Next Article in Journal
Follistatin Is a Novel Chemoattractant for Migration and Invasion of Placental Trophoblasts of Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Manganese Deficiency Suppresses Growth and Photosynthetic Processes but Causes an Increase in the Expression of Photosynthetic Genes in Scots Pine Seedlings
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Scaffold Immunophilin FKBP51 Is a Phosphoprotein That Undergoes Dynamic Mitochondrial-Nuclear Shuttling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

SAPAP Scaffold Proteins: From Synaptic Function to Neuropsychiatric Disorders

1
Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (STCSM & MOE), Affiliated Mental Health Center (ECNU), School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
2
Shanghai Changning Mental Health Center, Shanghai 200335, China
3
NYU-ECNU Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science at NYU Shanghai, Shanghai 200062, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(23), 3815; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11233815
Submission received: 30 August 2022 / Revised: 24 November 2022 / Accepted: 25 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Scaffold Proteins in Health, Disease, and Therapy)

Abstract

:
Excitatory (glutamatergic) synaptic transmission underlies many aspects of brain activity and the genesis of normal human behavior. The postsynaptic scaffolding proteins SAP90/PSD-95-associated proteins (SAPAPs), which are abundant components of the postsynaptic density (PSD) at excitatory synapses, play critical roles in synaptic structure, formation, development, plasticity, and signaling. The convergence of human genetic data with recent in vitro and in vivo animal model data indicates that mutations in the genes encoding SAPAP1–4 are associated with neurological and psychiatric disorders, and that dysfunction of SAPAP scaffolding proteins may contribute to the pathogenesis of various neuropsychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, obsessive compulsive disorders, Alzheimer’s disease, and bipolar disorder. Here, we review recent major genetic, epigenetic, molecular, behavioral, electrophysiological, and circuitry studies that have advanced our knowledge by clarifying the roles of SAPAP proteins at the synapses, providing new insights into the mechanistic links to neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders.

1. Introduction

Synapses are fundamental elements of neural circuits and networks that convey all aspects of brain function, and pathological alterations in synaptic structure and function are broadly held to underlie many neuropsychiatric disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), cognitive disorders, and mood disorders [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. In the mammalian brain, the vast majority of synapses are excitatory synapses (primarily glutamatergic), which occur predominantly at contacts between presynaptic axons and postsynaptic tiny, actin-rich protrusions known as dendritic spines. During synaptic plasticity at excitatory synapses, the molecular composition of postsynaptic membranes and the chemical modification of synaptic proteins are key determinants of the number, strength, morphology, and even connectivity of neuronal synapses [8,9,10]. The postsynaptic density (PSD) at the tip of a dendritic spine’s head, which is an electron-dense thickening assembly situated underneath the postsynaptic membrane, is composed of numerous proteins, including adhesion proteins, membrane-tethered receptor and ion channels, scaffold proteins, signaling molecules, and cytoskeletal proteins [8,9,11]. These components of the PSD assemble into a dynamic macromolecular complex and are crucial for synaptic transmission and plasticity [12]. During development, and in response to stimulation or inhibition, the PSD dynamically undergoes changes in molecular composition and structure in order to tune the strengths and/or efficacy of synaptic signaling.
The SAPAP (SAP90/PSD-95-associated protein, also called discs-large-associated proteins (DLGAPs)) family is made up of key postsynaptic scaffold proteins that are highly concentrated in the PSD of excitatory synapses and are essential for synaptic structure and functions [1,4,8,13,14,15,16,17]. In the brain, the SAPAP family is composed of four proteins encoded by four homologous genes (Figure 1A), which have different alternative splicing variants [4]: DLGAP1 (also referred to as guanylate kinase-associated protein GKAP and SAPAP1, located on chromosome 18p11), DLGAP2 (also known as SAPAP2, 8p23), DLGAP3 (also known as SAPAP3, 1p34), and DLGAP4 (also known as SAPAP4, 20q11). Owing to their differential expression in the brain and simultaneous expression in many brain regions [18,19], the different members of the SAPAP family not only play distinct physiological roles, but also cooperate to play physiological roles in excitatory synapses.
Several groups have reported changes in the expression and epigenetic dysregulation of SAPAP genes in patients afflicted with schizophrenia, alcohol use and dependence, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), or cerebellar ataxia [20,21,22,23]. Recent studies have also found that copy number variants (CNVs) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in diverse neuropsychiatric disorders such as ASD, OCD, and schizophrenia are present in the SAPAP family genes [2,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Further studies with Sapap1–4-mutant mice have revealed that these mice show marked behavioral abnormalities relevant to neuropsychiatric disorders, including increased repetitive behavior and anxiety, hyperactivity, mania-like phenotypes, altered memory ability, decreased alcohol use, and altered sensitivity to psychostimulants [13,14,15,16,17,21,35].
Despite the potential importance of SAPAP proteins in these neuropsychiatric disorders, the in vivo functional roles of SAPAP proteins are not yet fully understood. Here, we review the most recent findings that have emerged from human genetics studies exploring the links between mutations in SAPAP genes and neuropsychiatric disorders. We further review evidence from the recent studies of mutant mice concerning the physiological roles of SAPAP proteins at the excitatory synapses and provide deeper insights into the mechanistic links to neuropsychiatric disorders.

2. SAPAP Family

The SAPAP family proteins were originally identified as synaptic proteins that interact with the PSD-95 family and termed SAP90/PSD95-associated proteins [36,37]. The full-length structure of SAPAP proteins is characterized by a 14-amino-acid (aa) repeat domain, a dynein light-chain (DLC) domain, three proline-rich domains, and a GKAP homology (GH1) domain [36,37,38], by which SAPAPs bind to their interacting partners (Figure 1B).

2.1. SAPAP-Interacting Proteins

With the N-terminal conserved 14 aa repeat domain, SAPAP proteins directly interact with the GK domain of the PSD-95 family scaffolding proteins—a subfamily of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family composed of PSD-95, PSD-93, SAP97, and SAP102 [1,36]. PSD-95 and other members of the MAGUK family not only interact directly with the NR2A and NR2B subunits of NMDARs and Shaker-type K+ channels through C-terminal PDZ ligand motifs to promote the clustering of these proteins in the PSD [1,11], the neuronal cell adhesion molecule neuroligin [39,40] via its third PDZ domain, but also interact indirectly with AMPA receptors (AMPARs) through interaction with the transmembrane protein stargazin/TARPs [41,42,43], or other auxiliary proteins [44] to regulate the synaptic trafficking of NMDARs and AMPARs [45,46]. Signaling molecules including SynGAP (a synaptic Ras-GTPase activating protein) and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) also interact with the PDZ domains of PSD-95 and present in a large complex with PSD-95 and the NMDARs in the brain [47,48]. Both the SH3 and GK domains in PSD-95 bind to and induce clustering of the kainate subtype ionotropic glutamate receptors [49], which have been linked to schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders, such as intellectual disability (ID) and ASD [50].
An additional partner to the 14 aa repeat domain of SAPAP proteins is S-SCAM [51], which also interacts with NMDAR subunits, neuroligin 1, and β-catenin at excitatory synapses [51,52], neuroligin 2 and β-dystroglycan at inhibitory synapses [52], and the scaffold protein tamalin [53]. In addition, the N-terminal region of SAPAPs also interacts with neurofilaments (NFLs), but not with actin or tubulin. The NFL-interacting region is different from the regions interacting with PSD-95 and S-SCAM [54].
The C-terminal region of SAPAP proteins subsequently interacts with the PDZ domain of the SHANK protein family, including SHANK1, SHANK2, and SHANK3 [55,56]. SHANKs then not only bind to the Homer family proteins—thereby linking metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1/5) to SAPAPs [57]—but also provide a link between the SAPAP proteins and the actin cytoskeleton through interactions with the F-actin-binding protein cortactin [55,58]. SAPAPs can bridge the PSD-95 family and SHANK family to form the PSD-95/SAPAPs/SHANKs core complex [36], which is thought to be a major scaffold organizer in orchestrating the synaptic formation and plasticity at glutamatergic synapses. Additionally, SAPAP–SHANK interaction also involves the participation of N-terminal extension sequences of the PDZ domain [59,60]. These extension sequences govern the exquisite and strong interaction between SAPAPs and SHANKs. A recent study also shows that PSD-95, SAPAP1, and SHANK3 can form scaffold complexes with one another at different developmental stages [61].
The proline-rich domain of SAPAPs binds to the third SH3 domain of nArgBP2 [62]. nArgBP2, which is important for neuronal dendritic development and spine synapse formation [63,64], then binds to signaling molecules including the ubiquitin ligase CBL, protein kinases ABL and PYK2, and various proteins involved in the regulation of cell adhesion and the actin cytoskeleton [63,64,65].
The DLC domain of SAPAP proteins binds directly to DLC2 and DLC8 [38,66,67], which colocalize with SAPAP/PSD-95 in the PSD and also tend to distribute into the deep part of the spine [38]. DLC is an accessory subunit shared by dynein and myosin-V, and is highly enriched in dendritic spines [38,67], suggesting that DLC may link SAPAPs to actin- and microtubule-based motors and act as a motor–cargo adaptor.
The structure of the GH1 domain of SAPAP proteins is believed to be dynamic [68]. The function and interacting partners of the GH1 domain have not yet been well described [36]; however, one recent study identified a patient with cortical malformations who carried a novel SAPAP4 mutation, affecting the last part of the GH1 domain and leading to loss of a polyproline-rich domain of SAPAP proteins [34].
In addition to the aforementioned interacting partners, a number of other proteins have been identified as SAPAP-interacting proteins, including the scaffold protein tamalin (binding to the C-terminal PDZ-binding motif of SAPAP1/3) [53], nNOS (identified as a SAPAP1-interacting protein in HEK 293 human kidney epithelial cells [67], echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 1 (EML1), LGN, cortactin (actin cytoskeleton-regulating protein), β-catenin (SAPAP4-interacting protein, identified in Neuro2A cells) [34], spinophilin (SAPAP3 interacting protein) [69], and cyclin-dependent kinase-5 (CDK5) [70].

2.2. Expression of SAPAPs in the CNS

During postnatal development, the different SAPAP members are expressed differently. The temporal patterns of Sapap1 and Sapap2 expression in individual brain regions do not change prominently after birth [19]. For example, the expression of Sapap1 mRNAs in the cortex seems to slightly peak around postnatal day 90. However, the spatiotemporal expression pattern of Sapap3 during early postnatal development is noticeable, with peak expression observed around 2–3 weeks after birth in the cortex, striatum, and thalamus [19,71]. Although high expression levels are seen in the cortex within the first 3 weeks after birth, the distribution of Sapap4 mRNA appears to slightly decline afterwards [19]. Additionally, recent studies have indicated that both Sapap1 and Sapap4 are expressed in progenitor cells—the latter notably strongly expressed in the cortical progenitors and migrating neurons—suggesting the important roles of SAPAPs during early corticogenesis [34,72].
In the adult rodent brain, the Sapap mRNAs and proteins display overlapping yet distinct distribution characteristics. All four Sapap mRNAs are expressed abundantly in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and olfactory bulb, but at low or undetectable levels in the hypothalamus and substantia nigra [18,19]. Sapap1 mRNA is expressed abundantly in the cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, cerebellum, and olfactory bulb, moderately in the thalamus, and at low levels in the striatum [13,18]. Notably, Sapap1 mRNA is only expressed in a small subset of cells in the striatum and displays heterogeneous expression patterns in different subregions of the thalamus [18], but it is uniformly distributed throughout the whole cerebral cortex.
Distinct from the other SAPAP family members, Sapap2 mRNAs are expressed in a limited pattern—mainly in the forebrain, with relatively low expression levels. Sapap2 displays its highest expression levels in the hippocampus, with moderate levels in the striatum and almost undetectable levels in the cerebellum, thalamus, and amygdala [13,18]. In the cortex, Sapap2 mRNAs show relative strong expression in layers 2 and 3 [18].
The most abundant Sapap detected in the striatum and various thalamic nuclei is Sapap3 [18,19]. Moreover, Sapap3 mRNAs are also highly expressed in layers 1–3 of the cortex, but only moderately expressed in the amygdala [13,18]. An intriguing aspect of the subcellular distribution of Sapap3 is its dendritic localization. It has been found that several mRNAs are localized in the dendrites [73,74], and an extensive body of literature directly linked synaptic plasticity with local protein synthesis and degradation in dendrites [75,76,77] (reviewed in [73,78,79,80]). In the hippocampus, Sapap3 is the only family member that is highly localized in dendrites [18,19], which possibly allows rapid turnover of proteins and thus provides a mechanism for quick, activity-dependent changes in synaptic protein complex composition [73,80,81], suggesting that SAPAP3 may play a unique role in synaptic plasticity.
Sapap4 is highly expressed in many regions of the brain, such as the hippocampus, cortex, amygdala, and cerebellum [13,18,19]. In the hippocampus, the expression of Sapap4 mRNA and proteins is relatively high in CA1 and CA3, but low in the dentate gyrus. Additionally, Sapap4 mRNA shows high expression in layer 5 of the cortex. In addition to these areas, Sapap4 is also strongly expressed in the adult rodent thalamus [17,18] and striatum [13,82]—second only to Sapap3. Of particular interest, Sapap4 mRNA is strongly expressed in the locus coeruleus [18] as well as the ventricular zone and migrating neurons [34].
In general, the SAPAP proteins are predominantly localized at glutamatergic and cholinergic synapses, and not at GABAergic or glycinergic synapses [18], suggesting that SAPAPs may be a general “core” postsynaptic component of excitatory synapses, but not of inhibitory synapses. Moreover, subsequent studies have found that SAPAP3 and SAPAP4 may tend to present at corticostriatal and thalamostriatal excitatory synapses, respectively [13,82]. These findings of molecular heterogeneity of SAPAPs at different synapses imply that SAPAP family members may be localized at synapses in a circuit-selective manner, and that the molecular specificity in SAPAP proteins attributes a unique and specific function to the SAPAP family members. A systematic analysis of the SAPAPs according to the subregions and developmental stages of the brain remains to be determined and would be important for understanding the functions of SAPAPs in the brain.

3. Roles of SAPAPs in Synaptic Structure and Function

SAPAPs play direct or indirect roles in cellular signaling. Through their interactions with PSD-95 and SHANKs/Homers, SAPAPs couple the neuronal cell adhesion molecule neuroligin [39,40], ionotropic glutamate receptors, and ion channels—including NMDARs [59], AMPARs [41,42], kainate-type glutamate receptors [49], and Shaker-type K+ channels [83]—with metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1/5) and other downstream signaling proteins, bridging the PSD and the actin cytoskeleton and linking multiple cellular pathways together [9,11,84]. Conversely, SAPAPs can also directly recruit signaling molecules such as nNOS and nArgBP2—a modulator of both cell adhesion and the actin cytoskeleton [63,64,65]. Interestingly, the overexpression of Sapap4 in human retina pigment epithelial cells also disturbs neuronal migration and impacts actin cytoskeleton dynamics, probably involving cortactin and F-actin [34] (Figure 2).
The SAPAPs themselves also act as substrates for phosphorylation and ubiquitination. Previous in vivo and in vitro studies have indicated that SAPAPs can be phosphorylated by kinases such as PKA, PKC, CDK5, ERK1, P38 MAPK, AKT1, and CaMKII [70,84,85,86]. SAPAP1 protein complexes show increased binding in specific kinases and phosphatases upon induction of LTP [87]. Interestingly, PSD-95–SAPAP interaction and SAPAP–DLC interaction, which are dependent upon CaMKII phosphorylation of SAPAP, are crucial for proper SAPAP targeting and synaptogenesis [86,88]. Moreover, PKC phosphorylation of SAPAP proteins can also promote PSD-95–SAPAP complex formation and further enhance the clustering and formation of AMPAR nanodomains [84], while CaMKII phosphorylation of SAPAPs can control the turnover of SAPAPs at synapses in a bidirectional manner and phosphorylation of Ser54 in SAPAP promotes its removal from synapse sites [86]. Notably, overexpression of the SAPAP turnover mutants not only results in the loss of polyubiquitination and degradation of SAPAP from synapses but also eliminates activity-dependent remodeling of PSD-95, SHANK and regulation of surface AMPAR levels [86], indicating that SAPAP is critical for regulation of postsynaptic protein organization and synaptic structure. Moreover, SAPAPs can also be ubiquitinated by an E3 ligase (TRIM3), leading to its subsequent degradation and loss of SHANK1 from postsynaptic sites, which is involved in regulation of dendritic spine morphology [89]. CDK5 phosphorylation of SAPAP appears to be central in triggering ubiquitination and degradation of SAPAPs, as well as remodeling of the synaptic actin structures [70] (Figure 2). Together, the specialized functional network organized by PSD-95–SAPAP–SHANK scaffold complexes facilitates the activity-dependent remodeling of dendritic spines [86,89]; thus, the disruption of the activity-dependent turnover of PSD scaffold proteins such as SAPAPs can affect synaptic formation and plasticity, leading to abnormal synaptic and behavioral phenotypes.

3.1. Synaptic Formation and Maturation

As an indispensable central member of the axis of PSD-95–SAPAP–SHANK scaffold complexes in the PSD [4,8,9,11], SAPAPs play critical roles in initial synaptic formation and development. SAPAPs are always present before NMDAR and AMPAR clusters become synaptic [90], suggesting a structural role of SAPAPs in synapse formation. Indeed, the SAPAP–SHANK interaction is known to be essential for synaptic targeting of SHANK1 [55,91], whereas the interaction between SAPAPs and PSD-95 is crucial for synaptic localization of NMDARs [90], SHANKs [92], and SAPAPs [88]. Moreover, the SAPAP–DLC2 interaction is primarily located in dendritic spines, activity-dependent [93], and also thought to play important roles in proper targeting of SAPAP proteins to synapses [86] and controlling NMDARs’ function in synaptic transmission [94] (Figure 2).
Consistent with an essential function in SAPAP-mediated synaptogenesis and synaptic activity [88], the studies of SAPAPs in vivo have also highlighted a potential role of SAPAPs in synaptic development. For example, the deletion of the Sapap3 gene results in an increase in “juvenile” NMDAR subunit composition [13] and silent synapses (i.e., those containing no AMPARs) [95], suggestive of immature corticostriatal synapses. Intriguingly, the absence of Sapap4 also leads to similar alterations in the hippocampus [16], suggesting critical roles of SAPAP3 and SAPAP4 in promoting the early postnatal switch in NMDAR subunit expression and regulating the maturation of excitatory synapses.
Correspondingly, loss of SAPAPs in mice not only leads to disruption of protein interactions in the PSD [15], but also affects the dendritic arborization, spine numbers, axon caliber, and the structure of excitatory synapses in different brain regions [13,14,16,17,35,96]. In particular, SAPAP2 has been identified as a critical component involved in modulating synaptic function and development. For Sapap4, cell-type-specific differential isoform expression is seen during the transition from immature to mature neurons, probably reflecting the dynamic, diverse, and complex functions of SAPAPs [97]. More recently, SAPAP4 has been found to be required for proper cortical development [34]. These findings indicate an important role of SAPAPs in regulating excitatory synaptic formation and maturation.

3.2. Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity

Homeostatic plasticity has essential consequences for maintaining the stable function of neural circuits over a wide range of spatiotemporal scales [98]. There is evidence that SAPAPs can contribute to synaptic scaling by regulating the accumulation of postsynaptic receptors and scaffold proteins at synaptic sites [4,86]. The ubiquitination and degradation of SAPAPs at synapses is thought to be required for the normal activity-dependent remodeling of postsynaptic scaffold proteins such as PSD-95 and SHANKs, as well as excitatory synaptic scaling [86]. Consistent with the role of SAPAPs in synaptic scaling, deletion or perturbation of different SAPAP family members in mice also leads to alterations in the PSD levels of receptors and scaffold proteins, including NMDARs, AMPARs, mGluRs, Homer, SHANK, and αCaMKII [13,14,15,16,17,99]. Strikingly, not only the deletion of the repeat region R1 in SAPAP [86], but also the removal of SHANK [100], leads to the loss of AMPAR-containing synapses, along with impaired synaptic transmission.
The absence of SAPAP2 can lead to postsynaptic and presynaptic deficits, including a decrease in AMPAR-mediated postsynaptic response and an increased paired-pulse ratio (PPR), which indicates a reduction in the probability of presynaptic release in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) [14]. Two recent independent studies using different knockout strategies revealed that Sapap4-mutant mice exhibit decreased NR2A-mediated NMDAR currents and increased AMPAR transmission in the hippocampus [16], impaired synaptic transmission, and decreased AMPAR-mediated postsynaptic responses in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) [35], without alterations in the presynaptic neurotransmitter release. Moreover, SAPAP4 deficiency also impairs neuronal network function and affects synaptic plasticity in the hippocampal CA1 region, impairing long-term depression (LTD) but enabling the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) [16].
Due to its strong association with OCD, the synaptic roles of SAPAP3 have been well studied. Sapap3-mutant mice exhibit significant deficits in corticostriatal synaptic function, including reduced AMPAR-mediated postsynaptic responses and elevated signaling through NMDAR and mGluR5 [13,95,99,101], without significantly affecting thalamostriatal AMPAR synaptic function [82]. Furthermore, there is ample evidence for input- or circuit-specific impairments of corticostriatal synaptic transmission [82,101,102,103,104,105,106,107]. Beyond participating in glutamatergic system, SAPAPs have been implicated in modulating the monoaminergic system. Sapap3-mutant mice display upregulation of serotonin turnover in cortical and striatal regions and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid/dopamine ratios in the OFC [108], along with alterations in dopamine receptor density within the NAc [109], indicating an important role of SAPAP proteins in glutamate–monoamine interplay, which is relevant in psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, mood disorders, and OCD [110,111]. A follow-up study revealed an anomalous excessive form of synaptic plasticity (i.e., endocannabinoid-mediated LTD) expressed at striatal excitatory synapses, requiring mGluR5 signaling in Sapap3-mutant mice [99].

4. SAPAPs’ Expression, FMRP, and Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Substantial studies have shown the genetic and epigenetic dysregulation of SAPAP genes in patients afflicted with psychiatric disorders or related animal models [21,22,23,112,113,114,115,116]. Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is considered to be a translational repressor that plays a key role in regulating local mRNA translation in response to synaptic signaling. In Fmr1-knockout (KO) mice—a model for fragile X syndrome—the protein levels of several FMRP targets are increased in PSD fractions either from the neocortex or hippocampus, including Sapap1–3, Shank1, Shank3, and various glutamate receptor subunits [117]. Conversely, Sapap3 is decreased in both the OFC and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of Fmr1-KO mice [118], which may contribute to the deficits in cognitive flexibility found in fragile X syndrome. Additionally, aggressive experience also increases the expression of Sapap3, coupled with a decrease in FMRP phosphorylation that is dependent on the activation of mGluR5 [119]. The postsynaptic targets of FMRP also include Sapap4, mGluR5, and many other scaffold proteins that comprise the glutamate receptor interactomes, such as PSD-95, Homer1, and Neuroligins 1–3 [120,121,122]. The mRNA for Sapap4 is significantly increased by the activation of mGluRs in WT but not Fmr1-KO neurons [123]. Diminished mGluR-induced dendritic localization of Sapap4 mRNA is found in the hippocampal neurons of Fmr1-KO mice [123], indicating a surprising coordinate regulation between Sapap4 and mGluRs that may be altered in fragile X syndrome. In accordance with these findings, increased mGluR5-signaling-dependent AMPAR endocytosis or altered mGluR5–Homer scaffolds are observed in OCD models with Sapap3-mutant mice, fragile X syndrome models with Fmr1-KO mice, and autism models with Shank3-mutant mice, which all include repetitive behaviors, among other symptoms [95,101,124,125], suggesting a potential shared genetic mechanism of different neuropsychiatric disorders (Figure 2).
Altered expression levels of SAPAPs are also observed in different neuropsychiatric disorders (Table 1). Sapap1 expression in the NAc is significantly increased in both animal models of phencyclidine-induced schizophrenia and unmedicated patients [115]. Sapap2 mRNA expression, which is significantly associated with its DNA methylation status, was associated with coping with stress in an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder (PSTD) [112]. Similarly, the effects of Sapap2 methylation on memory ability in AD patients are also thought to be mediated by changes in SAPAP2 expression in the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) [22]. Increases in Sapap3 levels have been observed in both epilepsy patients and murine models [116]. Sapap4 has been indicated to be involved in psychostimulants’ actions and bipolar disorder (BD). In taste-aversion-resistant rats after cocaine exposure, the mRNA levels of Sapap4 in the amygdala were strikingly lower than those in taste-aversion-prone rats [126]. Remarkably, sensitivity to cocaine and amphetamine was also changed in Sapap4-deficient mice [17,35]. Interestingly, in human neural progenitor cells derived from BD patients, Sapap4 has been identified as a target gene of miR-1908-5p-a BD-associated epigenetic regulator [127]—suggesting that epigenetic dysregulation of SAPAP4 may be involved in the pathogenesis of BD.
Epigenetic dysregulation of the expression of SAPAP genes, mainly mediated by changes in DNA methylation and histone acetylation, may confer risks of various neuropsychiatric disorders (Table 2). Epigenetic modifications of the Sapap2 gene have been implicated in PTSD [112], alcohol and cannabis use [21,114], schizophrenia [113], and AD [22]. One study revealed that histone deacetylases and methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) inhibit repetitive behaviors through regulation of the Sapap3 gene [128]. Additionally, recent studies have also reported an association between altered methylation of SAPAP1 and stress responses to violence [129] and a link between epigenetic dysregulation of SAPAP4 and early-onset cerebellar ataxia [23,130].

5. Human Molecular Genetic Analysis of Neuropsychiatric Disorders Linked to SAPAP

5.1. SAPAP1 and Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Several human molecular genetic studies have emerged to show that SAPAP1 is related to several neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, OCD, AD, ADHD, ASD, mood disorders, and cortical malformation [24,25,26,27,28,131,132,133,134] (Table 3). The SAPAP1 gene is located on chromosome 18p11, which has been suggested to be a susceptibility region for schizophrenia and/or BD [135,136]. Although several SNPs found in SAPAP1 are not associated with schizophrenia [131,132], a de novo CNV mutation of SAPAP1 has been identified in patients with schizophrenia [24]. The first genome-wide association study (GWAS) with 1465 OCD cases revealed that the two SNPs with the lowest p-values were located within SAPAP1, suggesting a subthreshold statistical significance for SAPAP1 [25]. Furthermore, the fact that two rare CNVs (a 62 kb duplication for SAPAP1 and a 16 kb deletion for SAPAP2) overlapping the FMRP targets SAPAP1 and SAPAP2 were uncovered in another OCD study is of particular interest [26]. Two SAPAP1 SNPs associated with cognitive flexibility have also been identified in ADHD children [27]. In addition, SAPAP1 is also implicated in ASD [133] and recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) [134]. Interestingly, the expression of SAPAP1, which is significantly downregulated in the hippocampus and cortex of AD patients, is strongly associated with early identified AD variants (i.e., noncoding SNP rs8093731 in Desmoglein-2/DSG2 that acts as an expression quantitative trait loci for SAPAP1) [28] and SAPAP1 is identified as a potential candidate gene involved in AD.

5.2. SAPAP2 and Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Numerous studies have implicated SAPAP2 as being the strongest candidate gene for neurodevelopmental or behavioral phenotypes and closely associated with various neuropsychiatric disorders [2,20,22,26,29,30,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144]. Strikingly, many genetic variants—including SNPs, single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), and de novo common and/or rare CNVs—in SAPAP2 have been found to be associated with neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD and ADHD [20,29,30,137,138,139,140,141,142,145], cognitive disorders such as developmental delay (DD)/ID and AD [22,142,143,145], and other disorders, such as schizophrenia [2,29,139,146,147,148] and OCD [26,144].
Table 3. Genetic variants in SAPAP genes associated with neuropsychiatric disorders.
Table 3. Genetic variants in SAPAP genes associated with neuropsychiatric disorders.
GeneSchizophreniaASDOCD and Related DisordersAD and Other Cognitive DisordersADHD and MDD
SAPAP1Rare missense mutation c.1922A > G (a benign variant) [132]Associated with the IGAP (International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project) SNP rs8093731 in Desmoglein-2/DSG2; underexpressed in the entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, and frontal and temporal cortex of AD cases [28]SNPs rs1116345 and rs34248 [144]c.1397A > G, p. Asp466Gly, exon 8 in subcortical heterotopias [34]SNPs rs2049161and rs16946051 associated with cognitive flexibility in ADHD [27]
SNP rs12455524 in recurrent MDD [134]
De novo CNV deletion [24]Identified as an ASD-associated gene in a genome-wide network analysis [133]Two SNPs located within an intron of SAPAP1 [25]N/AN/A
N/AN/ARare CNVs (62 kb duplication) [26]N/AN/A
SAPAP2Damaging missense [147]CNV 8:1626547:G:C [30]SNPs rs6558484 and rs7014992 associated with OFC white matter volume [144]8p23.3 deletion in DD/mental retardation [145]N/A
CNV duplication [146]Rare de novo CNV duplications(704383-1521910) [29]Rare CNVs (16 kb deletion) [26]SNP rs34130287C within the first intron [149]N/A
SNV c.-69+9C.T, c.-69+13C.T, c.-69+47C.T, c.-69+55C.T [20]SNP rs2906569 at intron 1, rs2301963 (P384Q) at exon 3 and several nonsynonymous variants [137]N/ASNP rs6992443 [150]N/A
N/ARare de novo CMV duplication 8:704383-1521910 [138]N/ASNP rs2957061 SNP chr8:1316870; minor allele frequency (a locus within SAPAP2) [22]N/A
GeneSchizophreniaASDOCD and Related DisordersAD and Other Cognitive Disorders
SAPAP2CNV deletion, 8p 23.2 and 8p 23.1 [139]CNV deletion 8p 23.3 [151]N/AN/A
N/ACNV deletion 8p 23.2 and 8p 23.1 [139]N/AN/A
CNV deletion, 8p23.3-p23.1 [148]CNV duplication 8p23.3 (patients with de novo rearrangements) [140]N/AN/A
N/ACNV duplication,8p23.3 (1, 499, 963–1, 854, 917) [141]N/AN/A
SAPAP3SNVs
c.1141G > A; c.1759G > C;
c.2309G > T; c.2578-11C > T [20]
CNV 1:35365700:G:A [30]Increased frequency of rare nonsynonymous coding variants (in OCD and TTM) [152]N/A
N/AN/ASNPs rs6662980–rs4652867 in grooming disorder [31]N/A
N/AN/ASNP rs11264126 and two
haplotypes containing rs11264126 and rs12141243 in TS [33]
N/A
N/AN/ASNPs rs11583978 and rs6682829 in early-onset OCD [32]N/A
SAPAP4N/ASNP located at the 20q11.21–q13.12 locus comprising the Sapap4 gene [153]N/ADe novo frameshift SNVs (c.2714_2715insCAGCTGG) insertion, N905Qfs, exon 12; c.2893T > G, p. Ser965Ala, exon 13 in subcortical heterotopias [34]
Abbreviations: ASD, autism spectrum disorder; OCD, obsessive–compulsive disorder; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; TTM, trichotillomania; MDD, major depressive disorder; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; TS, Tourette syndrome; DD, developmental delay; ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; SNPs, single-nucleotide polymorphisms; SNVs, single-nucleotide variants; CNVs, copy number variants.
Although SAPAP2 has been identified as a promising candidate gene of ASD, the potential role of SAPAP2 in ASD is still unclear. A study using a murine model demonstrated that the deletion of SAPAP2 leads to increased social interaction and aggressive behavior, along with impaired initial reverse learning and synaptic function [14], indicating that SAPAP2 somehow modulates cognition. Correspondingly, a recent cross-species study not only revealed the role of SAPAP2 in age-related working memory decline, but also established an association between SAPAP2 and AD phenotypes at multiple levels of analysis [22], highlighting the possible importance of epigenetic dysregulation of SAPAP2 expression in the pathophysiology of AD. As noted in the above studies, CDK5—one of the key kinases in AD—is involved in triggering amyloid-beta (Aβ)-induced ubiquitination and degradation of SAPAPs [70], while amyloid precursor protein (APP) is one of binding partners of Homer, which is indirectly linked to SAPAPs via SHANKs [7]. Gene overexpression can arise from de novo CNV duplication, and several autism risk genes in duplicated loci—such as SAPAP2, SHANK3, and Neuroligins 1 and 3—are all FMRP targets [29,117,121,138,140], suggesting a promising link between dysfunction of FMRP in regulating the expression of synaptic proteins and the development of ASD.

5.3. SAPAP3 and Neuropsychiatric Disorders

After the initial report of the features of Sapap3-mutant mice for OCD-like repetitive self-grooming behaviors [13], a higher frequency of rare nonsynonymous coding variants located in SAPAP3 was found in OCD patients, providing the first clinical evidence and tentatively supporting the link between SAPAP3 and OCD [152]. Several follow-up human genetic studies and other secondary analyses of GWAS have also noted that SAPAP3 is a promising functional candidate gene for OCD and obsessive–compulsive spectrum disorders, such as trichotillomania (TTM) and Tourette syndrome (TS) [31,32,33,152], although some of the mutations identified in the above studies are more commonly found in association with grooming disorders and TTM than with OCD. Convergent evidence from functional imaging and neuropsychological studies has linked OCD symptoms to dysfunction of striatum-based circuitry, especially highlighting cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuitry [5,31,154]. Owing to their robust behavioral similarities and sophisticated neural circuitry shared with OCD and related disorders [13,82], Sapap3-mutant mice are now considered to be a well-established animal model for OCD and related disorders. Interestingly, a CNV within the SAPAP3 gene was also identified in a study of about 200 individuals with ASD [30]—a spectrum of disorders that involve prominent compulsive-like repetitive behaviors overlapped with the behavioral phenotypes of OCD.

5.4. SAPAP4 and Neuropsychiatric Disorders

In addition to the aforementioned possible roles in the actions of psychostimulants, BD, and fragile X syndrome, SAPAP4 is also associated with several other neuropsychiatric disorders, including ASD, early-onset cerebellar ataxia, and subcortical heterotopias [23,34,153]. An SNP located at the 20q11.21–q13.12 locus that encompasses the SAPAP4 gene has also been linked with a potential role in the development of ASD [153]. SAPAP4 is also implicated in early-onset cerebellar ataxia, according to an epigenetic study in which disruption of the SAPAP4 gene by the chromosome translocation t (8;20) caused monoallelic DNA hypermethylation of the truncated SAPAP4 promoter CpG island 820 bp downstream of the first untranslated exon of SAPAP4 isoform a and perturbed expression of the SAPAP4 gene [23]. A recent study has identified a de novo frameshift variation and a missense variant in SAPAP4 from two families with different types of subcortical heterotopias—which are cortical malformations associated with ID and epilepsy [34]—pinpointing a novel role of SAPAP4 in early cortical development. Although there is only an indirect link between SAPAP4 and mood disorders such as BD [127], 22q13 duplications spanning SHANK3 (a known interaction scaffold protein of SAPAP4) have been found in patients diagnosed with ADHD and BD, respectively [155], suggesting a possible role of SAPAP4 in hyperkinetic disorders and mood disorders.

6. Mutational Studies in Murine SAPAP Models

Because increasing evidence has pointed to a link between SAPAP family members and some aspects of the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders, characterizing how the perturbed synaptic functions of SAPAPs are involved informs behavioral phenotypes related to neuropsychiatric disorders in mutant mice, revealing part of what makes neuropsychiatric disorders’ neurobiology.
To study the in vivo function of SAPAPs, mutant mice carrying Sapap1–4 deletions have been generated (Table 4). Sapap1-mutant mice exhibit normal spontaneous locomotion and normal reverse learning ability, but subtle decreases in sociability and impaired association of PSD-95 with SHANK3 complexes [15,156], while Sapap2-mutant mice display enhanced social interaction ability, excessive aggressive behaviors, and abnormal synaptic morphology and transmission in the OFC [14]. In contrast, for reverse learning, two independent mutant lines show opposing phenotypes [14,156]. A recent study also found that deletion of SAPAP2 in mice leads to reduced alcohol consumption [21]. Sapap1- and -2-mutant mice all exhibit several forms of abnormal behavior relevant to schizophrenia, ASD, and cognitive disorders, such as deficits in learning, memory, and social behaviors.
Owing to the promising association between SAPAP3 and OCD, much more attention has been given to Sapap3-mutant mice—a well-established OCD-relevant murine model displaying repetitive self-grooming behavior, augmented anxiety, cognitive inflexibility, imbalances between goal-directed and habitual behavior, selective deficits in behavioral response inhibition, insensitivity to reward devaluation, altered valence processing, hypolocomotion, disrupted sleep patterns, normal preference motivation for sucrose, and Pavlovian learning [13,102,104,106,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164]. Convergent evidence from structural, biochemical, electrophysiological, and neural circuitry studies of Sapap3-mutant mice demonstrates and emphasizes the crucial role of SAPAP3 in corticostriatal synapses and striatum-based circuitry in OCD-like phenotypes. Surprisingly, neither cognitive inflexibility, augmented anxiety, nor aberrant habit formation are correlated with compulsive, repetitive behavior, implying that these different OCD-like behaviors in Sapap3-mutant mice probably involve complex or independent etiologies [157,159,160,162,163]. For example, the compromised PFC–striatal synaptic and circuitry function observed in Sapap3-mutant mice have been thought to be involved in their excessive compulsive and repetitive behavior [13,82,102].
Increased neural activity in prelimbic (PrL) and infralimbic (IL) regions of the medial PFC is associated with impaired reverse learning—usually representing cognitive inflexibility—in Sapap3-mutant mice [158]. Of particular interest, one study revealed an imbalanced cortical input to the central striatum in Sapap3-mutant mice, with more inputs from the secondary motor area (M2) and fewer inputs from the lateral OFC (LOFC) [103]. Notably, the role of SAPAP3 in the OFC appears to be highly heterogeneous.
Table 4. Characterization of Sapap1–4-mutant mice.
Table 4. Characterization of Sapap1–4-mutant mice.
Target ProteinMurine Model
Details and Background
Phenotype
Social Behaviors and PPILocomotion
and Motor Ability
Compulsive and Repetitive BehaviorsCognitive Function/
Learning and Memory
Anxiety, Depression, and Reward-Related BehaviorsOther Phenotypes
SAPAP1Dlgap1 KO
(129/C57BL/6J)
  • ↓ Sociability [15]
  • ═ Locomotion [15]
  • ↓ Grooming [15]
N/A
  • ═ Depressive levels and sucrose preference [15]
  • ↓ Digging behaviors [15]
Dlgap1 KO
(129 S5/C57BL/6J)
N/A
  • ═ Locomotion [156]
N/A
  • Slower reward collection latencies during reverse learning [156]
N/AN/A
SAPAP2Dlgap2 KO
exon 6 mutated (C57BL/6)
  • ↑ Social approach and aggressive behaviors [14]
  • Novelty-induced hyperactivity [14]
NA
  • ↓ Reverse learning [14]
N/AN/A
Dlgap2 KO
(129 S5/C57BL/6J)
N/A
  • ═ Locomotion [156]
N/A
  • ↑ Visual discrimination and reverse learning [156]
  • Shorter reward collection latencies during reverse learning [156]
N/AN/A
Dlgap2 KO
exon 6 mutated (C57BL/6J)
N/AN/AN/AN/A
  • ↓ Alcohol consumption, preference, and binge-like drinking [21]
  • ═ Sucrose preference [21]
N/A
Target ProteinMurine Model
Details and Background
Phenotype
Social Behaviors and PPILocomotion and Motor AbilityCompulsive and Repetitive BehaviorsCognitive Function/Learning and MemoryAnxiety, Depression, and Reward-Related BehaviorsOther Phenotypes
SAPAP3Sapap3 KO
exon 3 mutated (C57BL/6J)
  • ↓ Reverse learning [106,157,158,162], fear learning, and fear extinction [164]
  • ═ Pavlovian learning [157] and learning ability [106]
  • ↑ Response lability [162]
  • ↑ PFC activity associated with poor reverse learning [158]
  • ↑ Anxiety behaviors [13,101,157]
  • ═ Anxiety [160]
  • Insensitive to the devaluation of a sucrose reward [159]
  • ═ Sucrose preference and motivation [159]
  • Altered reward processing and impaired habit learning [161]
  • ↓ Acquisition of reward learning and goal-directed behaviors [164]
  • ↓ Lactate and glutathione levels in the striatum [167]
  • ↑ Serotonin turnover and metabolized dopamine ratios [108]
  • ↓ D1/2/3 receptor density in the NAcc,↑DAT binding density in the striatum [109]
  • ↓ SV2A [168] and mGluR5 availability [166]
  • ↓ Response vigor [160]
Sapap3 KO,
details not mentioned
(C57BL/6J)
N/AN/A
  • ↑ Grooming [163]
  • ↓ Reverse learning [163]
N/AN/A
Target ProteinMurine Model Details and BackgroundPhenotype
Social Behaviors and PPILocomotion and Motor AbilityCompulsive and Repetitive BehaviorsCognitive Function/Learning and MemoryAnxiety, Depression, and Reward-Related BehaviorsOther Phenotypes
SAPAP4Sapap4 KO
replaced exons 3–6 with an ATG-YFP-STOP cassette (C57BL/6J)
  • ═ Social interaction and recognition, ↓ PPI [17]
  • Hyperactivity, increased rearing behaviors ═ motor coordination and muscle endurance [17]
N/A
  • ↓ Contextual and cued memory [17]
  • ═ Anxiety [17]
  • ↓ Time immobile in the forced swimming test and tail suspension test [17]
  • Hypersensitivity to low doses of amphetamine [17]
  • ↓ Sensitivity to cocaine and high doses of amphetamine [17,35]
  • Impulsive behaviors [17]
Dlgap4geo/geo
exon trap vector integrated in intron 7 of the Dlgap4 gene (C57BL/6J)
  • ↓ Social interaction
  • ↓ USV [16]
  • Hyperactivity, reduced rearing behaviors [16]
  • ↑ Locomotion during the dark phase in home cages [16]
  • ↓ Self-grooming [16]
  • ↓ Working memory and spatial learning and memory [16]
  • ↓ Anxiety [16]
  • ═ General circadian activity. [16]
Dlgap4 KO
exon 8 mutated
(C57BL/6N)
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
  • Neuroanatomical defects in the dorsal telencephalon
  • ↓ Cell counts across the entire brain
  • Reduced in cortical layers II–IV and VI [34]
Target proteinMurine Model Details and BackgroundPhenotype
Synaptic MorphologySynaptic and Circuity FunctionsmRNA or Protein Level
SAPAP1Dlgap1 KO (129/C57BL/6J)N/AN/A Cortex (total proteins)
  • ═ Homer1, PSD-95, NR2A/2B and SynGAP1 [15]
SAPAP1Dlgap1 KO
(129 S5/C57BL/6J)
N/A N/A N/A [156]
SAPAP2Dlgap2 KO
exon 6 mutated (C57BL/6)
OFC
  • ↓ Spine density
    ↓ PSD length/thickness [14]
OFC
  • ↓ mEPSC amplitude
    ↑ PPR [14]
Cortex (synaptosome proteins)
  • ↓ NR1, GluR1,Homer1b/c, α and βCaMKⅡ [14]
  • ═ NR2A/2B, GluR2, SHANK3 and PSD95 [14]
Dlgap2 KO
(129 S5/C57BL/6J)
N/A N/A N/A [156]
Dlgap2 KO
exon 6 mutated (C57BL/6J)
N/AN/A N/A [21]
Target ProteinMurine Model Details and BackgroundPhenotype
Synaptic
Morphology
Synaptic and Circuity FunctionsmRNA or Protein Level
SAPAP3Sapap3 KO
exon 3 mutated (C57BL/6J)
Striatum
  • ═ Spine density and PSD length,↓PSD thickness [13]
Associative striatum
  • ↓ Axon caliber
  • ═ Density of myelinated axons [96]
Striatum
  • ↓ fEPSP amplitude, ↑ fEPSP (NMDA), ═ PPR [13]
  • ↓ PS amplitude and PPR, ↓ eEPSC amplitude and ↑ eEPSC PPR (D2 MSNs); ↑ synaptic depression [99]
  • ↓ AMPA/NMDA, ↓ mEPSC amplitude/ frequency (AMPA), ═PPR, ↑ silent synapses [95]
  • ↓ N2 field potential amplitude, ↑ PPR [169]
  • ↑ Baseline firing rate [102]
  • ═ mEPSC (striatopallidal MSNs), ↓ qEPSC frequency; ═ qEPSC frequency/amplitude (thalamostriatal synapses), ═ AMPA/NMDA, ═ PPR [82]
  • ↓ Firing rate and spike probability (MTEP treatment), ↑ spike probability, ↑ event amplitude, ↑ mEPSC frequency (MTEP treatment) [101]
  • Striatum: ═ SPN and FSI I–O curves, EPSC amplitude: ↑ excitatory drive to FSIs, ↓ LOFC inputs to SPNs, ↑ M2 input to central striatum [103]
  • Inhibition of striatal cells increases grooming behavior; inhibition of striatal indirect pathway neurons decreases grooming [105]
Striatum
  • ═ mEPSC amplitude/frequency (PV+ cells), ═ PPR,
↓ AMPA/NMDA (D1-, D2-MSNs),
↓ rectification index (D2-MSNs),
↓ cumulative probability (M1/M2-to-DLS AMPAR currents) [104]
LOFC
  • ↓ LFP oscillation power, ↑ firing rate (putative interneurons), ↑ bursting activity (putative pyramidal neurons) [170]
  • Altered OFC-striatal circuit [102,106] and corticostriatal circuitry [169]
  • ↑ Activity in LOFC excitatory neurons/activity in LOFC GABAergic interneurons in the early-reversal stage [106]
Striatum (PSD proteins)
  • ↑ NR1/2B,↓ NR2A, ═ PSD-95/93 and SHANK [13]
  • SAPAP4 is present at thalamostriatal synapses but not corticostriatal synapses [82]
  • ↓ mGluR5/Homer interaction [101]
mRNA
  • Sapap3 is the sole Sapap that is highly expressed in the striatum, Sapap4 is the next most abundant [82]
Target ProteinMurine model Details and BackgroundPhenotype
Synaptic MorphologySynaptic and Circuity Functions mRNA or Protein Level
SAPAP3Sapap3 KO
details not mentioned
(C57BL/6J)
N/A
  • Altered dmPFC-DMS circuit in compulsive groomers [107]
Distinct patterns of abnormal LOFC activity during grooming and reverse learning [163]N/A
SAPAP4Sapap4 KO
replace exons 3–6 with an ATG-YFP-STOP cassette (C57BL/6J)
mPFC
  • ↓ Spine density
  • ═ PSD length/thickness [17]
NAc (shell)
  • ↓ Spine density
  • ↓ Numbers of synapses with AMPARs [35]
NAc (shell)
  • ↓ Field population spike amplitude, ↓ mEPSC frequency/amplitude, ═ PPR, NMDA/AMPA [35]
N/APFC
  • PSD proteins: ↑ SHANK/SHANK3, ↓ PSD-95 and GluR1/2, ═ PSD93, Homer 1b/c, NR1, NR2A/2B, mGluR5 and SHANK1/2 [17]
  • mRNA:Sapap4 re-expression rescues Shank3 mRNA expression in cultured PFC neurons of KO mice [17]
Dlgap4geo/geo
exon trap vector integrated in intron 7 of the Dlgap4 gene (C57BL/6J)
Hippocampus (CA1)
  • ↓ Apical dendritic path length, intersections and branching points, ═ Basal dendrites, ↓ stubby spines, ↑ PSD size [16]
Hippocampus (CA1)
  • ═ fEPSP, ↑ mEPSC amplitude, ═ mEPSC frequency, ↓ NR2A-EPSC, ↓ LTD(LFS), ═ LTP
Hippocampus and PFC
  • ↑ Oscillatory events’ amplitude, ↓ oscillatory events’ duration [16]
N/AHippocampus (PSD proteins)
  • ═ NR1, NR2A-C, GRIA1-4, mGluR5, Actn2, Akap1, Baiap2, Dlg1-4, GKAP, Grip1, Magi1, Nsmf, SAPAP1-3, pan-SHANK, SHANK3, aCaMKII, SynGAP1 [16]
Dlgap4 KO
exon 8 mutated(C57BL/6N)
N/AN/AN/ASapap4 mRNA expression throughout the murine cortical wall at E14.5 [34]
Abbreviations: ↓, reduced; ═, unaltered; ↑, increased; N/A, not available; M1, primary motor cortex; M2, secondary motor cortex; DLS, dorsolateral striatum; DMS, dorsomedial striatum; LFS, low-frequency stimulation; PFC, prefrontal cortex; dmPFC, dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex; dmPFC, dorsal medial prefrontal cortex; LOFC, lateral part of the orbitofrontal cortex; LOFC, lateral orbitofrontal cortex; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; IC, internal capsule; NAc, nucleus accumbens; NAcc, nucleus accumbens core; PV, parvalbumin; MSNs, medium spiny neurons; SPN, spiny projection neuron; USVs, ultrasonic vocalizations; PPI, prepulse inhibition; MTEP, mGluR5 antagonism; KO, knockout; KD, knockdown; PSD, postsynaptic density; SV2A, synaptic vesicle protein 2A; PPR, paired-pulse ratio; mEPSC, miniature excitatory postsynaptic current; LTD, long-term depression; LTP, long-term potentiation; fEPSP, field excitatory postsynaptic potential; eEPSC, evoked excitatory postsynaptic current; qEPSC, quantal excitatory postsynaptic current; PS, population spike; EPSC, excitatory postsynaptic current; N2, second negative peak; I–O curves, input–output curves; LFP, local field potential; FSI, fast-spiking interneuron; E14.5, embryonic day 14.5; D1/2/3, dopamine receptor 1/2/3; DAT, dopamine transporter.
The LOFC is involved in both repetitive behaviors and reverse-learning deficits, but with disparate patterns of abnormal activity. Optogenetic stimulation of the LOFC’s pyramidal neurons or LOFC–striatum circuitry reduces compulsive grooming in Sapap3-mutant mice [102]. However, inhibition of LOFC GABAergic interneurons results in increased activity in the LOFC’s pyramidal neurons and constitutes a direct pathway that leads to the impairment of reverse learning in Sapap3-mutant mice [106].
Three independent Sapap4-mutant mouse lines generated using different deletion strategies have been used to investigate the in vivo functional roles of SAPAP4 [16,17,34,35]. Of these, one mouse line has not been tested for all behaviors [34]; the other two show both shared and distinct defects at the synaptic and behavioral levels [16,17,35]. These two lines both show robust hyperactivity and memory deficits [16,17]. Whereas Dlgap4geo/geo mice with an exon trap vector integrated in intron 7 of the Sapap4 gene show synaptic defects in the hippocampus and display impaired social interaction, diminished anxiety, and normal grooming behavior [16]—in which the social defects phenotype resembles the ASD-like behaviors observed in various Shank3-mutant mice [57]—mutant mice carrying Sapap4 deletions of exons 3-6 have profound synaptic defects in the NAc and exhibit robust hyperactivity, reduced depression-like behavior, altered sensitivity to amphetamine and cocaine, and reduced sensory responses, without deficits in anxiety and social interaction [17,35], and the behavioral phenotype of this line replicates the BD manic-like hyperkinetic behaviors seen in Shank3 transgenic mice [155]. Consistently, SHANK3 expression in the PSD is significantly upregulated in mice carrying Sapap4 deletions of exons 3-6 [17]. In addition, a recent study has shown that heterozygous mice with Sapap4 deletions (i.e., removal of exon 8) exhibit decreased size in several brain structures, with the hippocampus, corpus callosum, anterior commissure, thalamus, and cortex affected [34], suggesting the potential role of SAPAP4 during brain development. Given that the disruption of SAPAP4 in Dlgap4geo/geo mice mainly affects the C-terminal region of SAPAP4 (including the binding site for SHANKs) and results in almost total loss of interaction with SHANKs, and that the ablation of exons 3–6 leads to the loss of the vast majority of the SAPAP4 protein (especially the N-terminal region), these two studies provide insights into how different domains or isoforms of the Sapap4 gene may elicit domain- or isoform-specific synaptic and behavioral defects and be involved in different neuropsychiatric disorders.

7. Conclusions

Emerging evidence indicates that SAPAPs are multifaceted postsynaptic scaffold proteins at excitatory synapses; they are believed to control excitatory synaptic formation and maturation, and play crucial roles in homeostatic plasticity by regulating the accumulation and turnover of glutamatergic receptors and scaffold proteins at synaptic sites [4,86], which may involve FMRP, ubiquitination, and actin cytoskeleton dynamics (Figure 2). Although evidence from direct association studies between neuropsychiatric disorders and SAPAPs is limited, there is ample convergent evidence linking dysfunction of SAPAPs to various cognitive deficits and strongly supportive of the important roles of SAPAPs in neuropsychiatric disorders. Findings from human genetic studies and mutant murine models are coalescing into a picture of the molecular networks that, when dysregulated or disrupted, may lead to synaptic dysfunction and, ultimately, be responsible for various neuropsychiatric disorders, such as OCD, ASD, ADHD, BD, schizophrenia, addiction, AD, and other cognitive disorders.
Undoubtedly, Sapap-mutant mice could be useful tools with which to dissect the effects of SAPAP disturbances on neuronal and circuitry function, and to decipher the neurobiological mechanisms underlying behavioral abnormalities seen in neuropsychiatric disorders, including genetically overlapped psychiatric disorders. Given that different SAPAP members have shared and distinct expression patterns in different developmental stages, brain regions, cell types, and circuitry, with differential regulation of gene expression at the transcript, translational, and epigenetic levels, as well as different interacting partners and signaling molecules and possible compensatory expression of other SAPAP members, it will be very important to clarify the physiological functions of the individual SAPAPs, along with how disrupted SAPAPs may result in molecular, synaptic, and circuitry defects and related abnormal behaviors with regard to neuropsychiatric disorders.
Therefore, future studies on Sapap-mutant mice should take into consideration the alternative splicing variants of the gene, the expression timing, the site, and the cell type where the gene mutation exerts its primary effects, eventually compromising the specific neural circuit. Importantly, the significance of the specific neural circuits to individual SAPAP proteins and behavioral abnormalities relevant to neuropsychiatric disorders still needs to be further explored by combining the manipulation of specific circuitry with conventional and conditional gene manipulation strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L.; resources, Y.B.; manuscript preparation, writing, and final correction, C.L. and Y.B.; revision of the manuscript, H.W.; critical revision of the manuscript, C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (Grants nos. 16ZR1410100, 20ZR1416600 to C.L.). C.L. was also supported by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ting, J.T.; Peca, J.; Feng, G. Functional consequences of mutations in postsynaptic scaffolding proteins and relevance to psychiatric disorders. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 35, 49–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Soler, J.; Fananas, L.; Parellada, M.; Krebs, M.O.; Rouleau, G.A.; Fatjo-Vilas, M. Genetic variability in scaffolding proteins and risk for schizophrenia and autism-spectrum disorders: A systematic review. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2018, 43, 223–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lee, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, S.; Han, K. Excitatory and inhibitory synaptic dysfunction in mania: An emerging hypothesis from animal model studies. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Rasmussen, A.H.; Rasmussen, H.B.; Silahtaroglu, A. The DLGAP family: Neuronal expression, function and role in brain disorders. Mol. Brain 2017, 10, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Monteiro, P.; Feng, G. Learning from animal models of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 79, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Monteiro, P.; Feng, G. SHANK proteins: Roles at the synapse and in autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017, 18, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. de Bartolomeis, A.; Barone, A.; Buonaguro, E.F.; Tomasetti, C.; Vellucci, L.; Iasevoli, F. The Homer1 family of proteins at the crossroad of dopamine-glutamate signaling: An emerging molecular “Lego” in the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders. A systematic review and translational insight. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022, 136, 104596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sheng, M.; Hoogenraad, C.C. The postsynaptic architecture of excitatory synapses: A more quantitative view. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007, 76, 823–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Sheng, M.; Kim, E. The postsynaptic organization of synapses. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a005678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sinnen, B.L.; Bowen, A.B.; Forte, J.S.; Hiester, B.G.; Crosby, K.C.; Gibson, E.S.; Dell’Acqua, M.L.; Kennedy, M.J. Optogenetic Control of Synaptic Composition and Function. Neuron 2017, 93, 646–660.e645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Scannevin, R.H.; Huganir, R.L. Postsynaptic organization and regulation of excitatory synapses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2000, 1, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kaizuka, T.; Takumi, T. Postsynaptic density proteins and their involvement in neurodevelopmental disorders. J. Biochem. 2018, 163, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Welch, J.M.; Lu, J.; Rodriguiz, R.M.; Trotta, N.C.; Peca, J.; Ding, J.D.; Feliciano, C.; Chen, M.; Adams, J.P.; Luo, J.; et al. Cortico-striatal synaptic defects and OCD-like behaviours in Sapap3-mutant mice. Nature 2007, 448, 894–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Jiang-Xie, L.F.; Liao, H.M.; Chen, C.H.; Chen, Y.T.; Ho, S.Y.; Lu, D.H.; Lee, L.J.; Liou, H.H.; Fu, W.M.; Gau, S.S. Autism-associated gene Dlgap2 mutant mice demonstrate exacerbated aggressive behaviors and orbitofrontal cortex deficits. Mol. Autism 2014, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Coba, M.P.; Ramaker, M.J.; Ho, E.V.; Thompson, S.L.; Komiyama, N.H.; Grant, S.G.N.; Knowles, J.A.; Dulawa, S.C. Dlgap1 knockout mice exhibit alterations of the postsynaptic density and selective reductions in sociability. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Schob, C.; Morellini, F.; Ohana, O.; Bakota, L.; Hrynchak, M.V.; Brandt, R.; Brockmann, M.D.; Cichon, N.; Hartung, H.; Hanganu-Opatz, I.L.; et al. Cognitive impairment and autistic-like behaviour in SAPAP4-deficient mice. Transl. Psychiatry 2019, 9, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, T.; Bai, Y.; Zheng, X.; Liu, X.; Xing, S.; Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Feng, G.; Li, C. Sapap4 deficiency leads to postsynaptic defects and abnormal behaviors relevant to hyperkinetic neuropsychiatric disorder in mice. Cereb Cortex 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Welch, J.M.; Wang, D.; Feng, G. Differential mRNA expression and protein localization of the SAP90/PSD-95-associated proteins (SAPAPs) in the nervous system of the mouse. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004, 472, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kindler, S.; Rehbein, M.; Classen, B.; Richter, D.; Bockers, T.M. Distinct spatiotemporal expression of SAPAP transcripts in the developing rat brain: A novel dendritically localized mRNA. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 2004, 126, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, J.M.; Lu, C.L.; Cheng, M.C.; Luu, S.U.; Hsu, S.H.; Hu, T.M.; Tsai, H.Y.; Chen, C.H. Role of the DLGAP2 gene encoding the SAP90/PSD-95-associated protein 2 in schizophrenia. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meng, W.; Sjoholm, L.K.; Kononenko, O.; Tay, N.; Zhang, D.; Sarkisyan, D.; Geske, J.R.; Ing, A.; Qiu, W.; Watanabe, H.; et al. Genotype-dependent epigenetic regulation of DLGAP2 in alcohol use and dependence. Mol. Psychiatry 2021, 26, 4367–4382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ouellette, A.R.; Neuner, S.M.; Dumitrescu, L.; Anderson, L.C.; Gatti, D.M.; Mahoney, E.R.; Bubier, J.A.; Churchill, G.; Peters, L.; Huentelman, M.J.; et al. Cross-species analyses identify dlgap2 as a regulator of age-related cognitive decline and alzheimer’s dementia. Cell Rep. 2020, 32, 108091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Minocherhomji, S.; Hansen, C.; Kim, H.G.; Mang, Y.; Bak, M.; Guldberg, P.; Papadopoulos, N.; Eiberg, H.; Doh, G.D.; Mollgard, K.; et al. Epigenetic remodelling and dysregulation of DLGAP4 is linked with early-onset cerebellar ataxia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 6163–6176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kirov, G.; Pocklington, A.J.; Holmans, P.; Ivanov, D.; Ikeda, M.; Ruderfer, D.; Moran, J.; Chambert, K.; Toncheva, D.; Georgieva, L.; et al. De novo CNV analysis implicates specific abnormalities of postsynaptic signalling complexes in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 2012, 17, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Stewart, S.E.; Yu, D.; Scharf, J.M.; Neale, B.M.; Fagerness, J.A.; Mathews, C.A.; Arnold, P.D.; Evans, P.D.; Gamazon, E.R.; Davis, L.K.; et al. Genome-wide association study of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 2013, 18, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Gazzellone, M.J.; Zarrei, M.; Burton, C.L.; Walker, S.; Uddin, M.; Shaheen, S.M.; Coste, J.; Rajendram, R.; Schachter, R.J.; Colasanto, M.; et al. Uncovering obsessive-compulsive disorder risk genes in a pediatric cohort by high-resolution analysis of copy number variation. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2016, 8, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Fan, Z.; Qian, Y.; Lu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chang, S.; Yang, L. DLGAP1 and NMDA receptor-associated postsynaptic density protein genes influence executive function in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brain Behav. 2018, 8, e00914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Katsumata, Y.; Nelson, P.T.; Estus, S.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, I.; Fardo, D.W. Translating Alzheimer’s disease-associated polymorphisms into functional candidates: A survey of IGAP genes and SNPs. Neurobiol. Aging 2019, 74, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pinto, D.; Pagnamenta, A.T.; Klei, L.; Anney, R.; Merico, D.; Regan, R.; Conroy, J.; Magalhaes, T.R.; Correia, C.; Abrahams, B.S.; et al. Functional impact of global rare copy number variation in autism spectrum disorders. Nature 2010, 466, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Iossifov, I.; O’Roak, B.J.; Sanders, S.J.; Ronemus, M.; Krumm, N.; Levy, D.; Stessman, H.A.; Witherspoon, K.T.; Vives, L.; Patterson, K.E.; et al. The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder. Nature 2014, 515, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bienvenu, O.J.; Wang, Y.; Shugart, Y.Y.; Welch, J.M.; Grados, M.A.; Fyer, A.J.; Rauch, S.L.; McCracken, J.T.; Rasmussen, S.A.; Murphy, D.L.; et al. Sapap3 and pathological grooming in humans: Results from the OCD collaborative genetics study. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2009, 150B, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Boardman, L.; van der Merwe, L.; Lochner, C.; Kinnear, C.J.; Seedat, S.; Stein, D.J.; Moolman-Smook, J.C.; Hemmings, S.M. Investigating SAPAP3 variants in the etiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder and trichotillomania in the South African white population. Compr. Psychiatry 2011, 52, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Crane, J.; Fagerness, J.; Osiecki, L.; Gunnell, B.; Stewart, S.E.; Pauls, D.L.; Scharf, J.M.; Tourette Syndrome International Consortium for, G. Family-based genetic association study of DLGAP3 in Tourette Syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2011, 156B, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Romero, D.M.; Poirier, K.; Belvindrah, R.; Moutkine, I.; Houllier, A.; LeMoing, A.G.; Petit, F.; Boland, A.; Collins, S.C.; Soiza-Reilly, M.; et al. Novel role of the synaptic scaffold protein Dlgap4 in ventricular surface integrity and neuronal migration during cortical development. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, B.; Li, C.; Lei, H. SAPAP4 deletion causes synaptic dysfunction in the nucleus accumbens. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 505, 1223–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, E.; Naisbitt, S.; Hsueh, Y.P.; Rao, A.; Rothschild, A.; Craig, A.M.; Sheng, M. GKAP, a novel synaptic protein that interacts with the guanylate kinase-like domain of the PSD-95/SAP90 family of channel clustering molecules. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 136, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Takeuchi, M.; Hata, Y.; Hirao, K.; Toyoda, A.; Irie, M.; Takai, Y. SAPAPs. A family of PSD-95/SAP90-associated proteins localized at postsynaptic density. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 11943–11951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Naisbitt, S.; Valtschanoff, J.; Allison, D.W.; Sala, C.; Kim, E.; Craig, A.M.; Weinberg, R.J.; Sheng, M. Interaction of the postsynaptic density-95/guanylate kinase domain-associated protein complex with a light chain of myosin-V and dynein. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20, 4524–4534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Irie, M.; Hata, Y.; Takeuchi, M.; Ichtchenko, K.; Toyoda, A.; Hirao, K.; Takai, Y.; Rosahl, T.W.; Sudhof, T.C. Binding of neuroligins to PSD-95. Science 1997, 277, 1511–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mondin, M.; Labrousse, V.; Hosy, E.; Heine, M.; Tessier, B.; Levet, F.; Poujol, C.; Blanchet, C.; Choquet, D.; Thoumine, O. Neurexin-neuroligin adhesions capture surface-diffusing AMPA receptors through PSD-95 scaffolds. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 13500–13515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Chen, L.; Chetkovich, D.M.; Petralia, R.S.; Sweeney, N.T.; Kawasaki, Y.; Wenthold, R.J.; Bredt, D.S.; Nicoll, R.A. Stargazin regulates synaptic targeting of AMPA receptors by two distinct mechanisms. Nature 2000, 408, 936–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bats, C.; Groc, L.; Choquet, D. The interaction between Stargazin and PSD-95 regulates AMPA receptor surface trafficking. Neuron 2007, 53, 719–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Dakoji, S.; Tomita, S.; Karimzadegan, S.; Nicoll, R.A.; Bredt, D.S. Interaction of transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins with multiple membrane associated guanylate kinases. Neuropharmacology 2003, 45, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Schwenk, J.; Harmel, N.; Brechet, A.; Zolles, G.; Berkefeld, H.; Muller, C.S.; Bildl, W.; Baehrens, D.; Huber, B.; Kulik, A.; et al. High-resolution proteomics unravel architecture and molecular diversity of native AMPA receptor complexes. Neuron 2012, 74, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Elias, G.M.; Elias, L.A.; Apostolides, P.F.; Kriegstein, A.R.; Nicoll, R.A. Differential trafficking of AMPA and NMDA receptors by SAP102 and PSD-95 underlies synapse development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 20953–20958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Bissen, D.; Foss, F.; Acker-Palmer, A. AMPA receptors and their minions: Auxiliary proteins in AMPA receptor trafficking. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 2133–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kim, J.H.; Liao, D.; Lau, L.F.; Huganir, R.L. SynGAP: A synaptic RasGAP that associates with the PSD-95/SAP90 protein family. Neuron 1998, 20, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Brenman, J.E.; Chao, D.S.; Gee, S.H.; McGee, A.W.; Craven, S.E.; Santillano, D.R.; Wu, Z.; Huang, F.; Xia, H.; Peters, M.F.; et al. Interaction of nitric oxide synthase with the postsynaptic density protein PSD-95 and alpha1-syntrophin mediated by PDZ domains. Cell 1996, 84, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Garcia, E.P.; Mehta, S.; Blair, L.A.; Wells, D.G.; Shang, J.; Fukushima, T.; Fallon, J.R.; Garner, C.C.; Marshall, J. SAP90 binds and clusters kainate receptors causing incomplete desensitization. Neuron 1998, 21, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Hu, T.M.; Wu, C.L.; Hsu, S.H.; Tsai, H.Y.; Cheng, F.Y.; Cheng, M.C. Ultrarare loss-of-function mutations in the genes encoding the ionotropic glutamate receptors of kainate subtypes associated with schizophrenia disrupt the interaction with PSD95. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hirao, K.; Hata, Y.; Ide, N.; Takeuchi, M.; Irie, M.; Yao, I.; Deguchi, M.; Toyoda, A.; Sudhof, T.C.; Takai, Y. A novel multiple PDZ domain-containing molecule interacting with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and neuronal cell adhesion proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 21105–21110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Sumita, K.; Sato, Y.; Iida, J.; Kawata, A.; Hamano, M.; Hirabayashi, S.; Ohno, K.; Peles, E.; Hata, Y. Synaptic scaffolding molecule (S-SCAM) membrane-associated guanylate kinase with inverted organization (MAGI)-2 is associated with cell adhesion molecules at inhibitory synapses in rat hippocampal neurons. J. Neurochem. 2007, 100, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kitano, J.; Yamazaki, Y.; Kimura, K.; Masukado, T.; Nakajima, Y.; Nakanishi, S. Tamalin is a scaffold protein that interacts with multiple neuronal proteins in distinct modes of protein-protein association. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 14762–14768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Hirao, K.; Hata, Y.; Deguchi, M.; Yao, I.; Ogura, M.; Rokukawa, C.; Kawabe, H.; Mizoguchi, A.; Takai, Y. Association of synapse-associated protein 90/ postsynaptic density-95-associated protein (SAPAP) with neurofilaments. Genes Cells 2000, 5, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Naisbitt, S.; Kim, E.; Tu, J.C.; Xiao, B.; Sala, C.; Valtschanoff, J.; Weinberg, R.J.; Worley, P.F.; Sheng, M. Shank, a novel family of postsynaptic density proteins that binds to the NMDA receptor/PSD-95/GKAP complex and cortactin. Neuron 1999, 23, 569–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Yao, I.; Hata, Y.; Hirao, K.; Deguchi, M.; Ide, N.; Takeuchi, M.; Takai, Y. Synamon, a novel neuronal protein interacting with synapse-associated protein 90/postsynaptic density-95-associated protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 27463–27466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Jung, S.; Park, M. Shank postsynaptic scaffolding proteins in autism spectrum disorder: Mouse models and their dysfunctions in behaviors, synapses, and molecules. Pharm. Res. 2022, 182, 106340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Du, Y.; Weed, S.A.; Xiong, W.C.; Marshall, T.D.; Parsons, J.T. Identification of a novel cortactin SH3 domain-binding protein and its localization to growth cones of cultured neurons. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 5838–5851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kim, E.; Sheng, M. PDZ domain proteins of synapses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zeng, M.; Shang, Y.; Guo, T.; He, Q.; Yung, W.H.; Liu, K.; Zhang, M. A binding site outside the canonical PDZ domain determines the specific interaction between Shank and SAPAP and their function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E3081–E3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, J.; Zhang, W.; Yang, H.; Howrigan, D.P.; Wilkinson, B.; Souaiaia, T.; Evgrafov, O.V.; Genovese, G.; Clementel, V.A.; Tudor, J.C.; et al. Spatiotemporal profile of postsynaptic interactomes integrates components of complex brain disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 1150–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kawabe, H.; Hata, Y.; Takeuchi, M.; Ide, N.; Mizoguchi, A.; Takai, Y. nArgBP2, a novel neural member of ponsin/ArgBP2/vinexin family that interacts with synapse-associated protein 90/postsynaptic density-95-associated protein (SAPAP). J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 30914–30918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Lee, S.E.; Kim, Y.; Han, J.K.; Park, H.; Lee, U.; Na, M.; Jeong, S.; Chung, C.; Cestra, G.; Chang, S. nArgBP2 regulates excitatory synapse formation by controlling dendritic spine morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6749–6754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Zhang, Q.; Gao, X.; Li, C.; Feliciano, C.; Wang, D.; Zhou, D.; Mei, Y.; Monteiro, P.; Anand, M.; Itohara, S.; et al. Impaired dendritic development and memory in sorbs2 knock-out mice. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 2247–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Cestra, G.; Toomre, D.; Chang, S.; De Camilli, P. The Abl/Arg substrate ArgBP2/nArgBP2 coordinates the function of multiple regulatory mechanisms converging on the actin cytoskeleton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 1731–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Rodriguez-Crespo, I.; Yelamos, B.; Roncal, F.; Albar, J.P.; Ortiz de Montellano, P.R.; Gavilanes, F. Identification of novel cellular proteins that bind to the LC8 dynein light chain using a pepscan technique. FEBS Lett. 2001, 503, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Haraguchi, K.; Satoh, K.; Yanai, H.; Hamada, F.; Kawabuchi, M.; Akiyama, T. The hDLG-associated protein DAP interacts with dynein light chain and neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Genes Cells 2000, 5, 905–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tong, J.; Yang, H.; Eom, S.H.; Chun, C.; Im, Y.J. Structure of the GH1 domain of guanylate kinase-associated protein from Rattus norvegicus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 452, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Morris, C.W.; Watkins, D.S.; Salek, A.B.; Edler, M.C.; Baucum, A.J., 2nd. The association of spinophilin with disks large-associated protein 3 (SAPAP3) is regulated by metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) 5. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 90, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Roselli, F.; Livrea, P.; Almeida, O.F. CDK5 is essential for soluble amyloid beta-induced degradation of GKAP and remodeling of the synaptic actin cytoskeleton. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chua, J.J.; Schob, C.; Rehbein, M.; Gkogkas, C.G.; Richter, D.; Kindler, S. Synthesis of two SAPAP3 isoforms from a single mRNA is mediated via alternative translational initiation. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Polioudakis, D.; de la Torre-Ubieta, L.; Langerman, J.; Elkins, A.G.; Shi, X.; Stein, J.L.; Vuong, C.K.; Nichterwitz, S.; Gevorgian, M.; Opland, C.K.; et al. A single-cell transcriptomic atlas of human neocortical development during mid-gestation. Neuron 2019, 103, 785–801.e788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Hanus, C.; Schuman, E.M. Proteostasis in complex dendrites. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 14, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Cajigas, I.J.; Tushev, G.; Will, T.J.; tom Dieck, S.; Fuerst, N.; Schuman, E.M. The local transcriptome in the synaptic neuropil revealed by deep sequencing and high-resolution imaging. Neuron 2012, 74, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Kang, H.; Schuman, E.M. A requirement for local protein synthesis in neurotrophin-induced hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Science 1996, 273, 1402–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Aakalu, G.; Smith, W.B.; Nguyen, N.; Jiang, C.; Schuman, E.M. Dynamic visualization of local protein synthesis in hippocampal neurons. Neuron 2001, 30, 489–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Hegde, A.N.; Goldberg, A.L.; Schwartz, J.H. Regulatory subunits of cAMP-dependent protein kinases are degraded after conjugation to ubiquitin: A molecular mechanism underlying long-term synaptic plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 7436–7440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Steward, O.; Schuman, E.M. Compartmentalized synthesis and degradation of proteins in neurons. Neuron 2003, 40, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Cajigas, I.J.; Will, T.; Schuman, E.M. Protein homeostasis and synaptic plasticity. EMBO J. 2010, 29, 2746–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Mabb, A.M.; Ehlers, M.D. Ubiquitination in postsynaptic function and plasticity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010, 26, 179–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ehlers, M.D. Activity level controls postsynaptic composition and signaling via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wan, Y.; Ade, K.K.; Caffall, Z.; Ilcim Ozlu, M.; Eroglu, C.; Feng, G.; Calakos, N. Circuit-selective striatal synaptic dysfunction in the Sapap3 knockout mouse model of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2014, 75, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Kim, E.; Niethammer, M.; Rothschild, A.; Jan, Y.N.; Sheng, M. Clustering of shaker-type K+ channels by interaction with a family of membrane-associated guanylate kinases. Nature 1995, 378, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhu, J.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, M. Mechanistic basis of MAGUK-organized complexes in synaptic development and signalling. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016, 17, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Collins, M.O.; Yu, L.; Coba, M.P.; Husi, H.; Campuzano, I.; Blackstock, W.P.; Choudhary, J.S.; Grant, S.G. Proteomic analysis of in vivo phosphorylated synaptic proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 5972–5982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Shin, S.M.; Zhang, N.; Hansen, J.; Gerges, N.Z.; Pak, D.T.; Sheng, M.; Lee, S.H. GKAP orchestrates activity-dependent postsynaptic protein remodeling and homeostatic scaling. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15, 1655–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Li, J.; Wilkinson, B.; Clementel, V.A.; Hou, J.; O’Dell, T.J.; Coba, M.P. Long-term potentiation modulates synaptic phosphorylation networks and reshapes the structure of the postsynaptic interactome. Sci. Signal 2016, 9, rs8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Zhu, J.; Zhou, Q.; Shang, Y.; Li, H.; Peng, M.; Ke, X.; Weng, Z.; Zhang, R.; Huang, X.; Li, S.S.C.; et al. Synaptic targeting and function of SAPAPs mediated by phosphorylation-dependent binding to PSD-95 MAGUKs. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 3781–3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Hung, A.Y.; Sung, C.C.; Brito, I.L.; Sheng, M. Degradation of postsynaptic scaffold GKAP and regulation of dendritic spine morphology by the TRIM3 ubiquitin ligase in rat hippocampal neurons. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Rao, A.; Kim, E.; Sheng, M.; Craig, A.M. Heterogeneity in the molecular composition of excitatory postsynaptic sites during development of hippocampal neurons in culture. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18, 1217–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Yao, I.; Iida, J.; Nishimura, W.; Hata, Y. Synaptic localization of SAPAP1, a synaptic membrane-associated protein. Genes Cells 2003, 8, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Romorini, S.; Piccoli, G.; Jiang, M.; Grossano, P.; Tonna, N.; Passafaro, M.; Zhang, M.; Sala, C. A functional role of postsynaptic density-95-guanylate kinase-associated protein complex in regulating Shank assembly and stability to synapses. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 9391–9404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Moutin, E.; Raynaud, F.; Fagni, L.; Perroy, J. GKAP-DLC2 interaction organizes the postsynaptic scaffold complex to enhance synaptic NMDA receptor activity. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 2030–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Moutin, E.; Compan, V.; Raynaud, F.; Clerte, C.; Bouquier, N.; Labesse, G.; Ferguson, M.L.; Fagni, L.; Royer, C.A.; Perroy, J. The stoichiometry of scaffold complexes in living neurons-DLC2 functions as a dimerization engine for GKAP. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127, 3451–3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Wan, Y.; Feng, G.; Calakos, N. Sapap3 deletion causes mGluR5-dependent silencing of AMPAR synapses. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 16685–16691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Lousada, E.; Boudreau, M.; Cohen-Adad, J.; Nait Oumesmar, B.; Burguiere, E.; Schreiweis, C. Reduced axon calibre in the associative striatum of the sapap3 knockout mouse. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Joglekar, A.; Prjibelski, A.; Mahfouz, A.; Collier, P.; Lin, S.; Schlusche, A.K.; Marrocco, J.; Williams, S.R.; Haase, B.; Hayes, A.; et al. A spatially resolved brain region- and cell type-specific isoform atlas of the postnatal mouse brain. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Turrigiano, G. Homeostatic synaptic plasticity: Local and global mechanisms for stabilizing neuronal function. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4, a005736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Chen, M.; Wan, Y.; Ade, K.; Ting, J.; Feng, G.; Calakos, N. Sapap3 deletion anomalously activates short-term endocannabinoid-mediated synaptic plasticity. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 9563–9573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hung, A.Y.; Futai, K.; Sala, C.; Valtschanoff, J.G.; Ryu, J.; Woodworth, M.A.; Kidd, F.L.; Sung, C.C.; Miyakawa, T.; Bear, M.F.; et al. Smaller dendritic spines, weaker synaptic transmission, but enhanced spatial learning in mice lacking Shank1. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 1697–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ade, K.K.; Wan, Y.; Hamann, H.C.; O’Hare, J.K.; Guo, W.; Quian, A.; Kumar, S.; Bhagat, S.; Rodriguiz, R.M.; Wetsel, W.C.; et al. Increased metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 signaling underlies obsessive-compulsive disorder-like behavioral and striatal circuit abnormalities in mice. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 80, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Burguiere, E.; Monteiro, P.; Feng, G.; Graybiel, A.M. Optogenetic stimulation of lateral orbitofronto-striatal pathway suppresses compulsive behaviors. Science 2013, 340, 1243–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Corbit, V.L.; Manning, E.E.; Gittis, A.H.; Ahmari, S.E. Strengthened inputs from secondary motor cortex to striatum in a mouse model of compulsive behavior. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 2965–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Hadjas, L.C.; Schartner, M.M.; Cand, J.; Creed, M.C.; Pascoli, V.; Luscher, C.; Simmler, L.D. Projection-specific deficits in synaptic transmission in adult Sapap3-knockout mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020, 45, 2020–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ramirez-Armenta, K.I.; Alatriste-Leon, H.; Verma-Rodriguez, A.K.; Llanos-Moreno, A.; Ramirez-Jarquin, J.O.; Tecuapetla, F. Optogenetic inhibition of indirect pathway neurons in the dorsomedial striatum reduces excessive grooming in Sapap3-knockout mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 2022, 47, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Yang, Z.; Wu, G.; Liu, M.; Sun, X.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, C.; Lei, H. Dysfunction of orbitofrontal GABAergic interneurons leads to impaired reversal learning in a mouse model of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, 381–393.e384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Davis, G.L.; Minerva, A.R.; Lario, A.; Simmler, L.D.; Rodriguez, C.I.; Gunaydin, L.A. Ketamine increases activity of a fronto-striatal projection that regulates compulsive behavior in SAPAP3 knockout mice. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wood, J.; LaPalombara, Z.; Ahmari, S.E. Monoamine abnormalities in the SAPAP3 knockout model of obsessive-compulsive disorder-related behaviour. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 373, 20170023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Manning, E.E.; Wang, A.Y.; Saikali, L.M.; Winner, A.S.; Ahmari, S.E. Disruption of prepulse inhibition is associated with compulsive behavior severity and nucleus accumbens dopamine receptor changes in Sapap3 knockout mice. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Tomasetti, C.; Iasevoli, F.; Buonaguro, E.F.; De Berardis, D.; Fornaro, M.; Fiengo, A.L.; Martinotti, G.; Orsolini, L.; Valchera, A.; Di Giannantonio, M.; et al. Treating the synapse in major psychiatric disorders: The role of postsynaptic density network in dopamine-glutamate interplay and psychopharmacologic drugs molecular actions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Zai, G.; Barta, C.; Cath, D.; Eapen, V.; Geller, D.; Grunblatt, E. New insights and perspectives on the genetics of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatr. Genet. 2019, 29, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Chertkow-Deutsher, Y.; Cohen, H.; Klein, E.; Ben-Shachar, D. DNA methylation in vulnerability to post-traumatic stress in rats: Evidence for the role of the post-synaptic density protein Dlgap2. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010, 13, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Li, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhang, P.; Huang, J.; An, H.; Wang, N.; De Yang, F.; Wang, Z.; Tan, S.; Chen, S.; et al. Quantitative DNA methylation analysis of DLGAP2 gene using pyrosequencing in schizophrenia with tardive dyskinesia: A linear mixed model approach. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Schrott, R.; Acharya, K.; Itchon-Ramos, N.; Hawkey, A.B.; Pippen, E.; Mitchell, J.T.; Kollins, S.H.; Levin, E.D.; Murphy, S.K. Cannabis use is associated with potentially heritable widespread changes in autism candidate gene DLGAP2 DNA methylation in sperm. Epigenetics 2020, 15, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Kajimoto, Y.; Shirakawa, O.; Lin, X.H.; Hashimoto, T.; Kitamura, N.; Murakami, N.; Takumi, T.; Maeda, K. Synapse-associated protein 90/postsynaptic density-95-associated protein (SAPAP) is expressed differentially in phencyclidine-treated rats and is increased in the nucleus accumbens of patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003, 28, 1831–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Yan, Y.; Gu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhang, H.; Tao, K.; Lu, Y.; Yu, W.; et al. SAPAP3 regulates epileptic seizures involving GluN2A in post-synaptic densities. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Schutt, J.; Falley, K.; Richter, D.; Kreienkamp, H.J.; Kindler, S. Fragile X mental retardation protein regulates the levels of scaffold proteins and glutamate receptors in postsynaptic densities. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 25479–25487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Krueger, D.D.; Osterweil, E.K.; Chen, S.P.; Tye, L.D.; Bear, M.F. Cognitive dysfunction and prefrontal synaptic abnormalities in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 2587–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Been, L.E.; Moore, K.M.; Kennedy, B.C.; Meisel, R.L. Metabotropic glutamate receptor and fragile X signaling in a female model of escalated aggression. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 79, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Brown, V.; Jin, P.; Ceman, S.; Darnell, J.C.; O’Donnell, W.T.; Tenenbaum, S.A.; Jin, X.; Feng, Y.; Wilkinson, K.D.; Keene, J.D.; et al. Microarray identification of FMRP-associated brain mRNAs and altered mRNA translational profiles in fragile X syndrome. Cell 2001, 107, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Darnell, J.C.; Klann, E. The translation of translational control by FMRP: Therapeutic targets for FXS. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16, 1530–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Bassell, G.J.; Warren, S.T. Fragile X syndrome: Loss of local mRNA regulation alters synaptic development and function. Neuron 2008, 60, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Dictenberg, J.B.; Swanger, S.A.; Antar, L.N.; Singer, R.H.; Bassell, G.J. A direct role for FMRP in activity-dependent dendritic mRNA transport links filopodial-spine morphogenesis to fragile X syndrome. Dev. Cell 2008, 14, 926–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Nakamoto, M.; Nalavadi, V.; Epstein, M.P.; Narayanan, U.; Bassell, G.J.; Warren, S.T. Fragile X mental retardation protein deficiency leads to excessive mGluR5-dependent internalization of AMPA receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 15537–15542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Wang, X.; Bey, A.L.; Katz, B.M.; Badea, A.; Kim, N.; David, L.K.; Duffney, L.J.; Kumar, S.; Mague, S.D.; Hulbert, S.W.; et al. Altered mGluR5-Homer scaffolds and corticostriatal connectivity in a Shank3 complete knockout model of autism. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Elkins, R.L.; Orr, T.E.; Rausch, J.L.; Fei, Y.J.; Carl, G.F.; Hobbs, S.H.; Buccafusco, J.J.; Edwards, G.L. Cocaine-induced expression differences in PSD-95/SAP-90-associated protein 4 and in Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase subunits in amygdalae of taste aversion-prone and taste aversion-resistant rats. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003, 1003, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kim, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Pang, K.; Kang, H.; Park, H.; Lee, Y.; Lee, B.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, W.K.; Geum, D.; et al. Bipolar disorder associated microRNA, miR-1908-5p, regulates the expression of genes functioning in neuronal glutamatergic synapses. Exp. Neurobiol. 2016, 25, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Mahgoub, M.; Adachi, M.; Suzuki, K.; Liu, X.; Kavalali, E.T.; Chahrour, M.H.; Monteggia, L.M. MeCP2 and histone deacetylases 1 and 2 in dorsal striatum collectively suppress repetitive behaviors. Nat. Neurosci. 2016, 19, 1506–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Saadatmand, F.; Gurdziel, K.; Jackson, L.; Kwabi-Addo, B.; Ruden, D.M. DNA methylation and exposure to violence among African American young adult males. Brain Behav. Immun. Health 2021, 14, 100247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Minocherhomji, S.; Seemann, S.; Mang, Y.; El-Schich, Z.; Bak, M.; Hansen, C.; Papadopoulos, N.; Josefsen, K.; Nielsen, H.; Gorodkin, J.; et al. Sequence and expression analysis of gaps in human chromosome 20. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 6660–6672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Aoyama, S.; Shirakawa, O.; Ono, H.; Hashimoto, T.; Kajimoto, Y.; Maeda, K. Mutation and association analysis of the DAP-1 gene with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2003, 57, 545–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Li, J.M.; Lu, C.L.; Cheng, M.C.; Luu, S.U.; Hsu, S.H.; Chen, C.H. Genetic analysis of the DLGAP1 gene as a candidate gene for schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2013, 205, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Li, J.; Shi, M.; Ma, Z.; Zhao, S.; Euskirchen, G.; Ziskin, J.; Urban, A.; Hallmayer, J.; Snyder, M. Integrated systems analysis reveals a molecular network underlying autism spectrum disorders. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2014, 10, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Mathias, S.R.; Knowles, E.E.; Kent, J.W., Jr.; McKay, D.R.; Curran, J.E.; de Almeida, M.A.; Dyer, T.D.; Goring, H.H.; Olvera, R.L.; Duggirala, R.; et al. Recurrent major depression and right hippocampal volume: A bivariate linkage and association study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2016, 37, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Mukherjee, O.; Meera, P.; Ghosh, S.; Kubendran, S.; Kiran, K.; Manjunath, K.R.; Subhash, M.N.; Benegal, V.; Brahmachari, S.K.; Majumder, P.P.; et al. Evidence of linkage and association on 18p11.2 for psychosis. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2006, 141B, 868–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Schwab, S.G.; Hallmayer, J.; Lerer, B.; Albus, M.; Borrmann, M.; Honig, S.; Strauss, M.; Segman, R.; Lichtermann, D.; Knapp, M.; et al. Support for a chromosome 18p locus conferring susceptibility to functional psychoses in families with schizophrenia, by association and linkage analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1998, 63, 1139–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Chien, W.H.; Gau, S.S.; Liao, H.M.; Chiu, Y.N.; Wu, Y.Y.; Huang, Y.S.; Tsai, W.C.; Tsai, H.M.; Chen, C.H. Deep exon resequencing of DLGAP2 as a candidate gene of autism spectrum disorders. Mol. Autism 2013, 4, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Pinto, D.; Delaby, E.; Merico, D.; Barbosa, M.; Merikangas, A.; Klei, L.; Thiruvahindrapuram, B.; Xu, X.; Ziman, R.; Wang, Z.; et al. Convergence of genes and cellular pathways dysregulated in autism spectrum disorders. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2014, 94, 677–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Autism Genome Project, C.; Szatmari, P.; Paterson, A.D.; Zwaigenbaum, L.; Roberts, W.; Brian, J.; Liu, X.Q.; Vincent, J.B.; Skaug, J.L.; Thompson, A.P.; et al. Mapping autism risk loci using genetic linkage and chromosomal rearrangements. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Marshall, C.R.; Noor, A.; Vincent, J.B.; Lionel, A.C.; Feuk, L.; Skaug, J.; Shago, M.; Moessner, R.; Pinto, D.; Ren, Y.; et al. Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 82, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Woodbury-Smith, M.; Zarrei, M.; Wei, J.; Thiruvahindrapuram, B.; O’Connor, I.; Paterson, A.D.; Yuen, R.K.C.; Dastan, J.; Stavropoulos, D.J.; Howe, J.L.; et al. Segregating patterns of copy number variations in extended autism spectrum disorder (ASD) pedigrees. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2020, 183, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Catusi, I.; Garzo, M.; Capra, A.P.; Briuglia, S.; Baldo, C.; Canevini, M.P.; Cantone, R.; Elia, F.; Forzano, F.; Galesi, O.; et al. 8p23.2-pter microdeletions: Seven new cases narrowing the candidate region and review of the literature. Genes 2021, 12, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Shi, S.; Lin, S.; Chen, B.; Zhou, Y. Isolated chromosome 8p23.2pter deletion: Novel evidence for developmental delay, intellectual disability, microcephaly and neurobehavioral disorders. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 6837–6845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Wu, K.; Hanna, G.L.; Easter, P.; Kennedy, J.L.; Rosenberg, D.R.; Arnold, P.D. Glutamate system genes and brain volume alterations in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: A preliminary study. Psychiatry Res. 2013, 211, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Wu, Y.; Ji, T.; Wang, J.; Xiao, J.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Gao, Z.; Yang, Y.; Cai, B.; Wang, L.; et al. Submicroscopic subtelomeric aberrations in Chinese patients with unexplained developmental delay/mental retardation. BMC Med. Genet. 2010, 11, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Guilmatre, A.; Dubourg, C.; Mosca, A.L.; Legallic, S.; Goldenberg, A.; Drouin-Garraud, V.; Layet, V.; Rosier, A.; Briault, S.; Bonnet-Brilhault, F.; et al. Recurrent rearrangements in synaptic and neurodevelopmental genes and shared biologic pathways in schizophrenia, autism, and mental retardation. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2009, 66, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Purcell, S.M.; Moran, J.L.; Fromer, M.; Ruderfer, D.; Solovieff, N.; Roussos, P.; O’Dushlaine, C.; Chambert, K.; Bergen, S.E.; Kahler, A.; et al. A polygenic burden of rare disruptive mutations in schizophrenia. Nature 2014, 506, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Costain, G.; Lionel, A.C.; Merico, D.; Forsythe, P.; Russell, K.; Lowther, C.; Yuen, T.; Husted, J.; Stavropoulos, D.J.; Speevak, M.; et al. Pathogenic rare copy number variants in community-based schizophrenia suggest a potential role for clinical microarrays. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 4485–4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. White, C.C.; Yang, H.S.; Yu, L.; Chibnik, L.B.; Dawe, R.J.; Yang, J.; Klein, H.U.; Felsky, D.; Ramos-Miguel, A.; Arfanakis, K.; et al. Identification of genes associated with dissociation of cognitive performance and neuropathological burden: Multistep analysis of genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptional data. PLoS Med. 2017, 14, e1002287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Chaudhry, M.; Wang, X.; Bamne, M.N.; Hasnain, S.; Demirci, F.Y.; Lopez, O.L.; Kamboh, M.I. Genetic variation in imprinted genes is associated with risk of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2015, 44, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Chien, W.H.; Gau, S.S.; Wu, Y.Y.; Huang, Y.S.; Fang, J.S.; Chen, Y.J.; Soong, W.T.; Chiu, Y.N.; Chen, C.H. Identification and molecular characterization of two novel chromosomal deletions associated with autism. Clin. Genet. 2010, 78, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Zuchner, S.; Wendland, J.R.; Ashley-Koch, A.E.; Collins, A.L.; Tran-Viet, K.N.; Quinn, K.; Timpano, K.C.; Cuccaro, M.L.; Pericak-Vance, M.A.; Steffens, D.C.; et al. Multiple rare SAPAP3 missense variants in trichotillomania and OCD. Mol. Psychiatry 2009, 14, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Allen-Brady, K.; Miller, J.; Matsunami, N.; Stevens, J.; Block, H.; Farley, M.; Krasny, L.; Pingree, C.; Lainhart, J.; Leppert, M.; et al. A high-density SNP genome-wide linkage scan in a large autism extended pedigree. Mol. Psychiatry 2009, 14, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Pauls, D.L.; Abramovitch, A.; Rauch, S.L.; Geller, D.A. Obsessive-compulsive disorder: An integrative genetic and neurobiological perspective. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 410–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Han, K.; Holder, J.L., Jr.; Schaaf, C.P.; Lu, H.; Chen, H.; Kang, H.; Tang, J.; Wu, Z.; Hao, S.; Cheung, S.W.; et al. SHANK3 overexpression causes manic-like behaviour with unique pharmacogenetic properties. Nature 2013, 503, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Horner, A.E.; Norris, R.H.; McLaren-Jones, R.; Alexander, L.; Komiyama, N.H.; Grant, S.G.N.; Nithianantharajah, J.; Kopanitsa, M.V. Learning and reaction times in mouse touchscreen tests are differentially impacted by mutations in genes encoding postsynaptic interacting proteins SYNGAP1, NLGN3, DLGAP1, DLGAP2 and SHANK2. Genes Brain Behav. 2021, 20, e12723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. van den Boom, B.J.G.; Mooij, A.H.; Miseviciute, I.; Denys, D.; Willuhn, I. Behavioral flexibility in a mouse model for obsessive-compulsive disorder: Impaired Pavlovian reversal learning in SAPAP3 mutants. Genes Brain Behav. 2019, 18, e12557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Manning, E.E.; Dombrovski, A.Y.; Torregrossa, M.M.; Ahmari, S.E. Impaired instrumental reversal learning is associated with increased medial prefrontal cortex activity in Sapap3 knockout mouse model of compulsive behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 2019, 44, 1494–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Hadjas, L.C.; Luscher, C.; Simmler, L.D. Aberrant habit formation in the Sapap3-knockout mouse model of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Ehmer, I.; Crown, L.; van Leeuwen, W.; Feenstra, M.; Willuhn, I.; Denys, D. Evidence for distinct forms of compulsivity in the SAPAP3 mutant-mouse model for obsessive-compulsive disorder. eNeuro 2020, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ehmer, I.; Feenstra, M.; Willuhn, I.; Denys, D. Instrumental learning in a mouse model for obsessive-compulsive disorder: Impaired habit formation in Sapap3 mutants. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2020, 168, 107162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Benzina, N.; N’Diaye, K.; Pelissolo, A.; Mallet, L.; Burguiere, E. A cross-species assessment of behavioral flexibility in compulsive disorders. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Manning, E.E.; Geramita, M.A.; Piantadosi, S.C.; Pierson, J.L.; Ahmari, S.E. Distinct patterns of abnormal lateral orbitofrontal cortex activity during compulsive grooming and reversal learning normalize after fluoxetine. Biol. Psychiatry 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Kajs, B.L.; van Roessel, P.J.; Davis, G.L.; Williams, L.M.; Rodriguez, C.I.; Gunaydin, L.A. Valence processing alterations in SAPAP3 knockout mice and human OCD. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2022, 151, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Pinhal, C.M.; van den Boom, B.J.G.; Santana-Kragelund, F.; Fellinger, L.; Bech, P.; Hamelink, R.; Feng, G.; Willuhn, I.; Feenstra, M.G.P.; Denys, D. Differential effects of deep brain stimulation of the internal capsule and the striatum on excessive grooming in Sapap3 mutant mice. Biol. Psychiatry 2018, 84, 917–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Glorie, D.; Verhaeghe, J.; Miranda, A.; Kertesz, I.; Wyffels, L.; Stroobants, S.; Staelens, S. Progression of obsessive compulsive disorder-like grooming in Sapap3 knockout mice: A longitudinal [(11)C]ABP688 PET study. Neuropharmacology 2020, 177, 108160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Mintzopoulos, D.; Gillis, T.E.; Robertson, H.R.; Dalia, T.; Feng, G.; Rauch, S.L.; Kaufman, M.J. Striatal magnetic resonance spectroscopy abnormalities in young adult SAPAP3 knockout mice. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 2016, 1, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Glorie, D.; Verhaeghe, J.; Miranda, A.; De Lombaerde, S.; Stroobants, S.; Staelens, S. Sapap3 deletion causes dynamic synaptic density abnormalities: A longitudinal [(11)C]UCB-J PET study in a model of obsessive-compulsive disorder-like behaviour. EJNMMI Res. 2020, 10, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Xu, P.; Grueter, B.A.; Britt, J.K.; McDaniel, L.; Huntington, P.J.; Hodge, R.; Tran, S.; Mason, B.L.; Lee, C.; Vong, L.; et al. Double deletion of melanocortin 4 receptors and SAPAP3 corrects compulsive behavior and obesity in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10759–10764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Lei, H.; Lai, J.; Sun, X.; Xu, Q.; Feng, G. Lateral orbitofrontal dysfunction in the Sapap3 knockout mouse model of obsessive-compulsive disorder. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2019, 44, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure and domains of SAPAP proteins: (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of SAPAPs—SAPAP1 isoform a: 992 amino acids (NP_808307.2); SAPAP2 isoform a: 1059 amino acids (NP_766498.2); SAPAP3: 977 amino acids (NP_001289010.1); SAPAP4 isoform a: 992 amino acids (NP_666240.4). The alignment was generated and visualized using Jalview 2.11.2.0. The potential interacting domains are marked with black lines. (B) Only a subset of known binding partners is shown.
Figure 1. Structure and domains of SAPAP proteins: (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of SAPAPs—SAPAP1 isoform a: 992 amino acids (NP_808307.2); SAPAP2 isoform a: 1059 amino acids (NP_766498.2); SAPAP3: 977 amino acids (NP_001289010.1); SAPAP4 isoform a: 992 amino acids (NP_666240.4). The alignment was generated and visualized using Jalview 2.11.2.0. The potential interacting domains are marked with black lines. (B) Only a subset of known binding partners is shown.
Cells 11 03815 g001
Figure 2. Potential roles of SAPAPs in synaptic function and the pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric disorders. Hypothesized mechanisms of SAPAPs for the molecular signaling underlying OCD, ASD, Fragile X Syndrome, AD and other cognitive disorders are summarized in the figure. AMPAR, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor; NMDAR, N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor; KCh, Shaker-type K+ channels; SAPAP, SAP90/PSD-95-associated protein; mGluR1/5, Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors; CaMKII, Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II; PKC, Protein kinase C; SynGAP, Synaptic GTPase Activating Protein; nNOS, Neural Nitric Oxide Synthase; S-SCAM, synaptic scaffolding molecule; nArgBP2, Neural Abelson-related gene-binding protein 2; CBL, E3 ubiquitin ligase casitas B-lineage lymphoma; ABL, tyrosine kinase; PYK2, proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2; APP, amyloid precursor protein; P, phosphorylation; FMRP, fragile X mental retardation protein; TRIM3, Tripartite motif-containing 3; Ub, ubiquitin; DLC, dynein light-chain; CDK5, cyclin-dependent kinase 5; TRAP, transmembrane AMPAR regulatory protein.
Figure 2. Potential roles of SAPAPs in synaptic function and the pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric disorders. Hypothesized mechanisms of SAPAPs for the molecular signaling underlying OCD, ASD, Fragile X Syndrome, AD and other cognitive disorders are summarized in the figure. AMPAR, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor; NMDAR, N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor; KCh, Shaker-type K+ channels; SAPAP, SAP90/PSD-95-associated protein; mGluR1/5, Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors; CaMKII, Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II; PKC, Protein kinase C; SynGAP, Synaptic GTPase Activating Protein; nNOS, Neural Nitric Oxide Synthase; S-SCAM, synaptic scaffolding molecule; nArgBP2, Neural Abelson-related gene-binding protein 2; CBL, E3 ubiquitin ligase casitas B-lineage lymphoma; ABL, tyrosine kinase; PYK2, proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2; APP, amyloid precursor protein; P, phosphorylation; FMRP, fragile X mental retardation protein; TRIM3, Tripartite motif-containing 3; Ub, ubiquitin; DLC, dynein light-chain; CDK5, cyclin-dependent kinase 5; TRAP, transmembrane AMPAR regulatory protein.
Cells 11 03815 g002
Table 1. Changes of SAPAPs’ mRNA and/or protein expression associated with neuropsychiatric disorders.
Table 1. Changes of SAPAPs’ mRNA and/or protein expression associated with neuropsychiatric disorders.
GeneRegulationExpressionBrain RegionsAnimal Models/PatientsReferences
SAPAP1UpregulationProteinCortex or hippocampusFmr1-KO mice[117]
UpregulationmRNA or proteinRats: NAc and hippocampus; patients: NAcSchizophrenia rat model and patients[115]
SAPAP2UpregulationProteinCortex or hippocampusFmr1-KO mice[117]
SAPAP3UpregulationProteinCortex or hippocampusFmr1-KO mice[117]
UpregulationmRNAor ProteinNAcSyrian hamsters after aggressive experience[119]
DownregulationProteinOFC and mPFCFmr1-KO mice[118]
UpregulationProteinMice: cortex and hippocampus; patients: cortexEpilepsy patients and murine models[116]
SAPAP4Upregulation in
the hippocampus
mRNAHippocampusFmr1-KO mice[123]
DownregulationmRNAAmygdalaTaste-aversion-resistant rats after cocaine exposure[126]
Table 2. Epigenetic dysregulation of the expression of SAPAP genes associated with neuropsychiatric disorders.
Table 2. Epigenetic dysregulation of the expression of SAPAP genes associated with neuropsychiatric disorders.
GeneRegulationExpressionBrain
Regions/Cells
Animal
Models/Patients
References
SAPAP2Upregulation (with lower DNA methylation)mRNAHippocampusPTSD rat model[112]
Upregulation (with lower DNA methylation)mRNAdlPFC or
NAc
Patients with alcohol dependence[21]
Downregulation (related to DNA methylation)mRNA
protein
dlPFCAD patients[22]
SAPAP3Downregulation (by absence of histone deacetylases)mRNAFrontal cortex and striatumMice deficient in histone deacetylases 1 and 2[128]
SAPAP4Disruption of SAPAP4 by the chromosome translocation results in monoallelic hypermethylation of the truncated SAPAP4 promoter CpG islandN/ACerebellumEarly-onset cerebellar ataxia patients[23]
Identified as a target of the BD-associated microRNA miR-1908-5pN/ANeural progenitor cellsBD patients[127]
Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; BD, bipolar disorder; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bai, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, C. SAPAP Scaffold Proteins: From Synaptic Function to Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Cells 2022, 11, 3815. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11233815

AMA Style

Bai Y, Wang H, Li C. SAPAP Scaffold Proteins: From Synaptic Function to Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Cells. 2022; 11(23):3815. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11233815

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bai, Yunxia, Huimin Wang, and Chunxia Li. 2022. "SAPAP Scaffold Proteins: From Synaptic Function to Neuropsychiatric Disorders" Cells 11, no. 23: 3815. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11233815

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop