Next Article in Journal
Boosting Dual Hydrogen Electrocatalysis with Pt/NiMo Catalysts: Tuning the Ni/Mo Ratio and Minimizing Pt Usage
Previous Article in Journal
Revolutionizing Hydrogen Production: Unveiling the Role of Liquid Metals in Methane Pyrolysis over Iron Catalysts Supported on Titanium Dioxide and Alumina
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rationally Designed 2D CZIS/2D Ti3CNTx Heterojunctions for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

College of Science, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2025, 15(7), 632; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15070632
Submission received: 29 May 2025 / Revised: 21 June 2025 / Accepted: 25 June 2025 / Published: 27 June 2025

Abstract

Highly efficient photocatalysts for solar energy conversion require effective charge carrier separation and rapid interfacial transport kinetics to maximize electron availability. Two-dimensional Ti3CNTx, a novel conductive material in the MXene family with exceptional electrical conductivity, has emerged as an ideal electron transfer mediator due to its large specific surface area and abundant active terminal groups. In this work, we strategically integrated the 2D multi-metal sulfide Cu-Zn-In-S (CZIS) with 2D Ti3CNTx nanosheets through physical mixture, constructing a heterostructured 2D/2D CZIS/Ti3CNTx composite photocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. The unique architecture significantly accelerates electron migration from CZIS to Ti3CNTx, while synergistically promoting the spatial separation and directional transfer of photogenerated electron–hole pairs (e/h+). When the hydrogen evolution reaction is carried out under identical conditions, the hydrogen yield rate is 4.3 mmol g−1 h−1 with pristine CZIS but is improved dramatically to 14.3 mmol g−1 h−1 when the composite containing an adequate amount of 2D Ti3CNTx is used. This study offers new insight into the rational design and controllable synthesis of Ti3CNTx-based composite photocatalytic systems for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Advanced catalysts for solar-driven water splitting provide a transformative approach to harnessing clean energy and addressing global sustainability challenges [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Over recent decades, significant progress has been made in the development of nanostructured photocatalytic materials that are pivotal to advancing solar energy technologies. Among them, polymetallic sulfides have gained prominence as efficient semiconductor photocatalysts due to their exceptional spectral response, narrow bandgap, and high photochemical sensitivity [9]. Compared to binary metal sulfides, multinary metal sulfides (e.g., ZnIn2S4, ZnxCd1−xS) are distinct as the synergistic interactions between their metal ions help to deliver stable and superior performance during extended photocatalytic processes such as the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) [10]. Notably, quaternary metal sulfides with single-crystalline architecture exhibit outstanding photocatalytic activity and have become intriguing materials in modern research [11].
The three pillars of photocatalytic activity are photon absorption efficiency, charge carrier migration dynamics, and surface reaction kinetics [12]. Among sulfide semiconductors, Cu-Zn-In-S (CZIS) has demonstrated exceptional photocatalytic efficiency for HER under visible light, thanks to its optimized band structure [13,14,15,16]. However, it has inherent limitations, such as low charge separation efficiency, limited stability under prolonged operation, and suboptimal band structure that restricts the broader utilization of the solar spectrum. Various strategies have been developed to address these drawbacks [17,18], including elemental doping, heterojunction engineering, surface modifications, etc.
Earth-abundant transition metal can replace noble metals to provide efficient cocatalysts for solar-driven hydrogen production [19,20,21,22,23]. MXenes, a burgeoning family of two-dimensional (2D) transition metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides, have emerged as exceptional cocatalysts in photocatalysis [24]. Their superior performance stems from their high electrical conductivity, large surface area, and tunable composition [25]. They suppress charge recombination and promote charge separation to boost the photocatalytic efficiency, and they interact effectively with reactants through their abundant surface functional groups (e.g., –OH, –O, –F) [26]. Thanks to these advantages, MXenes have been proven to be a highly versatile material in HER as well as applications like CO2 reduction, and pollutant degradation.
The integration of Ti3CNTx, a member of the MXene family, with CZIS creates an intimate heterojunction interface allowing effective spatial separation of photogenerated carriers. This configuration optimizes carrier mobility and makes use of trapping channels to effectively mitigate the inherent limitations of pristine CZIS, including low electrical conductivity, rapid recombination of photogenerated holes and electrons, and insufficient hydrophilicity [18,27,28,29,30,31]. The 2D/2D architecture is known to render superior interfacial characteristics, particularly in terms of shorter carrier diffusion length, larger contact interface, and greater charge carrier mobility [32,33]. A planar heterojunction configuration facilitates interfacial charge transfer kinetics via built-in electric fields, and ultrathin Ti3CNTx MXene nanosheets enable broad-spectrum light absorption spanning UV to NIR regions.
In this work, we prepared 2D CZIS/2D Ti3CNTx MXene heterostructures via physical mixture. In the nanohybrid system, the CZIS component serves as a photoactive semiconductor for visible light harvesting, while the Ti3CNTx MXene enables directional charge transfer to allow efficient charge carrier separation. The synergy thus creates a stable 2D/2D photocatalytic system for HER that gives a remarkable hydrogen evolution rate of 14.3 mmol·h−1·g−1 under visible light illumination, surpassing most reported MXene-based photocatalysts.

2. Results

Figure 1 illustrates the synthesis of nanocomposite, denoted as 2D CZIS/2D Ti3CNTx. Two-dimensional nanosheets of titanium carbonitride (Ti3CNTx) were synthesized by firstly etching Ti3AlCN with an HCl/LiF solution to remove the Al layer and then exfoliating and delaminating the layers into thin sheets by ultrasonication. Two-dimensional CZIS nanobelts were synthesized via a colloidal approach mediated by oleylamine (OLA) and 1-dodecanethiol (DDT). The assembly of Ti3CNTx and CZIS, at different mass ratios then gave the CZIS/Ti3CNTx nanocomposite (referred to as CN-y%, where y denotes the mass ratio of Ti3CNTx in the composite).
Figure 2 shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of Ti3CNTx, CZIS, and CN-8%. The lamellar morphology of Ti3CNTx is clearly seen (Figure 2a). For CZIS, a distinct nanobelt structure exists (Figure 2b,f) [13]. Figure 2c,d verify the formation of CZIS and Ti3CNTx to give CN-8% composite. In CN-8%, a coupling interface exists between the Ti3CNTx nanosheets and the CZIS nanobelts (Figure 2e), and the 0.27 nm and 0.34 nm lattice spacings can be attributed to Ti3CNTx and CZIS, respectively (Figure 2f) [13,34]. Elemental mapping (Figure 2g) confirms the coexistence and uniform distribution of S, Cu, In, Zn, Ti, and N within CN-8%.
The characteristic XRD peaks of CZIS at 26.7°, 28.3°, 30.3°, 39.3°, 47.2°, 51.2°, and 55.9° correspond to its (1010), (0002), (1011), (1012), (1120), (1013), and (1122) crystal planes, respectively (Figure 3a) [13]. The XRD peaks of Ti3CNTx at 7.6° and 15.1° can be attributed to the (002) and (004) crystal planes and are characteristic of the layered structure, and the successful etching of the Al layer in Ti3AlCN is verified by the complete disappearance of diffraction peaks resulting from the Al-containing layers in Ti3AlCN (Figure S1). The XRD pattern of CN-8% inherits the features of CZIS and contains the (002) peak of Ti3CNTx, suggesting that the composite is assembled successfully without phase alteration [35]. The intensity of the (002) peak in CN-y% increases with the mass fraction of Ti3CNTx (Figure S2).
The interfacial electronic interactions between CZIS and Ti3CNTx and the valence states of the elements in CN-8% were investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The survey spectra of CN-8% verify the successful introduction of Ti3CNTx into CZIS (Figure 3b). In the Cu 2p spectrum (Figure 3c), the characteristic peaks of Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2 are at 931.65 and 951.54 eV for CZIS but shift notably to 932.34 and 952.23 eV in CN-8%. Figure 3d–f show similar shifts for Zn, In, and S. Therefore, electron transfer from CZIS to Ti3CNTx must have occurred in CN-8% [36,37,38]. This electronic interaction allows robust interfacial coupling between CZIS and Ti3CNTx. The Ti 2p spectrum of Ti3CNTx (Figure 3g) has four distinct components, i.e., Ti–C (455.33 eV), Ti–N (456.00 eV), Ti(II) (457.16 eV), and Ti–O (458.03 eV) [39,40]. In CN-8%, all four components of Ti 2p shift to a lower energy, and similar shifts also occur to the C and N peaks (Figure 3h,i). The results thus further verify the electron transfer from CZIS to Ti3CNTx. In CN-8%, the diminished intensity of C–Ti, C–N, C–O and C–F peaks (Figure 3g) likely originates from the relatively low mass fraction of Ti3CNTx, rather than chemical degradation [41].
The photocatalytic performance of Ti3CNTx, CZIS, and CN-y% in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) under visible light irradiation (λ ≥ 420 nm) was systematically investigated using Na2S/Na2SO3 as a hole scavenger. Under the same conditions, no hydrogen is generated when Ti3CNTx alone is used as the catalyst, and CZIS gives a hydrogen yield rate of 4382 μmol·g−1·h−1 (Figure S3) [42]. The combination of Ti3CNTx and CZIS enhances H2 generation remarkably (Figure 4a), as the hydrogen yield rate increases to 14,335 μmol·g−1·h−1 for CN-8%, although it decreases to 4869 μmol·g−1·h−1 for CN-16%. Presumably, incorporating a moderate amount of Ti3CNTx in CZIS facilitates charge transport/separation, but an excessive amount of Ti3CNTx obscures the active sites of CZIS and weakens the catalytic activity [43]. The stability of the photocatalysts was assessed through 12 h of continuous illumination tests. For CN-8%, the cumulative hydrogen yield increases linearly over the 12 h (Figure 4c), and the XRD of the used catalyst is identical compared to that of the fresh catalyst (Figure S4). The results collectively demonstrate the excellent structural integrity and stability of CN-8%. The apparent quantum yield (AQY) of CN-8% is 3.7%, 2.2%, and 0.7% at 420, 450, and 520 nm, respectively (Figure 4d). The close correlation between AQY and the optical absorption characteristics confirms the efficient utilization of visible light.
The charge separation and transport in CN-y% were systematically investigated through transient photocurrent response and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to find out why the addition of Ti3CNTx to CZIS can enhance the performance of the photocatalyst. Figure S5 shows that under visible light irradiation, CN-y% exhibits a notable decrease in electrochemical impedance, and the change in impedance matches the photocatalytic activity. The most significant amplification occurs to CN-8% (Figure 5a), as the current density becomes about three times that of CZIS, which indicates superior charge transfer kinetics. In the Nyquist plot (Figure 5b), compared to CZIS, CN-8% has a semicircle with a reduced diameter, which suggests diminished charge transfer resistance. These findings collectively demonstrate that doping CZIS with an appropriate amount of Ti3CNTx significantly enhances the carrier separation and transport efficiency, leading to a significant improvement in the photocatalytic performance [44].
Carrier separation was also investigated through steady-state photoluminescence (PL) and time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) spectroscopy. Figure 5c shows that the PL of CN-8% is quenched substantially. Hence, adding Ti3CNTx to CZIS facilitates the directional migration of photogenerated electrons and holes toward the active sites, and the suppressed carrier recombination enhances the photocatalytic activity [45]. Figure 5d shows that the average carrier lifetime is 2.25 ns for CZIS but 1.97 ns for CN-8%. A shorter fluorescence lifetime corresponds to a lower probability of charge recombination and a higher probability of surface migration, leading to stronger catalytic performance [46]. The findings all explain the stronger photocatalytic activity of CN-8%.
Some distinctions exist between CZIS and CN-8% in the UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy spectra (Figure S6). The enhanced light-harvesting efficiency of CN-8% compared to CZIS proves that incorporating Ti3CNTx helps to optimize photo-responsive behavior. The flat-band potential of CZIS is determined through Mott–Schottky analysis (Figure 6a) to be −0.64 V vs. Ag/AgCl, which is −0.34 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). In Figure 6b, the DRS-derived Tauc plot was applied to deduce the bandgap width (about 1.71 eV) of CZIS according to the formula αhv = A(hν − Eg)n/2, where n = 1 as CZIS is a direct semiconductor. Figure 6c sketches how Ti3CNTx improves the photocatalytic activity of CN-8% through band engineering. The favorable thermodynamic conditions, particularly in terms of conduction band positioning, make CN-8% suitable for the photocatalytic HER [47]. Photoexcitation promotes electron transitions from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB), followed by rapid interfacial transfer across the heterojunction for participation in surface reactions.
When CN-8% is used as the photocatalyst, the reaction pathways are as follows. Because of the superior electronic conductivity of Ti3CNTx, the photogenerated electrons migrate efficiently to Ti3CNTx, where they participate in the surface-mediated reaction with the adsorbed H+ to generate hydrogen. Meanwhile, S2− and SO32− are oxidized by the photogenerated holes to form Sn2− and SO42−, thus acting as sacrificial reagents for the photocatalytic hydrogen generation [48]. However, the oxidation of S2− to Sn2− has been shown to decrease in H2 formation over time because Sn2− has a high level of light absorption in the visible region [47]. Fortunately, SO32− can reduce Sn2− back to S2− to render the solution colorless again, thus preventing Sn2− (which gives the solution a yellow color) from interfering with effective light harvesting for water reduction [49]. That is, in the water/semiconductor suspension, the S2−/SO32− mixture contains electron donors that enhance photocatalytic activity and catalyst stability in the context of the HER [48].
The enhanced photocatalytic efficacy of CN-8% primarily stems from the 2D/2D heterostructure formed by integrating CZIS nanobelts with Ti3CNTx nanosheets, which significantly exposes abundant photoactive sites. Engineering heterojunctions is a key strategy for improving the photocatalytic performance of quaternary sulfides. The highly conductive Ti3CNTx nanosheets substantially enhance the charge carrier separation in CZIS and suppress electron–hole recombination. In addition, the hydrophilic functional groups (–OH, –O) on the Ti3CNTx surfaces promote intimate photocatalyst–water interactions (Figure S7), facilitating proton transfer dynamics and elevating hydrogen evolution rates [50]. Table S1 shows that CN-8% has superior photocatalytic performance in the HER compared to most reported MXene-based photocatalysts.
The physical mixture of 2D CZIS nanobelts and 2D Ti3CNTx nanosheets gave a composite as a superior photocatalyst in the hydrogen evolution reaction. The performance of the photocatalyst, referred to as CN-y%, depends on the mass fraction of Ti3CNTx in the composite (denoted as y) and is the best when y = 8. The excellent photocatalytic performance of CN-8% is attributed to the intimate interfacial contact between CZIS and Ti3CNTx. Photogenerated electrons migrate efficiently from CZIS to Ti3CNTx, and the reduction in protons takes place on the surfaces of Ti3CNTx [51]. The CZIS/Ti3CNTx composite facilitates charge separation and suppresses electron–hole recombination, thereby markedly improving both the activity and the stability of the catalyst [52,53]. This work uncovers critical design principles for optimizing 2D/2D heterojunction photocatalysts, offering targeted strategies for advancing solar energy conversion technologies.

3. Materials and Methods

Materials: All chemicals were ACS grade or analytical reagent grade and used as received without further purification. Titanium aluminum carbonitride (Ti3AlCN, 500 mesh, >98%), sodium diethyldithiocarbamate trihydrate (C5H10NNaS2·3H2O, 99%), 1-dodecanethiol (98%), oleylamine (80%–90%), 1-octadecene (>90.0%), ethanol (≥99%), anhydrous sodium sulfite (Na2SO3, ≥98%), sodium sulfide nonahydrate (Na2S·9H2O, ≥98%), and n-hexane (97%) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Hydrochloric acid (36%–38%) was obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Deionized (DI) water was purified using a laboratory water purification system (RODI-220A1, Qingdao Labtech Scientific, Qingdao, China).
Preparation of Cu(S2CNEt2)2 (Cu(dedc)2): The solution of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (1.208 g, 5 mmol) in water (100 mL) was added dropwise into the solution of N-ethyldithiocarbamate sodium (NaS2CNEt2, 2.2531 g, 10 mmol) in water (100 mL) under vigorous magnetic stirring (800 rpm). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min before centrifugation (6000 rpm, 10 min). The precipitates were washed with 1:1 v/v ethanol and deionized water three times and finally dried at 60 °C and 0.1 MPa for 12 h. Zn(dedc)2 and In(dedc)3 were synthesized analogously.
Preparation of CZIS nanobelts: To a three-necked flask containing OLA (16 mL), DDT (16 mL), and ODE (8 mL), the following were added sequentially: Cu(dedc)2 (0.144 g, 0.4 mmol), In(dedc)3 (0.224 g, 0.4 mmol), and Zn(dedc)2 (0.58 g, 1.6 mmol). The mixture was stirred vigorously until complete dissolution, and the homogeneous solution was heated to 100 °C under continuous magnetic agitation and degassed for 20 min. The temperature was then increased to 250 °C at 3 °C/min under N2 protection and maintained at 250 °C for 1 h before cooling to room temperature. The crude precipitates were washed alternately with n-hexane and ethanol for three cycles, with centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 10 min following each wash. After the final cycle, the precipitates were lyophilized for 24 h, yielding CZIS as a fine powder.
Preparation of Ti3CNTx nanosheets: To a three-necked round-bottom flask containing concentrated HCl (12 M, 20 mL) was added LiF (1.5× g), and the mixture was stirred magnetically at 45 °C for 30 min to give a homogeneous solution before the addition of Ti3AlCN powder (0.5× g). The suspension was stirred at 45 °C for 24 h before cooling to ambient temperature. The solid material was iteratively separated by centrifugation (8000 rpm, 5 min) and washed with DI water until neutral pH, thus giving multilayer Ti3CNTx (m-Ti3CNTx). The multilayer Ti3CNTx was redispersed in DI water (20 mL) and sonicated for 5 h. The supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min to give delaminated Ti3CNTx nanosheets, which were lyophilized and stored in amber vials under argon atmosphere.
Preparation of 2D CZIS/2D Ti3CNTx nanocomposites: Solution A was prepared by ultrasonically dispersing CZIS (500 mg) in ethanol (100 mL). Solution B was prepared by ultrasonically dispersing Ti3CNTₓ (x mg, x = 10, 20, 40, 60, 80) in ethanol (100 mL). Under nitrogen (N2) protection and at room temperature, Solution A was added dropwise into Solution B with continuous magnetic stirring at 150 rpm. The resulting mixture was stirred in the dark at room temperature for 12 h. The solid materials were collected after centrifugation and lyophilization to give the 2D CZIS/2D Ti3CNTₓ nanocomposites, designated as CN-y (y = 2, 4, 8, 12, 16).

4. Conclusions

This work presents the rational design of a 2D/2D heterojunction photocatalyst through the electrostatic self-assembly of Cu-Zn-In-S (CZIS) nanobelts and Ti3CNTₓ MXene nanosheets. The unique architecture facilitates efficient spatial separation of photogenerated charge carriers, wherein electrons rapidly transfer from CZIS to highly conductive Ti3CNTₓ with its large specific surface area. This yields a hydrogen evolution rate of 14.3 mmol·g−1·h−1 for the CN-8% composite—3.3-fold higher than pristine CZIS (4.3 mmol·g−1·h−1)—along with a 3.7% apparent quantum yield at 420 nm, confirming effective visible light utilization. Comprehensive characterizations (SEM, TEM, XRD, XPS) verify heterojunction formation and interfacial electron transfer, while electrochemical analyses demonstrate reduced charge transfer resistance and suppressed carrier recombination. The enhanced performance is attributed to shortened carrier diffusion paths, increased active site exposure, and proton transfer facilitation via hydrophilic groups on Ti3CNTₓ. This study uncovers a critical design principle for 2D/2D heterojunctions: synergistic integration of conductive MXenes with semiconductors to optimize charge dynamics, offering a viable strategy for advancing solar hydrogen production and sustainable energy technologies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal15070632/s1. Figure S1: XRD patterns of Ti3AlCN and Ti3CNTx, Figure S2: XRD patterns of CZIS, Ti3CNTx, and CN-x% (x = 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16), Figure S3: Photocatalytic H2 evolution activity of Ti3AlCN, Ti3CNTx, and CZIS, Figure S4: XRD patterns of CN-8% before and after photocatalytic testing, Figure S5: Nyquist plots of CZIS and CN-x% (x = 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16), Figure S6: UV-vis DRS of CZIS and CN-8%, Figure S7: Water contact angles of (a) CZIS and (b) CN-8%, Table S1: Comparisons of representative CZIS/Ti3CNTx and related MXene composite photocatalysts for H2 evolution [54,55,56,57,58,59,60].

Author Contributions

P.L.: investigation, data curation, writing—review and editing, and writing—original draft; Z.W.: software, validation, data curation, and writing—original draft; X.Y.: writing—review and editing, conceptualization, methodology, supervision, and project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, H.; Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, C.; Song, X.; Zhang, P.; Huo, P.; Li, X. A Review on Heterogeneous Photocatalysis for Environmental Remediation: From Semiconductors to Modification Strategies. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 178–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, B.-J.; Chen, Q.; Mo, Q.-L.; Xiao, F.-X. Robust, Versatile, Green and Emerging Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly Platform for Solar Energy Conversion. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 493, 215285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, P.; Navid, I.A.; Ma, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, P.; Ye, Z.; Zhou, B.; Sun, K.; Mi, Z. Solar-to-Hydrogen Efficiency of More than 9% in Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Nature 2023, 613, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, Y.; Vogel, A.; Sachs, M.; Sprick, R.S.; Wilbraham, L.; Moniz, S.J.A.; Godin, R.; Zwijnenburg, M.A.; Durrant, J.R.; Cooper, A.I.; et al. Current Understanding and Challenges of Solar-Driven Hydrogen Generation Using Polymeric Photocatalysts. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 746–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fang, Y.; Hou, Y.; Fu, X.; Wang, X. Semiconducting Polymers for Oxygen Evolution Reaction under Light Illumination. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 4204–4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pavliuk, M.V.; Wrede, S.; Liu, A.; Brnovic, A.; Wang, S.; Axelsson, M.; Tian, H. Preparation, Characterization, Evaluation and Mechanistic Study of Organic Polymer Nano-Photocatalysts for Solar Fuel Production. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 6909–6935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, M.; Sun, M.; Cao, X.; Wang, H.; Xia, L.; Jiang, W.; Huang, M.; He, L.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, Y. Progress in Preparation, Identification and Photocatalytic Application of Defective g-C3N4. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 510, 215849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rahman, M.Z.; Kibria, M.G.; Mullins, C.B. Metal-Free Photocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 1887–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, Q.; Xu, Q.; Du, M.; Zeng, X.; Zhong, G.; Qiu, B.; Zhang, J. Recent Progress of Metal Sulfide Photocatalysts for Solar Energy Conversion. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2202929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, X.; Song, Y.; Gao, Q.; Lin, J.; Zhai, J.; Shao, Z.; Li, J.; Wu, D.; Shi, X.; Liu, W.; et al. Controllable-Photocorrosion Balance Endows ZnCdS Stable Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2506159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Murtaza, G.; Alderhami, S.; Alharbi, Y.T.; Zulfiqar, U.; Hossin, M.; Alanazi, A.M.; Almanqur, L.; Onche, E.U.; Venkateswaran, S.P.; Lewis, D.J. Scalable and Universal Route for the Deposition of Binary, Ternary, and Quaternary Metal Sulfide Materials from Molecular Precursors. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 1952–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Feng, C.; Wu, Z.; Huang, K.; Ye, J.; Zhang, H. Surface Modification of 2D Photocatalysts for Solar Energy Conversion. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2200180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, L.; Wang, Q.; Zhuang, T.-T.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G.; Liu, G.-Q.; Fan, F.-J.; Shi, L.; Yu, S.-H. Single Crystalline Quaternary Sulfide Nanobelts for Efficient Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, L.; Su, F.; Liu, T.; Liu, G.-Q.; Li, Y.; Ma, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Y.; Yu, S.-H. Phosphorus-Doped Single-Crystalline Quaternary Sulfide Nanobelts Enable Efficient Visible-Light Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 20620–20629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, D.; Wang, K.; Yu, L.; Nguyen, T.H.; Ikeda, S.; Jiang, F. Over 1% Efficient Unbiased Stable Solar Water Splitting Based on a Sprayed Cu2 ZnSnS4 Photocathode Protected by a HfO2 Photocorrosion-Resistant Film. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 1875–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Z.; Tang, A.; Liu, J.; Zhu, D.; Shi, X.; Kong, Q.; Wang, Z.; Qu, S.; Teng, F.; Wang, Z. Non-Injection Synthesis of L-Shaped Wurtzite Cu–Ga–Zn–S Alloyed Nanorods and Their Advantageous Application in Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 18649–18659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ding, M.; Cui, S.; Lin, Z.; Yang, X. Crystal Facet Engineering of Hollow Cadmium Sulfide for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2024, 357, 124333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tong, R.; Ng, K.W.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Pan, H. Two-Dimensional Materials as Novel Co-Catalysts for Efficient Solar-Driven Hydrogen Production. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 23202–23230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guan, Y.; Zhao, R.; Cong, Y.; Chen, K.; Wu, J.; Zhu, H.; Dong, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Yuan, G.; Li, Y.; et al. Flexible Ti2C MXene Film: Synthesis, Electrochemical Performance and Capacitance Behavior. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 433, 133582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Muñoz-Batista, M.J.; Motta Meira, D.; Colón, G.; Kubacka, A.; Fernández-García, M. Phase-Contact Engineering in Mono- and Bimetallic Cu-Ni Co-catalysts for Hydrogen Photocatalytic Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1199–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Indra, A.; Acharjya, A.; Menezes, P.W.; Merschjann, C.; Hollmann, D.; Schwarze, M.; Aktas, M.; Friedrich, A.; Lochbrunner, S.; Thomas, A.; et al. Boosting Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution with an Integrated Nickel Phosphide–Carbon Nitride System. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1653–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Feng, W.; Yuan, J.; Gao, F.; Weng, B.; Hu, W.; Lei, Y.; Huang, X.; Yang, L.; Shen, J.; Xu, D.; et al. Piezopotential-Driven Simulated Electrocatalytic Nanosystem of Ultrasmall MoC Quantum Dots Encapsulated in Ultrathin N-Doped Graphene Vesicles for Superhigh H2 Production from Pure Water. Nano Energy 2020, 75, 104990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tang, R.; Xiong, S.; Gong, D.; Deng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Su, L.; Ding, C.; Yang, L.; Liao, C. Ti3C2 2D MXene: Recent Progress and Perspectives in Photocatalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2020, 12, 56663–56680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Cui, Z.; Sa, B.; Miao, N.; Zhou, J.; Sun, Z. Computational Design of Double Transition Metal MXenes with Intrinsic Magnetic Properties. Nanoscale Horiz. 2022, 7, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liao, G.; Li, C.; Liu, S.-Y.; Fang, B.; Yang, H. Z-Scheme Systems: From Fundamental Principles to Characterization, Synthesis, and Photocatalytic Fuel-Conversion Applications. Phys. Rep. 2022, 983, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mai, T.; Guo, W.-Y.; Wang, P.-L.; Chen, L.; Qi, M.-Y.; Liu, Q.; Ding, Y.; Ma, M.-G. Bilayer Metal-Organic Frameworks/MXene/Nanocellulose Paper with Electromagnetic Double Loss for Absorption-Dominated Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 464, 142517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ying, Y.; Lin, Z.; Huang, H. “Edge/Basal Plane Half-Reaction Separation” Mechanism of Two-Dimensional Materials for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. ACS Energy Lett. 2023, 8, 1416–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jin, S.; Shi, Z.; Wang, R.; Guo, Y.; Wang, L.; Hu, Q.; Liu, K.; Li, N.; Zhou, A. 2D MoB MBene: An Efficient Co-Catalyst for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production under Visible Light. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 12524–12536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kwon, N.H.; Yun, S.Y.; Lim, J.; Hwang, S.-J. Recent Advances in High-Performance Catalysts Hybridized with Two-Dimensional Conductive Inorganic Nanosheets. Nano Energy 2024, 122, 109315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, G.; Zhen, C.; Kang, Y.; Wang, L.; Cheng, H.-M. Unique Physicochemical Properties of Two-Dimensional Light Absorbers Facilitating Photocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 6410–6444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yan, X.; Zhang, J.; Hao, G.; Jiang, W.; Di, J. 2D Atomic Layers for CO2 Photoreduction. Small 2024, 20, 2306742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, H.; Dai, M.; Zhang, J.; Chen, W.; Jin, Q.; Wang, S.; He, Z. Interface Engineering in 2D/2D Heterogeneous Photocatalysts. Small 2023, 19, 2205767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hu, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, K.; Ma, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Huang, H.; Sun, X.; Ma, T. Construction of a 2D/2D Crystalline Porous Materials Based S-Scheme Heterojunction for Efficient Photocatalytic H2 Production. Adv. Energy Mater. 2024, 14, 2303638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, X.; Guan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Z. Bisphenol A Assisted Ti3C2Tx/CuZnInS Schottky Heterojunction for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Nitrogen Fixation. Colloid. Surf. A 2022, 648, 129430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, X.; Chen, J.; Zhao, C.; Liu, Y.; Liang, Q.; Zhou, M.; Li, Z.; Zhou, Y. Construction ZnIn2S4/Ti3C2 of 2D/2D Heterostructures with Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity: A Combined Experimental and First-Principles DFT Study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 570, 151183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Q.; Tan, X.; Wang, S.; Ma, F.; Znad, H.; Shen, Z.; Liu, L.; Liu, S. MXene as a Non-Metal Charge Mediator in 2D Layered CdS@Ti3C2@TiO2 Composites with Superior Z-Scheme Visible Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity. Environ. Sci. Nano 2019, 6, 3158–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xie, X.; Zhang, N.; Tang, Z.-R.; Anpo, M.; Xu, Y.-J. Ti3C2Tx MXene as a Janus Cocatalyst for Concurrent Promoted Photoactivity and Inhibited Photocorrosion. App. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 237, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Y.-H.; Zhang, F.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.-Y.; Xu, Y.-J. Photoredox-Catalyzed Biomass Intermediate Conversion Integrated with H2 Production over Ti3C2Tx/CdS Composites. Green. Chem. 2020, 22, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, K.; Li, C.; Meng, X. In-Situ Construction of Ternary Ti3C2 MXene@TiO2/ZnIn2S4 Composites for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2020, 580, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, S.; Shao, L.; Yang, Z.; Cheng, S.; Yang, C.; Liu, Y.; Xia, X. Constructing Ti3C2 MXene/ZnIn2S4 Heterostructure as a Schottky Catalyst for Photocatalytic Environmental Remediation. Green Energy Environ. 2022, 7, 246–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Peng, J.; Shen, J.; Yu, X.; Tang, H.; Zulfiqar; Liu, Q. Construction of LSPR-Enhanced 0D/2D CdS/MoO3− S-Scheme Heterojunctions for Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, Y.; Meng, X.; Dall’Agnese, Y.; Dall’Agnese, C.; Duan, S.; Gao, Y.; Chen, G.; Wang, X.-F. 2D MXenes as Co-Catalysts in Photocatalysis: Synthetic Methods. Nano-Micro Lett. 2019, 11, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, T.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, X.; Xue, Y.; Liu, W.; Tian, J. Dual Cocatalysts and Vacancy Strategies for Enhancing Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production Activity of Zn3In2S6 Nanosheets with an Apparent Quantum Efficiency of 66.20%. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2023, 640, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Biswal, L.; Acharya, L.; Mishra, B.P.; Das, S.; Swain, G.; Parida, K. Interfacial Solid-State Mediator-Based Z-Scheme Heterojunction TiO2@Ti3C2/MgIn2S4 Microflower for Efficient Photocatalytic Pharmaceutical Micropollutant Degradation and Hydrogen Generation: Stability, Kinetics, and Mechanistic Insights. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023, 6, 2081–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, B.; Han, J.; Zhang, Q.; Liao, G.; Cheng, W.; Ge, G.; Liu, J.; Yang, X.; Wang, R.; Jia, X. Carbon Defective G-C3N4 Thin-Wall Tubes for Drastic Improvement of Photocatalytic H2 Production. Carbon 2023, 202, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sun, Y.; Hao, Y.; Lin, X.; Liu, Z.; Sun, H.; Jia, S.; Chen, Y.; Yan, Y.; Li, X. Efficient Electron Transport by 1D CuZnInS Modified 2D Ti3C2 MXene for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2024, 653, 396–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, X.; Shen, S.; Guo, L.; Mao, S.S. Semiconductor-Based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6503–6570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wang, M.; Shen, S.; Li, L.; Tang, Z.; Yang, J. Effects of Sacrificial Reagents on Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution over Different Photocatalysts. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 5155–5164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Younsi, M.; Saadi, S.; Bouguelia, A.; Aider, A.; Trari, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Oxygen-Rich Delafossite CuYO2+x—Application to H2-Photo Production. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2007, 91, 1102–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, F.; Li, Z.; Fan, D.; Zhao, C.; Yang, X. Construction of G-C3N4/Ti3CN MXene Schottky Heterojunctions for Boosting Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Surf. Interf. 2024, 51, 104658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, H.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y.; Tu, W.; Wu, S.; Yuan, X.; Zeng, G.; Xu, Z.J.; Li, S.; Chew, J.W. Electrical Promotion of Spatially Photoinduced Charge Separation via Interfacial-Built-in Quasi-Alloying Effect in Hierarchical Zn2In2S5/Ti3C2(O, OH)x Hybrids toward Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution and Environmental Remediation. App. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 245, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huang, W.; Li, Z.; Wu, C.; Zhang, H.; Sun, J.; Li, Q. Delaminating Ti3C2 MXene by Blossom of ZnIn2S4 Microflowers for Noble-Metal-Free Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 120, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hou, H.; Zhang, X. Rational Design of 1D/2D Heterostructured Photocatalyst for Energy and Environmental Applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 125030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, D.; Yang, C.; Rajendran, S.; Qin, J.; Zhang, X. Nanoflower-like Ti3CN@TiO2/CdS Heterojunction Photocatalyst for Efficient Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 19580–19589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xu, H.; Xiao, R.; Huang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Yang, X. In Situ Construction of Protonated G-C3N4/Ti3C2 MXene Schottky Heterojunctions for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, S.; Fang, H.; Chen, R.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Ye, M.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, K. Bridging CdS with Ti3C2Tx Nanosheets via Ligands for Enhanced Charge Transfer in Photocatalytic H2 Production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2024, 54, 1154–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wei, P.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, T.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Yu, H.; Jia, J.; Zhang, K.; Peng, C. Manipulation of Charge-Transfer Kinetics via Ti3C2Tx(T = −O) Quantum Dot and N-Doped Carbon Dot Coloading on CdS for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 587–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Huang, K.; Lv, C.; Li, C.; Bai, H.; Meng, X. Ti3C2 MXene Supporting Platinum Nanoparticles as Rapid Electrons Transfer Channel and Active Sites for Boosted Photocatalytic Water Splitting over G-C3N4. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 636, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gu, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Chang, S.; Huang, Y.; Gao, L.; Cui, Y.; Liu, R.; Dai, W.-L. Robust Construction of CdSe nanorods@Ti3C2 MXene Nanosheet for Superior Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 328, 122537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zuo, G.; Wang, Y.; Teo, W.L.; Xie, A.; Guo, Y.; Dai, Y.; Zhou, W.; Jana, D.; Xian, Q.; Dong, W.; et al. Ultrathin ZnIn2S4 Nanosheets Anchored on Ti3C2TX MXene for Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 11383–11388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the synthesis of 2D CZIS/2D Ti3CNTx composites.
Figure 1. Schematic of the synthesis of 2D CZIS/2D Ti3CNTx composites.
Catalysts 15 00632 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) Ti3CNTx, (b) CZIS, and (c) CN-8%; (df) TEM images of CN-8%; EDS elemental mapping images of (g) S, (h) Cu, (i) In, (j) Zn, (k) Ti and (l) N.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) Ti3CNTx, (b) CZIS, and (c) CN-8%; (df) TEM images of CN-8%; EDS elemental mapping images of (g) S, (h) Cu, (i) In, (j) Zn, (k) Ti and (l) N.
Catalysts 15 00632 g002
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of CZIS, Ti3CNTx, and CN-8%; (b) survey XPS spectra and (c) Cu2p, (d) Zn2p, (e) In3d, (f) S2p, (g) Ti2p, (h) C1s, and (i) N1s high-resolution XPS spectra of CZIS, Ti3CNTx, and CN-8%.
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of CZIS, Ti3CNTx, and CN-8%; (b) survey XPS spectra and (c) Cu2p, (d) Zn2p, (e) In3d, (f) S2p, (g) Ti2p, (h) C1s, and (i) N1s high-resolution XPS spectra of CZIS, Ti3CNTx, and CN-8%.
Catalysts 15 00632 g003
Figure 4. (a,b) Photocatalytic activity of CZIS and CN-y% in the H2 evolution reaction; (c) stability of CN-8% in the photocatalytic H2 evolution reaction; (d) the apparent quantum yield (AQY) of CN-8% at different wavelengths.
Figure 4. (a,b) Photocatalytic activity of CZIS and CN-y% in the H2 evolution reaction; (c) stability of CN-8% in the photocatalytic H2 evolution reaction; (d) the apparent quantum yield (AQY) of CN-8% at different wavelengths.
Catalysts 15 00632 g004
Figure 5. (a) Photocurrent density curves, (b) Nyquist plots, (c) steady-state photoluminescence (PL), and (d) time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) of CZIS and CN-8%.
Figure 5. (a) Photocurrent density curves, (b) Nyquist plots, (c) steady-state photoluminescence (PL), and (d) time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) of CZIS and CN-8%.
Catalysts 15 00632 g005
Figure 6. (a) Mott–Schottky plots, (b) Tauc plots from UV–vis DRS, and (c) mechanistic illustration of enhanced H2 production with CN-8%.
Figure 6. (a) Mott–Schottky plots, (b) Tauc plots from UV–vis DRS, and (c) mechanistic illustration of enhanced H2 production with CN-8%.
Catalysts 15 00632 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, P.; Wang, Z.; Yang, X. Rationally Designed 2D CZIS/2D Ti3CNTx Heterojunctions for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Catalysts 2025, 15, 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15070632

AMA Style

Li P, Wang Z, Yang X. Rationally Designed 2D CZIS/2D Ti3CNTx Heterojunctions for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Catalysts. 2025; 15(7):632. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15070632

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Peize, Zhiying Wang, and Xiaofei Yang. 2025. "Rationally Designed 2D CZIS/2D Ti3CNTx Heterojunctions for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction" Catalysts 15, no. 7: 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15070632

APA Style

Li, P., Wang, Z., & Yang, X. (2025). Rationally Designed 2D CZIS/2D Ti3CNTx Heterojunctions for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Catalysts, 15(7), 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15070632

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop