Next Article in Journal
Unraveling the Mitochondrial Blueprint: Genome Characterization and Phylogenetic Insights of the Endemic Fish Onychostoma virgulatum (Teleostei: Cyprinidae)
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Phylogenetic Characterization of the FTIP Gene Family in Maize (Zea mays)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CYP2C9 Promoter Variable Number Tandem Repeat Polymorphism in a Dominican Population: Exploring Differences with Genetic Ancestry

by
Carla González de la Cruz
1,2,†,
Mariela Guevara
3,†,
Fernanda Rodrigues-Soares
1,4,
Ernesto Rodríguez
3,
Eva Peñas-Lledó
1,5,
Adrián LLerena
1,2,5 and
Pedro Dorado
1,5,*
1
Personalized Medicine and Mental Health Unit, INUBE University Institute for Bio-Sanitary Research of Extremadura, 06080 Badajoz, Spain
2
Pharmacogenetic and Pharmacogenomics Unit, Extremadura Health Service, Badajoz University Hospital, Extremadura University, 06080 Badajoz, Spain
3
Research and Development Department, Universidad Nacional Pedro Henríquez Ureña, Santo Domingo 10203, Dominican Republic
4
Department of Pathology, Genetic and Evolution, Biological and Natural Sciences Institute, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba 38025-350, Brazil
5
Department of Therapeutics and Medical-Surgery, Medical and Health Sciences School, 06006 Badajoz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2025, 16(5), 540; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16050540
Submission received: 2 April 2025 / Revised: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 28 April 2025 / Published: 30 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacogenetics)

Abstract

:
A variable number tandem repeat polymorphism has been described in the CYP2C9 promoter (pVNTR) with three types of fragments: short (pVNTR-S), medium (pVNTR-M), and long (pVNTR-L). The pVNTR-S allele appears in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the non-functional CYP2C9*3 allele in populations of European ancestry, but independently of this, it also appears to reduce the level of CYP2C9 expression in human liver by up to 34%. Objectives: This study, in a Dominican population with varying amounts of Western European, African, and Native American ancestry, aims primarily to determine the frequency of CYP2C9 pVNTR, and the degree of LD of pVNTR-S with CYP2C9*3. Secondarily, it explores if the frequency of the pVNTR-S allele is over- or under-represented in those with a greater component of African ancestry. Methods: A total of 193 healthy volunteers from the Dominican Republic participated in the study. The promoter region of CYP2C9 was amplified and analyzed by capillary electrophoresis. Analyses of CYP2C9 genotypes (*2, *3, *5, *6, and *8) and genetic ancestry, estimated in 176 Dominican individuals by genotyping 90 ancestry informative markers, were previously performed in this population. Results: The frequencies of CYP2C9 pVNTR-L, M, and S variants are 0.065, 0.896, and 0.039, respectively. LD between pVNTR-S and CYP2C9*3 was found (D’ = 0.756, r2 = 0.702) to be weaker than in European populations. Conclusions: Populations with a greater African ancestry component appear to present a lower-than-expected frequency of pVNTR-S, as well as a lower tendency for this and CYP2C9*3 alleles to be inherited together, as is common in Europeans. The present exploratory results warrant further research in vivo about the effects of pVNTR-S in predicting CYP2C9 activity. Its inclusion in CYP2C9 testing panels for personalized drug therapy could be relevant in populations such as the Dominican, where the LD between pVNTR-S and CYP2C9*3 is low.

1. Introduction

The enzyme responsible for the metabolism of about 20% of drugs is CYP2C9, which belongs to the P450 enzyme complex. It is involved in the metabolism of drugs widely used in today’s clinical practice, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ibuprofen, celecoxib, and diclofenac) [1], anticoagulants (acenocoumarol and warfarin) [2], antiepileptics (phenytoin) [3], and statins (fluvastatin) [4]. The CYP2C9 gene is located at 10q23.33 within the locus where other genes such as CYP2C19, CYP2C18, and CYP2C8 are located [5].
This enzyme is composed of 490 amino acids with a size of 55 kDa, and its level of expression is mainly found in the liver [6]. The CYP2C9 gene is highly polymorphic, with a total of 85 variants currently described [7], although there are variants with greater relevance that have been widely studied, such as CYP2C9*2 (rs1799853) and CYP2C9*3 (rs1057910), associated with a decrease or null enzyme activity, respectively [8].
This partial or total loss of enzymatic function has been demonstrated in different studies of plasma levels with drugs such as diclofenac, losartan, phenytoin, tolbutamide, or warfarin, with higher plasma concentrations in those individuals with CYP2C9*2 and/or CYP2C9*3 compared to CYP2C9*1/*1 individuals [9,10,11,12]. However, interethnic variability in CYP2C9 metabolism remains unexplained, mainly in individuals of non-European ancestry.
A variable number tandem repeat polymorphism (pVNTR) is present in the promoter region of the CYP2C9 gene, specifically, 4 Kb upstream of the translation start site. There are three pVNTRs with different fragment lengths: long (pVNTR-L), medium (pVNTR-M), and short (pVNTR-S).
This promoter polymorphism affects CYP2C9 mRNA expression in the liver [13], specifically, pVNTR-S is associated with lower CYP2C9 mRNA expression, reducing the transcriptional activity of the gene compared to pVNTR-M and pVNTR-L [13]. As the total mRNA level is strongly influenced by trans-active factors that may confound the effect of cis-acting polymorphisms, a previous study [13] measured the relative amount of mRNA derived from each of the two alleles in the same individual, finding evidence about the presence of one or more cis-acting regulatory polymorphisms affecting the CYP2C9 mRNA level by influencing transcription or RNA processing.
It has been reported that the pVNTR-S allele is associated with a 25–60% reduction in CYP2C9 mRNA expression compared with the pVNTR-M or pVNTR-L alleles, respectively [13], and recently, pVNTR-S has been associated with lower CYP2C9 expression (34% reduction) in human liver samples [14]. This evidence suggests that pVNTR-S reduces CYP2C9 expression, regardless of the presence or not of other CYP2C9 decreased function variants such as CYP2C9*3.
In addition, previous studies in the European population have demonstrated the existence of a near perfect linkage disequilibrium of pVNTR-S with CYP2C9*3 [13,14,15], but it has not been observed in African American, Egyptian [13], nor Jordanian populations [16]. This may be due to the ancestral component of each population and the importance of taking it into account when performing genetic analysis [17].
On the other hand, so far, the presence of this polymorphism has not been studied in Latin Americans, whose populations present an admixture, to a greater or lesser extent, of American, African, and European ancestry components.
Therefore, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the presence and frequency of CYP2C9 pVNTR polymorphisms in the Dominican population, the degree of LD between the pVNTR-S and CYP2C9*3 alleles, and to preliminarily explore its potential relationship across different components of genetic ancestry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

This study involved 193 unrelated students and employees of the Dominican Republic’s Universidad Nacional Pedro Henríquez Ureña (UNPHU) in Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic). These subjects were participants in a previous study [18]. None of the participants were immigrants, which applied to at least two previous generations; their ages ranged from 20 to 48 years, and 64.2% were women.
The study complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki for human research and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Health Bioethics Council (Ref. 018-2022) of the Dominican Republic. All patients’ informed consents were collected in writing at the time of sample collection.

2.2. CYP2C9 Genotyping and Genetic Ancestry Analysis

The analyses of the CYP2C9 genotype in the present Dominican population were previously performed in a study of our group [18]. Genotyping for the CYP2C9 variants (*2, *3, *5, *6, *8) was conducted using a fluorescence-based allele-specific TaqMan allelic discrimination assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). PCR amplification for all single-nucleotide polymorphisms was conducted in 20 µL reactions containing 30 ng of template DNA, 1× if each primer and probe assay, 1× TaqMan Universal Master Mix, and water. The thermal cycling began with an initial denaturation step of 10 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 92 °C for 15 s and annealing at 60 °C for 1 min. Allele detection was performed for 1 min at 60 °C on a Fast 7300 Real-Time System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) to enable allelic discrimination. CYP2C9 genotypes were assigned according to the presence of SNPs associated with the alleles of interest [18].
The genetic analysis of the ancestry of these participating individuals has also been previously analyzed [18]. African (AFR), European (EUR), and Native American (NAT) individual ancestry were estimated in 176 Dominican individuals by genotyping 90 ancestry-informative markers (AIMs) from the same panel as standardized in the previous RIBEF-CEIBA studies [17,18]. The AIMs genotyping was performed at the Spanish National Genotyping Center (CEGEN) from Santiago de Compostela, using iPLEX assays, followed by mass spectrometry analysis using the MassARRAY System (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) [18].

2.3. Determination of CYP2C9 pVNTR

A peripheral blood sample (5 mL) was collected into an EDTA tube from volunteers. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp® DNA Blood Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and assessed for integrity and concentration via spectrophotometry with a NanoDrop® ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Greenville, NC, USA).
A fragment of 476 bp (NC_000010.11; 94934442–94934917; GRCh38) was PCR-amplified. This fragment contains CYP2C9 pVNTR (NC_000010.11; 94934570–94934705; GRCh38), which is variable (Figure 1).
The sequences for the forward and reverse primers were 50-TGTAGTCCCAGGTTGTCAAGAGG-FAM-30 and 50-CCAGTCTCTGTCTTTTCATCTCATTC-30, respectively (Figure 1).
The PCRs were performed according to a previous study [15]. Briefly, initial PCR was performed using pVNTR-forward primer (10 M), pVNTR-reverse primer (10 M), and 50–80 ng of DNA in a Veriti Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The PCR products were analyzed using capillary electrophoresis, and the amplification products were diluted 1:10 with Hi-Di Formamide with 0.3% (v/v) of GeneScan™ 600 LIZ® Size Standard (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Afterward the samples were denatured, and the denatured PCR products were electrophoresed using POP-7 polymer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bedford, MA, USA) in an Applied Biosystems Sanger Sequencing 3500 Series Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with GeneScan Analysis v5.0 (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) to analyze and calculate the molecular size of the amplified alleles.

2.4. Data Analysis

To evaluate the relationship between ancestry and the presence of the three CYP2C9 pVNTR variants, a Student’s t-test for independent samples was performed using R software (version 4.2.2; https://www.r-project.org/; accessed on 1 February 2025) with the t.test() function from the R base package, with the aim of comparing the means of the percentage of ancestry of individuals who were carriers and non-carriers of each pVNTR variant. To evaluate the normality of the variables, a Shapiro–Wilk test was performed using the shapiro.test() function.
For genotypic frequencies, the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was determined by comparing them with expected values using a χ2 contingency table statistic with Yate’s correction. To compare differences in allele frequencies of pVNTR polymorphisms in different populations, Fisher’s exact test was used.
Linkage disequilibrium analysis was performed using SNPstat software v1 (https://www.snpstats.net/; accessed on 14 February 2025).
p values less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Frequency of CYP2C9 pVNTR in the Dominican Population

The frequency of CYP2C9 pVNTR was determined in a total of 193 samples (4 samples did not amplify), and the results are shown in Table 1. The presence of CYP2C9*2, *3, and *5 alleles was previously analyzed in these subjects [18], showing frequencies of 0.114, 0.034, and 0.002, respectively.
On the other hand, the analysis of pVNTR showed three different fragment sizes: 510–517 bp (pVNTR-L), 446–487 bp (pVNTR-M), and bp 419–431 bp (pVNTR-S), depending on the size of the 135 bp fragment containing the CYP2C9 pVNTR (see Figure 1).
The frequencies of different fragment sizes of CYP2C9 pVNTR-L, M, and S found in the Dominican population were 0.065, 0.896, and 0.039, respectively (Table 1 and Table 2).
In addition, according to the frequency of CYP2C9 pVNTR alleles in different populations, it can be observed that the frequency of the short pVNTR fragment in the Dominican population (0.039) is the lowest when comparing to other populations, such as the Jordanians (0.295; p < 0.0001) [16], Egyptians (0.115; p < 0.0001) [13], and Spaniards (0.081; p = 0.026) [15].
In contrast, the pVNTR-M variant presented the highest frequency of all populations studied (Table 2), whereas for the pVNTR-L variant, the frequency in the Dominican population was significantly lower than that found in the two White American populations previously studied (6.5% vs. 13.7% and vs. 15.2%; p < 0.005 and <0.0001, respectively) and in the average of those found in other populations (6.5% vs. 4.5–10.3%) (Table 2).

3.2. Linkage Disequilibrium Analysis Between CYP2C9 pVNTR-S and CYP2C9*3 in the Dominican Population

In the Dominican population, 83.3% (10/12) of individuals carrying the CYP2C9*3 allele also carried pVNTR-S. However, not all individuals carrying the pVNTR-S fragment also had the CYP2C9*3 allele (66.7%; 10/15), since five individuals with pVNTR-S were CYP2C9*1/*1 (Table 1).
In the Dominican population, both the LD coefficient (D’) between the pVNTR-S fragment and CYP2C9*3 and the squared correlation coefficient (r2) were lower (D’= 0.756, r2 = 0.702) than in populations with European ancestry (Table 2). Furthermore, the studied populations that also appear to present a less strong association between the two polymorphisms using the r2 value are those without a high EUR ancestry (African American and Egyptian; Table 2), suggesting the influence of other factors.
The analysis of LD between pVNTR and other CYP2C9 alleles analyzed (*2, *3, *5, *6, *8) were not significant in this population, similar to that observed in other populations [13,14,15].

3.3. CYP2C9 pVNTR Ancestry Analysis in the Dominican Population

Linear regression analysis could not be performed in this population to analyze the association between CYP2C9 pVNTR variants and genetic ancestry because data from other parental populations were not available to implement the analysis.
However, performing a Student t-test to compare across the percentages of ancestry shows how carriers of the pVNTR-S fragment have a lower percentage of AFR ancestry than those who are not carriers (p = 0.031; Figure 2a), whereas carriers of the pVNTR-M allele have a higher frequency of AFR ancestry than non-carriers (p = 0.019; Figure 2b). Conversely, pVNTR-M carriers have a lower percentage of EUR ancestry than non-carriers (p = 0.008; Figure 2e). Finally, the pVNTR-L allele was not significantly associated with any ancestry group (Figure 2g–i).

4. Discussion

This is the first study analyzing CYP2C9 pVNTRs in a Latin American population, specifically, in the Caribbean Dominican Republic. The ancestral molecular component of this population, which has been previously studied [18], indicates that the percentage of genomic ancestry for these individuals is 23.8% EUR, 42.6% NAT, and 33.6% AFR, demonstrating that it is a highly mixed population with more than 75% non-European ancestry.
Previous studies have been conducted to analyze CYP2C9 pVNTR in different populations, such as Egyptian, African [13], White American [13,14], Jordanian [16], and Spanish populations [15]. Regarding the frequencies of pVNTRs, the frequency of the pVNTR-M variant in the Dominican population was the highest among all the populations reported to date (89.6%), being similar only to that of the African American population (Table 2). As for the frequency of the long pVNTR fragment in the Dominican population, it was only different from that found in (Table 2) the White American populations, which can be explained in relation to the low percentage of European ancestry in the studied Dominican population (Table 2). Lastly, it is highlighted that the frequency of the short pVNTR fragment in the Dominican population was the lowest reported to date (3.9%; Table 2).
Regarding the LD between pVNTR-S and CYP2C9*3 variants, the Dominican population shows a weaker association (D’ = 0.70; r2 = 0.67) than in previously studied populations with European ancestry, but higher than in other populations, such as the Egyptians [13] (Table 2). Since strong LD is expected in parental populations due to a lower recombination frequency in these populations, a weaker LD was expected in Dominicans.
On the other hand, it would be more accurate the term ancestral haplotype than linkage disequilibrium, since these two variants (CYP2C9*3 and pVNTR-S) are found in the same gene (locus), and to establish the haplotype of each individual, further studies would be necessary to sequence the entire gene, or at least the promoter region and exon 7, which is where the pVNTR and reference SNP for the CYP2C9*3 variant are located, respectively.
Although it was not possible to perform a linear regression analysis to analyze the association between CYP2C9 pVNTR variants and genetic ancestry, because more populations studied are needed to implement such an analysis, the present original exploratory findings support the hypothesis that carriers of the pVNTR-S fragment appear to have a lower percentage of AFR ancestry than non-carriers (p = 0.031; Figure 2a). However, this hypothesis needs to be tested by comparing the genetic ancestry of other populations.
The clinical significance of CYP2C9 pVNTR-S is based on findings reported in two previous studies [13,14]. In the first of them [13], it was reported that in European Americans on treatment with standard dose of warfarin, pVNTR-S predicted a reduction in warfarin, but the in vivo effects of pVNTR-S on CYP2C9 metabolism could not be separated from the effects of CYP2C9*3 due to the high LD in European populations [13]. On the other hand, the other recently published study [14] has shown an association between the presence of pVNTR-S and the decrease in CYP2C9 expression, independently of the effect of CYP2C9*3. That is, pVNTR-S was shown to have an independent effect on CYP2C9 expression, and then, it may further contribute to the reduction of CYP2C9 activity when coexisting/co-expressed with CYP2C9*3 [14].
Nevertheless, pVNTR-S cannot be considered an independent biomarker for CYP2C9 activity in populations with a strong coefficient of LD (high D’ and r2) with CYP2C9*3; however, in cases where pVNTR-S does not coexist with CYP2C9*3, such as in individuals of non-European descent, pVNTR-S may serve as an additional biomarker to predict the reduction of CYP2C9 activity. Thus, according to this proposal, pVNTR-S may improve CYP2C9 genetic testing panels for personalized drug therapy in populations [19] where the LD between pVNTR-S and CYP2C9*3 is not too high, such as in the Dominican population, which requires the performance of validation studies in humans.

5. Conclusions

This is the first study that analyzes the frequency and presence of CYP2C9 pVNTR in a Latin American population, specifically, in a Caribbean population from the Dominican Republic. Results show a lower CYP2C9 pVNTR-S frequency than the ones reported in the rest of the populations published in studies to date, and, also, analysis of the presence of CYP2C9 pVNTR-S and CYP2C9*3, such as an ancestral haplotype, might be of help in understanding and predicting the reduction of CYP2C9 activity in populations with different ancestries.
Further research into CYP2C9 pVNTR is needed, including studies with larger and more diverse populations around the world. In addition, clinical studies, both phenotyping and measuring drug concentrations, would be necessary to test the independent effect of CYP2C9 pVNTR in humans, mainly in individuals without known variants with decreased CYP2C9 activity (such as *3, *5, 6, *8, etc.), but carriers of the pVNTR-S fragment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G.d.l.C., M.G., F.R.-S., E.P.-L., P.D., and A.L.; data curation: C.G.d.l.C., P.D., M.G., E.R., and F.R.-S.; investigation, C.G.d.l.C., F.R.-S., E.R., and P.D.; methodology, C.G.d.l.C., F.R.-S., A.L., and P.D.; resources, M.G., E.R., and A.L.; formal analysis, C.G.d.l.C., P.D., E.P.-L., and A.L.; visualization, C.G.d.l.C. and P.D.; writing—original draft preparation, C.G.d.l.C. and P.D.; writing—review and editing, M.G., C.G.d.l.C., F.R.-S., E.R., E.P.-L., P.D., and A.L.; supervision, P.D., E.P.-L., and A.L.; funding acquisition, M.G. and A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the AEXCID-Junta de Extremadura (24IA001); the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and NextGeneration EU/Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliéncia (PMP22/00099; BIO-FRAM22); and Fondo Nacional de Innovación y Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDOCYT) from República Dominicana (2020–2021–2C5–204), and it was coordinated by the RIBEF network (Red Iberoamericana de Farmacogenética y Farmacogenómica; https://redribef.org/, accessed on 15 March 2025).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Consejo Nacional de Bioética en Salud (CONABIOS Ethical Committee 018-2022, date: 4 May 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all volunteers who kindly participated in the study. In addition, also thank to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico for the fellowship (200824/2021-4) to support of F.R.-S.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Theken, K.N.; Lee, C.R.; Gong, L.; Caudle, K.E.; Formea, C.M.; Gaedigk, A.; Klein, T.E.; Agúndez, J.A.G.; Grosser, T. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline (CPIC) for CYP2C9 and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 108, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Johnson, J.A.; Caudle, K.E.; Gong, L.; Whirl-Carrillo, M.; Stein, C.M.; Scott, S.A.; Lee, M.T.; Gage, B.F.; Kimmel, S.E.; Perera, M.A.; et al. CPIC Warfarin Dosing, 2C9, 4F2, VKOR. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 102, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Karnes, J.H.; Rettie, A.E.; Somogyi, A.A.; Huddart, R.; Fohner, A.E.; Formea, C.M.; Ta Michael Lee, M.; Llerena, A.; Whirl-Carrillo, M.; Klein, T.E.; et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2C9 and HLA-B Genotypes and Phenytoin Dosing: 2020 Update. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 109, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cooper-DeHoff, R.M.; Niemi, M.; Ramsey, L.B.; Luzum, J.A.; Tarkiainen, E.K.; Straka, R.J.; Gong, L.; Tuteja, S.; Wilke, R.A.; Wadelius, M.; et al. The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for SLCO1B1, ABCG2, and CYP2C9 genotypes and Statin-Associated Musculoskeletal Symptoms. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 111, 1007–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sangkuhl, K.; Claudio-Campos, K.; Cavallari, L.H.; Agundez, J.A.G.; Whirl-Carrillo, M.; Duconge, J.; Del Tredici, A.L.; Wadelius, M.; Rodrigues Botton, M.; Woodahl, E.L.; et al. PharmVar GeneFocus: CYP2C9. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 110, 662–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Soars, M.G.; Gelboin, H.V.; Krausz, K.W.; Riley, R.J. A comparison of relative abundance, activity factor and inhibitory monoclonal antibody approaches in the characterization of human CYP enzymology. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2003, 55, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. PharmVar n.d. Available online: https://www.pharmvar.org/gene/CYP2C9 (accessed on 21 March 2025).
  8. CYP2C9 n.d. Available online: https://www.pharmgkb.org/gene/PA126/haplotype (accessed on 21 March 2025).
  9. Kirchheiner, J.; Brockmöller, J. Clinical consequences of cytochrome P450 2C9 polymorphisms. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 77, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, B.; Wang, J.; Huang, S.-Q.; Su, H.-H.; Zhou, S.-F. Genetic polymorphism of the human cytochrome P450 2C9 gene and its clinical significance. Curr. Drug Metab. 2009, 10, 781–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhou, S.F.; Zhou, Z.W.; Huang, M. Polymorphisms of human cytochrome P450 2C9 and the functional relevance. Toxicology 2010, 278, 165–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Preissner, S.C.; Hoffmann, M.F.; Preissner, R.C.; Dunkel, M.; Gewiess, A. Polymorphic Cytochrome P450 Enzymes (CYPs) and Their Role in Personalized Therapy. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 82562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, D.; Sun, X.; Gong, Y.; Gawronski, B.E.; Langaee, T.Y.; Shahin, M.H.A.; Khalifa, S.I.; Johnson, J.A. CYP2C9 promoter variable number tandem repeat polymorphism regulates mRNA expression in human livers. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2012, 40, 884–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Montalvo, A.D.; Gong, Y.; Collins, J.M.; Wang, D. The Association Between Promoter Tandem Repeat Polymorphism (pVNTR) and CYP2C9 Gene Expression in Human Liver Samples. Genes 2025, 16, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dorado, P.; Santos-Díaz, G.; Gutiérrez-Martín, Y.; Suárez-Santisteban, M.Á. Frequency of CYP2C9 Promoter Variable Number Tandem Repeat Polymorphism in a Spanish Population: Linkage Disequilibrium with CYP2C9*3 Allele. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Al-Eitan, L.N.; Almasri, A.Y.; Al-Habahbeh, S.O. Impact of a variable number tandem repeat in the CYP2C9 promoter on warfarin sensitivity and responsiveness in Jordanians with cardiovascular disease. Pharmgenomics. Pers. Med. 2019, 12, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rodrigues-Soares, F.; Peñas-Lledó, E.M.; Tarazona-Santos, E.; Sosa-Macías, M.; Terán, E.; López-López, M.; Rodeiro, I.; Moya, G.E.; Calzadilla, L.R.; Ramírez-Roa, R.; et al. Genomic Ancestry, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 Among Latin Americans. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 107, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Guevara, M.; Rodrigues-soares, F.; Gonz, C.; Cruz, D.; Andr, F.D. Afro-Latin American Pharmacogenetics of CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 in Dominicans: A Study from the RIBEF-CEIBA Consortium. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pratt, V.M.; Cavallari, L.H.; Del Tredici, A.L.; Hachad, H.; Ji, Y.; Moyer, A.M.; Scott, S.A.; Whirl-Carrillo, M.; Weck, K.E. Recommendations for Clinical CYP2C9 Genotyping Allele Selection: A Joint Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and College of American Pathologists. J. Mol. Diagn. 2019, 21, 746–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Representation and location of CYP2C9 pVNTR. Sequence highlighted in purple: forward primer; sequence highlighted in yellow: reverse primer; pVNTR: variable number tandem repeat polymorphism; pVNTR-S: short; pVNTR-M: medium; pVNTR-L: long. Figure adapted from [13].
Figure 1. Representation and location of CYP2C9 pVNTR. Sequence highlighted in purple: forward primer; sequence highlighted in yellow: reverse primer; pVNTR: variable number tandem repeat polymorphism; pVNTR-S: short; pVNTR-M: medium; pVNTR-L: long. Figure adapted from [13].
Genes 16 00540 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of the three CYP2C9 pVNTR variants according to different frequencies of genetic ancestries in the Dominican population (n = 176). p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test. NS: not significant; AFR: African; EUR: European; NAT: Native American. (a) AFR pVNTR-S; (b) AFR pVNTR-M; (c) AFR pVNTR-L; (d) EUR pVNTR-S; (e) EUR pVNTR-M; (f) EUR pVNTR-L; (g) NAT pVNTR-S; (h) NAT pVNTR-M; (i) NAT pVNTR-L.
Figure 2. Distribution of the three CYP2C9 pVNTR variants according to different frequencies of genetic ancestries in the Dominican population (n = 176). p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test. NS: not significant; AFR: African; EUR: European; NAT: Native American. (a) AFR pVNTR-S; (b) AFR pVNTR-M; (c) AFR pVNTR-L; (d) EUR pVNTR-S; (e) EUR pVNTR-M; (f) EUR pVNTR-L; (g) NAT pVNTR-S; (h) NAT pVNTR-M; (i) NAT pVNTR-L.
Genes 16 00540 g002
Table 1. Percentage of CYP2C9 star allele genotypes and pVNTR in the Dominican population (n = 193).
Table 1. Percentage of CYP2C9 star allele genotypes and pVNTR in the Dominican population (n = 193).
CYP2C9 pVNTR
L/MM/MM/S
CYP2C9n%n%n%n%
*1/*114173.12110.911559.652.6
*1/*394.6--21.073.6
*1/*510.5--10.5--
*1/*23618.742.13216.6--
*2/*231.6--31.6--
*2/*321.0----21.0
*3/*310.5----10.5
2513.015379.3157.7
L: long; M: medium; S: short.
Table 2. Allele frequencies of CYP2C9 pVNTR and linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis between pVNTR-S and CYP2C9*3 alleles in different populations.
Table 2. Allele frequencies of CYP2C9 pVNTR and linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis between pVNTR-S and CYP2C9*3 alleles in different populations.
PopulationnCYP2C9*3pVNTR-SpVNTR-MpVNTR-L#D’ (r2)Ref.
African American1340.0100.213 ***0.742 ***0.0450.99 (0.05)[14]
African American1200.0250.0510.8830.065n.p. (0.53)[13]
Egyptian2070.0920.115 ***0.785 ***0.100n.p. (0.59)[13]
Jordanian205n.e.0.295 ***0.627 ***0.078n.e.[16]
Spanish2090.0740.081 *0.816 **0.1030.93 (0.88)[15]
White American8040.0500.0580.789 ***0.152 ***n.p. (0.75)[13]
White American1130.0400.0490.814 **0.137 **0.99 (0.79)[14]
Dominican1930.0340.0390.8960.0650.76 (0.70)Present study
*** p value < 0.0001; ** < 0.005; * < 0.05 by two-tailed Fisher exact test compared to Dominicans; in bold type statistically significant; #D’ (r2) refers to pVNTR-S and CYP2C9*3; n.e. = not evaluated; n.p. = not provided.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de la Cruz, C.G.; Guevara, M.; Rodrigues-Soares, F.; Rodríguez, E.; Peñas-Lledó, E.; LLerena, A.; Dorado, P. CYP2C9 Promoter Variable Number Tandem Repeat Polymorphism in a Dominican Population: Exploring Differences with Genetic Ancestry. Genes 2025, 16, 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16050540

AMA Style

de la Cruz CG, Guevara M, Rodrigues-Soares F, Rodríguez E, Peñas-Lledó E, LLerena A, Dorado P. CYP2C9 Promoter Variable Number Tandem Repeat Polymorphism in a Dominican Population: Exploring Differences with Genetic Ancestry. Genes. 2025; 16(5):540. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16050540

Chicago/Turabian Style

de la Cruz, Carla González, Mariela Guevara, Fernanda Rodrigues-Soares, Ernesto Rodríguez, Eva Peñas-Lledó, Adrián LLerena, and Pedro Dorado. 2025. "CYP2C9 Promoter Variable Number Tandem Repeat Polymorphism in a Dominican Population: Exploring Differences with Genetic Ancestry" Genes 16, no. 5: 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16050540

APA Style

de la Cruz, C. G., Guevara, M., Rodrigues-Soares, F., Rodríguez, E., Peñas-Lledó, E., LLerena, A., & Dorado, P. (2025). CYP2C9 Promoter Variable Number Tandem Repeat Polymorphism in a Dominican Population: Exploring Differences with Genetic Ancestry. Genes, 16(5), 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16050540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop