# Smooth Spatial Modeling of Extreme Mediterranean Precipitation

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{4}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Study Area and Data

#### 2.1. Rainfall Station Data

^{2}(see the leftmost panel of Figure 2). The maximum altitude is located in the mountainous region known as Djebel Abderrahmane and then decreases toward the coast. Daily precipitation data are available from 1919 to 2014 in 18 stations, with a percentage of missing data that varies between $19.29\%$ and $67.5\%$. Average annual rainfall totals over the rainy season range from $377.3$ to $583.2$ mm. Both daily rainfall data sets in Tunisia were collected from the Tunisian General Directorate of Water Resources.

#### 2.2. CHIRPS Data Set

#### 2.3. Inter-Covariate Correlation Analysis

## 3. Statistical Methods

#### 3.1. Extreme Value Theory

#### 3.2. Smooth Spatial Modeling for Extremes

#### 3.2.1. Generalized Linear Models

#### 3.2.2. Artificial Neural Networks

- Shuffle the data set randomly.
- Split the data set into k = 10 folds.
- For each fold:
- –
- Define that fold as the validation data set.
- –
- Define the remaining folds as the training data set.
- –
- Fit the model on the training set and evaluate on the validation set.

- The error is calculated as the average of the error over all validation sets. The optimal number of hidden units corresponds to the minimum of errors.

## 4. Results

#### 4.1. Pointwise GEV Parameters Estimation

#### 4.2. Spatial GEV Parameters Estimation

#### 4.3. Model Evaluation

^{2}is $6.57$, i.e., 1 station per 152 km

^{2}. For Merguellil, the number of stations per 1000 km

^{2}is $3.6$, i.e., 1 station per 277 km

^{2}. To have approximately the same density, we selected 100 stations instead of 183. The selection of covariates in this case for the ANN model is 4 hidden units and the covariates (x,y,z). We even attempted to take the same number of stations, i.e., 26 stations for the French Mediterranean region. In this case, the result of the cross-validation for the ANN model is to use (x,y,z,chirps) as covariates and 2 hidden units. From these experiments, we can deduce that there is a close relationship between model complexity and input size, which explains the difference between the number of hidden units in Table 2 (four for the French Mediterranean and one for each Tunisian site).

## 5. Discussion

## 6. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## Appendix A

#### Appendix A.1. Estimation of the GEV Parameters Using ANN on the Tunisian Sites

**Figure A1.**Estimates of the GEV parameters $(\mu ,\sigma ,\xi )$ and the 100-year return level over the Merguellil region. The spatial estimates are resulted from an ANN using (y,chirps) as covariates with 1 hidden unit and the point estimations are obtained by the L-moments method.

**Figure A2.**Estimates of the GEV parameters $(\mu ,\sigma ,\xi )$ and the 100−year return level over the Cap Bon region. The spatial estimates are resulted from an ANN using (y,z) as covariates with 1 hidden unit, and the point estimations are obtained by the L−moments method.

#### Appendix A.2. 10-Fold Cross-Validation Results

**Figure A3.**Result of the 10-fold cross-validation with the ANN model for the French Mediterranean site.

## References

- Gaume, E.; Borga, M.; Llassat, M.; Maouche, S.; Lang, M.; Diakakis, M. Sub-chapter 1.3.4. Mediterranean extreme floods and flash floods. In The Mediterranean Region under Climate Change; Collection Synthèses; IRD Editions: Marseille, France, 2016; pp. 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leduc, C.; Ammar, S.B.; Favreau, G.; Beji, R.; Virrion, R.; Lacombe, G.; Tarhouni, J.; Aouadi, C.; Chelli, B.Z.; Jebnoun, N.; et al. Impacts of hydrological changes in the Mediterranean zone: Environmental modifications and rural development in the Merguellil catchment, central Tunisia/Un Ex. D’évolution Hydrol. En Méditerranée: Impacts Des Modif. Environnementales Et Du Développement Agric. Dans Le Bassin-Versant Du Merguellil (Tunisie Cent. Hydrol. Sci. J.
**2007**, 52, 1162–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hmidi, N.; Fehri, N.; Baccar, A. Inondation devastatrice dans la ville de Soliman (Tunisie): Cas de sa zone industrielle lors de l’événement pluviométrique du 22 septembre 2018. In Le Changement Climatique, la Variabilité et les Risques Climatiques; AIC: Aix-en-Provence, France, 2019; p. 199. [Google Scholar]
- Brunet, P.; Bouvier, C.; Neppel, L. Retour d’expérience sur les crues des 6 et 7 octobre 2014 à Montpellier-Grabels (Hérault, France): Caractéristiques hydro-météorologiques et contexte historique de l’épisode. Physio-Géo
**2018**, 12, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Katz, R.W.; Parlange, M.B.; Naveau, P. Statistics of extremes in hydrology. Adv. Water Resour.
**2002**, 25, 1287–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Coles, S. An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values; Springer Series in Statistics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vicente-Serrano, S.M.; Saz-Sánchez, M.A.; Cuadrat, J.M. Comparative analysis of interpolation methods in the middle Ebro Valley (Spain): Application to annual precipitation and temperature. Clim. Res.
**2003**, 24, 161–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Li, J.; Heap, A.D. A Review of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Environmental Scientists; Geoscience Australia: Canberra, Australia, 2008; p. 154.
- Kumar Adhikary, S.; Muttil, N.; Gokhan Yilmaz, A. Ordinary kriging and genetic programming for spatial estimation of rainfall in the Middle Yarra River catchment, Australia. Hydrol. Res.
**2016**, 47, 1182–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Feki, H.; Slimani, M.; Cudennec, C. Incorporating elevation in rainfall interpolation in Tunisia using geostatistical methods. Hydrol. Sci. J.
**2012**, 57, 1294–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Feki, H.; Slimani, M.; Cudennec, C. Geostatistically based optimization of a rainfall monitoring network extension: Case of the climatically heterogeneous Tunisia. Hydrol. Res.
**2017**, 48, 514–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ceresetti, D.; Ursu, E.; Carreau, J.; Anquetin, S.; Creutin, J.D.; Gardes, L.; Girard, S.; Molinié, G. Evaluation of classical spatial-analysis schemes of extreme rainfall. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
**2012**, 12, 3229–3240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shepard, D. A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM National Conference, New York, NY, USA, 27–29 August 1968; ACM Press: New York, NY, USA, 1968; pp. 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goovaerts, P. Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. J. Hydrol.
**2000**, 228, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Blanchet, J.; Lehning, M. Mapping snow depth return levels: Smooth spatial modeling versus station interpolation. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
**2010**, 14, 2527–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Neppel, L.; Arnaud, P.; Borchi, F.; Carreau, J.; Garavaglia, F.; Lang, M.; Paquet, E.; Renard, B.; Soubeyroux, J.; Veysseire, J. Résultats du projet Extraflo sur la comparaison des méthodes d’estimation des pluies extrêmes en France. Houille Blanche-Rev. Int. L’eau
**2014**, 2, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Chowdhury, M.; Alouani, A.; Hossain, F. Comparison of ordinary kriging and artificial neural network for spatial mapping of arsenic contamination of groundwater. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess.
**2010**, 24, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bishop, C.M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning; Information Science and Statistics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Carreau, J.; Toulemonde, G. Extra-parametrized extreme value copula: Extension to a spatial framework. Spat. Stat.
**2020**, 40, 100410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Tramblay, Y.; Neppel, L.; Carreau, J.; Najib, K. Non-stationary frequency analysis of heavy rainfall events in southern France. Hydrol. Sci. J.
**2013**, 58, 280–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Panthou, G.; Vischel, T.; Lebel, T.; Blanchet, J.; Quantin, G.; Ali, A. Extreme rainfall in West Africa: A regional modeling. Water Resour. Res.
**2012**, 48, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Šraj, M.; Viglione, A.; Parajka, J.; Blöschl, G. The influence of non-stationarity in extreme hydrological events on flood frequency estimation. J. Hydrol. Hydromech.
**2016**, 64, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Villarini, G.; Smith, J.; Serinaldi, F.; Ntelekos, A.; Schwarz, U. Analyses of extreme flooding in Austria over the period 1951–2006. Int. J. Climatol.
**2012**, 32, 1178–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aissaoui-Fqayeh, I.; El-Adlouni, S.; Ouarda, T.B.M.J.; St-Hilaire, A. Non-stationary lognormal model development and comparison with the non-stationary GEV model. Hydrol. Sci. J.
**2009**, 54, 1141–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wagner, P.D.; Fiener, P.; Wilken, F.; Kumar, S.; Schneider, K. Comparison and evaluation of spatial interpolation schemes for daily rainfall in data scarce regions. J. Hydrol.
**2012**, 464, 388–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Slimani, M.; Cudennec, C.; Feki, H. Structure du gradient pluviométrique de la transition Méditerranée-Sahara en Tunisie: Déterminants géographiques et saisonnalité/Structure Rainfall Gradient Mediterranean-Sahara Transit. Tunisia: Geogr. Determ. Seas. Hydrol. Sci. J.
**2007**, 52, 1088–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Raymond, F. and Ullmann, A.; Tramblay, Y.; Drobinski, P.; Camberlin, P. Evolution of Mediterranean extreme dry spells during the wet season under climate change. Reg. Environ. Chang.
**2019**, 19, 2339–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Joly, D.; Brossard, T.; Cardot, H.; Cavailhes, J.; Hilal, M.; Wavresky, P. Les types de climats en France, une construction spatiale. Cybergeo
**2010**, 501, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pujol, N.; Neppel, L.; Sabatier, R. Approche régionale pour la détection de tendances dans des séries de précipitations de la région méditerranéenne française. Comptes Rendus Geosci.
**2007**, 339, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lacombe, G.; Cappelaere, B.; Leduc, C. Hydrological impact of water and soil conservation works in the Merguellil catchment of central Tunisia. J. Hydrol.
**2008**, 359, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Funk, C.; Peterson, P.; Landsfeld, M.; Pedreros, D.; Verdin, J.; Shukla, S.; Husak, G.; Rowland, J.; Harrison, L.; Hoell, A.; et al. The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations-a new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Sci. Data
**2015**, 2, 150066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Fisher, R.A.; Tippett, L.H.C. Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc.
**1928**, 24, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pujol, N.; Neppel, L.; Sabatier, R. Regional tests for trend detection in maximum precipitation series in the French Mediterranean region. Hydrol. Sci. J.
**2007**, 52, 956–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cooley, D.; Nychka, D.; Naveau, P. Bayesian Spatial Modeling of Extreme Precipitation Return Levels. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
**2007**, 102, 824–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hosking, J. L-moments: Analysis and Estimation of Distribution us sing Linear Combinations of Order Statistics. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol.
**1990**, 52, 105–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hosking, J.R.M.; Wallis, J.R. Regional Frequency Analysis: An Approach Based on L-Moments, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCullagh, P. Generalized Linear Models; Routledge: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Chandler, R. On the use of generalized linear models for interpreting climate variability. Environmetrics
**2005**, 16, 699–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yan, Z.; Bate, S.; Chandler, R.E.; Isham, V.; Wheater, H. An Analysis of Daily Maximum Wind Speed in Northwestern Europe Using Generalized Linear Models. J. Clim.
**2002**, 15, 2073–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - McCullagh, P.; Nelder, J.A. Generalized Linear Models; Monographs on statistics and applied probability; Chapman and Hall: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Yee, T.W.; Stephenson, A. Vector generalized linear and additive extreme value models. Extremes
**2007**, 10, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Herath, H.; Chadalawada, J.; Babovic, V. Hydrologically informed machine learning for rainfall–runoff modelling: Towards distributed modelling. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
**2021**, 25, 4373–4401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jiang, S.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, C.; Babovic, V. Uncovering flooding mechanisms across the contiguous United States through interpretive deep learning on representative catchments. Water Resour. Res.
**2022**, 58, e2021WR030185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mezghani, A.; Hingray, B. A combined downscaling-disaggregation weather generator for stochastic generation of multisite hourly weather variables over complex terrain: Development and multi-scale validation for the Upper Rhone River basin. J. Hydrol.
**2009**, 377, 245–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Carreau, J.; Mhenni, N.; Huard, F.; Neppel, L. Exploiting the spatial pattern of daily precipitation in the analog method for regional temporal disaggregation. J. Hydrol.
**2019**, 568, 780–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, X.; Meshgi, A.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Tay, S.H.X.; Pijcke, G.; Manocha, N.; Ong, M.; Nguyen, M.; Babovic, V. Three resampling approaches based on method of fragments for daily-to-subdaily precipitation disaggregation. Int. J. Climatol.
**2018**, 38, e1119–e1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mélèse, V.; Blanchet, J.; Creutin, J. A Regional Scale-Invariant Extreme Value Model of Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Area-Frequency Relationships. Water Resour. Res.
**2019**, 55, 5539–5558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ulrich, J.; Jurado, O.; Peter, M.; Scheibel, M.; Rust, H. Estimating IDF Curves Consistently over Durations with Spatial Covariates. Water
**2020**, 12, 3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fatichi, S.; Ivanov, V.; Caporali, E. Simulation of future climate scenarios with a weather generator. Adv. Water Resour.
**2011**, 34, 448–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, X.; Babovic, V. A new scheme for multivariate, multisite weather generator with inter-variable, inter-site dependence and inter-annual variability based on empirical copula approach. Clim. Dyn.
**2019**, 52, 2247–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 2.**DEMs for the three study sites. The selected stations are represented with average annual rainfall totals over rainy season represented by the blue scale. The stations numbered in red will serve as test stations. The sky blue area represents the Mediterranean Sea and the blue lines delimit the catchment areas.

**Figure 3.**Interpolated average seasonal precipitation totals computed from the CHIRPS data constituting the CHIRPS spatial covariate. The gauging stations are depicted as black points, and contour lines from DEM are represented by the gray lines.

**Figure 5.**Box−plots of estimated L-moments parameters of GEV distribution $(\mu ,\sigma ,\xi )$ and 100-year return level.

**Figure 6.**Return levels at the selected test stations for the French Mediterranean region. The 95% bootstrap confidence bands of the return levels obtained from the fitted models: the ANN in gray and the GLM in blue. The dots represent the empirical return levels.

**Figure 7.**Return levels at the selected test stations for the Merguellil region, showing 95% bootstrap confidence bands of the return levels obtained from the fitted models: the ANN in gray and the GLM in blue. The dots represent the empirical return levels.

**Figure 8.**Return levels at the selected test stations for the Cap Bon region, showing 95% bootstrap confidence bands of the return levels obtained from the fitted models: the ANN in gray and the GLM in blue. The dots represent the empirical return levels.

**Figure 9.**Estimates of the GEV parameters $(\mu ,\sigma ,\xi )$ and the 100-year return level over the French Mediterranean region. Spatial estimates result from an ANN using (x,y,z,chirps) as covariates with four hidden units, and the point estimations are obtained by the L−moments method.

Covariate | French Mediterranean | Merguellil | Lebna |
---|---|---|---|

x | 4341.18 | 488.39 | 364.70 |

y | 4382.88 | 488.36 | 367.07 |

z | 4341.94 | 488.46 | 366.97 |

chirps | 4326.7 | 488.56 | 365.08 |

(x,y) | 4305.67 | 487.34 | 361.42 |

(x,z) | 4301.3 | 487.21 | 364.51 |

(y,z) | 4340.35 | 488.63 | 363.98 |

(x,chirps) | 4296.11 | 486.64 | 364.42 |

(y,chirps) | 4313.43 | 487.00 | 364.65 |

(z,chirps) | 4314.11 | 487.50 | 363.04 |

(x,y,z) | 4275.84 | 486.52 | 360.75 |

(x,y,chirps) | 4295.64 | 486.93 | 360.91 |

(y,z,chirps) | 4301.79 | 487.46 | 361.89 |

(x,z,chirps) | 4277.24 | 486.60 | 362.39 |

(x,y,z,chirps) | 4274.04 | 486.55 | 361.25 |

**Table 2.**The selected covariates for the spatial model (GLM and ANN) of the GEV parameters over the three sites. The number of hidden units concerns only the ANN model.

Site | GLM Covariate | ANN Covariate | Number of Hidden Units |
---|---|---|---|

French Mediterranean | (x,y,z,chirps) | (x,y,z,chirps) | 4 |

Merguellil | (x,y,z) | (y,chirps) | 1 |

Lebna | (x,y,z) | (y,z) | 1 |

Site | Negative Log-Likelihood | Kolmogorov–Smirnov |
---|---|---|

French Mediterranean | 72.67% | 74.35% |

Merguellil | 61.53% | 65.38% |

Lebna | 61.1% | 61.1% |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Hammami, H.; Carreau, J.; Neppel, L.; Elasmi, S.; Feki, H.
Smooth Spatial Modeling of Extreme Mediterranean Precipitation. *Water* **2022**, *14*, 3782.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223782

**AMA Style**

Hammami H, Carreau J, Neppel L, Elasmi S, Feki H.
Smooth Spatial Modeling of Extreme Mediterranean Precipitation. *Water*. 2022; 14(22):3782.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223782

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Hammami, Hela, Julie Carreau, Luc Neppel, Sadok Elasmi, and Haifa Feki.
2022. "Smooth Spatial Modeling of Extreme Mediterranean Precipitation" *Water* 14, no. 22: 3782.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223782