Next Article in Journal
Steady State of Motion of Two Particles in Poiseuille Flow of Power-Law Fluid
Next Article in Special Issue
Ring-Opening Polymerization (ROP) and Catalytic Rearrangement as a Way to Obtain Siloxane Mono- and Telechelics, as Well as Well-Organized Branching Centers: History and Prospects
Previous Article in Journal
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Bottle-to-Bottle Recycling for the Beverage Industry: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Organosilicone Compounds in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

by
Victor E. Sizov
1,2,*,
Vadim V. Zefirov
3,
Marat O. Gallyamov
1,2,3 and
Aziz M. Muzafarov
2,3
1
Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
Enikolopov Institute of Synthetic Polymeric Materials, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117393 Moscow, Russia
3
Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(12), 2367; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122367
Submission received: 24 May 2022 / Revised: 8 June 2022 / Accepted: 8 June 2022 / Published: 11 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in the Synthesis and Application of Polysiloxanes)

Abstract

:
This review considers the key advantages of using supercritical carbon dioxide as a solvent for systems with organosilicon compounds. Organosilicon polymeric materials synthesis as well as the creation and modification of composites based on them are discussed. Polydimethylsiloxane and analogues used as polymerization stabilizers and nucleation promoters in pore formation processes are analyzed as well.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Supercritical CO2 (scCO2) is an alternative promising solvent that has been actively used in recent decades to simplify many processes of polymer synthesis, modification, decomposition, etc. [1]. CO2 is a gas under normal conditions, which allows it to be effectively removed from the resulting material and thus solves the problem of residual solvent. The viscosity of scCO2 is rather low and approaches the viscosity of gases when the pressure decreases. The small size of CO2 molecules (0.4 nm) provides high coefficients of self-diffusion (≈10−4 cm2 s−1) and diffusion into various materials (≈10−7 cm2 s−1), which are two orders of magnitude higher than those of organic solvents. It should be noted that the solubility parameters of certain materials in scCO2 can be varied by changing the thermodynamic parameters of the medium (temperature, pressure, and density).
At present, supercritical CO2 has a wide range of applications. A large number of works have been devoted to the synthesis of various polymer particles in supercritical fluids, including CO2 [2], the creation of composites based on compounds soluble in CO2 and insoluble substrates [3], the modification of polymers, the synthesis of catalysts, polymerization, and polycondensation [4,5]. One more significant field is organosilicon polymers, which, along with fluoropolymers, form two large classes of macromolecular compounds soluble in scCO2 [6,7].
The purpose of this review is to describe the current level of application of supercritical carbon dioxide for organosilicon systems, including a discussion of actual development trends and the identification of still insufficiently developed but promising research areas.
We focused on the results of (co)polymerization in scCO2, the advantages of using organosilicon compounds as polymerization stabilizers, and the development of approaches to coating from carbon dioxide. In this review, the authors tried to supplement the previous review on related topics published in 2016, where the role of supercritical carbon dioxide in various chemical processes both as a solvent and a reagent was analyzed [5]. In the present review, we focus on recently published articles as well as those not previously reviewed in Ref. [5].

2. Synthesis in scCO2

2.1. Benefits of scCO2

Supercritical CO2 is already a common medium for laboratory synthesis, including the one of organosilicon compounds. The high diffusion rate and the absence of capillary effects significantly accelerate the kinetics of reactions in supercritical fluids as compared with the usage of typical liquid solvents. This is also due to the significantly lower viscosity of the supercritical fluid and, as a consequence, of the solutions of organosilicon compounds in it. Since CO2 is a chemically inert and harmless gas at normal pressure, there is no residual solvent problem. On the other hand, the dissolving power of scCO2 can be easily varied by tuning thermodynamic parameters of the system (temperature and pressure). This opens up the possibility of extracting and separating residual monomers and catalysts for subsequent reuse. Due to that, the method can be applied to a wide range of systems.

2.2. Obtaining Aerogels in scCO2

In 1997, Loy et al. described the first one-step sol–gel polycondensation of tetraalkoxysilanes or 1,4-bis-(triethoxysilyl)benzene (BESP) in scCO2: a mixture of alkoxysilanes or BESP and anhydrous formic acid was placed in a reactor, where scCO2 was applied. The system was exposed for 12 h and slowly decompressed, this way transforming scCO2 to a gaseous state and forming monolithic silica or polysilsesquioxane aerogel [8]. The use of scCO2 for carrying out such condensation reactions remains an urgent problem. Freed from the solvent in the absence of capillary forces, aerogels retain most of their original volume, which allows them to be effectively used as heat insulators, catalysts, etc. However, typically, low-molecular-weight liquid by-products of the condensation reaction, such as formic acid esters, require careful removal before the decompression procedure to prevent the retrograde condensation in the pores of the formed aerogel (the retrograde condensation is a counterintuitive phenomenon of liquid droplets formation in an initially homo-phase supercritical mixture during decompression) [9].
In 2015, Zou et al. demonstrated the process of obtaining elastic superhydrophobic cross-linked polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) aerogels for water purification [10]. In the presence of Karstedt’s catalyst (divinyl-containing Pt disiloxane complexes), oligomeric vinyl-terminated dimethylsiloxane was hydrosilylated with a hydride-containing oligomer. No liquid by-products of the reaction are formed with this approach, which guarantees the absence of possible complicating phenomena, such as the retrograde condensation at the stage of removal of the supercritical solvent. Various aerogel densities obtained by using diverse initial siloxane reagents and variations in their concentrations ranged from 150 to 260 mg cm−3. The method is fast in comparison with the classical schemes for obtaining aerogels, especially those involving a stage of solvent replacement, and it requires only a few hours.
In 2017, our group applied a similar hydrosilylation method for the synthesis of organosilicone aerogels in scCO2 [11]. Commercially available hydride-containing functionalized PDMS and a wide range of divinyl PDMS oligomers of variable length were used as reagents. Speier’s catalyst (chloroplatinic acid) or scCO2-soluble organometallic compound (1,5-cyclooctadiene)dimethylplatinum (PtMe2(COD)) were chosen as catalysts among a wide range of compounds. It was shown that the properties of the resulting aerogels are primarily affected by the density of CO2 and the length of the divinyl cross-links from PDMS units. By varying these parameters and the concentration of reagents, it was possible to obtain either superhydrophobic monolithic aerogels with a density of down to ~130 mg cm−3, which is slightly lower than the values achieved in the previous work, or microgranules with a diameter of ~0.5 mm. It is important to emphasize that the use of supercritical fluid soluble catalysts opens the potential for their extraction, at least partial, separation and reuse, which is an important problem in conventional synthesis in the presence of liquid solvents.
In subsequent work, a wider range of vinyl- and hydride-containing siloxane precursors was used, and the mechanical properties of aerogels obtained in scCO2 were studied depending on the nature of the reagents and their quantitative ratio [12]. When hyperbranched silsesquioxane hydrides are used, the Young’s modulus of the resulting aerogels is down to 3.6 kPa. On the other hand, the use of tetraallylsilane with oligomeric linear hydride-containing siloxane makes it possible to increase the Young’s modulus to 20–40 kPa and higher, depending on the ratios of the initial compounds during loading.
Mahadik et al. proposed a modified method for the preparation of aerogels from tetramethylorthosilicate (TMOS), including in combination with trimethoxymethylsilane in methanol [13]. In contrast to the well-known model, when the sol is heated slowly during synthesis in order to avoid a temperature gradient, it was proposed to provide fast heating. This approach allows for a rapid transition of methanol to the supercritical state so that gelation proceeds after this transition. For this, nitrogen was preliminarily pumped to the reactor at a partial pressure of above 50 bar, which increased the boiling point of methanol. The authors claim that this approach makes it possible to transfer methanol directly to the supercritical state, bypassing phase separation and thereby eliminating capillary effects. As a consequence, aerogels with minimal shrinkage and high specific surface area can be rapidly formed. The density of the resulting aerogels, depending on the concentrations and the combination of reagents, ranged from 35 to 170 mg cm−3.
It is worth discussing the success of classical processes for the synthesis of aerogels at atmospheric pressure followed by supercritical drying of the material. Thus, in 2007, the process of obtaining elastic aerogels based on methyltrimethoxysilane was described using the classical approach of supercritical drying [14,15]. Their flexible behavior is due to the silsesquioxane nature: the density of the network formed is lower than that in silica. At the same time, a high concentration of hydrophobic methyl groups, as well as a lower content of residual silanol groups, ensures the reversibility of deformations. Moreover, due to the excellent mechanical properties, it was also possible to obtain methyltrimethoxysilane-based xerogels by a simple conventional drying procedure.
A milestone on the way to obtaining aerogels with high mechanical properties was the series of works by Nakanishi et al. [16,17,18]. Transparent aerogels based on polyethylsilsesquioxane (PESQ, CH3CH2SiO1.5) and polyvinylsilsesquioxane (PVSQ, CH2=CHSiO1.5) with high thermal insulation properties were obtained. In addition, it was possible to carry out additional parallel cross-linking (according to the free radical mechanism, along with hydrolysis/condensation) in the resulting PVSQ, which provided an additional increase in mechanical characteristics. It is important that due to the flexibility and strength of the formed gels, it turned out to be possible to create xerogels that are easy to obtain and similar in properties. In order to further improve the properties of thermal insulation and flexibility, aerogels based on polyvinylpolymethylsiloxane, polyallylpolymethylsiloxane, and other compounds were obtained [16,17,18].
Due to the technological complexity of obtaining aerogels, maximum optimization of each stage is needed. In 2021, a highly efficient method for obtaining siloxane aerogels was described: the gelation time (the first stage of the process) was reduced to 5 min (subsequent drying of the gel was carried out in scCO2) [19]. During the classical aerogel-obtaining method, the hydrolysis stage proceeds much faster than condensation in acid catalysis, while the situation is reversed in basic catalysis. Therefore, a combined approach is often used: acid catalysis followed by basic catalysis. However, this method does not always allow simplifying the process and reducing the time. Therefore, it was proposed to use an “amphoteric” catalyst, which would be widespread, cheap and sufficiently active. Thus, the synthesis was carried out at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, BF3·Et2O was used as the desired catalyst, and acetone was used as a solvent. Great work has been carried out to analyze the influence of various parameters, including the type of precursor, type of solvent, and concentration of components, on the morphology of the obtained samples. For example, the specific surface area of aerogels obtained from TMOS varied in the range from 800 to 1200 m2 g−1, while Young’s modulus varied from 0.1 to 6 MPa.
The wide applications potential of organosilicon aerogels and the problems, primarily related to the complexity of the synthesis process and the mechanical stability of materials [20], stimulate further study of their synthesis.

2.3. Copolymers Based on Organosilicon Compounds in scCO2

The solubility of various classes of monomeric compounds and the high diffusion rate in scCO2 make it a promising medium for copolymerization reactions compared to organic solvents. Although the processes of copolymerization in scCO2 medium in general have been known for a relatively long time and are well systematized [21], not much work has been conducted on the synthesis of copolymers of organosilicon compounds.
The synthesis of a poly(acrylate-siloxane) copolymer in supercritical carbon dioxide was proposed (Figure 1) [22]. The reaction of poly(4,4′-isopropylidene-2,2′-diphenylene (tere) isophthalate) and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane was carried out in scCO2 at 150 bar and 100 °C. Under such conditions, aminolysis of ester bonds in the initial polymer occurred. This led to the formation of amides containing ethoxy groups and their subsequent condensation with the second chain fragment (by the reaction of ethoxy groups and terminal phenolic groups), to poly(acrylate-siloxane). The silane reagent incorporation into the structure of macromolecules made it possible to significantly improve the thermomechanical properties of the initial polymer. It is worth noting that ethoxy groups on silicon atoms remain reactive. This leads to the formation of an insoluble in standard solvents material upon exposure to air for a month. The long-term stability of Si–O–C bonds in the aromatic structural fragments of the polymer requires separate consideration.
Studies on the synthesis of triblock copolymers based on PDMS and polystyrene are known [23]. The authors proposed a radical polymerization of styrene and PDMS macroinitiator (PDMS-MA) in scCO2 medium. PDMS-MA was previously obtained by the reaction of hydroxyl-terminated PDMS with 4,4-azobis(4-cyanopentanoyl chloride) (Figure 2). The bond to the silicon atom between the forming blocks is ester, which has been confirmed by the detected peak in the IR spectrum at 1720 cm−1. The Si–O–C group in the aromatic structural fragment is a weak link due to the unpredictability of its stability under various conditions. On the other hand, its presence may prove to be an advantage in the directed utilization of the polymer, acting as an element of programmable decomposition into separate fragments in the recycling process.
A number of other examples of radical (co)polymerization using organosilicon monomers in supercritical carbon dioxide are known. Thus, using azobisisobutyric acid dinitrile as an initiator, a copolymer based on acrylic acid and 3-[tris(trimethylsilyloxy)silyl]propyl methacrylate was synthesized [24]. The viscosity of the solutions of the obtained copolymers showed a pronounced dependence on pH. The values of the average viscosity molecular weight increased in the range of (0.56–2.4) × 106 with an increase in the fraction of the organosilicon comonomer in the reaction mixture, which determined its proportion in the resulting copolymer. The authors note that the organosilicon fraction in the polymer systematically exceeded the organosilicon fraction in the reaction mixture, which indicates a higher activity of the organosilicon comonomer in comparison with acrylic acid in the reaction. Another research group investigated the copolymerization of dihydroperfluorooctyl methacrylate (FOMA) with methacryloxypropyl-terminated PDMS, Mn ~ 5900 kg mol−1 (Figure 3) [25]. The resulting copolymer turned out to be microphase separated into FOMA and PDMS domains. The GPC-measured values of Mn of the obtained copolymer were in the range of (230–36) kg mol−1 and decreased with an increase in the proportion of PDMS in the copolymer (which was determined by its fraction in the reaction mixture). The low values of the polymerization degree related to an increase in the proportion of PDMS are explained by a possible contribution of steric restrictions, a low concentration of vinyl groups in the macromonomer, as well as chain termination and transfer reactions.

2.4. Spatially Regular Well-Defined Mesoporous Organosilicon Materials

The absence of capillary effects and high diffusion coefficient makes scCO2 a superb media to obtain porous structures of complex geometric shapes.
In Ref. [26], supercritical carbon dioxide was used as a medium component for the hollow organosilicon spheres synthesis. Particles with an outer diameter of ≈5–10 microns were obtained in a CO2 emulsion in water with the addition of a poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(propylene oxide)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymer as a surfactant and an organosilicon precursor tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) (Figure 4). The resulting spheres had poor mechanical properties, partially collapsing during decompression. Nevertheless, the fundamental possibility of creating such structures, which are promising for problems of catalysis and drug delivery systems, was demonstrated. In addition, the authors indicated the potential possibilities of varying the properties of the obtained spheres by changing the reagents and the thermodynamic parameters of the medium.
In a subsequent similar work [27], the authors also managed to obtain more complex structures, i.e., single-layer and multilayer hollow organosilicon spheres. Pluronic P123 triblock copolymer and a mixture of cationic (hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide) and anionic (sodium dodecyl sulfate) surfactants were used as a double template for the spheres’ formation. The organosilicon precursor was 1,4-bis(triethoxysilyl)benzene. Single-layer and multilayer spheres with an average diameter of 40 to 200 nm were obtained, and varying the pressure of the medium—a mixture of the aqueous phase and compressed CO2—made it possible to change the wall thickness of the obtained particles.
In 2016, the same group of authors proposed a “green” method for obtaining bifunctional periodic mesoporous organosilicas in a mixture of an aqueous phase and compressed CO2 [28]. The resulting material had hexagonally packed cylindrical pores with a diameter of 3.2–6.5 nm, which could be controlled by changing the applied CO2 pressure (from 4 to 6 MPa). The same P123 copolymer and 1,4-bis(triethoxysilyl)benzene were used together with 2,5-bis(triethoxysilyl)thiophene as two organosilicon precursors in the synthesis. The authors believe that the morphology of the resulting structures is primarily determined by the kinetics of hydrolysis and condensation processes, which, in turn, depends on the pH of the aqueous phase of the synthesis medium. The authors used the bromophenol blue indicator to detect the pH values of the aqueous phase saturated with CO2 under pressure (formation of carbonic acid [29]) by means of spectrometry. It was concluded that at CO2 pressure of 3.9 MPa or less, the pH of the medium was insufficient for the rapid hydrolysis and condensation of silicon-containing precursors, which led to the formation of less regular structures. At higher pressures, it was possible to form worm-like mesoporous periodic structures, with the pore size and wall thickness increasing with an increase in CO2 pressure. This is due to the following factors: firstly, an increase in the concentration of dissolved CO2 facilitates the penetration of gas molecules into the hydrocarbon chains regions of the micelles, contributing to their volume growth; secondly, lower pH values accelerate the sol–gel reaction, which contributes to the rapid condensation of hydrolyzed siloxanes.
Furthermore, supercritical CO2 is used to create periodic mesoporous organosilicon films, which are required in sensors, detectors, separators, low permittivity materials and others [30]. Well-ordered mesoporous organosilicon films were prepared by the infusion and selective condensation of silicon alkoxides within microphase-separated block copolymer templates dilated with scCO2 [31]. Depending on the ratios of TEOS and methyltriethoxysilane (MTES), it was possible to achieve different spatial pores packing: a cubic lattice of spheres at a zero MTES content, and a hexagonal packing of cylinders at an MTES content of 25–50%. A further increase in the MTES concentration leads to the disordered structure. The authors attributed this behavior to the nature of the precursors, which affects the hydrophobic–hydrophilic balance of the structure-forming agent. In particular, the authors explained the transition from packing of cylinders to packing of spheres by a change in the spatial nature of the microphase separation of the block copolymer template.
Systems of noble metal nanoparticles on various substrates are notable due to their promising optical, magnetic, and catalytic properties [32,33]. The key parameters are the dispersity of metal particles as well as the morphology of the resulting system as a whole. Changes in the mesostructure usually occur through variations of reactant ratios, medium pH, salt or organic additives introduction [34,35]. Using CO2 as the synthesis medium allows avoiding the classic problems associated with the necessity for post-processing, high cost, non-environmental technology, etc. In a recent work, gold nanoparticles deposited on oriented mesoporous organosilicon structures formed using compressed CO2 were obtained according to the “one-pot” scheme (Figure 5) [36]. The stages illustrated in the figure (with intermediate exposures) included: loading a structure-forming block copolymer into the reactor (Pluronic P123, water-alcohol solution), loading of organosilicon precursors (bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl] tetrasulfide, tetramethoxysilane), CO2 pumping (pressure in the range of 2.9–5.9 MPa), subsequent loading of the gold precursor (HAuCl4, aqueous solution), drying and annealing (500 °C).
Variation of the CO2 pressure allowed a controlled transition from the tubular and hexagonal morphology of the formed substrate to the cellular and vesicular one. As it was described in [30], CO2 dissolved in the aqueous phase catalyzes the precursors hydrolysis, and its efficiency depends on pressure. Moreover, CO2 penetrates into the region of the hydrocarbon chains of the template, increasing the volume of the micelles and affecting the structure formation as a whole.

2.5. Composites Formed in scCO2

The high penetrating ability and diffusion rate of scCO2 are used for the synthesis of various types of composites, including those based on organosilicon compounds as well. The most common composites are network structures or dispersed particles of an inorganic phase incorporated into a polymer matrix. The benefits of using scCO2 to create such composites are described in detail in several reviews [5,37,38]; however, we will focus on some works not mentioned there.
Such composites are successfully used as various types of selective membranes and filters. The selectivity and overall efficiency of membranes largely depends on the accuracy of control of their characteristics, which is very difficult to achieve during synthesis. It is much easier to introduce particles with the required properties into the matrix in the second stage after the synthesis. In [39,40], the authors modified polymeric perfluorosulfonic acids (analogous to Nafion) by impregnation with a silane precursor and its subsequent conversion to polysiloxane using supercritical CO2. Since the modification with CO2 allows the new silicon-containing phase introduction along both hydrophilic ion channels and hydrophobic fluoropolymer domains, as well as their interfaces, it was possible to significantly suppress methanol permeability. Such microphase-separated membranes, in which nanosized proton-conducting channels are stabilized by the silicon-containing phase of the inclusions, can show better selectivity of ion transport in different power sources, reduced permeability for reagents (methanol, etc.), and also improved performance at elevated temperatures in fuel cells due to better retention of water.
Indeed, previously, our team described the classical process of silica composite obtaining with a polymer template: the TEOS silica precursor dissolved in scCO2 was delivered to the nanosized proton-conducting pores of Nafion matrix, where it was subsequently hydrolyzed and condensed in the presence of residual water due to the release of protons of sulfonic groups to catalyze the reaction [41]. It was possible to improve the thermomechanical properties and durability of the polymer and increase the hygroscopicity of the membrane, which led to enhanced and selective proton conductivity under low humidity conditions. The membranes with improved ion selectivity have shown promising performance in the operating cells of vanadium redox flow batteries.

3. Silicone Coatings, Silylation

In order to impart certain properties to the material, its surface can be coated with a layer of organosilicon compounds. The method of silylation from scCO2 is actively used primarily because of the possibility of uniform deposition of the material on substrates with complex surface geometry [42].
The main task of silylation is the functionalization of the material to create subsequently more durable organic–inorganic composite. The goal is to increase the affinity of the organic and inorganic phases to each other by forming a compatibilizing bifunctional layer at their interface.
The method of monolayer deposition of silanes on substrates made of hydroxyapatite, titanium dioxide, and hectorite from the supercritical CO2 phase was studied [43]. The obvious advantage of using scCO2 and silanes soluble in it is the possibility of creating homogeneous organosilicon coatings on hard-to-reach areas of the substrate such as deep and small pores, for example, of porous silicon oxide. Indeed, the approach was studied on model systems with different spatial pores scales (micro-, meso-, and macro-) [44].
The silanization of silicon substrates with an oxide layer is actively studied for microelectronics applications. Self-assembled layers of alkoxysilanes can be deposited on a silicon substrate to be used as barrier and adhesive layers in semiconductor devices [45].
In recent works, a group of French researchers studied the surface properties of a grafted alkoxysilanes layer on a silicon substrate with an oxidized surface layer [46]. By means of atomic force microscopy, it was possible to measure surface forces and to characterize the conformation of macromolecules in the obtained coatings. Depending on the nature of the precursor head group and the temperature of the system, various structures were formed during deposition: close-packed monolayers as well as inhomogeneous or dense bilayers. In the next study, the same group investigated the influence of the substrate morphology on the layer conformation: if in Ref. [46] alkoxysilanes were deposited on a flat sample of oxidized silicon, then in Ref. [47], the substrate consisted of planar silicon oxide nanochannels with a diameter of 3 and 5 nm. As a result, it was shown that the morphology of the coating is strongly influenced not only by the nature of the molecules but also by the geometry of the substrate.
Another type of research is devoted to the restoration of damaged surfaces of organosilicon materials by silylation from the scCO2 medium [48,49,50,51,52]. First of all, silylation is applied to restore porous dielectric materials with a low dielectric constant, which are required for the formation of new advanced semiconductor devices. The damages typically occur during the processing of such peculiar materials.
In a similar aspect, it would be interesting to study the use of other silicon-containing agents in order to impart new properties to surfaces. It is known that hydroxyl-containing silsesquioxane oligomers can be obtained under pressure in water or in an aqueous phase saturated with carbon dioxide (i.e., in the presence of carbonic acid, Figure 6) [53]. The described low-molecular-weight soluble polymethylsilsesquioxanes of various structures can act as materials for the formation of antiabrasive coatings due to high adhesion to a wide range of polar substrates provided by the presence of a large number of hydroxyl groups.
The study of the deposition of such silanes in CO2 is a promising direction and requires further development.

4. PDMS Role in Pore Nucleation Process during Decompression

The affinity of some organosilicon compounds to CO2, in particular, polydimethylsiloxanes, makes it possible to use them to increase the swelling degree of polymer matrices in CO2. PDMS in CO2 medium plays the role of an accumulator of the fluid molecules. It was shown that these properties make it possible to vary the process of pore formation in polystyrene polymer matrices with the addition of PDMS, which promotes nucleation upon decompression [54,55].
The addition of PDMS to the CO2/polystyrene system increases both the diffusion coefficient of the fluid molecules (by two times) and the swelling degree of the polystyrene/PDMS composite [56]. A high initial concentration of CO2 in the polymer during decompression and high velocities of fluid molecules lead to a larger volume of the formed porous structure. By varying the molecular lengths of PDMS additives, it was found that the usage of siloxanes with Mn ≈2000 resulted in a 40% reduction in pore size with a simultaneous increase in the volume expansion ratio as compared to polystyrene foamed without additives.
Similar studies were carried out for a polypropylene (PP) matrix [57]. Due to the ability of PP to crystallize, the pore formation with the addition of PDMS leads to a decrease in the CO2 desorption rate. The affinity of PDMS to CO2, as well as its role as a nucleation promoter, leads to smaller and more uniform pores formed during decompression.
Of great interest is the production of highly porous foams based on PDMS itself, which are used in an extremely wide range of applications: from the water purification from hydrophobic impurities tasks, to biomedical devices, flexible microfluidic devices, electronic skin for prostheses and robots (bionic system designed to imitate some physiological properties of human skin), epidermal electronics, highly sensitive capacitive pressure sensors, etc. [58,59,60,61]. Porous structures are most often obtained by coating a PDMS layer on different porous templates, which is followed by removal of the substrate. In particular, an easy-to-implement method is the preparation of a sponge-like PDMS structure using sugar particles as a porogen [62].
A demanding task seems to be creating the required porous morphology of materials based on PDMS by inducing phase separation in supercritical CO2 medium. In relation to PDMS, this has not yet been studied. Nevertheless, such a well-known approach [63,64] makes it quite easy to control the degree of material porosity in the range of 30–60%, which was shown for the films of some other polymers [65].

5. Polysiloxanes as Polymerization Stabilizers

Siloxane oligomers are widely used as surfactants, including for conventional (performed at normal pressure) emulsion and dispersion polymerizations [66,67,68]. They replaced stabilizers based on polyhydroxystearic acid, which requires the introduction of additional organic solvents for effective stabilization [68].
Recently, polymerization in supercritical CO2 has been widely used. Dispersion polymerization in scCO2 medium is a process when soluble in scCO2 substances are used as monomers and initiators. Here, the resulting polymer loses solubility in the fluid when a certain molecular weight is achieved. In order to prolong the growth of polymer chains and prevent premature coagulation and precipitation, special amphiphilic additives affinitive both for CO2 and polymer are used. In general, the use of scCO2 as a medium for dispersion polymerization has already been described in some reviews [69,70].
This approach makes it possible to carry out the synthesis using a small amount of organic solvents and to minimize the stages of post-treatment and disposal. The main disadvantage of using CO2 medium was the narrow range of particle size control. However, this problem was also partially solved by varying the synthesis parameters (variation of the monomer and stabilizer loading, stepwise introduction of the monomer) [71].
The first work on the use of siloxanes as an amphiphilic stabilizer and CO2-soluble macromonomer was published in 1996 [72]. The authors justify the choice in favor of siloxanes, in comparison with fluoropolymers, both by the high cost of the latter and by the fact that siloxanes are soluble in a large number of common solvents, which simplifies further study of the obtained polymers.
The use of PDMS and PDMS-based macromolecules as stabilizers of polymerization reactions in scCO2 is actively applied to solve various problems of polymer synthesis. Poly(methyl methacrylate) can be obtained using vinyl-terminated PDMS chains [73] and methacrylate-terminated monomethacrylate–PDMS macromonomer [74] as stabilizers. At the same time, varying the system parameters, including the reagents concentration, makes it possible to change the morphology of the resulting latex particles. By varying the monomer and stabilizer loadings, it was possible to obtain poly(methyl methacrylate) particles in a wide size range from 0.5 to 5 μm [71].
PDMS homopolymer is also used for the polymerization of phenol/furfural gel microspheres [75], and its vinyl-terminated modification is used for the in situ implementation of Copaiba balsam in growing poly(methyl methacrylate) particles for pharmaceutical applications [76]. A triblock copolymer based on PDMS and polycaprolactone is widely used for L-lactide polymerization [77]. The dispersion polymerization of glycidyl methacrylate in scCO2 was successfully carried out using the monomethacrylate-PDMS macromonomer [78].
Supercritical CO2 itself is a convenient medium for the synthesis of more complex stabilizers based on PDMS. In Ref. [79], the researchers synthesized similar stabilizers: triblock copolymers based on hydroxypropyl-terminated PDMS as the CO2-philic part and poly(L-lactide) as the hydrophilic part of the stabilizer.
Since the pioneering use of PDMS-based stabilizers for polymerization in scCO2 [72], the proposed approach has been actively developed, which is confirmed by dozens of new published studies. PDMS and stabilizers based on it are optimal for use in supercritical CO2 from both economic and chemical points of view and are promising for further study.

6. Extraction and Fractionation in scCO2

One of the most obvious and studied ways of using supercritical fluids, including scCO2, is extraction. Extraction is the process of dissolving a compound or a group of compounds from some matrix into an external solution using a supercritical fluid as an eluent. The main features of scCO2, such as the absence of capillary effects and high dissolving power, with the possibility of its control, allow the fluid to penetrate the entire volume of the substrate, including those with complex morphology, and extract a wide class of substances from it. The subsequent reduction in pressure of the supercritical fluid allows the dissolved extract to precipitate and separate from the eluent, which turns into a gas. The gaseous state of CO2 at normal pressure eliminates the problem of residual solvent in both the extract and the purified matrix.
The safety and nontoxicity of scCO2 primarily determine its frequent use for food industry tasks: this includes the extraction of various oils, flavonoids, vitamins, and other compounds, which is described in a large number of both original works and reviews [80,81,82,83]. For the same reason, scCO2 is also ubiquitously used for pharmaceutical purposes [84].
Despite the fact that the most large-scale polymers are not soluble in scCO2, it can be useful in the preliminary extraction of certain introduced additives in order to reuse them or to simplify the processing of the polymers themselves. These can be various dyes, plasticizers, modifiers, additives, stabilizers, flame retardants, coupling agents, antioxidants, residual monomers, oligomers, initiators, catalysts, pollutants, and other substances [85]. There are works on the extraction of functional additives, including antioxidants, from polypropylene and polyethylene matrices using supercritical fluids [86,87,88].
The extraction is of particular importance to the production of CO2-soluble polymers: the isolation of low-molecular-weight fraction from the resulting product should significantly increase its monodispersity, and hence the quality and cost.
The first work on PDMS fractionation in scCO2 by Yilgör and McGrath was published in 1984 [89]. It describes a method for the separation of PDMS oligomers with respect to their chain length into six fractions with a narrow dispersion: the achieved polydispersity index (PDI = Mw/Mn) was in the range of 1.1–1.4. The number average molecular weights of the oligomers to be separated were 2000 and 6400 g mol−1, while the measurement of the molecular weights of the fractionated parts was carried out by potentiometric titration. At the same time, since the first isolated fraction consists of the lowest molecular weight cyclic siloxanes due to the equilibrium nature of the reaction for obtaining PDMS [90], its titration is impossible due to the absence of titratable groups (COOH).
Numerical simulation, as well as experimental study, were conducted and compared for fractioning process of PDMS and other compounds using a supercritical fluid (Figure 7) [91]. The extraction was carried out at 40°C in the range of 260–570 bar, and it was possible to separate seven fractions of PDMS with Mn in the range of (60–200) 103 g mol−1.
Another group of authors carried out PDMS fractionation in the Mn range from 3 × 103 to 30 × 103 g mol−1 in the PDMS–toluene–CO2 ternary system [92]. At a temperature of 40 °C and a pressure of 130 to 210 bar, the polydispersity of the resulting fractions ranged from 1.4 to 2.0. In another work, at various temperatures in the range of 60–90 °C, it was possible to separate PDMS fractions with Mn from 40 to 240 × 103 g mol−1 (Figure 8) [93].
The phase behavior of the PDMS/CO2 binary system was studied in a practically important range of temperatures and pressures. Thus, the phase diagrams of the hydroxyl-terminated PDMS system and CO2 were obtained at temperatures of 40 °C, 50 °C, 60 °C and a polymer molecular weight of 2750 and 18,000 g mol−1 (PDI = 1.59 and 1.29, respectively) [94]. Data for a conventional PDMS/CO2 system in the temperature range from 30 to 190 °C and polymer mass in the range from 40 × 103 to 370 × 103 g mol−1 (PDI in the range from 2.2 to 3) are presented in [95,96].
The solubility of PDMS in scCO2 opens up a wide range of possibilities in its production process in comparison with almost any other polymers. One of the main problems of the large-scale production of PDMS is the purification of the obtained material from the low-molecular-weight fraction, including oligomers and monomers, which can be carried out by means of supercritical extraction. This requires detailed studies of the phase behavior of the PDMS/CO2 system in a wide range of polymer lengths and macroparameters.

7. Conclusions

Compared to conventional liquid solvents, supercritical fluids provide faster diffusion, reduced viscosity, and the ability to separate products, residual reactants, and catalysts for subsequent reuse. In particular, the fast reaction kinetics, the absence of capillary forces as well residual solvent problem, and environmental safety lead to the expansion of supercritical CO2 usage for organosilicon compounds as well. Due to their convenience and low cost, much attention is paid to the use of polydimethylsiloxanes as stabilizers for dispersion polymerization in scCO2, silylation, and pore formation. The extraction of organosilicon compounds was described in relatively early works, and many technological processes were then successfully implemented in industry. The performed analysis shows that this field still retains a great research potential for development both in terms of such technological operations as the surface treatment of various materials and products (textiles, implants, electronic devices, porous materials) and in relation to chemical transformations using reactive silicone oligomers of various structures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, V.E.S., V.V.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.O.G., A.M.M.; supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, A.M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation №21-73-30030, https://rscf.ru/project/21-73-30030/ (accessed on 23 May 2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tutek, K.; Masek, A.; Kosmalska, A.; Cichosz, S. Application of fluids in supercritical conditions in the polymer industry. Polymers 2021, 13, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yeo, S.D.; Kiran, E. Formation of polymer particles with supercritical fluids: A review. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2005, 34, 287–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Haldorai, Y.; Shim, J.J.; Lim, K.T. Synthesis of polymer-inorganic filler nanocomposites in supercritical CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2012, 71, 45–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kiran, E. Supercritical fluids and polymers—The year in review—2014. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2016, 110, 126–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pigaleva, M.A.; Elmanovich, I.V.; Temnikov, M.N.; Gallyamov, M.O.; Muzafarov, A.M. Organosilicon compounds in supercritical carbon dioxide: Synthesis, polymerization, modification, and production of new materials. Polym. Sci. Ser. B 2016, 58, 235–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. McClain, J.B.; Londono, D.; Combes, J.R.; Romack, T.J.; Canelas, D.A.; Betts, D.E.; Wignall, G.D.; Samulski, E.T.; DeSimone, J.M. Solution properties of a CO2-soluble fluoropolymer via small angle neutron scattering. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 917–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chillura-Martino, D.; Triolo, R.; McClain, J.B.; Combes, J.R.; Betts, D.E.; Canelas, D.A.; DeSimone, J.M.; Samulski, E.T.; Cochran, H.D.; Londono, J.D.; et al. Neutron scattering characterization of homopolymers and graft-copolymer micelles in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Mol. Struct. 1996, 383, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Loy, D.A.; Russick, E.M.; Yamanaka, S.A.; Baugher, B.M.; Shea, K.J. Direct Formation of Aerogels by Sol-Gel Polymerizations of Alkoxysilanes in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 2264–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Park, S.J.; Kwak, T.Y.; Mansoori, G.A. Statistical mechanical description of supercritical fluid extraction and retrograde condensation. Int. J. Thermophys. 1987, 8, 449–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zou, F.; Peng, L.; Fu, W.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z. Flexible superhydrophobic polysiloxane aerogels for oil-water separation via one-pot synthesis in supercritical CO2. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 76346–76351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Elmanovich, I.V.; Pryakhina, T.A.; Vasil’ev, V.G.; Gallyamov, M.O.; Muzafarov, A.M. A study of the hydrosilylation approach to a one-pot synthesis of silicone aerogels in supercritical CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 133, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Elmanovich, I.V.; Pryakhina, T.A.; Gallyamov, M.O.; Migulin, D.A.; Meshkov, I.B.; Vasil’ev, V.G.; Muzafarov, A.M. Silicone aerogels with tunable mechanical properties obtained via hydrosilylation reaction in supercritical CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 149, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mahadik, D.B.; Lee, Y.K.; Chavan, N.K.; Mahadik, S.A.; Park, H.H. Monolithic and shrinkage-free hydrophobic silica aerogels via new rapid supercritical extraction process. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2016, 107, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kanamori, B.K.; Aizawa, M.; Nakanishi, K.; Hanada, T. New Transparent Methylsilsesquioxane Aerogels and Xerogels with Improved Mechanical Properties. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1589–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kanamori, K.; Nakanishi, K.; Hanada, T. Elastic aerogels and xerogels synthesized from methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMS). MRS Proc. 2009, 1134, 1134-BB07-06. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zu, G.; Kanamori, K.; Maeno, A.; Kaji, H.; Nakanishi, K. Superflexible Multifunctional Polyvinylpolydimethylsiloxane-Based Aerogels as Efficient Absorbents, Thermal Superinsulators, and Strain Sensors. Angew. Chemie 2018, 57, 9722–9727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zu, G.; Kanamori, K.; Shimizu, T.; Zhu, Y.; Maeno, A.; Kaji, H.; Nakanishi, K.; Shen, J. Versatile Double-Cross-Linking Approach to Transparent, Machinable, Supercompressible, Highly Bendable Aerogel Thermal Superinsulators. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 2759–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zu, G.; Kanamori, K.; Wang, X.; Nakanishi, K.; Shen, J. Superelastic Triple-Network Polyorganosiloxane-Based Aerogels as Transparent Thermal Superinsulators and Efficient Separators. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 1595–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kholodkov, D.N.; Arzumanyan, A.V.; Novikov, R.A.; Kashin, A.S.; Polezhaev, A.V.; Vasil’Ev, V.G.; Muzafarov, A.M. Silica-Based Aerogels with Tunable Properties: The Highly Efficient BF3-Catalyzed Preparation and Look inside Their Structure. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 1961–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gurav, J.L.; Jung, I.K.; Park, H.H.; Kang, E.S.; Nadargi, D.Y. Silica aerogel: Synthesis and applications. J. Nanomater. 2010, 2010, 409310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yadav, P.; Agrawal, M.; Alexander, A.; Patel, R.; Siddique, S.; Saraf, S.; Ajazuddin. Polymer production and processing using supercritical carbon dioxide. In Green Sustainable Process for Chemical and Environmental Engineering and Science; Supercritical Carbon Dioxide as Green Solvent; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; ISBN 9780128173886. [Google Scholar]
  22. Stakhanov, A.I.; Said-Galiev, E.E.; Izmailov, B.A.; Vasnev, V.A.; Khokhlov, A.R. Synthesis of poly(arylate-siloxane)s in supercritical carbon dioxide. Polym. Sci. Ser. B 2008, 50, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Akgün, M.; Deniz, S.; Baran, N.; Uzun, N.I.; Akgün, N.A.; Dinçer, S. Synthesis of polydimethylsiloxane-block-polystryrene-block- polydimethylsiloxane via polysiloxane-based macroinitiator in supercritical CO2. Polym. Int. 2005, 54, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hu, H.; Chen, M.; Cheng, R. Siloxane-modified poly(acrylic acid) synthesized in supercritical CO2. Polymer 2002, 44, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shiho, H.; DeSimone, J.M. Preparation of Silicone-Graft Copolymers by Homogeneous Radical Copolymerization in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2000, 38, 1139–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.; Xia, Y.; Wang, W.; Mokaya, R.; Poliakoff, M. Synthesis of siliceous hollow spheres with large mesopore wall structure by supercritical CO2-in-water interface templating. Chem. Commun. 2005, 210–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, X.; Li, W.; Wang, M.; Tan, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H. Synthesis of multiple-shelled organosilica hollow nanospheres via a dual-template method by using compressed CO2. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 247, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, W.; Yang, Y.; Huang, X.; Wang, Q.; Liu, L.; Wang, M.; Tan, X.; Luo, T.; Patil, A.J. Compressed CO2 mediated synthesis of bifunctional periodic mesoporous organosilicas with tunable porosity. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 9668–9671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pigaleva, M.A.; Elmanovich, I.V.; Kononevich, Y.N.; Gallyamov, M.O.; Muzafarov, A.M. A biphase H2O/CO2 system as a versatile reaction medium for organic synthesis. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 103573–103608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pai, R.A.; Humayun, R.; Schulberg, M.T.; Sengupta, A.; Sun, J.N.; Watkins, J.J. Mesoporous Silicates Prepared Using Preorganized Templates in Supercritical Fluids. Science 2004, 303, 507–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pai, R.A.; Watkins, J.J. Synthesis of mesoporous organosilicate films in supercritical carbon dioxide. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. El-Sayed, M.A. Small is different: Shape-, size-, and composition-dependent properties of some colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bruchez, M.; Moronne, M.; Gin, P.; Weiss, S.; Alivisatos, A.P. Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent biological labels. Science 1998, 281, 2013–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Thomas, A. Functional materials: From hard to soft porous frameworks. Angew. Chemie 2010, 49, 8328–8344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Qiao, S.Z.; Yu, C.Z.; Xing, W.; Hu, Q.H.; Djojoputro, H.; Lu, G.Q. Synthesis and bio-adsorptive properties of large-pore periodic mesoporous organosilica rods. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6172–6176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, M.; Li, W.; Wang, C.; Hou, X.; Luan, S.; Wang, Q. Gold/Periodic Mesoporous Organosilicas with Controllable Mesostructure by Using Compressed CO2. Langmuir 2018, 34, 3642–3653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kazarian, S.G. Polymer Processing with Supercritical Fluids. Polym. Sci. Ser. C 2000, 42, 78–101. [Google Scholar]
  38. Alekseev, E.S.; Alentiev, A.Y.; Belova, A.S.; Bogdan, V.I.; Bogdan, T.V.; Bystrova, A.V.; Gafarova, E.R.; Golubeva, E.N.; Grebenik, E.A.; Gromov, O.I.; et al. Supercritical fluids in analytical chemistry. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2020, 89, 1337–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Su, L.; Pei, S.; Li, L.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, W.; Zhou, C. Preparation of polysiloxane/perfluorosulfonic acid nanocomposite membranes in supercritical carbon dioxide system for direct methanol fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 6892–6901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Su, L.; Li, L.; Li, H.; Tang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, W.; Zhou, C. Preparation of polysiloxane modified perfluorosulfonic acid composite membranes assisted by supercritical carbon dioxide for direct methanol fuel cell. J. Power Sources 2009, 194, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Simonov, A.S.; Kondratenko, M.S.; Elmanovich, I.V.; Sizov, V.E.; Kharitonova, E.P.; Abramchuk, S.S.; Nikolaev, A.Y.; Fedosov, D.A.; Gallyamov, M.O.; Khokhlov, A.R. Modification of Nafion with silica nanoparticles in supercritical carbon dioxide for electrochemical applications. J. Memb. Sci. 2018, 564, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sanli, D.; Erkey, C. Silylation from supercritical carbon dioxide: A powerful technique for modification of surfaces. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 7159–7181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Domingo, C.; Loste, E.; Fraile, J. Grafting of trialkoxysilane on the surface of nanoparticles by conventional wet alcoholic and supercritical carbon dioxide deposition methods. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2006, 37, 72–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. López-aranguren, P.; Saurina, J.; Vega, L.F.; Domingo, C. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials Sorption of tryalkoxysilane in low-cost porous silicates using a supercritical CO2 method. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 148, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rébiscoul, D.; Perrut, V.; Renault, O.; Rieutord, F.; Olivier, S.; Haumesser, P. Alkoxysilane layers deposited by SC CO2 process on silicon oxide for microelectronics applications. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2009, 51, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Israel, S.S.; Rebiscoul, D.; Odorico, M.; Flaud, V.; Ayral, A. Surface properties of alkoxysilane layers grafted in supercritical carbon dioxide. Langmuir 2019, 35, 2792–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Israel, S.S.; Tardif, S.; Larrey, V.; Ayral, A. Impact of Silica Surface Nanoconfinement on the Microstructure of Alkoxysilane Layers Grafted by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 12305–12312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gorman, B.P.; Zhang, Z.; Matz, P.D.; Mueller, D.W.; Reidy, R.F.; Gorman, B.P.; Zhang, Z. Rapid repair of plasma ash damage in low-k dielectrics using supercritical CO2. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2004, 22, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lahlouh, B.; Lubguban, J.A.; Sivaraman, G.; Gale, R.; Gangopadhyay, S. Silylation Using a Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Medium to Repair Plasma-Damaged Porous Organosilicate Films. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2004, 7, 338–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xie, B.; Muscat, A.J. Silylation of porous methylsilsesquioxane films in supercritical carbon dioxide. Microelectron. Eng. 2004, 76, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mok, J.; Seok, H.; Lee, W.; Choi, B.; Gyu, H.; Taek, K. Microelectronic Engineering Repair of plasma-damaged p-SiOCH dielectric films in supercritical CO2. Microelectron. Eng. 2010, 87, 1680–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rajagopalan, T.; Lahlouh, B.; Lubguban, J.A.; Biswas, N. Investigation on hexamethyldisilazane vapor treatment of plasma-damaged nanoporous organosilicate films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 252, 6323–6331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kalinina, A.A.; Kholodkov, D.N.; Meshkov, I.B.; Pigaleva, M.A.; Elmanovich, I.V.; Molodtsova, Y.A.; Gallyamov, M.O.; Muzafarov, A.M. Hydrolytic polycondensation of methylalkoxysilanes under pressure. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2016, 65, 1104–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, M.; Ma, J.; Chu, R.; Park, C.B.; Nanqiao, Z. Effect of the Introduction of Polydimethylsiloxane on the Foaming Behavior of Block-Copolymerized Polypropylene. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 123, 2726–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, W.; Zhou, S.; Xin, Z.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, S. Polydimethylsiloxane assisted supercritical CO2 foaming behavior of high melt strength polypropylene grafted with styrene. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2016, 10, 396–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Qiang, W.; Hu, D.; Liu, T.; Zhao, L. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids Strategy to control CO2 diffusion in polystyrene microcellular foaming via CO2 -philic additives. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 147, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qiang, W.; Zhao, L.; Gao, X.; Liu, T.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, W. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids Dual role of PDMS on improving supercritical CO2 foaming of polypropylene: CO2-philic additive and crystallization nucleating agent. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2020, 163, 104888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jung, Y.; Lee, W.; Jung, K.; Park, B.; Park, J.; Ko, J.; Cho, H. A highly sensitive and flexible capacitive pressure sensor based on a porous three-dimensional PDMS/microsphere composite. Polymers 2020, 12, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, S.; Dong, K.; Li, R.; Huang, X.; Chen, T.; Xiao, X. Capacitive pressure sensor inlaid a porous dielectric layer of superelastic polydimethylsiloxane in conductive fabrics for detection of human motions. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020, 312, 112106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kim, D.H.; Jung, Y.; Jung, K.; Kwak, D.H.; Park, D.M.; Shin, M.G.; Tak, H.J.; Ko, J.S. Hollow polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) foam with a 3D interconnected network for highly sensitive capacitive pressure sensors. Micro Nano Syst. Lett. 2020, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wolf, M.P.; Salieb-Beugelaar, G.B.; Hunziker, P. PDMS with designer functionalities—Properties, modifications strategies, and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018, 83, 97–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Choi, S.J.; Kwon, T.H.; Im, H.; Moon, D.I.; Baek, D.J.; Seol, M.L.; Duarte, J.P.; Choi, Y.K. A polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) sponge for the selective absorption of oil from water. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4552–4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gallyamov, M.O.; Nikolaev, A.Y.; Nikitin, L.N. Polystyrene Foamed with Supercritical CO2 as Possible Model System of the Membrane Materials for Flow Batteries. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 2018, 60, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kondratenko, M.S.; Elmanovich, I.V.; Gallyamov, M.O. Polymer materials for electrochemical applications: Processing in supercritical fluids. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2017, 127, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sizov, V.E.; Kondratenko, M.S.; Gallyamov, M.O.; Stevenson, K.J. Advanced porous polybenzimidazole membranes for vanadium redox batteries synthesized via a supercritical phase-inversion method. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 137, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gritskova, I.A.; Lakhtin, V.G.; Shragin, D.I.; Ezhova, A.A.; Sokolskaya, I.B.; Krizhanovsky, I.N.; Storozhenko, P.A.; Muzafarov, A.M. Synthesis of oligosiloxanes with 3-aminopropyl groups and their testing as surfactants in the preparation of polymer microspheres. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2018, 67, 1908–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Klein, S.M.; Manoharan, V.N.; Pine, D.J.; Lange, F.F. Preparation of monodisperse PMMA microspheres in nonpolar solvents by dispersion polymerization with a macromonomeric stabilizer. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2003, 282, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Richez, A.P.; Farrand, L.; Goulding, M.; Wilson, J.H.; Lawson, S.; Biggs, S.; Cayre, O.J. Erratum: Poly(dimethylsiloxane)-stabilized polymer particles from radical dispersion polymerization in nonpolar solvent: Influence of stabilizer properties and monomer type (Langmuir (2014) 30:5 (1220-1228) 10.1021/la4039304). Langmuir 2014, 30, 5046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Canelas, D.A.; DeSimone, J.M. Polymerizations in Liquid and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Adv. Polym. Sci. 1997, 133, 102–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Boyère, C.; Jérôme, C.; Debuigne, A. Input of supercritical carbon dioxide to polymer synthesis: An overview. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 61, 45–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. McAllister, T.D.; Farrand, L.D.; Howdle, S.M. Improved Particle Size Control for the Dispersion Polymerization of Methyl methacrylate in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2016, 217, 2294–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shaffer, K.A.; Jones, T.A.; Canelas, D.A.; DeSimone, J.M.; Wilkinson, S.P. Dispersion polymerizations in carbon dioxide using siloxane-based stabilizers. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 2704–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Oliveira, P.F.; Machado, R.A.F.; Barth, D.; Acosta, E.D. Dispersion polymerization of methyl methacrylate in supercritical carbon dioxide using vinyl terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane). Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2016, 103, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fehrenbacher, U.; Ballauff, M.; Muth, O.; Hirth, T. Investigation of heterogeneous radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate with polydimethylsiloxane as stabilizing agent in supercritical CO2 by turbidimetry. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 15, 613–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, K.N.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, J.H. Synthesis of phenolic/furfural gel microspheres in supercritical CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2000, 17, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Santos, T.M.M.; Chaves, B.B.; Cerqueira, J.S.; Canario, M.M.; Bresolin, D.; Pinto, J.C.; MacHado, R.A.F.; Cabral-Albuquerque, E.C.M.; Vieira De Melo, S.A.B. Dispersion Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate in Supercritical CO2: A Preliminary Evaluation of in Situ Incorporation of Copaiba Oil. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 9398–9407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhan, S.P.; Huang, X.; Zhao, Q.C.; Chen, L.; Hou, W.M.; Zhang, S.; Deng, J.J. A high efficiency PDMS-based stabilizer for dispersion polymerization of L-lactide in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 2013, 50, 1070–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, W.; Griffiths, R.M.T.; Naylor, A.; Giles, M.R.; Irvine, D.J.; Howdle, S.M. Preparation of cross-linked microparticles of poly(glycidyl methacrylate) by dispersion polymerization of glycidyl methacrylate using a PDMS macromonomer as stabilizer in supercritical carbon dioxide. Polymer 2002, 43, 6653–6659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhan, S.; Deng, J.; Wang, J.; Hou, W.; Li, Z. Synthesis of triblock stabilizers with and without end-capped for dispersion polymerization in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Polym. Res. 2019, 26, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mendes, R.L.; Fernandes, H.L.; Coelbo, J.P.; Reis, E.C.; Cabral, J.M.S.; Novaid, J.M.; Palavrab, A.F. Analytical, Nutritional and Clinical Methoak Section Supercritical CO, extraction of carotenuids and other lipids from Chlorella vd’garis. Food Chem. 1995, 53, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhao, S.; Zhang, D. Supercritical CO2 extraction of Eucalyptus leaves oil and comparison with Soxhlet extraction and hydro-distillation methods. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 133, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Reverchon, E.; Della Porta, G.; Senatore, F. Supercritical CO2 Extraction and Fractionation of Lavender Essential Oil and Waxes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43, 1654–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Anklam, E.; Berg, H.; Mathiasson, L.; Sharman, M.; Ulberth, F. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) in food analysis: A review. Food Addit. Contam. 1998, 15, 729–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mendiola, J.A.; Herrero, M.; Castro-Puyana, M.; Ibáñez, E. Supercritical fluid extraction. RSC Green Chem. 2013, 1, 196–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Vandenburg, H.J.; Clifford, A.A.; Bartle, K.D.; Carroll, J.; Newton, I.; Garden, L.M.; Dean, J.R.; Costley, C.T. Analytical extraction of additives from polymers. Analyst 1997, 122, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Daimon, H.; Hirata, Y. Directly coupled supercritical-fluid extraction/capillary supercritical-fluid chromatography of polymer additives. Chromatographia 1991, 32, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hirata, Y.; Okamoto, Y. Supercritical fluid extraction combined with microcolumn liquid chromatography for the analysis of polymer additives. J. Microcolumn Sep. 1989, 1, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ryan, T.W.; Yocklovich, S.G.; Watkins, J.C.; Levy, E.J. Quantitative analysis of additives in polymers using coupled supercritical fluid extraction-supercritical fluid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1990, 505, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yilgör, I.; McGrath, J.E. Novel supercritical fluid techniques for polymer fractionation and purification. Polym. Bull. 1984, 12, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. McGrath, J.E.; Riffle, J.S.; Banthia, A.K.; Yilgor, I.; Wilkes, G.L. Overview of the Polymerization of Cyclosiloxanes. ACS Symp. Ser. 1983, 212, 145–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Clifford, A.A.; Bartle, K.D.; Gelebart, I.; Zhu, S. Fractionation of polymers using supercritical fluid extraction. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 785, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kim, S.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, S.B. Phase behaviors and fractionation of polymer solutions in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 1998, 13, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhao, X.; Watkins, R.; Barton, S.W. Strategies for supercritical CO2 fractionation of polydimethylsiloxane. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1995, 55, 773–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sanli, D.; Erkey, C. Demixing pressures of hydroxy-terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane)-carbon dioxide binary mixtures at 313.2 K, 323.2 K and 333.2 K. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 92, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Xiong, Y.; Kiran, E. Miscibility, density and viscosity of poly(dimethylsiloxane) in supercritical carbon dioxide. Polymer 1995, 36, 4817–4826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bayraktar, Z.; Kiran, E. Miscibility, phase separation, and volumetric properties in solutions of poly(dimethylsiloxane) in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000, 75, 1397–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scheme for the synthesis of poly(acrylate-siloxane). Adopted from Ref. [22].
Figure 1. Scheme for the synthesis of poly(acrylate-siloxane). Adopted from Ref. [22].
Polymers 14 02367 g001
Figure 2. Stages of synthesis of the macroinitiator PDMS MAI (1) and triblock copolymer PDMS-b-PS-b-PDMS (2). Adopted from Ref. [23].
Figure 2. Stages of synthesis of the macroinitiator PDMS MAI (1) and triblock copolymer PDMS-b-PS-b-PDMS (2). Adopted from Ref. [23].
Polymers 14 02367 g002
Figure 3. Copolymerization of PDMS and FOMA in supercritical CO2. Adopted from Ref. [25].
Figure 3. Copolymerization of PDMS and FOMA in supercritical CO2. Adopted from Ref. [25].
Polymers 14 02367 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of hollow silicon dioxide spheres. Republished with permission of Royal Society of Chemistry, © 2005, from Ref. [26].
Figure 4. SEM images of hollow silicon dioxide spheres. Republished with permission of Royal Society of Chemistry, © 2005, from Ref. [26].
Polymers 14 02367 g004
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of formation of the Au/mesoporous organosilicon composite with a one-pot approach. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [36]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of formation of the Au/mesoporous organosilicon composite with a one-pot approach. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [36]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Polymers 14 02367 g005
Figure 6. Scheme of hydrolytic polycondensation of methyltrialkoxysilane in the presence of carbonic acid. Adopted from Ref. [53].
Figure 6. Scheme of hydrolytic polycondensation of methyltrialkoxysilane in the presence of carbonic acid. Adopted from Ref. [53].
Polymers 14 02367 g006
Figure 7. Supercritical extraction of polydimethylsiloxane using a linear density program; the graph shows the logarithm of the number-averaged molar masses of the fractions versus fluid density with filled circles (●) for a lower rate of density increase and open circles (○) for a higher rate. Reproduced from Ref. [91], Copyright (1997), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 7. Supercritical extraction of polydimethylsiloxane using a linear density program; the graph shows the logarithm of the number-averaged molar masses of the fractions versus fluid density with filled circles (●) for a lower rate of density increase and open circles (○) for a higher rate. Reproduced from Ref. [91], Copyright (1997), with permission from Elsevier.
Polymers 14 02367 g007
Figure 8. Gel permeation chromatogram of stock and fractionated PDMS samples separated at 70 °C. Reproduced with permission from Ref [93], copyright 1995 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 8. Gel permeation chromatogram of stock and fractionated PDMS samples separated at 70 °C. Reproduced with permission from Ref [93], copyright 1995 John Wiley and Sons.
Polymers 14 02367 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sizov, V.E.; Zefirov, V.V.; Gallyamov, M.O.; Muzafarov, A.M. Organosilicone Compounds in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Polymers 2022, 14, 2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122367

AMA Style

Sizov VE, Zefirov VV, Gallyamov MO, Muzafarov AM. Organosilicone Compounds in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Polymers. 2022; 14(12):2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122367

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sizov, Victor E., Vadim V. Zefirov, Marat O. Gallyamov, and Aziz M. Muzafarov. 2022. "Organosilicone Compounds in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide" Polymers 14, no. 12: 2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122367

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop