Next Article in Journal
Application of the Finite Element Method to the Incremental Forming of Polymer Sheets: The Thermomechanical Coupled Model and Experimental Validations
Next Article in Special Issue
One-Pot Polymerization of Dopamine as an Additive to Enhance Permeability and Antifouling Properties of Polyethersulfone Membrane
Previous Article in Journal
LLDPE Composites with Nanosized Copper and Copper Oxides for Water Disinfection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Erratum: Design of Web-to-Web Spacing for the Reduced Pressure Drop and Effective Depth Filtration. Polymers 2020, 11, 1882
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advanced Design of Fiber-Based Particulate Filters: Materials, Morphology, and Construction of Fibrous Assembly

1
Department of Textiles, Merchandising and Fashion Design, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2
Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(8), 1714; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081714
Submission received: 3 July 2020 / Revised: 27 July 2020 / Accepted: 28 July 2020 / Published: 30 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymeric Materials for Filtration and Purification)

Abstract

:
With increasing air pollution and sporadic outbreaks of epidemics, there is ramping attention on the filtration devices. The main constituents of airborne pollutants are particulate matters of solid particles, liquid aerosol, bioaerosol/bio-droplets, and gas/vapor. With the growing demand for high-performance filters, novel materials and functionalities are being developed applying advanced technologies. In this paper, recent developments of fiber-based particulate filters are reviewed, with a focus on the important performance parameters and material properties. Trends in technology and research activities are briefly reviewed, and the evaluative measures of filtration performance are reported. Recent studies on the advanced filter materials are reviewed in the aspect of polymers and the fabrication process of fibrous assembly. The characterization method including 3D modeling and simulation is also briefly introduced. Multifunctional filters such as antimicrobial filter and gas and particulate filters are briefly introduced, and efforts for developing environmentally sustainable filters are noted.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

With increasing air pollution and sporadic outbreaks of epidemics, there is ramping attention on the filtration devices. Previously, air-purifying respirators (APR) had been worn mainly by the first responders and industrial workers for respiratory protection from the exposure to airborne particles and gaseous matters. Nowadays, the protective facemasks became more an essential for public health in hazy days and virus outbreak.
The main constituents of airborne pollutants are particulate matters of solid particles, liquid aerosol, bioaerosol/bio-droplets, metal fume, gas, and vapor (Table 1). Particulate matters (PM) that are categorized by the size of particles and PM2.5, of which the particle size is smaller than 2.5 μm, are reported to be especially harmful because they can reach the thoracic region and blood stream, causing respiratory and cardiovascular diseases [1]. The associated risk can be exacerbated when pathogenic microbials including bacteria and virus are present in the air [2]. Coughing, sneezing, and talking can generate microbial aerosols and droplets in the air, potentially carrying infectious diseases. Thus, the role of air purifying devices becomes more important in the occurrence of viral pandemics such as COVID-19, SARS, H1N1 influenza, and in the secondary bacterial infections associated with viral epidemics.
As protective tools, filtration devices such as APR and heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems are used. For particulates, fiber-based filter media are generally used. A commonly used fibrous filter is made from nonwoven media made by meltblowing, electrospinning, air-laid, and the combination of different webbing processes [8,9,10]. For gaseous matters, activated carbon is commonly applied to purifying cartridges or face masks for a quick capture of gas and vapor molecules [11,12,13]. Various airborne pollutants are summarized in Table 1 with information of their general size ranges.
With the growing demand for high-performance filters, increasing research efforts are being made on understanding the filtration mechanism and developing novel filter materials. Figure 1 shows the survey results of a number of published journal articles in recent 20 years, with keywords of ‘air’ and ‘filter’ in the Scopus analytics site. Overall, a significant academic endeavor has been invested globally to overcome the serious airborne pollution from various research sectors. Of particular attention is the increased number of published articles from China and South Korea in recent ten years, reflecting the striving effort for responding to serious air pollution in this region.
In this review, recent developments of fiber-based particulate filters are reviewed, with a focus on the important performance parameters and material properties. Research trends are briefly reviewed, and the evaluative measures of filtration performance are reported. Recent studies on the advanced filter materials are reviewed in the aspect of polymers and the fabrication process of fibrous assembly. The characterization method including 3D modeling and simulation is also briefly introduced. Multifunctional filters that have an antimicrobial effect and gas removal function are briefly introduced. Finally, efforts for developing environmentally sustainable filters are noted. Overall, the research topics reviewed in this paper are shown in Figure 2.

2. Filtration Performance of Fiber-Based Filters for Particulates

2.1. Fiber-Based Filtration Mechanism

Airborne particles and aerosol can be mechanically captured by a single fiber through the mechanisms of interception, inertial impaction, diffusion, and gravitational settling [14], as illustrated in Figure 3a. Interception occurs when a particle follows the air stream line and makes a physical contact onto the media fiber. Inertial impaction occurs when a heavy particle cannot adjust to the abrupt changes in the air stream direction near the fiber, and due to the inertia, the particle continues along the original path and contacts the fiber. The inertial impaction works better at the high face velocity [15,16,17]. Diffusion is effective for small particles (<0.1 μm), and in this case, particles make a random Brownian motion and collide with the fibers. The diffusion mechanism is more effective for small particles at the slow air stream [15]. The gravitational sediment occurs for large and heavy particles that settle by gravity, and this gravity effect is negligible for particles smaller than 0.5 μm [14].
Overall, mechanical filtration efficiency is the result of a combined effect of those capture mechanisms. Very small particles less than 0.1 μm are primarily captured by the diffusion mechanism, and large particles greater than 0.4 μm are captured by interception and inertial impaction [14,18]. Generally, the particles between 0.1–0.4 μm are relatively less efficient to capture, and the most penetrating particle size (MPPS) range varies depending on the face velocity and fiber size [14,15,18] (Figure 3b).
When a fiber is electrostatically charged, electrostatic attraction and induced polarization additionally contribute to the capture of particles [19,20]. Electret fibers are generally composed of charges of both signs, and charged fibers effectively attract both the oppositely charged particles and the uncharged particles. For uncharged particles, fiber charges induce the instant dipoles on the particles when particles come close to the charged fiber surface, attracting the particles [20]. Commercially available filters are mostly electrically charged called electrets, and the use of electret filters significantly improves the particle collection efficiency, especially in the MPPS range.

2.2. Measurement of Particulate Filter Performance

2.2.1. Testing Parameters

Filtration performance is generally evaluated by the penetration of solid particles or oily aerosol at the specific flow rate and mass concentration of aerosol. For example, filtering face masks that are certified by the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 42 CRF Part 84 are tested against either NaCl particles of which count the median diameter (CMD) of 0.075 ± 0.02 μm or dioctyl phthalate (DOP) aerosol with CMD of 0.185 ± 0.02 μm, at 85 LPM of air flow [22,23]. The size of test particles is in the range of MPPS, and the charges of particles are neutralized to zero in the Boltzmann charge distribution, to make the test condition the worst case scenario.
Between the solid and oily aerosol, oily aerosol makes the filter efficiency deteriorate more rapidly in general, because the oily liquid easily spreads on the fiber surface, quickly masking the charged sites [24,25]. The air flow influences the air resistance or pressure drop of the test sample. More specifically, the resistance is proportional to the air face velocity [26], where the face velocity is calculated from the air flow rate divided by the test area. Thus, when evaluating the resistance of a filter, the face velocity of the test condition should be considered, as the face velocity is directly correlated with the resistance [26,27].

2.2.2. Filtration Performance and Service-Life

Generally, the percentage of particle penetration (100%—% efficiency) and the resistance are used as main indicators of filter performance. Filtration efficiency is measured either by the instantaneous penetration at the initial aerosol exposure or the maximum penetration during the mass loading of the aerosol. Figure 4 illustrates the loading behavior of different aerosol types and filters. For the oily aerosol, penetration generally continues to increase with the increased mass loading. The resistance does not change much, as the oily liquid spreads over the surface instead of clogging the pores [25,28,29]. For the solid aerosol, the loading trends can differ by the filter characteristics. For the porous electret filter that allows depth loading, penetration initially increases as the charged surface is masked by the deposition of solid particles; then after reaching the maximum penetration, the penetration begins to decrease as the solid particles clog the pores of the filter material [30,31,32]. The resistance may build up more quickly after reaching the maximum penetration, as the pores of the filter are clogged. For a filter material that the mechanical filtration mechanism is dominant, it is likely that the filter begins to get clogged in the early stage of aerosol loading; in this case, penetration keeps decreasing from the initial loading, and the resistance builds up steeply from the beginning.
As the loading trend varies by the challenge agent, the service life of a filter material can be also influenced by the aerosol type. It is likely that the solid aerosol limits the service life of a filter material by the build-up of resistance, whereas the oily aerosol limits the service life by the loss of filtration efficiency. To extend the service life against solid particles, the filter material needs to be designed to lower the resistance by allowing the depth loading. For the oily aerosol, the wettability of filter material can be modified to deter the quick spreading of the oily liquid; for this purpose, a hydrophobic/oleophobic treatment can be beneficial for extending the effective service life against the oily aerosol [30,33,34]. The oleophobic filter material can be applied to the NIOSH R- and P-type filters that require a certain level of efficiency during 200 mg of DOP loading.
Generally, a high filtration efficiency is traded off by a high resistance, and the respirator users are forced to compromise the protection performance with the breathing comfort. Thus, the design for superior filtration should be directed to have a high collection efficiency at a low resistance. To account for both efficiency and resistance, the concept of quality factor (QF) is employed, where QF = −[ln(penetration)]/resistance. From the equation, a higher QF indicates a higher efficiency at the unit resistance. The QF can be used as an inherent quality of filter media; that is, a multi-layer construction made of the same filter media would have a similar QF as the single layer, while the multi-layers may have a higher filtration efficiency and a higher resistance than a single layer. A typical example of the layering effect on performance and quality factor is shown in Figure 5.

3. Materials for Superior Filtration

3.1. Charge Retention Capacity of Electret Filters

For commercial filters, polypropylene (PP) is commonly used for meltblown (MB) nonwoven materials. PP is a nonpolar material with a low surface energy (27–33 mJ/m2). Its melt is used to form fibrous web, and the meltflow index (MI) of PP resin should be carefully chosen for proper processability. The PP MB web is often electrostatically charged to enhance the filtration efficiency. The charges held in PP stay relatively longer, as they are inert to conductive molecules such as water. Such a dielectric material that retains electric charges is called an electret [35,36].
The main charging techniques applied to electret filters include corona charging, tribocharging, and electrospinning [37]. Corona charging is commonly done to PP meltblown, where the polymer is exposed to corona discharges produced by a wire electrode [38]. Corona charging generates both the hetero- and homo-charged electrets. Hetero-charging is the result of orientation of dipoles and migration of free charges, while homo-charging occurs by charge injection from the ionized air [39]. A nonpolar polymer with a low ohmic conductivity is reported to make a homo-electret, giving a stable electret [39].
Tribocharging is a process where materials in dissimilar electronegativity contact each other and produce charges in the opposite signs [40]. Tribocharged webs display the surface charges in the opposite polarities, both positive and negative, behaving as bipolar materials [37]. Generally, corona and tribocharging processes produce slight dipole charges and high space charges, and they show gradual charge dissipation, resulting in the lowered filtration efficiency [41].
Electrospinning is a nanofiber fabrication technology that provides in situ charge injection prior to the fiber formation, generating the space charges of electrospun fibers with a great depth of energy level [41,42]. The advantage of this technique is that it produces the charged fibers in a one-step process, where the polymer solution is extruded through an electrode to a collector in an electric field, and it can produce nano-sized fibers that could enhance the mechanical filtration performance [43]. However, the enhanced mechanical filtration may lead to a higher resistance, thus the process parameters of electrospun filter media need to be carefully adjusted.
In general, electret filters as opposed to mechanical filters exhibit higher quality factor with the benefit of electrostatic filtration mechanism, but this benefit can be limited when the electret charges are deteriorated by the environmental aging. Charge retention ability is reported to depend on the electrical properties of polymers such as conductivity and dielectric constants [37,39,44]. From a study by Lee and Kim [45], PP, poly(acrylonitrile) (PAN), and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) which have different dielectric constants and moisture absorption properties were compared for the charge stability and its impact on filtration performance, when treated under high temperature (120 °C) or high humidity (25 °C, 90% RH). The effect of moisture-aging on charge decay was highest in the order of PAN > PVDF > PP, corresponding to the order of moisture absorption capacity. For thermal treatment, charge decay appeared larger in the order of PVDF > PAN > PP, showing that the material with higher dielectric constant was more vulnerable to charge loss, leading to deterioration of filtration performance. The effect of thermal aging on the filtration performance appeared significantly larger than the effect of humidity aging for all filter materials from this study [45].
The charge retention capacity of a dielectric polymer is generally associated with the electrical conductivity and the energy level of localized trap sites [45,46,47,48,49,50]. The dielectric property is affected by the electron hopping at each energy level, where the band gap energy becomes important [49,50,51]. According to Ravichandran et al. [50], the dielectric constant is inversely proportional to the square of the band gap energy [50,51]; thus, the material with a higher dielectric constant would have a smaller band gap energy, and the loss of charge can be much easier for this material. Similarly, the material with a high electrical conductivity would have a smaller band gap [49]. From this perspective, a nonpolar polymer would be a good candidate of electret material due to its low electrical conductivity [52,53]. The material with a high trap energy can hinder the charge transport to the conduction band, demoting the charge decay [45,46].
The mechanism of charge decay is generally explained by the relaxation of polarized state of dielectrics and the spatial distribution of dipoles and free charges [54,55,56,57]. Environmental factors such as heat, moisture, or solvent exposure can cause electric conduction, facilitating the charge carrier mobility, and leading to charge dissipation [57,58,59,60,61]. In Cho et al.’s study [36] where the charge retention of polycarbonate electrospun web was investigated, the charge decay was aggravated at above the glass transition temperature (Tg). It was reported that at above Tg, the segmental depolarization of oriented dipoles occurred by the facilitated molecular motion, and this led to the accelerated charge decay.

3.2. Advanced Electret Filter Materials

Efforts have been made to increase the surface potential of electret filter materials and to enhance the long-term service performance. PVDF, as a dipolar material, has been studied to apply as an effective electret filter [41,42,45,62,63]. It was expected that, when PVDF was electrospun, the crystal phase of PVDF molecules would be transformed from the nonpolar α-phase to the polar β-phase due to the spontaneous polarization upon electrospinning, and this β-phase conversion would maximize the dipole moment [41,42]. The surface potential and the charge stability of PVDF electrospun web was further improved by the addition of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) nanoparticles that acted as a charge enhancer [41]. In this study, the charge stability was measured by the thermally stimulated discharge current (TSDC), and it was proposed that the increased amount of PTFE particles was in correlation with the dipole polarity, where it was associated with the increased depth of energy for charge trapping [41]. For the long-term serviceability of electret filters, it is desirable to maintain the stable charges and the mechanical properties of filter material, even in a humid and heated condition [64,65].
In addition to making a long-surviving electret, magnetic force was used by incorporating magnetic particles in fibers [66,67,68]. In a study by Kim et al. [69], poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) was electrospun, dispersing Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles in the pre-spinning solution. When the produced web was magnetized by an external magnetic field, the collection efficiency of metal oxide particles (Fe2O3), one of the major components of subway dust, was greatly enhanced [69]. Zhao et al. [54] incorporated various kinds of negative ions including Al2O3, SiO2, MgO, Fe2O3, Na2O, TiO2, and FeO into the PVDF electrospun fibers. The produced web was capable of releasing negative ions and showed an effective filtration performance. Likewise, the electrostatic or magnetic attraction in addition to the mechanical filtration eventually improved the quality factor of the filters [70,71,72,73].
In general, the filtration performance of electret filters decreases more rapidly against the oily aerosol than the solid aerosol, because the immediate spreading of oily liquid on the fiber surface masks the surface charges of the filters [25,29,30]. To prevent the rapid masking of charges, the surface of electret filters was modified for oil resistance, and the effect of hydro/oleophobic treatment on filtration efficiency was investigated [24,30,33,55,74]. The surface energy of filter media was lowered by fluorination of the surfaces [24,30,33,55,74], and the resulting web showed superhydrophobicity or superoleophobicity. When the immediate wetting by the oily aerosol was deterred, the collection efficiency against dioctyl phthalate (DOP) was maintained longer with the continued loading of aerosol [30], while the instantaneous efficiency was not significantly different [24]; with a submicron layer of coating, the resistance was not affected. For some cases, oleophobic coating decreased the pore size of the filter media, and it led to the increase of instantaneous filtration efficiency against both oil and solid aerosols; however, the improved efficiency appeared to be the result of enhanced mechanical filtration by the blocked pores, and this would increase the resistance, giving an adverse effect [74].
The collection system of oil aerosol was explained by the collision and drainage mechanism from the study by Wei et al. [33]. In this study, a double layered structure with superoleophobic and oleophilic layers was examined, and the collection efficiency against oily aerosol was found to be more effective when the superoleophobic layer was positioned in the second layer. In this sequence of construction, the oily aerosol collected in the first oleophilic layer was blocked by the superoleophobic second layer [33]. In contrast, when the superoleophobic layer was positioned in the first layer, the oil collected by this layer was easily transported into the oleophilic layer, penetrating to the down flow.
A hybrid approach of fabricating a stable electret web was made by Jiang et al. [55]. In this study, poly(vinyl butyral) (PVB) with a high electrical resistivity was electrospun with the dispersion of silicon nitride (Si3N4) particles with a high dielectric constant. The Si3N4 acted as a charge enhancer, and the resulting web showed a high surface potential. When PVB was oleophobized by the addition of fluorinated polyurethane then doped with Si3N4 particles, the resulting oleophobic electret composite displayed the enhanced charge stability with a high surface potential. Overall, strategies for making a stable electret with a high surface potential have been discussed as: (1) hybridization of materials with different dielectric constants [41,55,69]; (2) reduction of surface energy to resist oil spreading or moisture absorption [24,30,33,74]; (3) reduction of electrical conductivity by using polymers with a high resistivity [45,55]. Table 2 summarizes the strategies for fabricating high-performing electret filters.

4. Fibrous Assembly for Advanced Filtration

4.1. Effect of Fiber Morphology on Filtration Performance and Resistance

As particles are captured by contacting on a single fiber, not by sieving, the fibrous structure with a high specific area and with long air pathways are beneficial for filtration. Most of the commercial filtering facepieces are made of meltblown web; as its open structure induces the tortuous air pathway, and allows breathability while capturing particles. As a versatile technique to design the submicron to micron fibers with various morphological structures [24,110,111,112,113,114], electrospinning has been employed [14,24,36,41,47,56,69,74,83,85,89,93,95,97,104,106,108,115,116,117]. Electrospun nanofibers can be advantageous for capturing small particles due to their high specific surface area and the inherent initial charges resulting from the electric field-driven process. However, nanofibers with a high packing density may result in a high resistance that leads to an earlier clogging [30,31,97,106]; thus, design parameters including fiber size, solidity, thickness, and basis weight should be prudently chosen to satisfy both filtration efficiency and resistance.
For submicron fibers with extensively interconnected pores, the aerodynamic behavior of airflow around the fibers is correlated with the mean free path of air molecules [96,118]. Theoretically, the mean free path of air molecule is 65.3 nm at 25 °C and 1 atm; when the fiber diameter is near 65.3 nm, the drag force of air stream was significantly lowered due to the slip flow effect [119]. When the slip effect was tested with a fiber diameter range of 60–100 nm with an aperture size (distance between adjacent fibers) of >3.5 μm, the air resistance decreased as the fiber diameter decreased [118]. Thus, efforts were made to further decrease the fiber size, and 2D nanonets with interlinked nanowires were made by the electrospinning process [42,81,82,83,104]. The nanonets were formed by adding the ionic liquids such as LiCl in the spinning solution to increase the conductivity, and the produced nanonets with ~20 nm fibers showed the enhanced slip effect, where the fiber size was much smaller than the mean free path of air (66 nm) [82]. Several polymers of nanofiber nets were fabricated including polyamide 6 [42,104], polyamide 56 [83], polyamide 66 [105], PAN [42], PVDF [42], polyurethane (PU) [42,82], poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide)/PU [86], etc., and those nanonets showed enhanced mechanical filtration performance. When nanonets were electrospun onto a non-planar geometry such as a rippled fibrous scaffold, the quality factor and the dust holding capacity were increased due to the increased surface area [104]. As an effort to enhance the particle filtration, metal organic frameworks (MOFs) were incorporated in nanofibers [78]. The porous structure and large surface area of MOFs not only enhanced the mechanical capturing of PM, but also the charges of metal ions enhanced the electrostatic interactions with particles [80,120].
While a high quality factor has been demonstrated for nanofibrous filters [24,30,121,122,123], those studies tested only the instantaneous performance including the initial efficiency and the initial resistance, rarely investigating the performance with the continuous mass loading. As the resistance gradually builds up with the mass loading of particles, the rate of increase with the continued loading may be more important in practical situations. In general, fluffy structures with large pores are preferred as they promote the depth filtration, leading to a lower resistance with the continued mass loading. Noticing that a nanofabric, commonly forming a compact structure, can be problematic to achieve a low resistance, Fan et al. [101] fabricated a fluffy, cotton candy-like structured web with fibers with ribbon morphology via electrospinning of the zein protein, using a mixture of different solvents that make the zein protein metastable. The ribbon-like fibers were curved to produce large pores within the web, giving a high air permeability and filtration capacity.

4.2. Hybrid Morphology and Layered Design of Fibrous Assembly

Hybrid fiber webs with multi-components and various structures have been extensively studied [84,85,93,94,103,106,107,108]. A hierarchical double layer structure with nanofibers and porous microfibers of poly(lactic acid) was fabricated by electrospinning; in this process, the pores of microfibers were designed by varying the relative environmental humidity, and the fiber size was controlled with the electrolytes such as LiBr in the pre-spinning solution [108]. The mass ratio of 1:5 of nanofiber:porous microfiber was reported to be optimum in giving a low resistance and high filtration efficiency in this hierarchical structure [108]. As a facile approach of making a binary structure with microfibers and nanofibers, a multi-spinning process was applied. Zhang et al. [93] made an intermingled binary structure with polysulfone (PSU) microfibers and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibers via multi-jet electrospinning, and the web had bimodal distribution of pore size with an excellent quality factor.
The main purpose of making a hybrid, multi-component structure is to improve the dust holding capacity and service life by reducing the resistance. The reduced resistance is also translated as breathing comfort for respirator users and energy saving for the HVAC system. Liu et al. [103] fabricated a bi-component spunbond web, employing polypropylene as a core and polyethylene as a sheath material. In this study, process parameters were controlled such as quenching temperature and drawing air pressure to produce a porous fluffy web [103]. The resulting spunbond web with through-air bonding showed an improved dust holding capacity compared to the conventional meltblown filter web or electrospun web. As another approach of making a hybrid structure, free surface electrospinning with a dual hopper was employed [106]. From one hopper, scaffold nanofibers of ~139 nm were produced, and from the other hopper, microspheres with nanofibers ~80 nm were produced. The fibers and spheres were intertwined and formed a 3D ternary structure, giving a low resistance filter media [106].
A sandwiched structure with dual morphology was fabricated via sequential electrospinning [84]; in this study, PAN bead-on-string fibers were sandwiched between polyamide (PA) nanonet layers. The produced structure had a stable cavity supported by the bead-on-string layer, and exhibited robust mechanical properties with a high quality factor. From the study by Zhang et al. [85], the dual layered structure was evolved to a triple layered structure for the multilevel physical capture of particles. The gradual variation of fiber diameter and pore size (~2.2, ~0.6, ~0.27 μm, respectively) was intended in this study, and the triple layers of microfiber, nanofiber, and nanonet morphologies were constructed by the sequential electrospinning. Notably, the electret charges of the produced web were eliminated by isopropanol to account for only the mechanical filtration efficiency of the web. The multi-layered hybrid construction has been suggested as a powerful approach for improving the quality factor and dust holding capacity, enabling the depth filtration with a multi-level capture of various sized particles [84,85,108,109]. Various morphological variations of filter media that have been investigated in recent studies are illustrated in Figure 6.

4.3. Modeling and Simulation for Particle Capture Behavior

Filtration modeling and simulation have been recently adopted to interpret the particle capture behavior of filter media [31,42,82,85,86,104,124,125,126]. The predictive capabilities of simulation depend on the accurate representation of filter construction. Micro computed tomography (μ-CT) can be employed to scan the 3D architecture of filter web, but the fiber size of several micrometers range is often too small to be precisely captured by this technique. Another approach was to use the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image to capture the 2D image of surface fibers, then to construct the fibrous assembly in depth layers to extract the 3D web formation [127,128]. For the realistic 3D representation of the web, a 3D shape of each fiber section was created by rotating with a particular diameter circle along the centerline, and then by stacking the individual nanofiber layers on each other with a particular space between them [62].
More recently, modeling modules such as FiberGeo and FilterDict have been used to extract the representative domains for filter construction to simulate the filtration process [85,86,104]. The resistance of the modeled filter was calculated to investigate the pressure distribution throughout the bulk of the filter material [82,85]. Moreover, the particle capture was simulated by tracking the particles across the filter media under a specific fluid condition. By feeding the particles with various sizes into the filter layers, the effect of fiber size and layer construction on depth filtration was investigated [85]. Likewise, the modeling and simulation technique can be applied to design high-performing filters, enabling the predictive engineering for superior filtration and prolonged service life. In this way, the modeling technique would save the massive load of experiments at least partially.

5. Multi-Functional Filter Development

5.1. Antimicrobial Filters

While ambient microbial aerosol and droplets can be filtered by the particulate filtration mechanism [24,129,130,131,132], more research attention was drawn to develop antimicrobial filters as a facile protective strategy [133,134,135,136]. The antimicrobial fibers are commonly based on the bactericidal effect of incorporated agents that disrupt the cell membrane. As antimicrobial agents, metals such as Ag, Au, and Cu, and photocatalytic metal oxides such as TiO2, ZnO, and MgO are commonly employed [134,135,137,138,139,140,141]. When the metal type is used, the metal ions and the reactive oxygen species (ROS) are released from the metal oxidation, and they cause cell death by damaging the proteins of membranes [138,142,143]. Silver has been widely employed as an antimicrobial agent [134,135,137,138,142,143]; when the silver nanoparticle-decorated silica hybrid particles were incorporated in the air filter material [143], the produced web showed the prompt and synergistic antibacterial activity against both Gram-negative (E. coli) and Gram-positive (S. epidermidis) bacteria.
The metal oxide of TiO2 has also been widely applied as an antimicrobial agent due to low cost and low toxicity. When TiO2 absorbs the UV light, the electron on the valence band overcomes the band gap and moves to the conductive band, generating electron hole pairs [144]. During this process, negative electrons generate O2−, and the positive electron holes generate the hydroxyl radicals which attack and kill the bacteria and viruses [145]. Naruporn et al. [146] fabricated a honeycomb structure of the TiO2-decorated hydroxyapatite composite (HA/TiO2), and this membrane showed 90–95% antibacterial efficacy against E. coli and S. aureus when exposed to UV light for 6 h. Recently, metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have been applied as a bactericidal agent, where ROS is generated from metal ions to kill bacteria [147]. ZIF-8, MOF-199, and Ag-MOF were tested by incorporating in the cellulose filters, and the incorporated filter showed ~99.9% bactericidal efficacy against E. coli [148].
Other than the bactericidal effect, anti-adhesive surfaces have been studied as to circumvent the adhesion of bacteria. The adhesion of bacterial cells on the flat surface is known to be mainly governed by the van der Waals interaction between the surface and the bacterial membrane. For fibrous surfaces, the adhesion mechanism is very complex, as the multiple factors including material chemistry, material morphology, cell morphology and chemistry need to be considered [149]. The criteria of surface properties for prevention of bacterial adhesion is not conclusive, but it has been generally reported that the moderately hydrophobic or moderately hydrophilic surfaces with a water contact angle in the range of 54 ~ 130° were subject to greater bacterial adhesion [150,151]. From the study where the wettability was controlled by the surface energy and nanoscale roughness, the superhydrophobic surface with nanoscale roughness showed a very low bacterial adhesion because the attachment of bacteria cell on the surface was prevented by the presence of trapped air in the nanoscale protrusions [150,152]. Furthermore, a superhydrophilic surface also showed low bacterial adhesion, because the tightly bound water layer caused the repulsive interaction between the bacteria and the surface [150,152]. While rough surfaces would afford favorable sites for bacterial adhesion with higher specific surface area, the effect of surface topography on cell adhesion is not conclusive as its interaction with bacterial morphology is varied [153,154,155]. More research is necessary to find the explicit criteria of surface topography and chemistry influencing the bacterial adhesion.

5.2. Gas and Vapor Adsorption

Toxic gases such as carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur oxides (SOx), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are common airborne threats for public health [156]. Filtration of gaseous matter is commonly performed by microporous sorbents and particles [156]. Activated carbons (ACs) have been exclusively used to adsorb gas and vapor [12,13], and depending on the type of gases, ACs can be modified with reactive compounds such as metal salts, acids, and amines to enhance the adsorption of different chemicals [11,157].
More recently, the metal organic framework (MOF) has drawn attention as a gas adsorbent, with its high porosity, large surface area, and thermal stability [79,80,148,158,159]. MOF is composed of a cluster of metal ions and organic linkers, where the linker length and the chemical functionality can be tailored [160]. Britt et al. [158] reported the possibility of selective adsorption of MOFs for different gases; in this study, MOF-5, IRMOFs-3, MOF-74, MOF-177, MOF-199, and IRMOF-62 were tested against sulfur dioxide, ammonia, chlorine, tetrahydrothiophene, benzene, dichloromethane, ethylene oxide, and carbon monoxide. When MOF was applied to the filter media, the chemical functionality of MOFs, open pore size, and the surface charge affected the capture of gas and particulate matters. For example, Bian et al. [79] used ZIF-67 on a PAN/cobalt (II) acetate electrospun filter and the produced web showed over 99% for PM2.5 filtration efficiency and 84% for formaldehyde removal efficiency. Zhang et al. [80] embedded ZIF-8, UiO-66-NH2, Mg-MOF-74, and MOF-199 within PAN, PS, and PVP fibers, and the resulting filter fibers showed high capturing efficiency against both particulate matters (PM2.5 and PM10) and SO2 from the SO2/N2 mixture. Other than the MOFs, metal oxide particles such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), zinc oxide (ZnO), and aluminum oxide (Al2O3) have also been used as detoxifying agents in the filters [72,137,161,162,163,164].
The addition of gas adsorbent particles to filter media may lead to an increase of resistance. Thus, for effective dual filtration for gas and particles, the filter needs to be properly designed so that the pores of the filter media are not clogged too early [27].

5.3. Reusable and Washable Filter

As the disposable filters may add an environmental burden [165], the washable filter has been developed to extend the service life of filter materials. As the washing procedure can lead to the charge decay of electrostatic filters, the washing is not generally recommended [166]. As a way to overcome the charge decay, application of tribocharged media has been investigated [166,167,168]. Tribocharging is generated when the materials with different triboelectricity contact each other. As the triboelectric generator has the ability to convert the mechanical energy into the electrical energy when two objects come into contact, the tribocharging can be regenerated when needed. Bai et al. [166] fabricated a washable multilayer triboelectric air filter with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and nylon fabrics. The triboelectricity of the developed material could be regenerated after washing, and the filter maintained ~96% filter efficiency against PM2.5 after five times of washing.
As another approach to designing a washable filter, Zhang et al. [169] used an ionic liquid polymer (ILP) on the melamine-formaldehyde (MF) sponge membrane. ILP had a high electrostatic potential, and with power supplied, the ILP-coated filter showed an effective filtration efficiency. In this invention, the filter itself acted as an electrostatic conductor and reservoir of dust. The filter can be cleaned and reused until 10 times of washing, as long as the coated material functions upon the power supply.
Several studies investigated the reusability of filter materials after cleaning [78,170]. However, most of the work examined the efficiency of individual filter materials they developed, and the results cannot be generalized. As the reusability would be dependent on the extent of charge dissipation and mechanical deformation of filters, the factors including charging process, polymer properties, and physical structure of filter material are all important. Further studies are needed on the reusability of filters with the varied material properties and maintenance methods.

5.4. Environmentally Sustainable Filters

Common filter materials are PP and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and they are hardly biodegradable. With the growing concern on the increasing amount of filter waste, filter development using biodegradable materials is gaining more attention. Soy bean protein is one of the actively used biomaterials with its availability as low-cost and processability. In many studies, soy protein was electrospun to form nanofibers, and the produced nanofibers demonstrated good filtration performance against solid particles and smoke [101,171,172,173]. Souzandeh et al. [171] fabricated a nanoweb with soy protein isolate and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), and reported that the functional groups of protein was beneficial in attracting airborne particles and smoke.
Other protein materials such as silk, gelatin, and chitosan have been investigated for their effectiveness as a filter material [95,174,175]. Silk fibroin nanofibers showed 98.8% filtration efficiency for PM2.5 with a relatively lower resistance [95]. The gelatin nanofibers were electrospun onto the cellulose paper, and their layers were used as a gas filter, which exhibited filtration performance >80% for various toxic chemicals including HCHO, CO, SO2, and VOCS [175]. Chitosan nanocomposite blended polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) membrane showed >95% for PM removal and >91% for antibacterial efficiency against E. coli and S. aureus [174]. Polylactic acid (PLA) is a bio-derived and biodegradable polyester, and its applicability as a filter material has been studied [97,108,111,112]. Likewise, PVA was studied as a biodegradable filter material [176].
In addition to employing the bio-derived polymers, waste recycled filters have also been developed. Zulfi et al. [100] recycled the acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) waste into a nanofiber web via electrospinning, and applied it as a filter. The ABS membrane was processable with solvents of dimethylacetamide, dimethylformamide, and tetrahydrofuran, and the resulting webs exhibited PM2.5 filtration efficiency greater than 95%. Polystyrene filter webs were made from the recycled waste of high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) and expanded polystyrene (EPS), and the recycled webs showed the filtration efficiency greater than 99.99%, which was comparable to the commercial high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter [98,99].
In addition to the efforts using biodegradable and recycled resources, the development of an environmentally responsible process is gaining great attention. While the electrospinning process is regarded as a promising method for manufacturing effective filter media, potential risks associated with harmful organic vapor generated from the process need to be carefully monitored [177]. As the ‘green electrospinning’ method, solvent-free electrospinning [178,179,180] and electrospinning with non-toxic solvents [180,181,182,183,184] are being studied. Electrospinning with an aqueous pre-spinning solution can easily achieve the non-toxic manufacturing, but its vulnerability to moisture remains as a drawback. With such a restraint, the thermal cross-linking method has been employed as a post-treatment of electrospinning [181,182,183]. Thermal cross-linking enhanced the thermal and chemical stabilities of polymeric membrane by forming a stable three-dimensional network structure [185], and produced an efficient filter media. In many studies [181,182,183], PVA was used as a water-soluble polymer in pre-spinning solution, and esterification of PVA was performed by the thermal cross-linking, producing a high efficiency filter material (>99%). Moreover, photo cross-linking via ultraviolet (UV) irradiation was conducted as another way of ‘green electrospinning’ [184], where the photo cross-linked PVA/chitosan nanofibers showed high filtration efficiency (>99%). Much endeavor is to be made to reduce the environmental impacts by the eco-friendly manufacturing process and by filter development with biodegradable, recyclable, or reusable resources.

6. Summary and Outlook

With increasing air pollution, there is ramping attention on the filtration devices. A number of studies have been conducted in the past ten years to explore the solutions for serious air pollution, especially in the Asia region. The main constituents of airborne pollutants include particulate matters of solid particles, liquid aerosol, microbial aerosol/droplets, gas, and vapor. In this paper, research efforts on the fiber-based particulate filters were reviewed with a focus on the following: (1) Understanding the filtration mechanism in relation to environmental factors such as face velocity, aerosol type, heat, humidity, and solvent exposure; (2) developing novel filter materials for enhanced filtration against various pollutants; (3) designing a breathable filter by lowering the pressure drop of filter media and filter assembly; (4) applying modeling and simulation techniques to understand the filtration process and to predict the performance; (5) exploring reusable and eco-friendly filter materials.
The overall mechanical filtration efficiency is the result of a combined effect of interception, inertial impaction, diffusion, and gravitational settling, and those mechanisms are affected by the particle size and the air velocity. There exists the most penetrating particle size (MPPS) range where the particle capture is the least effective, and the electrostatically charged filters significantly improves capturing particles especially in MPPS. An electret filter as opposed to a mechanical filter generally gives a higher quality factor, as the electrostatic attraction contributes as an additional capture mechanism. With such benefits of electret filters, long-lasting charges are the key to sustain the filtration efficiency.
Efforts have been made to increase the surface potential of electret filters and to enhance the long-term service performance, by exploring various material options and process techniques. The electrostatic charges of filter materials are influenced by environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity, and presence of organic vapors, and also by the polymer properties such as electric conductivity and moisture absorption capacity. In general, the polymers with low dielectric constants and low moisture absorption were advantageous for retaining charges longer. Filtration efficiency was more rapidly deteriorated by the oily aerosol than the solid aerosol, because the oily aerosol quickly spread on the charged fibers then masking the charged sites. As an easy solution to this, an anti-wetting treatment of fibrous media was conducted to delay the wetting of oily liquid.
As much efforts were made to lower the resistance of filter media by controlling the fiber size from nano to micrometer scale, and designing large pores and space between the fibers. The hierarchical layer design and multi-component web structure were rather effective in delaying the clogging of filters. Multifunctional filters that show antimicrobial effect and/or gas and vapor adsorption have been studied with great interest. Along with the emphasis on the environmental sustainability, reusability of filters and environmentally sustainable filters have been investigated. In addition to material development, modeling and simulation techniques have been adopted to interpret the particle capture behavior; this technique would save a massive load of experiments in the future.
With the sporadic occurrence of epidemic outbreaks such as COVID-10, SARS, H1N1 influenza, the role of air purifying respirators became an essential to the public. Much work has been done in maturing the research field of air filtration, but there is much to be done in the future. So far, most of the research has been focused on developing novel materials by the lab-scale processes, without much consideration of scalability. The scalable process needs to be further investigated to realize the exploratory concept materials. Moreover, in most of the research, the developed material was evaluated for the instantaneous performance in demonstrating the superior performance of the newly developed materials. As the filtration performance should sustain during the continuous loading of pollutants in real application, the performance evolvement with the continued exposure to pollutants needs to be further investigated.
While filtration performance against bacterial aerosol and droplets has been examined, rarely has the filter been evaluated for virus filtration, mainly due to the limited availability of test setup with the proper biosafety. Test methods that simulate the virus filtration need to be developed. Moreover, as novel materials are being developed, the toxicity of functional agents should be carefully analyzed. Together with the functional performance, comfort properties such as breathability and vapor transmission need to be prudently examined for assuring the protection with the minimal physiological burden.

Author Contributions

Investigation, S.J. and J.K.; conceptualization, J.K.; analytical discussion, S.J. and J.K.; writing, S.J. and J.K.; funding acquisition and supervision of investigation, J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program through Seoul National University, and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2020R1F1A1074295).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Feng, S.; Gao, D.; Liao, F.; Zhou, F.; Wang, X. The Health Effects of Ambient PM2.5 and Potential Mechanisms. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 128, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cao, C.; Jiang, W.; Wang, B.; Fang, J.; Lang, J.; Tian, G.; Jiang, J.; Zhu, T.F. Inhalable Microorganisms in Beijing’s PM2.5 and PM10 Pollutants during a Severe Smog Event. Environ Sci Technol. 2014, 48, 1499–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chu-Van, T.; Ristovski, Z.; Pourkhesalian, A.M.; Rainey, T.; Garaniya, V.; Abbassi, R.; Kimball, R.; Luong Cong, N.; Jahangiri, S.; Brown, R.J. A Comparison of Particulate Matter and Gaseous Emission Factors from Two Large Cargo Vessels during Manoeuvring Conditions. Energy Rep. 2019, 5, 1390–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tellier, R. Review of Aerosol Transmission of Influenza A Virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 1657–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gralton, J.; Tovey, E.; McLaws, M.L.; Rawlinson, W.D. The Role of Particle Size in Aerosolised Pathogen Transmission: A Review. J. Infect. 2011, 62, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hinds, W.C. Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Toronto, ON, Canada, 1999; ISBN 9780471194101. [Google Scholar]
  7. Betha, R.; Selvam, V.; Blake, D.R.; Balasubramanian, R. Emission Characteristics of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds in a Commercial Printing Center. J. Air Waste Manag. 2011, 61, 1093–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bresee, R.R.; Ko, W.-C. Fiber Formation during Melt Blowing. Int. Nonwovens J. 2003, os-12, 1558925003os-1551200209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Subbiah, T.; Bhat, G.S.; Tock, R.W.; Parameswaran, S.; Ramkumar, S.S. Electrospinning of Nanofibers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 96, 557–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montefusco, A.s.F. The Use of Nonwovens in Air Filtration. Filtr. Sep. 2005, 42, 30–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Romero, J.V.; Smith, J.W.H.; Sullivan, B.M.; Mallay, M.G.; Croll, L.M.; Reynolds, J.A.; Andress, C.; Simon, M.; Dahn, J.R. Gas Adsorption Properties of the Ternary ZnO/CuO/CuCl2 Impregnated Activated Carbon System for Multigas Respirator Applications Assessed through Combinatorial Methods and Dynamic Adsorption Studies. ACS Comb. Sci. 2011, 13, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cheng, W.H. Adsorption Characteristics of Granular Activated Carbon and SPME Indication of VOCs Breakthrough. Aeroso Air Qual. Res. 2008, 8, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Shiue, A.; Kang, Y.-H.; Hu, S.-C.; Jou, G.-t.; Lin, C.-H.; Hu, M.-C.; Lin, S.-I. Vapor Adsorption Characteristics of Toluene in an Activated Carbon Adsorbent-Loaded Nonwoven Fabric Media for Chemical Filters Applied to Cleanrooms. Build. Environ. 2010, 45, 2123–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, M.; Han, J.; Wang, F.; Shao, W.; Xiong, R.; Zhang, Q.; Pan, H.; Yang, Y.; Samal, S.K.; Zhang, F.; et al. Electrospun Nanofibers Membranes for Effective Air Filtration. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1600353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Heikkinen, M.S.A.; Harley, N.H. Experimental Investigation of Sintered Porous Metal Filters. J. Aerosol Sci. 2000, 31, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, K.W.; Liu, B.Y.H. Theoretical Study of Aerosol Filtration by Fibrous Filters. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1982, 1, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, C.C.; Lehtimäki, M.; Willeke, K. Aerosol Penetration through Filtering Facepieces and Respirator Cartridges. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1992, 53, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maroto, M.D. Filtration Efficiency of Intermediate Ventilation Air Filters on Ultrafine and Submicron Particles; Chalmers University of Technology: Göteborg, Sweden, 2011; Volume 14, pp. 14:1–14:75. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, C.-S. Electrostatic Forces in Fibrous Filters—A Review. Powder Technol. 2001, 118, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ardkapan, S.R.; Johnson, M.S.; Yazdi, S.; Afshari, A.; Bergsøe, N.C. Filtration Efficiency of an Electrostatic Fibrous Filter: Studying Filtration Dependency on Ultrafine Particle Exposure and Composition. J. Aerosol Sci. 2014, 72, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ding, B.; Wang, X.; Yu, J. Electrospinning: Nanofabrication and Applications, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1–832. ISBN 9780128134412. [Google Scholar]
  22. NIOSH. TEB-APR-STP-0056 Determination of Particulate Filter Efficiency Level for R95 Series Filters Against Liquid Particulates for Non-Powered, Air-Purifying Respirators.; CDC: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. NIOSH. TEB-APR-STP-0059 Determination of Particulate Filter Efficiency Level for N95 Series Filters Against Solid Particulates for Non-Powered, Air-Purifying Respirators; CDC: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jung, S.; An, J.; Na, H.; Kim, J. Surface Energy of Filtration Media Influencing the Filtration Performance against Solid Particles, Oily Aerosol, and Bacterial Aerosol. Polymers 2019, 11, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Barrett, L.W.; Rousseau, A.D. Aerosol Loading Performance of Electret Filter Media. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1998, 59, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xia, T.; Bian, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, C. Relationship between Pressure Drop and Face Velocity for Electrospun Nanofiber Filters. Energy Build. 2018, 158, 987–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Z.; Ji, Z.; Shang, J.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, R. Improved Design of Two-Stage Filter Cartridges for High Sulfur Natural Gas Purification. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 198, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Plebani, C.; Listrani, S.; Di Luigi, M. Filtering Facepieces: Effect of Oily Aerosol Load on Penetration Through the Filtering Material. Med. Lav. 2010, 101, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Rengasamy, S.; Miller, A.; Vo, E.; Eimer, B.C. Filter Performance Degradation of Electrostatic N95 and P100 Filtering Facepiece Respirators by Dioctyl Phthalate Aerosol Loading. J. Eng. Fiber Fabr. 2013, 8, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roh, S.; Kim, S.; Kim, J. Facile Functionalization via Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition for the Effective Filtration of Oily Aerosol. Polymers 2019, 11, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Roh, S.; Park, K.; Kim, J. Design of Web-to-Web Spacing for the Reduced Pressure Drop and Effective Depth Filtration. Polymers 2019, 11, 1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Thomas, D.; Penicot, P.; Contal, P.; Leclerc, D.; Vendel, J. Clogging of Fibrous Filters by Solid Aerosol Particles Experimental and Modelling Study. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 3549–3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wei, X.; Chen, F.; Wang, H.; Zhou, H.; Ji, Z.; Lin, T. Efficient Removal of Aerosol Oil-Mists Using Superoleophobic Filters. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 871–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, C.; Fang, J.; Low, Z.-X.; Feng, S.; Hu, M.; Zhong, Z.; Xing, W. Amphiphobic PFTMS@nano-SiO2/ePTFE Membrane for Oil Aerosol Removal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 10431–10438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Łowis, B. Parameters Characterizing the Charge State of Dielectrics. Mater. Sci. Pol. 2017, 35, 601–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Cho, B.M.; Nam, Y.S.; Cheon, J.Y.; Park, W.H. Residual Charge and Filtration Efficiency of Polycarbonate Fibrous Membranes Prepared by Electrospinning. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 41340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tsai, P.P.; Schreuder-Gibson, H.; Gibson, P. Different Electrostatic Methods for Making Electret Filters. J. Electrostat. 2002, 54, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, G.; Xiao, H.; Wang, X. Study on Parameter optimization of Corona Charging for Melt-Blown Polypropylene Electret Nonwoven Web Used as Air Filter. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE 9th International Conference on the Properties and Applications of Dielectric Materials, Harbin, China, 19–23 July 2009; pp. 389–391. [Google Scholar]
  39. Van Turnhout, J. The Use of Polymers for Electrets. J. Electrostat. 1975, 1, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Horn, R.G.; Smith, D.T. Contact Electrification and Adhesion Between Dissimilar Materials. Science 1992, 256, 362–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, S.; Zhao, X.; Yin, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Electret Polyvinylidene Fluoride Nanofibers Hybridized by Polytetrafluoroethylene Nanoparticles for High-Efficiency Air Filtration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 23985–23994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Liu, L.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. High-Performance PM0.3 Air Filters Using Self-Polarized Electret Nanofiber/Nets. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1909554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bhardwaj, N.; Kundu, S.C. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 325–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Van turnhout, J.; Adamse, J.W.C.; Hoeneveld, W.J. Electret Filters for High-Efficiency Air Cleaning. J. Electrostat. 1980, 8, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, J.; Kim, J. Material Properties Influencing the Charge Decay of Electret Filters and their Impact on Filtration Performance. Polymers 2020, 12, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Hoang, A.T.; Serdyuk, Y.V.; Gubanski, S.M. Charging and Discharge Currents in Low-Density Polyethylene and its Nanocomposite. Energies 2020, 13, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Collins, G.; Federici, J.; Imura, Y.; Catalani, L.H. Charge Generation, Charge Transport, and Residual Charge in the Electrospinning of Polymers: A Review of Issues and Complications. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 044701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, G.; Xu, Z. Charge Trapping and Detrapping in Polymeric Materials. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 123707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Lu, H.; Meng, X. Correlation between Band Gap, Dielectric Constant, Young’s Modulus and Melting Temperature of GaN Nanocrystals and their Size and Shape Dependences. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ravichandran, R.; Wang, A.X.; Wager, J.F. Solid State Dielectric Screening versus Band Gap Trends and Implications. Opt. Mater. 2016, 60, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hervé, P.; Vandamme, L.K.J. General Relation between Refractive Index and Energy Gap in Semiconductors. Infrared Phys. Technol. 1994, 35, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Teyssedre, G.; Laurent, C. Charge Transport Modeling in Insulating Polymers: From Molecular to Macroscopic Scale. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2005, 12, 857–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bakulin, A.A.; Rao, A.; Pavelyev, V.G.; van Loosdrecht, P.H.M.; Pshenichnikov, M.S.; Niedzialek, D.; Cornil, J.; Beljonne, D.; Friend, R.H. The Role of Driving Energy and Delocalized States for Charge Separation in Organic Semiconductors. Science 2012, 335, 1340–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Zhao, X.L.; Li, Y.; Hua, T.; Jiang, P.; Yin, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Low-Resistance Dual-Purpose Air Filter Releasing Negative Ions and Effectively Capturing PM2.5. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 12054–12063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jiang, P.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Liao, Y.; Hua, T.; Yin, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Moisture and Oily Molecules Stable Nanofibrous Electret Membranes for Effectively Capturing PM2.5. Compos. Commun. 2017, 6, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schreuder-Gibson, H.L.; Gibson, P.; Tsai, P. Cooperative Charging Effects of Fibers from Electrospinning of Electrically Dissimilar Polymers. Int. Nonwovens J. 2004, os-13, 1558925004os-1551300406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Choi, H.J.; Park, E.S.; Kim, J.U.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, M.H. Experimental Study on Charge Decay of Electret Filter Due to Organic Solvent Exposure. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Xiao, H.; Song, Y.; Chen, G. Correlation between Charge Decay and Solvent Effect for Melt-blown Polypropylene Electret Filter Fabrics. J. Electrostat. 2014, 72, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jasper, W.; Hinestroza, J.; Mohan, A.; Kim, J.; Shiels, B.; Gunay, M.; Thompson, D.; Barker, R. Effect of Xylene Exposure on the Performance of Electret Filter Media. J. Aerosol Sci. 2006, 37, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jasper, W.; Mohan, A.; Hinestroza, J.; Barker, R. Degradation Processes in Corona-Charged Electret Filter-Media with Exposure to Ethyl Benzene. J. Eng. Fiber Fabr. 2007, 2, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Pan, C.; Tang, J.; Wang, D.; Luo, Y.; Zhuo, R.; Fu, M. Decay Characters of Charges on an Insulator Surface after Different Types of Discharge. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2017, 19, 075503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Al Rai, A.; Stojanovska, E.; Fidan, G.; Yetgin, E.; Polat, Y.; Kilic, A.; Demir, A.; Yilmaz, S. Structure and Performance of Electroblown PVDF-Based Nanofibrous Electret Filters. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2020, 60, 1186–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sun, Q.; Leung, W.W.F. Enhanced Nano-aerosol Loading Performance of Multilayer PVDF Nanofiber Electret Filters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 240, 116606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hua, T.; Li, Y.; Zhao, X.; Yin, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Stable Low Resistance Air Filter under High Humidity Endowed by Self-Emission Far-Infrared for Effective PM2.5 Capture. Compos. Commun. 2017, 6, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yu, X.; Li, C.; Tian, H.; Yuan, L.; Xiang, A.; Li, J.; Wang, C.; Rajulu, A.V. Hydrophobic Cross-Linked Zein-Based Nanofibers with Efficient Air Filtration and Improved Moisture Stability. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 396, 125373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Huang, S.; Park, H.; Park, Y.K.; Jo, Y.M. Dynamic Trajectory and Capture of Fine Dust by Magnetic Mesh Filters Based on a Particle Velocity Model. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ahn, H.J.; Song, K.B.; Lee, Y.E.; Lee, J.T.; Cho, S.A.; Kim, K.H. Surface Change of Dental Amalgam After Treatment with 10% Carbamide Peroxide. Dent. Mater. J. 2006, 25, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Son, Y.S.; Dinh, T.V.; Chung, S.G.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.C. Removal of Particulate Matter Emitted from a Subway Tunnel Using Magnetic Filters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 2870–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kim, J.; Hong, C.S.; Bae, G.N.; Jung, J.H. Electrospun Magnetic Nanoparticle-Decorated Nanofiber Filter and Its Applications to High-Efficiency Air Filtration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 11967–11975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Cho, D.; Naydich, A.; Frey, M.W.; Joo, Y.L. Further Improvement of Air Filtration Efficiency of Cellulose Filters Coated with Nanofibers via Inclusion of Electrostatically Active Nanoparticles. Polymer 2013, 54, 2364–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Givehchi, R.; Li, Q.; Tan, Z. The Effect of Electrostatic Forces on Filtration Efficiency of Granular Filters. Powder Technol. 2015, 277, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Limmongkon, Y.; Johns, J.; Charerntanyarak, L. Preparation of a TiO2-Coated Photocatalytic Air Filter for Use with an Electrostatic Air Filter Pack for Xylene Removal. ScienceAsia 2013, 39, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Gobi, N.; Vijayalakshmi, E.; Robert, B.; Srinivasan, N.R. Development of PAN Nano Fibrous Filter Hybridized by SiO2 Nanoparticles Electret for High Efficiency Air Filtration. J. Polym. Mater. 2018, 35, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, N.; Zhu, Z.; Sheng, J.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Superamphiphobic Nanofibrous Membranes for Effective Filtration of Fine Particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 428, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cai, R.R.; Zhang, L.Z.; Bao, A.B. PM Collection Performance of Electret Filters Electrospun with Different Dielectric Materials-A Numerical Modeling and Experimental Study. Build. Environ. 2018, 131, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Son, Y.S.; Oh, Y.H.; Choi, I.Y.; Dinh, T.V.; Chung, S.G.; Lee, J.H.; Park, D.; Kim, J.C. Development of a Magnetic Hybrid Filter to Reduce PM10 in a Subway Platform. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 368, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fan, G.; Diao, Y.; Huang, B.; Yang, H.; Liu, X.; Chen, J. Preparation of Superhydrophobic and Superoleophilic Polylactic Acid Nonwoven Filter for Oil/Water Separation. J. Disper. Sci. Technol. 2020, 41, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Koo, W.-T.; Jang, J.-S.; Qiao, S.; Hwang, W.; Jha, G.; Penner, R.M.; Kim, I.-D. Hierarchical Metal–Organic Framework-Assembled Membrane Filter for Efficient Removal of Particulate Matter. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 19957–19963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Bian, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, S.; Yao, C.; Ren, W.; Chen, C.; Zhang, L. Metal–Organic Framework-Based Nanofiber Filters for Effective Indoor Air Quality Control. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 15807–15814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, Y.; Yuan, S.; Feng, X.; Li, H.; Zhou, J.; Wang, B. Preparation of Nanofibrous Metal–Organic Framework Filters for Efficient Air Pollution Control. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 5785–5788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Yin, X.; Li, Z.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Tailoring Mechanically Robust Poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) Nanofiber/nets for Ultrathin High-Efficiency Air Filter. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Zuo, F.; Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Fong, H.; Yin, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Free-Standing Polyurethane Nanofiber/Nets Air Filters for Effective PM Capture. Small 2017, 13, 1702139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, B.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Efficient and Reusable Polyamide-56 Nanofiber/Nets Membrane with Bimodal Structures for Air Filtration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 457, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Sandwich Structured Polyamide-6/Polyacrylonitrile Nanonets/Bead-on-String Composite Membrane for Effective Air Filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 152, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, S.; Tang, N.; Cao, L.; Yin, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Highly Integrated Polysulfone/Polyacrylonitrile/Polyamide-6 Air Filter for Multilevel Physical Sieving Airborne Particles. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 29062–29072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Tang, N.; Ali, N.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Highly Efficient, Transparent, and Multifunctional Air Filters Using Self-Assembled 2D Nanoarchitectured Fibrous Networks. Acs Nano 2019, 13, 13501–13512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Liu, L.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. A Fluffy Dual-Network Structured Nanofiber/Net Filter Enables High-Efficiency Air Filtration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1904108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tian, H.; Fu, X.; Zheng, M.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xiang, A.; Zhong, W.-H. Natural Polypeptides Treat Pollution Complex: Moisture-Resistant Multi-Functional Protein Nanofabrics for Sustainable Air Filtration. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 4265–4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, R.; Liu, C.; Hsu, P.-C.; Zhang, C.; Liu, N.; Zhang, J.; Lee, H.R.; Lu, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Chu, S.; et al. Nanofiber Air Filters with High-Temperature Stability for Efficient PM2.5 Removal from the Pollution Sources. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 3642–3649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Gao, N.; Li, M.; Jing, W.; Fan, Y.; Xu, N. Improving the Filtration Performance of ZrO2 Membrane in Non-Polar Organic Solvents by Surface Hydrophobic Modification. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhou, M.; Hu, M.; Quan, Z.; Zhang, H.; Qin, X.; Wang, R.; Yu, J. Polyacrylonitrile/Polyimide Composite Sub-Micro Fibrous Membranes for Precise Filtration of PM0.26 Pollutants. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 578, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Mao, X.; Si, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhao, F.; Ding, B.; Yu, J. Silica Nanofibrous Membranes with Robust Flexibility and Thermal Stability for High-Efficiency Fine Particulate Filtration. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 12216–12223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Yin, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Anti-Deformed Polyacrylonitrile/Polysulfone Composite Membrane with Binary Structures for Effective Air Filtration. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 8086–8095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tang, M.; Chen, S.C.; Chang, D.Q.; Xie, X.; Sun, J.; Pui, D.Y.H. Filtration Efficiency and Loading Characteristics of PM2.5 through Composite Filter Media Consisting of Commercial HVAC Electret Media and Nanofiber Layer. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 198, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, C.; Wu, S.; Jian, M.; Xie, J.; Xu, L.; Yang, X.; Zheng, Q.; Zhang, Y. Silk Nanofibers as High Efficient and Lightweight Air Filter. Nano Res. 2016, 9, 2590–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hung, C.-H.; Leung, W.W.-F. Filtration of Nano-Aerosol Using Nanofiber Filter under Low Peclet Number and Transitional Flow Regime. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 79, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, Z.; Zhao, C.; Pan, Z. Porous Bead-on-String Poly(lactic acid) Fibrous Membranes for Air Filtration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 441, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Rajak, A.; Hapidin, D.A.; Iskandar, F.; Munir, M.M.; Khairurrijal, K. Controlled Morphology of Electrospun Nanofibers from Waste Expanded Polystyrene for Aerosol Filtration. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 425602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Zulfi, A.; Munir, M.M.; Hapidin, D.A.; Rajak, A.; Edikresnha, D.; Iskandar, F.; Khairurrijal, K. Air Filtration Media from Electrospun Waste High-Impact Polystyrene Fiber Membrane. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 035049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zulfi, A.; Hapidin, D.A.; Munir, M.M.; Iskandar, F.; Khairurrijal, K. The Synthesis of Nanofiber Membranes from Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Waste Using Electrospinning for Use as Air Filtration Media. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 30741–30751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Fan, X.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, M.; Dunne, F.; Liu, T.; Fu, X.; Kong, L.; Pan, S.; Zhong, W.-H. Morphology Engineering of Protein Fabrics for Advanced and Sustainable Filtration. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 21585–21595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cai, R.R.; Lu, H.; Zhang, L.Z. Evaluation the Effect of Fiber Alignment on Particle Collection Performance of Mechanical/Electret Filters Based on Voronoi Tessellations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 197, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, L.; Huang, C.; Wu, H.; Wang, R.; Jin, X. Low Resistance Bicomponent Spunbond Materials for Fresh Air Filtration with Ultra-High Dust holding Capacity. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 43879–43887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Zuo, F.; Yin, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. A Controlled Design of Ripple-Like Polyamide-6 Nanofiber/Nets Membrane for High-Efficiency Air Filter. Small 2017, 13, 1603151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, N.; Wang, X.; Ding, B.; Yu, J.; Sun, G. Tunable Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Polyamide-66 Nano-Fiber/Nets for High Efficiency Fine Particulate Filtration. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 1445–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gao, H.; Yang, Y.; Akampumuza, O.; Hou, J.; Zhang, H.; Qin, X. A Low Filtration Resistance Three-Dimensional Composite Membrane Fabricated via Free Surface Electrospinning for Effective PM2.5 Capture. Environ. Sci. Nano 2017, 4, 864–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yuan, Y.; Zhao, J.; Dong, C.; Shao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Zhong, C.; Ye, L.; Song, R.; Zhang, H.; et al. Improved Electret Properties of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride)/Lithium Niobate Nanocomposites for Applications in Air Filters. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2019, 304, 1900003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wang, Z.; Pan, Z. Preparation of Hierarchical Structured Nano-Sized/Porous Poly(lactic acid) Composite Fibrous Membranes for Air Filtration. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 356, 1168–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Onur, A.; Ng, A.; Batchelor, W.; Garnier, G. Multi-Layer Filters: Adsorption and Filtration Mechanisms for Improved Separation. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Yuan, Y.; Choi, S.-O.; Kim, J. Analysis of Contact Area between Water and Irregular Fibrous Surface for Prediction of Wettability. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 73313–73322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Park, S.C.; Yuan, Y.; Choi, K.; Choi, S.-O.; Kim, J. Doxorubicin Release Controlled by Induced Phase Separation and Use of a Co-Solvent. Materials 2018, 11, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Yuan, Y.; Choi, K.; Choi, S.-O.; Kim, J. Early Stage Release Control of an Anticancer Drug by Drug-Polymer Miscibility in a Hydrophobic Fiber-Based Drug Delivery System. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 19791–19803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Brown, E.; Park, S.-H.; Elangovan, A.; Yuan, Y.; Kim, J.; Sun, X.S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, G.; Li, J. Facilitating High-Capacity V2O5 Cathodes with Stable Two and Three Li+ Insertion Using a Hybrid Membrane Structure Consisting of Amorphous V2O5 Shells Coaxially Deposited on Electrospun Carbon Nanofibers. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 269, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Yuan, Y.; Hays, M.P.; Hardwidge, P.R.; Kim, J. Surface Characteristics Influencing Bacterial Adhesion to Polymeric Substrates. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 14254–14261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Wang, Y.; Li, W.; Xia, Y.; Jiao, X.; Chen, D. Electrospun Flexible Self-Standing γ-Alumina Fibrous Membranes and their Potential as High-Efficiency Fine Particulate Filtration Media. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 15124–15131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Choi, J.; Yang, B.J.; Bae, G.-N.; Jung, J.H. Herbal Extract Incorporated Nanofiber Fabricated by an Electrospinning Technique and its Application to Antimicrobial Air Filtration. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 25313–25320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, C.; Hsu, P.-C.; Lee, H.-W.; Ye, M.; Zheng, G.; Liu, N.; Li, W.; Cui, Y. Transparent Air Filter for High-Efficiency PM2.5 Capture. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Zhao, X.; Wang, S.; Yin, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Slip-Effect Functional Air Filter for Efficient Purification of PM2.5. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Maze, B.; Tafreshi, H.V.; Wang, Q.; Pourdeyhimi, B. A Simulation of Unsteady-State Filtration via Nanofiber Media at Reduced Operating Pressures. J. Aerosol Sci. 2007, 38, 550–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Li, J.-R.; Kuppler, R.J.; Zhou, H.-C. Selective Gas Adsorption and Separation in Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1477–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Podgórski, A.; Bałazy, A.; Gradoń, L. Application of Nanofibers to Improve the Filtration Efficiency of the Most Penetrating Aerosol Particles in Fibrous Filters. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61, 6804–6815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Liu, Y.; Park, M.; Ding, B.; Kim, J.; El-Newehy, M.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; Kim, H.-Y. Facile Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile/Poly(acrylic acid) Nanofibrous Membranes for High Efficiency Particulate Air Filtration. Fiber Polym. 2015, 16, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Li, Q.; Xu, Y.; Wei, H.; Wang, X. An Electrospun Polycarbonate Nanofibrous Membrane for High Efficiency Particulate Matter Filtration. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 65275–65281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sambaer, W.; Zatloukal, M.; Kimmer, D. 3D Modeling of Filtration Process via Polyurethane Nanofiber Based Nonwoven Filters Prepared by Electrospinning Process. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Chang, D.-Q.; Chen, S.-C.; Pui, D.Y.H. Capture of Sub-500 nm Particles Using Residential Electret HVAC Filter Media-Experiments and Modeling. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2016, 16, 3349–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Wu, G.; Miao, Z.; Jasper, W.J.; Kuznetsov, A.V. Modeling of Submicron Particle Filtration in an Electret Monolith Filter with Rectangular Cross-Section Microchannels. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Wu, J.; Akampumuza, O.; Liu, P.; Quan, Z.; Zhang, H.; Qin, X.; Wang, R.; Yu, J. 3D Structure Design and Simulation for Efficient Particles Capture: The Influence of Nanofiber Diameter and Distribution. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 23, 100897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Tafti, A.P.; Kirkpatrick, A.B.; Alavi, Z.; Owen, H.A.; Yu, Z. Recent Advances in 3D SEM Surface Reconstruction. Micron 2015, 78, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Nicosia, A.; Gieparda, W.; Foksowicz-Flaczyk, J.; Walentowska, J.; Wesolek, D.; Vazquez, B.; Prodi, F.; Belosi, F. Air Filtration and Antimicrobial Capabilities of Electrospun PLA/PHB Containing Ionic Liquid. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 154, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Qian, Y.; Willeke, K.; Grinshpun, S.A.; Donnelly, J.; Coffey, C.C. Performance of N95 Respirators: Filtration Efficiency for Airborne Microbial and Inert Particles. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1998, 59, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Leonas, K.; Jones, C. The Relationship of Fabric Properties and Bacterial Filtration Efficiency for Selected Surgical Face Masks. J. Text. Appar. Technol. Manag. 2003, 3, 2:1–2:8. [Google Scholar]
  132. Selatile, M.K.; Ojijo, V.; Sadiku, R.; Ray, S.S. Development of Bacterial-Resistant Electrospun Polylactide Membrane for Air Filtration Application: Effects of Reduction Methods and their Loadings. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2020, 178, 109205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhuang, Y.; Ren, H.; Geng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, L.; Xu, K. Inactivation of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Municipal Wastewater by Chlorination, Ultraviolet, and Ozonation Disinfection. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 7037–7044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Fernández, J.G.; Almeida, C.A.; Fernández-Baldo, M.A.; Felici, E.; Raba, J.; Sanz, M.I. Development of Nitrocellulose Membrane Filters Impregnated with Different Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles Applied to Water Purification. Talanta 2016, 146, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Vukusic, T.; Shi, M.; Herceg, Z.; Rogers, S.; Estifaee, P.; Thagard, S.M. Liquid-Phase Electrical Discharge Plasmas with a Silver Electrode for Inactivation of a Pure Culture of Escherichia coli in Water. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 38, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Wagner-Graham, M.A.; Barndt, H.; Sunderland, M.A. Measurement of Antibacterial Properties of Foil-Backed Electrospun Nanofibers. Fash. Text. 2019, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Vanangamudi, A.; Hamzah, S.; Singh, G. Synthesis of Hybrid Hydrophobic Composite Air Filtration Membranes for Antibacterial Activity and Chemical Detoxification with High Particulate Filtration Efficiency (PFE). Chem. Eng. Trans. 2015, 260, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Wang, J.; Sui, M.; Ma, Z.; Li, H.; Yuan, B. Antibacterial Performance of Polymer Quaternary Ammonium Salt–Capped Silver Nanoparticles on Bacillus subtilis in Water. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 25667–25676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Sirelkhatim, A.; Mahmud, S.; Seeni, A.; Kaus, N.H.M.; Ann, L.C.; Bakhori, S.K.M.; Hasan, H.; Mohamad, D. Review on Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Antibacterial Activity and Toxicity Mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett. 2015, 7, 219–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. He, Y.; Ingudam, S.; Reed, S.; Gehring, A.; Strobaugh, T.P., Jr.; Irwin, P. Study on the Mechanism of Antibacterial Action of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles against Foodborne Pathogens. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2016, 14, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Grass, G.; Rensing, C.; Solioz, M. Metallic Copper as an Antimicrobial Surface. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 1541–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Joe, Y.H.; Park, D.H.; Hwang, J. Evaluation of Ag Nanoparticle Coated Air Filter against Aerosolized Virus: Anti-Viral Efficiency with Dust Loading. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 301, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ko, Y.-S.; Joe, Y.H.; Seo, M.; Lim, K.; Hwang, J.; Woo, K. Prompt and Synergistic Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticle-Decorated Silica Hybrid Particles on Air Filtration. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 6714–6722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Foster, H.A.; Ditta, I.B.; Varghese, S.; Steele, A. Photocatalytic Disinfection Using Titanium Dioxide: Spectrum and Mechanism of Antimicrobial Activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90, 1847–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Dalrymple, O.K.; Stefanakos, E.; Trotz, M.A.; Goswami, D.Y. A Review of the Mechanisms and Modeling of Photocatalytic Disinfection. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2010, 98, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Monmaturapoj, N.; Thepsuwan, W.; Wanakitti, S.; Mongkolkachit, C.; Mai-ngam, K.; Ngernpimai, S.; Klinsukhon, W.; Prahsarn, C. Honeycomb Structures of TiO2-modified Hydroxyapatite Composite forMicrobial Filtration Application. J. Chem. Eng. Process Technol. 2015, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Li, P.; Li, J.; Feng, X.; Li, J.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Yin, A.; Zhou, J.; Ma, X.; et al. Metal-Organic Frameworks with Photocatalytic Bactericidal Activity for Integrated Air Cleaning. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Ma, S.; Zhang, M.; Nie, J.; Yang, B.; Song, S.; Lu, P. Multifunctional Cellulose-Based Air Filters with High Loadings of Metal–Organic Frameworks Prepared by In Situ Growth Method for Gas Adsorption and Antibacterial Applications. Cellulose 2018, 25, 5999–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Hermansson, M. The DLVO Theory in Microbial Adhesion. Colloid Surf. B 1999, 14, 105–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Dou, X.-Q.; Zhang, D.; Feng, C.; Jiang, L. Bioinspired Hierarchical Surface Structures with Tunable Wettability for Regulating Bacteria Adhesion. Acs Nano 2015, 9, 10664–10672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Arima, Y.; Iwata, H. Effect of Wettability and Surface Functional Groups on Protein Adsorption and Cell Adhesion Using Well-Defined Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayers. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 3074–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Stallard, C.P.; McDonnell, K.A.; Onayemi, O.D.; O’Gara, J.P.; Dowling, D.P. Evaluation of Protein Adsorption on Atmospheric Plasma Deposited Coatings Exhibiting Superhydrophilic to Superhydrophobic Properties. Biointerphases 2012, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Tripathy, A.; Sen, P.; Su, B.; Briscoe, W.H. Natural and Bioinspired Nanostructured Bactericidal Surfaces. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 248, 85–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Susarrey-Arce, A.; Sorzabal-Bellido, I.; Oknianska, A.; McBride, F.; Beckett, A.J.; Gardeniers, J.G.E.; Raval, R.; Tiggelaar, R.M.; Diaz Fernandez, Y.A. Bacterial Viability on Chemically Modified Silicon Nanowire Arrays. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 3104–3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Michalska, M.; Gambacorta, F.; Divan, R.; Aranson, I.S.; Sokolov, A.; Noirot, P.; Laible, P.D. Tuning Antimicrobial Properties of Biomimetic Nanopatterned Surfaces. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 6639–6650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. DeCoste, J.B.; Peterson, G.W. Metal–Organic Frameworks for Air Purification of Toxic Chemicals. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 5695–5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Smith, J.W.H.; Romero, J.V.; Dahn, T.R.; Dunphy, K.; Croll, L.M.; Dahn, J.R. The Effect of Co-Impregnated Acids on the Performance of Zn-Based Broad Spectrum Respirator Carbons. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 235–236, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Britt, D.; Tranchemontagne, D.; Yaghi, O.M. Metal-Organic Frameworks with High Capacity and Selectivity for Harmful Gases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 11623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. Ma, S.; Zhang, M.; Nie, J.; Tan, J.; Yang, B.; Song, S. Design of Double-Component Metal–Organic Framework Air Filters with PM2.5 Capture, Gas Adsorption and Antibacterial Capacities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 203, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Zhou, H.C.; Long, J.R.; Yaghi, O.M. Introduction to Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 673–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Park, N.-K.; Han, G.B.; Yoon, S.H.; Ryu, S.O.; Lee, T.J. Preparation and Absorption Properties of ZnO Nanostructures for Cleanup of H2S Contained Gas. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2010, 11, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Sun, R.-D.; Nakajima, A.; Watanabe, I.; Watanabe, T.; Hashimoto, K. TiO2-Coated Optical Fiber Bundles Used as a Photocatalytic Filter for Decomposition of Gaseous Organic Compounds. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 2000, 136, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ghanbari, F.; Eskandari, M.; Nazari, P.; Gharibzadeh, S.; Kohnehpoushi, S.; Nejand, B.A. Potential Continuous Removal of Toluene by ZnO Nanorods Grown on Permeable Alumina Tube Filters. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 52360–52371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Isobe, T.; Shimizu, M.; Matsushita, S.; Nakajima, A. Preparation and Gas Permeability of the Surface-Modified Porous Al2O3 Ceramic Filter for CO2 Gas Separation. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2013, 1, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Rosenfeld, P.E.; Feng, L.G.H. 12 - Current Practices in Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal. In Risks of Hazardous Wastes, 1st ed.; Rosenfeld, P.E., Feng, L.G.H., Eds.; William Andrew Publishing: Boston, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 155–168. ISBN 978-1-4377-7842-7. [Google Scholar]
  166. Bai, Y.; Han, C.B.; He, C.; Gu, G.Q.; Nie, J.H.; Shao, J.J.; Xiao, T.X.; Deng, C.R.; Wang, Z.L. Washable Multilayer Triboelectric Air Filter for Efficient Particulate Matter PM2.5 Removal. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1706680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Gu, G.Q.; Han, C.B.; Lu, C.X.; He, C.; Jiang, T.; Gao, Z.L.; Li, C.J.; Wang, Z.L. Triboelectric Nanogenerator Enhanced Nanofiber Air Filters for Efficient Particulate Matter Removal. Acs Nano 2017, 11, 6211–6217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Chen, S.; Gao, C.; Tang, W.; Zhu, H.; Han, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Li, T.; Cao, X.; Wang, Z. Self-Powered Cleaning of Air Pollution by Wind Driven Triboelectric Nanogenerator. Nano Energy 2015, 14, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zhang, G.-H.; Zhu, Q.-H.; Zhang, L.; Yong, F.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, S.-L.; Wang, Y.; He, L.; Tao, G.-H. High-Performance Particulate Matter Including Nanoscale Particle Removal by a Self-Powered Air Filter. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  170. Jeong, S.; Cho, H.; Han, S.; Won, P.; Lee, H.; Hong, S.; Yeo, J.; Kwon, J.; Ko, S.H. High Efficiency, Transparent, Reusable, and Active PM2.5 Filters by Hierarchical Ag Nanowire Percolation Network. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 4339–4346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  171. Souzandeh, H.; Johnson, K.S.; Wang, Y.; Bhamidipaty, K.; Zhong, W.-H. Soy-Protein-Based Nanofabrics for Highly Efficient and Multifunctional Air Filtration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 20023–20031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Lubasova, D.; Netravali, A.; Parker, J.; Ingel, B. Bacterial Filtration Efficiency of Green Soy Protein Based Nanofiber Air Filter. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014, 14, 4891–4898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Shankar, A.; Seyam, A.; Hudson, S.M. Electrospinning of Soy Protein Fibers and their Compatibility with Synthetic Polymers. J. Text. Appar. Technol. Manag. 2013, 8, 1:1–1:14. [Google Scholar]
  174. Wang, Z.; Yan, F.; Pei, H.; Li, J.; Cui, Z.; He, B. Antibacterial and Environmentally Friendly Chitosan/Polyvinyl Alcohol Blend Membranes for Air Filtration. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 198, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Souzandeh, H.; Scudiero, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, W.-H. A Disposable Multi-Functional Air Filter: Paper Towel/Protein Nanofibers with Gradient Porous Structures for Capturing Pollutants of Broad Species and Sizes. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 6209–6217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Yeo, J.H.; Kim, M.; Lee, H.; Cho, J.; Park, J. Facile and Novel Eco-Friendly Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Nanofilters Using the Photocatalytic Property of Titanium Dioxide. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 5026–5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Juntunen, J.; Hupli, V.; Hernberg, S.; Luisto, M. Neurological Picture of Organic Solvent Poisoning in Industry. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 1980, 46, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Brown, T.D.; Dalton, P.D.; Hutmacher, D.W. Melt Electrospinning Today: An Opportune Time for an Emerging Polymer Process. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 56, 116–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Lian, H.; Meng, Z. Melt Electrospinning vs. Solution Electrospinning: A Comparative Study of Drug-Loaded Poly (ε-caprolactone) Fibres. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 74, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Lv, D.; Zhu, M.; Jiang, Z.; Shaohua, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xiong, R.; Huang, C. Green Electrospun Nanofibers and Their Application in Air Filtration. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2018, 303, 1800336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Lv, D.; Wang, R.; Tang, G.; Mou, Z.; Lei, J.; Han, J.; Smedt, S.D.; Xiong, R.; Huang, C. Ecofriendly Electrospun Membranes Loaded with Visible-LightResponding Nanoparticles for Multifunctional Usages: Highly Efficient Air Filtration, Dye Scavenging, and Bactericidal Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12880–12889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Zhu, M.; Hua, D.; Zhong, M.; Zhang, L.; Wang, F.; Gao, B.; Xiong, R.; Huang, C. Antibacterial and Effective Air Filtration Membranes by “Green” Electrospinning and Citric Acid Crosslinking. Colloids Interface Sci. Commun. 2018, 23, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Zhu, M.; Hua, D.; Pan, H.; Wang, F.; Manshian, B.; Soenen, S.J.; Xiong, R.; Huang, C. Green Electrospun and Crosslinked Poly(vinyl alcohol)/Poly(acrylic acid) Composite Membranes for Antibacterial Effective Air Filtration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 511, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Zhu, M.; Xiong, R.; Huang, C. Bio-Based and Photocrosslinked Electrospun Antibacterial Nanofibrous Membranes for Air Filtration. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 205, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Jin, X.; Li, L.; Xu, R.; Liu, Q.; Ding, L.; Pan, Y.; Wang, C.; Hung, W.; Lee, K.; Wang, T. Effects of Thermal Cross-Linking on the Structure and Property of Asymmetric Membrane Prepared from the Polyacrylonitrile. Polymers 2018, 10, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Research trends surveyed with key words of ‘filter’ and ‘air’ in the years 1990–2019. (a) Number of journal articles; (b) Published articles by country; (c) Articles by subject area. The research analytics are sourced from Scopus.com.
Figure 1. Research trends surveyed with key words of ‘filter’ and ‘air’ in the years 1990–2019. (a) Number of journal articles; (b) Published articles by country; (c) Articles by subject area. The research analytics are sourced from Scopus.com.
Polymers 12 01714 g001
Figure 2. Research topics related to air filters.
Figure 2. Research topics related to air filters.
Polymers 12 01714 g002
Figure 3. Illustration of the particle capture mechanism. (a) Mechanical capture of particles by a single fiber [14]; (b) Combined effect of the mechanical capture mechanism on the overall filtration efficiency [15,16,17,21].
Figure 3. Illustration of the particle capture mechanism. (a) Mechanical capture of particles by a single fiber [14]; (b) Combined effect of the mechanical capture mechanism on the overall filtration efficiency [15,16,17,21].
Polymers 12 01714 g003
Figure 4. Resistance and penetration of filter materials with mass loading of solid and oily aerosols at 85 LPM. (a) Resistance of oily aerosol; (b) Resistance of solid aerosol for a loosely packed electret filter; (c) Resistance of solid aerosol for a dense filter; (d) Penetration with oily aerosol; (e) Penetration with solid aerosol for a loosely packed electret filter; (f) Penetration with solid aerosol for a dense filter. Tests were conducted by the authors.
Figure 4. Resistance and penetration of filter materials with mass loading of solid and oily aerosols at 85 LPM. (a) Resistance of oily aerosol; (b) Resistance of solid aerosol for a loosely packed electret filter; (c) Resistance of solid aerosol for a dense filter; (d) Penetration with oily aerosol; (e) Penetration with solid aerosol for a loosely packed electret filter; (f) Penetration with solid aerosol for a dense filter. Tests were conducted by the authors.
Polymers 12 01714 g004
Figure 5. Effect of layers on filtration performance. (a) Effect of layers on penetration and resistance; (b) Effect of layers on quality factor. Tests were conducted with NaCl particles at 85 LPM by the authors.
Figure 5. Effect of layers on filtration performance. (a) Effect of layers on penetration and resistance; (b) Effect of layers on quality factor. Tests were conducted with NaCl particles at 85 LPM by the authors.
Polymers 12 01714 g005
Figure 6. Illustration of various morphology and construction of fibrous assembly applied as filter media. (a) Mix of micro and nanofibers by dual electrospinning [63,85,93]; (b) Two-dimensional (2D) nanonets with three-dimensional (3D) fibers [84,85,86]; (c) Ribbon-structured fibers for constructing a fluffy web [65]; (d) Porous fibers [73]; (e) Hybrid structures with microfiber, nanofiber, and microspheres [84,93,106].
Figure 6. Illustration of various morphology and construction of fibrous assembly applied as filter media. (a) Mix of micro and nanofibers by dual electrospinning [63,85,93]; (b) Two-dimensional (2D) nanonets with three-dimensional (3D) fibers [84,85,86]; (c) Ribbon-structured fibers for constructing a fluffy web [65]; (d) Porous fibers [73]; (e) Hybrid structures with microfiber, nanofiber, and microspheres [84,93,106].
Polymers 12 01714 g006
Table 1. Airborne pollutants [3,4,5,6,7].
Table 1. Airborne pollutants [3,4,5,6,7].
Types of PollutantsSize Range (μm)Protective Tool
Solid/liquid particulatesSolid particle [3]VariedParticulate filter
Liquid aerosol [4]Generally ≤ 5
Liquid droplet [4]Generally > 5
BioaerosolBacteria [5,6]0.5–2 Particulate filter, antimicrobial
Virus [5,6]0.02–0.3
Gas and vaporVolatile organic compound (VOC) [7]< 0.001 Gas adsorbent (activated carbon, etc.)
Gaseous matter (SOx, NOx, etc.) [3,7]< 0.01
Table 2. Design strategies for advanced particulate filter materials.
Table 2. Design strategies for advanced particulate filter materials.
PurposeFabrication MethodRef.
Enhancing
charge stability and electrostatic filtration
Using polymer with low dielectric constant
Combining high electrical resistive webs with charge enhancing materials
Incorporating magnetic particles to fibers
Hybridizing the materials with different dielectric constants
[41,54,62,75]
[41,45,55,64]

[54,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,76]
[33,34,41,55,77]
Enhancing mechanical filtration performanceAnchoring MOFs on nanofibers
Combining nanonet and nanofiber
[78,79,80]
[42,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]
Stabilizing filtration performance under humid or high temperature conditionStabilizing surface potential of filter membrane
Using materials with high thermal stability
[64,65,88]
[89,90,91,92]
Enhancing filtration efficiency against oily aerosolLowering the surface energy via fluorination[24,30,33,74]
Lowering resistance and facilitating depth filtrationLayering with large and small fibers
Making hybrid structure with beads and fibers
Making fluffy web
Fabricating 2D nanonet structure with nanowires
Making functional core shell structure fibers
Designing 3D ternary structural membrane
Constructing sandwich as a multi-layer filter
[63,93,94,95,96]
[71,84,97,98,99,100]
[87,101,102,103]
[42,81,82,83,104]
[88,103]
[85,93,104,105,106]
[31,63,84,85,107,108,109]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, S.; Kim, J. Advanced Design of Fiber-Based Particulate Filters: Materials, Morphology, and Construction of Fibrous Assembly. Polymers 2020, 12, 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081714

AMA Style

Jung S, Kim J. Advanced Design of Fiber-Based Particulate Filters: Materials, Morphology, and Construction of Fibrous Assembly. Polymers. 2020; 12(8):1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081714

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jung, Seojin, and Jooyoun Kim. 2020. "Advanced Design of Fiber-Based Particulate Filters: Materials, Morphology, and Construction of Fibrous Assembly" Polymers 12, no. 8: 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081714

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop