Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Responder Feelings in a Three-Player Three-Option Ultimatum Game: Affective Determinants of Rejection Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Unraveling Public Good Games
Open AccessArticle

The Resolution Game: A Dual Selves Perspective

1
Department of Economics, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
2
Max Planck Institute of Economics, Kahlaische Straße 10, 07745 Jena, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Games 2011, 2(4), 452-462; https://doi.org/10.3390/g2040452
Received: 18 July 2011 / Revised: 1 September 2011 / Accepted: 2 December 2011 / Published: 9 December 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Games and Psychology)
This article explains the emergence of an unique equilibrium resolution as the result of a compromise between two selves with different preferences. The stronger this difference is, the more generous the resolution gets. This result is in contrast to predictions of other models in which sinful consumption is distributed bimodally. Therefore, our result fits better with our daily observations concerning a lot of ambivalent goods where we often form nonrigid resolutions. The normative analysis uses the device of a hypothetical impartial self that regards both conflicting motives as equally legitimate. The result of this analysis is dilemmatic. It demonstrates that the resolution is broken too often to be welfare maximal. However, the introduction of external self-commitment devices results in their overuse and is welfare decreasing. View Full-Text
Keywords: dual selves; resolutions; self-control; impartiality dual selves; resolutions; self-control; impartiality
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Migrow, D.; Uhl, M. The Resolution Game: A Dual Selves Perspective. Games 2011, 2, 452-462.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop