Next Article in Journal
Utility of Gene Panels for the Diagnosis of Inborn Errors of Metabolism in a Metabolic Reference Center
Next Article in Special Issue
Whole-Genome Sequencing Improves the Diagnosis of DFNB1 Monoallelic Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Extensive Changes in Transcription Dynamics Reflected on Alternative Splicing Events in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Integrated Clinical-Biological Approach to Identify Interindividual Variability and Atypical Phenotype-Genotype Correlations in Myopathies: Experience on A Cohort of 156 Families
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/genes12081261
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis: Current Concepts of Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

by
Chu-Hsuan Huang
1,
Chung-May Yang
2,3,
Chang-Hao Yang
2,3,
Yu-Chih Hou
1 and
Ta-Ching Chen
2,*
1
Department of Ophthalmology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei 106, Taiwan
2
Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
3
Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(8), 1261; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081261
Submission received: 20 July 2021 / Revised: 15 August 2021 / Accepted: 18 August 2021 / Published: 19 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Genotype-Phenotype Study in Disease)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Leber’s congenital amaurosis (LCA), one of the most severe inherited retinal dystrophies, is typically associated with extremely early onset of visual loss, nystagmus, and amaurotic pupils, and is responsible for 20% of childhood blindness. With advances in molecular diagnostic technology, the knowledge about the genetic background of LCA has expanded widely, while disease-causing variants have been identified in 38 genes. Different pathogenetic mechanisms have been found among these varieties of genetic mutations, all of which result in the dysfunction or absence of their encoded proteins participating in the visual cycle. Hence, the clinical phenotypes also exhibit extensive heterogenicity, including the course of visual impairment, involvement of the macular area, alteration in retinal structure, and residual function of the diseased photoreceptor. By reviewing the clinical course, fundoscopic images, optical coherent tomography examination, and electroretinogram, genotype-phenotype correlations could be established for common genetic mutations in LCA, which would benefit the timing of the diagnosis and thus promote early intervention. Gene therapy is promising in the management of LCA, while several clinical trials are ongoing and preliminary success has been announced, focusing on RPE65 and other common disease-causing genes. This review provides an update on the genetics, clinical examination findings, and genotype-phenotype correlations in the most well-established causative genetic mutations of LCA.

1. Introduction

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) are a group of diseases caused by genetic mutations that are characteristic of photoceptor dysfunction and eventual death of retinal cells. Different extents of retinal degeneration result in widely varied presentations, from milder night blindness or color blindness to profound visual impairment [1]. Among the diverse phenotypes and genotypes within IRDs, Leber’s congenital amaurosis (LCA) is one of the earliest and most severe forms of IRDs. In 1869, Dr. Theodore Leber first described severe visual impairment in infants with nystagmus and poor pupillary light reflex, which were recognized as typical presentations of the later-named LCA [2]. LCA represents 5% of all IRDs and has a prevalence of 1/81,000 to 1/30,000. It also accounts for 20% of blindness in school-aged children [3,4,5,6].
To establish the diagnosis of LCA in children with suspected IRDs, detailed ophthalmic history, imaging studies, electrophysical examinations, and, most importantly, molecular confirmation is needed. Compared to other retinal dystrophies, LCA is even more heterogeneous in its disease course and presentation. A milder phenotype of LCA with relative visual preservation has been considered as early-onset severe retinal dystrophy, although their genetic basis overlaps significantly [7]. Owing to the diversity in genetic background, disease presentation, and early onset in infancy, it is challenging but important for ophthalmologists to obtain a definitive diagnosis in preliminary consultations. We searched the PubMed database with the keywords “Leber’s congenital amaurosis” and each specific gene (i.e., GUCY2D) for studies published before 30 June. We included articles published in Science Citation Index (SCI) journals and focused on reporting the clinical presentation of LCA cases with specific genetic mutations. Thus, this review aims to summarize the clinical manifestations and genetic updates of LCA, as well as show the genotype-phenotype correlations in LCA to promote early diagnosis and facilitate bridging therapies in the near future.

2. Clinical Manifestation

Typically, patients with LCA present with poor vision and nystagmus or the absence of fixation at as early as 6 weeks of age. Manifestation of vision loss in patients with LCA ranges from functional visual acuity to light perception only, and approximately three-quarters of these are stationary. Transient fluctuation in vision with delayed visual maturation is occasionally observed in the first or second decade of life until progressive decline occurs [3]. The most commonly presented refractive error is hyperopia, especially with the GUCY2D mutation. The patient may present with photophobia or nyctalopia, which could be gene specific, as described by Hanein et al. [8]. Similar to the presentation of other diseases resulting in congenital blindness, oculodigital signs are common in patients with LCA. Keratoconus and juvenile cataracts are other associated ocular features. Mental retardation could be concurrent in about one-fifth of syndromic or non-syndromic LCA cases. Renal and olfactory dysfunction may be present and are associated with mutations in specific genes [9].
Electrophysical studies are important in assessing patients with suspected LCA in their early life. Although a non-detectable electroretinogram (ERG) response is typical in LCA, a residual cone response could be detected with mutation in GUCY2D, and a residual rod response in RPE65 [10]. Fundoscopic imaging provides diagnostic clues, including peripheral pigmentary retinopathy, central maculopathy with or without bull’s eye pattern, or even frank macular atrophy. Depigmented fundus, reduced autofluorescence, whitish RPE spot, vascular attenuation, pseudopapillary edema, or coats-like vasculopathy have also been reported in the fundus of LCA cases [11]. Originally, time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) was rarely performed because of the commonly presenting nystagmus and young age, but the improvement in spectral-domain OCT technology has enhanced its application in this patient group [12]. The retinal structure revealed in OCT is dependent on age and may show specific abnormalities with a certain genotype (CRB1, GUCY2D). The disrupted anatomical structure of the retina includes decreased thickness in different layers, especially in the outer nuclear layer (ONL), loss of integrity in the ellipsoid zone, and disorganized macular atrophy [13]. The central foveal structure is relatively preserved in specific genetic mutations, such as GUCY2D and RPE65, which indicates a possible therapeutic window for genetic remodeling [14].
In summary, typical findings defining LCA includes (1) early and severe reduction of vision (from non-light perception to 20/400) associated with nystagmus in a large number of patients; (2) fundus appearance, ranging from normal, maculopathy, to typical retinitis pigmentosa (RP)-like abnormalities; and (3) severely reduced to non-detectable full field ERG responses [9]. Because of the clinically overlapping presentations, the differential diagnosis of LCA includes both syndromic and non-syndromic diseases. ERG is helpful in distinguishing it from achromatopsia, which has a normal rod response, and congenital stationary night blindness, which preserves the a-wave. The pupillary light reflex could be absent when combined with optic nerve hypoplasia. Specific systemic associations could be found in Batten disease, albinism, Joubert syndrome, peroxisome disease, Alstrom disease, and cobalamin C deficiency [15,16].

3. Genetic Features

Linkage analysis, identity-by-descent mapping, and the candidate gene approach are used to identify the mutation loci in LCA cases [9]. Since the recognition of the first gene, GUCY2D, in LCA cases, the Online Mendelian Inheritance (OMIM) database has identified 19 types of LCA with mutations in specific genes [17]. The incorporation of more efficient next-generation sequencing techniques, such as whole exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing, has enabled the exploration of more causative genes. So far, there have been 19 other genes considered to be responsible for the LCA phenotype according to the OMIM database (Table 1).
With the advances in molecular genetics, approximately three-quarters of the LCA cases could be identified with specific mutations [10,18]. Most of the causative mutations are inherited by an autosomal recessive pattern, with the exception of CRX, IMPDH1, and OTX2 [10]. These widely ranged mutations are involved in different aspects of maintaining normal retinal function or health. The common disease-causing mechanisms are as follows: phototransduction (GUCY2D, AIPL1, RD3, KCNJ13), retinoid cycle (RPE65, LRAT, RDH12), ciliary transportation (LCA5, CEP290, RPGRIP1, SPATA7, TULP1, IQCB1), photoreceptor morphogenesis (CRX, CRB1, GDF6, PRPH2), guanine synthesis (IMPDH1), and photoreceptor differentiation (OTX2) [9,10]. The mechanism involved in the LCA phenotype of recently identified mutations in USP45 (LCA type 19) and other genes is still controversial and further studies are required [19].
Common mutations, usually occurring with a frequency of approximately 10% or higher, include GUCY2D, RPE65, CRB1, CEP290, and RDH12 [9,20]. The frequency could vary according to ethnical background of the patients. Mutations in CEP290, GUCY2D, and RPE65 are generally more frequent in Caucasian populations [20,21,22]. On the other hand, CRB1, which accounts for 13.6% of LCA cases, has been reported as the leading causative genetic mutation in Chinese cohorts, followed by GUCY2D [23]. Meanwhile, there was a significantly less common mutation in CEP290 than in the European cohort, but more in RPGRIP1. The most common variant of the CEP290 mutation found in the European population, c.2991+1655A>G, was not detected in the Chinese cohort [23]. CRB1, NMNAT1, and RPGRIP1 were reported as the most common mutations in a Japanese cohort [24]. CEP290 and GUCY2D were the leading causative mutations in Australia, followed by NMNAT1 [25]. Moreover, these known mutations common in European and East Asian populations only accounted for 24% of LCA cases in the Saudi Arabian population, and several novel mutations have been discovered in this population [26]. These findings revealed regional differences in the genetic backgrounds of LCA cases.

4. Genotype-Phenotype Correlation

Although patients with LCA exhibit an extended range of intra- and interfamilial heterogenicity, genotype-phenotype correlations have been identified in several common mutations [15,16]. Establishing these correlations could facilitate the confirmation of molecular diagnosis by narrowing the range of responsible LCA genes when a specific phenotype is found. The incorporation of multimodal images, including fundus photography, autofluorescence, OCT, and ERG, may reveal more detailed information and improve the predictability of specific molecular defects (Table 1).

4.1. GUCY2D

GUCY2D, the first gene that was identified to be correlated with LCA, is localized on chromosome 17p13.1, and encodes retinal guanylate cyclase-1, which is involved in photoreceptor recovery phase in phototransduction [27]. GUCY2D is expressed in the photoreceptor outer segment with a higher level in cone cells than in rod cells [28]. The GUCY2D mutation accounts for 6–21% of LCA cases. GUCY2D-associated LCA cases are known to have very poor but stationary vision early in life, with nystagmus, oculodigital signs, and prominent photophobia [8,29]. Approximately 50% of cases present with vision worse than counting fingers, while only one-quarter of cases have vision measurable by the Snellen Chart [30]. While nonsense and some missense mutations in GUCY2D result in complete deficiency of enzyme function [9], Bouzia et al. found that a group of cases with a GUCY2D mutation on exon 2, which encodes the extracellular domain, had a milder phenotype with better visual acuity [31]. Although nyctalopia is less frequently reported, Bouzia et al. reported an incidence of 38% in their case series [31]. High hyperopia above +5 D, cataracts, and keratoconus are common ocular features [8,31]. Fundus image and autofluorescence appear nearly normal in most cases in childhood, but Jacobson et al. recently found that central retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) change and peripheral pigmentation could be noted as early as the third decade of life, which was much earlier than that in previous reports [32]. Despite severe visual impairment in these cases, a relatively preserved retinal structure with normal ONL thickness is observed on OCT [14]. The fovea bulge, representing the cone outer segment, is less prominent, and the ellipsoid zone (EZ) is intact, but with reduced intensity [30]. The ONL thickness in the fovea has been shown to decrease at a rate of 0.90 µm per year, while it remained stable in the rod-rich superior retina region [32]. In patients presenting with a central RPE change in fundus autofluorescence, the corresponding EZ loss could be found on OCT [31]. The cone response in ERG is generally diminished, while approximately 25% of cases have a preserved but attenuated rod response. Previous studies have demonstrated a detectable rod response on the full-field stimulation test as well [13,33]. This functional finding corresponded with the relatively preserved OCT structure in the rod-predominant area. The presence of rod-specific retinal guanylase cyclase-2 is a possible explanation for the relative preservation of rod function in the GUCY2D mutation [34].

4.2. RPE65

The RPE65 gene on chromosome 1p31.2 encodes retinoid isomerase, which is a 65 kDa enzyme expressed abundantly in RPE and is responsible for vitamin A metabolism in the retinoid cycle [35]. This deficiency results in a lack of 11-cis-retinal regeneration. The RPE65 mutation accounts for 4–16% of LCA cases, which is relatively rare in the Chinese population but more prevalent in the Caucasian and Indian populations [36,37,38]. The common phenotype of RPE65-associated LCA includes profound nyctalopia at birth; however, some residual cone-mediated vision has been observed in these cases. Therefore, possibly an alternative supply of 11-cis-retinal, apart from RPE65, in cone photoreceptors has been proposed [15]. About 10% of RPE65-associated LCA cases present with vision worse than counting fingers initially, and transient improvement could be noted in early life. However, visual impairment gradually progresses from the second to the third decade of life [13,39,40]. Patients that carried at least one nonsense variant had more progressive deterioration in retinal sensitivity [41]. Myopia and cataract, mostly posterior subcapsular cataract (PSC), are ocular features related to the RPE65 mutation [14]. Depigmentation and whitish deposits outside the macula, bull’s-eye maculopathy, or diffuse retinal degeneration are noted, and autofluorescence is typically reduced [14,42,43]. Pigmentary retinopathy can occur in the late stage [14]. Preserved ONL in the central island is observed on OCT, but ONL thickness is reduced adjacent to the fovea. The relatively preserved cone photoreceptors are explanatory to the cone-mediated vision [44,45]. Thinning of the retinal thickness, especially the ONL layer, and loss of lamination in the retina are more prominent in patients older than 30 years of age [14,44]. Hyperreflective deposits above the RPE may be found in correspondence to white dots in fundoscopy [7]. A diminished rod response is observed on the ERG, while a residual cone response has been recorded in some cases [40].

4.3. CRB1

The CRB1 gene on chromosome 1q31.3 encodes Crumbs homologue 1, which is expressed in the inner segment of the photoreceptors and Muller cells to maintain adequate morphogenesis and polarity in retinal development [46]. Therefore, mutations in the CRB1 gene have been associated with multiple retinal dystrophies, including RP, foveal retinoschisis, macular dystrophy, and LCA. Mutations within the Ca2+-binding EGF-like domain are often associated with more severe disease [10,47]. Approximately 9–17% of LCA cases have been related to CRB1 mutations, which are higher in the Chinese population [15,23]. CRB1-associated LCA cases present relatively preserved visual function, nyctalopia, and high hyperopia [47]. The typical findings are progressive macular atrophy with nummular pigmentation and preserved para-arteriolar RPE [48,49]. Similar to the presentation of CRB1-associated RP cases, coats-like vasculopathy could also be present in LCA with CRB1 mutations [50]. Thickening of the retina with loss of distinct lamination is a characteristic finding of CRB1 mutation, which indicates retinal disorganization caused by developmental defects [48,49]. This unique OCT morphology differentiates CRB1 mutations from other types of LCA and facilitates genetic diagnosis. The ERG response is generally diminished in these cases [49].

4.4. CEP290

The CEP290 gene on chromosome 12q21.32 encodes a 290 kD centrosomal protein that localizes to the basal bodies of the photoreceptors connecting the cilium and is responsible for its formation, stability, and transportation function. Mutations in CEP290 are associated with several systemic diseases, including Joubert syndrome, Senior-Løken syndrome, and Meckel syndrome [9]. It is also the most common cause of LCA in Caucasians, accounting for 15–30% of the cases, but relatively less prevalent in the Chinese population [23,51]. The most common variant, an intronic nonsense mutation, c.2991+1655A>G, was found in 77% of CEP-290-related LCA cases [51,52]. Vision is markedly impaired in CEP290-associated LCA cases in which the majority (62–89%) of patients had only light perception or less [13]. While nonsense mutations accounted for 75% of the variant of mutation in CEP290, patients with two nonsense mutations had a worse visual prognosis [53]. Photophobia and hyperopia are present. The fundus mostly exhibits a normal appearance in 74% of cases, but polymorphous white flecks, marbleized fundus, and pigmentary retinopathy may develop with age. A hyperautofluorescent ring can be found in the central macula [51,52]. Other associated fundus features include pseudopapillary edema, small atrophic RPE spot, chorioretinal atrophy, and Coats-like vasculopathy [54]. Apart from severe visual impairment at birth, the foveal architecture and integrity of the EZ are grossly preserved but are initially reduced in intensity on OCT images. ONL thickness in the paramacular region is decreased to one-third than the normal, and the inner retina is thickened and remodeled [13,14]. Cideciyan et al. reported that the foveal thickness decreased at a rate 0.7 to 1.3 µm per year in patients in their case series [13]. Cyst-like lesions were detected on OCT images in 43% of the cases reported by Pasalhika et al. [14]. Most of the cases with the CEP290 mutation demonstrate an extinguished ERG response.

4.5. RDH12

Retinol dehydrogenase 12, which is encoded by the RDH12 gene on chromosome 14q24.1, is expressed predominantly in the inner segment of the photoreceptor and participates in the retinoid cycle by converting 11-cis retinol to 11-cis retinal. Mutations in RDH12 account for approximately 3–10% of LCA cases [9,15]. RDH12-associated LCA cases demonstrate poor but functional vision with transient improvement lasting less than 10 years. Progressive decline in vision occurs after the second decade of life [55]. Other related ocular features include nyctalopia and mild cataract, but not hyperopia. Fundus examination may reveal prominent atrophic maculopathy and peripheral pigmentation with profoundly reduced autofluorescence [56]. Garg et al. found that the peripapillary area was spared extensive macular atrophy in these cases [57]. A thinner retina in correspondence to macular atrophy and loss of laminar structure may be seen on OCT [58,59]. An extinguished ERG response under scotopic and photopic conditions has been consistently noted [56].

4.6. SPATA7

The SPATA7 gene on chromosome 14q31.3 encodes a protein with a single transmembrane protein, termed spermatogenesis-associated protein 7. SPATA7 is expressed in the cytoplasm of the inner segment of photoreceptors of mature retina in animal models, but its function in the visual cycle has not been fully elucidated [60]. The mutation in SPATA7 has been identified not only in LCA but also in juvenile RP cases, while the severity of visual impairment largely differs [60]. The prevalence of SPATA7 has been reported to be low as 3% in LCA cases [15]. Perrault et al. and Wang et al. reported two case series with nonsense mutations in SPATA7, which had a phenotype resembling RPE65-associated LCA. The cases presented with stationary poor vision, nystagmus, nyctalopia, and hyperopia. Fundus examination revealed peripheral chorioretinal atrophy, bone spicule pigmentation, and a central foveal hyperautofluorescent ring. ERG was extinguished in both the rod and cone responses [60,61].

4.7. AIPL1

The AIPL1 gene on chromosome 17p13.2 encodes Aryl-hydrocarbon-interacting-protein-like 1, which is a cochaperone specific to photoreceptors that stabilize retinal cGMP phosphodiesterase in the phototransduction process. Both the rod and cone photoreceptors express the AIPL1 gene during development, but only the rod photoreceptor continues its expression in the adult retina [9]. Missense and stop mutations (class I and II) in AIPL1 produce an LCA phenotype, while a frameshift mutation (class III) results in the milder phenotype of juvenile RP [9]. Mutations in AIPL1 account for about 5% of LCA cases. The variant p.W278X (c.834G>A) has been commonly reported [15,62,63]. The phenotype of AIPL1-associated LCA cases is considered to be severe, with rapidly progressive visual impairment to only light perception in most patients. Patients often present with nystagmus, photophobia, photoattraction, keratoconus, and PSC [64]. Although pigmentary retinopathy in the mid-periphery and central maculopathy may develop at a young age, evidence of reduced but residual autofluorescence in the posterior pole is reported at an early stage [65,66,67]. Tan et al. reported two 2-year-old patients without pigmentation in the fundus and preserved macular autofluorescence [66]. In addition to severely affected vision and macular appearance, OCT in younger patients shows a relatively preserved paracentral outer retina but loss of integrity of the EZ. The disorganization of the retinal structure progresses with age [14,65,68]. Extinguished ERG has been reported in most cases but could be partially preserved in a scotopic response at a young age as well [67]. Heegaard et al. reported a unique case of an extensive avascular retina at the periphery and torturous retinal vessels with a novel H82Y (244C>T) variant in the AIPL1 mutation [69].

4.8. LCA5

The LCA5 gene on chromosome 6q14.1 encodes lebercilin, which is expressed widely in the tissues composed of cilia, including photoreceptors. However, mutations in LCA5 have been identified to be confined to retinal dystrophy without systemic association, while most of the cases meet the diagnosis of LCA [70,71]. The LCA5 mutation accounts for only 1–2% of the LCA cases [15]. LCA5-associated LCA cases present with impaired vision, nyctalopia, and severe hyperopia. Fundus examination typically reveals diffuse mottling of the RPE at the periphery when aging and a frankly normal macula [72]. Jacobson et al. and Mackay et al. reported reduced autofluorescence in correspondence to RPE atrophy, but central hyperautofluorescence could be present [71,73]. Scattered RPE white dots, which could also be found in the RPE65 phenotype, were common in the case series presented by Mackay et al. [71]. A relatively preserved foveal photoreceptor and an EZ zone with loss of lamination in the eccentric retina have been observed in the OCT images of younger patients [73]. An ERG response was mostly undetectable in the reported cases, but a retained residual cone response had been observed, compatible with the fovea-preserving features in OCT and fundus autofluorescence [71]. However, Mohamed et al. reported a dramatically different fundus feature in three of the five LCA cases in a Pakistani family confirmed with the LCA5 mutation, which exhibited coloboma-like macular atrophy [74].

4.9. RPGRIP1

The protein product of the RPGRIP1 gene on chromosome 14q11.2 regularly binds to the RP GTPase at the C-terminal interacting domain, to anchor on the connecting cilium in the retinal photoreceptor cells [9,75]. Mutations in RPGRIP1 account for approximately 5% of LCA cases when null mutations occur, while less severe cone-rod dystrophy results from variants causing missense mutations [76]. RPGRIP1-associated LCA cases present with gradually declining impaired vision, photophobia, and nystagmus. Attenuated vessels, chorioretinal atrophy, and peripheral pigmentation may be observed on fundus examination in childhood [77]. Granular hyperautofluorescence corresponding to atrophic RPE is seen on fundus autofluorescence. [75,78]. OCT images usually demonstrate a thinner ONL and disorganized EZ, especially parafoveal [78,79]. However, Miyamichi et al. reported better retention of retinal structure on OCT before the age of 5 in their case series [78]. In previous reports, despite the relative foveal sparing on OCT and fundus examination, cone response was generally diminished on ERG, but rod function remained detectable in some younger cases [77,78].

4.10. CRX

The cone-rod homeobox (CRX) gene on chromosome 19q13.3 encodes a homeobox transcription factor, which is essential for early ocular development by regulating the differentiation and maintenance of photoreceptor cells [9,80]. The mutation in CRX accounts for up to 1% of LCA cases, which is autosomal dominant [9]. The typical phenotypes include stationary poor vision, night blindness, and frank macular disorganization in fundus examination, even in very early childhood [81,82]. OCT revealed a thinner thickness with a relatively preserved outer nuclear layer, and ERG was extinguished in both rod and cone responses in a case series [82]. Koenekoop et al. reported a case of gradual visual improvement sustained in the first decade of life with a measurable cone response on ERG, which was undetectable in infancy [83].

4.11. NMNAT1

The NMNAT1 gene on chromosome 1q36.22 encodes a nuclear isoform of NAD+-synthesizing nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase. Besides affecting NAD+ synthesis for energy supply in the retina, deficiency in NMNAT1 is also evident in poor retinal differentiation and impaired neuroprotective function [84]. Mutations in NMNAT1 account for 2.3–4.9% of LCA cases [85,86]. The NMNAT1-associated LCA cases have severely impaired vision at birth and coloboma-like macular dystrophy since early infancy. Attenuated vessels, pallor optic disc, and peripheral pigmentation are observed on fundus examination. Extreme early onset and rapid progression are characteristics of NMNAT1 mutations [84,87]. Damage from light exposure possibly explains the predominant central retinal degeneration. Retinal disorganization in all layers with a well-defined boundary between normal and abnormal retinas has been found in the available OCT study [84,87]. Extinguished ERG is typical for NMNAT1 mutations.

4.12. IMPDH1

The protein product of the IMPDH1 gene on chromosome 7q32.1 is involved in the rate-limiting step of guanine synthesis. In addition, research on the IMPDH protein has revealed its binding capability to single-stranded nucleic acids, which possibly results in a retinal pathology through this pathway. IMPDH1 is expressed in a variety of tissues but is highly expressed in the retinal tissue [9]. Mutations in IMPDH1 were initially found in autosomal-dominant RP cases, while a more severe phenotype as LCA with an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern has also been reported [88]. IMPDH1-associated LCA appears to be rare. However, the case series by Bowne et al. reported a prevalence of 8.3% (2/24) [88]. They reported two IMPDH1-associated LCA cases that presented with mottling or depigmented fundus. One of the patients also had systemic hypotonia and growth retardation [88].

4.13. RD3

The RD3 gene on chromosome 1q32.3 is only expressed in retinal photoreceptors and is essential for the transportation of guanylate cyclase between the inner and outer segments [89]. Less than 1% of LCA cases have mutations in the RD3 gene [15,90]. RD3-associated LCA cases present nyctalopia and poor vision at birth, with progressive decline to barely precepting light. The visual function is comparably reduced as in the GUCY2D mutation because of the sharing dysfunction in guanylate cyclase [91]. Central maculopathy is observed in early life with or without a bull’s-eye pattern on fundus examination, and pigmentary retinopathy with a hammer-beaten appearance develops in the third decade of life. A disorganized retina with reduced thickness in every layer is observed on OCT images. Extinguished ERGs are universally noted in these cases [92].

4.14. LRAT

Lecithin retinol acyltransferase is the product of the LRAT gene on chromosome 4q32.1, which converts all-trans retinol to all-trans retinyl esters in the RPE phase of the retinoid cycle. Mutations in the LRAT gene have been reported in approximately 1–2% of LCA cases, and their phenotype is similar to that of the RPE65 mutation [15,93]. LRAT-associated LCA cases usually present with nyctalopia with poor vision but absence of photophobia. On fundus examination, a grossly normal but mild mottling appearance is observed in the posterior pole, and a demarcation margin with diffuse granular depigmentation can be seen outside the macula [93,94]. Borman et al. reported a case series using OCT, which revealed a thinner retinal thickness and loss of normal lamination in aged patients, but a preserved foveal architecture was found in a 27-year-old patient [93]. The rod response in ERG is always diminished, but a residual cone response has been detected in some cases [94].

4.15. TULP1

The tubby-like protein 1 is encoded by the TULP1 gene on chromosome 6q21.31, which is expressed specifically in the retina and is localized in the cilia of the photoreceptor’s inner segment, including both rods and cones. Mutations in TULP1 account for approximately 1% of LCA cases [9]. TULP-associated LCA cases present with poor vision, nystagmus, and nyctalopia since infancy, but no photophobia or hyperopia. Funduscopy findings remain unremarkable in early childhood, but pigmentary retinopathy is noted after the second decade of life, while maculopathy develops in the third decade [95]. A hyperautofluorescent ring can be seen in the central macula. OCT reveals a thinner retina with loss of outer retinal lamination eccentric to the fovea, while relatively preserved foveal bulge [96]. The ERG response is extinguished in most patients [95,96].

4.16. KCNJ13

The KCNJ13 gene on chromosome 2q37.1 encodes protein Kir7.1, which is localized on the apical process of RPE and functions as a potassium channel [97]. LCA cases of mutations in KCNJ13 present with nyctalopia, nystagmus, and cataracts [98]. Funduscopic findings are normal in early life, but characteristic dense pigmentary maculopathy develops after the first decade of life. A corresponding hyperreflective deposit spread in the disorganized retina can be seen on OCT. The ERG response is extinguished in most cases [98,99].

4.17. PRPH2

The PRPH2 gene on chromosome 6p21.1 encodes peripherin 2, which is present in the disc rims of the outer segment of the photoreceptors. Mutations in PRPH2 are related to RP, retinitis punctata albescens, and several macular dystrophies [100]. Mutation of PRPH2 has been reported in LCA in a limited manner. Poor vision, nyctalopia, and nystagmus have been observed in the reported case [101,102]. Fundus examination was nearly normal in infancy, but pigmentary retinopathy and bull’s-eye maculopathy were present in adulthood [101]. The family members who were carriers also exhibited maculopathy, even though they were asymptomatic [102]. OCT revealed a relatively normal thickness but disrupted outer retina with hyperreflective deposits [101]. The ERG response was extinguished in the reported cases.

4.18. IQCB1

The IQCB1 gene on 3q13.33 encodes nephrocystin, which is localized in the cilia in the kidney and retinal photoreceptors and interacts with CEP290 in ciliary function [103]. Patients with mutations in IQCB1 have onset of LCA in early childhood, and some of them develop renal dysfunction in adolescence [104]. These patients have progressively impaired vision, nyctalopia, and high hyperopia. Fundus examination may reveal early hypo- and hyperpigmentation outside the vascular arcades in a lobular fashion, which is distinct from other LCA phenotypes [105]. Eccentrically decreasing persevered foveal ONL and loss of EZ integrity may be seen on OCT. An extinguished ERG response has been seen in reported cases [104].
Many LCA-associated mutations have a relatively lower prevalence, and limited cases have been reported in the literature. Mutations in OTX2 and GDF6 are more known for severe ocular malformations, such as microphthalmia, because of their essential role in embryonic ocular development; however, milder cases with retinopathy have been diagnosed as LCA as well [106,107]. Mutations in the IFT140 gene cause ciliopathy, which is associated with retinal, renal, and skeletal abnormalities (Mainzer-Saldino syndrome) [108]. However, a specific genotype-phenotype correlation has not been established in the infrequent mutations.

5. Therapeutic Approach

Gene augmentation therapy is the main source of potential treatment for LCA. Animal studies have been conducted on commonly involved genes, including GUCY2D, RPE65, AIPL1, RPGRIP1, LCA5, CEP290, and RDH12, mostly by using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector-mediated or lentiviral-vector-mediated gene augmentation therapy [15]. Moreover, clinical trials focusing on GUCY2D, RPE65, and CEP290 are ongoing [109]. To date, the most advanced progress has been made in the treatment of RPE65 mutations [110,111,112,113]. Among them, Luxturna™ (Voretigene neparvovecryzl; Spark Therapeutics, Philadelphia, PA) is the first treatment to undergo a phase III trial and is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in genetic therapy for LCA [112]. Luxturna™ is an AAV designed to be administered to the sub-retinal space through the pars-plana approach, which carries the RPE65 gene to restore the deficiency in the RPE65 protein in patients with LCA with a biallelic RPE65 mutation. Early intervention is essential for success because more retinal cells may be viable during early life [113]. Improvements in visual acuity, perimetry, and retinal sensitivity have been reported and were sustained until 4 years after treatment in the latest clinical trials [114]; however, ongoing retinal degeneration was still noted with extended follow-up [110,111].
Being one of the most identified variants in western countries, gene therapy trials have also focused on c.2991+1655A>G in the CEP290 gene. A pioneer CRISPR (clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats)-mediated gene editing therapy focusing on the c.2991+1655A>G variant has been launched for phase I clinical trials. Another approach with intravitreal injection of mRNA, which serves as an anti-sense oligonucleotide for genetic editing, has been introduced to restore the expression level of CEP290 (NCT03140969) [115,116]. Pharmacotherapy could improve the retinoid cycle dysfunction by providing a specific substrate. A clinical trial of QLT091001, a precursor of 9-cis retinol taken orally, showed improvement in vision and perimetry in LRAT- and RPE65-associated LCA cases [117]. Stem-cell therapy is considered a rescue therapy for cases with atrophic macula by introducing progenitor retinal cells. It has been proved that both embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells are capable of regenerating retinal tissue for potential treatment of RP and age-related macular degeneration. Cell replacement therapy for atrophic retina is ubiquitous in different causative retinal diseases and is promising in the treatment of LCA and various inherited retinal diseases [118].

6. Conclusions

LCA is the most severe and early onset form of IRDs and is a major cause of childhood blindness. Hence, it is important to find an effective treatment soon. However, its highly heterogeneous phenotypic and genetic spectra have made it difficult to diagnose and plan individualized treatment. Owing to the modern advances in next-generation sequencing, the efficiency and accuracy of identifying causative gene mutations have been largely elevated. Therefore, the genotype-phenotype correlations can be explored more precisely when incorporating clinical assessments and image examinations. Nonetheless, the correlations between phenotypical features and intra-genetic variability or ethnical difference are even less established and further research is required in the future. Here, we provide a comprehensive review, anticipating to enhance the diagnosis and treatment of potential LCA cases in clinical practice, as well as the development of available therapeutic interventions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-C.C., C.-H.Y., and C.-M.Y.; investigation, C.-H.H. and T.-C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-H.H. and T.-C.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.-C.H. and C.-H.Y.; supervision, C.-M.Y. and Y.-C.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We would like to thank the National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, for supporting our IRD-related research, including via grants NTUH 109-CGN10 and 110-CGN14.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Berger, W.; Kloeckener-Gruissem, B.; Neidhardt, J. The molecular basis of human retinal and vitreoretinal diseases. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2010, 29, 335–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Perrault, I.; Rozet, J.M.; Gerber, S.; Ghazi, I.; Leowski, C.; Ducroq, D.; Souied, E.; Dufier, J.L.; Munnich, A.; Kaplan, J. Leber congenital amaurosis. Mol. Genet. Metab. 1999, 68, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Koenekoop, R.K. An overview of Leber congenital amaurosis: A model to understand human retinal development. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2004, 49, 379–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stone, E.M. Leber congenital amaurosis—A model for efficient genetic testing of heterogeneous disorders: LXIV Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2007, 144, 791–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Koenekoop, R.K.; Lopez, I.; den Hollander, A.I.; Allikmets, R.; Cremers, F.P. Genetic testing for retinal dystrophies and dysfunctions: Benefits, dilemmas and solutions. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2007, 35, 473–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, T.C.; Huang, D.S.; Lin, C.W.; Yang, C.H.; Yang, C.M.; Wang, V.Y.; Lin, J.W.; Luo, A.C.; Hu, F.R.; Chen, P.L. Genetic characteristics and epidemiology of inherited retinal degeneration in Taiwan. NPJ Genom. Med. 2021, 6, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Weleber, R.G.; Michaelides, M.; Trzupek, K.M.; Stover, N.B.; Stone, E.M. The phenotype of Severe Early Childhood Onset Retinal Dystrophy (SECORD) from mutation of RPE65 and differentiation from Leber congenital amaurosis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Hanein, S.; Perrault, I.; Gerber, S.; Tanguy, G.; Barbet, F.; Ducroq, D.; Calvas, P.; Dollfus, H.; Hamel, C.; Lopponen, T.; et al. Leber congenital amaurosis: Comprehensive survey of the genetic heterogeneity, refinement of the clinical definition, and genotype-phenotype correlations as a strategy for molecular diagnosis. Hum. Mutat. 2004, 23, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Den Hollander, A.I.; Roepman, R.; Koenekoop, R.K.; Cremers, F.P. Leber congenital amaurosis: Genes, proteins and disease mechanisms. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2008, 27, 391–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kondkar, A.A.; Abu-Amero, K.K. Leber congenital amaurosis: Current genetic basis, scope for genetic testing and personalized medicine. Exp. Eye Res. 2019, 189, 107834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chacon-Camacho, O.F.; Zenteno, J.C. Review and update on the molecular basis of Leber congenital amaurosis. World J. Clin. Cases 2015, 3, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jacobson, S.G.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Huang, W.C.; Sumaroka, A.; Nam, H.J.; Sheplock, R.; Schwartz, S.B. Leber Congenital Amaurosis: Genotypes and Retinal Structure Phenotypes. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 854, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cideciyan, A.V.; Jacobson, S.G. Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA): Potential for Improvement of Vision. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 1680–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Pasadhika, S.; Fishman, G.A.; Stone, E.M.; Lindeman, M.; Zelkha, R.; Lopez, I.; Koenekoop, R.K.; Shahidi, M. Differential macular morphology in patients with RPE65-, CEP290-, GUCY2D-, and AIPL1-related Leber congenital amaurosis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 2608–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kumaran, N.; Moore, A.T.; Weleber, R.G.; Michaelides, M. Leber congenital amaurosis/early-onset severe retinal dystrophy: Clinical features, molecular genetics and therapeutic interventions. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 101, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Traboulsi, E.I. The Marshall M. Parks memorial lecture: Making sense of early-onset childhood retinal dystrophies--the clinical phenotype of Leber congenital amaurosis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2010, 94, 1281–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). Available online: https://www.omim.org/ (accessed on 1 July 2021).
  18. Coussa, R.G.; Lopez Solache, I.; Koenekoop, R.K. Leber congenital amaurosis, from darkness to light: An ode to Irene Maumenee. Ophthalmic Genet. 2017, 38, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Yi, Z.; Ouyang, J.; Sun, W.; Xiao, X.; Li, S.; Jia, X.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Q. Biallelic mutations in USP45, encoding a deubiquitinating enzyme, are associated with Leber congenital amaurosis. J. Med. Genet. 2019, 56, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sweeney, M.O.; McGee, T.L.; Berson, E.L.; Dryja, T.P. Low prevalence of lecithin retinol acyltransferase mutations in patients with Leber congenital amaurosis and autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Mol. Vis. 2007, 13, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Coppieters, F.; Casteels, I.; Meire, F.; De Jaegere, S.; Hooghe, S.; van Regemorter, N.; Van Esch, H.; Matuleviciene, A.; Nunes, L.; Meersschaut, V.; et al. Genetic screening of LCA in Belgium: Predominance of CEP290 and identification of potential modifier alleles in AHI1 of CEP290-related phenotypes. Hum. Mutat. 2010, 31, E1709–E1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Astuti, G.D.; Bertelsen, M.; Preising, M.N.; Ajmal, M.; Lorenz, B.; Faradz, S.M.; Qamar, R.; Collin, R.W.; Rosenberg, T.; Cremers, F.P. Comprehensive genotyping reveals RPE65 as the most frequently mutated gene in Leber congenital amaurosis in Denmark. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 24, 1071–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Zou, X.; Xu, S.; Li, H.; Soens, Z.T.; Wang, K.; Li, Y.; Dong, F.; Chen, R.; et al. Comprehensive Molecular Diagnosis of a Large Chinese Leber Congenital Amaurosis Cohort. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 3642–3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hosono, K.; Nishina, S.; Yokoi, T.; Katagiri, S.; Saitsu, H.; Kurata, K.; Miyamichi, D.; Hikoya, A.; Mizobuchi, K.; Nakano, T.; et al. Molecular Diagnosis of 34 Japanese Families with Leber Congenital Amaurosis Using Targeted Next Generation Sequencing. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Thompson, J.A.; De Roach, J.N.; McLaren, T.L.; Montgomery, H.E.; Hoffmann, L.H.; Campbell, I.R.; Chen, F.K.; Mackey, D.A.; Lamey, T.M. The genetic profile of Leber congenital amaurosis in an Australian cohort. Mol. Genet. Genomic. Med. 2017, 5, 652–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Peng, J.; Gibbs, R.A.; Lewis, R.A.; Lupski, J.R.; Mardon, G.; Chen, R. Mutation survey of known LCA genes and loci in the Saudi Arabian population. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 1336–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Perrault, I.; Rozet, J.M.; Calvas, P.; Gerber, S.; Camuzat, A.; Dollfus, H.; Chatelin, S.; Souied, E.; Ghazi, I.; Leowski, C.; et al. Retinal-specific guanylate cyclase gene mutations in Leber’s congenital amaurosis. Nat. Genet. 1996, 14, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, X.; Seno, K.; Nishizawa, Y.; Hayashi, F.; Yamazaki, A.; Matsumoto, H.; Wakabayashi, T.; Usukura, J. Ultrastructural localization of retinal guanylate cyclase in human and monkey retinas. Exp. Eye Res. 1994, 59, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dharmaraj, S.R.; Silva, E.R.; Pina, A.L.; Li, Y.Y.; Yang, J.M.; Carter, C.R.; Loyer, M.K.; El-Hilali, H.K.; Traboulsi, E.K.; Sundin, O.K.; et al. Mutational analysis and clinical correlation in Leber congenital amaurosis. Ophthalmic Genet. 2000, 21, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jacobson, S.G.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Sumaroka, A.; Roman, A.J.; Charng, J.; Lu, M.; Choudhury, S.; Schwartz, S.B.; Heon, E.; Fishman, G.A.; et al. Defining Outcomes for Clinical Trials of Leber Congenital Amaurosis Caused by GUCY2D Mutations. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 177, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bouzia, Z.; Georgiou, M.; Hull, S.; Robson, A.G.; Fujinami, K.; Rotsos, T.; Pontikos, N.; Arno, G.; Webster, A.R.; Hardcastle, A.J.; et al. GUCY2D-Associated Leber Congenital Amaurosis: A Retrospective Natural History Study in Preparation for Trials of Novel Therapies. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 210, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jacobson, S.G.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Sumaroka, A.; Roman, A.J.; Wu, V.; Swider, M.; Sheplock, R.; Krishnan, A.K.; Garafalo, A.V. Leber Congenital Amaurosis Due to GUCY2D Mutations: Longitudinal Analysis of Retinal Structure and Visual Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jacobson, S.G.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Peshenko, I.V.; Sumaroka, A.; Olshevskaya, E.V.; Cao, L.; Schwartz, S.B.; Roman, A.J.; Olivares, M.B.; Sadigh, S.; et al. Determining consequences of retinal membrane guanylyl cyclase (RetGC1) deficiency in human Leber congenital amaurosis en route to therapy: Residual cone-photoreceptor vision correlates with biochemical properties of the mutants. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 168–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Peshenko, I.V.; Olshevskaya, E.V.; Dizhoor, A.M. GUCY2D mutations in retinal guanylyl cyclase 1 provide biochemical reasons for dominant cone-rod dystrophy but not for stationary night blindness. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 18301–18315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Moiseyev, G.; Chen, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Wu, B.X.; Ma, J.X. RPE65 is the isomerohydrolase in the retinoid visual cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 12413–12418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Chen, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Shen, T.; Xiao, X.; Li, S.; Guan, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Yin, Y.; Wang, P.; et al. Comprehensive mutation analysis by whole-exome sequencing in 41 Chinese families with Leber congenital amaurosis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 4351–4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Morimura, H.; Fishman, G.A.; Grover, S.A.; Fulton, A.B.; Berson, E.L.; Dryja, T.P. Mutations in the RPE65 gene in patients with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa or leber congenital amaurosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 3088–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Verma, A.; Perumalsamy, V.; Shetty, S.; Kulm, M.; Sundaresan, P. Mutational screening of LCA genes emphasizing RPE65 in South Indian cohort of patients. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chung, D.C.; Bertelsen, M.; Lorenz, B.; Pennesi, M.E.; Leroy, B.P.; Hamel, C.P.; Pierce, E.; Sallum, J.; Larsen, M.; Stieger, K.; et al. The Natural History of Inherited Retinal Dystrophy Due to Biallelic Mutations in the RPE65 Gene. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 199, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cideciyan, A.V. Leber congenital amaurosis due to RPE65 mutations and its treatment with gene therapy. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2010, 29, 398–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kumaran, N.; Rubin, G.S.; Kalitzeos, A.; Fujinami, K.; Bainbridge, J.W.B.; Weleber, R.G.; Michaelides, M. A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study of Retinal Sensitivity in RPE65-Associated Leber Congenital Amaurosis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 3330–3339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lorenz, B.; Gyurus, P.; Preising, M.; Bremser, D.; Gu, S.; Andrassi, M.; Gerth, C.; Gal, A. Early-onset severe rod-cone dystrophy in young children with RPE65 mutations. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 2735–2742. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lorenz, B.; Wabbels, B.; Wegscheider, E.; Hamel, C.P.; Drexler, W.; Preising, M.N. Lack of fundus autofluorescence to 488 nanometers from childhood on in patients with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy associated with mutations in RPE65. Ophthalmology 2004, 111, 1585–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jacobson, S.G.; Aleman, T.S.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Heon, E.; Golczak, M.; Beltran, W.A.; Sumaroka, A.; Schwartz, S.B.; Roman, A.J.; Windsor, E.A.; et al. Human cone photoreceptor dependence on RPE65 isomerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 15123–15128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Jacobson, S.G.; Aleman, T.S.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Sumaroka, A.; Schwartz, S.B.; Windsor, E.A.; Traboulsi, E.I.; Heon, E.; Pittler, S.J.; Milam, A.H.; et al. Identifying photoreceptors in blind eyes caused by RPE65 mutations: Prerequisite for human gene therapy success. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 6177–6182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Alves, C.H.; Pellissier, L.P.; Wijnholds, J. The CRB1 and adherens junction complex proteins in retinal development and maintenance. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2014, 40, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Beryozkin, A.; Zelinger, L.; Bandah-Rozenfeld, D.; Harel, A.; Strom, T.A.; Merin, S.; Chowers, I.; Banin, E.; Sharon, D. Mutations in CRB1 are a relatively common cause of autosomal recessive early-onset retinal degeneration in the Israeli and Palestinian populations. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 2068–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kousal, B.; Dudakova, L.; Gaillyova, R.; Hejtmankova, M.; Diblik, P.; Michaelides, M.; Liskova, P. Phenotypic features of CRB1-associated early-onset severe retinal dystrophy and the different molecular approaches to identifying the disease-causing variants. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2016, 254, 1833–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lotery, A.J.; Jacobson, S.G.; Fishman, G.A.; Weleber, R.G.; Fulton, A.B.; Namperumalsamy, P.; Heon, E.; Levin, A.V.; Grover, S.; Rosenow, J.R.; et al. Mutations in the CRB1 gene cause Leber congenital amaurosis. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2001, 119, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Den Hollander, A.I.; Heckenlively, J.R.; van den Born, L.I.; de Kok, Y.J.; van der Velde-Visser, S.D.; Kellner, U.; Jurklies, B.; van Schooneveld, M.J.; Blankenagel, A.; Rohrschneider, K.; et al. Leber congenital amaurosis and retinitis pigmentosa with Coats-like exudative vasculopathy are associated with mutations in the crumbs homologue 1 (CRB1) gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001, 69, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Leroy, B.P.; Birch, D.G.; Duncan, J.L.; Lam, B.L.; Koenekoop, R.K.; Porto, F.B.O.; Russell, S.R.; Girach, A. Leber congenital amaurosis due to cep290 mutations-severe vision impairment with a high unmet medical need: A review. Retina 2021, 41, 898–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. McAnany, J.J.; Genead, M.A.; Walia, S.; Drack, A.V.; Stone, E.M.; Koenekoop, R.K.; Traboulsi, E.I.; Smith, A.; Weleber, R.G.; Jacobson, S.G.; et al. Visual acuity changes in patients with leber congenital amaurosis and mutations in CEP290. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013, 131, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sheck, L.; Davies, W.I.L.; Moradi, P.; Robson, A.G.; Kumaran, N.; Liasis, A.C.; Webster, A.R.; Moore, A.T.; Michaelides, M. Leber Congenital Amaurosis Associated with Mutations in CEP290, Clinical Phenotype, and Natural History in Preparation for Trials of Novel Therapies. Ophthalmology 2018, 125, 894–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yzer, S.; Hollander, A.I.; Lopez, I.; Pott, J.W.; de Faber, J.T.; Cremers, F.P.; Koenekoop, R.K.; van den Born, L.I. Ocular and extra-ocular features of patients with Leber congenital amaurosis and mutations in CEP290. Mol. Vis. 2012, 18, 412–425. [Google Scholar]
  55. Perrault, I.; Hanein, S.; Gerber, S.; Barbet, F.; Ducroq, D.; Dollfus, H.; Hamel, C.; Dufier, J.L.; Munnich, A.; Kaplan, J.; et al. Retinal dehydrogenase 12 (RDH12) mutations in leber congenital amaurosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 75, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Mackay, D.S.; Dev Borman, A.; Moradi, P.; Henderson, R.H.; Li, Z.; Wright, G.A.; Waseem, N.; Gandra, M.; Thompson, D.A.; Bhattacharya, S.S.; et al. RDH12 retinopathy: Novel mutations and phenotypic description. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 2706–2716. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Garg, A.; Lee, W.; Sengillo, J.D.; Allikmets, R.; Garg, K.; Tsang, S.H. Peripapillary sparing in RDH12-associated Leber congenital amaurosis. Ophthalmic Genet. 2017, 38, 575–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, Y.; Pan, Q.; Gu, Y.S. Phenotype-genotype correlation with Sanger sequencing identified retinol dehydrogenase 12 (RDH12) compound heterozygous variants in a Chinese family with Leber congenital amaurosis. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2017, 18, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Jacobson, S.G.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Aleman, T.S.; Sumaroka, A.; Schwartz, S.B.; Windsor, E.A.; Roman, A.J.; Heon, E.; Stone, E.M.; Thompson, D.A. RDH12 and RPE65, visual cycle genes causing leber congenital amaurosis, differ in disease expression. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wang, H.; den Hollander, A.I.; Moayedi, Y.; Abulimiti, A.; Li, Y.; Collin, R.W.; Hoyng, C.B.; Lopez, I.; Abboud, E.B.; Al-Rajhi, A.A.; et al. Mutations in SPATA7 cause Leber congenital amaurosis and juvenile retinitis pigmentosa. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 84, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Perrault, I.; Hanein, S.; Gerard, X.; Delphin, N.; Fares-Taie, L.; Gerber, S.; Pelletier, V.; Merce, E.; Dollfus, H.; Puech, B.; et al. Spectrum of SPATA7 mutations in Leber congenital amaurosis and delineation of the associated phenotype. Hum. Mutat. 2010, 31, E1241–E1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Aboshiha, J.; Dubis, A.M.; van der Spuy, J.; Nishiguchi, K.M.; Cheeseman, E.W.; Ayuso, C.; Ehrenberg, M.; Simonelli, F.; Bainbridge, J.W.; Michaelides, M. Preserved outer retina in AIPL1 Leber’s congenital amaurosis: Implications for gene therapy. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 862–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Sacristan-Reviriego, A.; Le, H.M.; Georgiou, M.; Meunier, I.; Bocquet, B.; Roux, A.F.; Prodromou, C.; Bainbridge, J.; Michaelides, M.; van der Spuy, J. Clinical and functional analyses of AIPL1 variants reveal mechanisms of pathogenicity linked to different forms of retinal degeneration. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dharmaraj, S.; Leroy, B.P.; Sohocki, M.M.; Koenekoop, R.K.; Perrault, I.; Anwar, K.; Khaliq, S.; Devi, R.S.; Birch, D.G.; De Pool, E.; et al. The phenotype of Leber congenital amaurosis in patients with AIPL1 mutations. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2004, 122, 1029–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Jacobson, S.G.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Aleman, T.S.; Sumaroka, A.; Roman, A.J.; Swider, M.; Schwartz, S.B.; Banin, E.; Stone, E.M. Human retinal disease from AIPL1 gene mutations: Foveal cone loss with minimal macular photoreceptors and rod function remaining. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Tan, M.H.; Mackay, D.S.; Cowing, J.; Tran, H.V.; Smith, A.J.; Wright, G.A.; Dev-Borman, A.; Henderson, R.H.; Moradi, P.; Russell-Eggitt, I.; et al. Leber congenital amaurosis associated with AIPL1: Challenges in ascribing disease causation, clinical findings, and implications for gene therapy. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pennesi, M.E.; Stover, N.B.; Stone, E.M.; Chiang, P.W.; Weleber, R.G. Residual electroretinograms in young Leber congenital amaurosis patients with mutations of AIPL1. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 8166–8173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Testa, F.; Surace, E.M.; Rossi, S.; Marrocco, E.; Gargiulo, A.; Di Iorio, V.; Ziviello, C.; Nesti, A.; Fecarotta, S.; Bacci, M.L.; et al. Evaluation of Italian patients with leber congenital amaurosis due to AIPL1 mutations highlights the potential applicability of gene therapy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 5618–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Heegaard, S.; Rosenberg, T.; Preising, M.; Prause, J.U.; Bek, T. An unusual retinal vascular morphology in connection with a novel AIPL1 mutation in Leber’s congenital amaurosis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 87, 980–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Den Hollander, A.I.; Koenekoop, R.K.; Mohamed, M.D.; Arts, H.H.; Boldt, K.; Towns, K.V.; Sedmak, T.; Beer, M.; Nagel-Wolfrum, K.; McKibbin, M.; et al. Mutations in LCA5, encoding the ciliary protein lebercilin, cause Leber congenital amaurosis. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mackay, D.S.; Borman, A.D.; Sui, R.; van den Born, L.I.; Berson, E.L.; Ocaka, L.A.; Davidson, A.E.; Heckenlively, J.R.; Branham, K.; Ren, H.; et al. Screening of a large cohort of leber congenital amaurosis and retinitis pigmentosa patients identifies novel LCA5 mutations and new genotype-phenotype correlations. Hum. Mutat. 2013, 34, 1537–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Dharmaraj, S.; Li, Y.; Robitaille, J.M.; Silva, E.; Zhu, D.; Mitchell, T.N.; Maltby, L.P.; Baffoe-Bonnie, A.B.; Maumenee, I.H. A novel locus for Leber congenital amaurosis maps to chromosome 6q. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000, 66, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Jacobson, S.G.; Aleman, T.S.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Sumaroka, A.; Schwartz, S.B.; Windsor, E.A.; Swider, M.; Herrera, W.; Stone, E.M. Leber congenital amaurosis caused by Lebercilin (LCA5) mutation: Retained photoreceptors adjacent to retinal disorganization. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 1098–1106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Mohamed, M.D.; Topping, N.C.; Jafri, H.; Raashed, Y.; McKibbin, M.A.; Inglehearn, C.F. Progression of phenotype in Leber’s congenital amaurosis with a mutation at the LCA5 locus. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 87, 473–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Dryja, T.P.; Adams, S.M.; Grimsby, J.L.; McGee, T.L.; Hong, D.H.; Li, T.; Andreasson, S.; Berson, E.L. Null RPGRIP1 alleles in patients with Leber congenital amaurosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001, 68, 1295–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Li, T. Leber congenital amaurosis caused by mutations in RPGRIP1. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014, 5, a017384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Khan, A.O.; Abu-Safieh, L.; Eisenberger, T.; Bolz, H.J.; Alkuraya, F.S. The RPGRIP1-related retinal phenotype in children. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 97, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Miyamichi, D.; Nishina, S.; Hosono, K.; Yokoi, T.; Kurata, K.; Sato, M.; Hotta, Y.; Azuma, N. Retinal structure in Leber’s congenital amaurosis caused by RPGRIP1 mutations. Hum. Genome Var. 2019, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jacobson, S.G.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Aleman, T.S.; Sumaroka, A.; Schwartz, S.B.; Roman, A.J.; Stone, E.M. Leber congenital amaurosis caused by an RPGRIP1 mutation shows treatment potential. Ophthalmology 2007, 114, 895–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Furukawa, T.; Morrow, E.M.; Cepko, C.L. Crx, a novel otx-like homeobox gene, shows photoreceptor-specific expression and regulates photoreceptor differentiation. Cell 1997, 91, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Hull, S.; Arno, G.; Plagnol, V.; Chamney, S.; Russell-Eggitt, I.; Thompson, D.; Ramsden, S.C.; Black, G.C.; Robson, A.; Holder, G.E.; et al. The phenotypic variability of retinal dystrophies associated with mutations in CRX, with report of a novel macular dystrophy phenotype. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 6934–6944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Nichols, L.L., 2nd; Alur, R.P.; Boobalan, E.; Sergeev, Y.V.; Caruso, R.C.; Stone, E.M.; Swaroop, A.; Johnson, M.A.; Brooks, B.P. Two novel CRX mutant proteins causing autosomal dominant Leber congenital amaurosis interact differently with NRL. Hum. Mutat. 2010, 31, E1472–E1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Koenekoop, R.K.; Loyer, M.; Dembinska, O.; Beneish, R. Visual improvement in Leber congenital amaurosis and the CRX genotype. Ophthalmic Genet. 2002, 23, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Koenekoop, R.K.; Wang, H.; Majewski, J.; Wang, X.; Lopez, I.; Ren, H.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Fishman, G.A.; Genead, M.; et al. Mutations in NMNAT1 cause Leber congenital amaurosis and identify a new disease pathway for retinal degeneration. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Falk, M.J.; Zhang, Q.; Nakamaru-Ogiso, E.; Kannabiran, C.; Fonseca-Kelly, Z.; Chakarova, C.; Audo, I.; Mackay, D.S.; Zeitz, C.; Borman, A.D.; et al. NMNAT1 mutations cause Leber congenital amaurosis. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 1040–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Siemiatkowska, A.M.; van den Born, L.I.; van Genderen, M.M.; Bertelsen, M.; Zobor, D.; Rohrschneider, K.; van Huet, R.A.; Nurohmah, S.; Klevering, B.J.; Kohl, S.; et al. Novel compound heterozygous NMNAT1 variants associated with Leber congenital amaurosis. Mol. Vis. 2014, 20, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Hedergott, A.; Volk, A.E.; Herkenrath, P.; Thiele, H.; Fricke, J.; Altmuller, J.; Nurnberg, P.; Kubisch, C.; Neugebauer, A. Clinical and genetic findings in a family with NMNAT1-associated Leber congenital amaurosis: Case report and review of the literature. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2015, 253, 2239–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Bowne, S.J.; Sullivan, L.S.; Mortimer, S.E.; Hedstrom, L.; Zhu, J.; Spellicy, C.J.; Gire, A.I.; Hughbanks-Wheaton, D.; Birch, D.G.; Lewis, R.A.; et al. Spectrum and frequency of mutations in IMPDH1 associated with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa and leber congenital amaurosis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006, 47, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Azadi, S.; Molday, L.L.; Molday, R.S. RD3, the protein associated with Leber congenital amaurosis type 12, is required for guanylate cyclase trafficking in photoreceptor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 21158–21163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Friedman, J.S.; Chang, B.; Kannabiran, C.; Chakarova, C.; Singh, H.P.; Jalali, S.; Hawes, N.L.; Branham, K.; Othman, M.; Filippova, E.; et al. Premature truncation of a novel protein, RD3, exhibiting subnuclear localization is associated with retinal degeneration. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 79, 1059–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Perrault, I.; Estrada-Cuzcano, A.; Lopez, I.; Kohl, S.; Li, S.; Testa, F.; Zekveld-Vroon, R.; Wang, X.; Pomares, E.; Andorf, J.; et al. Union makes strength: A worldwide collaborative genetic and clinical study to provide a comprehensive survey of RD3 mutations and delineate the associated phenotype. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e51622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Preising, M.N.; Hausotter-Will, N.; Solbach, M.C.; Friedburg, C.; Ruschendorf, F.; Lorenz, B. Mutations in RD3 are associated with an extremely rare and severe form of early onset retinal dystrophy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 3463–3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Dev Borman, A.; Ocaka, L.A.; Mackay, D.S.; Ripamonti, C.; Henderson, R.H.; Moradi, P.; Hall, G.; Black, G.C.; Robson, A.G.; Holder, G.E.; et al. Early onset retinal dystrophy due to mutations in LRAT: Molecular analysis and detailed phenotypic study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 3927–3938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Talib, M.; van Schooneveld, M.J.; van Duuren, R.J.G.; Van Cauwenbergh, C.; Ten Brink, J.B.; De Baere, E.; Florijn, R.J.; Schalij-Delfos, N.E.; Leroy, B.P.; Bergen, A.A.; et al. Long-Term Follow-Up of Retinal Degenerations Associated With LRAT Mutations and Their Comparability to Phenotypes Associated With RPE65 Mutations. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2019, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Mataftsi, A.; Schorderet, D.F.; Chachoua, L.; Boussalah, M.; Nouri, M.T.; Barthelmes, D.; Borruat, F.X.; Munier, F.L. Novel TULP1 mutation causing leber congenital amaurosis or early onset retinal degeneration. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 5160–5167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Jacobson, S.G.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Huang, W.C.; Sumaroka, A.; Roman, A.J.; Schwartz, S.B.; Luo, X.; Sheplock, R.; Dauber, J.M.; Swider, M.; et al. TULP1 mutations causing early-onset retinal degeneration: Preserved but insensitive macular cones. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 5354–5364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Pattnaik, B.R.; Shahi, P.K.; Marino, M.J.; Liu, X.; York, N.; Brar, S.; Chiang, J.; Pillers, D.A.; Traboulsi, E.I. A Novel KCNJ13 Nonsense Mutation and Loss of Kir7.1 Channel Function Causes Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA16). Hum. Mutat. 2015, 36, 720–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Perez-Roustit, S.; Marquette, V.; Bocquet, B.; Kaplan, J.; Perrault, I.; Meunier, I.; Hamel, C.P. Leber Congenital Amaurosis with Large Retinal Pigment Clumps Caused by Compound Heterozygous Mutations in Kcnj13. Retin. Cases Brief. Rep. 2017, 11, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Sergouniotis, P.I.; Davidson, A.E.; Mackay, D.S.; Li, Z.; Yang, X.; Plagnol, V.; Moore, A.T.; Webster, A.R. Recessive mutations in KCNJ13, encoding an inwardly rectifying potassium channel subunit, cause leber congenital amaurosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 89, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Boon, C.J.; den Hollander, A.I.; Hoyng, C.B.; Cremers, F.P.; Klevering, B.J.; Keunen, J.E. The spectrum of retinal dystrophies caused by mutations in the peripherin/RDS gene. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2008, 27, 213–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Daftarian, N.; Mirrahimi, M.; Sabbaghi, H.; Moghadasi, A.; Zal, N.; Dehghan Banadaki, H.; Ahmadieh, H.; Suri, F. PRPH2 mutation as the cause of various clinical manifestations in a family affected with inherited retinal dystrophy. Ophthalmic Genet. 2019, 40, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Khan, A.O.; Al Rashaed, S.; Neuhaus, C.; Bergmann, C.; Bolz, H.J. Peripherin mutations cause a distinct form of recessive Leber congenital amaurosis and dominant phenotypes in asymptomatic parents heterozygous for the mutation. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 100, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Schafer, T.; Putz, M.; Lienkamp, S.; Ganner, A.; Bergbreiter, A.; Ramachandran, H.; Gieloff, V.; Gerner, M.; Mattonet, C.; Czarnecki, P.G.; et al. Genetic and physical interaction between the NPHP5 and NPHP6 gene products. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008, 17, 3655–3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Stone, E.M.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Aleman, T.S.; Scheetz, T.E.; Sumaroka, A.; Ehlinger, M.A.; Schwartz, S.B.; Fishman, G.A.; Traboulsi, E.I.; Lam, B.L.; et al. Variations in NPHP5 in patients with nonsyndromic leber congenital amaurosis and Senior-Loken syndrome. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2011, 129, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Estrada-Cuzcano, A.; Koenekoop, R.K.; Coppieters, F.; Kohl, S.; Lopez, I.; Collin, R.W.; De Baere, E.B.; Roeleveld, D.; Marek, J.; Bernd, A.; et al. IQCB1 mutations in patients with leber congenital amaurosis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 834–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Asai-Coakwell, M.; March, L.; Dai, X.H.; Duval, M.; Lopez, I.; French, C.R.; Famulski, J.; De Baere, E.; Francis, P.J.; Sundaresan, P.; et al. Contribution of growth differentiation factor 6-dependent cell survival to early-onset retinal dystrophies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 1432–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Ragge, N.K.; Brown, A.G.; Poloschek, C.M.; Lorenz, B.; Henderson, R.A.; Clarke, M.P.; Russell-Eggitt, I.; Fielder, A.; Gerrelli, D.; Martinez-Barbera, J.P.; et al. Heterozygous mutations of OTX2 cause severe ocular malformations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005, 76, 1008–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Perrault, I.; Saunier, S.; Hanein, S.; Filhol, E.; Bizet, A.A.; Collins, F.; Salih, M.A.; Gerber, S.; Delphin, N.; Bigot, K.; et al. Mainzer-Saldino syndrome is a ciliopathy caused by IFT140 mutations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 90, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Daich Varela, M.; Cabral de Guimaraes, T.A.; Georgiou, M.; Michaelides, M. Leber congenital amaurosis/early-onset severe retinal dystrophy: Current management and clinical trials. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bainbridge, J.W.; Mehat, M.S.; Sundaram, V.; Robbie, S.J.; Barker, S.E.; Ripamonti, C.; Georgiadis, A.; Mowat, F.M.; Beattie, S.G.; Gardner, P.J.; et al. Long-term effect of gene therapy on Leber’s congenital amaurosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 1887–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Jacobson, S.G.; Cideciyan, A.V.; Ratnakaram, R.; Heon, E.; Schwartz, S.B.; Roman, A.J.; Peden, M.C.; Aleman, T.S.; Boye, S.L.; Sumaroka, A.; et al. Gene therapy for leber congenital amaurosis caused by RPE65 mutations: Safety and efficacy in 15 children and adults followed up to 3 years. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2012, 130, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Russell, S.; Bennett, J.; Wellman, J.A.; Chung, D.C.; Yu, Z.F.; Tillman, A.; Wittes, J.; Pappas, J.; Elci, O.; McCague, S.; et al. Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: A randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017, 390, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Weleber, R.G.; Pennesi, M.E.; Wilson, D.J.; Kaushal, S.; Erker, L.R.; Jensen, L.; McBride, M.T.; Flotte, T.R.; Humphries, M.; Calcedo, R.; et al. Results at 2 Years after Gene Therapy for RPE65-Deficient Leber Congenital Amaurosis and Severe Early-Childhood-Onset Retinal Dystrophy. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 1606–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Maguire, A.M.; Russell, S.; Wellman, J.A.; Chung, D.C.; Yu, Z.F.; Tillman, A.; Wittes, J.; Pappas, J.; Elci, O.; Marshall, K.A.; et al. Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl in RPE65 Mutation-Associated Inherited Retinal Dystrophy: Results of Phase 1 and 3 Trials. Ophthalmology 2019, 126, 1273–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Cideciyan, A.V.; Jacobson, S.G.; Drack, A.V.; Ho, A.C.; Charng, J.; Garafalo, A.V.; Roman, A.J.; Sumaroka, A.; Han, I.C.; Hochstedler, M.D.; et al. Effect of an intravitreal antisense oligonucleotide on vision in Leber congenital amaurosis due to a photoreceptor cilium defect. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Maeder, M.L.; Stefanidakis, M.; Wilson, C.J.; Baral, R.; Barrera, L.A.; Bounoutas, G.S.; Bumcrot, D.; Chao, H.; Ciulla, D.M.; DaSilva, J.A.; et al. Development of a gene-editing approach to restore vision loss in Leber congenital amaurosis type 10. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Scholl, H.P.; Moore, A.T.; Koenekoop, R.K.; Wen, Y.; Fishman, G.A.; van den Born, L.I.; Bittner, A.; Bowles, K.; Fletcher, E.C.; Collison, F.T.; et al. Safety and Proof-of-Concept Study of Oral QLT091001 in Retinitis Pigmentosa Due to Inherited Deficiencies of Retinal Pigment Epithelial 65 Protein (RPE65) or Lecithin:Retinol Acyltransferase (LRAT). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Ikelle, L.; Al-Ubaidi, M.R.; Naash, M.I. Pluripotent Stem Cells for the Treatment of Retinal Degeneration: Current Strategies and Future Directions. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Overview of the genes responsible for LCA and their clinical presentation, including the common funduscopic features, exception in ERG, and findings in OCT *.
Table 1. Overview of the genes responsible for LCA and their clinical presentation, including the common funduscopic features, exception in ERG, and findings in OCT *.
Locus Name Causative GeneChromosome SiteEncoded ProteinProtein FunctionFrequencyTypical FundusERG **OCT Features
LCA 1 GUCY2D17p13.1Retinal guanylate cyclase-1Photo-transduction6~21%Normal appearance until central RPE change in third decadeRod-
preserved		Preserved EZ and ONL with reduced signal intensity
LCA 2 RPE651p31.2Retinoid isomeraseretinoid cycle4~16%Normal macula with white dot and depigmentation in mid-peripheryCone-
preserved		Preserved EZ and ONL but degenerated in 3rd decade
LCA 3 SPATA714q31.3Spermatogenesis-associated protein 7Ciliary transportation3%Pigmentary retinopathy in mid-periphery, chorioretinal atrophy
LCA 4 AIPL117p13.2Aryl-hydrocarbon-interacting-protein-like 1Photo-transduction5%Central atrophic maculopathy with peripheral pigmentary retinopathyRod-
preserved		Loss of EZ and outer retinal lamination
LCA 5 LCA56q14.1LebercilinCiliary transportation1~2%Normal macula with white dot and mottling RPE in mid-peripheryCone-
preserved		Preserved in fovea but loss of outer retinal lamination eccentrically
LCA 6 RPGRIP114q11.2RP GTPase regulator-interacting protein 1Ciliary transportation5%Pigmentary retinopathy in mid-peripheryRod-
preserved		Loss of EZ and outer retinal lamination eccentrically
LCA 7 CRX19q13.3Cone-rod homeoboxPhotoreceptor morphogenesis1%Central atrophic maculopathy Thinner retina with preserved ONL
LCA 8 CRB11q31.3Crumbs homologue 1Photoreceptor morphogenesis9~17%Central atrophic maculopathy with dense pigmentation, preserved para-arteriolar RPE, Coats-like vasculopathy Thicken and disorganized retina in macula
LCA 9 NMNAT11q36.22Nicotinamide nucleotide adenyltransferase 1NAD biosynthesis<5%Central atrophic maculopathy with peripheral pigmentary retinopathy Disorganized retina in macula
LCA 10 CEP29012q21.32290 kDa centrosomal proteinCiliary transportation15~30%Normal macula, white dot and mottling RPE in mid-periphery, Coats-like vasculopathy Preserved EZ in fovea, remodeled inner retina and loss thickness eccentrically
LCA 11 IMPDH17q32.1Inosine 5’-monophosphate dehydrogenase 1Guanine synthesis8%Mottling and depigmentation in macula and periphery
LCA 12 RD31q32.3Retinal degeneration 3Photo-transduction<1%Central atrophic maculopathy with peripheral pigmentary retinopathy Disorganized retina in macula
LCA 13 RDH1214q24.1Retinol dehydrogenase 12retinoid cycle3~10%Central atrophic maculopathy with peripheral pigmentary retinopathy Disorganized retina in macula
LCA 14 LRAT4q32.1Lecithin:retinol acyl transferaseretinoid cycle1~2%Nearly normal but mottling macula with granularity in mid-peripheryCone-
preserved		Loss of EZ and outer retinal lamination in older cases
LCA 15 TULP16q21.31Tubby-like protein 1Ciliary transportation1%Normal in childhood but central atrophic maculopathy and pigmentary retinopathy in mid-periphery in third decade Preserved fovea but loss of outer retinal lamination eccentrically
LCA 16 KCNJ132q37.1inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir) 7.1Photo-transductionUnknownCentral atrophic maculopathy with dense pigmentation Disorganized retina in macula with pigment clump
LCA 18 PRPH26p21.1Peripherin 2Photoreceptor morphogenesisUnknownMaculopathy and pigmentary retinopathy in mid-periphery Loss of EZ and outer retinal lamination
IQCB13q13.33IQ motif-containing B1 proteinCiliary transportationUnknownLobular hypo-hyper pigmentation in mid-periphery
Other causative genes for LCA *** ALMS2, CABP4, CCT2, CEP164, CLUAP1, CNGA3, DTHD1, GDF6 (LCA 17), IDH3A, IFT52, IFT140, MCOR, MERTK, MYO7A, NPHP3, NPHP4, OTX2, TUBB4B, USP45 (LCA 19), ZNF423
Syndromic type of LCASenior-Løken syndrome (CEP290, IQCB1), Joubert syndrome (CEP290), Meckel syndrome (CEP290), Klippel-Feil syndrome (GDF6), Usher syndrome (MYOA7), syndromic microphthalmia (GDF6, OTX2)
Abbreviations: LCA, Leber’s congenital amaurosis; ERG, electroretinogram; OCT, optical coherent tomography; EZ, ellipsoid zone; ONL, outer nuclear layer. * Inheritance patterns in the genes listed in the table are autosomal recessive except for CRX, IMPDH1, and OTX2. ** Exceptions from the typically diminished ERG. *** Other genes found in case reports to be responsible for LCA on the OMIM website [17], but without a conclusion on the phenotypic features.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, C.-H.; Yang, C.-M.; Yang, C.-H.; Hou, Y.-C.; Chen, T.-C. Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis: Current Concepts of Genotype-Phenotype Correlations. Genes 2021, 12, 1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081261

AMA Style

Huang C-H, Yang C-M, Yang C-H, Hou Y-C, Chen T-C. Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis: Current Concepts of Genotype-Phenotype Correlations. Genes. 2021; 12(8):1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081261

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Chu-Hsuan, Chung-May Yang, Chang-Hao Yang, Yu-Chih Hou, and Ta-Ching Chen. 2021. "Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis: Current Concepts of Genotype-Phenotype Correlations" Genes 12, no. 8: 1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081261

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop