Next Article in Journal
miR-215 Targeting Novel Genes EREG, NIPAL1 and PTPRU Regulates the Resistance to E.coli F18 in Piglets
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Diagnostic Biomarkers and Subtypes of Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Multi-Omics Data Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/genes11091052
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MiR-184 Combined with STC2 Promotes Endometrial Epithelial Cell Apoptosis in Dairy Goats via RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK Pathway

by
Jiuzeng Cui
,
Xiaorui Liu
,
Lichun Yang
,
Sicheng Che
,
Hongran Guo
,
Jincheng Han
,
Zhongshi Zhu
,
Binyun Cao
,
Xiaopeng An
,
Lei Zhang
and
Yuxuan Song
*
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shanxi 712100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(9), 1052; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091052
Submission received: 29 July 2020 / Revised: 3 September 2020 / Accepted: 3 September 2020 / Published: 7 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The endometrium undergoes a series of complex changes to form a receptive endometrium (RE) that allows the embryo to be implanted. The inability to establish endometrial receptivity of livestock causes embryo implantation failure and considerable losses to animal husbandry. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of noncoding RNAs. Studies have found that miRNAs can regulate many critical physiological processes, including the establishment of RE during embryo implantation. miR-184 is highly expressed in the endometrial receptive period of dairy goats. This study aimed to explore the effect of miR-184 on endometrial epithelial cell (EEC) apoptosis and RE establishment. Stanniocalcin2 (STC2) is a direct target of miR-184, and miR-184 decreases the expression of STC2 in dairy goat EECs. miR-184 can activate EECs apoptosis through the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway. Additionally, miR-184 increases the expression levels of RE marker genes, such as forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). These findings indicate that miR-184 promotes the apoptosis of endometrial epithelial cells in dairy goats by downregulating STC2 via the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, and that it may also regulate the establishment of RE in dairy goats.

1. Introduction

Embryo implantation is a key step in mammalian reproduction [1]. The establishment of RE is one of the most important factors for embryo implantation [2]. Studies have shown that endometrial damage and dysplasia can lead to inadequate endometrial receptivity, which ultimately leads to pregnancy failure [3]. A series of complex dynamic changes in the endometrium eventually form a receptive endometrium (RE), and apoptosis of endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) is an essential step in this process [4,5]. Therefore, in order to better understand embryo implantation in dairy goats, it is necessary to study the apoptosis of EECs.
miRNAs are a class of endogenous noncoding RNAs which are generally involved in the regulation of posttranscriptional gene expression by indirect or direct inhibition of the translation of mRNA-bound 3′ untranslated region (UTR) [6]. miRNAs are involved in most biological processes in mammals, e.g., cell differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis [7]. Additionally, miRNAs regulate the endometrial function and embryo development during embryo implantation [8]. Our previous studies showed that some miRNA regulates EEC apoptosis and proliferation, and thus, participates in endometrial receptivity formation [9,10]. Additionally, studies have shown that miR-184 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell apoptosis by regulating the expression of AGO2 [11], and that miR-184 upregulates the expressions of P53 and P21 to inhibit the proliferation of human glioma and breast cancer cells [12]. Although many studies have found that miR-184 can regulate the proliferation and apoptosis of cancer cell, the effect of miR-184 on the proliferation and apoptosis of EECs in dairy goats remains unclear.
STC2 is a glycoprotein in the Stanniocalcin family. Studies have shown that STC2 regulates a series of biological processes through autocrine or paracrine signaling [13]. For example, STC2 promotes the proliferation of liver cancer cells and also inhibits adipogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells [14,15]. Furthermore, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A2 (PAPP-A2) increases the expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) via the lytic IGF complex. At the same time, STC2 reduces the release of IGF1 by inhibiting the biological activity of PAPP-A2, thus participating in the regulation of human dental pulp cell differentiation [16,17]. Another study showed that STC2 activates the PI3K/AKT/Snail signaling pathway to promoted proliferation, promoted passage through the G1/S cell cycle transition, and inhibited apoptosis in carcinoma cells [18]. However, there is no research on the effect of STC2 on the endometrium of dairy goats.
In this study, miR-184 and STC2 were selected for the following three reasons: (1) Our previous sequencing results show that miR-184 levels in the endometrial receptive phase of the dairy goat were 31-fold higher than those in the prereceptive phase [19]; (2) 3′UTR of STC2 has a unique nucleotide sequence combined with the miR-184 seed sequence; (3) STC2 and miR-184 play an important role in cell proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation [11,15]. Moreover, we investigated the effect of miR-184 and STC2 on the EECs of dairy goats in vitro and the establishment of RE. On the basis of the present study, we concluded that miR-184 could target STC2 and inhibit its expression in EECs. miR-184 inhibited the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway by inhibiting STC2, and inhibited the proliferation of EECs and promoted their apoptosis. Therefore, the regulation effect of miRNA and mRNA on endometrial receptivity of dairy goat was studied; the molecular mechanism of endometrial receptivity establishment of dairy goat at the molecular level was determined. This knowledge is of great significance for improving the success rate of embryo implantation in dairy goats.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Cell Culture

In this study, all goats used for the experiments were Xinong Saanen dairy goats, raised according to the No. 5 proclamation of the Ministry of Agriculture, P. R. China. All procedures in our animal study were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Northwest A&F University (Yangling, China) (permit number: 17-347, data: 13 October 2017).
Endometrial tissue from the anterior wall of the uterine cavity was collected on day 5 (PE, n = 3) and day 15 (RE, n = 3) of pregnancy [19,20]. All endometrial tissues were immediately rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then stored in PBS containing penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 mg/mL), for EECs isolation. Some tissue samples were immediately placed in liquid nitrogen and stored. The primary EECs were digested and purified using trypsin and differential centrifugation, and the cells were identified via immunofluorescence chemical tests as previously described [9]. The EECs were cultured in the Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12), containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. HEK293T were cultured in high-glucose DMEM, containing 10% FBS, in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

2.2. Cell Treatment and Total RNA Extraction

EECs were cultured in 6-well plates and grown to 50% confluence before transfection. Si-STC2, miR-184 mimic, negative control (NC), miR-184 inhibitor, and NC-inhibitor (NCH) were designed and synthesized by Ribobio (Guangzhou, China), and these were transfected into EECs using the Lip2000 liposome (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The culture medium was changed 4 h after transfection and cultured for 24 h. Then, total RNA and tissue RNA were extracted following the RNAiso (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) instructions. The extracted RNA was analyzed for quality and concentration using an Epoch ultramicro microporous plate spectrophotometer (BioTek, Burlington, VT USA).

2.3. Luciferase Activity Assay

A bioinformatics analysis was performed on the binding sequence of STC2 and miR-184 using miRanda and Targetscan7.0 to identify the target gene of miR-184. In this experiment, 340 bp of STC2 3′UTR, containing the binding site sequence, was selected, and primers were designed. Not1 and Xho1 restriction sites were added to the upstream and downstream of the primers, respectively. The primer sequences are shown in Table 1. Then, 3′UTR of STC2 was cloned and inserted into psiCHECKTM2 vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) to construct STC2 wild-type (WT-STC2-3′UTR) double luciferase reporter vector, and the mutant plasmid with the mutant binding site was constructed successfully (MUT-STC2-3′UTR). All constructs were verified by sequencing. WT-STC2-3′UTR or MUT-STC2-3′UTR were cotransfected with miR-184 mimic or NC into 293T cells. After 36 h of culture, 293T cells were collected, and the double luciferase activity was evaluated. The specific protocol has been previously described [21]. Three replicates were used for each experiment.

2.4. RT-qPCR

RT-qPCR primers were designed using Primer 5.0 and synthesized by Sangon Biotech Company (Shanghai, China). All the primers for RT-qPCR are shown in Table 1. Total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Prime Script RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and an Epoch ultramicro microporous plate spectrophotometer was used to detect cDNA quality and concentration. The RT-qPCR reaction mixture was prepared following the instructions of SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). CFX Connect (Bio-Rad, Burlington, VT, USA) was used to perform RT-qPCR; the reaction procedure was as previously described [22]. β-actin was used as a reference for genes and U6 as a reference for miR-184. Three replicates were performed for each experiment.

2.5. Protein Extraction and Western Blot (WB) Analysis

After 48 h of EEC treatment, the original culture medium was discarded and cells were washed with PBS three times, placed on ice, and mixed with RIPA cell lysate (Applygen Technologies Inc., Beijing, China), containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The protein extraction method and WB analysis have been described previously [9,23]. All test antibodies are shown in Table 2. The blots were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (Advansta, Menlo Park, CA, USA), and related data were analyzed using ImageJ processing software; each experiment was performed in triplicate.

2.6. Vector Construction

For the construction of STC2 overexpression vector, the coding domain sequence (CDS) of goat STC2 in NCBI was used as a template to design primers, and the restriction enzyme digestion sites, Kpn1h and Xho1, were added to the upstream and downstream of the primers, respectively. Also, 2–3 protective bases were added before the restriction enzyme digestion sites; the primer sequences are shown in Table 1. The CDS of STC2 was cloned and inserted in the psiDNA3.1(+) vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The empty vector with no STC2 sequence was used as the NC.

2.7. Cell Proliferation Analysis

The CCK-8 (ZETA, San Francisco, CA, USA) was used to detect the viability of EECs in vitro. EECs were inoculated in 96-well plates and grown to 50% confluence before transfection. The steps are as described previously [24]. The optical density was measured at 450 nm using an Epoch ultramicro microporous plate spectrophotometer (BioTek, Burlington, VT, USA); each experiment was performed in triplicate. The EDU (Ribobio, Guangzhou, China) assay was used to measure the proliferation of EECs following the manufacturer’s instructions. The steps are as described previously [25]. We used Olympus IX73 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) to visualize and count EDU cells. Each experiment was performed in sextuplicate.

2.8. Cell Apoptosis Assay

The flow cytometry method (FCM) and the Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis kit (Liankebio, Hangzhou, China) were used to detect EECs apoptosis, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reaction was carried out as per a procedure described previously [26].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences, and the least significant difference method was used for further analysis. All data were expressed as the mean ± standard error. The differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01.

3. Results

3.1. Differential Expression of miR-184 and STC2 in PE and RE Endometrial Tissues

In our previous studies, the results showed that the expression of miR-184 in RE increased by 31 times compared to that in PE [19]. In this study, the RT-qPCR results show that the expression of miR-184 in RE was significantly increased compared to that in PE (Figure 1A), which was consistent with the previous sequencing results. Furthermore, the expression of STC2 mRNA in RE was significantly reduced compared to that in PE (Figure 1B), which was in contrast to the trend of miR-184 expression. Furthermore, miR-184 and STC2 were widely expressed in the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys, muscles, uterus, and breasts of dairy goats (Figure 1C,D). The results indicated that the expression levels of miR-184 were significantly increased by the miR-184 mimic and reduced by the miR-184 inhibitor (Figure S1A, p < 0.01).

3.2. miR-184 and STC2 Regulate the Expression of Some RE Markers in Dairy Goats

To further verify the regulatory effect of miR-184 and STC2 on the establishment of RE, we tested the expression of RE marker genes, VEGF and FOXM1. miR-184 mimic significantly upregulated VEGF and FOXM levels, while miR-184 inhibitors significantly downregulated their levels (Figure 1(E1,E2), p < 0.01). Additionally, overexpressing STC2 decreased the levels of VEGF and FOXM significantly, while knock-down of STC2 increased their levels significantly (Figure 1(F1,F2), p < 0.01).

3.3. STC2 Is the Target of miR-184

In this study, STC2 was predicted as the target of miR-184 using two publicly available programs (Targetscan 7.0 and miRanda). We successfully predicted the target binding sequence of miR-184 and STC2. To confirm this prediction, we constructed a dual-luciferase reporter vector (Figure 2A). The dual-luciferase test results show that miR-184 significantly downregulates the luciferase activity of WT-STC2, but has no significant effect on MUT-STC2 (Figure 2B, p < 0.01). Additionally, miR-184 significantly reduces the expression of STC2 mRNA in EECs (Figure 2C, p < 0.01), and decreases the expression of STC2 in EECs (Figure 2(D1,D2), p < 0.01). The results show that STC2 is the target of miR-184, and miR-184 inhibits the expression of STC2 at the mRNA and protein levels in EECs by binding to the 3′UTR of STC2.

3.4. miR-184 Inhibits the Proliferation and Promotes EECs Apoptosis

To verify the effect of miR-184 on EECs, we used CCK8 and EDU and analyzed cell proliferation. The CCK-8 assay results show that miR-184 mimic significantly reduces cell viability compared to NC, while miR-184 inhibitor significantly increases it compared to NCH (Figure 3A). Also, the EDU assay results show that miR-184 mimic significantly inhibits the proliferation of EECs compared to NC, but that miR-184 inhibitor significantly promotes that of EECs compared to NCH (Figure 3(B1,B2)). Moreover, the apoptosis results show that miR-184 mimic promotes EECs apoptosis, while miR-184 inhibitor inhibits it (Figure 3C and Figure S2A–D). We also detected the expression of apoptosis-related genes, BCL2 and BAX. The results show that miR-184 mimic significantly reduces the expression of BCL2 and increases the expression of BAX, but that miR-184 inhibitor significantly increases the expression of BCL2 and reduces the expression of BAX (Figure 3(D1,D2), p < 0.01). The results of the aforementioned experiments indicate that miR-184 promotes the proliferation of EECs and inhibits their apoptosis.

3.5. The Effect of STC2 on EECs

In order to verify the regulatory effect of STC2 on EECs, an STC2 overexpression vector (pc3.1-STC2) was successfully constructed. After transfecting EECs with pc3.1-STC2, the mRNA and protein expression levels of STC2 increased significantly, whereas the miR-184 mimic weakened the expression of STC2, indicating that pc3.1-STC2 could be used in subsequent experiments (Figure S3A–C). The EDU and CCK-8 assay results show that STC2 significantly promotes the proliferation of EECs, while miR-184 reduces this effect of STC2 (Figure 4(A,B1,B2)). Furthermore, the results of the apoptosis test show that STC2 significantly inhibits EECs apoptosis, while miR-184 weakens this effect of STC2 (Figure 4C and Figure S4A–C). The WB analysis results show that STC2 significantly downregulates BAX expression and upregulates BCL2 expression (Figure 4(D1,D2), p < 0.01).
The Si-STC2 designed and synthesized by Ribobio Company was transfected into EECs, which significantly reduced the mRNA and protein expression levels of STC2 (Figure S3D–F). Additionally, the EDU and CCK8 assay results show that Si-STC2 significantly inhibits the proliferation of EECs, while miR-184 inhibitor reduces this effect of Si-STC2 (Figure 5(A,B1,B2)). MiR-184 inhibitors reduced the expression of miR-184 and weakened the inhibitory effect of miR-184 on STC2, so the Si-STC2+ miR-184 inhibitor group significantly promoted EEC proliferation compared with the Si-STC2 group. Meanwhile, Si-STC2 significantly promoted the apoptosis of EECs, and the miR-184 inhibitor weakened this effect of Si-STC2 (Figure 5C and Figure S4D–F). Next, Si-STC2 significantly downregulated the expression of BCL2 and upregulated the expression of BAX (Figure 5(D1,D2), p < 0.01). The results show that STC2 promotes the proliferation and inhibits the apoptosis of EECs.

3.6. miR-184 Regulates the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK Pathway Through the STC2 in EECs

To explore the effects of miR-184 and STC2 on EECs survival further, we detected the expression levels of proteins involved in the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. The WB analysis results show that miR-184 significantly reduces the expression levels of RAS, P-RAF/RAF, P-MEK/MEK, and P-ERK/ERK, but that the miR-184 inhibitor significantly increases the expression levels of RAS, P-RAF/RAF, P-MEK/MEK, and P-ERK/ERK (Figure 6(A1,A2), p < 0.01). Additionally, pc3.1-STC2 significantly increases the expression levels of RAS, P-RAF/RAF, P-MEK/MEK, and P-ERK/ERK (Figure 6(B1,B2), p < 0.01), and STC2 knockdown significantly reduces the expression levels of RAS, P-RAF/RAF, P-MEK/MEK, and P-ERK/ERK (Figure 6(C1,C2), p < 0.01). The results show that miR-184 inhibits the RAS/RAF//MEK/ERK signaling pathway by targeting STC2.

4. Discussion

In previous studies, we reported, for the first time, that miRNAs were differentially expressed in the PE and RE of dairy goats [19]. Furthermore, we verified that miR-449a, miR-181a, and miR-26a play important roles during the establishment of endometrial receptivity in dairy goats [9,10,27]. In the current study, the RT-qPCR results show that miR-184 expression in dairy goats RE is significantly higher than that in PE, which was consistent with our previous sequencing results [19]. Additionally, studies have shown that miR-184 promotes the apoptosis of trophoblast cells and inhibits their proliferation, which plays an important role in maintaining pregnancy [28]. The aforementioned findings indicate that miR-184 may play an important role in the establishment of RE in dairy goats.
The establishment of RE is a dynamic and complex process, and cell proliferation and apoptosis play an important role [29]. Our previous results have shown that miR-34a/c and miR-181a participate in the establishment of endometrial receptivity by regulating EECs apoptosis in dairy goats [27,30]. Many studies have shown that miR-184 can be used as an oncogene or tumor suppressor. For example, miR-184 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of human glioma and breast cancer cells [12], and blocks the growth and survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by directly targeting BCL2 and C-MYC19 [31]. Many studies have shown that BAX is pro-apoptotic and BCl2 is anti-apoptotic [32,33]. In the current study, WB analysis showed that miR-184 upregulated the expression of BAX in EECs of dairy goats and downregulated the expression of BCL2. Furthermore, our results show that miR-184 promotes EECs apoptosis.
Generally, miRNA binds to the target gene 3′UTR seed sequence to induce degradation of the target mRNA or inhibit its translation, thus participating in various biological processes, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation [34]. For example, miR-532 induces apoptosis of human nucleus pulposus cells by inhibiting its target, Bcl-9 [35]. Here, we found that there was a seed sequence between STC2 and miR-184, and that miR-184 downregulated the dual-luciferase activity of MUT-STC2, thereby downregulating the expression of STC2 at mRNA and protein levels in dairy goat EECs. These results indicate that STC2 is the target of miR-184 in dairy goat EECs.
STC2 plays an important role in the regulation of the proliferation and apoptosis of cancer cells [18,36]. STC2 interference inhibits the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells, while its overexpression promotes proliferation [37]. Here, apoptosis and proliferation assay results show that STC2 promotes the proliferation of EECs in dairy goats and inhibits their apoptosis. These results also show that STC2 is the target of miR-184, and that miR-184 might regulate the EECs apoptosis in dairy goats through STC2.
Studies have shown that VEGF is an endometrial receptive biomarker [38,39], and that FOXM1 upregulates the expression of VEGF [22]. FOXM1 plays an important role in the establishment of RE in mice [40]. Additionally, the results of the current study show that miR-184 upregulates the expression of VEGF and FOXM1 in the EECs of dairy goats in vitro. Moreover, WB analysis showed that the overexpression of STC2 reduced the expression of VEGF and FOXM1, while interference with STC2 increased the expression of VEGF and FOXM1. Therefore, we concluded that miR-184 and STC2 participate in the establishment of RE by regulating VEGF and FOXM1 in vitro. However, in vivo, the development of miR-184 and STC2 in endometrial receptivity needs further study.
Research shows that the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway is key for cell proliferation and apoptosis [41,42]. Moreover, studies have shown that the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway regulates the apoptosis of EECs [30]. Studies have also found that STC2 regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells by activating the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway [36]. Therefore, in this experiment, we tested the expression of RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK. The results show that STC2 activates the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, while miR-184 inhibits it. In summary, miR-184 and STC2 participate in the regulation of the proliferation and apoptosis of EECs in dairy goats by regulating the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway.

5. Conclusions

From these findings, we conclude that miR-184 promotes the apoptosis of EECs in dairy goats by downregulating STC2 via the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, and that miR-184 contributes to the establishment of endometrial receptivity. Additionally, miR-184 may be a biomarker of RE in dairy goats. This study may contribute to our knowledge of the regulation molecular mechanism of embryo attachment in dairy goats. It may also be important in improving the reproduction rate of dairy goats.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/9/1052/s1, Figure S1: Efficiency of miR-184 transfection into EECs, Figure S2: MiR-184 promoted apoptosis of EECs, Figure S3: The transfection efficiency of Si-STC2 and pc3.1-STC2 into EECs, Figure S4: STC2 inhibited apoptosis of EECs.

Author Contributions

J.C. and X.L. conceived and designed the experiments; J.C., S.C., L.Y., J.H., Z.Z., and H.G. performed the experiments; X.A., S.C. and L.Y. analyzed the data; B.C., L.Z. and Y.S. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; J.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by PhD research startup foundation of Northwest A&F University (00400/Z109021811), the Key R&D Program of Shaanxi Province (2020ZDLANY02-01), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M653776), Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2020JQ-265, 2020JQ-868), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0500508). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Chao Zhu, Jidan Liu, Yuhan Liu, Meng Zhang, Shujuan Liu for their help during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Hu, S.J.; Ren, G.; Liu, J.L.; Zhao, Z.A.; Yu, Y.S.; Su, R.W.; Ma, X.H.; Ni, H.; Lei, W.; Yang, Z.M. MicroRNA expression and regulation in mouse uterus during embryo implantation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 23473–23484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Schulte, M.M.; Tsai, J.H.; Moley, K.H. Obesity and PCOS. The effect of metabolic derangements on endometrial receptivity at the time of implantation. Reprod. Sci. 2015, 22, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Achache, H.; Revel, A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation. Hum. Reprod. Update 2006, 12, 731–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Diedrich, K.; Fauser, B.C.; Devroey, P.; Griesinger, G. Evian Annual Reproduction Workshop G: The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation. Hum. Reprod. Update 2007, 13, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Galan, A.; O’Connor, J.E.; Valbuena, D.; Herrer, R.; Remohi, J.; Pampfer, S.; Pellicer, A.; Simon, C. The human blastocyst regulates endometrial epithelial apoptosis in embryonic adhesion. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 63, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 2009, 136, 215–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Bidarimath, M.; Khalaj, K.; Wessels, J.M.; Tayade, C. MicroRNAs, immune cells and pregnancy. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2014, 11, 538–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liang, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z. Role of microRNAs in embryo implantation. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2017, 15, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, L.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; Ma, X.; Zhou, Z.; Song, Y.; Cao, B. miR-26a promoted endometrial epithelium cells (EECs) proliferation and induced stromal cells (ESCs) apoptosis via the PTEN-PI3K/AKT pathway in dairy goats. J. Cell Physiol. 2018, 233, 4688–4706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. An, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Liu, J.; Zhao, X.; Chen, K.; Ma, H.; Li, G.; Cao, B.; Song, Y. MiR-449a regulates caprine endometrial stromal cell apoptosis and endometrial receptivity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Huang, W.; Huang, F.; Lei, Z.; Luo, H. LncRNA SNHG11 Promotes, Proliferation, Migration, Apoptosis, and Autophagy by Regulating hsa-miR-184/AGO2 in HCC. OncoTargets Ther. 2020, 13, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Feng, R.; Dong, L. Inhibitory effect of miR-184 on the potential of proliferation and invasion in human glioma and breast cancer cells in vitro. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 9376–9382. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Li, Q.; Zhou, X.; Fang, Z.; Pan, Z. Effect of STC2 gene silencing on colorectal cancer cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 20, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ma, B.; Xu, X.; He, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Wu, P.; Liu, J.; Jiang, H.; Zheng, M.; Li, W.; et al. STC2 modulates ERK1/2 signaling to suppress adipogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 524, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, F.; Li, T.Y.; Su, S.C.; Yu, J.S.; Zhang, H.L.; Tan, G.Q.; Liu, J.W.; Wang, B.L. STC2 as a novel mediator for Mus81-dependent proliferation and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2017, 388, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Minchenko, D.O.; Kharkova, A.P.; Halkin, O.V.; Karbovskyi, L.L.; Minchenko, O.H. Effect of hypoxia on the expression of genes encoding insulin-like growth factors and some related proteins in U87 glioma cells without IRE1 function. Endocr. Regul. 2016, 50, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Al-Khafaji, H.; Noer, P.R.; Alkharobi, H.; Alhodhodi, A.; Meade, J.; El-Gendy, R.; Oxvig, C.; Beattie, J. A characteristic signature of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis expression during osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp cells (hDPCs): Potential co-ordinated regulation of IGF action. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 2018, 42, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, S.W.; Ji, Q.H.; Chang, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Y.X.; Li, D.S.; Huang, C.P.; Wang, Y.L.; Sun, G.H.; Zhang, L.; et al. STC2 promotes head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through modulating the PI3K/AKT/Snail signaling. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 5976–5991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, Y.; An, X.; Zhang, L.; Fu, M.; Peng, J.; Han, P.; Hou, J.; Zhou, Z.; Cao, B. Identification and profiling of microRNAs in goat endometrium during embryo implantation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Igwebuike, U.M. A review of uterine structural modifications that influence conceptus implantation and development in sheep and goats. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 112, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, L.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Z.; Song, Y.; Cao, B.; An, X. miR-182 aids in receptive endometrium development in dairy goats by down-regulating, P.TN expression. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179783. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Cui, J.; Che, S.; An, X.; Song, Y.; Cao, B. Circ-8073 regulates CEP55 by sponging miR-449a to promote caprine endometrial epithelial cells proliferation via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2018, 1865, 1130–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Subramaniam, K.S.; Omar, I.S.; Kwong, S.C.; Mohamed, Z.; Woo, Y.L.; Adenan, N.A.M.; Chung, I. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote endometrial cancer growth via activation of interleukin-6/STAT-3/c-Myc pathway. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2016, 6, 200–213. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Li, H.; Yang, J.; Wei, X.; Song, C.; Dong, D.; Huang, Y.; Lan, X.; Plath, M.; Lei, C.; Ma, Y.; et al. CircFUT10 reduces proliferation and facilitates differentiation of myoblasts by sponging miR-133a. J. Cell Physiol. 2018, 233, 4643–4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luo, Z.; Rong, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Yu, Z.; Li, T.; Fu, Z.; Qiu, Z.; Huang, C. Circular RNA circCCDC9 acts as a miR-6792-3p sponge to suppress the progression of gastric cancer through regulating CAV1 expression. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.; Hou, J.; Zhang, M.; Seleh-Zo, E.; Wang, J.; Cao, B.; An, X. Circ-016910 sponges miR-574-5p to regulate cell physiology and milk synthesis via MAPK and PI3K/AKT-mTOR pathways in GMECs. J. Cell Physiol. 2020, 235, 4198–4216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhang, L.; Liu, X.; Che, S.; Cui, J.; Ma, X.; An, X.; Cao, B.; Song, Y. Endometrial Epithelial Cell Apoptosis Is Inhibited by a ciR8073-miR181a-Neurotensis Pathway during Embryo Implantation. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2019, 14, 262–273. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, M.Q.; Xu, J.; Zhang, J.P.; Jin, L.P. MicroRNA-184 promotes apoptosis of trophoblast cells via targeting WIG1 and induces early spontaneous abortion. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, L.; Liu, X.R.; Han, P.; Zhou, Z.Q.; Cao, B.Y.; Song, Y.X. The Study of Endometrium at Gestational Days 5 and 15 in Dairy Goats (Capra hircus). Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 62, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Yang, L.; Cui, J.; Che, S.; Liu, Y.; Han, J.; An, X.; Cao, B.; Song, Y. miR-34a/c induce caprine endometrial epithelial cell apoptosis by regulating circ-8073/CEP55 via the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways. J. Cell Physiol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yang, H.; Yu, X.; Wu, Q.; Hua, S.; Long, X.; Jiang, Q.; Song, Y.; Cheng, C.; et al. Tumor suppressor PDCD4 modulates miR-184-mediated direct suppression of C-MYC and BCL2 blocking cell growth and survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Soriano, M.E.; Scorrano, L. The Interplay between BCL-2 Family Proteins and Mitochondrial Morphology in the Regulation of Apoptosis. In Bcl-2 Protein Family: Essential Regulators of Cell Death; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 97–114. [Google Scholar]
  33. Oltvai, Z.N.; Milliman, C.L.; Korsmeyer, S.J. Bcl-2 Heterodimerizes in-Vivo with a Conserved Homolog, Bax, That Accelerates Programmed Cell-Death. Cell 1993, 74, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, C. MicroRNomics: A newly emerging approach for disease biology. Physiol. Genom. 2008, 33, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sun, Z.; Jian, Y.; Fu, H.; Li, B. MiR-532 downregulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling via targeting Bcl-9 and induced human intervertebral disc nucleus pulposus cells apoptosis. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 138, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, B.; Zeng, X.; He, Y.; Wang, X.X.; Liang, Z.W.; Liu, J.J.; Zhang, P.; Zhu, H.X.; Xu, N. Z, Liang, S.F. STC2 promotes the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of colorectal cancer cells through AKT-ERK signaling pathways. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 71400–71416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Law, A.Y.; Wong, C.K. Stanniocalcin-2 is a HIF-1 target gene that promotes cell proliferation in hypoxia. Exp. Cell Res. 2010, 316, 466–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Paul, S.; Jain, P.; Tuli, A.; Gupta, U.; Jain, M. Serum VEGF as a marker of endometrial receptivity in infertile women. FASEB J. 2013, 27, 750. [Google Scholar]
  39. Miravet-Valenciano, J.A.; Rincon-Bertolin, A.; Vilella, F.; Simon, C. Understanding and improving endometrial receptivity. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gyn. 2015, 27, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xie, Y.; Cui, D.; Kong, Y. FoxM1 influences embryo implantation and is regulated by 17 β-estradiol and progesterone in mouse uteri and endometrium cells. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 6585–6595. [Google Scholar]
  41. Butler, D.E.; Marlein, C.; Walker, H.F.; Frame, F.M.; Mann, V.M.; Simms, M.S.; Davies, B.R.; Collins, A.T.; Maitland, N.J. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway activates autophagy and compensatory Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signalling in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 56698–56713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Mei, Y.; Geng, W.; Yang, J.; Hong, Q.; Feng, Z.; Cai, G.; Zhu, H.; Shi, S.; et al. miR-34a regulates mesangial cell proliferation via the PDGFR-β/Ras-MAPK signaling pathway. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 4027–4042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Genes 11 01052 g001 550
Figure 1. The expression levels of miR-184 and STC2 in dairy goats. (A) The expression of miR-184 in PE and RE in dairy goats. (B) The expression of STC2 in PE and RE in dairy goats. (C) The expression of miR-184 in various tissues of dairy goats. (D) The expression of STC2 in various tissues of dairy goats. After transfection with miR-184 (E1,E2) or STC2 (F1,F2), WB analyzed the protein expression levels of VEGF and FOXM1. Stem-loop RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression of miR-184, which was standardized to that of U6. RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression of STC2, which was standardized to that of β-actin. The WB was used to measure protein expression and the optical density method was standardized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data is expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; PE, pre-receptive endometrium; RE, receptive endometrium; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 1. The expression levels of miR-184 and STC2 in dairy goats. (A) The expression of miR-184 in PE and RE in dairy goats. (B) The expression of STC2 in PE and RE in dairy goats. (C) The expression of miR-184 in various tissues of dairy goats. (D) The expression of STC2 in various tissues of dairy goats. After transfection with miR-184 (E1,E2) or STC2 (F1,F2), WB analyzed the protein expression levels of VEGF and FOXM1. Stem-loop RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression of miR-184, which was standardized to that of U6. RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression of STC2, which was standardized to that of β-actin. The WB was used to measure protein expression and the optical density method was standardized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data is expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; PE, pre-receptive endometrium; RE, receptive endometrium; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Genes 11 01052 g001
Genes 11 01052 g002 550
Figure 2. STC2 is the target of miR-184. (A) Schematic diagram of dual-luciferase reporter design for the wild-type (WT-STC2) or mutant (MUT-STC2). The red sequence represents the “seed sequence” of miR-184, and the yellow sequence represents the mutant sequence. (B) Double luciferase activity was detected after 293T cells were cotransfected with WT-STC2 or MUT-STC2 and miR-184 or NC (negative control). miR-184 upregulates the expression of STC2 at mRNA (C) and protein (D1,D2) levels. STC2 expression was detected using RT-qPCR and normalized to β-actin. WB analysis was used to measure expression at the protein level. The optical density method was standardized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data is expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. WB, western blot; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 2. STC2 is the target of miR-184. (A) Schematic diagram of dual-luciferase reporter design for the wild-type (WT-STC2) or mutant (MUT-STC2). The red sequence represents the “seed sequence” of miR-184, and the yellow sequence represents the mutant sequence. (B) Double luciferase activity was detected after 293T cells were cotransfected with WT-STC2 or MUT-STC2 and miR-184 or NC (negative control). miR-184 upregulates the expression of STC2 at mRNA (C) and protein (D1,D2) levels. STC2 expression was detected using RT-qPCR and normalized to β-actin. WB analysis was used to measure expression at the protein level. The optical density method was standardized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data is expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. WB, western blot; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Genes 11 01052 g002
Genes 11 01052 g003 550
Figure 3. miR-184 promoted EECs apoptosis in vitro. (A) CCK-8 was used to detect cell viability. (B1,B2) Cell proliferation indices were assessed after treatment with EDU. The scale bar is 100 μm. (C) FCM was used to detect apoptosis. (D1,D2) The WB analysis revealed the expression of BCL2 and BAX in EECs transfected with miR-184 mimic, NC, miR-184 inhibitor, or NCH. The optical density method was normalized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data is expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; WB, western blot; EDU, 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine; FCM, flow cytometry method; EECs, endometrial epithelial cell; SEM, standard error of the mean; NC, negative control; NCH, NC-inhibitor. “UL”, “LL”, “LR” and “UR” represented, respectively, the CEEC of mechanical damage, normal, early apoptosis, and late apoptosis.
Figure 3. miR-184 promoted EECs apoptosis in vitro. (A) CCK-8 was used to detect cell viability. (B1,B2) Cell proliferation indices were assessed after treatment with EDU. The scale bar is 100 μm. (C) FCM was used to detect apoptosis. (D1,D2) The WB analysis revealed the expression of BCL2 and BAX in EECs transfected with miR-184 mimic, NC, miR-184 inhibitor, or NCH. The optical density method was normalized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data is expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; WB, western blot; EDU, 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine; FCM, flow cytometry method; EECs, endometrial epithelial cell; SEM, standard error of the mean; NC, negative control; NCH, NC-inhibitor. “UL”, “LL”, “LR” and “UR” represented, respectively, the CEEC of mechanical damage, normal, early apoptosis, and late apoptosis.
Genes 11 01052 g003
Genes 11 01052 g004 550
Figure 4. Overexpression of STC2 inhibited the EECs apoptosis in vitro. (A) pc3.1-STC2 and/or miR-184 mimics were transfected into EECs, and CCK-8 was used to detect cell viability. (B1,B2) Cell proliferation indices were assessed after treatment with EDU. The scale bar is 100 μm. (C) FCM was used to detect apoptosis. (D1,D2) The WB analysis revealed the expression of BCL2 and BAX in EECs. The optical density method was normalized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data are expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; WB, western blot; EDU, 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine; FCM, flow cytometry method; EECs, endometrial epithelial cell; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 4. Overexpression of STC2 inhibited the EECs apoptosis in vitro. (A) pc3.1-STC2 and/or miR-184 mimics were transfected into EECs, and CCK-8 was used to detect cell viability. (B1,B2) Cell proliferation indices were assessed after treatment with EDU. The scale bar is 100 μm. (C) FCM was used to detect apoptosis. (D1,D2) The WB analysis revealed the expression of BCL2 and BAX in EECs. The optical density method was normalized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data are expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; WB, western blot; EDU, 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine; FCM, flow cytometry method; EECs, endometrial epithelial cell; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Genes 11 01052 g004
Genes 11 01052 g005 550
Figure 5. Interference with STC2 promoted EEC apoptosis in vitro. (A) Si-STC2 and/or miR-184 inhibitor were transfected into EECs, and the CCK-8 was used to detect cell viability. (B1,B2) Cell proliferation indices were assessed after treatment with EDU. The scale bar was 100 μm. (C) FCM was used to detect apoptosis. (D1,D2)The WB analysis revealed the expression of BCL2 and BAX in EECs. The optical density method was normalized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data is expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; WB, western blot; EDU, 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine; FCM, flow cytometry method; EEC, endometrial epithelial cell; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 5. Interference with STC2 promoted EEC apoptosis in vitro. (A) Si-STC2 and/or miR-184 inhibitor were transfected into EECs, and the CCK-8 was used to detect cell viability. (B1,B2) Cell proliferation indices were assessed after treatment with EDU. The scale bar was 100 μm. (C) FCM was used to detect apoptosis. (D1,D2)The WB analysis revealed the expression of BCL2 and BAX in EECs. The optical density method was normalized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data is expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; WB, western blot; EDU, 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine; FCM, flow cytometry method; EEC, endometrial epithelial cell; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Genes 11 01052 g005
Genes 11 01052 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of miR-184 and STC2 on the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway. (A1,A2) WB analysis of RAS, p-RAF, RAF, p-MEK, MEK, p-ERK, and ERK regulated by miR-184. (B1,B2) After transfection of EECs with pc3.1-STC2 or/and miR-184 mimic, WB was used to detect the expression levels of RAS, p-RAF, RAF, p-MEK, MEK, p-ERK, and ERK at the protein level in EECs. (C1,C2) After transfection of EECs with Si-STC2 or/and miR-184 inhibitor, WB was used to detect the expression levels of RAS, p-RAF, RAF, p-MEK, MEK, p-ERK, and ERK at the protein level in EECs. The optical density method was normalized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data is expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. WB, western blot; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 6. Effects of miR-184 and STC2 on the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway. (A1,A2) WB analysis of RAS, p-RAF, RAF, p-MEK, MEK, p-ERK, and ERK regulated by miR-184. (B1,B2) After transfection of EECs with pc3.1-STC2 or/and miR-184 mimic, WB was used to detect the expression levels of RAS, p-RAF, RAF, p-MEK, MEK, p-ERK, and ERK at the protein level in EECs. (C1,C2) After transfection of EECs with Si-STC2 or/and miR-184 inhibitor, WB was used to detect the expression levels of RAS, p-RAF, RAF, p-MEK, MEK, p-ERK, and ERK at the protein level in EECs. The optical density method was normalized to the density of β-actin in the same lane. Data is expressed as the “mean ± SEM” of three values, ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. WB, western blot; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Genes 11 01052 g006
Table
Table 1. All primers used in this study.
Table 1. All primers used in this study.
GeneGenBank Accession No.Primer Sequence (5′–3′)
STC2 (qPCR)XM_005694539.3F: CGGAAGTGTCCAGCCATCAAGG
R:GCAGCAGTCACACACAGTCA
STC2 (Check2)/F: CGCTCGAGTCGGGAGACCGGCCGAGG
R: ATGCGGCCGCTCGCTGCCCAGGGAGCCT
STC2 (pcDNA3.1)/F: CAGGGTACCATGTGTGCCGAGCGGCTG
R:CGCTCGAGTCACCTCCGGATATCGGAATACTCAGACTGTTC
β-actinXM_018039831.1F: GATCTGGCACCACACCTTCT
R: GGGTCATCTTCTCACGGTTG
U6/F: CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA
R: AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT
miR-184-Loop/gtcgtatccagtgcagggtccgaggtattcgcactggatacgacACCCTTAT
miR-184/gcgcgcTGGACGGAGAACTG
Reverse Primer/GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT
Note: The underlined characters are the restriction sites of xhoI and notI which were used to construct psiCHECK2. Italics and underline indicates the restriction sites of KpnI and xhoІ which were used to construct pcDNA3.1.
Table
Table 2. Antibody information.
Table 2. Antibody information.
NameManufacturerProduct Number
STC2Gene Tex, AmericaGTX82231
β-actinBeyotime, Shanghai, ChinaAA128
BAXBeyotime, Shanghai, ChinaAB026
BCL2Beyotime, Shanghai, ChinaAB112
VEGFBoster, Wnhan, ChinaBA0407
FOXM1SAB, United States#32671
RASGene Tex, AmericaGTX132480
RAFBBI, Shanghai, ChinaD220484
P-RAF (Ser642)BBI, Shanghai, ChinaD151385
MEK1Abways, Shanghai, ChinaCY5168
P-MEK1 (Ser298)Abways, Shanghai, ChinaCY5277
ERKCell Signaling, America#9101
P-ERK (Thr202/Tyr204)Cell Signaling, America#9102
HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L)Beyotime, Shanghai, ChinaA0208
HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L)Beyotime, Shanghai, ChinaA0216

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cui, J.; Liu, X.; Yang, L.; Che, S.; Guo, H.; Han, J.; Zhu, Z.; Cao, B.; An, X.; Zhang, L.; et al. MiR-184 Combined with STC2 Promotes Endometrial Epithelial Cell Apoptosis in Dairy Goats via RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK Pathway. Genes 2020, 11, 1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091052

AMA Style

Cui J, Liu X, Yang L, Che S, Guo H, Han J, Zhu Z, Cao B, An X, Zhang L, et al. MiR-184 Combined with STC2 Promotes Endometrial Epithelial Cell Apoptosis in Dairy Goats via RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK Pathway. Genes. 2020; 11(9):1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cui, Jiuzeng, Xiaorui Liu, Lichun Yang, Sicheng Che, Hongran Guo, Jincheng Han, Zhongshi Zhu, Binyun Cao, Xiaopeng An, Lei Zhang, and et al. 2020. "MiR-184 Combined with STC2 Promotes Endometrial Epithelial Cell Apoptosis in Dairy Goats via RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK Pathway" Genes 11, no. 9: 1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091052

APA Style

Cui, J., Liu, X., Yang, L., Che, S., Guo, H., Han, J., Zhu, Z., Cao, B., An, X., Zhang, L., & Song, Y. (2020). MiR-184 Combined with STC2 Promotes Endometrial Epithelial Cell Apoptosis in Dairy Goats via RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK Pathway. Genes, 11(9), 1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091052

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop