Next Article in Journal
Condition of Young Japanese Knotweed (Reynoutria japonica Houtt.) Offshoots in Response to Microwave Radiation of Their Rhizomes
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Mechanical Compression on the Postharvest Quality of ‘Shine Muscat’ Grapes during Short-Term Storage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Soil Chemical Properties and Microbial Behavior under Short-Term Organic and Mineral Fertilization within Different Crops

1
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, Bd. Marasti 59, Sector 1, 011464 Bucharest, Romania
2
National Research and Development Institute for Soil Science, Agrochemistry and Environment, Bd. Marasti 61, Sector 1, 011464 Bucharest, Romania
3
Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, Bd. Marasti 59, Sector 1, 011464 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(11), 2837; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112837
Submission received: 22 October 2023 / Revised: 9 November 2023 / Accepted: 16 November 2023 / Published: 17 November 2023

Abstract

:
Agronomic practices can have a negative impact on soil health and quality and ecosystem resilience. The objectives of the study were (1) to evaluate the soil chemical properties and microbial abundance under short-term application of organic and mineral fertilizers and different cultivated crops and (2) to observe the antifungal efficacy of microorganisms isolated from the studied soil. A field trial was conducted in the 2021–2022 period on a preluvosoil-type soil in four randomized blocks with eight fertilizer treatments based on manure compost (MC) and MC + mineral fertilizer (V1—control-soil; V2—NPK only; V3—15 t/ha MC; V4—15 t/ha MC + NPK; V5—30 t/ha MC; V6—30 t/ha MC + NPK; V7—60 t/ha MC; and V8—60 t/ha MC +NPK) and four crops (winter wheat—Triticum aestivum L., maize—Zea mays L., soybean—Glycine max L., and a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes). In almost all treatments, the soil pH decreased during the summer–autumn period. The organic carbon (Corg) and humus contents increased compared to the initial state of the soil after the application of different doses of MC and MC + NPK fertilization in almost all treatments. The microbial load of the soil was influenced by the fertilization regime and crop species, but there were no significant differences between the variants. The highest bacterial load was recorded in soil cultivated with a mixture of perennial grasses and grain legumes, i.e., in the variant with 15 t/ha MC, followed by soil cultivated with maize and fertilized with 30 t/ha and 60 t/ha MC. A higher number of fungi was observed in the mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, and Rhizobium population was higher, especially in the winter wheat plots, despite the fertilization regime. The antifungal efficacy of the microorganisms isolated from the samples was medium to low, except in the winter wheat experiment, where the efficacy against Fusarium culmorum was medium to high and against other pathogens was medium. In the other crops within the experiment, the antagonistic activity of the soil microorganisms was medium to low.

1. Introduction

Soil plays a crucial role in maintaining ecosystem functions and services [1,2], as there is a link between soil properties and the productivity and sustainability of natural and agricultural systems [3,4].
Agricultural practices can disrupt soil trophic networks and negatively affect soil health and quality, as well as ecosystem integrity and resilience [5]. More than 1/3 of soil resources are degraded by intensive agricultural activities and land management practices [6]. Therefore, the assessment of soil quality indicators (e.g., soil organic matter content, nitrogen supply, pH, microbial community and diversity, etc.) has become increasingly important over the last decade [7] in order to develop management strategies that ensure a good and sustainable soil quality [8].
Land use and management practices can slowly change soil properties. Therefore, it is a challenge to monitor the changes in the provision of ecosystem services and to find a set of sensitive soil indicators that can reflect the dynamics of soil function [9]. The microbial community can be a good indicator for assessing soil quality, as any change in community structure can be correlated with changes in soil quality, with biological processes being the most sensitive [10]; their diversity, abundance, and function can be influenced by cultivated crops, climatic conditions, or agricultural management practices such as tillage, fertilization, and pesticide use [11].
Fertilization can influence soil quality, but its effects depend on the type of fertilizer (organic or mineral) [12], soil properties, fertilization regime, crops grown, and climatic conditions of the area [13]. Excessive use of mineral fertilizers can contribute to soil acidification [14,15], ammonia volatilization, and denitrification [16], which changes the soil pH and reduces the soil organic carbon (Corg) content [14,15]. Ammonium fertilizers can lower the pH of the soil due to nitrification processes and the uptake of ammonium by plants, which leads to soil acidification and thus to a reduction in crop yields and soil fertility [17]. Intensive mineral fertilization also has a negative impact on the soil microbial community [18,19], which performs important functions in the soils, from the decomposition of organic matter to the soil recycling of nutrients or the formation of aggregates [20,21]. The long-term application of nitrogen fertilizers, for example, influences the nitrogen cycle and thus the corresponding bacterial population [18]. The changes in microbial populations or activity led to changes in soil physico-chemical properties, which can be used to determine the improvement or deterioration of the soil [22].
In line with the objectives of the circular economy, there is great interest in the reuse of organic waste and by-products as soil conditioners [23]. Organic amendments such as organic manure can have beneficial effects on both crops and soil because organic matter is mineralized throughout all seasons and nutrients are absorbed more gradually and slowly by plants compared to mineral fertilizers [24]. Hua and Zhu [25] reported that the application of organic amendments can improve soil organic matter content and increase phosphorus (P) utilization efficiency by increasing microbial biomass, phosphatase activity, and fungal activity, thereby accelerating the biochemical cycling process of P availability in soil. For example, cattle manure can increase Corg content in soil, stabilize organic aggregates, and reduce organic matter decomposition [26], while pig and chicken manure can increase soil bacterial abundance and total nitrogen (Nt) content. Environmental problems can occur when organic amendments are applied incorrectly or excessively (e.g., ammonia volatilization, greenhouse gas emissions, nitrate leaching, or P runoff) [27]. Thus, an adequate amount of fertilizer is not only necessary to meet the nutrient requirements of crops, but also to achieve higher nutrient use efficiency and lower environmental costs [28].
Crop diversification is also important for improving chemical nutrients and microbial activity in the soil and for improving soil health in agroecosystems [29]. Thus, soil microorganisms depend on organic carbon for their growth and development, which can be provided by plants mainly through root exudates and secretions into the rhizosphere [30]. In addition, each plant species can influence the microbial communities and structure through root distribution in soil depth, root respiration, or crop residues [31,32]. Turner et al. [33] found that the structures of bacterial and fungal communities in the rhizosphere differ between pea and cereal crops. In addition, beneficial bacteria such as Actinobacteria and Rhizobia were found in the soil at the early stage of maize development, while at the late stage of development, the soil may be enriched with saprophytic fungi [34]. Moreover, perennial grassland legumes (e.g., alfalfa or clover) are usually associated with soil microorganisms involved in symbiotic and non-symbiotic N fixation and mycorrhizal associations [35].
Crop species can also have a major impact on soil chemical properties by supplying organic matter through litter, roots, or root exudates [36]. Compared to cereals, grain legumes and root crops can improve the chemical composition of the soil mainly through their residues [37]. Grain legumes (especially peas) increase the soil Corg content by supplying organic carbon and nitrogen and increasing the humus content [38] as well as the availability of N, P, K, and Mg [38,39]. Dhakal and Islam [30] showed that a 50–50% mixture of grasses and legumes increased soil mineralizable carbon and nitrogen compared to 100% grasses.
Most previous studies have focused on investigating separately the soil chemical and microbiological properties affected by fertilizers. Of particular interest is the effect of fertilizer regime on soil microbial population, which also has a major impact on nutrient cycling, soil structure, or plant health. Moreover, many studies deal with the effects of long-term organic and mineral fertilizers application on soil chemical and biological properties. Given the above context, the main objectives of our study were (1) to assess the changes in chemical properties and microbial abundance of the analyzed soil induced by short-term organic and mineral fertilization and cultivation of four different crops (i.e., winter wheat, a mixture of legumes and grasses, maize, and soybean) and (2) to observe the inhibitory effect of the microorganisms isolated from the soil on some plant pathogens, such as Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium culmorum (major pathogens for cereals), Sclerotium bataticola (pathogen for grain legumes), and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (soil pathogen with a diverse host range).
The novelty of this study lies in the detailed comparison of chemical parameters and microbial abundance in the same soil type, when different organic and mineral fertilization dozes were applied, and different crops were grown. Understanding the organic or NPK fertilizers effects on microbial abundance is necessary for understanding the microbiological processes, to preserve soil ecosystem functions. This research theme is an important part of soil ecology, and its results can help to ensure a sustainable coexistence of ecosystems and agroecosystems in an area that is strongly anchored in agricultural production in Romania, namely the sylvosteppe area of the Romanian Plain. Also of great importance is the suppressive effect of microorganisms isolated from preluvosoil against different phytopathogens that can cause various diseases in cultivated crops and can be used as biocontrol agents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

A field trial with different doses of manure compost (MC), mineral fertilizers, and crop species was conducted in the period 2021–2022 at the Research and Development Station for Agronomy (RDSA) of Moara Domnească (44°29′36′′ N 26°15′29′′ E), belonging to the University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine (UASVM) and located in the northeastern part of Bucharest (in the Romanian Plain and a transition zone from steppe to sylvosteppe), in Ilfov County, about 17 km from Bucharest (Figure 1).
The experimental field was established in the southwestern part of the Moara Domnească RDSA, near Lake Pasarea, on a slightly sloping land where alfalfa was previously grown. There is a forest edge in the immediate vicinity.
The climate in the region is temperate with harsh winters and hot summers. In the period from September 2021 to October 2022, the climatic conditions (especially the pluviometric ones) from the Moara Domnească area influenced crop growth. The coldest months were January and March, and the hottest month was July. September 2021 was very dry, as only 3.1 mm of precipitation was recorded and the average amount of precipitation during this growing season was 30.29 mm (Table S1, Figure S1). April 2022, which coincides with the spring crops sowing, was characterized by a very good pluviometric regime, with a monthly rainfall of 71.5 mm.

2.2. Soil Analysis

2.2.1. Soil Physicochemical Characteristics Analysis

The soil in Moara Domnească is a red preluvosoil with a specific B-argic horizon (Bt) characterized in the upper layer (Ao) by a loamy-clayey texture, a pH between 5.2 and 5.4, a base saturation level between 65 and 70%, and a low differentiation of the soil profile [41].
To characterize the soil in the different horizons (Ap–Ao–A/B–Bt1–Bt2), a soil profile (Figure 2) was made, and soil samples were taken to determine their main physicochemical properties in the laboratory. In addition, soil samples were taken from a 0–20 cm deep layer before and during the experiment from each plot to investigate the initial state of the soil and the change in its chemical properties.
The soil bulk density (BD) was determined using metal cylinders with a volume of 100 cm3. Cylinders filled with soil were weighed in the field and oven-dried at 105 °C until they had a constant weight. The BD was estimated by dividing the dry weight of the soil material by the volume of the soil [42]. Total porosity (TP) was measured based on soil density and BD values according to STAS 7184/5-78 [43]. The degree of compaction (GD) was calculated using the following formula:
GD (% v/v) = (PMN − TP)/PMN × 100
where PMN is the minimum required porosity, calculated based on the following relation: PMN = 45 + 0.163 × C, (%v/v); C is the colloidal clay content, with a diameter of <0.002 mm (%g/g), and TP is total porosity, (%v/v) [44].
Chemical analyses were also carried out for soil samples taken from different depths of the horizons and from a layer of 0–20 cm to perform a comprehensive soil analysis. Soil pH was determined by the potentiometric method in aqueous suspension (1:2.5 w/v, soil:water) [45] using a Mettler Toledo pH meter (Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland) after shaking and resting for 1 h. The soil Corg was determined on 0.2 mm ground soil samples by dichromate oxidation and subsequent titration with ferrous ammonium sulfate [46]. The humus content was estimated from the Corg content by multiplying it by a coefficient (1.7241), knowing that the average percentage of carbon content of humus is 58% [47].
Available phosphorus and potassium in the soil were extracted with ammonium acetate lactate (AL extractable) at a pH of 3.75 [48] and analyzed by flame photometry (for potassium content) and UV/Vis spectrometry (for phosphorus content). The N content of the soil was determined using the Kjeldahl method. The soil was digested in concentrated sulfuric acid in the presence of a catalyst mixture, which made it possible to regulate the boiling temperature until complete dissolution and oxidation. The organic N contained in the sample was oxidized to ammonium (as ammonium sulfate). The ammonium (NH4+-N) in the digest was quantified by capturing the ammonia (NH3) released by steam distillation of the digest using alkalis and titrating with a volumetric acid solution, according to the methodological rules in STAS 7184/2-85 [49].
The nitrate and ammonium nitrogen content of the soil was determined in the fresh soil samples after extraction with a K2SO4 (0.1 N) solution at a ratio of 1:3 soil/solution (w/v). The nitrate concentration in the solution was determined by the potentiometric method using an ion-selective electrode. NH3 was determined by the distillation and titration method. The extraction solution was placed in a distillation unit and the extracted NH3 was distilled off by steam distillation and retained in the form of NH4+-N in a sample cup containing boric acid (H3BO3-2%) and then titrated with sulfuric acid (H2SO4) [50].

2.2.2. Soil Microbiological Characteristics Analysis

Biological analyses were carried out on soil samples taken from the top layer of 0–20 cm and the microbial load and antifungal efficacy of some soil microorganisms were determined to assess the initial and current microbiological status of the soil. The samples were collected from the field and brought to the microbiology laboratory on the same day. In the laboratory, they were kept refrigerated (at 4 °C) for 1 to 4 days until microbial analysis. Serial decimal dilutions were prepared from soil samples to quantify the microbial load and to perform quantitative and qualitative microbiological tests. For the first dilutions (from 10−1), 10 g of soil was processed and infused for 1 h at room temperature with stirring at 120 rpm and left overnight. Depending on the type of analysis, 10−4 ÷ 10−6 dilutions were then used. A volume of 100 µL of the final dilutions was applied in replicates to solid culture media.
Different growth media were used depending on the type of microorganisms to be detected: (i) Plate Count Agar (PCA) medium was used for cultivable bacteria. After proper incubation, only bacterial colonies were counted, including Actinomycetes [51]; (ii) for fungi, Rose-Bengal Chloramphenicol (RBC) Agar medium was used and only fungal colonies were counted after incubation [52]; (iii) for Enterobacteriaceae, Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) Agar medium was used. Several culture media were also used for the detection of specific microorganisms: (I) For the detection of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp., KingB agar medium was used and after incubation, the plates were irradiated with UV light. The fluorescent colonies with smooth appearance were considered as Pseudomonas [53]; (II) for the differentiation of microorganisms that can solubilize inorganic phosphorus from poorly soluble compounds, NBRIP (National Botanical Research Institute’s Phosphate) growth medium was used. After incubation, the colonies surrounded by a clear halo were considered phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms [54]; (III) for chitinolytic microorganisms, a similar protocol was used and the growth medium was chitin agar [55]; (IV) for the detection of cellulolytic microorganisms, carboxymethylcellulose agar (CMC-Agar) was used. After incubation, the plates were flooded with 0.1% Congo red solution for 15 min and then washed with 1 M sodium chloride (NaCl). The colonies surrounded by a clear halo were considered as cellulose-degrading microorganisms [56]; (V) skim milk agar (SMA) medium was used for the caseinase-producing proteolytic microorganisms [57] and (VI) Rhizobium-like bacteria were detected on Yeast Mannitol Agar (YMA) medium with Congo red. The colonies that showed a smooth, glistening, and raised appearance, full margins and a whitish or (semi-) translucent feature were counted [58,59,60]. The concentration of microorganisms in 1 g of soil was calculated according to the following formula:
Colony-forming units (CFU)/g = Colony count/plate × dilution factor/plate × serial dilution factor = colony count/plate × 10 × 10 number of serial dilution
The antifungal efficacy (E%) of the microbial communities in the tested soil samples was evaluated by biometric measurements to calculate the efficacy of inhibition of plant pathogenic mycelial growth. In the current study, we performed the antifungal activity against four plant pathogens i.e., Fusarium graminearum (DSM 4527 reference strain), Fusarium culmorum (FC46 strain), and two Romanian isolates, Sclerotium bataticola (sinonim Macrophoma phaseolina, current name Tiarosporella phaseolina) and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. The double culture method was used against these pathogens. For microbial antagonism, soil infusions (1:9 w/v) were inoculated in Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) growth medium using the pour plate method. For this, the soil infusion was first added to the Petri dish, then molten agar at 45 °C was poured into the dish and swirled. After solidification, the plate was inoculated in the center with a mycelial plug from a freshly grown culture. Control plates for each fungal strain were prepared by inoculating sterile PDA plates with the same amount of fungal inoculum. Test and control plates were then incubated, and the fungal growth analysis was comparatively assessed. Efficacy was calculated using the following formula:
E% = (RC − RT)/RC × 100
where E (%) is the inhibitory efficacy of the soil microbial community against the phytopathogenic fungi; RC is the phytopathogenic fungal growth in the control plates (average radius of the phytopathogenic colony in the control plates); and RT is the phytopathogenic fungal growth (as average radius) in the test plates with soil suspension [61].

2.3. Manure Compost Chemical and Microbiological Characteristics Analysis

The compost used in all experiments was obtained from cattle manure collected at the RDSA Moara Domnească livestock farm and straws. For the chemical analyses of the manure compost, samples were taken from 6 points of the pile.
The pH of the compost samples was determined by the potentiometric method in aqueous suspension (1:5 v/v, soil: water) according to SR ISO 10390:2022 using a Mettler Toledo pH meter, after shaking and resting for 1 h [62]. The C and N content of the compost was measured with an elemental analyzer vario Macro Cube (Elementar, Langenselbold, Germany) using the Dumas method (combustion at 900 °C). Acetanilide was used as a calibration standard. The total phosphorus and potassium content was measured by the wet digestion method using an HNO3-HClO4 mixture and then analyzed by flame photometry (for the potassium content) and UV/Vis spectrometry (for the phosphorus content) [48].
The manure compost was microbiologically analyzed before it was applied to the experimental field. For this purpose, 10 g of the compost sample was mixed with 50 mL of sterile distilled water and stirred for 1 h using a magnetic stirrer (Velp Scientifica, Europe, Usmate Velate, MB, Italy). After sedimentation, dilutions were prepared from the supernatant and CompactDry Disks (NISSUI Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were inoculated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For identification and quantification of pathogens in the manure compost (i.e., Salmonella sp., Escherichia coli, Coliforms, and Enterobacteriaceae), samples were incubated at different temperatures specified by the manufacturer (for Salmonella sp. at 37 °C/41 °C and for Escherichia coli, Coliforms, and Enterobacteriaceae at 37 °C). CompactDry EC disks were used for the enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliforms. An amount of 1 mL of the previously collected supernatant was dropped onto the center of the CompactDry EC plate. The sample is automatically and uniformly diffused into the medium. The samples were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Escherichia coli formed blue to blue-violet colonies; coliforms showed a red to pink coloration. The red/pink and blue/blue-violet colonies together represented the total number of coliform groups. CompactDry ETB disks, containing a medium with glucose and selective agents, were used to differentiate and enumerate Enterobacteriaceae. An amount of 1 mL of the previously obtained supernatant was dropped onto the center of the CompactDry ETB plate. The sample diffused automatically and evenly into the medium. The samples were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Red/violet-colored colonies were Enterobacteriaceae. Red/violet and other colored colonies together were the total Gram-negative bacteria. CompactDry SL disks were used for Salmonella sp. detection based on the combination of three different test principles: alkalinization of the medium and color change from blue-violet to yellow; greening of the colony, caused by the decomposition of the chromogenic substrate with a specific enzyme of Salmonella (black colonies were formed by hydrogen sulfide-producing Salmonella); and the motility of Salmonella sp. [63]. For the pre-enrichment phase, 25 g of the compost sample was mixed with 225 mL of sterile BPW medium (Buffered Peptone Water: enzymatic digestion of casein 10 g/L, sodium chloride 5 g/L, disodium hydrogen phosphate 3.5 g/L, potassium dihydrogen phosphate 1.5 g/L, final pH 7.0 ± 0.2) and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. After the incubation period, 0.1 mL of the pre-enriched sample was added to 10 mL of RVS broth (Rappaport-Vassiliadis soy broth: peptone from soy flour 4.5 g/L; magnesium chloride hexahydrate 29.0 g/L; sodium chloride 8.0 g/L; dipotassium hydrogen phosphate 0.40 g/L; potassium dihydrogen phosphate 0.60 g/L; malachite green oxalate 0.036 g/L) and incubated at 41.5 °C for 24 h. For “Salmonella positive”, black to green isolated or fused colonies must be visible and the medium around the colonies must turn yellow. For “Salmonella negative”, no black or green colonies must be present. The medium must not turn yellow [64].
Serial decimal dilutions were prepared to quantify the microbial load in the manure compost samples. For 10−1 dilutions, 10 g of manure compost was processed, melted for 1 h at room temperature, stirred at 120 rpm, and then allowed to stand overnight. Dilutions of 10−4 ÷ 10−6 were then used depending on the type of analysis. The same growth media were used as for the microbiological analysis of the soil.
The antifungal efficacy of soil microbial communities against various plant pathogenic fungi was also analyzed. The same method was used against Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium culmorum, Sclerotium bataticola, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated by measuring the growth rays of the plant-pathogenic fungus and by determining the efficacy of inhibition of plant-pathogenic mycelial growth. The efficacy was measured based on the same formula as for the antimicrobial efficacy of the soil microorganism [61].

2.4. Experimental Design

The experiment was conducted in a 4 randomized block design with four crops (i.e., winter wheat—Triticum aestivum L.; a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes—ryegrass—Lolium perenne L., bluegrass—Poa pratensis L., meadow fescue—Festuca pratensis L., white clover—Trifolium repens L., and bird’s foot trefoil—Lotus corniculatus L.; soybean—Glycine max L.; and maize—Zea mays L.) and eight fertilization treatments for each crop species (Table 1). There were 32 plots within each block.
Plot size was 15 m2 (5 m long × 3 m wide) with four replicates and a 1 m wide border between plots. Three doses of MC (15 t/ha; 30 t/ha and 60 t/ha) were applied at the end of September 2021 (Figure 3), either alone or in combination with NPK complex fertilizers 20:20:0, which were applied fractionally according to the nutrient requirements of each crop at different stages of vegetation (Table 1).
The drought from the beginning of September 2021 did not allow plowing, but the soil was scarified twice at a depth of 40 cm. The seedbed was prepared by two passes with the cultivator, the average soil moisture being 19.5%.
The seeds of winter wheat (Jaguar variety), purchased from the company ITC Seeds, and those of the mixture of perennial grasses and legumes were sown on 22 October 2021. The percentages of species within the mixture were as follows: 30% Lolium perenne (Mara variety); 10% Poa pratensis (Fima variety); 20% Festuca pratensis (Transilvan variety); 20% Trifolium repens (Danitim variety); and 20% Lotus corniculatus (Dacia 1 variety). The seeds of the mixture were obtained from the Research and Development Institute for Grassland in Brașov and the Research and Development Institute for Agriculture in Turda.
The soybean seeds (Daciana variety), obtained from the Research Institute for Cereals and Industrial Crops in Fundulea, and the maize seeds (Carioca hybrid), obtained from Syngenta, were sown on April 6 and 15, in the optimal season for the region, after a very good preparation of the seedbed by running over it twice with a cultivator. Soil moisture before sowing averaged 20.5%. The soybean seeds were treated with Nitragin and mycorrhiza before sowing to improve symbiotic activity.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of the data obtained was performed using Analyse-it software for Microsoft Excel version 5.66 One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test all parameters and to evaluate the statistically significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). In addition, least significant differences (LSD) at the 5%, 1%, and 0.1% probability levels were used with Microsoft Excel and the following significances were determined:
-
ns: non-significant differences;
-
* significant differences between the fertilized variants and the control;
-
** distinct significant differences between the fertilized variants and the control;
-
*** very significant differences between the fertilized variants and control.
For the differences with negative values, the notifications are as follows:
-
o—significant negative differences between the fertilized variant and control;
-
oo—distinctly significant negative differences between the fertilized variant and the control;
-
ooo—very significant negative differences between the fertilized variant and the control.

3. Results

3.1. Manure Compost Chemical and Microbiological Characteristics

The chemical analysis of the MC showed that the pH value was slightly alkaline and the contents of Corg and total nitrogen (Nt) contents averaged 21.58% and 1.76%, respectively. It also had a high content of mobile N forms (N-NO3; N-NH4) (Table 2).
The microbiological analyses of the MC showed a slight increase in Enterobacteriaceae load, with the limits set by the Italian Fertilizer Law (Law 748/84, amended by Decree 27/3/98) being <1 × 103 [65]. The load of Escherichia coli, coliforms, and Salmonella sp. was in accordance with the guidelines for compost quality, according to which the maximum values for Escherichia coli and coliforms are ≤1000 most probable number (MPN)/g D.M., and Salmonella sp. must not be present [66].
In MC, high loads of cultivable bacteria and fluorescent Pseudomonas were found and the microorganisms responsible for the decomposition of compost and cellulolytic microorganisms were also dominant (Table 3).
The microorganisms isolated from the manure compost had an inhibitory effect on the in vitro development of some tested microorganisms such as Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium culmorum, Sclerotium bataticola, or Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Table 4).

3.2. Variation of Soil Chemical Properties under Organic and Chemical Fertilizer Application and Different Crop Cultivation

The physical and chemical analyses carried out on the soil samples taken from different soil layers made it possible to characterize the red preluvosoil from the Moara Domnească experimental field. Thus, the Ap horizon (0–22 cm) has a dark brown color (7.5YR 3/2) when wet and a brown (7.5YR 4/1) color when dry, a granular structure, clayey texture, and fine sand grains; it is poorly compacted and has many roots. The soil had a high BD, a very low TP, and a medium GD.
The Ao horizon (22–55 cm) has a dark brown color (7.5YR 3/2) in the upper part when wet and a brown color (7.5 YR 4/1) when dry, and a brown color (7.5YR 4/2) in the lower part when wet and a brown color (7.5 YR 5/2) when dry. It is moderately compacted and has many roots in the upper part, a loamy-sandy texture, sand grains, and a large polyhedral structure. The soil BD was very high, the TP had a medium value, and the GD was 25.86%.
The A/B horizon (55–86 cm) is brown in color (7.5YR 4/2) when wet, with a loamy-clayey texture, moderately compacted in the upper part, highly compacted in the lower part, has rare roots, and a poorly developed polyhedral structure. The BD was high, TP was very low, and GD was very high.
The Bt1 horizon (86–149 cm) has a dark brown color (7.5YR 5/2) in the wet state, with a loamy-clayey texture, a polyhedral structure, is highly compacted, and has few sparse roots. The BD value was very high, and the TP value was very low.
The Bt2 horizon (149–220 cm) has a brown color (7.5YR 5/3) when wet, with fine sand grains, a loamy-clayey texture and a polyhedral structure; it is moderately compacted and has manganese oxides. This soil had a very high BD value, low TP values, and a high GD value (Table S2).
The pH value is moderately acidic in the Ap horizon and very slightly alkaline in the Bt2 layer, with the value determined in the top soil layer (Ap) being lower than the values characterizing the preluvosoil (6.2–6.7) [67]. The Corg and humus contents decrease with the depth of the layer, with the values in the upper horizon (Ap) being higher. The humus content in the preluvosoil is generally between 2 and 4% [42]. In the arable layer (0–22 cm), the Nt content indicates a medium fertility of the soil. The soil has a high supply of available P in all soil horizons, with values ranging from 158 mg/kg in Ap and Ao to 148 mg/kg in Bt. The K supply of the soil is also very good in the Ap horizon and good in the deeper layers (Table S2).
The analyses of soil samples taken from a depth of 0–20 cm before the establishment of the experiment (October 2021) showed that the soil in its initial state had a medium acidic pH and the mean value of the Corg content in the soil was 1.94%. The soil was well supplied with Nt and very well supplied with P and K (Table 5).
Compared to the initial state of the soil in October 2021, some of the soil chemical properties changed in spring. For example, the pH value of the soil averaged 5.89 and did not change over the winter. The Corg and humus content recorded higher values and the Nt value was lower on average than in October 2021 (Table 6).
The application of different doses of MC and chemical fertilizers resulted in a variation of some soil chemical properties over the growing season and from one variant to another in the plots cultivated with a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, winter wheat, maize, and soybean. In June, in the soil from the mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, the lowest pH value was recorded in V2 (moderately acidic), where only NPK was applied, whereby the differences compared to the control were distinctly significantly negative, and the highest values were recorded in V3 and V5, which indicates slightly acidic soil. The Corg content also varied slightly, recording values of 2.01% in variant V1 and 2.3% in V7, with a very significant difference compared to the control, with an increase of 0.29% when 60 t/ha MC was applied. In the other variants, the values did not vary from one treatment to another and were distinctly significant, except in V3, where the difference was significant, and the increase was only 0.16% compared to the control. The highest humus content in the soil was also determined in variant V7 (3.96%), followed by V8, whereby the differences compared to the control were statistically significant (p < 0.05). For V3, V4, V5, and V6, the differences were significant (p < 0.05). The Nt content in the soil ranged from 0.154% (V1) to 0.180% (V7), and except for V2, where the differences were significant, the values recorded in the other treatments were very significant (Table S3).
In winter wheat plots, the lowest pH value was recorded in V4 and the highest value in V5. Small differences were found between V3, V5, and V7, but compared to the control, they were distinctly significant. The Corg values in the soil ranged from 1.99% (V4) to 2.36% (V6). Significant (p < 0.05) differences were observed between V3 and V6 compared to the control, while insignificant differences were observed between the other variants. Humus content was influenced by soil Corg, with the obtained values varying as follows: V6 > V7, V3 > V5, and V8 > V2 > V4 > V1. The Nt content ranged from 0.159% (V4) to 0.184% (V6). Compared to V1, the results in V6, V7, and V3 were very significant (Table S3).
Differences between treatments were also observed in the maize plots in June. The pH ranged from 5.46 (V4) to 5.90 (V3), a difference that was distinctly significant compared to the control. The highest Corg value, which was distinctly significant, was determined in V5 followed by V6 and V7. The lowest Corg value of the soil was found in the control. The soil humus content was related to the Corg content; the lowest value was found in the control variant and the highest value in V5, a difference that was also distinctly significant. The Nt content in the soil ranged from 0.168% (V1) to 0.189% (V5), with the value being distinctly significant.
Under soybean cultivation, the values of the soil chemical properties differed between the treatments and compared to the control. Regarding soil pH, Table S3 shows that the differences between the control, the variants where different doses of MC were applied, and the variants where MC was applied in combination with NPK were insignificant and ranged between 5.82 (V7) and 6.21 (V3). The lowest value of Corg in the soil samples analyzed was recorded in V1 and the highest value in V4. In V4 and V3 the differences compared to the control were very significant. The humus and Nt contents were influenced by the different doses of MC in combination with mineral fertilizers, the highest values being determined in V4 (Table S3).
In the autumn of 2022, chemical analyses were also performed to determine whether there were seasonal changes in the soil chemical properties. The results varied under the different treatment conditions (Table S4). For example, the pH values in the mixture of perennial grasses and legumes varied from one treatment to another (p < 0.05). In variant V6, the pH had the highest value (6.06), indicating a slightly acidic soil, and the lowest value was observed in V2 (NPK only), where the soil was described as acidic. The soil Corg content showed lower but very significant values compared to the summer period, ranging from 1.88% in V1 to 2.26% in V6. The soil humus content varied between treatments, with the highest value recorded in V6. The Nt content was higher in autumn than in the summer. V3 had the lowest Nt content compared to the control, and V6 had the highest Nt content.
In the winter wheat plots, soil pH values were lower in the treated variants than in the control, indicating an acidic soil. The Corg content was higher in V8, followed by V4 and V5, but these values were insignificant compared to the control variant. The Nt and humus contents also varied between treatments (p < 0.05) and the highest values were recorded in variant V8 (60 t/ha MC and NPK fertilizers), namely 4.31% and 0.240%, respectively.
After maize cultivation, pH values in the treated variants were generally lower than in the control, and the lowest value was observed in variants V4 and V7, which characterize an acidic soil, with slight variations between treatments. In almost all variants, Corg and humus contents were slightly lower than in summer, except in variants V6 and V8, where values were slightly higher, i.e., 2.37% and 2.30% for Corg and 4.09% and 3.97% for humus, respectively (Table S4). In the autumn, the values of Nt content did not differ much between treatments, but they were higher than in the growing season. The highest value was recorded in V6, with a significant positive difference compared to the control. Variant V6 was followed by V8 with 0.222%, which was also significant.
In the fall, there were differences between the treatments in terms of pH in the soybean plots (p < 0.05). A maximum value of 6.27 was determined in V3, which indicates a slightly acidic soil. This value was significant compared to the control. The Corg content of the soil also varied, and the maximum value was recorded in V6, followed by V4 and V8. Compared to the control, the values in the variants V6 and V4 were very significant. In addition, the variants V6 and V4 were the ones with the highest values for humus and Nt content (Table S4).

3.3. Variation of Soil Microbial Abundance and Their Antifungal Efficiency under Organic and Mineral Fertilization and after Different Crop Cultivation

The soil samples analyzed before the start of the experiment showed a bacterial load of 107 CFU/g soil and a fungal load of 105 CFU/g soil. In addition, microorganisms that are beneficial to agricultural crops and are involved in atmospheric nitrogen fixation or biological pest control (e.g., fluorescent pseudomonads, rhizobia, or microorganisms that solubilize phosphorus from mineral compounds) were identified (Table 7).
In our experiment, in the autumn, under a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes and different doses of organic and mineral fertilizers, cultivable bacteria (107 CFU/g soil), chitinolytic, proteolytic, and cellulolytic microorganisms (106–107 CFU/g soil), and rhizobia (106 CFU/g soil) were the most abundant groups in the soil samples analyzed. The fungal load ranged from 1.8 × 105 CFU/g soil (V7) to 7.4 × 105 CFU/g soil in V4. The same observations can also be made for the cultivable bacteria, with the highest load being counted in V3 and the lowest load, in V7. The microorganisms that solubilize the inorganic P were abundant in V4 (15 t/ha MC + NPK), while a high number of chitinolytic microorganisms was found in V2 and V3. Also, in V2 (NPK only), high loads of cellulolytic microorganisms and proteolytic microorganisms were observed. Rhizobia colonies were more common in V3 and V8 (Table 8).
In the winter wheat plots, the fertilization regime also influenced the abundance of microorganisms in the soil. For example, the number of fungi was higher when 30 t/ha MC was applied to the soil, followed by the variant with 60 t/ha MC in combination with NPK fertilization. The number of cultivable bacteria was higher in variant V6, followed by V5 and V4. Fluorescent pseudomonads colonies were low in all treatments and the activity of microorganisms involved in the mineralization of inorganic phosphorous was increased by the application of 30 t/ha of MC and NPK fertilizer (V6). The highest chitinase and cellulolytic activity was observed in the variants with high doses of MC (V7) and MC combined with NPK fertilization (V8). Proteolytic microorganisms were more abundant in the soil treated with 60 t/ha MC and in V2 (NPK only). The number of rhizobia did not vary much between treatments. However, the highest load was found in variant V5 (30 t/ha MC).
Under soybean cultivation and the application of mineral and organic amendments, the microbial population changed. Fungal activity was influenced by the MC application. Compared to the control, the number of fungal colonies was lower in the variants treated with MC and MC + NPK fertilizers, and the differences between treatments were not significant (Table 8). In the treated variants, the highest load of cultivable bacteria was found in variant V7 followed by V6 and V5. The load of fluorescent pseudomonads was low in all treatments. The microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus and the rhizobia load were negatively affected by the organic and mineral fertilization compared to the control variant, where the highest number was recorded. The abundance of chitinolytic microorganisms was somewhat low, with the highest reached in V2. A high load of cellulolytic microorganisms was found in V6 compared to the control and the load of proteolytic microorganisms was higher in V3 compared to V1.
In the maize plots, the fungal population did not vary too much between treatments over the same period, with the highest load observed in V4. However, the lowest number of cellulolytic microorganisms was found in this variant. Many cultivable bacteria were found in variants V5 and V7 and the highest number of microorganisms that solubilize the inorganic phosphorus was also found in these variants. Pseudomonads colonies were also reduced (below 103). In the maize plots where 30 t/ha MC + NPK and 60 t/ha MC were applied, a high abundance of proteolytic microorganisms was observed. There were no major differences in rhizobia between the variants, with the highest numbers recorded in V7.
Regarding the initial antifungal effect of the soil microorganisms, it can be seen in Table 9 that the percentage of fungal inhibition was medium to high in the initial phase of the experiment.
In all experiments and for all treatment variants, the antifungal activity of the soil microbial communities against different plant pathogenic fungi (Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium graminearum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Sclerotium bataticola) was expressed as a percentage of the pathogenic growth inhibition efficacy. Figure 4a shows that the highest antifungal efficacy was found for Fusarium culmorum in the winter wheat experiment, with values ranging from 67.44% (V2) to 90.7% in V8. For Fusarium graminearum, an important pathogen for winter wheat that can lead to considerable yield reductions, the antifungal efficacy ranged from 65.21% (V8) to 78.26% (V6). The inhibitory effect against Sclerotium bataticola was weak to medium (from 30.43% in V2 to 70.65% in V6) and was medium in all variants against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, with the lowest value in V2 (41.3%) and the highest value in V6 (61.96%).
In the experiment with a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, the soil microbial population from V7 (60 t/ha MC) had a high inhibitory effect against all pathogens tested, with values ranging from 80.43% (for Fusarium culmorum and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum pathogens) to 95.65% (for Sclerotium bataticola). A medium inhibitory effect was observed in V3 samples (15 t/ha MC) with minimum values of 61.34% (for Fusarium graminearum) and maximum values of 68.48% (for Sclerotium bataticola) (Figure 4b and Figure 5A,B).
In the soil samples taken from the soybean plots in the fall, the microbial population had a low inhibitory effect against Fusarium culmorum (values ranged from 2.33% in V6 to 25% in the control) and against Sclerotium bataticola (from 5.43% in V7 to 25.54% in V5). The inhibition effect for Sclerotinia sclerotiorum was highest in variant V7 (65.22%) (Figure 4c).
The microorganisms counted in the soil samples from the maize plots had a low antifungal effect on the pathogens tested. As for the efficacy against Fusarium graminearum, a pathogen that can reduce maize yield and produce toxins that can affect human health, the values ranged from 15.12% (V8) to 36.83% (in V6). Low inhibition against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Sclerotium bataticola was also found in all treatment variants, except in V6 (30 t/ha MC + NPK), where efficacy against Sclerotium bataticola was 52.17%. The inhibitory effect on Fusarium culmorum was medium (Figure 4d).

4. Discussion

Knowledge of soil quality is very important for evaluating the positive or negative effects of agricultural practices, integrating the results obtained into the management process, promoting sustainable agricultural practices, and monitoring the changes in soil indicators during the growing season [68]. According to Zhang et al. [69], mineral fertilization alone has no effect on certain parameters such as Nt in the short term, but the combination of chemical fertilizers with organic amendments can increase Nt content. In addition, Liu et al. [70] indicated that soil organic matter, Nt content, and pH did not change with short-term application of mineral and organic fertilizers. Our results showed a slight variation of pH, soil Corg, humus, and Nt between treatments and between all experimental plots during the whole growing season, which also agrees with Deru et al. [71], who reported that chemical parameters were only weakly affected by fertilizers and their effects can only be seen after a longer period of time. The combined application of different doses of MC and NPK led to a decrease in soil pH in most cases (see Tables S3 and S4). A decrease in soil pH was also observed in almost all treatments in the autumn, with some exceptions. This decrease cannot be considered threatening to soil quality as the values are close to neutrality. Nevertheless, we must consider in the future that optimizing the N fertilizer doses to the actual crop needs may reduce the acidification potential through lower nitrate leaching and indirectly lower N deposition due to reduced NH3 emissions [72].
Soil Corg is a key factor for the soil fertility of agroecosystems and therefore all agricultural practices that may lead to a change in its content should be considered to avoid dangerous environmental changes [73]. Compared to the initial state of the soil, our data showed, as expected, that the Corg and humus contents increased after the application of different doses of MC and MC in combination with NPK fertilization, in all treatment variants and independently of all crops, with some exceptions. This agrees with the results of Kumar et al. [74] and is particularly important because it can have a major impact on the parameters that determine the productivity and sustainability of agroecosystems [75]. Moreover, improving soil organic matter content could be an important strategy to mitigate climate change and make agroecosystems more resilient [76] and is particularly important in our case, mainly because the soil of the Moara Domnească has a generally low organic matter content. The increase in soil Corg content due to the addition of organic fertilizers can be caused by the higher organic matter content in the manure compost. According to Angelova et al. and Li et al. [77,78], the Corg and humus contents of the soil increase with the fertilizer doses. In our experiments, this can only be associated with the soil from the mixture of perennial grasses and legumes. In the autumn, the decrease in the Corg and humus content of the soil was low compared to the summer. Rosa and Debska [79] also mentioned the decrease in Corg content in autumn compared to spring, which could be explained by the migration of dissolved Corg into the deeper soil profile layers.
Nitrogen dynamics in soil depend on several factors such as N2 fixation, nitrification, denitrification, N mineralization, and immobilization as well as nitrogen uptake by plants [80]. In our experiment, the Nt content changed during the growing season. In summer, the values were lower than in the autumn. These results agree with those of Taylor et al. [81], who explained that the low nitrogen content in the soil during the summer months could be due to the decrease in ammonium and nitrate production, with uptake rates exceeding mineralization rates. The greatest amount of nitrate and ammonium nitrogen accumulates in spring and autumn due to reduced nitrification–ammonification processes and high nitrogen consumption by plants and soil microorganisms in the summer [82]. Seasonal changes in soil organic matter are one of the most controversial issues in the scientific literature. The main factors that can lead to changes in Corg and Nt in soils are organic and mineral fertilization, soil water regime, soil temperature regime, microbiological activity, etc. In our future studies, it is therefore important to evaluate these factors in more detail and to analyze the variation of soil parameters in the soil profile [82].
Good soil quality, characterized among other things by a diverse and rich microbial community, is also a prerequisite for plant growth and optimal yields [83]. According to He et al. [84], the abundance of microorganisms in the topsoil can be influenced by some soil chemical properties, crop species, fertilization, or seasonal variation in climatic conditions. Soil microbial composition and abundance change with the seasons, possibly due to differences in soil temperature, moisture, and soil organic matter content [85]. In addition, soil microbial abundance and diversity can be influenced by fertilizer application, especially mineral fertilization [86]. Geisseler and Scow [87] found that mineral fertilizers can significantly increase soil microbial biomass, while Lazcano et al. [88] reported that organic fertilizers stimulate soil microbial activity and increase soil microbial biomass compared to mineral fertilizers. According to our results, the soil microbial load in autumn was influenced by the fertilization regime and the cultivated species, but there were no significant differences between the variants (see Table 8).
There is intense bacterial activity in the rhizosphere, with both beneficial and phytopathogenic organisms attracted to the root exudates [89]. In general, the abundance of the bacterial population in soil is higher than that of fungi [85], which is also consistent with our results. These results could be because the bacterial population dominates in soils with lower carbon storage, in contrast to fungi [90]. Microbial populations show complex relationships in nutrient uptake and utilization, so bacteria and fungi may not respond in the same way to N and/or P addition [91]. In the soil under a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, the lowest load of fungi, cultivable bacteria, microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus, and proteolytic microorganisms was found in the variant with 60 t/ha MC, while the highest load was recorded in the variant with exclusive NPK application (in the case of chitinolytic, cellulolytic, and proteolytic microorganisms), in the variant with 15 t/ha MC and NPK fertilizers (for fungi and microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus), and in the variant with only 15 t/ha MC (for cultivable bacteria and rhizobia). In the winter wheat plots, the high doses of manure compost (30 t/ha and 60 t/ha) applied alone or in combination with mineral fertilizers had a positive effect on the soil microbial population, with the highest load recorded in all these variants. These results are consistent with the conclusions of the study by Liu et al. [92], in which the combination of manure and chemical fertilizers showed great benefits in terms of the bacterial community.
High levels of cultivable bacteria (V7) and cellulolytic microorganisms (V6) were found when soybean was grown, and high doses of manure compost (60 t/ha) were applied alone or in combination with NPK in the autumn. These results are consistent with other studies conducted in soybean plots [93] which showed an improvement in the beneficial bacteria population when organic fertilizers were applied. Fungi, microorganisms that solubilize inorganic P and rhizobia populations were negatively affected by organic and mineral fertilization, with the highest number observed in the non-fertilized variant. This agrees with Lourenço et al. [94], who stated that the application of mineral fertilizer alone or in combination with organic fertilizer can reduce the saprotrophs fungi population by 40%.
The high MC doses (60 t/ha) for maize increased the soil load of cultivable bacteria, cellulolytic and proteolytic microorganisms, and rhizobia in the soil (except for chitinolytic microorganisms), and the MC dose of 30 t/ha was also beneficial for cultivable bacteria and microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus. These results agree with those of another study [95], which showed that the highest abundance and diversity of bacteria and archaea was recorded in the rhizosphere of maize and under MC application. The fungal load did not vary much between treatments. As for the fluorescent pseudomonads in the soil, the levels were lower in all treatments.
The highest bacterial load was recorded in soil with a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes in the variant with only 15 t/ha MC, followed by soil cultivated with maize and fertilized with 30 t/ha and 60 t/ha MC. A higher number of fungi was observed in the mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, while in the winter wheat experiment, the number of rhizobia was higher despite the fertilization regime. In the other cultivated plots, the organic and mineral fertilization reduced the rhizobia load. Under soybean cultivation, the microbial population density was influenced by the fertilization regime, which was also found by Guo et al. [96].
Overall, we found that the soil microbial population was improved by organic and mineral fertilization, but the response to nutrient addition varied from one crop to another and from one fertilization regime to another. In most cases, organic fertilization only increased the number of cultivable bacteria and rhizobia, except for winter wheat plots, where the combination of 30 t/ha MC and NPK had a greater effect on the population. Regardless of the fertilizer dose, the application of MC increased the abundance of proteolytic microorganisms, which are responsible for organic substrate decomposition and can convert ammonium to nitrate [97]. This was also found by Liang et al. [98], who observed the effects of different fertilizer treatments on the bacterial community in the rhizosphere. The number of chitinolytic microorganisms increased especially in the soil where only NPK fertilizers were applied. In addition, the cellulolytic microorganisms were more abundant in soils treated with a combination of MC and mineral fertilizers and with high doses of MC. The microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus were positively affected by the application of MC and NPK, except in the soybean rhizosphere, where the highest number was found in the unfertilized variant. The fungal population was higher in the soil fertilized with MC in combination with mineral fertilizers and MC only. Since the results indicate that the effects of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil microorganisms depend on the type of the soil and crop, fertilization regime, etc., their effects on soil microbial properties still need to be studied in the long term and dynamically. Further research should also be carried out to identify the specific microbial communities affected by chemical or organic fertilizer applications, as the bacterial or fungal populations may not respond in the same way due to their ecological differences.
The antibiotics produced by various microorganisms isolated from the soil can suppress or inhibit the growth of some plant pathogens. For example, soil bacteria produce extracellular lytic enzymes, siderophores, salicylic acid, antibiotics, and volatile metabolites that have antifungal activity [99]. Our studies have shown that although a rich diversity of microorganisms was found in the soil both before organic and mineral fertilization and at the end of the growing season, the antifungal efficacy was medium to low, except for the winter wheat experiment, where the efficacy of the microbial population found in the soil was medium to high against Fusarium culmorum and medium against other pathogens. This high inhibitory effect can be explained by the presence of microorganisms in the samples that produce lytic enzymes capable of degrading the cellular components of plant pathogenic fungi. In the autumn, the antagonistic activity of the microorganisms isolated from the soil was medium to low in the other cultivated species. Thus, we can say that fertilization affects the growth of plant pathogens and their antagonists. Compared to our results, in other research, organic fertilizers suppressed fungal phytopathogens, and conversely, mineral fertilization increased the abundance of pathogens in the rhizosphere. However, organic fertilizers had, on average, a medium inhibitory effect on the fungal phytopathogens studied and may therefore be used to enhance soil suppressiveness against plant pathogens [100]. Also, the use of fungicide seed treatment or cultivar resistance is an integrated approach to protect crops against different pathogens throughout the growing season [101].
Maintaining an active ecosystem at the soil level is crucial for improving the biological properties and agronomic value of soils such as the red preluvosoil soil of Moara Domnească and thus for maintaining its health. Therefore, healthy soil can influence agroecosystem sustainability, provide more ecosystem services (e.g., nutrient cycling, improvement of microbial diversity, etc.), improve crop yields, and also be more resilient to different factors. This could be possible through the application of different practices such as diversification of nutrient sources, especially organic sources [102]. The results obtained thus form the basis for further studies on how fertilization practices could affect soil properties, microbial diversity, and resilience in the short and long term in a preluvosoil from southeastern Romania.

5. Conclusions

The study highlights the short-term changes in the chemical properties of the soil during the growing season after different doses of organic and mineral fertilizer application, the activity of microbial populations after crop harvesting compared to the basic properties of the soil before fertilization, and determines which fertilization treatment is most suitable for improving soil fertility and for growing different crops in a red preluvosoil from a sylvosteppe area. One of the objectives was also to show the inhibitory effect of the microorganisms isolated from the soil on some plant pathogens such as Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium culmorum, which are important pathogens for cereal crops, Sclerotium bataticola, a pathogen for grain legumes, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, a soil pathogen with a diverse host range.
The results show that soil chemical properties in the topsoil, which are important for some ecosystem services, were weakly influenced by fertilizers and their effects may become apparent in the long term. Thus, a slight variation in soil pH, Corg, humus, and Nt between treatments and between cultivated species was observed during the growing season. In most cases, the combined application of MC at different doses and NPK led to a decrease in soil pH. In the autumn, a decrease in soil pH was observed in almost all treatments, but this cannot have a negative impact on soil quality as the values are close to neutrality. The Corg and humus content increased after the application of different doses of MC and MC in combination with NPK fertilization in almost all treatment variants and under different crops. Because the use of organic fertilizers only is not reasonable for sustaining plant productivity, a combination of chemical and organic fertilizers could be the right solution, especially for soils with low contents in N, P, and organic C [103].
The microbial population changed under organic and mineral fertilization, but their response was different. Fertilization can rapidly replenish nutrient elements, increasing available nitrogen and phosphorus in the soil, which could further increase microbial activity. Organic fertilizers increased nutrient enrichment in the soil and created a rich environment for microorganisms. Compared with the unfertilized treatment, the application of manure compost in combination with mineral fertilizers increased the load of fungi, cellulolytic microorganisms, or microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus, while organic fertilizers can create a suitable environment for cultivable bacteria, proteolytic microorganisms, and fungi.
Our studies have shown that although a rich diversity of microorganisms was found in the soil before both organic and mineral fertilization and at the end of the growing season, the antifungal efficacy was medium to low, except in the winter wheat experiment, where the efficacy of the microbial population found in the soil was medium to high against Fusarium culmorum and medium against other pathogens.
Since the results indicate that the effects of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil chemical properties and microbial behavior depend on the type of the soil and crop, fertilization regime, etc., their effects still need to be investigated dynamically and not only seasonally, but in the long term.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy13112837/s1, Figure S1: Rainfall (mm) and maximum and minimum air temperatures (°C) in the Moara Domnească area during September 2021–October 2022 period; Table S1: Air temperatures and rainfall values for the Moara Domnească area during September 2021–October 2022 vegetation period; Table S2: Red preluvosoil physicochemical properties at different soil layer depths; Table S3: Soil chemical properties under mineral and organic fertilizers and different crops (June 2022); Table S4: Soil chemical properties under mineral and organic fertilizers and after crop harvesting (October 2022).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M.D. and V.S.; methodology, E.M.D., V.S., N.V., M.M. and S.O; software, M.V.; validation, E.M.D. and V.S.; formal analysis, E.M.D.; investigation, E.M.D.; resources, V.M, N.V., O.S. and C.V.; data curation, C.V., N.V., O.S. and M.V.; writing—original draft preparation, E.M.D. and V.S.; writing—review and editing, V.S. and M.M.; visualization, E.M.D.; supervision, V.S., M.M. and C.V.; project administration, E.M.D.; funding acquisition, E.M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from the University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania, grant number 1258/30.07.2021, acronym SustenRo, within IPC 2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Weather data were provided through the ESA contract 4000125860/18/NL/CBi—Campaign Support for Sentinel-1 Companion Satellite (CS)—System Studies (Campaign S1_T-SAR). We also thank all members of the SustenRo project from the Faculty of Agriculture and from Moara Domnească Research and Development Station for Agronomy who participated in different activities during the field experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Breure, A.M.; De Deyn, G.B.; Dominati, E.; Eglin, T.; Hedlund, K.; Van Orshoven, J.; Posthuma, L. Ecosystem services: A useful concept for soil policy-making! Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2012, 4, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ferrarini, A.; Bini, C.; Amaducci, S. Soil and ecosystem services: Current knowledge and evidences from Italian case studies. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 123, 693–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Williams, T.G.; Guikema, S.D.; Brown, D.G.; Agrawal, A. Resilience and equity: Quantifying the distributional effects of resilience enhancing strategies in a smallholder agricultural system. Agric. Syst. 2020, 182, 102832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Melero, S.; Madejón, E.; Ruiz, J.C.; Herencia, J.F. Chemical and biochemical properties of a clay soil under dryland agriculture system as affected by organic fertilization. Eur. J. Agron. 2007, 26, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sofo, A.; Zanella, A.; Ponge, J.F. Soil quality and fertility in sustainable agriculture, with a contribution to the biological classification of agricultural soils. Soil Use Manag. 2022, 38, 1085–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, K.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, R.; Feng, G.; Liu, X.; Zuo, Y.; Yuan, H.; Zhang, C.; et al. Evaluating the effects of agricultural inputs on the soil quality of smallholdings using improved indices. Catena 2022, 209, 105838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, Y.; Zeng, C.; Long, M. Variation of soil nutrients and bacterial community diversity of different land utilization types in Yangtze River Basin, Chongqing Municipality. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nguemezi, C.; Tematio, P.; Yemefack, M.; Tsozue, D.; Silatsa, T.B.F. Soil quality and soil fertility status in major soil groups at the Tombel area, South-West Cameroon. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Spínola Garcia Távora, G.; Dias Turetta, A.P.; Soares da Silva, A.; Teixeira Simões, B.F.; Nehren, U. Trade-offs and synergies in agricultural landscapes: A study on soil-related ecosystem services in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Environ. Sustain. Ind. 2022, 16, 100205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gogoi, B.; Borah, N.; Baishya, A.; Nath, D.J.; Dutta, S.; Das, R.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Sharma, K.K.; Valente, D.; Petrosillo, I. Enhancing soil ecosystem services through sustainable integrated nutrient management in double rice-cropping system of North-East India. Ecol. Ind. 2021, 132, 108262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gafencu, A.M.; Florea, A.M.; Ulea, E. Influence of seed-protectant pesticides on soil Azotobacter and Clostridium nitrogen fixing bacteria. Scient. Pap. Ser. A Agron. 2021, LXIV, 92–97. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rasmussen, P.E.; Albrecht, S.L.; Smiley, R.W. Soil C and N changes under tillage and cropping systems in semi-arid Pacific Northwest agriculture. Soil Till. Res. 1998, 47, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Velthof, G.; Barot, S.; Bloem, J.; Butterbach-Bahl, K.; de Vries, W.; Kros, J.; Lavelle, P.; Eivind Olesen, J.; Oenema, O. Nitrogen as a Threat to European Soil Quality. In The European Nitrogen Assessment: Sources, Effects and Policy Perspectives; Sutton, M., Howard, C., Erisman, J., Billen, G., Bleeker, A., Grennfelt, P., Van Grinsven, H., Grizzetti, B., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 495–510. [Google Scholar]
  14. Celik, I.; Gunal, H.; Budak, M.; Akpinar, C. Effects of long-term organic and mineral fertilizers on bulk density and penetration resistance in semi-arid Mediterranean soil conditions. Geoderma 2010, 160, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Krasilnikov, P.; Taboada, M.A.; Amanullah. Fertilizer use, soil health and agricultural sustainability. Agriculture 2022, 12, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Z.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Y. Impacts of fertilization optimization on soil nitrogen cycling and wheat nitrogen utilization under water-saving irrigation. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 878424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Francioli, D.; Schulz, E.; Lentendu, G.; Wubet, T.; Buscot, F.; Reitz, T. Mineral vs. organic amendments: Microbial community structure, activity and abundance of agriculturally relevant microbes are driven by long-term fertilization strategies. Front. Microb. 2016, 7, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, L.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, F.; He, X.; Liu, H.; Yu, K. Increased organic fertilizer application and reduced chemical fertilizer application affect the soil properties and bacterial communities of grape rhizosphere soil. Nat. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sivojiene, D.; Kacergius, A.; Baksiene, E.; Maseviciene, A.; Zickiene, L. The influence of organic fertilizers on the abundance of soil microorganism communities, agrochemical indicators, and yield in East Lithuanian light soils. Plants 2021, 10, 2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Morugán-Coronado, A.; García-Orenes, F.; McMillan, M.; Pereg, L. The effect of moisture on soil microbial properties and nitrogen cyclers in Mediterranean sweet orange orchards under organic and inorganic fertilization. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 655, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheng, H.; Yuan, M.; Duan, Q.; Sun, R.; Shen, Y.; Yu, Q. Influence of phosphorus fertilization patterns on the bacterial community in upland farmland. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 155, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Trivedi, P.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Anderson, I.C.; Singh, B.K. Response of soil properties and microbial communities to agriculture: Implications for primary productivity and soil health indicators. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Urra, J.; Alkorta, I.; Garbisu, C. Potential benefits and risks for soil health derived from the use of organic amendments in agriculture. Agronomy 2019, 9, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Roussos, P.A.; Gasparatos, D.; Kechrologoua, K.; Katsenos, P.; Bouchagier, P. Impact of organic fertilization on soil properties, plant physiology and yield in two newly planted olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars under Mediterranean conditions. Sci. Hort. 2017, 220, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hua, K.; Zhu, B. Phosphorus loss through surface runoff and leaching in response to the long-term application of different organic amendments on sloping croplands. J. Soils Sed. 2020, 20, 3459–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Triberti, L.; Nastri, A.; Baldoni, G. Long-term effects of crop rotation, manure and mineral fertilization on carbon sequestration and soil fertility. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 74, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Martín-Lammerding, D.; Gabriel, J.L.; Zambrana, E.; Santín-Montanyá, I.; Tenorio, J.L. Organic amendment vs. mineral fertilization under minimum tillage: Changes in soil nutrients, soil organic matter, biological properties and yield after 10 years. Agriculture 2021, 11, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F. Effect of reduced subsequent N supply and organic amendment on soil bacterial community in a wheat-maize rotation system with over-fertilization. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 181, 104659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, T.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Liu, K. Cropping systems in agriculture and their impact on soil health—A review. Glob. Ecol. Cons. 2020, 23, e01118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dhakal, D.; Islam, M.A. Grass-Legume mixtures for improved soil health in cultivated agroecosystem. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fox, A.; Lüscher, A.; Widmer, F. Plant species identity drives soil microbial community structures that persist under a following crop. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 8652–8668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stefan, L.; Hartmann, M.; Engbersen, N.; Six, J.; Schöb, C. Positive effects of crop diversity on productivity driven by changes in soil microbial composition. Front. Microb. 2021, 12, 660749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Turner, T.R.; Ramakrishnan, K.; Walshaw, J.; Heavens, D.; Alston, M.; Swarbreck, D.; Osbourn, A.; Grant, A.; Poole, P.S. Comparative meta-transcriptomics reveals kingdom level changes in the rhizosphere microbiome of plants. ISME J. 2013, 7, 2248–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wen, Z.; Yao, W.; Han, M.; Xu, X.; Wu, F.; Yang, M.; Fazal, A.; Yin, T.; Qi, J.; Lu, G.; et al. Differential assembly of root-associated bacterial and fungal communities of a dual transgenic insect-resistant maize line at different host niches and different growth stages. Front. Microb. 2022, 13, 1023971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hayes, R.C.; Gupta, V.V.S.R.; Li, G.D.; Peoples, M.B.; Rawnsley, R.P.; Pembleton, K.G. Contrasting soil microbial abundance and diversity on and between pasture drill rows in the third growing season after sowing. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2021, 36, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Waring, B.G.; Álvarez-Cansino, L.; Barry, K.E.; Becklund, K.K.; Dale, S.; Gei, M.G.; Keller, A.B.; Lopez, O.R.; Markesteijn, L.; Mangan, S.; et al. Pervasive and strong effects of plants on soil chemistry: A meta-analysis of individual plant ‘Zinke’ effects. Proc. R. Soc. B 2015, 282, 20151001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kwiatkowski, C.A.; Harasim, E. Chemical properties of soil in four-field crop rotations under organic and conventional farming systems. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stagnari, F.; Maggio, A.; Galieni, A.; Pisante, M. Multiple benefits of legumes for agriculture sustainability: An overview. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2017, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wozniak, A. Chemical properties and enzyme activity of soil as affected by tillage system and previous crop. Agriculture 2019, 9, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Satellites.Pro. Available online: https://satellites.pro/Moara_Domneasca_map.Ilfov.Romania# (accessed on 25 August 2023).
  41. Blaga, G.; Paulette, L.; Udrescu, S.; Filipov, F.; Rusu, I.; Dumitru, V. Pedology; Mega: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2008; pp. 346–350. ISBN 978-973-1868-26-4. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  42. STAS 7184/3-77; Soils. Determination of Density and Bulk Density. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2019. (In Romanian)
  43. STAS 7184/5-78; Soils. Determination of Total Porosity and Aeration Porosity. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2019. (In Romanian)
  44. Mihalache, M.; Ilie, L. Pedology-Romania’s Soils; Dominor: Bucharest, Romania, 2008; ISBN 978-973-1838-71-7. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  45. SR 7184-13:2001; Soils. Determination of pH in Aqueous and Saline Suspensions (Mass/Volume) and in Saturated Paste. Romanian Standards Association: Bucharest, Romania, 2001. (In Romanian)
  46. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. De Oliveira, E. Sample preparation for atomic spectroscopy: Evolution and future trends. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2003, 14, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. STAS 7184/19-82; Soils. Determination of Phosphorus. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 1982. (In Romanian)
  49. STAS 7184/2-85; Soils. Determination of Nitrogen Content. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 1985. (In Romanian)
  50. Lăcătușu, R.; Lungu, M.; Rizea, N. Soil Global Chemistry—Processes, Determinations, Interpretation; Terra Nostra: Iași, Romania, 2017; ISBN 978-606-623-074-2. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  51. Desay, C.; Parikh, R.Y.; Vaishnav, T.; Shouche, Y.S.; Madamwar, D. Tracking the influence of long-term chromium pollution on soil bacterial community structures by comparative analyses of 16S rRNA gene phylotypes. Res. Microb. 2009, 160, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Corry, J.E.L.; Curtis, G.D.W.; Baird, R.M. Rose Bengal Chloramphenicol (RBC) Agar. In Progress in Industrial Microbiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; Volume 37, pp. 586–588. ISBN 9780444814982. [Google Scholar]
  53. Johnsen, K.; Nielsen, P. Diversity of Pseudomonas strains isolated with King’s B and Gould’s S1 agar determined by repetitive extragenic palindromic-polymerase chain reaction, 16S rDNA sequencing and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy characterisation. FEMS Microb. Lett. 1999, 173, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dobre, A.; Marin, L.A.; Manole, C.; Andrei, N.; Cornea, C.P. Evaluation of the capacity of different microorganisms to solubilize several compounds of phosphorous and zinc. Sci. Bull. Ser. F. Biotech. 2016, XX, 254–262. [Google Scholar]
  55. Agrawal, T.; Kotasthane, A.S. Chitinolytic assay of indigenous Trichoderma isolates collected from different geographical locations of Chhattisgarh in Central India. SpringerPlus 2012, 1, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sicuia, O.A.; Grosu, I.; Constantinescu, F.; Voaideş, C.; Cornea, P.C. Enzymatic and genetic variability in Bacillus spp. strains with plant-beneficial qualities. AgroLife Sci. J. 2015, IV, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Boiu-Sicuia, O.A.; Toma, R.C.; Diguță, F.C.; Matei, F.; Cornea, C.P. In vitro evaluation of some endophytic Bacillus to potentially inhibit grapes and grapevine fungal pathogens. Plants 2023, 12, 2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hahn, N.J. The Congo red reaction in bacteria and its usefulness in the identification of rhizobia. Can. J. Microb. 1966, 12, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Soares, R.; Trejo, J.; Lorite, M.J.; Figueira, E.; Sanjuán, J.; Videira e Castro, I. Diversity, phylogeny and plant growth promotion traits of nodule associated bacteria isolated from Lotus parviflorus. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Somasegaran, P.; Hoben, H.J. Handbook for Rhizobia: Methods in Legume-Rhizobium Technology; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1994; ISBN 0-387-94134-7. [Google Scholar]
  61. Boiu-Sicuia, O.A.; Stan, V.; Cornea, C.P. The compost, a source of plant beneficial bacteria with biocontrol potential. Curr. Trends Nat. Sci. 2021, 10, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. EN ISO 10390:2022; Soil, Treated Biowaste and Sludge—Determination of pH. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2022. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/35c1e689-fbc3-4bd2-a9e7-7162f61ae30b/en-iso-10390-2022 (accessed on 18 October 2023).
  63. Compact Dry—An Easy Test Method for Counting Microorganisms. Available online: https://www.laensenadacorp.com/documentos/r-biopharm-COMPACT-DRY.pdf (accessed on 18 October 2023).
  64. EN ISO 6579-1:2017; Microbiology of the Food Chain—Horizontal Method for the Detection, Enumeration and Serotyping of Salmonella-Part1: Detection of Salmonella spp. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. Available online: https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/76671/2e4fa9e44397450c83ba47e356c3dfe5/ISO-6579-1-2017-Amd-1-2020.pdf (accessed on 21 October 2023).
  65. Fernández, R.M.; Gómez, J.M.; Estrada, I.B. Compost legislation: Sanitization vs. Biological Quality. In Proceedings of the I International Conference Soil and Compost Eco-Biology, León, Spain, 15–17 September 2004. [Google Scholar]
  66. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). Guidelines for Compost Quality; CCME: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2005; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  67. Blaga, G.; Rusu, I.; Udrescu, S.; Vasile, D. Pedology; Academic Press: Bucharest, Romania, 2005; ISBN 973-744-004-8. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  68. Tesfahunegn, G.B.; Tamen, L.; Vlek, P.L.G. Evaluation of soil quality identified by local farmers in Mai-Negus catchment, northern Ethiopia. Geoderma 2011, 163, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, J.J.; Gao, H.J.; Zhu, P.; Gao, Q.; Wang, L.C. Effects of long-term fertilization and cropping regimes on total nitrogen and organic nitrogen forms in a Mollisol of Northeast China. Plant Soil Environ. 2014, 60, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, Z.; Rong, Q.; Zhou, W.; Liang, G. Effects of inorganic and organic amendment on soil chemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial community and soil quality in yellow clayey soil. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Deru, J.G.C.; Bloem, J.; de Goede, R.; Brussaard, L.; van Eekeren, N. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil properties related to the regeneration of ecosystem services in peat grasslands. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 187, 104838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zeng, M.; De Vries, W.; Bonten, L.T.C.; Zhu, Q.; Hao, T.; Liu, X.; Xu, M.; Shi, X.; Zhang, F.; Shen, J. Model-Based Analysis of the Long-Term Effects of Fertilization Management on Cropland Soil Acidification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 3843–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lemaire, G.; Tang, L.; Bélanger, G.; Zhu, Y.; Jeuffroy, M.H. Forward new paradigms for crop mineral nutrition and fertilization towards sustainable agriculture. Eur. J. Agron. 2021, 125, 126248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kumar, V.; Ghosh, B.C.; Bhat, R. Complementary effect of crop wastes and inorganic fertilizers on yield, nutrient uptake and residual fertility in mustard (Brassica juncea)-rice (Oryza sativa) cropping sequence. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 2000, 70, 69–72. [Google Scholar]
  75. Rocci, K.S.; Lavallee, J.M.; Stewart, C.E.; Cotrufo, M.F. Soil organic carbon response to global environmental change depends on its distribution between mineral-associated and particulate organic matter: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 793, 148569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Mi, W.; Sun, Y.; Gao, Q.; Liu, M.; Wu, L. Changes in humus carbon fractions in paddy soil given different organic amendments and mineral fertilizers. Soil Till. Res. 2019, 195, 104421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Angelova, V.R.; Akova, V.I.; Artinova, N.S.; Ivanov, K.I. The effect of organic amendments on soil chemical characteristics. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 19, 958–971. [Google Scholar]
  78. Li, S.; Li, J.; Li, G.; Li, Y.; Yuan, J.; Li, D. Effect of different organic fertilizers application on soil organic matter properties. Comp. Sci. Utiliz. 2017, 25, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rosa, E.; Debska, B. Seasonal changes in the content of dissolved organic matter in arable soils. J. Soils Sediments 2018, 18, 2703–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Deng, L.; Peng, C.; Kim, D.L.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Hai, X.; Liu, Q.; Huang, C.; Shangguan, Z.; Kuzyakov, Y. Drought effects on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in global natural ecosystems. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2021, 214, 103501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Taylor, A.A.; De-Felice, J.; Havill, D.C. Seasonal variation in nitrogen availability and utilization in an acidic and calcareous soil. New Phytol. 1982, 92, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kravchenko, Y.; Yarosh, A.; Chen, Y. Profile Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Typical Chernozem under Long-Term Tillage Use. Land 2022, 11, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Paz-Ferreiro, J.; Mendez, A.; Gascó, G.; Guo, M.; He, Z.; Uchimya, S.M. Application of Biochar for Soil Biological Improvement. In Agricultural and Environmental Applications of Biochar: Advances and Barriers; Guo, M., He, Z., Uchimiya, S.M., Eds.; Soil Science Society of America, Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  84. He, J.; He, Y.; Gao, W.; Chen, Y.; Ma, G.; Ji, R.; Liu, X. Soil depth and agricultural irrigation activities drive variation in microbial abundance and nitrogen cycling. Catena 2022, 219, 106596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ma, W.; Yang, Z.; Liang, L.; Ma, Q.; Wang, G.; Zhao, T. Seasonal changes in soil microbial community and co-occurrence network of species of the genus Corylus. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Verdenelli, R.A.; Dominchin, M.F.; Pérez-Brandan, C.; Rovea, A.; Vargas-Gil, S.; Meriles, J.M. Effect of long-term mineral fertilization on soil microbial abundance, community structure and diversity in a Typic Hapludoll under intensive farming systems. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2019, 175, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Geisseler, D.; Scow, K.M. Long-term effects of mineral fertilizers on soil microorganisms- A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 75, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lazcano, C.; Gómez-Brandón, M.; Revilla, P.; Domínguez, J. Short-term effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil microbial community structure and function. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2013, 49, 723–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Helepciuc, F.E.; Mitoi, E.M.; Brezeanu, A.; Cornea, C.P. Root colonization capacity by plant beneficial bacteria. AgroLife Sci. J. 2019, 8, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
  90. Yu, K.; van den Hoogen, J.; Wang, Z.; Averill, C.; Routh, D.; Smith, G.R.; Drenovsky, R.E.; Scow, K.M.; Mo, F.; Waldrop, M.P.; et al. The biogeography of relative abundance of soil fungi versus bacteria in surface topsoil. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2022, 14, 4339–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ling, N.; Chen, D.; Guo, H.; Wei, J.; Bai, Y.; Shen, Q.; Hu, S. Differential responses of soil bacterial communities to long-term N and P inputs in a semi-arid steppe. Geoderma 2017, 292, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Liu, Z.; Xie, W.; Yang, Z.; Huang, X.; Zhou, H. Effects of manure and chemical fertilizer on bacterial community structure and soil enzyme activities in North China. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Calderon, R.B.; Jeong, C.; Ku, H.-H.; Coghill, L.M.; Ju, Y.J.; Kim, N.; Ham, J.H. Changes in the microbial community in soybean plots treated with biochar and poultry litter. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lourenço, K.S.; Suleiman, A.K.A.; Pijl, A.; Cantarella, H.; Kuramae, E.E. Dynamics and resilience of soil mycobiome under multiple organic and inorganic pulse disturbances. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 733, 139173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Enebe, M.C.; Babalola, O.O. Effects of inorganic and organic treatments on the microbial community of maize rhizosphere by a shotgun metagenomics approach. Ann. Microb. 2020, 70, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Guo, Z.; Wan, S.; Hua, K.; Yin, Y.; Chu, H.Y.; Wang, D.; Guo, X. Fertilization regime has a greater effect on soil microbial community structure than crop rotation and growth stage in an agroecosystem. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 149, 103510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ai, C.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Guo, D.; Zhou, W.; Huang, S. Distinct responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to changes in fertilization regime and crop rotation. Geoderma 2018, 319, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Liang, R.; Hou, R.; Li, J.; Lyu, Y.; Hang, S.; Gong, H.; Ouyang, Z. Effects of different fertilizers on rhizosphere bacterial communities of winter wheat in the North China Plain. Agronomy 2020, 10, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Petatán-Sagahón, I.; Anducho-Reyes, M.A.; Silva-Rojas, H.V.; Arana-Cuenca, A.; Tellez-Jurado, A.; Cárdenas-Álvarez, I.O.; Mercado-Flores, Y. Isolation of bacteria with antifungal activity against the phytopathogenic fungi Stenocarpella maydis and Stenocarpella macrospora. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 5522–5537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Semenov, M.V.; Krasnov, G.S.; Semenov, V.M.; van Bruggen, A. Mineral and Organic Fertilizers Distinctly Affect Fungal Communities in the Crop Rhizosphere. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhao, X.; Hou, D.; Xu, J.; Wang, K.; Hu, Z. Antagonistic Activity of Fungal Strains against Fusarium Crown Rot. Plants 2022, 11, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Shahane, A.A.; Shivay, Y.S. Soil health and its improvement through novel agronomic and innovative approaches. Front. Agron. 2021, 3, 680456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Dincă, L.C.; Grenni, P.; Onet, C.; Onet, A. Fertilization and Soil Microbial Community: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Spatial map of the Experimental Field from Research and Development Station for Agronomy (RDSA) of Moara Domnească [40].
Figure 1. Spatial map of the Experimental Field from Research and Development Station for Agronomy (RDSA) of Moara Domnească [40].
Agronomy 13 02837 g001
Figure 2. Moara Domnească soil horizons at a 0–220 cm depth.
Figure 2. Moara Domnească soil horizons at a 0–220 cm depth.
Agronomy 13 02837 g002
Figure 3. Different doses of manure compost applied in Moara Domnească experimental plots in the autumn of 2021.
Figure 3. Different doses of manure compost applied in Moara Domnească experimental plots in the autumn of 2021.
Agronomy 13 02837 g003
Figure 4. (a–d). Antifungal efficiency of soil microorganisms from (a) winter wheat, (b) mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, (c) soybean, and (d) maize under different fertilization treatments. Errors bars represent the standard error.
Figure 4. (a–d). Antifungal efficiency of soil microorganisms from (a) winter wheat, (b) mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, (c) soybean, and (d) maize under different fertilization treatments. Errors bars represent the standard error.
Agronomy 13 02837 g004
Figure 5. (A,B). Inhibitory effect of soil microorganisms from (A) a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes and (B) winter wheat plots against Sclerotium bataticola.
Figure 5. (A,B). Inhibitory effect of soil microorganisms from (A) a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes and (B) winter wheat plots against Sclerotium bataticola.
Agronomy 13 02837 g005
Table 1. Treatment variants and mineral fertilizers fractions applied to crops during the 2021–2022 vegetation period.
Table 1. Treatment variants and mineral fertilizers fractions applied to crops during the 2021–2022 vegetation period.
TreatmentMixture of Perennial Grasses and Legumes Winter Wheat MaizeSoybean
Doses of Fertilizers
Fraction (kg/ha)Fraction (kg/ha)Fraction (kg/ha)Fraction (kg/ha)
1212123123
BBCH stages for different fertilizer dose applications *
22292731001316001219
V1—soil (Control)----------
V2—NPK40 N; 40 P2O5;
0 K2O
40 N; 40 P2O5; 0 K2O57 N; 57 P2O5; 0 K2O40 N;40 P2O5; 0 K2O28 N; 28 P2O5 0 K2O46 N; 46 P2O5; 0 K2O29 N; 29 P2O5; 0 K2O18 N; 18 P2O5 0 K2O20 N; 20 P2O5; 0 K2O13 N; 13 P2O5; 0 K2O
V3—15 t/ha MC----------
V4—15 t/ha MC + NPK29 N; 29 P2O5; 0 K2O29 N; 29 P2O5; 0 K2O42 N; 42 P2O5; 0 K2O21 N; 21 P2O5; 0 K2O29 N; 29 P2O5 0 K2O34 N; 34 P2O5; 0 K2O21 N; 21 P2O5; 0 K2O16 N; 16 P2O5; 0 K2O18 N; 18 P2O5; 0 K2O11 N;
11 P2O5 0 K2O
V5—30 t/ha MC----------
V6—30 t/ha MC + NPK18 N; 18 P2O5; 0 K2O18N; 18 P2O5; 0 K2O27 N; 27P2O5; 0 K2O13 N; 13 P2O5; 0 K2O19 N; 19P2O5; 0 K2O22 N; 22 P2O5; 0 K2O14 N;14 P2O5; 0 K2O13 N;13 P2O5; 0 K2O15 N 15 P2O5; 0 K2O9 N; 9 P2O5; 0 K2O
V7—60 t/ha MC----------
V8—60 t/ha MC + NPKAccording to dose calculation, in V8, for the mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, winter wheat, and maize, the amount of MC should have ensured the nutrient requirements (NPK) and it was decided not to supplement it with chemical fertilizers8 N; 8 P2O5; 0 K2O10 N 10 P2O5 0 K2O6 N; 6 P2O5; 0 K2O
Abbreviations: Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt, and Chemical Industry (BBCH); chemical fertilizers only (NPK); manure compost (MC); nitrogen (N); phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5); potassium oxide (K2O). * in the mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, there were considered the BBCH stages for the perennial grasses.
Table 2. Chemical characteristics of manure compost used in all experiments (October 2021).
Table 2. Chemical characteristics of manure compost used in all experiments (October 2021).
Manure Compost Chemical PropertiesMeasurement UnitMean Value ± SD
pH-8.00 ± 0.097
Corg%21.58 ± 0.359
Nt%1.76 ± 0.030
C: N Ratio-12.26 ± 0.190
N-NO3mg/kg d.m.431.5 ± 206.7
N-NH4mg/kg d.m.763.5 ± 158.5
Pt%0.603 ± 0.019
Kt%2.575 ± 0.148
Abbreviations: standard deviation (SD); organic carbon (Corg); total nitrogen (Nt); carbon:nitrogen ratio (C:N); nitrate nitrogen (N-NO3); ammonia (N-NH4); total phosphorus (Pt); total potassium (Kt); milligrams (mg); dry matter (d.m.).
Table 3. Microbial composition and load in the manure compost before application on the experimental field (October 2021).
Table 3. Microbial composition and load in the manure compost before application on the experimental field (October 2021).
Microbial CompositionMeasurement Unit Average Microbial Load
EnterobacteriaceaeCFU/mL11 × 103
Escherichia coli and coliformsCFU/mL8.37 × 103
SalmonellaCFU/mL nd
Cultivable bacteriaCFU/g soil4.25 × 108
FungiCFU/g soil9.14 × 104
Fluorescent Pseudomonads CFU/g soil3.53 × 107
Microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus CFU/g soil2.12 × 107
Cellulolytic microorganisms CFU/g soil6.22 × 107
Proteolytic microorganisms CFU/g soil4.18 × 107
Abbreviations: colony-forming units (CFU); not detected (nd).
Table 4. Antifungal efficiency of the microbial communities in the manure compost samples.
Table 4. Antifungal efficiency of the microbial communities in the manure compost samples.
Phytopathogenic FungusMeasurement Unit Antifungal Efficacy (E)
(Mean Values)
Fusarium graminearum%79.98 ± 6.89
Fusarium culmorum%83.32 ± 9.36
Sclerotium bataticola%79.76 ± 4.46
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum%73.58 ± 4.02
Table 5. Chemical properties of soil before starting the experiment (October 2021).
Table 5. Chemical properties of soil before starting the experiment (October 2021).
Soil Chemical PropertiesMeasurement UnitValue ± SD
pH-5.89 ± 0.176
Corg%1.94 ± 0.113
Humus %3.34 ± 0.196
Nt%0.20 ± 0.012
N-NO3mg/kg d.m.11.85 ± 4.80
N-NH4mg/kg d.m.12.14 ± 3.60
Available P mg/kg d.m65.50 ± 13.60
Available K mg/kg d.m231.70 ± 30.20
Abbreviations: standard deviation (SD); organic carbon (Corg); total nitrogen (Nt); nitrate nitrogen (N-NO3); ammonia (N-NH4); milligrams (mg); dry matter (d.m.).
Table 6. Soil chemical properties in the spring (March 2022).
Table 6. Soil chemical properties in the spring (March 2022).
Soil Chemical PropertiesMeasurement UnitMean Values ± SD
pH-5.89 ± 0.148
Corg%2.11 ± 0.078
Humus %3.65 ± 0.135
Nt%0.17 ± 0.006
Abbreviations: standard deviation (SD); organic carbon (Corg); total nitrogen (Nt).
Table 7. Initial microbial load and the component of microbial communities of Moara Domnească red preluvosoil.
Table 7. Initial microbial load and the component of microbial communities of Moara Domnească red preluvosoil.
Microbial CompositionMeasurement Unit Average Microbial Load
Cultivable bacteriaCFU/g soil3.7 × 107
FungiCFU/g soil2.0 × 105
Fluorescent pseudomonadsCFU/g soil6.5 × 106
Microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus CFU/g soil4.0 × 106
Chitinolytic microorganisms CFU/g soil7.5 × 106
Cellulolytic microorganisms CFU/g soil4.5 × 106
Proteolytic microorganisms CFU/g soil8.0 × 106
Rhizobia CFU/g soil1.3 × 106
Abbreviations: colony-forming units (CFU).
Table 8. Microbial composition and abundance in soil cultivated with winter wheat, a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, soybean, and maize under different fertilization treatments in autumn (October 2022).
Table 8. Microbial composition and abundance in soil cultivated with winter wheat, a mixture of perennial grasses and legumes, soybean, and maize under different fertilization treatments in autumn (October 2022).
Microbial CompositionV1—ControlV2—NPKV3—15 t/ha MCV4—15 t/ha MC + NPKV5—30 t/ha MCV6—30 t/ha MC + NPKV7—60 t/ha MCV8—60 t/ha MC + NPK
Mixture of perennial grasses and legumes experiment
Fungi
(CFU/g)
4.9 × 1053.5 × 1055.3 × 1057.4 × 1053.4 × 1054.2 × 1051.8 × 1055.1 × 105
Cultivable bacteria (CFU/g)4.0 × 1074.5 × 1077.5 × 1074.0 × 1075.0 × 1075.5 × 1072.0 × 1074.5 × 107
Fluorescent pseudomonads (CFU/g)≤103≤103≤103≤103≤103≤103≤103≤103
Microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus (CFU/g)3.5 × 1063.5 × 1065.5 × 1067.5 × 1064.5 × 1065.0 × 1063.0 × 1065.5 × 106
Chitinolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)2.5 × 1069.5 × 1068.5 × 1064.0 × 1063.0 × 1064.5 × 1063.0 × 1065.5 × 106
Cellulolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)1.8 × 1072.4 × 1071.6 × 1072.3 × 1071.0 × 1071.6 × 1071.0 × 1071.0 × 106
Proteolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)8.0 × 1063.0 × 1071.6 × 1071.0 × 1071.0 × 1071.5 × 1077.0 × 1061.2 × 107
Rhizobia (CFU/g soil)3.1 × 1062.8 × 1063.9 × 1063.7 × 1061.6 × 1062.0 × 1062.2 × 1063.9 × 106
Winter wheat experiment
Fungi (CFU/g)2.2 × 1051.1 × 1051.6 × 1051.4 × 1052.9 × 1051.9 × 1051.6 × 1052.4 × 105
Cultivable bacteria (CFU/g)3.5 × 1073.0 × 1071.0 × 1074.0 × 1074.0 × 1075.5 × 1072.5 × 1071.5 × 107
Fluorescent pseudomonades (CFU/g)1 × 103≤1031 × 103≤1031 × 103≤1031 × 103≤103
Microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus (CFU/g)9.5 × 1051.5 × 1069.0 × 1051.0 × 1063.5 × 1068.0 × 1062.0 × 1061.0 × 106
Chitinolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)8.3 × 1052.0 × 1056.0 × 1051.0 × 1059.5 × 1059.5 × 1051.0 × 1061.0 × 106
Cellulolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)6.5 × 1065.0 × 1066.5 × 1066.0 × 1067.0 × 1069.5 × 1068.0 × 1067.5 × 106
Proteolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)1.0 × 1067.0 × 1062.0 × 106<1066.0 × 1061.1 × 1067.5 × 1064.0 × 106
Rhizobia (CFU/g soil)3.6 × 1063.4 × 1062.3 × 1063.4 × 1062.9 × 1064.0 × 1063.6 × 1062.7 × 106
Soybean experiment
Fungi (CFU/g)2.9 × 1052.1 × 1050.9 × 1050.8 × 1050.8 × 1050.7 × 1050.9 × 1050.9 × 105
Cultivable bacteria (CFU/g)2.5 × 1072.0 × 1072.0 × 1071.5 × 1073.0 × 1073.0 × 1073.5 × 1072.5 × 107
Fluorescent pseudomonades (CFU/g)1 × 103≤1031 × 104≤104≤104≤103≤104≤103
Microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus (CFU/g)2.5 × 1061.5 × 1061.0 × 1060.3 × 1061.0 × 1060.5 × 1061.0 × 1061.0 × 106
Chitinolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)5.0 × 1051.3 × 1061.0 × 1065.0 × 1053.0 × 1051.0 × 1066.0 × 1051.0 × 106
Cellulolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)6.0 × 1065.5 × 1065.5 × 1064.0 × 1064.5 × 1066.5 × 1064.5 × 1062.0 × 106
Proteolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)9.0 × 1065.0 × 1069.5 × 1062.0 × 1066.0 × 1066.5 × 1064.0 × 1061.0 × 106
Rhizobia (CFU/g soil)4.6 × 1062.7 × 1062.6 × 1061.6 × 1063.8 × 1061.5 × 1061.2 × 1062.8 × 106
Maize experiment
Fungi (CFU/g)4.6 × 1053.1 × 1053.3 × 1055.2 × 1053.8 × 1054.4 × 1054.7 × 1054.2 × 105
Cultivable bacteria (CFU/g)6.0 × 1074.5 × 1073.0 × 1073.5 × 1077.0 × 1073.5 × 1077.0 × 1074.5 × 107
Fluorescent pseudomonads (CFU/g)≤103≤103≤103≤103≤103≤103≤103≤103
Microorganisms that solubilize inorganic phosphorus (CFU/g)5.0 × 1063.5 × 1064.5 × 1064.0 × 1067.0 × 1065.0 × 1066.0 × 1064.0 × 106
Chitinolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)4.0 × 1065.0 × 1064.5 × 1062.5 × 1064.3 × 1064.0 × 1062.5 × 1063.0 × 106
Cellulolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)2.0 × 1072.0 × 1072.0 × 1071 × 1071.1 × 1071.3 × 1074.3 × 1071.1 × 107
Proteolytic microorganisms (CFU/g)7.0 × 1067.5 × 1067.0 × 1067.5 × 1068.0 × 1061.5 × 1071.5 × 1078.0 × 106
Rhizobia (CFU/g soil)2.2 × 1061.5 × 1061.1 × 1062.0 × 1061.4 × 1061.0 × 1062.9 × 1061.1 × 106
Abbreviations: colony-forming units (CFU); manure compost (MC); NPK only (NPK).
Table 9. Antifungal efficacy of the microbial communities in the initial soil samples.
Table 9. Antifungal efficacy of the microbial communities in the initial soil samples.
Phytopathogenic FungusMeasurement Unit Antifungal Efficacy of Microorganisms (E)
(Mean Values)
Fusarium graminearum%82.22 ± 9.55
Fusarium culmorum%80.12 ± 9.28
Sclerotium bataticola%80.50 ± 6.35
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum%73.95 ± 4.99
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dușa, E.M.; Stan, V.; Vrînceanu, N.; Mihalache, M.; Vasile, M.; Sicuia, O.; Voaideș, C. Soil Chemical Properties and Microbial Behavior under Short-Term Organic and Mineral Fertilization within Different Crops. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2837. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112837

AMA Style

Dușa EM, Stan V, Vrînceanu N, Mihalache M, Vasile M, Sicuia O, Voaideș C. Soil Chemical Properties and Microbial Behavior under Short-Term Organic and Mineral Fertilization within Different Crops. Agronomy. 2023; 13(11):2837. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112837

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dușa, Elena Mirela, Vasilica Stan, Nicoleta Vrînceanu, Mircea Mihalache, Mihaela Vasile, Oana Sicuia, and Cătălina Voaideș. 2023. "Soil Chemical Properties and Microbial Behavior under Short-Term Organic and Mineral Fertilization within Different Crops" Agronomy 13, no. 11: 2837. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112837

APA Style

Dușa, E. M., Stan, V., Vrînceanu, N., Mihalache, M., Vasile, M., Sicuia, O., & Voaideș, C. (2023). Soil Chemical Properties and Microbial Behavior under Short-Term Organic and Mineral Fertilization within Different Crops. Agronomy, 13(11), 2837. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112837

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop