Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in the Hydrogen Gas Barrier Performance of Polymer Liners and Composites for Type IV Hydrogen Storage Tanks: Fabrication, Properties, and Molecular Modeling
Previous Article in Journal
Critical Perspectives on the Design of Polymeric Materials for Mitigating Thermal Runaway in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Previous Article in Special Issue
One-Step Synergistic SDS-H2O2 Process for High-Purity Chitin Extraction from Fly Larvae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physicochemical Characteristics of Chitosan Extracted from Pleurotus ostreatus and Its Anticancer Activity Against the MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cell Line

Clinical Laboratory Sciences Department, Turabah University College, Taif University, Taif 21995, Saudi Arabia
Polymers 2025, 17(9), 1228; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17091228
Submission received: 7 March 2025 / Revised: 28 April 2025 / Accepted: 28 April 2025 / Published: 30 April 2025

Abstract

:
One of the main causes of death worldwide is cancer, a disorder in which a solid or liquid mass of cells known as a tumor develops when one or more cells lose the capacity to regulate their development. This study aims to assess the potential of chitosan as an anticancer agent in place of standard therapy regimens that have some degree of unselective cytotoxicity. PCR was performed for the RNA extraction of Caspase-3 and β-actin genes, and Cq values and quantification curves for each gene were recorded. Additionally, SRB and FITC apoptosis investigations were used to assess the effectiveness of chitosan powder’s anticancer activity against breast cancer cells.

1. Introduction

Cancer is a multifaceted disease with very complicated genesis and course. The rise of multidrug resistance and relapse is one of the main issues with anticancer medication development. The DNA of the cell is the direct target of traditional chemotherapeutic medications, but mutations allow the cell to become resistant. Recent advances in the availability of anticancer medications include the creation and subsequent development of novel anticancer small-molecule therapies, as well as molecular-targeted therapy, which targets proteins that exhibit aberrant expression within cancer cells. Numerous intriguing therapeutic targets have been discovered in recent years that could be successfully used to treat cancer. Drug resistance and adverse effects on healthy tissues and cells have frequently hindered the efficacy of targeted chemotherapy, despite its success in treating some cancers. Many individuals who would benefit from targeted chemotherapies are unable to obtain them due to their high cost [1]. In women, non-melanoma skin cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed, followed by breast cancer. Among women worldwide, it is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The second leading cause of cancer-related fatalities among women, behind lung cancer, is breast cancer, which affects almost 316,000 people annually in the US [2,3]. A multidisciplinary team of experts in medical, surgical, and radiation oncology is needed to treat breast cancer. Primary care physicians are frequently the first people patients with a new breast cancer diagnosis contact because the majority of breast cancers are detected by mammography or physical examination [4]. Pleurotus is a genus of edible mushrooms that produces a considerable number of unique mycochemicals. Due to its short life cycle, high mineral content, therapeutic qualities, repeatability in recycling specific industrial and agricultural wastes, and cheap resource and technological requirements, a number of Pleurotus species are now grown commercially [5]. P. ostreatus, P. florida, P. flabellatus, and others belong to the genus Pleurotus; some of these are particularly noteworthy because of their high nutritional content and therapeutic significance [6,7]. There are approximately 100 distinct bioactive chemicals in the fruiting body of P. ostreatus, and these are mostly believed to be a possible new source of dietary fiber. The fungal cell wall, on the other hand, is rich in non-starch polysaccharides, of which β-glucan is one of the major intriguing functional components, as well as phenolic compounds like protocatechuic acid, tocopherols such as α-tocopherol and γ-tocopherol, homogentisic acid, ascorbic acid, naringin, rutin, myricetin, chrysin, and β-carotene, with each having an exceptional medicinal effect of its own [8,9]. Chitosan is derived from chitin, a naturally occurring biopolymer that is most prevalent in insect cuticles, fungal cell walls, mollusk shells, and crustacean exoskeletons [10]. Chitosan can be chemically modified to produce a number of derivatives with enhanced solubility and several uses [11]. It has been demonstrated that this derivatization of chitosan caused by amino groups and acetamido residues results in compounds with increased solubility and biological activity [12].
This research aims to identify chitosan’s potential as an anticancer agent, which will help to develop safer protocols and less unselective cytotoxic drugs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus

A Pleurotus ostreatus strain culture with GenBank accession number JN126342 was obtained from the Egyptian Microbial Culture Collection and used to produce chitosan. The active mycelia were collected from a freshly prepared PDA agar plate culture after 7 days of incubation at 25 °C on potato dextrose agar (PDA) with occasional transfers onto a fresh PDA medium. The pre-inoculums were made as follows: 50 mLof MGYP medium (meat extract 2%, peptone 0.5%, yeast extract 0.3%, and glucose 1.5%). Without any disruption, the Erlenmeyer flask that had been inoculated was incubated at 28 °C for 15 days. Following a 15-day incubation period, the Pleurotus ostreatus fungal mycelium was isolated and filtered to produce a consistent weight for the extraction of chitosan and chitin. The mycelium mat was dried at 60 °C after being rinsed with sterile distilled water until a clear filtrate was produced using Whatman No. 1 filter paper (MRS Scientific Ltd., Wickford, UK).

2.2. Production of Chitosan and Extraction of Chitin

Using the alkalization process, chitosan was obtained from the chitin extract [13,14]. After being dried for two days at 60 °C in an oven, the fresh fungal mycelium with different biomasses, shown in Table 1, was ground into a powder. After being treated with a 1 N NaOH solution, the powder was stored at 100 °C for three hours. The slurry was filtered in order to collect the alkali-insoluble materials (AIMs). The AIMs were dried for four days at 40 °C in an oven. A water bath heated to 100 °C was then used to dilute the dried AIMs in 2% acetic acid (Thermo Scientific Chemicals, Waltham, MA, USA, 99.5% pure) for five hours. The supernatant was then poured into a beaker after the sample solution was centrifuged for ten minutes at 6000 rpm. Centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 5 min was used to recover the precipitation after adjusting the pH to 12.0 using a 2 N NaOH solution. Following the same centrifugation parameters, the precipitate was rinsed 4 or 5 rounds with distilled water before being dried at 45 °C in an oven.

2.3. Characterization of Pleurotus ostreatus

The strain was characterized through chemical composition analysis to obtain moisture, fats, protein, ash, and carbohydrate contents; the procedures utilized are described in detail in the next sections.

2.3.1. Chemical Composition of Pleurotus ostreatus Biomass

The chemical composition of Pleurotus ostreatus was determined according to the official methods of analysis mentioned in AOAC INTERNATIONAL [15]. Briefly, a hot-air oven was utilized to determine moisture content, protein content was determined according to the Kjeldahl method, the acid hydrolysis method was used to determine total fat, and the gravimetric method was used to determine ash. Three replicates were used to assess the percentages of moisture, protein, fat, and ash. The amount of carbs was then obtained by calculating the difference between the chemical composition results using the following equation: moisture + protein + fat + ash = 100 − (fresh weight); this equals total carbs.

2.3.2. Moisture and Ash Content Determination in Biomass

Following a 0.5 g mass weighing of the chitosan for each sample, the moisture content of the samples was measured after being subjected to the moisture analyzer. For every sample, the values that were obtained were expressed as percentages. Weighed empty crucibles were labeled as Ma to indicate the amount of ash. The masses were expressed in Mb, and each sample was weighed to a mass of 0.1 g. The samples were placed in a crucible and exposed to an open flame until the chitosan ceased producing white fumes and turned black. A furnace was then used to burn the crucibles for 12 h at 550 °C. After weighing the samples again, the crucibles were assigned the number Mc. The following formula was used to determine each sample’s ash content: ash content (%) = 100 × (Mc − Ma/Mb).

2.4. Characterization of Chitosan

Chitosan’s inherent viscosity, molecular weight, degree of deacetylation, and nitrogen concentration were measured according to the methods mentioned below.

2.4.1. Determination of Nitrogen Content

According to ISO 16948:2015, the nitrogen (N) concentration was determined using the Vario MACRO CHNS from Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH (Langenselbold, Germany) [16]. After the combustion tube was heated to 1150 °C, 30 mg of homogenized samples was placed on the carousel of an automatic sample feeder and covered with tin foil.

2.4.2. Determination of Average Viscosity Molecular Weight

The molecular weight of chitosan was determined using the Ostwald viscometer through the comparison of the viscosity of a known solvent (0.3 M acetic acid + 0.2 M sodium acetate) with the viscosity of an unknown liquid (sample solution). Two liquids of the same volume were compared for flow times (tsolvent = solvent flow time and t sample = sample flow time) in order to measure the viscosity of the liquid using the same viscometer. Furthermore, the values of average runtime, specific viscosity (•spe), and reduced viscosity (•red) were calculated using the measured flow times. Moreover, the graph was created by plotting the concentration of chitosan (x-axis) against reduced viscosity (y-axis). The intrinsic viscosity [•], which is equivalent to the Y-intercept, was then determined by creating an extrapolation plot using a trend line showing a decrease in the viscosity relative to the concentration of chitosan. The following formula was used to determine the sample’s intrinsic viscosity: (Runtime A + Runtime B + Runtime C)/3 = the average runtime.
Specific viscosity (•spe) = (Sample runtime − Solvent runtime)/Solvent runtime
Reduced viscosity (•red) = Specific viscosity/Sample concentration
Intrinsic viscosity = Y − intercept of the plot
The Mark–Houwink equation was used to calculate the molecular weight [17].
  • η = KMa;
  • η = Intrinsic viscosity;
  • K = Constant;
  • M = Relative molecular mass average;
  • a = Solvent’s relative constant.

2.4.3. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis

Analysis was carried out using a GC-TSQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA) with a direct capillary column TG–5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm film thickness). The column oven temperature was initially held at 60 °C and then increased by 5 °C/min to 250 °C, then increased to 300 °C with a heating rate of 3 °C/min after being held for 2 min. The injector temperature was kept at 270 °C. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min. The solvent delay was 4 min, and 100 µL of derivatization reagent (80 µLBFSTA + 20 µLTMCS) was added to the dried sample that was incubated at 65 °C for one hour before injection. Diluted samples of 1 µL in volume were injected automatically using Autosampler AS3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with GC in the split mode. EI mass spectra were collected at 70 eV ionization voltages over the range of m/z 50–650 in full scan mode. The ion source and transfer line were set at 200 °C and 280 °C, respectively. The components were identified by comparing their mass spectra with those of WILEY 09 and NIST14 mass spectral database [18,19].

2.4.4. Water-Binding Capacity Determination (WBC)

The Knorr method [20] was used to measure the WBC of chitosan. By weighing a tube that contained 0.5 g of chitosan, WBC was determined. After adding 10 milliliters of water (Paul Muller Company, Springfield, MO, USA, 100% pure) to help disperse the material, the mixture was vortexed for one minute. The contents were allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min with 5 s of sporadic shaking every 10 min and were then centrifuged for 25 min at 3000 rpm. Following the decantation of the supernatant, the tube was weighed once more. The bound water (g) was computed by subtracting the weight of the centrifuge tube containing chitosan and water from the weight of the tube containing only chitosan. The formula used to determine WBC is as follows: WBC (%) = [Water bound (g)/Initial sample weight (g)] × 100.

2.4.5. Fat-Binding Capacity Determination (FBC)

The Knorr method [20] was used to measure the FBC of chitosan [20]. The same procedure outlined in WBC was performed to determine FBC, and soybean oil (Vigon International, an Azelis Company, East Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 100% pure) was substituted for water. The formula used to compute FBC is as follows: FBC (%) = [Fat bound (g)/Initial sample weight (g)] × 100.

2.4.6. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Infrared spectroscopy utilizing the KBr pellet method in FTIR (Shimadzu FTIR-8200, Kyoto, Japan) was used to confirm the structure of the isolated mycelia chitin and chitosan. With a resolution of 4 cm−1, FTIR spectra were acquired in the absorbance mode for 16 scans in the middle infrared (4000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1) at ambient temperature. The mycelial chitosan samples were prepared by grinding dry mycelial chitosan powder with powdered KBr (ACG-EGYPT, Nasr City, Egypt, 99.5% pure) in a 1:5 ratio (sample–KBr). The KBr pellet was then compressed and subjected to FTIR analysis.

2.4.7. Solubility Determination

The following formula was applied to ascertain each sample’s solubility: solubility (%) = 100 × (Ma − Mc/Ma). For each of the samples, the chitosan was weighed to a mass of 0.1 g; the masses are represented by the symbol Ma. After that, the samples were combined and dissolved in a 30 mL solution of 1% ethanoic acid. After stirring for 30 min, the undissolved residues were filtered out and dried in an oven.

2.4.8. Degree of Deacetylation

Using three distinct absorbance ratios (R = A1655/A2870, A1655/A3450, and A1320/A1420) in a comparable equation, the absorbance wavenumbers derived from FTIR spectroscopy study were used to calculate the chitosan’s deacetylation levels [21]: Deacetylation degree (%) = 100% − (R − 0.03822/0.03133).

2.5. Real Time PCR for Caspase-3 and β-Actin Genes in Chitosan

An RNeasy Mini kit (Cat. No. 74104, QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) was applied to the samples in compliance with the manufacturer’s directions to extract total RNA. An A260/280 ratio Plate reader FLUOstar Omega (BMG LABTECH company, Offenburg, Germany) Spectrophotometer was used to measure the RNA’s purity and concentration. Using a total volume of 20 µL, which included 2 µL DNA (ADVENT CHEMBIO PVT. LTD., Maharashtra, India, 100% pure), 2 µL (0.2–0.5 µM) forward and reverse primers, 10 µL master mix, and 6 µL nuclease-free water, the SYBR Green qPCR master mix (TransGen Biotech company, Haidian District, Beijing, China) and the Bio-Rad platform (Bio-Rad CFX OPUS 96, BIO RAD company, Dubai, United Arab Emirates) were used to determine the levels of gene expression.

2.6. Sulforhodamine B (SRB) Viability Test in Cancer Cells

2.6.1. Cell Culture

Nawah Scientific Inc. provided the MDA-MB-231: Breast Cancer Cell Line (Mokatam, Cairo, Egypt). At 37 °C in a humidified, 5% (v/v) CO2 environment, the cells were cultured in DMEM media formulated with 100 units/mL penicillin (OXOID, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK, 100% pure), 100 mg/mL streptomycin (OXOID, UK, 100% pure), and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Genetics company for Biotechnology, Amman, Jordan, 100% pure).

2.6.2. Cytotoxicity Assay

The SRB test was used to evaluate the viability of the cells after they were cultured in DMEM media along with 100 units/mL penicillin. In 96-well plates, aliquots of 100 μL cell suspension (5 × 103 cells) were incubated for 24 h in full media. The cells were treated with another aliquot of 100 μL media that included drugs in varying quantities. After the drug treatment, the cells were fixed with 150 μL of 10% TCA (Ataman chemicals, Istanbul, Turkey, 80% pure) added to the media, and they were then incubated at 4 °C for an hour. After removing the TCA solution, distilled water was used to wash the cells five times. After adding 70 μL aliquots of SRB solution (0.4% w/v), the mixture was allowed to sit at room temperature for 10 min in a dark environment. After three rounds of washing with 1% acetic acid, the plates were set to air dry overnight. Following the dissolution of the protein-bound SRB stain with 150 μL of TRIS (10 mM), the absorbance at 540 nm was measured using an Infinite F50 microplate reader (TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland) [22,23].

2.7. FITC Apoptosis Assay for Cancer Cells

2.7.1. Cell Culture

Nawah Scientific Inc. provided the MDA-MB-231: Breast Cancer Cell Line (Mokatam, Cairo, Egypt). A 10-percent heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin were added to DMEM media, which were used for culturing the cells at 37 °C in a humidified environment with 5% (v/v) CO2.

2.7.2. Flow Cytometry Assay

An Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (Abcam Inc., Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge, UK) in combination with flow cytometry using two fluorescent channels was employed to identify apoptosis and necrosis cell populations. Following a specified duration spent in treatment with the test chemicals, 105 cells underwent the trypsinization process and then rinsed twice with ice-cold PBS (pH 7.4). Then, in agreement with the manufacturer’s instructions, the cells were incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark with 0.5 mL of the Annexin V-FITC/PI solution. AnACEA Novocyte™ flow cytometer (ACEA Biosciences Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to inject the cells after staining. The FL1 and FL2 signal detectors were used to detect FITC and PI fluorescent signals, respectively (λex/em 488/530 nm for FITC and λex/em 535/617 nm for PI). Using ACEA NovoExpress™ software (version 1.6.2) (ACEA Biosciences Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), 12,000 incidents were collected for each sample, and positive FITC and/or PI cells were counted using quadrant analysis [24,25,26,27].

3. Results

3.1. Biomass of Pleurotus ostreatus and Yield of Chitin and Chitosan

Following 15 days of incubation at 28 °C in an Erlenmeyer flask containing Pleurotus ostreatus mycelia, the mat was washed and dried. Throughout the incubation period, the dry weight of the mat, the yield of extracted chitin, and the resultant chitosan were continuously measured (Table 1).

3.2. Characterization of Pleurotus ostreatus Biomass

“Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International” were followed in the analysis of Pleurotus ostreatus’ chemical composition, and the findings were documented (Table 2).

3.3. Characterization of Produced Chitosan

3.3.1. Chitosan’s Molecular Weight, Intrinsic Viscosity, and Degree of Deacetylation

Following the examination of chitosan composition and structure, each of the characterized parameters was measured, and the information obtained was documented (Table 3).

3.3.2. GC-MS Analysis

After injecting the sample into the GC-TSQ mass spectrometer, the sample was separated using gas chromatography features, and then the neutral molecules were eluted through a heated transfer line into the mass spectrometer. Moreover, the ionization of these molecules was achieved using electron ionization, resulting in unstable molecular ions, which can lose their excess energy via fragmentation. Furthermore, the produced fragments of different masses were separated using the mass analyzer; after that, they were subjected to ion detection, the signals of all the fragments were recorded (Table 4), and the chromatograms were generated (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

3.3.3. Solubility of Chitosan

After standing for 24 h at room temperature, the degree of solubility was tested at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in each solvent. The solvents in which solubility was assessed were H2O2, as well as various concentrations of CH3COOH and NaOH (Table 5).

3.3.4. Capacity of Chitosan to Bind Fat and Water

The water-binding capacity (WBC) and fat-binding capacity (FBC) were calculated using essentially the same equation except that the parameter indicating the fat bound in grams was used in the equation to measure the fat-binding capacity, whereas this was replaced with the weight of water bound for calculating the water-binding capacity; the values represent these capacities are listed in Table 6.

3.3.5. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

The absorption band at 2937 cm−1 is attributed to C-H symmetric stretching, while the strong band in the range 3340 cm−1 in the chitosan infrared spectrum is associated with OH stretching. These bands represent typical polysaccharide properties (Figure 3).

3.4. PCR for the RNA Extraction of Selected Chitosan Genes

During the analysis of quantification curves (Figure 4 and Figure 5), the cycle number at which the fluorescence first reaches above the threshold level for both is known as the quantification cycle, or Cq; this value was recorded for Caspase-3 and β-actin genes in breast cancer cells in both chitosan and control samples (Table 7 and Table 8).

3.5. SRB Viability Test

Subsequent to the incubation of cells with different concentrations of chitosan, at a wavelength of 540 nm, optical density values were measured with a 96-well micro-titer plate reader. The formula used to calculate the percentage of growth inhibition (I%) is I% = (1 [ODt/ODc] × 100%), where ODt and ODc stand for the optical density values of the test and control samples, respectively. To calculate the IC50 value, dose–response curves were plotted, and the percentage of viable cells at each concentration was recorded (Table 9 and Figure 6).

3.6. FITC Apoptosis Test

To evaluate the viability of the cells that were exposed to chitosan powder in comparison with the control sample, ACEA NovoExpress™ software (version 1.6.2) (ACEA Biosciences Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to quantify and analyze the PI cells through quadrant analysis; thus, all apoptotic phases of breast cancer cells, including early (Q2-4) and late (Q2-3) apoptotic phases and necrosis phase (Q2-1), were detected, in addition to the normal state of cells (Q2-2) (Figure 7 and Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Chitosan is a cationic polymer that is primarily produced by N-deacetylation chitin. It is a copolymer of N-acetyl glucosamine and glucosamine unit. Because of its biodegradability and biocompatibility, it has been widely used in biological and biomedical applications [28]. As chitosan is nontoxic, biocompatible, biodegradable, and adsorptive, it can be used for a variety of purposes. In several research studies, chitosan has been found to have anticancer properties with low toxicity to noncancer cells. Its capacity to be effective against various cancer cell types is mainly dependent on DDA and molecular weight [29,30,31,32]. In this research, chitosan was obtained from Pleurotus ostreatus fungi, and both Caspase-3 and β-actin were characterized through the analysis of chemical compositions and characteristics. The chemical composition analysis of Pleurotus ostreatus was performed according to the standard methods indicated in several previously published studies [33,34,35]. The solubility of chitosan in different solvents, such as hydrogen peroxide, sodium hydroxide, and acetic acid, was determined. Moreover, the molecular mass analysis of chitosan was carried out by means of both intrinsic viscosity and GC-MS spectrometry; in addition to that, water- and fat-binding capacities of chitosan were identified [16,17,18,19]. The IR spectrum of chitosan was acquired using the FTIR technique; OH stretching is represented by the strong band in the spectrum at 3340 cm−1, whereas the absorption band at 2937 cm−1 is attributed to C-H symmetric and asymmetric stretching, similar to the bands detected in IR spectrums in other similar previous studies [36]. The values obtained from assessing both fat- and water-binding capacities were almost typical and similar to what has been reported in other scientific publications [37,38]. Following [39], PCR was performed for Caspase-3 and β-actin genes in breast cancer cells exposed to chitosan to obtain the Cq values and amplification curves for both genes. The viability of breast cancer cells subjected to chitosan was investigated through SRB and FITC apoptosis examinations, and the results showed the ability of chitosan against cancer cells, in agreement with many previous studies; in addition to that, the quadrant analysis of FITC showed a considerable number of cells in both late and early apoptotic phases [40,41].

5. Conclusions

Briefly, and from the authors’ point of view, relying on safety features offered by using chitosan, which include nontoxicity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability, and the efficacy demonstrated through the results obtained from the assays performed in our study, such as SRB viability assay and FITC apoptosis assay, chitosan holds promise as an anticancer agent, which can be confirmed by performing more studies in the future.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The study’s original contributions are highlighted in the article’s Methods and Materials section; additional information is provided by contacting the study’s corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Meegan, M.J.; O’Boyle, N.M. Special issue “Anticancer drugs”. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures. 2019. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2019/cancer-facts-and-figures-2019.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2025).
  4. Ruddy, K.J.; Ganz, P.A. Treatment of nonmetastatic breast cancer. JAMA 2019, 321, 1716–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yildiz, S.; Yildiz, U.C.; Gezer, E.D.; Temiz, A. Some lignocellulosic waste used as raw material in cultivation of the Pleurotus ostreatus culture mushroom. Process Biochem. 2002, 37, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kues, U.; Liu, Y. Fruiting body production in basidomycetes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 54, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chang, S.T.; Miles, P.G. Edible Mushrooms and Their Cultivation; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, D.; Sakoda, A.K.; Suzuki, M. Biological efficiency and nutritional values of Pleurotus ostreatus cultivated on spent beer grain. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 78, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Barros, L.; Abreu, R.M.V. Antioxidants in wild mushrooms. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009, 16, 1543–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramya, R.; Sudha, P.N.; Mahalakshmi, J. Preparation and characterization of chitosan binary blend. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 2012, 2, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kumar, S.; Dutta, J.; Dutta, P. Preparation and characterization of N-heterocyclic chitosan derivative based gels for biomedical applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2009, 45, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gavhane, Y.N.; Gurav, A.S.; Yadav, A.V. Chitosan and its applications: A review of literature. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2013, 4, 312–331. [Google Scholar]
  13. Johney, J.; Eagappan, K.; Ragunathan, R.R. Microbial extraction of chitin and chitosan from Pleurotus spp., its characterization and antimicrobial activity. Int. J. Curr. Pharm. Res. 2017, 9, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, L.; Li, X.; Lai, C.; Fan, Y.; Ouyang, J.; Yong, Q. Fungal chitosan production using xylose-rich corn stover hydrolysate by Rhizopus oryzae. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2017, 31, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed.; Revision 3; AOAC International: Rockville, MD, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. ISO 16948:2015; Solid Biofuels—Determination of Total Content of Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen. International Organization for Standardization: London, UK, 2015. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/58004.html (accessed on 16 January 2025).
  17. Wang, W.; Bo, S.Q.; Li, S.Q.; Qin, W. Determination of the Mark-Houwink equation for chitosans with different degrees of deacetylation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1991, 13, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. El-Kareem, M.; Rabbih, M.; Selim, E.; Elsherbiny, E.; El-Khateeb, A.Y. Application of GC/EIMS in combination with semi-empirical calculations for identification and investigation of some volatile components in basil essential oil. Int. J. Anal. Mass Spectrom. Chromatogr. 2016, 4, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Datta, A.; Kamthan, A.; Kamthan, M.; Chakraborty, N.; Chakraborty, S. A simple protocol for extraction, derivatization, and analysis of tomato leaf and fruit lipophilic metabolites using GC-MS. Protoc. Exch. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Knorr, D. Functional properties of chitin and chitosan. J. Food Sci. 1982, 47, 593–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Czechowska-Biskup, R.; Jarosińska, D.; Rokita, B.; Ulanski, P.; Rosiak, J.M. Determination of degree of deacetylation of chitosan—Comparison of methods. Prog. Chem. Appl. Chitin Its Deriv. 2012, 17, 5–20. [Google Scholar]
  22. Skehan, P.; Storeng, R.; Scudiero, D.; Monks, A.; McMahon, J.; Vistica, D.; Warren, J.T.; Bokesch, H.; Kenney, S.; Boyd, M.R. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Allam, R.M.; Al-Abd, A.M.; Khedr, A.; Sharaf, O.A.; Nofal, S.M.; Khalifa, A.E.; Mosli, H.A.; Abdel-Naim, A.B. Fingolimod interrupts the cross talk between estrogen metabolism and sphingolipid metabolism within prostate cancer cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2018, 291, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fekry, M.I.; Ezzat, S.M.; Salama, M.M.; Alshehri, O.Y.; Al-Abd, A.M. Bioactive glycoalkaloids isolated from Solanum melongena fruit peels with potential anticancer properties against hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bashmail, H.A.; Alamoudi, A.A.; Noorwali, A.; Hegazy, G.A.; Ajabnoor, G.; Choudhry, H.; Al-Abd, A.M. Thymoquinone synergizes gemcitabine anti-breast cancer activity via modulating its apoptotic and autophagic activities. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Alaufi, O.M.; Noorwali, A.; Zahran, F.; Al-Abd, A.M.; Al-Attas, S. Cytotoxicity of thymoquinone alone or in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) against oral squamous cell carcinoma in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mohamed, G.A.; Al-Abd, A.M.; El-halawany, A.M.; Abdalla, H.M.; Ibrahim SR, M. New xanthones and cytotoxic constituents from Garcinia mangostana fruit hulls against human hepatocellular, breast, and colorectal cancer cell lines. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 198, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Anitha, A.; Sowmya, S.; Kumar, P.S.; Deepthi, S.; Chennazhi, K.; Ehrlich, H.; Tsurkan, M.; Jayakumar, R. Chitin and chitosan in selected biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 1644–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Park, J.K.; Chung, M.J.; Choi, H.N.; Park, Y.I. Effects of the molecular weight and the degree of deacetylation of chitosan oligosaccharides on antitumor activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gunbeyaz, M.; Faraji, A.; Ozkul, A.; Purali, N.; Senel, S. Chitosan-based delivery systems for mucosal immunization against bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1). Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 41, 531–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wimardhani, Y.S.; Suniarti, D.F.; Freisleben, H.J.; Wanadi, S.I.; Ikeda, M.A. Cytotoxic effects of chitosan against oral cancer cell lines is molecular-weight-dependent and cell-type specific. Int. J. Oral Res. 2012, 3, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wimardhani, Y.S.; Suniarti, D.F.; Freisleben, H.J.; Wanandi, S.I.; Siregar, N.C.; Ikeda, M.-A. Chitosan exerts anticancer activity through induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in oral cancer cells. J. Oral Sci. 2014, 56, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Oluwafemi, G.I.; Seidu, K.T.; Fagbemi, T.N. Chemical composition, functional properties and protein fractionation of edible oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). Ann. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 17, 218–224. [Google Scholar]
  34. Manu-Tawiah, W.; Martin, A.M. Chemical composition of Pleurotus ostreatus mycelial biomass. Food Microbiol. 1987, 4, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vamanu, E. Antioxidant properties and chemical compositions of various extracts of the edible commercial mushroom, Pleurotus ostreatus, in Romanian markets. Rev. Roum. Chim. 2013, 64, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  36. Queiroz, M.F.; Melo, K.R.T.; Sabry, D.A.; Sassaki, G.L.; Rocha, H.A.O. Does the use of chitosan contribute to oxalate kidney stone formation? Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 3038–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. No, H.K.; Lee, K.S.; Meyers, S.P. Correlation between physicochemical characteristics and binding capacities of chitosan products. J. Food Sci. 2000, 65, 1002–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cho, Y.I.; No, H.K.; Meyers, S.P. Physicochemical characteristics and functional properties of various commercial chitin and chitosan products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 3839–3843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Goni, R.; García, P.; Foissac, S. The qPCR data statistical analysis. Integromics White Pap. 2009, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  40. Venkatesan, J.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kang, D.S.; Anil, S.; Kim, S.-K.; Shim, M.S.; Kim, D.G. Antimicrobial and anticancer activities of porous chitosan-alginate-biosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 98, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gibot, L.; Chabaud, S.; Bouhout, S.; Bolduc, S.; Auger, F.A.; Moulin, V.J. Anticancer properties of chitosan on human melanoma are cell line dependent. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 72, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. GSMS chromatogram showing the abundance (y-axis) of chitosan at a retention time (x-axis) of 31.89 min.
Figure 1. GSMS chromatogram showing the abundance (y-axis) of chitosan at a retention time (x-axis) of 31.89 min.
Polymers 17 01228 g001
Figure 2. Mass spectrum of chitosan showing the reference base peak at m/z = 59; peaks with relative intensities smaller than 5% of the reference peak were excluded to avoid background contamination ions.
Figure 2. Mass spectrum of chitosan showing the reference base peak at m/z = 59; peaks with relative intensities smaller than 5% of the reference peak were excluded to avoid background contamination ions.
Polymers 17 01228 g002
Figure 3. Chitosan [poly-(β-1/4)-2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucopyranose] infrared spectrum with band positions and intensities.
Figure 3. Chitosan [poly-(β-1/4)-2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucopyranose] infrared spectrum with band positions and intensities.
Polymers 17 01228 g003
Figure 4. Quantification curves for Caspase-3 gene in breast cancer cells: (A) cells in the control sample; (B) cells in the chitosan sample.
Figure 4. Quantification curves for Caspase-3 gene in breast cancer cells: (A) cells in the control sample; (B) cells in the chitosan sample.
Polymers 17 01228 g004
Figure 5. Quantification curves for β-actin gene in breast cancer cells: (A) cells in the control sample; (B) cells in the chitosan sample.
Figure 5. Quantification curves for β-actin gene in breast cancer cells: (A) cells in the control sample; (B) cells in the chitosan sample.
Polymers 17 01228 g005
Figure 6. Dose–response curve displays the value of IC50 for chitosan considering the relationship between each concentration of chitosan and the resultant percentage of viable cells.
Figure 6. Dose–response curve displays the value of IC50 for chitosan considering the relationship between each concentration of chitosan and the resultant percentage of viable cells.
Polymers 17 01228 g006
Figure 7. Control sample’s flow cytometry using dot plotting; the results show the total fluorescence of the cell population: (A) forward and side scatter of cells representing the size and complexity of cells; (B) quadrant analysis of cells shows the number of cells in each phase of apoptosis.
Figure 7. Control sample’s flow cytometry using dot plotting; the results show the total fluorescence of the cell population: (A) forward and side scatter of cells representing the size and complexity of cells; (B) quadrant analysis of cells shows the number of cells in each phase of apoptosis.
Polymers 17 01228 g007
Figure 8. Chitosan sample’s flow cytometry using dot plotting; the results show the total fluorescence of the cell population: (A) forward and side scatter of cells representing the size and complexity of cells; (B) quadrant analysis of cells shows the number of cells in each phase of apoptosis.
Figure 8. Chitosan sample’s flow cytometry using dot plotting; the results show the total fluorescence of the cell population: (A) forward and side scatter of cells representing the size and complexity of cells; (B) quadrant analysis of cells shows the number of cells in each phase of apoptosis.
Polymers 17 01228 g008
Table 1. Yield of biomass, chitin, and chitosan through the incubation period of 15 days.
Table 1. Yield of biomass, chitin, and chitosan through the incubation period of 15 days.
DayYield of Biomass (g/L Dry wt)Chitin Yield (mg/L)Chitosan Yield (mg/L)
31.2318.50.084
53.84560.342
87.561820.653
1211.83298173.8
1410.021483.12
Table 2. The percentage of each chemical component measured using chemical analysis.
Table 2. The percentage of each chemical component measured using chemical analysis.
ComponentsPercentage %
Moisture content (%)92
Fats0.3
Protein3.2
Ash content (%)0.8
Carbohydrates3.6
Table 3. The characterization parameters of chitosan.
Table 3. The characterization parameters of chitosan.
ParameterValue
Intrinsic Viscosity (dL/g)765.0
Molecular weight 1.6 × 105 Da
Degree of deacetylation (DD%)80.0%
Nitrogen content (N%)0.54% dry weight of biomass
Table 4. Mass-to-charge ratio, absolute intensity, and relative intensity of all the fragment ions detected.
Table 4. Mass-to-charge ratio, absolute intensity, and relative intensity of all the fragment ions detected.
Mass-to-Charge Ratio (m/z)Absolute IntensityRelative Intensity
55.0876,135.431.67
56.1225,497.210.61
59.18141,858.259.01
58.1424,835.210.33
60.1921,5108.95
67.1126,771.611.14
69.1336,599.615.22
70.11240,394.6100
71.1233,801.514.06
73.0940,699.616.93
81.1436,989.815.39
95.1426,91511.2
97.1323,026.79.58
99.128,645.911.92
123.0829,64912.33
135.1824,164.310.05
136.1326,941.611.21
151.0821,880.99.1
159.1121,013.88.74
165.0833,782.614.05
Table 5. Percentage of solubility of chitosan in a variety of solvents.
Table 5. Percentage of solubility of chitosan in a variety of solvents.
TreatmentsSolubility CaseSolubility %
H2O2Insoluble0.00
CH3COOH (0.1%)Swelling21.6 ± 1.5
CH3COOH (0.5%)Soluble95.8 ± 0.72
CH3COOH (1%)Soluble100 ± 0.00
NaOH (1%)Insoluble0.00
Table 6. Water-binding (WB) and fat-binding (FB) capacities of chitosan.
Table 6. Water-binding (WB) and fat-binding (FB) capacities of chitosan.
ReplicatesInitial Weight (g)Chitosan’s Water-Binding (WB) CapacityChitosan’s Capacity to Fat Binding (FB)
Weight of Water BoundWBC (%)Ave.
WBC (%)
Weight of Fat BoundFBC (%)Ave.
FBC (%)
10.52.62524526.6 ± 8.31.78365363 ±4.3
20.52.685361.83366
30.52.605201.79358
Table 7. Cq for Caspase-3 gene in breast cancer cells in chitosan and control samples.
Table 7. Cq for Caspase-3 gene in breast cancer cells in chitosan and control samples.
SampleCq for Caspase-3
Result 1Result 2Result 3
Control25.6667925.456725.73934
Chitosan31.3761829.5023631.10158
Table 8. Cq for β-actin gene in breast cancer cells in chitosan and control samples.
Table 8. Cq for β-actin gene in breast cancer cells in chitosan and control samples.
SampleCq for β-Actin
Reading 1Reading 2Reading 3
Control15.5643915.6898315.74965
Chitosan20.3938319.9706719.55612
Table 9. Different treatment concentrations of chitosan during incubation and percentages of viability.
Table 9. Different treatment concentrations of chitosan during incubation and percentages of viability.
ChitosanRaw DataBlank Corrected DataViability%
Conc.123123123MeanSTD
C2.23042.2072.2212.1952.17162.18561001001001000
0.12.22232.25122.26492.18692.21582.2295100.13101.453102.08101.2210.813004658
0.32.22232.19932.30332.18692.16392.2679100.1399.0766103.838101.0152.042265236
12.24422.18072.23642.20882.14532.201101.13298.225100.775100.0441.294630271
32.18842.1552.19982.1532.11962.164498.577697.048399.099598.24180.870413289
102.10222.1882.11422.06682.15262.078894.630898.559395.180296.12341.736931189
Blank0.03580.0350.0354Blank average0.0354Control average2.18407
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aldhahrani, A. Physicochemical Characteristics of Chitosan Extracted from Pleurotus ostreatus and Its Anticancer Activity Against the MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cell Line. Polymers 2025, 17, 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17091228

AMA Style

Aldhahrani A. Physicochemical Characteristics of Chitosan Extracted from Pleurotus ostreatus and Its Anticancer Activity Against the MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cell Line. Polymers. 2025; 17(9):1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17091228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aldhahrani, Adil. 2025. "Physicochemical Characteristics of Chitosan Extracted from Pleurotus ostreatus and Its Anticancer Activity Against the MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cell Line" Polymers 17, no. 9: 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17091228

APA Style

Aldhahrani, A. (2025). Physicochemical Characteristics of Chitosan Extracted from Pleurotus ostreatus and Its Anticancer Activity Against the MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cell Line. Polymers, 17(9), 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17091228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop