Next Article in Journal
From Copper Tolerance to Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa towards Patho-Adaptation and Hospital Success
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic and Epigenetic Association of Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-1α with Glycosylation in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Bromeliad Crab Metopaulias depressus (Rathbun, 1896) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Physiological Genomics Plays a Crucial Role in Response to Stressful Life Events, the Development of Aggressive Behaviours, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

by
Thabo Magwai
1,2,* and
Khethelo Richman Xulu
1,*
1
Department of Physiology, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
2
National Health Laboratory Service, Department of Chemical Pathology, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Durban 4085, South Africa
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(2), 300; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13020300
Submission received: 10 January 2022 / Revised: 1 February 2022 / Accepted: 1 February 2022 / Published: 4 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Basis of Stress-Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders)

Abstract

:
Physiological genomics plays a crucial role in responding to stressful life events, such as violence and traumatic stress. This exposure to traumatic stress can trigger several physiological pathways, which are associated with genetic variability. Exposure to traumatic stress can result in the development of behavioural and psychiatric disorders, such as aggressive behaviour and anxiety disorders. Several genes play a crucial role in the neurophysiological response to chronic stress and trauma. These essential genes include monoamine oxidase A (MAOA), solute carrier family 6 member 4 (SLC6A4), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), dopamine receptor 2 and 4 (DRD2 and DRD4), and FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5). Genetic variations in several genes have been found to have altered physiological response, which associates with the development of several behavioural traits. Interestingly, previous studies show that there is an interplay between aggressive behaviour and anxiety disorders, which may be associated with physiological genomics structure. The physiological responses are based on genetic architecture and its molecular reaction. Understanding physiological genomics may show underpinnings related to the development of aggressive behaviours and their interaction with anxiety disorders. This review aims to discuss the association between different physiological genes and the development of psychiatric disorders related to aggressive behaviours and anxiety disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder.

1. Introduction

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating mental illness characterised by extreme fear, coupled with significant behavioural changes that occur because of extreme life-threatening stress [1,2]. Aggressive behaviour in humans is defined as a multi-factorial and complex functional behavioural act [3], which can lead to a plethora of problems, such as gangsterism, criminal activities, and the development of mental health disorders (e.g., psychotic disorders, conduct disorders, and PTSD) [4,5]. PTSD carries a significant heritability of PTSD risk [6] and a high polygenicity [7,8,9,10].
Genetic predispositions influence the development of aggressive behaviour, anxiety disorders, and other mental health disorders from heritability ranging from moderate to high estimates [11]. Furthermore, there are dynamic interactions between social variability, psychological outcomes, and genetic variation [12]. Genetic susceptibility is suggested to account for at least 65% of violent, aggressive, and impulsive behaviours [13]. These physiological genomic factors, together with adverse childhood trauma, are involved in the development of PTSD [14,15]. Chronic subjugation to traumatic stress can trigger many physiological responses, including the regulation of genes and epigenetic changes responsible for coping under threat [16,17,18,19].
Genomics and molecular biology have advanced the study of systematic human physiology from organ and cellular level to provide the genetic interactions as the basis of biochemical reactions occurring within the body [20]. This approach of research has aided scientists to delineate the physiological activities as defined by genomic architecture. Research in physiological genomics has also revolutionised the understanding of the pathophysiology of complex diseases, including psychiatric diseases [14,15]. Several studies have investigated the effect of molecular genetic variants in search of causative genetic variants of mental health disorders, such as aggressive behaviours, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and depression [9,15,21,22]. The current review will summarise previously studied genes in different types of aggression and PTSD.
Preceding studies have scrutinised these physiological genes in samples arising mainly from Europe and North America, resulting in a Eurocentric bias of candidate gene and genome-wide association studies (GWAS); therefore, African and admixed societies are not well documented [23,24,25]. The authors are not aware of studies that compared the genetic profile between samples of European and African origin. Studies are required to compare genetic variants between the European and African-based populations. Furthermore, previous studies have scrutinised aggressive behaviour in general, but there is a paucity of evidence on the association between aggressive behaviour and genetic factors as they relate to continuous exposure to violence. For a deeper comprehension of the genetic contribution to the development of aggression and PTSD, as it relates to childhood adversity exposure, genes that code for different peptides are discussed below. Physiological genes encoding neuropeptides, such as hormones, enzymes, and receptors are considered. Previously investigated genes have been found to overlap between aggressive behaviours and many psychiatric disorders, such as PTSD [15,26,27]. Physiological candidate genes investigated in the past are now GWAS hits for traits related to aggression and anxiety disorders.

2. Physiological Genetics/Genomics in Aggressive Behaviour and PTSD

Psychiatric disorders are characterised by altered systems, including the serotonergic, noradrenergic, dopaminergic, and neurotrophic systems [28,29]. Several genes have an important part in different physiological responses. Studies on the genetics of psychiatric disorders and anxiety disorder have covered different genes. These genes include the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [30], catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) [31], corticotrophin-releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRHR1) [32], dopamine receptor 2 and 4 (DRD2 and DRD4) [33], FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5) [34], monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) [35], solute carrier family 6 member 4 (SLC6A4) [36,37], and nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 1 (NR3C1) [38]. As this review is unable to discuss all the genes, Table 1 summarises the genes to be discussed here. Genetic variants of some of the above-mentioned genes have been reported to be related to aggressive behaviours and PTSD. Despite studies on some of these genes in aggressive behaviour and PTSD, in individual or combined samples, the current review will summarise data from studies only involving genes or variants that have been studied in both aggressive behaviour and PTSD as well as adverse childhood experiences.

2.1. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

The BDNF gene is a well-documented gene on both aggression and PTSD. The BDNF gene encodes the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) protein that is responsible for neuroplasticity [30]. The human BDNF gene is found on the short arm of the chromosome 11p14.1 [39]. The BDNF protein makes certain that there is ample neural differentiation and assures neural maturity. The highest activity of the BDNF protein is seen in the neurons where there is cellular signalling for the transmission of information through to influencing synaptic plasticity [45].
BDNF genotype and expression may affect the levels of the BDNF protein and/or its neuroplasticity, thus influencing the development of mood disorders [46]. The most studied single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is the genetic replacement of guanine (G) with adenine (A) nucleotides at position 196 (G196A) within codon 66, resulting in the amino acid substitution of valine (Val) with methionine (Met). This SNP is referred to as Val66Met or G196A polymorphism (rs6265) [47]. The Val66Met polymorphism has been found to be associated with the development of PTSD symptoms [48]. This genetic variation modulates the synthesis of the BDNF protein, which may alter its optimal intracellular function. On the other hand, the Met66Met polymorphism has been linked to hostility, anger, and the perpetration of physical belligerence in Met66Met men as opposed to those that are homozygous carriers of the Val66Val genotype [49].
Carriers of the BNDF Met66 variant have a higher prospect of suffering from PTSD [50]. Gene-based analyses in GWAS studies have also reported a relationship between the BDNF gene and nervous feelings, irritability, and several related behavioural phenotypes [51]. Results from a longitudinal study in a Chinese cohort that experienced the Wenchuan earthquake reported that carriers of BNDF Val66 polymorphism had fewer symptoms of PTSD as opposed to carriers of the BNDF Met66 allele [52]. Furthermore, carriers of the BNDF Val66 polymorphism were found to respond more positively to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) as opposed to those with the Met66 polymorphism [30].
The evidence shows that the interaction between the BDNF gene and environmental factors are important for the stress response, and this interplay can influence changes in behaviour. The BDNF gene is indicated to interact with NR3C1 and DRD2 genes. The interaction between BDNF and NR3C1 is important for hippocampal function, neurogenesis, and plasticity [53]. Therefore, variations in these genes may illicit dysfunctionality, which could negatively affect mental health. The BDNF protein has been reported to influence the regulation, preservation, and usual workings of mesolimbic dopaminergic neurotransmission and dopaminergic neural development [54,55,56].

2.2. Dopamine Receptors D2

The dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) protein, encoded by the DRD2 gene found on chromosome 11q23.2, is an important protein in the brain, where it aids in the formation of memory and neural plasticity [41]. The DRD2 gene is essential for the dopamine pathway. Genetic variants for the DRD2 gene are involved in susceptibility to PTSD [57]. Studies have reported that the DRD2 gene is associated with several psychiatric traits, which include irritability and schizophrenia [51,58]. Genetic variations in the DRD2 gene are thought to affects usual response to stressful events, which influences the processing of thought and may cause a raised risk of developing PTSD and aggression [59].
The DRD2 gene has been found to have a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs1800497), which is found 10 kb downward from the ankyrin repeat and kinase domain containing the ANKK1 gene [60]. This SNP is also known as Taq1A, which has two variants, the T (A1) and C (A2) variations [61]. The SNP leads to the substitution of glutamate at position 173 with lysine [62]. It has been found that Taq1A polymorphism is related to the development of PTSD [48] and altered behaviour, including addiction, alcoholism, and aggression [63]. Polymorphism of the DRD2 gene has been reported to be related to aggression and anger among Tanzanian Datoga men [64].
An epistatic interaction has been reported between BDNF Val66Met and DRD2 Taq1A polymorphisms and has been suggested to have a U-shaped function of dopamine [48]. The DRD2 Taq1A variant has been found to alter the quantity dopamine in different regions of the brain [65]. In another study, participants with the homozygous Val66Val genotype showed raised activity of the BDNF protein, in conjunction with reduced expression of the DRD2 gene seen in the DRD2 Taq1A genotype, leading to raised concentrations of dopamine [66]. Extreme dopamine concentrations, either too low or too high, are thought to disrupt cognitive function [67].

2.3. Dopamine Receptor D4

The DRD4 gene encodes for a seven domain trans-membranal dopamine receptor 4 (DRD4) protein that is found in the hypothalamus, frontal cortex, hippocampus, and striatum. The protein moderates the formation of memory by neurons [41]. Studies have shown that variation in DRD4 impacts negatively on brain function and can lead to the risk of developing aggression [68] and PTSD [69].
Variation in DRD4 spanning exon 3, specifically 2-repeats (2R), have been found to be associated with delinquency, anger, and thrill-seeking in a Russian sample [70]. The 7-repeats (7R) in exon 3 of DRD4 was shown to be associated with aggression, externalising behaviours, and delinquency [33,69]. Recently, an environmental correlation between traumatic events and the DRD4 gene was shown [51]. The reports of association between DRD4, aggression, and PTSD indicate that alterations in the DRD4 gene can lead to the disruption of usual function of the DRD4 protein, which can influence how memory is usually processed [71].

2.4. Catechol-O-Methyltransferase

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), found on chromosome 22q11.2 [72] encodes for catechol-O-methyltransferase enzyme, whose function is to break down some catecholamine neurotransmitters, such as noradrenaline, adrenaline, and dopamine [40]. There are isoforms of the COMT gene, each with its own promoter, and the soluble catechol-O-methyltransferase (S-COMT), which is mostly expressed in tissues, namely the kidney, liver, and blood, and the membrane-bound catechol-O-methyltransferase (MB-COMT), expressed mostly in the brain [73].
Available data show genetic variations in the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene that are associated with several traits of psychiatric and behavioural disorders, including PTSD and aggression [64,74]. Genetic variations in COMT are thought to be instrumental in hyperarousal, a symptom of PTSD [75]. Furthermore, the COMT gene variations have been reported to be related to physical aggression and impulsivity [64]. The presence of PTSD symptoms in individuals with previous experience of violence was reported to be associated with genetic variation in COMT [76].
This gene contains a functional polymorphism, rs4680, found in codon numbers 158, which then causes the replacement of amino acid valine with methionine (Val158Met). The Val158 polymorphism shows appropriate functioning of the protein as compared to the Met158 variant; thus, the homozygous Val158 variant can break down neurotransmitters at an increased rate compared to the Met158 variant [77]. A four-times decrease in the function of the COMT enzyme has been reported in participants with the Met variant and this is due to increased thermolability of the variant at physiological temperature [78,79]. The reduction in activity of the enzyme then causes a raise in the prefrontal cortex levels of dopamine [78].
An interplay between the variation of active dopamine transporter (DAT1), SLC6A3-COMT pair genes, has been reported to be associated with hostility and anger behaviour. The association has been shown to be related to physical aggression in Tanzanian Datoga men. It was also reported that carriers of the COMT Val158Val variant had a raised amount of impulsive aggression compared to Val158Met and Met158Met carriers [80].

2.5. Monoamine Oxidase A

The monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) gene was first reported in a Dutch family in 1993, where the men with aggressive behaviour were found to have a mutation in the MAOA gene. The MAOA gene codes for the monoamine oxidase A enzyme, which is also responsible for the breakdown of neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, serotonin, and adrenaline [43].
A polymorphism in the MAOA gene has been found upward of the variable number of sequential repeats (uVNTR) in the promoter region, which is 1.2 kb from the coding region [81]. Th above-mentioned polymorphic region is thought to be related to the risk of developing aggressive behaviours [82]. The MAOA-uVNTR is characterised by several repeats of 30 bp each; these are called the 2-, 3-, 3.5-, 4-, and 5-repeat alleles [83]. The 2- and 3-repeats (also known as MAOA-L) are thought to reduce the expression of MAOA, thus causing low levels of the MAOA enzyme and its activity. The 3.5- and 4-repeat (MAOA-H) on the other hand is thought to raise the expression of the MAOA gene, thus increasing the amount of the MAOA enzyme [84]. However, the consequences of the 5-repeat allele have not yet been well understood.
The MAOA-L variant has been associated with violent behaviour, aggression, and impulsivity [85]. Further studies have found an association between the MAOA-L and antisocial behaviour in maltreated children [86]. Antisocial personality disorder refers to a broad collection of physical, aggressive behaviours related to bullying and fighting, as well as irritability, rule-breaking, and oppositional behaviour [87]. Additionally, MAOA variants, including rs5906893, rs5906957, rs2283725, rs2072744, and rs979605, have been reported to be linked with antisocial personality disorder [88]. Although there is a paucity of evidence on PTSD and variants in MAOA, few studies have interrogated this relationship and found association [89], while others have not [44]. However, the monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) gene polymorphism, rs1799836, has been reported to be linked with the severity of PTSD symptoms in male war veterans [89]. The structure of the MAOB gene shares similarities with that of the MAOA gene. The MAOB gene codes MAOA isozyme known as monoamine oxidase B [81]. The MAOB enzyme also beaks down dopamine [90]. The rs1799836 variant has been reported to be linked to negative emotional personality and depression [91]. Therefore, since both MAOA and MAOB have similar functions, it is hypothesised that polymorphism in these genes will change the metabolism of neurotransmitters. The polymorphisms are thought to interrupt the usual response to stress, and this has been suggested as a mechanism in the development of PTSD and aggression.

2.6. Solute Carrier Family 6 Member 4

The solute carrier family 6 member 4 (SLC6A4) gene, which spans from 17q11.1 toq12, encodes for the serotonin transporter (5HTT, SERT) [44,92,93]. The 5HTT is required for serotonin reuptake (5HT) from the synaptic split and is essential for maintenance of serotonin concentration in the brain [94]. SLC6A4′s part in different psychiatric disorders, including PTSD, depression, and aggression, is well documented [37,95,96].
Several variable numbers of tandem repeats (VNTRs) of an insertion–deletion (indel) variant called the serotonin transporter-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) have been reported in the promoter region of the SLC6A4 gene [97]. The polymorphism has the short (S) and long (L) allele and these are at least 44 bp long. The L-allele is linked with enough expression of the serotonin transporter and the S-allele shows a reduced expression of the serotonin transporter [98]. Another SNP, the rs25531, found on the 5-HTTLPR polymorphic region, has been discovered [99] and suggested to change the functionality of the L-allele by regulating the expression of the SLC6A4 gene [100]. It has been reported that the long G (L-G) haplotype has a similar function as the S-allele, thus causing a decrease in the expression of the SLC6A4 gene, compared to the long A (L-A) haplotype, which leads to a raised expression of the SLC6A4 gene [101].
One study showed that participants with the SS genotype are reportedly at a higher risk of developing aggressive and violent behaviours, impulsive aggression, neuroticism, criminal behaviour, and anger [102]. The data show that the S-allele is related to the presence of conduct disorder [103], antisocial behaviour [12], and PTSD [37]. This evidence shows a link between genetic variants of the SLC6A4 gene and mental health disorders as well as behavioural problems. The S-allele is linked to both aggression and PTSD, thus suggesting similarity in the pathophysiological mechanism of these disorders. The S-allele leads to a decrease in the expression of the SLC6A4 gene, thus causing dysregulation in serotonin [104]. This dysfunction in the regulation of serotonin is due to lack of balance in the neuroendocrine response seen in both PTSD and aggressive behaviour.
Another variant in intron 2 of SLC6A4, called the serotonin transporter intron 2 (STin2), has been scrutinised in both aggression and PTSD [105]. This polymorphic region is characterised by different numbers of repeats that are 17 bp in length to produce 9-repeat (STin2.9), 10-repeat (STin2.10), and 12-repeat (STin2.12) variants [106]. The STin2.12 is referred to as the long allele (L), while both STin2.9 and STin2.10 are referred to as short alleles (S). Studies have shown that STin2.10 is associated with reduced expression of the SL6A4 gene, while STin2.12 has been linked to increased expression of this gene [107]. The data show there to be an association between STin2.12 and aggressive behaviours in individuals with impulsivity as well as persistent and pervasive aggression [108]. Recently, Hemmings and colleagues found that the STin2.12 variant was associated with decreased reactive aggression, but increased perpetration of aggression in a male South African population, suggesting that genetic underpinning may be essential to distinguish between forms of aggression [21].
The short alleles of STin2 (STin2.9 and STin2.10) have been shown to be linked to PTSD symptoms. This is intensified by the co-occurrence of the short STin2 variants and 5-HTTLPR genotypes as well as the occurrence of the rs25531 SNP [109]. The serotonin receptors 2A and 1B (HTR2A and HTR1B) gene variants have also been linked to aggression [110] and PTSD symptoms [111]. The SNPs (rs977003 and rs7322347) of HTR2A were reported in individuals with PTSD. The rs7322347 variant was also reported to be related to aggression [110]. These genetic variants are suggested to be involved in the development of PTSD and aggression.

2.7. FK506 Binding Protein 5

The FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5) gene encodes FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5), a functional protein that is important in the regulation of stress via modification of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) (GRs encoded by NR3C1) activity and its sensitivity [42,51]. Data on FKBP5 in the literature show that the FKBP5 gene is linked to chances of developing PTSD [42]. Data from non-combatant African Americans reported the rs9296158, rs3800373, 1360780, and rs9470080 SNPs to be linked to the severity of PTSD symptoms [112]. These SNPs were found to determine the severity of PTSD in adults with a history of childhood mistreatment, thus showing the interplay between the gene and childhood mistreatment as a threat for developing symptoms for PTSD [112]. Aspects of these findings were reproduced in another study of African Americans with a history of childhood adversity; however, only the rs9470080 SNP of FKBP5 was linked with a risk of PTSD [113]. Furthermore, the rs1360780 SNP of the FKBP5 gene has been reported to affect the risk of PTSD and other psychiatric disorders. Watanabe and colleagues have demonstrated the association between FKBP5 and anxious or worrisome feelings in a GWAS study [51].

3. Future Directions for Physiological Genomics in Complex Traits of Mental Health

The complexity of psychiatric and behavioural disorders is exacerbated by different factors that contribute to the onset of the disease. Several physiological pathways are involved; the genome, environmental factors, and physiological responses play key and interactive roles. Furthermore, the complex genetic architecture coupled with the influence of one gene on multiple traits are contributing factors in our limited understanding of the pathophysiology of these complex mental disorders. However, genomic research is now providing new insights to better understand mental health and behavioural disorders. For instance, psychiatric disorders are much more intricate than neurological disorders since they present substantial degrees of genetic correlation [114]. Moreover, GWAS studies are revealing other polymorphisms and genes involved; thus, the functional impact of them should be addressed in physiological genomics studies. Finally, epigenome- and metagenome-wide association studies are becoming popular approaches to evaluate the relationships of the environment and the biology underlying mental health. The big challenge of the near future will be to integrate all those new approaches. Multiple omics approaches to mental health disorders are becoming more necessary for the understanding of the physiology, pathophysiology, diagnostics, and prognostics of these disorders. More studies are required to cover multiple omics from the same sample. Furthermore, for a clear picture of pathophysiology of mental disorder, cofounders must be identified and controlled for during sampling.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, genomics architecture plays a pivotal role in the etiology of psychiatric disorders, such as PTSD and behavioural disorders, including aggression. The molecular risk factors of physiological genetics in complex disorders in mental health illness are pleiotropic. Therefore, it is still challenging to find causative genetic variants associated with complex psychiatric disorders. Recent studies have increased the understanding by involving big data of larger sample sizes. However, this recent data, as mentioned above, included mostly non-African populations. Genomic data of studying several alleles at the same time are emerging for a better understanding. Moreover, representative studies are required that will sample populations in different geographical locations and across racial and ethnic groups, particularly African and admixed people. These studies need to be sufficiently powered to enable drawing robust inferences from the outcomes. This future work is particularly important in the context of fine-tuning physiological genomics impact on the development of complex disorders, such as in psychiatric studies. Moreover, physiological, molecular genetic studies can aid in a better understanding of complex mental illnesses. Future work also needs to compare results from humans with those from experiments comparing wild and domestic animals of the same biological species.

Author Contributions

T.M. and K.R.X. conceived the concept, conducted the literature review and wrote the manuscript draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Research Foundation Thuthuka grant number (129827) (K.R.X). The APC was funded by (129827).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®), 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Pub: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shalev, A.; Liberzon, I.; Marmar, C. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 2459–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Georgiev, A.V.; Klimczuk, A.C.E.; Traficonte, D.M.; Maestripieri, D. When violence pays: A cost-benefit analysis of aggressive behavior in animals and humans. Evol. Psychol. 2013, 11, 147470491301100313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hinsberger, M.; Holtzhausen, L.; Sommer, J.; Kaminer, D.; Elbert, T.; Seedat, S.; Wilker, S.; Crombach, A.; Weierstall, R. Feasibility and effectiveness of narrative exposure therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy in a context of ongoing violence in South Africa. Psychol. Trauma Theory Res. Pract. Policy 2017, 9, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Weierstall, R.; Hinsberger, M.; Kaminer, D.; Holtzhausen, L.; Madikane, S.; Elbert, T. Appetitive aggression and adaptation to a violent environment among youth offenders. Peace Confl. J. Peace Psychol. 2013, 19, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wolf, E.J.; Miller, M.; Sullivan, D.R.; Amstadter, A.B.; Mitchell, K.S.; Goldberg, J.; Magruder, K.M. A classical twin study of PTSD symptoms and resilience: Evidence for a single spectrum of vulnerability to traumatic stress. Depress. Anxiety 2017, 35, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Duncan, L.E.; Ratanatharathorn, A.; Aiello, A.E.; Almli, L.; Amstadter, A.B.; Ashley-Koch, A.E.; Baker, D.G.; Beckham, J.C.; Bierut, L.J.; Bisson, J.; et al. Largest GWAS of PTSD (N = 20 070) yields genetic overlap with schizophrenia and sex differences in heritability. Mol. Psychiatry 2017, 23, 666–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nievergelt, C.M.; Maihofer, A.X.; Klengel, T.; Atkinson, E.G.; Chen, C.-Y.; Choi, K.W.; Coleman, J.R.I.; Dalvie, S.; Duncan, L.E.; Gelernter, J.; et al. International meta-analysis of PTSD genome-wide association studies identifies sex- and ancestry-specific genetic risk loci. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Stein, M.B.; Chen, C.-Y.; Ursano, R.; Cai, T.; Gelernter, J.; Heeringa, S.G.; Jain, S.; Jensen, K.P.; Maihofer, A.X.; Mitchell, C.; et al. Genome-wide Association Studies of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in 2 Cohorts of US Army Soldiers. JAMA Psychiatry 2016, 73, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xie, P.; Kranzler, H.R.; Yang, C.; Zhao, H.; Farrer, L.; Gelernter, J. Genome-wide Association Study Identifies New Susceptibility Loci for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 74, 656–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Polderman, T.; Benyamin, B.; de Leeuw, C.; Sullivan, P.F.; Van Bochoven, A.; Visscher, P.; Posthuma, D. Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 702–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ficks, C.A.; Waldman, I.D. Candidate Genes for Aggression and Antisocial Behavior: A Meta-analysis of Association Studies of the 5HTTLPR and MAOA-uVNTR. Behav. Genet. 2014, 44, 427–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Burt, S.A.; Mikolajewski, A.J.; Larson, C.L. Do aggression and rule-breaking have different interpersonal correlates? A study of antisocial behavior subtypes, negative affect, and hostile perceptions of others. Aggress. Behav. 2009, 35, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dalvie, S.; Maihofer, A.X.; Coleman, J.R.I.; Bradley, B.; Breen, G.; Brick, L.A.; Chen, C.-Y.; Choi, K.W.; Duncan, L.E.; Guffanti, G.; et al. Genomic influences on self-reported childhood maltreatment. Transl. Psychiatry 2020, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lind, M.J.; Brick, L.A.; Gehrman, P.R.; Duncan, L.E.; Gelaye, B.; Maihofer, A.X.; Nievergelt, C.M.; Nugent, N.R.; Stein, M.B.; Amstadter, A.B.; et al. Molecular genetic overlap between posttraumatic stress disorder and sleep phenotypes. Sleep 2019, 43, zsz257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bevilacqua, L.; Carli, V.; Sarchiapone, M.; George, D.K.; Goldman, D.; Roy, A.; Enoch, M.-A. Interaction Between FKBP5 and Childhood Trauma and Risk of Aggressive Behavior. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2012, 69, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bryushkova, L.; Zai, C.; Chen, S.; Pappa, I.; Mileva, V.; Tiemeier, H.; Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.; Kennedy, J.L.; Beitchman, J.H. FKBP5 interacts with maltreatment in children with extreme, pervasive, and persistent aggression. Psychiatry Res. 2016, 242, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Crombach, A.; Elbert, T. The benefits of aggressive traits: A study with current and former street children in Burundi. Child Abus. Negl. 2014, 38, 1041–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gorodetsky, E.; Bevilacqua, L.; Carli, V.; Sarchiapone, M.; Roy, A.; Goldman, D.; Enoch, M.-A. The interactive effect of MAOA-LPR genotype and childhood physical neglect on aggressive behaviors in Italian male prisoners. Genes Brain Behav. 2014, 13, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Glueck, S.B.; Dzau, V.J. Physiological genomics: Implications in hypertension research. Hypertension 2002, 39, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hemmings, S.M.J.; Xulu, K.; Sommer, J.; Hinsberger, M.; Malan-Muller, S.; Tromp, G.; Elbert, T.; Weierstall, R.; Seedat, S. Appetitive and reactive aggression are differentially associated with the STin2 genetic variant in the serotonin transporter gene. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nievergelt, C.M.; Maihofer, A.X.; Mustapic, M.; Yurgil, K.A.; Schork, N.J.; Miller, M.; Logue, M.W.; Geyer, M.A.; Risbrough, V.B.; O’Connor, D.T.; et al. Genomic predictors of combat stress vulnerability and resilience in U.S. Marines: A genome-wide association study across multiple ancestries implicates PRTFDC1 as a potential PTSD gene. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2015, 51, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gurdasani, D.; Barroso, I.; Zeggini, E.; Sandhu, M.S. Genomics of disease risk in globally diverse populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019, 20, 520–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hindorff, L.A.; Bonham, V.L.; Brody, L.C.; Ginoza, M.; Hutter, C.M.; Manolio, T.A.; Green, E.D. Prioritizing diversity in human genomics research. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2017, 19, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Peterson, R.E.; Kuchenbaecker, K.; Walters, R.K.; Chen, C.-Y.; Popejoy, A.B.; Periyasamy, S.; Lam, M.; Iyegbe, C.; Strawbridge, R.J.; Brick, L.; et al. Genome-wide Association Studies in Ancestrally Diverse Populations: Opportunities, Methods, Pitfalls, and Recommendations. Cell 2019, 179, 589–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lewis, A.S.; Picciotto, M.R. Regulation of aggressive behaviors by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: Animal models, human genetics, and clinical studies. Neuropharmacology 2020, 167, 107929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yin, H.; Galfalvy, H.; Zhang, B.; Tang, W.; Xin, Q.; Li, E.; Xue, X.; Li, Q.; Ye, J.; Yan, N.; et al. Interactions of the GABRG2 polymorphisms and childhood trauma on suicide attempt and related traits in depressed patients. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 266, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rakofsky, J.J.; Ressler, K.; Dunlop, B. BDNF function as a potential mediator of bipolar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder comorbidity. Mol. Psychiatry 2011, 17, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sbarski, B.; Akirav, I. Cannabinoids as therapeutics for PTSD. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 211, 107551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Felmingham, K.L.; Dobson-Stone, C.; Schofield, P.; Quirk, G.J.; Bryant, R. The Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Val66Met Polymorphism Predicts Response to Exposure Therapy in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 73, 1059–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hirata, Y.; Zai, C.C.; Nowrouzi, B.; Beitchman, J.H.; Kennedy, J.L. Study of the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) Gene with High Aggression in Children. Aggress. Behav. 2012, 39, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boscarino, J.A.; Kirchner, H.L.; Hoffman, S.N.; Erlich, P.M. Predicting PTSD using the New York Risk Score with genotype data: Potential clinical and research opportunities. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2013, 9, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Buchmann, A.F.; Holz, N.; Boecker, R.; Blomeyer, D.; Rietschel, M.; Witt, S.H.; Schmidt, M.H.; Esser, G.; Banaschewski, T.; Brandeis, D.; et al. Moderating role of FKBP5 genotype in the impact of childhood adversity on cortisol stress response during adulthood. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 24, 837–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Wilker, S.; Pfeiffer, A.; Kolassa, S.; Elbert, T.; Lingenfelder, B.; Ovuga, E.; Papassotiropoulos, A.; de Quervain, D.; Kolassa, I.-T. The role of FKBP5 genotype in moderating long-term effectiveness of exposure-based psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Transl. Psychiatry 2014, 4, e403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Beaver, K.M.; Barnes, J.C.; Boutwell, B.B. The 2-Repeat Allele of the MAOA Gene Confers an Increased Risk for Shooting and Stabbing Behaviors. Psychiatr. Q. 2013, 85, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gyurak, A.; Haase, C.M.; Sze, J.; Goodkind, M.S.; Coppola, G.; Lane, J.C.; Miller, B.L.; Levenson, R.W. The effect of the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) on empathic and self-conscious emotional reactivity. Emotion 2013, 13, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, Y.; Garrett, M.E.; Dennis, M.F.; Green, K.T.; Ashley-Koch, A.; Hauser, M.A.; Beckham, J.C.; Kimbrel, N.A.; Workgroup, V.M.-A.M.R. An Examination of the Association between 5-HTTLPR, Combat Exposure, and PTSD Diagnosis among U.S. Veterans. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Van Zuiden, M.; Geuze, E.; Willemen, H.L.; Vermetten, E.; Maas, M.; Amarouchi, K.; Kavelaars, A.; Heijnen, C.J. Glucocorticoid Receptor Pathway Components Predict Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Development: A Prospective Study. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 71, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cowansage, K.K.; LeDoux, J.E.; Monfils, M.-H. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor: A Dynamic Gatekeeper of Neural Plasticity. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010, 3, 12–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lonsdorf, T.B.; Rück, C.; Bergström, J.; Andersson, G.; Öhman, A.; Lindefors, N.; Schalling, M. The COMTval158met polymorphism is associated with symptom relief during exposure-based cognitive-behavioral treatment in panic disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2010, 10, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Saab, B.J.; Georgiou, J.; Nath, A.; Lee, F.J.; Wang, M.; Michalon, A.; Liu, F.; Mansuy, I.M.; Roder, J.C. NCS-1 in the Dentate Gyrus Promotes Exploration, Synaptic Plasticity, and Rapid Acquisition of Spatial Memory. Neuron 2009, 63, 643–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Klengel, T.; Mehta, D.; Anacker, C.; Rex-Haffner, M.; Pruessner, J.; Pariante, C.M.; Pace, T.W.W.; Mercer, K.B.; Mayberg, H.S.; Bradley, B.; et al. Allele-specific FKBP5 DNA demethylation mediates gene–childhood trauma interactions. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 16, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Brunner, H.G.; Nelen, M.; Breakefield, X.O.; Ropers, H.H.; van Oost, B.A. Abnormal Behavior Associated with a Point Mutation in the Structural Gene for Monoamine Oxidase A. Science 1993, 262, 578–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Kravic, N.; Dzananovic, E.S.; Umihanic, M.M.; Kulenovic, A.D.; Sinanovic, O.; Jakovljevic, M.; Babic, D.; Kucukalic, A.; Agani, F.; Kucukalic, S.; et al. Association analysis of maoa and SLC6A4 gene variation in South East European War related posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatr. Danub. 2019, 31, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, P.Z.; Nusslock, R. Exercise-Mediated Neurogenesis in the Hippocampus via BDNF. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Losenkov, I.; Mulder, N.J.V.; Levchuk, L.A.; Vyalova, N.M.; Loonen, A.J.M.; Bosker, F.J.; Simutkin, G.; Boiko, A.S.; Bokhan, N.; Wilffert, B.; et al. Association Between BDNF Gene Variant Rs6265 and the Severity of Depression in Antidepressant Treatment-Free Depressed Patients. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lester, K.J.; Hudson, J.L.; Tropeano, M.; Creswell, C.; Collier, D.A.; Farmer, A.; Lyneham, H.J.; Rapee, R.M.; Eley, T.C. Neurotrophic gene polymorphisms and response to psychological therapy. Transl. Psychiatry 2012, 2, e108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Hemmings, S.M.; Martin, L.I.; Klopper, M.; van der Merwe, L.; Aitken, L.; de Wit, E.; Black, G.F.; Hoal, E.G.; Walzl, G.; Seedat, S. BDNF Val66Met and DRD2 Taq1A polymorphisms interact to influence PTSD symptom severity: A preliminary investigation in a South African population. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 40, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Maynard, K.; Hill, J.; Calcaterra, N.E.; Palko, M.E.; Kardian, A.; Paredes, D.; Sukumar, M.; Adler, B.D.; Jimenez, D.V.; Schloesser, R.J.; et al. Functional Role of BDNF Production from Unique Promoters in Aggression and Serotonin Signaling. Neuropsych-pharmacology 2015, 41, 1943–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, L.; Li, X.-X.; Hu, X.-Z. Post-traumatic stress disorder risk and brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met. World J. Psychiatry 2016, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Watanabe, K.; Stringer, S.; Frei, O.; Mirkov, M.U.; de Leeuw, C.; Polderman, T.J.C.; van der Sluis, S.; Andreassen, O.A.; Neale, B.M.; Posthuma, D. A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 1339–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, R.H.; Fan, M.; Hu, M.S.; Ran, M.S.; Fang, D.Z. Reduced severity of posttraumatic stress disorder associated with Val allele of Val66Met polymorphism at brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene among Chinese adolescents after Wenchuan earthquake. Psychophysiology 2016, 53, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Suri, D.; Vaidya, V.A. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience 2013, 239, 196–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Berton, O.; McClung, C.A.; Dileone, R.J.; Krishnan, V.; Renthal, W.; Russo, S.J.; Graham, D.; Tsankova, N.M.; Bolanos, C.A.; Rios, M.; et al. Essential Role of BDNF in the Mesolimbic Dopamine Pathway in Social Defeat Stress. Science 2006, 311, 864–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Hünnerkopf, R.; Strobel, A.; Gutknecht, L.; Brocke, B.; Lesch, K.P. Interaction between BDNF Val66Met and Dopamine Transporter Gene Variation Influences Anxiety-Related Traits. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007, 32, 2552–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Trzaska, K.A.; King, C.C.; Li, K.-Y.; Kuzhikandathil, E.V.; Nowycky, M.C.; Ye, J.-H.; Rameshwar, P. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor facilitates maturation of mesenchymal stem cell-derived dopamine progenitors to functional neurons. J. Neurochem. 2009, 110, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Azadmarzabadi, E.; Haghighatfard, A. Detection of six novel de novo mutations in individuals with low resilience to psychological stress. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0256285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ripke, S.; Neale, B.M.; Corvin, A.; Walters, J.T.R.; Farh, K.-H.; Holmans, P.A.; Lee, P.; Bulik-Sullivan, B.; Collier, D.A.; Huang, H.; et al. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature 2014, 511, 421–427. [Google Scholar]
  59. Fraporti, T.T.; Contini, V.; Tovo-Rodrigues, L.; Recamonde-Mendoza, M.; Rovaris, D.L.; Rohde, L.A.; Hutz, M.H.; Salatino-Oliveira, A.; Genro, J.P. Synergistic effects between ADORA2A and DRD2 genes on anxiety disorders in children with ADHD. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2019, 93, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Young, R.; Lawford, B.R.; Noble, E.P.; Kann, B.; Wilkie, A.; Ritchie, T.; Arnold, L.; Shadforth, S. Harmful drinking in military veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder: Association with the D2 dopamine receptor A1 allele. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002, 37, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Comings, D.; Muhleman, D.; Gysin, R. Dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) gene and susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder: A study and replication. Biol. Psychiatry 1996, 40, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Neville, M.J.; Johnstone, E.C.; Walton, R. Identification and characterization of ANKK1: A novel kinase gene closely linked to DRD2 on chromosome band 11q23.1. Hum. Mutat. 2004, 23, 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Smith, L.; Watson, M.; Gates, S.; Ball, D.; Foxcroft, D. Meta-Analysis of the Association of the Taq1A Polymorphism with the Risk of Alcohol Dependency: A HuGE Gene-Disease Association Review. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 167, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Butovskaya, M.; Vasilyev, V.A.; Lazebny, O.E.; Suchodolskaya, E.M.; Shibalev, D.V.; Kulikov, A.; Karelin, D.; Burkova, V.; Mabulla, A.Z.P.; Ryskov, A. Aggression and polymorphisms in AR, DAT1, DRD2 and COMT genes in Datoga pastoralists of Tanzania. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Egan, M.F.; Kojima, M.; Callicott, J.; Goldberg, T.E.; Kolachana, B.S.; Bertolino, A.; Zaitsev, E.; Gold, B.; Goldman, D.; Dean, M.; et al. The BDNF val66met Polymorphism Affects Activity-Dependent Secretion of BDNF and Human Memory and Hippocampal Function. Cell 2003, 112, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Ritchie, T.; Noble, E.P. Association of Seven Polymorphisms of the D2 Dopamine Receptor Gene with Brain Receptor-Binding Characteristics. Neurochem. Res. 2003, 28, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Koven, N.S.; Carr, L. Differential Relationships among Facets of Alexithymia and BDNF- and Dopamine-Related Polymorphisms. Neurosci. Med. 2012, 03, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Schlomer, G.L.; Cleveland, H.H.; Vandenbergh, D.J.; Feinberg, M.E.; Neiderhiser, J.M.; Greenberg, M.T.; Spoth, R.; Redmond, C. Developmental differences in early adolescent aggression: A gene × environment × intervention analysis. J. Youth Adolesc. 2014, 44, 581–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Dragan, W.L.; Oniszczenko, W. The association between dopamine D4 receptor exon III polymorphism and intensity of PTSD symptoms among flood survivors. Anxiety Stress Coping 2009, 22, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dmitrieva, J.; Chen, C.; Greenberger, E.; Ogunseitan, O.; Ding, Y.-C. Gender-specific expression of the DRD4 gene on adolescent delinquency, anger and thrill seeking. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2010, 6, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Stolf, A.R.; Cupertino, R.B.; Müller, D.; Sanvicente-Vieira, B.; Roman, T.; Vitola, E.S.; Grevet, E.H.; von Diemen, L.; Kessler, F.H.P.; Grassi-Oliveira, R.; et al. Effects of DRD2 splicing-regulatory polymorphism and DRD4 48 bp VNTR on crack cocaine addiction. J. Neural Transm. 2018, 126, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Grossman, M.; Emanuel, B.; Budarf, M. Chromosomal mapping of the human catechol-O-methyltransferase gene to 22q11.1q11.2. Genomics 1992, 12, 822–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tenhunen, J.; Salminen, M.; Lundstrom, K.; Kiviluoto, T.; Savolainen, R.; Ulmanen, I. Genomic organization of the human catechol O-methyltransferase gene and its expression from two distinct promoters. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 223, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lee, J.J.; Wedow, R.; Okbay, A.; Kong, E.; Maghzian, O.; Zacher, M.; Nguyen-Viet, T.A.; Bowers, P.; Sidorenko, J.; Karlsson Linnér, R.; et al. Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 1112–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Kolassa, I.-T.; Kolassa, S.; Ertl, V.; Papassotiropoulos, A.; de Quervain, D. The Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder after Trauma Depends on Traumatic Load and the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Val158Met Polymorphism. Biol. Psychiatry 2010, 67, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Valente, N.L.M.; Vallada, H.; Cordeiro, Q.; Bressan, R.A.; Andreoli, S.B.; Mari, J.J.; Mello, M.F. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) val158met Polymorphism as a Risk Factor for PTSD After Urban Violence. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2010, 43, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Schacht, J.P. COMT val158met moderation of dopaminergic drug effects on cognitive function: A critical review. Pharm. J. 2016, 16, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Chen, J.; Lipska, B.K.; Halim, N.; Ma, Q.D.; Matsumoto, M.; Melhem, S.; Kolachana, B.S.; Hyde, T.M.; Herman, M.M.; Apud, J.; et al. Functional Analysis of Genetic Variation in Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT): Effects on mRNA, Protein, and Enzyme Activity in Postmortem Human Brain. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 75, 807–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Lotta, T.; Vidgren, J.; Tilgmann, C.; Ulmanen, I.; Melen, K.; Julkunen, I.; Taskinen, J. Kinetics of Human Soluble and Membrane-Bound Catechol O-Methyltransferase: A Revised Mechanism and Description of the Thermolabile Variant of the Enzyme. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 4202–4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wagner, S.; Baskaya, O.; Anicker, N.J.; Dahmen, N.; Lieb, K.; Tadic, A. The catechol o-methyltransferase (COMT) val158met polymorphism modulates the association of serious life events (SLE) and impulsive aggression in female patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2009, 122, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sabol, S.Z.; Hu, S.; Hamer, D. A functional polymorphism in the monoamine oxidase A gene promoter. Qual. Life Res. 1998, 103, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Chester, D.S.; DeWall, C.N.; Derefinko, K.J.; Estus, S.; Peters, J.R.; Lynam, D.R.; Jiang, Y. Monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) genotype predicts greater aggression through impulsive reactivity to negative affect. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 283, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Antypa, N.; Giegling, I.; Calati, R.; Schneider, B.; Hartmann, A.M.; Friedl, M.; Konte, B.; Lia, L.; De Ronchi, D.; Serretti, A.; et al. MAOA and MAOB polymorphisms and anger-related traits in suicidal participants and controls. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2013, 263, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Brummett, B.H.; Boyle, S.H.; Siegler, I.C.; Kuhn, C.M.; Surwit, R.S.; Garrett, M.E.; Collins, A.; Ashley-Koch, A.; Williams, R.B. HPA axis function in male caregivers: Effect of the monoamine oxidase-A gene promoter (MAOA-uVNTR). Biol. Psychol. 2008, 79, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Tiihonen, J.; Rautiainen, M.-R.; Ollila, H.; Repotiihonen, E.; Virkkunen, M.; Palotie, A.; Pietilainen, O.; Kristiansson, K.; Joukamaa, M.; Lauerma, H.; et al. Genetic background of extreme violent behavior. Mol. Psychiatry 2014, 20, 786–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Byrd, A.L.; Manuck, S.B. MAOA, Childhood Maltreatment, and Antisocial Behavior: Meta-analysis of a Gene-Environment Interaction. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 75, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Piotrowska, P.J.; Stride, C.B.; Croft, S.; Rowe, R. Socioeconomic status and antisocial behaviour among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2015, 35, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Ouellet-Morin, I.; Cote, S.M.; Vitaro, F.; Hébert, M.; Carbonneau, R.; LaCourse, E.; Turecki, G.; Tremblay, R.E. Effects of the MAOA gene and levels of exposure to violence on antisocial outcomes. Br. J. Psychiatry 2016, 208, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Svob Strac, D.; Kovacic Petrovic, Z.; Nikolac Perkovic, M.; Umolac, D.; Nedic Erjavec, G.; Pivac, N. Platelet monoamine oxidase type B, MAOB intron 13 and MAOA-uVNTR polymorphism and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. Stress 2016, 19, 362–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Youdim, M.B.H. Therapeutic Applications of Selective and Non-Selective Inhibitors of Monoamine Oxidase A and B that do not Cause Significant Tyramine Potentiation. NeuroToxicology 2004, 25, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dlugos, A.M.; Palmer, A.A.; de Wit, H. Negative emotionality: Monoamine oxidase B gene variants modulate personality traits in healthy humans. J. Neural Transm. 2009, 116, 1323–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Daw, J.; Shanahan, M.; Harris, K.M.; Smolen, A.; Haberstick, B.; Boardman, J.D. Genetic Sensitivity to Peer Behaviors. J. Health Soc. Behav. 2013, 54, 92–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Haberstick, B.C.; Smolen, A.; Hewitt, J.K. Family-Based Association Test of the 5HTTLPR and Aggressive Behavior in a General Population Sample of Children. Biol. Psychiatry 2006, 59, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Risch, S.C.; Nemeroff, C.B. Neurochemical alterations of serotonergic neuronal systems in depression. J. Clin. Psychiatry 1992, 53. [Google Scholar]
  95. Kilpatrick, D.G.; Resnick, H.S.; Milanak, M.E.; Miller, M.; Keyes, K.M.; Friedman, M.J. National Estimates of Exposure to Traumatic Events and PTSD Prevalence Using DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria. J. Trauma. Stress 2013, 26, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Maul, S.; Giegling, I.; Fabbri, C.; Corponi, F.; Serretti, A.; Rujescu, D. Genetics of resilience: Implications from genome-wide association studies and candidate genes of the stress response system in posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2019, 183, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. La Greca, A.M.; Lai, B.; Joormann, J.; Auslander, B.B.; Short, M.A. Children’s risk and resilience following a natural disaster: Genetic vulnerability, posttraumatic stress, and depression. J. Affect. Disord. 2013, 151, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Greenberg, B.D.; Tolliver, T.J.; Huang, S.J.; Li, Q.; Bengel, D.; Murphy, D.L. Genetic variation in the serotonin transporter promoter region affects serotonin uptake in human blood platelets. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1999, 88, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hu, X.-Z.; Lipsky, R.; Zhu, G.; Akhtar, L.A.; Taubman, J.; Greenberg, B.D.; Xu, K.; Arnold, P.D.; Richter, M.A.; Kennedy, J.L.; et al. Serotonin Transporter Promoter Gain-of-Function Genotypes Are Linked to Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 78, 815–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Wang, S.-W.; Lee, J.-K.; Ku, C.-C.; Chiou, S.-S.; Lin, C.-L.S.; Ho, M.-F.; Wu, D.-C.; Yokoyama, K.K. Jun Dimerization Protein 2 in Oxygen Restriction; Control of Senescence. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2011, 17, 2278–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Praschak-Rieder, N.; Kennedy, J.; Wilson, A.A.; Hussey, D.; Boovariwala, A.; Willeit, M.; Ginovart, N.; Tharmalingam, S.; Masellis, M.; Houle, S.; et al. Novel 5-HTTLPR Allele Associates with Higher Serotonin Transporter Binding in Putamen: A [11C] DASB Positron Emission Tomography Study. Biol. Psychiatry 2007, 62, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Haase, C.M.; Beermann, U.; Saslow, L.R.; Shiota, M.N.; Saturn, S.R.; Lwi, S.J.; Casey, J.J.; Nguyen, N.K.; Whalen, P.K.; Keltner, D.; et al. Short alleles, bigger smiles? The effect of 5-HTTLPR on positive emotional expressions. Emotion 2015, 15, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Brody, G.H.; Beach, S.R.H.; Chen, Y.-F.; Obasi, E.; Philibert, R.A.; Kogan, S.M.; Simons, R.L. Perceived discrimination, serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region status, and the development of conduct problems. Dev. Psychopathol. 2011, 23, 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Xie, P.; Kranzler, H.R.; Farrer, L.; Gelernter, J. Serotonin transporter 5-HTTLPR genotype moderates the effects of childhood adversity on posttraumatic stress disorder risk: A replication study. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2012, 159B, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Pietrzak, R.H.; Galea, S.; Southwick, S.M.; Gelernter, J. Examining the relation between the serotonin transporter 5-HTTPLR genotype x trauma exposure interaction on a contemporary phenotypic model of posttraumatic stress symptomatology: A pilot study. J. Affect. Disord. 2012, 148, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Sarosi, A.; Gonda, X.; Balogh, G.; Domotor, E.; Szekely, A.; Hejjas, K.; Sasvari-Szekely, M.; Faludi, G. Association of the STin2 polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene with a neurocognitive endophenotype in major depressive disorder. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2008, 32, 1667–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Heils, A.; Teufel, A.; Petri, S.; Stöber, G.; Riederer, P.; Bengel, D.; Lesch, K.P. Allelic Variation of Human Serotonin Transporter Gene Expression. J. Neurochem. 1996, 66, 2621–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Ali, F.R.; Vasiliou, S.A.; Haddley, K.; Paredes, U.M.; Roberts, J.C.; Miyajima, F.; Klenova, E.; Bubb, V.J.; Quinn, J.P. Combinatorial interaction between two human serotonin transporter gene variable number tandem repeats and their regulation by CTCF. J. Neurochem. 2010, 112, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mercer, K.B.; Orcutt, H.K.; Quinn, J.F.; Fitzgerald, C.A.; Conneely, K.N.; Barfield, R.T.; Gillespie, C.F.; Ressler, K.J. Acute and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in a Prospective Gene × Environment Study of a University Campus Shooting. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2012, 69, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Bánlaki, Z.; Elek, Z.; Nanasi, T.; Szekely, A.; Nemoda, Z.; Sasvári-Székely, M.; Ronai, Z. Polymorphism in the Serotonin Receptor 2a (HTR2A) Gene as Possible Predisposal Factor for Aggressive Traits. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Miller, M.W.; Sperbeck, E.; Robinson, M.E.; Sadeh, N.; Wolf, E.J.; Hayes, J.P.; Logue, M.; Schichman, S.A.; Stone, A.; Milberg, W.; et al. 5-HT2A Gene Variants Moderate the Association between PTSD and Reduced Default Mode Network Connectivity. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Binder, E.B.; Bradley, R.G.; Liu, W.; Epstein, M.P.; Deveau, T.C.; Mercer, K.B.; Tang, Y.; Gillespie, C.F.; Heim, C.M.; Nemeroff, C.B.; et al. Association of FKBP5 Polymorphisms and Childhood Abuse with Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in Adults. JAMA 2008, 299, 1291–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Xie, P.; Kranzler, H.R.; Poling, J.; Stein, M.B.; Anton, R.F.; Farrer, L.A.; Gelernter, J. Interaction of FKBP5 with Childhood Adversity on Risk for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35, 1684–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. The Brainstorm Consortium; Anttila, V.; Bulik-Sullivan, B.; Finucane, H.K.; Walters, R.K.; Bras, J.; Duncan, L.; Escott-Price, V.; Falcone, G.J.; Gormley, P.; et al. Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science 2018, 360, eaap8757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1. Summary of candidate genes for both PTSD and aggression.
Table 1. Summary of candidate genes for both PTSD and aggression.
GeneGene LocationEncoded ProteinGene FunctionReferences
BDNF11p13–14Brain Derived Neurotrophic FactorSurvival and differentiation of neurons[39]
COMT22q11Catechol-O-methyltransferaseCatecholamine metabolism[40]
DRD211q23.2Dopamine receptor 2Memory formation and neural plasticity[41]
DRD411p15.5Dopamine receptor 4Memory formation and neural plasticity[41]
FKBP56p21. 31FK506 binding protein 5Stress regulation[42]
MAOAXp11.3Monoamine oxidase ABreakdown of neurotransmitters[43]
SLC6A417q11.1–q12Serotonin transporterMaintenance of serotonin concentration in the brain[44]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Magwai, T.; Xulu, K.R. Physiological Genomics Plays a Crucial Role in Response to Stressful Life Events, the Development of Aggressive Behaviours, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Genes 2022, 13, 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13020300

AMA Style

Magwai T, Xulu KR. Physiological Genomics Plays a Crucial Role in Response to Stressful Life Events, the Development of Aggressive Behaviours, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Genes. 2022; 13(2):300. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13020300

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magwai, Thabo, and Khethelo Richman Xulu. 2022. "Physiological Genomics Plays a Crucial Role in Response to Stressful Life Events, the Development of Aggressive Behaviours, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)" Genes 13, no. 2: 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13020300

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop