Next Article in Journal
Extension of Avocado Fruit Postharvest Quality Using Non-Chemical Treatments
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Nonchemical Protection of Broad Bean on Epigeic and Soil Arthropodofauna—Analysis in Field-Realistic Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Exogenous Application of Osmotic Adjustment Substances on Growth, Pigment Concentration, and Physiological Parameters of Dracaena sanderiana Sander under Different Levels of Salinity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/agronomy10020210
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Glycinebetaine Enhances Osmotic Adjustment of Ryegrass under Cold Temperatures

by
Michael V. Mickelbart
1,2,* and
Barbara Boine
1
1
Agricultural and Life Sciences Division, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand
2
Current address: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2020, 10(2), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020210
Submission received: 11 December 2019 / Revised: 17 January 2020 / Accepted: 21 January 2020 / Published: 2 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Roles of Glycine Betaine in Improving Plant Abiotic Stress Resistance)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Perennial (Lolium perenne L.) and annual (L. multiflorum) ryegrass are important species for landscape (e.g., turf) and agricultural (e.g., pasture systems) uses. Abiotic stresses limit the survival, growth, and/or appearance of these species. The synthesis and accumulation of quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) such as glycinebetaine (GB) are an adaptive response to abiotic environmental stresses in some species. Both L. perenne and L. multiflorum are GB-accumulating species, and exogenous application of GB may enhance growth under less-than-optimal environmental conditions. We tested the effects of exogenous application of GB on growth and water relations of annual and perennial ryegrass growing under temperatures at the lower limits of their optimal growth. Osmotic stress resulted in increased GB accumulation in L. perenne, but exposure to cold temperatures did not result in increased GB accumulation in either species. Both species accumulated higher concentrations of GB in leaf and stem tissues when exogenous GB was supplied, regardless of growing temperature. Exogenous GB did contribute to lower osmotic potential in both species, but did not affect relative water content, although succulence was higher in some cases. Overall, exogenous GB did not affect growth under optimal growing temperatures, but did enhance growth of L. perenne growing under low temperatures.

1. Introduction

Annual (Lolium multiflorum) and perennial (Lolium perenne) ryegrass are important feed sources for a number of animals, and are important for their use in ornamental and sports turfs. Both species are widely grown, but growth is often limited under cold spring temperatures [1]. Traditional breeding is time-consuming, and agronomic approaches to enhancing growth under cold temperatures could be applied to multiple genotypes that have already been selected for growth under other environmental specifics (e.g., soil conditions) of a given region.
Osmoprotectants are an important component of the suite of traits utilized by plants to maintain growth under cold temperatures [2]. Lolium perenne and L. multiflorum both produce proline, and production is increased in response to abiotic stresses such as drought [3,4]. Biosynthesis of the quaternary ammonium compound glycinebetaine (GB) has been reported in L. perenne [5], and GB is thought to play a role in drought tolerance in L. multiflorum [6].
Glycinebetaine plays a role in plant stress tolerance via protection of proteins and membranes and as an osmoticum that acts to lower cell osmotic potential under various osmotic stresses [7]. Transformation of L. multiflorum with the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) gene (the final step in GB synthesis from choline) from zoyzia grass resulted in tolerance to NaCl, although GB concentrations in plants were not reported [7]. Expression of both spinach choline monooxygenase (CMO) and BADH in transgenic L. perenne also resulted in enhanced salt tolerance [8].
Exogenous application of GB can enhance stress tolerance, including in several grass species [9,10,11], and exogenous application of GB enhanced water-use efficiency of wheat [12]. Several reports have demonstrated positive effects of exogenous application of GB on freezing [13], chilling [14], and frost tolerance [15].
Although there are many reports of beneficial effects of GB on stress tolerance, there are conflicting results on the effects of exogenous GB on pasture growth under cold temperatures [16,17]. Given the fact that increased GB concentrations may also have positive effects on animal health and milk yields in dairy cows [16], the application to ryegrass may result in multiple benefits. Our objective was to determine the effects of exogenous GB application on growth of annual and perennial ryegrass under cold temperatures. We determined the natural accumulation of GB under different temperatures relative to other abiotic stresses, and quantified the contribution of GB to osmotic adjustment of these species. Since previous studies with conflicting results were conducted under field conditions, we sought to assess the effects of GB under controlled conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

For all experiments, seed of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ and L. perenne ‘Kingston’ were treated with a 10% bleach solution for 10 min, then imbibed with water overnight. Seeds were sown in 14.4 cm diameter containers, and thinned to 6 plants per container. The soil mix consisted of 80% composted pine bark (0–12 mm) and 20% pumice (3–6 mm), amended with agricultural lime (1 kg m−3), and Hydraflo II granular wetting agent (1 kg m−3). Half-strength Hoagland solution was used throughout the experiments.

2.2. Treatment Applications

2.2.1. Experiment 1—Accumulation of Glycinebetaine (GB) under Various Abiotic Stresses

For the quantification of changes in GB synthesis in response to various stresses (cold, heat, drought, salinity), plants were maintained in a growth room (Conviron) with a day and night constant temperature of 18 °C for 21 d. Light levels in this chamber and subsequent experiments were ca. 200 μmol m−2 s−1 with a photoperiod of 12 h. Cold-stressed plants were then moved to a 6 °C chamber for 20 d prior to sampling. Temperature was reduced by 2 °C d−1 for 4 d prior to exposure to 6 °C for 15 d. Heat-stressed plants were moved to a 40 °C chamber for 5 d prior to harvest. Water was withheld from water-stressed plants for 10 d prior to harvest. Salinized plants were treated with nutrient solution plus 50, 100, or 150 mM NaCl for 15 d prior to harvest. Salinity was increased from 50 (4 d) to 100 mM (4 d), and finally, 150 mM for respective treatment levels. CaCl2 was added to the NaCl solution in a 5:1 Na:Ca molar ratio. For each species × treatment, three replicate containers were used. All plants were harvested on the same day when leaf relative water content (RWC) and GB concentrations were quantified.

2.2.2. Experiment 2—Accumulation of GB under Different Temperatures

To quantify GB accumulation in ryegrass growing under different temperatures, plants were maintained in a growth room with a day and night constant temperature of 18 °C for 10 d, after which half of the plants were transferred to a 6 °C chamber for 22 d. Tissue was harvested for GB quantification from plants growing under both temperatures at 0, 15, and 22 d after moving to 6 °C. Three replicate containers were used for each species × temperature × GB treatment.

2.2.3. Experiment 3—The Effect of Exogenous GB Application on GB Accumulation in Ryegrass

To determine if L. multiflorum and L. perenne have the ability to take up exogenously applied GB, and its effect on water relations, plants were grown in an 18 °C chamber for twelve weeks. Plants were sprayed to dripping once a week with 0 (water control) or 100 mM GB. After twelve weeks, plants were harvested and biomass, leaf GB, relative water content (RWC), succulence, and osmotic potential of the cell sap was measured. Three replicate containers were used for each species × temperature × GB × time treatment.

2.2.4. Experiments 4 and 5—The Effect of Exogenous GB Application on Growth under Cold Temperatures

Seeds were germinated and plants were grown in an 18 °C chamber for two weeks, at which point half of the plants were moved to a chamber set to identical conditions except regarding temperature, which was set at 6 °C. Plants were sprayed to dripping once a week with 0 (water control), 50, or 100 mM GB. Every 7 d (over 35 d total), plants were harvested, and biomass, stem and leaf GB, relative water content (RWC), succulence, and osmotic potential of the cell sap were measured. To confirm the effects of exogenous application of GB on growth of these species under cold conditions, another set of plants (n = 15) was grown for 2 weeks at a light-period temperature of 18 °C. After these two weeks, GB was applied at 0 or 100 mM, and then plants were grown at 18 or 6 °C for another 2 weeks. Plants were harvested and total above-ground tissue was dried and weighed (n = 15).

2.3. Quantification of Glycinebetaine

Samples were taken from five to six individual plants of each species. A representative sub-sample of the leaf and stem (in some experiments) tissue bulked from the individual plants (1 to 1.5 g FW) was collected. Tissue was extracted by immersion in pre-weighed vials containing 10 mL methanol. Methanol extracts were stored at 4 °C in the dark and then phase-separated with chloroform and water, as described previously [18,19,20,21]. The upper (aqueous) phase was concentrated to dryness under an air stream. Total QAC levels in the betaine fraction were determined by a spectrophotometric periodide assay [22,23].

2.4. Quantification of Growth

In Experiment 3, five to six plants per container were harvested and fresh and dry weight was obtained. In Experiment 4, this was also done but plants were harvested weekly to determine growth over the experimental period. Growth over time was linear, so linear functions were fit to the data and differences among slopes (increase in growth per day) were tested.

2.5. Water Relations Measurements

Leaf tissue was excised and placed in pre-weighed vials containing ca. 10 mL of deionized water. Leaf fresh weight (FW) was calculated as initial vial weight subtracted from the vial weight containing tissue. After weighing, vial caps were removed, and the vials were placed under low light conditions for ca. 10 h. Leaf tissue was then removed from the vials and blotted dry before weighing to obtain the turgid weight (TW) of the tissue. Leaf tissue was then dried to obtain dry weight (DW), and relative water content (RWC) was calculated as:
[(FW − DW)/(TW − DW)] × 100.
Succulence was calculated as:
FW/DW.
Immediately after excision, a random sample of leaf tissue from the bulk sample was placed in a microfuge tube containing a cut pipette tip (ca. 5 mm) and a piece of mesh screen. The tube was then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −35 °C. Tubes were thawed for 20 min and spun for 5 min at 10,000× g in a microcentrifuge. Osmolality of the extracted cell sap was quantified with a vapor pressure osmometer (Wescor 5500, Wescor Inc., Logan, Utah, USA). Osmolality was converted to osmotic potential by the equation:
Ψπ = −CsRT,
where Ψπ is osmotic potential, Cs is the osmolality, R is the gas constant, and T is temperature. The osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψπ100) was calculated as:
Ψπ × RWC.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

All analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). Data were subjected to ANOVA and mean values were compared using Tukey’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05). For quantification of growth under different GB × temperature treatments, the slope of FW or DW over all weeks of growth for 50 or 100 mM GB-treated plants was tested for significant interaction with the same slope for 0 mM GB-treated plants.

3. Results

3.1. Glycinebetaine Concentrations in Two Lolium Species in Response to Various Stresses

To determine if GB is synthesized in response to abiotic stress, plants of L. multiflorum ‘Crusader’ and L. perenne ‘Kingston’ were exposed to salinity, a water deficit, and low and high temperatures. In both species, salinity of 100 and 150 mM NaCl and 10 d of water stress resulted in a lower RWC (Figure 1A). However, accumulation of GB increased in response to 150 mM NaCl and water stress only in L. perenne ‘Kingston’ (Figure 1B). In both species, exposure to high temperature resulted in increased accumulation of GB, whereas exposure to low temperature resulted in no change in accumulation of GB (Figure 1B).
To confirm the lack of accumulation of GB in response to cold temperatures in the two species, plants were grown for 20 d at 18 °C; then, plants were grown under 18 or 6 °C. After 15 d, plants of both species maintained at 18 °C had similar GB concentrations to day 0, whereas after 22 d, GB concentrations increased in L. perenne. ‘Kingston’ plants (Figure 2). Plants of both species had lower GB concentrations after 15 d of growth under 6 °C, although GB concentrations in these plants returned to day 0 values after 22 d. Exposure to cold temperatures, unlike some other abiotic stresses, do not result in an increase in endogenous levels of GB in either species.

3.2. Effects of Exogenous Glycinebetaine Application on Glycinebetaine Accumulation, Growth, and Water Relations

To determine if L. perenne and L. multiflorum were able to take up GB and the potential effects on growth and water relations under optimal temperatures, GB (100 mM) or water was applied weekly for twelve weeks. Both species accumulated GB, which was a significant contributor to osmotic adjustment based on Ψπ100 values (Table 1). Growth, RWC, and succulence were not affected by GB application under these conditions.
To test the effects of exogenous GB application on ryegrass growth under cold temperatures, plants were grown in 18 °C, and then grown under 18 or 6 °C while applying 0, 50, or 100 mM GB. Both species accumulated applied GB, and in most cases, GB uptake into leaf tissues was linearly correlated with the concentration of GB applied (Figure S1). The application of 100 mM GB resulted in an increased growth rate of L. multiflorum ‘Crusader’, but not of L. perenne ‘Kingston’ when grown at 18 °C (Table 2). When growing at low temperatures, application of 50 or 100 mM GB enhanced growth in L. perenne ‘Kingston’, but not L. multiflorum ‘Crusader’. This difference in effect on growth was despite the fact that both species accumulated GB in leaf and stem tissues when GB was applied (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
Application of GB had no effect on relative water content (RWC) of leaf tissue, and tissue succulence was only increased when 100 mM GB was applied to plants growing under 18 °C (Table 3). Exogenous GB resulted in a lowering of osmotic potential (Ψπ) and a lowering of osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψπ100), suggesting that exogenous application of GB contributed to osmotic adjustment in these plants (Table 2 and Figure 5). The contributions of GB (on a molar basis) to leaf osmotic potential were ca. 10% and 8% in plants growing under 18 and 6 °C, respectively, but GB accounted for up to almost 40% of the solutes when it was applied exogenously. Overall, exogenous application of GB resulted in enhanced growth under cold conditions only in L. perenne ‘Kingston’ when applied at 100 mM, despite the fact that GB application had a positive effect on solute accumulation in both species under all conditions. Overall, there was no effect of exogenous GB application on the allocation of biomass between leaf and stem (Table S1).
To confirm the effects of exogenous application of GB on growth of these species under cold conditions, plants were grown for 2 weeks at light-period temperature of 18 °C, GB was applied at 0 or 100 mM, and then half of the plants were moved to 6 °C. After 2 weeks, plants were harvested. In this experiment, the application of GB had no positive effect on plant dry weight (Figure S2).

4. Discussion

4.1. Glycinebetaine Concentrations Do Not Increase In Response to Cold Temperatures

Lolium perenne can accumulate exogenously applied GB under non-stress conditions [5,11,24], and accumulation increases in response to salinity [11,24]. There are no reports of GB accumulation in L. multiflorum. Lolium perenne and L. multiflorum also accumulate significant amounts of proline, and accumulation of this compatible solute is also increased under stress conditions [3]. Concentrations of GB in both species in this set of experiments (Figure 1B, Table 1 and Table 3) are similar to concentrations previously reported for L. perenne [5,11] and cereals such as wheat [25].
When exposed to osmotic stress, only L. perenne ‘Kingston’ had higher concentrations of GB over controls (Figure 1B), consistent with previous reports of induced accumulation of GB in L. perenne in response to osmotic stress [11,24]. This could be due to the relatively young age of the plants used in this study [26] and/or differences in environmental conditions. Other grass species, such as Festuca arundinaceae [27] and wheat [28,29], also respond to water stress with increased concentrations of GB.
Only the highest level of NaCl (150 mM) elicited an increase in GB and only in L. perenne (Figure 1B). Short-term salt stress also resulted in only a mild accumulation of GB in tomato [30]. Genotypes of spring wheat also vary in their accumulation of GB in response to salt [25]. Longer-term exposure resulted in GB accumulation in Anneurolepidium chinense [31]. It is likely that GB accumulation in these ryegrass species is dependent on genotype, plant age, and length of stress exposure.
When exposed to temperatures above the optimal for growth of both species, accumulation of leaf GB greatly increased (Figure 1B). Likewise, GB accumulation in response to high temperatures was much greater than in response to salinity in tomato [30]. Cold stress does elicit an accumulation of GB in some species such as wheat [32]. When exposed to temperatures at the low end for growth in these species, GB accumulation did not occur (Figure 1B), and, in fact, concentrations initially decreased in response to low temperatures (Figure 2). Several field trials show no beneficial effects of GB on growth on crop plants under moderate temperatures [17,33]. However, given the lack of induction in GB synthesis in response to cold temperatures, we hypothesized that exogenous application may aid growth in both species.

4.2. Both L. perenne and L. multiflorum Have the Ability to Accumulate Exogenously Applied Glycinebetaine That Contributes to Reduced Osmotic Potential

Many plant species have the capacity to take up and translocate GB [25,34], although there is typically genetic variability in the ability to accumulate GB [15]. Therefore, GB could be exogenously applied to both annual and perennial ryegrass for potential enhancement of growth and/or stress tolerance. Accumulation of GB in leaves following exogenous GB application was similar in both species (Figure 3 and Figure 4 and Table 1 and Table 3), and was, in most cases, linearly correlated with the concentration applied (Figure S1). Application of GB resulted in very high tissue concentrations, similar to concentrations reported in other crops following exogenous application of GB [33]. Importantly, there were no signs of toxicity as observed in some other species [35].
Thomas [3] speculated that solute accumulation in the stem of L. perenne may be more important for drought tolerance than leaf tissue levels, which may also be the case with cold tolerance, as regrowth of tillers appears to be an important freezing tolerance mechanism [36].
Since osmotic adjustment is a key trait for drought tolerance in perennial ryegrass [37], it is likely that GB application may enhance drought tolerance in these species. GB significantly contributes to solute potentials in wheat [38] and Anneurolepidium chinense [31].

4.3. Exogenous Application of Glycinebetaine Results in Lowered Solute Potential, But Inconsistently Affects Growth

Accumulation of GB has been demonstrated in some species to enhance stress tolerance, notably via protection of the photosynthetic apparatus [29]. There is genetic diversity for cold tolerance in L. perenne [39] and L. multiflorum [36], so it may be that other genotypes would respond differently to exogenous GB. Furthermore, it is likely that genotypes within each species vary for the ability and magnitude for GB accumulation [26].
Others have reported increased relative growth rate of crops treated with foliar-applied GB [40]; however, we found mixed results. Exogenous application of GB had contrasting effects on the two species in the first experiment we conducted. When plants were grown at 18 °C, L. perenne ‘Kingston’ exhibited an enhanced growth rate when 100 mM GB was applied, whereas L. multiflorum ‘Crusader’ growth was not enhanced by GB application (Table 1). When grown under low temperatures, GB enhanced the growth rate of L. multiflorum ‘Crusader’ at both GB concentrations, but GB had no effect on L. perenne. In a previous experiment, although exogenous GB application increased N, S, and K concentrations in perennial ryegrass, it did not enhance growth [41]. Lee et al. [17] found no effect of GB application on perennial ryegrass-clover pasture growth. GB application varied among sugarcane genotypes from positive to negative effects [42]. GB application had different effects on different rice cultivars [43].

5. Conclusions

The objectives of this set of experiments was not to assess the effect of GB on frost or freezing tolerance in annual and perennial ryegrass, but rather to determine if GB application would improve growth of these species under low-temperature growing conditions. We determined that both L. perenne and L. multiflorum do not accumulate GB in response to cold temperatures, but do have the capacity to take up exogenously applied GB, resulting in higher concentrations in both leaves and stems. This GB contributes to a decrease in osmotic potential, but the effect on growth was variable across experiments. Given the fact that toxicity was not observed, it is possible that higher concentrations of GB may provide more consistent contributions to growth under cold temperatures.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/2/210/s1. Table S1: The effects of exogenous glycinebetaine (GB) on biomass, leaf area, and leaf:stem values of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (L. m.) and L. perenne ‘Kingston’ (L. p.) plants grown under 18 or 6 °C for 35 d (n = 3). Figure S1: Uptake of glycinebetaine (GB) in response to applied concentrations of GB (x-axis) in Lolium multiflorum (A, C) and Lolium perenne (B, D) grown at 18 (A, B) or 6 °C (C, D). Figure S2: Dry weight of Lolium multiflorum and Lolium perenne grown at 18 °C for two weeks, and then transferred to 18 or 6 °C for another two weeks. Prior to transfer, 0 or 100 mM glycinebetaine was applied exogenously. Plants treated with 100 mM GB are significantly different than control plants at p ≤ 0.01 (**), based on Dunnett’s two-way test (n = 15).

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, M.V.M. and B.B.; investigation, M.V.M. and B.B.; writing—original draft, M.V.M.; writing—review and editing, M.V.M. and B.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank Alan Stewart (PGG Wrightson Seeds) for plant material and advice; Stuart Larsen, Stephen Stillwell, and Bruce Clark (University of Canterbury) for experimental assistance; and Robert Heath for assistance with growth analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Humphreys, M.; Feuerstein, U.; Vandewalle, M.; Baert, J. Ryegrasses. In Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses. Handbook of Plant Breeding; Boller, B., Posselt, U., Veronesi, F., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; Volume 5, pp. 211–260. [Google Scholar]
  2. John, R.; Anjum, N.A.; Sopory, S.K.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M. Some key physiological and molecular processes of cold acclimation. Biol. Plantarum. 2016, 60, 603–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thomas, H. Osmotic adjustment in Lolium perenne; Its heritability and the nature of solute accumulation. Ann. Bot. 1990, 66, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thomas, H. Accumulation and consumption of solutes in swards of Lolium perenne during drought and after rewatering. New Phytol. 1991, 118, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lou, Y.; Yang, Y.; Hu, L.; Liu, H.; Xu, Q. Exogenous glycinebetaine alleviates the detrimental effect of Cd stress on perennial ryegrass. Ecotoxicology 2015, 24, 1330–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pan, L.; Meng, C.; Wang, J.; Ma, X.; Fan, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, X. Integrated omics data of two annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) genotypes reveals core metabolic processes under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 26–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Annunziata, M.G.; Ciarmiello, L.F.; Woodrow, P.; Dell’Aversana, E.; Carillo, P. Spatial and temporal profile of glycine betaine accumulation in plants under abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 230–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Takahashi, W.; Oishi, H.; Ebina, M.; Komatsu, T.; Takamizo, T. Production of Italian ryegrass expressing the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene of zoyziagrass. Breed. Sci. 2010, 60, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bao, Y.; Zhao, R.; Li, F.; Tang, W.; Han, L. Simultaneous expression of Spinacia oleracea chloroplast choline monooxygenase (CMO) and betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) genes contribute to dwarfism in transgenic Lolium perenne. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 29, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 59, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, L.; Hu, T.; Zhang, T.; Pang, X.H.; Fu, J. Exogenous glycine betaine ameliorates the adverse effect of salt stress on perennial ryegrass. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2012, 137, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bergmann, H.; Eckert, H. Effect of glycinebetaine on water use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Biol. Plant 1984, 26, 384–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xing, W.; Rajashekar, C.B. Glycine betaine involvement in freezing tolerance and water stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2001, 46, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Park, E.-J.; Jeknić, Z.; Chen, T.H.H. Exogenous application of glycinebetaine increases chilling tolerance in tomato plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Somersalo, S.; Kyei-Boahen, S.; Pehu, E. Exogenous glycine betaine application as a possibility to increase low temperature tolerance of crop plants. Nord. Jordbr. 1996, 78, 102–114. [Google Scholar]
  16. Naidu, B.P.; Stevenson, G.; Page, R.; Munford, S. Glycinebetaine foliar application increases pasture winter growth and milk yield. In Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference, Geelong, Australia, 2–6 February 2003. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee, J.M.; Elborough, K.; Catto, W.D.; Donaghy, D.J.; Roche, J.R. Effect of surface applied glycine betaine on herbage production and quality of perennial ryegrass-white clover pastures. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2008, 48, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rhodes, D.; Rich, P.J.; Myers, A.C.; Reuter, C.R.; Jamieson, G.C. Determination of betaines by fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry: Identification of glycine betaine deficient genotypes of Zea mays. Plant Physiol. 1987, 84, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rhodes, D.; Rich, P.J. Preliminary genetic studies of the phenotype of betaine deficiency in Zea mays L. Plant Physiol. 1988, 88, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Brunk, D.G.; Rich, P.J.; Rhodes, D. Genotypic variation for glycinebetaine among public inbred lines of maize. Plant Physiol. 1989, 91, 1122–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rhodes, D.; Rich, P.J.; Brunk, D.G.; Ju, G.C.; Rhodes, J.C.; Pauly, M.H.; Hanson, L.A. Development of two isogenic sweet corn hybrids differing for glycinebetaine content. Plant Physiol. 1989, 91, 1112–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ladyman, J.A.R.; Ditz, K.M.; Grumet, R.; Hanson, A.D. Genotypic variation for glycinebetaine accumulation by cultivated and wild barley in relation to water stress. Crop Sci. 1983, 23, 465–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lerma, C.; Rich, P.J.; Ju, G.C.; Yang, W.-J.; Hanson, A.D.; Rhodes, D. Betaine deficiency in maize: Complementation tests and metabolic basis. Plant Physiol. 1991, 95, 1113–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sima, N.A.K.K.; Askari, H.; Mirzaei, H.H.; Pessarakli, M. Genotype-dependent differential responses of three forage species to calcium supplement in saline conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2009, 32, 579–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Raza, S.H.; Athar, H.R.; Ashraf, M.; Hameed, A. Glycinebetaine-induced modulation of antioxidant enzymes activities and ion accumulation in two wheat cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 60, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, W.-J.; Rich, P.J.; Axtell, J.D.; Wood, K.V.; Bonham, C.C.; Ejeta, G.; Mickelbart, M.V.; Rhodes, D. Genotypic variation for glycinebetaine in sorghum. Crop Sci. 2003, 43, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abernathy, G.A.; McManus, M.T. Biochemical responses to an imposed water deficit in mature leaf tissue of Festuca arundinaceae. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1998, 40, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Naidu, B.P.; Paleg, L.G.; Aspinall, D.; Jennings, A.C.; Jones, G.P. Rate of imposition of water stress alters accumulation of nitrogen-containing solutes by wheat seedlings. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1990, 17, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, G.P.; Li, F.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, M.R.; Hui, Z.; Wang, W. Overaccumulation of glycine betaine enhances tolerance of the photosynthetic apparatus to drought and heat stress in wheat. Photosynthetica 2010, 48, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rivero, R.M.; Mestre, T.C.; Mittler, R.; Rubio, F.; Garcia-Sanchez, F.; Martinez, V. The combined effect of salinity and heat reveals a specific physiological, biochemical and molecular response in tomato plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1059–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ochiai, K.; Matoh, T. Mechanism of salt tolerance in the grass species, Anneurolepidium chinense. 1. Growth response to salinity and osmotic adjustment. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2001, 47, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Naidu, B.P.; Paleg, L.G.; Aspinall, D.; Jennings, A.C.; Jones, G.P. Amino acid and glycine betaine accumulation in cold-stressed wheat seedlings. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 407–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mäkelä, P.; Mantila, J.; Hinkkanen, R.; Pehu, E.; Peltonen-Sainio, P. Effect of foliar applications of glycinebetaine on stress tolerance, growth, and yield of spring cereals and summer turnip rape in Finland. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1996, 176, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mäkelä, P.; Peltonen-Sainio, P.; Jokinen, K.; Setälä, H.; Hinkkanen, R.; Somersalo, S. Uptake and translocation of foliar-applied glycinebetaine in crop plants. Plant Sci. 1996, 121, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mickelbart, M.V.; Chapman, P.; Collier-Christian, L. Endogenous levels and exogenous application of glycinebetaine to grapevines. Sci. Hort. 2006, 111, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lorenzetti, F.; Tyler, B.F.; Cooper, J.P.; Breese, E.L. Cold tolerance and winter hardiness in Lolium perenne. 1. Development of screening techniques for cold tolerance and survey of geographical location. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 1971, 76, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cyriac, D.; Hofmann, R.W.; Stewart, A.; Sathish, P.; Winefield, C.S.; Moot, D.J. Intraspecific differences in long-term drought tolerance in perennial ryegrass. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Nio, S.A.; Cawthray, G.R.; Wade, L.J.; Colmer, T.D. Pattern of solutes accumulated during leaf osmotic adjustment as related to duration of water deficit for wheat at the reproductive stage. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49, 1126–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ollerenshaw, J.H.; Baker, R.H. Low temperature growth in a controlled environment of Lolium perenne L. ecotypes from northern latitudes. J. Agric. Sci. 1982, 99, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mäkelä, P.; Kleemoia, J.; Jokinen, K.; Pehu, E.; Peltonen-Sainio, P. Growth response of pea and summer turnip rape to foliar application of glycinebetaine. Acta Agric. Scand. 1997, 47, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mahdavi, S.; Kafi, M.; Fallahi, E.; Shokrpour, M.; Tabrizi, L. Drought and biostimulant impacts on mineral nutrients, ambient and reflected light-based chlorophyll index, and performance of perennial ryegrass. J. Plant Nutr. 2017, 40, 2248–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Campbell, J.A.; Naidu, B.P.; Wilson, J.R. The effect of glycinebetaine application on germination and early growth of sugarcane. Seed Sci. Technol. 1999, 27, 747–752. [Google Scholar]
  43. Demiral, T.; Türkan, I. Exogenous glycinebetaine affects growth and proline accumulation and retards senescence in two rice cultivars under NaCl stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2006, 56, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 10 00210 g001 550
Figure 1. Relative water content (RWC, (A)) and leaf glycinebetaine (GB, (B)) concentrations of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ and Lolium perenne ‘Kingston’ growing at 18 °C (Control) or after exposure to 50, 100, or 150 mM NaCl, 10 d of water stress, 4 d at 40 °C (heat), or 20 d at 6 °C (cold). Within a species, treatment plants are lower (RWC) or higher (GB) than control plants at p ≤ 0.05 (*), based on Dunnett’s one-way test (n = 3).
Figure 1. Relative water content (RWC, (A)) and leaf glycinebetaine (GB, (B)) concentrations of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ and Lolium perenne ‘Kingston’ growing at 18 °C (Control) or after exposure to 50, 100, or 150 mM NaCl, 10 d of water stress, 4 d at 40 °C (heat), or 20 d at 6 °C (cold). Within a species, treatment plants are lower (RWC) or higher (GB) than control plants at p ≤ 0.05 (*), based on Dunnett’s one-way test (n = 3).
Agronomy 10 00210 g001
Agronomy 10 00210 g002 550
Figure 2. Accumulation of glycinebetaine (GB) in Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (squares) and Lolium perenne ‘Kingston’ (circles) grown at 18 (solid) or 6 °C (open). GB concentrations at 0, 15, and 22 d after treatment initiation are lower or higher than control plants at p ≤ 0.05 (*), based on Dunnett’s two-way test (n = 3).
Figure 2. Accumulation of glycinebetaine (GB) in Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (squares) and Lolium perenne ‘Kingston’ (circles) grown at 18 (solid) or 6 °C (open). GB concentrations at 0, 15, and 22 d after treatment initiation are lower or higher than control plants at p ≤ 0.05 (*), based on Dunnett’s two-way test (n = 3).
Agronomy 10 00210 g002
Agronomy 10 00210 g003 550
Figure 3. Leaf lamina glycinebetaine (GB) concentrations of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (A,C) and Lolium perenne ‘Kingston’ (B,D) grown in 18 (A,B) or 6 °C (C,D) environments with application of 0 (circles), 50 (squares), or 100 (triangles) mM GB. Open symbols indicate significantly higher concentrations in plant tissue compared to day 0, based on Dunnett’s one-way test. Within each species × temperature × day group, GB treatments with the same letter (presented in table at the top of each panel) are not significantly different from each other, based on Tukey’s honest significant difference test (p ≤ 0.05) (n = 3).
Figure 3. Leaf lamina glycinebetaine (GB) concentrations of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (A,C) and Lolium perenne ‘Kingston’ (B,D) grown in 18 (A,B) or 6 °C (C,D) environments with application of 0 (circles), 50 (squares), or 100 (triangles) mM GB. Open symbols indicate significantly higher concentrations in plant tissue compared to day 0, based on Dunnett’s one-way test. Within each species × temperature × day group, GB treatments with the same letter (presented in table at the top of each panel) are not significantly different from each other, based on Tukey’s honest significant difference test (p ≤ 0.05) (n = 3).
Agronomy 10 00210 g003
Agronomy 10 00210 g004 550
Figure 4. Stem glycinebetaine (GB) concentrations of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (A,C) and Lolium perenne ‘Kingston’ (B,D) grown in 18 (A,B) or 6 °C (C,D) environments with application of 0 (circles), 50 (squares), or 100 (triangles) mM GB. Open symbols indicate significantly higher concentrations in plant tissue compared to day 0, based on Dunnett’s one-way test. Within each species × temperature × day group, GB treatments with the same letter (presented in table at the top of each panel) are not significantly different from each other, based on Tukey’s honest significant difference test (p ≤ 0.05) (n = 3).
Figure 4. Stem glycinebetaine (GB) concentrations of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (A,C) and Lolium perenne ‘Kingston’ (B,D) grown in 18 (A,B) or 6 °C (C,D) environments with application of 0 (circles), 50 (squares), or 100 (triangles) mM GB. Open symbols indicate significantly higher concentrations in plant tissue compared to day 0, based on Dunnett’s one-way test. Within each species × temperature × day group, GB treatments with the same letter (presented in table at the top of each panel) are not significantly different from each other, based on Tukey’s honest significant difference test (p ≤ 0.05) (n = 3).
Agronomy 10 00210 g004
Agronomy 10 00210 g005 550
Figure 5. Leaf osmotic potentials at full turgor (OP100) of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (A,C) and Lolium perenne ‘Kingston’ (B,D) grown in 18 (A,B) or 6 °C (C,D) environments with application of 0 (circles), 50 (squares), or 100 (triangles) mM GB. Open symbols indicate significantly higher concentrations in plant tissue compared to day 0, based on Dunnett’s one-way test. Within each species × temperature × day group, GB treatments with the same letter (presented in table at the top of each panel) are not significantly different from each other, based on Tukey’s honest significant difference test (p ≤ 0.05) (n = 3).
Figure 5. Leaf osmotic potentials at full turgor (OP100) of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (A,C) and Lolium perenne ‘Kingston’ (B,D) grown in 18 (A,B) or 6 °C (C,D) environments with application of 0 (circles), 50 (squares), or 100 (triangles) mM GB. Open symbols indicate significantly higher concentrations in plant tissue compared to day 0, based on Dunnett’s one-way test. Within each species × temperature × day group, GB treatments with the same letter (presented in table at the top of each panel) are not significantly different from each other, based on Tukey’s honest significant difference test (p ≤ 0.05) (n = 3).
Agronomy 10 00210 g005
Table
Table 1. The effects of glycinebetaine (GB) on relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (Ψπ), osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψπ100), leaf succulence, GB content, and the contribution of GB to Ψπ (GBC) (n = 6).
Table 1. The effects of glycinebetaine (GB) on relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (Ψπ), osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψπ100), leaf succulence, GB content, and the contribution of GB to Ψπ (GBC) (n = 6).
SpeciesApplied GBDWRWCΨπΨπ100SucGBGBC
mMg%MPaMPa nmol%
L. m.01.6491.8−1.27−1.156.501.232.74
1002.3891.6−1.40−1.27 *6.885.93 *11.98 *
L. p.01.5393.5−1.37−1.286.121.423.34
1001.1093.5−1.50 *−1.38 *5.865.50 *10.57 *
Sig zGBn.s.n.s.****n.s.******
Species**********n.s.n.s.
GB × Species*n.s.n.s.n.s.**n.s.*
z Treatment means within a species and main (GB and species) or interaction (GB × Species) effects are not significantly different (n.s.) or significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 (*), 0.01 (**), or 0.001 (***).
Table
Table 2. The effects of exogenous glycinebetaine (GB) on the growth rates of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (L. m.) and L. perenne ‘Kingston’ (L. p.) plants grown under 18 or 6 °C.
Table 2. The effects of exogenous glycinebetaine (GB) on the growth rates of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (L. m.) and L. perenne ‘Kingston’ (L. p.) plants grown under 18 or 6 °C.
TemperatureSpeciesApplied GBGrowth RateGrowth Rate
mMmg FW day−1mg DW day−1
18 °CL. m.019.156.23
5013.764.41
10032.91 ***7.04 **
L. p.014.194.89
5012.244.15
10022.135.94
6 °CL. m.06.322.61
505.762.53
10010.332.10
L. p.05.841.22
5014.16 *4.17 ***
10018.75 ***4.30 ***
The slope of biomass over five weeks of plants treated with 50 or 100 mM GB is significantly different from the slope of plants treated with 0 mM GB at p ≤ 0.05 (*), 0.01 (**), or 0.001 (***).
Table
Table 3. The effects of applied glycinebetaine (GB) on relative water content (RWC), leaf succulence (Suc), osmotic potential (Ψπ), osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψπ100), and the contribution of GB to Ψπ (GBC) values of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (L. m.) and L. perenne ‘Kingston’ (L. p.) plants grown under 18 or 6 °C (n = 6).
Table 3. The effects of applied glycinebetaine (GB) on relative water content (RWC), leaf succulence (Suc), osmotic potential (Ψπ), osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψπ100), and the contribution of GB to Ψπ (GBC) values of Lolium multiflorum ‘Crusader’ (L. m.) and L. perenne ‘Kingston’ (L. p.) plants grown under 18 or 6 °C (n = 6).
TemperatureSpeciesApplied GBRWCSucΨπΨπ100GBC
°C mM% MPaMPa%
18L. m.092.83.98b−1.12b−1.0310.0b
5092.64.19b−1.22ab−1.1523.2a
10088.94.93a−1.29a−1.1433.4a
L. p.092.33.91b−1.28b−1.1711.4b
5089.04.17ab−1.46a−1.2825.1ab
10086.74.84a−1.48a−1.2631.0a
Sig zGB**********
Speciesn.s.n.s.******n.s.
GB × Speciesn.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.
6L. m.085.54.07ab−1.28b−1.07b7.8b
5084.43.95b−1.47a−1.21a31.5a
10085.84.36a−1.52a−1.28a38.0a
L. p.085.34.36−1.35b−1.13b8.4b
5085.24.19−1.51a−1.26a29.4a
10084.64.22−1.51a−1.25a24.9a
Sig zGBn.s.n.s.*********
Speciesn.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.
GB × Speciesn.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.
z Means within a column are not significantly different (n.s.) or are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 (*), 0.01 (**), or 0.001 (***). Values with the same letter within a species × temperature level are not significantly different, based on Fisher’s Protected LSD test.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mickelbart, M.V.; Boine, B. Glycinebetaine Enhances Osmotic Adjustment of Ryegrass under Cold Temperatures. Agronomy 2020, 10, 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020210

AMA Style

Mickelbart MV, Boine B. Glycinebetaine Enhances Osmotic Adjustment of Ryegrass under Cold Temperatures. Agronomy. 2020; 10(2):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mickelbart, Michael V., and Barbara Boine. 2020. "Glycinebetaine Enhances Osmotic Adjustment of Ryegrass under Cold Temperatures" Agronomy 10, no. 2: 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020210

APA Style

Mickelbart, M. V., & Boine, B. (2020). Glycinebetaine Enhances Osmotic Adjustment of Ryegrass under Cold Temperatures. Agronomy, 10(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop