Next Article in Journal
A Cascading Mean-Field Approach to the Calculation of Magnetization Fields in Magnetoactive Elastomers
Next Article in Special Issue
Solvent Effect to the Uniformity of Surfactant-Free Salmon-DNA Thin Films
Previous Article in Journal
A Composite Nanosystem as a Potential Tool for the Local Treatment of Glioblastoma: Chitosan-Coated Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Embedded in Electrospun Nanofibers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Characterization of Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Based Bioactive Composite Films Modified with Fungal Melanin and Carvacrol
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/polym13091373
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Strontium Aluminate-Based Long Afterglow PP Composites: Phosphorescence, Thermal, and Mechanical Characteristics

by
Anesh Manjaly Poulose
1,*,
Arfat Anis
1,*,
Hamid Shaikh
1,
Abdullah Alhamidi
1,
Nadavala Siva Kumar
2,
Ahmed Yagoub Elnour
1 and
Saeed M. Al-Zahrani
1
1
SABIC Polymer Research Center, Department of Chemical Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(9), 1373; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091373
Submission received: 1 April 2021 / Revised: 19 April 2021 / Accepted: 21 April 2021 / Published: 22 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bio-Based Polymeric Films)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A tremendous potential has been observed in the designing of long afterglow materials for sensing, bioimaging, and encryption applications. In this study, two different strontium aluminate-based luminescent materials; SrAl2O4: Eu, Dy (S1), and Sr4Al14O25: Eu, Dy (S2) were melt-mixed with polypropylene (PP) matrix, and the phosphorescence properties were evaluated. After excitation at 320 nm, the PP/S1 composite exhibited a green emission and the PP/S2 generated a blue emission at 520 nm and 495 nm, respectively. The emission spectra intensity increased by increasing the content of these luminescent fillers. The attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) experiments show that no chemical reaction occurred during the melt-mixing process. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results revealed that the total crystallinity of the composites reduced by increasing the amount of the fillers; however, no changes in the temperature of melting (Tm) and crystallization (Tc) of PP were observed. Both fillers improved the impact strength of the composites, but the tensile strength (TS) and modulus (TM) decreased. Poly (ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether (P) plasticizer was used to improve the filler-matrix interaction and its dispersion; nevertheless, it adversely affected the intensity of the luminescence emissions.

1. Introduction

Luminescent materials emit light, especially in the visible region. When a material continuously emits visible light for longer time (hours) after stopping the radiating source (visible, UV, X-ray, or gamma-ray radiation), a persistence of luminescence or phosphorescence is observed [1]. The first-generation phosphors were Cu or Mn-doped ZnS-based materials (green emission at 530 nm) [2,3]. These materials have been exploited in catalysts and optoelectronic devices. However, their functions are limited because of their low brightness and short afterglow time, and chemical instability in the presence of moisture and CO2.
A new luminescence era started with the detection of rare-earth-doped phosphors. The first batch of modern luminescent materials was the rare-earth (R3+) and Eu2+ doped alkaline-earth aluminates (MAl2O4:Eu2+, R3+; M = Ca, Sr, or Ba) [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The Eu2+ doped phosphor exhibits a bluish-green luminescence, and the glowing time can be enhanced by adding rare-earth ions, such as neodymium (Nd) or dysprosium (Dy) (e.g., SrAlxOy: Eu2+, Dy3+), or by adding Al2O3 [4,10]. These phosphors have attracted much attention because of their long phosphorescence, greater stability (i.e., moisture and photo-stability), and high quantum efficiency compared with sulfide-based phosphors [9,11,12]. These materials can obtain radiation energy from solar light, remaining photo-luminescent for long periods of time (12–20 h) [13,14]. The luminescent properties of these phosphors allowed their commercial acceptance because of the suitable usage in fluorescent lamps, glowing paints for highways buildings and airports, cathode ray tubes, plasma displays, textile, ceramic area, nighttime clocks, safety displays, among others. Significant growth in the use of these phosphors was observed in optoelectronics, telecommunications, optically active commercial products, and biomedical and way-finding systems [15,16,17].
Recently, various phases of strontium aluminates with rare-earth-doped were developed, such as SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Sr2All6O11:Eu2+, Sr4Al14O25:Eu2+, SrAl12O19:Ce3+, SrAl12O19:Pr3+, and Sr4Al14O25:Sm2+ [18,19,20,21]. The wavelength of the emitted visible light is decided by the crystalline phase structure of the resultant strontium aluminate [22,23]. Among the different SrAlxOy: Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphors reported, Sr4Al14O25: Eu, Dy, and SrAl2O4: Eu, Dy have exhibited the strongest potential for long phosphorescence and are commercially available [8,21,24]. Different synthesis techniques such as solid-state reactions [14,20,25], sol-gel method [11,24,26], combustion method [27], solvothermal method [28], chemical precipitation [29], microwave processing, and hydrothermal reaction [30] have been developed. These synthesis methods are often complex and require high temperatures for long-duration phosphorescence materials [31]. A mechanism for luminescence persistence was proposed for SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ and has been implied to explain the luminescence in several Dy3+ and Eu2+ co-doped silicates and aluminates. The mechanism is related to the thermally activated release of a hole from Eu2+ in its excited 5d state to the valence band, in which it is then trapped by Dy3+. Luminescence is generated when the excited electron relaxes back to the ground state of Eu2+ [10,32]. The detailed mechanism of the process has been described [15]. However, SrAlxOy: Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphors are not exempt from gradual luminescence decay due to their affinity towards moisture. Various encapsulation procedures have been described for gaining stable phosphor, such as Al2O3 [33], SrF2 coating [34], phosphoric acid [35], organic ligands [36], amino-functionalized [37], among others, have been implied and reported. These processes are complicated, require elaborate equipment, and inversely affect the luminescence output. The easy and inexpensive method reported in the literature to prolong the afterglow properties of SrAlxOy: Eu, Dy is the encapsulation within a polymer matrix, which acts as an insulator for moisture. This process enables the composites to exhibit better chemical stability, good physical properties and can be processed very easily [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. In this study, two different strontium aluminate materials doped with Eu, Dy were incorporated in the selected poly(propylene) matrix, and the phosphorescent characteristics of the resultant composites were studied in detail. Moreover, a known plasticizer poly (ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether (P) was used to enhance the phosphor dispersion in the PP matrix, and also to evaluate its effect on the phosphorescence emission. The characterization studies on these composites provide valuable information on the fabrication of polymer-based luminescent films.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Poly(propylene) (TASNEE PP H4120) was provided by TASNEE with a density of 0.9 g/cm3. It has a melt flow rate (MFR) of 12 g/10 min (ISO 1133). The strontium aluminate phosphors, SrAl2O4: Eu, Dy (Mw = 209.11 g/mol) (S1) and Sr4Al14O25: Eu, Dy (1139.55 g/mol) (S2), were supplied by Sigma Aldrich. The plasticizer employed in this study was poly (ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether (P) purchased from Aldrich Company having a number average molecular weight of Mn 1000.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Preparation of the Composites

Different weight percentages of phosphors (1, 3, 5, and 10) were melt-mixed with the PP matrix in a Polylab QC (Brabender mixer) for a mixing period of 3 min at a temperature of 190–200 °C at 40 rpm. Thin films of 0.5 mm average thickness were made using COLLIN Press, Germany for the phosphorescence measurements.

2.2.2. Characterization of the Composites

Phosphorescence measurements
The phosphorescence tests were carried out in a Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using a Xe ultraviolet (UV) lamp. The emission spectra were collected at the wavelength of excitation 320 nm.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
The morphological and elemental analyses were performed in a JEOL JSM-6360A, Japan SEM model, with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) facility. A thin cut surface of the composite was prepared for the analyses. The gold coating for these samples is performed in an auto fine coater (JFC/1600) for 30 s. The coating with gold was carried out to prevent the effect of charging and to improve the quality of the image.
Attenuated Total Reflection-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR)
ATR-FTIR tests were performed in a Thermo-Scientific Nicolet iN10 FTIR model with germanium micro-tip attachment (400–4000 cm−1).
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
DSC tests were done in Shimadzu DSC-60A model. Approximately 6–10 mg of sample were taken in an aluminum pan and is heated from 30 °C to 220 °C at a ramp of 10 °C/min with 4 min holding time.
The percent crystallinity was evaluated as follows
X c ( % ) = Δ H m ( 1 − Φ ) Δ H m 0 × 100
where (Φ) is the filler weight fraction in the composites, (ΔHm) is the melting enthalpy, and (ΔH0m) is the melting enthalpy of 100% crystalline PP, and was reported as 207 J/g [46].
X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
The crystalline studies were performed in a wide-angle XRD (Bruker D8 advance). The diffractometer was endowed with a wide-angle goniometer attached to a sealed-tube Cu-Kα radiation source (λ = 1.54056 Å). The scanning was done in the 2θ range of 5° to 50° at 5°/min in the reflection mode.
Thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA)
TGA was done in a Shimadzu DTG-60H model. For the analysis, 10 ± 1.5 mg of the samples were maintained in an aluminum pan and is heated to a temperature of 600 °C (inert atmosphere) with a heating rate of 20 °C/min; and the loss in weight was monitored.
Mechanical properties
The standard tensile testing specimens (ASTM Type1, Dumb-bell shaped) were prepared using a DSM Xplore, Netherlands (12 cm3, microinjection molding). The mold was maintained at room temperature and at a pressure of 6 bar. Tensile testing was performed in Hounsfield H100 KS model UTM (ASTM D638), and the mean of five test results was reported.

3. Results

3.1. DSC and ATR-FTIR Data

The DSC data for the PP and its composites are displayed in Table 1 and Table 2. The presence of both S1 and S2 did not considerably affect the temperature of melting (Tm) and crystallization (Tc) of the composites, demonstrating that the PP was not interacting chemically with S1 and S2 and the mixing process was purely physical. Additionally, the FTIR spectra also support this observation as PP, PP/10S1, PP/10S2, and PP/10S1/5P have similar FTIR spectra, in which no new peaks were observed nor either peaks diminished (Figure 1). This observation confirms the absence of chemical reactions between both S1 and S2 and PP. The sharp peaks at 2900 cm−1 were due to the asymmetrical CH2 bending and the peaks at 1450 cm−1 and 1380 cm−1 were assigned to the symmetrical CH3 bending and asymmetrical CH3 bending, respectively, of PP [47].
Conversely, the crystallinity of the composites decreased by increasing the S1 and S2 contents. The crystallinity decrease was more pronounced in S2 because of the bulky chemical structure of S2 compared with S1, and in turn, restricts the PP chains mobility; thus, decreasing the crystallinity values [48]. The incorporation of the plasticizer in the composites led to a further reduction in the crystallinity percentage of the composites, as shown in Table 1.

3.2. X-ray Diffraction Studies of PP, PP/10S1, PP/10S2, and PP/10S1/5P

Figure 2 illustrates the XRD patterns of neat PP, PP/10S1, PP/10S2, and PP/10S1/5P. All composites show the characteristics diffraction peaks of α-PP, i.e., (110), (040), (130), and (111) [49]. Hence it was clear the absence of chemical reaction between PP and S1, S2 fillers, or the plasticizer. The (020) peak at 20°; (−211), (220), (211) peaks at 30°, and (031) peaks at 35° are the characteristics diffraction peaks of S1 [39], and S2 shows characteristics orthorhombic crystal structure with diffraction peaks at 25°, 27°, and 32° [50].

3.3. Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)

The TGA results collected for PP, PP/S1, PP/S2, S1, and S2 under an inert atmosphere are shown in Figure 3A–C, respectively. For both S1 and S2 composites, the degradation process occurred in a single step and the composite with the highest filler loading have better thermal stability than that of neat PP. The better thermal stability of the composites is because of the fact that the inorganic filler particles (S1 and S2) can act as a barrier, slowing down the decomposition process of PP [43]. However, in low filler loading concentrations, the thermal stability decreased. Moreover, the residual weight left at the end of the TGA curve was proportional to the loading percentage of the S1 and S2 fillers. Both S1 and S2 are inorganic materials and are very much stable as seen from the TGA graph (Figure 3C). The weight loss is very much negligible for both the S1 and S2, and on comparing S1 and S2; S2 is found to be slightly more stable than S1. The S1 and S2 are found to be stable until 300 °C and the minor weight loss starts from that temperature, as shown in Figure 3C.

3.4. Phosphorescence Emission

The phosphorescence emission spectra of PP/S1 and PP/S2 composites are presented in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. The emission spectra were collected at an excitation of 320 nm. As expected, the intensity of emission in the spectra of S1 and S2 were higher than that of PP composites because of the opacity and UV resistance of PP. In the PP/S1 and PP/S2 composites spectra, the emission intensity increased by increasing the percent loading of both S1 and S2. The PP/S1 composite generated a green emission at 520 nm attributed to the electronic transition of europium divalent ion (Eu2+) in the S1 phosphors (4f65d1 to 4f7) [10,51]; the detailed mechanism of phosphorescence has already been described [52]. The PP/S2 composites produced a blue emission at 495 nm and the emission intensity increased by increasing the S2 content (Figure 5). The green (PP/S1) and blue (PP/S2) emissions in the dark are shown in Figure 6A,B, respectively.
To investigate the effect of incorporation of plasticizer on the phosphorescence emission, 2.5 and 5 wt.% of plasticizers were added to composite with 10 wt.% of S1; however, the plasticizer exhibited an adverse effect on the intensity of emissions. The incorporation of the plasticizer in the 10 wt.% S1 composite decreases the overall phosphorescence emission intensity, as shown in Figure 7. The excitation process in S1 and S2 by absorbing UV light may get hindered in the presence of the plasticizer, which is more prone to degradation in UV light [53]. Because of the negative outcome of the plasticizer incorporation on the phosphorescence intensity of the PP/S1 composites, they were not studied for the PP/S2 composites.

3.5. Mechanical Characteristics of PP/S1 and PP/S2 Composites

For practical application purposes, the composites must exhibit suitable physical properties. Therefore, the Izod impact strength and tensile data of the PP with PP/S1 and PP/S2 composites were evaluated and are illustrated in Figure 8 and Figure 10, respectively.
The impact strength of PP/S1 and PP/S2 composites increased gradually by increasing the S1 and S2 contents as shown in Figure 8. The PP composites with 10 wt.% filler (S1 and S2) showed the highest notch impact strength, which is ~ 32% greater than that for PP. The increase in the impact strength of the composites is because of the better interfacial adhesion among the PP and fillers (S1 and S2), which allows more efficient stress transfer. The distribution of fillers and the increased adhesion between the fillers and PP are visible in the SEM images of the composites with the highest S1 and S2 loading of 10 wt.% (Figure 9A,B).
The tensile properties of PP and PP/S1 and PP/S2 composites are presented in Figure 10A,B, respectively. A gradual decrease in TS and tensile TM of the composites can be seen with the increase in the weight content of S1 and S2. In the highest filler loading (10 wt.% S1 and S2), the TS and TM decreased from 34.5 to 30.5 MPa and 1.1 to 0.94 GPa, respectively. The decrease in the tensile properties of PP/S1 and PP/S2 composites by increasing the filler loading can be due to the fact that the presence of inorganic fillers (S1 and S2) generally influences the elastic properties of PP because of their intrinsic stiffness and incapability to transfer the applied stress [37]. These observations are in agreement with the decrease in elongation at the yield values for these composites, as shown in Figure 10C. This is because of the decrease in PP ductility in the presence of S1 and S2 particles, which decreases the PP chain mobility. The inorganic-polymer composites often cause phase separation due to their incompatibility leading to a reduction in elongation at yield and break [54]. Additionally, the agglomeration of S1 and S2 filler, as shown in the SEM images (Figure 9A–C), adversely impacts the tensile modulus values.

4. Conclusions

In this study, strontium aluminate-based phosphors (S1 and S2) were melt-mixed with PP matrix to achieve the long afterglow properties. A long-lasting, PP encapsulated S1 and S2 composites with long afterglow properties, which lasts for hours, were obtained. The ATR-FTIR spectra confirmed that the melt-blending process was physical. Moreover, the luminescence spectra of the composite have a major excitation peak at 320 nm and an emission peak at 520 nm (S1; green) and 495 nm (S2; blue), respectively. The thermal studies show that the Tc and Tm of PP were not affected by the S1 and S2 fillers. However, there was a significant decrease in the crystallinity of the composites with S2 fillers, owing to the comparatively bulky chemical structure of these fillers. The impact strength of the resultant composites increased with the filler amount, but an adverse effect was witnessed on the TS and TM. These results demonstrated the satisfactory prospects for the formulation of phosphorescence films based on low-cost PP, which has great potential for applications in a new generation of light sources such as traffic signage and emergency signals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.P.; methodology, A.M.P.; investigation, A.A. (Abdullah Alhamidi) and A.Y.E.; writing draft preparation, A.M.P., A.A. (Arfat Anis) and N.S.K.; writing—review and editing, A.M.P., H.S., N.S.K., and A.A. (Arfat Anis); supervision, A.M.P. and S.M.A.-Z.; project administration, A.M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This Project was funded by the National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (13-ADV1044-02).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This Project was funded by the National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Award Number (13-ADV1044-02).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Harvey, E.N. A History of Luminescence from the Earliest Times Until 1900; American Philosophical Society: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, X.; Tian, B.; Yu, C.; Tu, B.; Zhao, D. Microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis of radial ZnS nanoribbons. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 522–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, H.; Lu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, C. Preparation and characterization of ZnS:Cu/PVA composite nanofibers via electrospinning. Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 2480–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Matsuzawa, T.; Aoki, Y.; Takeuchi, N.; Murayama, Y. A new long phosphorescent phosphor with high brightness, SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1996, 143, 2670–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Palilla, F.C.; Levine, A.K.; Tomkus, M.R. Fluorescent properties of alkaline Earth aluminates of the type MAl2O4 activated by divalent europium. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1968, 115, 642–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nakazawa, T.M.E. Traps in SrA12O4: Eu2+ phosphor with rare-Earth ion doping. J. Lumin. 1997, 72–74, 236–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sakai, R.; Katsumata, T.; Komuro, S.; Morikawa, T. Effect of composition on the phosphorescence from BaAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ crystals. J. Lumin. 1999, 85, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arellano-Tánori, O.; Meléndrez, R.; Pedroza-Montero, M.; Castañeda, B.; Chernov, V.; Yen, W.M.; Barboza-Flores, M. Persistent luminescence dosimetric properties of UV-irradiated SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphor. J. Lumin. 2008, 128, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Smets, B.; Rutten, J.; Hoeks, G.; Verlijsdonk, J. 2SrO·3Al2O3:Eu2+ and 1.29 (Ba, Ca) O, 6Al2O3:Eu2+: Two new blue-emitting phosphors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1989, 136, 2119–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nakazawa, E.; Murazaki, Y.; Saito, S. Mechanism of the persistent phosphorescence in Sr4Al14O25: Eu and SrAl2O4: Eu codoped with rare Earth ions. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 113113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, P.; Xu, M.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, L.; Li, L. Synthesis and characterization of europium-doped Sr3Al2O6 phosphors by sol–gel technique. J. Sol Gel Sci. Technol. 2007, 43, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Toh, K.; Nagata, S.; Tsuchiya, B.; Shikama, T. Luminescence characteristics of Sr4Al14O25: Eu,Dy under proton irradiation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2006, 249, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lu, Y.; Li, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, D.; Yin, Q. SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphors derived from a new sol–gel route. Microelectron. J. 2004, 35, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Katsumata, T.; Nabae, T.; Sasajima, K.; Komuro, S.; Morikawa, T. Effects of composition on the long phosphorescent SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphor crystals. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1997, 144, L243–L245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nance, J.; Sparks, T.D. From streetlights to phosphors: A review on the visibility of roadway markings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 148, 105749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tan, H.; Wang, T.; Shao, Y.; Yu, C.; Hu, L. Crucial breakthrough of functional persistent luminescence materials for biomedical and information technological applications. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lin, Y.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Preparation of long-afterglow Sr4Al14 O25-based luminescent material and its optical properties. Mater. Lett. 2001, 51, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zheng, R.; Xu, L.; Qin, W.; Chen, J.; Dong, B.; Zhang, L.; Song, H. Electrospinning preparation and photoluminescence properties of SrAl2O4:Ce3+ nanowires. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 7517–7524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sakirzanovas, S.; Katelnikovas, A.; Dutczak, D.; Kareiva, A.; Jüstel, T. Synthesis and Sm2+/Sm3+ doping effects on photoluminescence properties of Sr4Al14O25. J. Lumin. 2011, 131, 2255–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, S.J.; Won, H.I.; Hayk, N.; Won, C.W.; Jeon, D.Y.; Kirakosyan, A.G. Preparation and characterization of Sr4Al2O7:Eu3+, Eu2+ phosphors. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2011, 176, 1521–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chang, C.C.; Yang, C.Y.; Lu, C.H. Preparation and photoluminescence properties of Sr4Al14O25:Eu2+ phosphors synthesized via the microemulsion route. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2013, 24, 1458–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Katsumata, T.; Sasajima, K.; Nabae, T.; Komuro, S.; Morikawa, T. Characteristics of strontium aluminate crystals used for long-duration phosphors. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 81, 413–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Suriyamurthy, N.; Panigrahi, B.S. Effects of non-stoichiometry and substitution on photoluminescence and afterglow luminescence of Sr4Al14O25:Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphor. J. Lumin. 2008, 128, 1809–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peng, T.; Huajun, L.; Yang, H.; Yan, C. Synthesis of SrAl2O4: Eu, Dy phosphor nanometer powders by sol–gel processes and its optical properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2004, 85, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yeşilay Kaya, S.; Karacaoglu, E.; Karasu, B. Effect of Al/Sr ratio on the luminescence properties of SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphors. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 3701–3706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, I.; Chen, T. Effect of host compositions on the afterglow properties of phosphorescent strontium aluminate phosphors derived from the sol–gel method. J. Mater. Res. 2001, 16, 1293–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bem, D.B.; Swart, H.C.; Luyt, A.S.; Duvenhage, M.M.; Dejene, F.B. Characterization of luminescent and thermal properties of long afterglow SrAlxOy: Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphor synthesized by combustion method. Polym. Compos. 2011, 32, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xue, Z.; Deng, S.; Liu, Y. Synthesis and luminescence properties of SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ nanosheets. Phys. B 2012, 407, 3808–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chang, C.; Yuan, Z.; Mao, D. Eu2+ activated long persistent strontium aluminate nano scaled phosphor prepared by precipitation method. J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 415, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ravichandran, D.; Johnson, S.T.; Erdei, S.; Roy, R.; White, W.B. Crystal chemistry and luminescence of the Eu2+-activated alkaline Earth aluminate phosphors. Displays 1999, 19, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pathak, P.K.; Kurchania, R. Synthesis and thermoluminescence properties of SrAl2O4 (EU) phosphor irradiated with cobalt-60, 6 MV and 16 MV photon beams. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2015, 117, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dorenbos, P. Mechanism of persistent luminescence in Eu2+ and Dy3+ codoped aluminate and silicate compounds. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, H107–H110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Lü, X.; Zhong, M.; Shu, W.; Yu, Q.; Xiong, X.; Wang, R. Alumina encapsulated SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphors. Powder Technol. 2007, 177, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guo, C.; Luan, L.; Huang, D.; Su, Q.; Lv, Y. Study on the stability of phosphor SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ in water and method to improve Its moisture resistance. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2007, 106, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhu, Y.; Zeng, J.; Li, W.; Xu, L.; Guan, Q.; Liu, Y. Encapsulation of strontium aluminate phosphors to enhance water resistance and luminescence. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 7580–7585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, S.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Yang, J. The organic ligands coordinated long afterglow phosphor. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61, 3185–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tian, S.; Wen, J.; Fan, H.; Chen, Y.; Yan, J.; Zhang, P. Sunlight-activated long persistent luminescent polyurethane incorporated with amino-functionalized SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphor. Polym. Int. 2016, 65, 1238–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bem, D.B.; Luyt, A.S.; Dejene, F.B.; Botha, J.R.; Swart, H.C. Structural, luminescent and thermal properties of blue SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphor filled low-density polyethylene composites. Phys. B 2009, 404, 4504–4508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bem, D.B.; Swart, H.C.; Luyt, A.S.; Coetzee, E.; Dejene, F.B. Properties of green SrAl2O4 phosphor in LDPE and PMMA polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 117, 2635–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mishra, S.B.; Mishra, A.K.; Luyt, A.S.; Revaprasadu, N.; Hillie, K.T.; vdM Steyn, W.J.; Coetsee, E.; Swart, H.C. Ethylvinyl acetate copolymer-SrAl2O4: Eu,Dy and Sr4Al14O25:Eu,Dy phosphor-based composites: Preparation and material properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mishra, S.B.; Mishra, A.K.; Revaprasadu, N.; Hillie, K.T.; Steyn, W.V.; Coetsee, E.; Swart, H.C. Strontium aluminate/polymer composites: Morphology, luminescent properties, and durability. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 112, 3347–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nance, J.; Sparks, T.D. Comparison of coatings for SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ powder in waterborne road striping paint under wet conditions. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 144, 105637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wan, M.; Jiang, X.; Nie, J.; Cao, Q.; Zheng, W.; Dong, X.; Fan, Z.H.; Zhou, W. Phosphor powders-incorporated polylactic acid polymeric composite used as 3D printing filaments with green luminescence properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Piramidowicz, R.; Jusza, A.; Lipińska, L.; Gil, M.; Mergo, P. Re3+: LaAlO3 doped luminescent polymer composites. Opt. Mater. 2019, 87, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Barletta, M.; Puopolo, M.; Trovalusci, F.; Vesco, S. High-density polyethylene/SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+ photoluminescent pigments: Material design, melt processing, and characterization. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2017, 56, 400–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Paukkeri, R.; Lehtinen, A. Thermal behaviour of polypropylene fractions: 1. influence tacticity mol. weight crystallization melting behaviour. Polymer 1993, 34, 4075–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Poulose, A.M.; Elnour, A.Y.; Kumar, N.S.; Alhamidi, A.; George, J.; Al-Ghurabi, E.H.; Boumaza, M.; Al-Zahrani, S. Utilization of polyethylene terephthalate waste as a carbon filler in polypropylene matrix: Investigation of mechanical, rheological, and thermal properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 50292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vidović, E.; Faraguna, F.; Jukić, A. Influence of inorganic fillers on PLA crystallinity and thermal properties. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 127, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chiu, F.C.; Chu, P.H. Characterization of solution-mixed polypropylene/clay nanocomposites without compatibilizers. J. Polym. Res. 2006, 13, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Luitel, H.N.; Watari, T.; Torikai, T.; Yada, M. Luminescent properties of Cr3+ doped Sr4Al14O25: Eu/Dy blue–green and red phosphor. Opt. Mater. 2009, 31, 1200–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aitasalo, T.; Hölsä, J.; Jungner, H.; Lastusaari, M.; Niittykoski, J. Mechanisms of persistent luminescence in Eu2+, Re3+ doped alkaline Earth aluminates. J. Lumin. 2001, 94–95, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Clabau, F.; Rocquefelte, X.; Jobic, S.; Deniard, P.; Whangbo, M.H.; Garcia, A.; Le Mercier, T. Mechanism of phosphorescence appropriate for the long-lasting phosphors Eu2+-doped SrAl2O4 with codopants Dy3+ and B3+. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 3904–3912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Das, I.; Gupta, S.K. Polyethylene glycol degradation by UV irradiation. Indian J. Chem. 2005, 44a, 1355–1358. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mammeri, F.; Bourhis, E.L.; Rozes, L.; Sanchez, C. Mechanical properties of hybrid organic–inorganic materials. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 3787–3811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 13 01373 g001 550
Figure 1. ATR-FTIR spectra of PP, PP/10S1, PP/10S2, and PP/10S1/5P.
Figure 1. ATR-FTIR spectra of PP, PP/10S1, PP/10S2, and PP/10S1/5P.
Polymers 13 01373 g001
Polymers 13 01373 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD pattern of PP, PP/10S1, PP/10S1/5P, and PP/10S2.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of PP, PP/10S1, PP/10S1/5P, and PP/10S2.
Polymers 13 01373 g002
Polymers 13 01373 g003 550
Figure 3. TGA curves of PP/S1 (A), PP/S2 composites (B), S1 and S2 (C).
Figure 3. TGA curves of PP/S1 (A), PP/S2 composites (B), S1 and S2 (C).
Polymers 13 01373 g003
Polymers 13 01373 g004 550
Figure 4. Phosphorescence emissions of S1 and PP/S1 composites (excitation wavelength: 320 nm; green emission at 520 nm).
Figure 4. Phosphorescence emissions of S1 and PP/S1 composites (excitation wavelength: 320 nm; green emission at 520 nm).
Polymers 13 01373 g004
Polymers 13 01373 g005 550
Figure 5. Phosphorescence emissions of S2 and PP/S2 composites (excitation wavelength: 320 nm; blue emission at 495 nm).
Figure 5. Phosphorescence emissions of S2 and PP/S2 composites (excitation wavelength: 320 nm; blue emission at 495 nm).
Polymers 13 01373 g005
Polymers 13 01373 g006 550
Figure 6. Phosphorescent composites—(A) PP/10S1 in the dark (green emission) and (B) PP/10S2 in the dark (blue emission).
Figure 6. Phosphorescent composites—(A) PP/10S1 in the dark (green emission) and (B) PP/10S2 in the dark (blue emission).
Polymers 13 01373 g006
Polymers 13 01373 g007 550
Figure 7. Phosphorescence emission of PP/10S1 composites with 2.5 and 5 wt.% P plasticizers (excitation wavelength—320 nm; blue emission at 495 nm).
Figure 7. Phosphorescence emission of PP/10S1 composites with 2.5 and 5 wt.% P plasticizers (excitation wavelength—320 nm; blue emission at 495 nm).
Polymers 13 01373 g007
Polymers 13 01373 g008 550
Figure 8. Impact strength of PP/S1 and PP/S2 composites.
Figure 8. Impact strength of PP/S1 and PP/S2 composites.
Polymers 13 01373 g008
Polymers 13 01373 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM images of PP/10S1 (A) and PP/10S2 (B) composites, and (C) SEM-EDS of PP/10S1.
Figure 9. SEM images of PP/10S1 (A) and PP/10S2 (B) composites, and (C) SEM-EDS of PP/10S1.
Polymers 13 01373 g009
Polymers 13 01373 g010 550
Figure 10. Tensile strength (A), tensile modulus (B), and elongation at yield (C) for PP/S1 and PP/S2 composites.
Figure 10. Tensile strength (A), tensile modulus (B), and elongation at yield (C) for PP/S1 and PP/S2 composites.
Polymers 13 01373 g010
Table
Table 1. DSC data of PP, PP/S1, and plasticized composites.
Table 1. DSC data of PP, PP/S1, and plasticized composites.
MaterialTc (°C)Tm (°C)ΔHm (J/g)Xc (%)
PP121.9164.687.042.0
PP/1S1122.6165.783.840.5
PP/3S1122.7164.583.240.2
PP/5S1122.5164.183.340.2
PP/10S1122.9164.283.840.5
PP/10S1/2.5P122.0164.082.539.9
PP10S1/5P121.6163.976.637.0
Table
Table 2. DSC data of PP and PP/S2 composites.
Table 2. DSC data of PP and PP/S2 composites.
MaterialTc (°C)Tm (°C)ΔHm (J/g)Xc (%)
PP121.9164.687.042.0
PP/1S2120.9163.574.936.2
PP/3S2120.0164.471.434.5
PP/5S2120.1164.668.633.1
PP/10S2120.7164.966.932.3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Poulose, A.M.; Anis, A.; Shaikh, H.; Alhamidi, A.; Siva Kumar, N.; Elnour, A.Y.; Al-Zahrani, S.M. Strontium Aluminate-Based Long Afterglow PP Composites: Phosphorescence, Thermal, and Mechanical Characteristics. Polymers 2021, 13, 1373. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091373

AMA Style

Poulose AM, Anis A, Shaikh H, Alhamidi A, Siva Kumar N, Elnour AY, Al-Zahrani SM. Strontium Aluminate-Based Long Afterglow PP Composites: Phosphorescence, Thermal, and Mechanical Characteristics. Polymers. 2021; 13(9):1373. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091373

Chicago/Turabian Style

Poulose, Anesh Manjaly, Arfat Anis, Hamid Shaikh, Abdullah Alhamidi, Nadavala Siva Kumar, Ahmed Yagoub Elnour, and Saeed M. Al-Zahrani. 2021. "Strontium Aluminate-Based Long Afterglow PP Composites: Phosphorescence, Thermal, and Mechanical Characteristics" Polymers 13, no. 9: 1373. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091373

APA Style

Poulose, A. M., Anis, A., Shaikh, H., Alhamidi, A., Siva Kumar, N., Elnour, A. Y., & Al-Zahrani, S. M. (2021). Strontium Aluminate-Based Long Afterglow PP Composites: Phosphorescence, Thermal, and Mechanical Characteristics. Polymers, 13(9), 1373. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091373

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop