This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Comparison of the Applicability of Mainstream Objective Circulation Type Classification Methods in China
by
Minjin Ma
Minjin Ma *
,
Ran Chen
Ran Chen and
Xingyu Zhang
Xingyu Zhang
College of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2025, 16(11), 1231; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16111231 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 17 September 2025
/
Revised: 12 October 2025
/
Accepted: 21 October 2025
/
Published: 24 October 2025
Abstract
Circulation type classification (CTC) is an important method in atmospheric sciences, which reveals the relationship between atmospheric circulation and regional weather and climate. Accurate circulation classification helps to improve weather forecasting accuracy and supports climate change research. China has complex topography and significant spatiotemporal variability in its circulation patterns, making the study of circulation type classification in this region highly significant. This study aims to evaluate the applicability of several mainstream objective CTC methods in the China region. We applied methods including T-mode principal component analysis (PCT), Ward linkage, K-means, and Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) to classify the sea-level pressure daily mean fields from 1993 to 2023 in the study area, and compared the classification results in terms of internal metrics, continuity, seasonal variation, separability of related meteorological variables (e.g., temperature, precipitation), and stability to spatiotemporal resolution. The results show that each method has its advantages in different contexts, with the K-means method showing the best overall performance. Additionally, an optimized approach combining PCT and K-means is proposed.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ma, M.; Chen, R.; Zhang, X.
Comparison of the Applicability of Mainstream Objective Circulation Type Classification Methods in China. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 1231.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16111231
AMA Style
Ma M, Chen R, Zhang X.
Comparison of the Applicability of Mainstream Objective Circulation Type Classification Methods in China. Atmosphere. 2025; 16(11):1231.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16111231
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ma, Minjin, Ran Chen, and Xingyu Zhang.
2025. "Comparison of the Applicability of Mainstream Objective Circulation Type Classification Methods in China" Atmosphere 16, no. 11: 1231.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16111231
APA Style
Ma, M., Chen, R., & Zhang, X.
(2025). Comparison of the Applicability of Mainstream Objective Circulation Type Classification Methods in China. Atmosphere, 16(11), 1231.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16111231
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.