Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Chitosan-Based Gold Nanoparticles: Antimicrobial and Wound-Healing Activities
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Porous Chitosan/Saccharomycetes Adsorption Microspheres
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 11
10.3390/polym14112291
Review Report
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Microporous Formation Mechanism of Biaxial Stretching PA6/PP Membranes with High Porosity and Uniform Pore Size Distribution

Polymers 2022, 14(11), 2291; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112291
by Wenxiang Fang, Guixue Liang, Jiang Li * and Shaoyun Guo
Reviewer 1:
Robert Guidoin
Reviewer 2:
TOMAS MADERA
Polymers 2022, 14(11), 2291; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112291
Submission received: 19 April 2022 / Revised: 21 May 2022 / Accepted: 1 June 2022 / Published: 5 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Membranes and Films)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The quality of this manuscript cannot be ranked based upon totally unacceptable presentation.It is totally inappropriate to present results and discussion together:please give results first and then discuss them with reference to the literature.Then the conclusion will be significant.

1) The main question addressed by the research is to investigate the microporous formation mechanism of biaxial stretching PA6/PP membranes with high porosity and uniform pore size distribution.

2) The topic s original and relevant in the field for PA6/PP albeit the microporous formation is mastered in case of ePTFE.

3) This publication takes advantage of many techniques  of analysis and a justification is given.However there is no statistical validation of the pore sizes and the volume of void.

4) The authors shall add clear cut statistical figures to compare with other microporous polymers.

5) The conclusion is too vague to e convincing.

6) I have a deep respect for the research conducted in China.However the bibliography as presented is deliberately provocative.

Once again,it is unacceptable to mix Results and Discussion to allow the readership to make its own opinion about the results and appreciate the discussion proposed by the authors.              

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

I have performed the review of your manuscript. Some sections require to be discussed with detail (Materials and Methods, and Results and Discussion).

On the other hand, I found several issues about the English language, these issues were: word choise, wordy sentences, punctuation in compound/complex sentences, sentences to long (hard-to-read test), improper formating, etc, etc. These were highlighted in your manuscript.

I suggest that your manuscript must be revised by a native English speaker.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

I have performed the review of your manuscript and I can see that you have modified the points highlighted in my previous report. I agree with this manuscript.

Sincerely yours,

The reviewer

Back to TopTop