tidalic Fluvisols (site no. 55). According to the criteria presented, rare Rendzic Leptosols (site no. 90) and Mollic Leptosols (site no. 91). Soil properties are shown in Table 6.
The total PAHs content in the reference soils did not exceed 600 µg kg−1 and corresponded to the category of uncontaminated areas [26,28,67]. For Fluvisols Salic, Leptosols Rendzic Leptosols Mollic the PAHs content was at the level of the zonal Haplic Chernozem soil [33]. It was not detected as exceeding the maximum permissible concentration of BaP [53] (Table 7). At the same time, the concentration of low-molecular-weight compounds was below 312 µg kg−1, the threshold level for the most bioavailable PAHs [68].
The ratio of low-molecular PAHs groups to high molecular PAHs and their constituent compounds, in the absence of changes over time, indicates the stability of the soil system [61]. The group composition of individual PAH compounds can serve as a qualitative characteristic of soils in the background plots, performing a marker function in monitoring natural and impact zones confined to the coast. Typical representatives of PAHs of pedogenic origin are naphthalene and phenanthrene [57]. The features of the group composition of PAH compounds in reference soils depending on their position in the landscape were revealed. For automorphic soils Rendzic Leptosols and Mollic Leptosols, naphthalene and phenanthrene dominated in the composition of low-molecular-weight soils, the share of which reached 35–54%. A distinctive feature of the hydromorphic soils Tidalic Fluvisols, Fluvisols Salic was the pronounced dominance of phenanthrene, whose share in the composition of low-molecular-weight compounds reached 59–70%. At the same time, the share of naphthalene did not exceed 10%, which is most likely due to its lability and instability in the hydromorphic soils of the coast. Regardless of the position in the landscape, among the high-molecular-weight PAHs, the four-ring compounds dominated in the background soils. At the same time, fluoranthene, pyrene, and chrysene predominated in Rendzic Leptosols and Mollic Leptosols (18–25%), while pyrene and chrysene predominated in Tidalic Fluvisols and Fluvisols Salic (22–54%) (Figure 8).

4. Conclusions

It has been established that the content of 15 priority PAHs varies widely from 77 µg kg−1 to 16,017 µg kg−1 with mean and median values of 1040 µg kg−1 and 406 µg kg−1, respectively, in the soils of the Lower Don and the Taganrog Bay. The content of PAHs in the soils of the coast of the Lower Don and the Taganrog Bay is caused by fuel spills, as well as coal combustion. In general, the most vulnerable areas are confined to the Don River delta (8862 µg kg−1) and industrial areas of the Taganrog city (4309 µg kg−1). Under the conditions of the multifunctionality of the studied coastal zones, with an increase in the technogenic load, an increase in the content of high-molecular PAHs, especially fluoranthene and benzo(a)anthracene, has been observed. The soils were often heterogeneous in space, which is due to the typical features of the soil cover with a similar genesis of polyarenes in terms of the total 15 PAHs content. It has been established the background territories for the determination of PAHs content for the main soil types located in the studied coastal area of the Taganrog Bay, the total content of priority PAHs in which does not exceed 600 µg kg−1. The features of the PAHs compounds group composition in background soils depending on their position in the landscape were revealed. In automorphic soils, naphthalene, and phenanthrene (35–54%) dominated in the composition of the low-molecular-weight compounds, and only phenanthrene (59–70%) dominated in hydromorphic soils. The results of the study will serve as a basis for environmental monitoring of soils.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/w15132424/s1, Table S1. Limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs) for the 12 PAHs (μg kg−1). Figure S1. Chromatogram of PAHs detection example 1. Figure S2. Chromatogram of PAHs detection example 2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.D.; methodology, E.A. and E.S.; formal analysis, A.B., G.B. and A.I.; investigation, E.K.; data curation, A.B. and E.K.; writing—original draft preparation, T.D.; writing—review and editing, T.M., S.S., D.N. and M.G.; visualization, T.D.; supervision, T.M. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, Russian Federation, project no. 20-14-00317.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. IARC. List of Classifications. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2020; Volume 1–123. Available online: https://monographs.iarc.fr/list-of-classifications-volumes/ (accessed on 25 July 2020).
  2. US Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS); Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. Available online: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris_drafts/AtoZ.cfm (accessed on 13 June 2022).
  3. Gennadiev, A.; Tsibart, A. Pyrogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils of reserved and anthropogenically modified areas: Factors and features of accumulation. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2013, 46, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wilcke, W. Synopsis polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil—A review. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2000, 163, 229–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abakumov, E.; Tomashunas, V.; Lodygin, E.; Gabov, D.; Sokolov, V.; Krylenkov, V.; Kirtsideli, I.Y. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in insular and coastal soils of the Russian Arctic. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2015, 48, 1300–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Siemering, G.S.; Thiboldeaux, R. Background concentration, risk assessment and regulatory threshold development: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin surface soils. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qiu, Y.-Y.; Gong, Y.-X.; Ni, H.-G. Contribution of soil erosion to PAHs in surface water in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 686, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Macdonald, D.D.; Carr, R.S.; Calder, F.D.; Long, E.R.; Ingersoll, C.G. Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 1996, 5, 253–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abdel-Shafy, H.I.; Mansour, M.S. A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egypt J. Pet. 2016, 25, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhang, Z.; Hong, H.; Zhou, J.; Yu, G. Phase association of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Minjiang River Estuary, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 323, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gennadiev, A.; Pikovskii, Y.I. The maps of soil tolerance toward pollution with oil products and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Methodological aspects. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2007, 40, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dai, C.; Han, Y.; Duan, Y.; Lai, X.; Fu, R.; Liu, S.; Leong, K.H.; Tu, Y.; Zhou, L. Review on the contamination and remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in coastal soil and sediments. Environ. Res. 2022, 205, 112423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Koudryashova, Y.; Chizhova, T.; Tishchenko, P.; Hayakawa, K. Seasonal variability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a coastal marine area in the northwestern region of the sea of Japan/East Sea (Possiet Bay). Ocean Sci. J. 2019, 54, 635–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roy, D.; Jung, W.; Kim, J.; Lee, M.; Park, J. Cancer Risk Levels for Sediment-and Soil-Bound Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Coastal Areas of South Korea. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 719243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Orecchio, S. Assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil of a Natural Reserve (Isola delle Femmine)(Italy) located in front of a plant for the production of cement. J. Hazard Mater. 2010, 173, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Monaco, D.; Chianese, E.; Riccio, A.; Delgado-Sanchez, A.; Lacorte, S. Spatial distribution of heavy hydrocarbons, PAHs and metals in polluted areas. The case of “Galicia”, Spain. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 121, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sojinu, O.S.; Wang, J.-Z.; Sonibare, O.; Zeng, E.Y. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments and soils from oil exploration areas of the Niger Delta, Nigeria. J. Hazard Mater. 2010, 174, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nam, J.J.; Sweetman, A.J.; Jones, K.C. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in global background soils. J. Environ. Monit. 2009, 11, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nam, J.J.; Thomas, G.O.; Jaward, F.M.; Steinnes, E.; Gustafsson, O.; Jones, K.C. PAHs in background soils from Western Europe: Influence of atmospheric deposition and soil organic matter. Chemosphere 2008, 70, 1596–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cai, Q.-Y.; Mo, C.-H.; Wu, Q.-T.; Katsoyiannis, A.; Zeng, Q.-Y. The status of soil contamination by semivolatile organic chemicals (SVOCs) in China: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 389, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, P.; Chen, Y. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contamination in surface soil of China: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 605, 1011–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pikovskii, Y.I.; Smirnova, M.; Gennadiev, A.; Zavgorodnyaya, Y.A.; Zhidkin, A.; Kovach, R.; Koshovskii, T. Parameters of the native hydrocarbon status of soils in different bioclimatic zones. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2019, 52, 1333–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maliszewska-Kordybach, B.; Smreczak, B. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in agricultural soils in eastern Poland. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 1998, 66, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rong, H.; Hong-Fu, W.; Yan-Tun, S.; JIANG, H.; Shao-Lin, P. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in agricultural soils of the southern subtropics, China. Pedosphere 2007, 17, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thiombane, M.; Albanese, S.; Di Bonito, M.; Lima, A.; Zuzolo, D.; Rolandi, R.; Qi, S.; De Vivo, B. Source patterns and contamination level of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban and rural areas of Southern Italian soils. Environ. Geochem. Health 2019, 41, 507–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maliszewska-Kordybach, B.; Smreczak, B.; Klimkowicz-Pawlas, A.; Terelak, H. Monitoring of the total content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in arable soils in Poland. Chemosphere 2008, 73, 1284–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, C.; Wu, S.; Zhou, S.; Wang, H.; Li, B.; Chen, H.; Yu, Y.; Shi, Y. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils from urban to rural areas in Nanjing: Concentration, source, spatial distribution, and potential human health risk. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 527, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maliszewska-Kordybach, B. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in agricultural soils in Poland: Preliminary proposals for criteria to evaluate the level of soil contamination. Appl. Geochem. 1996, 11, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maliszewska-Kordybach, B.; Smreczak, B.; Klimkowicz-Pawlas, A. Concentrations, sources, and spatial distribution of individual polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in agricultural soils in the Eastern part of the EU: Poland as a case study. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 3746–3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aichner, B.; Bussian, B.M.; Lehnik-Habrink, P.; Hein, S. Regionalized concentrations and fingerprints of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in German forest soils. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 203, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wilcke, W.; Müller, S.; Kanchanakool, N.; Niamskul, C.; Zech, W. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in hydromorphic soils of the tropical metropolis Bangkok. Geoderma 1999, 91, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sosa, D.; Hilber, I.; Faure, R.; Bartolomé, N.; Fonseca, O.; Keller, A.; Schwab, P.; Escobar, A.; Bucheli, T.D. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls in soils of Mayabeque, Cuba. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res 2017, 24, 12860–12870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sushkova, S.; Minkina, T.; Dudnikova, T.; Barbashev, A.; Mazarji, M.; Chernikova, N.; Lobzenko, I.; Deryabkina, I.; Kizilkaya, R. Influence of carbon-containing and mineral sorbents on the toxicity of soil contaminated with benzo[a]pyrene during phytotesting. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 4, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sushkova, S.; Minkina, T.; Tarigholizadeh, S.; Antonenko, E.; Konstantinova, E.; Gülser, C.; Dudnikova, T.; Barbashev, A.; Kizilkaya, R. PAHs accumulation in soil-plant system of Phragmites australis Cav. in soil under long-term chemical contamination. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2020, 9, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, W.; Lang, Y.-H.; Bai, J.; Li, Z.-Y. Quantitative evaluation of carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic potential for PAHs in coastal wetland soils of China. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 74, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lang, Y.; Wang, N.; Gao, H.; Bai, J. Distribution and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from Liaohe estuarine wetland soils. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 5545–5552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiao, R.; Bai, J.; Wang, J.; Lu, Q.; Zhao, Q.; Cui, B.; Liu, X. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in wetland soils under different land uses in a coastal estuary: Toxic levels, sources and relationships with soil organic matter and water-stable aggregates. Chemosphere 2014, 110, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yang, D.; Qi, S.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, X.; Liu, H.; Qu, C.; Liu, J.; Li, F. Levels, sources and potential risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in multimedia environment along the Jinjiang River mainstream to Quanzhou Bay, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 76, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, W.; Yu, S.; Tao, S.; Liu, W. Modeling multimedia fate and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the coastal regions of the Bohai and Yellow Seas. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 818, 151789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shi, R.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Zhao, Z. Contamination and human health risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface soils from Tianjin coastal new region, China. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cho, J.-Y.; Son, J.G.; Park, B.-J.; Chung, B.-Y. Distribution and pollution sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in reclaimed tidelands and tidelands of the western sea coast of South Korea. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 149, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ma, C.; Ye, S.; Lin, T.; Ding, X.; Yuan, H.; Guo, Z. Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils of wetlands in the Liao River Delta, Northeast China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 80, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yuan, H.; Li, T.; Ding, X.; Zhao, G.; Ye, S. Distribution, sources and potential toxicological significance of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in surface soils of the Yellow River Delta, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 83, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Transport in Russia; Information-Statistics Bulletin; Rosstat: Moscow, Russia. 2022; 101p. Available online: https://mintrans.gov.ru/documents/7/12182?ysclid=ljhaqelxu5817008264 (accessed on 23 March 2023). (In Russian)
  45. Chaplygin, V.; Dudnikova, T.; Chernikova, N.; Fedorenko, A.; Mandzhieva, S.; Fedorenko, G.; Sushkova, S.; Nevidomskaya, D.; Minkina, T.; Sathishkumar, P. Phragmites australis cav. as a bioindicator of hydromorphic soils pollution with heavy metals and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pulikova, E.; Ivanov, F.; Gorovtsov, A.; Dudnikova, T.; Zinchenko, V.; Minkina, T.; Mandzhieva, S.; Barahov, A.; Sherbakov, A.; Sushkova, S. Microbiological status of natural and anthropogenic soils of the Taganrog Bay coast at different levels of combined pollution with heavy metals and PAHs. Environ. Geochem. Health 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Vorob’eva, L.A. (Ed.) Theory and Practice of the Chemical Analysis of Soils; GEOS: Moscow, Russia, 2006. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  48. GOST 12536-2014; Soils. Methods of Laboratory Particle-Size and Microaggregate-Size Distributions. Standartinform: Moscow, Russia, 2015; p. 19. (In Russian)
  49. Methodical Instructions. Definition of Polluting Substances in Sediments and Suspension; Directive Document 52.10.556-95; Roshydromet: Moscow, Russia, 2002; 21p. (In Russian)
  50. Sushkova, S.N.; Minkina, T.M.; Mandzhieva, S.S.; Deryabkina, I.G.; Vasil’eva, G.K.; Kızılkaya, R. Dynamics of benzo[α]pyrene accumulation in soils under the influence of aerotechnogenic emissions. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2017, 50, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. ISO 13877-2005; Soil Quality-Determination of Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons—Method Using High-performance Liquid Chromatography. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
  52. Procedure of Measurements Benz(a)pyrene Content in Soils, Sediments and Sludges by Highly Effective Liquid Chromatography Method. Certificate 27-08; State Register no. FR.1.31.2005.01725. 2008; 27p. Available online: https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4293809/4293809324.htm?ysclid=ljg45vs6ub561614960 (accessed on 4 March 2008). (In Russian).
  53. Zhidkin, A.; Gennadiev, A.; Koshovskii, T. Input and behavior of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in arable, fallow, and forest soils of the taiga zone (Tver oblast). Eurasian Soil Sci. 2017, 50, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. GN 2.1.7.2041-06; Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC) of Chemical Substances in Soil: Hygienic Standards. Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor. Hygienic Norms: Moscow, Russia, 2006; 7p. (In Russian)
  55. Gabov, D.; Beznosikov, V.; Kondratenok, B.; Yakovleva, E. Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in northern and middle taiga soils. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2008, 41, 1180–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vasil’chuk, Y.K.; Belik, A.; Budantseva, N.; Gennadiev, A.; Vasil’chuk, J.Y. Carbon Isotope signatures and polyarenes in the pedogenic material of ice wedges of the Batagay Yedoma (Yakutia). Eurasian Soil Sci. 2020, 53, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Atanassova, I.; Brümmer, G.W. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of anthropogenic and biopedogenic origin in a colluviated hydromorphic soil of Western Europe. Geoderma 2004, 120, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shamrikova, E.; Yakovleva, E.; Gabov, D.; Zhangurov, E.; Korolev, M.; Zazovskaya, E. Polyarenes distribution in the soil-plant system of reindeer pastures in the polar urals. Agronomy 2022, 12, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yakovleva, E.; Gabov, D.; Vasilevich, R.; Goncharova, N. Participation of plants in the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in peatlands. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2020, 53, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Andrade, M.V.; Santos, F.R.; Oliveira, A.H.; Nascimento, R.F.; Cavalcante, R.M. Influence of sediment parameters on the distribution and fate of PAHs in an estuarine tropical region located in the Brazilian semi-arid (Jaguaribe River, Ceará coast). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 146, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Pongpiachan, S.; Hattayanone, M.; Tipmanee, D.; Suttinun, O.; Khumsup, C.; Kittikoon, I.; Hirunyatrakul, P. Chemical characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in 2013 Rayong oil spill-affected coastal areas of Thailand. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 233, 992–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Khaustov, A.; Redina, M. Fractioning of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the components of the non-equilibrium geochemical systems (thermodynamic analysis). Appl. Geochem. 2020, 120, 104684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mazarji, M.; Minkina, T.; Sushkova, S.; Mandzhieva, S.; Fedorenko, A.; Bauer, T.; Soldatov, A.; Barakhov, A.; Dudnikova, T. Biochar-assisted Fenton-like oxidation of benzo[a]pyrene-contaminated soil. Environ. Geochem. Health 2022, 44, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Ling, W.; Liu, R.; Liu, J.; Kang, F.; Gao, Y. Contamination and health risk assessment of PAHs in soils and crops in industrial areas of the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 976–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ma, L.; Chu, S.; Wang, X.; Cheng, H.; Liu, X.; Xu, X. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the surface soils from outskirts of Beijing, China. Chemosphere 2005, 58, 1355–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yuan, G.-L.; Wu, L.-J.; Sun, Y.; Li, J.; Li, J.-C.; Wang, G.-H. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils of the central Tibetan Plateau, China: Distribution, sources, transport and contribution in global cycling. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 203, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bezberdaya, L.; Kosheleva, N.; Chernitsova, O.; Lychagin, M.; Kasimov, N. Pollution level, partition and spatial distribution of benzo[a]pyrene in urban soils, road dust and their PM10 fraction of health-resorts (Alushta, Yalta) and industrial (Sebastopol) cities of Crimea. Water 2022, 14, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Maliszewska-Kordybach, B. Persistent organic contaminants in the environment: PAHs as a case study. In Bioavailability of Organic Xenobiotics in the Environment: Practical Consequences for the Environment; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 3–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of the monitoring site’s location, indicating the soil types.
Figure 1. Map of the monitoring site’s location, indicating the soil types.
Water 15 02424 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of the 15 priority PAHs total content in soils.
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of the 15 priority PAHs total content in soils.
Water 15 02424 g002
Figure 3. Identification of the PAHs origin sources in the coastal area soils.
Figure 3. Identification of the PAHs origin sources in the coastal area soils.
Water 15 02424 g003
Figure 4. Grouping of soils according to the PAHs origin sources.
Figure 4. Grouping of soils according to the PAHs origin sources.
Water 15 02424 g004
Figure 5. Factor analysis results. Factor loads (A) and estimates of coordinates on the factor plane (B).
Figure 5. Factor analysis results. Factor loads (A) and estimates of coordinates on the factor plane (B).
Water 15 02424 g005
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of soil clusters obtained from the factor analysis results.
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of soil clusters obtained from the factor analysis results.
Water 15 02424 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of closely located monitoring sites soils (A) by origin sources (B) and the PAHs total content (C).
Figure 7. Comparison of closely located monitoring sites soils (A) by origin sources (B) and the PAHs total content (C).
Water 15 02424 g007
Figure 8. Composition of low-molecular-weight (A) and high-molecular-weight (B) PAHs in background soils of the coastal area zone.
Figure 8. Composition of low-molecular-weight (A) and high-molecular-weight (B) PAHs in background soils of the coastal area zone.
Water 15 02424 g008
Table 1. PAHs total content in soils of various regions of the world.
Table 1. PAHs total content in soils of various regions of the world.
GeoreferencingLand Use TypeNumber of PAHsPAH Concentration, µg kg−1Source
Mean/MedianMinimumMaximum
Land
GlobalAll types of land use15328/44--[18]
Africa30/33--
Asia65/21--
Europe714/136--
North America347/91--
South America21/5.8--
Oceania60/13--
Great BritainForest background15Average—580--[19]
Pasture backgroundAverage—700--
NorwayForest backgroundAverage—350--
Pasture backgroundAverage—110--
ChinaAll types of land use16-31136[20]
ChinaAll types of land use16Average—700--[21]
Russia, taiga zoneForesteleven<60--[22]
Eastern EuropeAgricultural13-160260[23]
China, southAgricultural16318/265221557[24]
Suburb1698/5222132
Italy, southCountryside16336/1881211,353[25]
PolandAll types of land use16Median—395807284[26]
ChinaSuburb16-52888[20]
Agricultural16-28554
China, eastCountryside16Average—1060223350[27]
PolandAgricultural13Average—264282447[28]
PolandCountryside13Average—387--[29]
GermanyForest16Average—551209038[30]
Northern EuropeBackground16<100--[19]
Tropical zoneBackground16-12380[31]
Temperate zoneBackground1265--[4]
CubaBackground16<120--[32]
Russia, southBackground16<300 [33,34]
Near water bodies
China, eastCoastal zone16-912311[35]
China, north mouth of the river. LiaoheBackground16<100--[36]
NigeriaDelta River Niger28Average—8024120[17]
China, r. PearlRiver mouth16Average—427--[37]
ChinaRiver mouths16<500--[35]
China, r. Jinjiang and Quanzhou BayCoastal zone16-19282[38]
China, Bohai and Yellow SeaCoast16Average—234--[39]
China, TianjinCoast16Median—385589160[40]
South korea, west coastCoast16Average—394701175[41]
China, Delta LiaoBackground16Average—5501063148[42]
China, r. HuangheiDelta16Average—13227753[43]
Spain, northwestCoast16-thirty800[16]
Italy, PalermoBackground, coast, nature reserve16-35545[15]
Table 2. Soil properties of the coastal territory of the Lower Don and the coast of the Taganrog Bay.
Table 2. Soil properties of the coastal territory of the Lower Don and the coast of the Taganrog Bay.
Soil PropertiesMeanMedianMinimumMaximumStandard DeviationCoefficient of Variation, %
pH7.887.907.248.910.334.23
CaCO3%2.361.800.198.301.9180.63
Particle < 0.00113.8411.700.1033.109.7870.66
Particle < 0.0129.4226.001.3067.7617.2258.55
Organic carbon1.321.100.123.940.8362.62
Ca2+cmol (+)16.0615.803.2036.308.4052.28
Mg2+3.022.100.2013.202.6186.44
Table 3. Content of individual PAHs compounds in the soils of the study area.
Table 3. Content of individual PAHs compounds in the soils of the study area.
PAHsMeanMedianMinimumMaximumStandard DeviationCoefficient of VariationAverage Content of PAHs in Temperate Soils
µg kg−1%µg kg−1
NaphthaleneSSS13.71.8103.219.4101.64.0
Fluorene18.410.31.3114.721.3116.01.9
Phenanthrene94.962.014.8623.392.197.119.0
Anthracene1.40.30.0221.03.6266.11.6
Acenaphthene8.06.00.734.46.985.9-
Acenaphthylene9.66.10.757.39.497.78-
Fluoranthene155.054.03.92070.2302.6195.251.0
Pyrene85.539.14.61811.0194.4227.425.0
Chryzene77.431.94.11448.8155.2200.5-
Benzo[a]anthracene80.721.40.71619.4212.8263.626.0
Benzo[b]fluoranthene106.931.51.12191.4250.2234.234.0
Benzo[k]fluoranthene76.516.40.41289.3179.7235.020.0
Benzo[a]pyrene125.122.70.52013.3297.5237.819
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene27.310.50.3408.553.0194.310
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene154.645.51.83767.6413.7267.528
∑15PAHs1040.1406.476.616,017.02001.8192.564.5
Table 4. Relationship between (r) the PAHs total content and the amount of individual polyarenes in the soils of the study area.
Table 4. Relationship between (r) the PAHs total content and the amount of individual polyarenes in the soils of the study area.
NaphthaleneFluorenePhenanthreneAnthraceneAcenaphthene
0.040.68 *0.81 *0.42 *0.60 *
AcenaphthyleneFluoranthenePyreneChryzeneBenzo[a]anthracene
0.66 *0.96 *0.87 *0.88 *0.95 *
Benzo[b]fluorantheneBenzo[k]fluorantheneBenzo[a]pyreneDibenzo[a,h]anthraceneBenzo[g,h,i]perylene
0.89 *0.84 *0.86 *0.91 *0.88 *
Note: * Results obtained using Spearman’s correlation coefficient at <0.0001.
Table 5. Correlation (r) between the new coordinates of Factor 1 and Factor 2 obtained from the results of Factor analysis with soil properties and PAHs accumulation.
Table 5. Correlation (r) between the new coordinates of Factor 1 and Factor 2 obtained from the results of Factor analysis with soil properties and PAHs accumulation.
ParameterFactor 1Factor 2ParameterFactor 1Factor 2
pH−0.120.16Acenaphthene−0.81 *−0.25
CaCO30.050.31Acenaphthylene−0.85 *−0.22
<0.001−0.300.36Fluoranthene−0.92 *0.23
<0.01−0.300.40 *Pyrene−0.69 *0.68 *
organic carbon−0.250.56 *Chryzene−0.70 *0.61 *
Ca++−0.340.40 *Benzo[a]anthracene−0.89 *0.18
Mg++−0.330.33Benzo[b]fluoranthene−0.78 *0.27
Naphthalene0.01−0.06Benzo[k]fluoranthene−0.82 *−0.06
Fluorene−0.85 *−0.21Benzo[a]pyrene−0.83 *0.01
Phenanthrene−0.91 *0.23Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene−0.75 *0.39
Anthracene−0.56 *0.23Benzo[g,h,i]perylene−0.74 *0.31
Note: * Results obtained using Spearman’s correlation coefficient at <0.001.
Table 6. Physical and chemical properties of background soils of monitoring sites.
Table 6. Physical and chemical properties of background soils of monitoring sites.
No.Type of SoilpHCaCO3Organic Carbon<0.001<0.01Ca2+Mg2+
%cmol (+) kg
55Tidalic Fluvisols8.1 ± 0.12.2 ± 0.12.5 ± 0.229.6 ± 0.549.1 ± 2.028.7 ± 1.74.0 ± 0.3
64Fluvisols Salic7.9 ± 0.20.9 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.14.9 ± 0.126.6 ± 1.712.0 ± 0.51.0 ± 0.2
90Rendzic Leptosols8.0 ± 0.26.1 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.126.8 ± 1.049.6 ± 2.130.6 ± 0.62.4 ± 0.1
91Mollic Leptosols8.0 ± 0.15.6 ± 0.42.4 ± 0.25.3 ± 0.123.8 ± 1.010.3 ± 0.65.7 ± 0.3
Table 7. Content of individual PAHs compounds in background soils, µg kg−1.
Table 7. Content of individual PAHs compounds in background soils, µg kg−1.
Monitoring Site Number55649091
Soil TypeTidalic FluvisolsFluvisols SalicRendzic LeptosolsMollic Leptosols
PAHs Type
Low molecular weightNaphthalene19.7 ± 2.03.8 ± 0.168.2 ± 3.658.5 ± 2.5
Fluorene17.0 ± 2.12.4 ± 0.26.8 ± 0.27.6 ± 0.3
Phenanthrene165.3 ± 7.222.8 ± 0.545.0 ± 4.062.0 ± 3.1
Anthracene2.3 ± 0.13.7 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.1
Acenaphthene16.5 ± 0.84.2 ± 0.13.0 ± 0.13.9 ± 0.2
Acenaphthylene15.9 ± 0.54.9 ± 0.34.0 ± 0.25.2 ± 0.2
High molecular weightFluoranthene37.5 ± 2.13.9 ± 0.227.0 ± 1.231.1 ± 1.0
Pyrene88.4 ± 4.28.1 ± 0.530.4 ± 1.533.8 ± 1.5
Chryzene70.8 ± 4.320.0 ± 1.222.0 ± 1.028.0 ± 1.5
Benzo[a]anthracene5.0 ± 0.20.7 ± 0.17.0 ± 0.28.4 ± 0.2
Benzo[b]fluoranthene10.2 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.111.5 ± 0.513.0 ± 0.6
Benzo[k]fluoranthene2.3 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.13.4 ± 0.13.8 ± 0.1
Benzo[a]pyrene4.7 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.17.0 ± 0.38.5 ± 0.3
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene6.7 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.1
Benzo[ g,h,i]perylene17.6 ± 0.51.8 ± 0.113.0 ± 0.415.0 ± 0.8
Σ PAH478.175.6249.3280.2
Σ low-molecular-weight PAHs/Σ high-molecular-weight PAHs0.971.051.040.96
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dudnikova, T.; Minkina, T.; Sushkova, S.; Barbashev, A.; Antonenko, E.; Konstantinova, E.; Shuvaev, E.; Nevidomskaya, D.; Ivantsov, A.; Bakoeva, G.; et al. Background Content of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons during Monitoring of Natural and Anthropogenically Transformed Landscapes in the Coastal Area Soils. Water 2023, 15, 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132424

AMA Style

Dudnikova T, Minkina T, Sushkova S, Barbashev A, Antonenko E, Konstantinova E, Shuvaev E, Nevidomskaya D, Ivantsov A, Bakoeva G, et al. Background Content of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons during Monitoring of Natural and Anthropogenically Transformed Landscapes in the Coastal Area Soils. Water. 2023; 15(13):2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132424

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dudnikova, Tamara, Tatiana Minkina, Svetlana Sushkova, Andrey Barbashev, Elena Antonenko, Elizaveta Konstantinova, Evgenyi Shuvaev, Dina Nevidomskaya, Artem Ivantsov, Gulnora Bakoeva, and et al. 2023. "Background Content of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons during Monitoring of Natural and Anthropogenically Transformed Landscapes in the Coastal Area Soils" Water 15, no. 13: 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132424

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop