You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Genes
  • Case Report
  • Open Access

10 November 2025

Prenatal Diagnosis of 6q Terminal Deletion Associated with Coffin–Siris Syndrome: Phenotypic Delineation and Review

,
,
,
and
1
Service of Genetics, Division of Pediatrics, “Dr. Juan I. Menchaca” Civil Hospital of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Mexico
2
Doctorate in Multidisciplinary Research in Health, University Center of Tonala, University of Guadalajara, Tonala 45425, Mexico
3
Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Dr. Juan I. Menchaca” Civil Hospital of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Mexico
4
Research Coordination, “Fray Antonio Alcalde” Civil Hospital of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Mexico
This article belongs to the Section Genetic Diagnosis

Abstract

Chromosome 6q deletion syndrome is a rare entity that has a highly variable clinical presentation and size of deletions. The most frequent manifestations of 6q terminal deletion are intellectual disability, facial dysmorphism, brain structural anomalies, and congenital heart defects. The phenotype is not clinically recognizable, except in those who harbor a terminal 6q deletion that includes the ARID1B gene, in whom features similar to Coffin–Siris syndrome (CSS) can be observed. We report the case of a female newborn with a prenatal diagnosis of a terminal deletion on 6q25.1q27, which encompasses the ARID1B gene, and who was diagnosed with CSS during the neonatal period. From our review, we found that facial gestalt, hypertrichosis, and fifth fingernail aplasia/hypoplasia, along with other features, such as vertebral defects and cystic hygroma (or webbed neck), correlated with the presence of a CSS causally related to 6q25.3 small deletions that include the ARID1B gene.

1. Introduction

Chromosome 6q deletion syndrome (C6qDS) is a rare entity first described by Milosevic and Kalicanin in 1975 [] in a boy with dysmorphic features and developmental delay. Since then, several cases have been reported. The clinical recognition of C6qDS is challenging due to the variation in deletion size and genes involved. In 1997, Hopkin et al. proposed a classification of C6qDS into three groups based on the description of 60 reported cases: (A) proximal deletion (6q11-q16), (B) middle deletion (6q15-q25), and (C) terminal deletion (6q25-qter) []. Intellectual disability is present in all groups. Group A correlates with mild dysmorphic features and lower frequency of congenital heart defects (CHDs) and microcephaly; Group B correlates with limb anomalies and high neonatal mortality; and Group C correlates with a higher incidence of brain anomalies, but remains difficult to clinically recognize. Advances in molecular cytogenetics have broadened the clinical spectrum, identifying microdeletions and new candidate genes [,,,,,,].
On the other hand, Coffin–Siris syndrome (CSS) was first described by Coffin and Siris in 1970 in three unrelated females with intellectual disability, coarse facial features, and absence of the fifth fingernail []. Not until 2012 did Santen et al. identify pathogenic variants in the ARID1B gene as the etiology of CSS type 1 (CSS1) [], and in the same year, Tsurusaki et al. reported other CSS genes related to the SWI/SNF complex []. The ARID1B gene (6q25.3) was proposed as a candidate gene for cerebral dysgenesis in terminal 6q deletion syndrome by Backx et al. 2011 [] and later by Michelson et al. 2012 in a boy with an interstitial deletion at 6q25, including only the genes ARID1B and ZDHHC []. Most patients with CSS do not have prenatal US anomalies, and those reported are mainly congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), congenital heart defects (CHDs), and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). However, in CSS related to ARID1B, the most frequent anomalies detected by prenatal US are brain anomalies, including corpus callosum agenesis (CCA) []. Here, we report a case of a female newborn with a prenatally detected 6q terminal deletion, which encompasses the ARID1B gene, in whom classic CSS was clinically diagnosed at birth. Additionally, we review all previous reports with similar deletions on chromosome 6q.25.3.

2. Materials and Methods

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents for publication. Amniotic fluid was collected via transabdominal amniocentesis. Fetal cells were cultured in situ and prepared for G-banded karyotyping. Chromosomal analysis was performed on metaphase spreads, with 20 cells counted. The karyotype was interpreted and reported according to ISCN, 2020. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using a commercial extraction kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. aCGH was performed using the commercial oligonucleotide microarray platform KaryoNIM®60K. Data were analyzed using Agilent Cytogenomics Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, California, USA Software v5.0.2.5 []. Detected copy number variations (CNVs) were filtered and classified following the guidelines of ACMG.

3. Case Report

The proposita was the first child of a young, healthy, and non-consanguineous couple. No family history of miscarriages or malformations was reported. During the first trimester, a fetal ultrasound detected a cystic hygroma (CH) and absence of the nasal bone (Figure 1A,B). At 18 weeks of gestation, amniocentesis and karyotyping were performed, reporting 46, XX, del(6)(q23) (Figure 2A). Despite prenatal diagnosis, the parents decided to continue the pregnancy. She was born at the 34th week of gestation by cesarean section. The Apgar score was 7–8 at 3 and 5 min, respectively. At birth, weight was 1840 g (P16), height was 41 cm (P10), and OFC was 32 cm (P76). Physical examination revealed coarse facial features with generalized hypertrichosis, dysplastic ears, a short neck with redundant nuchal skin, a broad thorax with widely spaced nipples, short hands with brachydactyly, nail hypoplasia of fingers 1–4, and nail aplasia of the left fifth finger. The feet showed nail aplasia of the fifth toes. A deep sacral skin dimple was also noted (Figure 1C–K). Thorax radiography revealed a hemivertebra in T6 (Figure 1L). Brain MRI showed agenesis of the corpus callosum, cerebellar hypoplasia, and pseudocystic dilatation of the posterior fossa (Figure 1M). Echocardiogram showed an ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD), along with a ventricular septal defect (VSD). Renal ultrasonography was normal. A CGH array was performed, revealing arr [] 6q25.1q27 (150321670_170537245)x1 (Figure 2B). The deletion spanned 20.2 megabases, involving at least 74 genes, spanning morbid genes as SYNE1, ARID1B, PDE10A, DLL1, and TBP (Figure 2B, lower panel in the enlargement). A normal karyotype was obtained for both parents. The proposita died at three months of age due to sepsis and multiorgan failure; an autopsy was not performed.
Figure 1. Clinical features in the proposita. (A,B) Prenatal ultrasound showing a cystic hygroma, mega cisterna magna, and absent nasal bone. (C) Coarse facial features. (DI), Nail aplasia/hypoplasia, short fifth fingers. (J) Dysplastic, low-set ears, and redundant nuchal skin. (K) Deep sacral skin dimple. (L) Thorax radiography showing mild scoliosis and T6 hemivertebra (arrow). (M) Sagittal view of a brain MRI showing agenesis of the corpus callosum (arrowheads), severe hypoplasia of the cerebellum, and pseudocystic dilatation of the posterior fossa (arrow).
Figure 2. Cytogenetic findings. (A) Karyogram (G-banding) of amniocytes demonstrating the female complement with a deletion on the long arm of chromosome 6:46, XX, del(6)(q23) (arrow). (B) aCGH Profile of chromosome 6 with a detailed view for the bands 6q25.1 to 6q27 and genes involved, including ARID1B (red circle).

4. Discussion

Pure chromosome 6q terminal deletions are relatively rare, with a frequency of about 0.05% in patients with intellectual disability and multiple malformations []. Although deletions across all chromosome 6q have been described, most recent research has focused on subtelomeric deletions in the cytoband 6q27, adding a pure subtelomeric deletion subgroup for the original Group C proposed by Hopkin et al. []. Regarding this subgroup, some candidate genes (DLL1, THBS2, PHF10, and C6orf70) have been proposed to explain the observed brain anomalies [,,,,,]. Expanding this subject, in 2005, Eash et al. described a correlation between deletion spans 6q26-q27 with congenital heart defects, genital hypoplasia, a short neck, and retinal anomalies, and pure subtelomeric deletions with dysmorphic features and brain anomalies, including ventriculomegaly/hydrocephaly []. Our patient, along with the 14 other cases summarized in Table 1, was analyzed to establish possible specific genotype–phenotype correlations, as detailed below.
A key objective of our analysis was to correlate specific genetic loci within Group C with distinct phenotypes. We noted that ARID1B gene haploinsufficiency (proximal at Group C, 6q25.1) correlates with the distinctive nail hypoplasia/aplasia of the fifth finger. This recognizable clinical manifestation is observed in 68% of patients with CSS1 []. Our patient is one of only three terminal 6q deletion cases to date that exhibit a recognizable CSS phenotype (along with Stevens et al. [] and Meng et al. []). This finding suggests that the CSS phenotype in other 6q terminal deletion cases may be masked by haploinsufficiency of other contiguous subtelomeric genes. This is supported by the fact that only patients with small interstitial deletions, including ARID1B, display a more evident CSS phenotype [,,]. Other seemingly specific features were hypertrichosis and corpus callosum agenesis (Table 1). Our case is particularly significant due to the presence of cystic hygroma (CH), a feature previously reported only in a few patients harboring deletions between 6q23 and 6q27 [,,]. Also, Meng et al. reported a case with a webbed neck and karyotype 46, XX, del(6)(q25) [], suggesting that CH is a clinical feature in terminal deletion but not in subtelomeric deletion only. No genes in this chromosomal region are known to be involved in CH or lymphatic system development. All five patients had CHD, specifically AVD and VSD, except for those reported by Shen-Shwartz et al. and Meng et al. [,], in which an atrioventricular septal defect was reported, leading to the suspicion of a relationship between CHD and CH in C6qDS patients.
The clinical variability among case reports could be explained by the wide range of deletion sizes. Chromosome 6q contains several known fragile sites (q13, q21, and q26) [], in addition to a preferential breakpoint at 6q25 first noted by Valtat et al. in 1992 []. This region was later characterized as FRA6E, a fragile site spanning 3.6 Mb from 6q25.3 to 6q26 [] (Figure 3), resulting in a highly variable deletion size and, consequently, diverse clinical outcomes.
Figure 3. Chromosome 6 deletion groups: 6q deletion Groups A, B, and C proposed by Hopkin et al. (1997) []. Major clinical findings of each group are noted. Known fragile sites at q13, q21, and q26 are shown (red arrows). Subtelomeric group (blue arrow). Candidate genes in the Group C subtelomeric region are shown in blue. FRA6E spans from 6q25.3 to 6q26. IUGR: Intrauterine growth restriction.
Table 1. Clinical and cytogenetic features in patients with distal pure 6q deletion syndrome (Group C).
Table 1. Clinical and cytogenetic features in patients with distal pure 6q deletion syndrome (Group C).
Reference
[][][][][][][][][][][][][]Present Case
Patient 2 1243544
SexMMMMMFMFMMFFMFF
Age at last examination2 yr9 mo3 yr1 yr21 wkFetus4 mo2 yr10 yr2 yr37 yr9 yr10 mo18 mo3 mo
Prenatal findings
Intrauterine growth retardation+NS+
Cystic hygroma++NS+
OligohydramniosNS+
Ventriculomegaly++NS+
Hydrops fetalis+NS
HydrothoraxNS
Absent nasal boneNS+
Diaphragmatic hernia+NS
Natal/postnatal findings
Birth length cm (percentile)NSNS51 (P50)48 (P60)23 (P25)NS44 NSNS55.5 (P5)NS49 (P50)47 (P1)4841 (P10)
Birth weight g (percentile)NS2670 (P1)3600 (P54)2870 (P60)280 (P10)NS22201800NS2600 (P10)NS2800 (P25)2800 (P3)20001840 (P16)
OFC at birth cm (percentile)NSNS35.5 (P50)32 (<P3)16 (P25)NS30.8NSNS44 (>P95)NS34 (P50)31 (<P1)3032 (P76)
Developmental delay/intellectual disability++++NANA+++++++++
MicrocephalyYes+++NS+NS++
Sparse scalp hair+NS++
Thick eyebrowsNS+++
Long eyelashesNSNS++
DacryostenosisNSNSNS+NS
Flat nasal bridge++++++++
Thick alae nasi++NS++
Anteverted nose++++++++
Long philtrum+++++NS+++++
Large mouth++++++++
Dysplastic ears++++++++++++
Hypertrichosis++NSNS+
Fifth fingernail aplasia/hypoplasia+NS+ *NSNS+
Brachydactyly+NSNSNoNSNS++
HemivertebraeNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNS+
Congenital heart defects
Atrioventricular septal defect+++NS
Ventricular septal defect+++NS++
Atrial septal defectNS+++
Partially anomalous pulmonary venous drainage+NS
Cor triatriatum+NS
Pulmonary vein stenosis+NS
Genitourinary anomalies
Hydronephrosis+++
Duplicated collecting system+
Renal cyst+
Cryptorchidism++NA+NANANANANA
Penoscrotal webbing+
Clitoromegaly+
Prominent labia minora+
Cerebral dysgenesis
Corpus callosum agenesis (A)/hypoplasiaNSNSNS−/−+/−−/−+/−−/−NS−/−−/+−/++/−+/−+/−
Ventriculomegaly/hydrocephaly NSNSNS−/−−/−−/−−/−+/−NS−/+−/−−/−−/−−/−−/−
ColpocephalyNSNSNSNS+++
ArhinencephalyNSNSNS+NS
Cerebellar hypoplasiaNSNSNSNS+
Other anomaliesHD, PrHCP, HDCdPrHCP, DHDH, SUAAA, CP, PrT, STThTGC, RNSEPi, RPiSSRNS
Cytogenomic findings
Cytogenetic band deleted6q256q256q246q256q236q24.36q24.36q25.36q256q25.26q25.36q25.26q25.36q246q25.1
ARID1B gene deletion??+++++??++++++
CSS clinically recognizable +++
M, male; F, female; IUGR, NS, non-stated; NA, not applicable, intrauterine growth restriction; CH, cystic hygroma; DD, developmental delay; PAPVD, partially anomalous pulmonary venous drainage; RVH, right ventricular hypertrophy; AVSD, atrioventricular septal defect; DCS, duplicated collecting system; CCA, corpus callosum agenesis; SUA, single umbilical artery; CCH, corpus callosum hypoplasia; ASD-OS, atrial septal defect ostium secundum; CP, cleft palate; CSS: Coffin-Siris syndrome. * seen on photograph, not mention it in text.

5. Conclusions

Chromosome 6q deletion syndrome is a rare chromosomal abnormality with a highly variable clinical presentation, making it very difficult to clinically recognize. The typical features of CSS, along with other anomalies, such as vertebral defects and CH (webbed neck), appear to correlate with the presence of CSS related to small deletions on 6q25.3 that include the ARID1B gene. Further large cohort studies are required to better understand its clinical variability and identify potential interactions between genes surrounding ARID1B.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.P.-P. and J.R.C.-R.; methodology, L.B.-M.; data curation, E.M.G.-H.; writing—original draft preparation, C.P.-P.; writing—review and editing, D.A.M.-C. and J.R.C.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Civil Hospital of Guadalajara, Dr. Juan I. Menchaca, Folio number 00094. Approved on 24 October 2025.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ASDAtrial septal defect
CDHCongenital diaphragmatic hernia
CHCystic hygroma
CHDCongenital heart defect
CSSCoffin–Siris syndrome
C6qDSChromosome 6q deletion syndrome
USUltrasound
VSDVentricular septal defect

References

  1. Milosević, J.; Kalicanin, P. Long arm deletion of chromosome no. 6 in a mentally retarded boy with multiple physical malformations. J. Ment. Defic. Res. 1975, 19, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hopkin, R.J.; Schorry, E.; Bofinger, M.; Milatovich, A.; Stern, H.J.; Jayne, C.; Saal, H.M. New insights into the phenotypes of 6q deletions. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1997, 70, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Caselli, R.; Mencarelli, M.; Papa, F.; Uliana, V.; Schiavone, S.; Strambi, M.; Pescucci, C.; Ariani, F.; Rossi, V.; Longo, I.; et al. A 2.6 Mb deletion of 6q24.3-25.1 in a patient with growth failure, cardiac septal defect, thin upperlip and asymmetric dysmorphic ears. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2007, 50, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mosca, A.; Callier, P.; Masurel-Paulet, A.; Thauvin-Robinet, C.; Marle, N.; Nouchy, M.; Huet, F.; Dipanda, D.; De Paepe, A.; Coucke, P.; et al. Cytogenetic and array-CGH characterization of a 6q27 deletion in a patient with developmental delay and features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2010, 152A, 1314–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gerber, J.C.; Neuhann, T.M.; Tyshchenko, N.; Smitka, M.; Hackmann, K. Expanding the clinical and neuroradiological phenotype of 6q27 microdeletion: Olfactory bulb aplasia and anosmia. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2011, 155, 1981–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rigon, C.; Salviati, L.; Mandarano, R.; Donà, M.; Clementi, M. 6q27 subtelomeric deletions: Is there a specific phenotype? Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2011, 155, 1213–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nowaczyk, M.J.; Carter, M.T.; Xu, J.; Huggins, M.; Raca, G.; Das, S.; Martin, C.L.; Schwartz, S.; Rosenfield, R.; Waggoner, D.J. Paternal deletion 6q24.3: A new congenital anomaly syndrome associated with intrauterine growth failure, early developmental delay and characteristic facial appearance. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2008, 146A, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peddibhotla, S.; Nagamani, S.C.S.; Erez, A.; Hunter, J.V.; Holder, J.L., Jr.; Carlin, M.E.; Bader, P.I.; Perras, H.M.F.; Allanson, J.E.; Newman, L.; et al. Delineation of candidate genes responsible for structural brain abnormalities in patients with terminal deletions of chromosome 6q27. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2015, 23, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Thakur, M.; Bronshtein, E.; Hankerd, M.; Adekola, H.; Puder, K.; Gonik, B.; Ebrahim, S. Genomic detection of a familial 382 Kb 6q27 deletion in a fetus with isolated severe ventriculomegaly and her affected mother. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2018, 176, 1985–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Coffin, G.S.; Siris, E. Mental retardation with absent fifth fingernail and terminal phalanx. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1970, 119, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Santen, G.W.; Aten, E.; Sun, Y.; Almomani, R.; Gilissen, C.; Nielsen, M.; Kant, S.G.; Snoeck, I.N.; Peeters, E.A.J.; Hilhorst-Hofstee, Y.; et al. Mutations in SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex gene ARID1B cause Coffin-Siris syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 379–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tsurusaki, Y.; Okamoto, N.; Ohashi, H.; Kosho, T.; Imai, Y.; Hibi-Ko, Y.; Kaname, T.; Naritomi, K.; Kawame, H.; Wakui, K.; et al. Mutations affecting components of the SWI/SNF complex cause Coffin-Siris syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 376–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Backx, L.; Seuntjens, E.; Devriendt, K.; Vermeesch, J.; Van Esch, H. A balanced translocation t(6;14)(q25.3;q13.2) leading to reciprocal fusion transcripts in a patient with intellectual disability and agenesis of corpus callosum. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2011, 132, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Michelson, M.; Ben-Sasson, A.; Vinkler, C.; Leshinsky-Silver, E.; Netzer, I.; Frumkin, A.; Kivity, S.; Lerman-Sagie, T.; Lev, D. Delineation of the interstitial 6q25 microdeletion syndrome: Refinement of the critical causative region. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2012, 158A, 1395–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. van der Sluijs, P.J.; Joosten, M.; Alby, C.; Attié-Bitach, T.; Gilmore, K.; Dubourg, C.; Fradin, M.; Wang, T.; Kurtz-Nelson, E.C.; Ahlers, K.P.; et al. Discovering a new part of the phenotypic spectrum of Coffin-Siris syndrome in a fetal cohort. Genet. Med. 2023, 25, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McGowan-Jordan, J.; Hastings, R.J.; Moore, S. (Eds.) ISCN 2020: An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2020); Karger: Basel, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wadt, K.; Jensen, L.N.; Bjerglund, L.; Lundstrøm, M.; Kirchhoff, M.; Kjaergaard, S. Fetal ventriculomegaly due to familial submicroscopic terminal 6q deletions. Prenat. Diagn. 2012, 32, 1212–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Eash, D.; Waggoner, D.; Chung, J.; Stevenson, D.; Martin, C.L. Calibration of 6q subtelomere deletions to define genotype/phenotype correlations. Clin. Genet. 2005, 67, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Santen, G.W.; Aten, E.; Silfhout, A.T.V.-V.; Pottinger, C.; van Bon, B.W.; van Minderhout, I.J.; Snowdowne, R.; van der Lans, C.A.; Boogaard, M.; Linssen, M.M.; et al. Coffin-Siris syndrome and the BAF complex: Genotype-phenotype study in 63 patients. Hum. Mutat. 2013, 34, 1519–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Stevens, C.A.; Fineman, R.M.; Breg, W.R.; Silken, A.B. Report of two cases of distal deletion of the long arm of chromosome 6. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1988, 29, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meng, J.; Fujita, H.; Nagahara, N.; Kashiwai, A.; Yoshioka, Y.; Funato, M. Two patients with chromosome 6q terminal deletions with breakpoints at q24.3 and q25.3. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1992, 43, 747–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Paulraj, P.; Palumbos, J.C.; Openshaw, A.; Carey, J.C.; Toydemir, R.M. Multiple Congenital Anomalies and Global Developmental Delay in a Patient with Interstitial 6q25.2q26 Deletion: A Diagnostic Odyssey. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2018, 156, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shen-Schwarz, S.; Hill, L.M.; Surti, U.; Marchese, S. Deletion of terminal portion of 6q: Report of a case with unusual malformations. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1989, 32, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Krassikoff, N.; Sekhon, G.S. Terminal deletion of 6q and Fryns syndrome: A microdeletion/syndrome pair? Am. J. Med. Genet. 1990, 36, 363–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Valtat, C.; Galliano, D.; Mettey, R.; Toutain, A.; Moraine, C. Monosomy 6q: Report on four new cases. Clin. Genet. 1992, 41, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hecht, F.; Hecht, B.K. Nonrandom chromosome breakpoints in 6q deletions. Clin. Genet. 1992, 41, 167–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Denison, S.R.; Callahan, G.; Becker, N.A.; Phillips, L.A.; Smith, D.I. Characterization of FRA6E and its potential role in autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism and ovarian cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2003, 38, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bartoshesky, L.; Lewis, M.B.; Pashayan, H.M. Developmental abnormalities associated with long arm deletion of chromosome No. 6. Clin. Genet. 1978, 13, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Goldberg, R.; Fish, B.; Ship, A.; Shprintzen, R.J. Deletion of a portion of the long arm of chromosome 6. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1980, 5, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Striano, P.; Malacarne, M.; Cavani, S.; Pierluigi, M.; Rinaldi, R.; Cavaliere, M.L.; Rinaldi, M.M.; De Bernardo, C.; Coppola, A.; Pintaudi, M.; et al. Clinical phenotype and molecular characterization of 6q terminal deletion syndrome: Five new cases. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2006, 140, 1944–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Elia, M.; Striano, P.; Fichera, M.; Gaggero, R.; Castiglia, L.; Galesi, O.; Malacarne, M.; Pierluigi, M.; Amato, C.; Musumeci, S.A.; et al. 6q terminal deletion syndrome associated with a distinctive EEG and clinical pattern: A report of five cases. Epilepsia 2006, 47, 830–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nagamani, S.C.S.; Erez, A.; Eng, C.; Ou, Z.; Chinault, C.; Workman, L.; Coldwell, J.; Stankiewicz, P.; Patel, A.; Lupski, J.R.; et al. Interstitial deletion of 6q25.2–q25.3: A novel microdeletion syndrome associated with microcephaly, developmental delay, dysmorphic features and hearing loss. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 17, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nair, S.; Varghese, R.; Hashim, S.; Scariah, P. Dysmorphic features and congenital heart disease in chromosome 6q deletion: A short report. Indian J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 18, 127–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.