Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Approaches to Analysis of Lignin by Thermal Decomposition
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Surface Texturing on the Dry Tribological Properties of Polymers in Medical Devices
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design, Manufacturing and Acoustic Assessment of Polymer Mouthpieces for Trombones
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anthraquinone-Polyaniline-Integrated Textile Platforms for In Situ Electrochemical Production of Hydrogen Peroxide for Microbial Deactivation

Physical Sciences Department, MacEwan University, 10700-104 Avenue, Edmonton, AB T5J 4S2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(13), 2859; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15132859
Submission received: 30 May 2023 / Revised: 22 June 2023 / Accepted: 26 June 2023 / Published: 28 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Polymer Composites: Design, Preparation and Applications)

Abstract

:
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a versatile and effective disinfectant against common pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli (E. coli). Electrochemical H2O2 generation has been studied in the past, but a lack of studies exists on miniaturized electrochemical platforms for the on-demand synthesis of H2O2 for antibacterial applications. In this article, a chemically modified cotton textile platform capable of in situ H2O2 production is demonstrated for E. coli deactivation. The cotton textile was modified by layer-by-layer coating with conductive carbon nanotubes/cellulose nanocrystals (CNT/CNC) and a polymer of polyaniline (PANI) decorated with anthraquinone (AQ), designated as the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch. The AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial textile patch H2O2 production capabilities were evaluated using both electrochemical and colorimetric methods. The AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch electrochemically produced H2O2 concentrations up to 209 ± 25 µM over a 40 min period and displayed a log reduction of 3.32 for E. coli over a period of 2 h. The AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch offers promise for use as a self-disinfecting pathogen control platform.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is an environmentally friendly oxidant used in a wide range of applications, including energy production, chemical synthesis, wastewater treatment, and bioremediation [1,2]. Additionally, it may act as a bacterial and viral pathogenic disinfectant [3,4]. As a disinfectant, H2O2 causes the oxidation of proteins, cleavage of nucleic acids, and dissociation of the 70S ribosomal subunits and denatures a pathogens cell wall [4]. Due to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, there is renewed interest in the use of H2O2 for the deactivation of pathogens. For example, some studies have examined the usage of H2O2 for the sterilization and reuse of personal protective equipment (PPE) to address global shortages and for environmental conservation motivations [5,6,7,8]. However, sterilized surgical masks and respirators must adhere to strict FDA guidelines of having a log reduction of ≥3 of both 2 g positive and 2 g negative vegetative bacteria [8]. Recent studies report that 0.5% H2O2 cooling aerosol sprays were found to be highly effective in reducing the viral coronavirus load on used face masks [9,10]. Because of its inherent disinfectant capabilities, the development of new methods for on-demand H2O2 production is an important area of research.
The standard method of H2O2 production includes a complex anthraquinone (AQ)-based process [11]. In this process, AQ undergoes hydrogenation and oxidation in the presence of a nickel or palladium catalyst, yielding H2O2 as a byproduct, which is then distilled and concentrated [1,11]. However, this process requires a high energy input, produces large amounts of waste, presents the risk of explosions, and is not suitable for producing small, on-demand quantities of H2O2 for integration into PPE [11]. To overcome these drawbacks, electrochemical methods for H2O2 production have been explored. For instance, electrochemical technologies have utilized metal catalysts, such as platinum, to produce H2O2 [1]. Additionally, Xue et al. developed a carbon- and nitrogen-doped TiO2 electrode capable of converting H2O into H2O2 at a rate of 0.29 µmol·L−1·cm−2·h−1, with a faradaic efficiency of 8% [2]. In a different approach, an electrocatalyst comprising polyaniline (PANI) and AQ has been developed to catalyze the reduction of O2 into H2O2 [12]. Utilizing an electrosynthesis flow cell, H2O2 was generated at a rate of 1.80 mol·g−1·hr−1, with a faradaic efficiency of 95.8%, making their platform a promising new technology [12].
Both PANI and AQ are capable of generating H2O2 on the cathode when immersed in an electrochemical cell [12,13]. When PANI is oxidized from its leucoemeraldine form to its emeraldine form, it electrocatalyzes the reduction of oxygen via a 2e oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) transition, shown in Equations (1) and (2) [12,13].
(PANI)ox + 2nH+ + 2ne → (PANI)red,
(PANI)red + nO2 → (PANI)ox + nH2O2,
A 2e ORR may also be catalyzed via AQ, and this reaction is a more kinetically favorable pathway than that afforded via PANI [14,15]. At the cathode, AQ reduces to its semiquinone form, which then catalyzes the reduction of oxygen to the superoxide anion radical (O2·−), which becomes protonated to form H2O2 (Figure 1) [14,15]. It is hypothesized that the integration of AQ into the PANI network will likely dramatically enhance the efficiency of H2O2 production [14,15].
While effective, metal electrocatalysts are susceptible to anodic degradation and may require regeneration between uses [2]. Furthermore, the creation and integration of a miniaturized electrochemical H2O2-producing device for bacterial and viral disinfection remain a challenge. This study demonstrates a layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly of a cotton textile substrate integrated with layers of conductive carbon nanotube (CNT)/cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) composite and PANI decorated with AQ (AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile). The AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile platform has been successfully tested for electrochemical production of H2O2 for E. coli deactivation. The H2O2 production capabilities of the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch were quantified using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and colorimetric methods. The H2O2-generating AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile holds promise for potential integration into masks or other wearable devices for in situ disinfection.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Ammonium peroxydisulfate (APS), 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate (TPM), methanol, silver nanoparticles, 2,6-diaminoanthraquinone, sodium hypochlorite, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), LB broth with agar (Lennox), potassium ferricyanide, sodium acetate trihydrate, 4-aminoantipyrine, phenol, acetic acid, horseradish peroxidase, E. coli K-12 (Z-), tryptic soy agar, saline solution, and barium chloride were procured from Sigma Aldrich, Oakville, ON, Canada. Sulfuric acid, 30% H2O2, aniline, dipotassium phosphate, and monopotassium phosphate were purchased from Fisher Scientific, Denver, CO, USA. Carboxylic acid-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNT) (OD: 4–6 nm. 98%) were bought from TimesNano, China. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) were donated by Alberta Innovates, Canada. Stainless steel hypodermic needles (0.7 mm × 40 mm, inner diameter 0.5 ± 0.1 mm) and textile bandages were bought from a local pharmacy in Edmonton, Alberta. Copper tape was purchased from 3M (Milton, ON, Canada). All reagents were of analytical reagent grade. All aqueous solutions were prepared using 18.2 MΩ deionized (DI) Milli-Q water.

2.2. CNT/CNC H2O2 Sensor Electrode Fabrication

The CNT/CNC sensor electrode for H2O2 detection and the CNT/CNC/Ag (Ag/AgCl) reference needle were fabricated as described previously [16,17]. Briefly, stainless steel hypodermic needles were oxidized via immersion in piranha solution consisting of concentrated H2SO4 and 30% H2O2 in a 1:1 (v/v) ratio for 4 h, then washed with DI water and air dried. The oxidized needles were then silylated via immersion in a solution comprising 3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate (TPM)/DI water/methanol (2:1:8 v/v/v) for 4 hrs, then washed with DI water and air dried. To fabricate the CNT/CNC sensor electrode, the silylated needles were infused with a homogenous suspension comprising 1 mg·mL−1 CNT/4 mg·mL−1 CNC at a flow rate of 15 µL·min−1 at 80 °C. Homogenous CNT/CNC suspensions were first prepared by sonicating 1 mg·mL−1 CNT/4 mg·mL−1 CNC in DI water for 3 h [17]. To fabricate the in-house Ag/AgCl reference needle, silylated needles were infused with a 1 mg·mL−1 CNT/4 mg·mL−1 CNC/5 mg·mL−1 Ag nanoparticle suspension (in DI water) at a flow rate of 15 µL·min−1. The needles were then immersed in 2 mL of sodium hypochlorite bleach overnight at room temperature and rinsed with DI water.

2.3. AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@Textile Antibacterial Patch Fabrication

To fabricate the antibacterial patch, an 8 × 8 cm cotton textile obtained from a local store was drop cast with 8 mL of a 1 mg·mL−1 CNT/4 mg·mL−1 CNC suspension and dried on a hot plate at 50 °C. The PANI microparticles were produced by mixing 50 mL of 0.2 M aniline (in 1 M H2SO4) and 50 mL of 0.25 M APS initiator in an ice bath at 4 °C. The resulting PANI microparticle suspension was then centrifuged (4000 rpm, 15 min) and rinsed with DI water three times before being dried in a dehydrator at 70 °C. A 20 mg·mL−1 solution comprising dried PANI microparticles (in DI water) was sonicated for 3 h to create a homogenous suspension. A total of 8 mL of the 20 mg·mL−1 PANI suspension was drop cast onto the CNT/CNC@textile patch and air dried. Lastly, the PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patch was cut into 4 × 4 cm squares. To integrate AQ into the PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches, 1.5 mL of 0.5 M 2,6-diaminoanthraquinone (in DMSO) was drop cast onto the patch surface and air dried to yield the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patches. The AQ was similarly drop cast onto the CNT/CNC@textile patches to yield AQ@CNT/CNC@textile patches. After air drying, the patches were gently rinsed in a beaker of DI water to remove any excess AQ. A 0.3 × 1.0 cm strip of copper tape was wrapped around one corner of each patch to serve as an electrical connection.

2.4. Characterization of AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@Textile Antibacterial Patch

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), voltammetric, and Raman spectroscopy techniques were used to characterize the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch. FTIR spectra were recorded using a Bruker Tensor 27 FTIR instrument fitted with diamond attenuated total reflectance (ATR). SEM images were acquired from a Zeiss Sigma 300 VP field emission SEM. EIS was performed by immersing different patches in 25 mM potassium ferricyanide (in 0.1 M KCl) as a standard redox probe in a three-electrode electrochemical cell, with an in-house fabricated Ag/AgCl reference needle, and a platinum counter electrode. EIS data were acquired in the frequency range of 20.0 Hz–1 MHz at 6.00 mV of sinusoidal amplitude. CV was used to determine the electroactive surface area of the different patches. The CV was performed by immersing each patch in 25 mM potassium ferricyanide (in 0.1 M KCl) in a three-electrode electrochemical cell, using an Ag/AgCl reference needle and a platinum counter electrode. A Palmsens 4 potentiostat equipped with PSTrace software was used for all electrochemical measurements.

2.5. In Situ Electrochemical Generation of H2O2, and Electrochemical and Colorimetric Quantification

To electrochemically generate H2O2, antibacterial patches were immersed in 10 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) electrolyte in a three-electrode cell comprising a platinum counter electrode and an Ag/AgCl reference needle for CV application (−1.0 to 1.0 V, 0.25 V·s−1).
The H2O2 was electrochemically detected using CV (−1.0 to 1.0 V, 0.1 V·s−1) acquired from a CNT/CNC needle sensor running separately within the H2O2 generation cell. The H2O2 detection cell comprised a three-electrode system, with a platinum wire and Ag/AgCl reference needle acting as the counter and reference electrodes, respectively. Faradaic capacitance was determined from the CVs acquired using the CNT/CNC needle sensor and was calculated by averaging the cathodic current within the − 0.50 to 0 V voltage range and dividing it by the scan rate. The ∆capacitance was determined by subtracting the capacitance generated from the blank from that generated from the sample and dividing it by capacitance of the blank.
A colorimetric method was also used to detect H2O2 generation. Briefly, the colorimetric reagent was prepared by combining 0.3681 g of sodium acetate trihydrate, 0.0102 g of 4-aminoantipyrine, 0.0047 g of phenol, 29.4 µL of glacial acetic acid, and D.I water to make 50 mL of solution. In a cuvette, 2 mL of the colorimetric reagent was mixed with 10 µL of 1.1 mg/mL horseradish peroxidase dissolved in D.I water, 500 µL of electrolyte, and brought to a volume of 3 mL using 490 µL of DI water [18]. The absorbance at 505 nm was measured in triplicate using a LabQuest spectrophotometer.

2.6. E. coli Deactivation Test Using the Antibacterial Patches

Different antibacterial patch designs were tested for their ability to deactivate E. coli. E. coli K-12 (Z-) cells were streaked on tryptic soy agar (TSA) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Single E. coli colonies were suspended in 0.85% (w/v) sterile saline, and the turbidity was adjusted to match a 0.5 McFarland standard, resulting in a bacterial suspension of approximately 108 cells·mL−1. The bacterial suspension was then diluted by combining 2.5 mL suspension with 2.5 mL of sterile saline. To incorporate E. coli into the antibacterial patch network for the deactivation test, 500 µL of dilute bacterial suspension was drop-casted onto the patch surface. CV (−1.0 to 1.0 V, 0.25 V·s−1) was subsequently performed via immersion in 10 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer under the same conditions used for electrochemical H2O2 generation. A total of 10 µL of phosphate buffer was drawn at various points in time (0, 5, 11, 16, 21, 27, 32, 60, 80, and 120 min), suspended in 990 µL of sterile water, and then serially diluted in a 1:9 ratio five times. The final diluted suspension was then cultured on LB agar and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. Bacterial growth was visually evaluated by counting the number of colonies formed on the LB agar plate after the 16 h incubation period.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological Characterization of Antibacterial Textile Patches

The surface morphologies of the various patches prior to and after E. coli integration were examined using SEM. The CNT/CNC@textile patch, shown in Figure 2a, shows evidence of the nanoporous and stable fiber network characteristic of the overlapping nanofiber structure of the cotton textile and CNT/CNC composite. The addition of PANI to the CNT/CNC@textile enhances patch rigidity. As shown in Figure 2b, the PANI microparticles are distributed on the CNT/CNC and textile fiber network. Figure 2c,d show the AQ@CNT/CNC@textile and the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches following the incorporation of E. coli cells, respectively. AQ is visualized as tiny crystals coated on the surface of the CNT/CNC fiber network, while E. coli cells appear as rounded cylinders (Figure 2c,d). Visually, the density of E. coli cells was higher in the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patch, which provides evidence that the integration of the porous PANI coating can trap more bacteria.
To confirm the success of the LbL patch assembly, FTIR was acquired at various stages during AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch fabrication. FTIR spectra from the CNT/CNC@textile patch showed peaks at 1091, 1714, 2910, and 3423 cm−1 (Figure 3), which can be attributed to C-O stretching, C=O stretching, and C-H stretching of the carboxy groups attached to the walls of the functionalized CNTs, and OH stretching of carboxylic acid group, respectively [19,20]. The addition of the PANI layer to the CNT/CNC@textile patch results in two new peaks at 1495 and 1583 cm−1 (Figure 3), which represent the C=C stretching vibrations of the benzenoid and quinoid rings of PANI [21]. Spectra acquired from the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch show an additional peak at 1567 cm−1, which can be attributed to the anthraquinone ring, as well as peaks around 3330, and 3417 cm−1 (Figure 3), which are indicative of the symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations of NH2 group [22].

3.2. Electrochemical Characterization of Antibacterial Patches

Different patches were characterized via EIS using 25 mM potassium ferricyanide (in 0.1 M KCl) as the standard redox probe. The Nyquist plots from EIS analysis and associated circuit fittings are shown in Figure 4a and Figure S1, respectively. A low electron transfer resistance (Rct) is desirable for high patch conductivity and effective signal transduction for H2O2 generation [16]. The Rct values determined from the circuit fittings (Figure S1) for the CNT/CNC@textile, PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, AQ@CNT/CNC@textile, and AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches are shown in Table 1. The integration of either PANI or AQ to the CNT/CNC@textile patches greatly reduced the Rct, indicative of increased electrical conductivity. When combined, the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch demonstrates a reduced Rct compared to the AQ@CNT/CNC@textile patch, owing to the enhanced conductivity afforded to it via the PANI integration. A lower Rct is advantageous for the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches, as it likely results in more effective H2O2 production via enhanced electrical signal transduction.
The electroactive surface areas of the different patches were determined by running CV of the redox couple 25 mM potassium ferricyanide (in 0.1 M KCl) at different scan rates (0.025, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 V·s−1) and invoking the Randles–Sevcik equation (Figure 4b) [23]. The electroactive surface areas of the CNT/CNC@textile, PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, AQ@CNT/CNC@textile, and AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches are shown in Table 1. The addition of the PANI layer resulted in an increase in the electroactive surface area of the textile patches relative to their non-PANI-integrated counterparts. A high electroactive surface area is desirable for an effective electrochemical platform and lends well to affording a higher capacity for bacterial adsorption. The addition of AQ only slightly reduced the electroactive surface area of the PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches.

3.3. Electrochemical and Colorimetric Quantification of Antibacterial Textile Patch H2O2 Production

Two three-electrode cells were utilized to produce and quantify the H2O2 generated from various chemically modified patches. In the H2O2 generation cell, the patches acted as the working electrode for CV application in phosphate buffer. For the H2O2 detection system, a CNT/CNC sensor electrode was used as the working electrode for CV acquisition in the same electrochemical cell using a different potentiostat [17]. Representative CVs taken from CNT/CNC@textile, PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, and AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches acquired during the electrochemical catalysis of H2O2 are shown in Figure S2.
For the capacitive quantification of H2O2, a calibration curve in the range of 0–400 µM H2O2 was used (Figure S3), where the ∆capacitance was determined using the cathodic peak current found within the −0.5 to 0 V range. Evidently, the CNT/CNC sensor electrode used for H2O2 detection is reliable, displaying a calibration sensitivity of 0.00202 µF·µM−1 (Figure S3b), with an LOD of 45.4 µM. CVs acquired using the CNT/CNC sensor electrode during H2O2 production from the various patches and the resulting plots of the time trend of ∆capacitance are shown in Figures S4 and S5, respectively. No H2O2 was produced via the CNT/CNC@textile patch, evident by the poor linear signal response (R2 = 0.0564) (Figure S5). H2O2 production rates determined by capacitive quantification were 4.19 and 7.20 µM·min−1 for the PANI@CNT/CNC@textile and AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches, respectively (Figure 5a). Additionally, the total concentration of H2O2 generated from the PANI@CNT/CNC@textile and AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches after 32 min of CV application was 173 and 209 µM, respectively (Figure 5a).
A colorimetric assay was used as an additional method to quantify H2O2 production [18]. The presence of H2O2 was indicated by the absorbance peak at 505 nm, and this detection method had a calibration sensitivity of 4.53 × 10−4 µM−1 (Figure S6), with a LOD of 59.5 µM. The resulting absorption spectra and timed trends in absorbance (@ 505 nm) for H2O2 generation from AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile and PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches are shown in Figures S7 and S8, respectively. Using the colorimetric assay, the PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patch produced H2O2 at a rate of 1.01 µM·min−1 (Figure 5b). For the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patch, H2O2 production occurred very slowly in the first 16 min before increasing linearly at a rate of 9.54 µM·min−1. The total concentration of H2O2 after 32 min of CV application was determined to be 36.8 and 143 µM for PANI@CNT/CNC@textile and AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches, respectively (Figure 5b). Both quantification methods indicate that the integration of AQ into PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches improves both the rate of and total H2O2 production (Figure 5). However, capacitive detection is likely more accurate due to a higher calibration sensitivity.
Mechanistically, H2O2 is generated from O2 via a 2e ORR assisted by the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch [1]. AQ acts as the primary catalyst for the OOR reaction, while PANI acts as a conductive surface for the attachment of AQ and contributes additional catalytic activity [1]. Therefore, the greater rates of H2O2 production for the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patches relative to the PANI@CNT/CNC@textile can be attributed to the enhanced catalytic activity imparted by the AQ layer [1]. Generally, the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patch produces either lower or similar amounts of H2O2 compared to other methods (Table 2). However, the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patch is flexible, lends well for wearability, and is an ideal platform for integration into medical PPE for self-disinfection via on-demand electrochemical H2O2 generation.

3.4. Antibacterial Efficacy of AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@Textile Antibacterial Patch

The ability of the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch to deactivate E. coli bacteria was tested. CV was performed on E. coli-integrated CNT/CNC@textile, PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, and AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches immersed in phosphate buffer, and samples taken from the electrochemical cells at various times were grown on LB agar plates and counted (Figure S9). The CNT/CNC@textile patch showed very little antibacterial activity, demonstrated by the large number of E. coli colonies formed from it at any point during CV application (Figure S9). Antibacterial activities of PANI@CNT/CNC@textile and AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches were evaluated numerically using a log reduction (Figure 6), calculated by taking the log of the colony forming units (CFU) after 0 min of CV application divided by the CFU after a given time of CV application. After 2 h of CV application, the E. coli-integrated AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch, and the log reduction was 3.32, whereas that of the PANI@CNT/CNC patch was less than 0.500 (Figure 6). As such, the FDA Tier 3 standard for reusable face masks (log reduction ≥ 3) [8] is satisfied via the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch, and its antibacterial activity correlates with an approximate 99.9% reduction in E. coli bacteria over 2 h. This suggests that the AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patch may be useful for integration into face coverings or masks for enhanced microbe deactivation and sanitization [28].

4. Conclusions

The AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch described in this study produced H2O2 in amounts up to 209 ± 25 µM. Although this concentration of H2O2 is lower than that reported in other studies conducted using PANI and AQ electrocatalysts [12], bacterial deactivation tests showed a log reduction of 3.32 for E. coli after 2 h of electrochemical H2O2 generation. These results are indicative of strong antibacterial activity, and the textile-based antibacterial patch has great potential to be integrated into PPE or face coverings for enhanced protection against pathogens. Overall, this study outlines a promising textile-based technology that may be further optimized for controlling various pathogens in food-safety- and health-related applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/15/13/2859/s1, Figure S1: EIS circuit fitting for different variations of the fabricated patches: (a) CNT/CNC@textile patch; (b) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patch; (c) AQ@CNT/CNC@textile patch; d) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patch; Figure S2: Overlaid CVs taken using (a) CNT/CNC@textile; (b) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile; and (c) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches to stimulate the electrochemical production of H2O2; Figure S3: (a) Overlaid CVs taken using the CNT/CNC sensor electrode in response to increasing H2O2 concentrations and (b) resulting ∆capacitance vs. H2O2 concentration calibration curve; Figure S4: CVs taken using the CNT/CNC sensor electrode for the electrochemical detection of H2O2 produced from (a) CNT/CNC@textile; (b) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile; and (c) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches; Figure S5: ∆Capacitance vs. H2O2 generation time plot, and resulting linear equations for (i) CNT/CNC@textile; (ii) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile; and (iii) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches; Figure S6: (a) Absorption spectra for the colorimetric detection of H2O2 in response to increasing H2O2 concentrations and (b) resulting absorbance (@ 505 nm) vs. H2O2 concentration calibration curve; Figure S7: Absorption spectra for the colorimetric detection of H2O2 produced from (a) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile; and (b) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches; Figure S8: Absorbance (@ 505 nm) vs. electrochemical H2O2 generation time plot and resulting linear equations for (i) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile; and (ii) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches; Figure S9: Camera images of E. coli colonies taken following various lengths of exposure to H2O2 production from CNT/CNC@textile, PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, and AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches.

Author Contributions

S.M.M.: Inception of the project design and its development to completion, supervision, funding acquisition, including revision of the manuscript. S.R.: Methodology and experimentation, data validation and writing the original manuscript. W.L.: Methodology and experimentation, data acquisition and revising the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

S.M.M. research group acknowledges funding from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) in the discovery grant category.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data is included in the manuscript and in the Supplementary Information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, Y.; Han, L.; Strasser, P. A comparative perspective of electrochemical and photochemical approaches for catalytic H2O2 production. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 6605–6631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xue, S.-G.; Tang, L.; Tang, Y.-K.; Li, C.-X.; Li, M.-L.; Zhou, J.-J.; Chen, W.; Zhu, F.; Jiang, J. Selective Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation to Produce H2O2 Using a C,N Codoped TiO2 Electrode in an Acidic Electrolyte. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 12, 4423–4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Du, W.-N.; Chen, S.-T. Bactericidal Effects of Oxidative Stress Generated by EDTA-Fe and Hydrogen Peroxide. Biocontrol Sci. 2019, 24, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Russell, A.D. Similarities and differences in the responses of microorganisms to biocides. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 52, 750–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Grant, K.; Andruchow, J.E.; Conly, J.; Lee, D.D.; Mazurik, L.; Atkinson, P.; Lang, E. Personal protective equipment preservation strategies in the covid-19 era: A narrative review. Infect. Prev. Pract. 2021, 3, 100146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grossman, J.; Pierce, A.; Mody, J.; Gagne, J.; Sykora, C.; Sayood, S.; Cook, S.; Shomer, N.; Liang, S.Y.; Eckhouse, S.R. Institution of a Novel Process for N95 Respirator Disinfection with Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Large Academic Medical Center. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2020, 231, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pradhan, D.; Biswasroy, P.; Kumar Naik, P.; Ghosh, G.; Rath, G. A Review of Current Interventions for COVID-19 Prevention. Arch. Med. Res. 2020, 51, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Berger, D.; Gundermann, G.; Sinha, A.; Moroi, M.; Goyal, N.; Tsai, A. Review of aerosolized hydrogen peroxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, and hydrogen peroxide gas plasma in the decontamination of filtering facepiece respirators. Am. J. Infect. Control 2021, 50, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Basso, I.B.; Schroder, A.G.D.; Santos, R.S.; Ravazzi, G.C.; Gonçalves, F.M.; Stechman-Neto, J.; Zeigelboim, B.S.; Povh, B.; de Araujo, C.M.; Guariza-Filho, O. Efficacy of disinfecting inanimate surfaces against coronavirus: A systematic review. Res. Soc. Dev. 2021, 10, e452101019100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kampf, G.; Todt, D.; Pfaender, S.; Steinmann, E. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 104, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Anantharaj, S.; Pitchaimuthu, S.; Noda, S. A review on recent developments in electrochemical hydrogen peroxide synthesis with a critical assessment of perspectives and strategies. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 287, 102331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, Q.; Hinkle, M.; Kim, D.J.; Kim, J.-H. Modular Hydrogen Peroxide Electrosynthesis Cell with Anthraquinone-Modified Polyaniline Electrocatalyst. ACS EST Eng. 2020, 1, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khomenko, V.; Barsukov, V.; Katashinskii, A. The catalytic activity of conducting polymers toward oxygen reduction. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 50, 1675–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gao, Y.; Zhu, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; Huang, T. Anthraquinone (AQS)/polyaniline (PANI) modified carbon felt (CF) cathode for selective H2O2 generation and efficient pollutant removal in electro-Fenton. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 304, 114315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kajita, M.; Hikosaka, K.; Iitsuka, M.; Kanayama, A.; Toshima, N.; Miyamoto, Y. Platinum nanoparticle is a useful scavenger of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic. Res. 2007, 41, 615–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dhanjai; Mugo, S.M.; Lu, W. Modified stainless steel microneedle electrode for polyphenolics detection. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 7063–7072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mugo, S.M.; Lu, W.; Wood, M.; Lemieux, S. Wearable microneedle dual electrochemical sensor for simultaneous pH and cortisol detection in sweat. Electrochem. Sci. Adv. 2021, 2, e2100039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mugo, S.M.; Berg, D.; Bharath, G. Integrated Microcentrifuge Carbon Entrapped Glucose Oxidase Poly (n-Isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAm) Microgels for Glucose Amperometric Detection. Anal. Lett. 2018, 52, 825–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Metwally, N.H.; Saad, G.R.; El-Wahab, E.A.A. Grafting of multiwalled carbon nanotubes with pyrazole derivatives: Characterization, antimicrobial activity and molecular docking study. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 6645–6659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kulkarni, M.V.; Kale, B.B. Studies of conducting polyaniline (PANI) wrapped-multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) nanocomposite and its application for optical pH sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 187, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oueiny, C.; Berlioz, S.; Perrin, F.-X. Carbon nanotube–polyaniline composites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 707–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, H.P.; Yang, Q.; Meng, Q.H.; Ahmad, A.; Zhang, M.; Zhu, L.Y.; Liu, Y.G.; Wei, Z.X. A polyimide derivative containing different carbonyl groups for flexible lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 4, 2115–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Habibi, B.; Jahanbakhshi, M. A novel nonenzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor based on the synthesized mesoporous carbon and silver nanoparticles nanohybrid. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 203, 919–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, H.; Guo, H.; Chai, C.; Li, N.; Lin, X.; Xu, W. Anodized graphite felt as an efficient cathode for in-situ hydrogen peroxide production and Electro-Fenton degradation of rhodamine B. Chemosphere 2021, 286, 131936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khoram, M.M.; Nematollahi, D.; Khazalpour, S.; Zarei, M.; Zolfigol, M.A. Electrocatalytic generation of hydrogen peroxide using carbon electrode modified with 5H-dibenzo[b,i]xanthene-5,7,12,14(13H)-tetraone derivative. A green and efficient method. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 407, 139885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, L.; Wang, J.; Ma, T.; Zhang, L. Nanointerface engineering Z-scheme CuBiOS@CuBi2O4 heterojunction with O S interpenetration for enhancing photocatalytic hydrogen peroxide generation and accelerating chromium(VI) reduction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 611, 760–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sánchez-Montes, I.; Santos, G.O.S.; Silva, T.O.; Colombo, R.; Lanza, M.R.V. An innovative approach to the application of electrochemical processes based on the in-situ generation of H2O2 for water treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 392, 136242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gizdavic-Nikolaidis, M.R.; Bennett, J.R.; Swift, S.; Easteal, A.J.; Ambrose, M. Broad spectrum antimicrobial activity of functionalized polyanilines. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 4204–4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Reaction scheme for AQ- and PANI-catalyzed H2O2 production.
Figure 1. Reaction scheme for AQ- and PANI-catalyzed H2O2 production.
Polymers 15 02859 g001
Figure 2. SEM images for (a) CNT/CNC@textile, (b) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, (c) AQ@CNT/CNC@textile patch after E. coli incorporation, and (d) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patch after E. coli incorporation.
Figure 2. SEM images for (a) CNT/CNC@textile, (b) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, (c) AQ@CNT/CNC@textile patch after E. coli incorporation, and (d) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patch after E. coli incorporation.
Polymers 15 02859 g002
Figure 3. Overlapped FTIR spectra of (i) CNT/CNC@textile, (ii) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, and (iii) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches.
Figure 3. Overlapped FTIR spectra of (i) CNT/CNC@textile, (ii) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, and (iii) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches.
Polymers 15 02859 g003
Figure 4. (a) Nyquist plots and (b) peak current vs. the square root of CV scan rate plots for (i) CNT/CNC@textile, (ii) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, (iii) AQ@CNT/CNC@textile, and (iv) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches.
Figure 4. (a) Nyquist plots and (b) peak current vs. the square root of CV scan rate plots for (i) CNT/CNC@textile, (ii) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, (iii) AQ@CNT/CNC@textile, and (iv) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches.
Polymers 15 02859 g004
Figure 5. H2O2 concentration vs. electrochemical H2O2 generation time plots resulting in linear equations determined from the (a) capacitive and (b) colorimetric detection methods for (i) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile and (ii) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches.
Figure 5. H2O2 concentration vs. electrochemical H2O2 generation time plots resulting in linear equations determined from the (a) capacitive and (b) colorimetric detection methods for (i) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile and (ii) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches.
Polymers 15 02859 g005
Figure 6. Log reduction of E. coli vs. CV application time plot of (i) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile and (ii) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patches.
Figure 6. Log reduction of E. coli vs. CV application time plot of (i) PANI@CNT/CNC@textile and (ii) AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile antibacterial patches.
Polymers 15 02859 g006
Table 1. Electrochemical characteristics of CNT/CNC@textile, PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, AQ@CNT/CNC@textile, and AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches.
Table 1. Electrochemical characteristics of CNT/CNC@textile, PANI@CNT/CNC@textile, AQ@CNT/CNC@textile, and AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patches.
Patch TypeRct (Ω)Electroactive Surface Area (cm2)
CNT/CNC@textile1.63 × 10413.3
PANI@CNT/CNC@textile1.45 × 10324.7
AQ@CNT/CNC@textile5.13 × 10310.8
AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile4.65 × 10316.5
Table 2. Comparison of the rate and total concentration of H2O2 produced using various methods in the literature.
Table 2. Comparison of the rate and total concentration of H2O2 produced using various methods in the literature.
H2O2 Production MethodRate of Production (µM·min−1)Total H2O2 Produced (µM)Reference
Electrochemical production using H2SO4-anodized graphite felt as a cathode27.13.25 × 103[24]
Electrochemical production using 13-(4-nitrophenyl)-5H-dibenzo[b,i]xanthene-5,7,12,14(13H)-tetraone–modified carbon electrode1131.36 × 104[25]
Photocatalytic production using a catalytic CuBiOS@CuBi2O4 heterojunction
with O-S interpenetration
1.12202[26]
Electrochemical production using a carbon-polytetrafluoroethylene-modified carbon cloth gas diffusion electrode141–3291.41–3.29 × 103[27]
Electrochemical production using AQ@PANI@CNT/CNC@textile patch7.20209This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mugo, S.M.; Lu, W.; Robertson, S. Anthraquinone-Polyaniline-Integrated Textile Platforms for In Situ Electrochemical Production of Hydrogen Peroxide for Microbial Deactivation. Polymers 2023, 15, 2859. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15132859

AMA Style

Mugo SM, Lu W, Robertson S. Anthraquinone-Polyaniline-Integrated Textile Platforms for In Situ Electrochemical Production of Hydrogen Peroxide for Microbial Deactivation. Polymers. 2023; 15(13):2859. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15132859

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mugo, Samuel M., Weihao Lu, and Scott Robertson. 2023. "Anthraquinone-Polyaniline-Integrated Textile Platforms for In Situ Electrochemical Production of Hydrogen Peroxide for Microbial Deactivation" Polymers 15, no. 13: 2859. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15132859

APA Style

Mugo, S. M., Lu, W., & Robertson, S. (2023). Anthraquinone-Polyaniline-Integrated Textile Platforms for In Situ Electrochemical Production of Hydrogen Peroxide for Microbial Deactivation. Polymers, 15(13), 2859. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15132859

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop