Next Article in Journal
Accelerated Storage Induced Structural Evolution in Natural Rubber: A Comparative Study of Two Constant Viscosity Treatment Methods
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Functional Applications of Hydrogel Delivery Systems in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Drug Delivery, Anti-Inflammation, and Intestinal Repair
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Aligned Polymers Using the Spin Hall Effect of Light
Previous Article in Special Issue
Melatonin and Bacterial Cellulose Regulate the Expression of Inflammatory Cytokines, VEGF, PCNA, and Collagen in Cutaneous Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Engineering Adhesive Hydrogels for Hemostasis and Vascular Repair

by
Juya Jeon
1,
Shri Venkatesh Subramani
1,
Kok Zhi Lee
1,
Santiago Elizondo-Benedetto
2,
Mohamed Adel Zayed
2,3,4,5 and
Fuzhong Zhang
1,6,7,*
1
Department of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
2
Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
3
Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
4
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
5
Cardiovascular Research Innovation in Surgery & Engineering Center, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
6
Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
7
Division of Biological & Biomedical Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2025, 17(7), 959; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070959
Submission received: 28 February 2025 / Revised: 25 March 2025 / Accepted: 30 March 2025 / Published: 1 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrogel Materials for Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering)

Abstract

:
Adhesive hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties and strong adhesion to wet, dynamic tissues have emerged as promising materials for tissue repair, with potential applications in wound closure, hemorrhage control, and surgical adhesives. This review highlights the key design principles, material classifications, and recent advances in adhesive hydrogels designed for vascular repair. The limitations of existing adhesive hydrogels, including insufficient mechanical durability, suboptimal biocompatibility, and challenges in targeted delivery, are critically evaluated. Furthermore, innovative strategies—such as incorporating self-healing capabilities, developing stimuli-responsive systems, integrating functional nanocomposites, and employing advanced fabrication techniques like 3D bioprinting—are discussed to enhance adhesion, mechanical stability, and vascular tissue regeneration. While significant progress has been made, further research and optimization are necessary to advance these materials toward clinical translation, offering a versatile and minimally invasive alternative to traditional vascular repair techniques.

1. Introduction

Bleeding and hemorrhagic shock have a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality, with uncontrolled bleeding being a leading cause of mortality worldwide, responsible for over two million deaths annually [1,2]. Trauma-related hemorrhage alone has a reported fatality rate of approximately 30–40% [3], while hemorrhage complications occur in nearly 7% of cardiac surgeries and percutaneous coronary interventions where patient underlying morbidity is already high [4]. Additionally, emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgeries following percutaneous coronary interventions exhibit mortality rates between 7.4% and 21% [5]. These high fatality rates stem from the challenges associated with managing and maintaining appropriate hemostasis to prevent hemodynamic compromise and progression to shock [6].
Current techniques for treating surgical and trauma-related bleeding, such as compression with absorbable textiles, often fail to effectively stop massive hemorrhage [7]. To address this, surgical toolkits often incorporate hemostatic gauzes, tissue adhesives, and sealants designed to promote blood coagulation and adhere to the adjacent tissue surfaces. Beyond wound management, hemostatic materials are increasingly explored for endovascular embolization, wherein biomaterials occlude blood vessels to prevent tissue rupture [8]. The current standard, coil embolization, relies on inserting a coil-shaped metal wire to induce clot formation; however, its efficacy is reduced in patients with coagulopathic diseases [8]. Therefore, the development of advanced biomaterials is crucial for improving effective hemorrhage management strategies.
Adhesive hydrogels have emerged as a particularly promising class of biomaterials for hemorrhage management and wound repair. Adhesive hydrogels not only absorb blood locally but also form strong molecular interactions with surrounding tissues, enabling rapid hemostasis and wound sealing. Among various tissue repair scenarios, vascular repair represents some of the greatest challenges due to the dynamic mechanical environment and the need for rapid hemostasis under high-pressure conditions. To be effective for vascular repair, adhesive hydrogels must meet several key criteria (Figure 1). (1) Biocompatibility—The material must be compatible with vascular and surrounding connective tissues. Incompatible materials, such as cyanoacylate-based sealants, have been shown to induce inflammation and tissue necrosis in vivo [9,10]. (2) Rapid Adhesion—Since hemorrhagic events are time-sensitive and life-threatening, the adhesive must act rapidly to stop bleeding and prevent fatal blood loss. (3) Tunable Mechanical Properties—The adhesive’s mechanical properties should be adjustable to accommodate different parts of the body with variable vascular structures. For example, arteries generally have a higher modulus and burst pressure than veins, thus requiring tailored performance for optimal sealing [11]. (4) Biofunctionalization—The adhesive should support the integration of bioactive molecules, such as vascular endothelial growth factors, to promote wound healing and accelerate recovery [12]. (5) Sufficient Mechanical Strength—To function effectively, the adhesive must withstand burst pressures of systolic blood exceeding 180 mmHg, the upper limit of human blood pressure, ensuring durability under physiological conditions [13]. Together, these criteria define the performance requirements for next-generation vascular adhesive hydrogels. Meanwhile, some real-time monitoring systems in hydrogels have been developed to monitor the wound healing process. However, these systems are limited to hydrogels applied on the surface of the body. Developing a deep-tissue monitoring system would be highly valuable for vascular adhesives, especially for fine-tuning the release of growth factors to accelerate the healing process [14,15].
While several engineered adhesive hydrogels have successfully met some of these criteria, none have yet fully satisfied all the requirements for optimal vascular repair applications. In this review, we explore natural and synthetic vascular adhesives, discuss vascular hydrogels for vascular applications, and highlight current challenges and future directions for vascular sealants.

2. Different Vascular Adhesives

Vascular adhesives can be categorized based on their composition and adhesion mechanisms, including natural polymer-based (e.g., fibrin, gelatin), synthetic polymer-based (e.g., cyanoacrylates, polyurethane), and hybrid adhesives that combine natural and synthetic components (Figure 2). In this section, we discuss these materials based on their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and adhesion performance in biological tissues [16,17,18]. Adhesives that lack hemostatic properties, exhibit cytotoxicity, or have not been validated on biological tissues are excluded from this review (Table 1).

2.1. Natural Material-Derived Vascular Adhesive

Some natural material-derived vascular adhesives offer good biocompatibility, biodegradability, and inherent hemostatic properties, supporting tissue integration and promoting healing. However, these adhesives typically suffer from weak adhesion, limited mechanical stability, and batch-to-batch variability, all of which hinder their broader application in vascular repair. Additionally, immunogenic risks and complex processing steps further complicate their clinical translation [33,34,35]. This section highlights the strategies researchers have developed to address these challenges, while also discussing the remaining limitations of natural material-based vascular adhesives.

2.1.1. Fibrin-Based Adhesives

Fibrin-based hydrogels are widely used in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine due to their biocompatibility, potential for autologous production, low cytotoxicity, and functions in wound healing and clot formation [36]. Fibrin glue, derived from the body’s natural coagulation system, consists of two components. The first component contains concentrated fibrinogen, and the other component comprises thrombin. Upon mixing, thrombin catalyzes the conversion of fibrinogen into fibrin, which polymerizes into a stable clot within 30 s. Clinically, fibrin glue has been used for over three decades in cardiovascular surgery to control bleeding and is routinely applied as a sealant for needle hole closure in vascular graft anastomoses [19,20,37].
Despite its clinical success, fibrin glue has notable limitations, including low adhesive strength, poor durability, and susceptibility to infection. These shortcomings largely stem from the low fibrinogen concentrations used in most formulations, which are intended to prevent the formation of dense polymer networks that could otherwise inhibit cell infiltration and migration. Therefore, the low-density molecular architecture of fibrin, together with the limited fibrin–fibrin interactions and crosslinking, leads to the formation of loosely interconnected hydrogels, inherently limiting their cohesive strength and mechanical durability [19]. Also, at such low concentrations, the resulting material becomes extremely soft and lacks the mechanical strength required for effective adhesion and tissue sealing. Additionally, these overly soft gels are impractical for clinical handling due to their fragility and inability to withstand manipulation [38]. Additionally, many fibrin-based adhesives exhibit rapid activation, limiting the ability for fine adjustments or the repositioning of surgical devices. Furthermore, fibrin glues are constrained with regard to their use in intervascular applications due to the risk of embolization, rendering them ineffective in vascular surgery [18].
To overcome these limitations, researchers have explored the incorporation of additional materials into fibrin formulations to enhance both adhesive strength and mechanical performance. One such approach involved integrating fibrin into collagen carriers to develop ready-to-use fibrinogen-coated collagen patches. While the collagen matrix improved the overall mechanical integrity of the patch, its adhesive strength to biological tissues in the presence of blood only reached approximately 3–5 kPa—significantly lower than the physiological blood pressure required for effective vascular sealing [39].

2.1.2. Silk Fibroin-Based Adhesives

Silk fibroin (SF), a natural polymer derived from the silkworm Bombyx mori, has been extensively explored for biomedical applications due to its desirable mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Structurally, SF consists of a 26 kDa light chain and a 390 kDa heavy chain linked by a disulfide bond. Its repetitive Gly–Ala–Gly–Ala–Gly–Ser sequences promote β-sheet formation through self-assembly, forming strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding, therefore contributing to its robust mechanical properties [40]. As a biomaterial, SF offers excellent biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, tunable biodegradability, and favorable water permeability, making it well suited for a range of tissue engineering applications [21,22,39].
Through various fabrication techniques, SF can be processed into fibers, films, sponges, hydrogels, and sealants, demonstrating versatility for biomedical use. However, SF-based adhesives inherently lack functional groups capable of forming strong covalent or non-covalent bonds with tissue surfaces [22,41]. As a result, they typically exhibit poor adhesion to wet, bleeding tissues, particularly under dynamic conditions such as pulsatile blood flow or heart contractions, limiting their effectiveness for vascular repair [21]. To address this challenge, Bai et al. incorporated tannic acid into an SF-based hydrogel, enabling rapid sealing of severely bleeding tissues under wet and highly dynamic conditions in rat models. Although this formulation exhibited relatively long gelation times, it demonstrated excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and antibacterial properties [22]. Similarly, Kim et al. developed a methacrylate-modified SF sealant (Sil-MAS) with enhanced mechanical properties, achieving an ultimate tensile stress of 32.9 kPa and withstanding burst pressures in the range of 90–140 mmHg, approaching physiological arterial pressures. Sil-MAS demonstrated effective hemostatic and adhesive performance in in vivo tests on rat skin, liver, and blood vessels, significantly reducing wound healing time compared to commercially available products [42]. Despite these promising advances, the need for extensive silk fibroin purification, functionalization, and processing presents challenges for large-scale production, requiring further optimization to enhance clinical feasibility [43].

2.1.3. Gelatin-Based Adhesives

Gelatin sponges, such as Gelfoam® from Pfizer (New York, NY, USA), are commercially available and widely used for controlling surgical bleeding due to their excellent biocompatibility and hemostatic properties. More recently, gelatin nanofiber sponges fabricated via electrospinning have been proposed for treating arterial injuries, demonstrating excellent hemostatic performance compared to conventional medical gauzes and traditional gelatin sponges [23,44]. In addition to sponges, gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels have gained attention as promising candidates for physical hemostasis in vivo, thanks to their tunable mechanical properties and strong adhesion capabilities. Zhou et al. developed a hybrid adhesive by combining GelMA with hyaluronic acid (HA) modified with N-(2-aminoethyl)-4-(4-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methoxy-5-nitrosophenoxy) butanamide (NB), which enhances adhesion and hemostasis [23]. The NB-functionalized HA enables on-demand aldehyde generation upon UV irradiation, facilitating Schiff base formation with tissue surfaces. This mechanism promotes strong adhesion, enabling the hydrogel to form robust bonds with vascular tissues and withstand blood pressures up to 250 mmHg. This strong adhesive hydrogel effectively sealed both ~6 mm diameter cardiac wounds and 4–5 mm long carotid artery incisions, demonstrating its potential for vascular repair [23].

2.1.4. Polysaccharides-Based Adhesives

Polysaccharide-based hydrogels, particularly those derived from chitosan and hyaluronic acid (HA), have been extensively studied for vascular applications due to their inherent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and hemostatic properties.
Chitosan, derived from chitin, also possesses antibacterial properties, making it particularly useful for wound healing in infection-prone environments. However, chitosan’s limited water absorbability restricts its practical application as a hemostatic adhesive [24,45,46]. To overcome this limitation, Song et al. developed a bio-hydrogel by combining 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl) propionic acid-modified chitosan with p-hydroxybenzaldehyde-modified PEG sebacate, avoiding the use of toxic crosslinking reagents [45]. The resulting hydrogel exhibited impressive stretchability (up to 780%) and exceptional blood absorbability (1300% ± 50%). Moreover, the hydrogel demonstrated strong adhesion (~68.5 kPa) to porcine skin and successfully sealed arterial injuries in rat models while also providing antibacterial protection, enhancing its potential for vascular applications [45].
Hyaluronic acid (HA)-based hydrogels also show promise for vascular repair due to HA’s excellent hydration properties and its ability to support cell migration, tissue regeneration, and angiogenesis [25]. HA-methacrylate (HA-ME) can be synthesized via transesterification and photopolymerized under UV irradiation. However, photopolymerization often generates free radicals that can compromise cell viability, particularly for sensitive cell types. Furthermore, crosslinked HA hydrogel lacks sufficient tissue adhesion for effective cell transplantation [25,47,48]. To overcome these challenges, Shin et al. employed mussel-inspired catechol chemistry, utilizing dopamine polymerization under alkaline conditions to create HA-catechol (HA-CA) hydrogels [26]. This UV-free approach improved biocompatibility and significantly enhanced tissue adhesion, achieving an adhesion strength of 47 ± 36 kPa on rat heart tissue, demonstrating its potential for vascular sealing and tissue regeneration [26].
Further advancing polysaccharide-based adhesives, Yuan et al. developed a multifunctional hydrogel utilizing a dual crosslinking strategy [49]. This system combined Schiff base crosslinking between catechol-modified oxidized hyaluronic acid (OD) and aminated gelatin (AG), with coordination crosslinking between OD and Fe3⁺ ions. Upon injection into a wound site, the prepolymer solution rapidly gelled upon contact with blood, forming a tight adhesive seal capable of stopping bleeding within seconds. In in vivo rat femoral vein puncture models, the hydrogel provided instant hemostasis, firmly adhered to the bleeding vessels, and effectively sealed pinhole injuries caused by needle removal [49].

2.2. Synthetic-Based Vascular Adhesive

In addition to natural polymer-based adhesives, synthetic polymer hydrogels offer precise control over physical and chemical properties, including swelling behavior, mechanical strength, and surface charge. This section reviews recent developments in synthetic polymer-based vascular adhesives, focusing on materials such as polyurethanes, polyacrylic acid, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) [2,18,50]. Cyanoacrylate-based adhesives, despite their strong adhesion and stability, are excluded from this review due to their lack of elasticity and known cytotoxicity.

2.2.1. Polyurethane-Based Adhesive

Polyurethane (PU)-based adhesives have gained attention for vascular applications due to their mechanical properties, which can tuned by controlling urethane linkage formation [27]. However, these materials may suffer from biocompatibility issues, as residual isocyanates or crosslinking agents can trigger chronic inflammation or immune reactions. When directly exposed to blood or vascular tissues, these molecular residues pose risks, highlighting the need for extensive purification and stabilization during synthesis [50]. Schulten et al. developed a PU adhesive that polymerizes rapidly when mixed with an amino-functional aspartic acid ester curing agent. This PU adhesive demonstrated sufficient burst pressure resistance and tensile strength to facilitate sutureless microsurgical anastomoses in ex vivo vascular models [27]. However, the successful application of this adhesive relied heavily on precise vessel alignment during application, which could be challenging under realistic surgical conditions. Furthermore, long-term studies investigating the adhesive’s degradation behavior and biocompatibility in in vivo vascular environments remain necessary to fully evaluate its clinical potential.

2.2.2. Polyacrylic Acid-Based Adhesive

Polyacrylic acid (PAA)-based hydrogels have also been explored for vascular applications, primarily due to their high water retention capacity and ability to swell in response to pH changes—properties that make them particularly suitable for moist environments such as blood vessels. However, PAA-based adhesives generally lack strong covalent bonding with tissue surfaces, resulting in relatively weak adhesion, particularly after the initial swelling phase [29,51,52]. To enhance adhesion and flexibility, Ito et al. developed a hybrid adhesive hydrogel using PAA and poly (vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) through a solid/solution interface complexation method [30]. In this system, the carboxyl groups of PAA remained partially uncomplexed, preserving PAA’s natural affinity for biological tissues. The hydrogel effectively adhered to moist beef tissue, demonstrating its potential for clinical applications. In an in vivo rat jugular vein incision model, the PAA/PVP adhesive film successfully achieved complete hemostasis within 15 min of application [30]. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term performance and stability of PAA-based adhesives after swelling in dynamic vascular environments.

2.2.3. Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)-Based Adhesive

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based materials are widely used in biomedical applications due to their high water solubility, biocompatibility, and tunable mechanical properties [17]. One clinically approved PEG-based sealant, Coseal® (Deerfield, IL, USA), has been successfully used in vascular surgery to prevent anastomotic leaks. Upon application, PEG in sodium phosphate/sodium carbonate solution reacts with PEG in dilute hydrogen chloride solution, forming a crosslinked hydrogel network. This synthetic PEG hydrogel also forms covalent bonds with amine groups on tissue surfaces, enhancing adhesion strength [16,53,54].
To further improve tissue adhesion and promote endothelial healing, researchers have explored hybrid formulations incorporating gelatin, catechol, and dendrimeric components [17]. Wang et al. developed a bio-inspired adhesive combining amino-gelatin and tetra-armed PEG succinimidyl succinate, mimicking the extracellular matrix [28]. This adhesive exhibited high toughness, rapid self-gelation, and controlled degradation when exposed to a cysteamine solution. In in vivo studies, the adhesive effectively sealed severe hemorrhages caused by aortic rupture and cardiac puncture injuries, with postoperative analysis confirming robust sealing, excellent blood compatibility, and accelerated healing [28]. Ongoing studies continue to optimize crosslinking chemistry for PEG-based adhesives to balance adhesion strength and tissue compatibility [55,56].

2.3. Recombinant-Protein Based Hydrogel

Adhesive hydrogels made from microbially produced recombinant proteins offer excellent biocompatibility, bio-absorbability, and tunable sequences, allowing both adhesive and mechanical properties to be precisely controlled [31,32,57,58]. These properties make recombinant protein-based hydrogels highly attractive for biomedical applications, including vascular repair [59,60].
One notable example is recombinant mussel foot proteins (Mfp), which display strong underwater adhesion to a wide range of surfaces, making them a promising base material for tissue adhesives [61,62,63]. However, Mfp proteins are intrinsically disordered and exhibit strong self-interaction, leading to significant protein aggregation under most conditions. This aggregation makes it difficult to form stable hydrogels directly from Mfp proteins. In contrast, silk and amyloid proteins provide excellent mechanical support through their ability to self-assemble into stable, fibrous structures [31,64,65,66,67]. To leverage the complementary properties of these proteins, recombinant hybrid proteins incorporating repetitive sequences from silk, amyloid, and Mfp domains—referred to as SAM proteins—have been developed [31,32]. These SAM proteins can be processed into hydrogels, where the repetitive amyloid and silk segments self-assemble into needle-like nanostructures. This self-assembly process effectively separates the adhesive Mfp fragments, allowing them to remain available for surface bonding. The resulting SAM hydrogels exhibited exceptionally strong underwater adhesion to porcine skin and other biological tissues, with adhesive strength reaching 416 ± 20 kPa [32]. Furthermore, the mechanical strength, modulus, toughness, and adhesive performance of SAM hydrogels can be fine-tuned by adjusting the length and composition of the individual protein segments, enabling the design of adhesives with tailored properties for specific applications [32].
A long-standing challenge associated with recombinant protein-based materials has been their relatively low production yield, which limited scalability for clinical applications. However, advances in high-cell-density fermentation have significantly improved production efficiency, with protein yields reaching 8–30 g/L [68,69]. These improvements enhance the feasibility of recombinant protein-based adhesives for future biomedical and vascular repair applications.

3. Applications and Outlook of Vascular Adhesive Hydrogels

3.1. Applications of Adhesive Hydrogels in Vascular Surgery and Repair

3.1.1. Hemostasis

One of the primary functions for adhesive hydrogels in vascular repair is in hemostasis, where they function as potent blood clotting agents [70]. These materials create a physical barrier over injured blood vessels, preventing further blood loss while promoting superficial blood clot formation. Their strong adhesive properties allow them to form stable seals on wet and pulsating tissues, making them valuable in emergency trauma care and in operative settings. An ideal vascular adhesive hydrogel should possess the following key properties and should (i) rapidly stop hemorrhage by gelling within 5–10 s and promote wound healing through strong adhesion to wet tissues; (ii) maintain sufficient mechanical strength to withstand physiological blood pressure; (iii) be composed of biocompatible materials, with a hemolysis rate of ≤5%; and (iv) fully degrade within a timeframe aligned with the natural wound healing process [71]. Multiple hydrogels have the potential to meet these targets for hemostasis purposes, including silk [22], gelatin [72], keratin [73], chitosan [74], alginate [75], hyaluronic acid [76], and polyethylene glycol [77]. These materials are endowed with strong adhesion properties under wet conditions by employing mussel-inspired compounds such as dopamine and dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA), which contain catechol groups, capable of adhering to wet surfaces [78]. Common approaches to introduce catechol groups include the enzymatic conversion of tyrosine residues in protein, introduction of polydopamine functionalized nanomaterials, conjugation of choline-containing compounds, and introduction of catechin nanoparticles [73,79,80,81]. Some hydrogel formulations also incorporate hemostatic agents, such as thrombin, fibrinogen, or bioactive peptides to accelerate coagulation and improve wound closure efficiency (Figure 3).

3.1.2. Vascular Anastomosis

Adhesive hydrogels also play a critical role in vascular anastomosis, the process of surgically connecting blood vessels. While traditional monofilament sutures are known to be effective, they can be associated with longer operative times, technical complications, suture line leakage, and narrowing and thrombosis of blood vessels. In contrast, vascular adhesive hydrogels offer a minimally invasive alternative by forming leak-proof and flexible seals on the external surface of the vascular structure and at anastomosis sites. Rapid management in this regard would reduce surgical trauma, reduce the operative times, and potentially improve patient clinical outcomes. For example, Muñoz Taboada et al. [82] designed a novel adhesive hydrogel for rapid and efficient vascular anastomosis. The hydrogel, composed of oxidized alginate, oxidized dextran, and polyamidoamine dendrimer amine, forms a dual network that interacts electrostatically and covalently with tissue surfaces. This formulation ensured strong adhesion, allowing the hydrogel to instantly seal vascular anastomosis sites and withstand high blood pressure readings (~300 mmHg). Moreover, when compared to commercial alternatives, such as Tisseel (Deerfield, IL, USA) and BioGlue (Kennesaw, GA, USA), this hydrogel demonstrated superior hemostatic efficiency and durability, significantly reducing the risk of leakage and thrombosis in surgical procedures. Lastly, in vivo animal model studies confirmed its efficacy in promoting healing while minimizing inflammatory responses [82], highlighting its potential as a minimally invasive, efficient, and reliable alternative to conventional sutures and adhesives.

3.1.3. Wound Healing

Adhesive hydrogels contribute significantly to wound healing by serving as scaffolds that support endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis during vascular repair [83]. Their ability to retain moisture creates an optimal environment for tissue regeneration, preventing desiccation and facilitating cellular interactions. Some formulations are enriched with growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), enhancing angiogenesis and accelerating healing in chronic wounds and burns. Li et al. developed silica-based nanocomposite hydrogel scaffolds with enhanced angiogenic properties to promote diabetic wound healing and skin repair [84,85,86]. Chronic diabetic wounds pose significant treatment challenges due to poor perfusion, higher infection risks, and impaired healing. The silica-based nanocomposite hydrogel provides a moist wound environment while releasing bioactive silica, which enhances endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Additionally, the nanocomposites exhibit strong antibacterial activity against common wound pathogens, reducing infection risks. The hydrogel also supports cell adhesion, migration, and collagen deposition, further accelerating tissue regeneration. Both in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated the hydrogel’s ability to promote neovascularization, re-epithelialization, and extracellular matrix remodeling, significantly improving wound closure rates in diabetic models.

3.1.4. Tissue Regeneration

Hydrogels, whether adhesive or not, are widely used as biomimetic scaffolds in tissue engineering applications, particularly for vascular tissue regeneration [87]. These materials provide structural support and bioactive cues that guide cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. By incorporating bioactive molecules and ECM components, such as collagen, fibronectin, and laminin, hydrogels can promote the development of functional vascular networks, which are essential for engineered tissues such as artificial blood vessels and cardiac patches. The primary challenge in tissue engineering is ensuring rapid vascularization to provide nutrients and oxygen to cells. Recently, Elomaa et al. developed an innovative method to enhance vascularization in hydrogel-based tissue constructs by integrating cell sheet engineering with dynamic perfusion culture [88]. The researchers developed a vascularized scaffold by rolling a confluent human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) sheet onto a 3D-printed, perfusable tubular scaffold. This structure was embedded in a collagen gel along with additional singularized HUVECs. Indirect co-culture with human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) facilitated molecular crosstalk, supporting angiogenesis without inducing excessive collagen remodeling. The embedded endothelial cells self-organized and formed a dense lumen-containing 3D vascular network within three weeks. To enhance vascularization, the system was further adapted to dynamic perfusion conditions using two independently addressable circuits [88]. Within one week of perfusion, angiogenic sprouting and microvascular network formation were observed. This hybrid approach successfully generated vascular-like networks, representing a crucial advancement in bioengineered tissue vascularization [88].

3.2. Current Challenges and Future Directions

3.2.1. Need for Self-Healing Hydrogels

Despite their adhesive properties, many hydrogels struggle to match the mechanical strength of native vascular tissues. Blood vessels endure continuous dynamic forces, including pulsatile blood flow and pressure fluctuations. Therefore, hydrogels must possess sufficient tensile strength and elasticity to withstand these forces without rupturing or degrading prematurely. Recent research has focused on incorporating nanomaterials, such as graphene oxide, silica nanoparticles, and reinforced polymer networks, to enhance the mechanical properties of hydrogels [89]. Another key challenge is the long-term stability of vascular adhesive hydrogels. Some hydrogels degrade too quickly, failing to provide sustained support for tissue repair. Conversely, slow-degrading hydrogels may lead to inflammation or fibrosis due to prolonged foreign body presence [90]. Fine-tuning the degradation rate to match the tissue regeneration process is crucial. Strategies such as crosslinking modifications, enzyme-sensitive linkages, and hybrid hydrogels with controlled degradation profiles are being explored to optimize stability [34,91,92]. To address mechanical and stability challenges, self-healing hydrogels capable of repairing microdamage and extending their functional lifespan have been developed [93]. These hydrogels utilize dynamic covalent bonds or supramolecular interactions, allowing them to reassemble after mechanical stress. The introduction of self-healing properties significantly improves durability, making these materials more suitable for vascular applications where maintaining mechanical integrity is critical.

3.2.2. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels for Targeted Delivery

Efficient delivery and retention of hydrogels at the injury site remain a major challenge, as blood flow, tissue pulsation, and physiological movements can displace these hydrogels, reducing their effectiveness. Multiple studies have investigated advanced adhesion strategies inspired by nature, such as Mfps and gecko-inspired nanostructures, to enhance hydrogel retention onto the external surface of vascular tissues [94]. Additionally, stimuli-responsive hydrogels that solidify upon contact with physiological cues, such as temperature, pH, or enzymatic activity, are being developed to improve targeted delivery [95,96,97]. For example, thermo-responsive hydrogels that transition from liquid to gel at body temperature may have promising vascular applications. Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM)-based hydrogels are particularly well-researched due to their reversible volume changes in response to temperature variations. Below their critical temperature, PNIPAM remains hydrophilic, adopting a hydrated coil structure in aqueous environments and remaining in a swollen hydrogel state. However, when the temperature exceeds 32 °C, hydrogen bonding with water is disrupted, causing the polymer to dehydrate, resulting in substantial water expulsion and hydrogel shrinkage [98]. This reversible process enables the fabrication of microstructures, such as blood vessels smaller than 100 μm. Li et al. successfully employed cytocompatible PNIPAM-GelMA scaffolds to create microscale vasculature, achieving a minimum vessel diameter of 70 μm by using sacrificial alginate fibers [99]. Such advancements demonstrate the potential of stimuli-responsive hydrogels with added precision and effectiveness of vascular repairs.

3.2.3. Minimizing Immune Response

The immune response to vascular adhesive hydrogels is another critical consideration. Although multiple hydrogels are designed to be biocompatible and biodegradable, certain formulations may still trigger chronic inflammation or foreign body reactions. One promising strategy to mitigate adverse immune responses is the incorporation of immunomodulatory agents, such as anti-inflammatory peptides or cytokine inhibitors, to regulate inflammation [100]. Furthermore, surface modifications that mimic the ECM, such as coating with ECM biomolecules or PEG, can enhance cellular integration while preventing protein adsorption and immune activation.
Integrating bioactive peptides and growth factors into hydrogel formulations can further enhance biocompatibility and therapeutic outcomes. These molecules promote angiogenesis, cell migration, and tissue regeneration, accelerating wound healing and vascular repair [101]. Advances in controlled-release systems allow the sustained delivery of these bioactive agents, improving therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, enzyme-sensitive linkages allow synchronized tissue regeneration while preventing chronic immune reactions [102]. Incorporating nanomaterials, such as graphene oxide or silver nanoparticles, can further reduce bacterial infections and modulate macrophage behavior toward tissue repair [103]. These combined strategies improve hydrogel safety profiles while also providing added clinical translation for applications, such as effectiveness for applications in drug delivery, wound healing, and tissue engineering.

3.2.4. Newer Methods of Fabrication

While there has been significant progress in biomaterial fabrication for tissue adhesive hemostatic agents, there is still room for significant improvements and advancements in this field. Composite hydrogels that combine the benefits of different materials are being explored to overcome the limitations of traditional hydrogels. Hybrid hydrogels incorporating synthetic polymers, natural biopolymers, and inorganic nanomaterials have the potential to achieve superior mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and controlled degradation [104]. For instance, incorporating nanocellulose or carbon-based nanomaterials is postulated to enhance structural integrity while maintaining bioactivity [105].
A more recent and exciting development in hydrogel fabrication is 3D bioprinting, which enables the precise design of hydrogels with desirable architectures [106]. This technology enables the fabrication of patient-specific vascular grafts and tissue scaffolds with controlled porosity, mechanical properties, and bioactive functionalities. By combining 3D bioprinting with bioinks containing endothelial cells and ECM components, investigators may have an opportunity to further personalize and tailor vascular repair solutions. Unique conduits can be developed for difficult-to-reconstruct areas of the body, such as the face, appendages (figures/toes), and densely vascularized tissue and internal organs.
Another novel approach to fabricating hydrogels with intricate 3D shapes involves introducing polyelectrolytes into hydrogel precursor solutions to modulate spatial internal stresses. Incorporating polyelectrolytes enhances volume shrinkage during polymerization, allowing precise modulation of internal stresses within the hydrogel network. The resulting hydrogels exhibit the ability to undergo complex deformations in response to environmental stimuli, showcasing potential not only in soft actuators but also in opening new avenues in vascular tissue engineering and related biomedical applications. Hydrogels with tailored internal stresses can be designed to mimic the mechanical properties of vascular tissues, facilitating the development of scaffolds that support the growth and organization of endothelial cells, which is essential for creating functional blood vessels [107].
Additionally, advances in microfluidic techniques and lithographic fabrication are also facilitating the creation of hydrogel-based vascular structures with highly controlled architectures [108]. These innovations are essential for developing next-generation vascular adhesive hydrogels capable of seamlessly integrating with native tissues.

4. Conclusions

Adhesive hydrogels have emerged as a groundbreaking innovation in biomedical engineering, providing potential solutions for hemostasis, vascular repair, and tissue regeneration. These hydrogels offer several advantages over traditional wound closure methods, such as sutures and staples, by enabling strong adhesion to wet and dynamic biological tissues, minimizing surgical trauma, and promoting faster healing. Advances in both natural and synthetic hydrogel formulations have significantly improved their mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and functionality, expanding their applications in vascular anastomosis, hemorrhage control, and tissue engineering.
Despite these advancements, several challenges remain. Achieving optimal mechanical strength and long-term stability is critical, as vascular tissues endure constant mechanical stress and pulsatile blood flow. Additionally, controlling degradation rates to match the healing process while minimizing immune responses is crucial for ensuring safe and effective clinical applications. Another key challenge is enhancing targeted delivery and retention of hydrogels at injury sites, even under physiological movements and blood flow. Future research should focus on refining hydrogel formulations to achieve an optimal balance of adhesion, durability, and biocompatibility while ensuring ease of application in surgical settings. Integrating cutting-edge technologies, such as engineered multi-functional recombinant proteins, bioactive molecules, and 3D bioprinting, could further enhance the potential of adhesive hydrogels for a wide range of biomedical applications (Table 2).

Funding

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation (award numbers DMR-2105150 and DMR-2207879 to F.Z.) and NIH (grant number R01HL164062 to F.Z.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pfeifer, R.; Tarkin, I.S.; Rocos, B.; Pape, H.-C. Patterns of Mortality and Causes of Death in Polytrauma Patients—Has Anything Changed? Injury 2009, 40, 907–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. El Sayad, M.; Noureddine, H. Recent Advances of Hemorrhage Management in Severe Trauma. Emerg. Med. Int. 2014, 2014, 638956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kauvar, D.S.; Lefering, R.; Wade, C.E. Impact of Hemorrhage on Trauma Outcome: An Overview of Epidemiology, Clinical Presentations, and Therapeutic Considerations. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 2006, 60, S3–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kristensen, K.L.; Rauer, L.J.; Mortensen, P.E.; Kjeldsen, B.J. Reoperation for Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2012, 14, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grines, C.L.; Box, L.C.; Mamas, M.A.; Abbott, J.D.; Blankenship, J.C.; Carr, J.G.; Curzen, N.; Kent, W.D.T.; Khatib, Y.; Matteau, A.; et al. SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without On-Site Surgical Backup. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2023, 16, 847–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rodrigues, R.R.; Carmona, M.J.C.; Junior, J.O.C.A. Bleeding and Damage Control Surgery. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2016, 29, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Naimer, S.A.; Tanami, M.; Malichi, A.; Moryosef, D. Control of Traumatic Wound Bleeding by Compression with a Compact Elastic Adhesive Dressing. Mil. Med. 2006, 171, 644–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lopera, J. Embolization in Trauma: Principles and Techniques. Semin. Interv. Radiol. 2010, 27, 014–028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Toriumi, D.M.; Raslan, W.F.; Friedman, M.; Tardy, M.E. Variable Histotoxicity of Histoacryl When Used in a Subcutaneous Site: An Experimental Study. Laryngoscope 1991, 101, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, J.C.; Bassage, S.D.; Kempski, M.H.; Del Cerro, M.; Park, S.B.; Aquavella, J.V. Evaluation of Tissue Adhesives in Closure of Scleral Tunnel Incisions. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 1995, 21, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Camasão, D.B.; Mantovani, D. The Mechanical Characterization of Blood Vessels and Their Substitutes in the Continuous Quest for Physiological-Relevant Performances. A Critical Review. Mater. Today Bio 2021, 10, 100106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Veith, A.P.; Henderson, K.; Spencer, A.; Sligar, A.D.; Baker, A.B. Therapeutic Strategies for Enhancing Angiogenesis in Wound Healing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 146, 97–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, D.; Yu, K.; Cao, W.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, H.; Sun, Z.; Guo, C.; et al. White-Light Crosslinkable Milk Protein Bioadhesive with Ultrafast Gelation for First-Aid Wound Treatment. Biomater. Res. 2023, 27, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lei, H.; Yu, X.; Fan, D. Nanocomposite Hydrogel for Real-Time Wound Status Monitoring and Comprehensive Treatment. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2405924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hu, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Liu, M.; Yang, F.; Wang, C.; Pan, P.; Wang, L.; Chen, L.; Chen, J. Real-Time Monitoring Flexible Hydrogels Based on Dual Physically Cross-Linked Network for Promoting Wound Healing. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2023, 34, 108262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. DeAnda, A.; Elefteriades, J.A.; Hasaniya, N.W.; Lattouf, O.M.; Lazzara, R.R. Improving Outcomes through the Use of Surgical Sealants for Anastomotic Sealing during Cardiovascular Surgery. J. Card. Surg. 2009, 24, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Perrin, B.R.M.; Braccini, M.; Bidan, C.M.; Derail, C.; Papon, E.; Leterrier, Y.; Barrandon, Y. Adhesion of Surgical Sealants Used in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2016, 70, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bhat, Y.M.; Banerjee, S.; Barth, B.A.; Chauhan, S.S.; Gottlieb, K.T.; Konda, V.; Maple, J.T.; Murad, F.M.; Pfau, P.R.; Pleskow, D.K.; et al. Tissue Adhesives: Cyanoacrylate Glue and Fibrin Sealant. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013, 78, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. MacGillivray, T.E. Fibrin Sealants and Glues. J. Card. Surg. 2003, 18, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Park, C.H.; Woo, K.M. Fibrin-Based Biomaterial Applications in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. In Biomimetic Medical Materials; Noh, I., Ed.; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Singapore, 2018; Volume 1064, pp. 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sultan, M.T.; Hong, H.; Lee, O.J.; Ajiteru, O.; Lee, Y.J.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, H.; Kim, S.H.; Park, C.H. Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials for Hemostatic Applications. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bai, S.; Zhang, X.; Cai, P.; Huang, X.; Huang, Y.; Liu, R.; Zhang, M.; Song, J.; Chen, X.; Yang, H. A Silk-Based Sealant with Tough Adhesion for Instant Hemostasis of Bleeding Tissues. Nanoscale Horiz. 2019, 4, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, F.; Hong, Y.; Liang, R.; Zhang, X.; Liao, Y.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, J.; Sheng, Z.; Xie, C.; Peng, Z.; et al. Rapid Printing of Bio-Inspired 3D Tissue Constructs for Skin Regeneration. Biomaterials 2020, 258, 120287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fan, P.; Zeng, Y.; Zaldivar-Silva, D.; Agüero, L.; Wang, S. Chitosan-Based Hemostatic Hydrogels: The Concept, Mechanism, Application, and Prospects. Molecules 2023, 28, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, X.; Jha, A.K.; Harrington, D.A.; Farach-Carson, M.C.; Jia, X. Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogels: From a Natural Polysaccharide to Complex Networks. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 3280–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shin, J.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, C.; Park, H.; Yang, K.; Jin, Y.; Ryu, J.H.; Hong, K.S.; Moon, S.; Chung, H.; et al. Tissue Adhesive Catechol-Modified Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel for Effective, Minimally Invasive Cell Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 3814–3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schulten, L.; Spillner, J.; Kanzler, S.; Teubner, A.; Jockenhoevel, S.; Apel, C. A Polyurethane-based Surgical Adhesive for Sealing Blood Vessel Anastomoses—A Feasibility Study in Pigs. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2022, 110, 1922–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.; Cheng, J.; Sun, F.; Dou, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Gao, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; et al. A Super Tough, Rapidly Biodegradable, Ultrafast Hemostatic Bioglue. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2208622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Elbarbary, A.M.; Ghobashy, M.M.; El Khalafawy, G.K.; Salem, M.A.; Kodous, A.S. Radiation Cross-Linking of pH-Sensitive Acrylic Acid Hydrogel Based Polyvinylpyrrolidone/2-Dimethylamino Ethyl Methacrylate Loaded with Betamethasone Dipropionate Drug and in Vitro Anti-Inflammatory Assessment. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 89, 105024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ito, T.; Otani, N.; Fujii, K.; Mori, K.; Eriguchi, M.; Koyama, Y. Bioadhesive and Biodissolvable Hydrogels Consisting of Water-swellable Poly(Acrylic Acid)/Poly(Vinylpyrrolidone) Complexes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2020, 108, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, E.; Jeon, J.; Zhu, Y.; Hoppe, E.D.; Jun, Y.-S.; Genin, G.M.; Zhang, F. A Biosynthetic Hybrid Spidroin-Amyloid-Mussel Foot Protein for Underwater Adhesion on Diverse Surfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 48457–48468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jeon, J.; Lee, K.Z.; Zhang, X.; Jaeger, J.; Kim, E.; Li, J.; Belaygorod, L.; Arif, B.; Genin, G.M.; Foston, M.B.; et al. Genetically Engineered Protein-Based Bioadhesives with Programmable Material Properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 56786–56795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhou, L.; Dai, C.; Fan, L.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhou, Z.; Guan, P.; Tian, Y.; Xing, J.; Li, X.; et al. Injectable Self-Healing Natural Biopolymer-Based Hydrogel Adhesive with Thermoresponsive Reversible Adhesion for Minimally Invasive Surgery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2007457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bao, Z.; Xian, C.; Yuan, Q.; Liu, G.; Wu, J. Natural Polymer-Based Hydrogels with Enhanced Mechanical Performances: Preparation, Structure, and Property. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, 1900670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Long, S.; Xie, C.; Lu, X. Natural Polymer-based Adhesive Hydrogel for Biomedical Applications. Biosurf. Biotribol. 2022, 8, 69–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sindhi, K.; Pingili, R.B.; Beldar, V.; Bhattacharya, S.; Rahaman, J.; Mukherjee, D. The Role of Biomaterials-Based Scaffolds in Advancing Skin Tissue Construct. J. Tissue Viabil. 2025, 34, 100858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sanz-Horta, R.; Matesanz, A.; Gallardo, A.; Reinecke, H.; Jorcano, J.L.; Acedo, P.; Velasco, D.; Elvira, C. Technological Advances in Fibrin for Tissue Engineering. J. Tissue Eng. 2023, 14, 20417314231190288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brown, A.C.; Barker, T.H. Fibrin-Based Biomaterials: Modulation of Macroscopic Properties through Rational Design at the Molecular Level. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 1502–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Erdogan, D.; Van Gulik, T.M. Evolution of Fibrinogen-coated Collagen Patch for Use as a Topical Hemostatic Agent. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2008, 85B, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xing, X.; Han, Y.; Cheng, H. Biomedical Applications of Chitosan/Silk Fibroin Composites: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 240, 124407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Haiyan, Z.; Baoqi, Z. Functional Silk Fibroin Hydrogels: Preparation, Properties and Applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, S.H.; Lee, Y.J.; Chao, J.R.; Kim, D.Y.; Sultan, M.T.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, J.M.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, O.J.; Hong, H.; et al. Rapidly Photocurable Silk Fibroin Sealant for Clinical Applications. NPG Asia Mater. 2020, 12, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Madappura, A.P.; Madduri, S. A Comprehensive Review of Silk-Fibroin Hydrogels for Cell and Drug Delivery Applications in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 4868–4886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yamashita, K.; Suzuki, S.; Tabayashi, N.; Abe, T.; Hayata, Y.; Hirose, T.; Hiraga, S.; Niwa, K.; Fukuba, R.; Takeda, M.; et al. Experimental Use of Crosslinked Gelatin Glue for Arterial Hemostasis in Cardiovascular Surgery. BME 2015, 25, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Song, F.; Kong, Y.; Shao, C.; Cheng, Y.; Lu, J.; Tao, Y.; Du, J.; Wang, H. Chitosan-Based Multifunctional Flexible Hemostatic Bio-Hydrogel. Acta Biomater. 2021, 136, 170–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xia, Y.; Yang, R.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Fu, C. Application of Chitosan-Based Materials in Surgical or Postoperative Hemostasis. Front. Mater. 2022, 9, 994265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Trombino, S.; Servidio, C.; Curcio, F.; Cassano, R. Strategies for Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel Design in Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, S.-Y.; Ma, J.; Khoo, T.S.; Abdullah, N.; Nik Md Noordin Kahar, N.N.F.; Abdul Hamid, Z.A.; Mustapha, M. Polysaccharide-Based Hydrogels for Microencapsulation of Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 735090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yuan, Y.; Shen, S.; Fan, D. A Physicochemical Double Cross-Linked Multifunctional Hydrogel for Dynamic Burn Wound Healing: Shape Adaptability, Injectable Self-Healing Property and Enhanced Adhesion. Biomaterials 2021, 276, 120838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dhandapani, V.; Ringuette, V.; Desrochers, M.; Sirois, M.; Vermette, P. Composition, Host Responses and Clinical Applications of Bioadhesives. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2022, 110, 2779–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bashir, S.; Hina, M.; Iqbal, J.; Rajpar, A.H.; Mujtaba, M.A.; Alghamdi, N.A.; Wageh, S.; Ramesh, K.; Ramesh, S. Fundamental Concepts of Hydrogels: Synthesis, Properties, and Their Applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ni, P.; Ye, S.; Xiong, S.; Zhong, M.; Shan, J.; Yuan, T.; Liang, J.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, X. A Chitosan-Optimized Polyethyleneimine/Polyacrylic Acid Multifunctional Hydrogel for Reducing the Risk of Ulcerative Arterial Bleeding. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023, 11, 5207–5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Slezak, P.; Klang, A.; Ferguson, J.; Monforte, X.; Schmidt, P.; Bauder, B.; Url, A.; Osuchowski, M.; Redl, H.; Spazierer, D.; et al. Tissue Reactions to Polyethylene Glycol and Glutaraldehyde-Based Surgical Sealants in a Rabbit Aorta Model. J. Biomater. Appl. 2020, 34, 1330–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Doraiswamy, A.; Crombez, R.; Shen, W.; Lee, Y.-S.; Narayan, R.J. Microscale Patterning of Two-Component Biomedical Hydrogel. J. Adhes. 2010, 86, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ge, L.; Chen, S. Recent Advances in Tissue Adhesives for Clinical Medicine. Polymers 2020, 12, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bal-Ozturk, A.; Cecen, B.; Avci-Adali, M.; Topkaya, S.N.; Alarcin, E.; Yasayan, G.; Ethan, Y.-C.; Bulkurcuoglu, B.; Akpek, A.; Avci, H.; et al. Tissue Adhesives: From Research to Clinical Translation. Nano Today 2021, 36, 101049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ma, C.; Sun, J.; Li, B.; Feng, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xiang, L.; Wu, B.; Xiao, L.; Liu, B.; Petrovskii, V.S.; et al. Ultra-Strong Bio-Glue from Genetically Engineered Polypeptides. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yin, Y.; Roas-Escalona, N.; Linder, M.B. Molecular Engineering of a Spider Silk and Mussel Foot Hybrid Protein Gives a Strong and Tough Biomimetic Adhesive. Adv. Mater. Inter. 2024, 11, 2300934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jeon, J.; Subramani, S.V.; Lee, K.Z.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, F. Microbial Synthesis of High-Molecular-Weight, Highly Repetitive Protein Polymers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, K.Z.; Jeon, J.; Jiang, B.; Subramani, S.V.; Li, J.; Zhang, F. Protein-Based Hydrogels and Their Biomedical Applications. Molecules 2023, 28, 4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lim, S.; Choi, Y.S.; Kang, D.G.; Song, Y.H.; Cha, H.J. The Adhesive Properties of Coacervated Recombinant Hybrid Mussel Adhesive Proteins. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 3715–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kim, E.; Dai, B.; Qiao, J.B.; Li, W.; Fortner, J.D.; Zhang, F. Microbially Synthesized Repeats of Mussel Foot Protein Display Enhanced Underwater Adhesion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 43003–43012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kim, E.; Qin, X.; Qiao, J.B.; Zeng, Q.; Fortner, J.D.; Zhang, F. Graphene Oxide/Mussel Foot Protein Composites for High-Strength and Ultra-Tough Thin Films. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, J.; Zhang, F. Amyloids as Building Blocks for Macroscopic Functional Materials: Designs, Applications and Challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, J.; Zhu, Y.; Yu, H.; Dai, B.; Jun, Y.-S.; Zhang, F. Microbially Synthesized Polymeric Amyloid Fiber Promotes β-Nanocrystal Formation and Displays Gigapascal Tensile Strength. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 11843–11853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dai, B.; Sargent, C.J.; Gui, X.; Liu, C.; Zhang, F. Fibril Self-Assembly of Amyloid–Spider Silk Block Polypeptides. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 2015–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Subramani, S.V.; Li, J.; Lee, K.Z.; Fisher, N.; Zhang, F. Blending Recombinant Amyloid Silk Proteins Generates Composite Fibers with Tunable Mechanical Properties. Mater. Adv. 2024, 5, 3506–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, J.; Jiang, B.; Chang, X.; Yu, H.; Han, Y.; Zhang, F. Bi-Terminal Fusion of Intrinsically-Disordered Mussel Foot Protein Fragments Boosts Mechanical Strength for Protein Fibers. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Schmuck, B.; Greco, G.; Barth, A.; Pugno, N.M.; Johansson, J.; Rising, A. High-Yield Production of a Super-Soluble Miniature Spidroin for Biomimetic High-Performance Materials. Mater. Today 2021, 50, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pourshahrestani, S.; Zeimaran, E.; Kadri, N.A.; Mutlu, N.; Boccaccini, A.R. Polymeric Hydrogel Systems as Emerging Biomaterial Platforms to Enable Hemostasis and Wound Healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, 2000905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, J.; Celiz, A.D.; Yang, J.; Yang, Q.; Wamala, I.; Whyte, W.; Seo, B.R.; Vasilyev, N.V.; Vlassak, J.J.; Suo, Z.; et al. Tough Adhesives for Diverse Wet Surfaces. Science 2017, 357, 378–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gaharwar, A.K.; Avery, R.K.; Assmann, A.; Paul, A.; McKinley, G.H.; Khademhosseini, A.; Olsen, B.D. Shear-Thinning Nanocomposite Hydrogels for the Treatment of Hemorrhage. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 9833–9842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sun, Z.; Chen, X.; Ma, X.; Cui, X.; Yi, Z.; Li, X. Cellulose/Keratin–Catechin Nanocomposite Hydrogel for Wound Hemostasis. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 6133–6141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Huang, W.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, X.; Chen, L.; Zhang, L. Strong and Rapidly Self-Healing Hydrogels: Potential Hemostatic Materials. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2016, 5, 2813–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Song, C.K.; Kim, M.-K.; Lee, J.; Davaa, E.; Baskaran, R.; Yang, S.-G. Dopa-Empowered Schiff Base Forming Alginate Hydrogel Glue for Rapid Hemostatic Control. Macromol. Res. 2019, 27, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sakoda, M.; Kaneko, M.; Ohta, S.; Qi, P.; Ichimura, S.; Yatomi, Y.; Ito, T. Injectable Hemostat Composed of a Polyphosphate-Conjugated Hyaluronan Hydrogel. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 3280–3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, T.; Shen, H.; Wang, X.; Yang, F.; Tang, P.; Wu, D. Synthesis and Properties of Hemostatic and Bacteria-Responsive in Situ Hydrogels for Emergency Treatment in Critical Situations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 12674–12683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hwang, D.S.; Zeng, H.; Lu, Q.; Israelachvili, J.; Waite, J.H. Adhesion Mechanism in a DOPA-Deficient Foot Protein from Green Mussels. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 5640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chan Choi, Y.; Choi, J.S.; Jung, Y.J.; Cho, Y.W. Human Gelatin Tissue-Adhesive Hydrogels Prepared by Enzyme-Mediated Biosynthesis of DOPA and Fe3+ Ion Crosslinking. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rajabi, N.; Kharaziha, M.; Emadi, R.; Zarrabi, A.; Mokhtari, H.; Salehi, S. An Adhesive and Injectable Nanocomposite Hydrogel of Thiolated Gelatin/Gelatin Methacrylate/Laponite® as a Potential Surgical Sealant. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 564, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Krishnadoss, V.; Melillo, A.; Kanjilal, B.; Hannah, T.; Ellis, E.; Kapetanakis, A.; Hazelton, J.; San Roman, J.; Masoumi, A.; Leijten, J.; et al. Bioionic Liquid Conjugation as Universal Approach To Engineer Hemostatic Bioadhesives. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 38373–38384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Muñoz Taboada, G.; Dosta, P.; Edelman, E.R.; Artzi, N. Sprayable Hydrogel for Instant Sealing of Vascular Anastomosis. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2203087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, W.; Liu, L.; Cheng, H.; Zhu, J.; Li, X.; Ye, S.; Li, X. Hydrogel-Based Dressings Designed to Facilitate Wound Healing. Mater. Adv. 2024, 5, 1364–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, Y.; Xu, T.; Tu, Z.; Dai, W.; Xue, Y.; Tang, C.; Gao, W.; Mao, C.; Lei, B.; Lin, C. Bioactive Antibacterial Silica-Based Nanocomposites Hydrogel Scaffolds with High Angiogenesis for Promoting Diabetic Wound Healing and Skin Repair. Theranostics 2020, 10, 4929–4943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Jang, M.J.; Bae, S.K.; Jung, Y.S.; Kim, J.C.; Kim, J.S.; Park, S.K.; Suh, J.S.; Yi, S.J.; Ahn, S.H.; Lim, J.O. Enhanced Wound Healing Using a 3D Printed VEGF-Mimicking Peptide Incorporated Hydrogel Patch in a Pig Model. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 16, 045013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wei, Z.; Volkova, E.; Blatchley, M.R.; Gerecht, S. Hydrogel Vehicles for Sequential Delivery of Protein Drugs to Promote Vascular Regeneration. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 149–150, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Blache, U.; Ehrbar, M. Inspired by Nature: Hydrogels as Versatile Tools for Vascular Engineering. Adv. Wound Care 2018, 7, 232–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Elomaa, L.; Lindner, M.; Leben, R.; Niesner, R.; Weinhart, M. In Vitro Vascularization of Hydrogel-Based Tissue Constructs via a Combined Approach of Cell Sheet Engineering and Dynamic Perfusion Cell Culture. Biofabrication 2023, 15, 015004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Karchoubi, F.; Afshar Ghotli, R.; Pahlevani, H.; Baghban Salehi, M. New Insights into Nanocomposite Hydrogels; a Review on Recent Advances in Characteristics and Applications. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2024, 7, 54–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Moura, D.; Rohringer, S.; Ferreira, H.P.; Pereira, A.T.; Barrias, C.C.; Magalhães, F.D.; Bergmeister, H.; Gonçalves, I.C. Long-Term in Vivo Degradation and Biocompatibility of Degradable pHEMA Hydrogels Containing Graphene Oxide. Acta Biomater. 2024, 173, 351–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Akalp, U.; Bryant, S.J.; Vernerey, F.J. Tuning Tissue Growth with Scaffold Degradation in Enzyme-Sensitive Hydrogels: A Mathematical Model. Soft Matter 2016, 12, 7505–7520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yang, J.; Zhao, J.-J.; Han, C.-R.; Duan, J.-F. Keys to Enhancing Mechanical Properties of Silica Nanoparticle Composites Hydrogels: The Role of Network Structure and Interfacial Interactions. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 95, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Taylor, D.L.; In Het Panhuis, M. Self-Healing Hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9060–9093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Demirci, G.; Niedźwiedź, M.J.; Kantor-Malujdy, N.; El Fray, M. Elastomer–Hydrogel Systems: From Bio-Inspired Interfaces to Medical Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Neumann, M.; Di Marco, G.; Iudin, D.; Viola, M.; Van Nostrum, C.F.; Van Ravensteijn, B.G.P.; Vermonden, T. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels: The Dynamic Smart Biomaterials of Tomorrow. Macromolecules 2023, 56, 8377–8392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Li, P.; Li, S. Gecko-Inspired Controllable Adhesive: Structure, Fabrication, and Application. Biomimetics 2024, 9, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dou, W.; Zeng, X.; Zhu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, H.; Li, S. Mussel-Inspired Injectable Adhesive Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wu, C.; Wang, X. Globule-to-Coil Transition of a Single Homopolymer Chain in Solution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 4092–4094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, S.; Wang, W.; Li, W.; Xie, M.; Deng, C.; Sun, X.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Shi, G.; Xu, Y.; et al. Fabrication of Thermoresponsive Hydrogel Scaffolds with Engineered Microscale Vasculatures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2102685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lu, P.; Ruan, D.; Huang, M.; Tian, M.; Zhu, K.; Gan, Z.; Xiao, Z. Harnessing the Potential of Hydrogels for Advanced Therapeutic Applications: Current Achievements and Future Directions. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Md Fadilah, N.I.; Shahabudin, N.A.; Mohd Razif, R.A.; Sanyal, A.; Ghosh, A.; Baharin, K.I.; Ahmad, H.; Maarof, M.; Motta, A.; Fauzi, M.B. Discovery of Bioactive Peptides as Therapeutic Agents for Skin Wound Repair. J. Tissue Eng. 2024, 15, 20417314241280359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yang, Y.; Ren, Y.; Song, W.; Yu, B.; Liu, H. Rational Design in Functional Hydrogels towards Biotherapeutics. Mater. Des. 2022, 223, 111086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ahmad, N.; Bukhari, S.N.A.; Hussain, M.A.; Ejaz, H.; Munir, M.U.; Amjad, M.W. Nanoparticles Incorporated Hydrogels for Delivery of Antimicrobial Agents: Developments and Trends. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 13535–13564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zhao, Z.; Vizetto-Duarte, C.; Moay, Z.K.; Setyawati, M.I.; Rakshit, M.; Kathawala, M.H.; Ng, K.W. Composite Hydrogels in Three-Dimensional in Vitro Models. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. De France, K.J.; Hoare, T.; Cranston, E.D. Review of Hydrogels and Aerogels Containing Nanocellulose. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 4609–4631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Li, J.; Wu, C.; Chu, P.K.; Gelinsky, M. 3D Printing of Hydrogels: Rational Design Strategies and Emerging Biomedical Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2020, 140, 100543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Duan, J.; Fan, W.; Xu, Z.; Cui, L.; Wang, Z.; Nie, Z.; Sui, K. Polyelectrolyte-Mediated Modulation of Spatial Internal Stresses of Hydrogels for Complex 3D Actuators. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202410383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Weigel, N.; Li, Y.; Thiele, J.; Fery, A. From Microfluidics to Hierarchical Hydrogel Materials. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 64, 101673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Li, Y.; Cheng, J.; Delparastan, P.; Wang, H.; Sigg, S.J.; DeFrates, K.G.; Cao, Y.; Messersmith, P.B. Molecular Design Principles of Lysine-DOPA Wet Adhesion. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Engineering adhesive hydrogels with desirable properties for vascular repair.
Figure 1. Engineering adhesive hydrogels with desirable properties for vascular repair.
Polymers 17 00959 g001
Figure 2. Different materials used for vascular adhesives.
Figure 2. Different materials used for vascular adhesives.
Polymers 17 00959 g002
Figure 3. Applications of vascular hydrogels.
Figure 3. Applications of vascular hydrogels.
Polymers 17 00959 g003
Table 1. Characteristics of different vascular adhesive materials.
Table 1. Characteristics of different vascular adhesive materials.
Material TypePropertiesAdvantagesDisadvantagesReferences
Fibrin-basedBiocompatible, promotes clottingWidely used, supports clottingWeak adhesion, poor durability[19,20]
Silk Fibroin-basedStrong, tunable mechanical propertiesHigh biocompatibility, robust adhesionPoor adhesion to wet tissues, requires modification[21,22]
Gelatin-basedBiocompatible, tunable adhesionGood for tissue integration, tunable adhesionLimited mechanical strength, processing complexity[23,24]
Polysaccharide-basedBiodegradable, hemostatic, antibacterialPromotes healing, antibacterial propertiesWater absorption issues, processing challenges[25,26]
Polyurethane-basedFlexible, high mechanical strengthDurable, used in vascular applicationsRequires precise application, potential biocompatibility issues[27,28]
Polyacrylic Acid-basedSwells in response to pH changesResponsive to biological environmentsWeak adhesion to tissues, swelling control needed[29,30]
Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)-basedHydrophilic, crosslinking for adhesionStrong adhesion, FDA-approved versions availablePotential cytotoxicity, adhesion strength variability[16,28]
Recombinant Protein-basedBioengineered, highly tunableHighly customizable, biomimetic adhesionHigh production cost[31,32]
Table 2. Existing efforts and future directions in engineering vascular adhesives of desirable properties.
Table 2. Existing efforts and future directions in engineering vascular adhesives of desirable properties.
AccomplishedChallengesReferences
Rapid AdhesionUse of mussel-inspired catechol chemistry, fibrin-based adhesives for rapid clot formation, and photopolymerizable hydrogels for fast adhesion.Further optimization for rapid solidification under physiological conditions; improved adhesion under dynamic vascular environments.[22,23,63,74,75]
Tunable Mechanical PropertiesIntegration of nanomaterials like graphene oxide and silica nanoparticles; hybrid hydrogels developed to enhance flexibility and elasticity.Precise control over mechanical tuning for different vascular sites; further integration of self-healing mechanisms.[27,28,30,32,51,65]
BiofunctionalizationIncorporation of bioactive molecules, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), for enhanced healing.Long-term bioactivity validation; optimizing controlled release mechanisms for sustained therapeutic effects.[83,85,86,88,109]
BiocompatibilityUse of natural polymers (fibrin, silk fibroin, chitosan, gelatin) and synthetic hydrogels (PEG, polyurethane) with validated biocompatibility studies.Addressing immune response and inflammation concerns in long-term applications; minimizing foreign body reactions.[20,23,26,36,47]
Sufficient Mechanical StrengthDevelopment of reinforced polymer networks, multi-functional protein adhesives, and high-strength hydrogel formulations to improve durability.Achieving physiological mechanical properties of native vascular tissues; balancing strength with flexibility.[57,69,91,92,93]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeon, J.; Subramani, S.V.; Lee, K.Z.; Elizondo-Benedetto, S.; Zayed, M.A.; Zhang, F. Engineering Adhesive Hydrogels for Hemostasis and Vascular Repair. Polymers 2025, 17, 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070959

AMA Style

Jeon J, Subramani SV, Lee KZ, Elizondo-Benedetto S, Zayed MA, Zhang F. Engineering Adhesive Hydrogels for Hemostasis and Vascular Repair. Polymers. 2025; 17(7):959. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070959

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeon, Juya, Shri Venkatesh Subramani, Kok Zhi Lee, Santiago Elizondo-Benedetto, Mohamed Adel Zayed, and Fuzhong Zhang. 2025. "Engineering Adhesive Hydrogels for Hemostasis and Vascular Repair" Polymers 17, no. 7: 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070959

APA Style

Jeon, J., Subramani, S. V., Lee, K. Z., Elizondo-Benedetto, S., Zayed, M. A., & Zhang, F. (2025). Engineering Adhesive Hydrogels for Hemostasis and Vascular Repair. Polymers, 17(7), 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070959

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop