Next Article in Journal
High Levels of Diversity in Anopheles Subgenus Kerteszia Revealed by Species Delimitation Analyses
Previous Article in Journal
Characterizing the Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Three Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Harming Bamboo
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/genes14020343
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification, Evolutionary and Functional Analyses of WRKY Family Members in Ginkgo biloba

by
Weixing Li
1,2,
Nan Xiao
1,
Yawen Wang
1,
Ximeng Liu
1,
Zhaoyu Chen
1,
Xiaoyin Gu
1 and
Yadi Chen
1,*
1
College of Horticulture and Landscape, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
2
Jiangsu Provincial Engineering Research Center of Green Horticulture, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(2), 343; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020343
Submission received: 10 November 2022 / Revised: 7 January 2023 / Accepted: 26 January 2023 / Published: 28 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
WRKY transcription factors (TFs) are one of the largest families in plants which play essential roles in plant growth and stress response. Ginkgo biloba is a living fossil that has remained essentially unchanged for more than 200 million years, and now has become widespread worldwide due to the medicinal active ingredients in its leaves. Here, 37 WRKY genes were identified, which were distributed randomly in nine chromosomes of G. biloba. Results of the phylogenetic analysis indicated that the GbWRKY could be divided into three groups. Furthermore, the expression patterns of GbWRKY genes were analyzed. Gene expression profiling and qRT−PCR revealed that different members of GbWRKY have different spatiotemporal expression patterns in different abiotic stresses. Most of the GbWRKY genes can respond to UV-B radiation, drought, high temperature and salt treatment. Meanwhile, all GbWRKY members performed phylogenetic tree analyses with the WRKY proteins of other species which were known to be associated with abiotic stress. The result suggested that GbWRKY may play a crucial role in regulating multiple stress tolerances. Additionally, GbWRKY13 and GbWRKY37 were all located in the nucleus, while GbWRKY15 was located in the nucleus and cytomembrane.

1. Introduction

The family of WRKY is a unique superfamily transcription factor (TF) of higher plants and algae, which plays vital roles in many life processes, especially in the protection of biological and abiotic stress [1,2]. WRKY structure consists of two parts, the N-terminal DNA binding domain and the C-terminal zinc-finger structure [3]. As a typical transcription factor, WRKY responds to various cues by recognizing the W box (C/T) TGAC (C/T) or W box−like (TGAC [C/T]) cis−regulatory elements in the promoters of the target genes to promote or inhibit genes expression. The WRKY TF superfamily are classified by their possession of the WRKY domain. The WRKY domain is consistent with the highly conserved heptapeptide WRKYGQK, known as the WRKY motif. Some plants have variants of the WRKYGQK motif, including WRKYSEK and WRKYGEK. The zinc-finger structure mainly includes C2H2 and C2HC type [4], but some of them exist in the form of CX29HXH and CX7CX24HXC [5]. According to the number of WRKY domains and the structure of their zinc-finger motifs, WRKY can be divided into I~III groups [4]. Group I WRKY TFs contains two WRKY domains and the zinc-finger structure is C2H2. Group II contains two WRKY domains, and the zinc-finger structure is C2H2 which is further divided into IIa, IIb, IIc, IId, IIe. Group III contains two WRKY domain, and the zinc-finger structure is C2HC [3,4,6]. Among them, the Group III WRKY TFs are considered the most evolutionarily advanced and adaptable [7].
In 1994, SPF1 gene of WRKY family was first found in Impoea batatas [8]. With the development of genome sequencing technology, large numbers of WRKY have been identified in many plant species [5,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Plants often encounter adverse conditions, such as drought, critical temperature, and changes in light conditions. To adapt to these environments, plants have evolved complex mechanisms at many levels. At the molecular level, a large part of the genome is used for transcription. TFs are composed of a gene family of plant regulatory proteins with a wide range of expressions [19]. The WRKY protein is believed to regulate plant responses to abiotic stresses including cold, drought, heat, heavy metal toxicity, salt stress and UV-B radiation [20]. For example, AtWRKY25, AtWRKY26 could improve the tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana to high temperature stress [20,21]. GmWRKY54 of Soybean could inhibit the expression of STZ and regulated the response to salt stress through DREB2A−mediated pathway [22]. OsWRKY76 of rice showed negative regulatory effects under low temperature stress [23]. In addition, the physiological response regulated by WRKY also includes some signaling substances such as ethylene (ETH), abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellin (GA) [24]. Under drought stress, higher ABA levels were accumulated in plants and the stomata of leaves closed. AtWRKY63 of A. thaliana had a certain influence on ABA-mediated stomatal closure, thus affecting the drought response pathway [25]. The expression of AtWRKY25, AtWRKY26 and AtWRKY33 in A. thaliana could be induced by ETH, which regulates the expression of EIN2 under high temperature. Furthermore, it can effectively activate the ETH-mediated signal transduction pathway and make plants have relatively stronger heat tolerance [21]. G. biloba is native to China and is regarded as a living fossil. G. biloba leaves are rich in terpenoids, flavonoids and proanthocyanidins and have been used for herbal medicine in China for thousands of years [26,27]. After the quaternary glacial catastrophe, Ginkgo has been widely planted all over the world, showing strong environmental adaptability and tolerance to extreme conditions [28,29]. Liao et al. [30] identified 28 WRKY genes from the transcriptome data of G. biloba based on the conserved WRKY domain and zinc-finger structure for the first time. It pointed out that GbWRKY2 was preferentially expressed in flowers, and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) had a strong induction effect on it. GbWRKY2 and GbWRKY11 have been identified for sequence analysis, which revealed maximum gene expression in ovules and pollen cones, respectively. Subsequently, Liao [31] cloned and identified GbWRKY11, which is mainly expressed in female flowers and was induced by SA, ETH, ABA and other plant hormones, while the expression decreased under MeJA, salinity, low and high temperature treatment. GbWRKY20 encoded a newly cloned WRKY which responds to salt, drought, heat and plant hormones [32]. Guan [33] completed the whole genome sequencing of G. biloba in 2016. On this basis, 40 members of the WRKY family of G. biloba were identified in the latest research, and their expression patterns were explored by hormone and stress treatment [34]. In addition, some studies have shown that there are binding sites of WRKY protein in the promoter region of the ginkgolide biosynthesis gene, such as GbLPS [35], GbDXS [36], GbGGPPS [36], GbHMGR [37], GbIDS [38], GbMECP and GbMECT [39]. These studies provide a theoretical basis for the study of the anti-reversal function of Ginkgo WRKY family genes. However, due to the large Ginkgo genome and updated chromosome level in 2019, there are still many resistance genes not identified and the regulation of resistance is still unclear.
In the cultivation of G. biloba, abiotic stresses such as extreme temperature, salt and drought are the main limiting factors, which greatly affect the economic and ecological application [40]. Therefore, it is important to study the regulatory pathway and mechanisms of WRKY under abiotic stress. Through these studies, we can provide important gene resources for the cultivation of new stress resistant crop germplasm, which is conducive to the long-term and stable development of agriculture. In this study, to explore valuable evolutionary and functional information on the GbWRKY gene family in G. biloba, we identified 37 members of GbWRKY TF family of G. biloba, analyzed the expression patterns of GbWRKYs under five common abiotic stresses (high temperature, low temperature, drought, high salt, UV−B radiation), which provide references for the further study of the regulatory network of GbWRKY in abiotic stress response.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

The seeds of G. biloba used in this study were collected from Yangzhou University (32° 20′ N, 119° 30′ E). G. biloba seedlings were cultured in the growth chamber at 25 °C with 16 h light. When the seedlings developed 5–6 leaves after 2 months, the seedlings were treated by high temperature (40 °C), low temperature (4 °C), salt stress (100 mmol/L), UV−B radiation (35 μw/cm2) and drought stress. Seedlings treated with distilled water were used as the control. Leave tissues were harvested from each sample with three biological replicates. The harvested leaves were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for subsequent analysis.

2.2. Identification of WRKY Family Members in G. biloba

The Hidden Markov Model (HMM) [41] and a Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART) [42] were used in this study. The HMM profile was downloaded from Pfam protein family database. The domain contained in GbWRKY protein sequence was detected using the Hmmsearch program in HMMER software [43]. The results of the HMMER were screened to remove protein sequences that were 45% longer than the length of the HMM model domain, while retaining the longest protein sequence in the variable shear. All non-redundant protein sequences were retrieved and further analyzed with SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/, accessed on 5 November 2021). Finally, 37 protein sequences corresponding to WRKYfamilies with conserved structural domains were obtained and named based on their position on the chromosome.
The Secondary structures of WRKY domains were performed by the website (https://www.novopro.cn/tools/secondary-structure-prediction.html, accessed on 6 November 2021).

2.3. Chromosome Localization of GbWRKYs

The chromosomal localization information was extracted from the G. biloba genome database and visualized using TBtools [44].

2.4. Prediction of Physicochemical Properties and Subcellular Localization

The physicochemical properties such as numbers of amino acids, MW (molecular weights), pI (isoelectric points), GRAVY (grand average of hydropathicity) of GbWRKY proteins were computed using the ProtParam software [45] (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 5 December 2021). The theoretical protein subcellular localization was conducted by Plant-mPLoc [46] (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/, accessed on 8 December 2021) and ProtComp [47] (http://www.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=protcomppl&group=programs&subgroup=proloc, accessed on 15 December 2021).

2.5. Gene Duplication

The potential replication genes were identified using the replicate gene classifier program of MCScanX software [48]. All the coding gene protein sequences of the genome were aligned using blastp, and the alignment results were used as input files for MCScanX software for replication gene prediction. The gene was identified as a replication gene according to e-value < 1 × 10−5 or e-value < 1 × 10−10. Afterwards, the genes were divided into segmental replication, tandem replication, proximal replication, and decentralized replication.

2.6. Nonsynonymous and Synonymous Substitution Rate Ratio (Ka/Ks)

TBtools software were used to analysis the Ks (synonymous substitution) and Ka (non-synonymous substitution). The differentiation time of GbWRKY gene replication was estimated by referring to Shen and Yuan’s paper [49].

2.7. Protein Conserved Domains and Motif Analysis

Pfam were used to analyze the conserved structural domains and position information of WRKY proteins [44], and the protein’s conserved motifs were performed by the online tool MEME (http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/, accessed on 20 December 2021). Tbtools were used for presenting the results.

2.8. Closely Related Species Analysis

The protein files of Ginkgo, Arabidopsis, rice, Selaginella and Picea were downloaded from PlantTFDB (http://planttfdb.gao-lab.org/, accessed on 24 December 2021). On this basis, the method for identification of GbWRKY proteins was used to search for WRKY members of other species. A total of 162 WRKY proteins were identified, including 60 members of Arabidopsis, 37 members in Ginkgo, 39 members in rice, 24 members in Selaginella, and 50 members in Picea. These protein sequences were used to construct phylogenetic trees and multiple sequence alignment [50]. Phylogenetic tree construction was based on ML (maximum likelihood) method [51] and via the IQ-TREE software [52,53] with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

2.9. Prediction of Promoter Cis-Acting Elements

The promoter sequences of target genes were extracted from the G. biloba genome, and cis-acting elements were predicted through the PlantCARE online tools.

2.10. RNA Extraction and Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from G. biloba tissues after different stress treatments. RNA samples were processed according to the manufacturer’s ((Perfect Real Time, Takara, Japan) instructions. T Specific primers for RT-PCR were listed in Table S2, GbGAPDH were used as reference genes [54,55]. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used for expression calculations [56].

3. Results

3.1. Identification of GbWRKY Transcription Factor Members in G. biloba

The WRKY family genes in G. biloba genome were identified by the HMMER3.0 software [43]. In total, 37 candidate WRKY genes were detected based on the chromosomal locations, the candidate GbWRKY genes were provisionally named GbWRKY1 to GbWRKY37 (Table 1).
The physiological and chemical characteristics of the GbWRKY members were investigated, including CDS (Coding Sequence), the protein molecular weight (MW) and isoelectric point (pI). The gene transcripts of the candidate GbWRKY genes range in size from 396 bp (GbWRKY23) to 3123 bp (GbWRKY36), encoding 131 to 1041 amino acids, respectively. pI distributions of GbWRKY proteins ranged from 4.72 (GbWRKY19) to 9.66 (GbWRKY14), indicating that the GbWRKY family members might play a role in different cellular microenvironments. The subcellular localization prediction results showed that most GbWRKY family members were nuclear localization proteins, and while one member existed in the extracellular space (GbWRKY24). The grand average of the hydropathicity (GRAVY) data of GbWRKY genes were negative, implicating hydrophilicity.

3.2. Chromosome Distribution and Gene Duplication Analysis of GbWRKY Genes

The chromosomal location analyses, using Circos software [57], revealed that 37 candidate GbWRKY genes were unevenly distributed across nine chromosomes (1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11Chr.), while GbWRKY37 was located on scaffold1055 (Figure 1a). The largest number of GbWRKY genes was observed in Chr. 1 (11), followed by Chr. 7 (6), Chr. 3 (4) and Chr. 5 (4), Chr. 4 (3), Chr. 8 (3) and Chr. 9 (3). On the contrary, Chr. 10 and Chr. 11 contained only one GbWRKY gene.
Gene duplication is one of the most important evolutionary processes producing new genetic material, and therefore new biological functions. Additionally, gene duplication promotes adaptation and speciation [58]. Underwent a genome duplication event, we found that among the 37 GbWRKY genes, GbWRKY3/GbWRKY4 on Chr.1 (location: 1053.17 Mb/1053.57 Mb), GbWRKY8/GbWRKY9 on Chr.1 (location: 1075.92 Mb/1077.67 Mb), GbWRKY23/GbWRKY24 on Chr.7 (location: 537.10 Mb/537.46 Mb), and GbWRKY27/GbWRKY28 on Chr.7 (location: 687.80 Mb/688.43 Mb) were tandem duplications (Figure 1a,b), by the definition of tandem replication [59]. Furthermore, 20 of 37 GbWRKY genes were dispersed, there are eight genes that were proximal copies, and one singleton gene (Figure 1a,b). In addition, the results of collinearity analysis of G. biloba showed that there were no collinearity pairs in the GbWRKY genes (Figure 1c).
The ratio of Ka (non-synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous site) to Ks (synonymous substitutions per synonymous site) is a valid indicator for examining positive selection pressure after gene replication is an effective indicator to test the positive selection pressure after gene duplication, meanwhile it provides inference for potential date of duplication events [60]. The GbWRKY3/GbWRKY4, GbWRKY8/GbWRKY9, GbWRKY23/GbWRKY24, GbWRKY27/GbWRKY28 Ka/Ks ratio were less than one (Table 2), suggesting that these four pairs of duplicated genes have undergone purification and elimination during evolution. The earliest divergence time between GbWRKY3 and GbWRKY4, GbWRKY8 and GbWRKY9 was around 0.47 million years ago (Mya), while GbWRKY23/GbWRKY24, GbWRKY27/GbWRKY28 began to diverge around 0.2 million years ago.

3.3. Structure and Sequence Alignment and Classification of GbWRKY Protein

According to the number of WRKY conserved domains and the type of zinc-finger structure, the WRKY proteins in A. thaliana were used to determine the grouping situation. Compared with Arabidopsis type Ⅰ clan, II clan, and III clan, the GbWRKY proteins are divided into three types: Ⅰ~III. The II type can be further divided into four subgroups based on the differences of WRKY conserved domain: IIb ~IIe. Group I include nine genes, these genes have zinc-finger structure types of C-X4-5-C-X22-23-H-X1-H (C2H2). Most of the GbWRKY genes belong to the II group, including 29 genes. Among the II group, each subgroup (IIb, IId, and IIe) contains four genes, while IIc includes 14 members, representing the largest subgroup (Figure 2a).
The structure type of the zinc finger of IId and IIe is C-X5-C-X23-H-X-H, IIb is C-X6-C-X29-H-X-H, and IIc is C-X4-C-X23-H-X-H. Group III has the lowest number of members and two genes in total, including GbWRKY3 and GbWRKY4. The structure type of the zinc finger is C-X4-C-X23-H-X-H. The protein sequence of GbWRKY34 was missing, but combined with the previous genome sequence, we finally classified it as a member of I group according to its characteristics. In addition, GbWRKY31, GbWRKY24, GbWRKY26 and GbWRKY27 have deletion or redundancy of protein sequences (Figure 2b). According to the evolutionary relationship of phylogenetic tree (Figure S1), it is speculated that the groups are I group, IIc group and IId group, respectively.
Sequence alignment software DNAMAN was used to compare the WRKY conserved domain of 37 GbWRKY proteins. GbWRKY12 in IIc group and GbWRKY25 in I group contain WRKYGKK structure, GbWRKY33 of IIb group contain WQKYGQK structure, GbWRKY30 and GbWRKY29 of IIc group contain WRKYGRK structure, GbWRKY10, GbWRKY5, GbWRKY9, GbWRKY8, GbWRKY7 and GbWRKY6 contain WRKYGEK structure, and GbWRKY35 of IIe group contain WRKYAQK structure (Figure 2). These may have mutated during evolution.

3.4. Phylogenetic Analysis, Conserved Motifs and Exon−Intron Organization of GbWRKY Family Members

The phylogenetic analysis of the 37 GbWRKY protein sequences was carried out by IQ-TREE [52,53] to further investigate the evolution relationship of GbWRKY members (Figure S2a). Furthermore, we analyzed the number and length of the GbWRKY gene introns and exons. The number of introns ranged from 1 to 19; in addition, the size of introns showed some extents of difference, as shown in Figure S2b. Compared with GbWRKY34, GbWRKY23 and GbWRKY7, GbWRKY36 and GbWRKY32 had longer introns.
Although most closely related genes showed high similarity and conservation in structures, there are still some differences in the numbers and length of introns among some phylogenetic ally related members. GbWRKY17 and GbWRKY16 were related genes according to the polygenetic analysis, they had three or two short introns, while GbWRKY36 had 16 longer introns, which may cause the expression pattern and function of GbWRKY36 to be different from that of GbWRKY17 and GbWRKY16. Moreover, from the distribution position of exons in nucleic acid sequence, the exon length of genes with more exons is generally shorter, and the distribution of exons in full-length sequence is more dispersed than that of other GbWRKY family members. On the other hand, the exon length of genes with fewer exons is generally longer, and the distribution of exons on the full-length sequence is more compact. In addition, none of the 37 GbWRKY family members had UTR structure. The GbWRKY proteins contain 15 conserved components, and 36 members all have the typical heptapeptide conserved domain (Figure S2b). Most of the members included Motif1 except for GbWRKY16, GbWRKY33, and GbWRKY34, all members contain Motif2. The motif sequences are listed in Table S1.

3.5. Conserved Domain Evolution of G. biloba and Multispecies WRKY Proteins

G. biloba has a special evolutionary relationship, which is a single family, a single genus, and a single species [61]. Then, we investigated the duplication and diversification of GbWRKY gene family. A phylogenetic tree of WRKY complete protein sequences from five representative species, including one monocot (Oryza sativa), one eudicot (A. thaliana) and three ferns (Selaginella moellendorffii, gymnosperm, and Picea abies), was constructed using MEGA 5.0 (Figure 3). In general, the number of GbWRKY genes is similar to the P. abies, and significantly lower than A. thaliana and O. sativa, while the S. moellendorffii WRKY gene are significantly lower than that of gymnosperms and angiosperms. The phylogenetic analysis suggested that the number of WRKY genes is between species. For example, in Group III, the G. biloba WRKY gene family contains two members: GbWRKY3 and GbWRKY4, and the S. moellendorffii and P. abies also contain two members, while the Arabidopsis and O. sativa contain 14 and 12 family members, respectively. There are also many branches of evolution with high self-extension values that often contain the same numbers of WRKY genes from each species, suggesting that these WRKY genes may have existed before the species divergence. For example, OsWRKY5, OsWRKY1, AtWRKY31, AtWRKY42, AtWRKY6, and AtWRKY47. Some branches lack GbWRKY genes, such as the Group IIa branch, this supports that IIa genes are the most recent evolutionary generation [7]. This might be due to the loss of the corresponding WRKY member in G. biloba during the evolutionary process or caused by problems in the assembly or annotation of genomic data. In addition, WRKY genes with direct homologous relationships tend to be clustered together more than those with collateral homologous relationships, such as GbWRKY10, GbWRKY5, GbWRKY9, GbWRKY8, GbWRKY7, and GbWRKY6 genes in G. biloba.
The expression pattern of GbWRKY genes in different tissues showed that the expression levels of individual members of this gene family varied significantly in various tissues (Figure 4). GbWRKY16/17/18/22/37 in Group I were closely related WRKY genes on the phylogenetic tree, and they were highly expressed in all tissues under study. In Group IIc, the gene expression levels in all tissues were generally lower than that of others, such as GbWRKY5, GbWRKY6, GbWRKY9 and GbWRKY10. In Group IId, GbWRKY27 and GbWRKY28 showed lower expression in multiple tissues, while GbWRKY14 and GbWRKY20 in the same group were highly expressed in all tissues. GbWRKY20/37 showed in male or female flowers, implying that these genes may play an important role in flower formation and development. However, some of the members such as GbWRKY13/14/16/17/18/19/20/22/36 were highly expressed in vegetative tissues, inferring that they may participate in the regulation of plant vegetative growth. Most of the GbWRKY genes were expressed highly in roots, such as GbWRKY8, which was expressed at higher rates in roots than in other organs, suggesting their possible involvement in G. biloba root development. On the contrary, GbWRKY5, GbWRKY9, and GbWRKY10 in Group IIc, three closely related WRKY genes on the phylogenetic tree, have low expression in roots. In addition, some closely related GbWRKYs genes have different expression patterns, for example, GbWRKY8 and GbWRKY9 were predicted in tandem duplication but they differed in expression patterns. GbWRKY8 was mainly expressed in roots, while GbWRKY9 was highly expressed in male flowers (Figure 4a).
To validate the reliability of RNA−Seq and DGE data, qRT−PCR assays were randomly performed on six selected genes (Figure 4b). As expected, in our study, we found that the relative expressions of all the test genes are highly expression in roots. The expression trends of the selected genes are consistent with the presented data, indicating that the DGE and RNA−seq data were highly reliable.

3.6. Analysis of Cis−Acting Elements in the Promoter Region of GbWRKYs

We analyzed the cis−acting elements in the 2000 bp sequence of the promoter region by using the PlantCARE online tool. Fifteen types cis−acting elements associated with responses to environmental stresses and plant hormones were identified in all GbWRKY promoters, such as defense and stress responsive element (TC-rich repeats), drought responsive element (MBS), and ABA response element (ABRE) (Figure 5). These results suggested that GbWRKYs may play a crucial role in plant growth and stress responses.

3.7. RNA−Seq Expression Analysis of GbWRKY Genes under Different Stress

To detect the expression of GbWRKY in different tissues, we performed RNA sequencing analysis using whole G. biloba with treatments [62,63]. As shown in Figure 6, most of the GbWRKY genes could respond to abiotic stress. The number of up-regulated GbWRKYs induced by salt and UV-B radiation was higher than that of down-regulated GbWRKYs. The GbWRKY13/14/19/25/26 expression levels were induced under both salt stress and UV-B radiation, while GbWRKY1/15/23 were down-regulated under both treatments compared with the control. In addition, GbWRKY4/7/8/12/32 were dominantly GbWRKY genes during high temperature stress. Furthermore, closely related genes had similar expression patterns. For example, the GbWRKY16 and GbWRKY17 genes of Group I are closely related, and their expression patterns are similar under different abiotic stresses. They are down−regulated under drought and high temperature stress, and up-regulated under UV−B radiation, while some genes have different degree of response to different abiotic stresses. The expression level of GbWRKY4 was increased under salt, high temperature and UV−B radiation, while GbWRKY3 displayed decreased expression under these treatments compared with the control. The expression levels of GbWRKY5/9/10/27/28/31/33/34 were very low in these treatments.

3.8. Expression Patterns of GbWRKY Genes Verified by qRT−PCR under Different Stresses

Based on the cis-acting elements analysis, the promoters of GbWRKYs contain a large number cis-acting elements which are related to stress. In our study, we conducted a variety of adverse treatments on G. biloba and analyzed the expression changes of WRKY genes. We found that GbWRKY genes were differentially expressed under different stress treatments. Under drought stress, the expressions of GbWRKY4, GbWRKY13, GbWRKY18 and GbWRKY37 were significantly up−regulation, and the expressions of GbWRKY1, GbWRKY11, GbWRKY21 and GbWRKY24 were significantly down-regulation. Under salt stress, GbWRKY4 and GbWRKY37 were significantly up-regulation, and GbWRKY11, GbWRKY15, GbWRKY21 and GbWRKY29 were significantly down-regulation. Under high temperature stress, GbWRKY12, GbWRKY13, GbWRKY15, GbWRKY17, GbWRKY18, GbWRKY21, GbWRKY23, and GbWRKY37 were significantly down-regulation. Under UV−B radiation, GbWRKY6 was significantly up-regulation and GbWRKY23 was significantly down-regulation (Figure 7). The results of fluorescence quantification were consistent with the transcriptome data. Among the differentially expressed genes, GbWRKY11, GbWRKY13, GbWRKY15, GbWRKY18, GbWRKY21, and GbWRKY37 could respond to multiple abiotic stresses.

3.9. Analysis of WRKY Gene Evolution Tree of G. biloba WRKY Family and Different Species with Known Abiotic Stress

To identify the stress-responsiveness GbWRKY genes, phylogenetic tree analysis was performed between 37 family members and WRKY genes related to known abiotic stress in other species. In extreme temperature stress, the related genes of phylogenetic tree analysis showed that the ginkgo GbWRKY15 with rice OsWRKY11, the ginkgo GbWRKY18 with grape VvWRKY24, and the ginkgo GbWRKY37 and Arabidopsis AtWRKY34 are close relatives (Figure 8), suggesting that these three genes in ginkgo might resist extreme temperature stress. The phylogenetic tree analysis of genes related to salt and drought stress showed that ginkgo GbWRKY15 was closely related to Arabidopsis AtWRKY8, and ginkgo GbWRKY13 was closely related to rice OsWRKY72, suggesting that these two genes played an important role in salt tolerance and drought resistance of G. biloba (Figure 9a,b). In addition, the GbWRKY family was far related to the rice OsWRKY89 gene associated with UV-B radiation (Figure 9c). The transcriptomic data and fluorescence quantitative results speculated that four genes of the GbWRKY family (GbWRKY13, GbWRKY15, GbWRKY18 and GbWRKY37) could be a response to abiotic stress such as extreme temperature, salt damage and drought, and GbWRKY6 and GbWRKY23 are involved in response to UV-B radiation.

3.10. Subcellular Localization of GbWRKY13/15/37

Since subcellular localization information can provide some clues for protein function research, GbWRKY13, GbWRKY15, and GbWRKY37 may play important role in abiotic stress. We cloned the GbWRKY13, GbWRKY15, and GbWRKY37 full−length CDS sequence. The sequence of GbWRKY13 and GbWRKY15 are consistent with the reference sequence, GbWRKY37 expected length is 2586 bp, and the actual sequencing length is 1173 bp (Figure S3), it may be due to the duplication of micro-fragments that lead to the misassembled of the assembly. The full−length CDS without the termination codon was fused in−frame to the 5′ end of the GFP gene under the control of the CaMV 35s promoter (Figure 10a). The recombined vector pK2GW7-GbWRKY-GFP was transfected into tobacco leaves. Confocal microscopy revealed that GFP control displayed ubiquitous distribution in the whole cell, while the fusion protein GbWRKY13/37−GFP was detected specifically in the nucleus (Figure 10b). Furthermore, the results showed that GbWRKY15 protein was localized to the cytomembrane and nucleus.

4. Discussion

WRKY proteins have been proven to be important regulators in numerous processes of plants. Chromosomal localization analysis showed that, except for chromosomes 2, 6, and 12, GbWRKY distributed on the remaining 9 chromosomes (non-uniform distribution) (Figure 1). GbWRKY37 could not determine the chromosome, this phenomenon was also found in grapes [64]. In the long-term evolution, Ginkgo needs to face natural selections resulting in the deletion of the WRKY gene on chromosomes 2, 6, and 12; or it could be due to the accuracy of this genome sequencing. Tandem duplication of WRKY transcription factors is common in many plants, such as Arabidopsis, rice, poplar, grape [64,65,66]. In this study, there were eight genes that were in tandem duplication in G. biloba WRKY family members. It can provide some references for the in-depth study of the similarities and differences of the duplicated gene.
Previous research have uncovered the functions of WRKY genes in many plant species, such as Arabidopsis, tomato, rice, and pineapple. WRKY exist as gene families in plants, and the WRKY genes in different species were uneven. Herein, 37 members of GbWRKY genes were discovered at the chromosome level which is more than 28 candidate WRKY genes were identified in G. biloba in a previous study [30]. The number of GbWRKY in G. biloba is lower than that in other plants, such as Arabidopsis [67], O. sativa [10], Solanum lycopersicum [5], Pinus monticola [13], Populus [68], but is higher than that in Platycodon grandiflorus [69]. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that the GbWRKYs can be classified into three primary groups (I, II, and III) and five subgroups (IIa, IIb, IIc, IId, and IIe) based on the conserved WRKY gene domain along with the zinc-finger motif. There were 9 GbWRKYs in Group I, 26 in group II, and 2 in group III (Figure 2). The WRKY genes distribution among different plants was different. Grape has a large group II [70], and a similar WRKY distribution was found in Ginseng [71]. The group III has more members in Arabidopsis, maize and rice compared to that in other plants [72,73,74]. WRKY genes are thought to play an important role in plant evolution and adaptation [75]. Because of the fewer genes in group III compared with other plants, the GbWRKY expansion in G. biloba may be caused by the expansion of other WRKY groups.
Most WRKY proteins in G. biloba contain a highly conserved heptapeptide (WRKYGQK) at the N-terminus DNA binding domain, while variants WRKYGKK was found in GbWRKY12 and GbWRKY25. Furthermore, GbWRKY5, GbWRKY6, GbWRKY7, GbWRKY8, GbWRKY9, and GbWRKY10 which belong to the IIc group have the heptapeptide variant (WRKYGEK), consistent with the mutant form commonly found in rice. GbWRKY29 and GbWRKY30 belong to the IIc group and contain WRKYGRK variation, GbWRKY33 contains WQKYGQK variation, and GbWRKY35 contains WRKYAQK variation (Figure 2), which may be mutated during evolution and belong to new mutants. Variants were also found in Arabidopsis, apple, peach and other plants, indicating the diversity of plant WRKY gene family in the evolutionary process. The variation might affect the ability of WRKY genes to bind to the W-box. For example, the variants appeared in soybean and Nicotiana tabacum do not properly bind to the W-box [76,77]. All GbWRKY proteins contained more than two conserved motifs, consistent with studies from other plant species [78,79]. The members distributed in each group had the same or similar motif composition, suggesting that WRKY genes in the same group have similar protein structures and biological functions.
Plant WRKY proteins belong to the superfamily of zinc finger transcription factors and are plant specific [80]. Although the WRKY gene is regarded as a transcription factor unique to vegetation, it is also present in some non-plant species, such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Dictyostelium and Giardia lamblia [6,81,82]. The WRKY genes contained in these three species and lower species such as mosses and gymnosperms cycads belong to family I, indicating that family I WRKY may be the ancestral class of the WRKY family [1]. Some studies suggest that the model WRKY gene containing a single WRKY structural region generates family I WRKY genes after domain cycling, followed by loss of the N-terminal domain to generate family IIc genes, and family III is the last evolution [58]. However, with the release of the genome sequences of Moss [12] and Selaginella [83], it was found that the genomes of Selaginella japonicus and moss all have Group III genes, while the genomes of S. japonicus are missing Group IIa genes, indicating that Group IIa genes are the most important. Late evolution produced [6] G. biloba was only left in China after the quaternary glacier catastrophe, and its evolution status is controversial because of its morphological characteristics different from other gymnosperms. Due to its special evolutionary status, this study compared the sequences of G. biloba with the gymnosperm Norway spruce, the fern S. japonicus, the monocotyledonous plant rice, and the dicotyledonous plant A. thaliana. The number of WRKY gene families is close, significantly lower than that of rice and Arabidopsis WRKY genes. The number of WRKY genes in S. japonicus was significantly lower than that in angiosperms and gymnosperms (Figure 3). It is inferred that the seed plants acquired new genes in the evolution process of lower plants, and at the same time, there was a loss and gain of individual genes in the evolution process of their respective species. Interestingly, similar to Jiangnan Selaginella [83], the G. biloba WRKY gene only lacks Group IIa genes, and our results support that Group IIa genes evolved last.
RNA−seq is an important approach for gene function to uncover new molecular aspects of particular processes. RNA−seq results indicated that GbWRKYs have different expression patterns in the eight tissues. These results suggested that GbWRKYs may perform a wide range of functions during the G. biloba lifecycle. Among 37 GbWRKY genes, 33 GbWRKYs were expressed in at least one tissue, and the GbWRKYs expression levels were diverse. In all the 37 G. biloba WRKY genes detected in this study, 17 genes, including GbWRKY13, GbWRKY16, GbWRKY18, and GbWRKY20, were highly expressed in roots, stems, leaves, flowers, and fruits. In addition, some genes displayed specific expression patterns. For instance, GbWRKY27 and GbWRKY28 displayed lower expression in multiple tissues, while GbWRKY14 and GbWRKY20 in the same group were expressed at a higher rate in almost all tissues. GbWRKY20 and GbWRKY37 showed in male or female flowers, other members such as GbWRKY13/14/16/17/18/19/20/22/36 showed high expression levels in vegetative organs, such as roots, stems, and leaves. Most of the GbWRKY genes were highly expressed in roots, such as GbWRKY8. On the contrary, GbWRKY5, GbWRKY9, and GbWRKY10 in Group IIc have low expression in roots (Figure 4), it is presumed that these GbWRKY genes may play crucial roles in these organs. These tissue-specific expression patterns suggest that GbWRKY is possibly involved in different tissue development.
During the long-term evolution, the plants have to deal with various environmental stimulates, such as salt, drought or UV−B radiation. Previous studies have suggested that WRKY genes play a crucial role in the response to abiotic stress [2,40]. For instance, 7 GbWRKYs responded to drought treatment, 5 GbWRKYs responded to salt treatment, 16 GbWRKYs changed under high temperature, and 7 GbWRKYs changed under UV-B radiation. Some genes such as GbWRKY1, GbWRKY11, GbWRKY29 responded to all treatments. These WRKY may be the central TFs response to environmental stress (Figure 6). In tobacco, overexpression of TaWRKY44 could enhance tobacco drought stress and salt stress [84]. GmWRKY21 and GmWRKY54 overexpression plants display enhanced salt, drought, and cold tolerance [22]. The GbWRKYs may play crucial roles in enhancing the tolerance of environmental stress. Furthermore, combined with transcriptome data, fluorescence quantitative results and phylogenetic tree analysis, it is speculated that four genes in the ginkgo WRKY family, GbWRKY4, GbWRKY12, and GbWRKY32, play important roles in responding to abiotic stresses. (Figure 6). In tobacco, overexpression of TaWRKY44 could enhance tobacco osmotic stress, salt stress and drought stress [84]. Overexpression of GmWRKY21 and GmWRKY54 shows enhanced salt, drought, and cold tolerance [22]. The GbWRKYs may play a crucial role in enhancing the tolerance of abiotic stress. Furthermore, combined with transcriptome data, fluorescence quantitative results and phylogenetic tree analysis, it is speculated that four genes in the ginkgo WRKY family, GbWRKY4, GbWRKY12, and GbWRKY32, play a key role in responding to abiotic stresses such as extreme temperature, salinity, and drought. GbWRKY6 and GbWRKY15 play a role in responding to UV-B radiation, and these genes can respond rapidly to stress treatment (Figure 8 and Figure 9). In addition, the functions of different types of WRKY transcription factors also have different emphases, and there are also differences in the way of regulating and controlling physiological metabolism [80]. Subcellular localization prediction and experimental results show that GbWRKY13, GbWRKY15, and GbWRKY37 are localized in the nucleus and have strong fluorescence (Figure 10), indicating that these three genes mainly play a regulatory role in the nucleus, which is consistent with transcription factor properties.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we performed genome-wide identification of WRKY genes in G. biloba and their expression patterns in different tissues and responses to different stresses. A total of 37 WRKY family genes with three groups were identified in the genomes of G. biloba. Molecular evolutionary analysis showed that the WRKY gene structures were conserved in G. biloba. Gene expression profiling and qRT−PCR revealed that different groups of GbWRKYs have distinct spatiotemporal patterns of expression in normal conditions or when subjected to extreme temperature, salinity, and drought and UV−B radiation. Notably, we found a variety of cis−acting elements with diverse biological functions in the promoters of these genes, transcriptome data and qRT−PCR experiments confirmed that they have vital roles in hormone signaling to regulate the tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses in G. biloba. The extensive annotation and expression analysis of the GbWRKYs contributes to our understanding of the functions of these genes in multiple stress responses and phytohormone crosstalk.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14020343/s1, Figure S1: The phylogenetic tree of WRKY proteins from Ginkgo along with protein sequences from Arabidopsis; Figure S2: Characterization of GbWRKY genes; Figure S3: PCR amplification gels of candidate genes; Table S1: Conserved sequences of specific motifs of each subfamily; Table S2: Primer sequences of qRT-PCR; Table S3: Primer sequences for vector construction.

Author Contributions

W.L.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review& editing. N.X.: Writing—review& editing, Software, Formal analysis. Y.W. and X.L.: Data curation. Z.C.: Supervision. X.G.: Writing—review& editing. Y.C.: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review& editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China: 31971408. The Central Finance of Forestry Science and Technology Promotion Demonstration Funds of China: Su[2022]TG09.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the results of this article are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ülker, B.; Somssich, I.E. WRKY transcription factors: From DNA binding towards biological function. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Pandey, S.P.; Somssich, I.E. The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 1648–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Phukan, U.J.; Jeena, G.S.; Shukla, R.K. WRKY transcription factors: Molecular regulation and stress responses in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, S.; Gao, Y.; Liu, J.; Peng, X.; Niu, X.; Fei, Z.; Cao, S.; Liu, Y. Genome-wide analysis of WRKY transcription factors in Solanum lycopersicum. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2012, 287, 495–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rushton, P.J.; Somssich, I.E.; Ringler, P.; Shen, Q.J. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rinerson, C.I.; Rabara, R.C.; Tripathi, P.; Shen, Q.J.; Rushton, P.J. The evolution of WRKY transcription factors. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Rushton, P.J.; Macdonald, H.; Huttly, A.K.; Lazarus, C.M.; Hooley, R. Members of a new family of DNA-binding proteins bind to a conserved cis-element in the promoters of α-Amy2 genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 1995, 29, 691–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chen, F.; Hu, Y.; Vannozzi, A.; Wu, K.; Cai, H.; Qin, Y.; Mullis, A.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, L. The WRKY transcription factor family in model plants and crops. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2007, 36, 311–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ross, C.A.; Liu, Y.; Shen, Q.J. The WRKY gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 827–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mangelsen, E.; Kilian, J.; Berendzen, K.W.; Kolukisaoglu, Ü.H.; Harter, K.; Jansson, C.; Wanke, D. Phylogenetic and comparative gene expression analysis of barley (Hordeum vulgare) WRKY transcription factor family reveals putatively retained functions between monocots and dicots. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Rensing, S.A.; Lang, D.; Zimmer, A.D.; Terry, A.; Salamov, A.; Shapiro, H.; Nishiyama, T.; Perroud, P.F.; Lindquist, E.A.; Kamisugi, Y.; et al. The Physcomitrella genome reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science 2008, 319, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Liu, J.J.; Ekramoddoullah, A.K. Identification and characterization of the WRKY transcription factor family in Pinus monticola. Genome 2009, 52, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Schmutz, J.; Cannon, S.B.; Schlueter, J.; Ma, J.; Mitros, T.; Nelson, W.; Hyten, D.L.; Song, Q.; Thelen, J.J.; Cheng, J.; et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010, 463, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ling, J.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, H.; Mao, Z.; Gu, X.; Huang, S.; Xie, B. Genome-wide analysis of WRKY gene family in Cucumis sativus. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Wei, K.F.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.F.; Wu, L.J.; Xie, D.X. Molecular phylogenetic and expression analysis of the complete WRKY transcription factor family in maize. DNA Res. 2012, 19, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, K.; Liu, X.; He, F.; Chen, S.; Zhou, G.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, S.L.; Ren, M.; Yuan, Y. Genome-wide analysis of the Tritipyrum WRKY gene family and the response of TtWRKY256 in salt-tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Huang, X.; Li, K.; Xu, X.; Yao, Z.; Jin, C.; Zhang, S. Genome-wide analysis of WRKY transcription factors in white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) reveals evolution and patterns under drought stress. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jiang, J.; Ma, S.; Ye, N.; Jiang, M.; Cao, J.; Zhang, J. WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jiang, Y.; Deyholos, M.K. Functional characterization of Arabidopsis NaCl-inducible WRKY25 and WRKY33 transcription factors in abiotic stresses. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, S.; Fu, Q.; Chen, L.; Huang, W.; Yu, D. Arabidopsis thaliana WRKY25, WRKY26, and WRKY33 coordinate induction of plant thermotolerance. Planta 2011, 233, 1237–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhou, Q.Y.; Tian, A.G.; Zou, H.F.; Xie, Z.M.; Lei, G.; Huang, J.; Wang, C.M.; Wang, H.W.; Zhang, J.S.; Chen, S.Y. Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2008, 6, 486–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yokotani, N.; Sato, Y.; Tanabe, S.; Chujo, T.; Shimizu, T.; Okada, K.; Yamane, H.; Nishizawa, Y.; Shimono, M.; Sugano, S.; et al. WRKY76 is a rice transcriptional repressor playing opposite roles in blast disease resistance and cold stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 5085–5097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Puccio, G.; Crucitti, A.; Tiberini, A.; Mauceri, A.; Taglienti, A.; Palumbo, P.A.; Carimi, F.; Kaauwen, M.; Scholten, O.; Sunseri, F.; et al. WRKY Gene Family Drives Dormancy Release in Onion Bulbs. Cells 2022, 11, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ren, X.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Q.; Hong, X.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z. ABO3, a WRKY transcription factor, mediates plant responses to abscisic acid and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010, 63, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Mahady, G.B. Ginkgo biloba for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease: A review of the literature. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2002, 16, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yao, P.; Song, F.; Li, K.; Zhou, S.; Liu, S.; Sun, X.; Nussler, A.; Liu, L. Ginkgo biloba extract prevents ethanol induced dyslipidemia. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2007, 35, 643–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, L.; Cui, J.; Jin, B.; Zhao, J.; Xu, H.; Lu, Z.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Lin, L.; Liang, E.; et al. Multifeature analyses of vascular cambial cells reveal longevity mechanisms in old Ginkgo biloba trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 2201–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Kosaki, Y.; Naito, H.; Nojima, T.; Nakao, A. Epileptic seizure from ginkgo nut intoxication in an adult. Case Rep. Emerg. Med. 2020, 2020, 5072954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Liao, Y.L.; Shen, Y.B.; Chang, J.; Zhang, W.W.; Cheng, S.Y.; Xu, F. Isolation, expression, and promoter analysis of GbWRKY2: A novel transcription factor gene from Ginkgo biloba. Int. J. Genom. 2015, 2015, 607185. [Google Scholar]
  31. Liao, Y.L.; Xu, F.; Zang, W.W.; Cheng, S.Y.; Shen, Y.B.; Chang, J. Cloning, characterization and expression analysis of GbWRKY11, a novel transcription factor gene in Ginkgo biloba. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2016, 18, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, T.; Yang, X.; Wang, G.; Cao, F. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of a WRKY transcription factor gene, GbWRKY20, from Ginkgo biloba. Plant Signal. Behav. 2021, 16, 1930442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Guan, R.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H.E.; Fan, G.; Liu, X.; Zhou, W.; Shi, C.; Wang, J.; Liu, W.; Liang, X.; et al. Draft genome of the living fossil Ginkgo biloba. Gigascience 2016, 5, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Cheng, S.; Liu, X.; Liao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ye, J.; Rao, S.; Xu, F. Genome-wide identification of WRKY family genes and analysis of their expression in response to abiotic stress in Ginkgo biloba L. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 2019, 47, 1100–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kim, J.H.; Lee, K.I.; Chang, Y.J.; Kim, S.U. Developmental pattern of Ginkgo biloba levopimaradiene synthase (GbLPS) as probed by promoter analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, F.; Huang, X.H.; Li, L.L.; Deng, G.; Cheng, H.; Rong, X.F.; Li, J.B.; Cheng, S.Y. Molecular cloning and characterization of GbDXS and GbGGPPS gene promoters from Ginkgo biloba. Genet. Mol. Res. 2013, 12, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liao, Y.; Xu, F.; Huang, X.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, H.; Linling, L.I.; Cheng, S.; Shen, Y. Promoter analysis and transcriptional profiling of Ginkgo biloba 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase (GbHMGR) gene in abiotic stress responses. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 2015, 43, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kang, M.K.; Nargis, S.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, S.U. Distinct expression patterns of two Ginkgo biloba 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate reductase/isopentenyl diphospahte synthase (HDR/IDS) promoters in Arabidopsis model. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 62, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cheng, S.Y.; Li, L.L.; Yuan, H.H.; Xu, F.; Cheng, H. Molecular cloning and characterization of GbMECT and GbMECP gene promoters from Ginkgo biloba. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 15112–15122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chang, B.; Ma, K.; Lu, Z.; Lu, J.; Cui, J.; Wang, L.; Jin, B. Physiological, transcriptomic, and metabolic responses of Ginkgo biloba L. to drought, salt, and heat stresses. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Punta, M.; Coggill, P.C.; Eberhardt, R.Y.; Mistry, J.; Tate, J.; Boursnell, C.; Pang, N.; Forslund, K.; Ceric, G.; Clements, J.; et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D290–D301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schultz, J.; Milpetz, F.; Bork, P.; Ponting, C.P. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: Identification of signaling domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 5857–5864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Mistry, J.; Finn, R.D.; Eddy, S.R.; Bateman, A.; Punta, M. Challenges in homology search: HMMER3 and convergent evolution of coiled-coil regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, e121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gasteiger, E.; Gattiker, A.; Hoogland, C.; Ivanyi, I.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3784–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Chou, K.C.; Shen, H.B. Plant-mPLoc: A top-down strategy to augment the power for predicting plant protein subcellular localization. PloS ONE 2015, 5, e11335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Jing, L.; Guo, D.; Hu, W.; Niu, X. The prediction of a pathogenesis-related secretome of Puccinia helianthi through high-throughput transcriptome analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2017, 18, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; DeBarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Shen, C.; Yuan, J. Genome-wide investigation and expression analysis of K+-transport-related gene families in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis). Biochem. Genet. 2021, 59, 256–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: A multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinform. 2004, 5, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Terwilliger, T.C. Maximum-likelihood density modification. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2000, 56, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; Von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Minh, B.Q.; Schmidt, H.A.; Chernomor, O.; Schrempf, D.; Woodhams, M.D.; Von Haeseler, A.; Lanfear, R. IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Jansson, S.; Meyer-Gauen, G.; Cerff, R.; Martin, W. Nucleotide distribution in gymnosperm nuclear sequences suggests a model for GC-content change in land-plant nuclear genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 1994, 39, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Yang, F.; Xu, F.; Wang, X.; Liao, Y.; Chen, Q.; Meng, X. Characterization and functional analysis of a MADS-box transcription factor gene (GbMADS9) from Ginkgo biloba. Sci. Horti. 2016, 212, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.; Birol, I.; Connors, J.; Gascoyne, R.; Horsman, D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Zhang, Y.; Wang, L. The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: Its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC Evol. Biol. 2005, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sun, Y.; Zhou, X.; Ma, H. Genome-wide Analysis of Kelch Repeat-containing F-box Family. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 940–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vatansever, R.; Koc, I.; Ozyigit, I.I.; Sen, U.; Uras, M.E.; Anjum, N.A.; Pereira, E.; Filiz, E. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of sulfate transporter (SULTR) genes in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Planta 2016, 244, 1167–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mao, D.Y.; Tang, H.; Xiao, N.; Wang, L. Uncovering the secrets of secretory fluids during the reproductive process in Ginkgo biloba. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2022, 41, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, S.; Meng, Z.; Zhang, H.; Chu, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Jin, B.; Wang, L. Identification and characterization of thirteen gene families involved in flavonoid biosynthesis in Ginkgo biloba. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 188, 115576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, B.; Wang, L.; Pang, S.; Jia, Z.; Wang, L.; Li, W.; Jin, B. UV-B promotes flavonoid synthesis in Ginkgo biloba leaves. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 151, 112483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Guo, C.; Guo, R.; Xu, X.; Gao, M.; Li, X.; Song, J.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, X. Evolution and expression analysis of the grape (Vitis vinifera L.) WRKY gene family. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 1513–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Jiang, Y.; Duan, Y.; Yin, J.; Ye, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, F.; Lu, W.; Fan, D.; Luo, K. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the Populus WRKY transcription factor family and analysis of their expression in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 6629–6644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cannon, S.B.; Mitra, A.; Baumgarten, A.; Young, N.D.; May, G. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2004, 4, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Berri, S.; Abbruscato, P.; Faivre-Rampant, O.; Brasileiro, A.; Fumasoni, I.; Satoh, K.; Kikuchi, S.; Mizzi, L.; Morandini, P.; Pè, M.E.; et al. Characterization of WRKYco-regulatory networks in rice and Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. He, H.; Dong, Q.; Shao, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zhu, S.; Cheng, B.; Xiang, Y. Genome-wide survey and characterization of the WRKY gene family in Populus trichocarpa. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1199–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, J.; Yu, H.; Liu, M.; Chen, B.; Dong, N.; Chang, X.; Wang, J.; Xing, S.; Peng, H.; Zha, L.; et al. Transcriptome-wide identification of WRKY transcription factors and their expression profiles in response to methyl jasmonate in Platycodon grandiflorus. Plant Signal. Behav. 2022, 17, 2089473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Huang, T.; Yang, J.; Yu, D.; Han, X.; Wang, X. Bioinformatics analysis of WRKY transcription factors in grape and their potential roles prediction in sugar and abscisic acid signaling pathway. J. Plant Biochem. Biot. 2021, 30, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Di, P.; Wang, P.; Yan, M.; Han, P.; Huang, X.; Yin, L.; Yan, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Y. Genome-wide characterization and analysis of WRKY transcription factors in Panax ginseng. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, X.; Li, C.; Wang, H.; Guo, Z. WRKY transcription factors: Evolution, binding, and action. Phytopathol. Res. 2019, 1, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Zhang, T.; Tan, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Han, Z. Phylogenetic analysis and drought-responsive expression profiles of the WRKY transcription factor family in maize. Agri Gene 2017, 3, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jimmy, J.L.; Babu, S. Variations in the structure and evolution of rice WRKY genes in indica and japonica genotypes and their co-expression network in mediating disease resistance. Evol. Bioinform. 2019, 15, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Tang, R.; Dong, H.; He, L.; Li, P.; Shi, Y.; Yang, Q.; Jia, X.; Li, X.Q. Genome-wide identification, evolutionary and functional analyses of KFB family members in potato. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Song, H.; Wang, P.; Hou, L.; Zhao, S.; Zhao, C.; Xia, H.; Li, P.; Zhang, Y.; Bian, X.; Wang, X. Global analysis of WRKY genes and their response to dehydration and salt stress in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. van Verk, M.C.; Pappaioannou, D.; Neeleman, L.; Bol, J.F.; Linthorst, H.J. A novel WRKY transcription factor is required for induction of PR-1a gene expression by salicylic acid and bacterial elicitors. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 1983–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Wei, Y.; Shi, H.; Xia, Z.; Tie, W.; Ding, Z.; Yan, Y.; Wang, W.; Hu, W.; Li, K. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the WRKY gene family in cassava. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Xu, Y.H.; Sun, P.W.; Tang, X.L.; Gao, Z.H.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, J.H. Genome-wide analysis of WRKY transcription factors in Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Gilg. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Eulgem, T.; Somssich, I.E. Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Banks, J.A.; Nishiyama, T.; Hasebe, M.; Bowman, J.L.; Gribskov, M.; DePamphilis, C.; Albert, V.A.; Aono, N.; Aoyama, T.; Ambrose, B.A.; et al. The Selaginella genome identifies genetic changes associated with the evolution of vascular plants. Science 2011, 332, 960–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Glöckner, G.; Eichinger, L.; Szafranski, K.; Pachebat, J.A.; Bankier, A.T.; Dear, P.H.; Lehmann, R.; Baumgart, C.; Parra, G.; Abril, J.F.; et al. Sequence and analysis of chromosome 2 of Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature 2002, 418, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Pan, Y.J.; Cho, C.C.; Kao, Y.Y.; Sun, C.H. A novel WRKY-like protein involved in transcriptional activation of cyst wall protein genes in Giardia lamblia. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 17975–17988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Wang, X.; Zeng, J.; Li, Y.; Rong, X.; Sun, J.; Sun, T.; Li, M.; Wang, L.; Feng, Y.; Chai, R.; et al. Expression of TaWRKY44, a wheat WRKY gene, in transgenic tobacco confers multiple abiotic stress tolerances. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 14 00343 g001 550
Figure 1. Chromosomal distribution and gene duplication of GbWRKYs genes. (a) Chromosomal distribution and gene duplication analysis of GbWRKYs, they were performed by Circos software and MCScanX, respectively; (b) statistical map of the number of replicating genes of each type; (c) collinearity analysis. The proximal duplicated genes are indicated in yellow. Tandem duplications are indicated in green.
Figure 1. Chromosomal distribution and gene duplication of GbWRKYs genes. (a) Chromosomal distribution and gene duplication analysis of GbWRKYs, they were performed by Circos software and MCScanX, respectively; (b) statistical map of the number of replicating genes of each type; (c) collinearity analysis. The proximal duplicated genes are indicated in yellow. Tandem duplications are indicated in green.
Genes 14 00343 g001
Genes 14 00343 g002 550
Figure 2. Multisequence alignment (a) and secondary structure (b) analysis of W−box in the GbWRKY proteins. (a) Identical amino acids are shown in same colors. (b) The secondary structures were conducted by NovoPro Bioscience Inc, an online tool.
Figure 2. Multisequence alignment (a) and secondary structure (b) analysis of W−box in the GbWRKY proteins. (a) Identical amino acids are shown in same colors. (b) The secondary structures were conducted by NovoPro Bioscience Inc, an online tool.
Genes 14 00343 g002
Genes 14 00343 g003 550
Figure 3. The phylogenetic tree of the WRKY proteins in G. biloba, A. thaliana, O. sativa, S. moellendorffii and P.abies.3.6. Tissue−specific expression analysis of GbWRKY genes.
Figure 3. The phylogenetic tree of the WRKY proteins in G. biloba, A. thaliana, O. sativa, S. moellendorffii and P.abies.3.6. Tissue−specific expression analysis of GbWRKY genes.
Genes 14 00343 g003
Genes 14 00343 g004 550
Figure 4. Expression profiles of GbWRKY genes in different G. biloba tissues from RNA−Seq and DGE data (a) and qRT−PCR verification (b).
Figure 4. Expression profiles of GbWRKY genes in different G. biloba tissues from RNA−Seq and DGE data (a) and qRT−PCR verification (b).
Genes 14 00343 g004
Genes 14 00343 g005 550
Figure 5. The number of cis−acting elements was tested in the promoter region of GbWRKYs. The name of cis−acting elements was listed on the left side of the image, and the corresponding function annotation was listed on the right side.
Figure 5. The number of cis−acting elements was tested in the promoter region of GbWRKYs. The name of cis−acting elements was listed on the left side of the image, and the corresponding function annotation was listed on the right side.
Genes 14 00343 g005
Genes 14 00343 g006 550
Figure 6. Analysis of expression patterns of GbWRKY genes under drought, salt, high temperature and UV−B radiation. The data were obtained from the publicly dataset. In the cDNA library of leaves under stress treatment, q-value < 0.05 and log2|fold−change| > 1 were used as the criteria to screen the differentially expressed WRKY genes.
Figure 6. Analysis of expression patterns of GbWRKY genes under drought, salt, high temperature and UV−B radiation. The data were obtained from the publicly dataset. In the cDNA library of leaves under stress treatment, q-value < 0.05 and log2|fold−change| > 1 were used as the criteria to screen the differentially expressed WRKY genes.
Genes 14 00343 g006
Genes 14 00343 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression patterns of selected GbWRKY genes under different stress by qRT−PCR, the data were normalized using the GAPDH gene. The error bars indicate the mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate a significant difference as determined by a Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 7. Expression patterns of selected GbWRKY genes under different stress by qRT−PCR, the data were normalized using the GAPDH gene. The error bars indicate the mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate a significant difference as determined by a Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Genes 14 00343 g007
Genes 14 00343 g008 550
Figure 8. Phylogenetic tree of GbWRKYs and known WRKYs associated with high temperature stress (a) and low temperature stress (b).
Figure 8. Phylogenetic tree of GbWRKYs and known WRKYs associated with high temperature stress (a) and low temperature stress (b).
Genes 14 00343 g008
Genes 14 00343 g009 550
Figure 9. Phylogenetic tree analysis of GbWRKYs and known WRKYs related to salt (a), drought (b) and UV−B radiation (c).
Figure 9. Phylogenetic tree analysis of GbWRKYs and known WRKYs related to salt (a), drought (b) and UV−B radiation (c).
Genes 14 00343 g009
Genes 14 00343 g010 550
Figure 10. Subcellular localization of GbWRKY proteins. (a) Schematic illustration of the constructs. (b) Subcellular location of free GFP and GbWRKY-GFP protein in tobacco leaves.
Figure 10. Subcellular localization of GbWRKY proteins. (a) Schematic illustration of the constructs. (b) Subcellular location of free GFP and GbWRKY-GFP protein in tobacco leaves.
Genes 14 00343 g010
Table
Table 1. Genome−wide identification of GbWRKY genes.
Table 1. Genome−wide identification of GbWRKY genes.
NameIDChromosomal LocationCDS (bp)GRAVYSubcellular LocalizationMW (KDa)pI
GbWRKY1Gb_05176261561178-2615632921494−0.814Nucleus54.676.53
GbWRKY2Gb_02351783125879-7831387391581−0.593Nucleus56.247.20
GbWRKY3Gb_005471053172260-10531748751740−0.538Nucleus63.676.58
GbWRKY4Gb_005451053573972-10535765141446−0.620Nucleus53.135.38
GbWRKY5Gb_402071072194964-1072196293801−0.666Nucleus29.957.69
GbWRKY6Gb_264111075330508-1075331449747−0.793Nucleus27.907.70
GbWRKY7Gb_264121075829444-1075830197573−0.949Nucleus21.539.03
GbWRKY8Gb_264131075925548-1075926489747−0.776Nucleus27.968.20
GbWRKY9Gb_402611077671233-1077672112681−0.711Nucleus25.778.83
GbWRKY10Gb_402571078258461-1078259371723−0.830Nucleus27.486.76
GbWRKY11Gb_170741129012414-11290142141404−0.739Nucleus51.724.89
GbWRKY12Gb_36273253690691-2537841172621−0.573Nucleus96.088.83
GbWRKY13Gb_39366397260590-3972632742124−0.651Nucleus76.526.11
GbWRKY14Gb_16513490181118-4901838971083−0.786Nucleus40.499.66
GbWRKY15Gb_01873567507034-5675089691458−0.721Nucleus52.555.73
GbWRKY16Gb_20926369244325-3692469681443−0.651Nucleus50.988.53
GbWRKY17Gb_31953505067926-5050867501980−0.866Nucleus71.116.86
GbWRKY18Gb_25118628096908-6281055953046−0.410Nucleus110.847.18
GbWRKY19Gb_25547145264191-1452667771152−0.717Nucleus42.174.72
GbWRKY20Gb_01527147519959-1475214981104−0.507Nucleus39.729.22
GbWRKY21Gb_23334489258288-4892614662064−0.745Nucleus74.815.92
GbWRKY22Gb_32055543409418-5434714622328−0.686Nucleus83.426.11
GbWRKY23Gb_17623537103484-537103996396−1.130Nucleus14.688.87
GbWRKY24Gb_15790537465845-537467456534−0.490Extracellular20.019.30
GbWRKY25Gb_16917546983507-546984721822−0.841Nucleus30.888.10
GbWRKY26Gb_08731675694495-6756958821194−0.598Nucleus43.055.60
GbWRKY27Gb_12538687806524-687807590651−0.875Nucleus24.268.79
GbWRKY28Gb_12539688432818-688434000759−0.892Nucleus28.219.27
GbWRKY29Gb_05024327509310-327510274702−0.952Nucleus27.026.75
GbWRKY30Gb_05026328511178-3285128841459−0.553Nucleus56.478.60
GbWRKY31Gb_28473633231750-633232705801−0.395Nucleus29.588.52
GbWRKY32Gb_03346447558574-4475623601866−0.515Nucleus67.995.71
GbWRKY33Gb_07810661423975-661424813483−0.430Nucleus18.149.44
GbWRKY34Gb_41027692001348-692001991474−0.690Nucleus17.529.39
GbWRKY35Gb_25334545181619-545183218825−0.858Nucleus30.345.82
GbWRKY36Gb_36184223808232-2238195233123−0.260Nucleus111.548.62
GbWRKY37Gb_01391836924-8932312589−0.691Nucleus92.736.05
MW is short for Molecular weight, pI is short for Isoelectric point, GRAVY is short for Grand average of hydropathicity. GRAVY > 0 indicates that proteins were hydrophobic, while GRAVY < 0 means the proteins were hydrophilic.
Table
Table 2. Ka and Ks calculation of GbWRKY gene tandem and segmental duplication.
Table 2. Ka and Ks calculation of GbWRKY gene tandem and segmental duplication.
Gene PairsType of Gene DuplicationChr. LocationKaKsKa/KsApproximate Duplication Date (Mya)
GbWRKY3/GbWRKY4Tandem duplicationChr010.442240.586820.7536220.475293
GbWRKY8/GbWRKY9Tandem duplicationChr010.3992670.7022240.5685750.468139
GbWRKY23/GbWRKY24Tandem duplicationChr070.2722190.3288960.8276750.286152
GbWRKY27/GbWRKY28Tandem duplicationChr070.1850170.3992580.4634010.234514
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, W.; Xiao, N.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, Z.; Gu, X.; Chen, Y. Genome-Wide Identification, Evolutionary and Functional Analyses of WRKY Family Members in Ginkgo biloba. Genes 2023, 14, 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020343

AMA Style

Li W, Xiao N, Wang Y, Liu X, Chen Z, Gu X, Chen Y. Genome-Wide Identification, Evolutionary and Functional Analyses of WRKY Family Members in Ginkgo biloba. Genes. 2023; 14(2):343. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020343

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Weixing, Nan Xiao, Yawen Wang, Ximeng Liu, Zhaoyu Chen, Xiaoyin Gu, and Yadi Chen. 2023. "Genome-Wide Identification, Evolutionary and Functional Analyses of WRKY Family Members in Ginkgo biloba" Genes 14, no. 2: 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020343

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop