Next Article in Journal
Sensing the Submerged Landscape of Nisida Roman Harbour in the Gulf of Naples from Integrated Measurements on a USV
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Adsorption of Cu (II) from Aqueous Solutions onto Pyrolytic Sludge-Derived Adsorbents
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Erosion Modelling and Risk Assessment in Data Scarce Rift Valley Lake Regions, Ethiopia
Open AccessReview

Review of Constructed Wetlands for Acid Mine Drainage Treatment

CONACYT-UNAM Instituto de Geología, Estación Regional del Noroeste (ERNO), Luis D. Colosio y Madrid, 83000 Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico
CONACYT-Instituto Tecnológico de Culiacán, Unidad de Posgrado e Investigación, Av. Juan de Dios Bátiz s/n, 80220 Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Engineering and Environmental Biotechnology Group, Environmental Sciences Faculty and EULA-Chile Center, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(11), 1685;
Received: 11 October 2018 / Revised: 3 November 2018 / Accepted: 8 November 2018 / Published: 19 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater)
The mining industry is the major producer of acid mine drainage (AMD). The problem of AMD concerns at active and abandoned mine sites. Acid mine drainage needs to be treated since it can contaminate surface water. Constructed wetlands (CW), a passive treatment technology, combines naturally-occurring biogeochemical, geochemical, and physical processes. This technology can be used for the long-term remediation of AMD. The challenge is to overcome some factors, for instance, chemical characteristics of AMD such a high acidity and toxic metals concentrations, to achieve efficient CW systems. Design criteria, conformational arrangements, and careful selection of each component must be considered to achieve the treatment. The main objective of this review is to summarize the current advances, applications, and the prevalent difficulties and opportunities to apply the CW technology for AMD treatment. According to the cited literature, sub-surface CW (SS-CW) systems are suggested for an efficient AMD treatment. The synergistic interactions between CW components determine heavy metal removal from water solution. The microorganism-plant interaction is considered the most important since it implies symbiosis mechanisms for heavy metal removal and tolerance. In addition, formation of litter and biofilm layers contributes to heavy metal removal by adsorption mechanisms. The addition of organic amendments to the substrate material and AMD bacterial consortium inoculation are some of the strategies to improve heavy metal removal. Adequate experimental design from laboratory to full scale systems need to be used to optimize equilibria between CW components selection and construction and operational costs. The principal limitations for CW treating AMD is the toxicity effect that heavy metals produce on CW plants and microorganisms. However, these aspects can be solved partially by choosing carefully constructed wetlands components suitable for the AMD characteristics. From the economic point of view, a variety of factors affects the cost of constructed wetlands, such as: detention time, treatment goals, media type, pretreatment type, number of cells, source, and availability of gravel media, and land requirements, among others. View Full-Text
Keywords: acid mine drainage; constructed wetland; passive treatment; metal removal acid mine drainage; constructed wetland; passive treatment; metal removal
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Pat-Espadas, A.M.; Loredo Portales, R.; Amabilis-Sosa, L.E.; Gómez, G.; Vidal, G. Review of Constructed Wetlands for Acid Mine Drainage Treatment. Water 2018, 10, 1685.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

Back to TopTop