Next Article in Journal
Reversible Single-Crystal-to-Single-Crystal Structural Transformation in a Mixed-Ligand 2D Layered Metal-Organic Framework: Structural Characterization and Sorption Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Chalcogenide Quaternary Cu2FeSnS4 Nanocrystals for Solar Cells: Explosive Character of Mechanochemical Synthesis and Environmental Challenge
Previous Article in Journal
Study of Anisotropic Plastic Behavior in High Pressure Torsion of Aluminum Single Crystal by Crystal Plasticity Finite Element Method
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 7
Issue 12
10.3390/cryst7120363
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Influence of Liquid on the Outcome of Halogen-Bonded Metal–Organic Materials Synthesis by Liquid Assisted Grinding

by
Katarina Lisac
and
Dominik Cinčić
*
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Horvatovac 102a, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2017, 7(12), 363; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7120363
Submission received: 15 November 2017 / Revised: 27 November 2017 / Accepted: 4 December 2017 / Published: 7 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymorphism of Mechanochemically Synthesized Cocrystals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work, we describe novel multi-component halogen bonded solids of Co(ii) complexes and 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene, 14tfib. We present the important influence of liquid on the outcome of liquid assisted grinding of dichlorobis(1,10-phenantroline)cobalt(ii), CoCl2(phen)2 and 14tfib. Grinding of solid reactants with a small amount of water gives the cocrystal product [CoCl2(phen)2](14tfib) (1) while grinding with a small amount of methanol gives an ionic structure, the four-component solid [CoCl(MeOH)(phen)2]Cl(14tfib)(MeOH) (2). Both solid products were also obtained by crystallization from the solution. Single crystal X-ray diffraction reveals that the dominant supramolecular interaction in 1 is the I···Cl halogen bond between 14tfib and CoCl2(phen)2 building blocks. On the other hand, the dominant supramolecular interactions in 2 are I···Cl− charge-assisted halogen bonds between the halogen bond donor and the chloride anion as well as hydrogen bonds between the chloride anion and OH groups of coordinated and solvated methanol molecules.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The study of multi-component materials, e.g., cocrystals and salts, has become one of the most attractive areas of research in the field of solid-state chemistry [1]. Effective synthesis of such materials utilizes appropriate molecular building blocks, either neutral or ionic, and supramolecular interactions which lead to reliable motifs of molecular assembly [2,3]. Over the past two decades, halogen bond [4] has been recognized as a reliable crystal engineering tool [5]. It is an attractive interaction between a positively charged area of a covalently bound halogen atoms (Br, I) and Lewis bases (nucleophilic atoms such as O, N, S, etc.) [6,7]. Typical halogen bonds are similar to hydrogen bonds in terms of both length and directionality [8,9]. Their strength strongly depends on the surroundings to which the halogen atom is bonded and on acceptor atom basicity [10,11].
The use of halogen bonding in crystal engineering of metal–organic materials remains a persistent challenge pursued by several groups [12,13,14,15,16]. Several reports and reviews have been published dealing with halogen bonding in crystal engineering of single component metal–organic solids [12,13]. In contrast, synthesis of multi-component metal–organic materials with halogen bond donors has received much less attention. In such materials, metal–organic building blocks can be employed in several different ways as halogen bond acceptors. Most reports have focused on the formation of ionic structures involving complexes of simple inorganic ligands (e.g., Cl−, CN−, etc.) [17,18,19]. On the other hand, much less explored systems, recently introduced, are neutral metal–organic cocrystals where coordination compounds are building blocks which contain ligands with pendant halogen bond acceptors group [20,21,22].
Herein, following previous studies on halogen-bonded cocrystal syntheses with neutral metal–organic electron donor units which contain simple inorganic ligands (Cl−) [12,17], and to explore the halogen bonding proclivity of the chlorine atom coordinated to metal, we report the synthesis of multi-component solids derived from dichlorobis(1,10-phenantroline)cobalt(ii), (CoCl2(phen)2), and a commonly used halogen bond donor, 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene, (14tfib) (Figure 1). The complex CoCl2(phen)2 is stable in solution and can be easily prepared by reacting CoCl2(H2O)6 with two equivalents of phen in various solvents, e.g., methanol, ethanol, acetonitrile, etc. [23,24]. Over the past several decades, phen has been used as a versatile reagent for analytical, inorganic and supramolecular chemistry, and numerous phen coordination compounds have been reported [25,26]. A survey of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD; version 5.38) [27] based on phen complexes with transition metals (MCl2(phen)n units) has resulted in 70 hits. Restraining the search further, to Co complexes, has resulted in 17 hits. Of those, 15 structures correspond to salts, solvates or hydrates of CoCl2(phen)2 and there are no entries corresponding to halogen bonded cocrystals. Furthermore, even though halogen atoms bonded to metal centers are potent as halogen bond acceptors, a survey based on the ability of any transition metal complexes, of the MXnLm type (X = halogen atom; L = any organic ligands) to act as a halogen bond acceptor with haloperfluorinated benzenes as halogen bond donors, via M–X∙∙∙X halogen bond, has resulted in only five hits.
As the complex CoCl2(phen)2 is less soluble in organic solvents than the selected halogen bond donor, our cocrystal synthesis was based on mechanochemical liquid-assisted grinding (LAG), grinding of solid reactants in the presence of a small (catalytic) amount of liquid [28,29]. Throughout the last two decades, methods such as neat grinding (NG) and LAG have shown potential as efficient approaches for supramolecular and covalent synthesis applicable to a wide range of targets [30], including organic molecules, functional organic solids, organometallics, metal–organic materials, as well as inorganic materials [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. In addition, LAG has been established as a fast and efficient screening method for desired crystal forms of molecular materials: for example, cocrystals, salts, solvates and polymorphs [40,41,42,43].
In the work presented herein, we describe the important role of liquid on the outcome of synthesis of halogen-bonded metal–organic materials by LAG. Grinding solid reactants with a small amount of water gives a two-component solid, the cocrystal product [CoCl2(phen)2](14tfib) (compound 1), while grinding with a small amount of methanol gives a four-component ionic solid, the salt of cocrystal solvate [CoCl(MeOH)(phen)2]Cl(14tfib)(MeOH) (compound 2) (Figure 1). Both solid products were also obtained by crystallization from the solution and characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. To the best of our knowledge, we report the first known cocrystal of neutral CoCl2(phen)2 building block with a I∙∙∙Cl-M halogen bond motif, as well as the first known ionic multi component solid of 14tfib containing a cobalt complex cation, with a I∙∙∙Cl− charge-assisted halogen bond.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Syntheses

As the solid-state synthesis of halogen bonded cocrystals has been described in earlier studies [44,45,46,47], we have decided to attempt to synthesize the targeted cocrystals by LAG. All reactants and products have been characterized by means of powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) (Figures S1 and S2) and thermogravimetry analysis (TGA). We first attempted grinding solid reactants, CoCl2(phen)2 and 14tfib, in the 1:1 stoichiometric ratio and in the presence of a small amount of methanol. The PXRD pattern of the orange solid product obtained after 60 min grinding, was measured and compared with powder patterns of reactants, and has shown that the obtained solid was a new phase (Figure 2). To observe the grinding experiment, as well as to produce single crystal suitable for X-ray diffraction experiment, we have performed the reaction from the methanol solution. Single crystal X-ray diffraction reveals that we obtained a methanol solvate of an ionic cocrystal, 2, which consists of CoCl(phen)2(MeOH) cation units, a chloride anion and 14tfib. PXRD pattern calculated from the obtained single crystal data was in good agreement with the diffraction pattern measured on the bulk material obtained by LAG (Figure 2). Repeating the synthesis by LAG of solid reactants, also in the 1:1 stoichiometric ratio and in the presence of a small amount of water, we obtained a new phase, a red solid product, its PXRD pattern different from that of 2. Furthermore, through synthesis from a mixture of dichloromethane and ethanol, we obtained crystals of identical PXRD as that of the product obtained by LAG in the presence of water. Single crystal X-ray diffraction revealed that this time we obtained the cocrystal of CoCl2(phen)2 and 14tfib, 1 (Figure 2).
TGA experiments show remarkably different thermal properties of the two prepared compounds (Figure 3). The TGA curve of 1 presents no obvious weight loss from 25 to 185 °C. In the range between 185 °C and 264 °C, a mass loss of 37% can be attributed to decomposition of the cocrystal. On the other hand, the TGA curve of 2 shows the start of decomposition at 123 °C (Figure 3). In the range between 123 °C and 178 °C, a mass loss of 7.8% can be attributed to decomposition of the complex due to the loss of methanol, both coordinated and solvated (calc. 6.7%). The second step is the same as for 1 and starts at 185 °C with a weight loss of 37% up to 185 °C. Annealing of 2 at 179 °C for 1 min promoted the formation of a red powder. Its PXRD pattern matched with that of 1 (see ESI, Figure S3). At room temperature, the reverse reaction could be achieved in the solid state by exposing 1 to methanol vapor for 16 h which yielded 2 (see ESI, Figure S4).

2.2. Structural Analysis

Molecular and crystal structure determination of the obtained single crystals revealed that we obtained solids containing different metal–organic building blocks which formed remarkably different supramolecular architecture in combination with 14tfib (Figure 4). Compound 1 is a two-component solid, which consists of a neutral Co(ii) complex and 14tfib, while 2 is a four-component solid, in which Co(ii) complex cations are the charge-balancing counterpart within halogen bond chains formed from Cl− and 14tfib. General and crystallographic data for both compounds are given in Table 1.
The asymmetric unit of 1 contains one molecule of CoCl2(phen)2 and two symmetrically inequivalent halves of 14tfib molecules. The molecular structure of the CoCl2(phen)2 unit is in a good agreement with that of the reported pure complex [23,24]. The Co(ii) atom is coordinated by four N atoms from two phen molecules and two Cl atoms, forming a structure of distorted octahedral geometry with the following geometrical parameters: d(Co–N), ranging from 2.121 Å to 2.222 Å, d(Co1–Cl1) = 2.426 Å, d(Co1–Cl2) = 2.392 Å, ∠ (N2–Co1–Cl1) = 97.0° and 87.4° between N–Co–N planes. In the crystal structure, each CoCl2(phen)2 unit is connected with 14tfib via I···Cl halogen bonds (d(I2∙∙∙Cl1) = 3.145 Å, ∠ (C–I∙∙∙Cl) = 172.9°; d(I1∙∙∙Cl2) = 3.137 Å, ∠ (C–I∙∙∙Cl) = 169.7) leading to the formation of zig-zag chains (Figure 5a, Table S1). The chains are connected into layers via contacts between aromatic rings of adjacent molecules (d(C15∙∙∙C16) = 3.387 Å) and form layers (Figure 5b) which are further connected into a 3D network by two types of C–H∙∙∙I interactions between 14tfib and phen (d(C8∙∙∙I1) = 3.899 Å, d(C18∙∙∙I2) = 3.808 Å).
The asymmetric unit of 2 contains the [CoCl(MeOH)(phen)2]+ cation complex, a Cl− anion, a MeOH molecule and a 14tfib molecule. The molecular structure of the [CoCl(MeOH)(phen)2]+ cation is similar to CoCl2(phen)2, where one Cl atom is substituted with a coordinated MeOH molecule. The Co(ii) atom is coordinated by four N atoms from two phen molecules, one Cl atom, and one MeOH molecule forming a structure of distorted octahedral geometry with the following geometrical parameters: d(Co–N) range from 2.121 Å to 2.145 Å, d(Co1–Cl2) = 2.416 Å, d(Co1–O1) = 2.110 Å, ∠ (N1–Co1–Cl2) = 93.4° and 87.9° between N–Co–N planes. In the crystal structure, dominant supramolecular interactions are I···Cl− charge-assisted halogen bonds between 14tfib and the Cl− anion (d(I1∙∙∙Cl1−) = 3.159 Å, ∠ (C–I∙∙∙Cl−) = 178.5°; d(I2∙∙∙Cl1−) = 3.163 Å, ∠ (C–I∙∙∙Cl−) = 176.1°) leading to the formation of chains (Figure 5c, Table S1 ). Since the Cl− anion is a superior acceptor for both halogen and hydrogen bonds [48], the coordinated Cl atom acts only as an acceptor for weak C–H∙∙∙Cl hydrogen bonds (d(C14∙∙∙Cl2) = 3.657 Å, d(C20∙∙∙Cl2) = 3.635 Å). In the crystal structure, each Cl− anion is connected with two 14tfib molecules via the described halogen bonds, with a solvent MeOH molecule and with a cation complex (over the coordinated MeOH molecule) via O–H∙∙∙Cl− hydrogen bonds (d(O1∙∙∙Cl1−) = 3.029 Å, d(O2∙∙∙Cl1−) = 3.199 Å) and with another cation complex via C–H∙∙∙Cl− hydrogen bond (d(C8∙∙∙Cl1−) = 3.784 Å) (Table S2). Similar replacement of coordinated halide with a hydrogen donating solvent molecule, placing the halide in the second coordination sphere of the cation has already been described in bis(morpholine)diketonate Cu(II) compounds [49]. Formed halogen bonded chains (Figure 5c) are connected into layers via C–H∙∙∙Cl, C–H∙∙∙Cl− and C–H∙∙∙F interactions. Layers are further connected into a 3D network via C–H∙∙∙C and C∙∙∙C contacts (Figure 5d). The described charge-assisted halogen bond supramolecular motif has been recognized in earlier studies [50,51,52]. However, even thoguh halide (Cl−, Br−, I−) anions are potent halogen bond acceptors, a survey of the CSD based on 14tfib cocrystals with the I∙∙∙X− motif has resulted in only 26 hits.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Synthesis of Complexes

A mixture of 1.876 g (7.88 mmol) CoCl2(H2O)6 and 3.125 g (15.76 mmol) phen was partially dissolved in 70.0 mL EtOH and refluxed with stirring for 3 h. The obtained red solid was filtered after one day.

3.2. Mechanochemical Synthesis of 1

A mixture of 40.0 mg (0.082 mmol) CoCl2(phen)2 and 32.9 mg (0.082 mmol) 14tfib was placed in a 5 mL stainless steel jar along with 20 µL of water and two stainless steel balls 5 mm in diameter. The mixture was then milled for 60 min in a Retsch MM200 Shaker Mill operating at 25 Hz frequency.

3.3. Mechanochemical Synthesis of 2

A mixture of 40.0 mg (0.082 mmol) CoCl2(phen)2 and 32.9 mg (0.082 mmol) 14tfib was placed in a 5 mL stainless steel jar along with 20 µL of methanol and two stainless steel balls 5 mm in diameter. The mixture was then milled for 60 min in a Retsch MM200 Shaker Mill operating at 25 Hz frequency.

3.4. Crystallization of 1 and 2

The single crystal of 1 was obtained by diffusion crystallization. A solution of 14tfib (202.95 mg, 0.505 mmol) in 4.0 mL of dichlormethane was layered by a solution of CoCl2(H2O)6 (30.0 mg, 0.126 mmol) and phen (50.0 mg, 0.252 mmol) in 5.0 mL of ethanol. The vial was stoppered and left at room temperature for a month.
The single crystal of 2 was obtained by dissolving a mixture of CoCl2(phen)2 (30.0 mg, 0.0612 mmol) and 14tfib (68.7 mg, 0.171 mmol) in 4.0 mL of hot methanol and the subsequent cooling and solvent evaporation at room temperature for 2 days.

3.5. Thermal Analysis

TG measurements were performed on a Mettler-Toledo TGA/SDTA 851e module (Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Greifensee, Switzerland). Samples were placed in sealed 40 µL aluminum pans with three pinholes and heated from 25 to 500 °C at a rate of 10 °C min−1 under nitrogen flow of 150 mL min−1. Data collection and analysis were performed using the program package STARe Software v14.00 [53].

3.6. Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Experiments

The crystal and molecular structures of the prepared samples were determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Details of data collection and crystal structure refinement are listed in Table 1. Thermal ellipsoid plots showing the atom-labelling schemes are given in ESI (Figures S5 and S6). The diffraction data for 1 and 2 were collected at 295 K. Diffraction measurements were made on an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Kappa CCD X-ray diffractometer (Oxford Diffraction, Oxford, UK) with graphite-monochromated MoKα (λ = 0.71073 Å) radiation. The datasets were collected using the ω scan mode over the 2θ range up to 54°. Programs CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED were employed for data collection, cell refinement, and data reduction [54]. The structures were solved by direct methods and refined using the SHELXS, SHELXT and SHELXL programs, respectively [55,56]. The structural refinement was performed on F2 using all data. The hydrogen atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding were placed in calculated positions and treated as riding on their parent atoms [d(C−H) = 0.93 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C)] while the others were located from the electron difference map. All calculations were performed using the WINGX crystallographic suite of programs [57]. The molecular structures of compounds are presented by ORTEP-3 [57], and their molecular packing projections were prepared by Mercury [58].

3.7. Powder X-ray Diffraction Experiments

PXRD experiments on the samples were performed on a PHILIPS PW 1840 X-ray diffractometer (Philips Analytical B. V., Almelo, The Netherlands) with CuKα1 (1.54056 Å) radiation at 40 mA and 40 kV. The scattered intensities were measured with a scintillation counter. The angular range was from 3 to 40° (2θ) with steps of 0.02–0.03°, and the measuring time was 0.2–0.5 s per step. Data collection and analysis was performed using the program package Philips X’Pert [59,60,61].

4. Conclusions

To conclude, we have obtained two novel multi-component halogen bonded solids of Co(ii) complexes by both liquid-assisted grinding and the conventional solvent-based method. We report the important role of liquid in directing the mechanochemical synthesis toward the intended solid product. Grinding of CoCl2(phen)2 complex and 14tfib with a small amount of water gives the cocrystal product [CoCl2(phen)2](14tfib), in which the dominant supramolecular interactions are I···Cl halogen bonds. Grinding solid reactants with a small amount of methanol gives an ionic structure, the four-component solid, [CoCl(MeOH)(phen)2]Cl(14tfib)(MeOH), in which the dominant supramolecular interactions are I···Cl− charge-assisted halogen as well as hydrogen bonds. To the best of our knowledge, we report the first known cocrystal of neutral CoCl2(phen)2 building block with a I∙∙∙Cl-M halogen bond motif. The coordinated chlorine can indeed be used as a reliable halogen acceptor in engineering multi-component metal–organic solids. We believe that the use of such metal–organic halogen bond acceptors may offer a general route to metal–organic halogen-bonded cocrystals. We are currently exploring the halogen bonding ability of other MCl2L2 building blocks with octahedrally coordinated Co(ii) and Ni(ii) metal centers.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/7/12/363/s1, Figure S1: PXRD patterns of: (a) CoCl2(phen)2; (b) 14tfib; (c) 1 by LAG; and (d) calculated pattern from single crystal data of 1, Figure S2: PXRD patterns of: (a) CoCl2(phen)2; (b) 14tfib; (c) 2 obtained by LAG; and (d) calculated pattern from single crystal data of 2, Figure S3: PXRD patterns of: (a) 2 obtained by LAG; (b) 2 after annealing at 179 °C; (c) calculated pattern from single crystal data of 2; and (d) calculated pattern from single crystal data of 1, Figure S4: PXRD patterns of: (a) 1 obtained by LAG; (b) 1 after exposure to methanol vapor for 16 h; (c) calculated pattern from single crystal data of 2; and (d) calculated pattern from single crystal data of 1, Figure S5: Molecular structure of 1 showing the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radius, Figure S6: Molecular structure of 2 showing the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radius, Table S1: Geometric parameters for the halogen bonds in 1 and 2, Table S2: Geometric parameters for the hydrogen bonds in 1 and 2. CCDC 1585631 and 1585632 contain crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CBZ 1EZ, UK (Fax: +44-1223-336033; email: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk or www: http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Croatian Science Foundation under the project IP-2014-09-7367. We are grateful to Vladimir Stilinović and Vinko Nemec for helpful suggestions.

Author Contributions

Katarina Lisac and Dominik Cinčić conceived and designed the experiments; Katarina Lisac performed the experiments; Katarina Lisac and Dominik Cinčić analyzed the data; Dominik Cinčić and Katarina Lisac contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Katarina Lisac and Dominik Cinčić wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. Desiraju, G.R. Crystal engineering: A holistic view. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8342–8356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aakeröy, C.B.; Salmon, D.J. Building co-crystals with molecular sense and supramolecular sensibility. CrystEngComm 2005, 7, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Friščić, T. Supramolecular concepts and new techniques in mechanochemistry: Cocrystals, cages, rotaxanes, open metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3493–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hassel, O. Structural aspects of interatomic charge-transfer bonding. Science 1970, 170, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cavallo, G.; Metrangolo, P.; Milani, R.; Pilati, T.; Priimägi, A.; Resnati, G.; Terraneo, G. The Halogen Bond. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 2478–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Politzer, P.; Murray, J.S.; Clark, T. Halogen bonding: An electrostatically-driven highly directional noncovalent interaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 7748–7757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Priimägi, A.; Cavallo, G.; Metrangolo, P.; Resnati, G. The Halogen Bond in the Design of Functional Supramolecular Materials: Recent Advances. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2686–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Fourmigué, M. Halogen bonding: Recent advances. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2009, 13, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cinčić, D.; Friščić, T.; Jones, W. Isostructural Materials Achieved by Using Structurally Equivalent Donors and Acceptors in Halogen-Bonded Cocrystals. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 747–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Metrangolo, P.; Neukirch, H.; Pilati, T.; Resnati, G. Halogen Bonding Based Recognition Processes: A World Parallel to Hydrogen Bonding. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Stilinović, V.; Horvat, G.; Hrenar, T.; Nemec, V.; Cinčić, D. Halogen and Hydrogen Bonding between (N-Halogeno)-succinimides and Pyridine Derivatives in Solution, the Solid State and In Silico. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 22, 5244–5257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bertani, R.; Sgarbossa, P.; Venzo, A.; Lelj, F.; Amati, M.; Resnati, G.; Pilati, T.; Metrangolo, P.; Terraneo, G. Halogen bonding in metal–organic–supramolecular networks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 677–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mahmudov, K.T.; Kopylovich, M.N.; Guedes da Silva, M.F.C.; Pombeiro, A.J.L. Non-covalent interactions in the synthesis of coordination compounds: Recent advances. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 345, 54–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, B.; Zhang, S.-Q.; Wang, L.-Y.; Mak, T.C.W. Halogen bonding: A powerful, emerging tool for constructing high-dimensional metal-containing supramolecular networks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 308, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gamekkanda, J.C.; Sinha, A.S.; Desper, J.; Ðaković, M.; Aakeröy, C.B. The Role of Halogen Bonding in Controlling Assembly and Organization of Cu (II)-Acac Based Coordination Complexes. Crystals 2017, 7, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aakeröy, C.B.; Schultheiss, N.; Desper, J.; Moore, C. Attempted assembly of discrete coordination complexes into 1-D chains using halogen bonding or halogen⋯halogen interactions. CrystEngComm 2007, 9, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Johnson, M.T.; Džolić, Z.; Cetina, M.; Wendt, O.F.; Ohrstrom, L.; Rissanen, K. Neutral Organometallic Halogen Bond Acceptors: Halogen Bonding in Complexes of PCPPdX (X = Cl, Br, I) with Iodine (I2), 1,4-Diiodotetrafluorobenzene (F4DIBz), and 1,4-Diiodooctafluorobutane (F8DIBu). Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Christopherson, J.-C.; Potts, K.P.; Bushuyev, O.S.; Topić, F.; Huskić, I.; Rissanen, K.; Barrett, C.J.; Friščić, T. Assembly and dichroism of a four-component halogen-bonded metal-organic cocrystal salt solvate involving dicyanoaurate(I) acceptors. Faraday Discuss. 2017, 203, 441–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ding, X.; Tuikka, M.J.; Hirva, P.; Kukushkin, V.Y.; Novikov, A.S.; Haukka, M. Fine-tuning halogen bonding properties of diiodine through halogen–halogen charge transfer—Extended [Ru(2,2′-bipyridine)(CO)2X2]·I2 systems (X = Cl, Br, I). CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 1987–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cinčić, D.; Friščić, T. Synthesis of an extended halogen-bonded metal–organic structure in a one-pot mechanochemical reaction that combines covalent bonding, coordination chemistry and supramolecular synthesis. CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 10169–10172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lapadula, G.; Judaš, N.; Friščić, T.; Jones, W. A Three-Component Modular Strategy to Extend and Link Coordination Complexes by Using Halogen Bonds to O, S and π Acceptors. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 7400–7403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nemec, V.; Fotović, L.; Friščić, T.; Cinčić, D. A Large Family of Halogen-Bonded Cocrystals Involving Metal–Organic Building Blocks with Open Coordination Sites. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, X.; Han, S.; Wang, R.; Li, Y. Four supramolecular isomers of dichloridobis(1,10-phenanthroline)cobalt(II): Synthesis, structure characterization and isomerization. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 2016, 72, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, L.-L.; Liu, D.-X.; Liu, T.-F. A polymorph of cis-dichloridobis(1,10-phenanthroline-κ2N,N′)cobalt(II). Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E 2007, 63, m1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moulton, B.; Zaworotko, M.J. From Molecules to Crystal Engineering: Supramolecular Isomerism and Polymorphism in Network Solids. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 1629–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ye, B.; Tong, M.; Chen, X. Metal-organic molecular architectures with 2,2′-bipyridyl-like and carboxylate ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 545–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Groom, C.R.; Bruno, I.J.; Lightfoot, M.P.; Ward, S.C. The Cambridge Structural Database. Acta Crystallogr. B 2016, B72, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Braga, D.; Curzi, M.; Johansson, A.; Polito, M.; Rubini, K.; Grepioni, F. Simple and Quantitative Mechanochemical Preparation of a Porous Crystalline Material Based on a 1D Coordination Network for Uptake of Small Molecules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Friščić, T.; Childs, S.L.; Rizvi, S.A.A.; Jones, W. The role of solvent in mechanochemical and sonochemical cocrystal formation: A solubility-based approach for predicting cocrystallisation outcome. CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. James, S.L.; Adams, C.J.; Bolm, C.; Braga, D.; Collier, P.; Friščić, T.; Grepioni, F.; Harris, K.D.M.; Hyett, G.; Jones, W.; et al. Mechanochemistry: Opportunities for new and cleaner synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 413–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wang, G.-W. Mechanochemical organic synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7668–7700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Friščić, T. New opportunities for materials synthesis using mechanochemistry. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 7599–7605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Braga, D.; Maini, L.; Grepioni, F. Mechanochemical preparation of co-crystals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7638–7648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Boldyreva, E.V. Mechanochemistry of inorganic and organic systems: What is similar, what is different? Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7719–7738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cinčić, D.; Kaitner, B. Schiff base derived from 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde and liquid-assisted mechanochemical synthesis of its isostructural Cu(II) and Co(II) complexes. CrystEngComm 2011, 13, 4351–4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Šepelák, V.; Düvel, A.; Wilkening, M.; Becker, K.-D.; Heitjans, P. Mechanochemical reactions and syntheses of oxides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7507–7520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cinčić, D.; Brekalo, I.; Kaitner, B. Effect of atmosphere on solid-state amine-aldehyde condensations: Gas-phase catalysts for solid-state transformations. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 11683–11685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cinčić, D.; Juribašić, M.; Babić, D.; Molčanov, K.; Šket, P.; Plavec, J.; Ćurić, M. New insight into solid-state molecular dynamics: Mechanochemical synthesis of azobenzene/triphenylphosphine palladacycles. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 11543–11545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Baláž, P.; Achimovičová, M.; Baláž, M.; Billik, P.; Cherkezova-Zheleva, Z.; Criado, J.M.; Delogu, F.; Dutková, E.; Gaffet, E.; José Gotor, F.; et al. Hallmarks of mechanochemistry: From nanoparticles to technology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7571–7637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Friščić, T.; Jones, W. Recent Advances in Understanding the Mechanism of Cocrystal Formation via Grinding. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 1621–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stilinović, V.; Cinčić, D.; Zbačnik, M.; Kaitner, B. Controlling solvate formation of a Schiff base by combining mechanochemistry with solution synthesis. Croat. Chem. Acta 2012, 85, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Braga, D.; Grepioni, F. Making crystals from crystals: A green route to crystal engineering and polymorphism. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3635–3645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Springuel, G.; Robeyns, K.; Norberg, B.; Wouters, J.; Leyssens, T. Cocrystal Formation between Chiral Compounds: How Cocrystals Differ from Salts. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 3996–4004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cinčić, D.; Friščić, T.; Jones, W. A Stepwise Mechanism for the Mechanochemical Synthesis of Halogen-Bonded Cocrystal Architectures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7524–7525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cinčić, D.; Friščić, T.; Jones, W. Structural Equivalence of Br and I Halogen Bonds: A Route to Isostructural Materials with Controllable Properties. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 6623–6626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mavračić, J.; Cinčić, D.; Kaitner, B. Halogen bonding of N-bromosuccinimide by grinding. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 3343–3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nemec, V.; Cinčić, D. Uncommon halogen bond motifs in cocrystals of aromatic amines and 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 7425–7429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brammer, L.; Bruton, E.A.; Sherwood, P. Understanding the Behavior of Halogens as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors. Cryst. Growth Des. 2001, 1, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stilinović, V.; Užarević, K.; Cvrtila, I.; Kaitner, B. Bis(morpholine) hydrogen bond pincer—A novel series of heteroleptic Cu(II) coordination compounds as receptors for electron rich guests. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 7493–7501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pfrunder, M.C.; Micallef, A.S.; Rintoul, L.; Arnold, D.P.; McMurtrie, J. Interplay between the Supramolecular Motifs of Polypyridyl Metal Complexes and Halogen Bond Networks in Cocrystals. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 16, 681–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cavallo, G.; Biella, S.; Lu, J.; Metrangolo, P.; Pilati, T.; Resnati, G.; Terraneo, G. Halide anion-templated assembly of di- and triiodoperfluorobenzenes into 2D and 3D supramolecular networks. J. Fluor. Chem. 2010, 131, 1165–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Raatikainen, K.; Rissanen, K. Modulation of N···I and +N−H···Cl−···I Halogen Bonding: Folding, Inclusion, and Self-Assembly of Tri- and Tetraamino Piperazine Cyclophanes. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 10, 3638–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. STARe Software v.14.00; MettlerToledo GmbH: Giessen, Germany, 2015.
  54. Oxford Diffraction. Xcalibur CCD System, CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED, version 1.171; Oxford Diffraction Ltd.: Abingdon, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Farrugia, L.J. WinGX and ORTEP for Windows: An update. J. Appl. Cryst. 2012, 45, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Macrae, C.F.; Bruno, I.J.; Chisholm, J.A.; Edgington, P.R.; McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Rodriguez-Monge, L.; Taylor, R.; Streek, J.V.; Wood, P.A. Mercury CSD 2.0—New features for the visualization and investigation of crystal structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 2008, 41, 466–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Philips X’Pert Data Collector 1.3e; Philips Analytical B. V.: Almelo, The Netherlands, 2001.
  60. Philips X’Pert Graphic & Identify 1.3e Philips; Analytical B. V.: Almelo, The Netherlands, 2001.
  61. Philips X’Pert Plus 1.0; Philips Analytical B. V.: Almelo, The Netherlands, 1999.
Crystals 07 00363 g001 550
Figure 1. Mechanochemical synthesis of a halogen-bonded metal–organic structures: diagrams of 14tfib and the CoCl2(phen)2 complex, and fragments of crystal structures of the resulting halogen-bonded metal–organic solids.
Figure 1. Mechanochemical synthesis of a halogen-bonded metal–organic structures: diagrams of 14tfib and the CoCl2(phen)2 complex, and fragments of crystal structures of the resulting halogen-bonded metal–organic solids.
Crystals 07 00363 g001
Crystals 07 00363 g002 550
Figure 2. A comparison of the powder diffraction patterns of reactants, LAG products and diffraction patterns calculated from the obtained single crystal data of 1 and 2.
Figure 2. A comparison of the powder diffraction patterns of reactants, LAG products and diffraction patterns calculated from the obtained single crystal data of 1 and 2.
Crystals 07 00363 g002
Crystals 07 00363 g003 550
Figure 3. A comparison of the TG curves of 1 and 2.
Figure 3. A comparison of the TG curves of 1 and 2.
Crystals 07 00363 g003
Crystals 07 00363 g004 550
Figure 4. Structure of: (a) compound 1; and (b) compound 2.
Figure 4. Structure of: (a) compound 1; and (b) compound 2.
Crystals 07 00363 g004
Crystals 07 00363 g005 550
Figure 5. Parts of the crystal structure of prepared solids: halogen bonded zig-zag chain (a) and 2D network (b) of 1; and halogen bonded chain (c) and 2D network (d) of 2.
Figure 5. Parts of the crystal structure of prepared solids: halogen bonded zig-zag chain (a) and 2D network (b) of 1; and halogen bonded chain (c) and 2D network (d) of 2.
Crystals 07 00363 g005
Table
Table 1. General and crystallographic data for the prepared compounds.
Table 1. General and crystallographic data for the prepared compounds.
Compound 1Compound 2
Molecular Formula(CoCl2C24H16N4)(C6F4I2)[(CoClC25H20N4O)]Cl(CH3OH)(C6F4I2)
Mr892.10956.18
Crystal systemtriclinictriclinic
Space groupP 1 ¯ P 1 ¯
Crystal data:
a/Å9.9129(5)9.1111(3)
b/Å12.8302(5)11.1583(5)
c/Å14.0185(6)17.8104(8)
α/°116.357(4)77.661(4)
β/°103.424(4)76.942(4)
γ/°96.119(4)81.311(3)
V/Å31508.31(13)1713.04(13)
Z22
Dcalc/g cm−31.9641.854
λ(MoKα)/Å0.710730.71073
T/K295295
Crystal size/mm30.46 × 0.25 × 0.110.60 × 0.55 × 0.31
µ/mm−12.8462.517
F(000)854926
Refl. collected/unique6632/42125872/4242
Parameters388430
Δρmax, Δρmin/e Å−30.547; −0.6320.586; −0.449
R[F2 > 4σ(F2)]0.02940.0297
wR(F2)0.07720.0655
Goodness-of-fit, S0.8790.940

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lisac, K.; Cinčić, D. The Influence of Liquid on the Outcome of Halogen-Bonded Metal–Organic Materials Synthesis by Liquid Assisted Grinding. Crystals 2017, 7, 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7120363

AMA Style

Lisac K, Cinčić D. The Influence of Liquid on the Outcome of Halogen-Bonded Metal–Organic Materials Synthesis by Liquid Assisted Grinding. Crystals. 2017; 7(12):363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7120363

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lisac, Katarina, and Dominik Cinčić. 2017. "The Influence of Liquid on the Outcome of Halogen-Bonded Metal–Organic Materials Synthesis by Liquid Assisted Grinding" Crystals 7, no. 12: 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7120363

APA Style

Lisac, K., & Cinčić, D. (2017). The Influence of Liquid on the Outcome of Halogen-Bonded Metal–Organic Materials Synthesis by Liquid Assisted Grinding. Crystals, 7(12), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7120363

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop