Next Article in Journal
Click Synthesis of Triazole Polymers Based on Lignin-Derived Metabolic Intermediate and Their Strong Adhesive Properties to Cu Plate
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of the Heat Transfer Process on the Electrical and Mechanical Properties of Flexible Silver Conductors on Textiles
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Accelerated Aging on the Molecular Weight and Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Polyester Yarns Containing Ceramic Particles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Additive Manufactured Strain Sensor Using Stereolithography Method with Photopolymer Material
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Polymer Micro/Nanofabrication and Manufacturing

1
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1 University Road, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
2
Core Facility Center, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1 University Road, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
3
Research Center for Energy Technology and Strategy, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1 University Road, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
Polymers 2023, 15(6), 1350; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061350
Submission received: 23 February 2023 / Accepted: 7 March 2023 / Published: 8 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Micro/Nanofabrication and Manufacturing)
Polymer microfabrication/nanofabrication and manufacturing are processes that involve the creation of small-scale structures using various polymeric materials. This technique has gained significant attention since the 1980s due to its ability to produce precise and complex structures with high efficiency and cost-effectiveness. The resulting structures can be found in a wide range of applications such as microfluidics, biosensors, microelectronics, micro-optics, and tissue engineering. In this Special Issue, Juang and Chiu reviewed the fabrication techniques for polymer microfluidics, which can be categorized into the mold-based and non-mold-based approaches. Various techniques such as micro-embossing, micro-injection molding, casting, CNC micromachining, laser micromachining, and 3D printing are discussed [1]. For the mold-based approaches, Zhu et al. investigated the fabrication of polymer microstructures via ultrasonic-assisted embossing and it was found that the embossing time was less than a few seconds and more than a 75% average filling rate was achieved [2]. Juang et al. extended the application of micro-embossing to fabricate microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (µPADs) [3]. By utilizing the one-step strategy, i.e., forming the protruded channel and sealing the backside of the channel simultaneously, the processing time was reduced to around 5 s and the µPADs as fabricated were used for glucose detection with a linear relationship between 5 and 50 mM. Numerical simulation was conducted to address the issues in micro-injection molding. Wu et al. utilized the improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm NSGA-II for the optimization of micro-injection-molded gear shrinkage [4]. The optimization results of the NSGA-II algorithm were verified using Moldflow simulation and the accuracy of the optimized method was further compared with the experimental results. It was found that the tooth profile accuracy of the micro-injection-molded gears was improved. The finite element simulation was also applied to the acoustic streaming and mixing characteristics in ultrasonic plasticization micro-injection molding (UPMIM) [5]. The authors found that several melt vortices were developed in the plasticizing chamber via ultrasonic vibrations, with the melt rotating around the center of the vortex. Moreover, the Stokes drag force acting on the fluorescent particles was two orders of magnitude greater than the acoustic radiation force. As for the non-mold-based approaches, Chen et al. utilized the FDM 3D printer and stereolithographic printer to construct a lifelike brain glioblastoma simulator [6] and a simulator containing the brain stem, soft brain tissue, carotid arteries, and a hollow transparent circle of Willis [7] for the training of neurosurgeons. They also exploited digital light processing (DLP) stereolithographic printing to fabricate microfluidic devices with an extremely high aspect ratio equal to 40 [8]. Lai and Yu designed the ink for 3D printable sensors with cationic cellulose nanocrystals (CCNCs) and zwitterionic hydrogels [9]. It was found that the nanocomposite hydrogels made by the designed ink possess a stronger physical network at lower nanofiller concentrations. As a result, they showed good mechanical strength, high transparency, and 3D printability. Examples were also demonstrated by applying various polymer microfabrication techniques such as ion-milling on epoxy resin [10], the fabrication of oblique structures via hard X-ray lithography [11], paper-based microfluidics constructed via spraying [12], micromechanical punch for the fabrication of non-spherical microparticles [13], electrostatic self-assembly of composite nanofiber yarn [14], and mechanical and chemical polishing of the surface of polymer microchannels [15]. The editors are confident that the readers will benefit from this book by gaining common knowledge regarding polymer microfabrication techniques and a better understanding of the practical uses and versatility of these techniques through the demonstrated examples. This book is also a useful resource for the general audience who are interested in polymer microfabrication and would like to embark upon their exploration into this field.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan (MOST 110-2221-E-006-019-MY3).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Juang, Y.-J.; Chiu, Y.-J. Fabrication of Polymer Microfluidics: An Overview. Polymers 2022, 14, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhu, Y.; Bengsch, S.; Zheng, L.; Long, Y.; Roth, B.W.; Wurz, M.C.; Twiefel, J.; Wallaschek, J. Experimental Investigation of the Rapid Fabrication of Micron and Submicron Structures on Polymers Utilizing Ultrasonic Assisted Embossing. Polymers 2021, 13, 2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Juang, Y.-J.; Wang, Y.; Hsu, S.-K. One-Step Hot Microembossing for Fabrication of Paper-Based Microfluidic Chips in 10 Seconds. Polymers 2020, 12, 2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wu, W.; He, X.; Li, B.; Shan, Z. An Effective Shrinkage Control Method for Tooth Profile Accuracy Improvement of Micro-Injection-Molded Small-Module Plastic Gears. Polymers 2022, 14, 3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, W.; Zou, Y.; Wei, G.; Jiang, B. Numerical Simulation on the Acoustic Streaming Driven Mixing in Ultrasonic Plasticizing of Thermoplastic Polymers. Polymers 2022, 14, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, P.-C.; Yang, Y.-W.; Lin, J.-C.; Liu, W.-H. Advanced Manufacturing in the Fabrication of a Lifelike Brain Glioblastoma Simulator for the Training of Neurosurgeons. Polymers 2022, 14, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, P.-C.; Lin, J.-C.; Chiang, C.-H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chen, J.-E.; Liu, W.-H. Engineering Additive Manufacturing and Molding Techniques to Create Lifelike Willis’ Circle Simulators with Aneurysms for Training Neurosurgeons. Polymers 2020, 12, 2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chen, P.-C.; Chen, P.-T.; Vo, T.N.A. Using Stereolithographic Printing to Manufacture Monolithic Microfluidic Devices with an Extremely High Aspect Ratio. Polymers 2021, 13, 3750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lai, P.-C.; Yu, S.-S. Cationic Cellulose Nanocrystals-Based Nanocomposite Hydrogels: Achieving 3D Printable Capacitive Sensors with High Transparency and Mechanical Strength. Polymers 2021, 13, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Samira, R.; Vakahi, A.; Eliasy, R.; Sherman, D.; Lachman, N. Mechanical and Compositional Implications of Gallium Ion Milling on Epoxy Resin. Polymers 2021, 13, 2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kim, K.; Park, K.; Nam, H.; Kim, G.H.; Hong, S.K.; Kim, S.; Woo, H.; Yoon, S.; Kim, J.H.; Lim, G. Fabrication of Oblique Submicron-Scale Structures Using Synchrotron Hard X-ray Lithography. Polymers 2021, 13, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Juang, Y.-J.; Hsu, S.-K. Fabrication of Paper-Based Microfluidics by Spray on Printed Paper. Polymers 2022, 14, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Petersen, R.S.; Boisen, A.; Keller, S.S. Micromechanical Punching: A Versatile Method for Non-Spherical Microparticle Fabrication. Polymers 2021, 13, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, W.-C.; Cheng, Y.-T.; Estroff, B. Electrostatic Self-Assembly of Composite Nanofiber Yarn. Polymers 2021, 13, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tsao, C.-W.; Wu, Z.-K. Polymer Microchannel and Micromold Surface Polishing for Rapid, Low-Quantity Polydimethylsiloxane and Thermoplastic Microfluidic Device Fabrication. Polymers 2020, 12, 2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Juang, Y.-J. Polymer Micro/Nanofabrication and Manufacturing. Polymers 2023, 15, 1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061350

AMA Style

Juang Y-J. Polymer Micro/Nanofabrication and Manufacturing. Polymers. 2023; 15(6):1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061350

Chicago/Turabian Style

Juang, Yi-Je. 2023. "Polymer Micro/Nanofabrication and Manufacturing" Polymers 15, no. 6: 1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061350

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop