Next Article in Journal
The Colorful Sex Chromosomes of Teleost Fish
Previous Article in Journal
The Most Important Virulence Markers of Yersinia enterocolitica and Their Role during Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/genes9050236
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of Arabidopsis Sodium Proton Antiporter (NHX) and Human Sodium Proton Exchanger (NHE) Homologs in Sorghum bicolor

by
P. Hima Kumari
1,2,
S. Anil Kumar
1,2,
Katam Ramesh
3,
Palakolanu Sudhakar Reddy
4,
M. Nagaraju
1,
A. Bhanu Prakash
4,
Trushar Shah
5,
Ashley Henderson
3,6,
Rakesh K. Srivastava
4,
G. Rajasheker
1,
A. Chitikineni
4,
Rajeev K. Varshney
4,
P. Rathnagiri
7,
M. Lakshmi Narasu
2 and
P. B. Kavi Kishor
1,*
1
Department of Genetics, Osmania University, Hyderabad 500 007, India
2
Centre for Biotechnology, Institute of Science & Technology, JNT University, Hyderabad 500 085, India
3
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA
4
Center of Excellence in Genomics & Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Hyderabad 502 324, India
5
IITA-Kenya c/o International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), PO Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
6
Ottawa University, Ottawa, KS 66067, USA
7
Genomix CARL Pvt. Ltd. Rayalapuram Road, Pulivendula, 516 390, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2018, 9(5), 236; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9050236
Submission received: 13 March 2018 / Revised: 24 April 2018 / Accepted: 24 April 2018 / Published: 3 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Na+ transporters play an important role during salt stress and development. The present study is aimed at genome-wide identification, in silico analysis of sodium-proton antiporter (NHX) and sodium-proton exchanger (NHE)-type transporters in Sorghum bicolor and their expression patterns under varied abiotic stress conditions. In Sorghum, seven NHX and nine NHE homologs were identified. Amiloride (a known inhibitor of Na+/H+ exchanger activity) binding motif was noticed in both types of the transporters. Chromosome 2 was found to be a hotspot region with five sodium transporters. Phylogenetic analysis inferred six ortholog and three paralog groups. To gain an insight into functional divergence of SbNHX/NHE transporters, real-time gene expression was performed under salt, drought, heat, and cold stresses in embryo, root, stem, and leaf tissues. Expression patterns revealed that both SbNHXs and SbNHEs are responsive either to single or multiple abiotic stresses. The predicted protein–protein interaction networks revealed that only SbNHX7 is involved in the calcineurin B-like proteins (CBL)- CBL interacting protein kinases (CIPK) pathway. The study provides insights into the functional divergence of SbNHX/NHE transporter genes with tissue specific expressions in Sorghum under different abiotic stress conditions.

1. Introduction

To cope with high salt concentrations in the soil and the toxic effects of Na+ and Cl- ions, plants have evolved multiple mechanisms like exclusion of salt at the membrane level or inclusion of it in the vacuoles [1]. Ions that are sequestered into the vacuoles would be used by the plants as a cheap source of osmoticum that can help to absorb water [2]. Both ion and pH homeostasis play crucial roles in diverse cellular processes that control plant growth, development, and stress tolerance [3]. In general, the cytoplasmic pH value is determined to be above neutrality (pH 7.2–7.6), which is controlled by an array of buffering molecules like K+, Na+/K+, cation/proton exchangers like Ca2+/H+, sodium-proton antiporters (NHX), proton/nutrient-transporters and H+-translocating enzymes [4]. Na+ enters into the cell through two non-selective cation channels (NSCC): voltage-dependent and voltage-independent cation (VIC) channels. VIC channels are thought to be the major way for the movement of Na+ into plant cells [5,6]. NHX and sodium-proton exchanger (NHE) transporters belong to the cation proton antiporter1 CPA1 family [7,8]. It appears that CPA1 family has evolved from ancestral sodium-proton antiporter (NhaP) genes in prokaryotes [8,9,10]. Their primary physiological functions are regulation of cytoplasmic pH, extrusion of H+ generated during metabolism in exchange of Na+ or K+ ions into cytoplasm and vacuoles in plants and animals [11,12,13].
NHX1 was the first plant NHX identified in Arabidopsis and its overexpression lead to salt tolerance in plants [14,15]. Among the eight NHX members, NHX1 and NHX2 are the most abundant proteins in Arabidopsis [16]. In plants, NHX7 or salt overly sensitive (SOS1) and NHX8 are located in the plasma membrane and named PM-class [17]; NHX5 and NHX6 are intracellularly located in the endosomal compartments and named Endo-class [18,19]; NHX1 to NHX4 are in the tonoplast and named Vac-class [20]. NHX transporters are associated with salt tolerance, long-distance transport of Na+ from root to shoot, protein targeting and trafficking, and stomatal functioning [18,19,21,22,23,24]. Like NHX-type proteins, NHE-type protein family members are required for several key cellular processes like regulation of intracellular pH, cell volume and reabsorption of Na+ in the kidney and gastrointestinal tract [25]. The members of this family may have a similar structure, containing 10 to 12-transmembrane domains, large C-terminal domain and function as homodimers [26]. Bobulescua et al. [27] pointed out that NHE-type family of proteins fall into two subfamilies; the plasma membrane bound NHE 1-5, and the organellar membrane-bound NHE 6–9. The C-terminal domains may be cytosolic as in the case of NHE1 [28], or extracellularly exposed as in NHE3 [29]. It appears that NHX genes have evolved from plasma membrane NHE sequences [10]. However, functions of NHE members in plants are not known completely.
Sorghum bicolor is a moderately stress-tolerant crop suitable for dry land cultivation, ensuring productivity and access to food when other crops fail. S. bicolor is the fifth most important cereal crop and the second most important staple food grain in the semi-arid tropics. It is a self-pollinated diploid, C4 photosynthetic plant, which makes it adaptable to high temperature. It is an efficient biomass accumulator, provides feed, fodder and fuel, and shows genetic diversity with smaller genome [30]. Recently, NHX-like protein (NHXLP), which is plasma membrane bound and helps in Na+ exclusion, has been detected in S. bicolor [31]. This shows that S. bicolor may have NHXLP- and NHE-type genes in their genomes besides NHX for carrying out redundant functions. However, the tissue-specific expressions of NHX and NHE-type exchangers and their association with different abiotic stresses in S. bicolor are unknown. Earlier, genome-wide analysis of CPA1 family was carried out for Ca2+ transporters [32], K+ transporters [33,34], and NHX-type genes in poplar [33], but not for NHE homologs in plants. In this study, genome-wide scanning of Arabidopsis NHX and human NHE homologs in Sorghum was carried out including their chromosomal locations, gene structures, conserved motifs, phylogenetic relationship, transcript expressions in different tissues, promoter analysis, and predicted protein–protein interactions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Abiotic Stress Treatments

Sorghum (S. bicolor L. BTx623) seeds collected from the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT, Patancheru, India) were sown in earthen pots containing 4.5 kg of garden soil and manure (4:1) and maintained in green house at 28/20 °C day/night temperatures and relative humidity of 60±5% to 81±2%. Seventy-five-day-old Sorghum variety BTx623 plants were treated with salt (200 mM NaCl), drought (200 mM mannitol), heat (42 °C), and cold (4 °C) stresses for 4 h. Control (without any stress) plants were treated with tap water. Embryo, root, stem, and leaf tissue samples were collected immediately, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction.

2.2. Identification and Characterization of Sodium Transporters

All the 16 cDNA sequences of Arabidopsis and human Na+ transporters (NHX1-7, [35]; NHE1-9) were collected from NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (File S1) and blasted against the S. bicolor genome in the Gramene database by default settings. Different software tools like Genscan [36] for gene prediction, Gene Structure Display Server [37], for gene structure analysis, TMHMM [38], for topology analysis of transmembrane domains and WoLFPSORT [39] for subcellular localization of the predicted gene, NetPhos 3.1 [40] for phosphorylation sites, MEME [41] for conserved motifs with parameters like 20 number of motifs, 2–20 motif sites, 6–20 wide motif width were used. SMART program was employed to check for the presence of sodium proton exchanger domains [42]. The SbNHX and SbNHE proteins were modelled using I-TASSER tool [43].

2.3. Phylogeny, Divergence, Promoter Analysis, Physical Gene Mapping, and Co-Expression Analysis

Phylogenetic tree was constructed with amino acid sequences of Sorghum bicolor (Sb), Populus trichocarpa (Pt), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Eucalyptus grandis (Eg), Medicago truncatula (Mt), Vitis vinifera (Vv), Glycine max (Gm), Oryza sativa (Os), Brachypodium distachyon (Bd), Zea mays (Zm), and Physcomitrella patens (Pp) using MEGA 6.0 software, by the Neighbor-Joining method [44]. The reliability of the phylogenetic tree was estimated using bootstrap values with 1000 replicates. Gene duplication events were also investigated using phylogenetic tree based on 70% similarity and 80% coverage of aligned sequences [45,46]. Synonymous (dS) and non-synonymous (dN) substitution rates were calculated using the PAL2NAL program [47]. In silico promoter analysis was carried out for 1 kb sequence upstream to all the Sorghum NHE/NHX transporters using PLACE [48] and PlantCARE [49] software. Physical mapping of the transporters was constructed based on their location on the Sorghum genome. The predicted protein–protein interaction (PPI) map of SbNHXs/NHEs was generated from the STRING database [50].

2.4. RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from all the samples using Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin RNA plant kit (740949.50) by following the instructions manual. DNaseI was used to eliminate genomic DNA contamination in RNA samples. The concentration and purity of RNA samples were checked using Eppendorf BioPhotometer. Total RNA (2 µg) was taken as template for first strand cDNA synthesis using RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (#K1622, Thermo Scientific EU, Reinach, Switzerland). The relative expression levels of SbNHX/NHE genes were studied using 2X applied biosystems (ABI) Master Mix with gene specific primers (File S1). ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used with the following thermal cycling conditions of 95 °C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. The expression of each SbNHX/NHE gene in various samples was normalized with EIF4α and PP2A reference genes [51]. The experiment was performed with two biological replicates and for each sample, three technical replicates were used. The specificity of the PCR reaction was confirmed by melting curve analysis of the amplicons. Comparative 2−ΔΔCT method was used to calculate the relative quantities of each transcript in the samples [52].

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Characterization of NHX/NHE Transporters in Sorghum

A total of 16 SbNHX/NHE transporter homologs (Arabidopsis NHX1-NHX7 and human NHE1-9) were identified in S. bicolor genome. The coding and amino acid sequence for each SbNHX/NHE transporter was predicted using Genscan tool (File S1). The number of exons vary from one (SbNHE7) to 18 (SbNHX2 and SbNHX5) among the transporters (Figure 1; Table 1). The number of transmembrane domains for Na+ transporters varies from 0 to 8 (Table 1, Figure S1). The predicted proteins in Sorghum are localized on the plasma membrane, chloroplast, nucleus, endoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondria (Table 1). SbNHX/NHE are more phosphorylated with protein kinase C, protein kinase A (PKA), and cyclin-dependent protein kinase (CDC2) and very less with ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM). Serine has been found as the most common site for phosphorylation compared to threonine and tyrosine (Table 2). Motif prediction was carried out by MEME, and it showed from 0 to 20 motifs with a conservation and variation. No motifs were observed in SbNHE1, SbNHE4, SbNHE5, and SbNHE7. Amiloride drug binding site (LLFIYLLPPI), typical characteristic feature of NHX transporters was seen in SbNHX1, SbNHX2, SbNHX3, SbNHX5, SbNHE2, SbNHE3, SbNHE6, and SbNHE8, but absent in SbNHX4, SbNHX6, SbNHX7, and SbNHE9 (Figure 2). Sodium proton exchanger domain was observed in all the SbNHXs but not in SbNHEs. SbNHEs exhibit domains like ovate, reverse transcriptase (RVT), integrase core domain (RVE), transposase, PKinase, heat shock protein90 (HSP90), von Willebrand factor type A domain (VWA), domain of unknown function (DUF), and RVT1 (Table 1). All the SbNHX and SbNHE proteins were modeled using I-TASSER software to find out their 3D structures. For all the proteins, 3D structures were constructed based on the similar template obtained from Protein Data Bank (PDB). All the predicted SbNHX/NHE models constructed showed a C-Score range from −0.20 to −3.48, indicating the predicted proteins are constructed with high accuracy (Figure 3, File S1).

3.2. Phylogeny, Divergence, Promoter Analysis, and Physical Genome Mapping

The phylogenetic tree displayed three major clusters. Cluster 1 represented all the vacuolar membrane transporters including SbNHX1, SbNHX2, SbNHX3, SbNHX4, and SbNHE2. Cluster 2 formed all the endomembrane-located transporters like SbNHX6. Cluster 3, on the other hand, represented all the plasma membrane bound transporters such as SbNHX5, SbNHE1, SbNHE3, SbNHE4, SbNHE5, SbNHE6, SbNHE7, SbNHE8, and SbNHE9. Not surprisingly, similar to human NHE, all the Sorghum NHE homologs (except SbNHE2) clustered on the plasma membrane (Figure 4). Out of three paralog gene pairs, two segmental (SbNHE1 and SbNHE7, SbNHE4 and SbNHE9) and one regional (SbNHX5 and SbNHE6) duplications were observed. Sorghum showed six ortholog pairs, four with maize (SbNHX1 and ZM2G037342, SbNHX2 and Zm2G063492, SbNHX4 and Zm2G118019, SbNHX7 and Zm2G098494) and two with Eucalyptus (SbNHX6 and Eucgr.E04240.1, SbNHE3 and Eucgr.BO2635.1) (Figure 4). Synonymous and non-synonymous substitution rates were calculated for paralog gene pairs. dN/dS was found to be below <1, implying that the genes underwent a positive Darwinian selection or a purifying selection (Table 2). One kilobase (kb) sequence (File S1), upstream of the transcription start site was analyzed for cis-acting elements in all the SbNHX/NHE genes (Table 3). The identified cis-acting elements are grouped into hormone (ABA, auxin, gibberellic acid, ethylene, methyl jasmonic acid, and salicylic acid), stress (drought, heat shock, low temperature, salt, fungal, defense, and light), and other-responsive factors (guard cell specific (KST1), salt-responsive element (GT1) motif, O2 site, and zein metabolism regulation involved in circadian control). Special Protein 1 motif (SP1), stress-responsive and G BOX, positive regulators of senescence were found to be the highest number of cis-acting elements in SbNHX/NHE. GT1 and KST1 elements were noticed in all the promoter sequences of SbNHX/NHE genes (Table 3). In Sorghum, Na+ transporters were detected on seven out of 10 chromosomes, but no transporters were noticed on chromosomes 3, 4, and 6. Five genes are located on chromosome 2, three genes on chromosome 1, two genes on chromosomes 5, 8, and 9, and one gene each on chromosomes 7 and 10. Chromosome 2 has been found to be a hotspot region for SbNHX/NHE transporters (Figure 5, File S1).

3.3. Protein–Protein Interaction Analysis Prediction

In the predicted protein–protein interaction map, SbNHX/NHE displayed interactions with several other transporter proteins of Sorghum. SbNHX5 and SbNHE6 have been noticed as centers for interactions (Figure 6). When individual proteins (SbNHX and SbNHEs) were checked for their interaction, they showed interactions with various calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) like CBL02, CBL03, CBL05, and CBL08. SbNHX/NHE also showed interactions with various CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) like CIPK01, CIPK14, CIPK17, and CIPK22 (Figure S2).

3.4. Expression Analysis of SbNHX/NHE Transporters in Different Tissues Treated with Diverse Abiotic Stresses

SbNHX/NHE transporters expression levels were analyzed in Sorghum embryos, roots, stems, and leaves exposed to salt, drought, heat, and cold stresses. SbNHX/NHE displayed differential gene expression levels among the four tissue types. Native expression of the transporters was high in roots followed by leaf, stem, and embryo, which may be involved in growth and developmental processes (Figure 7a). SbNHX7 also recorded higher transcript abundance in all four tissues under native conditions (Figure 7a). Among the four stresses, high transcript levels were recorded in cold followed by salt, heat, and drought stresses. Among the genes, SbNHX1 and SbNHX4 showed higher expression in cold-treated stems, SbNHX2 in drought-stressed embryos, SbNHX3 in salt-exposed embryos, SbNHX5 in salt-stressed roots, SbNHX7 in drought-treated stems. Expression of SbNHE1, SbNHE4, SbNHE5, SbNHE6, and SbNHE9 was high in cold-exposed stems, SbNHE2, SbNHE3, and SbNHE8 in heat-treated stems, and SbNHE7 in salt-stressed root tissues (Figure 7b).

4. Discussion

Salt stress limits plant growth and productivity due to ion toxicity and water uptake by decreasing the water potential [53]. Plants can either efflux Na+ ions or compartmentalize them into vacuoles through NHXs family members [54]. Both NHX/NHE members belong to the CPA1 family of transporters [7,55] and play crucial roles in providing energy, and cell expansion in plants [56].

4.1. Identification and Structural Analysis of SbNHX/NHE Genes

In the present study, a total of seven SbNHX and nine SbNHE transporters have been identified in the genome of S. bicolor (Table 1), like in other cereals such as Oryza sativa and Zea mays, which also contain seven NHX members in all [35]. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that NHX members in S. bicolor can be grouped into three classes based on their plasma (SbNHX5 and SbNHX7), vacuolar (SbNHX1, SbNHX2, SbNHX3, and SbNHX4), and endomembrane (SbNHX6) localizations. Both SbNHX5 and SbNHX7 are grouped under plasma membrane in Sorghum. But in Arabidopsis, AtNHX7 and AtNHX8 have been identified under the same category [22]. While Bassil et al. [18] noticed two endomembrane transporters (NHX5 and NHX6) in A. thaliana, only one (SbNHX6) is identified under this category in Sorghum in the present study (Figure 4). Plasma membrane-bound transporters (SOS1/NHX7 and NHX8) help in the exclusion of Na+ ions from cytoplasm [57,58]. Likewise, vacuolar bound NHX members segment Na+ ions, sugars, and secondary products under stress conditions [59]. Thus, NHX members located on both the plasma and the tonoplast play critical roles in efflux and compartmentalization respectively, and maintain Na+ ion homeostasis. On the other hand, endomembrane-located AtNHX5 and AtNHX6 have been found necessary for regulating protein processing, trafficking of cellular cargo, plant growth and development [1,18,19]. In Sorghum, SbNHX6 has been found on the endomembrane, but not NHX5 (Figure 4). Variation in the number of NHX family members was observed in diverse taxa like Arabidopsis thaliana (8), Populus trichocarpa (8), Brachypodium distachyon (9), Eucalyptus grandis (10), and Glycine max (12) [35]. SbNHX genes are well conserved similar to poplar NHX [35] during the course of evolution (Figure 4). Introns were noticed in all SbNHXs, like in poplar [35], and also in SbNHE members excepting SbNHE7 (Figure 1). It is also observed that plasma membrane-bound NHX members have a long C-terminal cytosolic tail, which helps in interacting with other proteins [22]. Similar to poplar NHX [35], SbNHX/NHE proteins were constructed with high accuracy.
Like NHX, NHE family members also appear as the important determinants of salt stress tolerance and hence are of enormous importance in agriculture [60]. While nine eukaryotic NHE members are present in humans [8], no information is available on the number of NHE transporters present in the genomes of higher plants and their subcellular localizations. In humans, NHE1-5 are located on plasma membrane, while NHE6-9 act as intracellular transporters [27]. All the SbNHEs are classified as plasma membrane bound except SbNHE2, which is predicted as a vacuolar membrane transporter (Figure 4). Contrary to the above report, the human isoforms HsNHE6 and HsNHE7 have been recognized as endosome-localized transporters [61,62].

4.2. Motif Identification, Promoter Analysis, Phylogenetic Tree, and Divergence

The N-termini of these proteins are comprised of a conserved domain LLFIYLLPPI, typical characteristic feature of NHX transporters in plants [63,64]. Amiloride binding site was found in all the NHX members of Arabidopsis, poplar [35], and in SbNHX1, SbNHX2, SbNHX3, SbNHX5, SbNHE2, SbNHE3, SbNHE6, and SbNHE8. Quiet surprisingly, it could not be detected in SbNHX4, SbNHX6, SbNHE7, and SbNHE9 (Figure 2; Table 1). All SbNHX and SbNHE promoter regions showed hormone, stress, and development-responsive cis-acting elements, indicating that these genes are regulated not only by abiotic stresses, but also by different hormones (Table 3). Similar to poplar NHX elements [35], abscisic acid-responsive elements (ABRE), auxin-responsive, fungal-responsive, circadian, low temperature-responsive (LTR), and heat shock elements (HSE) were noticed in SbNHX/NHE sequences. This infers that even NHE homologues are regulated by phytohormones and help perhaps in stress alleviation. Promoters of all SbNHX and SbNHE members showed GT1 and KST1 cis-elements. Plesch et al. [65] pointed out that KST1 is a guard cell-specific expression element that controls stomatal carbon dioxide uptake and water loss in crop plants during stress. Surprisingly, Sp1, a zinc finger transcription factor has also been detected in the promoter region of SbNHX/NHE members. Sp1 regulates the expression of many genes involved in various cellular functions such as differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis in cancer cells [66]. The presence of Sp1 transcription factor in Sorghum indicates that SbNHX/SbNHE group of genes may be associated with important cellular functions. G-box elements that act as positive regulators of early leaf senescence in rice [67] were detected in the promoter regions of SbNHX/SbNHE, implying that these genes also modulate leaf senescence. A phylogenetic tree indicated that SbNHX/NHE members fall into three paralog and six ortholog groups. In addition to rice (the common monocot ancestor), four ortholog Sorghum transporter events were observed with maize. Interestingly, SbNHX6 and SbNHE3 showed ortholog events with Eucalyptus. For paralog gene pairs, <1 substitution rates indicated that the genes underwent a positive Darwinian selection or a purifying selection [68].

4.3. Gene Expressions in Different Tissues under Abiotic Stresses

The Sorghum variety BTx623 is moderately tolerant to drought and adapted to high temperature but highly sensitive to cold. Genome-wide analysis for the identification and gene expressions of NHX and NHE members was carried out in this variety due to the availability and accessibility of its genome sequence [30]. Such an analysis helps to find out the role of NHX and NHE members in abiotic stress tolerance. Accordingly, in Sorghum, NHX and NHE genes were expressed in a tissue specific manner under different abiotic stress conditions. Among four tissues, noticeably high transcript levels were recorded in stems followed by roots, and embryos. SbNHX5 displayed higher transcript levels in root and embryo tissues. Bassil et al. [18] pointed out that NHX5 is required for plant growth and development. High transcript levels of SbNHX7 under drought stress may be due to the presence of KST1, which controls stomatal carbon dioxide uptake and water loss in crop plants [65]. In spite of low number or absence of low temperature-responsive elements, SbNHX1, SbNHX4, SbNHE1, SbNHE4, SbNHE5, SbNHE6, and SbNHE9 showed high transcript levels under cold stress conditions indicating a key role for them in temperature stress. The function of NHE homologues in plants is not yet known. For the first time, SbNHE transcript profile was carried out in Sorghum and found to be associated with abiotic stresses. Most of the SbNHEs displayed high expression in stem tissues under different abiotic stresses indicating their role in specific tissues during stress. Such tissue-specific expression patterns of SbHSFs were observed earlier in many plants including S. bicolor [69] and specifically NHX genes in poplar [35] and NHXLP gene in tomato [31]. These results indicate the involvement of NHX family members not only in salt stress, but also in different developmental processes like flower development and reproduction as also pointed out by Bassil et al. [18].

4.4. Protein–Protein Interaction Predictions

Our study revealed that all the SbNHX and SbNHE members, especially SbNHX5 and SbNHE6, interacted with many other proteins. The Arabidopsis AtNHX5 and AtNHX6 play a key role in plant development, and these genes have been used to improve salt tolerance in a variety of species [70]. Katiyar-Agarwal et al. [71] and Quintero et al. [72] revealed that C-terminal tails of NHX1 and SOS1 are essential for mediation of protein–protein interactions and ion selectivity. Wu et al. [73] also pointed out that hydrophilic C-terminus of Salicornia europaea vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter is necessary for interaction and its function. It is known that CBL proteins interact and modulate the CIPK. In turn, kinases mediate the calcium signal transduction. SOS1/NHX7 is regulated by CBL and CIPK-mediated Ca2+ signaling pathway during Na+ expulsion [74]. In the present study, only SbNHX7 interacted with CBL5 and CIPK24. SOS3 or CBL4 is a Ca2+ sensor and escorts SOS2 to SOS1 to interact and activate it for Na+ efflux from the cell [75]. Thus, binding of CBL4 with Ca2+ is needed for its function during salt stress [76]. Ma et al. [77] found that overexpression of CPA1 or SOS1 increased the salt tolerance. This is also consistent with the present observation that SbSOS1/SbNHX7 is bound to the CBL5 and CIPK24. Unlike SbNHX7, other SbNHX members were bound only to the members of CBL, except NHX5, but not to CIPK24. Our findings thus revealed that SbNHX members interact with CBL members and play distinct roles during salt stress and plant developmental processes. Contrary to this, SbNHE members have not been found to interact with any one of the CBL members indicating such an interaction may not be necessary. However, some functional redundancy among NHX and NHE members cannot be ruled out in plants since both the groups are associated with abiotic stresses.

5. Conclusions

Genome-wide screening of S. bicolor revealed the presence of seven SbNHX and nine SbNHE homologs. While the NHX members fall into three subfamilies (plasma, vacuolar, and endomembranes), NHE family members form only two subfamilies (plasma and vacuolar). Interestingly, promoter regions showed GT1 and KST1 cis-elements, revealing their role in salt stress responsiveness and guard cell functioning respectively. Tissue-specific expression studies of SbNHX and SbNHE genes under abiotic stress conditions showed that they are associated with growth and developmental processes. This information would be useful in selecting candidate genes for functional validation in relation to abiotic stress tolerance during various developmental phases in crop species.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/9/5/236/s1, Figure S1: Transmembrane domains for SbNHX/NHE proteins, Figure S2: String analysis for individual SbNHX/NHE proteins, File S1: List of Sodium transporters, comparative list, phosphorylation sites, Cds, amino acids, promoters, phylogeny sequences, protein modeling, and primer sequences.

Author Contributions

P.B.K. conceived and designed the experiments; P.H.K., S.A.K., and P.S.R. performed the experiments; M.N., A.B.P., A.H., and A.C. helped with collecting data; T.S., R.K.S., R.K.V., P.R., G.R., K.R., and M.L.N. analyzed the data; P.B.K. and P.H.K. wrote the manuscript and critically revised it. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Polavarapu B Kavi Kishor is thankful for the CSIR-Emeritus Scientist Fellowship through Grant 38(1325)/12/EMR-II) from the Council for Scientifics and Industrial Research, New Delhi. Palavalasa Hima Kumari is thankful to the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, for providing a Kothari postdoctoral fellowship (F.4-2/2006 (BSR)/BL/14-15/0392). Ashley Henderson and Katam Ramesh acknowledge the support from the National Science Foundation (Grant #1560049 Awarded to PI, Katam Ramesh).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bassil, E.; Coku, A.; Blumwald, E. Cellular ion homeostasis: Emerging roles of intracellular NHX Na+/H+antiporters in plant growth and development. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 5727–5740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bohnert, H.J.; Nelsen, D.E.; Jensen, R.G. Adaptation to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 1099–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. An, R.; Chen, Q.J.; Chai, M.F.; Lu, P.L.; Su, Z.; Qin, Z.X.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.C. AtNHX8, a member of the monovalent cation: Proton antiporter-1 family in Arabidopsis thaliana, encodes a putative Li+/H+ antiporter. Plant J. 2007, 49, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mojca, B.; Tanja, B.; Ljerka, L.; Nada, K. A comparative genomic analysis of calcium and proton signaling/homeostasis in Aspergillus species. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009, 46, S93–S104. [Google Scholar]
  5. Amtmann, A.; Sanders, D. Mechanisms of Na+ uptake by plant cells. Adv. Bot. Res. 1999, 29, 76–112. [Google Scholar]
  6. Schachtman, D.; Liu, W. Molecular pieces to the puzzle of the interaction between potassium and sodium uptake in plants. Trends Plant. Sci. 1999, 4, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maser, P.; Thomine, S.; Schroeder, J.I.; Ward, J.M.; Hirschi, K.; Sze, H.; Talke, I.N.; Amtmann, A.; Maathuis, F.J.; Sanders, D.; et al. Phylogenetic relationships within cation transporter families of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 1646–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Brett, C.L.; Donowitz, M.; Rao, R.; Christopher, L. Evolutionary origins of eukaryotic Na+/H+ exchangers. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2005, 288, C223–C239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Xiang, M.; Feng, M.; Muend, S.; Rao, R. A human Na+/H+ antiporter sharing evolutionary origins with bacterial NhaA may be a candidate gene for essential hypertension. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 18677–18681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rodríguez-Rosales, P.M.; Gálvez, F.J.; Huertas, R.; Aranda, M.N.; Baghour, M.; Cagnac, O.; Venema, K. Plant NHX cation/protonantiporters. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Waditee, R.; Hibino, T.; Nakamura, T.; Incharoensakdi, A.; Takabe, T. Overexpression of a Na+/H+ antiporter confers salt tolerance on a freshwater cyanobacterium, making it capable of growth in sea water. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 4109–4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Putney, L.K.; Denker, S.P.; Barber, D.L. The changing face of the Na+/H+ exchanger, NHE1: Structure, regulation, and cellular actions. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2002, 42, 527–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Leidi, E.O.; Barragan, V.; Rubio, L.; El-Hamdaoui, A.; Ruiz, M.T.; Cubero, B.; Fernández, J.A.; Bressan, R.A.; Hasegawa, P.M.; Quintero, F.J.; et al. The AtNHX1 exchanger mediates potassium compartmentation in vacuoles of transgenic tomato. Plant J. 2010, 61, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Apse, M.P.; Aharon, G.S.; Snedden, W.A.; Blumwald, E. Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 1999, 285, 1256–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gaxiola, R.A.; Rao, R.; Sherman, A.; Grisafi, P.; Alper, S.L.; Fink, G.R. The Arabidopsis thaliana proton transporters, AtNhx1 and Avp1, can function in cation detoxification in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 1480–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yokoi, S.; Quintero, F.J.; Cubero, B.; Ruiz, M.T.; Bressan, R.A.; Hasegawa, P.M.; Pardo, J.M. Differential expression and function of Arabidopsis thaliana NHX Na+/H+ antiporters in the salt stress response. Plant J. 2002, 30, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shi, H.; Ishitani, M.; Kim, C.; Zhu, J.K. The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 6896–6901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bassil, E.; Ohto, M.A.; Esumi, T.; Tajima, H.; Zhu, Z.; Cagnac, O.; Belmonte, M.; Peleg, Z.; Yamaguchi, T.; Blumwald, E. The Arabidopsis intracellular Na+/H+ antiporters NHX5 and NHX6 are endosome associated and necessary for plant growth and development. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 224–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bassil, E.; Tajima, H.; Liang, Y.C.; Ohto, M.A.; Ushijima, K.; Nakano, R.; Esumi, T.; Coku, A.; Belmonte, M.; Blumwald, E. The Arabidopsis Na+/H+antiporters NHX1 and NHX2 control vacuolar pH and K+ homeostasis to regulate growth, flower development, and reproduction. Plant Cell 2011, 223, 3482–3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Apse, M.P.; Blumwald, E. Na+ transport in plants. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2247–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, H.X.; Blumwald, E. Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 765–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shi, H.; Quintero, F.J.; Pardo, J.M.; Zhu, J.K. The putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na+ transport in plants. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Barragan, V.; Leidi, E.O.; Andres, Z.; Rubio, L.; Luca, A.D.; Fernandez, J.A.; Cubero, B.; Pardo, J.M. Ion exchangers NHX1 and NHX2 mediate active potassium uptake into vacuoles to regulate cell turgor and stomatal function in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 1127–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Wu, X.X.; Li, J.; Wu, X.D.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Z.K.; Liu, S.S.; Li, S.N.; Ma, Y.L.; Sun, J.; Zhao, L.; et al. Ectopic expression of Arabidopsis thaliana Na+(K+)/H+ antiporter gene, AtNHX5, enhances soybean salt tolerance. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Counillon, L.; Pouyssegur, J. The expanding family of eukaryotic Na+/H+ exchangers. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Orlowski, J.; Grinstein, S. Na+/H+ exchangers in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 22373–22376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bobulescua, I.A.; Soleb, F.D.; Moe, O.W. Na+/H+ exchangers: Physiology and link to hypertension and organ ischemia. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertense 2005, 14, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wakabayashi, S.; Pang, T.; Su, X.; Shigekawa, M. A novel topology model of the human Na+/H+ exchanger isoform. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 7942–7949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Biemesderfer, D.; Reilly, R.F.; Exner, M.; Igarashi, P.; Aronson, P.S. Immunocytochemical characterization of Na+-H+ exchanger isoform NHE-1 in rabbit kidney. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 1992, 263, F833–F840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Paterson, A.H.; Bowers, J.E.; Bruggmann, R.; Dubchak, I.; Grimwood, J.; Gundlach, H.; Haberer, G.; Hellsten, U.; Mitros, T.; Poliakov, A. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 2009, 457, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Kumari, P.H.; Kumar, A.S.; Sivan, P.; Katam, R.; Suravajhala, P.; Rao, K.S.; Varshney, R.K.; Kishor, P.B.K. Overexpression of a plasma membrane Na+/H+-antiporter-like protein (SbNHXLP) confers salt tolerance and improves fruit yield in tomato by maintaining ion homeostasis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Anshita, G.; Gohar, T.; Dinesh, P.; Sanjay, G.; Anil, K. Genome-wide comparative in silico analysis of calcium transporters of rice and sorghum. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2011, 9, 138–150. [Google Scholar]
  33. Amrutha, R.N.; Sekhar, P.N.; Varshney, R.K.; Kishor, P.B.K. Genome-wide analysis and identification of genes related to potassium transporter families in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci. 2007, 172, 708–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, R.; Wang, H.; Wei, J. Genome-wide analysis and identification of HAK potassium transporter gene family in maize (Zea mays L.). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 8465–8473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tian, F.; Chang, E.; Li, Y.; Sun, P.; Hu, J.; Zhang, J. Expression and integrated network analyses revealed functional divergence of NHX-type Na+/H+ exchanger genes in poplar. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Burge, C.B.; Karlin, S. Finding the genes in genomic DNA. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1998, 8, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guo, A.Y.; Zhu, Q.H.; Chen, X.; Luo, J.C.; Chuan, Y.I. GSDS a gene structure display server. Yi Chuan 2007, 29, 1023–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Moller, S.; Croning, M.D.R.; Apweller, R. Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 646–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Horton, P.; Park, K.J.; Obayashi, T.; Fujita, N.; Harada, H.C.J.; Nekai, A.C.K. WoLF PSORT: Protein localization predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W585–W587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Blom, N.; Gammeltoft, S.; Brunak, S. Sequence-and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 294, 1351–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bailey, T.L.; Gribskov, M. Combining evidence using p-values: Application to sequence homology searches. Bioinformatics 1998, 14, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Letunic, I.; Copley, R.R.; Schmidt, S.; Ciccarelli, F.D.; Doerks, T.; Schultz, J.; Ponting, C.P.; Bork, P. SMART 4.0: Towards genomic data integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32D, 142–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, J.; Yan, R.; Roy, A.; Xu, D.; Poisson, J.; Zhang, Y. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 7–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gu, Z.; Cavalcanti, A.; Chen, F.C.; Bouman, P.; Li, W.H. Extent of gene duplication in the genomes of Drosophila, nematode, and yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yang, S.; Zhang, X.; Yue, J.X.; Tian, D.; Chen, J.Q. Recent duplications dominate NBS-encoding gene expansion in two woody species. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2008, 280, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Suyama, M.; Torrents, D.; Bork, P. PAL2NAL: Robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W609–W612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Higo, K.; Ugawa, Y.; Iwamoto, M.; Korenaga, T. Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database. NucleicAcids Res. 1999, 27, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lescot, M.P.; Dehais, G.; Thijs, K.; Marchal, Y.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Szklarczyk, D.; Franceschini, A.; Kuhn, M.; Simonovic, M.; Roth, A.; Minguez, P.; Doerks, T.; Stark, M.; Muller, J.; Bork, P.; et al. The STRING database in 2011: Functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, D561–D568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Reddy, P.S.; Reddy, D.S.; Sivasakthi, K.; Bhatnagar-Mathur, P.; Vadez, V.; Sharma, K.K. Evaluation of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.)) reference genes in various tissues and under abiotic stress conditions for quantitative real-time PCR data normalization. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 529. [Google Scholar]
  52. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Munns, M.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Ann. Rev. Plant. Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhu, J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant. Biol. 2002, 53, 247–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Orlowski, J.; Grinstein, S. Diversity of the mammalian Na+/H+exchanger SLC9 gene family. Pflugers Arch. 2004, 447, 549–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bassil, E.; Blumwald, E. The ins and outs of intracellular ion homeostasis: NHX-type cation/H+ transporters. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 22, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Blumwald, E. Sodium transport and salt tolerance in plants. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2000, 12, 431–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, J.K. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, C.; Hicks, G.R.; Raikhel, N.V. Plant vacuole morphology and vacuolar trafficking. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 5, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Moffat, A.S. Plant genetics. Finding new ways to protect drought-stricken plants. Science 2002, 296, 1226–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Brett, C.L.; Tukaye, D.N.; Mukherjee, S.; Rao, R. The yeast endosomal Na+K+/H+ exchanger NHX1 regulates cellular pH to control vesicle trafficking. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16, 1396–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Chanroj, S.; Wang, G.; Venema, K.; Zhang, M.W.; Delwiche, C.F.; Sze, H. Conserved and diversified gene families of monovalent Na+/H+ antiporters from algae to flowering plants. Front. Plant. Sci. 2012, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kinsella, J.; Aronson, P. Amiloride inhibition of the Na+/H+ exchanger in renal microvillus membrane vesicles. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 1981, 241, F374–F379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Blumwald, E.; Poole, R.J. Salt tolerance in suspension cultures of sugar beet induction of Na+/H+ antiport activity at the tonoplast by growth in salt. Plant Physiol. 1987, 83, 884–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Plesch, G.; Ehrhardt, T.; Mueller-Roeber, B. Involvement of TAAAG elements suggests a role for Dof transcription factors in guard cell-specific gene expression. Plant J. 2001, 28, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Deniaud, E.; Baguet, J.; Chalard, R.; Blanquier, B.; Brinza, L.; Meunier, J.; Michallet, M.C.; Laugraud, A.; Ah-Soon, C.; Wierinckx, A.; et al. Overexpression of transcription factor Sp1 leads to gene expression perturbations and cell cycle inhibition. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4, e7035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Liu, L.; Xu, W.; Hu, X.; Liu, H.; Lin, Y. W-box and G-box elements play important roles in early senescence of rice flag leaf. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bowers, J.E.; Chapman, B.A.; Rong, J.; Paterson, A.H. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 2003, 422, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Nagaraju, M.; Reddy, P.S.; Kumar, A.S.; Srivastava, R.K.; Kishor, P.B.K.; Rao, D.M. Genome-wide scanning and characterization of Sorghum bicolor L. heat shock transcription factors. Curr. Genom. 2015, 16, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ashnest, J.R.; Huynh, D.L.; Dragwidge, J.M.; Ford, B.A.; Gendall, A.R. Arabidopsis intracellular NHX-type sodium-proton antiporters are required for seed storage protein processing. Plant. Cell. Physiol. 2015, 56, 2220–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Katiyar-Agarwal, S.; Zhu, J.; Kim, K.; Agarwal, M.; Fu, X.; Huang, A.; Zhu, J. The plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 interacts with RCD1 and functions in oxidative stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 18816–18821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Quintero, F.J.; Martinez-Atienza, J.; Villalta, I.; Jiang, X.; Kim, W.Y.; Ali, Z.; Fujii, H.; Mendoza, I.; Yun, D.-J.; Zhu, K.-K.; et al. Activation of the plasma membrane Na/H antiporter salt-overly-sensitive 1 (SOS1) by phosphorylation of an auto-inhibitory C-terminal domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 2611–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Wu, G.; Wang, G.; Ji, J.; Tian, X.; Gao, H.; Zhao, Q.; Li, J.; Wang, Y. Hydrophilic C terminus of Salicornia europaea vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter is necessary for its function. J. Genet. 2014, 93, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Weinl, S.; Kudla, J. The CBL-CIPK Ca2+-decoding signaling network: Function and perspectives. New Phytol. 2009, 184, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Liu, J.; Zhu, J.K. A calcium sensor homolog required for plant salt tolerance. Science 1998, 280, 1943–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ishitani, M.; Liu, J.; Halfter, U.; Kim, C.S.; Shi, W.; Zhu, J.K. SOS3 function in plant salt tolerance requires N-myristoylation and calcium binding. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1667–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ma, Y.C.; Auge, R.M.; Dong, C.; Cheng, Z.M.M. Increased salt tolerance with overexpression of Na+/H+antiporter 1 genes: A meta-analysis. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 09 00236 g001 550
Figure 1. Gene characterization of sodium transporters. Exons are represented as red boxes and introns as black lines. Intron phases 0, 1, and 2 are indicated by the numbers 0, 1, and 2.
Figure 1. Gene characterization of sodium transporters. Exons are represented as red boxes and introns as black lines. Intron phases 0, 1, and 2 are indicated by the numbers 0, 1, and 2.
Genes 09 00236 g001
Genes 09 00236 g002 550
Figure 2. Conserved motif analysis of SbNHX/NHE proteins. Amiloride motif (LLFIYLLPPI) is represented in black. Sb: Sorghum bicolor; NHX: sodium proton antiporter; NHE: sodium proton exchanger.
Figure 2. Conserved motif analysis of SbNHX/NHE proteins. Amiloride motif (LLFIYLLPPI) is represented in black. Sb: Sorghum bicolor; NHX: sodium proton antiporter; NHE: sodium proton exchanger.
Genes 09 00236 g002
Genes 09 00236 g003 550
Figure 3. Structural analysis of seven SbNHX and nine SbNHE modeled proteins. The best Protein Data Bank (PDB) structural analog for each transporter is represented in the figure.
Figure 3. Structural analysis of seven SbNHX and nine SbNHE modeled proteins. The best Protein Data Bank (PDB) structural analog for each transporter is represented in the figure.
Genes 09 00236 g003
Genes 09 00236 g004 550
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of sodium transporters between Sorghum bicolor (Sb), Populus trichocarpa (Pt), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Eucalyptus grandis (Eg), Medicago truncatula (Mt), Vitis vinifera (Vv), Glycine max (Gm), Oryza sativa (Os), Brachypodium distachyon (Bd), Zea mays (Zm), and Physcomitrella patens (Pp). Predicted amino acid sequences were used for construction of the tree. The tree was constructed by the Neighbor Joining method using MEGA version 6.0. Values indicate the number of times (as apercentage) that each branch topology was found during bootstrap analysis.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of sodium transporters between Sorghum bicolor (Sb), Populus trichocarpa (Pt), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Eucalyptus grandis (Eg), Medicago truncatula (Mt), Vitis vinifera (Vv), Glycine max (Gm), Oryza sativa (Os), Brachypodium distachyon (Bd), Zea mays (Zm), and Physcomitrella patens (Pp). Predicted amino acid sequences were used for construction of the tree. The tree was constructed by the Neighbor Joining method using MEGA version 6.0. Values indicate the number of times (as apercentage) that each branch topology was found during bootstrap analysis.
Genes 09 00236 g004
Genes 09 00236 g005 550
Figure 5. Physical mapping of Sorghum NHX/NHE genes. The three paralog gene pairs are represented with lines (SbNHE1 and SbNHE7, SbNHX4 and SbNHE9) and a box (SbNHX5 and SbNHE9). All the SbNHX genes are represented in maroon and all SbNHE genes in blue.
Figure 5. Physical mapping of Sorghum NHX/NHE genes. The three paralog gene pairs are represented with lines (SbNHE1 and SbNHE7, SbNHX4 and SbNHE9) and a box (SbNHX5 and SbNHE9). All the SbNHX genes are represented in maroon and all SbNHE genes in blue.
Genes 09 00236 g005
Genes 09 00236 g006 550
Figure 6. String analysis of SbNHX/NHE interacting proteins. All the SbNHX/NHE transporters are represented in bold.
Figure 6. String analysis of SbNHX/NHE interacting proteins. All the SbNHX/NHE transporters are represented in bold.
Genes 09 00236 g006
Genes 09 00236 g007 550
Figure 7. Relative expression analysis of SbNHX/NHE transporter genes in Sorghum. (a) Native expressions of the SbNHX/NHE transporters. (b) SbNHX/NHE transporters expressions to salt, drought, heat, and cold stresses. Relative expression of transporters is shown during different stress conditions in comparison to its corresponding controls. Values represent the expression levels obtained after normalizing against control tissues. All samples were analyzed in triplicate, in two independent experiments. Names on the horizontal axis indicate the tissues and the vertical axis represents various genes. E: embryo; R: root; S: stem; L: leaf; S: salt; D: drought; H: heat; C: cold. Each color represents the relative expression levels.
Figure 7. Relative expression analysis of SbNHX/NHE transporter genes in Sorghum. (a) Native expressions of the SbNHX/NHE transporters. (b) SbNHX/NHE transporters expressions to salt, drought, heat, and cold stresses. Relative expression of transporters is shown during different stress conditions in comparison to its corresponding controls. Values represent the expression levels obtained after normalizing against control tissues. All samples were analyzed in triplicate, in two independent experiments. Names on the horizontal axis indicate the tissues and the vertical axis represents various genes. E: embryo; R: root; S: stem; L: leaf; S: salt; D: drought; H: heat; C: cold. Each color represents the relative expression levels.
Genes 09 00236 g007
Table
Table 1. Characterization of S. bicolor NHX and NHE transporters.
Table 1. Characterization of S. bicolor NHX and NHE transporters.
ACC NumberGene NameNo. ofAaChrDomainDBDpI/MWGRAVYTMHMMNo. of ExonsLocalizationInstability INDEX
Sb05g025700.1SbNHX13865NHX23–2839.28/42,070.00.44578PM40.26
Sb09g003590.1SbNHX28239NHX377–7199.56/89,834.30.144818Chlo48.13
Sb02g042190.1SbNHX36962NHX405–5609.42/76,720.90.151416PM44.18
Sb10g012140.1SbNHX463110NHX192–51610.19/70,077.0−0.009813PM42.92
Sb02g028020.1SbNHX514662NHX459–5776.74/164,308.4−0.483218Chlo45.69
Sb02g019500.1SbNHX64342NHX191–3466.41/48,771.7−0.400012ER47.89
Sb08g023290.1SbNHX71788NHX14–1786.27/18,648.00.68855Cyto24.22
Sb08g003620.1SbNHE15978Ovate319–3755.25/62,189.4−0.35705Chlo46.11
UnknownSbNHE214143RVT595–7526.19/163,691.7−0.36102Cyto48.12
UnknownSbNHE37263RVE258–3679.21/84,058.5−0.58705Nucl57.40
UnknownSbNHE4182610Transposase686–8676.75/203,438.2−0.738014Nucl58.73
Sb05g008500.1SbNHE59555PKinase496–7098.71/101,934.8−0.00623PM49.28
Sb02g028020.1SbNHE66992HSP90185–6954.97/80,238.0−0.60903Nucl36.89
Sb01g047480.1SbNHE76371VWA169–3556.07/67,727.9−0.28501Chlo50.99
Sb01g001630.1SbNHE812981DUF48–3626.94/145,110.4−0.335013Cyto39.59
Sb02g017020.1SbNHE98402RVT165–2149.10/95,836.4−0.32003Mito36.69
Aa: amino acid length; chr: chromosomal location; DBD: DNA binding domain; pI/MW: isoelectric point/molecular weight; TMHMM: transmembrame domain; NHX: sodium proton domain; HSP9: heat shock protein9; VWA: von Willebrand A; DUF: domain of unknown function; RVT: reverse transcriptase; PM: plasma membrane; Chlo: chloroplast; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; Cyto: cytoplasm; Nucl: nucleus; Mito: mitochondria; Sb: Sorghum bicolor; NHX: sodium proton antiporter; NHE: sodium proton exchanger.
Table
Table 2. Divergence time of Sorghum paralog genes.
Table 2. Divergence time of Sorghum paralog genes.
Gene 1Gene 2dNdSdN/dS
SbNHX5SbNHE60.00470.36270.0130
SbNHE1SbNHE71.723760.27140.0286
SbNHE4SbNHE91.399350.22710.0279
dS, synonymous substitution; dN, non-synonymous substitution. Sb: Sorghum bicolor; NHX: sodium proton antiporter; NHE: sodium proton exchanger.
Table
Table 3. Cis-acting element analysis of SbNHX and SbNHE gene promoters.
Table 3. Cis-acting element analysis of SbNHX and SbNHE gene promoters.
GeneHormone ResponsiveStress ResponsiveOthers
ABRETGAAACGACGARETCTGTTGEREATTTCAAAMe-JaTCACAGAAAAGGADREHSELTRGT1MYBBoxTC richSp1 motifGARETCTGTTGKST1SKN1Box4Box IG BoxII BoxO2 siteCircadian
SbNHX110100412302210180421112012
SbNHX223117203052223186347011
SbNHX37011300107321111373318021
SbNHX431004012044141086318202
SbNHX500100200121130146025010
SbNHX6015221010452525133243123
SbNHX700004310020001062528113
SbNHE140114131280022145119011
SbNHE200001040021019060216413
SbNHE311001300146002057004303
SbNHE410002120011023077202124
SbNHE510005035043314082203112
SbNHE6121002030431211710310434
SbNHE700202302122123263135014
SbNHE822002111142006034103411
SbNHE95110120110242051450010218
ABRE: Abscisic acid-responsive elements; DRE (CACGTG): Drought-responsive (ACCGAC); HSE: heat shock-responsive elements(AGAAAATTCG); LTR: Low temperature-responsive (CCGAAA); GT1GMSCAM4 (GAAAAA): SALT-responsive; MYB (WAACCA/YAACKG/CNGTTR): drought-responsive; TGAACGAC; auxin-responsive: GCN4CAAGCCA; endosperm-responsive: GARETCTGTTG; gibberellic acid-responsive: EREATTTCAAA; ethylene-responsive: CGTCA; methyl jasmonic acid-responsive (CGTCA): Box-W1TTGAC; fungal-responsive: TCACAGAAAAGGA; salicylic acid-responsive: TC rich (ATTTTCTCCA); defense and stress-responsive: KST1 (TAAAG); guard cell specific: SKN1 (GTCAT); endosperm-responsive: Box 4 (ATTAAT): Box I (TTTCAAA): G Box (CACGTC): GT1 motif (GGTTAA): I Box (GATAAGGTG): and Sp1 motif (CC(G/A)CCC); light-responsive; O2 site: (GATGACATGA); Zein metabolism regulation: circadian (CAANNNNATC): involved in circadian control.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hima Kumari, P.; Anil Kumar, S.; Ramesh, K.; Sudhakar Reddy, P.; Nagaraju, M.; Bhanu Prakash, A.; Shah, T.; Henderson, A.; Srivastava, R.K.; Rajasheker, G.; et al. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of Arabidopsis Sodium Proton Antiporter (NHX) and Human Sodium Proton Exchanger (NHE) Homologs in Sorghum bicolor. Genes 2018, 9, 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9050236

AMA Style

Hima Kumari P, Anil Kumar S, Ramesh K, Sudhakar Reddy P, Nagaraju M, Bhanu Prakash A, Shah T, Henderson A, Srivastava RK, Rajasheker G, et al. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of Arabidopsis Sodium Proton Antiporter (NHX) and Human Sodium Proton Exchanger (NHE) Homologs in Sorghum bicolor. Genes. 2018; 9(5):236. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9050236

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hima Kumari, P., S. Anil Kumar, Katam Ramesh, Palakolanu Sudhakar Reddy, M. Nagaraju, A. Bhanu Prakash, Trushar Shah, Ashley Henderson, Rakesh K. Srivastava, G. Rajasheker, and et al. 2018. "Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of Arabidopsis Sodium Proton Antiporter (NHX) and Human Sodium Proton Exchanger (NHE) Homologs in Sorghum bicolor" Genes 9, no. 5: 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9050236

APA Style

Hima Kumari, P., Anil Kumar, S., Ramesh, K., Sudhakar Reddy, P., Nagaraju, M., Bhanu Prakash, A., Shah, T., Henderson, A., Srivastava, R. K., Rajasheker, G., Chitikineni, A., Varshney, R. K., Rathnagiri, P., Lakshmi Narasu, M., & Kavi Kishor, P. B. (2018). Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of Arabidopsis Sodium Proton Antiporter (NHX) and Human Sodium Proton Exchanger (NHE) Homologs in Sorghum bicolor. Genes, 9(5), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9050236

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop