Next Article in Journal
OHDLF: A Method for Selecting Orthologous Genes for Phylogenetic Construction and Its Application in the Genus Camellia
Next Article in Special Issue
Hotspots for Disease-Causing Mutations in the Mitochondrial TIM23 Import Complex
Previous Article in Journal
Reply to Elgoyhen et al. Comment on “De Rosa et al. Hearing Loss: Genetic Testing, Current Advances and the Situation in Latin America. Genes 2024, 15, 178”
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Pathogenic Large Duplication in EXT1 Identified in a Family with Multiple Osteochondromas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Segregation of the COL6A2 Variant (c.1817-3C>G) in a Consanguineous Saudi Family with Bethlem Myopathy

Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah 51452, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(11), 1405; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111405
Submission received: 14 October 2024 / Revised: 22 October 2024 / Accepted: 23 October 2024 / Published: 30 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Variations of Rare Genetic Diseases)

Abstract

:
Introduction: Bethlem myopathy is a rare genetic disease caused by a variant mapped to 21q22, which harbors the collagen type VI alpha 2 chain (COL6A2) and collagen type VI alpha 1 chain (COL6A1) genes, and 2q37, which harbors the collagen type VI alpha 3 chain (COL6A3) gene. Disease onset can occur at any age, and the symptoms are related to those of muscular dystrophy. Since Bethlem myopathy is a rare disease, no previous studies have been conducted in Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia. Its variable presentation of nonspecific muscular contractions and severity represents a diagnostic dilemma. Case presentation: Here, we report a Saudi pediatric patient, who is 9 years old (proband), brought to the pediatric clinic of King Saud’s Hospital by his mother. The boy presented with difficulty standing, walking, and running with his classmates and unaffected siblings. He has a younger sibling, aged 6 years old, who reported having a limping gait and difficulty bending his right knee. Laboratory results for the proband were unremarkable except for a slight increase in creatine kinase (CK). Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed for five family members, including the proband and his symptomatic brother, their mother and two asymptomatic siblings. A very rare 3′ splice site acceptor intronic variant, NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G, located three nucleotides before exon 25, was identified in COL6A2. Bioinformatics tools (SpliceAI, dbscSNV, FATHMM-MKL, and MaxEntScan) predicted this variant as pathogenic. The proband and his 6-year-old sibling presented a homozygous genotype for the variant, whereas the mother and one asymptomatic sibling were heterozygous, and the other sibling carried homozygous wild-type alleles. Conclusions: This is the first study to report a case of Bethlem myopathy confirmed by WES in Saudi Arabia and all Arab nations. The identified variant is rare, and its segregation pattern suggests autosomal recessive inheritance. The segregation pattern and bioinformatics tool results may qualify this variant to be annotated as pathogenic, addressing the reported uncertainty of its classification. Our findings contribute to linking and filling the knowledge gap of diagnosing and managing patients with collagen VI-related myopathies, providing greater clinical and genetic understanding to the existing knowledge.

1. Introduction

Bethlem myopathy (BM; MIM #158810) and Ulrich congenital muscular dystrophy (UCMD; MIM #254090) fall under the category of congenital muscular dystrophy (CMD), which defines a set of MDs that become evident at or near birth [1]. BM and UCMD are very rare inherited muscle disorders caused by variants in one of the genes responsible for collagen VI alpha chain synthesis (COL6A1, COL6A2, COL6A3) [2,3]. Different variants have been associated with BM, namely missense, nonsense, splice site, and Indels Table 1, constraining the normal expression and/or function of alpha chain proteins. BM has a prevalence of 0.7 in 100,000 people, while UCMD affects 0.3 in 100,000 [4]. Patients of any age can present with symptoms, including muscle weakness, joint laxity, hypotonia, and contractures in the hips and ankles [2,3]. Nevertheless, mild symptoms and slow progression are noticed in patients with BM. Since collagen VI is found in the skin, an unusual skin appearance can also be observed in BM patients.
BM is usually inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, where a single copy from either parent is sufficient to cause the disease. However, it can also be inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern [2,3,5,6]. In some cases, the patient’s parents were asymptomatic, which could indicate that either the parents were mildly affected or the defect in the gene originated in the affected children.
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD; OMIM #310200) is another rare, life-threatening neuromuscular disease that is inherited as an X-linked disease and affects the normal physiology of the muscle, similar to Bethlem myopathy. However, DMD is caused by variants in the DMD gene, which encodes the dystrophin protein [7,8]. Duplication and deletion are the most common alterations in the DMD gene, particularly in the hot-spot region (exon 44–55). Consequently, patients with DMD lack normal expression of the dystrophin protein, which leads to a clinical picture characterized by progressive muscle degeneration and rapid deterioration in ambulatory activities, as well as cardiac and respiratory abnormalities.
In Saudi Arabia and Arab nations, hereditary diseases are poorly investigated although they are more common than in other countries [9]. Ethnicity and social factors, namely high consanguinity rates, play a significant role in this issue [9,10,11]. The diagnosis of genetic diseases mainly depends on the patient’s clinical presentation and family history, which increases the possibility of late diagnosis or misdiagnosis. In the case of rare diseases such as BM and DMD, the signs and symptoms may overlap and lead to improper medical decisions. This study presents a rare family case of BM that was initially misdiagnosed as DMD. We report the proband’s genetic findings, characterize and compare genotype–phenotype correlation with reported cases, and discuss the family’s history of the disease.

2. Case Report

The proband is a 9-year-old boy who presented to the pediatric clinic of King Saud Hospital, Unaizah-Al Qassim, in August 2020 with symptoms of muscular dystrophy. The mother described the prenatal period as unremarkable, and he was delivered full-term by unassisted vaginal delivery, which was uneventful. During his neonatal period, no hypotonia was observed. The child supported his neck at around 5 months of age and was able to walk independently at around 19 months of age.
At age 4, his mother noticed that he became fatigued easily when playing with his peers and siblings and sometimes experienced repeated falls. At age 6, he experienced difficulties in standing, walking, and running. He was able to climb stairs on his own but with slight difficulty, and he would get up from the floor using his arms. During school competitions, he always lags and is slower than his peers.
On examination, the proximal muscles of the lower limbs were mildly weak, mainly the hip extensor muscle group, with a power grade of (4/5) on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale [12], with no muscular atrophy observed. The left ankle had a slight contracture affecting the dorsiflexion action of the joint. Gower’s sign was positive [13]. The distal lower limb muscles were normal in power and shape, similar to the bilateral upper limbs and shoulder muscles. Cranial nerves and memory and cognition upon testing were intact, and no sensory loss was detected. The skin examination revealed no scars, keloid, follicular keratosis, or other clinical skin signs or abnormalities. Upon examination, there were no signs/symptoms suggestive of cardio-respiratory abnormalities. The echocardiogram and electrocardiogram (ECG) were normal. The serum creatine kinase (CK) level was abnormally high at 335 U/L (reference range 39–308 U/L).
An investigation of the family’s history revealed that the parents are first-degree cousins with four male offspring. The two oldest sons were asymptomatic. However, the youngest exhibited limping gait and difficulty bending his right knee, in addition to muscle pain and fatigability similar to those reported in the proband (Figure 1). The serum CK level for the youngest sibling was 192 U/L (reference range 39–308 U/L). There is no history of similar conditions in close family relatives from either side. Informed consent for diagnostic and research purposes was obtained from the mother and the four children. Peripheral blood samples and clinical data were subsequently collected from the family members other than the father, who was not available to participate in the study.

2.1. Extraction of Genomic DNA and Whole-Exome Sequencing

Each participant’s genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral venous blood (2 mL), which was collected using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as an anticoagulant. Following extraction, the DNA was enriched with the MGIEasy Exome Capture V5 probe kit (MGI-Tech Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China). The MGI-DNBSEQ Tech platform was employed to sequence the generated DNA libraries. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) services were provided by a commercial genomic laboratory accredited by the College of American Pathology (CAP). Comprehensive clinical and bioinformatics reports_which include variant genomic location, variant frequency in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), and examination of variant reports submitted to bioinformatics databases such as ClinVar and Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD)_were provided and interpreted according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines [14].

2.2. Ethical Consideration and Consent for Participation and Publication

This project received ethical approval from the Regional Research Ethics Committee, Qassim Province (Approval Number: 607/44/17554). Signed informed consent was obtained from the mother for herself and her children after informing her of the study objectives, including consent for publication.

3. Results

3.1. The (c.1817-3C>G) Variant Was Recessively Inherited in the Family

Upon analyzing the WES findings for all genes, particularly the targeted genes (COL6A1, COL6A2, COL6A3, DMD, HNRPDL, FSHMDA1, and LAMA2), the results revealed that the proband (IV-3) and his symptomatic brother (IV-4) were homozygous for the NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G variant in COL6A2 (Figure 2,IV-3 and IV-4). The genomic analysis of the mother (III-4) revealed that she was an asymptomatic heterozygous carrier for this variant (Figure 2, III-4). Further analysis revealed that one sibling (IV-1) was an asymptomatic heterozygous carrier for the same variant (Figure 2, IV-1), whereas another sibling (IV-2) was negative for the variant (Figure 2, IV-2). These findings confirm the autosomal recessive inheritance of this variant. A genomic analysis for the father (III-1) was missing because the father was unavailable for genotyping in this study.

3.2. The (c.1817-3C>G) Variant Is Predicted to Be an Intronic and Likely Pathogenic

The genomic analysis of this variant revealed its chromosomal location to be chr21: 47,545,376. Moreover, it falls within intron 24 of the COL6A2 gene transcript, just three nucleotides before the start of exon 25, and its SNP identifier is rs112645828 (Figure 2).
To predict the effect of the splice site variant NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G, we conducted bioinformatics analysis using SpliceAI, dbscSNV, FATHMM-MKL, and MaxEntScan [15,16,17,18], accessed through the varSome platform [19]. Each tool utilizes distinct algorithms and technology: Briefly, SpliceAI utilizes a 32-layer neural network based on deep learning and uniquely validates splice site variants in RNA-seq data, predicting the impact on exon gain or loss. dbscSNV predicts the single-nucleotide variant (SNV) within consensus regions of splice sites (−3 to +8 at the 5′ site and −12 to +2 at the 3′ site) using a specialized model. FATHMM-MKL employs machine learning with multiple kernel learning sets to predict SNV effects in coding and noncoding regions, using pathogenic data from the Human Gene Mutation Database and control data from the 1000 Genomes Project. MaxEntScan (MES) applies the maximum entropy principle to evaluate the impact of SNV at both the 5′ and 3′ splice sites. All tools indicated that the variant had a deleterious effect, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Prediction of the pathogenicity of the SNV (NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G) using the bioinformatics tools SpliceAI, dbscSNV, FATHMM-MKL, and MaxEntScan.
Table 1. Prediction of the pathogenicity of the SNV (NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G) using the bioinformatics tools SpliceAI, dbscSNV, FATHMM-MKL, and MaxEntScan.
SNV
rs112645828
SpliceAIdbscSNVFATHMM-MKLMaxEntScan
Reported score0.6500.9980.9914.677
InterpretationAcceptor lossPathogenic supportingPathogenic supportingPathogenic supporting

4. Discussion

This study described the first case of Bethlem myopathy in Saudi Arabia according to the disease progression, mild symptoms, and the slight elevation of the proband’s CK, confirmed by WES. The main finding of this study is that the homozygous (GG) splice site 3′ acceptor variant (NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G), rs112645828 in intron 24 of the COL6A2 gene, was found in the two symptomatic siblings, aged 9 and 6 years. The results of the asymptomatic siblings and the mother indicated a segregation pattern of this variant in the family. The mother and one asymptomatic sibling were found to be heterozygous (CG) for this SNV. The other asymptomatic sibling was found to have the homozygous wild-type allele (CC) of this SNV. Notably, the proband and his siblings are the children of a consanguineous marriage, and the parents themselves are first-degree cousins. This finding is supported by a series of reports from a genetic testing center in Germany, CENTOGEN-AG, at the ClinVar website [20], which includes many cases of BM patients with a homozygous genotype (GG) for the same variant (NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G). However, Lampe et al. in the UK reported the same variant (NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G) in one symptomatic patient with a heterozygous genotype (CG), which indicates an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern [21]. These discrepancies in the literature may be due to interethnic variation.
At the molecular level, this SNV of COL6A2 (NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G) is located at intron 24 at the third nucleotide before exon 25, and it is annotated in Ensembl as a splice 3′ acceptor variant [22]. Nucleotide substitution at the splice site is known to be associated with either intron retention or exon skipping, which can be partial or complete [23]. In either case, the sequence of the protein is altered. Hence, its folding and function will also change. Therefore, this variant, with its impact on the translated protein, is considered a loss-of-function variant [24]. In our case, exon 25, which is likely to be affected, encompasses 50 amino acids, from amino acid number 606 to amino acid 656, which participate in the formation of the second Von Willebrand factor (VWFA-2) domain. This domain contains 190 amino acids, from amino acid number 615 to amino acid number 805 [25]. Therefore, exon 25 contributes approximately 20% of the total amino acid content of VWFA-2 [26]. Notably, the COL6A2 protein contains three VWFA domains, and VWFA-2 is the largest. This VWFA-2 domain is particularly important for crosslinking with other alpha chain proteins, namely COL6A1 and COL6A3, and for fully assembling the collagen type IV protein [27]. This function may provide the rationale for why this variant is labeled as pathogenic. Moreover, some molecular genetics databases classify this variant as pathogenic, including the ClinVar database and Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD) [20,28]. In this case, the classification is consistent with the latest updated American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines [14], in which this variant meets one criterion for moderate evidence of pathogenicity, which is its very rare global allele frequency of 3.992 × 10−6, as reported in gnomAD [29], in addition to three criteria for supporting evidence of pathogenicity: segregation of the homozygous variant in symptomatic family members only, heterozygosity in asymptomatic carriers, and the consensus of four in silico tools, namely, SpliceAI v1.3.1, dbscSNV v1.1, FATHMM-MKL v2.3, and MaxEntScan v1.1 [15,16,17,18] on the pathogenicity of this variant. Finally, the recent reporting of this variant showed that it was linked with a myopathy related to COL6A2 [21]. Together, these criteria suggest that the current studied variant is a pathogenic variant.
Many variations have been reported to be associated with Bethlem myopathy; see Table 2. All the reported cases in COL6A2 had missense or splice site variants. Compared to the case reported [30], our case shows similar phenotypic features of proximal lower limb muscle weakness, ankle contractures, and ambulation preservation. There were no observed cardiac or respiratory problems, consistent with all published cases of BM; see Table 2. Although c.1817-3C>G is predicted to cause the deletion of exon 25 of CLO6A2 and c.1000-2A>G was shown in [30] to affect exon 11, they both share a genotype–phenotype correlation.
The creatine kinase (CK) level is slightly elevated in our reported case. Of note is that the CK level in most reported cases of BM ranges from normal to slightly elevated. It has been reported that CK levels do not correlate with disease severity [42,43]. In contrast, in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a motor neuron disease, CK levels are consistently elevated and have a prognostic value [44].
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting this variant (NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G) of COL6A2 as related to BM in Saudi Arabia and all Arabic countries, the inhabitants of which are primarily of Arabic ethnicity, representing approximately 5.7% (464,68 million inhabitants) of the entire world population. The rate of consanguinity in Saudi Arabia is very high; on average, it is estimated to be 56% and may exceed 80% in some local communities [45,46]. Consanguineous marriages may unmask known autosomal recessive diseases that may not have appeared in the last two generations of a family. Moreover, the unity and accumulation of heterozygous variant genotypes may also lead to the emergence of rare unknown autosomal recessive diseases in a consanguineous family [47]. The emergence of the whole-exome sequencing (WES) technique, which is based on next-generation sequencing, has aided in detecting variants associated with Mendelian inherited diseases [48]. Nevertheless, rare diseases such as Bethlem myopathy, characterized by variable severity and nonspecific muscular contractures, are difficult to diagnose and may overlap with other muscular dystrophy diseases, such as Duchene muscular dystrophy and Becker disease [49]. Therefore, we highly recommend genetic testing based on these cases, which is not a routine test in Saudi Arabia, as it will help clinicians shortlist, diagnose, and manage rare diseases.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we report a consanguineous Saudi family with BM caused by a rare, likely pathogenic SNV in COL6A2 confirmed using WES. The segregation pattern is consistent with that of autosomal recessive inheritance, which is the most common type of genetic disease in the country. The genotype–phenotype correlation is consistent with previously reported cases and suggests that our case is to be identified as a BM one. Further longitudinal studies are needed, to explore and confirm the impact of this SNV on the expression of the COL6A2 gene and the translated protein. These can be conducted by applying the RNA sequencing technique, the minigene assay and protein functional assays.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.A. and H.Z.H.; methodology, H.A. and H.Z.H.; validation, H.A. and H.Z.H.; formal analysis, H.A. and H.Z.H.; investigation, H.A. and H.Z.H.; data curation, H.A. and H.Z.H.; writing—original draft preparation, H.A. and H.Z.H.; writing—review and editing, H.A. and H.Z.H.; project administration, H.A.; funding acquisition, H.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Qassim University for the financial support (20033-mduc-2023-10-1-w).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This project received ethical approval from the Regional Research Ethics Committee, Qassim Province (Approval Number: 607/44/17554).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study, including consent for publication.

Data Availability Statement

All the collected data and medical reports used in this study are maintained by the corresponding author and can be provided upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the proband’s family members for their participation in this study. We also would like to thank the administrative team of King Saud Hospital for their cooperation and support.

Conflicts of Interest

Both authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Huml, R.A. Muscular Dystrophy: Historical Background and Types. In Muscular Dystrophy; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015; pp. 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gualandi, F.; Urciuolo, A.; Martoni, E.; Sabatelli, P.; Squarzoni, S.; Bovolenta, M.; Messina, S.; Mercuri, E.; Franchella, A.; Ferlini, A.; et al. Autosomal Recessive Bethlem Myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2009, 19, 608–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bönnemann, C.G. The Collagen VI-Related Myopathies. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2011, 101, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Norwood, F.L.M.; Harling, C.; Chinnery, P.F.; Eagle, M.; Bushby, K.; Straub, V. Prevalence of Genetic Muscle Disease in Northern England: In-Depth Analysis of a Muscle Clinic Population. Brain 2009, 132, 3175–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saroja, A.O.; Naik, K.R.; Nalini, A.; Gayathri, N. Bethlem Myopathy: An Autosomal Dominant Myopathy with Flexion Contractures, Keloids, and Follicular Hyperkeratosis. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 2013, 16, 712–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Elmas, M.; Gogus, B. A Case of Bethlem Myopathy with Autosomal Recessive Inheritance with a Novel Mutation in the COL6A2 Gene. J. Biochem. Clin. Genet. 2018, 1, 81–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shih, J.A.; Folch, A.; Wong, B.L. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: The Heart of the Matter. Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 2020, 17, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Galli, F.; Bragg, L.; Meggiolaro, L.; Rossi, M.; Caffarini, M.; Naz, N.; Santoleri, S.; Cossu, G. Gene and Cell Therapy for Muscular Dystrophies: Are We Getting There? Hum. Gene Ther. 2018, 29, 1098–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Alkuraya, F.S. Genetics and Genomic Medicine in Saudi Arabia. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2014, 2, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bamaga, A.K.; Alghamdi, F.; Alshaikh, N.; Altwaijri, W.; Bashiri, F.A.; Hundallah, K.; Abukhaled, M.; Muthaffar, O.Y.; Al-Mehmadi, S.; Jamaly, T.A.; et al. Consensus Statement on the Management of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy in Saudi Arabia During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9, 629549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alghamdi, F.; Al-Tawari, A.; Alrohaif, H.; Alshuaibi, W.; Mansour, H.; Aartsma-Rus, A.; Mégarbané, A. Case Report: The Genetic Diagnosis of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy in the Middle East. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9, 716424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. O’Brien, M. Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System: 6th Edition. Pract. Neurol. 2023, 23, 263–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gowers, W.R. Clinical Lecture ON PSEUDO-HYPERTROPHIC MUSCULAR PARALYSIS. Lancet 1879, 114, 73–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jaganathan, K.; Kyriazopoulou Panagiotopoulou, S.; McRae, J.F.; Darbandi, S.F.; Knowles, D.; Li, Y.I.; Kosmicki, J.A.; Arbelaez, J.; Cui, W.; Schwartz, G.B.; et al. Predicting Splicing from Primary Sequence with Deep Learning. Cell 2019, 176, 535–548.e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jian, X.; Boerwinkle, E.; Liu, X. In Silico Prediction of Splice-Altering Single Nucleotide Variants in the Human Genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 13534–13544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yeo, G.; Burge, C.B. Maximum Entropy Modeling of Short Sequence Motifs with Applications to RNA Splicing Signals. J. Comput. Biol. 2004, 11, 377–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shihab, H.A.; Rogers, M.F.; Gough, J.; Mort, M.; Cooper, D.N.; Day, I.N.M.; Gaunt, T.R.; Campbell, C. An Integrative Approach to Predicting the Functional Effects of Non-Coding and Coding Sequence Variation. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1536–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kopanos, C.; Tsiolkas, V.; Kouris, A.; Chapple, C.E.; Albarca Aguilera, M.; Meyer, R.; Massouras, A. VarSome: The Human Genomic Variant Search Engine. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 1978–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. National Center for Biotechnology Information. ClinVar; [VCV000974882.4]. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/VCV000974882.4 (accessed on 5 September 2024).
  21. Lampe, A.K.; Dunn, D.M.; Von Niederhausern, A.C.; Hamil, C.; Aoyagi, A.; Laval, S.H.; Marie, S.K.; Chu, M.L.; Swoboda, K.; Muntoni, F.; et al. Automated Genomic Sequence Analysis of the Three Collagen VI Genes: Applications to Ullrich Congenital Muscular Dystrophy and Bethlem Myopathy. J. Med. Genet. 2005, 42, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rs112645828 (SNP)—Genes and Regulation—Homo_Sapiens—Ensembl Genome Browser 111. Available online: http://asia.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Variation/Mappings?db=core;r=21:46124962-46125962;v=rs112645828;vdb=variation;vf=1079240881#ENST00000300527_1079240881_G_tablePanel (accessed on 9 May 2024).
  23. Ward, A.J.; Cooper, T.A. The Pathobiology of Splicing. J. Pathol. 2010, 220, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ward, L.D.; Kellis, M. Interpreting Noncoding Genetic Variation in Complex Traits and Human Disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bateman, A.; Martin, M.J.; Orchard, S.; Magrane, M.; Ahmad, S.; Alpi, E.; Bowler-Barnett, E.H.; Britto, R.; Bye-A-Jee, H.; Cukura, A.; et al. UniProt: The Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D523–D531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Duvaud, S.; Gabella, C.; Lisacek, F.; Stockinger, H.; Ioannidis, V.; Durinx, C. Expasy, the Swiss Bioinformatics Resource Portal, as Designed by Its Users. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W216–W227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, R.Z.; Zou, Y.; Pan, T.C.; Markova, D.; Fertala, A.; Hu, Y.; Squarzoni, S.; Reed, U.C.; Marie, S.K.N.; Bönnemann, C.G.; et al. Recessive COL6A2 C-Globular Missense Mutations in Ullrich Congenital Muscular Dystrophy: Role of the C2a Splice Variant. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 10005–10015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Full Data View for Gene COL6A2—Global Variome Shared LOVD. Available online: https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/view/COL6A2?search_VariantOnGenome%2FDBID=%3D%22COL6A2_000014%22 (accessed on 9 May 2024).
  29. 21-46125462-C-G|GnomAD v4.1.0|GnomAD. Available online: https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/21-46125462-C-G?dataset=gnomad_r4 (accessed on 9 May 2024).
  30. Wilpert, N.-M.; Schuelke, M.; Lala, B.; Weiß, C. A Mild But Typical Presentation of Bethlem Myopathy With a Novel In-Frame Deletion in COL6A1: Almost Overlooked. Neurology 2024, 102, e209476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bardakov, S.N.; Deev, R.V.; Magomedova, R.M.; Umakhanova, Z.R.; Allamand, V.; Gartioux, C.; Zulfugarov, K.Z.; Akhmedova, P.G.; Tsargush, V.A.; Titova, A.A.; et al. Intrafamilial Phenotypic Variability of Collagen VI-Related Myopathy Due to a New Mutation in the COL6A1 Gene. J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2021, 8, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kachuei, M.; Orangi, K.; Mohammadi, A.; Mohammadi, M.; Mojbafan, M. Bethlem Myopathy: A Novel Homozygous Variant of c.385C>T (p.Arg129Cys) in the COL6A2 Gene. Clin. Case Rep. 2024, 12, e9306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baker, N.L.; Mörgelin, M.; Pace, R.A.; Peat, R.A.; Adams, N.E.; Gardner, R.J.M.K.; Rowland, L.P.; Miller, G.; De Jonghe, P.; Ceulemans, B.; et al. Molecular Consequences of Dominant Bethlem Myopathy Collagen VI Mutations. Ann. Neurol. 2007, 62, 390–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kutluk, M.G.; Kadem, N.; Bektas, O.; Randa, N.C.; Tuncer, G.O.; Albayrak, P.; Eminoglu, T.; Teber, S.T. Genotype-Phenotype Correlation of the Childhood-Onset Bethlem Myopathy in the Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 2021, 24, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oros, M.; Baranga, L.; Glangher, A.; Adina-Diana, M.; Jugulete, G.; Pavelescu, C.; Mihaltan, F.; Plaiasu, V.; Gheorghe, D.C. A Diagnostic Challenge in an Adolescent with Collagen VI-Related Myopathy and Emotional Disorder-Case Report. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stavusis, J.; Micule, I.; Wright, N.T.; Straub, V.; Topf, A.; Panadés-de Oliveira, L.; Domínguez-González, C.; Inashkina, I.; Kidere, D.; Chrestian, N.; et al. Collagen VI-Related Limb-Girdle Syndrome Caused by Frequent Mutation in COL6A3 Gene with Conflicting Reports of Pathogenicity. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2020, 30, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Peng, X.Y.; Qu, Y.J.; Song, F.; Sun, X.F.; Ge, X.S.; Jiao, H. [Clinical manifestations and genetics analysis of collagen type Ⅵ-related myopathy caused by variants in COL6A3 gene]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2019, 57, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Marakhonov, A.V.; Tabakov, V.Y.; Zernov, N.V.; Dadali, E.L.; Sharkova, I.V.; Skoblov, M.Y. Two Novel COL6A3 Mutations Disrupt Extracellular Matrix Formation and Lead to Myopathy from Ullrich Congenital Muscular Dystrophy and Bethlem Myopathy Spectrum. Gene 2018, 672, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Collins, J.; Foley, A.R.; Straub, V.; Bönnemann, C.G. Spontaneous Keloid Formation in Patients with Bethlem Myopathy. Neurology 2012, 79, 2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Witting, N.; Krag, T.; Werlauff, U.; Duno, M.; Oestergaard, S.T.; Dahlqvist, J.R.; Vissing, J. Collagen XII Myopathy with Rectus Femoris Atrophy and Collagen XII Retention in Fibroblasts. Muscle Nerve 2018, 57, 1026–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Punetha, J.; Kesari, A.; Hoffman, E.P.; Gos, M.; Kamińska, A.; Kostera-Pruszczyk, A.; Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz, I.; Hu, Y.; Zou, Y.; Bönnemann, C.G.; et al. Novel Col12A1 Variant Expands the Clinical Picture of Congenital Myopathies with Extracellular Matrix Defects. Muscle Nerve 2017, 55, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Panadés-de Oliveira, L.; Rodríguez-López, C.; Cantero Montenegro, D.; Marcos Toledano, M.d.M.; Fernández-Marmiesse, A.; Esteban Pérez, J.; Hernández Lain, A.; Domínguez-González, C. Bethlem Myopathy: A Series of 16 Patients and Description of Seven New Associated Mutations. J. Neurol. 2019, 266, 934–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Martins, A.I.; Marques, C.; Pinto-Basto, J.; Negrão, L. Bethlem Myopathy in a Portuguese Patient—Case Report. Acta Myol. 2017, 36, 178–181. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pino, M.G.; Rich, K.A.; Kolb, S.J. Update on Biomarkers in Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Biomark Insights 2021, 16, 11772719211035643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. El Mouzan, M.I.; Al Salloum, A.A.; Al Herbish, A.S.; Qurachi, M.M.; Al Omar, A.A. Consanguinity and Major Genetic Disorders in Saudi Children: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Ann. Saudi Med. 2008, 28, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. El-Mouzan, M.I.; Al-Salloum, A.A.; Al-Herbish, A.S.; Qurachi, M.M.; Al-Omar, A.A. Regional Variations in the Prevalence of Consanguinity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med. J. 2007, 28, 1881–1884. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Alkuraya, F.S. Discovery of Rare Homozygous Mutations from Studies of Consanguineous Pedigrees. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 2012, 75, 6.12.1–6.12.13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Metzker, M.L. Sequencing Technologies—The next Generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Merlini, L.; Morandi, L.; Granata, C.; Ballestrazzi, A. Bethlem Myopathy: Early-Onset Benign Autosomal Dominant Myopathy with Contractures. Description of Two New Families. Neuromuscul. Disord. 1994, 4, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pedigree analysis of the family carrying the variant NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G in COL6A2.
Figure 1. Pedigree analysis of the family carrying the variant NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G in COL6A2.
Genes 15 01405 g001
Figure 2. Visualization of the BAM files extracted from whole-exome sequencing (WES) confirming the (NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G) variant segregation in the family. The human chromosome (chr21) and the collagen type VI alpha 2 chain (COL6A2) gene transcript (NM_001849.4) are indicated. The human reference genome (GRCh37.P13) was used for data alignments and variant recall. The proband (IV-4) and the symptomatic sibling (IV-3) display homozygous guanosine ‘G’ alleles, shown in orange. The mother (III-4) and the asymptomatic carrier (IV-1) are heterozygous and carry both alleles. IV-2 indicates that an unaffected sibling inherited the wild-type cytosine ‘C’ alleles, shown in blue. Visualization of BAM files was performed using Integrative Genomic Viewer (IGV-Web app version 1.13.12), an open-source genome browser and visualization tool.
Figure 2. Visualization of the BAM files extracted from whole-exome sequencing (WES) confirming the (NM_001849.4: c.1817-3C>G) variant segregation in the family. The human chromosome (chr21) and the collagen type VI alpha 2 chain (COL6A2) gene transcript (NM_001849.4) are indicated. The human reference genome (GRCh37.P13) was used for data alignments and variant recall. The proband (IV-4) and the symptomatic sibling (IV-3) display homozygous guanosine ‘G’ alleles, shown in orange. The mother (III-4) and the asymptomatic carrier (IV-1) are heterozygous and carry both alleles. IV-2 indicates that an unaffected sibling inherited the wild-type cytosine ‘C’ alleles, shown in blue. Visualization of BAM files was performed using Integrative Genomic Viewer (IGV-Web app version 1.13.12), an open-source genome browser and visualization tool.
Genes 15 01405 g002
Table 2. Reported cases of Bethlem myopathy (BM). This table presents various genetic variants described in the literature and their phenotypic correlations.
Table 2. Reported cases of Bethlem myopathy (BM). This table presents various genetic variants described in the literature and their phenotypic correlations.
CaseGene VariantType Genotype Lost AmbulationWalking AbnormalityRespiratory Symptoms Muscle Weakness and Contractures
[31]
(Wilpert et al., 2024)
COL6A1c.117_119delCCTIn-Frame deletion HhNot reported Truncal pendulum movements during walking.Not reported Elbow and long finger flexor contractures. Mild proximal muscle weakness
[32]
(Bardakov et al., 2021)
COL6A1c.227 + 2T>CSplice siteHHNot reported Not reported Not reported Early-onset severe proximal joint contractures and distal joint hypermobility
[33]
(Kachuei et al., 2024)
COL6A2c.385C>T MissenseHH yesWaddling gait and Not reported Proximal lower limb weakness, a positive Gowers’ sign, lumbar hyperlordosis and absent myotatic reflexes
[33]
(Baker et al., 2007)
COL6A2c.1000-2A>GSplice siteHhNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedProximal lower limb muscle weakness and contractures of elbow, knee, and ankles
[6]
(Elmas and Gogus, 2018)
COL6A2c.2584C>T (p.Arg862Trp)MissenseHhNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedJoint contractures, finger flexors, neuromotor developmental delay
[34]
(Kutluk et al., 2021)
COL6A2c.2096G>AMissenseHhNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedPredominant proximal muscle weakness, contractures at metacarpals, distal hyperextensibility of fingers
[34]
(Kutluk et al., 2021)
COL6A2c.2096G>AMissenseHhNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedPredominant proximal muscle weakness, distal hyperextensibility of fingers
[35]
(Oros et al., 2023)
COL6A2c.784G>TMissenseHhNot reported Difficulty to walk independently and running Not reported Progressive motor deficit involving all four limbs
[2]
(Gualandi et al., 2009)
COL6A2Q819X; R366X MissenseHHNot reported Not reported Not reported Proximal lower limb muscle weakness and contractures of fingers flexors muscles
[36]
(Stavusis et al., 2020)
COL6A3c.7447A>GMissenseHh Not reported Not reported Not reportedTendon retractions,
kyphoscoliosis
[37]
(Peng et al., 2019)
COL6A3c.6229G>C, c.5169_5177del Missense, Deletion HhNot reported Not reported Not reportedMild muscle weakness
[38]
(Marakhonov et al., 2018)
COL6A3p.Glu2402TerNonsense HHNot reported Not reported Not reportedDiffuse muscle weakness, striking distal joint hyperlaxity,
proximal contractures,
calcaneal protrusion, kyphosis, hip dislocation.
[39]
(Collins et al., 2012)
COL6A3, COL6A2c.G6517T, c.G1861AMissenseHhNot reported Not reported Not reportedDistal hyperlaxity (finger and ankles),
proximal contractures (hips and knees),
prominent calcaneus.
[40]
(Witting et al., 2018)
COL12A1c.8100 + 2T>CMissenseHhNot reported Not reported Not reportedCongenital hip dysplasia
[41]
(Punetha et al., 2017)
COL12A1c.8329G>C MissenseHhNot reported Not reported Not reportedUpper and lower limbs contractures
followed by resolution of contractures, limited motor performance.
HH: homozygous; Hh: heterozygous.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aldharee, H.; Hamdan, H.Z. Segregation of the COL6A2 Variant (c.1817-3C>G) in a Consanguineous Saudi Family with Bethlem Myopathy. Genes 2024, 15, 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111405

AMA Style

Aldharee H, Hamdan HZ. Segregation of the COL6A2 Variant (c.1817-3C>G) in a Consanguineous Saudi Family with Bethlem Myopathy. Genes. 2024; 15(11):1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111405

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aldharee, Hitham, and Hamdan Z. Hamdan. 2024. "Segregation of the COL6A2 Variant (c.1817-3C>G) in a Consanguineous Saudi Family with Bethlem Myopathy" Genes 15, no. 11: 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111405

APA Style

Aldharee, H., & Hamdan, H. Z. (2024). Segregation of the COL6A2 Variant (c.1817-3C>G) in a Consanguineous Saudi Family with Bethlem Myopathy. Genes, 15(11), 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111405

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop