Next Article in Journal
Impacts of Legal and Institutional Changes on Irrigation Management Performance: A Case of the Gezira Irrigation Scheme, Sudan
Next Article in Special Issue
Landscape Drivers and Social Dynamics Shaping Microbial Contamination Risk in Three Maya Communities in Southern Belize, Central America
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the Public Flood Risk Perception in a Flood-Prone City: The Case of Jingdezhen City in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling Water Yield: Assessing the Role of Site and Region-Specific Attributes in Determining Model Performance of the InVEST Seasonal Water Yield Model
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2018, 10(11), 1578; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111578

Socioeconomic and Environmental Proxies for Comparing Freshwater Ecosystem Service Threats across International Sites: A Diagnostic Approach

1
Environmental Systems Graduate Program, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California Merced, Merced, CA 94343, USA
2
Environmental and Urban Studies, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York, NY 12504, USA
3
Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA
4
Centro de Manejo Costero (CURE), Universidad de la República, Maldonado 20000, Uruguay
5
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
6
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia
7
Center for Tropical Paleoecology and Archaeology, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City 32401, Panama
8
Department of History and Social Sciences, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia
9
Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía, CONICET & Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca 8000, Argentina
10
Institute of the Environment, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
11
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas de la Patagonia, Universidad Austral de Chile, Coyhaique 5951601, Chile
12
Department of Biology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
13
Dorset Environmental Science Centre, Dorset, ON P0A 1E0, Canada
14
Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 4P5, Canada
15
Department of Civil Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Bucaramanga 681007, Colombia
16
Department of Geography, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
17
Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur—CONICET & Universidad Nacional del Sur Argentina, Bahía Blanca 8000, Argentina
18
Sección Limnología, IECA, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 11 September 2018 / Revised: 24 October 2018 / Accepted: 2 November 2018 / Published: 4 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current and Emerging Issues Surrounding Water in the Americas)
Full-Text   |   PDF [5498 KB, uploaded 17 November 2018]   |  

Abstract

In this work, we develop and test proxy-based diagnostic tools for comparing freshwater ecosystem services (FWES) risks across an international array of freshwater ecosystems. FWES threats are increasing rapidly under pressure from population, climate change, pollution, land use change, and other factors. We identified spatially explicit FWES threats estimates (referred to as threat benchmarks) and extracted watershed-specific values for an array of aquatic ecosystems in the Western Hemisphere (Ramsar sites). We compared these benchmark values to values extracted for sites associated with an international FWES threat investigation. The resulting benchmark threats appeared to provide a meaningful context for the diagnostic assessment of study site selection by revealing gaps in coverage of the underlying socio-environmental problem. In an effort to simplify the method, we tested regularly updated environmental and socioeconomic metrics as potential proxies for the benchmark threats using regression analysis. Three category proxies, aggregated from (i) external (global to regional, climate-related), (ii) internal (watershed management-related), and (iii) socioeconomic and governance related proxies produced strong relationships with water supply threat benchmarks, but only weak relationships with biodiversity-related and nutrient regulation benchmark threats. Our results demonstrate the utility of advancing global FWES status and threat benchmarks for organizing coordinated research efforts and prioritizing decisions with regard to international socio-environmental problems. View Full-Text
Keywords: socio-environmental systems; ecosystem services; risk analysis; anthropogenic pressure; human pressure; experimental design socio-environmental systems; ecosystem services; risk analysis; anthropogenic pressure; human pressure; experimental design
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Harmon, T.C.; Smyth, R.L.; Chandra, S.; Conde, D.; Dhungel, R.; Escobar, J.; Hoyos, N.; Lozoya, J.P.; Nin, M.; Perillo, G.M.; Pincetl, S.; Piccolo, M.C.; Reid, B.; Rusak, J.A.; Scordo, F.; Velez, M.I.; Villamizar, S.R.; Wemple, B.; Zilio, M. Socioeconomic and Environmental Proxies for Comparing Freshwater Ecosystem Service Threats across International Sites: A Diagnostic Approach. Water 2018, 10, 1578.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top