Next Article in Journal
Role of Persistent Slip Bands and Persistent Slip Markings in Fatigue Crack Initiation in Polycrystals
Previous Article in Journal
The Renaissance and Golden Age of Epitaxial Dry Germanene
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pink-Beam Serial Synchrotron Crystallography at Pohang Light Source II
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Serial X-ray Crystallography II

by 1,2
1
Department of Life Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
2
POSTECH Biotech Center, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
Crystals 2023, 13(2), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13020222
Received: 13 January 2023 / Revised: 17 January 2023 / Accepted: 21 January 2023 / Published: 25 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Serial X-ray Crystallography)
Traditional macromolecular crystallography (MX) and recently spotlighted cryogenic electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) techniques have contributed greatly to the development of macromolecule structures and the related fields [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Although these methods are widely applied, they are limited by a cryogenic environment and radiation damage [8,9]. In this Special Issue, we covered a serial crystallography (SX) technique that overcomes the experimental limitations of MX and CryoEM. Because SX can determine the biological crystal structure at room temperature, it provides good biologically relevant information despite a molecular flexibility or fluctuation [10,11]. In addition, because the crystal sample is exposed only once to X-rays, it can provide accurate structural information by minimizing radiation damage [11]. Furthermore, pump–probe experiments using an optical laser and the liquid application method of the mix-and-inject concept are used to time-resolve the molecular substrate or inhibitor recognition process to provide an accurate reconstruction of the entire reaction mechanism and expand our knowledge [12,13,14,15].
Starting with serial femtosecond crystallography (SFX) using an X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) [11], the SX technique is widely applied to serial synchrotron crystallography (SSX) using synchrotron X-rays [16], which can aid in obtaining in-depth and accurate structural information. Although the SX experimental technique provides remarkable research results, it requires more effort than other methods in terms of the experimental aspects of the preparation of a crystal sample, the sample’s delivery, and data processing [17,18,19,20,21]. Accordingly, studies that have contributed to the development of serial X-ray crystallography have been collected in this Special Issue. Herein, we briefly covered serial crystallography techniques [22], one review related to crystallization [23], and two research articles on SX [24,25].
Jang et al. reviewed general X-ray crystallography experiments for the crystallization, data collection, and structural determination [23]. In addition, various types of cryoprotectant solutions have been reviewed, along with the radiation damage and diffraction quality improvement [23]. This review aims to not only inform the reader regarding traditional protein crystallography experiments but also provides useful information for evaluating the sample’s quality prior to SX applications.
Nam introduced a method to index the diffraction patterns obtained from multiple crystals using a serial crystallography program [24]. Owing to the nature of serial crystallography research, multiple crystals are exposed to X-rays during the sample delivery, resulting in a multicrystal diffraction pattern [17]. Programs have been developed to extract multicrystal diffraction patterns from these data [20] which can be used in macromolecular crystallography [24]. This approach contributes to lowering the boundary between MX and SX in data processing.
Kim and Nam reported experiments on serial crystallography using pink-beam X-rays in PLS-II [25]. Pink-beams not only have a higher flux than monochromatic beams but also provide more reflection information [26]. As a result, they have the advantage of reducing the amount of sample consumption and X-ray exposure time of the crystal sample [25,26]. Thus, pink-beam X-ray and various pump–probe experiments significantly contribute to the development of serial crystallography techniques and protein structure research.
Overall, the contents covered in this Special Issue will contribute to the development of SX and MX.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017M3A9F6029736 and NRF-2021R1I1A1A01050838) and Korea Initiative for Fostering University of Research and Innovation (KIURI) Program of the NRF (NRF-2020M3H1A1075314). This work is supported by ProGen.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

As the Guest Editor, I would like to acknowledge all the authors for their valuable contribution to this Special Issue, which is expressed in fascinating and inspiring papers. Additionally, I thank the Editor of Crystals for her assistance during the processing of this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chua, E.Y.D.; Mendez, J.H.; Rapp, M.; Ilca, S.L.; Tan, Y.Z.; Maruthi, K.; Kuang, H.; Zimanyi, C.M.; Cheng, A.; Eng, E.T.; et al. Better, Faster, Cheaper: Recent Advances in Cryo–Electron Microscopy. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2022, 91, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nam, K.H. Crystal structure of human brain-type fatty acid-binding protein FABP7 complexed with palmitic acid. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 2021, 77, 954–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, L.; Bu, T.; Bai, X.; He, S.; Zhang, J.; Jin, L.; Liu, B.; Dong, Y.; Ha, N.-C.; Quan, C.; et al. Crystal structure of the domain-swapped dimeric maltodextrin-binding protein MalE from Salmonella enterica. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2022, 78, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hu, C.; Almendros, C.; Nam, K.H.; Costa, A.R.; Vink, J.N.A.; Haagsma, A.C.; Bagde, S.R.; Brouns, S.J.J.; Ke, A. Mechanism for Cas4-assisted directional spacer acquisition in CRISPR–Cas. Nature 2021, 598, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, C.; Ni, D.; Nam, K.H.; Majumdar, S.; McLean, J.; Stahlberg, H.; Terns, M.P.; Ke, A. Allosteric control of type I-A CRISPR-Cas3 complexes and establishment as effective nucleic acid detection and human genome editing tools. Mol. Cell 2022, 82, 2754–2768.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hu, C.; van Beljouw, S.P.B.; Nam, K.H.; Schuler, G.; Ding, F.; Cui, Y.; Rodríguez-Molina, A.; Haagsma, A.C.; Valk, M.; Pabst, M.; et al. Craspase is a CRISPR RNA-guided, RNA-activated protease. Science 2022, 377, 1278–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nam, K.H. Structural analysis of metal chelation of the metalloproteinase thermolysin by 1,10-phenanthroline. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2021, 215, 111319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Garman, E.F. Radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography: What is it and why should we care? Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. 2010, 66, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baker, L.A.; Rubinstein, J.L. Radiation Damage in Electron Cryomicroscopy. In Cryo-EM Part A Sample Preparation and Data Collection; Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010; pp. 371–388. [Google Scholar]
  10. Weinert, T.; Olieric, N.; Cheng, R.; Brunle, S.; James, D.; Ozerov, D.; Gashi, D.; Vera, L.; Marsh, M.; Jaeger, K.; et al. Serial millisecond crystallography for routine room-temperature structure determination at synchrotrons. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Boutet, S.; Lomb, L.; Williams, G.J.; Barends, T.R.; Aquila, A.; Doak, R.B.; Weierstall, U.; DePonte, D.P.; Steinbrener, J.; Shoeman, R.L.; et al. High-resolution protein structure determination by serial femtosecond crystallography. Science 2012, 337, 362–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tenboer, J.; Basu, S.; Zatsepin, N.; Pande, K.; Milathianaki, D.; Frank, M.; Hunter, M.; Boutet, S.; Williams, G.J.; Koglin, J.E.; et al. Time-resolved serial crystallography captures high-resolution intermediates of photoactive yellow protein. Science 2014, 346, 1242–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Orville, A.M. Recent results in time resolved serial femtosecond crystallography at XFELs. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2020, 65, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pandey, S.; Calvey, G.; Katz, A.M.; Malla, T.N.; Koua, F.H.M.; Martin-Garcia, J.M.; Poudyal, I.; Yang, J.H.; Vakili, M.; Yefanov, O.; et al. Observation of substrate diffusion and ligand binding in enzyme crystals using high-repetition-rate mix-and-inject serial crystallography. IUCrJ 2021, 8, 878–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Malla, T.N.; Schmidt, M. Transient state measurements on proteins by time-resolved crystallography. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2022, 74, 102376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Stellato, F.; Oberthur, D.; Liang, M.; Bean, R.; Gati, C.; Yefanov, O.; Barty, A.; Burkhardt, A.; Fischer, P.; Galli, L.; et al. Room-temperature macromolecular serial crystallography using synchrotron radiation. IUCrJ 2014, 1, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nam, K.H. Hit and Indexing Rate in Serial Crystallography: Incomparable Statistics. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beale, J.H.; Bolton, R.; Marshall, S.A.; Beale, E.V.; Carr, S.B.; Ebrahim, A.; Moreno-Chicano, T.; Hough, M.A.; Worrall, J.A.R.; Tews, I.; et al. Successful sample preparation for serial crystallography experiments. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2019, 52, 1385–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, F.Z.; Zhang, B.; Yan, E.K.; Sun, B.; Wang, Z.J.; He, J.H.; Yin, D.C. A guide to sample delivery systems for serial crystallography. FEBS J. 2019, 286, 4402–4417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. White, T.A. Processing serial crystallography data with CrystFEL: A step-by-step guide. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 2019, 75, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, K.; Kim, J.; Baek, S.; Park, J.; Park, S.; Lee, J.-L.; Chung, W.K.; Cho, Y.; Nam, K.H. Combination of an inject-and-transfer system for serial femtosecond crystallography. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2022, 55, 813–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nam, K.H. Serial X-ray Crystallography. Crystals 2022, 12, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jang, K.; Kim, H.G.; Hlaing, S.H.S.; Kang, M.; Choe, H.-W.; Kim, Y.J. A Short Review on Cryoprotectants for 3D Protein Structure Analysis. Crystals 2022, 12, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nam, K.H. Processing of Multicrystal Diffraction Patterns in Macromolecular Crystallography Using Serial Crystallography Programs. Crystals 2022, 12, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, Y.; Nam, K.H. Pink-Beam Serial Synchrotron Crystallography at Pohang Light Source II. Crystals 2022, 12, 1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Meents, A.; Wiedorn, M.O.; Srajer, V.; Henning, R.; Sarrou, I.; Bergtholdt, J.; Barthelmess, M.; Reinke, P.Y.A.; Dierksmeyer, D.; Tolstikova, A.; et al. Pink-beam serial crystallography. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nam, K.H. Serial X-ray Crystallography II. Crystals 2023, 13, 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13020222

AMA Style

Nam KH. Serial X-ray Crystallography II. Crystals. 2023; 13(2):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13020222

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nam, Ki Hyun. 2023. "Serial X-ray Crystallography II" Crystals 13, no. 2: 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13020222

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop