Next Article in Journal
Complete Mitogenome and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Carthamus tinctorius L.
Next Article in Special Issue
G-Quadruplexes in Nuclear Biomolecular Condensates
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Library Preparation Workflows and Applications to Different Sample Types Using the PowerSeq® 46GY System with Massively Parallel Sequencing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Analysis of Non-B Nucleic Acids Structures in SARS-CoV-2: Potential Key Roles for These Structures in Mutability, Translation, and Replication?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MOSR and NDHA Genes Comprising G-Quadruplex as Promising Therapeutic Targets against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Molecular Recognition by Mitoxantrone Suppresses Replication and Gene Regulation

1
Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India
2
Centre for Infectious Disease Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(5), 978; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14050978
Submission received: 15 November 2022 / Revised: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 18 April 2023 / Published: 26 April 2023

Abstract

:
Occurrence of non-canonical G-quadruplex (G4) DNA structures in the genome have been recognized as key factors in gene regulation and several other cellular processes. The mosR and ndhA genes involved in pathways of oxidation sensing regulation and ATP generation, respectively, make Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) bacteria responsible for oxidative stress inside host macrophage cells. Circular Dichroism spectra demonstrate stable hybrid G4 DNA conformations of mosR/ndhA DNA sequences. Real-time binding of mitoxantrone to G4 DNA with an affinity constant ~105–107 M−1, leads to hypochromism with a red shift of ~18 nm, followed by hyperchromism in the absorption spectra. The corresponding fluorescence is quenched with a red shift ~15 nm followed by an increase in intensity. A change in conformation of the G4 DNA accompanies the formation of multiple stoichiometric complexes with a dual binding mode. The external binding of mitoxantrone with a partial stacking with G-quartets and/or groove binding induces significant thermal stabilization, ~20–29 °C in ndhA/mosR G4 DNA. The interaction leads to a two/four-fold downregulation of transcriptomes of mosR/ndhA genes apart from the suppression of DNA replication by Taq polymerase enzyme, establishing the role of mitoxantrone in targeting G4 DNA, as an alternate strategy for effective anti-tuberculosis action in view of deadly multi-drug resistant tuberculosis disease causing bacterial strains t that arise from existing therapeutic treatments.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) disease is caused by pathogenic bacteria named Mtb, a family member of Mycobacteriaceae, and was the leading cause of approximately 1.3 million deaths in the year 2021. An extensive drug-resistant (XDR) and multidrug-resistant strain (MDR) makes it more vulnerable to society [1]. It is essential to have a thorough understanding of the mechanism of the bacteria’s survival and persistence pathways to uncover new therapeutic targets. A novel drug target, such as G-quadruplex DNA, may turn out to be a cornerstone for eliminating drug-susceptibility and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. A G-quadruplex (G4) is a repetitive guanine-rich sequence that forms a secondary structure with a distinct pattern of motifs/loops and is an evolutionary conserved pharmacological target found in prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and viruses. In humans, the G4 DNA/RNA is associated with many vital cellular processes, such as replication, transcription, etc. In addition, this G-quartet is also found in the telomere, which inhibits telomerase enzyme or the promoters of several proto-oncogenes, such as BCL-2, c-MYC, KRAS, and c-KIT, making it a potential therapeutic target for cancer [2,3,4]. The RNA/DNA G-quadruplex structure is found in several bacterial proteins and enzymes involved in pathogenesis and antigen diversification. In Mtb, having a 65% GC-rich genome, bioinformatic analysis has identified more than a thousand motifs that have the potential to fold into G4 DNA structures [5,6,7].
Among the genes of Mtb with a predicted G4 in their promoter region, we selected two candidates for the experimental validations, namely oxidation-sensing Regulator transcription Factor (mosR) and membrane NADH dehydrogenase (ndhA) [5]. Many dormancy regulon factors control most of the mycobacterial hypoxic growth-related operons. Mtb shows an anaerobic response after forming the ΔmosR [8]. Under certain stress conditions in the host’s microenvironment (e.g., a high O level), bacteria go into the log phase and mosR expression becomes lowered as a resultant relief from the repression of other genes, such as hypoxia and phagosome expression genes. The mosR gene is, thus, responsible for survival in a stress condition and is involved in oxidative phosphorylation [8]. NADH dehydrogenase is a key factor enzyme for processing ATP synthesis, catalyzed by the F1Fo–ATP synthase complex [9], which is an essential pathway in Mtb, regardless of the growth environment. Although both ndh and ndhA are genes with a biochemically similar property and both have a significant role in ATP synthesis by ATP synthase in the oxidative phosphorylation pathway, ndh does not have a putative G-quadruplex sequence. Importantly, while common among bacteria and protozoan parasites, these enzymes are absent from the mammalian genome, which further highlights their potential as drug targets [7].
Intramolecular G4 forming sequences, consisting of stretches of guanines (G-runs or G-tracts) separated by short gaps (loop sequences), can be predicted to fold into stable G4s under near-physiological conditions using Bio-informatics tools. The presence of three Gs in each island, and loops no longer than 11 nt that are expected to form stable G4s [5,6,10,11], G-score values above 19 indicate that the corresponding PQS (Predicted quadruplex sequences) is predicted to fold into a highly stable G-quadruplex structure [10,11]. The transcription start site (TSS) of mosR is at −38 Nts. The genome sequence has 3, 5, 3, 3 Guanines (“Gs”) in the four islands and loops of 7–9 nucleotides (nt). The corresponding transcription site (TSS) of ndhA is at −47 Nts. It has three Gs in each of the four islands and six bases in each loop (Table S1). These features in mosR/ndhA sequences suggest the formation of stable G4s [5]. A QGRS mapper [10] provides a G-score = 72 and 67 for the mosR and ndhA genes, respectively. According to the PQS finder [11], the G-score for ndhA G4 is 52 and that for mosR G4DNA is 50. Although the G-score values are different due to the different algorithms used in the software, both of the G-score values are well above the threshold and, therefore, indicate the formation of stable G4s. Thus, both of the genes have a high putative G-quadruplex constructing sequence score, making them a favorable and efficient therapeutic target against the H37Rv deadly strain. The H37Rv strain was obtained from a patient’s sample and is a more susceptible strain. Since the isolation of the H37Rv strain in 1905, this strain of Mtb has found widespread use in biomedical research. Unlike some clinical isolates, it retains full virulence in animal models of tuberculosis; it is also drug resistant/susceptible and amenable to genetic manipulation [5,7,12,13,14].
A unique electron-rich aromatic surface made up of four guanine nucleotides is provided by a planar arrangement of the G-quartet structure, held together by the Hoogstein hydrogen bonding scheme. In addition, the groove binding pockets and loop arrangement are ideal for a specific ligand-based therapeutic design. The mode of action of the G-quadruplex depends on stability with the ligands and the basis of forming different structures (parallel, antiparallel and hybrid) in the presence of ions such as K+, Na+, Mg+, and the pH [15,16,17,18,19]. Several G-quadruplex ligands (e.g., anthraquinone derivatives, flavonoids, alkaloids, telomastatins, anthracyclines, etc.), bind through external groove binding mode [2,3,4,20,21]. Few others, such as RHPS4, daunomycin (an anthracycline) and epiberberine alkaloid bind through stacking mode at the ends of DNA or intercalate between the G-quartets via favorable π-π interactions between the aromatic surface of the G-quartets and ligands [2,3,4,17]. Aromatic end stackers and groove binding ligands increase the binding affinity by interacting with side chains. To the best of our knowledge, there are three reports of ligands tested against some of the genes comprising G4s in Mtb for their selectivity for towards tetraplex structures over duplex [5,6,7]. The ligands, BRACO-19 and c-exNDI 2, were found to stabilize mosR, ndhA, zwf1, and clpx gene sequences, inhibit Mtb growth and downregulate their gene expression [5]. The highly conserved potential of the G-quadruplex motifs (PGQs) in three essential genes, namely espK, espB, and cyp5, across 160 strains of the Mtb genome, suggested their role in bacterial survival and virulence [6]. A well-known G4 ligand, TMPyP4, was found to bind to and stabilize these PGQ motifs. TMPyP4 had an inhibitory role in the expression of espK and espB virulence genes and in the survival of Mtb [6]. The synthesized compounds CBR-1825, having a thioquinazoline (TQZ) core, and CBR-4032, having a tetrahydroindazole (THI) core, were found to inhibit ATP synthesis by targeting the ndh-2 genes in Mtb [7].
We selected mitoxantrone (MTX) as a ligand for the present study on Mtb gene sequences. Mitoxantrone, 1,4-dihydroxy-5,8-bis[[2-[(2-hydroxyethyl) amino]ethyl] amino] anthracene-9,10-dione (Figure 1), known as a clinically approved anticancer drug, was found to target the human telomeric G4 DNA sequence leading to the inhibition of the telomerase enzyme [21]. MTX is a frequently used anthraquinone derivative in view of its non-cardiotoxicity because it lacks the amino sugar fragment and has a hydroxyquinone functional group with a polyamide side chain.
In the present study, cell-based assays and diverse biophysical tools have been used to predict and analyze the interaction of MTX with mosR and ndhA genes. A Taq polymerase and qRT-PCR assay show that MTX inhibits G-quadruplex formation and transcription via downregulation of the mosR and ndhA genes. The real-time binding of MTX to mosR/ndhA G4 DNA sequences was demonstrated using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR). An Absorption, Fluorescence and Circular Dichroism (CD) spectral analysis provided insight into the characteristics of ligand-binding and conformational changes. Finally, the ligand-induced thermal stabilization of the G4 DNA was determined from the melting profiles using CD spectroscopy and assessed independently with Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). The present study corroborates a novel approach towards therapeutic investigations against Mtb infection by exploiting potential G-quadruplex targets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Desalted oligonucleotide sequences, 34-mer d-TGGGCTAGCTCTAGGGGGCAGGGCTTTGACGGGT (mosR), 32-mer d-TGGGCCTTGTGGGCCTTGTGGGCCTTGTGGGT (ndhA) (Table S1) and Mitoxantrone (MTX) were purchased from Sigma Chem Co., Burlington, MA, USA. The oligonucleotide sequences were dissolved in a buffer (pH 7.0) containing K+/Na+ and 1 mM EDTA. The stock solution of MTX was prepared by dissolving in KBEPS buffer (pH 7.0). The concentration of DNA sequence and MTX were determined using the molar extinction co-efficient ε = 69,800 M−1 cm−1 at 256 nm (per strand) and ε = 20,900 M−1 cm−1 at 659 nm, respectively. Further details are available in the Supplementary Information.

2.2. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)

SPR experiments were conducted using the Biacore T200 optical biosensor system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). mosR/ndhA G4 DNA were immobilized onto a streptavidin-derivatized sensor chip, BIACORE SA (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) and dissolved in HEPES buffer at pH 7.4. MTX prepared in HEPES buffer was passed over the respective immobilized DNA cells and subsequently dissociated from the complex after passing the regeneration buffer. The response unit was evaluated after subtracting the corresponding flow cell 2/4 (immobilized DNA) from the reference flow cell 1/3 (HEPES buffer) to obtain the response from the bound ligand. An analysis and fitting of the data of the Response Unit were performed using the Biacore T200 evaluation software to obtain the Dissociation constant (KD) [20].

2.3. Absorption Spectroscopy

Varying concentrations of mosR/ndhA G4 DNA were mixed with a fixed concentration of MTX (3 μM) to reach mole equivalent ratios (D/N) of MTX Drug (D) to Nucleic acid quadruplex (N) in the range of 0.31–10. Absorbance spectra of each sample were recorded using a Bio UV-visible spectrophotometer (CARY 100, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a thermostatic cell holder and quartz cuvette (path length 1 cm) in the wavelength range of 200–800 nm [20,21]. The intrinsic binding constant was calculated using the standard equations described in the Supplementary Information along with an analysis of the data.

2.4. Steady-State Fluorescence

Steady-state fluorescence experiments were accomplished using a Fluorolog-3 Spectro-fluorimeter LS55 (Horiba Jobin Yvon Spex®, Kyoto, Japan). The samples used in the absorption spectra were excited (λex = 610 nm) and the emission spectra were recorded in the wavelength range 640–800 nm [20,21]. The fluorescence quenching constant KSV, binding constant Kb and binding stoichiometry (n) of the complex (the number of ligands binding to the DNA) were determined using standard procedures.

2.5. Method of Continuous Variation (Job Plot)

To determine the stoichiometry of a binding event, the total concentration of MTX and G-quadruplex DNA were kept constant (3 μM) but their relative mole fractions were varied. The emission intensity at λem = 678 nm was measured after exciting the reaction mixture at λex = 610 nm [20,21]. The difference in fluorescence intensity of free MTX (F0) and its complex (F) with G4 DNA (ΔF = F − F0) was plotted as a function of the mole fraction of the MTX yields binding stoichiometry.

2.6. Time-Resolved Fluorescence

Time-resolved fluorescence measurements were performed using the Fluoro-Cube®-Fluorescence lifetime system, (make HORIBA Jobin YvonSpex®, Piscataway, NJ, USA) using a quartz cuvette (path length 10 mm) operating in a time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) mode. The samples were excited using a fixed-wavelength Nano LED (λex = 640 nm) with a pulse duration of <200 ps [20,21]. The data were fitted using a re-convolution method provided with the DAS 6.3 software producing the best chi-square fitting values.

2.7. Circular Dichroism

Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were recorded on an Applied Photophysics (Model Chirascan, Leatherhead, UK) spectropolarimeter using a 1 mm path length quartz cell, which was equipped with a programmable temperature-controlled cell holder. All CD spectra of the samples were recorded in the wavelength range 200–700 nm with a 1 nm slit width at a 1 nm interval [20,21]. The generated spectra were plotted after baseline correction and smoothening using the Savitzky–Golay algorithm provided by Chirascan software.

2.8. Thermal Profiling (Tm) Using Circular Dichroism (CD)

Thermal melting profiles were performed [20] with a temperature range from 25–95 °C at the rate of 1 °C/min using a Jasco J-1500 CD Spectrometer (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a MCB-100 Mini circulation Bath, Peltier unit-controlled cell holder, and a xenon lamp.

2.9. Thermal Profiling (Tm) Using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Thermal transitions from ordered quadruplex (helix) DNA to a disordered (strand) state were monitored by determiningthe excess heat capacity as a function of temperature using a VP DSC Micro-calorimeter (Microcal Inc., Northampton, MA, USA). The sample was scanned from 25 °C to 120 °C at a scan speed of 60 °C/h at approximately 34 psi pressure [20]. Thermograms were analyzed using the inbuilt VP Viewer software with Origin 7.0. The 3-state model of curve fitting was used to fit the raw thermograms of the unbound G4 DNA and its complexes.

2.10. Taq Polymerase Stop Assay

The template DNA strand, containing mosR and ndhA and all primers were procured from Sigma Aldrich (Table S2). A primer annealing region was added to the 3′ end of the mosR and ndhA oligonucleotide sequences for the assay. Additional T-flanking bases were inserted at both the 5′ and 3′ ends to isolate the 3′ end of the primer from the first base of the G4 component. The PCR method was performed in a 10 µL reaction containing a concentration of 1 μg/μL template DNA (100 mM KCl), 10 mM primer, 2.5 mM dNTPs, 5 Units of Taq polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and different concentrations of MTX (1.56–50 μM). The reaction mixture was prepared in nuclease-free water. The negative control was considered to be no template in the reaction mixture, producing no product. The PCR-based amplification was carried out using an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing and extension at 64 °C for 30 s, and the final extension at 72 °C for 50 s using a thermal cycler (model T100, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA); after the end of the reaction, the PCR tubes were kept at 4 °C. The amplified PCR products were then separated by agarose gel electrophoresis by mixing with 6× loading dye, resolved on a 3% w/w agarose gel, and an image analysis was conducted using a Gel Doc EZ imager (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) by staining with ethidium bromide.

2.11. Alamar Blue Assay (MIC Calculation)

The metabolic activity of Mtb strains in the presence of various concentrations of MTX was monitored using the reduction/oxidation indicator Alamar blue redox dye. Briefly, 100 μL of Middlebrook 7H9 broth supplemented with 10% (v/v) ADS and 0.2% glycerol was dispensed in every well of a sterile 96-flat-bottom well plate (Thermo Scientific, Mumbai, India), and serial dilutions (2-fold) of MTX were prepared in the plate directly. Bacteria were cultured in a 7H9−ADS medium and grown until the exponential phase (OD600-0.6). A total of 100 μL of inoculum from each strain (approximately 1 × 105 bacteria/well) was added in triplicate wells. A growth control (Mtb without drugs) and a sterile control (drugs in media without bacteria) were also included. The 7H9 medium was added to all perimeter walls to avoid evaporation. The plate was sealed, covered and incubated at 37 °C. After six days of incubation, Alamar blue (10% of total volume) was added to each well, and the plate was further incubated for 1 day. A change from non-fluorescent blue to fluorescent pink color indicated a reduction in Alamar blue and the fluorescence readings were recorded. Fluorescence was measured in a Spectramax M3 plate reader with an emission wavelength of 590 nm after exciting at wavelength 530 nm and converted as a growth inhibition percentage. The intensity of the pink color is directly proportional to the amount of bacterial growth. The Minimum Inhibitory concentration, MIC, was defined as the lowest drug concentration that prevented 90% of growth.

2.12. Gene Expression by qRT-PCR

The wild type Mtb (H37Rv) strain was grown in a 7H9 medium supplemented with 1× ADS (Albumin Dextrose Saline) to an OD600-0.4 and exposed to 5X MIC of MTX for 1 h in a rotating incubator (180 rpm) at 37 °C. After treatment, the total RNA was purified as described [22]. After the purification and DNase treatment, cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA using a script cDNA synthesis kit as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Gene-specific primers for Mtb mosR (FP2_KAAD_Rv1049RT-5-′CGAATGCGCTTGCTACACC-3′ and RP2_KAAD_Rv1049RT-5-′CCTTCCGACAGCGAGATCAC-3′) and ndhA FP1_KAAD_Rv0392cRT-5-′AGACGGTCACGTCGAAATTG-3′ and RP1_KAAD_Rv0392cRT-5-′GCCGAAGTAGGACTGCTGTG-3′) were selected (Table S3) for RT-PCR (Step one Applied Biosystem). iQTM SYBR Green Supermix was used for the gene expression analysis and the data were normalized to 16S rRNA expression. The experiment was conducted with a minimum of two biological replicates and the fold change was calculated concerning the untreated control.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. mosR/ndhA DNA Sequences Adopt Stable G4 DNA Conformation

The folding and topology of selected 34-mer mosR and 32-mer ndhA DNA sequences (Table S1) were assessed using CD spectroscopy, which can distinguish between different types of parallel/antiparallel stranded G4 DNA having an anti or syn glycosidic bond angle besides a single-stranded/duplex DNA conformation [15,16,17,18]. The CD spectra of the B-forms of DNA are characterized by a positive long wavelength band at about 260–280 nm and a negative band around 245 nm [16]. Typically, guanines in a parallel G-quadruplex that have an anti glycosidic bond conformation throughout the sequence exhibit a positive peak at 264 nm and a negative peak at 240 nm. On the other hand, guanines in antiparallel G-quadruplex strands with an alternate anti and syn glycosidic bond conformation in each DNA strand show a characteristically strong positive peak at 295 and 245 nm and a negative peak at 265 nm. In several G4 DNA folded structures, a mixed 3+1 hybrid structure with three parallel and one antiparallel strand have been observed with the formation of a double chain reversal loop. The 3+1 hybrid G4 conformation provides a strong positive CD band at 290 nm due to the alternating anti and syn glycosidic conformation between the top and middle G-tetrads. In addition, a positive shoulder around 268 nm and a small negative band at 240 nm, which are characteristic of non-alternating anti glycosidic bond rotation between the middle and bottom G-tetrads, are observed [15,16,17,18]. The observed CD spectra of the mosR sequence showed the signature peaks of a mixed type of G4 DNA conformation in K+ with two positive peaks at 265 and 288 nm and a negative peak at 240 nm (Figure S1A). The molar ellipticity values increased with the concentration of K+ (0–150 mM) significantly, further supporting the G4 formation [19]. The ndhA G4 sequence also showed (Figure S1B) a mixed type of G4 DNA conformation but with a relatively higher population of antiparallel G4 DNA, with maxima at 287 nm, a small negative band at 240 nm, and a positive band in the form of a shoulder at 260 nm in the presence of K+. The molar ellipticity increased with K+ concentration as observed for the mosR sequence. Notably, a mixed type of G4 conformation was displayed by both mosR and ndhA sequences in water; that is, in the absence of K+, indicating a high propensity to fold and stability. Thus, the selected sequences of Mtb effectively fold into G4 DNA conformations.
The thermal melting profiles of mosR and ndhA G4 DNA, obtained by monitoring CD as a function of temperature (Table S4A,B, Figure S2A,B), yielded several melting temperatures (Tm) due to the presence of distinct partially folded/unfolded intermediate species in the melting pathway of the ordered to disordered 3+1 mixed hybrid G4 DNA conformation [20], and are consistent with that reported in the literature [5]. Ligand binding to G-quadruplex DNA depends upon several parameters, such as the nature of the cations, their concentration, pH, viscosity, the base sequence in DNA that are involved in the folding of single stranded DNA to form G4 DNA, etc. Therefore, we determined Tm as a function of K+ concentration in the range 0–150 mM (Table S4A,B, Figure S2A,B). The results showed an increase in the thermal stability of mosR/ndhA G4 DNA with K+ concentration. Subsequently, we selected 100 mM as the concentration of K+ cations, in a 10 mM KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) solution, for further studies; since our focus was on the study of the interaction with stable solution structures. Having established the existence of mosR/ndhA as stable G4 DNA structures, the next step was to determine if MTX binds to them, and to ascertain the binding process accompanying the changes in conformation and stability of G4 DNA.

3.2. Real-Time Binding of Mitoxantrone to mosR/ndhA G4 DNA

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) is a reliable analysis of the kinetics parameters as well as the steady state of the ligand–macromolecule interaction [20]. Upon binding of the increasing concentration of MTX to mosR and ndhA in the range 0.03–3.0 μM, the sensograms (Figure 2A,B) show a steady-state response on binding (Figure 2C,D). The steady-state analysis yields the affinity constant, Kb = 3.16 × 105 M−1, whereas the analysis of the kinetics of association and dissociation yield Kb = 3.85 × 105 M−1 for the MTX-mosR G4 DNA complex (Table S5). For the MTX–ndhA assembly, the binding constant from the steady-state and kinetics data was found to be Kb = 1.17 × 106 M−1 and Kb = 1.27 × 107 M−1, respectively (Table S6). Real-time binding showing an increase in steady-state response with concentration indicates a specific interaction between the ligand and the G4 DNA molecules.

3.3. Binding Characteristics of Mitoxantrone-G4 DNA Complex

The assessment of the binding of a variable ratio of ligand (D) and target G4 DNA (N) sequence was indicated by the absorption spectra. MTX shows four distinct wavelength maxima, λmax = 242, 276, 609 and 660 nm [21]. A change in absorbance in the visible region was used for the analysis, as DNA does not contribute to the absorbance in this region. Upon the stepwise addition of varying concentrations of mosR G4 DNA to a fixed concentration of MTX (7 μM), the intensity of both absorption bands of MTX showed hypochromism of ~35% at D/N = 5.0 accompanied by a red shift, Δλmax = 16 and 18 nm at 609 and 660 nm, respectively. Further addition of mosR resulted in hyperchromism with no further change in the wavelength maxima, the increase in absorbance being significant, up to ~75% at D/N = 0.5 at 678 nm (Figure 3A). In the case of the ndhA G4 DNA, similar hypochromism of ~29% at D/N = 5.0, accompanied by a red shift of 15 and 18 nm at 609 and 660 nm, respectively, followed by hyperchromism at D/N = 0.5, was observed (Figure 3B). This demonstrates the presence of two binding modes, one at D/N > 5.0 while the other exists at lower D/N ratios, in which most of the MTX is expected to be bound at preferential sites on the G4 DNA. The absence of an isobestic point indicates the existence of more than one stoichiometric complex. The binding characteristics are found to be similar to that observed with tetramolecular parallel stranded G4 DNA [21]. In the absence of a large red shift of ~45 nm, which is characteristic of classical intercalation [23], the predominant mode of binding to mosR and ndhA G4 DNA sequences is expected to be partial stacking via the insertion of chromophore of MTX in the vicinity of base quartets or end stacking with G-quartets in addition to external groove binding of the side chains [21]. A detailed analysis of the absorbance data (Figures S3A–C and S4A–C) is indicative of the stoichiometry of the MTX–G4 DNA complex as 1, 2, 4 and 1, 2 in the MTX–mosR and MTX–ndhA complexes, respectively, which may arise from simultaneous stacking at the ends and groove binding near loops. An estimate of the intrinsic binding constant is Kb = 1.6 × 104 M−1 and 1.6 × 106 M−1 at D/N = 0.36–2.00 and 2.00–3.80, respectively, for the mosR complexes, while the corresponding value for the ndhA complexes is Kb = 1.0 × 106 M−1 and 8.7 × 104 M−1 at D/N = 0.36–3.80 and 3.80–8.75, respectively (Figures S3A–C and S4A–C). The Scatchard plots were found to be nonlinear and could not be used to determine the binding affinity as they did not fit into a combination of 2–3 straight lines. The intrinsic binding constants may be considered as a rough estimate due to the existence of multiple binding sites, neighbor exclusion effects, and ligand–ligand interactions [21]. The existence of multiple binding sites resulting in the absence of a clear isobestic point has previously been reported in the literature [20].
MTX exhibits well-resolved emission spectra with a maxima of λem = 695 nm for the excitation wavelength, λex = 610 nm [21]. The addition of mosR/ndhA to a fixed concentration of MTX (7 μM) quenched the fluorescence by ~28% with a red shift of Δλem = 15 nm at D/N = 5.0. Subsequent stepwise additions of mosR/ndhA, however, resulted in a rapid increase in fluorescence by 160% and 90% in the mosR and ndhA complexes, respectively, at D/N = 0.3, with no further shift in the emission maxima (Figure 4A,B). Fluorescence quenching followed by an enhancement in intensity suggests the presence of multiple modes of binding, which is like the corresponding absorbance data. The iso-emissive point was not observed throughout the course of the titrations. An analysis of the fluorescence data [20,21] indicated the presence of several stoichiometric complexes with n ~1, 2, and 4 (Figures S5A–F and S6A–F), which may arise from the binding of 1–4 molecules of MTX in different binding modes and positionings with respect to the G4 DNA. The KSV and Kb obtained were close to that obtained from the absorbance data. The non-linear fit of the emission data at 695 nm showed the presence of two independent binding sites for the MTX–mosR and MTX–ndhA complexes, yielding two binding constants (Figures S5A–F and S6A–F). The bimolecular quenching constant, Kq ~2.6 × 1013–3.1 × 1015 M−1s−1, obtained using Ksv = 1.3 × 104–2.5 × 105 M−1 and the fluorescence lifetime τ = 0.11–0.51 ns (discussed later) was much greater than the collision constant for a biological macromolecule and small molecule as a ligand, i.e., 2 × 1010 M−1s−1 [21], which rules out the possibility of any dynamic quenching. The presence of static quenching owing to ground state interactions was also evident from the accompanying changes observed in the absorbance and practically no change in the fluorescence lifetime. The initial quenching of the fluorescence at D/N = 5 may be attributed to the proximity of the MTX to the G4 DNA molecule, upon binding externally through partial stacking/end stacking/groove binding, which could bring about the efficient electron transfer from the nucleoside to the anthraquinone moiety. Qu et al. [24] have shown that the electron transfer process for daunomycin in the presence of d-GTP, an anthracycline having a conjugated aromatic chromophore, is found to be thermodynamically favorable, particularly for guanosines (∆G ~0.71 eV for excited singlet) and is a function of both proximity (~8–10 Å) and the relative orientation of the two molecules [21,24]. At low D/N ratios, MTX binds to the G4 DNA at a preferential site via stacking/partial intercalation/grooves in which it is apparently screened by a solvent, as demonstrated by Lin and Struve [25] in their studies of the fluorescence lifetime of MTX in aprotic solvents, resulting in the significant increase in fluorescent emission [21]. This is similar to the properties of several aromatic compounds (e.g., EthBr), for which the fluorescence is strongly quenched in an aqueous solution, but in a nonpolar or a rigid environment, a striking enhancement is observed.
Time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) studies yielding the fluorescence lifetime may reflect upon the mode of binding of the ligand to DNA. The fluorescence decay of free MTX (3 μM) is bi-exponential, yielding the lifetime values, τ1 = 0.11 ns (90% population of major component) and τ2 = 0.47 ns (~10% population of minor component), which are close to that reported in the literature [21,25]. The fluorescence decay profiles of MTX changes on binding to G4 DNA indicating an interaction between the ligand MTX and the mosR/ndhA G4 DNA. The complex of MTX with mosR at varying D/N ratios showed an increase in the population of the minor component up to 50% while the individual lifetime values (τ1 = 0.09–0.21 ns and τ2 = 0.36–0.51 ns) remained practically the same (Table S7A). The decay profile of the MTX–ndhA complexes is like that of MTX–mosR complexes (Table S7B). The MTX chromophore may be shielded from the solvent after binding through partial stacking/end stacking/groove binding with mosR/ndhA G4 DNA leading to an increase in the higher lifetime component and preventing the fast mode of decay through water. This is consistent with the reported higher lifetimes prevalent in aprotic solvents [25] as well as the increase in intensity of the fluorescence at low D/N ratios [21].
The observed lifetimes of complexes suggest external binding/partial stacking of MTX to G4 DNA involving contributions from side chains, since the classical intercalation between G-quartets would lead to an increase in the lifetime, which is about three to four times that of the free ligand; e.g., the lifetime of ethidium bromide, a classical intercalator, in a free state (τ = 1.6 ns), shows an increase to τ = 22.2 ns upon binding to duplex DNA [21]. It has also been shown that the fluorescence lifetime of porphyrins, TMPyP4 and TrPyP4 (τ = 4.6–5.0 ns in the free form), increases to 6.6–7.5 and 10.6–12.4 ns, respectively, and corresponds to end stacking and groove binding modes of interaction with d-(TTGGGGT)4 G4 DNA [26].
Since the binding of MTX to G4 DNA showed the formation of more than one bound complex, we established the stoichiometry independently with the continuous variation method (Job plot) using fluorescence. An analysis of the Job plot (Figure 5A,B) indicates several inflection points between approximately linear regions [20,21].
Multiple complexes with a stoichiometry of 0.5:1, 1:1, 2:1 and 4:1 exist in solution, which corresponds to slope changes at the MTX/mole equivalent of G4 DNA fractions of 0.33, 0.50, 0.67, 0.82 (Figure 5A) and 0.33, 0.5, 0. 82 (Figure 5B) in mosR and ndhA complexes, respectively. This is consistent with the absorption data of mosR complexes, in which the plot of the reciprocal of absorbance (1/A) as a function of D/N at 678 nm showed inflection at D/N = 1.2, 2.0, and 3.7, suggesting a stoichiometry of 1:1, 2:1, and 4:1, respectively (Figure S3). The stoichiometry of 0.5:1, corresponding to a slope change at 0.33 (Figure 5A), is not obvious in the absorbance data, presumably due to fewer data points available in that region. In the same way, the results of the Job plot are found to be in accord with the absorption and fluorescent data of all other complexes.

3.4. Ligand-Induced Conformational Changes in mosR/ndhA G4 DNA

Upon the stepwise addition of MTX to the fixed concentration (20 μM) of mosR G4 DNA, the intensity of the CD band decreased continuously, by ~67% and 50% at 266 and 288 nm, respectively, up to D/N = 5.0 (Figure 6A). The negative CD band at 246 nm also decreased in magnitude significantly by ~73% up to D/N = 5.0. The proportion of antiparallel stranded G4 conformation increased or, in other words, equilibrium in the mixed hybrid conformation shifted towards an antiparallel conformation. Equivalent results have been observed in the case of binding to ndhA, in which the change in intensity of the bands was ~58% and 50%, at 265 and 288 nm, respectively, up to D/N = 5.0 (Figure 6B). The nonlinear fitting of CD as a function of ligand concentration gives an estimate of the affinity constants (Figure S7). No induced CD (ICD) band was observed in the wavelength range of 600–690 nm, unlike that observed in the binding of MTX to parallel stranded telomeric G4 DNA sequences, in which a bisignate [21] or negative ICD [27] were observed. The overall spectral features characteristic of G4 DNA remain unchanged on interaction with a ligand, which together with the absence of a negative induced CD band characteristic of classical intercalation, suggest the external binding of MTX to the grooves/loops or end stacking/partial stacking with guanine quartets of G4 DNA [28,29,30].

3.5. Ligand-Induced Thermal Stabilization of mosR/ndhA G4 DNA

The thermal denaturation profiles of ordered to disordered 100 μM mosR/ndhA G4 DNA sequences were monitored using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), which yields the melting temperatures (Tm) by measuring the changes in heat capacity as a function of temperature. The DSC data was deconvoluted and found to fit into three “two state” transition models, yielding three melting temperatures (Tm), indicating the existence of two intermediate species in the melting pathway. The three melting temperatures Tm1, Tm2, and Tm3 are centered at 47.3, 58.3, 71.4 °C and 46.8, 64.0, 84.4 °C for the mosR and ndhA G4 DNA sequences, respectively (Figure 7A,C). Upon the binding of MTX to mosR G4 DNA at D/N = 5.0, it is observed that Tm increases, yielding thermal stabilization at ∆Tm1 = 19.9 °C, ∆Tm2 = 25.3 °C and ∆Tm3 = 28.8 °C, while the corresponding stabilization in ndhA G4 DNA is ∆Tm2 = 17.9 °C and ∆Tm3 = 10.1 °C (Figure 7B,D). These values of ∆Tm (Table 1) are comparable to that obtained for other ligands to mosR/ndhA and other G4 DNA [5,6].
Structure-dependent melting profiles from the folded to unfolded conformation of mosR/ndhA G4 DNA in the native and complexed state at D/N = 5.0 were obtained from CD measurements at 265/260 and 287/288 nm with respect to the temperature at 2 °C intervals. The melting transitions of free mosR G4 DNA, yielded Tm values at 25, 32, 54, 68, 85 °C and 28, 43, 60, 74, 87 °C at 288 and 265 nm (Figure 8A,C), respectively, which correspond well to the Tm value 47.3, 58.3, 71.4 °C observed in the DSC thermograms as well as that reported in the literature [5]. Similarly, the Tm values 28, 39, 45, 60, 84 °C and 26, 38, 60, 85 °C observed at 287 and 260 nm, respectively, for ndhA G4 DNA (Figure 8B,D), correspond to the 46.8, 64.0, 84.4 °C obtained from the DSC thermograms. Upon complex formation at D/N = 5.0, Tm is found to increase in both complexes, yielding a thermal stabilization of ∆Tm up to ~26 and 20 °C in mosR and ndhA complexes, respectively (Figure 8A–D; Table S8A,B). We observed that the melting pathways observed at two wavelengths, 265/260 and 288/287 nm, were different, giving rise to different ∆Tm values. This is expected as melting transitions involve the reordering of a mixture of parallel/antiparallel hybrid conformations, which contributes differently to CD at 265/260 and 288/287 nm. The same has also been reported in the literature on the binding of ligands, BRACO-19 and c-exNDI 2 to mosR/ndhA G4 DNA [5] as well as 2,6 disubstituted anthraquinones to human telomeric G4 DNA [20]. It has been shown that the groove binding of mitoxantrone in monomeric/dimeric form to parallel d-[TTGGGG]4 [21] and d-[TTAGGG]4 [27] G4 DNA increases thermal stability by ~25 °C and, consequently, inhibits telomerase enzyme activity. The observed ∆Tm obtained on the external groove/end stacking of mitoxantrone to mosR/ndhA G4 DNA are comparable to these results.

3.6. Stall Replication Machinery by Taq Polymerase Enzyme Assay

To determine if MTX can induce G4 formation in the 34/32-mer mosR/ndhA DNA sequence (Table S1) under physiologically relevant conditions, we performed a Taq DNA polymerase stop assay using a template containing mosR/ndhA sequences, to which 4 T were added at the 5′end and 3′end, followed by the addition of another 30 bases for annealing purposes at the 3′end, which are complementary to the selected Taq primer sequence of 30 bases (Table S2). A G4 structure formed in the template strand can block the Taq polymerase synthesis of the complementary strand, since the enzyme requires single stranded DNA for its action. This G4-specific block can then be precisely solved in a denaturing polyacrylamide gel in terms of the intensity and sequence position. The technique is, thus, used to excise the ability of the ligand to stabilize the G4 structure in order to arrest the movement of the Taq polymerase enzyme at G-quadruplex sites. After the binding of MTX to the mosR and ndhA quadruplex DNA with the increasing concentration of MTX, the extension of the Taq polymerase enzyme became impeded. As a result, the shorter band was deferred to decreasing band intensity according to the concentration of the MTX binding to the template DNA (mosR and ndhA) (Figure S8); whereas it was also noted that neither a shorter product nor a small band was observed in the negative control (absence of DNA). It can be consummated that MTX strongly binds to the oligonucleotides’ template and inhibits further enzymatic processes.

3.7. Mitoxantrone Regulates Gene Expression of mosR and ndhA

In order to assess the involvement of G-quadruplex motifs in the regulation of gene expression upon treatment with MTX, the expression of mosR and ndhA genes in Mtb was checked using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Quantification of the gene transcripts was performed in relation to the 16S rRNA gene transcript (a housekeeping gene), and the Cq for non-template controls was >35 cycles. The results (Figure 9) show that compared to an untreated culture control, transcription of the mosR and ndhA genes was downregulated by a factor of 2–4-fold after the Mtb cells were treated with the 5XMIC value of MTX. The MIC of MTX was determined by treating the Mtb with various concentrations of MTX for six days. The MIC90 of MTX is 100 micromolar. To alleviate the general effect of MTX on gene expression, we performed qRT-PCR on the RNA derived from Mtb exposed to 5X MIC for a short duration (1 h). We confirmed the viability at different concentrations (in the range of 10X MIC–0.3X MIC) for 3 h and did not observe any cytotoxic effect of MTX until 10X of MIC (Figure S9a). Further, we examined the expression of a few other genes that either lack (Rv1403c) or contain (hupB) the G4 motif in their regulatory regions. Like ndhA and mosR, we observed a significant downregulation of hupB (G4 motif containing genes), but not of Rv1403c (non-G4 containing genes) (Figure S9b). The involvement of a G4-mediated mechanism in the transcription of mosR and ndhA suggest a therapeutic potential of the drug for Mtb, potentially through the inhibition of transcription by binding to the G4 motif.

3.8. Ligand Binding-Induced Thermal Stabilization Relates to Gene Function

The formation of the G4-motif inside cells is tightly linked to survival, stress resistance, and the modulation of gene expression in various organisms, e.g., humans, pathogenic bacteria, and viruses. The present investigations revealed that mitoxantrone has a specific affinity towards the G-quadruplex DNA motifs present in the regulatory region of mosR (−38 from TSS or −69 bp to −38 bp of the gene) and ndhA (−47 bp from TSS or −106 bp to −77 bp of the gene) under in vitro conditions. The external binding to G4 DNA induced significant thermal stabilization up to 29 and 20 °C in the mosR and ndhA G4 DNA sequences, respectively. A Taq polymerase stop assay demonstrated that the G4 structure assembly and replication machinery was hindered in the presence of MTX. Finally, a transcriptome analysis of the mosR and ndhA genes showed that gene expression was significantly reduced upon MTX treatment as compared to the untreated control, which may be attributed to the binding-induced thermal stabilization of mosR/ndhA G4 DNA, which is similar to ligand-induced thermal stability of G4 DNA inhibiting telomerase enzyme activity, requiring single stranded telomeric DNA for its function [2,3,4]. This implies a significant role of the transcriptional regulation of G-quadruplex in the regulatory region of these two genes. Moreover, these findings also support the idea of implementing the G-quadruplex ligand as a new therapeutic approach to treat this fatal human bacterial disease in combination with current anti-tuberculosis drugs.
For drugs that target G4 DNA in cells, ligand-induced thermal stabilization is an important parameter since it would deplete the availability of single stranded DNA in telomeric DNA or the promoters of oncogenes due to the formation of stable G4 folded structures, which are required for their functioning and lead to apoptosis. Thus, the extent of the thermal stabilization of G4 DNA has emerged as an important therapeutic index besides the high affinity of binding. We observed that the binding affinity of mitoxantrone towards ndhA G4 DNA was higher than that for mosR G4 DNA. On the other hand, the thermal stability of the mosR complex was significantly higher than that of the ndhA complex. This is understandable, since the ligand–G4 DNA interaction involves short contacts between specific chemical groups/moieties of the ligand and G4 DNA, contributing to van der Waals, hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding energy terms, which define the stability of the complex. Unlike the well-characterized X-ray crystallographic and NMR [17,18] conformation of the 3+1 hybrid G-quadruplex of human telomeric DNA sequences (HTel22), the topology of mosR and ndhA G4 DNA has not been elucidated in the literature. Thus, the specific groups exposed and available for the interaction and accommodation of the approaching ligand are not spelled out. The aromatic chromophore of MTX may partially stack at the top/bottom/sides of G4 DNA. The three hydroxyl groups at the 1, 4, 14 positions, two oxygen atoms at the 9,10 positions and 11NH/12NH in the anthraquinone ring and side chains of MTX (Figure 1) offer immense possibilities for hydrogen bonding interactions with several groups in G4 DNA. Phosphates in the DNA backbone, G2NH2/O6/N7 of the G-quartets and the A/T base atoms available in the grooves/loops of G4 DNA have previously been reported to participate in ligand–G4 DNA interactions in the case of metalloporphyrin, aryl ethynyl anthraquinones, benzimidazole and furan derivatives [28,29,30,31]. For example, a detailed study of the binding of metalloporphyrins to different parallel/antiparallel G4 DNA structures (PDB ID:143D, 1KF1, 2HY9) by molecular dynamics simulations for 100 ns, using a FF12SB forcefield available in the AMBER12 package, revealed [29] how the saddle shape of porphyrin together with the d-TTA loop structure of antiparallel G4 covers the G-quartets at the top, bottom and grooves. Such possibilities can exist with MTX, with additional short polar contacts through its side chains, which will give rise to multiple binding sites, binding modes, and the stoichiometry (n = 1,2, and 4) observed in the present study. It may be noted that any aromatic chromophore can stack with a G-quartet with a non-specific interaction, but external contact at the grooves/loops is significant for ligand recognition and contributes to the interaction’s specificity. The exact nature of the interactions on external binding involving specific groups of ligands engaged in interactions, which are based on both the kind of ligand and the structural subtleties of the quadruplex, would dictate the stability of the ligand–G4 DNA complex. Differences in structural configuration contribute to thermal stability and more significant structural knowledge is required to comprehend the stabilization difference between the mosR/ndhA complexes and, hence, in evaluating the therapeutic potential of G4-binding ligands.
The anti-cancer action of mitoxantrone has been attributed to its binding to the DNA duplex by intercalating between the base pairs of DNA. Its binding affinity with calf thymus DNA in the presence of a Na+ [32] and Tris–HCl solution [33] is reported to be, Kb = 6 × 106 M−1 and 4 × 105 M−1, respectively. Upon binding with a Herring testes DNA duplex (Kb = 5.1–6.3 × 106 M−1 at 298.15 K), mitoxantrone was found to increase the thermal stability of DNA by 11.75 K [34]. Our earlier studies with hexanucleotide d-(CTCGAG)2 yielded an equilibrium constant for binding at low (1.0–0.2) and high (28.0–1.1) mitoxantrone drug to DNA (D/N) ratios as Kb = 1.8 × 105 M−1 and 1.38 × 106 M−1, respectively [35]. Further, binding with intermolecular parallel [d-(TTGGGGT)]4 G4 DNA with an intrinsic binding constant, Kb = 0.6 × 106 M−1, 3.5 × 106 M−1, and 3.7 × 106 M−1 for the range of D/N = 0.21–1.3, 1.16–4.75, and 4.75–9.5, respectively, yielded a thermal stabilization of ΔTm = 25 °C. The experiments using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy clearly showed non-intercalative binding with no evidence of the opening of base quartets to accommodate the mitoxantrone chromophore [21,27]. In the present study, we observed groove binding to the intramolecular mosR hybrid G4 DNA sequence leading to a thermal stabilization up to 29 °C (Table 1). Thus, although the binding affinity of MTX with G4 DNA is comparable to that with a duplex DNA sequence [32], the binding mechanism is distinctly different. Its mode of binding to G4 DNA is non-intercalative external groove binding and the thermal stabilization is significantly larger than that of duplex DNA, which is an important therapeutic index.
Several questions about the selectivity, specificity and biological implications of G4 ligands and G4 aptamers remain unanswered, but the evidence already available reveals that G-quadruplexes are valuable and inventive pathogen-fighting tools. Excitingly, the fact that some G4 ligands have reached the clinical trial phase is encouraging. The G-quadruplex field of research would benefit from in vivo proof and structural data from both the physiologically relevant folding of the target G4 structures and their ligand interactions. In this context, our study emphasizes the understanding of an improved comprehension of the G4/i–motif/R-loop interaction that could lead to the development of novel ligands capable of modulating the expression of genes responsible for regulating the pathogenesis of Mtb. There is immense scope towards the discovery of novel anthraquinone-based compounds having slight modifications in their side chains, in the form of the nature of the substituent, and the substituent’s position on the anthraquinone ring [20], as reported in studies of the inhibition of telomerase enzymes to provide better efficacy. A question remains about the transcription factors associated with mosR and ndhA genes that may be disseminated because of MTX binding to the G quartet and stabilizing the structure. A comprehensive investigation of the high-resolution structure of this complex in the future may enlighten the necessary scaffolds and mechanisms. Based on the outcomes of the above study, we can, therefore, conclude that anthraquinones may be considered a novel target for the development of anti-tuberculosis therapy.

4. Conclusions

We have shown that the virulence-determining mosR/ndhA genes of Mtb fold as a stable hybrid form of G-quadruplex DNA. Diverse biophysical techniques, that is, surface plasmon resonance, absorption, fluorescence and circular dichroism spectroscopy, demonstrate that mitoxantrone binds to the G4 DNA sequences with an affinity ~105–106 M−1, forming multiple stoichiometric complexes. Experimental evidence points towards the binding of MTX with G4, forming DNA sequences at the grooves/loops/ends externally, inducing a conformational change that is energetically favorable due to significant thermal stabilization (20–29 °C), as monitored by CD and heat capacity. The interaction leads to an inhibition of Taq polymerase enzyme action and the two/four-fold downregulation of mosR/ndhA gene expression. The inhibition of the expression of both oxidative stress-prone genes may be attributed to the binding and subsequent stabilization of their associated G4 DNA structures. The results on the binding affinity, thermal stabilization and the downregulation of expression are encouraging from a therapeutic point of view and show that mitoxantrone, or similar anthraquinone-based compounds, can be used as a promising strategy for developing highly selective G-quadruplex targeted therapies towards tuberculosis. Nevertheless, the present investigations pave the way for the discovery of novel anthraquinone-based compounds as potent G4 ligands.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14050978/s1, The data that supports the findings in this study are available on-line in the Supplementary Information.pdf file of this article. The details are as follows: 1. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION (page no. 2–6) [36,37,38,39]. 2. TABLES (page no. 7–11): Table S1: List of oligonucleotide sequences used in biophysical experiments; Table S2: List of template and primer sequences used in Taq polymerase stop assay; Table S3: List of primers used in qRT-PCR experiments; Table S4: Melting temperatures, Tm, of mosR/ndhA G4 DNA sequences; Tables S5 and S6: Binding affinity of MTX complexed with mosR and ndhA G4 DNA from SPR; Table S7A: Fluorescence decay lifetime (τ in ns), their relative proportions (B in percentage) and average lifetime (τ in ns) from fluorescence decay profiles of 3 μM free MTX and its complexes with mosR at varying MTX to mosR G4 DNA ratio. χ2/DOF (degrees of freedom) for the goodness of fit are also shown. Table S7B: Fluorescence decay lifetime (τ in ns), their relative proportions (B in percentage) and average lifetime (τ in ns) from fluorescence decay profiles of 3 μM free MTX and its complexes with ndhA at varying MTX to ndhA G4 DNA ratio. χ2/DOF (degrees of freedom) for the goodness of fit are also shown. Table S8A: Melting temperatures (Tm in °C) and subsequent thermal stabilization (∆Tm in °C) due to binding from melting profiles obtained from data of Circular Dichroism at 288/287 nm as a function of temperature for free mosR and ndhA and their complex with MTX at D/N = 5.0. Table S8B: Melting temperatures (Tm in °C) and subsequent thermal stabilization (∆Tm in °C) due to binding from melting profiles obtained from data of Circular Dichroism at 265/260 nm as a function of temperature for free mosR and ndhA and their complex with MTX at D/N = 5.0. Figure S1: Circular Dichroism spectra of mosR/ndhA G4 DNA; Figure S2: Thermal melting profiles of mosR/ndhA G4 DNA; Figure S3: Binding affinity and Stoichiometry—absorption spectra of MTX-mosR complex; Figure S4: Binding affinity and Stoichiometry—absorption spectra of MTX-ndhA complex; Figure S5: Binding affinity and Stoichiometry—fluorescence spectra of MTX-mosR complex; Figure S6: Binding affinity and Stoichiometry—fluorescence spectra of MTX-ndhA complex; Figure S7: Binding affinity—CD spectra of MTX-mosR and MTX-ndhA complexes; Figure S8: Taq polymerase stop assay of MTX with mosR/ndhA template; Figure S9: Viability of MTX in replicating model (a) and Gene expression for Rv1403c and hupB (b).

Author Contributions

A.D., K.A., R.B. and A.S. participate in the design of the experiments and methodology. A.D. and R.B. conceptualized the idea. The data mining, curation and the experiments were performed by A.D and K.A. under the supervision of R.B. and A.S. The original draft was written by A.D. and K.A. and reviewed by R.B., A.S., K.A. and R.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded jointly by Department of Bio-Technology (DBT; BT/PR/14187/BRB/10/1413/2015 [R.B.]), Department of Science and Technology (DST; DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2016/IF160370 [A.D.]), Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance (IA; IA/E/16/1/503017 [K.A.]). K.A. is early-career fellows of Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance. The Funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. We confirm no competing financial interests exist.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting results are available in Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the experimental facilities provided by the Institute Instrumentation Center at the Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India. We are thankful to BSL3 facilities at CIDR, IISc Bangalore for conducting all experiments related to Mtb.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  1. Knight, G.M.; McQuaid, C.F.; Dodd, P.J.; Houben, R.M.G.J. Global Burden of Latent Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: Trends and Estimates Based on Mathematical Modelling. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 903–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. De Cian, A.; Lacroix, L.; Douarre, C.; Temime-Smaali, N.; Trentesaux, C.; Riou, J.F.; Mergny, J.L. Targeting Telomeres and Telomerase. Biochimie 2008, 90, 131–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sekaran, V.; Soares, J.; Jarstfer, M.B. Telomere Maintenance as a Target for Drug Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 521–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Balasubramanian, S.; Hurley, L.H.; Neidle, S. Targeting G-Quadruplexes in Gene Promoters: A Novel Anticancer Strategy? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011, 10, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Perrone, R.; Lavezzo, E.; Riello, E.; Manganelli, R.; Palù, G.; Toppo, S.; Provvedi, R.; Richter, S.N. Mapping and Characterization of G-Quadruplexes in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Gene Promoter Regions. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mishra, S.K.; Shankar, U.; Jain, N.; Sikri, K.; Tyagi, J.S.; Sharma, T.K.; Mergny, J.L.; Kumar, A. Characterization of G-Quadruplex Motifs in EspB, EspK, and Cyp51 Genes of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis as Potential Drug Targets. Mol. Ther.—Nucleic Acids 2019, 16, 698–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Harbut, M.B.; Yang, B.; Liu, R.; Yano, T.; Vilchèze, C.; Cheng, B.; Lockner, J.; Guo, H.; Yu, C.; Franzblau, S.G.; et al. Small Molecules Targeting Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Type II NADH Dehydrogenase Exhibit Antimycobacterial Activity. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 3478–3482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abomoelak, B.; Hoye, E.A.; Chi, J.; Marcus, S.A.; Laval, F.; Bannantine, J.P.; Ward, S.K.; Daffé, M.; Hong, D.L.; Talaat, A.M. MosR, a Novel Transcriptional Regulator of Hypoxia and Virulence in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 5941–5952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vilchèze, C.; Weinrick, B.; Leung, L.W.; Jacobs, W.R. Plasticity of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis NADH Dehydrogenases and Their Role in Virulence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 1599–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kikin, O.; D’Antonio, L.; Bagga, P.S. QGRS Mapper: A Web-Based Server for Predicting G-Quadruplexes in Nucleotide Sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Puig Lombardi, E.; Londoño-Vallejo, A. A Guide to Computational Methods for G-Quadruplex Prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cole, S.; Brosch, R.; Parkhill, J.; Garnier, T.; Churcher, C.; Harris, D.; Gordon, S.V.; Eiglmeier, K.; Gas, S.; Barry, C.; et al. Deciphering the Biology of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis from the Complete Genome Sequence. Nature 1998, 393, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Thakur, R.S.; Desingu, A.; Basavaraju, S.; Subramanya, S.; Rao, D.N.; Nagaraju, G. Mycobacterium Tuberculosis DinG Is a Structure-Specific Helicase That Unwinds G4 DNA: Implications for Targeting G4 DNA as a Novel Therapeutic Approach. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 25112–25136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ruggiero, E.; Richter, S.N. Survey and Summary G-Quadruplexes and G-Quadruplex Ligands: Targets and Tools in Antiviral Therapy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 3270–3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vorlíčková, M.; Kejnovská, I.; Sagi, J.; Renčiuk, D.; Bednářová, K.; Motlová, J.; Kypr, J. Circular dichroism and guanine quadruplexes. Methods 2012, 57, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kypr, J.; Kejnovská, I.; Renčiuk, D.; Vorlíčková, M. Circular dichroism and conformational polymorphism of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 1713–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lin, C.; Wu, G.; Wang, K.; Onel, B.; Sakai, S.; Shao, Y.; Yang, D. Molecular Recognition of the Hybrid-2 Human Telomeric G-Quadruplex by Epiberberine. Angew. Chem. 2018, 57, 10888–10893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Phan, A.T.; Luu, K.N.; Patel, D.J. Different Loop Arrangements of Intramolecular Human Telomeric (3+1) G-Quadruplexes in K+ Solution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 5715–5719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Largy, E.; Mergny, J.L.; Gabelica, V. Role of alkali metal ions in G-Quadruplex nucleic acid structure and stability. Met. Ions. Life Sci. 2016, 16, 203–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dey, A.; Pandav, K.; Nath, M.; Barthwal, R.; Prasad, R. Molecular recognition of telomere DNA Sequence by 2, 6 anthraquinone derivatives leads to thermal stabilization and induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 221, 355–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pradeep, T.P.; Barthwal, R. A 4:1 Stoichiometric Binding and Stabilization of Mitoxantrone-Parallel Stranded G-Quadruplex Complex Established by Spectroscopy Techniques. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2016, 162, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Anand, K.; Tripathi, A.; Shukla, K.; Malhotra, N. Redox Biology Mycobacterium Tuberculosis SufR Responds to Nitric Oxide via Its 4Fe–4S Cluster and Regulates Fe–S Cluster Biogenesis for Persistence in Mice. Redox Biol. 2021, 46, 102062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Krugh, T.R.; Reinhardt, C.G. Evidence for Sequence Preferences in the Intercalative Binding of Ethidium Bromide to Dinucleoside Monophosphates. J. Mol. Biol. 1975, 1971, 133–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Qu, X.; Wan, C.; Becker, H.C.; Zhong, D.; Zewail, A.H. The Anticancer Drug-DNA Complex: Femtosecond Primary Dynamics for Anthracycline Antibiotics Function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 14212–14217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lin, S.; Struve, W.S. Solvatochromism and Time-Resolved Fluorescence of the Antitumor Agent Mitoxantrone and Its Analogues in Solution and in DNA. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 2251–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wei, C.; Wang, L.; Jia, G.; Zhou, J.; Han, G.; Li, C. The Binding Mode of Porphyrins with Cation Side Arms to (TG4T)4 G-Quadruplex: Spectroscopic Evidence. Biophys. Chem. 2009, 143, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tripathi, S.; Pradeep, T.P.; Barthwal, R. Molecular Recognition of Parallel DNA Quadruplex d(TTAGGGT)4 by Mitoxantrone: Binding with 1:2 Stoichiometry Leading to Thermal Stabilization and Telomerase Inhibition. ChemBioChem 2016, 17, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. White, E.W.; Tanious, F.; Ismail, M.A.; Reszka, A.P.; Neidle, S.; Boykin, D.W.; Wilson, W.D. Structure-Specific Recognition of Quadruplex DNA by Organic Cations: Influence of Shape, Substituents and Charge. Biophys. Chem. 2007, 126, 140–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rubio-Magnieto, J.; Di Meo, F.; Lo, M.; Delcourt, C.; Clément, S.; Norman, P.; Richeter, S.; Linares, M.; Surin, M. Binding Modes of a Core-Extended Metalloporphyrin to Human Telomeric DNA G-Quadruplexes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 2453–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Percivalle, C.; Sissi, C.; Greco, M.L.; Musetti, C.; Mariani, A.; Artese, A.; Costa, G.; Perrore, M.L.; Alcaro, S.; Freccero, M. Aryl Ethynyl Anthraquinones: A Useful Platform for Targeting Telomeric G-Quadruplex Structures. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 3744–3754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jain, A.K.; Reddy, V.V.; Paul, A.; Muniyappa, K.; Bhattacharya, S. Synthesis and Evaluation of a Novel Class of G-Quadruplex-Stabilizing Small Molecules Based on the 1,3-Phenylene-Bis(Piperazinyl Benzimidazole) System. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 10693–10704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lown, J.W.; Morgan, A.R.; Yen, S.F.; Wang, Y.H.; Wilson, W.D. Characteristics of the binding of the anticancer agents mitoxantrone and ametantrone and related structures to deoxyribonucleic acids. Biochemistry 1985, 24, 4028–4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Agarwal, S.; Jangir, D.K.; Mehrotra, R. Spectroscopic Studies of the effects of anticancer drug mitoxantrone interaction with calf-thymus DNA. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2013, 120, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bhattacharyya, J.; Basu, A.; Suresh Kumar, G. Intercalative Interaction of the anticancer drug mitoxantrone with double stranded dna: A calorimetric characterization of the energetics. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2014, 75, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dogra, S.; Awasthi, P.; Nair, M.; Barthwal, R. Interaction of anticancer drug mitoxantrone with DNA hexamer sequence D-(CTCGAG)2 by absorption, fluorescence and circular dichroism spectroscopy. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2013, 123, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barthwal, R.; Tariq, Z. Molecular Recognition of Parallel G-quadruplex [d-(TTGGGGT)]4 Containing Tetrahymena Telomeric DNA Sequence by Anticancer Drug Daunomycin: NMR-Based Structure and Thermal Stability. Molecules 2018, 23, 2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tariq, Z.; Barthwal, R. Binding of anticancer drug daunomycin to parallel G-quadruplex DNA [d-(TTGGGGT)]4 leads to thermal stabilization: A multispectroscopic investigation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018, 120, 1965–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hargrove, A.E.; Zhong, Z.; Sessler, J.L.; Anslyn, E.V. Algorithms for the determination of binding constants and enantiomeric excess in complex host: Guest equilibria using optical measurements. New J. Chem. 2010, 34, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Padiadpu, J.; Baloni, P.; Anand, K.; Munshi, M.; Thakur, C.; Mohan, A.; Singh, A.; Chandra, N. Identifying and Tackling Emergent Vulnerability in Drug-Resistant Mycobacteria. ACS Infect. Dis. 2016, 2, 592–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of Mitoxantrone (MTX).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of Mitoxantrone (MTX).
Genes 14 00978 g001
Figure 2. Results of the SPR for the interaction of MTX with G4 DNA using a HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) with 100 mM KCl at 25 °C. Sensograms obtained for the increasing concentration of MTX from 0.03 μM (bottom) to 3.0 μM (top): (A) mosR and (B) ndhA. Plot of steady-state binding showing the Response Unit (R.U.) as a function of the concentration of MTX: (C) mosR and (D) ndhA.
Figure 2. Results of the SPR for the interaction of MTX with G4 DNA using a HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) with 100 mM KCl at 25 °C. Sensograms obtained for the increasing concentration of MTX from 0.03 μM (bottom) to 3.0 μM (top): (A) mosR and (B) ndhA. Plot of steady-state binding showing the Response Unit (R.U.) as a function of the concentration of MTX: (C) mosR and (D) ndhA.
Genes 14 00978 g002
Figure 3. Absorption spectra of 7 μM MTX with increasing concentration of G4 DNA at D/N = 0.5–7.0 in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl at 25 °C in the visible region: (A) mosR and (B) ndhA.
Figure 3. Absorption spectra of 7 μM MTX with increasing concentration of G4 DNA at D/N = 0.5–7.0 in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl at 25 °C in the visible region: (A) mosR and (B) ndhA.
Genes 14 00978 g003aGenes 14 00978 g003b
Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra of 7 μM MTX with increasing concentration of G4 DNA at D/N = 0.3–8.7 in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl at 25 °C, λex = 610 nm: (A) mosR and (B) ndhA.
Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra of 7 μM MTX with increasing concentration of G4 DNA at D/N = 0.3–8.7 in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl at 25 °C, λex = 610 nm: (A) mosR and (B) ndhA.
Genes 14 00978 g004
Figure 5. Job plot for the binding of MTX to G4 DNA in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl at 25 °C using fluorescence. The total concentration of ligand and DNA is kept constant at 3 μM: (A) mosR and (B) ndhA.
Figure 5. Job plot for the binding of MTX to G4 DNA in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl at 25 °C using fluorescence. The total concentration of ligand and DNA is kept constant at 3 μM: (A) mosR and (B) ndhA.
Genes 14 00978 g005aGenes 14 00978 g005b
Figure 6. Circular Dichroism spectra of free 20 μM G4 DNA and its complex on the progressive addition of MTX at D/N = 1.0–5.0 in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl at 25 °C: (A) mosR and (B) ndhA.
Figure 6. Circular Dichroism spectra of free 20 μM G4 DNA and its complex on the progressive addition of MTX at D/N = 1.0–5.0 in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl at 25 °C: (A) mosR and (B) ndhA.
Genes 14 00978 g006
Figure 7. Melting profiles showing excess heat capacity as a function of temperature: (A) 100 μM free mosR; (B) MTX–mosR complex at D/N = 5.0; (C) 100 μM free ndhA; and (D) MTX–ndhA complex at D/N = 5.0 in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl. The observed raw data (thick red lines) in each Figure have been deconvoluted into three “two-state” processes (thin red lines), respectively, using Origin 7.0.
Figure 7. Melting profiles showing excess heat capacity as a function of temperature: (A) 100 μM free mosR; (B) MTX–mosR complex at D/N = 5.0; (C) 100 μM free ndhA; and (D) MTX–ndhA complex at D/N = 5.0 in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl. The observed raw data (thick red lines) in each Figure have been deconvoluted into three “two-state” processes (thin red lines), respectively, using Origin 7.0.
Genes 14 00978 g007aGenes 14 00978 g007b
Figure 8. Thermal melting profiles showing normalized CD (in millidegrees) for 20 μM free G4 DNA and its complex with MTX at D/N = 5.0 in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl: (A) free mosR and its complex at 288 nm; (B) free ndhA and its complex at 287 nm; (C) free mosR and its complex at 265 nm; and (D) free ndhA and its complex at 260 nm.
Figure 8. Thermal melting profiles showing normalized CD (in millidegrees) for 20 μM free G4 DNA and its complex with MTX at D/N = 5.0 in 10 mM of KBPES buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM KCl: (A) free mosR and its complex at 288 nm; (B) free ndhA and its complex at 287 nm; (C) free mosR and its complex at 265 nm; and (D) free ndhA and its complex at 260 nm.
Genes 14 00978 g008aGenes 14 00978 g008b
Figure 9. Mtb H37Rv was treated with 5XMIC of MTX; RNA was isolated and subjected to qRT-PCR for mosR and ndhA. qRT-PCR data showing the expression of the genes were normalized with 16S rRNA and compared with the untreated control. The data shown are the result of three independent experiments. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001 **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 9. Mtb H37Rv was treated with 5XMIC of MTX; RNA was isolated and subjected to qRT-PCR for mosR and ndhA. qRT-PCR data showing the expression of the genes were normalized with 16S rRNA and compared with the untreated control. The data shown are the result of three independent experiments. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001 **** p < 0.0001.
Genes 14 00978 g009
Table 1. Melting temperature, Tm (°C), of mosR and ndhA in free state and that bound to mitoxantrone (MTX) at D/N = 5.0 by fitting the data into three “two-state” transition models using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). The binding-induced thermal stabilization, ΔTm (°C), in mosR/ndhA G4 DNA sequences and χ2/Degrees Of Freedom for the goodness of fit are also shown. Symbol * indicates a major component in the DSC thermogram.
Table 1. Melting temperature, Tm (°C), of mosR and ndhA in free state and that bound to mitoxantrone (MTX) at D/N = 5.0 by fitting the data into three “two-state” transition models using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). The binding-induced thermal stabilization, ΔTm (°C), in mosR/ndhA G4 DNA sequences and χ2/Degrees Of Freedom for the goodness of fit are also shown. Symbol * indicates a major component in the DSC thermogram.
SampleTm1Tm1Tm2Tm2Tm3Tm3χ2/DOF
free mosR 47.3 ± 0.6-58.3 ± 0.2 *-71.4 ± 0.5-1.7 × 104
mosR + MTX67.2 ± 1.619.983.6 ± 0.3 *25.3100.2 ± 0.428.81.9 × 105
free ndhA 46.8 ± 0.5-64.0 ± 0.4-84.4 ± 0.3 *-9.9 × 104
ndhA + MTX46.5 ± 0.4-81.9 * ± 0.517.994.5 ± 0.310.11.4 × 105
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dey, A.; Anand, K.; Singh, A.; Prasad, R.; Barthwal, R. MOSR and NDHA Genes Comprising G-Quadruplex as Promising Therapeutic Targets against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Molecular Recognition by Mitoxantrone Suppresses Replication and Gene Regulation. Genes 2023, 14, 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14050978

AMA Style

Dey A, Anand K, Singh A, Prasad R, Barthwal R. MOSR and NDHA Genes Comprising G-Quadruplex as Promising Therapeutic Targets against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Molecular Recognition by Mitoxantrone Suppresses Replication and Gene Regulation. Genes. 2023; 14(5):978. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14050978

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dey, Arpita, Kushi Anand, Amit Singh, Ramasare Prasad, and Ritu Barthwal. 2023. "MOSR and NDHA Genes Comprising G-Quadruplex as Promising Therapeutic Targets against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Molecular Recognition by Mitoxantrone Suppresses Replication and Gene Regulation" Genes 14, no. 5: 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14050978

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop