# Modeling of Cavitation Bubble Cloud with Discrete Lagrangian Tracking

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

^{†}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. LE Two-Way Coupling Model

#### 2.1. Governing Equations

#### 2.2. Gas Volume Fraction

#### 2.3. Fluid-Mixture Pressure

## 3. Numerical Methods

#### 3.1. Bubble Dynamics

#### 3.2. Spatial Discretization

#### 3.3. Time Integration

- if $\mid \Delta {R}_{n}\mid /{R}_{n}<0.02$, $\Delta {tb}_{n+1}=\Delta {tb}_{n}$;
- if $\mid \Delta {R}_{n}\mid /{R}_{n}>0.02$ and $\Delta {R}_{n}<0$, $\Delta {tb}_{n+1}=\Delta {tb}_{n}/1.3$;
- if $\mid \Delta {R}_{n}\mid /{R}_{n}>0.02$ and $\Delta {R}_{n}>0$, $\Delta {tb}_{n+1}=1.3\Delta {tb}_{n}$.

#### 3.4. Computing Procedure

- Lagrangian computation. Update the gas bubbles positions ${\mathbf{x}}_{b}$ and radii ${R}_{b}$. Here, $\frac{d{\mathbf{x}}_{b}}{dt}$ is directly derived from the velocity field $\mathbf{u}$ of the mixture. The radius ${R}_{b}$ is updated by Equation (4). The ${p}_{\infty}$ and ${\rho}_{\infty}$ in Equation (4) are derived by Equation (13).
- Update the volume fraction in each computation cell by Equation (8).

## 4. Validation

#### 4.1. Isolated Bubble

#### 4.2. 1D Bubble Advection

#### 4.3. Single Bubble Oscillating

## 5. Application of a Bubble Cloud Interacting with Pressure Wave

## 6. Rayleigh Collapse of a Bubble Cloud

#### 6.1. Rayleigh Collapse

#### 6.2. Results and Discussion

## 7. Concluding Remarks

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Darmana, D.; Deen, N.G.; Kuipers, J.A.M. Detailed modeling of hydrodynamics, mass transfer and chemical reactions in a bubble column using a discrete bubble model. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**2005**, 60, 3383–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Singh, R.N.; Sharma, S. Development of suitable photobioreactor for algae production—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2012**, 16, 2347–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Coussios, C.C.; Roy, R.A. Applications of acoustics and cavitation to noninvasive therapy and drug delivery. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
**2008**, 40, 395–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vlaisavljevich, E.; Lin, K.W.; Warnez, M.T.; Singh, R.; Mancia, L.; Putnam, A.J.; Johnsen, E.; Cain, C.; Xu, Z. Effects of tissue stiffness, ultrasound frequency, and pressure on histotripsy-induced cavitation bubble behavior. Phys. Med. Biol.
**2015**, 60, 2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Ohl, C.D.; Arora, M.; Dijkink, R.; Janve, V.; Lohse, D. Surface cleaning from laser-induced cavitation bubbles. Appl. Phys. Lett.
**2006**, 89, 074102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Balachandar, S.; Eaton, J.K. Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
**2010**, 42, 111–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Matsumoto, Y.; Allen, J.S.; Yoshizawa, S.; Ikeda, T.; Kaneko, Y. Medical ultrasound with microbubbles. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
**2005**, 29, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lauer, E.; Hu, X.; Hickel, S.; Adams, N.A. Numerical investigation of collapsing cavity arrays. Phys. Fluids
**2012**, 24, 052104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lauer, E.; Hu, X.Y.; Hickel, S.; Adams, N.A. Numerical modelling and investigation of symmetric and asymmetric cavitation bubble dynamics. Comput. Fluids
**2012**, 69, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tiwari, A.; Pantano, C.; Freund, J.B. Growth-and-collapse dynamics of small bubble clusters near a wall. J. Fluid Mech.
**2015**, 775, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stride, E.; Coussios, C. Cavitation and contrast: The use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med.
**2010**, 224, 171–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hauptmann, M.; Struyf, H.; De Gendt, S.; Glorieux, C.; Brems, S. Evaluation and interpretation of bubble size distributions in pulsed megasonic fields. J. Appl. Phys.
**2013**, 113, 184902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Iida, Y.; Ashokkumar, M.; Tuziuti, T.; Kozuka, T.; Yasui, K.; Towata, A.; Lee, J. Bubble population phenomena in sonochemical reactor: I Estimation of bubble size distribution and its number density with pulsed sonication–Laser diffraction method. Ultrason. Sonochem.
**2010**, 17, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Maeda, K. Simulation, Experiments, and Modeling of Cloud Cavitation with Application to Burst Wave Lithotripsy. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ando, K.; Colonius, T.; Brennen, C.E. Numerical simulation of shock propagation in a polydisperse bubbly liquid. Int. J. Multiph. Flow
**2011**, 37, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Delale, C.F.; Nas, S.; Tryggvason, G. Direct numerical simulations of shock propagation in bubbly liquids. Phys. Fluids
**2005**, 17, 121705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Calzavarini, E.; Kerscher, M.; Lohse, D.; Toschi, F. Dimensionality and morphology of particle and bubble clusters in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech.
**2008**, 607, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Egerer, C.P.; Schmidt, S.J.; Hickel, S.; Adams, N.A. Efficient implicit LES method for the simulation of turbulent cavitating flows. J. Comput. Phys.
**2016**, 316, 453–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lauterborn, W.; Kurz, T. Physics of bubble oscillations. Rep. Prog. Phys.
**2010**, 73, 106501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fuster, D.; Colonius, T. Modelling bubble clusters in compressible liquids. J. Fluid Mech.
**2011**, 688, 352–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Allaire, G.; Clerc, S.; Kokh, S. A five-equation model for the simulation of interfaces between compressible fluids. J. Comput. Phys.
**2002**, 181, 577–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Gorokhovski, M.; Herrmann, M. Modeling primary atomization. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
**2008**, 40, 343–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ma, J.; Hsiao, C.T.; Chahine, G.L. Numerical study of acoustically driven bubble cloud dynamics near a rigid wall. Ultrason. Sonochem.
**2018**, 40, 944–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Maeda, K.; Colonius, T. Bubble cloud dynamics in an ultrasound field. J. Fluid Mech.
**2019**, 862, 1105–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Lyu, X.; Pan, S.; Hu, X.; Adams, N.A. Numerical investigation of homogeneous cavitation nucleation in a microchannel. Phys. Rev. Fluids
**2018**, 3, 064303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Darmana, D.; Deen, N.G.; Kuipers, J. Parallelization of an Euler–Lagrange model using mixed domain decomposition and a mirror domain technique: Application to dispersed gas–liquid two-phase flow. J. Comput. Phys.
**2006**, 220, 216–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rayleigh, L. VIII. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci.
**1917**, 34, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Plesset, M.S. The dynamics of cavitation bubbles. J. Appl. Mech.
**1949**, 16, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shams, E.; Finn, J.; Apte, S.V. A numerical scheme for Euler–Lagrange simulation of bubbly flows in complex systems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
**2011**, 67, 1865–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Abgrall, R. How to prevent pressure oscillations in multicomponent flow calculations: A quasi conservative approach. J. Comput. Phys.
**1996**, 125, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Saurel, R.; Abgrall, R. A multiphase Godunov method for compressible multifluid and multiphase flows. J. Comput. Phys.
**1999**, 150, 425–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hu, X.; Adams, N.; Herrmann, M.; Iaccarino, G. Multi-scale modeling of compressible multi-fluid flows with conservative interface method. In Proceedings of the Summer Program; Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2010; Volume 301. [Google Scholar]
- Han, L.H.; Hu, X.Y.; Adams, N.A. Adaptive multi-resolution method for compressible multi-phase flows with sharp interface model and pyramid data structure. J. Comput. Phys.
**2014**, 262, 131–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jiang, G.S.; Shu, C.W. Efficient Implementation of Weighted ENO Schemes. J. Comput. Phys.
**1996**, 126, 202–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Roe, P.L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys.
**1981**, 43, 357–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Johnsen, E.; Colonius, T. Implementation of WENO schemes in compressible multicomponent flow problems. J. Comput. Phys.
**2006**, 219, 715–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alehossein, H.; Qin, Z. Numerical analysis of Rayleigh-Plesset equation for cavitating water jets. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
**2007**, 72, 780–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hu, X.Y.; Khoo, B.C.; Adams, N.A.; Huang, F.L. A conservative interface method for compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys.
**2006**, 219, 553–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Maeda, K.; Colonius, T. Eulerian-Lagrangian method for simulation of cloud cavitation. J. Comput. Phys.
**2018**, 371, 994–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Ohl, S.W.; Klaseboer, E.; Khoo, B.C. Bubbles with shock waves and ultrasound: A review. Interface Focus
**2015**, 5, 20150019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Arora, M.; Ohl, C.D.; Lohse, D. Effect of nuclei concentration on cavitation cluster dynamics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
**2007**, 121, 3432–3436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

**Figure 1.**Schematic of three interface types with respect to the computational grid: the fully-resolved, under-resolved, and sub-grid dispersed interfaces.

**Figure 2.**Isolated bubble: The time history of the bubble size ${R}^{*}={R}_{b}/{R}_{b0}$ in 1D simulation. Results of grid resolutions of 100 ($\mathrm{d}x=4{R}_{b0}$) and 200 ($\mathrm{d}x=2{R}_{b0}$) are compared with the analytical solution.

**Figure 3.**Isolated bubble: The time history of the bubble size ${R}^{*}={R}_{b}/{R}_{b0}$ in 3D simulation.

**Figure 4.**1D bubble advection: The solid line represents the initial fluid condition, and ∘ represents the results when the Lagrangian bubble reaches $x=2.86$ at $t=3.0$.

**Figure 5.**Single bubble oscillating: Volume fraction ${\alpha}_{l}$ along the bubble radius for different resolutions.

**Figure 6.**Single bubble oscillating: Pressure wave propagation induced from an oscillating gas bubble at ${t}^{*}=tf=0.0,1.0,3.0,\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{and}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}5.0$.

**Figure 7.**Single bubble oscillating: Pressure wave propagation induced from a continuous oscillating gas bubble at ${t}^{*}=tf=0.0,1.0,3.0,\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{and}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}5.0$.

**Figure 8.**Initial setup of the simulation of a bubble cloud interacting with pressure wave. The radius of the bubble cloud is ${A}_{0}=2\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{mm}$, and it has 200 bubbles with random size distribution between $1\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{m}$ and $5\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{m}$. The computation domain is $2\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}L\times L$ (L = 10.24 mm). The distribution of the gas bubbles is visualized by both the volume fraction ${\alpha}_{g}$ and the radius ${R}_{b}$ of Lagrangian spherical particles. Four bubbles (bubble A, B, C, and D) located at the four boxes’ centers are marked for future reference.

**Figure 9.**The pressure field induced by the bubble cluster when the bubble cluster interacts with a sinusoidal pulse. The initial state and the pressure field at $1.0\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{s}$, $2.5\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{s}$, $3.5\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{s}$, $4.5\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{s}$, and $5.5\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{s}$ are shown.

**Figure 10.**The time history of pressure at the bubble cloud center without (the dashed line) and with bubble cloud for two different resolutions.

**Figure 11.**The gas volume fraction ${\alpha}_{g}$ when the bubble cluster interacts with a sinusoidal pulse at $1.5\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{s}$, $2.0\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{s}$, $2.5\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{s}$, $3.0\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{s}$, $3.5\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{s}$, and $4.5\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathsf{\mu}\mathrm{s}$.

**Figure 12.**The time history of bubble radius ${R}_{b}$ of Bubble A (on the

**left**side), Bubble B (on the

**bottom**), Bubble C (at bubble cloud

**center**), and Bubble D (on the

**right**side).

**Figure 13.**Schematic of the set-up of the bubble cloud Rayleigh Collapse. A spherical bubble cloud with ${N}_{0}$ vapor bubbles is placed inside the bulk water. $A\left(t\right)$ is the radius of the bubble cloud.

**Figure 14.**The snapshots of the collapsing process of a bubble cloud with ${N}_{0}$ = 200 vapor bubbles (at t = 0 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 6 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 9 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 12 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 14 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, and 16 $\mathsf{\mu}$s). The distribution of the vapor bubbles is visualized both by the iso-surfaces of the volume fraction ${\alpha}_{g}=0.002$ (${\alpha}_{l}=0.998$) and the Lagrangian spherical particles of the radius ${R}_{b}$. Slices of the high pressure area (higher than 10 atm) at the center of the bubble cloud are also plotted, which indicate the cloud collapse induced violent pressures.

**Figure 15.**The time history of the non-dimensional active bubble number ${N}_{b}/{N}_{0}$ (${N}_{0}$ = 200) and the averaged gas fraction $\beta /{\beta}_{0}$, here being $\beta ={\Sigma}_{{V}_{c}}{\alpha}_{g}/{V}_{c}$.

**Figure 16.**The snapshots of the vapor bubble cloud collapse process with ${N}_{0}$ = 300 vapor bubbles (t = 0 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 6 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 9 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 12 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 13 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, and 14 $\mathsf{\mu}$s). Distribution of the vapor bubbles is visualized both by the iso-surfaces of the volume fraction ${\alpha}_{g}=0.002$ (${\alpha}_{l}=0.998$) and the radius ${R}_{b}$ of Lagrangian spherical particles. Slices of the extreme pressure area (higher than 10 atm) at the center of the bubble cloud are also plotted, which indicate the cloud collapse induced violent pressures.

**Figure 17.**The snapshots of the vapor bubble cloud collapse process initially with ${N}_{0}$ = 400 vapor bubbles (t = 0 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 6 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 9 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 12 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 13 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, and 14 $\mathsf{\mu}$s). Distribution of the vapor bubbles is visualized both by the iso-surface of the volume fraction ${\alpha}_{g}=0.002$ (${\alpha}_{l}=0.998$) and the radius ${R}_{b}$ of Lagrangian spherical particles. Slices of the high pressure area (higher than 10 atm) at the center of the bubble cloud are also plotted, which indicate the cloud collapse induced violent pressures.

**Figure 18.**The time history of the non-dimensional active bubble number ${N}_{b}/{N}_{0}$ (${N}_{0}$ = 400) and the averaged gas fraction $\beta /{\beta}_{0}$ ($\beta ={\Sigma}_{{V}_{c}}{\alpha}_{g}/{V}_{c}$).

**Figure 19.**The bubble distributions (radii density bar graphs) of the bubbles’ radii at t = 0 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 6 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 9 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 12 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, 13 $\mathsf{\mu}$s, and 14 $\mathsf{\mu}$s. The first bar from the left side indicates the density of the collapsed vapor bubbles.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Lyu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Hu, X.; Adams, N.A.
Modeling of Cavitation Bubble Cloud with Discrete Lagrangian Tracking. *Water* **2021**, *13*, 2684.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192684

**AMA Style**

Lyu X, Zhu Y, Zhang C, Hu X, Adams NA.
Modeling of Cavitation Bubble Cloud with Discrete Lagrangian Tracking. *Water*. 2021; 13(19):2684.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192684

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Lyu, Xiuxiu, Yujie Zhu, Chi Zhang, Xiangyu Hu, and Nikolaus A. Adams.
2021. "Modeling of Cavitation Bubble Cloud with Discrete Lagrangian Tracking" *Water* 13, no. 19: 2684.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192684