Next Article in Journal
Add-Drop Filter Based on Wavelength-Dependent Light Interlink between Lithium-Niobate Microwaveguide Chip and Microfiber Knot Ring
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and 3D Network Architecture of 1- and 16-Hydrated Salts of 4-Dimethylaminopyridinium Decavanadate, (DMAPH)6[V10O28nH2O
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Molecular Structures of the Lowest Melting Odd- and Even-Numbered α,β-Unsaturated Carboxylic Acids—(E)-Hept-2-Enoic Acid and (E)-Oct-2-Enoic Acid

Leibniz Institute for Catalysis at the University of Rostock (LIKAT), Albert-Einstein-Str. 29a, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2016, 6(6), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6060066
Submission received: 13 May 2016 / Revised: 27 May 2016 / Accepted: 31 May 2016 / Published: 3 June 2016

Abstract

:
The molecular structures of the two lowest melting odd- and even-numbered α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids—(E)-hept-2-enoic acid (C7) and (E)-oct-2-enoic acid (C8)—are herein reported. The title compounds were crystallized by slow evaporation of ethanolic solutions at −30 °C. C7 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 ¯ with two molecules in the unit cell and C8 in the monoclinic space group C2/c with eight molecules in the unit cell. The unit cell parameters for C7 are: a = 5.3049(2) Å, b = 6.6322(3) Å, c = 11.1428(5) Å, α = 103.972(3)°, β = 97.542(3)°, γ = 90.104(3)°, and V = 376.92(3) Å3 (T = 150(2) K). The unit cell parameters for C8 are: a = 19.032(10) Å, b = 9.368(5) Å, c = 11.520(6) Å, β = 123.033(11)°, and V = 1721.80(16) Å3 (T = 200(2) K).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Essential fatty acids have attracted much interest in food, health, and nutrition sciences due to their role in biological processes especially for humans [1,2,3,4]. Oleic acid, (Z)-octadec-9-enoic acid, and linoleic acid, (9Z,12Z)-9,12-octadecadienoic acid, respectively, can be found, for example, in meat and milk products, nuts, olives, and oils. Increasing the number of double bonds within the alkyl chain leads to a melting point decrease and hence yields liquids at ambient conditions, which is an especially important property of polyunsaturated fatty acids [5]. Derivatives of the title compounds—(E)-hept-2-enoic acid (C7) and (E)-oct-2-enoic acid (C8)—exhibit interesting occurrences and properties. For example, they can be found as active compounds in beetles’ sexual pheromones [6,7], as part of siderophores in bacteria [8,9], as an anti-osteoporotic [10], or as phytotoxic substances [11], respectively.
Crystal structure determinations of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids have been known from the literature in the cases of acrylic acid (C3) [12,13,14,15] and crotonic acid (C4) [16] for more than 40 years, but the crystal structures of other members of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids, namely, (E)-pent-2-enoic acid (C5) [17], (E)-hex-2-enoic acid (C6) [18], (E)-non-2-enoic acid (C9), (E)-dec-2-enoic acid (C10) [19], (E)-undec-2-enoic acid (C11) [20], and (E)-dodec-2-enoic acid (C12) [21], respectively, have just recently been reported. In addition, two crystal structure determinations of co-crystals containing C6 are also known [22,23]. In comparison, a complete set of crystal structures of the corresponding saturated carboxylic acids (propionic acid to pentadecanoic acid) is also available from the literature [24,25,26,27,28]. In this contribution, we report on the synthesis, characterization, and crystal structure determinations of the two missing and lowest melting odd- and even-numbered members of the series of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids—(E)-hept-2-enoic acid (C7) and (E)-oct-2-enoic acid (C8)—respectively, which complete the series of crystal structure data from C3 to C12.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Melting Points

The synthesis of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids has been known for more than 130 years, when Schneegans reported on the synthesis of nonenoic acid via the reaction of heptanal, sodium acetate, and acetic anhydride in 1885 [29]. More than 20 years later, Harding and Weizmann reported on the correct molecular formula of the received (E)-non-2-enoic acid in 1910 [30]. The syntheses of the two α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids C7 and C8 were conducted by an adapted condensation reaction of malonic acid and the appropriate aldehyde at room temperature in high yields and purities as depicted in Scheme 1 [31,32,33,34] (see Experimental Section for details).
The title compounds exhibit low melting points, which lie below room temperature (C7: −11 °C; C8: 10 °C). As expected, crystallographic data of these structures have not yet been reported to date due to difficulties in crystallizing and analyzing. From the complete series of trans-α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids, a melting point alternation for even- and odd-numbered trans-α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids from C3 to C16 can be found as for most homologous chemical series. For comparison, in the case of saturated carboxylic acids, from hexanoic acid to pentadecanoic acid, this effect was traced back to crystal density variations [24]. This correlation was not detected in the present case for trans-α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids from C3 to C16.
The melting point alternation for the series of trans-α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids C3 to C16 based on melting points known from the literature and this work is depicted in Figure 1 [17,18,19,20,21,35,36,37,38,39,40]. It is clear that C7 has the lowest melting point within the series of odd-numbered carboxylic acids, whereas C8 exhibits the lowest melting point within the series of even-numbered carboxylic acids, respectively. Crystallographic density of C7 is significantly higher than that of C8, whereas the melting point of C7 is remarkably lower than that of C8, which is in contrast to the most homologous chemical series, e.g., for saturated carboxylic acids.

2.2. Crystal Structures

Molecular structures of linked acid dimers of the title compounds with pairs of O–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively, with an atom-labeling scheme and displacement thermal ellipsoids at the 50% probability level. Crystal and instrumental parameters of the crystal structure determinations of C7 and C8 can be found in Table 1.
Selected bond lengths and angles are summarized in Table 2. C7 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 ¯ with two molecules in the unit cell, whereas C8 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with eight molecules in the unit cell. Trans-α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids in the series C3C12 crystallize either in orthorhombic (C3: Ibam) [12,13,14,15], monoclinic (C4: C2/c; C9: P21/c) [16,19], or triclinic (C5, C6, C10, C11, C12: P 1 ¯ ) [17,18,19,20,21] space groups. The title compounds show no exceptional behavior and crystallize in these known space groups (C7: P 1 ¯ ; C8: C2/c). Bond lengths and angles in C7 and C8 closely resemble values found in other α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. The bond length C1–C2 is in accordance with reported C(sp2)–C(sp2) single bonds incorporated in carboxylic systems (C7: 1.4672(15) Å; C8: 1.4712(19) Å; ref.: 1.475 Å [41]). The bond lengths C2–C3 show characteristic values for C(sp2)–C(sp2) trans-configurated double bonds (C7: 1.3240(15) Å; C8: 1.3140(20) Å; ref.: 1.312 Å [41]). The crystal structures of C7 and C8 are characterized by carboxylic acid dimers linked by pairs of O–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds. Interestingly, the hydrogen-bonded dimer in C7 is connected by inversion (O1∙∙∙O2), whereas C8 exhibits a hydrogen-bonded dimer built up by a mirror plane (O1∙∙∙O1 and O2∙∙∙O2). Views of the packing of acid dimer layers in C7 and C8 are depicted in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively.
All non-hydrogen atoms of C7 and C8 lie nearly in one plane with a mean deviation from the best plane defined by these atoms of 0.02 Å in C7 and 0.03 Å in C8. In C7, C6 exhibits the largest deviation from that plane (0.033(1) Å), whereas this is observed for O2 with 0.056(1) Å in C8, respectively. For C8, the carboxyl group is affected by disorder. Equal C–O bond distances were obtained (C1–O1: 1.2655(18), C1–O2 1.2644(18) Å), which indicates that there is a half mirrored overlay by a single and a double bond for C1–O1 and C1–O2, respectively. This could not be further resolved reasonably by applying a splitting model and geometric restraints. The initial geometry of the carboxyl group was retained, and two hydrogen atoms (H1 and H2A) are therefore present, each only half occupied (O1–H1: 0.90(4), O2–H2A: 0.84(4) Å). Only one orientation is shown in each case for Figure 3.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Considerations

NMR spectra were recorded on a AV300 or AV400 spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and chemical shifts of the 1H, and 13C spectra were reported in parts per million (ppm) using the solvent shifts for 1H and 13C as internal standard (CDCl3: 1H δ = 7.26, 13C δ = 77.0). Elemental analysis for C and H was performed on a Microanalysator TruSpec CHNS device (LECO Corporation, Saint Joseph, MI, USA). MS spectra were determined by electron spray ionization using a Electron Finnigan MAT 95-XP mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Melting points were determined by cyclic differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) using a DSC823e device (Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Gießen, Germany) in the range of −50 °C to 50 °C with a heating rate of 10 K/min (2 cycles, N2 atmosphere, Al crucible). All melting points are peak temperatures.

3.2. Materials

All chemicals were used as received without further drying or purification unless otherwise noted. n-pentanal, n-hexanal, and malonic acid were purchased from ABCR (purity >98%).

3.3. General Synthesis and Crystallization of α,β-Unsaturated Carboxylic Acids

Malonic acid (25.0 g, 240.2 mmol, 1.0 eq) was dissolved in dry pyridine (38.0 g, 480.5 mmol, 2.0 eq) at room temperature in a three-necked flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar and a reflux condenser under a mild flow of argon. The appropriate aldehyde (240.2 mmol, 1.0 eq) was then added in one portion, and the resulting clear solution was further stirred for 72 h at room temperature under argon. Afterwards, the resulting light yellow to orange solution was brought to an acidic pH value by adding phosphoric acid at 0 °C (42.5 wt %, 138.5 g, 600.6 mmol, 2.5 eq). The resulting two layers were extracted three times with 150 mL portions of ethyl acetate and reduced to a volume of ca. 150 mL in vacuo. To remove impurities from aldol condensation the raw acid was converted into the corresponding sodium salt by addition of an aqueous solution of sodium carbonate (20.4 g, 192.2 mmol, 0.8 eq in 200 mL). After stirring for 30 min, the water phase was separated and extracted three times with 150-mL portions of ethyl acetate. The water phase was then acidified with concentrated hydrochloric acid (37.0 wt %, 35.5 g, 360.4 mmol, 1.5 eq), the organic phase was separated, and the water phase was again extracted three times with 150-mL portions of ethyl acetate. The combined organic phases were dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness under diminished pressure. The resulting raw product was further purified by distillation in vacuo, yielding the product with a purity of >99% (GC).
The two purified and liquid unsaturated carboxylic acids crystallize spontaneously during storage in a refrigerator at −30 °C as compact polycrystalline materials. Suitable single crystals for X-ray investigations were obtained by slow evaporation of the solvent from ethanolic solutions of each compound at −30 °C over two weeks in small open GC vials.
(E)-hept-2-enoic acid (C7). M. p. −11 °C (lit. –12 °C–−11 °C) [42]; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 12.20 (br s, 1H, OH); 7.08 (dt, 3J = 15.6 Hz, 3J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, –CH–); 5.82 (dt, 3J = 15.6 Hz, 4J = 1.6 Hz, 1H, –CH–); 2.26–2.20 (m, 2H, –CH2–); 1.49–1.41 (m, 2H, –CH2–); 1.39–1.30 (m, 2H, –CH2–); 0.91 (t, 3J = 7.2 Hz; 3H, –CH3–). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.59 (CO); 152.61 (CH); 120.79 (CH); 32.12 (CH2); 30.09 (CH2); 22.33 (CH2); 13.90 (CH3). MS (EI, 70eV): m/z = 128 (M+, 3), 110 (10), 99 (37), 87 (11), 86 (18), 82 (12), 81 (14), 73 (68), 71 (11), 69 (14), 68 (47), 67 (15), 57 (15), 56 (46), 55 (41), 54 (14), 53 (33), 52 (11), 51 (22) 50 (14), 45 (51), 43 (58), 42 (23), 41 (100), 40 (19), 39 (98), 38 (21), 29 (51). HRMS (ESI-TOF/MS): calculated for C7H12O2 ([M − H]) 127.07645, found 127.07660. Elemental analysis for C7H12O2% (calc.): C 65.58 (65.60); H 9.58 (9.44).
(E)-oct-2-enoic acid (C8): M. p. 10 °C (lit. 2 °C–6 °C) [43,44]; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 11.83 (br s, 1H, OH); 7.09 (dt, 3J = 15.6 Hz, 3J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, –CH–); 5.82 (dt, 3J = 15.6 Hz, 4J = 1.6 Hz, 1H, –CH–); 2.25–2.19 (m, 2H, –CH2–); 1.51–1.43 (m, 2H, –CH2–); 1.34–1.27 (m, 4H, 2x –CH2–); 0.91–0.86 (m, 3H, –CH3–). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.56 (CO); 152.66 (CH); 120.78 (CH); 32.41 (CH2); 31.43 (CH2); 27.68 (CH2); 22.54 (CH2); 14.06 (CH3). MS (EI, 70eV): m/z = 142 (M+, 0), 99 (20), 96 (20), 87 (11), 86 (22), 82 (22), 81 (11), 73 (54), 71 (12), 70 (37), 69 (13), 68 (33), 67 (22), 57 (20), 56 (18), 55 (57), 54 (12), 53 (23), 51 (12), 45 (45), 43 (27), 42 (29), 41 (100), 40 (20), 39 (98), 29 (89). HRMS (ESI-TOF/MS): calculated for C8H14O2 ([M − H]) 141.0921, found 141.09201. Elemental analysis for C8H14O2% (calc.): C 65.50 (65.57); H 9.97 (9.92).

3.4. Crystal Structure Determinations

Data were collected on a Bruker Kappa APEX II Duo diffractometer [45]. The structures were solved by direct methods (SHELXS-97) and refined by full-matrix least-squares procedures (SHELXL-2014) on F2 with the SHELXTL software package [46,47]. Data were corrected for absorption effects using the multi-scan method (SADABS) [48]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. For C7, H1 could be found from the difference Fourier map and was refined freely. For C8 the carboxyl group is affected by disorder, which is apparent in equal C–O bond lengths. This could not be further resolved reasonably by applying a splitting model and geometric restraints. H1 and H2A are found from the difference Fourier map and were refined with Uiso(H) fixed at 1.5 Ueq(O) and site occupancy factors of 0.5. All other H atoms were placed in idealized positions with d(C–H) = 0.95 Å (CH), 0.99 Å (CH2), 0.98 Å (CH3) and refined using a riding model with Uiso(H) fixed at 1.2 Ueq(C) for CH and CH2 and 1.5 Ueq(C) for CH3. Crystal data, data collection, and refinement parameters are collected in Table 1. The DIAMOND program package was used for graphical representations [49]. Crystallographic data for the structural analyses have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre—CCDC-1475066 for (E)-hept-2-enoic acid (C7), and CCDC-1475065 for (E)-oct-2-enoic acid (C8). These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (or from the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; Fax: +44 1223 336033; E-mail: [email protected].

4. Conclusions

The crystal and molecular structures of ((E))-hept-2-enoic acid (C7) and ((E))-oct-2-enoic acid (C8) exhibiting the lowest melting points for odd- and even-numbered homologues within the series of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids are reported. By analogy to other known crystal structures of this class of substances, C7 and C8 are characterized by carboxylic acid dimers linked by pairs of O–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Philipp Thiele (University of Rostock) for DSC measurements and Johannes Gerardus de Vries (LIKAT) for helpful support. The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Fund of the Leibniz Association.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design: Tim Peppel, Marcel Sonneck, Anke Spannenberg, Sebastian Wohlrab; acquisition of data: Tim Peppel, Marcel Sonneck, Anke Spannenberg; analysis and interpretation of data: Tim Peppel, Marcel Sonneck, Anke Spannenberg; the drafting of the manuscript: Tim Peppel, Marcel Sonneck, Anke Spannenberg, Sebastian Wohlrab; critical revision: Tim Peppel, Anke Spannenberg, Sebastian Wohlrab.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Burr, G.O.; Burr, M.M.; Miller, E.S. On the fatty acids essential in nutrition. III. J. Biol. Chem. 1932, 97, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  2. Damude, H.G.; Kinney, A.J. Enhancing Plant Seed Oils for Human Nutrition. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 962–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lands, B. Consequences of Essential Fatty Acids. Nutrients 2012, 4, 1338–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Spector, A.A.; Kim, H.-Y. Discovery of essential fatty acids. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Beare-Rogers, J.L.; Dieffenbacher, A.; Holm, J.V. Lexicon of lipid nutrition (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 685–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cork, A.; Hall, D.R.; Blaney, W.M.; Simmonds, M.S.J. Identification of a component of the female sex pheromone of callosobruchus analis (coleoptera: bruchidae). Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shu, S.; Mbata, G.N.; Cork, A.; Ramaswamy, S.B. Sex Pheromone of Callosobruchus subinnotatus. J. Chem. Ecol. 1999, 25, 2715–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martin, J.D.; Ito, Y.; Homann, V.V.; Haygood, M.G.; Butler, A. Structure and membrane affinity of new amphiphilic siderophores produced by Ochrobactrum sp. SP18. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 11, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Okujo, N.; Sakakibara, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Yamamoto, S. Structure of acinetoferrin, a new citrate-based dihydroxamate siderophore fromAcinetobacter haemolyticus. Biometals 1994, 7, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yamaguchi, K.; Shinohara, C.; Kojima, S.; Sodeoka, M.; Tsuji, T. (2E,6R)-8-Hydroxy-2,6-dimethyl-2-octenoic Acid, a Novel Anti-osteoporotic Monoterpene, Isolated from Cistanche salsa. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1999, 63, 731–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jacyno, J.M.; Harwood, J.S.; Cutler, H.G.; Dulik, D.M. Structure and solution-state conformation of botcinolide, a new biologically active metabolite from the fungus Botrytis cinerea. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11585–11592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Boese, R.; Bläser, D.; Steller, I.; Latz, R.; Bäumen, A. Redetermination of 2-propenoic acid at 125K. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 1999, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chatani, Y.; Sakata, Y.; Nitta, I. Crystal structures of monomers polymerizable in their solid states. I. Acrylic acid. J. Polym. Sci. 1963, Pt.B 1, 419–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Higgs, M.A.; Sass, R.L. The crystal structure of acrylic acid. Acta Crystallogr. 1963, 16, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oswald, I.D.H.; Urquhart, A.J. Polymorphism and polymerisation of acrylic and methacrylic acid at high pressure. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2011, 13, 4503–4507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Shimizu, S.; Kekka, S.; Kashino, S.; Haisa, M. Topochemical Studies. III. The Crystal and Molecular Structures of Crotonic Acid, CH3CH=CHCOOH, and Crotonamide, CH3CH=CHCONH2. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1974, 47, 1627–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Peppel, T.; Sonneck, M.; Spannenberg, A.; Wohlrab, S. Crystal structure of ((E))-pent-2-enoic acid. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E 2015, 71, o316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Peppel, T.; Sonneck, M.; Spannenberg, A.; Wohlrab, S. Crystal structure of ((E))-hex-2-enoic acid. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E 2015, 71, o323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sonneck, M.; Peppel, T.; Spannenberg, A.; Wohlrab, S. Synthesis and Molecular Structures of ((E))-non-2-enoic Acid and ((E))-dec-2-enoic Acid. Crystals 2015, 5, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sonneck, M.; Peppel, T.; Spannenberg, A.; Wohlrab, S. Crystal structure of ((E))-undec-2-enoic acid. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E 2015, 71, o426–o427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sonneck, M.; Peppel, T.; Spannenberg, A.; Wohlrab, S. Crystal structure of ((E))-dodec-2-enoic acid. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E 2015, 71, o528–o529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Aakeröy, C.B.; Beatty, A.M.; Helfrich, B.A.; Nieuwenhuyzen, M. Do Polymorphic Compounds Make Good Cocrystallizing Agents? A Structural Case Study that Demonstrates the Importance of Synthon Flexibility. Cryst. Growth Des. 2003, 3, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stanton, M.K.; Bak, A. Physicochemical Properties of Pharmaceutical Co-Crystals: A Case Study of Ten AMG 517 Co-Crystals. Cryst. Growth Des. 2008, 8, 3856–3862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bond, A.D. On the crystal structures and melting point alternation of the n-alkyl carboxylic acids. New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Scheuerman, R.F.; Sass, R.L. The crystal structure of valeric acid. Acta Crystallogr. 1962, 15, 1244–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Strieter, F.J.; Templeton, D.H. Crystal structure of butyric acid. Acta Crystallogr. 1962, 15, 1240–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Strieter, F.J.; Templeton, D.H.; Scheuerman, R.F.; Sass, R.L. The crystal structure of propionic acid. Acta Crystallogr. 1962, 15, 1233–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Allan, D.R.; Clark, S.J.; Parsons, S.; Ruf, M. A high-pressure structural study of propionic acid and the application of CCD detectors in high-pressure single-crystal X-ray diffraction. J. Phy.: Condens. Matter 2000, 12, L613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schneegans, A. Die Perkin’sche Reaction in der Fettkörperreihe. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1885, 227, 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Harding, V.J.; Weizmann, C. XXXII.-[capital Delta]1-Nonylenic acid. J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 1910, 97, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bennani, Y.L.; Sharpless, K.B. Asymmetric Synthesis of γ-Hydroxy α,β-Unsaturated Amides via an AD-elimination Process; Synthesis of (+)-Coriolic Acid. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 2083–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Böhme, R.; Jung, G.; Breitmaier, E. Synthesis of the Antibiotic ((R))-Reutericyclin via Dieckmann Condensation. Helv. Chim. Acta 2005, 88, 2837–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Doebner, O. Ueber die der Sorbinsäure homologen, ungesättigten Säuren mit zwei Doppelbindungen. Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges. 1902, 35, 1136–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Knoevenagel, E. Condensation von Malonsäure mit aromatischen Aldehyden durch Ammoniak und Amine. Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges. 1898, 31, 2596–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Heravi, M.M.; Zargarani, D.; Shoar, R.H.; Khaleghi, S. Hydrolysis of amides to carboxylic acids using phthalic anhydride under microwave irradiation and solvent-free conditions. J. Chem. Res. 2005, 119–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dalcanale, E.; Montanari, F. Selective oxidation of aldehydes to carboxylic acids with sodium chlorite-hydrogen peroxide. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 567–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stoll, M. Sur la formation de chaînes normales dans la condensation d’aldéhydes saturés Synthèse du n-tridécylène-2-al et du n-pentadécadiène-2,4-al. Helv. Chim. Acta 1947, 30, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Savary, P. Sur la détermination des acides gras α.β-insaturés. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1950, 624–627. [Google Scholar]
  39. Grimmer, G.; Hildebrandt, A. Synthese von cis-Formen α.β-ungesättigter Carbonsäuren. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1965, 685, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ahmad, M.U.; Shamim Ahmad, M.; Osman, S.M. Allylic halogenation and oxidation of long chain α,β-unsaturated ester. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2013, 55, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Allen, F.H.; Kennard, O.; Watson, D.G.; Brammer, L.; Orpen, A.G.; Taylor, R. Tables of bond lengths determined by X-ray and neutron diffraction. Part 1. Bond lengths in organic compounds. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1987, S1–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Morton, A.A.; Marsh, F.D.; Coombs, R.D.; Lyons, A.L.; Penner, S.E.; Ramsden, H.E.; Baker, V.B.; Little, E.L.; Letsinger, R.L. Polymerization. XII. The Metalation of Olefins and Dienes and their Use in Alfin Polymerization of Butadiene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 3785–3792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Colonge, J.; Lartigau, G. 1.1.1.4-Tetrachlor-buten-(2). Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1965, 684, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bourguel, M.M. Sur l’isomérie cis-trans éthylénique. Addition de deux atomes d’hydrogène à la liaison acétylénique. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1929, 45, 1067–1091. [Google Scholar]
  45. Bruker. APEX II; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madion, WI, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sheldrick, G. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sheldrick, G. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bruker. SADABS; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  49. Brandenburg, K. Diamond; Crystal Impact GbR: Bonn, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
Scheme 1. Reaction sequence for the synthesis of the two title compounds—C7 and C8.
Scheme 1. Reaction sequence for the synthesis of the two title compounds—C7 and C8.
Crystals 06 00066 sch001
Figure 1. Melting point alternation of trans-α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids in the series C3 to C16.
Figure 1. Melting point alternation of trans-α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids in the series C3 to C16.
Crystals 06 00066 g001
Figure 2. View of acid dimer molecules in the crystal of C7 showing the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Figure 2. View of acid dimer molecules in the crystal of C7 showing the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Crystals 06 00066 g002
Figure 3. View of acid dimer molecules in the crystal of C8 showing the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Figure 3. View of acid dimer molecules in the crystal of C8 showing the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Crystals 06 00066 g003
Figure 4. View of the packing of acid dimer layers in the crystal of C7 along the crystallographic a axis.
Figure 4. View of the packing of acid dimer layers in the crystal of C7 along the crystallographic a axis.
Crystals 06 00066 g004
Figure 5. View of the packing of acid dimer molecules in the crystal of C8 along the crystallographic b axis.
Figure 5. View of the packing of acid dimer molecules in the crystal of C8 along the crystallographic b axis.
Crystals 06 00066 g005
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement for C7 and C8.
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement for C7 and C8.
CompoundC7C8
Chemical formulaC7H12O2C8H14O2
Formula weight128.17142.19
Crystal systemtriclinicmonoclinic
a5.3049(2) Å19.032(10) Å
b6.6322(3) Å9.368(5) Å
c11.1428(5) Å11.520(6) Å
α103.972(3)°90°
β97.542(3)°123.033(11)°
γ90.104(3)°90°
Unit cell volume376.92(3) Å31721.8(16) Å3
Temperature150(2) K200(2) K
Space group P 1 ¯ C2/c
Z (Z’)2 (1)8 (1)
μ0.661 mm−10.077 mm−1
No. of reflections measured523313812
No. of independent reflections13251883
Rint0.01940.0293
Final R1 values (I > 2σ(I))0.02990.0433
Final wR(F2) values (I > 2σ(I))0.08370.1071
Final R1 values (all data)0.03280.0634
Final wR(F2) values (all data)0.08610.1238
Goodness of fit on F21.0681.047
Density1.129 g/cm31.097 g/cm3
Table 2. Selected atom distances (Å) and angles (°) for C7 and C8.
Table 2. Selected atom distances (Å) and angles (°) for C7 and C8.
CompoundC7C8
AtomsDistanceDistance
C1–O11.3178(12)1.2655(18)
C1–O21.2265(12)1.2644(18)
C1–C21.4672(15)1.4712(19)
C2–C31.3240(15)1.3140(20)
C3–C41.4905(15)1.4920(20)
average C–C (alkyl chain)1.5191.519
H-bonds in:D–H∙∙∙AD∙∙∙A
C7O1–H1∙∙∙O2i2.637
C8O1–H1∙∙∙O1ii2.651 #
O2–H2A∙∙∙O2ii2.595 #
AtomsAngleAngle
O1–C1–O2122.91(9)122.36(13)
O1–C1–C2113.37(9)118.88(12)
O2–C1–C2123.71(9)118.76(13)
C1–C2–C3121.41(9)121.69(13)
C2–C3–C4126.47(9)127.87(13)
H-bonds in:D–H∙∙∙AAngle
C7O1–H1∙∙∙O2i176.8
C8O1–H1∙∙∙O1ii177.3 #
O2–H2A∙∙∙O2ii171.7 #
Symmetry codes:(i) −x, −y, −z
(ii) –x, y, –z + 2.5
Note: # suffered from disorder.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sonneck, M.; Spannenberg, A.; Wohlrab, S.; Peppel, T. Synthesis and Molecular Structures of the Lowest Melting Odd- and Even-Numbered α,β-Unsaturated Carboxylic Acids—(E)-Hept-2-Enoic Acid and (E)-Oct-2-Enoic Acid. Crystals 2016, 6, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6060066

AMA Style

Sonneck M, Spannenberg A, Wohlrab S, Peppel T. Synthesis and Molecular Structures of the Lowest Melting Odd- and Even-Numbered α,β-Unsaturated Carboxylic Acids—(E)-Hept-2-Enoic Acid and (E)-Oct-2-Enoic Acid. Crystals. 2016; 6(6):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6060066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sonneck, Marcel, Anke Spannenberg, Sebastian Wohlrab, and Tim Peppel. 2016. "Synthesis and Molecular Structures of the Lowest Melting Odd- and Even-Numbered α,β-Unsaturated Carboxylic Acids—(E)-Hept-2-Enoic Acid and (E)-Oct-2-Enoic Acid" Crystals 6, no. 6: 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6060066

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop