Next Article in Journal
Genetic Dissection of Growth and Eco-Physiological Traits Associated with Altitudinal Adaptation in Sakhalin Fir (Abies sachalinensis) Based on QTL Mapping
Previous Article in Journal
Study of the Interaction between Executive Function and Adaptive Behavior at School in Girls with Fragile X Syndrome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/genes12081109
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Maternal Phylogenetic Relationships and Genetic Variation among Rare, Phenotypically Similar Donkey Breeds

by
Andrea Mazzatenta
1,2,*,
Massimo Vignoli
1,
Maurizio Caputo
1,
Giorgio Vignola
1,*,
Roberto Tamburro
1,
Francesco De Sanctis
3,
Jordi Mirò Roig
4,
Roberta Bucci
1,
Domenico Robbe
1 and
Augusto Carluccio
1
1
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, SP 18, 64100 Teramo, Italy
2
Physiology and Physiopathology Section, Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences Department, University G. D’Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy
3
Section of Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
4
Servei de Reproducció Equina, Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Edifici V, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(8), 1109; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081109
Submission received: 24 June 2021 / Revised: 2 July 2021 / Accepted: 13 July 2021 / Published: 22 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) D-loop of endangered and critically endangered breeds has been studied to identify maternal lineages, characterize genetic inheritance, reconstruct phylogenetic relations among breeds, and develop biodiversity conservation and breeding programs. The aim of the study was to determine the variability remaining and the phylogenetic relationship of Martina Franca (MF, with total population of 160 females and 36 males), Ragusano (RG, 344 females and 30 males), Pantesco (PT, 47 females and 15 males), and Catalonian (CT) donkeys by collecting genetic data from maternal lineages. Genetic material was collected from saliva, and a 350 bp fragment of D-loop mtDNA was amplified and sequenced. Sequences were aligned and evaluated using standard bioinformatics software. A total of 56 haplotypes including 33 polymorphic sites were found in 77 samples (27 MF, 22 RG, 8 PT, 19 CT, 1 crossbred). The breed nucleotide diversity value (π) for all the breeds was 0.128 (MF: 0.162, RG: 0.132, PT: 0.025, CT: 0.038). Principal components analysis grouped most of the haplogroups into two different clusters, I (including all haplotypes from PT and CT, together with haplotypes from MF and RG) and II (including haplotypes from MF and RG only). In conclusion, we found that the primeval haplotypes, haplogroup variability, and a large number of maternal lineages were preserved in MF and RG; thus, these breeds play putative pivotal roles in the phyletic relationships of donkey breeds. Maternal inheritance is indispensable genetic information required to evaluate inheritance, variability, and breeding programs.

1. Introduction

The genus Equus is the only remaining member of the family Equidae, which includes both extant and fossil species [1]. The noncaballine forms include the African wild ass Equus africanus; zebras Equus quagga (formerly Equus burchellii), Equus grevyi, and Equus zebra (with two subspecies Equus zebra zebra of South Africa and Equus zebra hartmannae of Namibia and Angola); and the Asian wild asses Equus kiang and Equus hemionus (with subspecies Equus hemionus kulan and Equus hemionus onager) [2,3]. The domestic donkey E. africanus is accepted as a subspecies of the African wild ass [4,5].
Geographically isolated donkey populations, referred to as breeds here, including Martina Franca (MF) of the continental Puglia region, Ragusano (RG) of the island province of Sicily, Pantesco (PT) of the small island of Pantelleria (85 km2), and Catalonian (CT) of the Spanish Catalonian region, share similar phenotypes due to genetic inheritance/ecological constraints and the outcomes of biodiversity conservation programs. The natural history of the donkey is of interest because the desire to safeguard genetic biodiversity is growing [6] and because the three autochthonous Italian breeds are considered endangered, including MF with 160 females and 36 males (Associazione Nazionale Asino Martina Franca) and RG with 344 females and 30 males (Domestic Animals Diversity Information System), which are critically endangered, as is PT with 47 females and 15 males (Associazione Italiana Allevatori).
The phylogeny of the domestic donkey is not yet well understood. Historical files show that the Roman Empire dominated the Iberian Peninsula for ~613 years from 218 BC to 395 [7]. At that time, the MF donkey was commonly used for transport and military operations; thus, it is presumed that it was widely distributed across Spain [8].
Later, Spain dominated central Southern Italy for ~148 years from 1559–1707 BC, and CT was likely introduced during this time in Italy. However, phenotypic traits and anthropological documents are often insufficient to ascertain breed history, origin, and the occurrence of genetic exchange [9]. Instead, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequencing can determine intra- and inter-species historical, biogeographic, and phylogenetic relationships [10]. The extrachromosomal mitochondrial genome, unlike the nuclear one, is inherited only through the maternal lineage, is haploid, and does not undergo genetic recombination [11,12].
The application of clonal polymorphisms to study the genetics of domestic animals is valuable [8,10]. Variation in the D-loop region of mtDNA and the lack of recombination in mtDNA make it a highly informative tool for matrilineal studies, for determining intraspecies phylogenetic relationships, and for characterizing intrabreed variation [12,13,14,15,16]. mtDNA studies of dog breeds, which have greater phenotypic and working variability compared to the donkey, which is relatively uniform, have revealed genetic information on their domestication, evolution, and hereditary diseases [17,18].
mtDNA studies of equine breeds were used to investigate their origin [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] and to track breed migration and distribution by comparing the maternal lines in different populations [27,28]. The complete donkey mitochondrial genome sequence was essential to date the divergence from the horse between 8 and 10 MYA [29,30], which is earlier than paleontological data [24,31] and data from restriction endonuclease analysis [32].
Interestingly, two lineages of the domestic donkey were identified using mtDNA: Clade 1 for the Nubian lineage (E. a. africanus) and Clade 2 for the Somali lineage (E. a. somaliensis). These lineages resulted from two separate domestication events among two wild ancestral populations located in (1) the Atbara region and Red Sea Hills (NW Sudan) and in (2) southern Eritrea, Ethiopia, and Somalia [5,33,34,35,36]. However, the existence of another ancestor of the domestic donkey belonging to an unrecognized extinct African wild population has been suggested [6,36,37].
Genetic studies on the biodiversity of the Italian donkey are limited and have primarily focused on variability among protein markers and microsatellites [38,39,40]. Recently, whole genome sequencing [41] and mtDNA [42] were used to study the evolution and genetic diversity of Italian donkey populations.
In this study, we evaluated the mtDNA D-loops of endangered and critically endangered Italian donkey breeds. mtDNA sequences, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and haplotypes were identified and analyzed to investigate the matrilineal assortment within and between asinine breeds with similar phenotypes and to investigate the origin and phylogenetic relationships between asinine breeds to better manage rare donkey breeds by establishing proper breeding and conservation programs.

2. Materials and Methods

One-hundred and twenty-three salivary samples were collected from eight official breeding stations (Supplementary Table S1 additional material; Istituto Incremento Ippico associated with Facoltà di Medicina Veterinaria Università degli Studi di Teramo (Fondo Rustico Chiareto) and Centro di Conservazione del Patrimonio Genetico dell’Asino della razza Martina Franca (Azienda agricola Russoli Crispiano); Istituto Incremento Ippico Regione Campania Santa Maria Capua Vetere and Azienda Agricola Ciro Schirò Corleone-Monreale unfortunately have no successful sequenced samples) in accordance with the standards for care and protection of animals used for scientific purposes Directive 2010/63/EU. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee (Protocol No. 62128 of 27 April 2018). The samples collected were from free-range animals with certificates of origin, which were used to exclude animals of the same maternal descent, in order to increase genetic variability in the sample set. Seventy-seven samples, including MF = 27, RG = 22, PT = 8, CT = 19, and 1 Italian crossbreed, were sequenced successfully (Figure 1), whereas the remaining 46 samples were corrupted.
Genetic material was collected from saliva using a sterile oral swab, transferred to FTA mini-cards, and stored in multibarrier pouches (Whatman Labware Products, U.K.). The reference material is available at the O.V.U.D. (University Veterinary Hospital) Centre for the breeding of large animals at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Italy. Based on the complete donkey mtDNA sequence (GenBank X97337) [29], two pairs of primers were designed to amplify the hypervariable region between sites 15390 and 15750 [43], which is a fragment of the D-loop mtDNA (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3, accessed on 4 April 2019). After extraction from the FTA mini-card, DNA was amplified by PCR in a 25 μL reaction containing 50 ng of DNA, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 0.5 μM PER 5′- CC AAG GAC TAT CAA GGA AG-3′ and FOR 5′-TTG GAG GGA TTG CTG ATT TC-3′ primers, 1× PCR buffer, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas, Thermo Fischer Scientific). The amplification was performed using the Mastercycler thermal cycler (Eppendorf, USA) with the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s, and then, a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.
The raw sequence trace files were checked for the presence of ambiguous bases using the software Chromas v.2.5.1 (http://www.technelysium.com.au/, accessed on 4 April 2019). Sequences were aligned with Muscle; in Supplementary Table S2 of the Supplementary Materials is the alignment with other Italian donkey breeds [42]. The number of polymorphic sites (parsimony informative and singleton sites), the number of haplotypes (private and shared haplotypes), nucleotide diversity, and the average number of nucleotide differences were calculated according to Tajima (1983) and Nei (1987) using MEGA7, Fu’s neutrality statistic test, and Tajima’s D test with DnaSP 6.12.01, as well as using a maximum parsimony analysis and the maximum composite likelihood method. The median-joining network (for sequences, see Supplementary Table S3 in the Supplementary Materials) and principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) were performed with DARwin software [44,45,46]; Supplementary Figures S1 and S2 were created by using itol.embl.de/tree [47]. The other statistical analyses were performed with Statistica 7.0 StatSoft.

3. Results

3.1. Breed Haplotype Analysis

The successfully analyzed samples from the eight certified breeding centers (Table S1) included MF, RG, PT, and CT donkeys. The mtDNA D-loop hypervariable region between sites 15390 and 15750 (GenBank ID # 2466755, Table S3) was fully sequenced for 77 samples, and 56 haplotypes including 33 polymorphic sites were found. Of these, 14.6% of haplotypes have frequencies greater than 2.7%: Hap 1, 22 and 36; Hap 30, 37, 40 and 53 F = 4.1%; Hap 51 F = 12.2% the most common; while 85.4% of haplotypes are rare and have frequencies of 1.4%. Table 1 shows molecular diversity indices for each breed. The breed genetic diversity for all the breeds, evaluated by the nucleotide diversity value (π), was 0.128. Within subpopulations, π was 0.098, and the mean interpopulation evolutionary π was 0.03. The haplotypes identified in the analyzed breeds included 6 for PT, 14 for CT, and 22 each for MF and RG.
All the sequenced samples were aligned with a reference sequence (GenBank X97337) to highlight the presence of SNPs. The absolute number of mutations identified for each sequenced sample is shown (Figure 2A, Table 2 and Table S4). Moreover, all identified SNPs were classified according to their positions in the reference sequence and were characterized as transitions (purine–purine and pyrimidine–pyrimidine substitutions) or deletion (Figure 2B, left panel; every column represents a sequenced sample). The percentages of samples in which each SNP was identified are shown as histograms (Figure 2B, right panels, Table 2 and Table S4).
The multivariate test of significance for nucleotide frequencies (Table S5) showed no differences in nucleotide composition among breeds (p = 0.98). Maximum composite likelihood estimates of the nucleotide substitution pattern per breed, positions containing gaps, and missing data were eliminated as recommended by the literature (Supplementary Table S6) [45].

3.1.1. Population Analyses

Higher base composition differences within and between breed sequences were found for MF and RG (Table 3).
Despite the limited number of samples, the following haplotypes were found: 17 in MF (Hap 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, 11, 15, 20, 24, 25, 34, 39, 41, 46, 47, 50, 54); 19 in RG (Hap 4, 6, 8, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 29, 38, 42, 43, 44, 48, 49, 55); 9 in CT (Hap 2, 14, 26, 27, 28, 31, 33, 45, 52); and 3 in PT (Hap 7, 32, 35). The most represented seven haplotypes were Hap 51, common to all breeds; Hap 22, 36, and 37 found in MF and shared with PT and/or RG; Hap 30, distinctive of MF and also found in CT; and Hap 40 and 53, characteristic of CT.
The sequences were aligned with the reference sequence GenBank X97337 and other similar GenBank sequences representative of the Somali and Nubian African donkey lines, Chinese and other Asiatic E. kiang, E. hemionus, and E. h. kulan lines (Figure S1), and other Italian breeds (Figure S2, Supplementary Materials as in Ref. [42]: Romagnolo donkey (ROD), Amiata donkey (AMD), Sardinian donkey (SAD), Asinara donkey (ASD), Ragusano donkey (RAD)).

3.1.2. Origin and Phylogenetic Relationships

The phylogenetic relationships among the 55 haplotypes were calculated using a median-joining network. The haplotypes of each breed are color coded, the abundance of the haplotype indicated by the relative size of the symbol, and diffusion among the breeds is shown in color-coded pie charts (Figure 3). Looking at the distribution of haplotypes by breed, most of them are represented alone. In particular, MF and RG diverge from the reference sequence X97337 hap and show the highest variability. Conversely, PT is closely related and even shares haps with MF. Most CTs are grouped into two clusters: CT hap outgroups are closely related mainly to MF and completely share two haps with MF. Hap 51 is the most common and is shared among all races. The Fu neutrality statistic test and Tajima’s D test were performed to address the hypothesis of population expansion, and the results were Fs = −2.523, p < 0.05, and D = 2.004, p < 0.05, respectively.
PCoA analysis based on the dissimilarity matrix returned two different clusters, clusters I and II. Interestingly, in cluster II, there are only MF (6, 17, 27, 35) and RG (9, 21, 35, 53), while the rest of the haplotypes are grouped into cluster I. However, six haplotypes are not included in clusters I and II: they are MF Hap 22, 37, and 40; and RG Hap 13, 16, and 38 (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

4.1. Breed Molecular Analysis

Donkey breeds represent a fascinating model of domesticated biodiversity; thus, a number of studies have analyzed donkey pedigree and genetics. Pedigree and reconstruction studies usually lack the corresponding genetics [1,48,49], and genetic studies have frequently lacked lineage information [39,42,50].
Pedigree studies on Italian (MF, Amiata) and Spanish (CT, Andalusian, Miranda) donkeys found dramatic losses in genetic variation due to high rates of inbreeding [1,48,49,51]. However, pedigree incompleteness and the occurrence of a bottleneck event (e.g., MF in 1980) may have led to over- or under-estimations of genetic variation, which could affect breeding strategies [1,51]. To overcome this bias, in this study, genetic analysis was performed on subjects with certificates of origin from official authorized breeding centers. This approach allowed us to link mtDNA data to pedigree record, population, and breed to identify the same maternal descendants and to select individuals with presumed higher genetic variability to preserve biodiversity. A further bias in breed studies comes from unbalanced sample size comparisons for populations (e.g., difference of five-fold [39,42]), genetic structure, genetic variability, genetic robustness, average relatedness, inbreeding, co-ancestry, the degree of nonrandom mating, and origin [50,52]. In this study, we collected a similar number of samples per breed, except PT because of its limited number of breed lines; consequently, we analyzed a balanced sample. We found higher genetic variability in MF and RG, which disagrees with studies based on pedigree [1]. RG and MF are widely used on farms where natural random mating still occurs, and we believe that is the source of the variability. We found lower variability in PT, as expected, because of the limited number of individuals (n = 62) and because of its isolation. In the PT certificates of origin, eight distinct maternal lineages are attested, which is in agreement with the statement that the recovery of the PT breed started from a small nucleus of founders [39]. Furthermore, based on the number of haplotypes, the genetic robustness of PT is dramatically lower and the pedigree certificate alone cannot predict it. The low variability found in CT was not predicted because of the number of individuals in the population and the common distribution in the large region of Catalonia. This phenomenon could be the result of a breeding program with an unbalanced number of males vs. females (517 vs. 310 respectively; Asociacio del Foment dela Raca Asina Catala), rather than the result of the number of subjects and area occupied. Consequently, a potential bottleneck was produced by human artificial selection, which led to a loss in variability [42,49,53]. Because variability, robustness, and the degree of nonrandom mating decrease as average relatedness increases due to inbreeding and co-ancestry, a new reproduction program with multiple approaches is needed.
The molecular characteristics analyzed showed distinct nucleotide frequencies among breeds, which is in line with the literature [29,30]. The transition rate was greater for purines, and the transition rate per breed decreased from MF to RG to CT, which is partially discordant with other studies on the Italian donkey [42]. The nucleotide diversity (π) values are in line with a previous study on CT [54]. Cozzi et al. 2017 [42] found high nucleotide diversity in the MF donkey, but found low nucleotide diversity in the RG donkey.
We found the highest diversity in MF followed by RG and the lowest variability in CT followed by PT. The differences in our results and a previous study on the Italian donkey could be due to the following biases: (i) a lack of certificate of origin information leading to uncertain breed origin, (ii) unbalanced sampling between breeds with 74% of the breeds being Asinara and Sardo donkeys, both from the island of Sardinia [42]. Overall, molecular indices show greater genetic variability among the Italian than the Spanish donkeys according to the previous literature [42,49,53].

4.2. Population Analyses

The population analyses showed more differences within RG, followed by MF, CT, and PT. The RG genetic population structure is analogous to the highly heterogeneous large maternal Balkan donkey population with a more complex genetic structure than previously thought [53]. The Balkan donkey population is highly genetically diverse despite their severe population decline, probably due to introgression of other related breeds [53]. Introgression probably occurred for RG, but not MF.
Our analysis of PT is consistent with a microsatellite genetic variability study that showed lower variability in PT compared to RG and another Sicilian breed, the Grigio Siciliano (GS) [39]. The genetic variability observed in PT, RG, and GS [39] is lower than that reported in five Spanish breeds [54] and three Croatian breeds [55], but higher than that observed in the Amiata donkey from Italy [31] and in Chinese breeds [36]. The comparisons between breeds showed more differences between MF and RG and fewer differences between PT and CT, between RG and PT, and between RG and CT. The fewest differences are between PT and CT.
Two different studies on the Balkan donkey revealed different interpretations. In the first study, no correspondence between geographical areas and maternal genetic structure was found. Because the difference between the Balkan donkey and the African Burkina Faso donkey outgroup was also low, the authors could not trace routes of expansion in the donkey; consequently, they suggested that the species spread very quickly after domestication [56]. The second study assessed three Balkan donkey populations: Istrian (IS), north Adriatic (NA), and Littoral-Dinaric (LD), and their results suggested that IS is a unique breed, which mixed with LD during sporadic migration events, and that NA and LD are genetically similar [55]. Our study suggests similar effects of migration by MF on CT and PT, which are in accordance with historical reconstructions.

4.3. Origin and Phylogenetic Relationships

The well-established identification of two main lineages and the probable existence of another unrecognized extinct wild ancestor in domestic donkeys are believed to be the result of separate domestication events [5,6,33,34,35,36,37]. However, the genetic structure of the Chinese donkey indicates another possible line [36]. Therefore, in the donkey, such as in the dog [17], genetic data support multicentric breed origins. In agreement with this emerging theory is the identification of a potential new clade unique from the MF and RG Italian donkeys. Furthermore, another recent study also suggested multiple breed origins [42]. In Croatian and Serbian donkeys, three haplotype groups were found [55] with distinct nuclear gene pools [53]. A heterogeneous genetic structure of the Balkan donkey was hypothesized because there was no geographical structure; thus, it was difficult to trace the routes of expansion in the donkey [56]. However, other hypotheses for the complex genetic relationships among Italian donkey breeds and breeds living in the Mediterranean and Balkan areas [42] include ancestry and the genetic makeup of modern donkey populations. Our analysis suggests a multicentric domestication phenomena coupled with multiple waves of colonization and counter colonization, such as what occurred when the Roman Empire brought the MF donkey to Spain and when Spain brought the MF donkey to Italy; this is in accordance with the hypothesis suggested by Stanisic and colleagues [53].
There is a rising interest in maintaining genetic diversity in animal populations to safeguard the widest possible genetic resources through conservation programs [57,58].
For conservation of domestic breeds, the preservation of genetic capital is crucial because they are already zootechnical forms with reduced original natural variability. The biodiversity of the domestic form is the result of a genetic pool derived from interaction with semi-artificial environments regulated by human needs and human migratory movements. As a result, genetic and phenotypic changes with respect to the wild species of origin have been addressed slowly based on human necessity.
Donkey conservation represents a biological problem with regard to analogous phenotypes. The similar donkey breed phenotypes may be a result of genetic exchange among breeds, identical origin from an African or Asian population, equivalent climate conditions, and/or similar types of work carried out by the donkeys.
Our molecular analyses showed a dramatic loss in variability across all breeds tested, but especially in PT and CT. MF and RG have higher numbers of haplotypes and SNPs than PT and CT. In practice, the MF donkey is an important reservoir of biodiversity that must be preserved with the widest possible range of its genetic heritage, and errors of consanguinity for aesthetic purposes should be avoided with the help of conservation programs. Future conservation programs should include certificates of origin and genetic analyses of the matrilines at least.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study: (i) identified D-loop mtDNA characteristics for the MF donkey and three phenotypically similar breeds, (ii) identified different matrilines in the MF donkey and similar breeds, (iii) identified the biodiversity of each breed, and (iv) determined the phylogenetic relationships among the breeds. This extensive study on the biodiversity and phylogenetic relationships of MF, RG, PT, and CT donkey breeds is useful for future domestication studies.
In this study, we analyzed the genetics of a limited number of endangered and highly endangered donkey breeds. The data showed significant loss in variability among all the breeds evaluated, which is in agreement with previous studies that used different methods. The primeval haplotypes, haplogroup variability, and large number of maternal lineages are preserved in the MF and RG breeds; thus, they play putative pivotal roles in the phyletic relationships of the studied donkey breeds. Given the level of endangerment undergone by these breeds, actions are necessary to ensure their long-term survival and conservation. Improving the reproduction and management of existing populations, clarifying their historic interactions by studying their population genetics, and extending and improved monitoring of maternal lineages are valid options.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes12081109/s1: Figure S1: All sequences were aligned with reference sequence GenBank X97337 and other similar sequences present in GenBank representative of African donkey lines Somalicus and Nubianus, Chinese ones, and other Asiatic E. kiang, E. hemionus, and E. h. kulan; Figure S2: The sequences aligned with the reference GenBank X97337 and other similar GenBank sequences representative of other Italian breeds (as in Ref. [42]: Romagnolo donkey (ROD), Amiata donkey (AMD), Sardinian donkey (SAD), Asinara donkey (ASD), Ragusano donkey (RAD)); Table S1: Microchip number of the samples successfully sequenced by breed and official breeding station; Table S2: CLUSTAL multiple sequence alignment by MUSCLE (3.8) of Italian donkey MF, RG, PT, and CT with other sequences of Italian donkey in GenBank (Legend: RAD = Ragusano donkey; AMD = Amiata d.; ASN = Asinara d.; SAD = Sardinian d.; ROD = Romagnolo d.); Table S3: Sequences deposited in GenBank, Submission No. 2466755; Table S4: SNP alignments performed on mtDNA isolated from MF, RG, PT, and CT donkey breeds; Table S5: Nucleotide frequencies per breed. A multivariate test of significance returned no differences in nucleotide composition among breeds (p = 0.98); Table S6: Maximum composite likelihood estimate of the pattern of nucleotide substitution. Each entry shows the probability of substitution (r) from one base (row) to another base (column). Rates of different transitional (A × G and C × T) substitutions are shown in bold and those of transversional (G × T and A × C) substitutions are shown in italics.

Author Contributions

The authors contributions are as follows: conceptualization, A.M. and A.C.; methodology, A.M.; software, F.D.S.; validation, A.M. and A.C.; formal analysis, A.M. and F.D.S.; investigation, M.C., J.M.R., D.R. and R.B.; resources, A.C.; data curation, A.M., M.V., R.T., G.V. and A.C.; writing, original draft preparation, A.M., D.R., F.D.S. and A.C.; writing, review and editing, A.C., A.M., M.V., R.T. and G.V.; supervision, A.C.; funding acquisition, A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was carried out in the framework of the Project Demetra (Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018–2022, CUP_C46C18000530001) funded by the Italian Ministry for Education, University, and Research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the by the Ethical Committee (Protocol No. 62128 of 27 April 2018) of the University of Bologna.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Sequences deposited in GenBank Submission No. 2466755 and showed in Table S3.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Macfadden, B.J. Evolution. Fossil Horses—Evidence for Evolution. Science 2005, 307, 1728–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Krüger, K.; Gaillard, C.; Stranzinger, G.; Rieder, S. Phylogenetic Analysis and Species Allocation of Individual Equids Using Microsatellite Data. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2005, 122 (Suppl. 1), 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Groves, C.; Grubb, P. Ungulate Taxonomy; The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2011; p. 336. [Google Scholar]
  4. Beja-Pereira, A.; England, P.R.; Ferrand, N.; Jordan, S.; Bakhiet, A.O.; Abdalla, M.A.; Mashkour, M.; Jordana, J.; Taberlet, P.; Luikart, G. African Origins of the Domestic Donkey. Science 2004, 304, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kimura, B.; Marshall, F.B.; Chen, S.; Rosenbom, S.; Moehlman, P.D.; Tuross, N.; Sabin, R.C.; Peters, J.; Barich, B.; Yohannes, H.; et al. Ancient DNA from Nubian and Somali Wild Ass Provides Insights into Donkey Ancestry and Domestication. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 278, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Rizzi, R.; Tullo, E.; Cito, A.M.; Caroli, A.; Pieragostini, E. Monitoring of Genetic Diversity in the Endangered Martina Franca Donkey Population. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 1304–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Piganoil, A.F.G. La Conquête Romaine; Edité par Félix Alcan: Paris, France, 1927. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rand, D.M. The Units of Selection on Mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32, 415–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Clutton-Brock, J. Horse Power: A History of the Horse and the Donkey in Human Societies; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowling, A.T.; Del Valle, A.; Bowling, M. A Pedigree-Based Study of Mitochondrial D-Loop DNA Sequence Variation among Arabian Horses. Anim. Genet. 2000, 31, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Hutchison, C.A.; Newbold, J.E.; Potter, S.S.; Edgell, M.H. Maternal Inheritance of Mammalian Mitochondrial DNA. Nature 1974, 251, 536–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brown, W.M.; George, M.; Wilson, A.C. Rapid Evolution of Animal Mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76, 1967–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Wallace, D.C. Why Do We Still Have a Maternally Inherited Mitochondrial DNA? Insights from Evolutionary Medicine. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007, 76, 781–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Mirol, P.M.; Peral García, P.; Vega-Pla, J.L.; Dulout, F.N. Phylogenetic Relationships of Argentinean Creole Horses and Other South American and Spanish Breeds Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA Sequences. Anim. Genet. 2002, 33, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stoneking, M.; Sherry, S.T.; Redd, A.J.; Vigilant, L. New Approaches to Dating Suggest a Recent Age for the Human MtDNA Ancestor. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1992, 337, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vigilant, L.; Pennington, R.; Harpending, H.; Kocher, T.D.; Wilson, A.C. Mitochondrial DNA Sequences in Single Hairs from a Southern African Population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 9350–9354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Verginelli, F.; Capelli, C.; Coia, V.; Musiani, M.; Falchetti, M.; Ottini, L.; Palmirotta, R.; Tagliacozzo, A.; De Grossi Mazzorin, I.; Mariani-Costantini, R. Mitochondrial DNA from Prehistoric Canids Highlights Relationships between Dogs and South-East European Wolves. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22, 2541–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Mazzatenta, A.; Carluccio, A.; Robbe, D.; Giulio, C.D.; Cellerino, A. The Companion Dog as a Unique Translational Model for Aging. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2017, 70, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Achilli, A.; Olivieri, A.; Soares, P.; Lancioni, H.; Hooshiar Kashani, B.; Perego, U.A.; Nergadze, S.G.; Carossa, V.; Santagostino, M.; Capomaccio, S.; et al. Mitochondrial Genomes from Modern Horses Reveal the Major Haplogroups That Underwent Domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 2449–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cothran, E.G.; Juras, R.; Macijauskiene, V. Mitochondrial DNA D-Loop Sequence Variation among 5 Maternal Lines of the Zemaitukai Horse Breed. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2005, 28, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kavar, T.; Dovč, P. Domestication of the Horse: Genetic Relationships between Domestic and Wild Horses. Livest. Sci. 2008, 116, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lippold, S.; Matzke, N.J.; Reissmann, M.; Hofreiter, M. Whole Mitochondrial Genome Sequencing of Domestic Horses Reveals Incorporation of Extensive Wild Horse Diversity during Domestication. BMC Evol. Biol. 2011, 11, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cieslak, M.; Pruvost, M.; Benecke, N.; Hofreiter, M.; Morales, A.; Reissmann, M.; Ludwig, A. Origin and History of Mitochondrial DNA Lineages in Domestic Horses. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Guastella, A.M.; Zuccaro, A.; Criscione, A.; Marletta, D.; Bordonaro, S. Genetic Analysis of Sicilian Autochthonous Horse Breeds Using Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA Markers. J. Hered. 2011, 102, 753–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Jansen, T.; Forster, P.; Levine, M.A.; Oelke, H.; Hurles, M.; Renfrew, C.; Weber, J.; Olek, K. Mitochondrial DNA and the Origins of the Domestic Horse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 10905–10910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Vilà, C.; Leonard, J.A.; Gotherstrom, A.; Marklund, S.; Sandberg, K.; Liden, K.; Wayne, R.K.; Ellegren, H. Widespread Origins of Domestic Horse Lineages. Science 2001, 291, 474–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Kivisild, T.; Reidla, M.; Metspalu, E.; Rosa, A.; Brehm, A.; Pennarun, E.; Parik, J.; Geberhiwot, T.; Usanga, E.; Villems, R. Ethiopian Mitochondrial DNA Heritage: Tracking Gene Flow across and around the Gate of Tears. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 75, 752–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Matisoo-Smith, E.; Robins, J. Mitochondrial DNA Evidence for the Spread of Pacific Rats through Oceania. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11, 1521–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, X.; Gullberg, A.; Arnason, U. The Complete Mitochondrial DNA (MtDNA) of the Donkey and MtDNA Comparisons among Four Closely Related Mammalian Species-Pairs. J. Mol. Evol. 1996, 43, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Luo, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, F.; Jiang, C.; Gao, Y. Mitochondrial Genome Sequence of the Tibetan Wild Ass (Equus Kiang). Mitochondrial DNA 2011, 22, 6–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ciampolini, R.; Cecchi, F.; Mazzanti, E.; Ciani, E.; Tancredi, M.; De Sanctis, B. The Genetic Variability Analysis of the Amiata Donkey Breed by Molecular Data. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 6, 78–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. George, M., Jr.; Ryder, O.A. Mitochondrial DNA Evolution in the Genus Equus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1986, 3, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Meadow, R.H. Equus africanus in Arabia. In Equids in the Ancient World; Uerpmann, H.P., Ed.; Ludwig Reichert Verlag: Wiesbaden, Germany, 1991; pp. 12–33. [Google Scholar]
  34. Vila, E. Data on equids from late fourth and third millennium sites in Northern Syria. In Equids in Time and Space; Mashkour, M., Ed.; Oxbow Books Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2002; pp. 101–123. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rossel, S.; Marshall, F.; Peters, J.; Pilgram, T.; Adams, M.D.; O’Connor, D. Domestication of the Donkey: Timing, Processes, and Indicators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 3715–3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Chen, S.Y.; Zhou, F.; Xiao, H.; Sha, T.; Wu, S.F.; Zhang, Y.P. Mitochondrial DNA Diversity and Population Structure of Four Chinese Donkey Breeds. Anim. Genet. 2006, 37, 427–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kefena, E.; Dessie, T.; Tegegne, A.; Beja-Pereira, A.; Yusuf Kurtu, M.; Rosenbom, S.; Han, J.L. Genetic Diversity and Matrilineal Genetic Signature of Native Ethiopian Donkeys (Equus asinus) Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Polymorphism. Livest. Sci. 2014, 167, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Matassino, D.; Cecchi, F.; Ciani, F.; Incoronato, C.; Occidente, M.; Santoro, L.; Ciampolini, R. Genetic Diversity and Variability in Two Italian Autochthonous Donkey Genetic Types Assessed by Microsatellite Markers. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 13, 3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bordonaro, S.; Guastella, A.M.; Criscione, A.; Zuccaro, A.; Marletta, D. Genetic Diversity and Variability in Endangered Pantesco and Two Other Sicilian Donkey Breeds Assessed by Microsatellite Markers. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 648427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Colli, L.; Perrotta, G.; Negrini, R.; Bomba, L.; Bigi, D.; Zambonelli, P.; Verini Supplizi, A.; Liotta, L.; Ajmone-Marsan, P. Detecting Population Structure and Recent Demographic History in Endangered Livestock Breeds: The Case of the Italian Autochthonous Donkeys. Anim. Genet. 2013, 44, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bertolini, F.; Scimone, C.; Geraci, C.; Schiavo, G.; Utzeri, V.J.; Chiofalo, V.; Fontanesi, L. Next Generation Semiconductor Based Sequencing of the Donkey (Equus asinus) Genome Provided Comparative Sequence Data against the Horse Genome and a Few Millions of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Cozzi, M.C.; Valiati, P.; Cherchi, R.; Gorla, E.; Prinsen, R.T.M.M.; Longeri, M.; Bagnato, A.; Strillacci, M.G. Mitochondrial DNA Genetic Diversity in Six Italian Donkey Breeds (Equus Asinus). Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp. Seq. Anal. 2018, 29, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Aranguren-Mendez, J.; Beja-Pereira, A.; Avellanet, R.; Dzama, K.; Jordana, J. Mitochondrial DNA variation and genetic relationships in Spanish donkey breeds (Equus asinus). J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2004, 121, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tamura, K.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Prospects for Inferring Very Large Phylogenies by Using the Neighbor-Joining Method. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 11030–11035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Tamura, K.; Battistuzzi, F.U.; Billing-Ross, P.; Murillo, O.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. Estimating Divergence Times in Large Molecular Phylogenies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 19333–19338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cecchi, F.; Ciampolini, R.; Ciani, E.; Matteoli, B.; Mazzanti, E.; Tancredi, M.; Presciuttini, S. Demographic Genetics of the Endangered Amiata Donkey Breed. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 5, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Navas, F.J.; Jordana, J.; León, J.M.; Barba, C.; Delgado, J.V. A Model to Infer the Demographic Structure Evolution of Endangered Donkey Populations. Animal 2017, 11, 2129–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cinar Kul, B.; Bilgen, N.; Akyuz, B.; Ertugrul, O. Molecular Phylogeny of Anatolian and Cypriot Donkey Populations Based on Mitochondrial DNA and Y-Chromosomal STRs. Ank. Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2016, 63, 143–149. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gutiérrez, J.P.; Marmi, J.; Goyache, F.; Jordana, J. Pedigree Information Reveals Moderate to High Levels of Inbreeding and a Weak Population Structure in the Endangered Catalonian Donkey Breed. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2005, 122, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ivanković, A.; Ramljak, J.; Konjačić, M.; Kelava, N.; Dovč, P.; Mijić, P. Mitochondrial D-Loop Sequence Variation among Autochthonous Horse Breeds in Croatia. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 54, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Stanisic, L.J.; Aleksic, J.M.; Dimitrijevic, V.; Simeunovic, P.; Glavinic, U.; Stevanovic, J.; Stanimirovic, Z. New Insights into the Origin and the Genetic Status of the Balkan Donkey from Serbia. Anim. Genet. 2017, 48, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aranguren-Méndez, J.; Jordana, J.; Gomez, M. Genetic Diversity in Spanish Donkey Breeds Using Microsatellite DNA Markers. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2001, 33, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ivankovic, A.; Kavar, T.; Caput, P.; Mioc, B.; Pavic, V.; Dovc, P. Genetic Diversity of Three Donkey Populations in the Croatian Coastal Region. Anim. Genet. 2002, 33, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pérez-Pardal, L.; Grizelj, J.; Traoré, A.; Cubric-Curik, V.; Arsenos, G.; Dovenski, T.; Marković, B.; Fernández, I.; Cuervo, M.; Álvarez, I.; et al. Lack of Mitochondrial DNA Structure in Balkan Donkey Is Consistent with a Quick Spread of the Species after Domestication. Anim. Genet. 2014, 45, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bjørnstad, G.; Røed, K.H. Evaluation of Factors Affecting Individual Assignment Precision Using Microsatellite Data from Horse Breeds and Simulated Breed Crosses. Anim. Genet. 2002, 33, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Toro, M.A.; Barragán, C.; Ovilo, C. Estimation of Genetic Variability of the Founder Population in a Conservation Scheme Using Microsatellites. Anim. Genet. 2003, 34, 226–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 12 01109 g001 550
Figure 1. Breed distribution. The red perimeters pinpoint the original Mediterranean distribution of the four donkey breeds investigated: Martina Franca (MF), Ragusano (RG), Pantesco (PT), and Catalonian (CT).
Figure 1. Breed distribution. The red perimeters pinpoint the original Mediterranean distribution of the four donkey breeds investigated: Martina Franca (MF), Ragusano (RG), Pantesco (PT), and Catalonian (CT).
Genes 12 01109 g001
Genes 12 01109 g002 550
Figure 2. SNP analysis performed on mtDNA isolated from Martina Franca (MF), Ragusano (RG), Pantesco (PT), and Catalonian (CT) donkey breeds. (A) Absolute number of mutations found in each sample by Sanger sequencing. (B) Every SNP was characterized according to the position on the reference sequence, the kind of mutation, and the percentage of samples containing the mutation (brown histograms) using MEGA7. R = reference sequence (X97337).
Figure 2. SNP analysis performed on mtDNA isolated from Martina Franca (MF), Ragusano (RG), Pantesco (PT), and Catalonian (CT) donkey breeds. (A) Absolute number of mutations found in each sample by Sanger sequencing. (B) Every SNP was characterized according to the position on the reference sequence, the kind of mutation, and the percentage of samples containing the mutation (brown histograms) using MEGA7. R = reference sequence (X97337).
Genes 12 01109 g002
Genes 12 01109 g003 550
Figure 3. Median-joining network analysis. This analysis was based on 350 bp of the mtDNA D-loop sequences of 77 donkeys (Martina Franca (MF), Ragusano (RG), Pantesco (PT), Catalonian (CT)), which consists of 55 haplotypes (DARwin 6.0). Each breed is color coded, and for each haplotype, the proportions of the different breeds are shown, in black the crossbreed haplotype. The reference sequence X97337 is indicated as x.
Figure 3. Median-joining network analysis. This analysis was based on 350 bp of the mtDNA D-loop sequences of 77 donkeys (Martina Franca (MF), Ragusano (RG), Pantesco (PT), Catalonian (CT)), which consists of 55 haplotypes (DARwin 6.0). Each breed is color coded, and for each haplotype, the proportions of the different breeds are shown, in black the crossbreed haplotype. The reference sequence X97337 is indicated as x.
Genes 12 01109 g003
Genes 12 01109 g004 550
Figure 4. PCoA. The two axes of the PCoA plot were based on the dissimilarity matrix according to Kimura (1980) and generated using DARwin 6.0. Two different clusters, cluster I and cluster II, included most haplotypes of the breeds studied (Martina Franca (MF), Ragusano (RG), Pantesco (PT), Catalonian (CT)). Haplotypes that did not fall into either cluster were MF Hap 22, 37, and 40 and RG Hap 13, 16, and 38.
Figure 4. PCoA. The two axes of the PCoA plot were based on the dissimilarity matrix according to Kimura (1980) and generated using DARwin 6.0. Two different clusters, cluster I and cluster II, included most haplotypes of the breeds studied (Martina Franca (MF), Ragusano (RG), Pantesco (PT), Catalonian (CT)). Haplotypes that did not fall into either cluster were MF Hap 22, 37, and 40 and RG Hap 13, 16, and 38.
Genes 12 01109 g004
Table
Table 1. D-loop nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular diversity indices per breed tested in the study.
Table 1. D-loop nucleotide polymorphisms and molecular diversity indices per breed tested in the study.
BreednNHapSNPsπ
Martina Franca (MF)2722(5 s)130.162 ± 0.022
Ragusano (RG)2222(3 s)150.132 ± 0.028
Pantesco (PT)86(3 s)10.025 ± 0.001
Catalonian (CT)1913(4 s)20.038 ± 0.009
crossbreed111
ALL7756330.128
s, shared haplotypes. In this dataset, there is a crossbreed with its own haplotype. n, number of individuals sampled per breed; NHap, the number of haplotypes in each breed with the number of shared haplotypes in parentheses; SNPs, the number of polymorphic sites; π, nucleotide diversity with standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Absolute and relative haplotype frequencies in the four analyzed donkey breeds.
Table 2. Absolute and relative haplotype frequencies in the four analyzed donkey breeds.
SNPMartina Franca (MF)Catalano
(CT)		Pantesco
(PT)		Ragusano
(RG)
PositionReferenceMutationSamples (n)%Samples (n)%Samples (n)%Samples (n)%
15719CT00000015
15699CT6210000418
15663AG6210000418
15653CT6210000418
15646AG27000015
15645GA6210000418
15622AG414000029
15600AG291001910081001777
15599CT6210000418
15581AG621115800418
15570AG6210000418
15524CDEL00000029
15504TC6210000418
15491CT6210000418
15485GA6210000418
15474CT00000029
Table
Table 3. Estimates of base composition differences within and between breed sequences using MEGA7.
Table 3. Estimates of base composition differences within and between breed sequences using MEGA7.
BreedMean within Groups
Martina Franca (MF)0.289
Ragusano (RG)0.521
Pantesco (PT)0.044
Catalonian (CT)0.020
Mean between Groups
MF × CT0.162
MF × RG0.387
MF × PT0.158
RG × CT0.276
RG × PT0.278
CT × PT0.031
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mazzatenta, A.; Vignoli, M.; Caputo, M.; Vignola, G.; Tamburro, R.; De Sanctis, F.; Roig, J.M.; Bucci, R.; Robbe, D.; Carluccio, A. Maternal Phylogenetic Relationships and Genetic Variation among Rare, Phenotypically Similar Donkey Breeds. Genes 2021, 12, 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081109

AMA Style

Mazzatenta A, Vignoli M, Caputo M, Vignola G, Tamburro R, De Sanctis F, Roig JM, Bucci R, Robbe D, Carluccio A. Maternal Phylogenetic Relationships and Genetic Variation among Rare, Phenotypically Similar Donkey Breeds. Genes. 2021; 12(8):1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mazzatenta, Andrea, Massimo Vignoli, Maurizio Caputo, Giorgio Vignola, Roberto Tamburro, Francesco De Sanctis, Jordi Mirò Roig, Roberta Bucci, Domenico Robbe, and Augusto Carluccio. 2021. "Maternal Phylogenetic Relationships and Genetic Variation among Rare, Phenotypically Similar Donkey Breeds" Genes 12, no. 8: 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop