Next Article in Journal
Interpolymer Complexes of Eudragit® Copolymers as Novel Carriers for Colon-Specific Drug Delivery
Previous Article in Journal
l-Arginine Grafted Poly(Glycerol Sebacate) Materials: An Antimicrobial Material for Wound Dressing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Forensic Engineering of Advanced Polymeric Materials—Part VII: Degradation of Biopolymer Welded Joints
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/polym12071458
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermal Transitions in P3HT:PC60BM Films Based on Electrical Resistance Measurements

by
Barbara Hajduk
*,
Henryk Bednarski
,
Marian Domański
,
Bożena Jarząbek
and
Barbara Trzebicka
*
Centre of Polymer and Carbon Materials, Polish Academy of Sciences, 34 Marie Curie-Skłodowska str., 41-819 Zabrze, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(7), 1458; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071458
Submission received: 21 May 2020 / Revised: 26 June 2020 / Accepted: 27 June 2020 / Published: 30 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forensic Engineering of Advanced Polymer Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this paper, we present research on thermal transition temperature determination in poly (3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT), [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PC60BM), and their blends, which are materials that are conventionally used in organic optoelectronics. Here, for the first time the results of electrical resistance measurements are explored to detect thermal transitions temperatures, such as glass transition Tg and cold crystallization Tcc of the film. To confirm these results, the variable-temperature spectroscopic ellipsometry studies of the same samples were performed. The thermal transitions temperatures obtained with electrical measurements are well suited to phase diagram, constructed on the basis of ellipsometry in our previous work. The data presented here prove that electrical resistance measurements alone are sufficient for qualitative thermal analysis, which lead to the identification of characteristic temperatures in P3HT:PC60BM films. Based on the carried studies, it can be expected that the determination of thermal transition temperatures by means of electrical resistance measurements will also apply to other semi-conducting polymer films.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Organic photovoltaic devices (OPV), such as organic solar cells, are important examples of practical applications of organic optoelectronic materials. For this reason, these materials have been widely studied and described in the literature [1,2,3]. A very significant limitation in the wide application of organic photovoltaic solar cells is their much shorter lifetime when compared to their inorganic counterparts. To achieve further progress, it is also necessary to develop thermal analysis methods [4,5] to examine the thermo-optical properties of thin organic films. The correct determination of these physical properties plays a decisive role in improving their parameters, which, in turn, determines the thermal durability and performance of the final devices. In organic optoelectronics, the most widely studied and used organic materials are semiconducting poly (3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) [6,7,8,9,10] and its fullerene derivative, [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PC60BM) [11,12,13,14,15]. Films constructed with blends of both compounds [16,17,18,19,20,21,22] are widely used as active layers in OPV devices [23,24,25]. Solar cells that are based on active layers of P3HT:PC60BM blends commonly serve as reference devices for cells made of other organic materials [26,27,28,29,30]. The maximum reported values of power conversion efficiency of these cells range from 5% to 16–18% [31,32,33]. Cell efficiency is affected by many factors, including surface morphology [34,35] or technical parameters of their preparation process [36,37,38,39,40]. It should be noted that the power conversion efficiency of OPV devices can be optimized by heat treatment. For this purpose, the thermal transition temperatures of OPV materials must be known. Pearson et al. [37] showed that OPV devices were most efficient when the P3HT:PC60BM blends were annealed above the upper apparent glass transition temperature (Tg) of the blend. They also related optimum values of sample annealing temperature with the content of PC60BM in the studied samples. To confirm the results, two experimental methods were used for Tg determination, namely variable-temperature spectroscopic ellipsometry and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis.
Spectroscopic ellipsometry is an experimental optics technique that enables accurate, indirect measurements of thickness and dielectric properties of film materials [41,42,43,44]. A spectroscopic ellipsometer equipped with a temperature adapter enables the thermal analysis of the tested sample by optical measurements during controlled heating or cooling. Literature studies indicate that the characteristic temperatures of thermal transitions can be determined by analysing raw ellipsometric data on the basis of ellipsometric angles or their temperature derivatives [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. The temperature dependence of physical quantities, such as film thickness, its coefficient of thermal expansion, refractive index, and ellipsometric data modelling [54,55,56,57,58,59,60] is also explored. In this work we use raw ellipsometric data as the reference results for thermal transition detection, as shown in our previous papers [61,62].
In the literature, there are examples of investigations on thermal transitions of polymers while using measurements of electrical resistance as a function of temperature [63,64,65,66,67]. These literature examples are quite few. Farbod and Tadavani [63] showed that the Tg of polyaniline/multiwalled carbon nanotubes composite can be determined by measuring resistance as a function of temperature. Polyaniline and its composites with different content of nanotubes (2, 4, and 16%) were studied. It turned out that the glass transition temperature increased with the concentration of nanotubes. Mei and Chung [65] showed that electrical resistance can be useful for studying thermal properties and thermal history of carbon fiber reinforced nylon-6 composite. They observed the influence of heat treatment on thermal transitions (Tg and Tm) of the materials. It has been confirmed that this measurement method is more sensitive to thermal transitions than the DSC technique (which was the reference method). In this connection, related research carried out on P3HT layers should also be described. Namely, Liu et al. [67] studied P3HT with high molecular weight (Mw) and different regioregularity, while taking their anisotropy into account by analyzing the temperature dependence of conductivity in parallel (σ‖) and perpendicular (σ⊥) directions to the film surface. In the case of highly oriented P3HT thick films, it was found that the temperature relationship σ⊥ reflects the amorphous nature of the charge hopping along this direction. However, σ‖ dropped significantly above 50 °C, which was attributed to a decrease in the in-plane -stacking that was caused by both the melting of crystallized side chains and the enhanced side-chain disturbance with increasing temperature; thus, to the morphological changes within P3HT layer. The abovementioned works used various techniques for measuring resistance, among others, the four-probe technique [63,65], the technique of two electrodes, in which the electrodes were located under or above the foil [64,67].
In this work, for the first time, the possibility of determining the characteristic thermal transition temperatures in nanometric polymer films using temperature-dependent electrical resistance measurements was investigated. For this purpose we used the technique of two-electrodes to measure resistance (the electrodes were placed on the surface of the film) combined with simultaneous ellipsometric measurement. Well-known reference materials (P3HT, PC60BM) were used to demonstrate the usefulness of the method. On the example of films from these materials, it was shown that the thermal transition temperatures can be accurately determined and the results obtained from the electrical resistance are similar to those that were obtained by means of variable temperature spectroscopic ellipsometry and UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy.
We show that electrical resistance measurements that are dependent on temperature, like variable–temperature spectroscopic ellipsometry, are very useful for qualitative thermal analysis, helping to identify characteristic temperatures in films of P3HT:PC60BM blends. These studies are an introduction to the application of this method to other polymer films.

2. Materials and Methods

The materials used were 95.7% regioregularity poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) M102 (P3HT) (with molar mass Mw = 65.2 kDa) and 99 wt. % purity [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester M112 (PC60BM). All of the materials used were supplied by Ossila. Figure 1 shows their chemical structures.
P3HT, PC60BM, and their 1:1 weight mixture were dissolved in chlorobenzene (maintaining a constant weight concentration of 20 mg/mL) and stirred for 24 h at 60 °C. Films of P3HT, PC60BM, and the P3HT:PC60BM blend were deposited, from these solutions, on microscope glasses (0.1 mm thick) and quartz substrates by spin coating at spin speeds of 750 and 2000 rpm, respectively. The electrodes were applied to the sample surfaces using silver paste. Figure 2 shows the arrangement of the electrodes. All of the samples were stored at room temperature in the laboratory dry box.
Ellipsometric measurements were performed using a SENTECH SE850E spectroscopic ellipsometer (SENTECH Instruments GmbH, Berlin, Germany), operating in the spectral range of 240–2500 nm, while using the Spectra Ray 3 software. Additionally, the ellipsometer is equipped with a variable temperature chamber, operating at low pressure, and an INSTEC mK1000 temperature controller (Instec, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA). The design of the temperature cell allows for measurement at a 70° angle of incidence. The set temperature is precisely maintained by the controller using an electric heater and liquid nitrogen circuit.
The following measurement protocol was used. Each sample was annealed at 200 °C for 2 min and then cooled to 40 °C. The annealing temperature was lower than the thermal degradation temperatures of P3HT and PC60BM [68,69,70,71]. Ellipsometric measurements were carried out during the heating cycle, at a heating rate of 2 °C/min. Measurements were made in the spectral range of 240–930 nm with a time interval of 10 s between subsequent measurements. All of the measurements were carried out in an air atmosphere. Electrical resistance was measured using a Keithley 6517A electrometer/high resistance meter (Keithley Intsruments, Solon, USA) simultaneously with ellipsometric measurements.
Temperature-dependent UV-Vis absorption measurements were carried out using a JASCO V-570 UV-Vis-NIR (200–2500 nm), double-beam spectrophotometer (JASCO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), controlled by the Spectra Manager program. The prepared films were subjected to gradual annealing in a homemade, electrically-heated sample holder, mounted in the JASCO spectrophotometer, which records transmission spectra at elevated temperatures with an accuracy of ±0.5 °C. The transmission spectra of the films were measured in the temperature range of 20 to 210 °C, with a temperature step of 20 °C.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 3 shows ellipsometric transmission spectra, normalized to unity, for P3HT, PC60BM, and P3HT:PC60BM films deposited on quartz substrates. These spectra were recorded at room temperature in ellipsometer transmission mode. The absorption bands in all of these films are in the spectral range of 240–750 nm. This indicates that the Cauchy dispersion model can be applied to the samples, for wavelengths above 750 nm, in order to determine film thickness.
The Cauchy model parameterizes the spectral dispersion of the refractive index, n(λ), and the extinction coefficient, k(λ), as follows [61,62]:
n ( λ ) = n 0 + C 0 n 1 λ 2 + C 1 n 2 λ 4
and
k ( λ ) = k 0 + C 0 k 1 λ 2 + C 1 k 2   λ 4
where the temperature-dependent parameters ni and ki (i = 0, 1, 2) are the model parameters, and the coefficients C0 and C1 are numerical constants. Table 1 shows the thicknesses of the studied samples determined using this model.
Figure 4 shows the measured resistances of the spin coated films, measured on glass substrates, as a function of temperature.
The electrical resistance of the glass substrate alone is one to three orders of magnitude higher than that measured for coated films on the substrates, as can be seen from Figure 4. Nevertheless, an equivalent electrical circuit can be adopted as a parallel connection of resistors representing, respectively, film and substrate in order to take into account the corresponding leakage current. Therefore, for electrical conductance of the film-substrate, σ f i l m / s u b s t r a t e = 1 / R , the following relation applies:
σ f i l m / s u b s t r a t e = σ f i l m + σ s u b s t r a t e
where the meaning of the subscripts for conductance are self-explanatory. In practice, the resistance of the glass substrate and the resistance of the film-substrate system are measured, and the change in the value of the electrical resistance of the film itself should be calculated while using the above formula. It should be noted that the conductivity value determined by us for P3HT film, which is of the order 10−5 S/cm, agrees well with the value determined by Liu et al. [67] for a 15× thicker P3HT layer.
The temperature dependence of the electrical conductance, σ f i l m (T) and ellipsometric angle Δ(T) obtained for films of P3HT, PC60BM, and their 1:1 weight blend is shown in Figure 5, on the left and right panel, respectively. It should be noted that these relationships are presented on a logarithmic scale, which reveals a qualitative similarity to the corresponding Δ(T) ellipsometric curves that are shown on the right panel. This similarity indicates the possibility of performing a linear analysis, also, for σ f i l m (T) to determine the characteristic temperatures of the thermal transitions. Linear analysis involves fitting straight lines using the least squares method. Fittings were made in subsequent recorded sections of ellipsometric and resistance curves. Let’s take a closer look on results for pure materials. From the Δ(T) relationship for P3HT, two characteristic temperatures of 64 and 118 °C can be distinguished, while the corresponding characteristic temperatures on the conductance curve are 62 and 117 °C. This is a one-to-one correspondence. Based on our previous work [61,62], each of them can be identified. The lower transition temperatures, i.e., 62 °C on Δ(T) and 64 °C on σ f i l m (T), correspond to the cold crystallization temperatures Tcc of P3HT. In the case of the PC60BM film, the temperature dependence of the electrical conductance curve shows three characteristic temperatures: 119, 150, and 165 °C. However, only two characteristic temperatures are clearly visible on the curve Δ(T), at 116 and 145 °C. This is most likely due to the large dispersion of ellipsometric data at temperatures above 140 °C. Comparing the charts for Δ(T) and σ f i l m (T) of the pure materials, several important conclusions can be drawn. Namely, with increasing temperature, the conductance of P3HT increases until reaching second cold crystallization temperature Tcc2 = 117 °C. When this temperature is exceeded, the trend reverses. Similarly, the conductance of the blend increases until reaching 118 °C. However, the conductance of PC60BM grows in the whole range. After exceeding Tg, the growth rate of σ f i l m (T) for PC60BM increases significantly.
For films of P3HT:PC60BM blends, corresponding charts for Δ(T) and σ f i l m (T) contain a larger number of characteristic temperatures. Zhao et al. [72] showed that, even in a single-phase of P3HT: PCBM blends several characteristic temperatures originated from various thermal transitions can be observed in DSC measurements. In the case of a multiphase system (whose presence in our case has been confirmed by means of an optical microscope and UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy), additional thermal transitions and, consequently, characteristic temperatures from the precipitated phases P3HT and PC60BM can be expected. That is why we used the phase diagram published in [61] to identify thermal transition temperatures for the film of P3HT:PCBM blend, see Figure 6. In this way, temperatures of 118 °C, 137, and 157 on the plot for σ f i l m (T) of the blend can be identified as glass transition temperature of PC60BM and cold crystallization temperatures of the P3HT and PC60BM phases, respectively. However, the characteristic temperature at about 92 °C in the blend should be identified as Tcc1 of P3HT phase. As can be seen in Figure 6, the values of the characteristic temperatures determined on the basis of resistance measurements in this work, blue balls, are similar to the corresponding characteristic temperatures that were previously determined on the basis of only ellipsometric results.
The identification of the thermal transition at 157 °C was also confirmed by temperature-dependent UV-Vis absorption measurements. It is related to the ordering and formation of defects (precipitation) of the PC60BM phase in P3HT:PC60BM films. Figure 7 shows the temperature dependence of the absorption edge parameters, energy gap (EG), and Urbach energy (EU), which are associated with the length of conjugation and structural disorder, respectively.
The values of the absorption edge in Figure 7 were determined on the basis of absorption measurements in situ, during annealing of the P3HT:PC60BM blend film, up to 210 °C. The curves EG(T) and EU(T) reflect increasing processes of P3HT order, the orderly stacking of polymer chains, and the introduction of structural defects within the flexible side chains, which are responsible for slight changes of the absorption edge parameters. After exceeding the glass transition temperature of the PC60BM film, the increase in EU and reduction of EG can be clearly seen. At temperatures above 140 °C, rapid changes in these parameters can be attributed to the creation of PC60BM clusters that occur with the phase separation of the P3HT:PC60BM mixture. Different behaviors have been observed for the pure PC60BM and P3HT films during their stepwise annealing, up to 200 °C, as presented in [73]. Both the absorption spectra and absorption edge parameters (EG ≅ 2.73 eV, EU ≅ 480 meV) of the PC60BM film did not change during thermal treatment. In the case of the P3HT film, the conjugation of polymer chains was not influenced by heating (EG ≅ 1.86 eV was constant during the annealing/cooling process), while the linear temperature dependence of the EU was connected with reversible, thermally-induced movements of elastic hexyl side chains.
Analysis of surface images of samples, obtained with an optical microscope, provides valuable additional information on changes in surface morphology of P3HT and PC60BM. Figure 8 and Figure 9 show a series of surface images taken before and after thermal annealing, allowing for the comparison of the film surfaces of pure P3HT and PC60BM materials, respectively. Further, Figure 10 shows corresponding images for the P3HT:PC60BM blend film. On the surfaces of all the samples, precipitation appears after annealing. In the case of P3HT (Figure 8b), there are quite a few numerous and widely-spread precipitations on the surface, while the surface of pure PC60BM (Figure 9b) is densely covered with large precipitates. The most ordered phase is formed on the surface of the P3HT:PC60BM (Figure 10b) blend film. After temperature treatment, the entire surface of the sample is covered with interconnected precipitation. Such an intense change is associated with the formation of crystallites of the pure PC60BM phase, included in the P3HT:PC60BM blend film in the temperature range of 130–160 °C.

4. Conclusions

The paper presents the results of research on the thermal behavior of P3HT, PC60BM films, and their blends. The measurements of electrical resistance as a function of sample temperature allowed determination of thermal transitions of studied films. This gave us the basis to perform a linear analysis for conductance σ f i l m (T) and allowed reading the characteristic temperatures of thermal transitions directly from the σ f i l m (T) plots. The results of electrical resistance were compared with data that were obtained by other methods (variable-temperature spectroscopic ellipsometry and UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy). As it turned out, temperatures determined by different methods overlap. The results of the measurements of EG(T) and EU(T) parameters obtained by means of UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy confirm that the obtained P3HT: PC60BM mixtures are multiphase systems. In addition, the attached microscopic image of the surface of the samples taken before and after temperature measurements shows the occurrence of precipitation. This shows that electrical resistance measurements are very useful for qualitative thermal analysis, helping to identify characteristic temperatures in polymer/fullerene films. Moreover, the thermal transitions temperatures obtained with electrical measurements can be included to phase diagram, constructed on the basis of ellipsometry in our previous work. The presence of thermal transitions, such as glass transitions or cold crystallization, can be detected while using both raw ellipsometric data and electrical resistance measurements. However, it should be remembered that, unlike optical measurements, electrical measurements require contacts on the sample surface, i.e., interference with the sample structure. The work was carried out on the basis of films from materials whose thermal properties are well known and widely described in the literature. However, it can be expected that the presented method can be applied to films that are made of other polymeric materials.

Author Contributions

B.H.—conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing-original draft; H.B.—investigation, supervision; M.D.—investigation; B.J.—investigation, B.T.—supervision, writing—review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ostroverkhova, O. Organic optoelectronic materials: Mechanisms and applications. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 13279–13412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Abdulrazzaq, O.A.; Saini, V.; Bourdo, S.; Dervishi, E.; Biris, A.S. Organic solar cells: A review of materials, limitations and possibilities for improvement. Part. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2013, 31, 427–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, S.; Jahandar, M.; Jeong, J.H.; Lim, D.C. Recent progress in solar cell technology for low-light indoor applications. Curr. Altern. Energy 2018, 2, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Papageorgiou, G.Z.; Bikiaris, D.N. Crystallization and melting behavior of three biodegradable poly(alkylene succinates). A comparative study. Polymer 2005, 46, 12081–12092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bikiaris, D.; Prinos, J.; Botev, M.; Betchev, C.; Panayiotou, C. Blends of polymers with similar glass transition temperatures: A DMTA and DSC study. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 93, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Giulianini, M.; Waclawik, E.R.; Bell, J.M.; Scarselli, M.; Castrucci, P.; De Crescenzi, M.; Motta, N. Microscopic and spectroscopic investigation of poly(3-hexylthiophene) interaction with carbon nanotubes. Polymers 2011, 3, 1433–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Molefe, F.V.; Khenfouch, M.; Dhlamini, M.S.; Mothudi, B.M. Spectroscopic investigation of charge and energy transfer in P3HT/GO nanocomposite for solar cell applications. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2017, 8/3, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, L.; Zhao, K.; Li, H.; Zhang, T.; Liu, D.; Han, Y. Liquid crystal ordering on conjugated polymers film morphology for high performance. J. Polym. Sci. Part B 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Miller, E.D.; Jones, M.L.; Jankowski, E. Tying together multiscale calculations for charge transport in P3HT: Structural descriptors, morphology, and tie-chains. Polymers 2018, 10, 1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Jaglarz, J.; Nosidlak, N.; Wolska, N. Thermo-optical properties of conducted polythiophene polymer films used in electroluminescent devices. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2016, 48, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sheng, C.-Q.; Wang, P.; Shen, Y.; Li, Y.-J.; Zhang, W.-H.; Xu, F.-Q.; Zhu, J.-F.; Lai, G.-Q.; Li, H.-N. Electronic structure of PC60BM. Chin. Phys. B 2012, 21/1, 017102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Santo, Y.; Jeon, I.; Sheng Yeo, K.; Nakagawa, T.; Matsuo, Y. Mixture of [60] and [70] PC60BM giving morphological stability in organic solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 073306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, Y.; Jin, B.; Peng, R.; Fan, L.; Cai, L.; Fan, B.; Chu, S. Photovoltaic performance of PCBM analogs with different ester groups as acceptor in the polymer solar cells. Synth. Met. 2016, 212, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ismail, Y.A.M.; Soga, T.; Jimbo, T. Investigation of PC60BM concentration on the performance of small organic solar cell. ISRN Renew. Energy 2012, 2012, 385415. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, F.; Zhuo, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Xu, X.; Wang, Z.; Xin, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Tang, W.; et al. Influence of PC60BM or PC70BM as electron acceptor on the performance of polymer solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2012, 97, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schmerl, N.; Andersson, G. A layered structure at the surface of P3HT/PCBM blends. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 14993–15002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ourida, O.; Said, B.M. Influence of the blend concentration of P3HT: PCBM in the performances of BHJ solar cells. Sci. Acad. Trans. Renew. Energy Syst. Eng. Technol. 2011, 1/3, 90–92. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, D.; Nakahara, A.; Wei, D.; Nordlund, D.; Russell, T.P. P3HT/PC60BM bulk heterojunction organic photovoltaics: Correlating efficiency and morphology. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Munshi, J.; Balasubramanian, G. Investigating blend morphology of P3HT:PCBM bulk heterojunction solar cells by classical atomistic simulations—Progress and prospects. Soft Mater. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Laquai, F.; Andrienko, D.; Mauer, R.; Blom, P.W.M. Charge carrier transport and photogeneration in P3HT:PCBM photovoltaic blends. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2015, 36/11, 1001–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bednarski, H.; Hajduk, B.; Domański, M.; Jarząbek, B.; Nitschke, P.; Łaba, K.; Wanic, A.; Łapkowski, M. Unveiling of polymer/fullerene blend films morphology by ellipsometrically determined optical order within polymer and fullerene phases. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2018, 56, 1094–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xie, Y.; Zabihi, F.; Eslamian, M. Fabrication of highly reproducible polymer solar cell using ultrasonic substrate vibration posttreatment. J. Photonics Energy 2016, 6/4, 045502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Oyewole, O.K.; Yu, D.; Du, J.; Asare, J.; Anye, V.C.; Fashina, A.; Zebaze Kana, M.G.; Soboyejo, W.O. Lamination of organic solar cells and organic light emitting devices: Models and experiments. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 075302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Basel, T.P.; Gautam, B.R.; Yang, X.; Mascaro, D.J.; Liu, F.; Valy Vardeny, Z. Spin-enhanced organic bulk heterojunction photovoltaic solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Tore, N.; Parlak, E.; Gunes, S.; Ozturk, U.; Utkan, G.; Denizci, A.; Basarir, F. Efficiency enhancement of P3HT: PCBM based organic photovoltaic devices via incorporation of bio-synthesized gold nanoparticles. Austin J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2014, 2/6, 1036. [Google Scholar]
  26. Shin, W.S.; Hwang, Y.M.; So, W.-W.; Yoon, S.C.; Lee, C.J.; Moon, S.-J. Performance of P3HT/C70-PCBM polymer photovoltaic devices according to manufacturing conditions. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2008, 491, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, G.; Zhu, R.; Yang, Y. Polymer solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kroon, R.; Lenes, M.; Hummelen, J.C.; Blom, P.W.M.; De Boer, B. Small bandgap polymers for organic solar cells (polymer material development in the last 5 years). Polym. Rev. 2008, 48/3, 531–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ciammaruchi, L.; Oliveira, R.; Charas, A.; Tulus; Von Hauff, E.; Polino, G.; Brunetti, F.; Hansson, R.; Moons, E.; Krassas, M.; et al. Stability of organic solar cells with PCDTBT donor polymer: An interlaboratory study. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33/13, 1909–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pierini, F.; Lanzi, M.; Nakielski, P.; Pawłowska, S.; Urbanek, O.; Zembrzycki, K.; Kowalewski, T.A. Single-material organic solar cells based on electrospun fullerenegrafted polythiophene nanofibers. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 4972–4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cui, Y.; Yao, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Y.; Hong, L.; Xian, K.; Xu, B.; Zhang, S.; Peng, J.; et al. Over 16% efficiency organic photovoltaic cells enabled by a chlorinated acceptor with increased open-circuit voltages. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Jin, K.; Qin, J.; Xu, J.; Li, W.; Xiong, J.; Liu, J.; Xiao, Z.; Sun, K.; et al. 18% efficiency organic solar cells. Sci. Bull. 2020, 65/4, 272–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Lin, Y.; Adilbekova, B.; Firdaus, Y.; Yengel, E.; Faber, H.; Sajjad, M.; Zheng, X.; Yarali, E.; Seitkhan, A.; Bakr, O.M.; et al. 17% efficient organic solar cells based on liquid exfoliated WS2 as a replacement for PEDOT:PSS. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1902965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shen, Y.M.; Chen, C.S.; Yang, P.C.; Ma, S.Y.; Lin, C.F. Improvement of surface morphology of thin films and performance by applying electric field on P3HT:PCBM based solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2012, 99, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ma, S.Y.; Shen, Y.M.; Yang, P.C.; Chen, C.S.; Lin, C.F. Morphological modification induced by external electric field during solution process of organic solar cells. Org. Electron. 2012, 13, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dang, M.T.; Hirsch, L.; Wantz, G. P3HT:PCBM, best seller in polymer photovoltaic research. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23/31, 3597–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pearson, A.J.; Wang, T.; Jones, R.A.L.; Lidzey, D.G.; Staniec, P.A.; Hopkinson, P.E.; Donald, A.M. Rationalizing phase transitions with thermal annealing temperatures for P3HT:PCBM organic photovoltaic devices. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 1499–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baek, W.H.; Yang, H.; Yoon, T.S.; Kang, C.J.; Lee, H.H.; Kim, Y.S. Effect of P3HT:PCBM concentration in solvent on performances of organic solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2009, 93, 1263–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, J.; Zheng, Y.; Huang, J. Towards high performance organic photovoltaic cells: A review of recent development in organic photovoltaics. Polymers 2014, 6, 2473–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Park, S.; Seo, Y.S.; Shin, W.S.; Moon, S.J.; Hwang, J. Rapid and checkable electrical post-treatment method for organic photovoltaic devices. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jung, J.; Bork, J.; Holmgaard, T.; Kortbek, N.A.; Pedersen, K. “Ellipsometry”, Scientific Project 2004, 1-132; Institute of Physics and Nanotechnology, Aalborg University: Aalborg, Denmark, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  42. Nestler, P.; Helm, C.A. Determination of refractive index and layer thickness of nm-thin films via ellipsometry. Opt. Express 2017, 25/22, 27077–27085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hilfiker, J.N.; Bungay, C.L.; Synowicki, R.A.; Tiwald, T.E.; Herzinger, C.M.; Johs, B.; Pribil, G.K.; Woollam, J.A. Progress in spectroscopic ellipsometry: Applications from vacuum ultraviolet to infrared. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2013, 21/4, 1103–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Singh, L.; Ludovice, P.J.; Henderson, C.L. Influence of molecular weight and film thickness on the glass transition temperature and coefficient of thermal expansion of supported ultrathin polymer films. Thin Solid Film. 2004, 449, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, T.; Pearson, A.J.; Dunbar, A.D.F.; Staniec, P.A.; Watter, D.C.; Coles, D.; Yi, H.; Iraqi, A.; Lidzey, D.G.; Jones, R.A.L. Competition between substrate-mediated π-π stacking and surface-mediated Tg depression in ultrathin conjugated polymer films. Eur. Phys. J. E 2012, 35, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Kim, J.H.; Jang, J.; Zin, W.-C. Estimation of the Thickness dependence of the glass transition temperature in various thin polymer films. Langmuir 2000, 16, 4064–4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Keddie, J.L.; Jones, R.A.L.; Cory, R.A. Size-dependent depression of the glass transition temperature in polymer films. Europhys. Lett. 1994, 27, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hajduk, B.; Bednarski, H.; Trzebicka, B. Temperature-dependent spectroscopic ellipsometry of thin polymer films. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 3229–3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. El Ouakili, A.; Vignaud, G.; Balnois, E.; Bardeau, J.-F.; Grohens, Y. Glass transition temperatures of isotactic poly(methymethacrylate) thin films and individual chains probed by multi wavelength ellipsometry. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 56, 13703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Geng, K.; Tsui, O.K.C. Effects of Polymer tacticity and molecular weight on the glass transition temperature of poly(methyl methacrylate) films on silica. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 2671–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, J.; Liu, Z.; Lan, Y.; Zuo, B.; Wang, X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, W.; Hu, W. Mobility gradient of poly(ethylene terephthalate) chains near a substrate scaled by the thickness of the adsorbed layer. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 6804–6812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Efremov, M.Y.; Kiyanova, A.V.; Nealey, P.F. Temperature-modulated ellipsometry: A new probe for glass transition in thin supported polymer films. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 5978–5980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yamamoto, S.; Tsujii, Y.; Fukuda, T. Glass transition temperatures of high-density poly(methyl methacrylate) brushes. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 6077–6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fryer, D.S.; Peters, R.D.; Kim, E.J.; Tomaszewski, J.E.; De Pablo, J.J.; Nealey, P.F.; White, C.C.; Wu, W.-L. Dependence of the glass transition temperature of polymer films on interfacial energy and thickness. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 5627–5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Christian, P.; Coclite, A.M. Vapor-phase-synthesized fluoroacrylate polymer thin films: Thermal stability and structural properties. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Askar, S.; Evans, C.M.; Torkelson, J.M. Residual stress relaxation and stiffness in spin-coated polymer films: Characterization by ellipsometry and fluorescence. Polymer 2015, 76, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Sharp, J.S.; Forrest, J.A. Dielectric and ellipsometric studies of the dynamics in thin films of isotactic poly(methylmethacrylate) with one free surface. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 67, 031805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Beaucage, C.; Composto, R.; Stein, R.S. Ellipsometric study of the glass transition and thermal expansion coefficients of thin polymer films. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Part B 1993, 31, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kawana, S.; Jones, R.A.L. Character of the glass transition in thin supported polymer films. Phys. Rev. E 2001, 63, 021501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dos Santos, W.N.; De Sousa, J.A.; Gregorio, R., Jr. Thermal conductivity behaviour of polymers around glass transition and crystalline melting temperatures. Polym. Test. 2013, 32, 987–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hajduk, B.; Bednarski, H.; Jarząbek, B.; Janeczek, H.; Nitschke, P. P3HT:PCBM blend films phase diagram on the base of variable-temperature spectroscopic ellipsometry. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 1108–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hajduk, B.; Bednarski, H.; Jarząbek, B.; Nitschke, P.; Janeczek, H. Phase diagram of P3HT:PC70BM thin films based on variable-temperature spectroscopic ellipsometry. Polym. Test. 2020, 84, 106383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Farbod, M.; Tadavani, S.K. Electrical properties and glass transition temperature of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyaniline composites. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2012, 358, 1339–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Girtan, M. On the stability of the electrical and photoelectrical properties of P3HT and P3HT:PCBM blends thin films. Org. Electr. 2013, 14, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Mei, Z.; Chung, D.D.L. Glass transition and melting behavior of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite, studied by electrical resistance measurement. Polym. Compos. 2000, 21, 711–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kline, R.J.; McGehee, M.D.; Kadnikova, E.N.; Liu, J.; Fréchet, J.M.J.; Toney, M.F. Dependence of regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene) film morphology, and field-effect mobility on molecular weight. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 3312–3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Liu, C.; Oshima, K.; Shimomura, M.; Miyauchi, S. Anisotropic conductivity–temperature characteristic of solution-cast poly(3-hexylthiophene) films. Synth. Met. 2006, 156, 1362–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ngo, T.T.; Nguyen, D.N.; Nguyen, V.T. Glass transition of PC60BM, P3HT and their blends in quenched state. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 3, 045001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fernandes, L.; Gaspar, H.; Bernardo, G. Inhibition of thermal degradation of polystyrene by C60 and PC60BM: A comparative study. Polym. Test. 2014, 40, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rodrigues, A.; Cidália, M.; Castro, R.; Farinha, A.S.F.; Oliveira, M.; Tomé, J.P.C.; Machado, A.V.; Raposo, M.M.M.; Hilliou, L.; Bernardo, G. Thermal stability of P3HT and P3HT:PC60BM blends in the molten state. Polym. Test. 2013, 32, 1192–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Adhikari, A.R.; Huang, M.; Bakhru, H.; Chipara, M.; Ryu, C.Y.; Ajayan, P.M. Thermal property of regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene)/nanotube composites using modified single-walled carbon nanotubes via ion irradiation. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 5947–5953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhao, J.; Swinnen, A.; Van Assche, G.; Manca, J.; Vanderzande, D.; Van Mele, B. Phase diagram of P3HT/PCBM blends and its implication for the stability of morphology. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 1587–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Jarząbek, B.; Nitschke, P.; Hajduk, B.; Domański, M.; Bednarski, H. In situ thermo-optical studies of polymer:fullerene blend films. Polym. Test. 2020, 88, 106573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 12 01458 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of (a) P3HT and (b) PC60BM.
Figure 1. Structures of (a) P3HT and (b) PC60BM.
Polymers 12 01458 g001
Polymers 12 01458 g002 550
Figure 2. Arrangement of electrodes for measuring electrical resistance.
Figure 2. Arrangement of electrodes for measuring electrical resistance.
Polymers 12 01458 g002
Polymers 12 01458 g003 550
Figure 3. Spectra of P3HT, PC60BM, and P3HT:PC60BM taken in ellipsometer transmission mode.
Figure 3. Spectra of P3HT, PC60BM, and P3HT:PC60BM taken in ellipsometer transmission mode.
Polymers 12 01458 g003
Polymers 12 01458 g004 550
Figure 4. Electrical resistance as a function of temperature of indicated P3HT, PCBM and P3HT:PCBM blend films deposited on a glass substrates. Inset: glass resistance.
Figure 4. Electrical resistance as a function of temperature of indicated P3HT, PCBM and P3HT:PCBM blend films deposited on a glass substrates. Inset: glass resistance.
Polymers 12 01458 g004
Polymers 12 01458 g005 550
Figure 5. Left panel: The electrical conductance as a function of temperature for: (a) P3HT, (c) PC60BM, and (e) P3HT:PC60BM (1:1) blend. Right panel: The ellipsometric angle Δ at 280 nm as a function of temperature for: (b) P3HT, (d) PC60BM, and (f) P3HT:PC60BM blend.
Figure 5. Left panel: The electrical conductance as a function of temperature for: (a) P3HT, (c) PC60BM, and (e) P3HT:PC60BM (1:1) blend. Right panel: The ellipsometric angle Δ at 280 nm as a function of temperature for: (b) P3HT, (d) PC60BM, and (f) P3HT:PC60BM blend.
Polymers 12 01458 g005
Polymers 12 01458 g006 550
Figure 6. The characteristic temperatures of thermal transitions in P3HT:PC60BM (1:1) films, obtained from resistance and ellipsometric measurements (blue balls and red squares, respectively) added to the phase diagram presented earlier in [61]. The point marked with an asterisk represents the Tcc temperature of 30 nm thick PC60BM film.
Figure 6. The characteristic temperatures of thermal transitions in P3HT:PC60BM (1:1) films, obtained from resistance and ellipsometric measurements (blue balls and red squares, respectively) added to the phase diagram presented earlier in [61]. The point marked with an asterisk represents the Tcc temperature of 30 nm thick PC60BM film.
Polymers 12 01458 g006
Polymers 12 01458 g007 550
Figure 7. The absorption edge parameters: the energy gap (EG) and the Urbach energy (EU) as a function of temperature for P3HT:PC60BM film deposited on quartz substrate.
Figure 7. The absorption edge parameters: the energy gap (EG) and the Urbach energy (EU) as a function of temperature for P3HT:PC60BM film deposited on quartz substrate.
Polymers 12 01458 g007
Polymers 12 01458 g008 550
Figure 8. P3HT before (a) and after annealing (b).
Figure 8. P3HT before (a) and after annealing (b).
Polymers 12 01458 g008
Polymers 12 01458 g009 550
Figure 9. PC60BM before (a) and after annealing (b).
Figure 9. PC60BM before (a) and after annealing (b).
Polymers 12 01458 g009
Polymers 12 01458 g010 550
Figure 10. P3HT:PC60BM before (a) and after annealing (b).
Figure 10. P3HT:PC60BM before (a) and after annealing (b).
Polymers 12 01458 g010
Table
Table 1. Sample thicknesses determined by spectroscopic ellipsometry.
Table 1. Sample thicknesses determined by spectroscopic ellipsometry.
SampleP3HTPC60BMP3HT:PC60BM
thickness [nm]quartz15080120
microscope glass250400250

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hajduk, B.; Bednarski, H.; Domański, M.; Jarząbek, B.; Trzebicka, B. Thermal Transitions in P3HT:PC60BM Films Based on Electrical Resistance Measurements. Polymers 2020, 12, 1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071458

AMA Style

Hajduk B, Bednarski H, Domański M, Jarząbek B, Trzebicka B. Thermal Transitions in P3HT:PC60BM Films Based on Electrical Resistance Measurements. Polymers. 2020; 12(7):1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071458

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hajduk, Barbara, Henryk Bednarski, Marian Domański, Bożena Jarząbek, and Barbara Trzebicka. 2020. "Thermal Transitions in P3HT:PC60BM Films Based on Electrical Resistance Measurements" Polymers 12, no. 7: 1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071458

APA Style

Hajduk, B., Bednarski, H., Domański, M., Jarząbek, B., & Trzebicka, B. (2020). Thermal Transitions in P3HT:PC60BM Films Based on Electrical Resistance Measurements. Polymers, 12(7), 1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071458

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop