Next Article in Journal
EmiStatR: A Simplified and Scalable Urban Water Quality Model for Simulation of Combined Sewer Overflows
Previous Article in Journal
Concentrations, Distribution, and Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Daya Bay, China
Open AccessArticle

Institutionalizing Participation in Water Resource Development: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Practices in Southern Thailand

1
Soil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
2
Water Resources Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(6), 781; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060781
Received: 21 May 2018 / Revised: 7 June 2018 / Accepted: 11 June 2018 / Published: 13 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Water Resources Management and Governance)
Substantive stakeholder engagement is increasingly recognized as essential for effective water resource development. Infrastructure development projects and strategies are however typically designed by engineers first before initiating discussions about impacts with stakeholders. In altering this sequence, designing meaningful participatory planning processes needs careful attention. This requires an innovative approach taking into account the institutional and discursive structure of the negotiation arena. This study uses eight features of participation and related micro-politics questions to scrutinize the design process of two water resource development projects in Thailand. The research shows that in one case some of the affected stakeholders were excluded, and in the other case, a lack of trust made one village obstruct the design process from the start. In both cases, the capacity to facilitate the negotiation about alternative designs and compensation was deficient. It is concluded that participation should be institutionalized and facilitated in a way that fosters accountable representation by all stakeholders, builds trust, and recognizes stakeholder interests and knowledge. The approach taken helps to understand the outcomes of the planning process and is useful to design planning processes that foster the accountable representation of all stakeholders and the recognition of their interests and knowledge. View Full-Text
Keywords: micro-politics; reservoir projects; participation; multi-stakeholder processes; Thailand micro-politics; reservoir projects; participation; multi-stakeholder processes; Thailand
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Singto, C.; Fleskens, L.; Vos, J. Institutionalizing Participation in Water Resource Development: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Practices in Southern Thailand. Water 2018, 10, 781.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop