4.1. LULCC
Land cover maps of the upstream Dong Nai River Basin for 1973, 1989, 1994, 2005, and 2014 are shown in
Figure 3. From
Table 3, we found dense-forest, spare-forest/shrub, and perennial/orchard to be more reliable by the producer and user accuracy, that is higher than the target accuracy of 85% proposed by Anderson et al. [
42]. As Foody discussed in [
45], this 85% target accuracy is often used without questioning its suitability. It appears to stem from early research on mapping broad land-cover classes at a small cartographic scale and may be inappropriate for some current mapping applications. Furthermore, the overall accuracy of 88.9% and Kappa coefficient of 0.85, as well as the results from the field survey, show our results to be in good agreement. In 1973, the forest area, including dense forest and sparse forest/shrub, constituted 86% of the total area, and agricultural land, including perennial orchard and crop, were 14% of the total. These proportions experienced no major changes until 1994, when they changed to 73% and 24%, respectively. In 2005, the forest area decreased significantly to 51% (7588 km
2), and in contrast, the agricultural land area increased to 45%. In 2014, the proportions of forest area and agricultural land continued to drop to 45% (6565 km
2) and 51%, respectively (
Table 4). The land cover area change matrices for the years of 1994 and 2005 are shown in
Table 5. The forest area that was converted to agricultural land during the period 1994 to 2005 was 3343 km
2, whereas the reverse conversion was only 240 km
2. Land use change occurred primarily in the highland and midland regions, which experienced a high influx of immigrants, with an average growth rate of 2.3% per year during the period of 1999 to 2009 [
46]. Pham et al. [
16] concluded that population growth was behind the expansion of cultivation and that the primary causes of deforestation were land conversions via agriculture, infrastructure, unsustainable logging, including both legal and illegal logging, and fire. DeFries [
47] analyzed the factors associated with forest loss for 41 countries including Vietnam from 2000 to 2005; this analysis showed that urban population growth is the biggest cause of deforestation.
Table 6 and
Table 7 are population and forest loss statistical data of the provinces in the study area. The population growth rate of Dak Nong, Dong Nai, and Lam Dong—the three provinces with the largest reduction of forest area—for the period 2005–2014 were 43.72, 29.42, and 8.47%, respectively. While the annual forest loss area was insignificant compared to the total forest area. It can be concluded that population growth is also an important factor behind the decrease of forest in the study area.
In order to complement the results between 1994 and 2005, the GIMMS-NDVI dataset was used to assess the short-term land cover change maps for the period 1994 to 2005 because there are no high-quality Landsat images available in this period. The maximum NDVI value composites from the first 15 days of January, the month when the Landsat images were taken, from 1994 to 2006, are shown in
Figure 4. The NDVI decreased from 1994 onward, especially in the upper region of the basin, then started to decline in 1996 and declined the most in 1998. The NDVI of the entire area dropped substantially in 1999 before showing an increase again from 2000 to 2003, followed by a slight decrease. Moreover, the results indicated that during the period of 1994 to 2005, the majority of deforestation occurred since 1998 and that the largest area of forest cover was lost in 1999.
4.2. LULCC Effect on the Flow Regime
Figure 5 and
Figure 6 show the changes in plentiful, ordinary, low, and scanty flow and runoff at Tri An and Da Nhim in the same period. The average proportions of plentiful, ordinary, low, and scanty runoff at Da Nhim were 70%, 17%, 10%, and 3%, respectively. Similarly, at Tri An, the proportions were 78%, 15%, 5%, and 2%, respectively. At Tri An, all the plentiful, ordinary, low, and scanty runoff suddenly increased in 1999 and decreased after that until 2004. At Da Nhim, all runoff increased twice, in 1996 and in 1999, corresponding to two times of forest reductions in this region. Although the plentiful and ordinary runoff decreased before increasing again in 1998, the low and scanty runoff continued to increase until 1997, then decreased in 1998. As mentioned above, deforestation has occurred since 1996 and the largest area of forest cover was lost in 1999; leading the flow–duration curve of 1999 to occupying the top position of the FDCs chart. After 1999, all the plentiful, ordinary, low, and scanty runoff decreased until 2004. From 1999 to 2004, the reductions in the plentiful, ordinary, low, and scanty runoff at Da Nhim were 1036, 318, 175, and 47 mm (77%, 76%, 72%, and 64%), respectively, and at Tri An, the reductions were 380, 320, 77, and 10 mm (35%, 67%, 61%, and 40%), respectively.
Comparing the flow rate of Tri An and Da Nhim before (1994) and after (1999) deforestation (the bold letters present the large side between the Tri An and Da Nhim basin) (
Table 8). Before deforestation, in the high-water side, the Tri An flow rate was larger than that of Da Nhim and conversely in the low-water side, the Da Nhim flow rate was larger. The large/small flow rates of both basins were reserved between day 192nd and 193rd on FDC (1.72 mm/day). Specifically, for more than half of a year (192 days) the flow rate at Tri An is larger than Da Nhim, but in the low-water side (<1.72 mm/day) the flow rate at Da Nhim is larger. After deforestation, all of the flow rates at Da Nhim were larger than the flow rates at Tri An, as both the value and rate of changes at Da Nhim were greater than at Tri An. This means that the flow rate increased due to the effect of deforestation, and this influence in the small basin is greater than in the large basin.
Figure 7 compares the flow rate of the same days, before and after deforestation.
Look at the
Figure 7, Da Nhim FDC was located above the 1-1 line, meaning that the flow after deforestation was higher. Based on the 1-1 line, the part of Tri An FDC below the 1-1 line takes about 60 days with runoff value from 6.82 to 11.46 mm/day. After that, even though the flow subsequently increased, overall the increase of Tri An was smaller than that of Da Nhim.
By viewing the annual hydrographs shown in
Figure 8, although annual rainfall was almost unchanged, discharge at Da Nhim station in November and December, 1996 and 1998, increased dramatically, equivalent to reducing the forest area in the upper region. The peak flow at Tri An station increased in 1999, 2000, and 2001, the years which saw the largest decline in forest area.
Nakano et al. [
12,
39] summarized the results of several studies in Japan and confirmed that the plentiful, ordinary, low, and scanty runoff increases were due to deforestation. The primary cause of the increase in plentiful runoff was the increase in surface runoff, and the primary cause of the increase in ordinary, low, and scanty runoff was the decrease in evapotranspiration loss due to the decrease in forest vegetation. Similarly, Maita et al. [
48,
49] also concluded that annual discharge increased after deforestation, and the FDC in forested watersheds is influenced more by vegetation than by geology. Long-term change in FDC was affected by both forest growth and precipitation fluctuations [
50]. This research reinforced those findings. Moreover, this study found that the runoff decreased rapidly as the vegetation recovered and continued to decrease during the period of 1999–2004. This is similar finding to Yao et al. [
51] where runoff reduced by forest growth with the increased leaf area index. In addition, Noguchi et al. [
36] showed that the FDCs are affected by differences of variation in rainfall and annual rainfall. In this study, considering the years 1999, 2002 and 2004, the FDCs were different as showed in
Figure 5. Annual rainfalls were 2475, 2380, and 2277 mm, respectively. Though the variation of rainfall during these years caused the differences of FDC curves, the trends of runoff illustrated clearly the impacts of land cover change to flow in the areas.
Forest soil absorbs, temporarily stores, and gradually releases rainwater to the river to mitigate flooding, along with storing rainwater as a water resource, demonstrating the forest’s capacity for water resource conservation. Forests are covered by lower vegetation, such as shrubs and fallen leaves, preventing erosion and runoff of soil due to rainwater. Additionally, the roots of trees fix the soil and rocks, etc., to prevent soil collapse, providing landslide prevention and soil conservation functions [
52]. The tropical monsoon forests shed their leaves every year in the dry season, and that leaf litter acts as a special shield, protecting soil from erosion produced by rain, and maintaining the structure of the surface soil layer [
53]. According to Whitmore [
54], after human disturbances in tropical forests, soil is usually covered by creeping plants or thicket-forming resam ferns, and the density of the plant growth quickly responds to the increased sunlight on the undergrowth layer. Bamboo culms grow at a rate of 1 m/day for a few days by expanding the internodes of previously formed shoots. The study area is in the tropical rainforest region with bamboo forests among the major ecosystem types, so along with crops replacing lost forest, the rapid regrowth of secondary forest is the cause of NDVI increased right after deforestation. In addition, Pham et al. [
16] concluded that land conversion for agriculture is one of the main direct drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Vietnam, meaning that lost forests were replaced with crops. On a national scale, the Vietnamese government has developed various policies and programs targeting a reduction in deforestation and forest degradation. One of these is the five-million-hectare reforestation program from 1998 to 2010. The result of the program is that nationwide forest coverage increased from 33.2% in 1999 to 37.1% in 2004 [
55].