Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Highly Dispersed Rod- and Particle-Shaped CuFe19Ox Catalysts and Their Shape Effects on WGS
Next Article in Special Issue
N-Doped K3Ti5NbO14@TiO2 Core-Shell Structure for Enhanced Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity in Environmental Remediation
Previous Article in Journal
Carbonate-Catalyzed Room-Temperature Selective Reduction of Biomass-Derived 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-Bis(hydroxymethyl)furan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microcystis aeruginosa Synergistically Facilitate the Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride and Cr(VI) on PAN/TiO2/Ag Nanofiber Mats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/catal8120634
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progress in Constructing Plasmonic Metal/Semiconductor Hetero-Nanostructures for Improved Photocatalysis

by
Liang Ma
1,*,
Shuang Chen
1,
Yun Shao
2,
You-Long Chen
1,
Mo-Xi Liu
1,
Hai-Xia Li
1,
Yi-Ling Mao
1 and
Si-Jing Ding
3,*
1
Hubei Key Laboratory of Optical Information and Pattern Recognition, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
2
School of Material Science and Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
3
School of Mathematics and Physics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2018, 8(12), 634; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8120634
Submission received: 19 November 2018 / Revised: 5 December 2018 / Accepted: 5 December 2018 / Published: 7 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructured Materials for Photocatalysis)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hetero-nanomaterials constructed by plasmonic metals and functional semiconductors show enormous potential in photocatalytic applications, such as in hydrogen production, CO2 reduction, and treatment of pollutants. Their photocatalytic performances can be better regulated through adjusting structure, composition, and components’ arrangement. Therefore, the reasonable design and synthesis of metal/semiconductor hetero-nanostructures is of vital significance. In this mini-review, we laconically summarize the recent progress in efficiently establishing metal/semiconductor nanomaterials for improved photocatalysis. The defined photocatalysts mainly include traditional binary hybrids, ternary multi-metals/semiconductor, and metal/multi-semiconductors heterojunctions. The underlying physical mechanism for the enhanced photocatalysis of the established photocatalysts is highlighted. In the end, a brief summary and possible future perspectives for further development in this field are demonstrated.

1. Introduction

The increasing energy shortage and environmental crisis are common problems faced by the world in the twenty-first century, and the whole world is seeking ways to ease these issues. As a clean technique to convert solar energy, semiconductor-based photocatalysis has been intensely investigated and widely used in energy stores and pollutant treatment [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Since Fujishima and Honda firstly applied TiO2 electrode to electrochemical water splitting under ultraviolet light irradiation in 1972 [11], large amounts of semiconductor materials have been extensively explored for diverse photocatalytic applications, such as pollution degradation, water splitting, CO2 reduction. [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. In the case of the photocatalytic process, semiconductors can only absorb a photon whose energy is equal or larger than its band gap. However, the commonly used semiconductors often have wide band gaps, indicating that they could only be motivated by ultraviolet light [19,20]. As the semiconductor is excited, the formation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs occurs, while the fast recombination of electron–hole pairs in a semiconductor plays a negative role on the photocatalytic reaction. Therefore, to optimize the photocatalytic performance of semiconductor, the exploring of new strategies, to expand the light response region and accelerate the separation rate of electron–hole pairs, is necessary.
Over the past two decades, metal nanocrystals have attracted intense research attention due to their extraordinary physical and chemical characteristics [21,22,23]. The most fascinating property of metal nanocrystals is their plasmonic optical peculiarity. Plasmon resonance of metal nanomaterials refers to the collective oscillations of light-excited free charges, which can endow metals with strong light absorption and scattering cross-sections [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Furthermore, the localized surface plasmon resonance excitation of a metal nanocrystal can induce a strong local electromagnetic field. Moreover, upon resonant excitation, plasmonic metals interact strongly with incident light, the oscillation of free electrons dephases in a short time, then generates energetic hot electrons and holes. Only certain metal nanocrystals, such as Au, Al, Ag, and Cu, possess noticeable surface plasmon resonance [31,32,33,34]. The plasmon resonance of these metal nanomaterials can be easily adjusted through varying the sizes and morphologies, which could across the entire visible spectrum [35,36,37,38,39,40]. With these characters, the plasmonic metals deservedly display great promises for the effective solar energy conversion in photocatalytic reaction.
Incorporating plasmonic metal nanocrystals with semiconductor photocatalysts to form metal/semiconductor hybrid nanostructures is a potential way to enlarge the light absorption, charge generation, and separation during the photocatalytic process. Great efforts have been applied to construct various metal/semiconductors hybrids with excellent photocatalytic performance [41,42,43,44,45]. In present article, we give a mini-review about the recent efforts in efficient preparation of metal/semiconductor nanomaterials for improved photocatalytic applications. The defined photocatalysts are mainly centralized in traditional binary hybrids, ternary multi-metals/semiconductor, and metal/multi-semiconductors heterojunctions. The underlying physical mechanism (including plasmon coupling of multi-metals, co-catalytic effect of functional metals, plasmon-mediated Z-scheme, and p–n heterojunctions of multi-semiconductors) for the efficiently improved photocatalysis of metal/semiconductor heterojunctions are highlighted. In the end, a concise summary and discussion on the future challenges in the area of metal/semiconductor photocatalysis are demonstrated.

2. Binary Metal/Semiconductor Hybrids for Enhanced Photocatalysis

Binary photocatalysts constructed by one plasmonic metal and one semiconductor are the most frequently studied. In a metal/semiconductor heterojunction, plasmon can modulate photocatalysis mainly through the following characteristics: (1) strong light absorption and scattering; (2) large local electromagnetic field; (3) abundant hot electrons generation [46,47,48,49,50]. Thus, in the photocatalytic process, plasmon could promote the redox reaction via the following pathways: enlarging light trapping, speeding charge separation, hot electron injection, and plasmon-induced energy transfer [51,52,53,54,55]. Since the optical and photocatalytic performances of metal/semiconductor hybrids are highly dependent on their morphologies and structures, the design of hetero-nanostructure is very important. In this section, we mainly focus on the recent progress about the structural adjustment of binary metal/semiconductor photocatalysts. Traditional core–shell, yolk–shell, and anisotropic morphologies are highlighted. The underlying enhanced mechanism for photocatalysis of the classified nanostructures is demonstrated.
A typical core–shell structural motif of metal/semiconductors has special advantages for photocatalytic reactions, such as protecting the metal core and enlarging the active sties [56,57]. Generally, the plasmonic metal cores mainly include Au, Ag, Cu, and semiconductor nanoshells that are usually centered in metallic oxide, sulfide, and selenide [58,59,60,61,62,63]. For instance, Zhang’s group reported the synthesis of high-quality Au@CdS core–shell hybrids with atomically organized interfaces [64]. As shown in Figure 1a,b, the high-yield and monodisperse Au@CdS, with quasi-single crystalline shell, was observed. The photocatalytic performance was evaluated by testing the hydrogen generation rate when Na2SO3 and Na2S were used as sacrificial agents. The results indicated that Au35@CdS5 (the Au core size was around 35 nm and CdS shell thickness was 5 nm) exhibited the highest activity, with the rate reaching to 24.0 mmol g−1 h−1 (see Figure 1c). The results of transient absorption indicated that the specific interfacial characteristic activated efficient hot electrons, injected from Au to CdS, which could be the reason for the excellent photocatalytic activity.
Apart from core–shell nanostructures, metal-semiconductor yolk–shell nanostructures also benefit photocatalysis. The unique void between metal and semiconductor could efficiently improve light trapping and accelerate plasmon-induced resonant energy transfer [65,66,67,68]. For example, Han and co-workers reported a yolk–shell nanostructure consisting of plasmonic Au nanorod yolk and CdS shell [69]. The synthetic route was shown in Figure 2a, and the most important point in the process was the action exchange. The identified yolk–shell structure of Au/CdS was given in Figure 2b. The photocatalytic activity was evaluated by testing the hydrogen generation rate when Na2SO3 and Na2S were served as sacrificial agents under visible light (λ > 400 nm) irradiation. The prepared Au–CdS yolk–shell hybrids exhibited largely enhanced photocatalytic activity, as compared to other contrast nanostructures (see Figure 2c). The cooperative effect between multiple photon reflections and the radiative relaxation of plasmon energy were thought to be the promotional effect for the photocatalysis, as proposed in Figure 2d.
In addition, anisotropic binary metal/semiconductor hybrids have unique merits for photocatalytic reaction. By selectively growing semiconductor shells on the surface of metal nanocrystals, the processes of electron injection and energy transfer can be prominently accelerated [70,71,72]. In 2016, Stucky’s group prepared an anisotropic Au/TiO2 nanodumbbell, where the TiO2 nanoshells were spatially grown at the two ends of Au nanorod (see Figure 3a) [73]. Through testing the hydrogen production rate by evaluating the photocatalytic oxidation of methanol, the designed Au/TiO2 showed the best photocatalytic activity (see Figure 3b). As proposed in Figure 3c, for the nanodumbbells, the oxidation occurs on their side surface, the lateral side of Au can be directly used as the electron donor. With Au partially exposed, Au could generate a large local electric field that focused energy transfer to TiO2, thereby enhancing photocatalytic activity. Similarly, Han and co-workers reported the site-selective growth of Cu2O nanoshells on desired sites of hexoctahedral Au nanocrystals [74]. The morphology characterization in Figure 3d clearly shown that Cu2O grew on the vertices of hexoctahedral Au (Auvertex–Cu2O). Auvertex–Cu2O exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity for hydrogen generation, compared to the other nanostructures. A series of experiments (including adding insulating layer and theoretical simulation) indicated that the strong plasmon resonance, subsequent sustainable hot electron and energy transfer process (1 and 2, labeled in Figure 3f) were responsible for the enhanced photocatalytic activity.

3. Plasmon Coupling, Co-Catalytic Effect, and Components Arrangement in Ternary Multi-Metals/Semiconductor Catalysts

Integrating one metal nanocrystal with binary metal/semiconductor to form ternary hetero-nanostructure could dramatically improve the photocatalytic activity, due to the synergistic effect between the three nano-spaced components [75,76]. The introduced metals could be a plasmonic donor or functional catalyst. In that way, the synergistic effect includes plasmon coupling and co-catalytic effect. Furthermore, the arrangements of the three different components also influence the whole photocatalytic performance. In the current section, we focus on the progress achieving in constructing ternary multi-metals/semiconductor photocatalysts. The excellent photocatalytic performances of defined nanomaterials and underlying physical mechanism are highlighted.
The plasmon coupling between two metals could generate excellent optical properties. On the one hand, the light trapping of multi-metals can be largely enhanced due to the strong plasmon coupling of two types of metals [77,78]. On the other hand, the local electric field of multi-metals can be largely enhanced, which can benefit the hot electron generation and electron–hole pairs’ separation [79,80]. Recently, Huang and co-workers used Au–Ag bimetallic nanoparticles to modify ZnO nanorods via a simple photodeposition procedure (see Figure 4a) [81]. Through testing the rate of ethylene-oxidation, the ZnO co-decorated by 0.8 wt% Au–Ag exhibited the best photocatalytic activity. The efficient light trapping and fast carrier separation, which were caused by cooperative effect of plasmonic Au–Ag alloys, were thought to be the enhanced factor. Besides, Kamimura et al. prepared (core@shell)@shell ((Au@Ag)@Au) nanocrystals as photosensitizers of TiO2 (see Figure 4c) [82]. They confirmed that the as-prepared catalysts could oxidize 2-propanol, and its activity was about 15× higher when compared with Au/TiO2. The strong local surface plasmon resonance of (Au@Ag)@Au and efficient electrons injection to TiO2 were thought to be the promotional effect.
As is well-known, Pt and Pd nanocrystals are ideal catalysts for oxygen reduction reactions [83,84]. Commonly, they can be directly decorated on semiconductors, which could be used as co-catalysts and active sites for the improved photocatalysis. Combining Pt or Pd with plasmonic metal/semiconductor hetero-nanostructures can lead to an extreme boost of electron migration in the redox reaction [85,86,87,88,89,90]. In 2015, Moskovits’ group fabricated a device including Au nanorod, TiO2, and Pt, to achieve panchromatic photoproduction of hydrogen [91]. Firstly, Au nanorods with different aspect ratios were dropped cast on quartz slides with panchromatic absorption. Then, TiO2 film was deposited, and played the role of a hot electron filter, and Pt nanoparticles were capped, functioning as the hydrogen evolution catalyst (see Figure 5a). The photocatalytic results revealed that the catalyst with Au nanorods of aspect ratio 1.4 and 3.0 showed the highest photocatalytic activity for hydrogen production.
The arrangement of components in multi-metals/semiconductor heterojunctions has a great influence on their final photocatalytic performance. Properly optimizing the structural configuration could increase the utilization efficiency of plasmon-induced hot electrons [92,93,94]. Meanwhile, abundant pathways for electron transfer could expedite the separation of electron–hole pairs. Our previous work had certified the important role of structural arrangement for improving the photocatalytic activity [95]. We prepared an each-contacted Au–Pt–CdS hybrid, which is shown in Figure 6a. The photocatalytic testing indicated that Au–Pt–CdS exhibited excellent photocatalytic performance for hydrogen production. Through testing the ultrafast time-resolved transient absorption (see Figure 6c), the multipathway electron-transfer processed in Au–Pt–CdS hybrids could be attested, which were illustrated in Figure 6d. The multiple effective electron-transfer pathways (Au to CdS, Au to Pt, and CdS to Pt) were thought to be the enhancing factor. Similar nanostructures were reported by Dong and co-workers [96]. They synthesized an Au–Pt–CdS photocatalyst, which featured an Au nanorod with tip-coated Pt and side-coated CdS. The as-prepared Au–Pt–CdS possessed efficient UV–vis–NIR-driven plasmonic photoactivity for hydrogen generation. The rational arrangement of the components in Au–Pt–CdS, induced to resonance energy and hot electron transfer, was thought be responsible for the outstanding photocatalytic activity.

4. Plasmon-Mediated Heterojunctions Photocatalysis in Ternary Metal/Multi-Semiconductors Hetero-Nanostructures

Properly engineered semiconductor heterojunction photocatalysts are proved to show better photocatalytic performance owing to the spatial separation of photo-generated electron–hole pairs. The direct Z-scheme and p–n heterojunctions are the most frequently studied due to their distinct advantages for charge migration [97,98,99,100]. By introduction of plasmonic metal with these junctions, the separation rate of electron–hole pairs can be observably expedited. In present section, we briefly review the recent works centered on plasmon-modified Z-scheme and p–n heterojunctions for efficient photocatalysis.
The Z-scheme concept was raised by Bard and co-workers, in order to enlarge the redox potential of the semiconductor heterojunction [101]. Several advantages have been obtained for the Z-scheme configuration, such as effective charge separation, high reduction, and oxidation power, and more participant photocatalysts [102,103,104]. By introduction of plasmonic metals into this system, the high concentration of hot electrons and large utilization of light induced by plasmon resonance could further promote the photocatalytic reaction [105,106,107]. For instance, Tang and co-workers reported a plasmon-excited dual Z-scheme system in ternary BiVO4/Ag/Cu2O nanocomposite [108]. Specifically, the Cu2O particles were coupled with BiVO4 nanostructure, which were deposited with metallic Ag nanocrystals. The specific morphology of BiVO4/Ag/Cu2O was shown in Figure 7a. It was shown that the ternary BiVO4/Ag/Cu2O had the highest photocatalytic activity (see Figure 7b). The enhanced photocatalytic activity was mainly caused by the collaboration of Cu2O, Ag, and BiVO4, especially the plasmon-mediated dual Z-scheme, and strong local electric field induced by Ag, which was proposed in Figure 7c.
The photocatalytic concept of p–n junction was put forward to speed up the electron–hole transfer along the junction through introducing an additional electric field [109,110,111]. Generally, to obtain an effective p–n heterojunction photocatalyst, we can simply combine a p-type semiconductor with a n-type semiconductor. As the p–n heterojunction photocatalyst is excited by incident photons, both types of semiconductor can generate electron–hole pairs. Then, the electrons and holes will be transferred under the effect of the internal electric field. Typically, the electrons will migrate to the conduction band of the n-type semiconductor, and the holes migrate to the valence band of the p-type semiconductor, thus resulting in the fast spatial separation of the electron–hole pairs [112,113]. Combing plasmonic metal nanocrystals with p–n heterojunction could further speed the process of electron–hole pairs’ separation [114,115]. For instance, Zhou et al. fabricated a unique three-dimensional CuxO/ZnO@Au composite, in which CuO nanowires were coupled with ZnO nanodisks and Au nanoparticles (see Figure 8a–c) [116]. The photocatalytic results indicated that CuxO/ZnO@Au exhibited the highest hydrogen production rate, which reaches to 12.4 μmol cm−2 h−1. The possible enhanced mechanism was proposed in Figure 8e. On the one hand, the cooperative effect between CuO, ZnO, and the formed p–n junctions could enlarge the light utilization. Furthermore, the plasmon-mediated p–n junction could accelerate the separation of electron–hole pairs, thus enhancing the photocatalytic activity.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

In recent years, the research focused on plasmon-mediated photocatalysis of hetero-nanomaterials has been steadily expanding, and the progress mentioned in the present work is only a drop in the bucket. In this article, we present a concise review of the recent progress in the field of plasmon-mediated metal/semiconductor photocatalysts, including their designs, synthesis, and photocatalytic applications. The physical mechanism for the enhanced photocatalysis, in binary and ternary metal/semiconductor heterojunctions, is briefly classified.
Although many exciting results have been achieved in this field, the practical efficiency of the photocatalytic reaction is still low, and the further industrialization and commercialization of photocatalysts requires untiring exploration. In our option, the future research effort in this field may be centered on the following aspects. Firstly, the synthetic method is the footstone for the preparation of photocatalysts. Currently, efforts should be continued in exploring facile, economic, environmentally friendly strategies for preparing high-performance metal/semiconductor photocatalysts. Secondly, searching new plasmonic materials and functional semiconductors to form effective heterojunctions is one of the key research goals. More research efforts should be centered on the developing new materials with low cost and high solar-conversion efficiency. Thirdly, the mechanism of plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic activity requires further systematic studies. An effective ultrafast spectral analysis technique should be applied to quantitatively verify the migration pathway of charge. Meanwhile, the corresponding theoretical calculations and modeling methods for optimizing the structural construct and charge transfer should receive more attention. Further theoretical achievement could offer a better understanding of the charge and energy transfer kinetics, thereby guiding the design of high-quality photocatalyst.
In brief, we have reviewed the recent progress in constructing metal/semiconductor photocatalysts for improved photocatalytic applications. The variation of their photocatalytic performance with structural adjustment and component arrangement was demonstrated. We hope this article will inspire the further design and fabrication of functional materials which could be used in photocatalysis and other important applications.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11804257), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2018CFB106), college president’s foundation (2018130), and scientific research foundation (18QD24 and 18QD25) of Wuhan Institute of Technology.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. Chen, X.; Shen, S.; Guo, L.; Mao, S.S. Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6503–6570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Martin, D.J.; Reardon, P.J.T.; Moniz, S.J.; Tang, J. Visible light-driven pure water splitting by a nature-inspired organic semiconductor-based system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 12568–12571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Marszewski, M.; Cao, S.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M. Semiconductor-based photocatalytic CO2 conversion. Mater. Horiz. 2015, 2, 261–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, J.; Wu, N. Semiconductor-based photocatalysts and photoelectrochemical cells for solar fuel generation: A review. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 1360–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kisch, H. Semiconductor photocatalysis-mechanistic and synthetic aspects. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 812–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xiang, Q.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M. Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 782–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liu, G.; Jimmy, C.Y.; Lu, G.Q.M.; Cheng, H.M. Crystal facet engineering of semiconductor photocatalysts: Motivations, advances and unique properties. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6763–6783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, G.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X. Polycondensation of thiourea into carbon nitride semiconductors as visible light photocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 8083–8091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, X.; Liu, L.; Peter, Y.Y.; Mao, S.S. Increasing solar absorption for photocatalysis with black hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanocrystals. Science 2011, 1200448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, G.; Zhang, M.; Ye, X.; Qiu, X.; Lin, S.; Wang, X. Iodine modified carbon nitride semiconductors as visible light photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 805–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fu, J.; Chang, B.; Tian, Y.; Xi, F.; Dong, X. Novel C3N4-CdS composite photocatalysts with organic–inorganic heterojunctions: In situ synthesis, exceptional activity, high stability and photocatalytic mechanism. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 3083–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, C.C.; Li, J.R.; Lv, X.L.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Guo, G. Photocatalytic organic pollutants degradation in metal-organic frameworks. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2831–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ge, L.; Han, C.; Liu, J. Novel visible light-induced g-C3N4/Bi2WO6 composite photocatalysts for efficient degradation of methyl orange. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2011, 108, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liang, Y.T.; Vijayan, B.K.; Gray, K.A.; Hersam, M.C. Minimizing graphene defects enhances Titania nanocomposite-based photocatalytic reduction of CO2 for improved solar fuel production. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2865–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tran, P.D.; Wong, L.H.; Barber, J.; Loo, J.S. Recent advances in hybrid photocatalysts for solar fuel production. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5902–5918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cowan, A.J.; Durrant, J.R. Long-lived charge separated states in nanostructured semiconductor photoelectrodes for the production of solar fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2281–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Müller, C. On the glass transition of polymer semiconductors and its impact on polymer solar cell stability. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 2740–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Han, C.; Yang, M.Q.; Weng, B.; Xu, Y.J. Improving the photocatalytic activity and anti-photocorrosion of semiconductor ZnO by coupling with versatile carbon. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 16891–16903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, W.; Jiang, C.; Roy, V.A. Recent progress in magnetic iron oxide–semiconductor composite nanomaterials as promising photocatalysts. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 38–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stamplecoskie, K.G.; Kamat, P.V. Synergistic effects in the coupling of plasmon resonance of metal nanoparticles with excited gold clusters. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 1870–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Juan, M.L.; Righini, M.; Quidant, R. Plasmon nano-optical tweezers. Nat. Photonics 2011, 5, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, W.; Huang, L.; Santschi, C.; Martin, O.J. Trapping and sensing 10 nm metal nanoparticles using plasmonic dipole antennas. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1006–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ni, W.; Kou, X.; Yang, Z.; Wang, J. Tailoring longitudinal surface plasmon wavelengths, scattering and absorption cross sections of gold nanorods. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Luk’yanchuk, B.; Zheludev, N.I.; Maier, S.A.; Halas, N.J.; Nordlander, P.; Giessen, H.; Chong, C.T. The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Aydin, K.; Ferry, V.E.; Briggs, R.M.; Atwater, H.A. Broadband polarization-independent resonant light absorption using ultrathin plasmonic super absorbers. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Schaadt, D.M.; Feng, B.; Yu, E.T. Enhanced semiconductor optical absorption via surface plasmon excitation in metal nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 063106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barnes, W.L.; Dereux, A.; Ebbesen, T.W. Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 2003, 424, 824–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luther, J.M.; Jain, P.K.; Ewers, T.; Alivisatos, A.P. Localized surface plasmon resonances arising from free carriers in doped quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schuller, J.A.; Barnard, E.S.; Cai, W.; Jun, Y.C.; White, J.S.; Brongersma, M.L. Plasmonics for extreme light concentration and manipulation. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zijlstra, P.; Paulo, P.M.; Orrit, M. Optical detection of single non-absorbing molecules using the surface plasmon resonance of a gold nanorod. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Sherry, L.J.; Chang, S.H.; Schatz, G.C.; Van Duyne, R.P.; Wiley, B.J.; Xia, Y. Localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy of single silver nanocubes. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2034–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chan, G.H.; Zhao, J.; Hicks, E.M.; Schatz, G.C.; Van Duyne, R.P. Plasmonic properties of copper nanoparticles fabricated by nanosphere lithography. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 1947–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Robatjazi, H.; Zhao, H.; Swearer, D.F.; Hogan, N.J.; Zhou, L.; Alabastri, A.; McClain, M.J.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N.J. Plasmon-induced selective carbon dioxide conversion on earth-abundant aluminum-cuprous oxide antenna-reactor nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Orendorff, C.J.; Gearheart, L.; Jana, N.R.; Murphy, C.J. Aspect ratio dependence on surface enhanced Raman scattering using silver and gold nanorod substrates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liao, H.; Hafner, J.H. Gold nanorod bioconjugates. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 4636–4641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Camargo, P.H.; Rycenga, M.; Au, L.; Xia, Y. Isolating and probing the hot spot formed between two silver nanocubes. Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 2214–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fu, Q.; Ran, G.; Xu, W. Direct self-assembly of CTAB-capped Au nanotriangles. Nano Res. 2016, 9, 3247–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tabatabaei, M.; Sangar, A.; Kazemi-Zanjani, N.; Torchio, P.; Merlen, A.; Lagugné-Labarthet, F. Optical properties of silver and gold tetrahedral nanopyramid arrays prepared by nanosphere lithography. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 14778–14786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Y.; Sun, J.; Wang, L.; Zhan, P.; Cao, Z.; Wang, Z. Surface plasmon sensor with gold film deposited on a two-dimensional colloidal crystal. Appl. Phys. A 2008, 92, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, L.; Yang, D.J.; Luo, Z.J.; Chen, K.; Xie, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Q.Q. Controlled growth of sulfide on gold nanotriangles with tunable local field distribution and enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 26996–27002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ma, L.; Ding, S.J. Synthesis of thermostable Au@ZnO core-shell nanorods with efficient visible-light photocatalytic activity. Mater. Lett. 2018, 217, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jiang, R.; Li, B.; Fang, C.; Wang, J. Metal/semiconductor hybrid nanostructures for plasmon-enhanced applications. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 5274–5309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, M.; Ye, M.; Iocozzia, J.; Lin, C.; Lin, Z. Plasmon-mediated solar energy conversion via photocatalysis in noble metal/semiconductor composites. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1600024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Choi, W.; Park, G.; Bae, K.L.; Choi, J.Y.; Nam, K.M.; Song, H. Metal–semiconductor double shell hollow nanocubes for highly stable hydrogen generation photocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 13414–13418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Li, H.; Li, P.; Zou, Z. Au@TiO2 yolk-shell hollow spheres for plasmon-induced photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to solar fuel via a local electromagnetic field. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 14232–14236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Linic, S.; Aslam, U.; Boerigter, C.; Morabito, M. Photochemical transformations on plasmonic metal nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, Y.; He, S.; Guo, W.; Hu, Y.; Huang, J.; Mulcahy, J.R.; Wei, W.D. Surface-plasmon-driven hot electron photochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2017, 118, 2927–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bernardi, M.; Mustafa, J.; Neaton, J.B.; Louie, S.G. Theory and computation of hot carriers generated by surface plasmon polaritons in noble metals. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Hong, T.; Chamlagain, B.; Hu, S.; Weiss, S.M.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, Y.Q. Plasmonic hot electron induced photocurrent response at MoS2-metal junctions. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 5357–5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, W.; Valentine, J.G. Harvesting the loss: Surface plasmon-based hot electron photodetection. Nanophononics 2017, 6, 177–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, J.; Cushing, S.K.; Meng, F.; Senty, T.R.; Bristow, A.D.; Wu, N. Plasmon-induced resonance energy transfer for solar energy conversion. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, K.; Chen, J.; McBride, J.R.; Lian, T. Efficient hot-electron transfer by a plasmon-induced interfacial charge-transfer transition. Science 2015, 349, 632–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ma, X.C.; Dai, Y.; Yu, L.; Huang, B.B. Energy transfer in plasmonic photocatalytic composites. Light Sci. Appl. 2016, 5, e16017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Brongersma, M.L.; Halas, N.J.; Nordlander, P. Plasmon-induced hot carrier science and technology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, M.; Yu, X.F.; Liang, S.; Peng, X.N.; Yang, Z.J.; Wang, Y.L.; Wang, Q.Q. Synthesis of Au-CdS core-shell hetero-nanorods with efficient exciton-plasmon interactions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 1788–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ma, L.; Liang, S.; Liu, X.L.; Yang, D.J.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Q.Q. Synthesis of dumbbell-like gold-metal sulfide core-shell nanorods with largely enhanced transverse plasmon resonance in visible region and efficiently improved photocatalytic activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, J.; Tang, Y.; Lee, K.; Ouyang, M. Nonepitaxial growth of hybrid core-shell nanostructures with large lattice mismatches. Science 2010, 327, 1634–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lu, B.; Liu, A.; Wu, H.; Shen, Q.; Zhao, T.; Wang, J. Hollow Au-Cu2O core-shell nanoparticles with geometry-dependent optical properties as efficient plasmonic photocatalysts under visible light. Langmuir 2016, 32, 3085–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Li, B.; Gu, T.; Ming, T.; Wang, J.; Wang, P.; Wang, J.; Yu, J.C. (Gold core)@(ceria shell) nanostructures for plasmon-enhanced catalytic reactions under visible light. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8152–8162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Muhammed, M.A.H.; Döblinger, M.; Rodríguez-Fernández, J. Switching plasmons: Gold nanorod-copper chalcogenide core-shell nanoparticle clusters with selectable metal/semiconductor NIR plasmon resonances. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 11666–11677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Li, J.; Cushing, S.K.; Bright, J.; Meng, F.; Senty, T.R.; Zheng, P.; Bristow, A.D.; Wu, N. Ag@ Cu2O core-shell nanoparticles as visible-light plasmonic photocatalysts. ACS Catal. 2012, 3, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ai, Z.; Zhang, L.; Lee, S.; Ho, W. Interfacial hydrothermal synthesis of Cu@Cu2O core-shell microspheres with enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 20896–20902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, J.; Feng, J.; Gui, J.; Chen, T.; Xu, M.; Wang, H.; Dong, H.; Chen, H.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; et al. Metal@semiconductor core-shell nanocrystals with atomically organized interfaces for efficient hot electron-mediated photocatalysis. Nano Energy 2018, 48, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Feng, J.; Liu, J.; Cheng, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, M.; Zhang, J. Hydrothermal cation exchange enabled gradual evolution of Au@ZnS-AgAuS yolk-shell nanocrystals and their visible light photocatalytic applications. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Feng, Y.; Jian, H.; Wang, L.; Ma, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, H. Resonance energy transfer-promoted photothermal and photodynamic performance of gold-copper sulfide yolk-shell nanoparticles for chemophototherapy of cancer. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ji, M.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Huang, L.; Xu, M.; Liu, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J. Versatile synthesis of yolk/shell hybrid nanocrystals via ion-exchange reactions for novel metal/semiconductor and semiconductor/semiconductor conformations. Nano Res. 2017, 10, 2977–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wan, G.; Peng, X.; Zeng, M.; Yu, L.; Wang, K.; Li, X.; Wang, G. The Preparation of Au@TiO2 yolk-shell nanostructure and its applications for degradation and detection of methylene blue. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lee, S.U.; Jung, H.; Wi, D.H.; Hong, J.W.; Sung, J.; Choi, S.I.; Han, S.W. Metal–semiconductor yolk-shell heteronanostructures for plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 4068–4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Costi, R.; Cohen, G.; Salant, A.; Rabani, E.; Banin, U. Electrostatic force microscopy study of single Au-CdSe hybrid nanodumbbells: Evidence for light-induced charge separation. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 2031–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chakrabortty, S.; Yang, J.A.; Tan, Y.M.; Mishra, N.; Chan, Y. Asymmetric dumbbells from selective deposition of metals on seeded semiconductor nanorods. Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 2950–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kim, Y.; Park, K.Y.; Jang, D.M.; Song, Y.M.; Kim, H.S.; Cho, Y.J.; Myung, Y.; Park, J. Synthesis of Au-Cu2S core- shell nanocrystals and their photocatalytic and electrocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 22141–22146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wu, B.; Liu, D.; Mubeen, S.; Chuong, T.T.; Moskovits, M.; Stucky, G.D. Anisotropic growth of TiO2 onto gold nanorods for plasmon-enhanced hydrogen production from water reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1114–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hong, J.W.; Wi, D.H.; Lee, S.U.; Han, S.W. Metal-semiconductor heteronanocrystals with desired configurations for plasmonic photocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 15766–15773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tsukamoto, D.; Shiro, A.; Shiraishi, Y.; Sugano, Y.; Ichikawa, S.; Tanaka, S.; Hirai, T. Photocatalytic H2O2 production from ethanol/O2 system using TiO2 loaded with Au-Ag bimetallic alloy nanoparticles. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhou, N.; Polavarapu, L.; Gao, N.; Pan, Y.; Yuan, P.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Q.H. TiO2 coated Au/Ag nanorods with enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4236–4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, Y.; Zhang, B.P.; Zhao, J.X. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of Au-Ag alloy modified ZnO nanocomposite films. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 586, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kamimura, S.; Yamashita, S.; Abe, S.; Tsubota, T.; Ohno, T. Effect of core@shell (Au@Ag) nanostructure on surface plasmon-induced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 211, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zielińska-Jurek, A.; Kowalska, E.; Sobczak, J.W.; Lisowski, W.; Ohtani, B.; Zaleska, A. Preparation and characterization of monometallic (Au) and bimetallic (Ag/Au) modified-Titania photocatalysts activated by visible light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2011, 101, 504–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tahir, M.; Tahir, B.; Amin, N.A.S. Synergistic effect in plasmonic Au/Ag alloy NPs co-coated TiO2 NWs toward visible-light enhanced CO2 photoreduction to fuels. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 204, 548–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhai, H.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Huang, B. Plasmonic Au-Ag bimetallic alloy nanoparticles decorated ZnO nanorod with enhanced photocatalytic activity for ethylene-oxidation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kamimura, S.; Miyazaki, T.; Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Tsubota, T.; Ohno, T. (Au@Ag)@Au double shell nanoparticles loaded on rutile TiO2 for photocatalytic decomposition of 2-propanol under visible light irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 180, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zheng, Z.; Tachikawa, T.; Majima, T. Single-particle study of Pt-modified Au nanorods for plasmon-enhanced hydrogen generation in visible to near-infrared region. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6870–6873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Li, K.; Hogan, N.J.; Kale, M.J.; Halas, N.J.; Nordlander, P.; Christopher, P. Balancing near-field enhancement, absorption, and scattering for effective antenna-reactor plasmonic photocatalysis. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 3710–3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Yu, L.; Shao, Y.; Li, D. Direct combination of hydrogen evolution from water and methane conversion in a photocatalytic system over Pt/TiO2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 204, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xue, J.; Ma, S.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Z.; He, M. Facile photochemical synthesis of Au/Pt/g-C3N4 with plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic activity for antibiotic degradation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 2015, 7, 9630–9637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Wang, F.; Jiang, Y.; Lawes, D.J.; Ball, G.E.; Zhou, C.; Liu, Z.; Amal, R. Analysis of the promoted activity and molecular mechanism of hydrogen production over fine Au-Pt alloyed TiO2 photocatalysts. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 3924–3931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, Z.; Li, A.; Cao, S.W.; Bosman, M.; Li, S.; Xue, C. Direct evidence of plasmon enhancement on photocatalytic hydrogen generation over Au/Pt-decorated TiO2 nanofibers. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5217–5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Su, R.; Tiruvalam, R.; Logsdail, A.J.; He, Q.; Downing, C.A.; Jensen, M.T.; Dimitratos, N.; Kesavan, L.; Wells, P.P.; Bechstein, R.; et al. Designer titania-supported Au–Pd nanoparticles for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3490–3497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Darabdhara, G.; Boruah, P.K.; Borthakur, P.; Hussain, N.; Das, M.R.; Ahamad, T.; Alshehri, S.M.; Malgras, V.; Wu, K.C.W.; Yamauchi, Y. Reduced graphene oxide nanosheets decorated with Au–Pd bimetallic alloy nanoparticles towards efficient photocatalytic degradation of phenolic compounds in water. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 8276–8287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mubeen, S.; Lee, J.; Liu, D.; Stucky, G.D.; Moskovits, M. Panchromatic photoproduction of H2 with surface plasmons. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2132–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Tanaka, A.; Hashimoto, K.; Kominami, H. Visible-light-induced hydrogen and oxygen formation over Pt/Au/WO3 photocatalyst utilizing two types of photoabsorption due to surface plasmon resonance and band-gap excitation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 586–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. She, P.; Xu, K.; Zeng, S.; He, Q.; Sun, H.; Liu, Z. Investigating the size effect of Au nanospheres on the photocatalytic activity of Au-modified ZnO nanorods. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 499, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Yun, J.; Hwang, S.H.; Jang, J. Fabrication of Au@Ag core/shell nanoparticles decorated TiO2 hollow structure for efficient light-harvesting in dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 2015, 7, 2055–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ma, L.; Chen, K.; Nan, F.; Wang, J.H.; Yang, D.J.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Q.Q. Improved hydrogen production of Au-Pt-CdS hetero-nanostructures by efficient plasmon-induced multipathway electron transfer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 6076–6083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, B.; Fang, Y.; Wang, L.; Dong, B. UV-Vis-NIR-driven plasmonic photocatalysts with dual-resonance modes for synergistically enhancing H2 generation. Sol. RRL 2018, 2, 1800039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Xia, P.; Zhu, B.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J.; Xu, J. 2D/2D g-C3N4/MnO2 nanocomposite as a direct Z-scheme photocatalyst for enhanced photocatalytic activity. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 6, 965–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhou, P.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M. All-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4920–4935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Maeda, K. Z-scheme water splitting using two different semiconductor photocatalysts. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1486–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chen, Z.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Fang, X. High-efficiency visible-light-driven Ag3PO4/AgI photocatalysts: Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism for their enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 19346–19352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bard, A.J. Photoelectrochemistry and heterogeneous photo-catalysis at semiconductors. J. Photochem. 1979, 10, 59–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jia, Q.; Iwase, A.; Kudo, A. BiVO4-Ru/SrTiO3: Rh composite Z-scheme photocatalyst for solar water splitting. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 1513–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhou, F.Q.; Fan, J.C.; Xu, Q.J.; Min, Y.L. BiVO4 nanowires decorated with CdS nanoparticles as Z-scheme photocatalyst with enhanced H2 generation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 201, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Jin, J.; Yu, J.; Guo, D.; Cui, C.; Ho, W. A Hierarchical Z-scheme CdS-WO3 photocatalyst with enhanced CO2 reduction activity. Small 2015, 11, 5262–5271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ye, L.; Liu, J.; Gong, C.; Tian, L.; Peng, T.; Zan, L. Two different roles of metallic Ag on Ag/AgX/BiOX (X = Cl, Br) visible light photocatalysts: Surface plasmon resonance and Z-scheme bridge. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1677–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhang, J.; Niu, C.; Ke, J.; Zhou, L.; Zeng, G. Ag/AgCl/Bi2MoO6 composite nanosheets: A plasmonic Z-scheme visible light photocatalyst. Catal. Commun. 2015, 59, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gao, H.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, J.; Shao, G. Plasmon enhancement on photocatalytic hydrogen production over the Z-scheme photosynthetic heterojunction system. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 210, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Deng, Y.; Tang, L.; Zeng, G.; Feng, C.; Dong, H.; Wang, J.; Feng, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Pang, Y. Plasmonic resonance excited dual Z-scheme BiVO4/Ag/Cu2O nanocomposite: Synthesis and mechanism for enhanced photocatalytic performance in recalcitrant antibiotic degradation. Environ. Sci. Nano 2017, 4, 1494–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Jiang, D.; Chen, L.; Zhu, J.; Chen, M.; Shi, W.; Xie, J. Novel p-n heterojunction photocatalyst constructed by porous graphite-like C3N4 and nanostructured BiOI: Facile synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic activity. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 15726–15734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, C.; Cai, W.; Long, M.; Zhou, B.; Wu, Y.; Wu, D.; Feng, Y. Synthesis of visible-light responsive graphene oxide/TiO2 composites with p/n heterojunction. ACS Nano 2012, 4, 6425–6432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhang, Z.; Shao, C.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Y. Electrospun nanofibers of p-type NiO/n-type ZnO heterojunctions with enhanced photocatalytic activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 2010, 2, 2915–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Peng, Y.; Yan, M.; Chen, Q.G.; Fan, C.M.; Zhou, H.Y.; Xu, A.W. Novel one-dimensional Bi2O3-Bi2WO6 p-n hierarchical heterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 8517–8524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lin, L.; Yang, Y.; Men, L.; Wang, X.; He, D.; Chai, Y.; Zhao, B.; Ghoshroy, S.; Tang, Q. A highly efficient TiO2@ZnO n-p-n heterojunction nanorod photocatalyst. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zhao, W.; Dai, B.; Zhu, F.; Tu, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, S.; Leung, D.Y.C.; Cheng, S. A novel 3D plasmonic p-n heterojunction photocatalyst: Ag nanoparticles on flower-like p-Ag2S/n-BiVO4 and its excellent photocatalytic reduction and oxidation activities. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 229, 171–180. [Google Scholar]
  115. Pal, J.; Sasmal, A.K.; Ganguly, M.; Pal, T. Surface plasmon effect of Cu and presence of n-p heterojunction in oxide nanocomposites for visible light photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 3780–3790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhou, G.; Xu, X.; Ding, T.; Feng, B.; Bao, Z.; Hu, J. Well-steered charge-carrier transfer in 3D branched CuxO/ZnO@Au heterostructures for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 2015, 7, 26819–26827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Catalysts 08 00634 g001 550
Figure 1. (a,b) Morphology characterization of prepared Au@CdS nanocrystals. Scale bar in (a) and (b) are 20 nm and 10 nm, respectively. (c) Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of prepared Au@CdS with different architectural feature in comparison with pure CdS under visible light irradiation. (d) Possible physical mechanism of the hot electron-mediated photocatalysis. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Figure 1. (a,b) Morphology characterization of prepared Au@CdS nanocrystals. Scale bar in (a) and (b) are 20 nm and 10 nm, respectively. (c) Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of prepared Au@CdS with different architectural feature in comparison with pure CdS under visible light irradiation. (d) Possible physical mechanism of the hot electron-mediated photocatalysis. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Catalysts 08 00634 g001
Catalysts 08 00634 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustrating the synthesis route of Au–CdS yolk–shell nanostructures. (b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of Au–CdS yolk–shell nanostructures. (c) Rate of evolved hydrogen with different catalysts. (d) Hydrogen evolution activity of Au–CdS yolk–shell hybrids as a function of excitation wavelength. Inset shows the schematic illustration of the synergism. Copyright 2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustrating the synthesis route of Au–CdS yolk–shell nanostructures. (b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of Au–CdS yolk–shell nanostructures. (c) Rate of evolved hydrogen with different catalysts. (d) Hydrogen evolution activity of Au–CdS yolk–shell hybrids as a function of excitation wavelength. Inset shows the schematic illustration of the synergism. Copyright 2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Catalysts 08 00634 g002
Catalysts 08 00634 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) TEM image of Au/TiO2 nanodumbbells. (b) Hydrogen evolution rate by various catalysts. (c) Possible photocatalytic mechanism of an Au/TiO2 dumbbell under visible light irradiation. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (d) TEM image of Auvertex–Cu2O heteronanocrystal. (e) Photocatalytic hydrogen generation rates of different heteronanocrystals. (f) Schematic illustration the possible charge transfer in Auvertex–Cu2O hybrids. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. (a) TEM image of Au/TiO2 nanodumbbells. (b) Hydrogen evolution rate by various catalysts. (c) Possible photocatalytic mechanism of an Au/TiO2 dumbbell under visible light irradiation. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (d) TEM image of Auvertex–Cu2O heteronanocrystal. (e) Photocatalytic hydrogen generation rates of different heteronanocrystals. (f) Schematic illustration the possible charge transfer in Auvertex–Cu2O hybrids. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 08 00634 g003
Catalysts 08 00634 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) TEM image of AuAg/ZnO. (b) Photocatalytic rate of different catalysts. Copyright 2017 Elsevier. (c) TEM image of (Au@Ag)@Au decorated TiO2. (d) Photocatalytic performance of the contrast samples under visible light irradiation. Copyright 2017 Elsevier.
Figure 4. (a) TEM image of AuAg/ZnO. (b) Photocatalytic rate of different catalysts. Copyright 2017 Elsevier. (c) TEM image of (Au@Ag)@Au decorated TiO2. (d) Photocatalytic performance of the contrast samples under visible light irradiation. Copyright 2017 Elsevier.
Catalysts 08 00634 g004
Catalysts 08 00634 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Typical morphology of an Au–TiO2–Pt nanostructure. (b) A digital photograph of hydrogen production. (c) Extinction spectra of Au nanorods mixing with different aspect ratios. (d) The hydrogen production rates of different catalysts. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. (a) Typical morphology of an Au–TiO2–Pt nanostructure. (b) A digital photograph of hydrogen production. (c) Extinction spectra of Au nanorods mixing with different aspect ratios. (d) The hydrogen production rates of different catalysts. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 08 00634 g005
Catalysts 08 00634 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) TEM image of Au–Pt–CdS hybrids. (b) Photocatalytic hydrogen production of contrast samples. (c) Normalized time-resolved optical differential transmission of different samples. (d) Schematic illustration of the possible electron transfer process of Au–Pt–CdS. Copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH.
Figure 6. (a) TEM image of Au–Pt–CdS hybrids. (b) Photocatalytic hydrogen production of contrast samples. (c) Normalized time-resolved optical differential transmission of different samples. (d) Schematic illustration of the possible electron transfer process of Au–Pt–CdS. Copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH.
Catalysts 08 00634 g006
Catalysts 08 00634 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Morphology characterization of BiVO4/Ag/Cu2O composites. (b) The photocatalytic performance of different photocatalysts. (c) Possible reaction mechanism in the BiVO4/Ag/Cu2O nanocomposite-based reaction systems. Copyright 2017 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 7. (a) Morphology characterization of BiVO4/Ag/Cu2O composites. (b) The photocatalytic performance of different photocatalysts. (c) Possible reaction mechanism in the BiVO4/Ag/Cu2O nanocomposite-based reaction systems. Copyright 2017 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Catalysts 08 00634 g007
Catalysts 08 00634 g008 550
Figure 8. (a–c) Morphology and compositions characterizations of CuxO/ZnO@Au hetero-nanostructures. (d) Recycling photocatalytic test of CuxO/ZnO@Au. (e) Schematic illustration of photoexcited carrier dynamics in CuxO/ZnO@Au. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Figure 8. (a–c) Morphology and compositions characterizations of CuxO/ZnO@Au hetero-nanostructures. (d) Recycling photocatalytic test of CuxO/ZnO@Au. (e) Schematic illustration of photoexcited carrier dynamics in CuxO/ZnO@Au. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 08 00634 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, L.; Chen, S.; Shao, Y.; Chen, Y.-L.; Liu, M.-X.; Li, H.-X.; Mao, Y.-L.; Ding, S.-J. Recent Progress in Constructing Plasmonic Metal/Semiconductor Hetero-Nanostructures for Improved Photocatalysis. Catalysts 2018, 8, 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8120634

AMA Style

Ma L, Chen S, Shao Y, Chen Y-L, Liu M-X, Li H-X, Mao Y-L, Ding S-J. Recent Progress in Constructing Plasmonic Metal/Semiconductor Hetero-Nanostructures for Improved Photocatalysis. Catalysts. 2018; 8(12):634. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8120634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Liang, Shuang Chen, Yun Shao, You-Long Chen, Mo-Xi Liu, Hai-Xia Li, Yi-Ling Mao, and Si-Jing Ding. 2018. "Recent Progress in Constructing Plasmonic Metal/Semiconductor Hetero-Nanostructures for Improved Photocatalysis" Catalysts 8, no. 12: 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8120634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop