Next Article in Journal
Gene Mapping and Molecular Marker Development for Controlling Purple-Leaf Trait in Pakchoi (Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis (L.) Hanelt)
Previous Article in Journal
The p.Ile202Thr Substitution in TUBB2B Can Be Associated with Syndromic Presentation of Congenital Fibrosis of the Extraocular Muscles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 16
Issue 10
10.3390/genes16101183
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Inherited Retinal Diseases with High Myopia: A Review

by
Cyndy Liu
,
Narin Sheri
and
Matthew D. Benson
*
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2025, 16(10), 1183; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16101183 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 September 2025 / Revised: 4 October 2025 / Accepted: 9 October 2025 / Published: 11 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inherited Retinal Dystrophies: Genetic Basis, Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) are a diverse group of monogenic disorders associated with dysfunction of the retina. High myopia, commonly defined as a spherical equivalent ≤ −6.00 D or axial length ≥ 26.5 mm, is a recurring clinical feature across several IRDs, and could serve as an early diagnostic clue. This review provides a summary of IRDs associated with high myopia to guide the clinician in establishing a molecular diagnosis for patients. We performed a comprehensive literature review of articles in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and JAMA Network to identify associations between monogenic IRDs and high myopia. Genes associated with IRDs and high myopia clustered into functional categories that included collagen/structural integrity (COL2A1, COL9A1, COL11A1, COL18A1, P3H2), phototransduction and visual cycle (PDE6C, PDE6H, GUCY2D, ARR3, RBP3), ciliary trafficking and microtubule-associated genes (RPGR, RP2, IFT140, CFAP418, FAM161A), synaptic ribbon and bipolar cell signaling (NYX, CACNA1F, TRPM1, GRM6, LRIT3, GPR179), opsin-related genes (OPN1LW, OPN1MW), and miscellaneous categories (VPS13B, ADAMTS18, LAMA1). Associations between IRDs and high myopia spanned stationary and progressive retinal disorders and included both cone-dominant and rod-dominant diseases. High myopia accompanied by other visual symptoms and signs such as nyctalopia, photophobia, or reduced best-corrected visual acuity should heighten suspicion for an underlying IRD. Earlier diagnosis of IRDs for patients could facilitate timely genetic counseling, participation in clinical trials, and interventions for patients to preserve vision.:

1. Introduction

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) are a group of disorders characterized by the progressive degeneration of the retina and/or retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) [1]. The retina contains cone and rod photoreceptors that are crucial for phototransduction, where light entering the eyes is converted into an electric signal for the brain to process [2]. The RPE is a single layer of cells that plays an important role in supporting the neural retina by forming the outer blood-retinal barrier, sustaining photoreceptors through the transportation of ions/nutrients, recycling vitamin A for the visual cycle, and managing waste products, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) [3]. IRDs arise from pathogenic variants in genes expressed in the retina and/or RPE, impacting approximately 1 in 3000 individuals globally [4]. These conditions can cause progressive vision loss, and common symptoms can include: reduced central vision, light sensitivity, colour blindness, night blindness, loss of peripheral vision, and progression to complete blindness [5]. Currently, treatment options are limited, but a range of therapeutic approaches including small molecule therapies, genetic therapies, stem cell therapies, and retinal implants are being investigated in clinical trials [6]. An important aspect in managing patients with IRDs is the early detection of the condition, which may result in an improved prognosis through the identification and management of any associated ocular and systemic complications [7]. Early disease detection also helps identify at-risk family members for additional testing, can inform family planning through genetic counseling and helps position patients for participation in clinical trials. Therefore, it is important to explore different methods of improving the diagnosis and treatment of IRDs. There is a group of IRDs that are frequently associated with high myopia, which is typically defined as a refractive error of ≤−6.00 D or an axial length of ≥26.5 mm [8]. Identifying shared clinical signs, such as high myopia, can streamline diagnosis and inform potential shared underlying pathomechanisms, both of which may be important for developing treatments. In this review, we examine the correlation between IRDs and myopia by examining the genes associated with both high myopia and retinal dystrophies.

2. Methods

Although myopia is common globally, high myopia is estimated to affect 2–3% of the population [9]. Given the distinction between standard myopia and high myopia, there may be an association between high myopia and certain inherited retinal disorders. As a result, a comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and JAMA Network to identify genetic associations between inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) and high myopia. The search included keywords: high myopia, myopia, retinal dystrophies, retina, nearsightedness, and retinal degeneration. Ophthalmic measurements such as refractive error (≤−6.00 D) and axial length (≥26.5 mm) were considered when available. However, due to variability in definitions of high myopia, some case reports included patients who were just above the −6.00 D cut-off, and judgment was required in determining which genes to include in this review. We note that some patients may have other confounding reasons for their myopic refractive error, such as steep corneas. As well, some genes associated with myopia, but not high myopia, may not have been included. Additionally, there is a possibility that rare monogenic disorders that may be associated with high myopia are absent from this review due to limited availability of the literature on them. Despite these limitations, this review provides a guide for clinicians and vision scientists by focusing on overlapping molecular mechanisms to help refine differential diagnosis and potentially guide molecular testing for patients suspected of having IRDs.
We have categorized our results according to the functional class of disorders that each gene belongs to (Table 1). In addition, we have included a flowchart based on clinical symptoms and signs which may assist clinicians in prioritizing molecular testing (Figure 1).

3. Collagen/Structural Integrity

3.1. COL2A1

The COL2A1 gene encodes the alpha−1 chain of type II collagen, which is abundant in cartilage and vitreous humour of the eye [10]. Heterozygous pathogenic mutations in COL2A1 are associated with type I Stickler syndrome which results from the improper formation of collagen [11]. Specifically, this genetic disorder can result in retinal abnormalities often presenting as optically empty or membranous vitreous (type I) with veils and perivascular and peripheral lattice degeneration [12,13]. Furthermore, sixty percent of patients develop rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD), the most common form of RD, where a tear or hole is present in the retina [14]. Pathogenic variants in COL2A1 are also associated with other ocular conditions including glaucoma, cataracts, and lens subluxation [11,15]. Extraocular signs that would increase the suspicion for type 1 Stickler syndrome include midface hypoplasia, Pierre-Robin sequence (micrognathia, glossoptosis, cleft palate), hearing loss, and degenerative joint disease [16].
Kniest dysplasia is an allelic disorder that is associated with an ocular triad including high myopia, vitreous changes, and RD [17]. Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita (SEDC), also caused by heterozygous pathogenic COL2A1 variants, demonstrates similar ocular features including high myopia, vitreous changes, and risk of RD [18].
Pathogenic variants in COL2A1 are frequently associated with high myopia [19,20,21]. In addition, a large study of over 250 families with high myopia found a significant association with COL2A1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) [22]. A recent study on 13 members of a four-generation Chinese family with early-onset high myopia utilized whole-exome sequencing (WES) to identify an intronic COL2A1 variant accounting for the family’s high myopia [23].

3.2. COL9A1

COL9A1 encodes one of the three alpha chains of type IX collagen [24]. Biallelic pathogenic mutations in COL9A1 have also been associated with Stickler syndrome with ocular abnormalities, alongside more common causes of Stickler syndrome caused by mutations in COL2A1 and COL11A1 [25]. In COL9A1-related autosomal recessive Stickler syndrome, the vitreous does not phenocopy the classic type 1 Stickler syndrome (COL2A1; membranous vitreous) or type 2 Stickler syndrome (COL11A1; beaded vitreous) patterns. Rather, the vitreous is generally described as optically empty with a syneresis appearance due to progressive liquefaction [26].
One study evaluated a family including four children with COL9A1-related Stickler syndrome due to a novel homozygous nonsense variant, p.R295* [26]. Ophthalmic investigations of the four affected children revealed retinopathy in two children whose refractive errors were −15.00 D (right eye)/−14.50 D (left eye) and −4.50 D/−5.50 D. The other two affected children, who did not have retinopathies, had refractive errors of −4.00 D/−4.50 D and −3.50 D/−3.50 D [26].
Maghsoudi and colleagues reported on the risk of retinal detachment in a cohort of 13 patients (ages 3 to 42; median age 14) with COL9A1-related autosomal recessive Stickler syndrome [27]. All patients exhibited myopia (ranging from −2.00 D to −23.00 D), and 9 of the 13 patients had high myopia (−6.00 D or higher) in both eyes. Retinal detachment occurred in 2 out of 26 eyes (2 out of 13 patients; 15.5%) in the 3rd and 4th decade of life [27]. Given these findings, patients with COL9A1-related autosomal recessive Stickler syndrome may have a lower risk of retinal detachment compared to other types of Stickler syndrome. However, additional longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm these findings.

3.3. COL11A1

The COL11A1 gene encodes for one of the two alpha chains in type XI collagen. Heterozygous pathogenic mutations in this gene are associated with type II Stickler syndrome, and patients characteristically have an irregular and beaded vitreous phenotype [28,29]. As in type I Stickler syndrome, the incidence of a retinal tear and detachment is increased [30]. Although retinal detachment in type II Stickler syndrome is less common than in type 1 Stickler syndrome, the risk remains approximately 40% and represents a significant cause of blindness in children [30].
One study evaluated four Turkish families with Marshall–Stickler syndrome and identified disease-causing COL11A1 variants in three families, specifically 4 patients ranging from 1 month to 9 years of age [31]. Of the affected patients, 1 individual had degenerative myopia (−5.75 D/−5.25 D) and tigroid retinae, another unrelated patient also had myopia (refraction not reported), and a third unrelated patient exhibited severe myopia (−17.00 D/−17.00 D).
Given the substantial risk of RD in patients with Stickler syndrome, regular dilated peripheral retinal exams are prudent. Wide-field fundus imaging, if available, is helpful for documenting retinal pathology and evaluating for disease progression [32]. Importantly, an RD could present in infants or children who may be unable to verbalize any visual symptoms, so clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion. There is a growing body of evidence to support prophylactic treatment, particularly peripheral laser retinopexy, in patients with Stickler syndrome [33,34,35,36]. A recent meta-analysis of 400 eyes of 225 patients with COL2A1- or COL11A1-related Stickler syndrome reported an RD rate of 6.6% (6.3 years mean follow-up duration) in patients who had prophylactic laser retinopexy compared to 36.0% (4.0 years mean follow-up duration) in patients without laser [36]. Importantly, the benefit of laser prophylaxis for mitigating RD was the greatest in patients with high myopia [36]. Consistent with previous studies, retinal detachment developed in 58.2% of patients with COL2A1-related Stickler syndrome who did not undergo laser prophylaxis, compared to 37.5% of patients with COL11A1-related Stickler syndrome. While patients with COL2A1 pathogenic variants benefitted from laser prophylaxis, there were too few patients with COL11A1 pathogenic variants (and too short of follow-up) to confirm whether a similar benefit exists. In summary, clinicians should consider offering prophylactic laser retinopexy for patients with Stickler syndrome, especially for patients with COL2A1 pathogenic variants and high myopia [36].

3.4. COL18A1

COL18A1 encodes the alpha chain of type XVIII collagen, which is important for brain development and the formation of many eye structures [37]. Specifically, type XVIII collagen is present in the corneal epithelial basement membrane and Descemet’s membrane, the basement membranes of the iris and ciliary body, and the retinal inner limiting membrane [38]. Biallelic pathogenic mutations in this gene cause Knobloch syndrome, a condition associated with vision abnormalities and occipital encephalocele [34]. Characteristic ocular features in Knobloch syndrome can include high myopia, vitreoretinal degeneration and malformations of the macula [39].
Similarly to COL2A1, biallelic pathogenic variants in COL18A1 are consistently associated with high myopia as shown across cohort and case studies [40,41,42,43]. One case study examined 2 patients from a Chinese family where genetic testing had confirmed novel compound heterozygous COL18A1 variants [42]. The 7-year-old patient had high myopia with a refractive error of −14.50 D in both eyes and an axial length of 22.3 mm (eye not specified). In addition, she had thinning of the retinae, but no retinal detachment at the time of the study. However, her 4-year-old sibling, who had a refractive error of −14.50 D/−15.50 D and an axial length of 21.36 mm (left eye only reported) had a history of total retinal detachment of the left eye and a partial retinal detachment of the right eye at the age of 7 months.
Recently, a novel variant in PAK2 was identified in a newborn exhibiting features consistent with Knobloch syndrome, specifically atretic parietal meningocele and presumed retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) [44]. At 6–7 weeks of age, the patient was treated for rapidly progressive ROP, which was unresponsive to laser therapy. Subsequently, right vitrectomies were performed at 4 and 5 months of age for complex retinal detachments. Due to the ocular anomalies and meningocele, this study concluded that the kinase-deficient PAK2 variant contributes to the pathogenesis of Knobloch syndrome, thus expanding the understanding of genes associated with syndromic retinal dystrophies.

3.5. P3H2/LEPREL1

LEPREL1 encodes the enzyme prolyl 3-hydroxylase 2 (P3H2) that has an important role in the stabilization of connective tissue by catalyzing the post-translational inclusion of 3-hydroxyproline on collagens [45]. P3H2 interacts with collagen COL4A1 and COL1A1 of the tendons, sclera, and membrane surrounding the lens of the eye [46]. Since LEPREL1 plays a role in the formation of collagen, biallelic pathogenic loss-of-function mutations can result in ineffective collagen assembly that alters basement membrane structures of the eye, such as the inner limiting membrane (ILM). The ILM ensures proper development of the retina, and LEPREL mutations can weaken this layer, increasing the risk of retinal tears and subsequent retinal detachment [47]. LEPREL1 mutations can also cause other ocular manifestations including high myopia.
A case study identified high myopia in a Bedouin Israeli family with homozygous LEPREL1 mutations [48]. Ophthalmic exams were performed on 13 affected individuals, and refractive errors were reported in 11 patients, resulting in a mean refractive error of −11.30 D. All affected individuals demonstrated axial myopia, confirmed by elongated axial lengths ranging from 25.1 mm to 30.5 mm. Peripheral vitreo-retinal degenerative changes were present in 9 of the patients, of which 4 developed retinal tears resulting in RD in one or both of the eyes. Despite repeated surgical intervention, 3 of the patients had intractable RD which resulted in blindness.

4. Phototransduction and Visual Cycle

4.1. PDE6C

The gene PDE6C encodes the catalytic α’ subunit of the cone photoreceptor phosphodiesterase [49]. This enzyme is expressed in cone photoreceptors and facilitates colour vision and daylight vision. Biallelic pathogenic mutations in this gene typically cause achromatopsia, a condition characterized by complete or partial loss of colour vision, diminished visual acuity (VA), nystagmus, and photophobia.
There is evidence to suggest that pathogenic variants in PDE6C may be associated with high myopia. One study recruited 8 patients (ages 22 to 46 years old) with disease-causing mutations in PDE6C who all presented with early-onset fine nystagmus, decreased VA, light sensitivity, and severe color vision loss [50]. Ophthalmic investigations revealed that five of the eight participants had high myopia, with refractive errors of −10.25 D/−11.00 D, −10.50 D/−11.00 D, −14.00 D/−14.50 D, −11.00 D/−12.00 D, and −9.00 D/−9.75 D. Alongside the association with high myopia, 4 of the patients with PDE6C-associated achromatopsia were found to have outer retinal atrophy, which is a significant finding as PDE6C disease has been associated with progressive cone and cone-rod dystrophies [51]. While this study demonstrated an association between PDE6C and high myopia, achromatopsia (as a clinical diagnosis) is classically associated with hyperopia [52]. This association is likely driven by hyperopic refractive errors that tend to occur in patients with pathogenic variants in CNGA3 and CNGB3, the most common genetic etiologies of achromatopsia [52].

4.2. PDE6H

PDE6H encodes the gamma subunit of the cone-specific cGMP phosphodiesterase. Biallelic pathogenic mutations in PDE6H are associated with achromatopsia, with ocular symptoms such as diminished visual acuity (VA) and photophobia (sensitivity to light) and abnormal colour vision [53].
Studies have also investigated the possibility of an association of PDE6H with high myopia. Andersen and colleagues conducted a study of Danish achromatopsia patients and compared refractive error across causal genes, including PDE6H [54]. Refractive error data were obtained from 82 individuals, 5 of whom had PDE6H variants. Of the 5 patients with PDE6H variants, 80% had high myopia. Furthermore, Kohl and colleagues reported refractive errors from 3 individuals with homozygous nonsense variants of PDE6H, which ranged from −6.50 D to 14.25 D [53]. Refractive errors in patients with achromatopsia appear to be gene-specific, where biallelic pathogenic variants in PDE6C and PDE6H tend to be associated with myopia.

4.3. GUCY2D

The gene GUCY2D encodes retinal guanylate cyclase-1, an enzyme that is expressed exclusively in the outer segments of photoreceptors and is crucial in the recovery phase of phototransduction [55]. The phototransduction cascade is initiated when light enters the eyes and stimulates specialized pigments known as opsins. When the opsins are exposed to light, a conformational change in the chromophore 11-cis-retinal to all-trans retinal occurs, triggering a cascade of events within the photoreceptor cells. The role of GUCY2D is to replenish cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), which is required to keep ion channels open in the photoreceptor cells. The cGMP produced by GUCY2D allows the photoreceptor cells to continue responding to light stimuli [56].
Pathogenic variants in GUCY2D can cause autosomal recessive Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), as well as both autosomal dominant and recessive cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) [57]. LCA is a congenital disorder affecting the retina where patients frequently exhibit severely reduced visual acuity, night blindness, nystagmus, and an extinguished electroretinogram. There are over 25 genes associated with LCA [58]. CRD due to GUCY2D mutations is a type of hereditary retinal disorder that primarily affects the cone photoreceptors, with eventual involvement of the rod photoreceptors [59]. A clinical study featuring 42 patients with GUCY2D variants demonstrated that those with CRD had a higher prevalence of myopia (62% of participants) compared to other GUCY2D-related phenotypes [59].
While many types of LCA are characteristically associated with hyperopia, studies have suggested that GUCY2D could instead be associated with high myopia [60]. One study examined 50 patients with high myopia, and genetic testing determined that 4 of the patients had mutations linked with retinal dystrophies (GUCY2D, FAM161A, PDE6H, CACNA1F), suggesting an association between GUCY2D and high myopia [61].

4.4. ARR3

ARR3 is expressed in cone photoreceptors and encodes for cone arrestin, which deactivates the phototransduction cascade after exposure to light [62]. Heterozygous pathogenic variants in ARR3 are the most common cause of early-onset high myopia (eoHM) [63]. This condition typically presents in early childhood (before the age of 6) with symptoms of high myopia and reduced best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in a female-limited pattern [64]. In a study of 78 individuals from 29 families with ARR3 mutations, 68 of the 78 patients were affected by eoHM, with refractive errors ranging from −5.00 D to −28.75 D [63]. Among the 78 patients, 64 out of 66 women and 4 out of 12 men were myopic, highlighting that ARR3-associated eoHM predominantly affects women. This predominant female X-linked inheritance is likely due to random X-inactivation in cones that causes cellular interference, whereas hemizygous males lack mosaicism and are often unaffected [64]. There are no overt differences in refraction, BCVA, or fundus features in affected females and males, however [63].
It is proposed that mutations in ARR3 cause cone dysfunction and abnormal visual processing which leads to luminance contrast perturbations that drive the elongation of the eye. While ARR3-related eoHM appears to be distinct from cone dystrophies, patients frequently have reduced cone-driven responses on full-field electroretinography, leading us to include this gene in our review [63]. Given the X-linked inheritance pattern, we recommend that clinicians obtain a three-generation pedigree and document age of onset of myopia and sex distribution of affected relatives to guide molecular testing and genetic counseling.

4.5. RBP3

RBP3 encodes for the interstitial retinol binding protein which is responsible for binding and transporting cis/trans retinols between the photoreceptors and the RPE [65]. RBP3-related retinopathy had been reported in three families, with one study reporting 4 siblings from an Italian family with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa [66]. A second case reported on 3 children from 2 families who had generalized rod and cone dysfunction but had unremarkable fundus photos [67]. Furthermore, all eight affected patients in these studies had high myopia, thus suggesting an association between RBP3-related retinopathy and high myopia.
A recent study evaluated 12 patients with RBP3-related retinopathy and identified high myopia in all patients ranging from −7.00 D to −33.00 D [68]. The mean age of the cohort was 21.4 +/− 19.1 years (range from 2.9 to 60.5 years). All 12 patients had reduced visual acuity and an onset of myopia by the age of 7.

5. Ciliary Trafficking and Microtubule-Associated Genes

5.1. RPGR

The gene RPGR encodes a connecting cilium protein that supports intraflagellar transport in photoreceptors [69]. Loss-of-function of RPGR generally causes X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP); however, certain variants are more frequently associated with cone or cone-rod dystrophy [70]. While males are predominantly affected, females can present with a range of clinical signs that can occasionally be as severe as in males [71].
Patients with RPGR-related XLRP commonly exhibit high myopia, and studies have interrogated the association between RPGR mutations and high myopia [70,72,73]. One study recruited 17 patients (mean age at examination was 7.18 +/− 7.24 years) with X-linked retinopathies who underwent WES, Sanger sequencing, and ophthalmic investigations [74]. Of the 17 patients, 7 patients were confirmed to have RPGR mutations. It was determined that 57.1% of patients with RPGR mutations had high myopia (mean refractive error of the entire RPGR cohort was −5.29 D +/− 4.16 D; range from +1.50 D to −10.75 D), and 2 female patients with de novo RPGR variants had retinitis pigmentosa or cone-rod dystrophy along with high myopia. Axial length measurements were only available for 2 patients with RPGR-related retinopathy (24.74 mm/24.25 mm and 24.62 mm/24.55 mm) [74].
Another study evaluated a Chinese family with RPGR-related XLRP, where 8 patients were enrolled and underwent ophthalmic examination and genetic testing [75]. Three male patients (ages 32, 59, and 50 years) out of the eight were found to have high myopia with the following refractive errors: −10.00 D/−9.75 D, −9.25 D/−8.75 D, −5.75 D/−6.50 D, respectively. Additionally, one female carrier (55 years of age) had a refractive error of −1.25 D/−8.25 D. Other studies have also shown the association between RPGR-related XLRP and high myopia, with refractive error ranges reported as −10.75 D to +1.50 D in the RPGR subset of a Chinese X-linked retinopathies cohort [74], and −8.00 D to +1.00 D in affected males from a Japanese RPGR cohort (left eyes −7.00 D to +1.00 D) [76]. Within the Chinese cohort, 4 out of 7 patients had high myopia, while 50% of patients had high myopia within the Japanese cohort.

5.2. RP2

RP2 encodes a GTPase-activating protein for ARL3 that supports ciliary protein trafficking in photoreceptors, and loss-of-function of RP2 causes XLRP [77]. RP2-related retinopathy has been reported across many families and is characterized by early macular involvement and frequent high myopia [78]. Jayasundera and colleagues completed a cohort study of patients with RP2 mutations and discovered 9 out of 11 affected males (ages all stated as less than 12 years old) were myopic with a mean refractive error of −7.97 D, and all 3 female carriers (ages 6, 28, and 45 years old) were myopic (mean −6.23 D) and had macular atrophy in one or both eyes [79]. Alongside the high myopia, electroretinography was conducted on 10 patients, which demonstrated severe rod-cone dysfunction in 9 out of 10 patients.

5.3. IFT140

IFT140 encodes for one of the subunits of the intraflagellar transport system. Biallelic pathogenic variants in IFT140 are associated with severe syndromic ciliopathies [80]. These disorders include Mainzer–Saldino syndrome and Jeune asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy, which can present with ophthalmic manifestations including retinitis pigmentosa and non-specific retinal dystrophies. A pediatric study investigated a 5-year-old patient diagnosed with Mainzer–Saldino syndrome who presented with retinitis pigmentosa [81]. Ophthalmic evaluation revealed an initial refractive error of −4.50 D/−6.25 D, and by 8 years of age his myopia progressed to −10.25 D/−11.00 D. Importantly, refractive errors generally progress as the eye grows; thus, genes associated with high myopia may only become evident as a child grows older.

5.4. CFAP418 (C8orf37)

CFAP418 encodes for a protein that interacts with polyglutamylated tubulin at the base of the primary cilium in retinal pigment epithelium. Biallelic pathogenic mutations in CFAP418 cause Bardet-Biedl syndrome and isolated retinopathies including cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP) [82]. One study investigated 2 Japanese siblings who presented with early-onset retinal dystrophy due to novel variants in CFAP418 [83]. The siblings underwent ophthalmic exams which revealed decreased visual acuity, markedly reduced peripheral vision, high myopia, cataracts, and retinal degeneration with macular atrophy. Refractive errors were obtained at the age of 37 and 43 for the siblings and measured: −14.00 D/−9.00 D and −9.00 D/−10.00 D. Goyal and colleagues investigated two siblings with homozygous C8orf37 mutations from a consanguineous North Indian family [84]. Both siblings had retinitis pigmentosa with early macular degeneration and night-vision loss in late childhood. Refractive errors obtained at the ages of 20 and 17, respectively, were −4.50 D/−5.50 D and −10.00 D/−10.00 D for each sibling [84].

5.5. FAM161A

FAM161A is a gene that is predominantly expressed in the retina and causes autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa [85]. FAM161A encodes a ciliary, microtubule-associated protein that plays a role in photoreceptor cells of the retina [86]. Various studies have shown an association between FAM161A mutations and high myopia [61,85,87].
FAM161A is the most common cause of autosomal recessive RP in Israeli-Jewish families, with one study examining refractive errors in 114 Israeli-Jewish patients with pathogenic biallelic mutations in FAM161A [87]. Of the 63 patients (ages ranging from 3.5 to 86 years old) for whom refractive data was obtained, all patients had varying degrees of myopia, ranging from −0.75 D to −15.00 D. Additionally, the majority of these patients had high myopia with the mean refraction of the cohort being −6.20 D ± 2.93 D.
Another study examined 50 patients with high myopia who all underwent WES [61]. Disease-causing mutations in FAM161A were identified in 1 patient; however, more gene-specific studies should be performed to highlight and validate the association of FAM161A with high myopia.

6. Synaptic Ribbon and Bipolar Cell Signalling

6.1. NYX

The NYX gene encodes for the protein nyctalopin, which is located at the synapse between photoreceptors and on-bipolar cells. Hemizygous pathogenic variants in NYX cause X-linked complete congenital stationary night blindness type 1 (CSNB1) [88]. CSNB1 is an inherited retinal disorder characterized by blindness in dimly lit conditions, myopia, nystagmus and reduced VA. High myopia is commonly found in patients with CSNB1. Poels and colleagues found that all (43 out of 43) patients older than 4 years with CSNB1 were myopic, with a mean refractive error of −7.50 D and a median refractive error of −8.10 D [89]. There was minimal progression of myopia after age 4 (approximately −0.12 D per year) [89,90]. Consistent with this, two Chinese families with CSNB1 with novel NYX variants had early-onset myopia that ranged from −4.5 D to −10.00 D, and one 11-year-old that had axial lengths 26.72 mm/26.65 mm [91]. Additionally, studies investigating patient cohorts with high myopia (and without known CSNB1) have identified variants in NYX [92].
For example, a study by Zhang and colleagues recruited 52 male probands who all had high myopia but did not have CSNB1 (or any other inherited retinal dystrophy) [92]. Two novel mutations in NYX were identified, suggesting that NYX mutations could cause isolated high myopia. It is suggested that disruptions in NYX cause aberrant retinal signalling, mimicking retinal blur that could cause abnormal elongation of the eye and subsequent high myopia.

6.2. CACNA1F

CACNA1F is a gene that encodes a voltage-gated calcium channel subunit in photoreceptors. Hemizygous pathogenic mutations in CACNA1F cause X-linked disorders including incomplete congenital stationary night blindness type 2 (CSNB2), cone-rod dystrophy (CORDX3) and Aland Island eye disease (AIED) [93,94]. CACNA1F has a well-established association with high myopia in affected males, and subsequent cohort studies confirmed high rates of myopia that often progress during childhood and throughout adolescence [89,94,95,96]. One study investigated 42 patients with CACNA1F mutations and reported 11 patients with a CSNB2 phenotype, 20 patients with a CORDX3 phenotype, and 11 patients with an AIED phenotype [94]. Importantly, all CACNA1F-related phenotypes are associated with high myopia. For the CSNB2 patients, the mean refractive error was −8.09 D ± 3.15 D. The CORDX3 and AIED patients had milder degrees of myopia, where the CORDX3 patients had a mean refractive error of −1.43 D ± 3.81 D, and the AIED patients had a mean refractive error of −1.82 D ± 4.70 D. This study suggested that specific mutations in CACNA1F in CSNB2 patients may uniquely contribute to the severity of myopia.
Another gene associated with incomplete CSNB (or cone-rod synaptic disorder) is CABP4, which encodes calcium-binding 4 and regulates Cav1.4-mediated calcium influx at photoreceptor ribbon synapses [97]. Unlike the association between CACNA1F and high myopia, the few published studies of CABP4-related disease report on patients with hyperopic refractive errors [97,98,99].

6.3. TRPM1

The TRPM1 gene encodes a protein that plays an important role in signalling for bipolar cells in the retina, with biallelic pathogenic variants causing complete congenital stationary night blindness type 1C (CSNB1C) [100]. One study investigated 4 patients (two sibling pairs) from two families who underwent genetic testing and ophthalmic evaluations for presumed CSNB [101]. Genetic testing showed one sibling pair had a novel homozygous missense variant in TRPM1, while the other pair had a homozygous deletion. Three of the four patients had their refractive errors measured at the first visit: −11.25 D/−12.00 D, −8.50 D/−9.75 D, −8.50 D/−8.25 D. The fourth patient, who did not have a refractive error measurement reported, had an axial length of 27.39 mm/26.69 mm. This study suggests that pathogenic variants in TRPM1 are associated with high myopia in CSNB patients, where altered signalling in ON-bipolar cells may promote axial elongation of the eye, resulting in high myopia.
Another longitudinal study followed 7 pediatric patients with TRPM1-associated CSNB, where 5 of the 7 patients had progressive myopia, strabismus and nystagmus [102]. Ophthalmic evaluation showed an average final refractive error of −8.75 D for the 7 patients, with a range from −4.00 D to −14.00 D, at a mean age of 12 years.

6.4. GRM6

The GRM6 gene encodes a glutamate receptor, mGluR6, which resides in the membrane of retinal ON-bipolar cells [103]. In low light levels, rod photoreceptors release glutamate at their ribbon synapses, which then binds to mGluR6 to stimulate ON-bipolar cells. Biallelic pathogenic variants in GRM6 interrupt glutamate signalling and cause the characteristic symptoms of complete CSNB type 1B such as night blindness [104].
Sergouniotis and colleagues reported on nine patients from seven families (ages ranging from 7 to 75 years old) and identified a median spherical equivalent refractive error of −5.38 D (range from +0.25 D to −17.00 D) [105]. Five out of the nine patients (55.6%) had high myopia. In addition, in a study of 96 unrelated Chinese patients with high myopia, 3 novel variants in GRM6 with predicted functional consequences were identified [106]. The authors suggested that the identification of rare variants in GRM6 in patients with high myopia may indicate a role for GRM6 in myopia development [106].

6.5. LRIT3

LRIT3 encodes a synaptic transmembrane protein required for ON-bipolar cell signalling in the retina, and biallelic pathogenic mutations cause complete CSNB type 1F [107]. Zeitz and colleagues investigated 90 individuals with CSNB and identified pathogenic LRIT3 variants in two unrelated probands [108]. The first proband had a refractive error of −26.00 D/−27.00 D at age 45, with prior retinal tears treated at age 25. The second proband had a refractive error of −7.00 D/−8.00 D at age 9 [108], suggesting an association between LRIT3 and high myopia.
Additionally, Dan and colleagues identified novel compound heterozygous variants in LRIT3 in a patient with CSNB and high myopia (−8.50 D/−8.75 D at age 9) [109]. Despite the paucity of reported patients with LRIT3-related CSNB, the published cases find high myopia to be a consistent feature [108,109].

6.6. GPR179

GPR179 encodes an orphan G protein-coupled receptor expressed in postsynaptic ON-bipolar cells. Biallelic pathogenic variants in GPR179 cause complete CSNB type 1E [110]. Audo and colleagues reported on 5 probands with biallelic pathogenic variants in GPR179 [111]. Two of these patients were described as having high myopia (ages not specified), but no refractive errors or axial lengths were mentioned. Refractive error was not commented on in the remaining three probands [111]. Klooster and colleagues reported on 2 patients with CSNB due to pathogenic GPR179 variants [112]. The first patient had a refractive error of −9.00 D/−8.50 D at age 18, and the second patient had a refractive error of −8.00 D/−7.00 D at age 15 [112].
Considering the association of other types of complete CSNB with high myopia, in conjunction with the limited published cases of GPR179-related complete CSNB reporting myopic refractive errors, there likely exists an association between GPR179 and high myopia, but larger studies are needed to confirm this.

7. Opsin-Related Genes

7.1. OPN1LW

OPN1LW encodes the red cone photopigment/long wavelength-sensitive opsin (L-opsin) that is crucial for facilitating colour vision [113]. Mutations in this gene cause cone-based disorders such as protanopia, the inability to perceive red light, or protanomaly, a reduced sensitivity to red light. Hemizygous variants of OPN1LW are also a well-established cause of blue cone monochromacy (BCM) [114].
Some OPN1LW mutations are associated with high myopia, purported to be due to abnormal mRNA slicing, causing photoreceptors to lack photopigment [115]. Specifically, Neitz and colleagues analyzed 413 healthy male patients and determined that patients with significant amounts of OPN1LW exon 3 skipping were associated with high myopia [115]. Photoreceptors with exon 3 skipping exhibit lower levels of photopigment, while nearby unaffected cones have normal levels. These varying levels of photopigment amongst adjacent cone photoreceptors can cause abnormal contrast signals. It is thus hypothesized that the abnormal contrast signals due to exon 3 skipping results in axial elongation and the development of myopia.
Another study recruited 1226 families with early onset high myopia (eoHM) and performed WES to elucidate the genetic basis of eoHM [116]. The authors identified novel OPN1LW variants in 68 out of the 1226 families. The range of refractive errors of these 68 families was between −3.75 D and −22.00 D, with a median refractive error of −9.38 D.

7.2. OPN1MW

OPN1MW is a gene encoding the green cone photopigment or medium-wavelength-sensitive opsin (M-opsin) [117]. On the X chromosome, one or more copies of OPN1MW are arranged in a head-to-tail opsin array immediately downstream of OPN1LW. The opsin OPN1MW is crucial for normal colour vision, specifically for facilitating sensitivity to yellow and green light. Mutations in the OPN1MW gene can cause abnormalities in colour vision, resulting in deuteranopia, an inability to perceive green light or deuteranomaly, a decreased sensitivity to green light. Additionally, hemizygous variants in OPN1MW are associated with BCM, which is strongly associated with high myopia in males [118,119].
In a multigenerational family with males who were hemizygous for the MVAVA haplotype of the OPN1MW gene, refractive error ranged from −5.00 D to −21.00 D [120]. In addition, the LVAVA haplotype of OPN1LW gene and MVAVA haplotype of OPN1MW have been reported to cause non-syndromic high myopia due to axial elongation in young patients [120]. Specifically, the MVAVA haplotype causes abnormal mRNA splicing and skips exon 3, which leads to loss of opsin function and cone dysfunction. Notably, specific exon 3 haplotypes in the OPN1LW/OPN1MW cluster (LIAVA, LVAVA and MVAVA) are known to cause defects in colour vision [121].
The L/M opsin array is prone to copy number variation (CNVs) and hybrid OPN1LW and OPN1MW genes from misalignment and unequal recombination due to their proximity and high sequence homology [122]. Routine short-read sequencing cannot readily differentiate between OPN1LW and OPN1MW and cannot readily detect structural variants and CNVs in the opsin array. As a result, targeted sequencing strategies such as MLPA and long-read sequencing are utilized for the molecular interrogation of the opsin array [122].

8. Miscellaneous

8.1. COH1/VPS13B

VPS13B (COH1) encodes a protein that plays an important role in intracellular transport [123]. Biallelic pathogenic variants in VPS13B cause Cohen syndrome, which is characterized by severe myopia and progressive retinal dystrophy. Extraocular manifestations of Cohen syndrome include: developmental delay, microcephaly, intellectual disability and truncal obesity with slender extremities [124,125]. One study conducted genetic testing and ophthalmic exams on 5 patients (4 females and 1 male) between the ages of 9 and 38 with Cohen syndrome [126]. Ophthalmic examinations revealed the following spherical corrections of the five patients: −10.00 D/−10.00 D, −10.00 D/−10.00 D, −14.50 D/−14.50 D, −3.25 D/−3.25 D, −6.25 D/−6.25 D, suggesting a correlation between VPS13B and high myopia. High myopia and chorioretinal dystrophy are considered the primary contributors to vision loss in Cohen syndrome, with another study reporting that patients typically exhibit a median refractive error of −8.00 D [127].
The dysregulation of protein trafficking arising from VPS13B variants is hypothesized to contribute to axial elongation and the development of high myopia in patients with Cohen syndrome [127].

8.2. ADAMTS18

ADAMTS18 encodes a member of the ADAMTS protein family, with mutations being associated with an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by microcornea, myopic chorioretinal atrophy, and telecanthus (MMCAT) [128]. An investigation of 9 patients of Saudi ethnicity with molecularly confirmed MMCAT reported refractive errors in 7 patients (ages 4 to 10 years; mean spherical equivalent refractive error of −6.66 D; range from −0.50 D to −13.75 D) [128,129]. Four out of 7 (57.1%) patients had high myopia. Axial length measurements were reported for 6 patients, with a mean axial length of 24.63 mm (range from 22.41 mm to 26.84 mm) [128,129]. These findings suggest an association between variants in ADAMTS18 and high myopia. Additional studies in diverse patient populations may further establish this association.

8.3. LAMA1

LAMA1 encodes one of the alpha 1 subunits of laminin, and biallelic pathogenic variants in this gene cause Poretti–Boltshauser syndrome, a disorder associated with high myopia and variable retinal dystrophy [130].
One case study examined a 3-year-old boy with pathogenic variants in LAMA1, who underwent comprehensive ophthalmic testing [131]. Imaging reviewed retinal vascular anomalies such as a large area of nonperfusion in the temporal macula with corresponding retinal thinning. Furthermore, he had a refractive error of −16.50 D in each eye, highlighting the presentation of high myopia alongside retinal vascular abnormalities. Finally, another study identified five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the LAMA1 gene among 97 Chinese individuals diagnosed with high myopia, providing additional evidence to support an association between variants in LAMA1 and high myopia [132].

9. Limitations

Our review highlights IRDs that are associated with high myopia, but it does not serve as an exhaustive list of all genes associated with high myopia. Not all studies of IRDs report refractive errors, and thus, it is possible that other IRDs may be associated with high myopia but are not included in our study. In addition, nystagmus is a feature of several of the IRDs included in our review, and this may reduce the accuracy of refraction measurements. Some case studies that we evaluated included patients who did not meet the threshold refractive error of ≤−6.00 D. These cases were included because there was a well-established association between the gene and high myopia and/or a substantial number of patients had high myopia, even if some individuals in the studies were just below this threshold. Furthermore, the lack of consistent data on axial length and keratometry in many studies introduces a gap in understanding the structural contributions to myopia development. Additionally, within families, it is unclear if high myopia is directly related to the underlying retinal dystrophy or due to other genetic or environmental factors. A degree of variability in refractive errors in patients with the same genetic variant is expected as there are multiple environmental and genetic factors that influence ocular growth and myopia development [133]. In addition, myopia typically progresses with age during childhood and adolescence. As a result, studies that reported on infants with retinal dystrophy and myopia > −6.00 D may not have been included in our study, but it is possible that the myopia in these patients may progress and reach the threshold of high myopia in the future. Moreover, ocular procedures such as cataract surgery and refractive surgery may make it challenging to identify genetic associations with high myopia if axial lengths and keratometry are not reported. Finally, there is a possibility that rare monogenic disorders are under-represented or absent in our study due to limited availability of published reports. Despite these limitations, our review can aid clinicians by guiding molecular testing for patients with IRDs in the setting of high myopia. In addition, by examining the overlap between molecularly confirmed IRDs and high myopia, this review also has the potential to enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms for eye growth and myopia development.

10. Conclusions

Our review highlights the molecularly confirmed IRDs that are associated with high myopia, emphasizing how shared genetic mechanisms may contribute to both retinal disease progression and the development of myopia. High myopia in the setting of other visual symptoms such as nyctalopia could serve as a clinical indicator to facilitate the early detection of IRDs, thus aiding clinicians in generating a differential diagnosis and providing effective patient counseling. Establishing an early diagnosis for patients with IRDs could allow for timely interventions, as there are numerous ongoing clinical trials and therapies on the horizon. Finally, interrogating the molecular mechanisms driving the development of high myopia is critical as myopia is a vision-threatening public health concern on a global scale [134]. Utilizing IRDs associated with high myopia as a lens to understand the genetic factors contributing to myopia may inform the development of novel therapies to combat the growing myopia epidemic.

Author Contributions

C.L.—data acquisition, analysis, manuscript drafting; N.S.—data analysis, manuscript editing; M.D.B.—study conception, design, data analysis, manuscript editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

There are no funding sources for this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ben-Yosef, T. Inherited Retinal Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lamb, T.D. Photoreceptor Physiology and Evolution: Cellular and Molecular Basis of Rod and Cone Phototransduction. J. Physiol. 2022, 600, 4585–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lakkaraju, A.; Umapathy, A.; Tan, L.X.; Daniele, L.; Philp, N.J.; Boesze-Battaglia, K.; Williams, D.S. The Cell Biology of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2020, 78, 100846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sahel, J.-A.; Marazova, K.; Audo, I. Clinical Characteristics and Current Therapies for Inherited Retinal Degenerations. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 5, a017111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Prokofyeva, E.; Troeger, E.; Wilke, R.; Zrenner, E. Early Visual Symptom Patterns in Inherited Retinal Dystrophies. Ophthalmologica 2011, 226, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Battu, R.; Ratra, D.; Gopal, L. Newer Therapeutic Options for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Gene and Cell Replacement Therapy. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 70, 2316–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Suppiej, A.; Marino, S.; Reffo, M.E.; Maritan, V.; Vitaliti, G.; Mailo, J.; Falsaperla, R. Early Onset Retinal Dystrophies: Clinical Clues to Diagnosis for Pediatricians. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2019, 45, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shih, Y.-F. Visual Outcomes for High Myopic Patients with or without Myopic Maculopathy: A 10 Year Follow up Study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006, 90, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Holden, B.A.; Fricke, T.R.; Wilson, D.A.; Jong, M.; Naidoo, K.S.; Sankaridurg, P.; Wong, T.Y.; Naduvilath, T.J.; Resnikoff, S. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 1036–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Deng, H.; Huang, X.; Yuan, L. Molecular Genetics of the COL2A1-Related Disorders. Mutat. Res./Rev. Mutat. Res. 2016, 768, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hoornaert, K.P.; Vereecke, I.; Dewinter, C.; Rosenberg, T.; Beemer, F.A.; Leroy, J.G.; Bendix, L.; Björck, E.; Bonduelle, M.; Boute, O.; et al. Stickler Syndrome Caused by COL2A1 Mutations: Genotype–Phenotype Correlation in a Series of 100 Patients. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 18, 872–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Okazaki, S.; Meguro, A.; Ideta, R.; Takeuchi, M.; Yonemoto, J.; Teshigawara, T.; Yamane, T.; Okada, E.; Ideta, H.; Mizuki, N. Common Variants in the COL2A1 Gene Are Associated with Lattice Degeneration of the Retina in a Japanese Population. Mol. Vis. 2019, 25, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Shapiro, M.; Blair, M.; Solinski, M.; Zhang, D.; Jabbehdari, S. The Importance of Early Diagnosis of Stickler Syndrome: Finding Opportunities for Preventing Blindness. Taiwan J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 8, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chauvaud, D. Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Rev. Prat. 1996, 46, 1750–1755. [Google Scholar]
  15. Snead, M.P.; Payne, S.J.; Barton, D.E.; Yates, J.R.; Al-Imara, L.; Popp, F.M.; Scott, J.D. Stickler Syndrome: Correlation between Vitreoretinal Phenotypes and Linkage to Col 2A1. Eye 1994, 8, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liberfarb, R.M.; Levy, H.P.; Rose, P.S.; Wilkin, D.J.; Davis, J.; Balog, J.Z.; Griffith, A.J.; Szymko-Bennett, Y.M.; Johnston, J.J.; Francomano, C.A. The Stickler Syndrome: Genotype/Phenotype Correlation in 10 Families with Stickler Syndrome Resulting from Seven Mutations in the Type II Collagen Gene Locus COL2A1. Genet. Med. 2003, 5, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhu, X.; Xing, X.; Li, D.; Yu, B. Restoration of Vision in KNIEST Dysplasia Patient Characterized by Retinal Detachment with Dialysis of the Ora Serrata: A Case Report. Medicine 2023, 102, e36090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hamidi-Toosi, S.; Maumenee, I.H. Vitreoretinal Degeneration in Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia Congenita. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1982, 100, 1104–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, L.; Chen, C.; Wang, Z.; Sun, L.; Li, S.; Zhang, T.; Luo, X.; Ding, X. Mutation Spectrum and De Novo Mutation Analysis in Stickler Syndrome Patients with High Myopia or Retinal Detachment. Genes 2020, 11, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kondo, H.; Matsushita, I.; Nagata, T.; Hayashi, T.; Kakinoki, M.; Uchio, E.; Kondo, M.; Ohji, M.; Kusaka, S. Novel Mutations in the COL2A1 Gene in Japanese Patients with Stickler Syndrome. Hum. Genome Var. 2016, 3, 16018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jacobson, A.; Besirli, C.G.; Bohnsack, B.L. Characteristics of a Three-Generation Family with Stickler Syndrome Type I. Genes 2023, 14, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Metlapally, R.; Li, Y.J.; Tran-Viet, K.N.; Abbott, D.; Czaja, G.R.; Malecaze, F.; Calvas, P.; Mackey, D.; Rosenberg, T.; Paget, S.; et al. COL1A1 and COL2A1 Genes and Myopia Susceptibility: Evidence of Association and Suggestive Linkage to the COL2A1 Locus. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 1310–1319. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sun, W.; Xiao, X.; Li, S.; Jia, X.; Zhang, Q. A Novel Deep Intronic Col2a1 Mutation in a Family with Early-onset High Myopia/Ocular-only Stickler Syndrome. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2020, 40, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Muragaki, Y.; Kimura, T.; NInomiya, Y.; Olsen, B.R. The Complete Primary Structure of Two Distinct Forms of Human α(IX) Collagen Chains. Eur. J. Biochem. 1990, 192, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nikopoulos, K.; Schrauwen, I.; Simon, M.; Collin, R.W.; Veckeneer, M.; Keymolen, K.; Van Camp, G.; Cremers, F.P.; van den Born, L.I. Autosomal Recessive Stickler Syndrome in Two Families Is Caused by Mutations in the Col9a1 Gene. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 4774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van Camp, G.; Snoeckx, R.L.; Hilgert, N.; van den Ende, J.; Fukuoka, H.; Wagatsuma, M.; Suzuki, H.; Erica Smets, R.M.; Vanhoenacker, F.; Declau, F.; et al. A New Autosomal Recessive Form of Stickler Syndrome Is Caused by a Mutation in the COL9A1 Gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 79, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Maghsoudi, D.; Nixon, T.R.; Martin, H.; Richards, A.J.; McNinch, A.M.; Alexander, P.; Poulson, A.V.; Snead, M.P. Retinal Detachment in Type IX Collagen Recessive Stickler Syndrome. Eye 2024, 39, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nixon, T.; Richards, A.J.; Lomas, A.; Abbs, S.; Vasudevan, P.; McNinch, A.; Alexander, P.; Snead, M.P. Inherited and de Novo Biallelic Pathogenic Variants in Col11a1 Result in Type 2 Stickler Syndrome with Severe Hearing Loss. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2020, 8, e1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Richards, A.J.; McNinch, A.; Martin, H.; Oakhill, K.; Rai, H.; Waller, S.; Treacy, B.; Whittaker, J.; Meredith, S.; Poulson, A.; et al. Stickler Syndrome and the Vitreous Phenotype: Mutations in COL2A1 and COL11A1. Hum. Mutat. 2010, 31, E1461–E1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boothe, M.; Morris, R.; Robin, N. Stickler Syndrome: A Review of Clinical Manifestations and the Genetics Evaluation. J. Pers. Med. 2020, 10, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guo, L.; Elcioglu, N.H.; Wang, Z.; Demirkol, Y.K.; Isguven, P.; Matsumoto, N.; Nishimura, G.; Miyake, N.; Ikegawa, S. Novel and Recurrent COL11A1 and COL2A1 Mutations in the Marshall–Stickler Syndrome Spectrum. Hum. Genome Var. 2017, 4, 17040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fujimoto, K.; Nagata, T.; Matsushita, I.; Oku, K.; Imagawa, M.; Kuniyoshi, K.; Hayashi, T.; Kimoto, K.; Ohji, M.; Kusaka, S.; et al. Ultra-Wide Field Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging of Eyes with Stickler Syndrome. Retina 2020, 41, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Khanna, S.; Rodriguez, S.H.; Blair, M.A.; Wroblewski, K.; Shapiro, M.J.; Blair, M.P. Laser prophylaxis in patients with Stickler syndrome. Ophthalmol. Retin. 2022, 6, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Linton, E.; Jalil, A.; Sergouniotis, P.; Moussa, G.; Black, G.; Charles, S.; Ivanova, T. Laser prophylaxis in stickler syndrome: The Manchester protocol. Retina 2023, 43, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Naravane, A.V.; Belin, P.J.; Pierce, B.; Quiram, P.A. Risk and prevention of retinal detachments in patients with Stickler syndrome. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2022, 53, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Camp, D.A.; Bakhsh, S.R.; Torkashvand, A.; Jensen, N.R.; Naravane, A.V.; Belin, P.J.; Quiram, P.A.; Ivanova, T.; Wubben, T.J.; Besirli, C.G.; et al. Laser prophylaxis for retinal detachment in Stickler syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2025, 103, e364–e373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Irene Díez García-Prieto, I.; Lopez-Martín, S.; Albert, J.; Jiménez de la Peña, M.; Fernández-Mayoralas, D.M.; Calleja-Pérez, B.; Gómez Fernández, M.T.; Álvarez, S.; Pihlajaniemi, T.; Izzi, V.; et al. Mutations in the COL18A1 Gene Associated with Knobloch Syndrome and Structural Brain Anomalies: A Novel Case Report and Literature Review of Neuroimaging Findings. Neurocase 2022, 28, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Määttä, M.; Heljasvaara, R.; Pihlajaniemi, T.; Uusitalo, M. Collagen XVIII/Endostatin Shows a Ubiquitous Distribution in Human Ocular Tissues and Endostatin-Containing Fragments Accumulate in Ocular Fluid Samples. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2006, 245, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Suzuki, O.T.; Sertié, A.L.; Der Kaloustian, V.M.; Kok, F.; Carpenter, M.; Murray, J.; Czeizel, A.E.; Kliemann, S.E.; Rosemberg, S.; Monteiro, M.; et al. Molecular Analysis of Collagen XVIII Reveals Novel Mutations, Presence of a Third Isoform, and Possible Genetic Heterogeneity in Knobloch Syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002, 71, 1320–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vasilyeva, T.; Kadyshev, V.; Khalanskaya, O.; Kuznetsova, S.; Ionova, S.; Marakhonov, A.; Zinchenko, R. Clinical and Molecular Findings in Patients with Knobloch Syndrome 1: Case Series Report. Genes 2024, 15, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hull, S.; Arno, G.; Ku, C.A.; Ge, Z.; Waseem, N.; Chandra, A.; Webster, A.R.; Robson, A.G.; Michaelides, M.; Weleber, R.G.; et al. Molecular and Clinical Findings in Patients with Knobloch Syndrome. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016, 134, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chong, S.C.; Yuen, Y.-P.; Cao, Y.; Fan, S.-S.; Leung, T.Y.; Chan, E.K.; Zhu, X.L. Case Report: Novel Biallelic Variants in the COL18A1 Gene in a Chinese Family with Knobloch Syndrome. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 853918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Menzel, O.; Bekkeheien, R.C.J.; Reymond, A.; Fukai, N.; Boye, E.; Kosztolanyi, G.; Aftimos, S.; Deutsch, S.; Scott, H.S.; Olsen, B.R.; et al. Knobloch Syndrome: Novel Mutations in Col18a1, Evidence for Genetic Heterogeneity, and a Functionally Impaired Polymorphism in Endostatin. Hum. Mutat. 2004, 23, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Schnur, R.E.; Dvořáček, L.; Kalsner, L.; Shapiro, F.L.; Grebeňová, D.; Yanni, D.; Wasserman, B.N.; Dyer, L.M.; Antonarakis, S.E.; Kuželová, K. New Kinase-deficient Pak2 Variants Associated with Knobloch Syndrome Type 2. Clin. Genet. 2024, 106, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fernandes, R.J.; Farnand, A.W.; Traeger, G.R.; Weis, M.A.; Eyre, D.R. A Role for Prolyl 3-Hydroxylase 2 in Post-Translational Modification of Fibril-Forming Collagens. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 30662–30669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tiainen, P.; Pasanen, A.; Sormunen, R.; Myllyharju, J. Characterization of Recombinant Human Prolyl 3-Hydroxylase Isoenzyme 2, an Enzyme Modifying the Basement Membrane Collagen IV. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 19432–19439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, K.Y.; Johnson, T.V. The Internal Limiting Membrane: Roles in Retinal Development and Implications for Emerging Ocular Therapies. Exp. Eye Res. 2021, 206, 108545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mordechai, S.; Gradstein, L.; Pasanen, A.; Ofir, R.; El Amour, K.; Levy, J.; Belfair, N.; Lifshitz, T.; Joshua, S.; Narkis, G.; et al. High Myopia Caused by a Mutation in LEPREL1, Encoding Prolyl 3-Hydroxylase 2. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 89, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Weisschuh, N.; Stingl, K.; Audo, I.; Biskup, S.; Bocquet, B.; Branham, K.; Burstedt, M.S.; De Baere, E.; De Vries, M.J.; Golovleva, I.; et al. Mutations in the Gene PDE6C Encoding the Catalytic Subunit of the Cone Photoreceptor Phosphodiesterase in Patients with Achromatopsia. Hum. Mutat. 2018, 39, 1366–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Georgiou, M.; Robson, A.G.; Singh, N.; Pontikos, N.; Kane, T.; Hirji, N.; Ripamonti, C.; Rotsos, T.; Dubra, A.; Kalitzeos, A.; et al. Deep Phenotyping of Pde6c-Associated Achromatopsia. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 5112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Daich Varela, M.; Ullah, E.; Yousaf, S.; Brooks, B.P.; Hufnagel, R.B.; Huryn, L.A. PDE6C: Novel Mutations, Atypical Phenotype, and Differences among Children and Adults. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020, 61, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Eshel, Y.M.; Abaev, O.; Yahalom, C. Achromatopsia: Long term visual performance and clinical characteristics. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 34, 986–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kohl, S.; Coppieters, F.; Meire, F.; Schaich, S.; Roosing, S.; Brennenstuhl, C.; Bolz, S.; van Genderen, M.M.; Riemslag, F.C.C.; Lukowski, R.; et al. A Nonsense Mutation in PDE6H Causes Autosomal-Recessive Incomplete Achromatopsia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 91, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Andersen, M.K.; Bertelsen, M.; Grønskov, K.; Kohl, S.; Kessel, L. Genetic and Clinical Characterization of Danish Achromatopsia Patients. Genes 2023, 14, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dizhoor, A. The Human Photoreceptor Membrane Guanylyl Cyclase, Retgc, Is Present in Outer Segments and Is Regulated by Calcium and a Soluble Activator. Neuron 1994, 12, 1345–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lazar, C.H.; Mutsuddi, M.; Kimchi, A.; Zelinger, L.; Mizrahi-Meissonnier, L.; Marks-Ohana, D.; Boleda, A.; Ratnapriya, R.; Sharon, D.; Swaroop, A.; et al. Whole Exome Sequencing Reveals GUCY2D as a Major Gene Associated with Cone and Cone-Rod Dystrophy in Israel. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 56, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wimberg, H.; Lev, D.; Yosovich, K.; Namburi, P.; Banin, E.; Sharon, D.; Koch, K.-W. Photoreceptor Guanylate Cyclase (GUCY2D) Mutations Cause Retinal Dystrophies by Severe Malfunction of Ca2+-Dependent Cyclic GMP Synthesis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 11, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kumaran, N.; Moore, A.T.; Weleber, R.G.; Michaelides, M. Leber Congenital Amaurosis/Early-Onset Severe Retinal Dystrophy: Clinical Features, Molecular Genetics and Therapeutic Interventions. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 101, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Rodilla, C.; Martín-Merida, I.; Blanco-Kelly, F.; Trujillo-Tiebas, M.J.; Avila-Fernandez, A.; Riveiro-Alvarez, R.; del Pozo-Valero, M.; Perea-Romero, I.; Swafiri, S.T.; Zurita, O.; et al. Comprehensive Genotyping and Phenotyping Analysis of Gucy2d-Associated Rod- and Cone-Dominated Dystrophies. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 254, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. den Hollander, A.I.; Black, A.; Bennett, J.; Cremers, F.P.M. Lighting a Candle in the Dark: Advances in Genetics and Gene Therapy of Recessive Retinal Dystrophies. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 3042–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Haarman, A.E.G.; Thiadens, A.A.; van Tienhoven, M.; Loudon, S.E.; de Klein, J.E.M.M.A.; Brosens, E.; Polling, J.R.; van der Schoot, V.; Bouman, A.; Kievit, A.J.A.; et al. Whole-Exome Sequencing of Known Eye Genes Reveals Genetic Causes for High Myopia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2022, 31, 3290–3298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Guo, Y.-M.; Wei, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, G.; Bi, J.; Ye, L. Advances in the Study of ARR3 in Myopia. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2025, 13, 1551135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, Y.; Xiao, X.; Li, X.; Yi, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhou, L.; Li, S.; Jia, X.; Sun, W.; et al. Genetic and Clinical Landscape of Arr3-Associated MYP26: The Most Common Cause of Mendelian Early-Onset High Myopia with a Unique Inheritance. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 107, 1545–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mazijk, R.; Haarman, A.E.G.; Hoefsloot, L.H.; Polling, J.R.; Tienhoven, M.; Klaver, C.C.W.; Verhoeven, V.J.M.; Loudon, S.E.; Thiadens, A.A.H.J.; Kievit, A.J.A. Early Onset X-linked Female Limited High Myopia in Three Multigenerational Families Caused by Novel Mutations in the Arr3 Gene. Hum. Mutat. 2022, 43, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Edwards, R.B.; Adler, A.J. IRBP Enhances Removal of 11- Cis -Retinaldehyde from Isolated RPE Membranes. Exp. Eye Res. 2000, 70, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. den Hollander, A.I.; McGee, T.L.; Ziviello, C.; Banfi, S.; Dryja, T.P.; Gonzalez-Fernandez, F.; Ghosh, D.; Berson, E.L. A Homozygous Missense Mutation in the Irbp Gene (Rbp3) Associated with Autosomal Recessive Retinitis Pigmentosa. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Arno, G.; Hull, S.; Robson, A.G.; Holder, G.E.; Cheetham, M.E.; Webster, A.R.; Plagnol, V.; Moore, A.T. Lack of Interphotoreceptor Retinoid Binding Protein Caused by Homozygous Mutation of RBP3 Is Associated with High Myopia and Retinal Dystrophy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 2358–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Georgiou, M.; Fujinami, K.; Robson, A.G.; Fujinami-Yokokawa, Y.; Shakarchi, A.F.; Ji, M.H.; Uwaydat, S.H.; Kim, A.; Kolesnikova, M.; Arno, G.; et al. RBP3-Retinopathy—Inherited High Myopia and Retinal Dystrophy: Genetic Characterization, Natural History, and Deep Phenotyping. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2024, 258, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Murga-Zamalloa, C.A.; Atkins, S.J.; Peranen, J.; Swaroop, A.; Khanna, H. Interaction of Retinitis Pigmentosa GTPase Regulator (RPGR) with Rab8a GTPase: Implications for Cilia Dysfunction and Photoreceptor Degeneration. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 3591–3598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nassisi, M.; De Bartolo, G.; Mohand-Said, S.; Condroyer, C.; Antonio, A.; Lancelot, M.-E.; Bujakowska, K.; Smirnov, V.; Pugliese, T.; Neidhardt, J.; et al. Retrospective Natural History Study of RPGR-Related Cone- and Cone-Rod Dystrophies While Expanding the Mutation Spectrum of the Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Fahim, A.T.; Sullivan, L.S.; Bowne, S.J.; Jones, K.D.; Wheaton, D.K.; Khan, N.W.; Heckenlively, J.R.; Jayasundera, K.T.; Branham, K.H.; Andrews, C.A.; et al. X-Chromosome Inactivation Is a Biomarker of Clinical Severity in Female Carriers of RPGR-Associated X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa. Ophthalmol. Retin. 2020, 4, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, J.; Zhou, L.; Ouyang, J.; Xiao, X.; Sun, W.; Li, S.; Zhang, Q. Genotype–Phenotype Analysis of RPGR Variations: Reporting of 62 Chinese Families and a Literature Review. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 600210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Di Iorio, V.; Karali, M.; Melillo, P.; Testa, F.; Brunetti-Pierri, R.; Musacchia, F.; Condroyer, C.; Neidhardt, J.; Audo, I.; Zeitz, C.; et al. Spectrum of Disease Severity in Patients with X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Due to Rpgr Mutations. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020, 61, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Huang, L.; Lai, Y.; Sun, L.; Li, S.; Ding, X. High Myopia Is Common in Patients with X-Linked Retinopathies. Retina 2024, 44, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Li, H.-P. Myopia with X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Results from a Novel Gross Deletion of RPGR Gene. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 13, 1306–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mawatari, G.; Fujinami, K.; Liu, X.; Yang, L.; Yokokawa, Y.F.; Komori, S.; Ueno, S.; Terasaki, H.; Katagiri, S.; Hayashi, T.; et al. Clinical and genetic characteristics of 14 patients from 13 Japanese families with RPGR-associated retinal disorder: Report of eight novel variants. Hum. Genome Var. 2019, 6, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Veltel, S.; Gasper, R.; Eisenacher, E.; Wittinghofer, A. The Retinitis Pigmentosa 2 Gene Product Is a GTPase-Activating Protein for ARF-like 3. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Georgiou, M.; Robson, A.G.; Uwaydat, S.H.; Ji, M.H.; Shakarchi, A.F.; Pontikos, N.; Mahroo, O.A.; Cheetham, M.E.; Webster, A.R.; Hardcastle, A.J.; et al. Rp2-Associated X-Linked Retinopathy: Clinical Findings, Molecular Genetics, and Natural History in a Large Cohort of Female Carriers. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2024, 261, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jayasundera, T. RP2 Phenotype and Pathogenetic Correlations in X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2010, 128, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hull, S.; Owen, N.; Islam, F.; Tracey-White, D.; Plagnol, V.; Holder, G.E.; Michaelides, M.; Carss, K.; Raymond, F.L.; Rozet, J.-M.; et al. Nonsyndromic Retinal Dystrophy Due to Bi-Allelic Mutations in the Ciliary Transport Gene Ift140. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Helm, B.M.; Willer, J.R.; Sadeghpour, A.; Golzio, C.; Crouch, E.; Vergano, S.S.; Katsanis, N.; Davis, E.E. Partial Uniparental Isodisomy of Chromosome 16 Unmasks a Deleterious Biallelic Mutation in IFT140 That Causes Mainzer-SALDINO Syndrome. Hum. Genom. 2017, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Estrada-Cuzcano, A.; Neveling, K.; Kohl, S.; Banin, E.; Rotenstreich, Y.; Sharon, D.; Falik-Zaccai, T.C.; Hipp, S.; Roepman, R.; Wissinger, B.; et al. Mutations in C8ORF37, Encoding a Ciliary Protein, Are Associated with Autosomal-Recessive Retinal Dystrophies with Early Macular Involvement. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 90, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Katagiri, S.; Hayashi, T.; Yoshitake, K.; Akahori, M.; Ikeo, K.; Gekka, T.; Tsuneoka, H.; Iwata, T. Novel C8orf37 Mutations in Patients with Early-Onset Retinal Dystrophy, Macular Atrophy, Cataracts, and High Myopia. Ophthalmic Genet. 2014, 37, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Goyal, S.; Singh, K.; Uppal, A.; Vanita, V. A Nonsense Mutation in C8ORF37 Linked with Retinitis Pigmentosa, Early Macular Degeneration, Cataract, and Myopia in an ARRP Family from North India. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023, 23, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Bandah-Rozenfeld, D.; Mizrahi-Meissonnier, L.; Farhy, C.; Obolensky, A.; Chowers, I.; Pe’er, J.; Merin, S.; Ben-Yosef, T.; Ashery-Padan, R.; Banin, E.; et al. Homozygosity Mapping Reveals Null Mutations in FAM161A as a Cause of Autosomal-Recessive Retinitis Pigmentosa. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 87, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Di Gioia, S.A.; Letteboer, S.J.F.; Kostic, C.; Bandah-Rozenfeld, D.; Hetterschijt, L.; Sharon, D.; Arsenijevic, Y.; Roepman, R.; Rivolta, C. FAM161A, Associated with Retinitis Pigmentosa, Is a Component of the Cilia-Basal Body Complex and Interacts with Proteins Involved in Ciliopathies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012, 21, 5174–5184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Beryozkin, A.; Khateb, S.; Idrobo-Robalino, C.A.; Khan, M.I.; Cremers, F.P.; Obolensky, A.; Hanany, M.; Mezer, E.; Chowers, I.; Newman, H.; et al. Unique Combination of Clinical Features in a Large Cohort of 100 Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa Caused by FAM161A Mutations. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gregg, R.G.; Kamermans, M.; Klooster, J.; Lukasiewicz, P.D.; Peachey, N.S.; Vessey, K.A.; McCall, M.A. NYCTALOPIN Expression in Retinal Bipolar Cells Restores Visual Function in a Mouse Model of Complete X-Linked Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 98, 3023–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Poels, M.M.; de Wit, G.C.; Bijveld, M.M.; van Genderen, M.M. Natural Course of Refractive Error in Congenital Stationary Night Blindness: Implications for Myopia Treatment. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024, 65, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Huang, L.; Bai, X.; Xie, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, J.; Li, N. Clinical and Genetic Studies for a Cohort of Patients with Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2024, 19, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Xiao, X.; Jia, X.; Guo, X.; Li, S.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Q. CSNB1 in Chinese Families Associated with Novel Mutations in Nyx. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 51, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, Q.; Xiao, X.; Li, S.; Jia, X.; Yang, Z.; Huang, S.; Caruso, R.C.; Guan, T.; Sergeev, Y.; Guo, X.; et al. Mutations in NYX of Individuals with High Myopia, but without Night Blindness. Mol. Vis. 2007, 13, 330–336. [Google Scholar]
  93. Strom, T.M.; Nyakatura, G.; Apfelstedt-Sylla, E.; Hellebrand, H.; Lorenz, B.; Weber, B.H.; Wutz, K.; Gutwillinger, N.; Rüther, K.; Drescher, B.; et al. An L-Type Calcium-Channel Gene Mutated in Incomplete X-Linked Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, P. Phenotype and Genotype of CACNA1F-Related Diseases. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024, 65, 5267. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bech-Hansen, N.T.; Naylor, M.J.; Maybaum, T.A.; Pearce, W.G.; Koop, B.; Fishman, G.A.; Mets, M.; Musarella, M.A.; Boycott, K.M. Loss-of-Function Mutations in a Calcium-Channel A1-Subunit Gene in XP11.23 Cause Incomplete X-Linked Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 264–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Boycott, K.; Maybaum, T.; Naylor, M.; Weleber, R.; Robitaille, J.; Miyake, Y.; Bergen, A.; Pierpont, M.; Pearce, W.; Bech-Hansen, N. A Summary of 20 CACNA1F Mutations Identified in 36 Families with Incomplete X-Linked Congenital Stationary Night Blindness, and Characterization of Splice Variants. Hum. Genet. 2001, 108, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hauser, B.M.; Place, E.; Huckfeldt, R.; Vavvas, D.G. A novel homozygous nonsense variant in CABP4 causing stationary cone/rod synaptic dysfunction. Ophthalmic Genet. 2024, 45, 640–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Khan, A.O.; Alrashed, M.; Alkuraya, F.S. Clinical characterisation of the CABP4-related retinal phenotype. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 97, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Katta, M.; de Guimaraes, T.A.C.; Fujinami-Yokokawa, Y.; Fujinami, K.; Georgiou, M.; Mahroo, O.A.; Webster, A.R.; Michaelides, M. Congenital Stationary Night Blindness: Structure, Function and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in a Cohort of 122 Patients. Ophthalmol Retin. 2024, 8, 932–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, Z.; Sergouniotis, P.I.; Michaelides, M.; Mackay, D.S.; Wright, G.A.; Devery, S.; Moore, A.T.; Holder, G.E.; Robson, A.G.; Webster, A.R. Recessive Mutations of the Gene TRPM1 Abrogate on Bipolar Cell Function and Cause Complete Congenital Stationary Night Blindness in Humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 85, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Al-Hujaili, H.; Taskintuna, I.; Neuhaus, C.; Bergmann, C.; Schatz, P. Long-Term Follow-Up of Retinal Function and Structure in TRPM1-Associated Complete Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Mol. Vis. 2019, 25, 851–858. [Google Scholar]
  102. Miraldi Utz, V.; Pfeifer, W.; Longmuir, S.Q.; Olson, R.J.; Wang, K.; Drack, A.V. Presentation of Trpm1-Associated Congenital Stationary Night Blindness in Children. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018, 136, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Dryja, T.P.; McGee, T.L.; Berson, E.L.; Fishman, G.A.; Sandberg, M.A.; Alexander, K.R.; Derlacki, D.J.; Rajagopalan, A.S. Night Blindness and Abnormal Cone Electroretinogram on Responses in Patients with Mutations in the Grm6 Gene Encoding Mglur6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 4884–4889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bai, D.; Guo, R.; Huang, D.; Ji, J.; Liu, W. Compound Heterozygous Mutations in GRM6 Causing Complete Schubert-Bornschein Type Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Heliyon 2024, 10, e27039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sergouniotis, P.I.; Robson, A.G.; Li, Z.; Devery, S.; Holder, G.E.; Moore, A.T.; Webster, A.R. A phenotypic study of congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) associated with mutations in the GRM6 gene. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012, 90, e192–e197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Xu, X.; Li, S.; Xiao, X.; Wang, P.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Q. Sequence variations of GRM6 in patients with high myopia. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 2094–2100. [Google Scholar]
  107. Neuillé, M.; Morgans, C.W.; Cao, Y.; Orhan, E.; Michiels, C.; Sahel, J.; Audo, I.; Duvoisin, R.M.; Martemyanov, K.A.; Zeitz, C. Lrit3 Is Essential to Localize Trpm1 to the Dendritic Tips of Depolarizing Bipolar Cells and May Play a Role in Cone Synapse Formation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2015, 42, 1966–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zeitz, C.; Jacobson, S.G.; Hamel, C.P.; Bujakowska, K.; Neuillé, M.; Orhan, E.; Zanlonghi, X.; Lancelot, M.-E.; Michiels, C.; Schwartz, S.B.; et al. Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies LRIT3 Mutations as a Cause of Autosomal-Recessive Complete Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 92, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Dan, H.; Song, X.; Li, J.; Xing, Y.; Li, T. Mutation screening of the LRIT3, CABP4, and GPR179 genes in Chinese patients with Schubert-Bornschein congenital stationary night blindness. Ophthalmic Genet. 2017, 38, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Yun, Y.; Jeong, H.; Laboute, T.; Martemyanov, K.A.; Lee, H.H. Cryo-EM Structure of Human Class C Orphan GPCR GPR179 Involved in Visual Processing. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 8299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Audo, I.; Bujakowska, K.; Orhan, E.; Poloschek, C.M.; Defoort-Dhellemmes, S.; Drumare, I.; Kohl, S.; Luu, T.D.; Lecompte, O.; Zrenner, E.; et al. Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies Mutations in GPR179 Leading to Autosomal-Recessive Complete Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 90, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Klooster, J.; van Genderen, M.M.; Yu, M.; Florijn, R.J.; Riemslag, F.C.; Bergen, A.A.; Gregg, R.G.; Peachey, N.S.; Kamermans, M. Ultrastructural localization of GPR179 and the impact of mutant forms on retinal function in CSNB1 patients and a mouse model. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 6973–6981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Nathans, J.; Thomas, D.; Hogness, D.S. Molecular Genetics of Human Color Vision: The Genes Encoding Blue, Green, and Red Pigments. Science 1986, 232, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Sechrest, E.R.; Chmelik, K.; Tan, W.D.; Deng, W.-T. Blue Cone Monochromacy and Gene Therapy. Vis. Res. 2023, 208, 108221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Neitz, M.; Wagner-Schuman, M.; Rowlan, J.S.; Kuchenbecker, J.A.; Neitz, J. Insight from OPN1LW Gene Haplotypes into the Cause and Prevention of Myopia. Genes 2022, 13, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wang, Y.; Sun, W.; Xiao, X.; Jiang, Y.; Ouyang, J.; Wang, J.; Yi, Z.; Li, S.; Jia, X.; Wang, P.; et al. Unique Haplotypes in Opn1lw as a Common Cause of High Myopia with or without Protanopia: A Potential Window into Myopic Mechanism. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023, 64, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Katagiri, S.; Iwasa, M.; Hayashi, T.; Hosono, K.; Yamashita, T.; Kuniyoshi, K.; Ueno, S.; Kondo, M.; Ueyama, H.; Ogita, H.; et al. Genotype Determination of the OPN1LW/OPN1MW Genes: Novel Disease-Causing Mechanisms in Japanese Patients with Blue Cone Monochromacy. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Michaelides, M.; Johnson, S.; Simunovic, M.P.; Bradshaw, K.; Holder, G.; Mollon, J.D.; Moore, A.T.; Hunt, D.M. Blue Cone Monochromatism: A Phenotype and Genotype Assessment with Evidence of Progressive Loss of Cone Function in Older Individuals. Eye 2004, 19, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Aboshiha, J.; Dubis, A.M.; Carroll, J.; Hardcastle, A.J.; Michaelides, M. The Cone Dysfunction Syndromes: Table 1. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 100, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Orosz, O.; Rajta, I.; Vajas, A.; Takács, L.; Csutak, A.; Fodor, M.; Kolozsvári, B.; Resch, M.; Sényi, K.; Lesch, B.; et al. Myopia and Late-Onset Progressive Cone Dystrophy Associate to LVAVA/MVAVA Exon 3 Interchange Haplotypes of Opsin Genes on Chromosome X. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Gardner, J.C.; Liew, G.; Quan, Y.-H.; Ermetal, B.; Ueyama, H.; Davidson, A.E.; Schwarz, N.; Kanuga, N.; Chana, R.; Maher, E.R.; et al. Three Different Cone Opsin Gene Array Mutational Mechanisms; Genotype-Phenotype Correlation and Functional Investigation of Cone Opsin Variants. Hum. Mutat. 2014, 35, 1354–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Haer-Wigman, L.; den Ouden, A.; van Genderen, M.M.; Kroes, H.Y.; Verheij, J.; Smailhodzic, D.; Hoekstra, A.S.; Vijzelaar, R.; Blom, J.; Derks, R.; et al. Diagnostic analysis of the highly complex OPN1LW/OPN1MW gene cluster using long-read sequencing and MLPA. NPJ Genom. Med. 2022, 7, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Seifert, W.; Kühnisch, J.; Maritzen, T.; Horn, D.; Haucke, V.; Hennies, H.C. Cohen Syndrome-Associated Protein, Coh1, Is a Novel, Giant Golgi Matrix Protein Required for Golgi Integrity. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 37665–37675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hennies, H.C.; Rauch, A.; Seifert, W.; Schumi, C.; Moser, E.; Al-Taji, E.; Tariverdian, G.; Chrzanowska, K.H.; Krajewska-Walasek, M.; Rajab, A.; et al. Allelic Heterogeneity in the COH1 Gene Explains Clinical Variability in Cohen Syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 75, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kolehmainen, J.; Wilkinson, R.; Lehesjoki, A.-E.; Chandler, K.; Kivitie-Kallio, S.; Clayton-Smith, J.; Träskelin, A.-L.; Waris, L.; Saarinen, A.; Khan, J.; et al. Delineation of Cohen Syndrome Following a Large-Scale Genotype-Phenotype Screen. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 75, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Nasser, F.; Kurtenbach, A.; Biskup, S.; Weidensee, S.; Kohl, S.; Zrenner, E. Ophthalmic Features of Retinitis Pigmentosa in Cohen Syndrome Caused by Pathogenic Variants in the Vps13b Gene. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019, 98, E316–E321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Kim, D.A.; Kim, J. Ophthalmic Findings in Cohen Syndrome Patient without Subjective Ophthalmic Complaints: A Case Report. Medicine 2023, 102, e35945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Aldahmesh, M.A.; Alshammari, M.J.; Khan, A.O.; Mohamed, J.Y.; Alhabib, F.A.; Alkuraya, F.S. The Syndrome of Microcornea, Myopic Chorioretinal Atrophy, and Telecanthus (MMCAT) Is Caused by Mutations in Adamts18. Hum. Mutat. 2013, 34, 1195–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Khan, A.O. Microcornea with myopic chorioretinal atrophy, telecanthus and posteriorly-rotated ears: A distinct clinical syndrome. Ophthalmic Genet. 2012, 33, 196–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Faizi, N.; Casteels, I.; Termote, B.; Coucke, P.; De Baere, E.; De Bruyne, M.; Balikova, I. High Myopia and Vitreal Veils in a Patient with Poretti– Boltshauser Syndrome Due to a Novel Homozygous Lama1 Mutation. Ophthalmic Genet. 2022, 43, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Cai, C.X.; Go, M.; Kelly, M.P.; Holgado, S.; Toth, C.A. Ocular Manifestations of Poretti-Boltshauser Syndrome: Findings from Multimodal Imaging and Electrophysiology. Retin. Cases Brief Rep. 2020, 16, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhao, Y.Y.; Zhang, F.J.; Zhu, S.Q.; Duan, H.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Z.J.; Ma, W.X.; Wang, N.L. The Association of a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Promoter Region of the LAMA1 Gene with Susceptibility to Chinese High Myopia. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 1003–1010. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  133. Martínez-Albert, N.; Bueno-Gimeno, I.; Gené-Sampedro, A. Risk Factors for Myopia: A Review. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Landreneau, J.R. Review on the Myopia Pandemic: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention. Mo Med. 2021, 118, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Genes 16 01183 g001
Figure 1. Diagnostic flowchart to assist in the clinical evaluation of patients presenting with an inherited retinal disorder (IRD) and high myopia. Abbreviations: ACHM = achromatopsia; BCM = blue cone monochromacy; CD = cone dystrophy; CRD = cone-rod dystrophy; CSNB = congenital stationary night blindness; DD = developmental delay; ERG = electroretinogram; HL = hearing loss; ID = intellectual disability; RCD = rod-cone dystrophy; RD = retinal detachment; RP = retinitis pigmentosa.
Figure 1. Diagnostic flowchart to assist in the clinical evaluation of patients presenting with an inherited retinal disorder (IRD) and high myopia. Abbreviations: ACHM = achromatopsia; BCM = blue cone monochromacy; CD = cone dystrophy; CRD = cone-rod dystrophy; CSNB = congenital stationary night blindness; DD = developmental delay; ERG = electroretinogram; HL = hearing loss; ID = intellectual disability; RCD = rod-cone dystrophy; RD = retinal detachment; RP = retinitis pigmentosa.
Genes 16 01183 g001
Table 1. Functional categories for IRDs associated with high myopia and monogenic high myopia.
Table 1. Functional categories for IRDs associated with high myopia and monogenic high myopia.
Monogenic IRDs and High Myopia Functional Categories
Collagen/Structural Integrity
COL2A1 (AD; OMIM: 120140)
COL9A1 (AR; OMIM: 120210)
COL11A1 (AD; OMIM: 120280)
COL18A1 (AR; OMIM: 120328)
P3H2 (AR; OMIM: 610341)
Phototransduction and Visual Cycle
PDE6C (AR; OMIM: 600827)
PDE6H (AR; OMIM: 601190)
GUCY2D (AD/AR; OMIM: 600179)
ARR3 (XL; OMIM: 301770)
RBP3 (AR; OMIM: 180290)
Ciliary Trafficking and Microtubule-Associated Proteins
RPGR (XL; OMIM: 312610)
RP2 (XL; OMIM: 300757)
IFT140 (AR; OMIM: 614620)
CFAP418 (AR; OMIM: 614477)
FAM161A (AR; OMIM: 613596)
Synaptic Ribbon and Bipolar Cell Signalling
NYX (XL; OMIM: 300278)
CACNA1F (XL; OMIM: 300110)
TRPM1 (AR; OMIM: 603576)
GRM6 (AR; OMIM: 604096)
LRIT3 (AR; OMIM: 615004)
GPR179 (AR; OMIM: 614515)
Opsin-Related Proteins
OPN1LW (XL; OMIM: 300822)
OPN1MW (XL; OMIM: 300821)
Miscellaneous
VPS13B (AR; OMIM: 607817)
ADAMTS18 (AR; OMIM: 607512)
LAMA1 (AR; OMIM: 150320)
AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; XL = X-linked; OMIM: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, C.; Sheri, N.; Benson, M.D. Inherited Retinal Diseases with High Myopia: A Review. Genes 2025, 16, 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16101183

AMA Style

Liu C, Sheri N, Benson MD. Inherited Retinal Diseases with High Myopia: A Review. Genes. 2025; 16(10):1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16101183

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Cyndy, Narin Sheri, and Matthew D. Benson. 2025. "Inherited Retinal Diseases with High Myopia: A Review" Genes 16, no. 10: 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16101183

APA Style

Liu, C., Sheri, N., & Benson, M. D. (2025). Inherited Retinal Diseases with High Myopia: A Review. Genes, 16(10), 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16101183

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop