Next Article in Journal
Study of the Microscopic Mechanism of Natural Rubber (Cis-1, 4-Polyisoprene, NR)/Polyethylene (PE) Modified Asphalt from the Perspective of Simulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Multiple Self-Healing Effects of Water-Absorbing Microcapsules in Cementitious Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Curcumin and Diclofenac Therapeutic Efficacy Enhancement Applying Transdermal Hydrogel Polymer Films, Based on Carrageenan, Alginate and Poloxamer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tunneling Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of Supramolecular Self-Responsive Nanocomposites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 19
10.3390/polym14194090
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Quadrupolar-Hydrogen-Bonded Polymeric Ionic Liquids for Potential Self-Healing Electrolytes

by
Chenming Li
1,
Rajesh Bhandary
1,
Anja Marinow
1,
Dmitrii Ivanov
1,
Mengxue Du
2,
René Androsch
2 and
Wolfgang H. Binder
1,*
1
Macromolecular Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Science II, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Danckelmann-Platz 4, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
2
Interdisciplinary Center for Transfer-Oriented Research in Natural Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06099 Halle (Saale), Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(19), 4090; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194090
Submission received: 29 August 2022 / Revised: 19 September 2022 / Accepted: 23 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymeric Self-Healing Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Within the era of battery technology, the urgent demand for improved and safer electrolytes is immanent. In this work, novel electrolytes, based on pyrrolidinium-bistrifluoromethanesulfonyl-imide polymeric ionic liquids (POILs), equipped with quadrupolar hydrogen-bonding moieties of ureido-pyrimidinone (UPy) to mediate self-healing properties were synthesized. Reversible addition–fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization was employed using S,S-dibenzyl trithiocarbonate as the chain transfer agent to produce precise POILs with a defined amount of UPy and POIL-moieties. Kinetic studies revealed an excellent control over molecular weight and polydispersity in all polymerizations, with a preferable incorporation of UPy monomers in the copolymerizations together with the ionic monomers. Thermogravimetric analysis proved an excellent thermal stability of the polymeric ionic liquids up to 360 °C. By combining the results from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), broadband dielectric spectroscopy (BDS), and rheology, a decoupled conductivity of the POILs from glass transition was revealed. While the molecular weight was found to exert the main influence on ionic conductivity, the ultimate strength and the self-healing efficiency (of up to 88%) were also affected, as quantified by tensile tests for both pristine and self-healed samples, evidencing a rational design of self-healing electrolytes bearing both hydrogen bonding moieties and low-molecular-weight polymeric ionic liquids.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) as an alternative power source to traditional petrochemical energy have attracted researchers’ interest owing to their excellent power density, reusability, and processability [1]. However in conventional liquid electrolytes, LIBs generally suffer drawbacks from lithium dendrites [2,3], leakage and flammability of the liquid electrolytes and the thus resulting poor thermal stability [4]. To solve such deficiencies in current electrolyte systems, polymeric ionic liquids (POILs), where ionic moieties are tethered onto a polymeric backbone, represent potential candidates as polymer electrolytes due to their good conductivity, thermal and mechanical stability, as well as their plasticity [5,6]. For next-generation electrolytes with battery applications, not only high ionic conductivity and good mechanical properties are required [7,8], but also properties such as self-healing can contribute to extending the lifespan of a polymer electrolyte, and thus of the battery as a whole. In the field of supramolecular materials, hydrogen bonds (HBs) play an important role because HBs can provide interchain forces, leading to material properties such as improved mechanical strength [9], shape memory behavior [10], stimulus responsiveness [11], and self-healing [12,13]. Thus in the field of polymer electrolyte chemistry, researchers are exploiting such HBs in POILs to exploit their generally proposed weaker strength and thus to embed self-healing ability into the materials [14,15]. Among the diverse HB synthons, ureido-pyrimidinone (UPy) is widely applied to polymer matrices [16,17,18,19] owing to its facile synthesis and strong dimerization-abilities (with an association constant, Kasssn. ≥ 106 M−1 in CDCl3) [20] via its quadrupolar HBs. There have been several approaches to introducing UPy into POIL to explore its self-healing property together with the conductive nature of POILs [15,17,18,19], which represents an advantageous strategy to design new-generation functional electrolytes.
While many POILs have been reported predominantly with polyimidazolium ions [17,21] or other POILs [18,22,23] as self-healing electrolytes, poly-pyrrolidinium-based self-healing electrolytes have been scarcely reported, despite the fact that pyrrolidinium-based ionic liquids generally have a higher electrochemical stability [24]. Moreover, in many publications POILs were synthesized via free radical polymerization, which offers no control over the molecular weight of POILs, thus yielding polymers with a broad polydispersity and a poor reproducibility, which significantly influences the final conductivity of the obtained polymer electrolytes [25,26,27,28]. While UPy was widely exploited in polymers synthesized via RAFT polymerization [29,30,31], only a few [32] RAFT kinetics studies regarding an acrylate-based UPy monomer were reported, let alone studies involving its copolymerization with ionic monomers.
Motivated by these findings, we herein report the synthesis and characterization of pyrrolidinium-bistrifluoromethanesulfonyl-imide-based POILs (POIL-x, with x being the entry number as provided in Table 1) and also the copolymers (CPILU-y, with y being the entry number) with an acrylate-based UPy monomer via RAFT polymerization. Kinetic studies were carried out firstly via the RAFT homopolymerization of the ionic monomer ILA in DMF, and subsequently the copolymerization kinetics with the acrylate-based UPy monomer UPyA. Homopolymers and copolymers with various molecular weights were prepared, and their thermal, electrical, rheological, and self-healing properties were discussed. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed an extraordinarily high thermal stability of the homopolymers POIL-x and the copolymers CPILU-y, while differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was employed to study the thermal transition of the homo- and co-polymers. Together with conductivity obtained via broadband dielectric spectroscopy (BDS) and zero shear viscosity determined by rheology, the relationship between conductivity and viscosity was explored. By combination with DSC data, an insight into the decoupled conductivity properties of both POIL-x and CPILU-y was revealed. To elucidate the self-healing ability, two copolymers with different molecular weights but identical UPy content were subjected to tensile tests, allowing the future rational design of self-healing electrolytes via HBs and with low molecular weight.

2. Materials and Methods

Acryloyl chloride 96%, 2-cyanobutanyl-2-yl 3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazole-1-carbodithioate, 95% (PCDT), and calcium hydride coarse powder 92% were purchased from ABCR (Karlsruhe, Germany); 3-chloro-1-propanol 98%, 1-methyl-pyrrolidine 98%, benzyl chloride 99%, carbon disulfide 99.9%, and α,α′-azoisobutyronitrile (AIBN) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany); triethylamine 99% and molecular sieve 3Å 1–2 mm bead were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Kandel, Germany); 2-isocyanatoethyl acrylate 98% and 2-amino-4-hydroxy-6-methylpyrimidine (6-methylisocytosine) 98% were purchased from TCI (Eschborn, Germany); lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide 99% was purchased from IoLiTech (Heilbronn, Germany); and potassium carbonate was purchased from Bernd Kraft (Oberhausen, Germany). Molecular sieve 3Å was activated in a vacuum oven at 200 °C for one week before use. 1-Methyl-pyrrolidine was refluxed and distilled with calcium hydride for 48 h to dry and stored with molecular sieve 3Å in a glovebox filled with nitrogen (O2: 0.1 ppm, H2O: 0.1 ppm). All the other chemicals were used as received unless otherwise stated. All other chemicals which are not described here can be found in the Supplementary Material Section S1.1.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a Netzsch Tarsus TG 209 F3 (NETZSCH-Gerätebau GmbH, Selb, Germany). Approximately 10 mg of samples was placed in aluminum oxide crucibles and measured from room temperature to 600 °C at 10 K·min−1 under nitrogen with a flow rate of 20 mL min−1. The data analysis was performed via the NETSCH Proteus-Thermal Analysis (Germany, version 5.2.1) software.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were performed on a calibrated heat-flux DSC (Mettler-Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland) equipped with a FRS5 sensor, connected to a TC100 Intracooler (Huber, Offenbach, Germany). 5–10 mg of samples were placed in aluminum sealed crucibles for measurements. The thermal history was cancelled by heating the samples from 25 °C to 120 °C at 10 K·min−1, followed by isothermal annealing for 20 min, re-cooling to −60 °C at 5 K·min−1, and thermostatting at −60 °C for another 20 min. The final DSC curves were then recorded from −60 °C to 120 °C at 5 K·min−1.
Preparations of samples applied in this work with specific geometry (bar or disc) were obtained via hot-vacuum press by a VCM Essential molding machine (MeltPrep GmbH, Graz, Austria). First, the raw polymers were dried in an oven at 80 °C at 5 mbar for 24 h and then dried thoroughly by an ultrahigh vacuum pump at 80 °C for 24 h to eliminate water traces. Second, the polymers were hot-vacuum-pressed into a bar or disc at 70 °C and the so prepared specimens were kept in a desiccator with phosphorous oxide before the measurements started. For disc samples with specific geometries, a punching tool was used. For the self-healing samples, the pristine samples were cut vertically at the middle of the long edge and brought back tightly before being put in an oven pre-conditioned at the temperature of interest and annealed for a certain time. After self-healing, the samples were cooled to room temperature in a desiccator containing phosphorous oxide before measurements were conducted.
Broadband dielectric spectroscopy (BDS) was performed on an Alpha analyzer dielectric spectrometer (Novocontrol Technologies GmbH & Co. KG, Hundsangen, Germany). Two different sample cells were used depending on the sample texture. For the gel samples, a cell consisting of two brass electrodes with a sample size of 20 mm diameter and a thickness of 0.25 mm was used. Gel samples were carefully inserted into the hollow space between the electrodes inside the sample holder, with air bubble formation avoided. For self-standing samples, the samples were firstly hot-vacuum-pressed into a disc of 20 mm in diameter and 0.2–0.8 mm in thickness and subsequently sandwiched between two brass electrodes for the dielectric measurement. The measurements were performed inside a cryostat with a constant flow of dry nitrogen gas during the measurements to avoid moisture. Measurements were performed in a frequency range from 1 Hz to 106 Hz. Values of the DC conductivity were extracted from the DC plateau of the log σ vs. log frequency plots.
Rheology measurements were performed on an MCR 101 DSO rheometer (Anton Paar Germany GmbH, Ostfildern-Scharnhausen, Germany) using a parallel plate–plate geometry (plate diameter: 8 mm). All polymers were dried under high vacuum at 80 °C for 24 h before the rheology measurement. While the gel samples were directly smeared on the lower plate of the sample holder, the solid samples were hot-vacuum-pressed into films at 70 °C, cut into discs of 8 mm with a punching tool, and subject to the measurement. The sample temperature was regulated by thermoelectric cooling/heating in a Peltier chamber under a dry nitrogen atmosphere. At each temperature the sample was equilibrated for 20 min before measurement was initiated. All measurements were performed in the dynamic mode and repeated twice to ensure precise viscosity values. Data analysis was performed via Rheo CompassTM (Austria, version V1.30.1064).
Tensile tests were performed on an INSTRON 5900 Series (INSTRON Deutschland GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) tensile testing machine at room temperature at a strain rate of 20 mm·min−1. Data analysis was performed via Bluehill Universal (Germany, version 4.08).
All methods which are not mentioned here can be found in the Supplementary Material Section S1.1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Monomers and Polymers

To synthesize the ionic monomer ILA, firstly acryloyl chloride was reacted with chloropropanol in excess with triethylamine as the organic base in DCM to obtain chloropropyl acrylate (CPA) as a precursor. The precursor CPA was then used to quaternize 1-methyl pyrrolidine in MeCN to obtain pyrrolidinium-based acrylate with chloride as the counterion. Ion exchange was performed in water using an excessive amount of LiTFSI to afford the final ionic acrylate-base monomer ILA, with the pyrrolidinium-ion representing the cationic moiety and bistrifluoromethanesulfonyl imide (TFSI) constituting the anion (see Scheme 1). To link the UPy moiety to a polymerizable acrylate, 6-methylisocytosine was firstly dissolved in hot DMSO, whereafter an excessive amount of isocyanatoethyl acrylate was added, followed by immediate cooling in a water bath to prevent self-polymerization. After stirring for 3 h at room temperature and subsequent purification, the finely powdered UPy monomer UPyA was obtained (for synthetic details, see Supplementary Material Section S1.2).
In this work, S,S-dibenzyl trithiocarbonate (DBTTC) was used as a chain transfer agent (CTA) for the RAFT polymerization owing to its excellent control over acrylate monomers [33] and ionic monomers [34]. To make full use of the potential of DBTTC and reach the maximum chain end fidelity, the ratio between DBTTC and AIBN was kept at 1:0.1 in all entries. Thanks to the nature of RAFT polymerization, by manipulation of the ILA to DBTTC ratio, the molecular weight of the final polymers can be adjusted, which enables precise studies on the influence of molecular weight on the final properties of the homopolymer POIL-x and the copolymers CPILU-y. RAFT polymerizations were carried out in DMF because it has been reported as an outstanding solvent for the polymerization of ionic liquids [35]. To obtain POIL-x with various molecular weights, the kinetics of RAFT homopolymerization of the ILA was investigated using DBTTC and AIBN as the initiator. The polymerization conditions, the monomer conversion into the final polymer, the calculated theoretical and practical number-averaged molecular weight via 1H NMR, as well as polydispersities determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) can be found in Table 1. As shown in Figure 1a), polymerization using [ILA]/[DBTTC] = 20:1 at 70 °C (red square) showed first-order kinetics within the investigated time (7 h), while increasing the reaction temperature to 80 °C (blue circle) with the same monomer to CTA ratio drastically boosted the reaction rate, and the polymerization reached its maximum conversion within 3 h. As represented by the orange triangles in Figure 1a, when the [ILA]/[DBTTC] ratio was increased to 100:1, the polymerization at 80 °C showed pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics, and after a 7-hour reaction, it reached a final conversion of 67%. As shown in Table 1, when the [ILA]/[DBTTC] ratio increased from 20: to 100:1, and subsequently to 200:1, the conversion also rose from 62% to 67%, and finally to 79%. Control over the molecular weight was also improved as the ratio increased, as evidenced by the decreasing deviation between the theoretical and experimental molecular weights calculated via 1H NMR (for calculation details and NMR spectra, see Supplementary Material Sections S1.2 and S4). In addition to the moderate control over molecular weight, the control over polydispersity decreased as the [ILA]/[DBTTC] ratio increased but still remained within the moderate range (PDI ≤ 1.4).
Although GPC is a well-established method to characterize the molecular weight of many neutral polymers, the determination of the molecular weight of POILs via GPC remains challenging due to their unique hydrodynamic radius and interaction with the GPC column, as previously reported [36,37,38]. In 2013, He [38] reported a strategy to characterize the molecular weight of imidazolium-based POILs with various (counter)-anions by synthesizing a set of poly(4-vinylbenzyl chloride) with precise molecular weights via RAFT polymerization, followed by quaternization and ion exchange of the polymer precursors to obtain the final PS-based polybutylimidazolium with TFSI as the counterion. These polyimidazoliums were then used for calibration in a DMF GPC with LiTFSI as the additive to reduce the interaction of POILs with the GPC column. The molecular weights detected by this GPC were compared with those obtained via 1H NMR, proving the preciseness of this strategy. Therefore we also prepared our acrylate-based polypyrrolidinium following this strategy (for synthesis details, see Supplementary Material Section S1.3). However, during the quaternization where 1-methylpyrrolidine was involved, side reactions took place, and the final POILs showed imperfect curves as detected by the GPC in DMF. This could be attributed to the hydrolysis of the ester moieties of the polymer [39,40] and the RAFT-active chain end [41] due to the presence of 1-methyl pyrrolidine (which is a base), which deteriorated the overall polydispersity and further impaired our GPC characterization with POIL calibration. Therefore, only the conventional PS standard calibration together with the 0.1 M LiTFSI as an additive was used in DMF GPC to establish the polydispersity (for GPC curves and data, see Supplementary Section S2).
To introduce the HB-moiety UPy into the POILs and also to study the RAFT copolymerization kinetics of the ionic monomer ILA with the quadrupolar hydrogen-bonded monomer UPyA, random copolymerizations of the two monomers were investigated. The copolymerization conditions, the monomer conversion into the final polymer, the initial molar fraction of UPyA in the monomer mixture and the final fraction on the polymer backbone, the degree of polymerization of both the ILA and the UPyA, the calculated theoretical and practical number-averaged molecular weight via 1H NMR, and the polydispersity determined by GPC are listed in Table 2.
As shown in Figure 1b, the copolymerization of ILA with a 5% feeding molar ratio of UPyA at 80 °C with [ILA + UPyA]/[DBTTC] = 20:1 (green rhombus) showed similar kinetics as the homopolymerization entry 2 (blue circle in Figure 1a), and in 3 h the copolymerization reached its full conversion of 55%. Entry 8 with [ILA + UPyA]/[DBTTC] = 100:1 also showed comparable kinetics (brown star in Figure 1b) as compared to the homopolymerization (entry 3) under the same conditions (orange triangle in Figure 1a)). As shown in Table 2, when the initial fraction of UPyA increased from 5% to 15% and to 25% the overall conversion of the two monomers also increased from 55% to 77% and to 84% respectively (see entry 5–7), this indicated a higher reactivity catalyzed by the HBs in monomer UPyA, presumably due to the attractive association of UPyA in compared to the repulsive ionic nature of ILA. Despite the difficulties of copolymerizing non-ionic and ionic monomers, the control over molecular weight by DBTTC remained moderate in all cases, while control over polydispersity was less pronounced compared to the homopolerizations, which again was anticipated again due to the strong association among UPy moieties and ionic clusters of pyrrolidinium and TFSI ions.
In order to find the proper fraction of UPy on the polymer chain for application as self-healing electrolytes, CPILU-y with different UPy contents were prepared. As shown in Figure 1c, as the content of the strong dimerization of UPy moieties increased, the CPILU-y altered from a gel (5%) to a glassy solid (25%) and finally to a powdery material (>25%), indicating increased interchain forces due to the quadrupolar HBs of UPy moieties.

3.2. Thermal Characterization via Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

To understand the thermal stability of the POILs thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was employed. The 5%-weight-loss temperature and the degradation onset temperature are listed in Table 3. The ionic monomer ILA demonstrated excellent thermal stability up to 348 °C as shown in the Figure 2a, while the non-ionic monomer UPyA showed lower stability until 198 °C. For the homopolymers POIL-2 and POIL-3 the thermal stabilities were slightly higher than that of the monomer, manifesting a minor influence by molecular weight on the thermal stability. The thermal stabilities of the POIL-x are comparable with those of similar polypyrrolidinium-polymers as previously reported [42]. However, when UPyA was incorporated into the polymer backbone the thermal stability showed a decreasing trend as the UPyA fraction increased. The degradation of the copolymer CPILU-y was found to be a two-step process, where the UPy moieties were decomposed first at around 200 °C, followed by the ionic moieties decomposing at around 360 °C (see Table 3, column Onset T/°C), indicating a resonable thermal stability compared to the homopolymers.
For the electrolytes used in batteries, it is often observed that the batteries can provide different local temperatures which could introduce a temperature-controlled structural transition of the electrolytes, causing changes in the physical and chemical properties of the electrolytes and further affecting the performance of the batteries, but also reaching temperatures sufficient to activate dynamic self-healing processes. Therefore, the thermal behavior of the polymers in this work was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). As shown in Figure 2b, the crystallization and melting peaks of the pyrrolidinium moieties [43] were not found in the DSC curves of all POILs, but only glass transitions were observed. This could be advantageous for polymers applied as electrolytes, as a better conductivity value can be achieved both above and below the glass transition temperature in amorphous regions (analogous to higher conductivities achieved in amorphous region in PEO [44]). All Tgs are listed in Table 3 and are also shown in the plot. We found that the molecular weight of the POIL-x and the UPy content of the CPILU-y indeed influenced the glass transition temperature. When the molecular weight increased from 11 kDa to 40 kDa, Tg also increased from −13 °C (POIL-2) to 7 °C (POIL-3), which is potentially indicative of more restricted chain motions. When only 4% of the UPy moieties were introduced into the polymers, Tg drastically increased from −13 °C to 9 °C, revealing that the dimerizable UPy moieties act as a strong “chain-hardener” in comparison to the increase of molecular weight. If the UPy content increased from 4% to 14% and then to 24%, Tg increased further from 9 °C to 13 °C and to 30 °C, respectively, this evidenced stiffer chain segments in CPILU-6 and CPILU-7 as a result of a denser UPy dimerization.

3.3. Conductivity via Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy (BDS) and Zero Shear Viscosity via Rheology

To elucidate the potential of the polymers to be applied as electrolytes the DC conductivity was investigated by broadband dielectric spectroscopy (BDS). As shown in Figure 3a the low-molecular-weight POIL-2 showed a higher conductivity compared to the high-molecular-weight POIL-3, matching the conclusions that—in line with expectations—low-molecular-weight POILs generally offer higher conductivity [25,26,27,28]. When 4% UPy moieties were introduced into the polymer backbone (CPILU-5), the conductivity was barely influenced by the non-conductive UPy moieties as compared to the homopolymer POIL-2 (see red squares for POIL-2 and blue triangles for CPILU-5 in Figure 3a). However, when the UPy content continued increasing, a generally lower conductivity could be observed within the whole temperature range, as represented by CPILU-6 and CPILU-7. It is often reported [45,46,47] that the conductivity of low-molecular-weight ionic liquids is affected by the viscosity of the conductive system, wherefore the zero shear viscosity η0 was determined to assist the interpretation of the conductivity behavior of the POILs. As shown in Figure 3b, an inverse relation was observed for the viscosity for those POILs, which can be explained by the higher molecular weight polymers also showing higher viscosity that further hinders ion transport.
In addition to the notable influence of the viscosity, the conductivity of polymer electrolytes before and after the thermal transition is significantly altered. Thus the conductivity of the polymers was plotted versus their glass transition temperature divided by the measurement temperature (Tg/T), as shown in Figure 3c. The variation in conductivity of the polymers by temperature showed two distinct regions in the plot. When the temperature was higher than the polymers’ Tg, segmental motion was enabled, and the conductivity was coupled with the segmental motion, thus following the Vogel−Fulcher−Tammann (VFT) equation. At temperatures below Tg, segments were frozen, and the conductivity plot displayed Arrhenius behavior, which is comparable to the conductive behavior of inorganic glasses [48]. As previously reported [49,50], if the conductivity at Tg is roughly equal to 10–15 S·cm−1 in an ionic system, the charge transport is then fully governed by the structural relaxation of the system, which is segmental motion in case of polymer electrolytes. For our polymers, the conductivities at Tg, as listed in Table 4, are all higher than the reported threshold value (10–15 S·cm−1) for the fully relaxation-coupled systems. As a consequence, the polymers in this work exhibited a certain degree of decoupled ion transport from the segmental dynamics. To clearly visualize this behavior, the decoupling index defined as Rσ, Tg = 15 + log σTg [51,52] was applied. Among our copolymers, those polymer with the strongest decoupling, ie those where the charge transport is least linked to the segmental relaxation, is the copolymer CPILU-5 with 4% UPy moieties, with a decoupling index of 8.4. The least-decoupled homopolymer can be observed in the case of the homopolymer POIL-2 (for Rσ, Tg of other polymers, see Table 4). Because the copolymers show a higher decoupling index, they could provide better conductivity and mechanical strength simultaneously. Therefore, a tensile test was employed to explore their mechanical strength and their self-healing ability, which is discussed in next chapter.

3.4. Mechanical and Self-Healing Characterization via Tensile Test

To evaluate the mechanical strength and the prominent self-healing ability, two copolymers, both with 7% UPy content but with different molecular weights, were synthesized, which are designated as CPILU-9 (7% UPy, 10 kDa) and CPILU-10 (7% UPy, 67 kDa) (for synthesis details, see Supplementary Material Section S1.2). The copolymers were hot-vacuum-pressed into bars or disc specimens, and self-healing ability tests were firstly performed with CPILU-9, as visualized in Figure 4a. A specimen was cut vertically at the long edge into two pieces and brought back with the freshly generated surface tightly and accurately matched. Owing to the quadrupolar HBs of the UPy moieties associating at the edge of the wound, self-healing was observed within 1 h at 40 °C or 24 h at room temperature. To quantify the mechanical strength and the self-healing ability, tensile tests of both pristine and self-healed bar specimens of CPILU-9 and CPILU-10 were performed at a strain rate of 20 mm·min−1 at room temperature, as shown in Figure 4b.
For the pristine specimen, increasing the molecular weight from 10 kDa to 67 kDa indeed drastically enhanced the mechanical strength from 0.34 MPa (CPILU-9, red solid line in Figure 4b) to 2.25 MPa (CPILU-10, blue solid line in Figure 4b) in terms of ultimate stress. Both specimen showed good ductility, with roughly 550% and 650% in relation to the tensile strain for CPILU-9 and CPILU-10, respectively. Regarding self-healing ability, the self-healed specimen of CPILU-9 showed an almost identical tensile behavior (red dash line in Figure 4b) in comparison to the pristine specimen, with a slightly reduced ultimate stress (0.30 MPa) and a similar ductility. These results indicated efficient self-healing (88% in terms of ultimate stress compared to the pristine specimen) at 40 °C for 1 h which is the consequence of the flexible segments and the strong quadrupolar HBs of UPy moieties in CPILU-9. As for CPILU-10, with a molecular weight of 67 kDa, the self-healed specimen generated an ultimate stress of 1.33 MPa (59% in terms of ultimate stress compared to the pristine specimen) and a poor ductility at 32% tensile strain. This could be attributed to the more entangled segments in the high-molecular-weight CPILU-10 which hindered self-healing by UPy dimerization.

4. Conclusions

Novel polymeric ionic liquids POIL-x and copolymers CPILU-y bearing quadrupolar hydrogen bonds were synthesized via RAFT polymerization using DBTTC as chain transfer agent. Kinetic studies revealed that the HBs monomer UPyA showed preferable incorporation in a copolymerization of ILA, anticipated as the attractive association of UPyA. While the synthesized homopolymers were thermally stable up to 360 °C, the introduction of UPy moieties into the polymer chains decreased the thermal stability and altered the decomposition into a two-step process. Examining a combination of data from DSC, BDS, and rheology, a decoupling of conductivity from the glass transition was observed in all polymers, while the trend of the zero shear viscosity values of all the polymers matched that of their conductivity values. A copolymer with 4% UPy content displayed the highest decoupling index of 8.4, proving that both, self-healing and excellent conductivities can be embedded into the same type of a POIL using complex hydrogen-bonding. While copolymers with low molecular weights demonstrated both better conductivity and self-healing efficiency, the high-molecular-weight samples showed higher ultimate strength but lower healing efficiency and conductivity. This work proves that HBs are a useful tool for designing electrolytes with unique properties like decoupled conductivity and self-healing ability, which can contribute to battery science and electronic devices such as supercapacitors in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym14194090/s1, Scheme S1: Synthesis route of monomers, RAFT chain transfer agent, and polymers; Scheme S2: Synthesis rout of POILC-z for GPC calibration; Figure S1–S4: GPC curves of all the polymers; Figure S5–S12 NMR spectra of all the compounds and polymers; Table S1: Synthesis data of the copolymers CPILU-9 and CPILU-10 for tensile test; Table S2: GPC data of precursor polymers pCPA and final POILC-z, planned for calibration; Table S3: Conductivity of POIL-x and CPILU-y from −20 °C to 80 °C, measured by BDS; Table S4: Zero shear viscosity of POIL-x and CPILU-y from 50 °C to 100 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.H.B., A.M. and C.L.; methodology, C.L., R.B., D.I. and M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L.; writing—review and editing, W.H.B., A.M. and R.A.; supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition, W.H.B. and A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was developed under the framework of the BAT4EVER project. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 957225.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dieter Ströhl and his team for NMR measurements, Mario Beiner and his team for BDS measurement, Thomas Thurn-Albrecht for the molding machine, and all the members of AG Binder for their physical and mental support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Placke, T.; Kloepsch, R.; Dühnen, S.; Winter, M. Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: The odyssey for high energy density. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2017, 21, 1939–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lu, D.; Shao, Y.; Lozano, T.; Bennett, W.D.; Graff, G.L.; Polzin, B.; Zhang, J.; Engelhard, M.H.; Saenz, N.T.; Henderson, W.A.; et al. Failure Mechanism for Fast-Charged Lithium Metal Batteries with Liquid Electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1400993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Pei, A.; Yan, K.; Sun, Y.; Wu, C.-L.; Joubert, L.-M.; Chin, R.; Koh, A.L.; Yu, Y.; et al. Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo–electron microscopy. Science 2017, 358, 506–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Q.; Jiang, L.; Yu, Y.; Sun, J. Progress of enhancing the safety of lithium ion battery from the electrolyte aspect. Nano Energy 2019, 55, 93–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, D.-Z.; Ren, Y.-Y.; Hu, Y.; Li, L.; Yan, F. Ionic Liquid/Poly (ionic liquid)-based Semi-solid State Electrolytes for Lithium-ion Batteries. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 38, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, H.; Xu, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, J.; Hirano, S.-I. Polymer electrolytes for rechargeable lithium metal batteries. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 5469–5487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, J.; Li, S.; Zhao, Q.; Song, C.; Xue, Z. Structure Code for Advanced Polymer Electrolyte in Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2008208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meng, N.; Lian, F.; Cui, G. Macromolecular Design of Lithium Conductive Polymer as Electrolyte for Solid-State Lithium Batteries. Small 2021, 17, e2005762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, X.; Nakagawa, S.; Houjou, H.; Yoshie, N. Insights into the Role of Hydrogen Bonds on the Mechanical Properties of Polymer Networks. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 4070–4080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, K.; Zhu, W.; Li, X.; Yu, Z. A novel mechanical robust, self-healing and shape memory hydrogel based on PVA reinforced by cellulose nanocrystal. Mater. Lett. 2020, 260, 126884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lugger, S.J.D.; Houben, S.J.A.; Foelen, Y.; Debije, M.G.; Schenning, A.P.H.J.; Mulder, D.J. Hydrogen-Bonded Supramolecular Liquid Crystal Polymers: Smart Materials with Stimuli-Responsive, Self-Healing, and Recyclable Properties. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 4946–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, S.; Mahmood, N.; Beiner, M.; Binder, W.H. Self-Healing Materials from V- and H-Shaped Supramolecular Architectures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 10188–10192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Herbst, F.; Seiffert, S.; Binder, W.H. Dynamic supramolecular poly(isobutylene)s for self-healing materials. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 3084–3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Long, T.; Li, Y.; Fang, X.; Sun, J. Salt-Mediated Polyampholyte Hydrogels with High Mechanical Strength, Excellent Self-Healing Property, and Satisfactory Electrical Conductivity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1804416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, J.; Peng, Q.; Thundat, T.; Zeng, H. Stretchable, Injectable, and Self-Healing Conductive Hydrogel Enabled by Multiple Hydrogen Bonding toward Wearable Electronics. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 4553–4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ligthart, G.B.W.L.; Ohkawa, H.; Sijbesma, A.R.P.; Meijer, E.W. Complementary Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding in Supramolecular Copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 810–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Guo, P.; Su, A.; Wei, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Guo, F.; Li, J.; Hu, Z.; Sun, J. Healable, Highly Conductive, Flexible, and Nonflammable Supramolecular Ionogel Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 19413–19420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, Y.; Hu, H.; Yi, P.; Sun, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, G. Zwitterionic hydrogels formed via quadruple hydrogen-bonds with ultra-fast room-temperature self-healing ability. Mater. Lett. 2020, 269, 127665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Yu, L.; Wang, J.; Xue, Z. Self-Healing Single-Ion Conducting Polymer Electrolyte Formed via Supramolecular Networks for Lithium Metal Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 482–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Beijer, F.H.; Sijbesma, R.P.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A.L.; Meijer, E.W. Strong Dimerization of Ureidopyrimidones via Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6761–6769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, P.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Sun, J. Counteranion-Mediated Intrinsic Healing of Poly (ionic liquid) Copolymers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 2105–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. D’Angelo, A.J.; Panzer, M.J. Design of Stretchable and Self-Healing Gel Electrolytes via Fully Zwitterionic Polymer Networks in Solvate Ionic Liquids for Li-Based Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 2913–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, Y.; Ren, Y.-Y.; Li, Q.; Shi, R.-W.; Hu, Y.; Guo, J.-N.; Sun, Z.; Yan, F. Conductive, Stretchable, and Self-healing Ionic Gel Based on Dynamic Covalent Bonds and Electrostatic Interaction. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2019, 37, 1053–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McGrath, L.M.; Rohan, J.F. Pyrrolidinium Containing Ionic Liquid Electrolytes for Li-Based Batteries. Molecules 2020, 25, 6002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Keith, J.R.; Mogurampelly, S.; Aldukhi, F.; Wheatle, B.K.; Ganesan, V. Influence of molecular weight on ion-transport properties of polymeric ionic liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 29134–29145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, Q.; Evans, C.M. Effect of Molecular Weight on Viscosity Scaling and Ion Transport in Linear Polymerized Ionic Liquids. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 3395–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fan, F.; Wang, W.; Holt, A.P.; Feng, H.; Uhrig, D.; Lu, X.; Hong, T.; Wang, Y.; Kang, N.-G.; Mays, J.; et al. Effect of Molecular Weight on the Ion Transport Mechanism in Polymerized Ionic Liquids. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 4557–4570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, H.; Mahanthappa, M.K. Ionic Conductivities of Broad Dispersity Lithium Salt-Doped Polystyrene/Poly (ethylene oxide) Triblock Polymers. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 8798–8809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, B.; He, D.; Hu, J.; Ye, Y.; Peng, H.; Zhou, X.; Xie, X.; Xue, Z. A flexible, self-healing and highly stretchable polymer electrolyte via quadruple hydrogen bonding for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 11725–11733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, X.; Yi, L.; Zou, C.; Liu, J.; Yu, J.; Zang, Z.; Tao, X.; Luo, Z.; Guo, X.; Chen, G.; et al. High-Performance Gel Polymer Electrolyte with Self-Healing Capability for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 5267–5276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheng, Q.; Ding, S.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, M.; Peng, Y.-Y.; Diaz-Dussan, D.; Shi, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, H.; Cui, Z.; et al. Dual Cross-Linked Hydrogels with Injectable, Self-Healing, and Antibacterial Properties Based on the Chemical and Physical Cross-Linking. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22, 1685–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lewis, C.L.; Anthamatten, M. Synthesis, swelling behavior, and viscoelastic properties of functional poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) with ureidopyrimidinone side-groups. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 4058–4066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, S.; Binder, W.H. Controlled copolymerization of n-butyl acrylate with semifluorinated acrylates by RAFT polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, S.; Funtan, A.; Gao, F.; Cui, B.; Meister, A.; Parkin, S.S.P.; Binder, W.H. Synthesis and Morphology of Semifluorinated Polymeric Ionic Liquids. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 8620–8628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, M.; Dugger, J.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Kumar, R.; Meek, K.M.; Uhrig, D.W.; Browning, J.F.; Madsen, L.A.; Long, T.E.; et al. Polymerized ionic liquids: Effects of counter-anions on ion conduction and polymerization kinetics. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2018, 56, 1346–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rulkens, R.; Schulze, M.; Wegner, G. Rigid-rod polyelectrolytes: Synthesis of sulfonated poly(p-phenylene)s. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 1994, 15, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, F.; Hou, L.; Wu, H.; Wang, X.; Shen, H.; Cao, W.; Yang, A.W.; Cao, Y. High-Efficiency, Environment-Friendly Electroluminescent Polymers with Stable High Work Function Metal as a Cathode: Green- and Yellow-Emitting Conjugated Polyfluorene Polyelectrolytes and Their Neutral Precursors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9845–9853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. He, H.; Zhong, M.; Adzima, B.; Luebke, D.; Nulwala, H.; Matyjaszewski, K. A Simple and Universal Gel Permeation Chromatography Technique for Precise Molecular Weight Characterization of Well-Defined Poly(ionic liquid)s. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4227–4230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mori, H.; Müller, A.H. New polymeric architectures with (meth) acrylic acid segments. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28, 1403–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, L.; Tong, X.; Li, M.; Wang, E. Synthesis and solution properties of anionic linear-dendritic block amphiphiles. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2000, 38, 4282–4288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moad, G.; Chong, Y.; Postma, A.; Rizzardo, E.; Thang, S. Advances in RAFT polymerization: The synthesis of polymers with defined end-groups. Polymer 2005, 46, 8458–8468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ogihara, W.; Washiro, S.; Nakajima, H.; Ohno, H. Effect of cation structure on the electrochemical and thermal properties of ion conductive polymers obtained from polymerizable ionic liquids. Electrochimica Acta 2006, 51, 2614–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. A Henderson, W.; Young, V.G.; Pearson, W.; Passerini, S.; De Long, H.C.; Trulove, P.C. Thermal phase behaviour ofN-alkyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium and piperidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide salts. J. Physics Condens. Matter 2006, 18, 10377–10390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Berthier, C.; Gorecki, W.; Minier, M.; Armand, M.; Chabagno, J.; Rigaud, P. Microscopic investigation of ionic conductivity in alkali metal salts-poly (ethylene oxide) adducts. Solid State Ionics 1983, 11, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qing-Shan, L.; Pei-Fang, Y.; Miao, Y.; Zhi-Cheng, T.; Chang-Ping, L.; Urs, W.-B. Dynamic Viscosity and Conductivity of Ionic Liquids [Cnpy] [NTf2] (n = 2, 4, 5). Acta Physico-Chimica Sin. 2011, 27, 2762–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chang-Ping, L.; Zhuo, L.; Ben-Xue, Z.; Qing-Shan, L.; Xiao-Xia, L. Density, Viscosity and Conductivity of Protic Ionic Liquid N,N-DimethylethanolammoniumPropionate. Acta Physico-Chimica Sin. 2013, 29, 2157–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yuan, W.-L.; Yang, X.; He, L.; Xue, Y.; Qin, S.; Tao, G.-H. Viscosity, Conductivity, and Electrochemical Property of Dicyanamide Ionic Liquids. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dyre, J.C.; Maass, P.; Roling, B.; Sidebottom, D.L. Fundamental questions relating to ion conduction in disordered solids. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2009, 72, 046501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mizuno, F.; Belieres, J.-P.; Kuwata, N.; Pradel, A.; Ribes, M.; Angell, C. Highly decoupled ionic and protonic solid electrolyte systems, in relation to other relaxing systems and their energy landscapes. J. Non-Crystalline Solids 2006, 352, 5147–5155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ansari, Y.; Ueno, K.; Zhao, Z.; Angell, C.A. Anhydrous Superprotonic Polymer by Superacid Protonation of Cross-linked (PNCl2)n. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 1548–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Angell, C. Fast ion motion in glassy and amorphous materials. Solid State Ionics 1983, 9–10, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wojnarowska, Z.; Feng, H.; Fu, Y.; Cheng, S.; Carroll, B.; Kumar, R.; Novikov, V.N.; Kisliuk, A.M.; Saito, T.; Kang, N.-G.; et al. Effect of Chain Rigidity on the Decoupling of Ion Motion from Segmental Relaxation in Polymerized Ionic Liquids: Ambient and Elevated Pressure Studies. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 6710–6721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 04090 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthetic route towards the POIL-x and CPILU-y (bearing the IL and the self-healing UPy moieties): (a) precursor CPA: acryloyl chloride with chloropropanol and triethylamine (TEA) at room temperature for 24 h; (b) ionic monomer ILA: CPA with 1-methyl pyrrolidine in MeCN at 75 °C for 24 h; (c) with LiTFSI in H2O at room temperature for 24 h; (d) HBs monomer UPyA: 6-methylisocytosine in DMSO at 120 °C, followed by isocyanatoethyl acrylate and stirring at room temperature for 3 h; (e) homopolymers POIL-x: DBTTC and AIBN in DMF at 70/80 °C for 7 h; (f) copolymers CPILU-y: DBTTC and AIBN in DMF at 80 °C.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route towards the POIL-x and CPILU-y (bearing the IL and the self-healing UPy moieties): (a) precursor CPA: acryloyl chloride with chloropropanol and triethylamine (TEA) at room temperature for 24 h; (b) ionic monomer ILA: CPA with 1-methyl pyrrolidine in MeCN at 75 °C for 24 h; (c) with LiTFSI in H2O at room temperature for 24 h; (d) HBs monomer UPyA: 6-methylisocytosine in DMSO at 120 °C, followed by isocyanatoethyl acrylate and stirring at room temperature for 3 h; (e) homopolymers POIL-x: DBTTC and AIBN in DMF at 70/80 °C for 7 h; (f) copolymers CPILU-y: DBTTC and AIBN in DMF at 80 °C.
Polymers 14 04090 sch001
Polymers 14 04090 g001 550
Figure 1. Kinetic plots of RAFT (a) homopolymerizations of ILA under the conditions: [ILA]/[DBTTC] = 20:1 at 70 °C (red square), [ILA]/[DBTTC] = 20:1 at 80 °C (blue circle), and [ILA]/[DBTTC] = 100:1 at 80 °C (orange triangle); (b) copolymerizations of ILA with UPyA under the conditions: [ILA + UPyA]/[DBTTC] = 20:1 at 80 °C (green rhombus) and [ILA + UPyA]/[DBTTC] = 100:1 at 80 °C (brown star); and (c) photos of the copolymers CPILU-y with various contents of UPy moieties.
Figure 1. Kinetic plots of RAFT (a) homopolymerizations of ILA under the conditions: [ILA]/[DBTTC] = 20:1 at 70 °C (red square), [ILA]/[DBTTC] = 20:1 at 80 °C (blue circle), and [ILA]/[DBTTC] = 100:1 at 80 °C (orange triangle); (b) copolymerizations of ILA with UPyA under the conditions: [ILA + UPyA]/[DBTTC] = 20:1 at 80 °C (green rhombus) and [ILA + UPyA]/[DBTTC] = 100:1 at 80 °C (brown star); and (c) photos of the copolymers CPILU-y with various contents of UPy moieties.
Polymers 14 04090 g001
Polymers 14 04090 g002 550
Figure 2. Thermal characterization of ionic monomer ILA, HBs monomer UPyA, homopolymers POIL-x, and copolymers CPILU-y via (a) thermogravimetric analysis measured at a heating rate of 10 K·min−1 under N2 atmosphere; and (b) differential scanning calorimetry measured at a heating rate of 5 K·min−1 with the thermal history cancelled by a preheating/cooling circle (the baseline of POIL-3 was corrected manually).
Figure 2. Thermal characterization of ionic monomer ILA, HBs monomer UPyA, homopolymers POIL-x, and copolymers CPILU-y via (a) thermogravimetric analysis measured at a heating rate of 10 K·min−1 under N2 atmosphere; and (b) differential scanning calorimetry measured at a heating rate of 5 K·min−1 with the thermal history cancelled by a preheating/cooling circle (the baseline of POIL-3 was corrected manually).
Polymers 14 04090 g002
Polymers 14 04090 g003 550
Figure 3. Conductivity σ of homo-/copolymer POIL-x and CPILU-y (a) as a function of inverse temperature 1000/T; (c) glass transition temperature divided by measurement temperature Tg/T; and (b) zero shear viscosity η0 of homo-/copolymer POIL-x and CPILU-y versus temperature T.
Figure 3. Conductivity σ of homo-/copolymer POIL-x and CPILU-y (a) as a function of inverse temperature 1000/T; (c) glass transition temperature divided by measurement temperature Tg/T; and (b) zero shear viscosity η0 of homo-/copolymer POIL-x and CPILU-y versus temperature T.
Polymers 14 04090 g003
Polymers 14 04090 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Visualized self-healing of CPILU-9; and (b) stress–strain curves of pristine (solid line) and self-healed (at 40 °C for 1 h, dash line) CPILU-9 and CPILU-10 at a strain rate of 20 mm·min−1 at room temperature.
Figure 4. (a) Visualized self-healing of CPILU-9; and (b) stress–strain curves of pristine (solid line) and self-healed (at 40 °C for 1 h, dash line) CPILU-9 and CPILU-10 at a strain rate of 20 mm·min−1 at room temperature.
Polymers 14 04090 g004
Table
Table 1. Data from RAFT polymerizations of ILA and the resulting homopolymer POIL-x.
Table 1. Data from RAFT polymerizations of ILA and the resulting homopolymer POIL-x.
SampleEntryM/CTA aT/°Ct/hconv. bMn, thcMn, NMRPDI d
POIL-120:170738%390080001.26
220:180762%610011,0001.26
3100:180767%32,50040,1001.34
4200:180779%75,80082,1001.36
a Polymerization was carried out in DMF with AIBN as the initiator, and the ratio of [DBTTC]/[AIBN] was kept to 1:0.1 while the monomer concentration was kept at 1 mmol monomer in 1 mL DMF; b conversion was detected by 1H NMR using trioxane as reference; c the number-average molecular weight calculated by the equation: Mn,th = conv. × ([MILA]/[DBTTC]) × mILA + mDBTTC; d PDI was determined by DMF + LiTFSI (0.1 M) GPC with a PS standard.
Table
Table 2. Data from RAFT copolymerizations of ILA with UPyA and the resulting copolymer CPILU-y.
Table 2. Data from RAFT copolymerizations of ILA with UPyA and the resulting copolymer CPILU-y.
SampleEntryM/CTA afUPy bT/°Ct/hconv. cFUPy, NMR dDPIL eDPUPy fMn, th gMn, NMRPDI h
CPILU-520:15%80755%4%22.50.9540011,8001.35
620:115%80777%14%18.62.6720010,7001.32
720:125%80784%24%18.74.5740010,5001.25
8100:15%80765%4%90.13.630,70044,4001.36
a Polymerization was carried out in DMF with AIBN as the initiator, and the ratio of [DBTTC]/[AIBN] was kept to 1:0.1, while the monomer concentration was kept at 1 mmol monomer in 1 mL DMF; b fUPy was the initial molar fraction of UPyA in the monomer mixture; c conversion was detected by 1H NMR using trioxane as reference; d FUPy was the final molar fraction of UPyA on the polymer backbone, calculated from 1H NMR; e, f calculated from relative integral of protons from 1H NMR (for details see Supplementary Material Section S1.2); g the number-average molecular weight calculated by the equation: Mn,th = conv. × [([MILA]/[DBTTC]) × mILA + ([MUPyA]/[DBTTC]) × mUPyA] + mDBTTC; h PDI was determined by DMF + LiTFSI (0.1 M) GPC with PS standard.
Table
Table 3. Thermal characterization data of ILA, UPyA, POIL-x, and CPILU-y via thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry.
Table 3. Thermal characterization data of ILA, UPyA, POIL-x, and CPILU-y via thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry.
SampleEntrySample Info.5 wt%-loss T/°COnset T/°CTg, DSC/°C a
ILA-monomer348348-
UPyA-monomer201198-
POIL-211 k348353−13
340 k3603577
CPILU-54%, 12 k338198, 3609
614%, 11 k297212, 36513
724%, 10 k263215, 36330
a Glass transition temperature via DSC.
Table
Table 4. Glass transition temperature and conductivity at glass transition temperature, and zero shear viscosity and conductivity at 80 °C of POIL-x and CPILU-y.
Table 4. Glass transition temperature and conductivity at glass transition temperature, and zero shear viscosity and conductivity at 80 °C of POIL-x and CPILU-y.
SampleEntrySample Info.Tg, DSC/°C aσTg/S·cm−1bRσ, Tg cη0, 80 °C Pa·s dσ80 °C/S·cm−1e
POIL-211 k−133.07 × 10−9 (−10 °C)6.5432.46 × 10−4
340 k72.04 × 10−8 (10 °C)7.33689.09 × 10−5
CPILU-54%, 12 k92.55 × 10−7 (10 °C)8.4372.19 × 10−4
614%, 11 k132.19 × 10−8 (20 °C)7.32.76 × 1034.85 × 10−5
724%, 10 k303.27 × 10−8 (30 °C)7.52.84 × 1051.84 × 10−5
a Glass transition temperature via DSC; b conductivity at glass transition temperature; c decoupling index calculated with Rσ, Tg = 15 + log σTg; d zero shear viscosity at 80 °C; e and conductivity at 80 °C.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Bhandary, R.; Marinow, A.; Ivanov, D.; Du, M.; Androsch, R.; Binder, W.H. Synthesis and Characterization of Quadrupolar-Hydrogen-Bonded Polymeric Ionic Liquids for Potential Self-Healing Electrolytes. Polymers 2022, 14, 4090. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194090

AMA Style

Li C, Bhandary R, Marinow A, Ivanov D, Du M, Androsch R, Binder WH. Synthesis and Characterization of Quadrupolar-Hydrogen-Bonded Polymeric Ionic Liquids for Potential Self-Healing Electrolytes. Polymers. 2022; 14(19):4090. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Chenming, Rajesh Bhandary, Anja Marinow, Dmitrii Ivanov, Mengxue Du, René Androsch, and Wolfgang H. Binder. 2022. "Synthesis and Characterization of Quadrupolar-Hydrogen-Bonded Polymeric Ionic Liquids for Potential Self-Healing Electrolytes" Polymers 14, no. 19: 4090. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194090

APA Style

Li, C., Bhandary, R., Marinow, A., Ivanov, D., Du, M., Androsch, R., & Binder, W. H. (2022). Synthesis and Characterization of Quadrupolar-Hydrogen-Bonded Polymeric Ionic Liquids for Potential Self-Healing Electrolytes. Polymers, 14(19), 4090. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194090

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop