Comparative Use of Quantitative PCR (qPCR), Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR), and Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) in the Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STEC) in Environmental Samples
- Supplementary File 1:
PDF-Document (PDF, 420 KiB)
Ibekwe, M.A.; Murinda, S.E.; Park, S.; Obayiuwana, A.; Murry, M.A.; Schwartz, G.; Lundquist, T. Comparative Use of Quantitative PCR (qPCR), Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR), and Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) in the Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STEC) in Environmental Samples. Water 2020, 12, 3507. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123507
Ibekwe MA, Murinda SE, Park S, Obayiuwana A, Murry MA, Schwartz G, Lundquist T. Comparative Use of Quantitative PCR (qPCR), Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR), and Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) in the Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STEC) in Environmental Samples. Water. 2020; 12(12):3507. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123507
Chicago/Turabian StyleIbekwe, Mark A., Shelton E. Murinda, Stanley Park, Amarachukwu Obayiuwana, Marcia A. Murry, Gregory Schwartz, and Trygve Lundquist. 2020. "Comparative Use of Quantitative PCR (qPCR), Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR), and Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) in the Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STEC) in Environmental Samples" Water 12, no. 12: 3507. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123507