Next Article in Journal
Linear Dextrin as Potential Insulin Delivery System: Effect of Degree of Polymerization on the Physicochemical Properties of Linear Dextrin–Insulin Inclusion Complexes
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrogen Recovery by Mixed Matrix Membranes Made from 6FCl-APAF HPA with Different Contents of a Porous Polymer Network and Their Thermal Rearrangement
Previous Article in Journal
An Iterative Approach for the Parameter Estimation of Shear-Rate and Temperature-Dependent Rheological Models for Polymeric Liquids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improvement of Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane High-Efficiency Particulate Air Filter Performance with Melt-Blown Media
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Inner Surface Hydrophilic Modification of PVDF Membrane with Tea Polyphenols/Silica Composite Coating

Polymers 2021, 13(23), 4186; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234186
by Qiang Xu 1, Xiaoli Ji 1, Jiaying Tian 1, Xiaogang Jin 1,* and Lili Wu 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2021, 13(23), 4186; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234186
Submission received: 4 November 2021 / Revised: 24 November 2021 / Accepted: 24 November 2021 / Published: 30 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymer Membranes)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript "Inner surface hydrophilic modification of PVDF membrane with tea polyphenols/silica composite coating" shows an interesting concept making PVdF hydrophilic by coating and soaking tea phenol with SiO2. The concept is nice unfortunately the science behind such is a little missing.

  1. The authors need to add a proper characterization such as FTIR  showing they obtained the composites. Please add those and that can be shown in supplementary. Additionally if you have larger pores as seen in SEM the modulus of such membrane will change please present strain stress results
  2.  If you show results and discussion there should be a discussion to other work make in the field as example contact angles. Please provide such hence the paper missing scientific depth
  3. The authors talk a lot about hydrophilic behavior inside PVdF membrane but no analysis made to confirm such.
  4. There a lot of typos in the manuscripts with "." missing some letter writing big and grammatical errors as well. Please let the manuscript check with a native speaker
  5. If you show this as communication Figure 4 is somehow not real scientific please add some data for such and show Figure 4 in supplementary.
  6.  There a lot of polymers as chitosan which are hydrophilic in nature why you need to use PVdF. Please give reason for such as well in motivation of work.
  7. The conclusion need be rewritten its far to shallow and you should present your major results

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this work, a superhydrophilic tea polyphenols/silica com-
posite coating was developed by a one-step process. The authors reported composite coating can achieve not only  superhydrophilic modification of the surface, but also the inner surface of the porous PVDF membrane, which endows the modified membrane with excellent water permeability.

The whole work is very interesting.

POINTS FOR IMPROVEMENT:

  1. The chemical stability of the prepared membranes was not examined. For example pH, presence of an oxidant, etc.
  2. The temperature stability of the prepared membranes was not examined.
  3. The mechanical properties were not examined
  4. The antifouling properties, flux recovey ratio could be further examined
  5. A major problem is that green tea is used for nutrition. Please, make an appropriate comment for the application of by products or wastes from green tea production.
  6. Characterize these membranes in terms i) of morphology (dense, microporous, etc) ii) physical state (glassy, semicrystalline, etc)
  7. Propose specific process for their application (microfiltration, osmosis, etc)In my opinion this work could be published after revision.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors made a good revision and answered all open question. The revised version now suitable for publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for your revision

Back to TopTop