Next Article in Journal
Irrigation Governance in Developing Countries: Current Problems and Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Drag Effect of Water Consumption on Urbanization—A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2015
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2018, 10(9), 1116; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091116

Monthly Rainfall-Runoff Modeling at Watershed Scale: A Comparative Study of Data-Driven and Theory-Driven Approaches

1
and
2,*
1
Department of Mathematical Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 2825 Campus Way, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
2
Department of Geography and Geographic Information Science, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 2825 Campus Way, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 27 July 2018 / Revised: 19 August 2018 / Accepted: 20 August 2018 / Published: 22 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrology)
Full-Text   |   PDF [7183 KB, uploaded 22 August 2018]   |  

Abstract

Data-driven machine learning approaches have been rapidly developed in the past 10 to 20 years and applied to various problems in the field of hydrology. To investigate the capability of data-driven approaches in rainfall-runoff modeling in comparison to theory-driven models, we conducted a comparative study of simulated monthly surface runoff at 203 watersheds across the contiguous USA using a conceptual model, the proportionality hydrologic model, and a data-driven Gaussian process regression model. With the same input variables of precipitation and mean monthly aridity index, the two models showed similar performance. We then introduced two more input variables in the data-driven model: potential evaporation and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), which were selected based on hydrologic knowledge. The modified data-driven model performed much better than either the conceptual or original data-driven model. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on all three models tested in this study, which showed that surface runoff responded positively to increased precipitation. However, a confounding effect on surface runoff sensitivity was found among mean monthly aridity index, potential evaporation, and NDVI. This confounding was caused by complex interconnections among energy supply, vegetation coverage, and climate seasonality of the watershed system. We also conducted an uncertainty analysis on the two data-driven models, which showed that both models had reasonable predictability within the 95% confidence interval. With the additional two input variables, the modified data-driven model had lower prediction uncertainty and higher prediction accuracy. View Full-Text
Keywords: rainfall-runoff process; data-driven; machine learning approach; Gaussian process regression; watershed; comparative study rainfall-runoff process; data-driven; machine learning approach; Gaussian process regression; watershed; comparative study
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, W.; Chen, X. Monthly Rainfall-Runoff Modeling at Watershed Scale: A Comparative Study of Data-Driven and Theory-Driven Approaches. Water 2018, 10, 1116.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top