Next Article in Journal
Preliminary Studies on How to Reduce the Effects of Salinity
Next Article in Special Issue
Imidacloprid Disturbs the Nitrogen Metabolism and Triggers an Overall Stress Response in Maize Seedlings
Previous Article in Journal
Climate Change and Its Impact on Crops: A Comprehensive Investigation for Sustainable Agriculture
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research Progress in Leaf Related Molecular Breeding of Cucurbitaceae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in the Agro-Environment Migration of Organic Chemical Pollutants and Their Biotransformation in Crops

1
College of Food Science and Light Industry, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
2
Horticultural Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China
3
College of Horticulture Science, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2022, 12(12), 3009; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123009
Submission received: 1 November 2022 / Revised: 26 November 2022 / Accepted: 27 November 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breeding Innovations in Crop for Resilient Cropping Systems)

Abstract

:
Global production, consumption and emission of various chemicals continue to rise, despite growing evidence of their harmful effects on environmental quality, food safety and human health. Agronomy, a nature-dependent industry, is considered to be extremely sensitive to chemical pollution. Hence, it is of great importance for food safety and human health to study the migration and biotransformation of chemical pollutants among agricultural elements, such as soil, water and crops. Thus, this review focused on typical organic pollutants (TOPs) in the agro-environment, such as pesticides, antibiotics and persistent organic pollutants (POPs), firstly describing their sources and the current state. Then, we further elucidated the mechanism and influence factors of the TOP-based uptake, translocation and biotransformation of TOPs in crops, including the apoplastic and symplastic pathway, enzyme-assisted nontarget resistance and the physicochemical properties of different TOPs. In addition, future insight into the identification of detoxified genes and lower-toxic metabolism of TOPs was presented in this review, which provides valuable information for breeding agro-products with lower chemical contaminants. In a nutshell, our review discussed comprehensive research progress on TOPs’ fates and offered theoretical guidance for pollution control and ecological risk assessment in agroecosystems.

1. Introduction

Agricultural products, including cereals, fruits and vegetables, are an indispensable part of daily life [1]. China is a great agricultural country that accounts for 7% of the farmland, yields 5.5% of the food resource, and feeds 20% of the population around the globe [2]. Hence, the security of agriculture in China is the top priority. However, the contradiction between the pursuit of more industrial benefits and environmental pollution is a critical threat to agricultural production. In particular, the increasing appearances of chemical contaminants, such as pesticides, antibiotics and persistent organic pollutants (POPs), have an adverse effect on crop growth. Subsequently, the residues accumulating in the edible parts of crops could be harmful to organisms in the food chain [1].
Agrochemicals are the most widely used chemicals in the world, and their consecutive input into farmland caused many environmental problems [3]. For instance, the detection profiles of Shandong province showed that the maximum residue of omethoate in wheat grain reached 2.1028 kg−1, nearly 10 times than the maximum residue limit (MRL = 0.02 kg−1) of national standards in China (GB/T 2763-2021), causing serious crop contamination [4]. The issue of excessive residues of pesticides in exported vegetables has frequently happened because of different standards for MRL around the globe. For example, the MRL of pesticide malathion in beans is 2 kg−1 in China, which is stricter than in the United States of America (8 kg−1). Furthermore, the MRLs of fungicide thiamethoxam in mushrooms are 5 kg−1 in China, 40 kg−1 in the United States, 10 kg−1 in Europe and 60 mg kg−1 in Japan, respectively [5]. Thus, the most effective way to avoid the pesticide-based trade boundary is the decrease pesticide residue in agriculture products as much as possible. Except for pesticide residues, other contaminants from surrounding media could be taken up by crops and accumulated in vivo. Recently, POPs are a matter of concern due to their high toxicity and tendency to accumulate in food chains [6]. More seriously, POPs are organic chemicals that can persist in the environment for a longer period due to their nonbiodegradability [6]. In Nanjing, 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) belonging to the POP family were detected in nine common vegetables. In particular, the accumulation contents of benzo(a)anthracene (BaA), chrysene (CHR), benzo(b)fluoranthene (BbF) and benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) at 60.5–312 ng g−1 significantly exceeded the MRL of 12 ng g−1 based on the standard (Commission Regulation (EC) number 1881/2006 amended by Commission Regulation (EU) number 835/2011) [7,8,9]. In addition, the residue concentrations of these PAHs in different species were ranked as leafy vegetables > fruit vegetables > root vegetables [7]. Li et al. [10] found that phenanthrene (PHE) residues (44.3 μg kg−1) were observed at the highest level in vegetables and Benzo(g, hi)perylene (Bghip) residues were at the highest level in the edible part of maize (35.7 μg kg−1) and wheat (157.7 μg kg−1), such as corn and grain, which indicated that different PAHs have their individual or unique pathways in different crop species or tissues [11]. More recently, veterinary antibiotics are intensively and widely used in animal farming as a result of their high residues in animal manure, which, as an important agricultural fertilizer, becomes a predominant reservoir of veterinary antibiotics in agroecosystems [12]. According to the profiles from Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety [13], 30.5 μg kg−1 of enrofloxacin, 120.0 μg kg−1 of ciprofloxacin and 33.9 μg kg−1 of norfloxacin were detected in bean sprouts. Moreover, the adsorption of veterinary antibiotics in crops could have a toxic effect on growth and cause oxidative stress [14,15,16].
The above-mentioned evidence has clarified an urgent fact that TOP residues are widespread in agriculture and food environments and have been undergoing various biotransportation and biotransformation in organisms to produce plenty of derivatives and metabolites, which pose a serious threat to human health and environmental safety [17,18,19]. Hence, the analysis of the migration, transformation, and degradation mechanisms of chemical contaminants from agricultural sources is critical to the risk assessment and prevention of chemical contaminants [3,20,21,22].

2. The Main TOPs Existing in Agroecosystems

2.1. Types of TOPs

Agro-environmental pollutants are currently categorized into agrochemicals, antibiotics and POPs (Figure 1) [23]. Agrochemicals are classified into organic and inorganic pesticides [24,25]. Organic pesticides are well-known to be used as insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, rodenticides, molluscicides and nematicides [26]. The updated additions are pyrethrins and neonicotinoids. Inorganic pesticides include copper sulfate, ferrous sulfate, copper, lime and sulfur. Since dealers misuse pesticides out of standards with backward techniques, only nearly 30% of pesticides applied can be attached to crops, and the remaining 70% losses in the surrounding area, such as soil, water or atmosphere, lead to an unexpected bioavailability [27]. Furthermore, the ongoing need for pesticides contributes to the serious environmental risk regarding pesticide residues [28]. The profiles of each class of pesticide show that herbicides dominate the biggest market (more than 26%) in China [29]. Not surprisingly, herbicide residues have become the largest source of organic pollution in the agricultural environment. According to the mode of action (MOA), herbicides are classified into two types: systemic conductive and thixotropic compounds [30,31]. Systemic conductive herbicides (SCH) could be absorbed and conducted to all plant tissues for harmful microbes, pests or weed control; however, the adsorbed and accumulated SCHs are more potential to damage nontarget plants, such as crops. Thixotropic herbicides usually have high toxicity, and their overuse usually causes adverse effects on nontarget organisms, including crops and human beings [32]. For instance, atrazine, a broad-spectrum triazine herbicide, could be taken up by crops and distributed quickly to shoots and leaves, which leads to high accumulation in the water environment, soil, fruits and vegetables [33,34]. Its environmental residues have aroused the concern of the Food Safety Committee in many countries [35]. Paraquat is a widely used thixotropic herbicide with high hydrophilicity and poor translocation in plants, which has been demonstrated in the role of fatal toxicity in the human lung [36]. With respect to antibiotics, the loss of large amounts of antibiotics and their degradation products into the soil environment, such as through animal excreta, livestock wastes, human-derived biosolids and irrigation water, is due to insufficient absorption by humans or animals [37]. The types and abundance of antibiotics in agricultural soils vary considerably depending on the land-use management regime and soil type [38]. For example, antibiotic contamination in vegetable, paddy and upland soils varies greatly depending on the fertilization regime [39]. High residue concentrations of several antibiotics were found in agricultural soils, such as beta-lactam (5.89 mg kg−1), fluoroquinolones (2.09 mg kg−1), sulfonamides (6.92 mg kg−1) and tetracyclines (10.00 mg kg−1) [38,40]. Recently, POPs have been discovered across the globe, including regions where they have never been used. The 1998 Aarhus protocol on persistent organic pollutants (POPs) listed 16 different substances, including 11 pesticides, 2 industrial chemicals and 3 by-products (Figure 1) [41,42,43].

2.2. Environmental Sources

The TOPs in the agro-environment are mainly from illegal abuse and factory emissions (Figure 2). Chemical pesticides can ensure the efficiency of modern agriculture. According to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the global consumption of agrochemicals in 2019 was 4.2 million tons, of which herbicides account for the major share. However, there are differences in the proportion of applications of different agrochemicals across countries, because of their characterization of the cropping pattern, climate, and technology diffusion. For example, herbicides are the major group of agrochemicals consumed in the United States of America, whereas insecticides are the major group in countries such as India, which lead to a difference in major residues in the agro-environment of different regions. Unfortunately, it is known that 3 billion kilograms of pesticides are used annually worldwide, while only 1% are effectively used to control pests and weed damage in target crops [24]. Furthermore, especially in developing economies, unscientific practices in the selection and use of agrochemicals are common (Figure 2) [44,45]. Moreover, the end users mainly rely on guidance from pesticide retailers who are not aware of the suitable dose and desire to increase the volume of pesticide sales. These law-violated actions promote stress and risks to the soil environment [46].
Like pesticides, the large consumption of antibiotics around the globe was estimated to be 225,000 tons in 2020 [47]. Antibiotics are largely associated with anthropogenic activities (e.g., municipal sewage discharge, livestock farming, aquaculture) and inevitably enter the environment after use and excretion (Figure 2). The release of untreated wastewater or the constant input also increases the environmental residue and subsequently exerts ecotoxic effects on aquatic organisms [48]. China is the largest producer and user of antibiotics in the world, with its annual usage accounting for approximately 45% of global consumption, 30–90% of which (about 162,000 tons per year) cannot be metabolized and then enters the soil and water environment [49,50].
POPs are present in the ecosystem for a longer period and can move through the environment over long distances when released from various sources. The major sources of POPs are attributed to anthropogenic activities, such as effluent disposal, agricultural runoff, drainage leakages, urban runoff, landfilling leachate mixing and huge atmospheric deposition (Figure 2). Usage of household insecticides, vector control agents and pest management devices are a few of the various sources of POP contamination, such as chlorine-containing pesticides. The residual % of most organic insecticides present in water sources or land sediments is diagnosed to be much higher in particle concentration in agriculture-based sectors compared to other regions that do not initiate farming activities [51]. Moreover, industrial production, such as metal smelting and waste incineration, is also owing to POP emissions [6]. Such categories of POPs can enter into atmospheric air and extend their availability all around the universe, even in the Arctic/Antarctic continent. Due to their long distance to the atmospheric region of boundary deposition/migration and persistence in the natural environment, the risks of POPs have been highly noticed by the public [51].

2.3. Hazards of Organic Chemical Pollutants on the Agricultural Environment

Global consumption and production of TOPs continue to rise, leading to growing adverse effects on environmental quality and human health. However, the toxicity and severity of the detrimental impacts vary by type of chemical compound [52]. The specific hazards caused by the presence of TOPs in different environments are depicted in Table 1. Concerning pesticide pollution, significant environmental incidents were reported in more than 20% of countries in a global survey on pesticide management in agriculture. Herbicides such as trifluralin and triazines, as well as nicotine insecticides, are said to be detrimental to biodiversity in soil and water, particularly to soil organisms and soil enzyme activity. Recent studies demonstrated that most copper-based fungicides and several herbicides, such as triazines, alachlor, atrazine, paraquat and glyphosate, could significantly alter the symbiotic association of soil microbes with plants, impacting their nutrient-fixing and solubilizing abilities [53]. More seriously, environmental toxicology experiments have shown that some agrochemicals exhibit strong inhibitory effects on the growth of nontarget plants and affect the survival of other animals [48]. Herbicides such as atrazine and isoproturon were found to be accumulated in crops and inhibit seed germination and elongation of the coleoptile [54,55,56]. Residual triazole fungicides in the aquatic environment are highly toxic to both vertebrates and invertebrates [57]. Popular neonicotinoid pesticides not only pollute the water environment but also prevent bees from pollinating [58]. Epidemiological data show that there are approximately 3 million cases of acute poisoning caused by organophosphorus pesticides (OCPs) in the world each year.
Antibiotics used in this agriculture have been associated with a high frequency of resistant bacteria in the soil and livestock tissues such as the gut flora of chickens, swine and other food-producing animals (Table 1). Without appropriate regulation, a huge diverse reservoir of resistant bacteria and resistance genes could facilitate the emergence and spread of resistant pathogens to humans, and even the ongoing transmission of such resistant organisms within the human population. Thus, the use of antibiotics in agriculture is routinely described as a major contributor to the clinical problem of resistant disease in human medicine [59]. In addition, the residue of antibiotics in the farmland has toxic effects on crop growth and development. Tomato was demonstrated to be ultrasensitive to doxycycline [60]. Sulfadimethoxine affects negatively photosynthesis in plants and ofloxacin decreases the protein of plants [61]. Clarithromycin and sulfadiazine can be absorbed by vegetables and remain in the tissue for a long time and can be directly taken in by humans and cause potential risks [62].
The persisting nature of POPs enables them to persist in the biota over a longer duration of time, hence symbolizing a longer-duration exposure hazard and enhancing the risk effect. POPs, such as dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and poly-fluoro chloro compounds (PFCs), are found not only in living organisms such as animals and plants but also in humans, causing endocrine disruption, cardiovascular disease, obesity and diabetes via the alteration of endocrine functions and reproductive systems in humans and wildlife [51]. More recently, some POPs have also been implicated in reduced immunity in infants and children, and the concomitant increase in infection, as well as developmental abnormalities, neurobehavioral impairment and cancer and tumor induction or promotion. For instance, based on the pieces of evidence that polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) can formulate oxygen reactive molecules, lipid peroxidation, alkylating and oxidative DNA components, PCBs are categorized as carcinogenic by the International Cancer Research Agency (IARC) for human beings. Crops, as the first link in human food, are susceptible to the residues of soil POPs, which are carriers of POPs into the human body via the consumption of contaminated rice or meat from livestock raised on contaminated straw (Figure 2) [63]. It was found that high levels of POPs accumulated in edible parts of Cucurbitaceae such as squash, zucchini and cucumber [64]. Edible meat and meat products from China [65], the United States of America [66], Russia [67], Britain [68] and Germany [69] are contaminated by polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and OCPs.
Table 1. Environmental hazards are caused by typical organic chemical pollutants.
Table 1. Environmental hazards are caused by typical organic chemical pollutants.
TOPsSourcesEnvironmental HazardsReference
Pesticide
Direct use, misuse and abuse in agriculture, animal husbandry and fisheries, etc.
Water and soil contamination
Poisoning of terrestrial vegetation and aquatic plants
Nontarget organisms taking various degrees of damage
[57,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78]
Antibiotic
Misuse and abuse in agriculture and aquaculture
Urban, medical and industrial waste pollution, etc.
Soil flora dysbiosis
Drinking water contamination
Poisoning of mammals and aquatic animals and health risks to humans and livestock
[79,80,81,82,83,84]
POPs
Contaminated water
Contaminated animal products, such as milk and meat
Forest and grassland fires, volcanic eruptions
Combustion processes such as automobile exhaust and industrial production, etc.
Persisting in the environment and polluting the water environment
Cause of animal deaths and human diseases
Contaminated soil that prevents the growth of crop vegetation
[85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93]

3. Transport Behavior of Organic Chemical Pollutants in the Agricultural Environment

Different TOPs, due to their different sources and application methods, will inevitably lead to differences in their transport behavior and influencing factors in agroecosystems. In this review, the environmental-to-crop transport behavior of different organic pollutants and their influencing factors are presented according to their sources and application scenarios (Figure 3A). In general, the dissipation or migration of TOPs is affected by processes such as photolysis, volatilization, plant uptake and runoff/leaching as a result of prevailing soil and environmental conditions.
For agrochemicals, the predominant application habits are foliar spraying and soil mixing. Except for the part absorbed by plants, a majority of pesticides remain in the pedosphere. Hence, agrochemical dissipation in soils is critical to understanding their potential movement offsite. It has long been recognized that a pesticide that will sorb to soils is governed by plenty of complex interactions relating to the chemical properties and the composition of the soil, including particle size, cation-exchange capacity, soil organic carbon (composition and concentration), clay mineralogy, temperature and moisture content [94]. The faster dissipation rates are usually in soil environments with higher temperature, moisture and organic carbon contents, possibly due to stronger microbial activity in such soils [95,96]. Moreover, biopores (negative relationship with soil particle size) can lead to preferential flow and facilitate the leaching of pesticides into groundwater, which is an important loss pathway of relatively polar pesticides such as diuron, metribuzin, simazine, atrazine, tebuthiuron and hexazinone [97]. The current study reported that the levels of pesticides in soil pore water and plant uptake are in positive correlation with the uptake of plants. The pH of soil pore water affects the dissociation of pesticides, especially ionizable pesticides, and subsequently alters their accumulation in plants [64].
The slow degradation of antibiotics in organisms and the constant input of untreated sewage wastewater and animal manure fertilization into aquatic environments result in persistent behavior and subject organisms to long-term exposure [98,99,100]. Sediments, serving as habitats for plants and animals, are the natural repositories for various chemical residues in the waters. Meanwhile, they can act as a source to release the sorbed contaminants into the water when their hydraulic conditions and aquatic physicochemical properties such as pH, organic carbon, and metal ions are changed [101]. The released antibiotics from water are absorbed by crop plants through irrigation. A recent report found that the concentration of antibiotics in farm water is 1–6 mg L−1, which is much higher than that in the aquatic environment [102]. In sediments, important factors controlling antibiotics’ behavior might include logKOW. Chen et al. reported that the distribution coefficient (Kd) is an important factor controlling antibiotics’ behavior instead of KOW. Ternes et al. found that antibiotics with log Kd of 2.7 or lower, such as fluoroquinolones, were demonstrated to have a low sorption potential on the solid phase [103]. In soil environments, the ionic strength of antibiotic contaminations affects their migration ability. Generally speaking, weakly acidic, weakly alkaline and lipophilic classes of antibiotics showed an easy binding with the soil particles and are tougher to transport to other environments.
Unlike agrochemicals and antibiotics, and besides in water, sediments and soils, more evaporative POPs can exist in the atmosphere for more than weeks before reaching land and plant surfaces. The possible reason for the long-distance migration of POPs is the reduction in component volatility at mild temperatures, but pollutants that volatilize at high-temperature latitudes are transported by winds to icy polar regions where they concentrate and condensate [104]. Some POPs such as PAHs that landed on foliage slowly diffused into the tissues of leaves and were immobilized by lipid-like substances in the leaf cuticle. Higher lipid content in leaves leads to higher uptake of PAHs, which causes toxic accumulation of POPs in plants [105,106]. Interestingly, a novel global transportation mechanism of PFCs was elucidated. Specifically, owing to the lower vapor pressure of their ions, polyfluorinated POPs can be moderately abundant in water or bound to particulates or sediments and might be transferred via oceanic currents or sea spray [51].

4. Transport and Transformation of Organic Chemical Pollutants in Crops

A large amount of evidence that the existence of TOPs in agricultural circles can be transferred into crop tissues towards uptake indicates that a key point in protecting food chain safety is the elimination of risks in crops [107,108,109]. Metabolic tolerance as an important strategy of nontarget resistance in higher plants is potentially important for resisting TOPs stresses. In general, the metabolism of xenobiotics in vivo is classified as two processes, namely transportation and biotransformation.

4.1. Biotransportation Processes in Soil–Plant

The transferred pathway of TOPs from the surroundings to crops is illustrated in Figure 3B. The modes of TOPs in plant cells from environments have two types: passive and active absorption models, respectively [110]. Plants’ adsorptive types of xenobiotics are largely dependent on their physicochemical properties, such as molecular weight, concentration, solubility, etc. The molecular weight of pollutants is an important influence factor for determining the adsorption model. Xenobiotics with molecular weights less than 500 Da are readily absorbed by crop roots and leaves through passive diffusion, whereas those with molecular weights more than 500 Da usually require ATPs to facilitate active uptake by root [3]. Thus, most pesticides (<300 Da) enter plants by passive transport, while some large molecules such as POPs or endocrine disruptors (EDCs) (e.g., phenoxyacid herbicides) rely on active transport [111,112]. Furthermore, chemical solubility, which is calculated by the octanol/media partition coefficient, plays an essential role in the uptake of TOPs from the environment to crops (Figure 3B) [113,114,115,116]. The octanol/medium partition coefficient is defined as the ratio of the concentration of organic chemicals between the n-octanol and medium phases. The values of the octanol–water partition coefficient (KOW) and octanol–air partition coefficient (KOA), which are usually expressed in logarithmic form, are commonly used to characterize the lipophilicity or hydrophilicity of chemical contaminants and study the distribution or absorption of TOCs in various mediums. When the log Kow values of organic chemical contaminants are in the range of −1 to 5, they easily enter the plant roots by passive adsorption [117]. For instance, quinolone antibiotics metformin (log KOW = 3.3), ciprofloxacin (log KOW = 1.5) and narasin (log KOW = 5.9) were easily absorbed by roots of carrots and barley [115]. However, tetracycline antibiotics (log KOW = −1.37) entered alfalfa via active transportation [113].
Similarly to antibiotics, most of the POPs with log KOW < 4 are more likely to accumulate via roots and then translocate to other plant tissues, whilst highly hydrophobic PAHs with log KOW > 4 may strongly adsorb on the root epidermis and are unlikely to be penetrated the inner roots and translocated within the plant [118]. In addition, POPs were found to be transported for long distances through atmospheric circulation, due to their high logKOA value (>8). These POPs with high logKOA values usually exist in the gas phase, are easily captured by plant leaves and have the potential to biomagnify in food chains [119,120]. In addition, the temperature, pH and ionic strength of the pollutants have an impact on their transition behavior from the environment to crop (Figure 3B). Especially in the aquatic environment, the migration rates of chlortetracycline, hygromycin and tetracycline increased with increasing temperature [121]. Chen et al. [122] found that the migration rate of sulfamethoxazole in groundwater (pH = 5.6) was higher than that of ciprofloxacin because sulfamethoxazole presents a non-ionic form in a weakly acidic solution.
After entering into crop roots, the distribution of TOPs in plant tissues is dependent on two main driving forces, including the transpiration stream and water migration (Figure 4A). The transpiration stream, as an important internal driver of plant transport, is characterized by the transpiration stream concentration factor (TSCF), which is the ratio of the concentration of chemicals in the transpiration stream to the concentration in the external solution [123]. It is an important indicator to determine the upward transfer capability of TOPs. By contrast, the absorbed TOPs could rely on water migration to directly run back from the above-ground part to root or fruit tissues via bidirectional translocation (so-called assimilate transportation; Figure 4A) [123,124]. The flow of assimilates is accomplished by active transport and is one of the characteristics of higher plants [125]. Some pesticides can be excreted by root via assimilating transportation. For example, the foliar application of alachlor can enhance its content in the nutrition solution, because the flow of assimilates moves the contaminants from phloem to root for excretion.
In the distribution process, TOPs have to penetrate biofilms of various cells or tissues, such as the epidermis, cortex, endodermis, etc. [117]. The penetration of organic chemical contaminants in the root system can take place through both the apoplastic pathway and the symplastic pathway. Which distribution pathway chosen by TOPs in plant tissues is determined by molecular weight, lipophilicity or hydrophilicity, dissociation constant pKa, and pH (Figure 4B). For example, 1,3-dinitrobenzene (SW = 533 mg L−1; logKOW = 1.49) and 2,4-dinitrobenzene (SW = 300 mg L−1; logKOW = 1.98), which have relatively high water solubility, are mainly transported in plants via the symplastic pathway, whereas phenanthrene (SW = 1.29 mg L−1; logKOW = 4.46) and pyrene (SW = 7.87 mg L−1; logKOW = 3.72) are transported via the apoplastic pathway [126]. Notably, some of the highly lipophilic pesticides enter the root cortex by the apoplastic or symplastic route, but they are also blocked from further transport in the Casparian strip. Therefore, transporter proteins are needed as carriers to aid in the transport of these pesticides [3,124,127]. The Arabidopsis PDR1 protein is a paraquat transporter protein that promotes paraquat accumulation in plants [128]. Because of the species specificity of transporter proteins, differences in crop species also significantly affect the distribution of contaminants in the crop. For instance, sulfamethoxazole and norfloxacin have a higher translocation capacity in radishes than in cabbage when exposed to the same dose [129]. These chemical parameters are usually associated with bioconcentration factors (BCFs, a ratio of TOC content in plant tissues and environments), including the root concentration factor (RCF), stem concentration factor (SCF), leaf concentration factor (LCF) and translocation factor (TF, a ratio of TOP content in one tissue and the other tissue), which are used to calculate the transfer capability of pesticides from roots to stems or stems to leaves. Of note, a significant positive correlation between the root enrichment factor (logRCF) and logKOW of TOPs was found in recent studies [130,131]. Wang et al. simultaneously applied imidacloprid, acetamiprid, tricyclazole, azoxystrobin, tebuconazole and difenoconazole in maize and found that pesticides with higher logKOW and lower SW are more easily accumulated in roots, while pesticides with lower logKOW and higher SW are more liable to be translocated from roots to shoots [132]. This indicates that pesticide accumulation is positively correlated with logKOW value and negatively with water solubility (SW). In general, chemicals with logKOW at the range of 1 to 3 are easily translocated from roots to the phloem [133]. For ionic organic pollutants, their transport distribution in plant tissues depends on the acid ionization constant (pKa), which has been identified as a fundamental parameter for predicting the uptake, bioaccumulation, metabolism and elimination in animals; absorption and translocation in plants; and sorption to—and consequently, mobility in—soil. The dissociation constant (pKa) is associated with the lipophilicity, solubility, protein binding and permeability of organic contaminants, which directly affect the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion processes of TOPs [134]. It was found that acid pollutants with pKa < 7 and logKOW < 3 are more easily translocated through the xylem to the fruit; alkaline contaminants with pKa > 7 and logKOW < 0 can be transported simultaneously in the vascular tissue parts [135]. For example, thiamethoxam and its metabolite clothianidin (logKOW = −0.13–0.905, pKa = 9.0–11.1) have lower logKOW and higher pKa values than difenoconazole (logKOW = 4.4, pKa = 1.07), resulting in them being less likely to dissociate. Consequently, thiamethoxam and its metabolite clothianidin are more likely to penetrate biofilms and undergo translocation and accumulation in rice than difenoconazole [136].

4.2. Biotransformation Process in Plant

Biotransformation, also known as metabolism, is an important mechanism by which organisms metabolize and detoxify organic chemical pollutants. Since plants do not have specific excretory organs, biotransformation becomes an important way for plants to defend themselves against xenobiotics. Recent studies have found that metabolic detoxification is the most important mechanism of nontarget resistance in plants, and its process is complex and requires the involvement of specific enzymes [112]. In general, the metabolic detoxification mechanism of TOPs is divided into three main phases in crops (Figure 5) [137]: phase I metabolism—the formation of hydrophilic functional groups through redox or hydrolysis reactions; phase II metabolism—these functional groups undergo secondary enzymatic reactions to affix endogenous molecules such as sugars, amino acids, and glutathione; and phase III metabolism—transporters recognize metabolic conjugates and transport them into the vesicle or fix them in the cell wall [138].
The most important part of phase I metabolism is the oxidation reaction [139], which generally occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum, and the main catalyzed enzymes include cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (CYP450), peroxidase, phenoloxidase and laccase (Figure 5). In the action of phase I metabolizing enzymes, organic pollutants undergo hydroxylation, dealkylation, epoxidation, desulfurization and ester hydrolysis to produce more hydrophilic oxidative metabolites, which play a functional role in introducing active reaction sites for subsequent phase II reactions [140]. Xiang et al. discovered that a wheat P450 gene CYP71C6V1, which encodes a 5-phenylcyclic hydroxylase, could metabolize chlorsulfuron and triasulfuron to form 5-hydroxy-chlorsulfuron and 5-hydroxy-trisulfuron, respectively [141]. Chu et al. also demonstrated that CYP450s catalyzes the hydroxylation of PCBs in reeds and rice [142]. The hydroxylation reaction is an important intermediate reaction step in the biodegradation of TOPs, as the products are more hydrophilic than the precursors and can easily undergo subsequent metabolic reactions. Dealkylation is also an important reaction process of phase I metabolism. It is generally believed that the first step of this reaction is also the hydroxylation of alkyl groups. Studies have shown that pesticides with different chemical structures, such as diquat, simazine and chlordane, can undergo dealkylation reactions to reduce the toxicity of pesticides to crops [143]. However, some of the phase I metabolic reactions can also lead to increased toxicity of the products, such as epoxidation. It has been reported that human CYP1A1 metabolizes benzo[a]pyrene to form epoxidized benzo[a]pyrene, which further binds to DNA and causes base mutations [144].
Most phase II conjugation reactions are based on phase I-based metabolism (Figure 5). Phase II metabolism catalyzes the reaction of hydrophilic groups introduced by phase I metabolism, such as hydroxyl, amino, carboxy or thiol groups, with endogenous molecules to form conjugates. Obviously, if the organic chemical pollutant itself has reactive functional groups, the phase II reaction can also occur directly. The main enzymes in this process comprise of methyltransferases, glycosyltransferases, acetyl-transferases, glutathione-S-transferases (GST), etc. Methylation plays an important role in the process of crop detoxification. The reaction occurs through the binding of functional groups of phase I metabolites, such as amino, phenol groups and thiol groups, by methyltransferases, resulting in -NHCH3 and -OCH3 and -SCH3 groups [145]. Liscombe et al. found that the C-methylation of ethyl groups on atrazine in alfalfa and other plants was characterized accordingly [146]. Rezek et al. also found that there are specialized methyltransferases for the induction of hydroxylated-PCB methylation, and the hydroxylated PCBs enter the hydroxyl-substituted aromatic ring as alternative substrates for subsequent methylation of the biosynthesis pathway [147]. By contrast, the demethylation reaction of clarithromycin in lettuce generates metabolites that are more toxic than the parent. Interestingly, glycosylated metabolites of clarithromycin manifest less toxicity [62]. Recently, various glycosylation reactions have been found in plants and animals, which are catalyzed by glycosyltransferases (UGTs). UGTs catalyze the replacement of deprotonated nucleophilic sites in xenobiotics (acceptors) by UDP-glucose moiety and form β-glycosidic bond products. According to the nucleophilic sites (hydroxyl, carboxyl and thiol groups) binding with the C1 carbon of UDP-glucose, glucosylated reactions are divided into O-, N- and S-glucosylation, respectively. Current experiments have demonstrated that O-glycosylation is the most predominant metabolic mode of TOP detoxification [148]. The O-glycosylation products of sulfadimethoxine and sulfamethoxazole were found to be most abundant in crop tissues, accounting for 80–90% of the total metabolites [149]. Furthermore, hydroxylated TOPs are more susceptible to glycosylation reactions in plants. For instance, many glycosylated PCB adducts were yielded by the addition of glucose moiety to monohydroxylated PCBs in carrots [150]. Moreover, several S-glucosinolates and N-glucosinolates were identified in chemicals in the amino group or thiol group, such as isoproturon and atrazine [151,152]. Acetylation is usually a subsequent detoxification reaction after glycosylation in xenobiotics metabolism. Malonyltransferase as a catalyst helps glycosylated TOPs react with malonyl-CoA to form malonlyglucoside [153]. The ionic malonylglucoside in plant cytoplasm (pH = 7.0–7.5) benefits from being transported into vacuoles by anionic transporters, which facilitates the decay of toxic compounds and lower cell toxicity [154].
In higher plants, the methylene or heteroatom (e.g., halogenated elements) of TOPs can be replaced by the thiol of glutathione (GSH) and cysteine (Cys) via an SN2 nucleophilic substitution reaction [155]. The interaction between xenobiotic molecules and glutathione is specifically catalyzed by the subfamily of glutathione S-transferase (GSTs; E.C. 2.5.1.18). GSH, as an important acceptor of S-thiols, is usually composed of glutamic acid, cysteine and glycine. However, two GSH derivatives—homoglutathione (γ-glutamyl-cysteine-glycine; hGSH) and hydroxymethylgluthione (γ-glutamyl-cysteine-serine; hmGSH)—are found in alfalfa and rice, respectively [156]. Several herbicides, such as atrazine and acetochlor, are found to form the conjugation of hGSH and hmGSH in rice [157]. In addition, xenobiotic compounds containing a C=C bond can react with GSH via the Michael reaction [158]. Carbamazepine (CBZ) can be metabolized to cysteinyl CBZ (an amino acid conjugation) via a double-bond addition reaction with cysteine in the root tissues of Phragmites australis [131]. Micheal et al. found that the chlortetracycline–glutathione conjugate by the catalysis of GST was found in maize rather than in pinto beans, leading to less phytotoxicity in maize, which indicates that chlortetracycline is detoxified via the induction of GST in maize crops [159]. It is noted that the GSH conjugates can be carried by GSH transporters and are transmitted into the cytosol as a result of detoxification in the cytoplasm [138]. Condensation is another type of amino acid conjugation reaction and plays a detoxified role in xenobiotics. Xenobiotics containing a carboxylic acid group (-COOH) attend to ligands and acyl-CoA by coenzyme A (CoASH) to yield a xenobiotic-CoA thioester intermediate, and then, the acyl group transfers to the amino group of glycine by the catalysis of acyl-CoA: glycine N-acyltransferases (E.C. 2.3.1.13) [160]. To date, few studies about TOP condensation in crop plants have been investigated, and its mechanism needs to be further explored.
Phase II metabolic conjugates are usually more hydrophilic than the parent compounds. They can be recognized by the transporter and are excreted out of the cell via the transporter in the phase III process, which is considered another vital detoxification metabolism to eliminate toxic compounds (Figure 5). Phase II metabolic conjugates are usually more hydrophilic than the parent compounds. They can be recognized by the transporter and transported into the large central vacuole or released into the apoplast, which is considered another vital detoxification metabolism to eliminate toxic compounds (Figure 5). Many observations have demonstrated that glutathionated xenobiotic transport is strictly ATP-dependent and is thus likely mediated by ABC-type transporters. The ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABC), a large family of transmembrane proteins, are widely present in organisms and are responsible for transporting xenobiotics. The structure of ABC transporters is highly conserved around most eukaryotic organisms, including plants. A functional ABC transporter is characterized by the presence of a P-type traffic ATPase, which comprises two cytosolic nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) and two transmembrane domains (TMDs) [161]. In Arabidopsis, based on their domain structure and phylogenetic relationships, the ABC proteins are categorized into eight subfamilies AtABCA-AtABCI, of which ABCA, ABCB, ABCC, ABCD and ABCG have been reported to be associated with resistance to insecticides [162,163]. The specific ABCA and ABCC genes were found to enhance resistance to pyrethroids in Tribulus Terrestris. Furthermore, a half-size member of the AtABCG family, AtABCG19, can remove kanamycin from the cytosol and store it in the vacuole, which confers kanamycin resistance under its genetic overexpression in plants [164]. Co-expression of OsSTAR1 and OsSTAR2 in oocytes revealed that their function is a role in the transport of UDP-glucose or its derivatives, including glycosylated xenobiotics [165]. Moreover, DDT enters plants, experiences hydroxylation and glycosylation, and is moved into the vacuole for storage by the ABC transporter [123]. Thus, ABC transporter-based phase III metabolism supplies an alternative strategy for plants to cope with toxic TOPs via excretion from the cell.

5. Perspectives

Over-emissions of artificial compounds into agro-environmentscause adverse effects on both agricultural product quality and human health. Hence, the elimination of TOPs from the sources of the food chain is mandatory to reduce their adverse effects on humans, plants and animals. Phytoremediation or phytodegradation is an effective and eco-friendly method for TOP reduction because it can metabolize organic pollutants into nontoxic or relatively less toxic forms and interrupt the spread of hazards towards the food chain. Recently, a variety of genes encoding detoxifying enzymes or proteins were demonstrated to remove and catabolize TOPs in vivo and in vitro by genetic engineering technologies. For instance, overexpression of two glycosyltransferase genes (ARGT1E and LOC_Os04g40520) could effectively degrade the accumulation of atrazine in the grain of rice and improve rice growth in atrazine-contaminated soil [166]. Moreover, transgenic expression of soybean gene CYP71A10 in tobacco significantly improved the tolerance of linuron and chlorotoluron [167]. The present advancement in the discovery of valuable genes or enzymes stimulates the breeding of TOP-resistant crops through transgenic technology. Recently, a human P450 gene, CYP2C9, was reconstructed into the rice genome, and the obtained transgenic rice showed a rapid degradation for sulfonylurea herbicides [168]. However, the developmental speed of TOP-resistant crops is still slow because enzymes and proteins involved in the detoxification and degradation of TOPs are still rarely discovered in crop plants. It is urgent to continuously explore unknown resistance genes and use them to breed resistant crops. To date, some TOP-resistant rice species, such as glyphosate and glufosinate-resistant species, are mainly obtained through transgenic technology. Given that the safety of genetically modified rice is still controversial in the world, restricting the commercial application of transgenic TOP-resistant rice will last for a long time. Fortunately, CRISPR/Cas9 technology and various gene-editing systems provide an effective way to modify rice endogenous genes and develop new herbicide-resistant rice [169]. Gene-edited transgenic plants can be self-crossed or crossed with nontransgenic plants to separate the CRISPR/Cas9 transgene from the target mutation and obtain progeny without the transgene, which in nature is the same as natural mutants and mutants produced by artificial mutagenesis.
In the near future, the issue of organic chemical pollution in agricultural environments will continue for a long time and has been developing from single pollution to complex pollution. Future research needs to focus on the transport model, metabolic behavior and combined toxicity of TOP metabolites and multipollutant. In addition, more molecular breeding approaches to increase plants’ ability to quickly degrade chemical contaminants are still desirable because they cannot only enhance the plant resistance to toxicity but also reduce the pollutants residues for better food safety.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation and review and editing, Y.L., Y.H. and Y.Y.; visualization and supervision, Y.Q., C.Z. and X.W. collected the literature. S.F. provided critical comments on the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21707070; No. 31860552), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province in China (BK20170998).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Griffiths, M.R.; Strobel, B.W.; Hama, J.R.; Cedergreen, N. Toxicity and risk of plant-produced alkaloids to Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2021, 33, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fróna, D.; Szenderák, J.; Harangi-Rákos, M. The Challenge of Feeding the World. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zhang, J.J.; Yang, H. Metabolism and Detoxification of Pesticides in Plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 790, 148034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, B.; Chu, G.; Wei, C.; Ye, J.; Li, Z.; Liang, Y. The Growth and Antioxidant Defense Responses of Wheat Seedlings to Omethoate Stress. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2011, 100, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liang, C.-P.; Sack, C.; McGrath, S.; Cao, Y.; Thompson, C.J.; Robin, L.P. US Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Pesticide Residue Monitoring of Human Foods: 2009–2017. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2021, 38, 1520–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. El-Shahawi, M.S.; Hamza, A.; Bashammakh, A.S.; Al-Saggaf, W.T. An Overview on the Accumulation, Distribution, Transformations, Toxicity and Analytical Methods for the Monitoring of Persistent Organic Pollutants. Talanta 2010, 80, 1587–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wu, M.; Xia, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, J.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, H. Distribution and Health Risk Assessment on Dietary Exposure of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Vegetables in Nanjing, China. J. Chem. 2016, 2016, 1581253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fakinle, B.S.; Odekanle, E.L.; Ike-Ojukwu, C.; Sonibare, O.O.; Falowo, O.A.; Olubiyo, F.W.; Oke, D.O.; Aremu, C.O. Quantification and Health Impact Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Emissions from Crop Residue Combustion. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adeyeye, S.A.O.; Ashaolu, T.J. A Study on Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon and Heavy Metal Concentrations of Commercial Grilled Meat (Suya) and Smoked Catfish (Clarias Gariepinus Burchell, 1822) Fish from South-West, Nigeria. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2022, 42, 3281–3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, L.; Hua, G.; Guanhua, H.; Quanzhong, H.; Honglu, L. Contamination and Health Risk Assessment of PAHs in Irrigation District in Southeastern Suburb of Beijing. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2017, 48, 237–249. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kipopoulou, A.M.; Manoli, E.; Samara, C. Bioconcentration of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Vegetables Grown in an Industrial Area. Environ. Pollut. 1999, 106, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhao, F.; Yang, L.; Li, G.; Fang, L.; Yu, X.; Tang, Y.-T.; Li, M.; Chen, L. Veterinary Antibiotics Can Reduce Crop Yields by Modifying Soil Bacterial Community and Earthworm Population in Agro-Ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 808, 152056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Deng, H.; Feng, Y.; Wu, G.; Zhang, R.; Li, B.; Yin, Q.; Luo, L. Detection and Degradation Characterization of 16 Quinolones in Soybean Sprouts by Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Foods 2022, 11, 2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, Z.; Dong, J.; Zhu, G.; Huang, X. Potential Effect and Accumulation of Veterinary Antibiotics in Phragmites Australis under Hydroponic Conditions. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 53, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Christou, A.; Michael, C.; Fatta-Kassinos, D.; Fotopoulos, V. Can the Pharmaceutically Active Compounds Released in Agroecosystems Be Considered as Emerging Plant Stressors? Environ. Int. 2018, 114, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kuppusamy, S.; Kakarla, D.; Venkateswarlu, K.; Megharaj, M.; Yoon, Y.-E.; Lee, Y.B. Veterinary Antibiotics (VAs) Contamination as a Global Agro-Ecological Issue: A Critical View. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 257, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Carvalho, F.P. Pesticides, Environment, and Food Safety. Food Energy Secur. 2017, 6, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Saxena, G.; Bharagava, R.N. (Eds.) Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety: Volume I: Industrial Waste and Its Management; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 53–76. ISBN 9789811318900. [Google Scholar]
  19. Manyi-Loh, C.; Mamphweli, S.; Meyer, E.; Okoh, A. Antibiotic Use in Agriculture and Its Consequential Resistance in Environmental Sources: Potential Public Health Implications. Molecules 2018, 23, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yan, Y.; Deng, Y.; Li, W.; Du, W.; Gu, Y.; Li, J.; Xu, X. Phytoremediation of Antibiotic-Contaminated Wastewater: Insight into the Comparison of Ciprofloxacin Absorption, Migration, and Transformation Process at Different Growth Stages of E. Crassipes. Chemosphere 2021, 283, 131192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, J.; Zhou, A.; Zhang, Y.; Si, C.; Chen, Z.; Qian, H.; Zhao, Z. Research on the Adsorption and Migration of Sulfa Antibiotics in Underground Environment. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shan, Q.; Liu, M.; Li, R.; Shi, Q.; Li, Y.; Gong, B. γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Improves Pesticide Detoxification in Plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 835, 155404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Thompson, L.A.; Darwish, W.S. Environmental Chemical Contaminants in Food: Review of a Global Problem. J. Toxicol. 2019, 2019, 2345283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Tudi, M.; Daniel Ruan, H.; Wang, L.; Lyu, J.; Sadler, R.; Connell, D.; Chu, C.; Phung, D.T. Agriculture Development, Pesticide Application and Its Impact on the Environment. IJERPH 2021, 18, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hassaan, M.A.; El Nemr, A. Pesticides Pollution: Classifications, Human Health Impact, Extraction and Treatment Techniques. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2020, 46, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bernardes, M.F.F.; Pazin, M.; Pereira, L.C.; Dorta, D.J. Impact of Pesticides on Environmental and Human Health. In Toxicology Studies-Cells, Drugs and Environment; Andreazza, A.C., Scola, G., Eds.; InTech: London, UK, 2015; pp. 196–223. ISBN 978-953-51-2140-4. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhao, L.; Teng, Y.; Luo, Y.M. Present Pollution Status and Control Strategy of Pesticides in Agricultural Soils in China: A Review. Soils 2017, 49, 417–427. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ajiboye, T.O.; Oladoye, P.O.; Olanrewaju, C.A.; Akinsola, G.O. Organophosphorus Pesticides: Impacts, Detection and Removal Strategies. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2022, 17, 100655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, C.; Sun, Y.; Hu, R.; Huang, J.; Huang, X.; Li, Y.; Yin, Y.; Chen, Z. A Comparison of the Effects of Agricultural Pesticide Uses on Peripheral Nerve Conduction in China. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gerbig, S.; Brunn, H.E.; Spengler, B.; Schulz, S. Spatially Resolved Investigation of Systemic and Contact Pesticides in Plant Material by Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging (DESI-MSI). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 7379–7389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abubakar, Y.; Tijjani, H.; Egbuna, C.; Adetunji, C.O.; Kala, S.; Kryeziu, T.L.; Ifemeje, J.C.; Patrick-Iwuanyanwu, K.C. Pesticides, History, and Classification. In Natural Remedies for Pest, Disease and Weed Control; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 29–42. ISBN 978-0-12-819304-4. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nayak, P.; Solanki, H. Pesticides and Indian agriculture—A review. Int. J. Res. Granthaalayah 2021, 9, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ran, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Jiang, X.; Hu, D.; Lu, P. The Enantioselective Toxicity and Oxidative Stress of Dinotefuran on Zebrafish (Danio Rerio). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 226, 112809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, Q.; Fu, L.; Cang, T.; Tang, T.; Guo, M.; Zhou, B.; Zhu, G.; Zhao, M. Toxicological Effect and Molecular Mechanism of the Chiral Neonicotinoid Dinotefuran in Honeybees. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 1104–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gagneten, A.M.; Regaldo, L.; Carriquiriborde, P.; Reno, U.; Kergaravat, S.V.; Butinof, M.; Agostini, H.; Alvarez, M.; Harte, A. Atrazine Characterization: An Update on Uses, Monitoring, Effects, and Environmental Impact, for the Development of Regulatory Policies in Argentina. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2022; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  36. Smith, L.L. Mechanism of Paraquat Toxicity in Lung and Its Relevance to Treatment. Hum. Toxicol. 1987, 6, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhao, Y.; Yang, Q.E.; Zhou, X.; Wang, F.H.; Muurinen, J.; Virta, M.P.; Brandt, K.K.; Zhu, Y.G. Antibiotic Resistome in the Livestock and Aquaculture Industries: Status and Solutions. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 51, 2159–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, J.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Guo, S.; Li, K.; Xu, P.; Ok, Y.S.; Jones, D.L.; Zou, J. Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Agricultural Soils: A Systematic Analysis. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, Y.; Guo, Y.; Shi, M.; Qiu, T.; Gao, M.; Tian, S.; Wang, X. Effect of Antibiotic Type and Vegetable Species on Antibiotic Accumulation in Soil-Vegetable System, Soil Microbiota, and Resistance Genes. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Upmanyu, N.; Malviya, V.N. Antibiotics: Mechanisms of Action and Modern Challenges. In Microorganisms for Sustainable Environment and Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 367–382. ISBN 978-0-12-819001-2. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bull, K. Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants: The 1998 Agreement for the UNECE Region. In Persistent Organic Pollutants; Fiedler, H., Ed.; The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; Volume 3, pp. 1–11. ISBN 978-3-540-43728-4. [Google Scholar]
  42. Jeong, Y.; Lee, Y.; Park, K.J.; An, Y.-R.; Moon, H.-B. Accumulation and Time Trends (2003–2015) of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in Blubber of Finless Porpoises (Neophocaena Asiaeorientalis) from Korean Coastal Waters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 385, 121598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, Y.; Zhi, D.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, A.; Wu, S.; Yao, B.; Tang, Y.; Sun, C. Electrokinetic Techniques, Their Enhancement Techniques and Composite Techniques with Other Processes for Persistent Organic Pollutants Remediation in Soil: A Review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 97, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Damalas, C.A.; Koutroubas, S.D. Farmers’ Behaviour in Pesticide Use: A Key Concept for Improving Environmental Safety. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2018, 4, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rother, H.-A. Pesticide Labels: Protecting Liability or Health?–Unpacking “Misuse” of Pesticides. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2018, 4, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Devi, P.I.; Manjula, M.; Bhavani, R.V. Agrochemicals, Environment, and Human Health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2022, 47, 399–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sriram, A.; Kalanxhi, E.; Kapoor, G.; Craig, J.; Balasubramanian, R.; Brar, S.; Criscuolo, N.; Hamilton, A.; Klein, E.; Tseng, K.; et al. The State of the World’s Antibiotics 2021: A Global Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance and Its Drivers; Center for disease Dynamics, Economics &Policy: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chen, Y.; Jiang, C.; Wang, Y.; Song, R.; Tan, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Sources, Environmental Fate, and Ecological Risks of Antibiotics in Sediments of Asia’s Longest River: A Whole-Basin Investigation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 14439–14451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sarmah, A.K.; Meyer, M.T.; Boxall, A.B.A. A Global Perspective on the Use, Sales, Exposure Pathways, Occurrence, Fate and Effects of Veterinary Antibiotics (VAs) in the Environment. Chemosphere 2006, 65, 725–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zhang, Q.-Q.; Ying, G.-G.; Pan, C.-G.; Liu, Y.-S.; Zhao, J.-L. Comprehensive Evaluation of Antibiotics Emission and Fate in the River Basins of China: Source Analysis, Multimedia Modeling, and Linkage to Bacterial Resistance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 6772–6782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Aravind kumar, J.; Krithiga, T.; Sathish, S.; Renita, A.A.; Prabu, D.; Lokesh, S.; Geetha, R.; Namasivayam, S.K.R.; Sillanpaa, M. Persistent Organic Pollutants in Water Resources: Fate, Occurrence, Characterization and Risk Analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 831, 154808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Carvalho, F.P. Agriculture, Pesticides, Food Security and Food Safety. Environ. Sci. Policy 2006, 9, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Virág, D.; Naár, Z.; Kiss, A. Microbial Toxicity of Pesticide Derivatives Produced with UV-Photodegradation. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2007, 79, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vallotton, N.; Eggen, R.I.L.; Chèvre, N. Effect of Sequential Isoproturon Pulse Exposure on Scenedesmus Vacuolatus. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2009, 56, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lu, Y.C.; Zhang, J.J.; Luo, F.; Huang, M.T.; Yang, H. RNA-Sequencing Oryza Sativa Transcriptome in Response to Herbicide Isoprotruon and Characterization of Genes Involved in IPU Detoxification. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 18852–18867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pascal-Lorber, S.; Alsayeda, H.; Jouanin, I.; Debrauwer, L.; Canlet, C.; Laurent, F. Metabolic Fate of [14 C]Diuron and [14 C]Linuron in Wheat (Triticum Aestivum) and Radish (Raphanus Sativus). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 10935–10944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Li, C.; Yuan, S.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Duan, L.; Huang, L.; Zhou, X.; Ma, Y.; Pang, S. Microplastics Reduce the Bioaccumulation and Oxidative Stress Damage of Triazole Fungicides in Fish. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 151475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vela, N.; Fenoll, J.; Navarro, G.; Garrido, I.; Navarro, S. Trial of Solar Heating Methods (Solarization and Biosolarization) to Reduce Persistence of Neonicotinoid and Diamide Insecticides in a Semiarid Mediterranean Soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 590–591, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Chang, Q.; Wang, W.; Regev-Yochay, G.; Lipsitch, M.; Hanage, W.P. Antibiotics in Agriculture and the Risk to Human Health: How Worried Should We Be? Evol. Appl. 2015, 8, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Litskas, V.D.; Karamanlis, X.N.; Prousali, S.P.; Koveos, D.S. The Xenobiotic Doxycycline Affects Nitrogen Transformations in Soil and Impacts Earthworms and Cultivated Plants. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2019, 54, 1441–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Maldonado, I.; Moreno Terrazas, E.G.; Vilca, F.Z. Application of Duckweed (Lemna sp.) and Water Fern (Azolla sp.) in the Removal of Pharmaceutical Residues in Water: State of Art Focus on Antibiotics. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 838, 156565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tian, R.; Zhang, R.; Uddin, M.; Qiao, X.; Chen, J.; Gu, G. Uptake and Metabolism of Clarithromycin and Sulfadiazine in Lettuce. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 247, 1134–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, C.; Jiang, X.; Ma, Y.; Cade-Menun, B.J. Pollutant and Soil Types Influence Effectiveness of Soil-Applied Absorbents in Reducing Rice Plant Uptake of Persistent Organic Pollutants. Pedosphere 2017, 27, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, Y.; Sallach, J.B.; Zhang, W.; Boyd, S.A.; Li, H. Characterization of Plant Accumulation of Pharmaceuticals from Soils with Their Concentration in Soil Pore Water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 9346–9355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lei, B.; Zhang, K.; An, J.; Zhang, X.; Yu, Y. Human Health Risk Assessment of Multiple Contaminants Due to Consumption of Animal-Based Foods Available in the Markets of Shanghai, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 4434–4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vogt, R.; Bennett, D.; Cassady, D.; Frost, J.; Ritz, B.; Hertz-Picciotto, I. Cancer and Non-Cancer Health Effects from Food Contaminant Exposures for Children and Adults in California: A Risk Assessment. Environ. Health 2012, 11, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Polder, A.; Savinova, T.N.; Tkachev, A.; Løken, K.B.; Odland, J.O.; Skaare, J.U. Levels and Patterns of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPS) in Selected Food Items from Northwest Russia (1998–2002) and Implications for Dietary Exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 5352–5361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fernandes, A.; Mortimer, D.; Rose, M.; Gem, M. Dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and PCBs in Offal: Occurrence and Dietary Exposure. Chemosphere 2010, 81, 536–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Schwarz, M.A.; Lindtner, O.; Blume, K.; Heinemeyer, G.; Schneider, K. Dioxin and Dl-PCB Exposure from Food: The German LExUKon Project. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2014, 31, 688–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Myers, J.H.; Rose, G.; Odell, E.; Zhang, P.; Bui, A.; Pettigrove, V. Household Herbicide Use as a Source of Simazine Contamination in Urban Surface Waters. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 299, 118868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Rosas, J.M.; Vicente, F.; Saguillo, E.G.; Santos, A.; Romero, A. Remediation of Soil Polluted with Herbicides by Fenton-like Reaction: Kinetic Model of Diuron Degradation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 144, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Khan, M.A.; Costa, F.B.; Fenton, O.; Jordan, P.; Fennell, C.; Mellander, P.-E. Using a Multi-Dimensional Approach for Catchment Scale Herbicide Pollution Assessments. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 747, 141232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, Z.; Yu, S.; Zhang, L.; Liu, R.; Deng, Y.; Nie, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Diao, J. Effects of Simazine Herbicide on a Plant-Arthropod-Lizard Tritrophic Community in Territorial Indoor Microcosms: Beyond the Toxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 781, 146723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yan, X.; Wang, J.; Zhu, L.; Wang, J.; Li, S.; Kim, Y.M. Oxidative Stress, Growth Inhibition, and DNA Damage in Earthworms Induced by the Combined Pollution of Typical Neonicotinoid Insecticides and Heavy Metals. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 141873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Khataei, M.M.; Epi, S.B.H.; Lood, R.; Spégel, P.; Yamini, Y.; Turner, C. A Review of Green Solvent Extraction Techniques and Their Use in Antibiotic Residue Analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2022, 209, 114487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rezende-Teixeira, P.; Dusi, R.G.; Jimenez, P.C.; Espindola, L.S.; Costa-Lotufo, L.V. What Can We Learn from Commercial Insecticides? Efficacy, Toxicity, Environmental Impacts, and Future Developments. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 300, 118983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Hu, H.; Wu, R.; Ling, J.; Yue, S.; Yang, D.; Yu, W.; Du, W.; Shen, G.; et al. Neonicotinoid Pollution in Marine Sediments of the East China Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 842, 156658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Satapute, P.; Jogaiah, S. A Biogenic Microbial Biosurfactin That Degrades Difenoconazole Fungicide with Potential Antimicrobial and Oil Displacement Properties. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Tang, L.; Tong, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Sun, H. A Simple Judgment Method for Joint Action of Antibacterial Agents on Bacterial Resistance. MethodsX 2022, 9, 101700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Chen, B.; Lin, L.; Fang, L.; Yang, Y.; Chen, E.; Yuan, K.; Zou, S.; Wang, X.; Luan, T. Complex Pollution of Antibiotic Resistance Genes Due to Beta-Lactam and Aminoglycoside Use in Aquaculture Farming. Water Res. 2018, 134, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zhang, H.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Q.; Long, Z.; Yu, Y.; Fang, H. Fungicides Enhanced the Abundance of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Greenhouse Soil. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 259, 113877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Delis, G.A.; Siarkou, V.I.; Vingopoulou, E.I.; Koutsoviti-Papadopoulou, M.; Batzias, G.C. Pharmacodynamic Interactions of Amikacin with Selected β -Lactams and Fluoroquinolones against Canine Escherichia Coli Isolates. Res. Vet. Sci. 2018, 117, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Buelow, E.; Ploy, M.-C.; Dagot, C. Role of Pollution on the Selection of Antibiotic Resistance and Bacterial Pathogens in the Environment. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2021, 64, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ding, Y.; Jiang, W.; Liang, B.; Han, J.; Cheng, H.; Haider, M.R.; Wang, H.; Liu, W.; Liu, S.; Wang, A. UV Photolysis as an Efficient Pretreatment Method for Antibiotics Decomposition and Their Antibacterial Activity Elimination. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 392, 122321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zheng, Y.; Han, B.; Xu, X.; Liu, A.; Zheng, L. Distribution Characteristics, Source Analysis and Risk Assessment of Organochlorine Pesticides in Ny-Ålesund, Arctic. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 181, 113862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Adithya, S.; Jayaraman, R.S.; Krishnan, A.; Malolan, R.; Gopinath, K.P.; Arun, J.; Kim, W.; Govarthanan, M. A Critical Review on the Formation, Fate and Degradation of the Persistent Organic Pollutant Hexachlorocyclohexane in Water Systems and Waste Streams. Chemosphere 2021, 271, 129866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bouzid, I.; Maire, J.; Laurent, F.; Broquaire, M.; Fatin-Rouge, N. Controlled Treatment of a High Velocity Anisotropic Aquifer Model Contaminated by Hexachlorocyclohexanes. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Lu, S.; Cao, Y.; Tang, C.; Yan, Z.; Zheng, L. History Traces of HCHs and DDTs by Groundwater Dating and Their Behaviours and Ecological Risk in Northeast China. Chemosphere 2020, 257, 127212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Qu, C.; Albanese, S.; Lima, A.; Hope, D.; Pond, P.; Fortelli, A.; Romano, N.; Cerino, P.; Pizzolante, A.; De Vivo, B. The Occurrence of OCPs, PCBs, and PAHs in the Soil, Air, and Bulk Deposition of the Naples Metropolitan Area, Southern Italy: Implications for Sources and Environmental Processes. Environ. Int. 2019, 124, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Matson, P.G. Variation in Natural Attenuation Rates of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Fish from Streams and Reservoirs in East Tennessee Observed over a 35-Year Period. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 438, 29427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Hasan, G.M.M.A.; Shaikh, M.A.A.; Satter, M.A.; Hossain, M.S. Detection of Indicator Polychlorinated Biphenyls (I-PCBs) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Cow Milk from Selected Areas of Dhaka, Bangladesh and Potential Human Health Risks Assessment. Toxicol. Rep. 2022, 9, 1514–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lian, X.; Zhang, G.; Yang, Y.; Chen, M.; Yang, W.; Cheng, C.; Huang, B.; Fu, Z.; Bi, X.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Measurement of the Mixing State of PAHs in Individual Particles and Its Effect on PAH Transport in Urban and Remote Areas and from Major Sources. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 114075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chakravarty, P.; Chowdhury, D.; Deka, H. Ecological Risk Assessment of Priority PAHs Pollutants in Crude Oil Contaminated Soil and Its Impacts on Soil Biological Properties. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 437, 129325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lewis, S.E.; Silburn, D.M.; Kookana, R.S.; Shaw, M. Pesticide Behavior, Fate, and Effects in the Tropics: An Overview of the Current State of Knowledge. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 3917–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, P.; Ren, C.; Sun, H.; Min, L. Sorption, Desorption and Degradation of Neonicotinoids in Four Agricultural Soils and Their Effects on Soil Microorganisms. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bento, C.P.M.; Yang, X.; Gort, G.; Xue, S.; van Dam, R.; Zomer, P.; Mol, H.G.J.; Ritsema, C.J.; Geissen, V. Persistence of Glyphosate and Aminomethylphosphonic Acid in Loess Soil under Different Combinations of Temperature, Soil Moisture and Light/Darkness. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 572, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dores, E.F.G.C.; Spadotto, C.A.; Weber, O.L.S.; Dalla Villa, R.; Vecchiato, A.B.; Pinto, A.A. Environmental Behavior of Chlorpyrifos and Endosulfan in a Tropical Soil in Central Brazil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 3942–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dolliver, H.; Gupta, S.; Noll, S. Antibiotic Degradation during Manure Composting. J. Environ. Qual. 2008, 37, 1245–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Blackwell, P.A.; Kay, P.; Ashauer, R.; Boxall, A.B.A. Effects of Agricultural Conditions on the Leaching Behaviour of Veterinary Antibiotics in Soils. Chemosphere 2009, 75, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Gothwal, R.; Shashidhar, T. Antibiotic Pollution in the Environment: A Review: Antibiotic Pollution in the Environment. Clean. Soil Air Water 2015, 43, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hong, B.; Yu, S.; Zhou, M.; Li, J.; Li, Q.; Ding, J.; Lin, Q.; Lin, X.; Liu, X.; Chen, P.; et al. Sedimentary Spectrum and Potential Ecological Risks of Residual Pharmaceuticals in Relation to Sediment-Water Partitioning and Land Uses in a Watershed. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 817, 152979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Le, T.X.; Munekage, Y. Residues of Selected Antibiotics in Water and Mud from Shrimp Ponds in Mangrove Areas in Viet Nam. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 49, 922–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ternes, T.A.; Herrmann, N.; Bonerz, M.; Knacker, T.; Siegrist, H.; Joss, A. A Rapid Method to Measure the Solid–Water Distribution Coefficient (Kd) for Pharmaceuticals and Musk Fragrances in Sewage Sludge. Water Res. 2004, 38, 4075–4084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. De Voogt, P.; Jansson, B. Vertical and Long-Range Transport of Persistent Organics in the Atmosphere. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Ware, G.W., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1993; Volume 132, pp. 1–27. ISBN 978-1-4684-7067-3. [Google Scholar]
  105. Ashraf, M.A. Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs): A Global Issue, a Global Challenge. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 4223–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Tian, X.; Liu, J.; Zhou, G.; Peng, P.; Wang, X.; Wang, C. Estimation of the Annual Scavenged Amount of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Forests in the Pearl River Delta of Southern China. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 156, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yuan, X.; Lee, J.; Han, H.; Ju, B.; Park, E.; Shin, Y.; Lee, J.; Kim, J.-H. Translocation of Residual Ethoprophos and Tricyclazole from Soil to Spinach. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2021, 64, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Fujita, K.; Inui, H. How Does the Cucurbitaceae Family Take up Organic Pollutants (POPs, PAHs, and PPCPs)? Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 20, 751–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pullagurala, V.L.R.; Rawat, S.; Adisa, I.O.; Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Plant Uptake and Translocation of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 636, 1585–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Inui, H.; Wakai, T.; Gion, K.; Kim, Y.-S.; Eun, H. Differential Uptake for Dioxin-like Compounds by Zucchini Subspecies. Chemosphere 2008, 73, 1602–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Collins, C.; Fryer, M.; Grosso, A. Plant Uptake of Non-Ionic Organic Chemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhang, C.; Feng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chang, H.; Li, Z.; Xue, J. Uptake and Translocation of Organic Pollutants in Plants: A Review. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 1659–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Kong, W.D.; Zhu, Y.G.; Liang, Y.C.; Zhang, J.; Smith, F.A.; Yang, M. Uptake of Oxytetracycline and Its Phytotoxicity to Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.). Environ. Pollut. 2007, 147, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Collins, C.D. A Semi-Quantitative Approach to Deriving a Model Structure for the Uptake of Organic Chemicals by Vegetation. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2008, 10, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Eggen, T.; Asp, T.N.; Grave, K.; Hormazabal, V. Uptake and Translocation of Metformin, Ciprofloxacin and Narasin in Forage- and Crop Plants. Chemosphere 2011, 85, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Desalme, D.; Binet, P.; Chiapusio, G. Challenges in Tracing the Fate and Effects of Atmospheric Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Deposition in Vascular Plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 3967–3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Liu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Dong, F.; Sallach, J.B.; Wu, X.; Liu, X.; Xu, J.; Zheng, Y.; Li, Y. Uptake Kinetics and Accumulation of Pesticides in Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.): Impact of Chemical and Plant Properties. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 275, 116637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. St-Amand, A.D.; Mayer, P.M.; Blais, J.M. Modeling PAH Uptake by Vegetation from the Air Using Field Measurements. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 4283–4288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Su, Y.; Wania, F.; Harner, T.; Lei, Y.D. Deposition of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers, Polychlorinated Biphenyls, and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons to a Boreal Deciduous Forest. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Yang, P.; Tian, F.; Qiao, X.; Bian, H.; Ge, L. Distribution of PAHs in Pine (Pinus Thunbergii) Needles and Soils Correlates with Their Gas-Particle Partitioning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 1336–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Loftin, K.A.; Adams, C.D.; Meyer, M.T.; Surampalli, R. Effects of Ionic Strength, Temperature, and PH on Degradation of Selected Antibiotics. J. Environ. Qual. 2008, 37, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Chen, H.; Gao, B.; Li, H.; Ma, L.Q. Effects of PH and Ionic Strength on Sulfamethoxazole and Ciprofloxacin Transport in Saturated Porous Media. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2011, 126, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Öztürk, M.; Ashraf, M.; Aksoy, A.; Ahmad, M.S.A.; Hakeem, K.R. (Eds.) Plants, Pollutants and Remediation; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 251–268. ISBN 978-94-017-7193-1. [Google Scholar]
  124. Chedik, L.; Bruyere, A.; Bacle, A.; Potin, S.; Le Vée, M.; Fardel, O. Interactions of Pesticides with Membrane Drug Transporters: Implications for Toxicokinetics and Toxicity. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2018, 14, 739–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Chandler, A.M.; Basler, E.; Santelmann, P.W. Uptake and Translocation of Alachlor in Soybean and Wheat. Weed Sci. 1974, 22, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Su, Y.-H.; Zhu, Y.-G. Transport Mechanisms for the Uptake of Organic Compounds by Rice (Oryza Sativa) Roots. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 148, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Miller, E.L.; Nason, S.L.; Karthikeyan, K.G.; Pedersen, J.A. Root Uptake of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Product Ingredients. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 525–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Xi, J.; Xu, P.; Xiang, C.-B. Loss of AtPDR11, a Plasma Membrane-Localized ABC Transporter, Confers Paraquat Tolerance in Arabidopsis Thaliana: A Paraquat Transporter in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012, 69, 782–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wang, J.; Lin, H.; Sun, W.; Xia, Y.; Ma, J.; Fu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, H.; Qian, M. Variations in the Fate and Biological Effects of Sulfamethoxazole, Norfloxacin and Doxycycline in Different Vegetable–Soil Systems Following Manure Application. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 304, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Liu, J.; Cheng, J.; Zhou, C.; Ma, L.; Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, X.; Yan, X.; Geng, R.; Wan, Q.; et al. Uptake Kinetics and Subcellular Distribution of Three Classes of Typical Pesticides in Rice Plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 858, 159826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lin, H.; Tao, S.; Zuo, Q.; Coveney, R.M. Uptake of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Maize Plants. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 148, 614–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wang, F.; Li, X.; Yu, S.; He, S.; Cao, D.; Yao, S.; Fang, H.; Yu, Y. Chemical Factors Affecting Uptake and Translocation of Six Pesticides in Soil by Maize (Zea Mays L.). J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 405, 124269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Fan, T.; Chen, X.; Xu, Z.; Liu, L.; Shen, D.; Dong, S.; Zhang, Q. Uptake and Translocation of Triflumezopyrim in Rice Plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 7086–7092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Benvidi, A.; Dadras, A.; Abbasi, S.; Tezerjani, M.D.; Rezaeinasab, M.; Tabaraki, R.; Namazian, M. Experimental and Computational Study of the p K a of Coumaric Acid Derivatives. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2019, 66, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Christou, A.; Papadavid, G.; Dalias, P.; Fotopoulos, V.; Michael, C.; Bayona, J.M.; Piña, B.; Fatta-Kassinos, D. Ranking of Crop Plants According to Their Potential to Uptake and Accumulate Contaminants of Emerging Concern. Environ. Res. 2019, 170, 422–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Ge, J.; Cui, K.; Yan, H.; Li, Y.; Chai, Y.; Liu, X.; Cheng, J.; Yu, X. Uptake and Translocation of Imidacloprid, Thiamethoxam and Difenoconazole in Rice Plants. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 226, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Schröder, P.; Collins, C.D. (Eds.) Organic Xenobiotics and Plants: From Mode of Action to Ecophysiology; Plant Ecophysiology; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 8, pp. 125–148. ISBN 978-90-481-9851-1. [Google Scholar]
  138. Coleman, J.; Blake-Kalff, M.; Davies, E. Detoxification of Xenobiotics by Plants: Chemical Modification and Vacuolar Compartmentation. Trends Plant Sci. 1997, 2, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Kreuz, K.; Martinoia, E. Herbicide Metabolism in Plants: Integrated Pathways of Detoxification. In Pesticide Chemistry and Bioscience; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 279–287. ISBN 978-1-85573-810-2. [Google Scholar]
  140. Morant, M.; Bak, S.; Møller, B.L.; Werck-Reichhart, D. Plant Cytochromes P450: Tools for Pharmacology, Plant Protection and Phytoremediation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Xiang, W.; Wang, X.; Ren, T. Expression of a Wheat Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenase CDNA in Yeast Catalyzes the Metabolism of Sulfonylurea Herbicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2006, 85, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Chu, W.K.; Wong, M.H.; Zhang, J. Accumulation, Distribution and Transformation of DDT and PCBs by Phragmites Australis and Oryza Sativa L.: II. Enzyme Study. Environ. Geochem. Health 2006, 28, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Li, R.N.; Wang, H.L. Herbicide-induced passivation mechanism by plants N-dealkylation reaction. World Pestic. 1982, 5, 50–52. [Google Scholar]
  144. Woo, H.; Lee, J.; Park, D.; Jung, E. Protective Effect of Mulberry (Morus Alba L.) Extract against Benzo[a]Pyrene Induced Skin Damage through Inhibition of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signaling. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 10925–10932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Lu, Y.C.; Luo, F.; Pu, Z.J.; Zhang, S.; Huang, M.T.; Yang, H. Enhanced Detoxification and Degradation of Herbicide Atrazine by a Group of O -Methyltransferases in Rice. Chemosphere 2016, 165, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Liscombe, D.K.; Louie, G.V.; Noel, J.P. Architectures, Mechanisms and Molecular Evolution of Natural Product Methyltransferases. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Rezek, J.; Macek, T.; Mackova, M.; Triska, J.; Ruzickova, K. Hydroxy-PCBs, Methoxy-PCBs and Hydroxy-Methoxy-PCBs: Metabolites of Polychlorinated Biphenyls Formed In Vitro by Tobacco Cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 5746–5751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Bauer, A.; Luetjohann, J.; Rohn, S.; Jantzen, E.; Kuballa, J. Development of a Suspect Screening Strategy for Pesticide Metabolites in Fruit and Vegetables by UPLC-Q-Tof-MS. Food Anal. Methods 2018, 11, 1591–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Dudley, S.; Sun, C.; Jiang, J.; Gan, J. Metabolism of Sulfamethoxazole in Arabidopsis Thaliana Cells and Cucumber Seedlings. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 1748–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Butler, J.M.; Groeger, A.W.; Fletcher, J.S. Characterization of Monochlorinated Biphenyl Products Formed by Paul’s Scarlet Rose Cells. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1992, 49, 821–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Levsen, K.; Schiebel, H.-M.; Behnke, B.; Dötzer, R.; Dreher, W.; Elend, M.; Thiele, H. Structure Elucidation of Phase II Metabolites by Tandem Mass Spectrometry: An Overview. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1067, 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Lu, F.F.; Liu, J.T.; Zhang, N.; Chen, Z.J.; Yang, H. OsPAL as a Key Salicylic Acid Synthetic Component Is a Critical Factor Involved in Mediation of Isoproturon Degradation in a Paddy Crop. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Chen, C.-H. Xenobiotic Metabolic Enzymes: Bioactivation and Antioxidant Defense; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 87–106. ISBN 978-3-030-41678-2. [Google Scholar]
  154. Ahmad, M.Z.; Li, P.; Wang, J.; Rehman, N.U.; Zhao, J. Isoflavone Malonyltransferases GmIMaT1 and GmIMaT3 Differently Modify Isoflavone Glucosides in Soybean (Glycine Max) under Various Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kóňa, J.; Fabian, W.M.F. Hybrid QM/MM Calculations on the First Redox Step of the Catalytic Cycle of Bovine Glutathione Peroxidase GPX1. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 2610–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Pivato, M.; Fabrega-Prats, M.; Masi, A. Low-Molecular-Weight Thiols in Plants: Functional and Analytical Implications. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 560, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Su, X.N.; Zhang, J.J.; Liu, J.T.; Zhang, N.; Ma, L.Y.; Lu, F.F.; Chen, Z.J.; Shi, Z.; Si, W.J.; Liu, C.; et al. Biodegrading Two Pesticide Residues in Paddy Plants and the Environment by a Genetically Engineered Approach. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 4947–4957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Zhang, J.J.; Xu, J.Y.; Lu, F.F.; Jin, S.F.; Yang, H. Detoxification of Atrazine by Low Molecular Weight Thiols in Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa). Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2017, 30, 1835–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Farkas, M.H.; Berry, J.O.; Aga, D.S. Chlortetracycline Detoxification in Maize via Induction of Glutathione S -Transferases after Antibiotic Exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 1450–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Knights, K.M.; Sykes, M.J.; Miners, J.O. Amino Acid Conjugation: Contribution to the Metabolism and Toxicity of Xenobiotic Carboxylic Acids. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2007, 3, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Wu, C.; Chakrabarty, S.; Jin, M.; Liu, K.; Xiao, Y. Insect ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) Transporters: Roles in Xenobiotic Detoxification and Bt Insecticidal Activity. IJMS 2019, 20, 2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Kang, J.; Park, J.; Choi, H.; Burla, B.; Kretzschmar, T.; Lee, Y.; Martinoia, E. Plant ABC Transporters. Arab. Book 2011, 9, e0153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Lespine, A.; Martin, S.; Dupuy, J.; Roulet, A.; Pineau, T.; Orlowski, S.; Alvinerie, M. Interaction of Macrocyclic Lactones with P-Glycoprotein: Structure–Affinity Relationship. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007, 30, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Kang, B.; Ye, X.; Osburn, L.D.; Stewart, C.N.; Cheng, Z.-M. Transgenic Hybrid Aspen Overexpressing the Atwbc19 Gene Encoding an ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Confers Resistance to Four Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 29, 643–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Huang, C.F.; Yamaji, N.; Mitani, N.; Yano, M.; Nagamura, Y.; Ma, J.F. A Bacterial-Type ABC Transporter Is Involved in Aluminum Tolerance in Rice. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 655–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Weber, H. Fatty Acid-Derived Signals in Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Ohkawa, H.; Inui, H. Metabolism of Agrochemicals and Related Environmental Chemicals Based on Cytochrome P450s in Mammals and Plants. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 824–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Kato, S.; Yokota, Y.; Suzuki, R.; Fujisawa, Y.; Sayama, T.; Kaga, A.; Anai, T.; Komatsu, K.; Oki, N.; Kikuchi, A.; et al. Identification of a Cytochrome P450 Hydroxylase, CYP81E22, as a Causative Gene for the High Sensitivity of Soybean to Herbicide Bentazon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 2105–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Jin, M.; Chen, L.; Deng, X.W.; Tang, X. Development of herbicide resistance genes and their application in rice. Crop J. 2022, 10, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The classification of typical organic pollutants in the agricultural environment.
Figure 1. The classification of typical organic pollutants in the agricultural environment.
Agronomy 12 03009 g001
Figure 2. The sources and spread of typical organic pollutants in the agricultural environment.
Figure 2. The sources and spread of typical organic pollutants in the agricultural environment.
Agronomy 12 03009 g002
Figure 3. Transport behavior of organic chemical pollutants in the environment. (A) Transport of organic pollutants in the atmospheric, aqueous and agricultural environments; (B) factors influencing the migration of organic chemical contaminants in crops.
Figure 3. Transport behavior of organic chemical pollutants in the environment. (A) Transport of organic pollutants in the atmospheric, aqueous and agricultural environments; (B) factors influencing the migration of organic chemical contaminants in crops.
Agronomy 12 03009 g003
Figure 4. Transport of organic chemical pollutants. (A) Pathways of organic pollutant translocation in vascular tissues of crops; (B) root transport of organic pollutants in crops (abbreviations: H, herbicide; LP, lipophilic pesticides; A, antibiotics; P, POPs).
Figure 4. Transport of organic chemical pollutants. (A) Pathways of organic pollutant translocation in vascular tissues of crops; (B) root transport of organic pollutants in crops (abbreviations: H, herbicide; LP, lipophilic pesticides; A, antibiotics; P, POPs).
Agronomy 12 03009 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of organic pollutant transformation in crop cells. (Abbreviations: OP, organic pollutants; F, functional group; CT, glutathione-conjugate transporter; AT, ATP-dependent transporter; GT, ATP-dependent glucoside-conjugate transporter).
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of organic pollutant transformation in crop cells. (Abbreviations: OP, organic pollutants; F, functional group; CT, glutathione-conjugate transporter; AT, ATP-dependent transporter; GT, ATP-dependent glucoside-conjugate transporter).
Agronomy 12 03009 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hua, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Feng, S.; Lu, Y. Advances in the Agro-Environment Migration of Organic Chemical Pollutants and Their Biotransformation in Crops. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3009. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123009

AMA Style

Hua Y, Yuan Y, Qin Y, Zhang C, Wang X, Feng S, Lu Y. Advances in the Agro-Environment Migration of Organic Chemical Pollutants and Their Biotransformation in Crops. Agronomy. 2022; 12(12):3009. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hua, Yifei, Yi Yuan, Yi Qin, Chenyi Zhang, Xiaodong Wang, Shengjun Feng, and Yichen Lu. 2022. "Advances in the Agro-Environment Migration of Organic Chemical Pollutants and Their Biotransformation in Crops" Agronomy 12, no. 12: 3009. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop