Next Article in Journal
Tracing the Evolutionary Expansion of a Hyperdiverse Antimicrobial Peptide Gene Family in Mytilus spp.: The MyticalinDB Resource
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Network Analysis and Effector Gene Prioritization of Endurance-Training-Influenced Modulation of Cardiac Aging
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 16
Issue 7
10.3390/genes16070815
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dark Rearing Does Not Alter Developmental Retinoschisis Cavity Formation in Rs1 Gene Knockout Rat Model of X-Linked Retinoschisis

by
Zeljka Smit-McBride
1,2,
In Hwan Cho
1,3,
Ning Sun
4,
Serafina Thomas
4 and
Paul A. Sieving
1,*
1
Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
2
Vitreoretinal Research Lab, UC Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA 95616, USA
3
Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Cell Biology & Human Anatomy, UC Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2025, 16(7), 815; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16070815
Submission received: 28 May 2025 / Revised: 1 July 2025 / Accepted: 7 July 2025 / Published: 11 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in Inherited Retinal Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Background/Objective: The Rs1 exon-1-del rat (Rs1KO) XLRS model shows normal retinal development until postnatal day 12 (P12) when small cystic spaces start to form in the inner nuclear layer. These enlarge rapidly, peak at P15, and then collapse by P19. These events overlap with eye opening at P12–P15. We investigated whether new light-driven retinal activity could contribute to the appearance and progression of schisis cavities in this rat model of XLRS disease. Methods: For dark rearing (D/D), mating pairs of Rs1KO strain were raised in total darkness in a special vivarium at UC Davis. When pups were born, they were maintained in total darkness, and eyes were collected at P12, P15, and P30 (n = 3/group) for each of the D/D and cyclic light-reared 12 h light–12 h dark (L/D) Rs1KO and wild-type (WT) littermates. Eyes were fixed, paraffin-embedded, and sectioned. Tissue morphology was examined by H&E and marker expression of retinoschisin1 (Rs1), rhodopsin (Rho), and postsynaptic protein 95 (Psd95) by fluorescent immunohistochemistry. H&E-stained images were analyzed with ImageJ version 1.54h to quantify cavity size using the “Analyze Particles” function. Results: Small intra-retinal schisis cavities begin to form by P12 in the inner retina of both D/D and L/D animals. Cavity formation was equivalent or more pronounced in D/D animals than in L/D animals. We compared Iba1 (activation marker of immune cells) distribution and found that by P12, when schisis appeared, Iba1+ cells had accumulated in regions of schisis. Iba1+ cells were more abundant in Rs1KO animals than WT animals and appeared slightly more prevalent in D/D- than L/D-reared Rs1KO animals. We compared photoreceptor development using Rho, Rs1, and Psd95 expression, and these were similar; however, the outer segments (OSs) of D/D animals with Rho labeling at P12 were longer than L/D animals. Conclusions: The results showed that cavities formed at the same time in D/D and L/D XLRS rat pups, indicating that the timing of schisis formation is not light stimulus-driven but rather appears to be a result of developmental events. Cavity size tended to be larger under dark-rearing conditions in D/D animals, which could be due to the decreased rate of phagocytosis by the RPE in the dark, allowing for continued growth of the OSs without the usual shedding of the distal tip, a key mechanism behind dark adaptation in the retina. These results highlight the complexity of XLRS pathology; however, we found no evidence that light-driven metabolic activity accounted for schisis cavity formation.

1. Introduction

Environmental light exposure is important for the normal maturation of the retina of mice and rats, and it is known that conditions of light exposure can modify the natural history of inherited retinal degeneration in animal models [1,2,3,4,5]. It is also reported that light deprivation, by dark rearing or by suturing the eyelids shut, retards light-dependent maturation of visual pathway activity in the proximal retina involving retinal ganglion cells [6,7] and visual parts of the brain [3].
In working with Rs1 exon-1 deletion knockout mice [2], a model for X-linked retinoschisis, we previously demonstrated that the amount of daily cyclic light exposure altered the degree of XLRS structural and functional pathology at a young age [1]. Rs1KO mice housed in low, 20-lux lighting had fewer retinal cavities, and the inner retinal structure was more organized than that of Rs1KO mice reared at 300 lux. This was surprising, as neither 20 nor 300 lux is at photochemical retinal-damaging light levels [8,9]. This indicated an unusual interaction of low-level light exposure with the mature Rs1KO retina.
We subsequently generated a rat Rs1 exon-1-del Rs1KO model of XLRS pathology [10], homologous to the Rs1 exon-1-del Rs1KO mouse model, and have been studying the developmental course of schisis cystic cavities. These first appear in the inner nuclear layer (INL) by P12. The histology of the XLRS rat model consistently shows apparently normal retinal development through age P10, as judged by normal inner retinal cellular lamination by light microscopy. But at P12 age, many small intra-retinal cysts first appear in the middle of the INL adjacent to the soma of Muller glial cells (MGCs). These schisis spaces then enlarge rapidly, and by P15, they occupy the entire space of the normal INL.
We are interested in what contributes to the appearance and progression of these cysts, and we have noted that by the P10–P12 age, rod photoreceptors begin to elaborate inner and outer segments and exhibit light response activity. This age also coincides with the first eye opening at P12–P15 when the retina responds to environmental light. We had found that retinoschisin protein plays some role in photoreceptor processes even during development, as loss of retinoschisin in maturing mouse rod photoreceptors altered light-driven translocation of transducin but not arrestin between rod inner and outer segments [11]. Consequently, we wondered whether light-driven retinal activity could contribute to the appearance and progression of schisis cavities during retinal development in this XLRS rat model.
Exposure of rat pups to light even prior to eye opening, as early as the second postnatal week, can affect retinal function by evoking waves of spreading depression across the retina, and the segregation of retinal projections to the lateral geniculate nucleus of the brain [4,5,12]. Consequently, in conducting the study, we took care to have total light exclusion with XLRS rat pups even prior to conception by housing XLRS breeding pairs in continuous total 24 h darkness. This was performed in a specialized, separate vivarium facility on the campus of the University of California, Davis. Mothers and newborn pups were then kept in total darkness, and pups were weaned, segregated, and maintained in total darkness through age P31. This article is a revised and expanded version of preliminary data presented as a poster at ARVO 2025 [13].
MGCs’ involvement in XLRS pathology has been suggested previously [10,14,15], yet the precise mechanisms remain unresolved. We hypothesized that the dysregulation of water and ion channel homeostasis contributes to the early formation of schisis cavities during retinal development. Therefore, we investigated whether MGC activation and soma swelling are involved in schisis formation at postnatal day 12 (P12).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

The research was carried out in compliance with ARVO’s animal use guidelines for Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of California at Davis (protocol code #23299; date of original approval was 24 March 2021 and renewal 24 March 2023). Long Evans Rs1KO and wild-type (WT) rats (Charles River Laboratories, San Francisco, CA, USA) were used to establish a breeding colony. The Rs1-exon1-knockout (Rs1KO) was generated by our lab in Long Evans rats using CRISPR/Cas9 by deleting Exon 1, with assistance from Horizon Discovery (Saint Louis, MO, USA) [10]. The breeding colony is maintained at UC Davis Teaching and Research Animal Care Services (TRACS) animal husbandry facility. Using our protocol, genotyping was performed using rat toe clippings at Transnetyx, Inc. (Cordova, TN, USA) for Rs1 status. For dark rearing (D/D), mating pairs were continuously raised in total darkness, with no exposure to light, in a specialized vivarium at UC Davis. In dark-rearing rooms, rats were housed in a controlled environment for temperature and humidity. To guarantee complete darkness, the animal room had a prep room where personnel would enter, turn off the lights, and then open the animal room door in complete darkness. Lab personnel checked the temperature and humidity daily, using red lights for maintenance activities.

2.2. Ocular Tissue Collection and Processing

Rats were sacrificed by asphyxiation with carbon dioxide. Eyes were oriented, enucleated, and fixed with 97% methanol/3% glacial acetic acid for up to 5 days before embedding in paraffin [16]. Sagittal sections 5 µm thick were cut through the eye and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (Modified Harris Hematoxylin, 72711, Richard-Allan Scientific LLC, Kalamazoo, MI, USA; Eosin Y disodium salt, E4382-25G, Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA). Retinal images were collected using a Nikon Eclipse e800 microscope with a DS-Ri1 digital camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Dark-reared animals were sacrificed in total darkness, while retina slices were prepared under regular lighting conditions. Retinas from standard cyclic light/dark rearing (L/D) and fully dark-reared, dark/dark (D/D) postnatal (P) day 12 (P12), P15, and P30 Rs1KO and WT littermate rats were collected and examined via histology and immunohistochemistry following previously published procedures [10].

2.3. Histology and Immunohistochemistry

Tissue sections for morphology examination were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated, followed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Paraffin sections for immunohistochemistry were rehydrated before blocking and then washed with phosphate buffer 0.1% Tween 20 (1x PBST) and preincubated with serum (5% normal goat serum, or 10% normal donkey serum, and 0.1% Tween 20 in 1x PBS) at RT for 2 h. Primary antibodies were added at the appropriate dilution using a blocking buffer containing 1x PBS and incubated overnight (Table 1).
Tissue sections were washed with 1x PBST 3 times, 15 min each, followed by secondary antibody labeling. The fluorescent secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-chicken, Alexa Fluor 647 goat anti-mouse, and Alexa Fluor 647 goat anti-guinea pig; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were added to retinal sections at a 1:1000 dilution in PBST and incubated for 1.5 h (Table 2).
Tissue sections were washed in 1x PBST 3 times for 15 min each, and then cover-slipped with DAPI Fluoromount-G® (Cat#: 0100-20, SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) mounting media and imaged on the Olympus Fluoview FV3000 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Preliminary studies investigated the expression of Vimentin (Vim), ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) to establish optimal methods for ocular tissue collection, sectioning, and processing before the final studies. At the final fluorescent labeling stage, 36 slides (three biologic replicas for each genotype, WT, and Rs1KO, at three ages, P12, P15, and P30, and repeated set for both dark and light rearing) were deparaffinized together, washed, and incubated overnight with antibody aliquots from the same master mix.

2.4. Measurement of Cavity Size

H&E-stained sections were imaged on the microscope and analyzed in ImageJ version 1.54h, https://imagej.net/ij/ (accessed on 16 February 2024). The cavity regions were isolated and selected using the “Polygon Selection Tool,” and all other regions were removed. A threshold was then applied to isolate the cavities. Cavity size was measured using the “Analyze Particles” function in ImageJ, with the “outline” option enabled to confirm that the desired cavities were accurately selected.

2.5. Statistical Analysis of Cavity Size

Data were analyzed using Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) and presented as mean ± SEM. Group comparisons were made with an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

2.6. Study Design

A total of 12 breeding animals (6 males and 6 females) were used, consisting of 3 breeder pairs per rearing condition: light/dark (L/D) and dark/dark (D/D). Each pair comprised a heterozygous female (XRs1KO/XWT) and a wild-type male (XWT/Y). From these breeding pairs, hemizygous male littermates (XRs1KO/Y and XWT/Y) were collected and sacrificed at three developmental time points: P12, P15, and P30. At each time point, n = 3 animals (6 eyes) per genotype per group were analyzed, yielding 36 animals and 72 eyes. To minimize litter-specific and environmental confounders, three independent breeding pairs were established for each rearing condition (L/D and D/D), and litters were selected from across breeders to ensure distributional balance across groups. This pilot study was designed to test a binomial hypothesis for the presence or absence of cavity formation under D/D-rearing conditions. Assuming the null hypothesis (H0) corresponds to a 0% occurrence rate, the minimum sample size required to detect at least one “Yes” outcome (cavity formation) with 95% power and α = 0.05 depends on the true rate under the alternative hypothesis (H1): for a 10% true rate, 29 animals; for a 50% true rate, 5 animals; and for a 100% true rate, 1 animal. In our study, cavity formation was observed in 100% of animals under D/D rearing, for which the minimum required sample size is 1. Accordingly, our final experimental design included 36 animals (72 eyes), exceeding the minimum requirement and providing robust support for our binary outcome hypothesis. Sample size calculations were performed using the Binomial Reliability Demonstration Test calculator “https://reliabilityanalyticstoolkit.appspot.com/sample_size (accessed on 20 May 2025)”.

3. Results

3.1. Tiny Schisis Cavities Begin to Form in the INL of Dark-Reared Animals by P12

The retinal morphology of light/dark (L/D)- and dark/dark (D/D)-reared animals was analyzed with H&E staining at P12, P15, and P30 of Rs1KO and WT (Figure 1). By P12, the Rs1KO rat model exhibited small, discernible intra-retinal schisis cavities within the central region of the INL. These cavities enlarged rapidly over the next three days, and by P15, they significantly altered the structural integrity of the INL [10].

3.2. Dark Rearing Does Not Reduce Cavity Formation Versus Standard Cyclic Lighting

Cavities were present at P12 for all Rs1KO rats, independent of whether reared in darkness (D/D) or in light (L/D) (Figure 2, Table 3). Dark rearing did not delay cavity appearance, and, contrary to our expectations, schisis cavities were not smaller in dark-reared XLRS rats; in fact, they appeared larger. We then confirmed that the machinery for light activation was present in all animals at P12 by looking at the histological presence of rod outer segments (ROSs) and the presence of rhodopsin (see text below).

3.3. Immune Cells (Iba and GFAP) Distribution and Activation in Dark vs. Light Rearing

We also investigated whether the immunologic status was comparable for D/D- and L/D-reared rats. A panel of retinal markers was used to examine whether differential immune cell activation might contribute to cavities in D/D-reared animals, using Vimentin (Vim) labeling as a marker of MGC fibers, and Iba1 and GFAP as markers of cellular activation. Iba1 (ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1), also known as allograft inflammatory factor 1 (AIF1), is a well-established marker for the activation of microglia and macrophages [17]. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an intermediate filament (IF) III protein found in astrocytes and MGCs as an indicator of tissue stress, and it has been associated with retinal degeneration [18]. Figure 3 shows representative images of P12, P15, and P30 for WT and Rs1KO animals, as well as for both L/D- and D/D-reared animals. By P12, when schisis appeared, Iba1+ cells had accumulated in regions of schisis. Iba1+ cells were more abundant in Rs1KO animals than WT animals and appeared slightly more prevalent in D/D- than L/D-reared Rs1KO animals (Figure 3 and Figure 4). At P30, Iba1+ cells were more prevalent in the retina of D/D-reared Rs1KO animals than L/D-reared (Figure 3, P30 panels).
GFAP expression at P12 was only seen at the level of ganglion cells and intermingled astrocytes. However, by P15, Müller cell fibers were also positive for GFAP, as indicated by the overlapping expression of Vimentin (a marker for MGC fibers) and GFAP. By P30, GFAP expression in MGC fibers was much stronger in Rs1KO than in WT, irrespective of D/D or L/D rearing.

3.4. Photoreceptor Rhodopsin Expression at P12

This study is preconditioned on the suitable development of photoreceptors by P12 in both D/D- and L/D-reared mice. Photoreceptor response to light requires rhodopsin expression in the outer segments, and this begins by about P5. We examined the presence of rhodopsin in the D/D- and L/D-reared P12 animals, using rhodopsin and retinoschisin fluorescent antibody labeling. Rod outer segments (ROSs) and inner segments (RISs) appeared equally developed in Rs1KO and WT animals in L/D- and D/D-reared conditions (Figure 5) (noting that Rs1KO animals do not express Rs1). Consistent with the previous report [19], by Rho labeling, the ROSs for both WT and Rs1KO appeared slightly longer at P12 for D/D-reared animals. There was no apparent change in the RISs.

4. Discussion

4.1. Eye Opening and Light Exposure

Eye opening and light exposure are important for retinal development and differentiation, and this event coincides with numerous physiological responses, including synapse and neuroglial maturation [20,21,22]. Light exposure alters the metabolic state of photoreceptors and downstream neurons [23,24], thereby increasing the demand for ionic regulation and energy metabolism. A key player in this process is Na+/K+-ATPase, which maintains ion gradients essential for retinal function [25]. Retinoschisin (Rs1), a protein deficient in the XLRS mouse model, is known to bind the β2 subunit of Na+/K+-ATPase, stabilizing this complex and supporting structural integrity and proper synaptic signaling. In the absence of Rs1, as in Rs1KO mice, this interaction is disrupted, potentially compromising the ATPase’s ability to maintain ion homeostasis during heightened activity associated with light exposure and post-eye opening maturation [25,26,27]. In the XLRS mouse model, retinoschisin deficiency induces persistent aberrant waves of activity, affecting neuroglial signaling in the inner retina at a young developmental age [28]. The waves were associated with glutamatergic neurosignaling in the proximal retina and bursts of activity in MGCs. This abnormal neuronal transmission appeared around the time of eye opening and cystic schisis formation, suggesting that while light and neuronal activity escalate ionic demands, the underlying vulnerability might be from disrupted RS1–Na+/K+-ATPase signaling.
As early retinal structural schisis cavity formation in XLRS animals occurs at P12–P15, overlapping with eye opening [29], this generated our question of whether eye opening and light exposure were involved in cavity formation. If the light was a trigger for the development of cavities, one would expect that cavity formation for Rs1KO pups raised in darkness would lag behind or even be nonexistent compared to same-age rat pups raised under normal cyclic lighting conditions. However, that was not the case. Rather, retinal cavities in the D/D- and L/D-reared conditions were the same at P12. Indeed, in this small sample of animals, if anything, the cavities of D/D-reared Rs1KO animals were possibly bigger compared to L/D-reared controls.
Light is known to affect cavity size: XLRS mice reared in low vivarium lighting (20 lux) had fewer and smaller cavities and better lamellar organization of the inner retina at 4 months old compared to others reared in moderate light (300 lux) [1]. However, this effect was not noted for younger age cohorts: XLRS mice at 1 month age (i.e., which is closer to the rat developmental P12 stage of the present study) had similar retinal schisis cavity extent between the D/D and L/D groups [1], indicating a different effect of light on developmental activity in the present study than the mature retina of 4-month-old XLRS mice.
Light exposure and dark adaptation influence retinal morphology and function in Rs1KO mice. It was reported at the ARVO 2025 meeting that larger cysts are detected by OCT in the morning after whole-night dark adaptation, while smaller cysts were found in the evening after entire-day light exposure [30]. This phenomenon may be related to higher activity of fluid removal mechanisms during light exposure, thus shrinking the cavities. The retina expels fluid primarily through active transport across the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and passive hydrostatic and oncotic forces. Active transport is crucial for maintaining retinal function, while passive forces assist when the RPE barrier is compromised [31].

4.2. Diurnal Variation in XLRS Cavities

Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that schisis cavities in X-linked juvenile retinoschisis (XLRS) exhibit significant diurnal variation. Specifically, patients with XLRS show increased central foveal thickness in the morning, which gradually decreases throughout the day, with the most pronounced changes occurring between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. [1,2]. This pattern suggests that the size of schisis cavities is not static but fluctuates over the course of the day.
According to our results, light does not appear to be the determining factor for the opening of the schisis. This result implies that the timing of the first retinal schisis cavity formation is developmentally programmed. It appears to be a developmental step in which the presence of retinoschisin is essential for the stability and structural preservation of the retina. As retinoschisin is not present in Rs1KO animals, the retinal tissue splits.

4.3. Microglial Activation in XLRS Retina

Microglia are resident immune cells in the retina that play a role in maintaining retinal homeostasis. These cells become activated in pathological conditions, adopting pro- or anti-inflammatory phenotypes. Microglia activation in XLRS retinas is associated with the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which can further exacerbate retinal damage. The increased number of Iba1+ cells alongside retinal cavities in XLRS suggests a robust microglial response to retinal damage even as early as P12 (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
Studies in animal models of XLRS have shown that microglial activation occurs early in the disease process. In the Rs1−/Y rat model, microglial activation is evident by P7, preceding significant photoreceptor degeneration [10]. The early activation of Iba1 indicates pathological processes even before overt schisis cavities begin to form at P12.
The increased number of Iba1+ cells in the developing XLRS retina highlights the potential of targeting microglial activation and inflammation as a therapeutic strategy. Gene augmentation therapy reduced microglial activation and inflammation in XLRS [32]. Rs1 expression in the Rs1−/Y rat model, achieved by applying AAV8-Rs1 at P5-6, rescued the inner nuclear layer (INL) and outer plexiform layer (OPL) cavity formation and attenuated microglial activation, suggesting that restoring homeostasis by restoring Rs1 function served to reduce inflammation [10]. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying these processes will facilitate the development of effective therapies.

5. Conclusions

  • Retinoschisis cavities formed at the same time in dark- and light-reared XLRS rats, indicating that the timing and extent of schisis formation are not driven by the metabolic activity of light exposure but apparently by developmental events.
  • In our small sample, cavity size tended to be larger under dark-rearing conditions than under cyclic light/dark rearing, possibly due to reduced RPE fluid pumping activity that is normally stimulated by light.
  • Dark-reared Rs1KO and WT rats have longer photoreceptor OSs (previously reported by Matt LaVail [19]) as RPE phagocytosis is decreased in the dark in adult rodents, allowing for ROS elongation in the absence of shedding of the distal tip.
  • These results highlight the complexity of XLRS pathology, but we found no evidence that light-driven metabolic activity accounted for schisis cavity formation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.S.-M. and P.A.S.; Data curation, Z.S.-M.; Formal analysis, I.H.C.; Funding acquisition, P.A.S.; Investigation, Z.S.-M., N.S. and S.T.; Methodology, N.S., S.T., I.H.C. and S.T.; Project administration, P.A.S.; Resources, P.A.S.; Software, Z.S.-M., I.H.C. and S.T.; Supervision, Z.S.-M. and P.A.S.; Validation, Z.S.-M., N.S. and P.A.S.; Visualization, Z.S.-M. and N.S.; Writing—original draft, Z.S.-M. and P.A.S.; Writing—review and editing, Z.S.-M. and P.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, the National Eye Institute (DC900065); the UC Davis Medical School Dean’s Fund for laboratory startup to PAS; and the NEI Core Facilities grant P30-EY012576 (UCD).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of California at Davis (protocol code #23299; date of original approval was 24 March 2021 and renewal 24 March 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank UC Davis TRACs for their superb technical assistance with animal breeding and husbandry. We also thank Vijayasarathy Camasamudram, Andrea Garcia Llorka, and Susanna Park for constructive discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Marangoni, D.; Yong, Z.; Kjellstrom, S.; Vijayasarathy, C.; Sieving, P.A.; Bush, R.A. Rearing Light Intensity Affects Inner Retinal Pathology in a Mouse Model of X-Linked Retinoschisis but Does Not Alter Gene Therapy Outcome. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 1656–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zeng, Y.; Takada, Y.; Kjellstrom, S.; Hiriyanna, K.; Tanikawa, A.; Wawrousek, E.; Smaoui, N.; Caruso, R.; Bush, R.A.; Sieving, P.A. RS-1 Gene Delivery to an Adult Rs1h Knockout Mouse Model Restores ERG b-Wave with Reversal of the Electronegative Waveform of X-Linked Retinoschisis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 3279–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Guan, W.; Cao, J.W.; Liu, L.Y.; Zhao, Z.H.; Fu, Y.; Yu, Y.C. Eye opening differentially modulates inhibitory synaptic transmission in the developing visual cortex. eLife 2017, 6, e32337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Davis, Z.W.; Chapman, B.; Cheng, H.J. Increasing Spontaneous Retinal Activity before Eye Opening Accelerates the Development of Geniculate Receptive Fields. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 14612–14623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Akerman, C.J.; Smyth, D.; Thompson, I.D. Visual experience before eye-opening and the development of the retinogeniculate pathway. Neuron 2002, 36, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tian, N.; Copenhagen, D.R. Visual deprivation alters development of synaptic function in inner retina after eye opening. Neuron 2001, 32, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tian, N.; Copenhagen, D.R. Visual stimulation is required for refinement of ON and OFF pathways in postnatal retina. Neuron 2003, 39, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Organisciak, D.T.; Vaughan, D.K. Retinal light damage: Mechanisms and protection. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2010, 29, 113–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Van Norren, D.; Vos, J.J. Light damage to the retina: An historical approach. Eye 2016, 30, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ye, E.A.; Zeng, Y.; Thomas, S.; Sun, N.; Smit-McBride, Z.; Sieving, P.A. XLRS Rat with Rs1-/Y Exon-1-Del Shows Failure of Early Postnatal Outer Retina Development. Genes 2022, 13, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ziccardi, L.; Vijayasarathy, C.; Bush, R.A.; Sieving, P.A. Loss of retinoschisin (RS1) cell surface protein in maturing mouse rod photoreceptors elevates the luminance threshold for light-driven translocation of transducin but not arrestin. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 13010–13021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tiriac, A.; Smith, B.E.; Feller, M.B. Light Prior to Eye Opening Promotes Retinal Waves and Eye-Specific Segregation. Neuron 2018, 100, 1059–1065.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Smit-McBride, Z.; Sun, N.; Thomas, S.; Cho, I.H.; Sieving, P.A. Dark-rearing of XLRS Rs1 rat pups during development and effects on early post-natal age pathology. In Proceedings of the ARVO 2025, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 4–8 May 2025. [Google Scholar]
  14. Smit-McBride, Z.; Sun, N.; Thomas, S.; Cho, I.H.; Stricklin, R.G.; Sieving, P.A. Kir4.1 and Aqp4 Contribution to Schisis Cystic Water Accumulation and Clearance in the Rs1 Exon-1 Del XLRS Rat Model. Genes 2024, 15, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Reid, S.N.; Yamashita, C.; Farber, D.B. Retinoschisin, a photoreceptor-secreted protein, and its interaction with bipolar and muller cells. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 6030–6040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, N.; Shibata, B.; Hess, J.F.; FitzGerald, P.G. An alternative means of retaining ocular structure and improving immunoreactivity for light microscopy studies. Mol. Vis. 2015, 21, 428–442. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bosco, A.; Steele, M.R.; Vetter, M.L. Early microglia activation in a mouse model of chronic glaucoma. J. Comp. Neurol. 2011, 519, 599–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fernandez-Sanchez, L.; Lax, P.; Campello, L.; Pinilla, I.; Cuenca, N. Astrocytes and Muller Cell Alterations During Retinal Degeneration in a Transgenic Rat Model of Retinitis Pigmentosa. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2015, 9, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Battelle, B.A.; LaVail, M.M. Rhodopsin content and rod outer segment length in albino rat eyes: Modification by dark adaptation. Exp. Eye Res. 1978, 26, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Osswald, I.K.; Galan, A.; Bowie, D. Light triggers expression of philanthotoxin-insensitive Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors in the developing rat retina. J. Physiol. 2007, 582, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, R.W.; Wei, H.P.; Xia, Y.M.; Du, J.L. Development of light response and GABAergic excitation-to-inhibition switch in zebrafish retinal ganglion cells. J. Physiol. 2010, 588, 2557–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thompson, I. Visual development: From darkness into light. Curr. Biol. 1994, 4, 458–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Linton, J.D.; Holzhausen, L.C.; Babai, N.; Song, H.; Miyagishima, K.J.; Stearns, G.W.; Lindsay, K.; Wei, J.; Chertov, A.O.; Peters, T.A.; et al. Flow of energy in the outer retina in darkness and in light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 8599–8604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yu, T.Y.; Acosta, M.L.; Ready, S.; Cheong, Y.L.; Kalloniatis, M. Light exposure causes functional changes in the retina: Increased photoreceptor cation channel permeability, photoreceptor apoptosis, and altered retinal metabolic function. J. Neurochem. 2007, 103, 714–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Friedrich, U.; Stohr, H.; Hilfinger, D.; Loenhardt, T.; Schachner, M.; Langmann, T.; Weber, B.H. The Na/K-ATPase is obligatory for membrane anchorage of retinoschisin, the protein involved in the pathogenesis of X-linked juvenile retinoschisis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 1132–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Plossl, K.; Royer, M.; Bernklau, S.; Tavraz, N.N.; Friedrich, T.; Wild, J.; Weber, B.H.F.; Friedrich, U. Retinoschisin is linked to retinal Na/K-ATPase signaling and localization. Mol. Biol. Cell 2017, 28, 2178–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Molday, L.L.; Wu, W.W.; Molday, R.S. Retinoschisin (RS1), the protein encoded by the X-linked retinoschisis gene, is anchored to the surface of retinal photoreceptor and bipolar cells through its interactions with a Na/K ATPase-SARM1 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 32792–32801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eleftheriou, C.G.; Corona, C.; Khattak, S.; Alam, N.M.; Ivanova, E.; Bianchimano, P.; Liu, Y.; Sun, D.; Singh, R.; Batoki, J.C.; et al. Retinoschisin Deficiency Induces Persistent Aberrant Waves of Activity Affecting Neuroglial Signaling in the Retina. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2022, 42, 6983–7000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tarchick, M.J.; Beight, C.; Bonezzi, P.B.; Peachey, N.S.; Renna, J.M. Photoreceptor deficits appear at eye opening in Rs1 mutant mouse models of X-linked retinoschisis. Exp. Eye Res. 2024, 242, 109872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hassan, S.; Stanley, S.; Brandauer, E.; Laird, J.; Hsu, Y.; Drack, A.V. Retinal Changes in Rs1-KO Mice: Role of Light and Dark Adaptation. In Proceedings of the ARVO 2025, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 4–8 May 2025. [Google Scholar]
  31. Marmor, M.F. Control of subretinal fluid: Experimental and clinical studies. Eye 1990, 4 Pt 2, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vijayasarathy, C.; Zeng, Y.; Brooks, M.J.; Fariss, R.N.; Sieving, P.A. Genetic Rescue of X-Linked Retinoschisis Mouse (Rs1-/y) Retina Induces Quiescence of the Retinal Microglial Inflammatory State Following AAV8-RS1 Gene Transfer and Identifies Gene Networks Underlying Retinal Recovery. Hum. Gene Ther. 2021, 32, 667–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 16 00815 g001
Figure 1. Retinal morphological alterations of Rs1KO rat model at P12, P15, and P30. (A) Histology of WT and Rs1KO (KO) retinas in normal lighting conditions (L/D). At the earliest age examined (P12), small cavities appeared in the inner nuclear layer (INL) of the KO. The cavities continued to increase rapidly with age. Cells from the outer nuclear layer (ONL) were found to be displaced into the inner segment (IS)/outer segment (OS) by P15. At P30, the cavities disappeared, and a few ONL cells were still present with the outer plexiform layer (OPL) showing signs of disturbance. (B) Histology of WT and KO retinas of dark-reared animals (D/D). Similar morphological alterations were observed in the dark-reared animals at the examined time points in KO. Ganglion cells (GCL); inner plexiform layers (IPL); inner nuclear layer (INL); outer plexiform layers (OPL); outer nuclear layers (ONL); inner segments/outer segments (IS/OS); retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) (scale bar: 50 μm).
Figure 1. Retinal morphological alterations of Rs1KO rat model at P12, P15, and P30. (A) Histology of WT and Rs1KO (KO) retinas in normal lighting conditions (L/D). At the earliest age examined (P12), small cavities appeared in the inner nuclear layer (INL) of the KO. The cavities continued to increase rapidly with age. Cells from the outer nuclear layer (ONL) were found to be displaced into the inner segment (IS)/outer segment (OS) by P15. At P30, the cavities disappeared, and a few ONL cells were still present with the outer plexiform layer (OPL) showing signs of disturbance. (B) Histology of WT and KO retinas of dark-reared animals (D/D). Similar morphological alterations were observed in the dark-reared animals at the examined time points in KO. Ganglion cells (GCL); inner plexiform layers (IPL); inner nuclear layer (INL); outer plexiform layers (OPL); outer nuclear layers (ONL); inner segments/outer segments (IS/OS); retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) (scale bar: 50 μm).
Genes 16 00815 g001
Genes 16 00815 g002
Figure 2. (A–C) Representative H&E-stained sections of Rs1KO, P12 retinas (20×) under light rearing (L/D), and (G–I) representative H&E-stained sections (20×) under dark rearing (D/D), showing an overall increase in cavity size in the D/D compared to the L/D. (D–F) Overall cavity distribution is depicted using ImageJ analysis for L/D rearing and (J–L) for D/D rearing, indicating somewhat more extensive cavities in D/D than in L/D rearing (scale bar: 50 μm). Ganglion cells (GC); inner plexiform layers (IPL); inner nuclear layer (INL); outer plexiform layers (OPL); outer nuclear layers (ONL); inner segments/outer segments (IS/OS); retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).
Figure 2. (A–C) Representative H&E-stained sections of Rs1KO, P12 retinas (20×) under light rearing (L/D), and (G–I) representative H&E-stained sections (20×) under dark rearing (D/D), showing an overall increase in cavity size in the D/D compared to the L/D. (D–F) Overall cavity distribution is depicted using ImageJ analysis for L/D rearing and (J–L) for D/D rearing, indicating somewhat more extensive cavities in D/D than in L/D rearing (scale bar: 50 μm). Ganglion cells (GC); inner plexiform layers (IPL); inner nuclear layer (INL); outer plexiform layers (OPL); outer nuclear layers (ONL); inner segments/outer segments (IS/OS); retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).
Genes 16 00815 g002
Genes 16 00815 g003
Figure 3. Comparative analysis of retinal morphology of Rs1KO and WT rats reared under dark (D/D) vs. light (L/D) conditions. Retinal morphology is similar in the retinal samples between light- and dark-reared animals at P12, P15, and P30: Vimentin (silver); Iba1 (red); GFAP (green); DAPI (blue); Yellow arrow points at Iba1+ microglia. Ganglion cells (GC); inner plexiform layers (IPL); inner nuclear layer (INL); outer plexiform layers (OPL); outer nuclear layers (ONL); inner segments/outer segments (IS/OS); retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), (scale bar: 100 μm).
Figure 3. Comparative analysis of retinal morphology of Rs1KO and WT rats reared under dark (D/D) vs. light (L/D) conditions. Retinal morphology is similar in the retinal samples between light- and dark-reared animals at P12, P15, and P30: Vimentin (silver); Iba1 (red); GFAP (green); DAPI (blue); Yellow arrow points at Iba1+ microglia. Ganglion cells (GC); inner plexiform layers (IPL); inner nuclear layer (INL); outer plexiform layers (OPL); outer nuclear layers (ONL); inner segments/outer segments (IS/OS); retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), (scale bar: 100 μm).
Genes 16 00815 g003
Genes 16 00815 g004
Figure 4. Glial and macrophage activity at P12 in Rs1KO in dark vs. light rearing. At P12, Iba1+ microglia (yellow arrow) increased in RS1KO retinas in both dark- and light-reared retinas. Iba1 (red); DAPI (blue) (scale bar: 100 μm).
Figure 4. Glial and macrophage activity at P12 in Rs1KO in dark vs. light rearing. At P12, Iba1+ microglia (yellow arrow) increased in RS1KO retinas in both dark- and light-reared retinas. Iba1 (red); DAPI (blue) (scale bar: 100 μm).
Genes 16 00815 g004
Genes 16 00815 g005
Figure 5. Photoreceptor inner- and outer-segment length in dark vs. light rearing. Photoreceptor structure at P12 was verified in D/D- and L/D-reared animals. Lack of retinoschisin (Rs1—red) protein does not affect rod structure, as imaged by rhodopsin (Rho—green) in rod outer segments (ROSs) and PSD95 (silver) at the synapse. The ROSs were slightly longer (insets) in dark-reared rats for both WT and Rs1KO animals (scale bar: 50 μm).
Figure 5. Photoreceptor inner- and outer-segment length in dark vs. light rearing. Photoreceptor structure at P12 was verified in D/D- and L/D-reared animals. Lack of retinoschisin (Rs1—red) protein does not affect rod structure, as imaged by rhodopsin (Rho—green) in rod outer segments (ROSs) and PSD95 (silver) at the synapse. The ROSs were slightly longer (insets) in dark-reared rats for both WT and Rs1KO animals (scale bar: 50 μm).
Genes 16 00815 g005
Table 1. The primary antibodies (Abs) and dilution used in fluorescent immunohistology.
Table 1. The primary antibodies (Abs) and dilution used in fluorescent immunohistology.
Primary AntibodySpeciesVendorCat#Dilution
Vimentin (Vim)ChickenCustom Ab, Fitzgerald Labn/a1:1000
Iba1RabbitWako Chemicals, Richmond, VA, USA019-197411:500
GFAPMouseCell Signaling Technology, Inc. Danvers, MA367051:500
Rhodopsin (Rho)MouseSanta Cruz Biotechsc-574321:500
Psd-95RabbitCell Signaling Technology, Inc. Danvers, MA345051:500
Retinoschisin 1 (RS-1)Guinea PigCustom Ab, Sieving Labn/a1:1000
Table 2. Fluorescent secondary Abs and dilutions used in fluorescent immunohistology.
Table 2. Fluorescent secondary Abs and dilutions used in fluorescent immunohistology.
Secondary AntibodyVendorCat#Dilution
Goat anti-chicken, AF488-conjugatedInvitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USAA-329311:1000
Goat anti-mouse, AF488-conjugatedInvitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USAA-106671:1000
Goat anti-rabbit, AF568-conjugatedInvitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USAA-110111:1000
Goat anti-mouse, AF647-conjugatedInvitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USAA-212351:1000
Goat anti-guinea pig, AF647-conjugatedInvitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USAA-214501:1000
Table 3. Comparison of cavity size in Rs1KO rats at P12 under light (L/D) and dark (D/D) rearing. Statistical analysis and a graphic view of the data are presented below.
Table 3. Comparison of cavity size in Rs1KO rats at P12 under light (L/D) and dark (D/D) rearing. Statistical analysis and a graphic view of the data are presented below.
Genes 16 00815 i001
Light-Rearing (L/D)Dark-Rearing (D/D)
Cavity Size (Pixels) Cavity Size (Pixels)
A1741G5860
B5263H12,979
C34,970I85,401
Mean Values of Cavity Size in Rs1KO Rats Under L/D and D/D
Light-Rearing (L/D)Dark-Rearing (D/D)p-Value
Mean ± SEM13,991 ± 10,53834,747 ± 25,4100.511
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Smit-McBride, Z.; Cho, I.H.; Sun, N.; Thomas, S.; Sieving, P.A. Dark Rearing Does Not Alter Developmental Retinoschisis Cavity Formation in Rs1 Gene Knockout Rat Model of X-Linked Retinoschisis. Genes 2025, 16, 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16070815

AMA Style

Smit-McBride Z, Cho IH, Sun N, Thomas S, Sieving PA. Dark Rearing Does Not Alter Developmental Retinoschisis Cavity Formation in Rs1 Gene Knockout Rat Model of X-Linked Retinoschisis. Genes. 2025; 16(7):815. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16070815

Chicago/Turabian Style

Smit-McBride, Zeljka, In Hwan Cho, Ning Sun, Serafina Thomas, and Paul A. Sieving. 2025. "Dark Rearing Does Not Alter Developmental Retinoschisis Cavity Formation in Rs1 Gene Knockout Rat Model of X-Linked Retinoschisis" Genes 16, no. 7: 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16070815

APA Style

Smit-McBride, Z., Cho, I. H., Sun, N., Thomas, S., & Sieving, P. A. (2025). Dark Rearing Does Not Alter Developmental Retinoschisis Cavity Formation in Rs1 Gene Knockout Rat Model of X-Linked Retinoschisis. Genes, 16(7), 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16070815

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop