Tripeptide-Catalyzed Asymmetric Aldol Reaction Between α-ketoesters and Acetone Under Acidic Cocatalyst-Free Conditions

Abstract

Here, we report the tripeptide-catalyzed asymmetric aldol reaction between α-ketoesters and acetone under acidic cocatalysts-free conditions. H-Pro-Tle-Gly-OH 3g-catalyzed reactions between α-ketoesters and acetone resulted in up to 95% yield and 88% ee. Analysis of the transition state using density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed that the tert-butyl group in 3g played an important role in enantioselectivity.

1. Introduction

Optically active tertiary alcohols are partial structures present in various natural products and biologically active compounds [1,2,3,4,5]. Various synthetic methods for these compounds have been developed. Asymmetric nucleophile addition to functionalized ketones is one of the most useful synthetic methods, because highly functionalized optically active tertiary alcohols, which can undergo various transformations, can be obtained. For example, the direct asymmetric aldol reaction between α-ketoesters and acyclic ketones is a helpful asymmetric reaction, because it gives γ-keto-α-hydroxyesters, which can undergo various transformations [6,7,8]. Therefore, various asymmetric catalysts, such as bisprolinamide, primary amine, and diamine catalysts, have been developed for this reaction [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. However, most catalysts require acidic cocatalysts for high enantioselectivity and high chemical yield. Thus, simpler catalytic systems that do not require acidic cocatalysts are needed. Nevertheless, the number of asymmetric catalysts that catalyze this reaction, under acidic cocatalyst-free conditions, is limited. Although Zhang et al. [18] reported a proline-catalyzed asymmetric aldol reaction between ethyl phenylglyoxylate and acetone under acidic cocatalyst-free conditions, this method was enantioselective to some degree [18]. To the best of our knowledge, for this reaction, an asymmetric catalyst displaying high enantioselectivity and chemical yield under acidic cocatalyst-free conditions has still not been reported.

Following the introduction of a proline-catalyzed asymmetric aldol reaction of aldehydes reported by List et al. [19], prolinamide catalysts for this reaction have been actively developed [20,21]. Synthetic peptides in prolinamide catalysts, are recognized as effective catalysts for the direct asymmetric aldol reaction using aldehydes as electrophiles [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. However, peptide catalysts for the direct asymmetric aldol reaction using ketones as electrophiles are limited [29,33,34,35,36]. Previously, we developed tripeptide catalysts (Supplementary Materials) that catalyzed the direct asymmetric aldol reaction of isatins or trifluoromethyl ketones with acetone (Figure 1a) [37,38]. These catalysts, under acidic cocatalyst-free conditions, displayed good enantioselectivity and kinetics in these reactions. Herein, we will report the direct asymmetric aldol reaction between α-ketoesters and acetone catalyzed by tripeptide under acidic cocatalyst-free conditions (Figure 1b).

2. Results and Discussion

In this study, we investigated the effect of the catalyst structure on the rate and enantioselectivity of the reaction between methyl phenylglyoxylate (1a) and acetone (2) (

Table 1. Optimization of catalysts and reaction conditions.

Entry	Catalyst	Solvent	Yield (%) a	ee (%) b
1	H-Pro-Gly-Gly-OH 3a	neat	61	31
2	H-Pro-Gly-Ala-OH 3b	neat	81	30
3	H-Pro-Gly-D-Ala-OH 3c	neat	70	26
4	H-Pro-Ala-Gly-OH 3d	neat	50	38
5	H-Pro-D-Ala-Gly-OH 3e	neat	49	34
6	H-Pro-Val-Gly-OH 3f	neat	49	50
7	H-Pro-Tle-Gly-OH 3g	neat	90	65
8	3g	MeOH	40	30
9	3g	MeCN	62	54
10	3g	CHCl3	81	68
11	3g	PhMe	44	70
12	3g	THF	82	79
13	3g	Et2O	74	82
14 c	3g	THF	76	88
15 c	3g	Et2O	45	88
16 d	3g	THF	—	—
17 c,e	3g	THF	39	89
18 c,f	3g	THF	56	87
19 c,g	3g	THF	57	89
20 c,h	3g	THF	34	89
21 c,i	3g	THF	56	83

^a Isolated yield after preparative thin layer chromatography. ^b Determined by HPLC. Absolute configuration of 4a was determined by comparing optical rotation between 4a and previous report [14]. ^c Reaction was carried out at 0 °C. ^d Reaction was carried out at −15 °C. ^e 3g (10 mol%) was used. ^f 2 (150 eq.) was used. ^g 2 (50 eq.) was used. ^h Reaction was carried out in THF (2 mL). ⁱ Reaction was carried out in THF (0.5 mL).

, entries 1–9). H-Pro-Gly-Gly-OH 3a-catalyzed reaction progressed to give the corresponding aldol adduct 4a with 61% yield and 31% ee (Table 1, entry 1). To investigate the effect of introducing a methyl group to the C-terminal amino acid residue in 3a, H-Pro-Gly-Ala-OH 3b- and H-Pro-Gly-D-Ala-OH 3c-catalyzed reactions were carried out (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). Both reactions displayed higher reaction rates than the 3a-catalyzed reaction; however, enantioselectivities of both reactions were not improved, compared with that of the 3a-catalyzed reaction. H-Pro-Ala-Gly-OH 3d- and H-Pro-D-Ala-Gly-OH 3e-catalyzed reactions introduced a methyl group to the amino acid residue adjacent to the proline residue in 3a. The reaction between 1a and 2 gave 4a higher enantioselectivity than the 3a-catalyzed reaction (Table 1, entries 4 and 5). The 3d-catalyzed reaction displayed higher enantioselectivity than the 3e-catalyzed one. However, the reaction catalyzed by H-Pro-Val-Gly-OH 3f and H-Pro-Tle-Gly-OH 3g, containing bulkier isopropyl and tertiary butyl groups instead of methyl groups, displayed higher enantioselectivities than the 3d-catalyzed reaction (Table 1, entries 6–7). Above all, 3g-catalyzed reactions showed the highest enantioselectivity and reaction rates than any of the other catalyzed reactions. From these investigations, it was discovered that bulky substitution in L-amino acid adjacent to proline residue played an important role in determining enantioselectivity. From the results, we decided that the most efficient catalyst for this reaction was 3g, in terms of enantioselectivity and the reaction rate obtained.

To improve enantioselectivity, we optimized the reaction conditions for a 3g-catalyzed reaction between 1a and 2 (Table 1, entries 8–21). This reaction was carried out in various solvents (Table 1, entries 8–13). In THF and diethyl ether, the reaction displayed higher enantioselectivity than in any other solvent (Table 1, entries 12 and 13). The reaction in THF and diethyl ether at 0 °C produced 4a with higher enantioselectivity than that at 20 °C. However, the reaction rate at 0 °C in diethyl ether was lower than that in THF at 0 °C. Therefore, we determined that the best solvent for this reaction was THF, in terms of enantioselectivity and reaction rate (Table 1, entries 14 and 15). The reaction in THF at −15 °C did not progress (Table 1, entry 16). The reaction in THF at 0 °C was also slow when the catalytic amount was reduced from 20 mol% to 10 mol% (Table 1, entry 17). The increase and decrease in the amounts of 2 and THF, respectively, caused a reduction in reaction rate (Table 1, entries 18–21). From all the reaction conditions tested, it was revealed that the optimum reaction was 3g (20 mol%)-catalyzed reaction using 2 (100 eq.) in THF (1 mL) at 0 °C, because this reaction gave 4a with 76% chemical yield and 88% ee under less acidic conditions (Table 1, entry 16).

We also investigated the reaction between various α-ketoesters 1a–1h and 2 under optimized conditions (

Table 2. Substrate scope.

Entry	R1	R2	1	4	Yield (%) a	ee (%) b
1	Ph	Me	1a	4a	76	88(R) c
2	Ph	Et	1b	4b	63	82
3	Ph	iPr	1c	4c	33	86
4	4-ClPh	Me	1d	4d	84	75
5 d	4-CF3Ph	Me	1e	4e	95	50
6	4-MePh	Me	1f	4f	25	75
7	4-MeOPh	Me	1g	4g	10	65
8	Me	Me	1h	4h	92	39

^a Isolated yield after preparative thin layer chromatography. ^b Determined by HPLC. ^c Absolute configuration of 4a was determined by comparing optical rotation between 4a and previous report [14]. ^d Reaction was demonstrated for 3d.

). To reveal the effect of ester substituents, reactions of 1a–1c having various ester groups were carried out (Table 2, entries 1–3). In reactions using 1a–1c as substrates with alkyl esters, the bulkier the alkyls esters were, the slower the reactions progressed. The substrates 1a–1c generated the corresponding aldol adducts 4a–4c with good enantioselectivities. To estimate the contribution of the methoxycarbonyl group of 1a, the reaction between acetophenone and acetone was carried out. This reaction was not progressed. To investigate the effect of substituents on phenyl groups, reactions of 4-substituted α-ketoesters 1d–1g were carried out (Table 2, entries 4–7). Reactions of 4-Cl 1d and 4-CF₃ 1e were faster than that of 1a, and especially that of 1e, which was completed after three days. However, enantioselectivities of reactions 1d and 1e were lower than that of the reaction of 1a (Table 2, entries 4 and 5, respectively). In the reactions of 4-Me 1f and 4-MeO 1g, the reaction rates and enantioselectivities were also lower than that of the reaction of 1a (Table 2, entries 6 and 7, respectively). The reactions of methyl pyruvate (1h) and methyl trimethylpyruvate as aliphatic α-ketoesters were investigated. The reaction between 1h and 2 gave corresponding aldol adduct 4h, with good chemical yield and medium enantioselectivity (Table 2, entry 8). Additionally, the reaction of more bulky genusmethyl trimethylpyruvate (R¹ = ^tBu) with 2 did not give corresponding aldol adduct. Cyclohexanone, 2-butanone, and acetophenone were applied as nucleophiles. These nucleophiles were not reacted.

It was assumed that the catalytic cycle of this reaction was similar to that of the proline-catalyzed asymmetric aldol reaction (Figure 2a) [9]. Therefore, 2 was activated by enamine formation by reacting with the amino group of 3g. The C–C bond was then formed by nucleophilic addition to the 1 of enamine as a nucleophile to generate the iminium cation. Finally, the aldol adduct was produced by the hydrolysis of the iminium cation. In this reaction, the absolute configuration of the aldol adduct 4 was determined at the C–C bond formation step.

To understand the effect of tert-leucine residue in H-Pro-Tle-Gly-OH 3g on enantioselectivity, origins of enantioselectivity of 3g and H-Pro-Gly-Gly-OH 3a were investigated. Specifically, transition states of the stereo-determining C–C bond forming step of 3g- and 3a-catalyzed reactions between 1a and 2 were investigated via density functional theory (DFT) calculations (Figure 2b and Figure 3) [39,40].

Investigation of transition states of the stereo-determining C–C bond forming step of 3a-catalyzed reactions between 1a and 2 via DFT calculations revealed that the major (R)-aldol adduct was produced through 3a-TS-(R), and the minor (S)-aldol adduct was produced through 3a-TS-(S) in the 3a-catalyzed reaction (Figure 2b). Like the experimental result where (R)-aldol adduct was preferentially obtained (Table 1, entry 1), 3a-TS-(R) was the more stable transition state. To understand the origin of enantioselectivity of 3a, we focused on hydrogen bonds in transition states of the stereo-determining C–C bond forming step. Hydrogen bonds a, b, and c were formed in both transition states. However, hydrogen bonds d and e were present in only 3a-TS-(R), and hydrogen bond f was present in only 3a-TS-(S). Namely, 3a-TS-(R) had more hydrogen bonds than 3a-TS-(S). This was the reason why 3a-TS-(R) was the more stable transition state. The investigation of transition states of the C–C bond forming step of the 3g-catalyzed reaction via DFT calculation found four transition states, such as 3g-TS-(R)-1, 3g-TS-(R)-2, 3g-TS-(S)-1, and 3g-TS-(S)-2 (Figure 3). When this 3g-catalyzed reaction passed through 3g-TS-(R)-1 and 3g-TS-(R)-2, the major (R)-aldol adduct was obtained. Similarly, when this 3g-catalyzed reaction passed through 3g-TS-(S)-1 and 3g-TS-(S)-2, the minor (S)-aldol adduct was obtained. Focusing on conformations of these transition states, 3g in 3g-TS-(R)-1 and 3g-TS-(S)-1 had a similar conformation to 3a in the transition state of the C–C bond forming step of the 3a-catalyzed reaction. However, the presence of 3g in these transition states introduced steric repulsion between the ^tBu of tert-leucine residue and the carbonyl group of proline residue, causing destabilization of these transition states. In contrast, this steric repulsion was mitigated in 3g-TS-(R)-2 and 3g-TS-(S)-2, due to the change in conformation influenced by the ^tBu group. Due to this change of steric environment in these transition states, 3g-TS-(R)-2 and 3g-TS-(S)-2 were more stable than 3g-TS-(R)-1 and 3g-TS-(S)-1. For that reason, it was concluded that (S)- and (R)-aldol adducts were formed through 3g-TS-(S)-2 and 3g-TS-(R)-2 in the 3g-catalyzed reaction, respectively.

Finally, 3g-TS-(R)-2 and 3g-TS-(S)-2 were analyzed and a comparison of their Gibbs free energy revealed that 3g-TS-(R)-2 was 2.2 kcal/mol more stable than 3g-TS-(S)-2. This difference in Gibbs free energy was larger than that between 3a-TS-(R) and 3a-TS-(S). Moreover, DFT calculations reproduced the experimental results such that 3g displayed higher enantioselectivity than 3a, mainly because of the difference in stabilization caused by hydrogen bonds. In both 3g-TS-(R)-2 and 3g-TS-(S)-2, multiple hydrogen bonds a, b, and c formed. Hydrogen bonds g and h formed only in 3g-TS-(R)-2. The conformational change of 3g by the introduction of ^tBu group to 3a created a larger difference in the number of hydrogen bonds formed between 3g-TS-(R)-2 and 3g-TS-(S)-2 than that between 3a-TS-(R) and 3a-TS-(S). Hence, difference of stabilization by hydrogen bonds between 3g-TS-(R)-2 and 3g-TS-(S)-2 was larger than that between 3a-TS-(R) and 3a-TS-(S). From the above results, we concluded that the control of 3g conformation by ^tBu groups played an important role in the production of enantioselectivity.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Methods

Column chromatography was carried out on a column packed with spherical silica gel 60N of neutral size, 40–50 μm. Thin layer chromatography was prepared using PLC Silica gel (60 F₂₅₄, 1 mm, Merck). NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL JNM-ECA600 spectrometer (¹H, 600 MHz; ¹³C, 150 MHz). Chemical shifts of ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR signals, reported as δ ppm, were referenced to an internal standard SiMe₄ or sodium 3-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propanesulfonate. HRMS were obtained at an ionization potential of 70 eV with a JEOL JMS-T100GCV spectrometer. Melting points were measured on an AS ONE ATM-01 melting-point apparatus. Optical rotations were measured by a JASCO P-1010 Polarimeter. HPLC analysis was performed with a Daicel Chiralpak AD-H column (25 cm × 4.6 mm × 5 μm) and Chiralpak OD-H column (25 cm × 4.6 mm × 5 μm). All reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial sources and used without purification. Compounds 1a–1g were synthesized by the previously reported method [41,42]. Tripeptide catalysts were synthesized by the literature methods [37,38].

3.2. General Procedure for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction between α-Ketoesters and Acetone

A mixture of H-Pro-Tle-Gly-OH 3g (20 μmol, 5.7 mg), acetone (10 mmol, 0.74 mL), and THF (1.0 mL) was stirred at 0 °C for 10 min. To the resulting mixture, α-ketoester (0.1 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for six days and then filtered to remove the catalyst. The resulting mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure. Preparative thin layer chromatography on silica gel using hexane/ethyl acetate as the eluent gave the aldol adduct. The enantiomeric excess of aldol adduct was determined by chiral HPLC.

4. Conclusions

We have developed a direct asymmetric aldol reaction between α-ketoesters and acetone, catalyzed by a tripeptide under acidic cocatalyst-free conditions. The 3g-catalyzed reaction gave various aldol adducts with up to 95% yield and 88% ee. Investigation of the transition state via the C–C bond forming step by DFT calculations has revealed the role of the ^tBu group in 3g in determining enantioselectivity.