Next Article in Journal
Numerical Investigation of Thermal Diode-Based Elastocaloric Heat Pump Working with Different Crystalline Refrigerants and Thermoelectric Switches
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Stress Corrosion Resistance of Multiphase Composite Nanobainitic Steel via Isothermal Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lanthanide-Induced Local Structural and Optical Modulation in Low-Temperature Ag2Se
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Time-Dependent Evolution of Nanostructure Formation on CdI2 Crystal Surfaces

1
Department of Information Technologies and Electronic Communication Systems, Lviv State University of Life Safety, Kleparivska Str., 35, 79007 Lviv, Ukraine
2
Department of Specialized Computer Systems, Institute of Computer Technologies, Automation and Metrology, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 12 Bandera Str., 79013 Lviv, Ukraine
3
Department of Radiophysics and Computer Technologies, Faculty of Electronics and Computer Technologies, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 50, Dragomanova Str., 79005 Lviv, Ukraine
4
Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Latvia, Kengaraga 8, LV-1063 Riga, Latvia
5
Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ravila 14A, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
6
School of Integrated Circuits and Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications Innovation Institute, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China
7
Department of Technical Physics, Institute of Physics and Technology, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazhymukan St. 13, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2026, 16(2), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16020152 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 January 2026 / Revised: 13 February 2026 / Accepted: 17 February 2026 / Published: 22 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Properties and Synthesis of Luminescent Materials)

Abstract

The time evolution of nanoscale structure formation on the surface of CdI2 crystals grown both from the melt and from the gas phase is investigated. Atomic force microscopy was used to show that, already at the initial stages of exposure to air at room temperature, island-shaped nanostructures form, which subsequently aggregate into nanoclusters as the exposure time increases. Similar nanostructures, including nanopores and nanoclusters, are observed for CdI2 crystals grown from the gas phase after prolonged exposure to air. Photoluminescence spectroscopy indicates that the formed nanoclusters are consistent with the presence of cadmium hydroxide (Cd(OH)2) and cadmium oxide (CdO). The formation of nanostructures determines the time evolution of the low-temperature luminescence spectra of CdI2 crystals. Additional bands with maxima at 1.87 eV and long-wavelength luminescence in the region with a maximum at 1.68 eV appear in the spectral structure. These results highlight the close relationship between surface structural evolution and the time-dependent optical properties of CdI2.

1. Introduction

Alkali and alkaline-earth halides continue to attract significant scientific interest due to their fundamental role in solid-state physics, materials chemistry, and photonic technologies [1,2,3]. These compounds exhibit a wide range of optical, luminescent, and electronic properties that make them valuable in radiation detection, scintillation, photonics, and optoelectronic devices [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
Among them, cadmium iodide (CdI2) is a highly significant layered halide material with widespread applications in optoelectronics and photonics. Its strong transparency in the visible range, favorable nonlinear optical characteristics, and pronounced excitonic behavior make it attractive for various optical and electronic devices [19,20,21,22,23,24]. The material’s strongly anisotropic layered structure also renders its surface highly sensitive to environmental effects. When exposed to atmospheric conditions, CdI2 undergoes structural modifications that promote the spontaneous formation of surface nanostructures, which can substantially alter its physical, optical, and luminescent properties [23,24,25,26,27,28].
A major research focus is the elucidation of nanostructure formation mechanisms on CdI2 crystal surfaces and their influence on the material’s luminescence characteristics and defect-related properties [29,30,31]. Owing to its tunable band gap, pronounced excitonic response, and capacity for impurity incorporation or intercalation, CdI2 serves as a versatile model system for investigating low-dimensional phenomena in halide materials. It also holds significant potential for applications in photodetectors, solid-state ionics, and UV/X-ray detection technologies [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].
Another important direction is the study of nanostructures aimed at discovering materials with new functional properties for modern micro- and nanoelectronic devices [42,43,44]. Layered crystals such as CdI2 are particularly suitable due to their atomically smooth van der Waals (vdW) surfaces, which enable the formation of molecular, organic, and metallic nanostructures and the fabrication of heterostructures via incoherent vdW epitaxy [28,45]. These surfaces also act as natural nanometrology standards for accurate characterization of nanoobjects [28,46,47,48,49].
It is known that CdI2 develops nanoislands, nanopores, and nanoclusters under prolonged atmospheric exposure, yet the mechanisms behind these transformations and their effects on optical properties remain unclear. Existing studies suggest that such environmentally induced nanostructuring may lead to new materials for lasers, detectors, and other optoelectronic applications [49,50,51,52,53].
Earlier studies have shown that the surface of CdI2 possesses unique characteristics that can be modified by controlling the conditions under which the crystals are grown and by post-processing them in different atmospheric environments [28]. By employing techniques such as atomic force microscopy (AFM) and photoluminescence (PL), it is possible to study the evolution of these surface changes and gain deeper insights into the mechanisms behind nanostructure formation and their subsequent evolution [45,54,55,56].
The role of ambient-induced surface transformations and their temporal development has not been systematically addressed, particularly in relation to the stability of their electronic and luminescent states. This lack of systematic insight into surface-driven transformations limits a fundamental understanding of optical ageing processes in layered halide crystals.
This study focuses on investigating the effects of prolonged exposure of CdI2 crystals to the atmosphere on the processes of nanostructure formation. Using AFM and PL, we will explore the morphology and optical properties of these nanostructures. Furthermore, we will compare the results obtained from crystals grown from the melt versus those grown from the gas phase, in order to better understand the differences in nanocluster formation processes and their impact on the luminescence properties of the material.

2. Materials and Methods

Cadmium iodide crystals were synthesized using the Bridgman–Stockbarger method from raw materials that had undergone preliminary purification through zone melting. In the upper section of the growth ampoule, thin single-crystal plates of CdI2 were produced via melt and gas-phase deposition [45].
For microscopic studies, samples in the form of plane-parallel plates measuring 5 mm × 5 mm and no more than 1 mm thick were cut from CdI2 crystals along cleavage planes. Both the so-called “old” surfaces and freshly cleaved areas of the samples were analyzed. The “old” surfaces were formed by prolonged exposure to air, while fresh cleavage surfaces were obtained by removing the upper layers. Single-crystal CdI2 plates grown from the gas phase were not subjected to preliminary mechanical treatment [28,55].
To examine the surface morphology and local properties of the samples, a Solver P47-PRO atomic force microscope (NT-MDT BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was used. During the studies, semi-contact mode probe sensors with rectangular cantilevers of 11.8 N/m stiffness were employed. The probe tip’s curvature radius did not exceed 10 nm, and the device’s height resolution was 0.1 nm. AFM measurements of the micro- and nanostructure morphology were conducted in semi-contact mode [28].

3. Results and Discussion

AFM images illustrating the morphology of the van der Waals (VdW) surface of CdI2 crystals obtained from the melt after their exposure to an air atmosphere for different durations are shown in Figure 1. The temporal evolution was investigated on the same sample, which was rigidly fixed in the microscope and covered with the protective hood supplied with the Solver P47-PRO microscope. The same surface area was examined throughout the study, as the sample was firmly mounted in the microscope and was not subjected to any mechanical disturbance during the measurements. Such experiments require dedicated laboratory time; therefore, the study was carried out on a single sample only.
Experimental conditions were as follows: ambient temperature in the range of 22–25 °C, relative humidity of 80%, atmospheric pressure of 730 mmHg. The sample was kept in air and in darkness. All AFM images were processed using the specialized Nova software provided with the Solver P47-PRO microscope.
After a short exposure time of 1 h, island-shaped nanostructures (A, B) with varying morphometric characteristics formed on the CdI2 surface.
Nanostructures labeled as A exhibit diameters ranging from 200 to 300 nm and heights between 10 and 20 nm. In contrast, the islands labeled B (B1, B2, B3) are characterized by larger lateral dimensions but relatively smaller heights. Their average diameters reach approximately 600 nm, while their heights remain around 10 nm. The nanostructures marked in Figure 1a (B1, B2, B3) were used as reference markers, relative to which the subsequent analysis and identification of the nanostructures over time were performed.
In the vicinity of island-type nanostructures, the formation of another type of nanostructure—depressions C1 and C2 is observed. These depressions have a rounded shape, characteristic of the hexagonal atomic packing of CdI2 (Figure 1a). The diameter of depression C1 is 473 nm, while its depth measures 0.7 nm. Given that the vertical (height) resolution of the microscope is 0.1 nm, this value can be considered reliable and not related to crystal delamination, since the surface was not subjected to any mechanical influence during exposure to the ambient air.
After exposing the crystal to air for 8 h, the sizes of depressions C1 and C2 increased, and a new depression, C3, appeared around island B3 (Figure 1b). At the same time, the height of nanoclusters A increased by approximately 5 nm. The depth of depression C2 grew to 0.8 nm, and its diameter nearly doubled, reaching 855 nm. Additionally, new nanostructures (labeled D in Figure 1b) emerged along one of the step edges.
Following 24 h of air exposure (Figure 1c), new nanostructures appeared at the edges of depressions C1, C2, and C3, which had formed on the smooth surface, as well as on step edges B1 and B2. The height and diameter of the newly formed structures at the depression boundaries ranged from 3 to 5 nm and 100 to 120 nm, respectively. The nanostructures that developed along the step edges roughly doubled in size, reaching heights of up to 40 nm and diameters of 700 nm.
In this work, surface depressions are defined as localized height minima of at least 0.5 nm relative to the surrounding terrace, with lateral dimensions exceeding 100 nm.
In contrast, the lateral dimensions of the nanostructures formed on the smooth surface remained nearly constant. At this stage, interactions between the nanoformations were observed, leading to their coalescence and sintering into larger cluster aggregates (denoted as C in Figure 1c).
Figure 1d presents AFM images of the same surface region of CdI2 after 32 h of air exposure. New nanoclusters appeared on the step edges, while on the smooth surface, new nanopores (E1, E2) emerged, surrounded by additional nanostructures. Simultaneously, the previously formed nanoformations continued to grow.
Nanopores here are defined as stable, approximately rounded depressions with lateral dimensions significantly exceeding those of atomic steps and persisting over time. This definition is based solely on AFM topography and does not imply a fully perforated or bulk-connected pore geometry.
After seven days (168 h) of air exposure, an ensemble of nanostructures developed across the CdI2 surface (Figure 1e). The numerical characteristics of the nanoclusters’ sizes, which form on the CdI2 surface during prolonged exposure to an air atmosphere, are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1 is based on AFM images of the same 6 × 10 μm surface area of a single CdI2 crystal, which was reimaged over time without moving the sample. Nanoclusters were counted using the same criteria at all stages. The observed increase in cluster number and decrease in nearest-neighbor distance therefore represent therefore time-dependent surface evolution.
To establish the growth mechanism, the temporal dynamics of the size change in the same nanocluster was studied (Table 2, Figure 2). The nanocluster analyzed in Table 2 was identified across consecutive AFM scans using its fixed position relative to step edges and neighboring nanostructures within the same surface region. The non-monotonic change in radius and volume observed at intermediate times (e.g., between 32 h and 48 h) is attributed to local surface restructuring and redistribution of material, which can temporarily modify the apparent cluster geometry without implying a change in object.
At least two stages are distinguished in the time dependence of the volume of one nanocluster (Figure 2). At the first stage (0 50 h), a rapid growth of the volume is observed, which reaches a maximum at approximately 32 h. At t >100 h, a monotonic growth of the volume is observed, which is described in the V t coordinates by a linear dependence. This behavior is consistent with diffusion-limited growth in the late-stage regime.
For this reason, the kinetic analysis below focuses on the late-stage regime (t ≥ 100 h), where monotonic growth is observed and phenomenological scaling can be meaningfully applied.
This stepwise formation of nanostructures highlights the dynamic processes occurring on the surface of CdI2 crystals as they age in air, with the gradual evolution from nanopores to the development of nanoclusters. The presence of these distinct features in the AFM images further emphasizes the role of the crystal surface in the formation of nanophases and their aggregation over time.
During the initial stage of air exposure (1 h) at room temperature, island-like nanostructures begin to form on the surface. With prolonged exposure, these nanostructures progressively aggregate into nanoclusters, while the nucleation of additional nanostructures continues over time. Similarly, in CdI2 crystals grown from the gas phase, extended air exposure exceeding 30 days results in the development of both nanopores and nanoclusters.
To determine the phase composition of nanostructures or nanoclusters obtained on the surface of CdI2 crystals, as well as to study the chemical process of their formation, studies of the photoluminescence (PL) spectra of freshly cleaved and aged in air (over 168 h) CdI2 crystals (grown from the melt and gas phase for comparison) were carried out. AFM analysis of CdI2 crystals grown from the gas phase and aged in ambient air for over 30 days (Figure 3) reveals the characteristic surface morphology after long-term atmospheric exposure.
Figure 4a shows the maximum-normalized photoluminescence spectra of freshly cleaved and air-aged CdI2 samples grown from the melt (T = 160 °C). To identify detailed features, difference spectra were constructed, revealing an intense band with a maximum at 3.1 eV, as well as several bands in the low-energy part of the spectrum with distinct maxima (Figure 4b).
By comparing the experimental difference spectra with literature data [57,58], we can associate the observed features with the luminescence of nanophases of cadmium oxide (CdO) and cadmium hydroxide (Cd(OH)2). The band with a maximum at 3.1 eV (Figure 4b) corresponds to interband electronic transitions in cadmium oxide, while additional bands with maxima at 1.88, 2.12, and 2.27 eV are linked to electronic transitions to deep levels caused by defect centers [57]. The bands with maxima at 2.40 and 2.50 eV are associated with electronic transitions to deep levels in cadmium hydroxide (Cd(OH)2) and interband electronic transitions in this material, respectively [58].
For comparison, Figure 5 presents the luminescence spectra of CdI2 crystals grown from the gas phase. In addition to the intrinsic luminescence of the matrix (at 2.7 eV), a narrow band with a maximum at 2.45 eV (508 nm) is observed. As the temperature decreases, the intensity of the intrinsic luminescence increases, and its maximum shifts to the longer-wavelength region of the spectrum. However, the intensity and spectral position of the band at 508 nm remain unaffected by temperature variations. The spectral characteristics of the band with a maximum at 2.45 eV correlate well with the luminescence of CdO nanostructures [57].
Figure 6 illustrates the time evolution of the spectral luminescence of CdI2 crystals obtained from the melt during prolonged exposure to air (e.g., 168 h and several years). In the spectra of freshly grown crystals, an intense band with a maximum around 2.48 eV (501 nm) (G-band) is observed. On the long-wavelength tail of this band, a weakly pronounced component at 2.15 eV (578 nm) (Y-band) is recorded (curve 1). The spectral composition of this luminescence is independent of the wavelength of the exciting light in the fundamental absorption region and is associated with the radiative recombination of self-localized excitons in the molecular complex [Cd2+I62−]4 [59,60].
After prolonged exposure of the CdI2 crystals to air, their spectra undergo significant changes. Figure 6 (curves 2 and 3) presents the spectra of CdI2 crystals aged for more than 168 h (curve 2) and for over four years (curve 3).
Notably, both the G- and Y-bands shift to the longer-wavelength region: the maximum of the G-band moves to 2.42 eV (514 nm) (curve 2), and the maximum of the Y-band shifts to 2.04 eV (609 nm). Additionally, the intensity ratios between these bands vary, reflecting alterations in the luminescence characteristics of the aged crystals.
In a freshly grown crystal, the G-band is dominant (curve 1). However, during the aging process in air, the intensity of the Y-band becomes comparable to that of the G-band (curves 2 and 3). It is noteworthy that similar changes were observed in the luminescence spectra of CdI2 films after annealing at T = 420 K. In addition to the initial G-center band, intense luminescence appeared in the region around 2.2 eV (565 nm) [61].
For comparison, as CdI2 continues to age (curve 3), a narrow band with a maximum at 1.87 eV (665 nm) appears, along with long-wavelength luminescence in the region around 1.68 eV (740 nm). The transformation of the PL spectra of CdI2 during exposure to air, when considered alongside the AFM study results, may be linked to the formation of nanoscale structures on the surface of the crystals and their subsequent aggregation into nanoclusters.
Let us analyze the possible nature of the radiation with a maximum in the region at 1.87 eV. Its characteristic feature is a small half-width of 0.05 eV, which is significantly smaller than the half-widths of other bands (Figure 6). It appears in the spectra of CdI2 when they are aged in air (curves 2, 3 in Figure 6), which indicates the connection of this band with nanoformations that are formed on the surface of cadmium iodide.
The phase composition of the surface nanostructures was previously identified by the authors using Raman spectroscopy [45], indicating the formation of CdO and Cd(OH)2 during air exposure. The PL spectra observed here are consistent with reported emission features of these phases and thus provide complementary, but not standalone, evidence for their presence.
Now, let us consider the mechanism of formation of the cadmium hydroxide and oxide nanophases obtained. The valence of cadmium is 2 (oxidation state +2), meaning it forms two chemical bonds. These bonds are formed by two electrons from the outermost energy level of cadmium, which participate in bonding with iodine, which has 7 electrons in its outer shell. To complete its shell, iodine needs one more electron, which it “accepts” from cadmium, resulting in the formation of CdI2.
On the other hand, cadmium possesses a vacant 5f orbital that can participate in the formation of coordination (donor–acceptor) bonds. In this case, iodine acts as the electron donor, while cadmium provides the available 5f orbital to accommodate the donated electron density.
At the edge of the I-Cd-I structural layer, the electron donor is likely to be water, specifically the oxygen atom in the water molecule. The oxygen atom has 6 electrons in its outer energy level, two of which participate in forming bonds with hydrogen to create a water molecule. The remaining four electrons can engage in the formation of a coordination bond, with cadmium acting as the acceptor through its free 5f orbital in CdI2.
Thus, on the surface of the crystal, the first step is the coordination of water molecules. Over time, the crystal gradually undergoes hydrolysis, leading to the formation of cadmium hydroxide:
CdI2 + H2O = Cd(OH)I + HI,
Cd(OH)I + H2O = Cd(OH)2 + HI.
Since the interaction of cadmium with unsaturated (broken) bonds directly with oxygen molecules is unlikely (as cadmium in the CdI2 compound is in the highest oxidation state of +2), it can be inferred that cadmium hydroxide serves as the “building material” for nanostructures that include cadmium oxide. This suggests that the formation of cadmium hydroxide on the crystal surface might be a precursor step in the creation of cadmium oxide nanophases, where the hydroxide undergoes further transformation or dehydration to form cadmium oxide structures (Cd(OH)2 = CdO + H2O).
Before moving on to the conclusion, it is necessary to note that the results of this work are of particular interest for a more in-depth study of similar processes in other promising halides [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77], that have gained new interest for light detection and imaging.

4. Conclusions

The time evolution of nanoscale structure formation on the surfaces of CdI2 crystals grown from the melt and from the gas phase was investigated. The AFM method revealed that at the initial stages of keeping the samples in an air atmosphere (for 1 h) at room temperature, island-shaped nanostructures begin to form. With increasing exposure time, these structures undergo aggregation and eventually form nanoclusters, while the persistence of nanostructure formation continues. This process of nanostructure development is observed both in CdI2 crystals grown from the melt and in those grown from the gas phase. In particular, for the gas-phase-grown crystals, after exposure to air for more than 30 days, nanopores and nanoclusters are observed to form on the surface.
Photoluminescence spectroscopy further confirms the composition of these formed nanoclusters, showing that they contain cadmium hydroxide (Cd(OH)2) and cadmium oxide (CdO). The formation of these nanostructures plays a crucial role in the time evolution of the low-temperature luminescence spectra of CdI2 crystals. Additional luminescence bands with maxima at 1.87 eV and a long-wavelength emission near 1.68 eV emerge during air ageing. These features indicate the appearance of new electronic transitions associated with the evolving surface of nanostructures. This suggests a dynamic relationship between the structural evolution of the material and its optical properties over time.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, I.R.; writing—review and editing, H.K., I.K. and A.I.P.; validation, I.R. and I.K.; funding acquisition, M.K., N.K. and A.I.P.; investigation, I.R., H.K., I.K., M.K., N.K. and A.I.P.; software, I.R., H.K. and I.K.; supervision, H.K., M.K., N.K. and A.I.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine for providing support (Projects No 0125U001883 and 0125U003462), Latvian research project lzp-2023/1-0453, Latvian State Research Program No. VPP-IZM-CERN-2022/1-0001 and Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (TK210).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

Authors (I.R.; H.K. and I.K.) would like to thank the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine for providing support (Projects No 0125U001883 and 0125U003462). In addition, Marina Konuhova and Anatoli I. Popov were supported by Latvian research project lzp-2023/1-0453, “Prediction of long-term stability of functional materials under extreme radiation conditions”, and the Latvian State Research Program No. VPP-IZM-CERN-2022/1-0001. Finally, research of N.K. was supported by Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (TK210).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lushchik, A.; Lushchik, C.; Vasil’chenko, E.; Popov, A.I. Radiation Creation of Cation Defects in Alkali Halide Crystals: Review and Today’s Concept. Low Temp. Phys. 2018, 44, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vaněček, V.; Děcká, K.; Mihóková, E.; Čuba, V.; Král, R.; Nikl, M. Advanced Halide Scintillators: From the Bulk to Nano. Adv. Photon. Res. 2022, 3, 2200011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, H. Scintillation Mechanisms in Inorganic Scintillators: An Excitonic and Alkali Halides Focused Review. In Hard X-Ray, Gamma-Ray, and Neutron Detector Physics XXIV; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2022; Volume 12241, pp. 12–30. [Google Scholar]
  4. Racu, A.V.; Ristić, Z.; Ćirić, A.; Đorđević, D.; Bușe, G.; Poienar, M.; Gutmann, M.J.; Ivashko, O.; Ștef, M.; Vizman, D.; et al. Analysis of Site Symmetries of Er3+-Doped CaF2 and BaF2 Crystals by High-Resolution Photoluminescence Spectroscopy. Opt. Mater. 2023, 136, 113337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Levkovets, S.I.; Khyzhun, O.Y.; Myronchuk, G.L.; Fochuk, P.M.; Piasecki, M.; Kityk, I.V.; Fedorchuk, A.O.; Levkovets, V.I.; Parasyuk, L.V. Synthesis, Electronic Structure and Optical Properties of PbBr1.2I0.8. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2017, 218, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nicoara, I.; Ștef, M.; Vizman, D.; Negut, C.D. Gamma-Rays Induced Color Centers in Pb2+-Doped CaF2 Crystals. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 153, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Popov, A.I.; Elsts, E.; Kotomin, E.A.; Moskina, A.; Karipbayev, Z.T.; Makarenko, I.; Pazylbek, S.; Kuzovkov, V.K. Thermal Annealing of Radiation Defects in MgF2 Single Crystals Induced by Neutrons at Low Temperatures. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2020, 480, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shunkeyev, K.; Tilep, A.; Sagimbayeva, S.; Lushchik, A.; Ubaev, Z.; Myasnikova, L.; Zhanturina, N.; Aimaganbetova, Z. The Enhancement of Exciton-Like Luminescence in KCl Single Crystals under Local and Uniaxial Elastic Lattice Deformation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2022, 528, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lushchik, C.; Kolk, J.; Lushchik, A.; Lushchik, N.; Taiirov, M.; Vasilchenko, E. Decay of excitons into long-lived F, H and α, I pairs in KCl. Phys. Status Solidi B 1982, 114, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shunkeyev, K.; Aimaganbetova, Z.; Myasnikova, L.; Maratova, A.; Ubaev, Z. Mechanisms of Radiation Defect Formation in KCl Crystals under the Influence of Local and Plastic Deformation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2021, 509, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Myasnikova, L.N.; Istlyaup, A.S.; Sergeyev, D.M.; Shunkeyev, K.S. Computer Simulations of the Band Structure and Density of States of the Linear Chains of NaCl Ions. Latv. J. Phys. Tech. Sci. 2019, 56, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tariwong, Y.; Kim, H.J.; Quang, N.D.; Khan, A.; Daniel, D.J.; Limsuwan, P.; Wantana, N.; Pakawanit, P.; Vittayakorn, N.; Intachai, N.; et al. Ca Co-Doped CsI(Tl) Crystal Scintillator for γ- and X-Ray Detecting Applications. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2025, 226, 112241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Romanova, M.; Chertopalov, S.; Dekhtyar, Y.; Fekete, L.; Lančok, J.; Novotný, M.; Pokorný, P.; Popov, A.I.; Sorokins, H.; Vilken, A. Charge Trapping in SiO2 Substrate during Electron Beam Deposition of CaF2 Thin Films of Different Thicknesses. Opt. Mater. X 2025, 25, 100400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ubukata, T.; Otake, S.; Kato, T.; Nakauchi, D.; Kawaguchi, N.; Yanagida, T. Scintillation Properties of SrCl2:Eu Transparent Ceramics Fabricated by Spark Plasma Sintering Method. J. Lumin. 2025, 278, 121021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kalniņš, A.; Pļaviņa, I.; Popov, A.I.; Tāle, A. Determination of the effective absorption cross-section of F-centres in KBr–In by photostimulated luminescence. Phys. Status Solidi B 1990, 161, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zheng, B.; Deng, L.; Ma, H.; Wang, J.; Yao, Y.; Qi, D.; Shen, Y.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, S. Defect-related luminescence in BaF2 nanoparticles for plant cell imaging. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2025, 126, 173701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Popov, A.I. Manifestation of H-Centre Aggregation in the Exciton-Induced Thermostimulated Luminescence of KBr:In and KBr:Tl Crystals. Phys. Status Solidi B 1992, 169, K47–K51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rogulis, U.; Spaeth, J.-M.; Elsts, E.; Dolgopolova, A. Tl-related radiation defects in CsI:Tl. Radiat. Meas. 2004, 38, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ronda, C.R.; Zwaal, E.; Folkersma, H.F.; Lenselink, A.; Haas, C. Absorption and luminescence of photochromic CdI2:CuI. J. Solid State Chem. 1988, 72, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, Z.; Rui, Q.; Geng, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X. Pressure-induced decomposition of cadmium iodide. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 2022, 140, 16003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miah, M.I. Size- and temperature-dependent second-order optical effects in copper-doped cadmium iodide nanocrystals. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 064313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, W.; Qiao, J.; Wang, L.; Duan, L.; Zhang, D.; Yang, W.; Qiu, Y. Synthesis, structures, and optical properties of cadmium iodide/phenethylamine hybrid materials with controlled structures and emissions. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 10252–10260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yue, L.; Jin, W.; Mao, A.J.; Kuang, X. Single-layer MX2 (M = Zn, Cd; X = Cl, I): Auxetic semiconductors with strain-tunable optoelectronic properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 12983–12990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tao, L.; Huang, L. Computational design of enhanced photocatalytic activity of two-dimensional cadmium iodide. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 53653–53657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tubbs, M.R. Polytypism and spiral growth in cadmium iodide. Acta Cryst. B 1971, 27, 857–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aldwayyan, A.S.; Al-Jekhedab, F.M.; Al-Noaimi, M.; Hammouti, B.; Hadda, T.B.; Suleiman, M.; Warad, I. Synthesis and characterization of CdO nanoparticles starting from organometallic dmphen-CdI2 complex. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 10506–10514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bolesta, I.; Velgosh, S.; Datsiuk, Y.; Karbovnyk, I.; Lesivtsiv, V.; Kulay, T.; Popov, A.I.; Bellucci, S.; Cestelli Guidi, M.; Marcelli, A.; et al. Optical, infrared and electron-microscopy studies of (Cdi)n metallic clusters in layered CdI2 crystals. Radiat. Meas. 2007, 42, 851–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bolesta, I.M.; Rovetskyj, I.N.; Partyka, M.V.; Karbovnyk, I.D.; Kulyk, B.Y. Formation of nanostructures on the VdW-surface of CdI2 crystals. Ukr. J. Phys. 2013, 58, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miah, M.I. Stimulated photoluminescence and optical limiting in CdI2. Opt. Mater. 2002, 20, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Miah, M.I. One-, two-, and three-photon processes in CdI2 crystal. Opt. Mater. 2004, 25, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Miah, M.I. Multiphoton excitation and thermal activation in indirect bandgap semiconductors. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2018, 50, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Novosad, S.S.; Matviishin, I.M.; Novosad, I.S.; Novosad, O.S. Spectral and kinetic characteristics of CdI2 and CdI2:Pb scintillators. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2008, 75, 826–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bukivskii, A.P.; Gnatenko, Y.P.; Piryatinski, Y.P.; Fesych, I.V.; Lendel, V.V.; Tkach, V.M.; Bukivskij, P.M. Nature of radiative recombination processes in layered heterogeneous PbCdI2 thick films: Promising scintillator materials. Adv. Condens. Matter Phys. 2018, 2018, 2762369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Salakhutdinov, G.K.; Efanov, D.V. Nonlinear effects in scintillation detectors. Instrum. Exp. Tech. 2015, 58, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, C. The electronic and optical properties of Cu-doped CdI2. Optik 2013, 124, 3230–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rybak, O.V.; Chekaylo, M.V.; Pokladok, N.T. Vapor phase growth and properties of mixed layered Pb1−xCdxI2 semiconductors. Phys. Chem. Solid State 2022, 23, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Novosad, S.S.; Novosad, I.S.; Goncharuk, V.E. Recombination processes in europium-doped cadmium iodide crystals. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2009, 76, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Novosad, I.; Kalivoshka, B.; Novosad, S.; Vas’kiv, A. Effect of preparation conditions and impurities on the spectral characteristics of cadmium iodide. In Proceedings of the XIth International Scientific and Practical Conference on Electronics and Information Technologies (ELIT), Lviv, Ukraine, 16–18 September 2019; pp. 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cummings, T.; Marín, C.; Ostrogorsky, A.G.; Burger, A.; Bliss, M. Tetragonal red and yellow HgI2-CdI2 crystals for X- and γ-ray solid-state detectors directionally solidified under argon pressure of 20 atm. J. Cryst. Growth 2006, 297, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Furyer, M.S.; Skubenko, P.A.; Bukivskij, P.M.; Tarakhan, L.M.; Chesnokov, E.D.; Vertegel, I.G.; Ovcharenko, A.I.; Ivanova, L.S.; Gamernyk, R.V.; Gnatenko, Y.P. Study of the photoluminescence and photoelectric properties of Pb1− xCdxI2 alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 103711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bukivskii, A.P.; Gnatenko, Y.P.; Piryatinskii, Y.P.; Gamernyk, R.V. Nature of radiative recombination processes in layered semiconductor PbCdI2 nanostructural scintillation material. J. Lumin. 2017, 185, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Momin, M.A.; Islam, M.A.; Nesa, M.; Sharmin, M.; Rahman, M.J.; Bhuiyan, A.H. Effect of M (Ni, Cu, Zn) Doping on the Structural, Electronic, Optical, and Thermal Properties of CdI2: DFT-Based Theoretical Studies. AIP Adv. 2021, 11, 055012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Karbovnyk, I.; Bolesta, I.; Rovetskyi, I.; Lesivtsiv, V.; Shmygelsky, Y.; Velgosh, S.; Popov, A.I. Long-Term Evolution of Luminescent Properties in CdI2 Crystals. Low Temp. Phys. 2016, 42, 594–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Karbovnyk, I.; Bolesta, I.; Rovetskii, I.; Velgosh, S.; Klym, H. Studies of CdI2–Bi3+ Microstructures with Optical Methods, Atomic Force Microscopy and Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy. Mater. Sci. Pol. 2014, 32, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bolesta, I.M.; Rovetskii, I.N.; Karbovnik, I.D.; Rykhlyuk, S.V.; Partyka, M.V.; Gloskovskaya, N.V. Formation and Optical Properties of CdI2 Nanostructures. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2015, 82, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ai, R.; Guan, X.; Li, J.; Yao, K.; Chen, P.; Zhang, Z.; Duan, X. Growth of Single-Crystalline Cadmium Iodide Nanoplates, CdI2/MoS2 (WS2, WSe2) van der Waals Heterostructures, and Patterned Arrays. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3413–3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bellucci, S.; Bolesta, I.; Guidi, M.C.; Karbovnyk, I.; Lesivtsiv, V.; Micciulla, F.; Pastore, R.; Popov, A.I.; Velgosh, S. Cadmium Clusters in CdI2 Layered Crystals: The Influence on the Optical Properties. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2007, 19, 395015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bellucci, S.; Bolesta, I.; Karbovnyk, I.; Hrytskiv, R.; Fafilek, G.; Popov, A.I. Microstructure of Ag2BI4 (B = Ag, Cd) Superionics Studied by SEM, Impedance Spectroscopy and Fractal Dimension Analysis. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2008, 20, 474211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ueno, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Saiki, K.; Koma, A. Van der Waals Epitaxy of Metal Dihalide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1997, 113, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kumari, S.; Suthar, D.; Himanshu; Kumari, N.; Dhaka, M.S. Understanding Grain Growth Mechanism in Vacuum Evaporated CdTe Thin Films by Different Halide Treatments: An Evolution of Ion Size Impact on Physical Properties for Solar Cell Applications. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2023, 43, 429–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Roccanova, R.; Ming, W.; Whiteside, V.R.; McGuire, M.A.; Sellers, I.R.; Du, M.H.; Saparov, B. Synthesis, Crystal and Electronic Structures, and Optical Properties of (CH3NH3)2CdX4 (X = Cl, Br, I). Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13878–13888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Suchikova, Y.; Nazarovets, S.; Popov, A.I. Ga2O3 Solar-Blind Photodetectors: From Civilian Applications to Missile Detection and Research Agenda. Opt. Mater. 2024, 142, 116397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Suchikova, Y.; Kovachov, S.; Bohdanov, I.; Popova, E.; Moskina, A.; Popov, A.I. Characterization of CdxTeyOz/CdS/ZnO Heterostructures Synthesized by the SILAR Method. Coatings 2023, 13, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gal’chinskii, A.V.; Gloskovskaya, N.V.; Yaritskaya, L.I. Carrier Trapping and Delocalization in PbI2-Containing CdI2 Crystals. Inorg. Mater. 2012, 48, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bolesta, I.M.; Rovetskii, I.N.; Velgosh, S.R.; Rykhlyuk, S.V.; Karbovnyk, I.D.; Gloskovskaya, N.V. Morphology and Optical Properties of Nanostructures Formed in Non-Stoichiometric CdI2 Crystals. Ukr. J. Phys. 2018, 63, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bolesta, I.M.; Gloskovskaya, N.V.; Panasyuk, M.R.; Rovetskii, I.N.; Yaritskaya, L.I. Extrinsic Luminescence Centers in CdI2 Crystals Doped with PbI2 (10−4 to 1 mol%). Inorg. Mater. 2013, 49, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Benhaliliba, M.; Benouis, C.E.; Tiburcio-Silver, A.; Yakuphanoglu, F.; Avila-Garcia, A.; Tavira, A.; Mouffak, Z. Luminescence and Physical Properties of Copper Doped CdO Derived Nanostructures. J. Lumin. 2012, 132, 2653–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sahraei, R.; Mihandoost, A.; Nabiyouni, G.; Daneshfar, A.; Roushani, M.; Majles Ara, M.H. Room Temperature Synthesis and Characterization of Ultralong Cd(OH)2 Nanowires: A Simple and Template-Free Chemical Route. Appl. Phys. A 2012, 109, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Matsumoto, H.; Nakagawa, H. Relaxed Excitonic States in CdI2 Crystals. J. Lumin. 1979, 18, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kawabata, S.; Nakagawa, H. Life-Time Resolved Emission Spectra in CdI2 Crystals. J. Lumin. 2007, 126, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fukui, K.; Asakura, K.; Niimi, K.I.; Ishizue, I.; Nakagawa, H. Absorption and Luminescence Spectra of Amorphous CdI2 Thin Films. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1999, 101, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhunusbekov, A.M.; Strelkova, A.V.; Karipbayev, Z.T.; Kumarbekov, K.K.; Akilbekov, A.; Kassymkhanova, R.N.; Kassymzhanov, M.T.; Smortsova, Y.; Popov, A.I. Luminescence Investigation of BaMgF4 Ceramics under VUV Synchrotron Excitation. Crystals 2025, 15, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nagorny, S. Novel Cs2HfCl6 Crystal Scintillator: Recent Progress and Perspectives. Physics 2021, 3, 320–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Buryi, M.; Kral, R.; Babin, V.; Paterek, J.; Vanecek, V.; Veverka, P.; Kohoutkova, M.; Laguta, V.; Fasoli, M.; Villa, I.; et al. Trapping and Recombination Centers in Cesium Hafnium Chloride Single Crystals: EPR and TSL Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 19402–19411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Maji, S.B.; Vanetsev, A.; Mändar, H.; Nagirnyi, V.; Chernenko, K.; Kirm, M. Investigation of Luminescence Properties of Hydrothermally Synthesized Pr3+-Doped BaLuF5 Nanoparticles under Excitation by VUV Photons. Opt. Mater. 2024, 154, 115781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Saaring, J.; Vanetsev, A.; Chernenko, K.; Feldbach, E.; Kudryavtseva, I.; Mändar, H.; Pikker, S.; Pärna, R.; Nagirnyi, V.; Omelkov, S.; et al. Time-Resolved Luminescence Spectroscopy of Ultrafast Emissions in BaGeF6. J. Lumin. 2022, 244, 118729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Saaring, J.; Vanetsev, A.; Chernenko, K.; Feldbach, E.; Kudryavtseva, I.; Mändar, H.; Pärna, R.; Nagirnyi, V.; Omelkov, S.; Romet, I.; et al. Relaxation of Electronic Excitations in K2GeF6 Studied by Means of Time-Resolved Luminescence Spectroscopy under VUV and Pulsed Electron Beam Excitation. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 883, 160916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cirulis, J.; Antuzevics, A.; Fedotovs, A.; Rogulis, U.; Zvejnieks, G. Local Structure of an Oxygen Impurity and Fluorine Vacancy Complex in LiYF4. Materialia 2023, 30, 101848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Antuzevics, A.; Fedotovs, A.; Berzins, D.; Rogulis, U.; Auzins, K.; Zolotarjovs, A.; Baldochi, S.L. Recombination Luminescence of X-Ray Induced Paramagnetic Defects in BaY2F8. J. Lumin. 2020, 223, 117216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, X.; Hu, C.; Guo, L.; Ye, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Wu, J.; Liu, Q.; Shi, Y.; Chen, J.; et al. Scintillation properties and slow component suppression mechanism of BaF2 transparent ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2025, 108, e20469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ubukata, T.; Otake, S.; Kimura, H.; Kato, T.; Nakauchi, D.; Kawaguchi, N.; Yanagida, T. Effect of Eu-doping on optical and scintillation properties of CaCl2 transparent ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2025, 36, 2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Okazaki, K.; Koshimizu, M.; Koba, Y.; Kato, T.; Nakauchi, D.; Kawaguchi, N.; Yanagida, T. Effects of linear energy transfer on thermoluminescence properties of Eu-doped CaF2 ceramics. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2025, 566, 165785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wauke, T.; Kawano, N.; Kato, T.; Takebuchi, Y.; Fukushima, H.; Okada, G.; Yanagida, T. Dosimetric properties of Eu-doped Ca2BO3Cl. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2024, 548, 165227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Stef, M.; Buse, G.; Gutmann, M.; Poienar, M. Structural and optical properties of 5 mol% ErF3-doped fluoride crystals. Phys. Scr. 2025, 100, 105902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ćirić, A.; Stef, M.; Buse, G.; Periša, J.; Ristić, Z.; Gavrilović, T.; Dramićanin, M.D. Principal component analysis luminescence thermometry of Ce3+: Case study of BaF2:Ce3+ single crystals. J. Appl. Cryst. 2025, 58, 1659–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Stef, M.; Schornig, C.; Buse, G. Optical and Dielectric Properties of BaF2:(Er,Yb) Co-Doped Crystal. Materials 2025, 18, 1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Schornig, C.; Stef, M.; Buse, G.; Poienar, M.; Veber, P.; Vizman, D. Spectroscopic Properties of TmF3-Doped CaF2 Crystals. Materials 2024, 17, 4965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Time-dependent evolution of nanostructure formation on the surface of CdI2 crystals after their exposure in air for 1 (a), 8 (b), 24 (c), 32 (d), 168 h (e); (area size: 6 × 10 μm; height range: (a) 34 nm, (b) 51 nm, (c) 55 nm, (d) 74 nm, (e) 98 nm).
Figure 1. Time-dependent evolution of nanostructure formation on the surface of CdI2 crystals after their exposure in air for 1 (a), 8 (b), 24 (c), 32 (d), 168 h (e); (area size: 6 × 10 μm; height range: (a) 34 nm, (b) 51 nm, (c) 55 nm, (d) 74 nm, (e) 98 nm).
Crystals 16 00152 g001
Figure 2. Time dependence of the nanocluster size parameters on the crystal exposure time in the air atmosphere (upper panels); late-stage growth of an individual nanocluster: r2 as a function of exposure time (lower panel). The orange shaded region represents the confidence interval of the linear fit.
Figure 2. Time dependence of the nanocluster size parameters on the crystal exposure time in the air atmosphere (upper panels); late-stage growth of an individual nanocluster: r2 as a function of exposure time (lower panel). The orange shaded region represents the confidence interval of the linear fit.
Crystals 16 00152 g002
Figure 3. AFM images of the surface morphology of CdI2 crystals grown from the gas phase, aged in an air atmosphere for a long time (30 days or more); (a) nanostructures: A—nanopore; B, C—nanoclusters; (b) nanocluster formed in a nanopore; respective profiles (c,d). Profile (c) is recorded along the white line shown in panel (a). (Area sizes: (a) 2 × 2 μm; (b) 320 × 350 nm. Height range for (a,b) is 3 nm).
Figure 3. AFM images of the surface morphology of CdI2 crystals grown from the gas phase, aged in an air atmosphere for a long time (30 days or more); (a) nanostructures: A—nanopore; B, C—nanoclusters; (b) nanocluster formed in a nanopore; respective profiles (c,d). Profile (c) is recorded along the white line shown in panel (a). (Area sizes: (a) 2 × 2 μm; (b) 320 × 350 nm. Height range for (a,b) is 3 nm).
Crystals 16 00152 g003
Figure 4. Photoluminescence spectra of freshly cleaved and aged in air (over 168 h) CdI2 crystals grown from melt, T = 160 K (a), excitation length λ = 337 nm; (b) difference spectra.
Figure 4. Photoluminescence spectra of freshly cleaved and aged in air (over 168 h) CdI2 crystals grown from melt, T = 160 K (a), excitation length λ = 337 nm; (b) difference spectra.
Crystals 16 00152 g004
Figure 5. Temperature dependence of photoluminescence of air-aged CdI2 crystals grown from the gas phase (measurements were carried out at 100–170 K).
Figure 5. Temperature dependence of photoluminescence of air-aged CdI2 crystals grown from the gas phase (measurements were carried out at 100–170 K).
Crystals 16 00152 g005
Figure 6. Luminescence spectra of freshly cleaved (curve 1) and aged in air over 186 h and over 4 years (curves 2, 3) CdI2 crystals grown from the melt, T = 8 K (excitation length λ = 100 nm).
Figure 6. Luminescence spectra of freshly cleaved (curve 1) and aged in air over 186 h and over 4 years (curves 2, 3) CdI2 crystals grown from the melt, T = 8 K (excitation length λ = 100 nm).
Crystals 16 00152 g006
Table 1. Time dependence of the size of nanoparticles formed on the surface of CdI2 during its exposure to air.
Table 1. Time dependence of the size of nanoparticles formed on the surface of CdI2 during its exposure to air.
t, Hours Characteristics of Clusters
NumberCluster Density
Per μm2
Minimum Radius, nmMaximum Radius, nmAverage Radius, nmMinimum Height, nmMaximum Height, nmAverage Height, nmAverage Distance to Nearest Neighbor, nm
8200.333823892123423922
24370.62312538144520721
32821.37312757945718474
48811.35312406696423507
541091.82312415886221434
1201432.38312345187823342
1441752.92312364967720309
1683445.73312584868218242
Table 2. Time dependence of the size of one nanocluster.
Table 2. Time dependence of the size of one nanocluster.
Not, HoursCharacteristics of the Nanocluster
Radius, nmArea, nm2Height, nmVolume, nm3
1166353151765
2566351232691
3873429294147
42488624357280
5291109763411,061
63211710933312,023
74888624459360
85482546478554
912076468487488
1014482546488736
1116885585499555
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rovetskii, I.; Klym, H.; Karbovnyk, I.; Konuhova, M.; Kongi, N.; Popov, A.I. Time-Dependent Evolution of Nanostructure Formation on CdI2 Crystal Surfaces. Crystals 2026, 16, 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16020152

AMA Style

Rovetskii I, Klym H, Karbovnyk I, Konuhova M, Kongi N, Popov AI. Time-Dependent Evolution of Nanostructure Formation on CdI2 Crystal Surfaces. Crystals. 2026; 16(2):152. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16020152

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rovetskii, Ivan, Halyna Klym, Ivan Karbovnyk, Marina Konuhova, Nadezda Kongi, and Anatoli I. Popov. 2026. "Time-Dependent Evolution of Nanostructure Formation on CdI2 Crystal Surfaces" Crystals 16, no. 2: 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16020152

APA Style

Rovetskii, I., Klym, H., Karbovnyk, I., Konuhova, M., Kongi, N., & Popov, A. I. (2026). Time-Dependent Evolution of Nanostructure Formation on CdI2 Crystal Surfaces. Crystals, 16(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16020152

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop