Next Article in Journal
Replicative Study in Performance-Related Genes of Brazilian Elite Soccer Players Highlights Genetic Differences from African Ancestry and Similarities between Professional and U20 Youth Athletes
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Homozygous GPAA1 Variant in a Patient with a Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Biosynthesis Defect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

D-Type Cyclins in Development and Disease

Division of Molecular Medicine, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2023, 14(7), 1445; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071445
Submission received: 17 June 2023 / Revised: 5 July 2023 / Accepted: 11 July 2023 / Published: 14 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)

Abstract

:
D-type cyclins encode G1/S cell cycle checkpoint proteins, which play a crucial role in defining cell cycle exit and progression. Precise control of cell cycle exit is vital during embryonic development, with defects in the pathways regulating intracellular D-type cyclins resulting in abnormal initiation of stem cell differentiation in a variety of different organ systems. Furthermore, stabilisation of D-type cyclins is observed in a wide range of disorders characterized by cellular over-proliferation, including cancers and overgrowth disorders. In this review, we will summarize and compare the roles played by each D-type cyclin during development and provide examples of how their intracellular dysregulation can be an underlying cause of disease.

1. Introduction

Progression through the cell cycle is tightly controlled by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and their regulatory partners, cyclins [1]. CDKs are activated by binding to their respective cyclin partner, followed by activating phosphorylation by a CDK-activating kinase (CAK) [2]. The transition into each phase of the cell cycle is controlled by the kinase activity of a specific cyclin-CDK complex. The ‘S-phase’ of the cell cycle initiates DNA replication, which is necessary for the forthcoming cell division [3]. Cyclin D (CCND) forms active complexes with CDK4 and CDK6 (CDK4/6), which drives the G1-S phase transition by phosphorylating tumour-suppressor ‘pocket proteins’ retinoblastoma (Rb), p107, and p130. Phosphorylated pocket proteins are then hyper-phosphorylated by cyclin E-CDK2 complexes, causing them to dissociate from, and release, their E2F transcription factor binding partners. This release initiates the transcription of several key proteins required in order to advance the cell cycle and promote cell proliferation [4,5]. Dysfunction of these cell cycle regulators leads to uncontrolled cell proliferation and genomic instability, contributing to tumorigenesis and overgrowth disorders [1,6,7,8].
Cyclin D-CDK4/6 can also advance the cell cycle by binding and sequestering the CDK-inhibitors (CKI) p21 and p27, which inhibits the activity of cyclin E-CDK2 complexes [9]. Outside of the Rb family, cyclin D-CDK 4/6 also phosphorylates Smad3, a transcription factor of the TGF-ß signalling pathway, and FOXM1, a transcription factor implicated in promoting cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Phosphorylation of Smad3 at multiple sites by CDK4 inhibits its anti-proliferative response [10]. Phosphorylation of FOXM1 by CDK4/6 increases its stability, preventing cellular senescence in cancer cells as well as promoting G1/S cell cycle entry [11,12]. In addition to tumorigenesis, a role for Foxm1 in murine development has been described, in particular of the liver, heart, and lungs [13]. However, the Smad3 mice were viable, with death mostly occurring postnatally due to the development of neoplasms and impaired immune functions [14,15].
D-type cyclins are encoded by separate genes on three chromosomes (CCND1: 11q13.3, CCND2: 12p12.23, CCND3: 6p21.1) [16], and display high homology (~57% sequence identity in coding sequence) [1,17]. They can be expressed individually or in combination, typically with one D-type cyclin dominant in progressing the cell cycle of a particular cell type [17,18]. While functionally interchangeable, the loss of one or two D-type cyclins results in focused abnormalities and premature mortality in mice. Highly specialised tissues require a specific D-type cyclin [18]. Therefore, the requirement and dominance of a specific D-type cyclin in a particular tissue type is thought to be a likely result of extant transcription factors rather than the intrinsic physical properties of the cyclin [18]. Conversely, mice deficient in all three D-type cyclins die in mid-to-late gestation from heart abnormalities and severe anaemia, suggesting that cyclin D is required for the expansion of haematopoietic stem cells during development [19].
D-type cyclins serve as key endpoints of mitogenic signalling, acting as important growth factor sensors. Their transcription and activation are heavily dependent on receiving and integrating mitogenic signals from the Ras/Raf/MAPK (cyclin D synthesis), PI3K-Akt (cyclin D stability), and ß-catenin/TCF-LEF pathways [20,21,22]. Furthermore, D-type cyclins are highly labile, with proteasomal degradation occurring at rates comparable to their production. Cyclin D-CDK4/6 complexes are deactivated by the phosphorylation of a key regulatory C-terminal threonine (CCND1:Thr-286, CCND2:Thr-280, CCND3:Thr-283) by GSK3ß via the PI3K/AKT3/mTOR pathways, followed by export out of the nucleus, ubiquitylation in the cytoplasm by SKP1-Cullin1-F-Box (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligase, and degradation at the proteasome [7,23,24].
Recent evidence has emerged, however, that challenges this model of cyclin D degradation. CRL4AMBRA1 has been identified as the E3 ubiquitin ligase that ubiquitylates cyclin D, with ubiquitylation and degradation likely occurring in the nucleus [25,26,27]. Further complicating this is the observation of cyclin D degradation independent of GSK3ß, suggesting degradation pathways which are potentially mediated by other kinases [28,29,30].
Thus, the activity of cyclin D is carefully regulated through its mitogen-activated transcription, binding to CDK4/6, phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, nuclear export, and degradation (Figure 1) [1].

2. Cyclin D1

Cyclin D1 (CCND1) encodes the general D-type cyclin, expressed in all tissue types except those derived from haematopoietic stem cell lines [16]. CCND1 is composed of 5 exons, which are separated by 4 introns. Alternative splicing at the exon 4–intron 4 boundary results in the cyclin D1b (CCND1b) variant, which does not include exon 5, and acquires 33 new amino acids. Both isoforms are identical for the first 240 amino acids but differ in their C-termini. CCND1b is deficient in promoting Rb phosphorylation and lacks the LxxLL motif (aa 251–257) required for ligand-dependent interaction with nuclear receptors, as well as both the Thr-286 residue and the PEST sequence (aa 241–290) required for degradation (Figure 2). This is postulated to be responsible for the increased nuclear retention of the CCND1b isoform [31,32,33]. Furthermore, CCND1b has been observed to have increased oncogenic potential relative to the CCND1 isoform. CCND1b, but not CCND1, was sufficient to drive the transformation of NIH3T3 cells in vitro and tumour formation in vivo [34,35]. Indeed, the CCND1b isoform is highly expressed in several cancers, including breast cancer [36], prostate cancer [37], and B-lymphoid malignancies [38].
Ccnd1-deficient mice display developmental abnormalities such as reduced body size, hypoplastic retinas, and pregnancy-insensitive mammary glands, as well as increased premature mortality within the first 3 weeks of life [23,39]. Recent studies have revealed that the mammary and retinal defects could be rescued following the knock-in of a catalytically inactive variant, Ccnd1K112E, indicating that Ccnd1′s role in retinal and mammary development occurs independently of CDK4/6 [40]. No human disease has yet been associated with variants in CCND1; however, a number of studies have identified a common CCND1 polymorphism (c.870G>A, rs603965) that increases susceptibility to colorectal cancer and multiple myeloma [41,42,43,44].
As an oncogene, dysregulation of CCND1 compromises the S-phase checkpoint, inducing forced progression of the cell cycle, disrupting DNA replication, and promoting DNA damage and genomic instability, resulting in oncogenesis [45]. CCND1 is more frequently deregulated than CCND2 and CCND3 in both solid and haematological cancers [46], and is over-expressed and upregulated in multiple cancers, including head and neck squamous carcinoma [47], mantle cell lymphoma [48], pancreatic cancer [49], melanoma [50], non-small cell lung cancer [51], gastric cancer [52], colorectal cancer [53], endometrial cancer [54], and over 50% of human breast cancers [55]. The oncogenic activity of CCND1 is strongly tied to its cellular levels, as tumour cells with high CCND1 levels exhibit uncontrolled cell proliferation. Overexpression of CCND1 can be caused by the amplification of CCND1, chromosomal re-arrangement, or the stabilisation of the CCND1 protein via impaired degradation, often caused by mutations at or around the Thr-286 phosphorylation site, leading to accumulation in the nucleus [33]. Additionally, point mutations or deletions around the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the CCND1 mRNA transcript result in shorter, more stable transcripts [56].
In addition to its canonical role in the Rb pathway, CCND1 plays a key role in promoting cell proliferation, cell survival, angiogenesis, and cell migration, as well as in preventing cell senescence [17]. CCND1 can execute some of these functions independently from its association with CDK4/6. For example, CCND1 binds nuclear receptors such as eostrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and steroid receptor co-factors such as SRC1 and SRC3, enhancing oestrogen-receptor-mediated transcription in breast epithelial cells [11,57]. Conversely, CCND1 inhibits the activity of androgen receptors (ARs) via binding and preventing the formation of the active AR complex, as well as recruiting histone deacetylases (HDACs) to repress its transcription [58]. Moreover, CCND1 binds histone acetyltransferases such as p300/CREB-binding protein-associated factor (P/CAF), which increases the transcriptional activity of ER, and HDACs to enhance transcriptional repression, as seen with AR [58,59]. Indeed, CCND1 acts as a key transcription regulator of several genes through a combination of interactions with transcription factors, coactivators, and chromatin-altering enzymes.
CCND1 has also been shown to play a role in DNA repair. Following DNA damage, CCND1 is recruited by BRCA2 to DNA damage sites, after which CCND1 interacts with Rad51, a critical recombinase involved in homologous recombination and DNA repair. This facilitates its recruitment to regions of DNA damage to promote DNA repair. Decreased expression of CCND1, but not treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors, decreases Rad51 recruitment to DNA damage sites, confirming that CCND1 promotes DNA repair independently of CDK4/6 [60].
CCND1 can also affect the movement and invasiveness of mantle cell lymphoma cells by localising and accumulating in the cytoplasm. Proteomic analysis of CCND1-interacting proteins showed that many of them are involved in the regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics, migration, and invasion [61]. For example, CCND1 enhances cellular motility by inhibiting the signalling pathways of thrombospondin 1 (TSP-1) and Rho-activated kinase (ROCK) [62]. Additionally, through the inhibition of TSP1 and co-expression with the vascular growth factor VEGF, CCND1 can promote angiogenesis, enabling tumour survival, growth, and metastasis [63]. Blocking the nuclear export of CCND1 resulted in a significant decrease in migration and invasion, indicating that cytoplasmic CCND1 is essential for chemotaxis and the invasion of mantle cell lymphoma cells [61].
Over-expression of CCND1 alone, however, is not sufficient to drive oncogenic cell transformation without cooperating mutations [24]. p.Thr286Ala is a gain-of-function mutation that prevents CCND1 from being phosphorylated by GSK3ß or AMBRA1, resulting in the stabilisation and accumulation of CCND1 in the nucleus throughout all stages of the cell cycle. This leads to increased formation of active cyclin D-CDK4/6 complexes, genomic instability, oncogenic cell transformation, and neoplastic growth. It has been postulated that the degradation of CCND1 is vital to maintaining genomic stability following DNA damage, and, therefore, dysregulation of its export via stabilisation is a prelude to oncogenesis rather than the underlying cause [64,65].

3. Cyclin D2

CCND2, located on chromosome 12p13, consists of 5 exons that encode the cyclin D2 (CCND2) protein [16]. Like CCND1, CCND2 is a component of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, which controls the transition between G1 and S phase of the cell cycle by forming a complex with its cyclin-dependent kinases, CDK4 (CCND2–CDK4) and CDK6. The formation of this complex is a rate-limiting step for progression through the G1 phase, and heavily depends on the availability of serum in cells [66].
Once assembled, CCND2–CDK4 complexes control the phosphorylation of its substrate, Rb [67]. Phosphorylated Rb (pRb) cannot bind to the transcription factor EGF-1 [68], which increases the pool of free, active EGF protein. The accumulation of active EGF activates the expression of many downstream genes needed for S phase initiation and cell proliferation, subsequently triggering S-phase entry of the cell cycle [68,69]. A reduction in pRb, and, therefore, a reduction in the upstream production of CCND2, increases the amount of active (hypophosphorylated) Rb. Therefore, Rb-EGF complexes can form and prevent EGF accumulation, leading to cell cycle arrest [68]. It is, therefore, essential that the components responsible for regulating pRb production, including CCND2, are expressed and regulated precisely to ensure adequate entry through the cell cycle and normal cell growth.
CCND2 is the only D-type cyclin expressed in the adult hippocampus [70], with Ccnd2 knockout mice (Ccnd2-KO) displaying reduced hippocampal neuron production [71]. However, these Ccnd2-KO-associated brain abnormalities result in limited impact on behavioural phenotypes [72]. Although the role of CCND2 in adult neurogenesis is less understood, there is a well-established role of CCND2 in neurodevelopment during embryogenesis [73]. De novo germline CCND2 mutations cause megalencephaly-polymicrogyria-polydactyly-hydrocephalus syndrome (MPPH), with mutations clustering at the c-terminus. These mutations occur at and around the phosphodegron residue Thr-280 and result in resistance to proteasomal degradation in vitro, leading to significantly increased CCND2 accumulation in patient cells compared to controls [7]. Interestingly, the stabilisation of CCND2 is also observed in related neurodevelopmental overgrowth conditions caused by mutations in proteins upstream of CCND2 in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, such as AKT3, PIK3CA, and PIK3R2 [74,75,76]. CCND2 stabilisation and/or accumulation therefore appears to be a common end point for this group of disorders, making it an excellent therapeutic target [7]. Similar results have also been observed in mouse models of brain overgrowth, with mice deficient in Dusp16, a negative regulator of MAPK, showing brain overgrowth and stabilised CCND2 [77]. This indicates the important role that CCND2 plays in early neurogenesis in terms of regulating cell cycle exit in neural progenitor cells, and how stabilised CCND2 leads to the continued entering of the cell cycle into the S phase, resulting in over-proliferation and increased brain growth.
Recently, loss-of-function CCND2 variants resulting in protein truncation were found in patients with microcephaly, the inverse brain phenotype to MPPH [78]. Prior to this study, the effect of loss-of-function mutations on CCND2 was poorly understood, with only mice studies indicating that Ccnd2-KO causes a lack of cerebellar stellate interneurons [79], supressed adult hippocampal neurogenesis [80], and severe microcephaly [81]. These recent findings in humans with heterozygous loss of CCND2 confirm the phenotypes observed in mice and further support a crucial role of CCND2 during neurogenesis, as well as the requirement for the careful control of intracellular levels of cyclin D.
In addition to its key role in neurogenesis, CCND2 also regulates the cell cycle in other tissues which may also be affected in patients with stabilising mutations. For example, MPPH patients display 3- or 4-limb postaxial polydactyly, indicating a role for CCND2 in early limb bud development [7]. The crucial role of CCND2 in limb development has also been identified independently in the developing limb buds of chick wings [82]. RNA sequencing of the polarising region of the limb buds and adjacent skeletal progenitor cells revealed that Ccnd2 and its inhibitor p27 are the only core cell cycle regulators expressed in these cells [83]. More recently, CCND2 has been implicated in pancreatic B-cell proliferation, with MPPH or MCAP patients with CCND2 or PIK3CA variants, respectively, found to have hypoglycaemia [84,85]. β-cells of the pancreas are responsible for the secretion of insulin; thus, over-proliferation of β-cells due to CCND2-stabilising mutations likely results in hyperinsulinaemia and, in turn, hypoglycaemia [86]. Patients with MPPH or MCAP are, therefore, recommended to undergo regular blood glucose monitoring, and those with low blood glucose levels should be referred for specialist endocrine review.
While its roles in development have only recently been discovered, the role of CCND2 in cancers is more established. Prior to being identified in patients with MPPH, the same protein-stabilising mutations in and around Thr-280 had been identified somatically in tumours (COSMIC). Recent studies have identified CCND2 and CCND1 mutations as frequent events in myeloid leukaemia, in particular acute myeloid leukaemia [87,88]. These mutations are identical to those seen in MPPH and have the same underlying mechanisms, i.e., accumulation of stabilised CCND2, increased phosphorylation of Rb protein, and uncontrolled cellular proliferation.
While the accumulation of CCND2 is the most common disease mechanism associated with CCND2-associated disorders, a number of cancers have been found to have reduced CCND2 due to CCND2 hypermethylation, particularly breast and lung cancers [89]. CCND2-promoter hypermethylation was found at an early stage of breast cancer tumorigenesis and was associated with the silencing of CCND2 expression [90]. Administering the de-methylating agent antroquinonol D increased CCND2 expression in breast cancer samples and resulted in reduced cancer cell growth through cell cycle arrest [89,91]. It remains unclear why the loss of CCND2, and, therefore, CCND2-associated cell proliferation, is observed in cancers, but this may be due to a compensation effect leading to the up-regulation of another cyclin, e.g., cyclin E. Another explanation may be related to the stage or sub-type of cancer. For example, in gastric cancer, some studies have CCND2 hypermethylation listed as an underlying cause of proliferation [92], whereas others have found CCND2 hypomethylation leading to increased CCND2 expression in more advanced-stage gastric carcinomas [93].

4. Cyclin D3

The major isoform of cyclin D3 (CCND3), located on chromosome 6p21, consists of 5 exons, but several alternative isoforms exist with different transcriptional start sites. While each isoform contains the regulatory C-terminal region of CCND3, the alternative start sites affect the CDK4-binding region, indicating a CDK4-independent role for these isoforms. In comparison to CCND1 and CCND2, CCND3 is predominantly found in bone marrow and lymphoid tissues, with the highest protein and RNA expression found in the thymus (proteinatlas.org) [94]. High protein expression is, however, also observed in the cerebellum, duodenum, pancreas, and testis, although RNA levels of CCND3 in these tissues is comparatively low.
CCND3 is an atypical D-type cyclin that is predominantly expressed in differentiated tissues [95,96,97]. Germline knockout of CCND3 in mice is viable, but homozygous null mice show defects in lymphoid-derived cells, such as impaired B- and T-cell differentiation and granulocyte proliferation [98,99,100]. A similar role is observed in humans, with CCND3 playing a key role during B-cell precursor cell development [101] and, at later stages, a crucial role in the expansion of germinal centre B-cells [102,103].
In addition to an effect on lymphoid-derived cells, CCND3−/− mice also show retarded growth, significant loss of muscle mass, and impaired muscle regeneration, suggesting an important role of CCND3 in myogenesis [97,99,104]. These models suggest that, while CCND3 may not have a direct role during development, it does play a key role in differentiation and maturation in lymphoid and musculoskeletal tissues.
Like CCND1, no human disorder has yet been associated with germline mutations in CCND3. However, a role of CCND3 in multiple cancers has been observed, with most CCND3 aberrations being gene-amplification rather than single-nucleotide variants. Due to the expression profile of CCND3, it is no surprise that lymphoid cancers are most commonly associated with dysregulation of CCND3. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and alterations in the cyclin D/CDK4-6 pathway are found in approximately 67% of DLBCL cases, with CCND3 overexpression accounting for 53% [105,106,107]. More significantly, DLBCL patients with high levels of CCND3 have shown lower response rates to chemotherapy and shorter survival durations compared to those with low CCND3 expression [108]. Increased expression of CCND3 has also been observed in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) cells, with RNA sequencing identifying a 38-fold increase in CCND3 in NOTCH1-mutated cells compared to NOTCH1 non-mutated cells [109]. A similar increase was also seen for CDK4 and CDK6, and the results of a previous study associating Notch signalling with CCND3 was confirmed [110]. A role of CCND3 in B-cell lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) was also described, with CCND3 being found to be indispensable for the growth and survival of B-ALL cells irrespective of the underlying driver mutation [102]. Increased CCND3 expression associated with cells developing resistance to the CDK4 inhibitor Palbociclib, suggesting targeting of CCND3 rather than CDK4, may be a more effective therapeutic approach. Altogether, these findings highlight a key role of CCND3 in the regulation of lymphoid-derived cells and the consequences of its dysregulation.
In addition to lymphoid cancers, somatic mutations in CCND3 have recently been identified in bone tumours. Xie et al. found that 43/357 (12.04%) bone tumours sequenced had a genomic aberration in CCND3, making it the 5th most mutated gene after TP53, NCOR1, VEGFA, and RB1 [111]. CCND3 amplifications were mainly identified in osteosarcoma patients, with 42/43 CCND3 mutations identified being in the 227 osteosarcoma patients present in the cohort (42/227, 18.5%). A recurrent fusion gene between KCNMB4 and CCND3 has also been identified in a cohort of osteosarcoma, but not in a cohort of 240 other sarcomas, further suggesting a specific role of CCND3 in osteosarcoma [112]. Functional assessment of the KCNMB4-CCND3 fusion gene showed that it promoted cell migration in SAOS-2 cells. By comparing the ages of patients, it was found that CCND3 mutations were more frequent in paediatric, adolescent, and young adult (P-AYA) osteosarcoma than in adult osteosarcoma [113].

5. Current Therapeutic Strategies for D-Type Cyclin Disorders

As D-type cyclins do not possess any enzymatic functions alone, a favoured strategy for treating cyclin D based disorders involve targeting the enzymatic activities of their partners, CDK4 and CDK6. As such, three highly specific dual-CDK4/6 inhibitors have been developed and approved by the FDA for use in the treatment of advanced or metastatic breast cancer: Palbociclib, Abemaciclib, and Ribociclib [46,114]. These inhibitors function by binding and blocking the ATP-binding pockets of CDK4 and CDK6, preventing kinase activity as well as indirect non-catalytic inhibition of CDK2 via displacement of CKI p21 [115]. More recently, these CDK4/6 inhibitors have been used to create IKZF1 and IKZF3, selective imide-based CDK4/6 degraders used to reduce cell proliferation in mantle cell lymphoma cell lines [114].
There are caveats, however: potent side effects occur due to lack of selectivity, the most notable of which is neutropenia, i.e., a low neutrophil count [11]. Furthermore, resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors has been observed in some stabilised cyclin D phenotypes [26]. The loss of AMBRA1 can also reduce sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors by stabilising cyclin D and forming active complexes with CDK2 [27]. This has led to the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with other therapies, such as hormone treatment, chemotherapy, PI3K pathway inhibitors, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy, for increased effectiveness [11,116].
Another therapeutic strategy to treat stabilised D-type cyclin disorders would be to disrupt the protein–protein interactions between cyclin D and CDK4. This would prevent the formation of active cyclin D-CDK4 complexes, arresting cell cycle progression and reducing cell proliferation in addition to also potentially inhibiting the formation of cyclin D-CDK2 complexes in some stabilised cyclin D phenotypes. However, no known inhibitors of the cyclin D-CDK4 complex have been identified. This represents an interesting opportunity to explore and investigate novel inhibitors which are able to perturb cyclin D-CDK4 complex formation.

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

Careful regulation of D-type cyclins is crucial to ensure there is sufficient proliferation and adequate cell numbers to develop, maintain, and repair tissues throughout life. Dysregulation of D-type cyclins, either by mutation in key regulatory proteins or through hyper-activation of upstream pathways, results in a range of disorders associated with over- or under-proliferation. Therapies that target cyclin D may offer exciting opportunities to overcome the effects of any dysregulation; however, it will be crucial to ensure that they do not tip the balance from over- to under-proliferation, or vice versa. While this review focused on the three D-type cyclins and their interactions with CDK4, it is now known that cyclin D has additional roles independent of CDK4, although what these roles are remains unclear [11,40,57,60]. Recent studies have also identified additional proteins and assembly factors required for CCND-CDK4 assembly, which will also impact downstream signalling pathways [117]. Further research is, therefore, required in order to better understand the mechanisms underpinning cyclin-D-associated regulation of the cell cycle and to identify therapeutic targets that will allow for the careful modulation of intracellular cyclin D.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.P.; original draft preparation, M.S., E.L.H. and J.A.P.; writing—review and editing, M.S., E.L.H. and J.A.P.; visualization, M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a Future Leaders Fellowship to J.A.P. from UK Research and Innovation, grant number MR/T02044X/1, and a University Academic Fellowship to J.A.P. from the University of Leeds. The APC was funded by UK Research and Innovation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish.

References

  1. Malumbres, M.; Barbacid, M. To cycle or not to cycle: A critical decision in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2001, 1, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lolli, G.; Johnson, L.N. CAK-Cyclin-dependent Activating Kinase: A key kinase in cell cycle control and a target for drugs? Cell Cycle 2005, 4, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Suryadinata, R.; Sadowski, M.; Sarcevic, B. Control of cell cycle progression by phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) substrates. Biosci. Rep. 2010, 30, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Malumbres, M.; Pellicer, A. RAS pathways to cell cycle control and cell transformation. Front. Biosci. 1998, 3, d887–d912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cobrinik, D. Pocket proteins and cell cycle control. Oncogene 2005, 24, 2796–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ortiz, J.F.; Ruxmohan, S.; Khurana, M.; Hidalgo, J.; Alzamora, I.M.; Patel, A. Megalencephaly Polymicrogyria Polydactyly Hydrocephalus (MPPH): A Case Report and Review of Literature. Cureus 2021, 13, e16132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mirzaa, G.; Parry, D.A.; Fry, A.E.; Giamanco, K.A.; Schwartzentruber, J.; Vanstone, M.; Logan, C.V.; Roberts, N.; Johnson, C.A.; Singh, S.; et al. De novo CCND2 mutations leading to stabilization of cyclin D2 cause megalencephaly-polymicrogyria-polydactyly-hydrocephalus syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 510–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Colas, P. Cyclin-dependent kinases and rare developmental disorders. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2020, 15, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sherr, C.J.; Roberts, J.M. CDK inhibitors: Positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 1501–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Matsuura, I.; Denissova, N.G.; Wang, G.; He, D.; Long, J.; Liu, F. Cyclin-dependent kinases regulate the antiproliferative function of Smads. Nature 2004, 430, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gao, X.; Leone, G.W.; Wang, H. Cyclin D-CDK4/6 functions in cancer. Adv. Cancer Res. 2020, 148, 147–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Anders, L.; Ke, N.; Hydbring, P.; Choi, Y.J.; Widlund, H.R.; Chick, J.M.; Zhai, H.; Vidal, M.; Gygi, S.P.; Braun, P.; et al. A systematic screen for CDK4/6 substrates links FOXM1 phosphorylation to senescence suppression in cancer cells. Cancer Cell 2011, 20, 620–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kim, I.M.; Ramakrishna, S.; Gusarova, G.A.; Yoder, H.M.; Costa, R.H.; Kalinichenko, V.V. The forkhead box m1 transcription factor is essential for embryonic development of pulmonary vasculature. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 22278–22286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zhu, Y.; Richardson, J.A.; Parada, L.F.; Graff, J.M. Smad3 mutant mice develop metastatic colorectal cancer. Cell 1998, 94, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Yang, X.; Letterio, J.J.; Lechleider, R.J.; Chen, L.; Hayman, R.; Gu, H.; Roberts, A.B.; Deng, C. Targeted disruption of SMAD3 results in impaired mucosal immunity and diminished T cell responsiveness to TGF-beta. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 1280–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Inaba, T.; Matsushime, H.; Valentine, M.; Roussel, M.F.; Sherr, C.J.; Look, A.T. Genomic organization, chromosomal localization, and independent expression of human cyclin D genes. Genomics 1992, 13, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiong, Y.; Menninger, J.; Beach, D.; Ward, D.C. Molecular cloning and chromosomal mapping of CCND genes encoding human D-type cyclins. Genomics 1992, 13, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ciemerych, M.A.; Kenney, A.M.; Sicinska, E.; Kalaszczynska, I.; Bronson, R.T.; Rowitch, D.H.; Gardner, H.; Sicinski, P. Development of mice expressing a single D-type cyclin. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 3277–3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kozar, K.; Ciemerych, M.A.; Rebel, V.I.; Shigematsu, H.; Zagozdzon, A.; Sicinska, E.; Geng, Y.; Yu, Q.; Bhattacharya, S.; Bronson, R.T.; et al. Mouse development and cell proliferation in the absence of D-cyclins. Cell 2004, 118, 477–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Sherr Charles, J. Cancer Cell Cycles. Science 1996, 274, 1672–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Won, K.A.; Xiong, Y.; Beach, D.; Gilman, M.Z. Growth-regulated expression of D-type cyclin genes in human diploid fibroblasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 9910–9914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Musgrove, E.A. Cyclins: Roles in mitogenic signaling and oncogenic transformation. Growth Factors 2006, 24, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sicinski, P.; Donaher, J.L.; Parker, S.B.; Li, T.; Fazeli, A.; Gardner, H.; Haslam, S.Z.; Bronson, R.T.; Elledge, S.J.; Weinberg, R.A. Cyclin D1 provides a link between development and oncogenesis in the retina and breast. Cell 1995, 82, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Alt, J.R.; Cleveland, J.L.; Hannink, M.; Diehl, J.A. Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of cyclin D1 nuclear export and cyclin D1-dependent cellular transformation. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 3102–3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Maiani, E.; Milletti, G.; Nazio, F.; Holdgaard, S.G.; Bartkova, J.; Rizza, S.; Cianfanelli, V.; Lorente, M.; Simoneschi, D.; Di Marco, M.; et al. AMBRA1 regulates cyclin D to guard S-phase entry and genomic integrity. Nature 2021, 592, 799–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chaikovsky, A.C.; Li, C.; Jeng, E.E.; Loebell, S.; Lee, M.C.; Murray, C.W.; Cheng, R.; Demeter, J.; Swaney, D.L.; Chen, S.-H.; et al. The AMBRA1 E3 ligase adaptor regulates the stability of cyclin D. Nature 2021, 592, 794–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Simoneschi, D.; Rona, G.; Zhou, N.; Jeong, Y.-T.; Jiang, S.; Milletti, G.; Arbini, A.A.; O’Sullivan, A.; Wang, A.A.; Nithikasem, S.; et al. CRL4AMBRA1 is a master regulator of D-type cyclins. Nature 2021, 592, 789–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chaikovsky, A.C.; Sage, J.; Pagano, M.; Simoneschi, D. The Long-Lost Ligase: CRL4(AMBRA1) Regulates the Stability of D-Type Cyclins. DNA Cell Biol. 2021, 40, 1457–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Germain, D.; Russell, A.; Thompson, A.; Hendley, J. Ubiquitination of free cyclin D1 is independent of phosphorylation on threonine 286. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 12074–12079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Alao, J.P. The regulation of cyclin D1 degradation: Roles in cancer development and the potential for therapeutic invention. Mol. Cancer 2007, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Li, Z.; Jiao, X.; Wang, C.; Shirley, L.A.; Elsaleh, H.; Dahl, O.; Wang, M.; Soutoglou, E.; Knudsen, E.S.; Pestell, R.G. Alternative cyclin D1 splice forms differentially regulate the DNA damage response. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 8802–8811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Knudsen, K.E. The cyclin D1b splice variant: An old oncogene learns new tricks. Cell Div. 2006, 1, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Tchakarska, G.; Sola, B. The double dealing of cyclin D1. Cell Cycle 2020, 19, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Lu, F.; Gladden, A.B.; Diehl, J.A. An alternatively spliced cyclin D1 isoform, cyclin D1b, is a nuclear oncogene. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 7056–7061. [Google Scholar]
  35. Solomon, D.A.; Wang, Y.; Fox, S.R.; Lambeck, T.C.; Giesting, S.; Lan, Z.; Senderowicz, A.M.; Conti, C.J.; Knudsen, E.S. Cyclin D1 splice variants. Differential effects on localization, RB phosphorylation, and cellular transformation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 30339–30347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hosokawa, Y.; Gadd, M.; Smith, A.P.; Koerner, F.C.; Schmidt, E.V.; Arnold, A. Cyclin D1 (PRAD1) alternative transcript b: Full-length cDNA cloning and expression in breast cancers. Cancer Lett. 1997, 113, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Burd, C.J.; Petre, C.E.; Morey, L.M.; Wang, Y.; Revelo, M.P.; Haiman, C.A.; Lu, S.; Fenoglio-Preiser, C.M.; Li, J.; Knudsen, E.S.; et al. Cyclin D1b variant influences prostate cancer growth through aberrant androgen receptor regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 2190–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hosokawa, Y.; Joh, T.; Maeda, Y.; Arnold, A.; Seto, M. Cyclin D1/PRAD1/BCL-1 alternative transcript [B] protein product in B-lymphoid malignancies with t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation. Int. J. Cancer 1999, 81, 616–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fantl, V.; Stamp, G.; Andrews, A.; Rosewell, I.; Dickson, C. Mice lacking cyclin D1 are small and show defects in eye and mammary gland development. Genes Dev. 1995, 9, 2364–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Landis, M.W.; Pawlyk, B.S.; Li, T.; Sicinski, P.; Hinds, P.W. Cyclin D1-dependent kinase activity in murine development and mammary tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 2006, 9, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kong, S.; Amos, C.I.; Luthra, R.; Lynch, P.M.; Levin, B.; Frazier, M.L. Effects of cyclin D1 polymorphism on age of onset of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 249–252. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Kong, S.; Wei, Q.; Amos, C.I.; Lynch, P.M.; Levin, B.; Zong, J.; Frazier, M.L. Cyclin D1 polymorphism and increased risk of colorectal cancer at young age. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93, 1106–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Le Marchand, L.; Seifried, A.; Lum-Jones, A.; Donlon, T.; Wilkens, L.R. Association of the cyclin D1 A870G polymorphism with advanced colorectal cancer. JAMA 2003, 290, 2843–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Weinhold, N.; Johnson, D.C.; Chubb, D.; Chen, B.; Forsti, A.; Hosking, F.J.; Broderick, P.; Ma, Y.P.; Dobbins, S.E.; Hose, D.; et al. The CCND1 c.870G>A polymorphism is a risk factor for t(11;14)(q13;q32) multiple myeloma. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 522–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Shimura, T.; Ochiai, Y.; Noma, N.; Oikawa, T.; Sano, Y.; Fukumoto, M. Cyclin D1 overexpression perturbs DNA replication and induces replication-associated DNA double-strand breaks in acquired radioresistant cells. Cell Cycle 2013, 12, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Casimiro, M.C.; Velasco-Velázquez, M.; Aguirre-Alvarado, C.; Pestell, R.G. Overview of cyclins D1 function in cancer and the CDK inhibitor landscape: Past and present. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2014, 23, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Michalides, R.; van Veelen, N.; Hart, A.; Loftus, B.; Wientjens, E.; Balm, A. Overexpression of cyclin D1 correlates with recurrence in a group of forty-seven operable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer Res. 1995, 55, 975–978. [Google Scholar]
  48. Navarro, A.; Beà, S.; Jares, P.; Campo, E. Molecular Pathogenesis of Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 34, 795–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Capurso, G.; Festa, S.; Valente, R.; Piciucchi, M.; Panzuto, F.; Jensen, R.T.; Delle Fave, G. Molecular pathology and genetics of pancreatic endocrine tumours. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2012, 49, R37–R50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sini, M.C.; Doneddu, V.; Paliogiannis, P.; Casula, M.; Colombino, M.; Manca, A.; Botti, G.; Ascierto, P.A.; Lissia, A.; Cossu, A. Genetic alterations in main candidate genes during melanoma progression. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 8531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gautschi, O.; Ratschiller, D.; Gugger, M.; Betticher, D.C.; Heighway, J. Cyclin D1 in non-small cell lung cancer: A key driver of malignant transformation. Lung Cancer 2007, 55, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yuan, C.; Zhu, X.; Han, Y.; Song, C.; Liu, C.; Lu, S.; Zhang, M.; Yu, F.; Peng, Z.; Zhou, C. Elevated HOXA1 expression correlates with accelerated tumor cell proliferation and poor prognosis in gastric cancer partly via cyclin D1. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 35, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Albasri, A.; Yosef, H.; Hussainy, A.S.; Sultan, S.A.; Alhujaily, A. Histopathological features of colorectal cancer in Al-Madinah region of Saudi Arabia: 8 years experience. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014, 15, 3133–3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yildirim, H.T.; Nergiz, D.; Sadullahoglu, C.; Akgunduz, Z.; Yildirim, S.; Dogan, S.; Sezer, C. The extent of cyclin D1 expression in endometrial pathologies and relevance of cyclin D1 with the clinicopathological features of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Indian. J. Pathol. Microbiol. 2020, 63, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bartkova, J.; Lukas, J.; Müller, H.; Lützhøt, D.; Strauss, M.; Bartek, J. Cyclin D1 protein expression and function in human breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer 1994, 57, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wiestner, A.; Tehrani, M.; Chiorazzi, M.; Wright, G.; Gibellini, F.; Nakayama, K.; Liu, H.; Rosenwald, A.; Muller-Hermelink, H.K.; Ott, G. Point mutations and genomic deletions in CCND1 create stable truncated cyclin D1 mRNAs that are associated with increased proliferation rate and shorter survival. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2007, 109, 4599–4606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zwijsen, R.M.; Buckle, R.S.; Hijmans, E.M.; Loomans, C.J.; Bernards, R. Ligand-independent recruitment of steroid receptor coactivators to estrogen receptor by cyclin D1. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 3488–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Petre-Draviam, C.E.; Williams, E.B.; Burd, C.J.; Gladden, A.; Moghadam, H.; Meller, J.; Diehl, J.A.; Knudsen, K.E. A central domain of cyclin D1 mediates nuclear receptor corepressor activity. Oncogene 2005, 24, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. McMahon, C.; Suthiphongchai, T.; DiRenzo, J.; Ewen, M.E. P/CAF associates with cyclin D1 and potentiates its activation of the estrogen receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 5382–5387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chalermrujinanant, C.; Michowski, W.; Sittithumcharee, G.; Esashi, F.; Jirawatnotai, S. Cyclin D1 promotes BRCA2-Rad51 interaction by restricting cyclin A/B-dependent BRCA2 phosphorylation. Oncogene 2016, 35, 2815–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Body, S.; Esteve-Arenys, A.; Miloudi, H.; Recasens-Zorzo, C.; Tchakarska, G.; Moros, A.; Bustany, S.; Vidal-Crespo, A.; Rodriguez, V.; Lavigne, R.; et al. Cytoplasmic cyclin D1 controls the migration and invasiveness of mantle lymphoma cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Li, Z.; Wang, C.; Jiao, X.; Lu, Y.; Fu, M.; Quong, A.A.; Dye, C.; Yang, J.; Dai, M.; Ju, X.; et al. Cyclin D1 regulates cellular migration through the inhibition of thrombospondin 1 and ROCK signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 4240–4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Pestell, R.G.; Li, Z. Antisense to cyclin D1 inhibits VEGF-stimulated growth of vascular endothelial cells: Implication of tumor vascularization. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 4459–4462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Pontano, L.L.; Aggarwal, P.; Barbash, O.; Brown, E.J.; Bassing, C.H.; Diehl, J.A. Genotoxic stress-induced cyclin D1 phosphorylation and proteolysis are required for genomic stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28, 7245–7258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Benzeno, S.; Lu, F.; Guo, M.; Barbash, O.; Zhang, F.; Herman, J.G.; Klein, P.S.; Rustgi, A.; Diehl, J.A. Identification of mutations that disrupt phosphorylation-dependent nuclear export of cyclin D1. Oncogene 2006, 25, 6291–6303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Kato, J.Y.; Matsuoka, M.; Strom, D.K.; Sherr, C.J. Regulation of cyclin D-dependent kinase 4 (cdk4) by cdk4-activating kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14, 2713–2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, Z.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, H.; An, X.; Wang, T.; Meng, A. Migratory localization of cyclin D2-Cdk4 complex suggests a spatial regulation of the G1-S transition. Cell Struct. Funct. 2008, 33, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ikeda, M.A.; Jakoi, L.; Nevins, J.R. A unique role for the Rb protein in controlling E2F accumulation during cell growth and differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 3215–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kato, J.; Matsushime, H.; Hiebert, S.W.; Ewen, M.E.; Sherr, C.J. Direct binding of cyclin D to the retinoblastoma gene product (pRb) and pRb phosphorylation by the cyclin D-dependent kinase CDK4. Genes Dev. 1993, 7, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kowalczyk, A.; Filipkowski, R.K.; Rylski, M.; Wilczynski, G.M.; Konopacki, F.A.; Jaworski, J.; Ciemerych, M.A.; Sicinski, P.; Kaczmarek, L. The critical role of cyclin D2 in adult neurogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 167, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Platek, R.; Rogujski, P.; Mazuryk, J.; Wisniewska, M.B.; Kaczmarek, L.; Czupryn, A. Impaired Generation of Transit-Amplifying Progenitors in the Adult Subventricular Zone of Cyclin D2 Knockout Mice. Cells 2022, 11, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Filipkowski, R.K.; Kaczmarek, L. Severely impaired adult brain neurogenesis in cyclin D2 knock-out mice produces very limited phenotypic changes. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2018, 80, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ross, M.E.; Carter, M.L.; Lee, J.H. MN20, a D2 cyclin, is transiently expressed in selected neural populations during embryogenesis. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lindhurst, M.J.; Parker, V.E.; Payne, F.; Sapp, J.C.; Rudge, S.; Harris, J.; Witkowski, A.M.; Zhang, Q.; Groeneveld, M.P.; Scott, C.E.; et al. Mosaic overgrowth with fibroadipose hyperplasia is caused by somatic activating mutations in PIK3CA. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 928–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lee, J.H.; Huynh, M.; Silhavy, J.L.; Kim, S.; Dixon-Salazar, T.; Heiberg, A.; Scott, E.; Bafna, V.; Hill, K.J.; Collazo, A.; et al. De novo somatic mutations in components of the PI3K-AKT3-mTOR pathway cause hemimegalencephaly. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Riviere, J.B.; Mirzaa, G.M.; O’Roak, B.J.; Beddaoui, M.; Alcantara, D.; Conway, R.L.; St-Onge, J.; Schwartzentruber, J.A.; Gripp, K.W.; Nikkel, S.M.; et al. De novo germline and postzygotic mutations in AKT3, PIK3R2 and PIK3CA cause a spectrum of related megalencephaly syndromes. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 934–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Zega, K.; Jovanovic, V.M.; Vitic, Z.; Niedzielska, M.; Knaapi, L.; Jukic, M.M.; Partanen, J.; Friedel, R.H.; Lang, R.; Brodski, C. Dusp16 Deficiency Causes Congenital Obstructive Hydrocephalus and Brain Overgrowth by Expansion of the Neural Progenitor Pool. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pirozzi, F.; Lee, B.; Horsley, N.; Burkardt, D.D.; Dobyns, W.B.; Graham, J.M., Jr.; Dentici, M.L.; Cesario, C.; Schallner, J.; Porrmann, J.; et al. Proximal variants in CCND2 associated with microcephaly, short stature, and developmental delay: A case series and review of inverse brain growth phenotypes. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2021, 185, 2719–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Glickstein, S.B.; Moore, H.; Slowinska, B.; Racchumi, J.; Suh, M.; Chuhma, N.; Ross, M.E. Selective cortical interneuron and GABA deficits in cyclin D2-null mice. Development 2007, 134, 4083–4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Garthe, A.; Huang, Z.; Kaczmarek, L.; Filipkowski, R.K.; Kempermann, G. Not all water mazes are created equal: Cyclin D2 knockout mice with constitutively suppressed adult hippocampal neurogenesis do show specific spatial learning deficits. Genes Brain Behav. 2014, 13, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Huard, J.M.; Forster, C.C.; Carter, M.L.; Sicinski, P.; Ross, M.E. Cerebellar histogenesis is disturbed in mice lacking cyclin D2. Development 1999, 126, 1927–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Towers, M.; Mahood, R.; Yin, Y.; Tickle, C. Integration of growth and specification in chick wing digit-patterning. Nature 2008, 452, 882–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Chinnaiya, K.; Tickle, C.; Towers, M. Sonic hedgehog-expressing cells in the developing limb measure time by an intrinsic cell cycle clock. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. McDermott, J.H.; Hickson, N.; Banerjee, I.; Murray, P.G.; Ram, D.; Metcalfe, K.; Clayton-Smith, J.; Douzgou, S. Hypoglycaemia represents a clinically significant manifestation of PIK3CA- and CCND2-associated segmental overgrowth. Clin. Genet. 2018, 93, 687–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Stutterd, C.; McGillivray, G.; Stark, Z.; Messazos, B.; Cameron, F.; White, S.; Melbourne Genomics Health, A.; Mirzaa, G.; Leventer, R. Polymicrogyria in association with hypoglycemia points to mutation in the mTOR pathway. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2018, 61, 738–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Salpeter, S.J.; Klochendler, A.; Weinberg-Corem, N.; Porat, S.; Granot, Z.; Shapiro, A.M.; Magnuson, M.A.; Eden, A.; Grimsby, J.; Glaser, B.; et al. Glucose regulates cyclin D2 expression in quiescent and replicating pancreatic beta-cells through glycolysis and calcium channels. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 2589–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Faber, Z.J.; Chen, X.; Gedman, A.L.; Boggs, K.; Cheng, J.; Ma, J.; Radtke, I.; Chao, J.R.; Walsh, M.P.; Song, G.; et al. The genomic landscape of core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemias. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 1551–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Eisfeld, A.K.; Kohlschmidt, J.; Schwind, S.; Nicolet, D.; Blachly, J.S.; Orwick, S.; Shah, C.; Bainazar, M.; Kroll, K.W.; Walker, C.J.; et al. Mutations in the CCND1 and CCND2 genes are frequent events in adult patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2017, 31, 1278–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Hung, C.S.; Wang, S.C.; Yen, Y.T.; Lee, T.H.; Wen, W.C.; Lin, R.K. Hypermethylation of CCND2 in Lung and Breast Cancer Is a Potential Biomarker and Drug Target. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Evron, E.; Umbricht, C.B.; Korz, D.; Raman, V.; Loeb, D.M.; Niranjan, B.; Buluwela, L.; Weitzman, S.A.; Marks, J.; Sukumar, S. Loss of cyclin D2 expression in the majority of breast cancers is associated with promoter hypermethylation. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 2782–2787. [Google Scholar]
  91. Akone, S.H.; Ntie-Kang, F.; Stuhldreier, F.; Ewonkem, M.B.; Noah, A.M.; Mouelle, S.E.M.; Muller, R. Natural Products Impacting DNA Methyltransferases and Histone Deacetylases. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yu, J.; Leung, W.K.; Ebert, M.P.; Leong, R.W.; Tse, P.C.; Chan, M.W.; Bai, A.H.; To, K.F.; Malfertheiner, P.; Sung, J.J. Absence of cyclin D2 expression is associated with promoter hypermethylation in gastric cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2003, 88, 1560–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Oshimo, Y.; Nakayama, H.; Ito, R.; Kitadai, Y.; Yoshida, K.; Chayama, K.; Yasui, W. Promoter methylation of cyclin D2 gene in gastric carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2003, 23, 1663–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Uhlen, M.; Fagerberg, L.; Hallstrom, B.M.; Lindskog, C.; Oksvold, P.; Mardinoglu, A.; Sivertsson, A.; Kampf, C.; Sjostedt, E.; Asplund, A.; et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 2015, 347, 1260419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Bartkova, J.; Lukas, J.; Strauss, M.; Bartek, J. Cyclin D3: Requirement for G1/S transition and high abundance in quiescent tissues suggest a dual role in proliferation and differentiation. Oncogene 1998, 17, 1027–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Jin, J.; Wang, G.L.; Salisbury, E.; Timchenko, L.; Timchenko, N.A. GSK3beta-cyclin D3-CUGBP1-eIF2 pathway in aging and in myotonic dystrophy. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 2356–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Athar, F.; Parnaik, V.K. Potential gene regulatory role for cyclin D3 in muscle cells. J. Biosci. 2015, 40, 497–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Peled, J.U.; Yu, J.J.; Venkatesh, J.; Bi, E.; Ding, B.B.; Krupski-Downs, M.; Shaknovich, R.; Sicinski, P.; Diamond, B.; Scharff, M.D.; et al. Requirement for cyclin D3 in germinal center formation and function. Cell Res. 2010, 20, 631–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Sicinska, E.; Aifantis, I.; Le Cam, L.; Swat, W.; Borowski, C.; Yu, Q.; Ferrando, A.A.; Levin, S.D.; Geng, Y.; von Boehmer, H.; et al. Requirement for cyclin D3 in lymphocyte development and T cell leukemias. Cancer Cell 2003, 4, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Sicinska, E.; Lee, Y.M.; Gits, J.; Shigematsu, H.; Yu, Q.; Rebel, V.I.; Geng, Y.; Marshall, C.J.; Akashi, K.; Dorfman, D.M.; et al. Essential role for cyclin D3 in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-driven expansion of neutrophil granulocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 8052–8060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Cooper, A.B.; Sawai, C.M.; Sicinska, E.; Powers, S.E.; Sicinski, P.; Clark, M.R.; Aifantis, I. A unique function for cyclin D3 in early B cell development. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 7, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ketzer, F.; Abdelrasoul, H.; Vogel, M.; Marienfeld, R.; Muschen, M.; Jumaa, H.; Wirth, T.; Ushmorov, A. CCND3 is indispensable for the maintenance of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncogenesis 2022, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Cato, M.H.; Chintalapati, S.K.; Yau, I.W.; Omori, S.A.; Rickert, R.C. Cyclin D3 is selectively required for proliferative expansion of germinal center B cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. De Luca, G.; Ferretti, R.; Bruschi, M.; Mezzaroma, E.; Caruso, M. Cyclin D3 critically regulates the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in skeletal muscle stem cells. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 2478–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Sanchez-Beato, M.; Sanchez-Aguilera, A.; Piris, M.A. Cell cycle deregulation in B-cell lymphomas. Blood 2003, 101, 1220–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Sanchez-Beato, M.; Camacho, F.I.; Martinez-Montero, J.C.; Saez, A.I.; Villuendas, R.; Sanchez-Verde, L.; Garcia, J.F.; Piris, M.A. Anomalous high p27/KIP1 expression in a subset of aggressive B-cell lymphomas is associated with cyclin D3 overexpression. p27/KIP1-cyclin D3 colocalization in tumor cells. Blood 1999, 94, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ye, X.; Maglione, P.J.; Wehr, C.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Abolhassani, H.; Deripapa, E.; Liu, D.; Borte, S.; Du, L.; et al. Genomic characterization of lymphomas in patients with inborn errors of immunity. Blood Adv. 2022, 6, 5403–5414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Filipits, M.; Jaeger, U.; Pohl, G.; Stranzl, T.; Simonitsch, I.; Kaider, A.; Skrabs, C.; Pirker, R. Cyclin D3 is a predictive and prognostic factor in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2002, 8, 729–733. [Google Scholar]
  109. Carrillo-Tornel, S.; Chen-Liang, T.H.; Zurdo, M.; Puiggros, A.; Gomez-Llonin, A.; Garcia-Malo, M.D.; Cuenca-Zamora, E.J.; Ortuno, F.J.; Lopez, A.M.H.; Espinet, B.; et al. NOTCH1 mutation in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is associated with an enhanced cell cycle G1/S transition and specific cyclin overexpression: Preclinical ground for targeted inhibition. Br. J. Haematol. 2023, 201, 470–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Joshi, I.; Minter, L.M.; Telfer, J.; Demarest, R.M.; Capobianco, A.J.; Aster, J.C.; Sicinski, P.; Fauq, A.; Golde, T.E.; Osborne, B.A. Notch signaling mediates G1/S cell-cycle progression in T cells via cyclin D3 and its dependent kinases. Blood 2009, 113, 1689–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Xie, X.; Bian, Y.; Li, H.; Yin, J.; Tian, L.; Jiang, R.; Zeng, Z.; Shi, X.; Lei, Z.; Hou, C.; et al. A Comprehensive Understanding of the Genomic Bone Tumor Landscape: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 835004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Yang, J.; Annala, M.; Ji, P.; Wang, G.; Zheng, H.; Codgell, D.; Du, X.; Fang, Z.; Sun, B.; Nykter, M.; et al. Recurrent LRP1-SNRNP25 and KCNMB4-CCND3 fusion genes promote tumor cell motility in human osteosarcoma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2014, 7, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Gounder, M.M.; Agaram, N.P.; Trabucco, S.E.; Robinson, V.; Ferraro, R.A.; Millis, S.Z.; Krishnan, A.; Lee, J.; Attia, S.; Abida, W.; et al. Clinical genomic profiling in the management of patients with soft tissue and bone sarcoma. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Jiang, B.; Wang, E.S.; Donovan, K.A.; Liang, Y.; Fischer, E.S.; Zhang, T.; Gray, N.S. Development of Dual and Selective Degraders of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4 and 6. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 6321–6326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Pack, L.R.; Daigh, L.H.; Chung, M.; Meyer, T. Clinical CDK4/6 inhibitors induce selective and immediate dissociation of p21 from cyclin D-CDK4 to inhibit CDK2. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Musgrove, E.A.; Caldon, C.E.; Barraclough, J.; Stone, A.; Sutherland, R.L. Cyclin D as a therapeutic target in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 558–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hallett, S.T.; Pastok, M.W.; Morgan, R.M.L.; Wittner, A.; Blundell, K.; Felletar, I.; Wedge, S.R.; Prodromou, C.; Noble, M.E.M.; Pearl, L.H.; et al. Differential Regulation of G1 CDK Complexes by the Hsp90-Cdc37 Chaperone System. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 1386–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The regulation of Cyclin D: Cyclin D is expressed in response to mitogenic stimulation through the Ras (in light blue) and PI3K-Akt (in light green) pathways, which stimulate the synthesis and promote the stability of cyclin D, respectively. CDK-interacting proteins/kinase inhibitory proteins (CIP/KIP) such as p21 and p27 stabilize and facilitate the formation of the cyclin D-CDK4/6 complex. In the nucleus, the activity of this complex is terminated by the phosphorylation of C-terminal threonine by GSK3ß or, potentially, other unknown kinases. Once phosphorylated, cyclin D is then polyubiquitylated by the CRL4AMBRA1 E3 ubiquitin ligase and is then subsequently degraded.
Figure 1. The regulation of Cyclin D: Cyclin D is expressed in response to mitogenic stimulation through the Ras (in light blue) and PI3K-Akt (in light green) pathways, which stimulate the synthesis and promote the stability of cyclin D, respectively. CDK-interacting proteins/kinase inhibitory proteins (CIP/KIP) such as p21 and p27 stabilize and facilitate the formation of the cyclin D-CDK4/6 complex. In the nucleus, the activity of this complex is terminated by the phosphorylation of C-terminal threonine by GSK3ß or, potentially, other unknown kinases. Once phosphorylated, cyclin D is then polyubiquitylated by the CRL4AMBRA1 E3 ubiquitin ligase and is then subsequently degraded.
Genes 14 01445 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of cyclins D1, D2, and D3. The three D-type cyclins share a number of conserved sequences and domains. The Rb-binding domain, located at the N-terminus, is responsible for binding the C-terminal helix of Rb when cyclin D is bound to CDK4/6. The cyclin box domain is a heavily conserved region of ~100 amino acids located in the N-terminus of each D-cyclin, which facilitates binding to CDK4/6. Mutagenesis of Lys112 (CCND1 and CCND3) and Lys111 (CCND2), in particular, abolishes binding to CDK4, demonstrating the residue’s essential role in mediating CDK-binding. The PEST sequence located at the C-terminus is required to mediate the degradation of cyclin D. Mutations at the Threonine phosphodegron site induce the stabilisation of cyclin D, resulting in increased progression of the cell cycle into the S-phase and genomic instability. CCND1 also possess an LxxLL motif, which mediates ligand-dependent interaction with nuclear receptors such as Erα.
Figure 2. Comparison of cyclins D1, D2, and D3. The three D-type cyclins share a number of conserved sequences and domains. The Rb-binding domain, located at the N-terminus, is responsible for binding the C-terminal helix of Rb when cyclin D is bound to CDK4/6. The cyclin box domain is a heavily conserved region of ~100 amino acids located in the N-terminus of each D-cyclin, which facilitates binding to CDK4/6. Mutagenesis of Lys112 (CCND1 and CCND3) and Lys111 (CCND2), in particular, abolishes binding to CDK4, demonstrating the residue’s essential role in mediating CDK-binding. The PEST sequence located at the C-terminus is required to mediate the degradation of cyclin D. Mutations at the Threonine phosphodegron site induce the stabilisation of cyclin D, resulting in increased progression of the cell cycle into the S-phase and genomic instability. CCND1 also possess an LxxLL motif, which mediates ligand-dependent interaction with nuclear receptors such as Erα.
Genes 14 01445 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saleban, M.; Harris, E.L.; Poulter, J.A. D-Type Cyclins in Development and Disease. Genes 2023, 14, 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071445

AMA Style

Saleban M, Harris EL, Poulter JA. D-Type Cyclins in Development and Disease. Genes. 2023; 14(7):1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saleban, Mostafa, Erica L. Harris, and James A. Poulter. 2023. "D-Type Cyclins in Development and Disease" Genes 14, no. 7: 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071445

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop