Next Article in Journal
Self-Assembly Kinetics of Colloidal Particles inside Monodispersed Micro-Droplet and Fabrication of Anisotropic Photonic Crystal Micro-Particles
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Structures and Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties of Ionic Organic Crystal Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Spacer-Controlled Supramolecular Assemblies of Cu(II) with Bis(2-Hydroxyphenylimine) Ligands. from Monoligand Complexes to Double-Stranded Helicates and Metallomacrocycles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Packing of Helices: Is Chirality the Highest Crystallographic Symmetry?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 6
Issue 10
10.3390/cryst6100121
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A High Laser Damage Threshold and a Good Second-Harmonic Generation Response in a New Infrared NLO Material: LiSm3SiS7

by
Ni Zhen
,
Leyan Nian
,
Guangmao Li
,
Kui Wu
* and
Shilie Pan
*
Key Laboratory of Functional Materials and Devices for Special Environments of CAS, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Electronic Information Materials and Devices, Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics & Chemistry of CAS, 40-1 South Beijing Road, Urumqi 830011, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2016, 6(10), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6100121
Submission received: 29 June 2016 / Revised: 16 September 2016 / Accepted: 19 September 2016 / Published: 23 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nonlinear Optical Crystals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of new infrared nonlinear optical (IR NLO) materials, LiRe3MS7 (Re = Sm, Gd; M = Si, Ge), have been successfully synthesized in vacuum-sealed silica tubes via a high-temperature solid-state method. All of them crystallize in the non-centrosymmetric space group P63 of the hexagonal system. In their structures, LiS6 octahedra connect with each other by sharing common faces to form infinite isolated one-dimensional ∞[LiS3]n chains along the 63 axis. ReS8 polyhedra share edges and corners to construct a three-dimensional tunnel structure with ∞[LiS3]n chains located inside. Remarkably, LiSm3SiS7 shows promising potential as one new IR NLO candidate, including a wide IR transparent region (0.44–21 μm), a high laser damage threshold (LDT) (3.7 × benchmark AgGaS2), and a good NLO response (1.5 × AgGaS2) at a particle size between 88 μm and 105 μm. Dipole-moment calculation was also used to analyze the origin of NLO responses for title compounds.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals play an increasingly critical role in developing new coherent light sources by frequency conversion technology on traditional lasers [1,2]. Recently, numerous famous NLO crystals have been discovered and have effectively solved the generation of UV-visible light [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. However, for the mid-far infrared (IR) region (3–20 μm), outstanding IR NLO materials have been discovered less, and only a few (chalcopyrites AgGaS2, AgGaSe2, and ZnGeP2) have been commercially applied [23,24,25]. Note that some of the self-defects hinder their future development (especially for high-energy laser system), such as low laser-damage thresholds (LDTs) for AgGaS2 and AgGaSe2, and serious two-photon absorption (TPA) for ZnGeP2. Nowadays, the development of many important fields, such as laser guidance, infrared remote sensing, and telecommunication, has hardly been realized without the help of high-energy IR sources. Thus, to find new excellent IR NLO materials with a wide IR transparent range, a good chemical stability, a high LDT, and a large NLO coefficient is still an urgent task and a great challenge. In recent decades, research systems have almost covered the entire periodic table, and hundreds of new IR NLO crystals have been discovered [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. As one NLO material, a non-centrosymmetric (NCS) structure is an essential condition. Previous investigations indicate that tetrahedral MIVS4 (MIV = Si, Ge, and Sn) with lively alkali metals can increase the opportunity to obtain NCS structures [53,54]. Moreover, combining the electropositive elements including alkaline, alkaline-earth, or rare-earth metals with crystal structures can increase the band gaps of compounds and further increase their LDTs [55,56]. Based on the above strategy, we have focused our research interests on the Li−Re−M−S system and fortunately obtained three new NCS compounds: LiSm3SiS7, LiSm3GeS7, and LiGd3GeS7, which belong to the well-known ARe3MQ7 family, where A is the monovalent, divalent, or trivalent ions, Re is the rare-earth ions, M is the tetravalent ions (Si4+, Ge4+, and Sn4+), and Q is S or Se [57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. To the best of our knowledge, Li-containing ARe3MQ7 compounds has not been reported yet. All of them crystallize in the polar space groups of P63 and exhibit similar crystal structures. Among them, LiSm3SiS7 has a high laser damage threshold about 3.7 times that of benchmark AgGaS2. In addition, LiSm3SiS7 also shows a wide transmission window in the IR range (up to 21 μm) and a large NLO response (1.5 × AgGaS2) at a particle size between 88 μm and 105 μm. Herein, LiSm3SiS7 can be expected as a new NLO candidate in the IR region.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Crystal Structure

Three compounds including LiSm3SiS7, LiSm3GeS7, and LiGd3GeS7 crystallize in the NCS polar space group P63 of the hexagonal system. Herein, LiSm3SiS7 was chosen as the representative to illuminate its crystal structure. In its asymmetric unit, there is one unique Sm atom, one Li atom, one Si atom, and three S atoms. As for its structure, Sm atoms are connected with eight S atoms to form the distorted SmS8 polyhedra with d(Sm−S) = 2.791(5) − 2.993(6) Å. SmS8 polyhedra connect together by sharing corners or edges to form the three-dimensional tunnel framework (Figure 1a). Si atoms are connected with four S atoms to form the isolated typical SiS4 tetrahedra with d(Si−S) = 2.089(2) − 2.132(1) Å. Li atoms are linked with six S atoms to form LiS6 octahedra with three short (2.568(8) Å) and three long (2.623(3) Å) Li−S bonds. The LiS6 octahedra share faces with each other to form one-dimensional ∞[LiS3]n chains along the 63 axis, and the chains then stretch in the tunnels surrounded by SmS8 (Figure 1b,c). In addition, title compounds have similar crystal structures to previous reported ARe3MQ7 series of crystals [57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64], where A represents Na, Cu, and Ag. In this work, the new Li-containing compounds were discovered to enlarge the AIRe3MIVQ7 family and enrich the structural chemistry.
Moreover, in order to ensure the reasonability of crystal structures of these compounds, the bond valence [65,66] and the global instability index (GII) [67,68,69] are systemically calculated (Table 1). The method of bond-valence parameters was used to calculate the bond valences of elements. The following equation is commonly used to calculate the bond valence ( v i j ):
V i = ∑ j v i j = ∑ j exp ( r ′ − r i j B ) ,
where r’ is an empirically determined bond valence parameter, rij is the actual bond length, and B is commonly taken to be a universal constant equal to 0.37 Å. Calculated results (Li, 0.993–1.021; Sm/Gd, 3.024–3.039; Si/Ge, 4.060–4.134; S, 1.933–2.128) indicate that all atoms are in reasonable oxidation states. In addition, GII can be derived from the bond valence concepts, which represent the tension of lattice parameters and are always used to evaluate the rationality of structure. While the value of GII is less than 0.05 vu (valence unit), the tension of the structure is not proper; while the value of GII is larger than 0.2 vu, its structure is not stable. Thus, the value of GII in a reliable structure should be limited to 0.05–0.2 in general. As for title compounds, calculated GII values are in the range of 0.07–0.09 vu, which illustrates that the crystal structures of all compounds are reasonable.

2.2. Optical Properties

Experimental optical bandgap (Figure 2) of LiSm3SiS7 was measured to be 2.83 eV (440 nm), which is consistent with the crystal color (pale yellow). IR and Raman spectra (Figure 2) show that LiSm3SiS7 has a wide transmission range in the IR region (up to 21 μm) that covers two critical atmospheric windows (3–5 and 8–12 μm), which is comparable to those reported for powdered BaGa4Se7 (~18 μm) [35], AgGaS2 (~23 μm) [30], Li2CdGeS4 (~22 μm) [70], and Na2Hg3Si2S8 (~20 μm) [47]. Moreover, the bandgap (2.83 eV) of LiSm3SiS7 is larger than that of commercial AgGaS2 crystal (2.56 eV) [30]; thus, LiSm3SiS7 may have a higher laser damage resistance since the LDT is generally proportional to the bandgap for one material. In this work, a pulse laser (1.06 μm, 10 Hz, and 10 ns) was chosen to measure the LDT of LiSm3SiS7 with AgGaS2 as the reference on powder samples (Table 2). The LDT value of LiSm3SiS7 is 118 MW/cm2, about 3.7 times that of commercial AgGaS2 (32 MW/cm2), which shows this material has good potential to apply in the high-power laser system. We have also investigated the second-harmonic generation (SHG) response for LiSm3SiS7, and the particle size versus SHG intensity of LiSm3SiS7 indicates a nonphase-matching behavior at 2.09 μm. As seen from Figure 3 and Table 3, LiSm3SiS7 shows a large SHG response about 1.5 times that of standard AgGaS2 in the 88–105 μm particle size range. Remarkably, LiSm3SiS7 also achieves a suitable balance of high LDT and good SHG response, which can effectively avoid the drawbacks (low LDT and harmful TPA) of commercially available materials. Thus, LiSm3SiS7 has potential application as a NLO material in the mid- and far-IR region.

2.3. Dipole Moment Calculation

The SHG response has a close relationship with the distortion degree of anionic groups in the crystal structure. While the spatial arrangement of all units tends to be uniform, the local NLO effects stack with each other, and then lead to a large NLO effect for material. Thus, in order to obtain a deeper understanding of NLO responses origin of title compounds, the dipole moments for the [LiS6], [ReS8], and [MS4] units were calculated with a bond-valence method [71,72,73], and the calculated results are listed in Table 4. From the table, it can be seen that the polarizations of the x- and y-directions from all building units are almost canceled out, and the polarizations of z-direction are constructively added in a unit cell for title compounds. Moreover, the polarization of the [ReS8] unit is also found to be much larger than those of the distorted [LiS6] octahedra and [MS4] tetrahedra for all title compounds. As seen from the results for previous reported La3Ga0.5(Ge0.5/Ga0.5)S7 and La3In0.5(Ge0.5/In0.5)S7 on the calculation of cutoff-energy-dependent SHG coefficient [57], their SHG responses mainly originate from the transition processes from S-3p, La-5d states to La-5d, S-3p states, which are consistent with the calculated results of dipole moments for the title compounds in this work.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Synthesis

Raw materials were commercially purchased. Because Li metal is easily oxidized in air, all the preparation processes were completed in an Ar-filled glovebox.

3.1.1. LiSm3SiS7

Elementary reactants of Li, Sm, Si, and S were weighted at the stoichiometric ratio of 1:3:1:7. All the raw materials were firstly loaded into a graphite crucible, the graphite crucible was then put into a silica tube, and the tube was flame-sealed under 10−3 Pa. The detailed temperature-setting curve for the muffle furnace was heated to 850 °C in 50 h and kept at this temperature for about 100 h, then slowly cooled to 300 °C by 80 h, finally quickly cooled to the room temperature. The product was washed with N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) to remove the byproducts. Pale-yellow crystals were found and stable in the air.

3.1.2. LiSm3GeS7 and LiGd3GeS7

These reaction processes including starting composition and heating profile are similar to that of LiSm3SiS7. Finally, yellow crystals were also obtained by washing with DMF, but they would deliquesce when exposed to air for a long time.

3.2. Structure Determination

Selected high-quality crystals were used for data collections on a Bruker SMART APEX II 4K CCD diffractometer (Bruker Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) using MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 296 K. The crystal structures were solved by a direct method and refined using the SHELXTL program package [74]. Multi-scan method was chosen for absorption correction [75]. As for the LiSm3SiS7, the space group was determined from the systematic absences was P63. The first run of a routine refinement of the initial structure generated an “un-balanced” formula of “Sm3SiS7” with R1 = 2.04%, R2 = 5.06%. In addition, a high electron density peak with 6.49 e−/Å3 and 2.55 Å away from S1, was observed. We also tried to assign this position to the other atoms or a mixed occupation with two atoms (Li and Sm), but no refinement results were proper or obtained the balanced formula. Only this position was assigned as Li1, which provided a balanced formula of “LiSm3SiS7,” and R1 and R2 converged to improved values of 1.50% and 3.05%. Rational anisotropic thermal parameters for all atoms were obtained by the anisotropic refinement and extinction correction. Moreover, the maximum and minimum peaks on the final Fourier difference map corresponded to 0.57 and −0.60 e−/Å3. Other two compounds (LiSm3GeS7 and LiGd3GeS7) have the similar refinement process with that of LiSm3SiS7. Final structures were also checked with the PLATON program, and no other symmetries were found. Crystallographic data for title compounds are reported in Table 5.

3.3. Powder XRD Measurement

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was measured at room temperature using an automated Bruker D2 X-ray diffractometer. However, we did not prepare the pure phase of LiSm3GeS7 and LiGd3GeS7 for the reason of moisture absorption. In this work, only the pure phase of LiSm3SiS7 was obtained, and we systemically studied its physicochemical properties. In addition, in comparison with calculated and experiment results (Figure 4), it can be found that the experimental powder XRD patterns are basically consistent with calculated values.

3.4. UV–Vis–NIR Diffuse-Reflectance Spectroscopy

With a Shimadzu SolidSpec-3700DUV spectrophotometer, optical diffuse reflectance spectrum was measured in the wavelength range from 190 nm to 2600 nm. The absorption spectrum was calculated from the diffuse reflectance spectra according to the Kubelka–Munk function: α/S = (1 − R)2/2R, where R is the reflectance coefficient, and α and S are the absorption and scattering coefficient, respectively. Based on the absorption spectrum, the optical bandgap was obtained with the absorption edge of material.

3.5. Raman Spectroscopy

Hand-picked single-crystals were put on an object slide, and a LABRAM HR Evolution spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Beijing, China) equipped with a CCD detector with a 532-nm laser was then used to record the Raman spectra. The integration time was 5 s.

3.6. Infrared Spectroscopy

IR spectra were measured on the powder sample mixed with dried KBr powder. A Shimadzu IRAffinity-1 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer recorded the measurement data in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 2 cm−1.

3.7. Second-Harmonic Generation (SHG) Measurement

A Q-switch laser (2.09 μm, 3 Hz, 50 ns) was used to measure the SHG response with different particle sizes on powder sample, including 38–55, 55–88, 88–105, 105–150, and 150–200 μm. The AgGaS2 crystal was ground and sieved into the same size ranges as the reference.

3.8. LDT Measurement

A pulse laser (1.06 μm, 10 Hz, and 10 ns) was chosen to estimate the powder LDT with the same powdered AgGaS2 sample as the reference with a particle size range of 150–200 μm. The detail test procedure is as follows: with increasing laser energy, the color change of the powder sample was constantly observed with an optical microscope to determine the damage threshold. To adjust different laser beams, an optical concave lens was added into the laser path. The damage spot was measured by the scale of optical microscope.

3.9. Calculations of Group Dipole Moments

The dipole moments of the LiS6, SmS8, GdS8, SiS4, and GeS4 units were calculated with a simple bond-valence method [71,72,73]. Distribution of the electron on the each atom was estimated by the bond-valence theory vij = exp[(r’ − rij)/B; where r’ is the empirical constant, rij is the actual bond length, and B is commonly taken to be a universal constant equal to 0.37 Å. The geometrical position was taken from the unit cell of the experimental X-ray crystal structure. The Debye equation μ = neR, where μ is the net dipole moment in Debye, n the total number of electrons, e the charge on an electron, and R the difference, in cm, between the “centroids” of positive and negative charges, was used to calculate the dipole moment.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the first three new Li-containing ARe3MQ7 compounds including LiSm3SiS7, LiSm3GeS7, and LiGd3GeS7 are isostructural with a polar space group P63 in the hexagonal system. The LiSm3SiS7, for example, features a 3D tunnel structure composed of isolated SiS4 tetrahedra, 1D ∞[LiS3]n chains along the 63 axis formed by face-sharing LiS6 octahedra, and 3D framework by the interconnection of SmS8 polyhedra, with the 1D ∞[LiS3]n chains located in the tunnels. Moreover, LiSm3SiS7 shows good SHG efficiency ~1.5 times that of AgGaS2 in the particle size range of 88–105 μm and a high LDT that is ~3.7 times that of AgGaS2, demonstrating that LiSm3SiS7 exhibits a suitable balance of good SHG response and high LDT and can be expected to be a potential candidate in the IR NLO region.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/6/10/121/s1. Cifs for title compounds.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang, China (Grant No. 2014211B046).

Author Contributions

Ni Zhen and Leyan Nian contributed equally. Ni Zhen conceived and designed this study, prepared the crystals, and wrote the manuscript. Leyan Nian carried out the properties characterization work and analysis. Guangmao Li analyzed the crystal structures. Kui Wu and Shilie Pan conceived and coordinated the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Duarte, F.J. Tunable Laser Applications, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; Chapters 2, 9, and 12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nikogosyan, D.N. Nonlinear Optical Crystals: A Complete Survey, 1st ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, C.T.; Wu, Y.C.; Jiang, A.D.; Wu, B.C.; You, G.M.; Li, R.K.; Lin, S.J. New Nonlinear-Optical Crystal: LiB3O5. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1989, 6, 616–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, C.T.; Wu, B.C.; Jiang, A.D.; You, G.M. A New-Type Ultraviolet SHG Crystal-β-BaB2O4. Sci. Sin. Ser. B (Engl. Ed.) 1985, 28, 235–243. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mei, L.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C.T.; Wu, B.C. Nonlinear Optical Materials Based on MBe2BO3F2 (M = Na, K). J. Appl. Phys. 1993, 74, 7014–7016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, G.L.; Zhang, C.Q.; Chen, C.T.; Yao, A.Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Z.Y.; Wang, J.Y. High-Efficiency 266-nm Output of A KBe2BO3F2 Crystal. Appl. Opt. 2003, 42, 4331–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Becker, P. Borate Materials in Nonlinear Optics. Adv. Mater. 1998, 10, 979–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, C.F.; Hu, C.L.; Xu, X.; Ling, J.B.; Hu, T.; Kong, F.; Long, X.F.; Mao, J.G. BaNbO(IO3)5: A New Polar Material with A Very Large SHG Response. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9486–9487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hu, C.L.; Mao, J.G. Recent Advances on Second-Order NLO Materials Based on Metal Iodates. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 288, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, J.L.; Hu, C.L.; Xu, X.; Kong, F.; Mao, J.G. A Facile Synthetic Route to a New SHG Material with Two Types of Parallel π-Conjugated Planar Triangular Units. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3679–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zou, G.H.; Ye, N.; Huang, L.; Lin, X.S. Alkaline-Alkaline Earth Fluoride Carbonate Crystals ABCO3F (A = K, Rb, Cs; B = Ca, Sr, Ba) as Nonlinear Optical Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20001–20007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yang, G.S.; Peng, G.; Ye, N.; Wang, J.Y.; Luo, M.; Yan, T.; Zhou, Y.Q. Structural Modulation of Anionic Group Architectures by Cations to Optimize SHG Effects: A Facile Route to New NLO Materials in the ATCO3F (A = K, Rb; T = Zn, Cd) Series. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 7520–7530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zou, G.H.; Huang, L.; Ye, N.; Lin, C.S.; Cheng, W.D.; Huang, H. CsPbCO3F: A Strong Second-Harmonic Generation Material Derived from Enhancement via p−π Interaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18560–18566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yu, H.W.; Zhang, W.G.; Young, J.; Rondinelli, J.M.; Halasyamani, P.S. Bidenticity-Enhanced Second Harmonic Generation from Pb Chelation in Pb3Mg3TeP2O14. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yu, H.W.; Zhang, W.G.; Young, J.; Rondinelli, J.M.; Halasyamani, P.S. Design and Synthesis of the Beryllium-Free Deep-Ultraviolet Nonlinear Optical Material Ba3(ZnB5O10)PO4. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7380–7385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, H.G.; Tran, T.T.; Choi, W.; You, T.S.; Halasyamani, P.S.; Ok, K.M. Two New Non-centrosymmetric n = 3 Layered Dion–Jacobson Perovskites: Polar RbBi2Ti2NbO10 and Nonpolar CsBi2Ti2TaO10. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 2424–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zou, G.H.; Nam, G.; Kim, H.G.; Jo, H.; You, T.S.; Ok, K.M. ACdCO3F (A = K and Rb): New Noncentrosymmetric Materials with Remarkably Strong Second-Harmonic Generation (SHG) Responses Enhanced via π-Interaction. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 84754–84761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, L.; Wei, Q.; Wu, H.Q.; Zhou, L.J.; Yang, G.Y. Ba3M2[B3O6(OH)]2[B4O7(OH)2] (M = Al, Ga): Two Novel UV Nonlinear Optical Metal Borates Containing Two Types of Oxoboron Clusters. Chem.—Eur. J. 2013, 19, 17662–17667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Huang, H.W.; Liu, L.J.; Jin, S.F.; Yao, W.J.; Zhang, Y.H.; Chen, C.T. Deep-Ultraviolet Nonlinear Optical Materials: Na2Be4B4O11 and LiNa5Be12B12O33. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18319–18322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Li, F.; Hou, X.L.; Pan, S.L.; Wang, X.A. Growth, structure, and optical properties of a congruent melting oxyborate, Bi2ZnOB2O6. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2846–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, H.P.; Pan, S.L.; Poeppelmeier, K.R.; Li, H.Y.; Jia, D.Z.; Chen, Z.H.; Fan, X.Y.; Yang, Y.; Rondinelli, J.M.; Luo, H.S. K3B6O10Cl: A New Structure Analogous to Perovskite with a Large Second Harmonic Generation Response and Deep UV Absorption Edge. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7786–7790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yu, H.W.; Wu, H.P.; Pan, S.L.; Yang, Z.H.; Hou, X.L.; Su, X.; Jing, Q.; Poeppelmeier, K.R.; Rondinelli, J.M. Cs3Zn6B9O21: A Chemically Benign Member of the KBBF Family Exhibiting the Largest Second Harmonic Generation Response. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1264–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Okorogu, A.O.; Mirov, S.B.; Lee, W.; Crouthamel, D.I.; Jenkins, N.; Dergachev, A.Y.; Vodopyanov, K.L.; Badikov, V.V. Tunable Middle Infrared Downconversion in GaSe and AgGaS2. Opt. Commun. 1998, 155, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Boyd, G.D.; Storz, F.G.; McFee, J.H.; Kasper, H.M. Linear and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Some Ternary Selenides. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1972, 8, 900–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boyd, G.D.; Buehler, E.; Storz, F.G. Linear and Nonlinear Optical Properties of ZnGeP2 and CdSe. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1971, 18, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chung, I.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Metal chalcogenides: A rich source of nonlinear optical materials. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 849–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, X.M.; Guo, S.P.; Zeng, H.Y.; Zhang, M.J.; Guo, G.C. Large Crystal Growth and New Crystal Exploration of Mid-Infrared Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Materials. Struct. Bond. 2012, 145, 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bera, T.K.; Jang, J.I.; Ketterson, J.B.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Strong Second Harmonic Generation from the Tantalum Thioarsenates A3Ta2AsS11 (A = K and Rb). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 75–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, W.; Li, F.; Kim, S.H.; Halasyamani, P.S. Top-Seeded Solution Crystal Growth and Functional Properties of A Polar Material Na2TeW2O9. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 4091–4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, H.; Zhou, L.J.; Chen, L. Sulfides with Strong Nonlinear Optical Activity and Thermochromism: ACd4Ga5S12 (A = K, Rb, Cs). Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 3406–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, M.C.; Wu, L.M.; Lin, H.; Zhou, L.J.; Chen, L. Disconnection Enhances the Second Harmonic Generation Response: Synthesis and Characterization of Ba23Ga8Sb2S38. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6058–6060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yu, P.; Zhou, L.J.; Chen, L. Noncentrosymmetric Inorganic Open-Framework Chalcohalides with Strong Middle IR SHG and Red emission: Ba3AGa5Se10Cl2 (A = Cs, Rb, K). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 2227–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chen, M.C.; Li, L.H.; Chen, Y.B.; Chen, L. In-Phase Alignments of Asymmetric Building Units in Ln4GaSbS9 (Ln= Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd−Ho) and Their Strong Nonlinear Optical Responses in Middle IR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 4617–4624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, Y.K.; Chen, M.C.; Zhou, L.J.; Chen, L.; Wu, L.M. Syntheses, Structures, and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Quaternary Chalcogenides: Pb4Ga4GeQ12 (Q = S, Se). Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 8334–8341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yao, J.Y.; Mei, D.J.; Bai, L.; Lin, Z.S.; Yin, W.L.; Fu, P.Z.; Wu, Y.C. BaGa4Se7: A New Congruent-Melting IR Nonlinear Optical Material. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 9212–9216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lin, X.S.; Zhang, G.; Ye, N. Growth and Characterization of BaGa4S7: A New Crystal for Mid-IR Nonlinear Optics. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 1186–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luo, Z.Z.; Lin, C.S.; Cui, H.H.; Zhang, W.L.; Zhang, H.; Chen, H.; He, Z.Z.; Cheng, W.D. PbGa2MSe6 (M = Si, Ge): Two Exceptional Infrared Nonlinear Optical Crystals. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 914–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Luo, Z.Z.; Lin, C.S.; Cui, H.H.; Zhang, W.L.; Zhang, H.; He, Z.Z.; Cheng, W.D. SHG Materials SnGa4Q7 (Q = S, Se) Appearing with Large Conversion Efficiencies, High Damage Thresholds, and Wide Transparencies in the Mid-Infrared Region. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 2743–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Geng, L.; Cheng, W.D.; Lin, C.S.; Zhang, W.L.; Zhang, H.; He, Z.Z. Syntheses and Characterization of New Mid-Infrared Transparency Compounds: Centric Ba2BiGaS5 and Acentric Ba2BiInS5. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 5679–5686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Luo, Z.Z.; Lin, C.S.; Zhang, W.L.; Zhang, H.; He, Z.Z.; Cheng, W.D. Ba8Sn4S15: A Strong Second Harmonic Generation Sulfide with Zero-Dimensional Crystal Structure. Chem. Mater. 2013, 26, 1093–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, B.W.; Zeng, H.Y.; Zhang, M.J.; Fan, Y.H.; Guo, G.C.; Huang, J.S.; Dong, Z.C. Syntheses, Structures, and Nonlinear-optical Properties of Metal Sulfides Ba2Ga8MS16 (M = Si, Ge). Inorg. Chem. 2014, 54, 976–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, S.F.; Liu, B.W.; Zhang, M.J.; Fan, Y.H.; Zeng, H.Y.; Guo, G.C. Syntheses, Structures, and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Two Sulfides Na2In2MS6 (M = Si, Ge). Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 1480–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wu, Q.; Meng, X.G.; Zhong, C.; Chen, X.G.; Qin, J.G. Rb2CdBr2I2: A New IR Nonlinear Optical Material with A Large Laser Damage Threshold. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5683–5686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, G.; Li, Y.J.; Jiang, K.; Zeng, H.Y.; Liu, T.; Chen, X.G.; Qin, J.G.; Lin, Z.S.; Fu, P.Z.; Wu, Y.C.; et al. A New Mixed Halide, Cs2HgI2Cl2: Molecular Engineering for a New Nonlinear Optical Material in the Infrared Region. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14818–14822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Haynes, A.S.; Saouma, F.O.; Otieno, C.O.; Clark, D.J.; Shoemaker, D.P.; Jang, J.I.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Phase-Change Behavior and Nonlinear Optical Second and Third Harmonic Generation of the One-Dimensional K(1–x)CsxPSe6 and Metastable β-CsPSe6. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 1837–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wu, K.; Yang, Z.H.; Pan, S.L. Na4MgM2Se6 (M = Si, Ge): The First Noncentrosymmetric Compounds with Special Ethane-Like [M2Se6]6− Units Exhibiting Large Laser-Damage Thresholds. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 10108–10110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wu, K.; Yang, Z.H.; Pan, S.L. Na2Hg3M2S8 (M = Si, Ge, and Sn): New Infrared Nonlinear Optical Materials with Strong Second Harmonic Generation Effects and High Laser-Damage Thresholds. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 2795–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, K.; Yang, Z.H.; Pan, S.L. Na2BaMQ4 (M = Ge, Sn; Q = S, Se): Infrared Nonlinear Optical Materials with Excellent Performances and that Undergo Structural Transformations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 128, 6825–6827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pan, M.Y.; Ma, Z.J.; Liu, X.C.; Xia, S.Q.; Tao, X.T.; Wu, K.C. Ba4AgGa5Pn8 (Pn = P, As): New Pnictide-Based Compounds with Nonlinear Optical Potential. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 9695–9700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kuo, S.M.; Chang, Y.M.; Chung, I.; Jang, J.I.; Her, B.H.; Yang, S.H.; Ketterson, J.B.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Hsu, K.F. New Metal Chalcogenides Ba4CuGa5Q12 (Q = S, Se) Displaying Strong Infrared Nonlinear Optical Response. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 2427–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bera, T.K.; Jang, J.I.; Song, J.H.; Malliakas, C.D.; Freeman, A.J.; Ketterson, J.B.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Soluble Semiconductors AAsSe2 (A = Li, Na) with A Direct-Band-Gap and Strong Second Harmonic Generation: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3484–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liao, J.H.; Marking, G.M.; Hsu, K.F.; Matsushita, Y.; Ewbank, M.D.; Borwick, R.; Cunningham, P.; Rosker, M.J.; Kanatzidis, M.G. α- and β- A2Hg3M2S8 (A = K, Rb; M = Ge, Sn): Polar Quaternary Chalcogenides with Strong Nonlinear Optical Response. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9484–9493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Parthé, E. Crystal Chemistry of Tetrahedral Structures; Gordon and Breach Science: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  54. Aitken, J.A.; Larson, P.; Mahanti, S.D.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Li2PbGeS4 and Li2EuGeS4: Polar Chalcopyrites with a Severe Tetragonal Compression. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 4714–4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bai, L.; Lin, Z.S.; Wang, Z.Z.; Chen, C.T. Mechanism of Linear and Nonlinear Optical Effects of Chalcopyrites LiGaX2 (X = S, Se, and Te) Crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 083111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, Y.; Seo, I.S.; Martin, S.W.; Baek, J.; Shiv Halasyamani, P.; Arumugam, N.; Steinfink, H. Characterization of New Infrared Nonlinear Optical Material with High Laser Damage Threshold, Li2Ga2GeS6. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 6048–6052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shi, Y.F.; Chen, Y.K.; Chen, M.C.; Wu, L.M.; Lin, H.; Zhou, L.J.; Chen, L. Strongest Second Harmonic Generation in the Polar R3MTQ7 Family: Atomic Distribution Induced Nonlinear Optical Cooperation. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 1876–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rudyk, B.W.; Stoyko, S.S.; Mar, A. Rare-earth transition-metal indium sulphides RE3FeInS7 (RE = La–Pr), RE3CoInS7 (RE = La, Ce), and La3NiInS7. J. Solid State Chem. 2013, 208, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Choudhury, A.; Dorhout, P.K. Alkali-Metal Thiogermanates: Sodium Channels and Variations on the La3CuSiS7 Structure Type. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 1055–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Poduska, K.M.; DiSalvo, F.J.; Min, K.; Halasyamani, P.S. Structure Determination of La3CuGeS7 and La3CuGeSe7. J. Alloys Compd. 2002, 335, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hwu, S.J.; Bucher, C.K.; Carpenter, J.D.; Taylor, S.P. A Solid-state Diastereomer, AgLa3GeS7. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 1979–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gulay, L.D.; Olekseyuk, I.D.; Wołcyrz, M.; Stepien-Damm, J. The Crystal Structures of R3CuSnS7 (R = La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Ho). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2005, 631, 1919–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gulay, L.D.; Lychmanyuk, O.S.; Olekseyuk, I.D.; Daszkiewicz, M.; Stepien-Damm, J.; Pietraszko, A. Crystal Structures of the Compounds R3CuSiS7 (R = Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy and Er) and R3CuSiSe7 (R = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb and Dy). J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 431, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yin, W.L.; Shi, Y.G.; Kang, B.; Deng, J.G.; Yao, J.Y.; Wu, Y.C. Rare-Earth Transition-Metal Chalcogenides Ln3MGaS7 (Ln = Nd, Sm, Dy, Er; M = Co, Ni) and Ln3MGaSe7 (Ln = Nd, Sm, Gd, Dy, M = Co; Ln = Nd, Gd, Dy, M = Ni). J. Solid State Chem. 2014, 213, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Brese, N.E.; O’Keeffe, M. Bond-Valence Parameters for Solid. Acta Crystallogr. B 1991, 47, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Brown, I.D.; Altermatt, D. Bond-Valence Parameters Obtained from a Systematic Analysis of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database. Acta Crystallogr. B 1985, 41, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Brown, I.D. The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry: The Bond Valence Model, 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  68. Preiser, C.; Losel, J.; Brown, I.D.; Kunz, M.; Skowron, A. Long Range Coulomb Forces and Localized Bonds. Acta Crystallogr. B 1999, 55, 698–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Salinas-Sanchez, A.; Garcia-Munoz, J.L.; Rodriguez-Carvajal, J.; Saez-Puche, R.; Martinez, J.L. Structural Characterization of R2BaCuO5 (R = Y, Lu, Yb, Tm, Er, Ho, Dy, Gd, Eu and Sm) Oxides by X-ray and Neutron Diffraction. J. Solid State Chem. 1992, 100, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Brant, J.A.; Clark, D.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Jang, J.I.; Zhang, J.H.; Aitken, J.A. Li2CdGeS4, A Diamond-Like Semiconductor with Strong Second-Order Optical Nonlinearity in the Infrared and Exceptional Laser Damage Threshold. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 3045–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Maggard, P.A.; Nault, T.S.; Stern, C.L.; Poeppelmeier, K.R. Alignment of Acentric MoO3F33− Anions in a Polar Material: (Ag3MoO3F3)(Ag3MoO4)Cl. J. Solid State Chem. 2003, 175, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ok, K.M.; Halasyamani, P.S. Mixed-Metal Tellurites: Synthesis, Structure, and Characterization of Na1.4Nb3Te4.9O18 and NaNb3Te4O16. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 3919–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kim, J.H.; Halasyamani, P.S. A Rare Multi-Coordinate Tellurite, NH4ATe4O9·2H2O (A = Rb or Cs): The Occurrence of TeO3, TeO4, and TeO5 Polyhedra in the Same Material. J. Solid State Chem. 2008, 181, 2108–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXTL, Version 6.14; Bruker Analytical X-ray Instruments, Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2008.
  75. Spek, A.L. Single-Crystal Structure Validation with the Program PLATON. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Crystals 06 00121 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Crystal structure of LiSm3SiS7. All the Li–S bonds are omitted for clarity. (b) Structure of LiSm3SiS7 viewed down the c-axis. The Sm−S bonds were omitted for the sake of clarity. Blue: Sm; Gray octahedron: LiS6; Green tetrahedron: SiS4. (c) One-dimensional ∞[LiS3]n chains in LiSm3SiS7.
Figure 1. (a) Crystal structure of LiSm3SiS7. All the Li–S bonds are omitted for clarity. (b) Structure of LiSm3SiS7 viewed down the c-axis. The Sm−S bonds were omitted for the sake of clarity. Blue: Sm; Gray octahedron: LiS6; Green tetrahedron: SiS4. (c) One-dimensional ∞[LiS3]n chains in LiSm3SiS7.
Crystals 06 00121 g001
Crystals 06 00121 g002 550
Figure 2. Optical properties (infrared (IR), bandgap, and Raman) of LiSm3SiS7.
Figure 2. Optical properties (infrared (IR), bandgap, and Raman) of LiSm3SiS7.
Crystals 06 00121 g002
Crystals 06 00121 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Second-harmonic generation (SHG) intensity versus particle size for LiSm3SiS7 and AgGaS2. (b) Comparison on SHG intensities for LiSm3SiS7 and AgGaS2 at the particle size (88–105 μm).
Figure 3. (a) Second-harmonic generation (SHG) intensity versus particle size for LiSm3SiS7 and AgGaS2. (b) Comparison on SHG intensities for LiSm3SiS7 and AgGaS2 at the particle size (88–105 μm).
Crystals 06 00121 g003
Crystals 06 00121 g004 550
Figure 4. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of LiSm3SiS7.
Figure 4. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of LiSm3SiS7.
Crystals 06 00121 g004
Table
Table 1. Bond valence sum (vu) and global instability index (GII) of title compounds.
Table 1. Bond valence sum (vu) and global instability index (GII) of title compounds.
CompoundsLi+Sm/Gd3+Si/Ge4+S2−GII
LiSm3SiS71.0193.0394.0601.962–2.1060.07
LiSm3GeS70.9933.0344.1141.933–2.1020.08
LiGd3GeS71.0213.0244.1341.936–2.1280.09
Table
Table 2. Laser-damage thresholds (LDTs) of LiSm3SiS7 and AgGaS2 (as the reference).
Table 2. Laser-damage thresholds (LDTs) of LiSm3SiS7 and AgGaS2 (as the reference).
CompoundsDamage Energy (mJ)Spot Diameter (mm)LDT (MW/cm2)
AgGaS20.350.37532
LiSm3SiS70.580.25118
Table
Table 3. SHG intensity versus particle size for LiSm3SiS7 and AgGaS2 (as the reference).
Table 3. SHG intensity versus particle size for LiSm3SiS7 and AgGaS2 (as the reference).
Particle Size (μm)
compounds33–5555–8888–105105–150150–200
AgGaS235.250110185248
LiSm3SiS73689.41638423
Table
Table 4. Dipole moment calculations for LiRe3MS7 (Re = Sm, Gd; M = Si, Ge).
Table 4. Dipole moment calculations for LiRe3MS7 (Re = Sm, Gd; M = Si, Ge).
Dipole Moment
Speciesx (a)y (b)z (c)Magnitude
Debye×10−4 esu·cm/Å3
LiSm3SiS7
LiS60.000.009.529.520.04
SmS80.000.0621.0821.080.09
SiS40.000.00−8.248.240.03
Unit cell0.000.0622.3722.370.09
LiSm3GeS7
LiS60.000.008.238.230.03
SmS80.060.0021.3124.900.10
GeS40.000.00−8.058.050.03
Unit cell0.060.0021.4921.490.09
LiGd3GeS7
LiS60.000.0014.0614.060.06
GdS80.000.0022.1826.910.12
GeS40.000.00−8.438.430.04
Unit cell0.000.0027.8127.810.12
Table
Table 5. Crystal data and structure refinement for LiRe3MS7 (Re = Sm, Gd; M = Si, Ge).
Table 5. Crystal data and structure refinement for LiRe3MS7 (Re = Sm, Gd; M = Si, Ge).
Empirical FormulaLiSm3SiS7LiSm3GeS7LiGd3GeS7
Formula weight710.50755.00775.70
Temperature296 (2) K
Crystal systemHexagonal
Space groupP63
Unit cell dimensionsa = 10.007(2) Å
c = 5.668(3) Å		a = 9.991(3) Å
c = 5.752(3) Å		a = 9.900(7) Å
c = 5.753(5) Å
Z, V2, 491.6(3) Å32, 497.3(4) Å32, 488.4(2) Å3
Density (calculated)4.800 g/cm35.042 g/cm35.274 g/cm3
crystal size (mm3)0.182 × 0.180 × 0.0950.261 × 0.172 × 0.1380.210 × 0.160 × 0.120
Completeness to theta = 27.49100 %100.0 %100 %
Goodness-of-fit on F21.0031.1831.150
Final R indices [Fo2 > 2σ(Fo2)] [a]R1 = 0.0150
wR2 = 0.01558		R1 = 0.0162
wR2 = 0.0169		R1 = 0.0179
wR2 = 0.0180
R indices (all data) [a]R1 = 0.0303
wR2 = 0.0305		R1 = 0.0357
wR2 = 0.0359		R1 = 0.0399
wR2 = 0.0399
Absolute structure parameter0.02(2)0.011(18)−0.02 (2)
Extinction coefficient0.0150(3)0.0277(6)0.0350(8)
Largest diff. peak and hole0.564 and −0.614 e Å−30.661 and −0.648 e Å−31.052 and −1.291 e Å−3
[a] R1 = Fo − Fc/Fo and wR2 = [w (Fo2 − Fc2)2/wFo4]1/2 for Fo2 > 2σ (Fo2).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhen, N.; Nian, L.; Li, G.; Wu, K.; Pan, S. A High Laser Damage Threshold and a Good Second-Harmonic Generation Response in a New Infrared NLO Material: LiSm3SiS7. Crystals 2016, 6, 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6100121

AMA Style

Zhen N, Nian L, Li G, Wu K, Pan S. A High Laser Damage Threshold and a Good Second-Harmonic Generation Response in a New Infrared NLO Material: LiSm3SiS7. Crystals. 2016; 6(10):121. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6100121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhen, Ni, Leyan Nian, Guangmao Li, Kui Wu, and Shilie Pan. 2016. "A High Laser Damage Threshold and a Good Second-Harmonic Generation Response in a New Infrared NLO Material: LiSm3SiS7" Crystals 6, no. 10: 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6100121

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop