Next Article in Journal
Targets and Mechanisms of Photodynamic Therapy in Lung Cancer Cells: A Brief Overview
Next Article in Special Issue
Cell-Centric View of Apoptosis and Apoptotic Cell Death-Inducing Antitumoral Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Epigenetic Alteration by DNA Promoter Hypermethylation of Genes Related to Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β) Signaling in Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advances in Viral Vector-Based TRAIL Gene Therapy for Cancer

Cancers 2011, 3(1), 994-1013;

Role of p53 in Cell Death and Human Cancers
Laboratory of Anti-tumor Research, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute, 666-2 Nitona, Chuoh-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan
Division of Biochemistry and Laboratory of Innovative Cancer Therapeutics, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute, 666-2 Nitona, Chuoh-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 December 2010; in revised form: 22 February 2011 / Accepted: 22 February 2011 / Published: 3 March 2011


: p53 is a nuclear transcription factor with a pro-apoptotic function. Since over 50% of human cancers carry loss of function mutations in p53 gene, p53 has been considered to be one of the classical type tumor suppressors. Mutant p53 acts as the dominant-negative inhibitor toward wild-type p53. Indeed, mutant p53 has an oncogenic potential. In some cases, malignant cancer cells bearing p53 mutations display a chemo-resistant phenotype. In response to a variety of cellular stresses such as DNA damage, p53 is induced to accumulate in cell nucleus to exert its pro-apoptotic function. Activated p53 promotes cell cycle arrest to allow DNA repair and/or apoptosis to prevent the propagation of cells with serious DNA damage through the transactivation of its target genes implicated in the induction of cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis. Thus, the DNA-binding activity of p53 is tightly linked to its tumor suppressive function. In the present review article, we describe the regulatory mechanisms of p53 and also p53-mediated therapeutic strategies to cure malignant cancers.
apoptosis; DNA damage; p53

1. Introduction

Cells are constantly exposed to a variety of cellular stresses such as DNA damage. These cellular stresses finally introduce the genomic aberrations including mutation, deletion and/or translocation into the cellular genome and thereby induce the genomic instability. Accumulation of the genomic aberrations often results in the development of cancers [1]. Therefore, a proper stress response is required to maintain the genomic integrity and protect cells from malignant transformation.

p53 is a nuclear transcription factor and transactivates numerous target genes involved in the induction of cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis [2-5]. Under normal conditions, p53 is expressed at an extremely low level, which is caused by proteasomal degradation mediated largely by RING-finger type E3 ubiquitin protein ligase MDM2 [6-8] and as a functionally latent form. Upon DNA damage, p53 is induced to accumulate in cell nucleus through post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation and acetylation. These chemical modifications convert p53 from a latent to an active form, which might be due to the dissociation of MDM2 from p53 [2-5]. Functionally active p53 transactivates an appropriate set of its target genes to induce cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis, which is dependent on the extent and types of DNA damage [2-5,9]. p53-mediated cell cycle arrest allows cells to repair damaged DNA. When DNA repair is complete, cells re-enter the normal cell cycle. In contrast, when cells have serious DNA damage, p53 exerts its pro-apoptotic function to eliminate cells with serious DNA damage and thereby inhibit the transfer of damaged DNA to daughter cells. Thus, p53 has an ability to maintain genomic integrity.

Extensive mutation searches demonstrated that over 50% of human cancers carry the loss of function mutations in p53 gene [10-17], suggesting that p53 is a classical Knudson-type tumor suppressor. Indeed, p53-deficient mice developed spontaneous cancers [18]. Among them, 95% of mutations are detectable within the genomic region encoding the DNA-binding domain of p53 and thereby mutant p53 lacks the sequence-specific transactivation ability [4]. The transactivation ability of p53 is tightly linked to its pro-apoptotic function [19,20]. Mutant p53 forms the hetero-oligomer with wild-type p53 through their intact oligomerization domains and acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor toward wild-type p53 [21,22]. In contrast to short-lived wild-type p53 (20 min), mutant p53 has a prolonged half-life (2 to 12 h) with an oncogenic potential [23-25]. Cancers bearing p53 mutations sometimes display the chemo-resistant phenotype, indicating that p53 plays a critical role in the regulation of DNA damage response [26-28]. Thus, it is quite important to develop a novel strategy to eliminate the negative effect of mutant p53 on wild-type p53 for efficient chemotherapy.

2. Structural Features of p53

p53 is composed of three representative functional domains including an NH2-terminal acidic transactivation domain (TA: amino acid residues 1–45), a DNA-binding domain (DB: amino acid residues 102–292) and a COOH-terminal oligomerization domain (OD: amino acid residues 319–359) [2-5]. The NH2-terminal transactivation domain is subdivided into two independent domains such as TA 1 (amino acid residues 1-40) and TA II (amino acid residues 43–63) [29,30]. The DNA-binding domain binds to the tandem repeat of the p53-responsive element (RRRCWWGYYY: R, G/A; W, A/T; Y, C/T) separated by up to 13 bp within the promoter regions of its target genes [19]. In response to a variety of cellular stresses, such as DNA damage and energetic stress, p53 induces cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis through the transactivation of its target genes. Functional p53 forms a homo-tetramer, which is mediated by its COOH-terminal oligomerization domain.

In addition to those representative functional domains, p53 contains several characteristic domains required for its activity. Since p53 is a transcription factor, p53 must be localized within cell nucleus. For the efficient nuclear access of p53, p53 contains three nuclear localization signals (NLSs, amino acid residues 305–322, 369–375 and 379–384), which are recognized by importin α/β complex [31]. Dysfunction of importin α resulted in the cytoplasmic retention of p53 [32]. Therefore, importin α contributes to the nuclear localization of p53. Alternatively, p53 contains a Leu-rich nuclear export signal (NES, amino acid residues 339–352) recognized by nuclear export machinery CRM1 (chromosomal region maintenance 1) [31]. CRM1 is a member of the karyo-pherin-β family of receptor proteins and has been proposed as being the key factor that mediates the nuclear export of p53 [33]. It has been shown that the tetramer formation of p53 masks NES and thereby inhibits its nuclear export [34]. In contrast, MDM2-mediated monoubiquitination at the COOH-terminal Lys residues disrupted tetramer formation of p53 and exposed NES for CRM1 binding [35]. p53 also has a Pro-rich domain (amino acid residues 63–97). This pro-rich domain has been shown to be associated with pro-apoptotic function of p53 [36,37]. Indeed, deletion of this pro-rich region led to a complete loss of pro-apoptotic activity of p53.

3. Mutational Inactivation of p53

Mutational inactivation is considered to be one of the most common molecular mechanisms behind the dysfunction of p53. Extensive mutation search revealed that more than half of human cancers carry loss of function mutations of p53 [16]. Among them, 95% of mutations were detectable within the genomic region (exons 5–8) encoding the DNA-binding domain [4]. The close inspection of the mutation profiles revealed that the six amino acid residues are most frequently mutated in human cancers including Arg-175, Gly-245, Arg-248, Arg-249, Arg-273 and Arg-282 [38]. These mutations found within the DNA-binding domain of p53 disrupt its proper conformation and thus the mutant p53 is defective in the sequence-specific transcriptional activation dependent on the wild-type p53-binding consensus element. Furthermore, mutant p53 displays a dominant-negative behavior toward wild-type p53 through the formation of hetero-tetramer with wild-type p53 and has oncogenic potential [21,22,25].

The accumulating evidence demonstrated that certain cancer-derived mutant forms of p53 transactivate various target genes such as the multiple drug resistance gene 1 (MDR1), c-myc, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), interleukin-6 (IL-6), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [39-45]. Scian et al. found that cancer-derived mutant p53 transactivates aspargine synthetase (ASNS) and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) [46]. Therefore, it is likely that certain cancer-derived p53 mutants transactivate growth-promoting and oncogenic genes, thereby leading to the progression of the aggressive cancers (Figure 1).

Since the mutation search for p53 focused on the genomic region encoding the DNA-binding domain, there could still be unidentified loss of function mutations outside the DNA-binding domain [4]. Lomax et al. found point mutations (L344P and R337C) within the COOH-terminal oligomerization domain of p53 [47,48]. According to their results, p53 bearing L344P mutation existed as the monomeric form and lacked the transactivation ability. On the other hand, p53 carrying R377C mutation formed the tetramer, whereas this mutant displayed the significantly reduced transcriptional and pro-apoptotic activities. DiGiammarino et al. reported the presence of a point mutation (R337H) within the COOH-terminal oligomerization domain [49]. p53 bearing R337H mutation formed the native-like tetramer, however, its stability was significantly lower than that of wild-type p53. We have found p53ΔC lacking a part of the oligomerization domain and nuclear localization signals in human neuroblastoma-derived cell lines [50]. Based on our results, p53ΔC largely expressed in cytoplasm and had significantly lower pro-apoptotic ability as compared with wild-type p53. Therefore, p53 mutations detected outside the DNA-binding domain also caused loss of function of p53. From the clinical point of view, a novel strategy to eliminate the negative effect of mutant p53 on wild-type p53 needs to be developed. Although the great majority of p53 mutants exert a dominant-negative effect on wild-type p53, some of p53 mutants such as R175P display only partial loss of their DNA-binding activity [5].

4. Proteolytic Degradation of p53

Under normal conditions, p53 is maintained at a quite low level through the ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent protein degradation system. RING-finger type E3 ubiquitin protein ligase MDM2 (murine double minute 2) largely catalyzes this process [6-8]. MDM2 was identified as one of the genes amplified on the double minute chromosomes present in the spontaneously transformed murine cell lines [51]. Since NIH3T3 cells overexpressing MDM2 are tumorigenic in nude mice, MDM2 possesses a transforming potential [52]. MDM2 binds to the NH2-terminal transactivation domain of p53 and catalyzes the addition of ubiquitin to a cluster of six COOH-terminal Lys residues (Lys-370, Lys-372, Lys-373, Lys-381, Lys-382 and Lys-386) in p53 [53,54]. Polyubiquitinated p53 are detectable in cells exposed to proteasome inhibitor [55]. Mutant p53 escapes from MDM2-mediated proteasomal degradation and accumulates to high levels in cancer cells [46]. Recently, it has been described that MDM2 has a post-ubiquitination function for p53 degradation [56]. According to their results, MDM2 enhanced the association of p53 with proteasome. Lai et al. found that MDM2 monoubiquitinates p53 but not polyubiquitinates p53 [54], suggesting that there could exist an E4 ubiquitin protein ligase which catalyzes the polyubiquitination of p53. Grossmaan et al. reported that p300 with an intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity acts as an E4 ubiquitin protein ligase for p53 [57,58].

Since p53 transactivates MDM2, p53 creates the negative auto-regulatory feedback loop in which p53 induces the expression of its negative regulator MDM2. In addition to MDM2, RING-finger type E3 ubiquitin protein ligases Pirh2 (p53-induced RING H2 domain protein) [59] and COP1 (constitutive photomorphogenic 1) [60,61] also interact with p53 and mediate the ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent degradation of p53 in an MDM2-independent manner. Like MDM2, Pirh2 and COP1 inhibit transcriptional as well as pro-apoptotic function of p53. Since Pirh2 and COP1 are p53-induced target gene products, they also participate in a negative auto-regulatory feedback loop which controls p53. Expression studies demonstrated that COP1 is overexpressed in breast and ovarian adenocarcinomas in association with a remarkable reduction of steady-state p53 [61]. Therefore, it is likely that the overexpression of COP1 contributes to the rapid degradation of p53 in cancers and attenuates the function of p53. Alternatively, p53-interacting protein termed HAUSP (herpes virus-associated ubiquitin-specific protease) has an intrinsic enzymatic activity to deubiquitinate p53 and thereby increasing its stability even in the presence of excessive amounts of MDM2 [62].

5. Subcellular Distribution of p53

Appropriate nuclear distribution of p53 is critical for the expression of the transcriptional activity mediated by p53. In addition to the mutational inactivation of p53, the abnormal cytoplasmic retention of p53 causes the loss of function of p53. In contrast to the majority of other cancers, p53 is infrequently mutated in human neuroblastoma [17]. Previously, Moll et al. found that wild-type p53 is largely expressed in cytoplasm in the undifferentiated neuroblastoma [63], indicating that the inability of nuclear translocation of p53 attenuates its tumor suppressive activity. Abnormal cytoplasmic localization of p53 is also observed in human primary breast cancers, colon cancers and hepatoblastomas [64,65]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that the COOH-terminal region of p53 containing NLS is masked in neuroblastoma and the addition of the short COOH-terminal peptide promotes the nuclear access of p53 [64]. Intriguingly, it has been shown that the aberrant hyperubiquitination of p53 contributes to its cytoplasmic retention in neuroblastoma [66].

Nikolaev et al. discovered a large cytoplasmic protein termed Parc (p53-associated, Parkin-like cytoplasmic protein) [67]. According to their results, NH2-terminal region of Parc interacted with the COOH-terminal region of p53. Parc had an intrinsic E3 ubiquitin protein ligase activity, however, Parc had a negligible effect on the steady-state expression level of p53. Of note, Parc was associated with the majority of cytoplasmic p53 and acted as a cytoplasmic anchor protein for p53. siRNA-mediated knockdown of Parc in neuroblastoma resulted in an increase in a chemo-sensitivity in a p53-dependent manner.

Mihara et al. found that, in response to DNA damage, a fraction of p53 is translocated from cell nucleus into mitochondria in cancer cells undergoing apoptosis [68]. Within mitochondria, p53 directly promotes the permeabilization of the outer mitochondrial membrane by forming complexes with BclXL and Bcl2, and thereby releasing cytocrome c into cytoplasm. Additional studies demonstrated that MDM2-mediated monoubiquitination of p53 promotes its mitochondrial translocation where p53 undergoes a rapid deubiquitination by mitochondrial HAUSP, generating the apoptotically active non-ubiquitinated p53 [69]. Down-regulation of HAUSP, results in an increased resistance to DNA damage-induced apoptosis in association with the suppression of mitochondrial translocation of p53 [70]. Thus, targeting p53 to mitochondria, which causes the dysfunction of mitochondria, might be one of the transcription-independent pro-apoptotic pathways mediated by p53.

6. p53-Responsible Target Gene Products

Since p53 exerts its biological function through its target gene products, it is quite important to identify p53-target gene products and also to elucidate the functional significance of them. In this section, we describe the functional significance of the representative p53-target gene products.

The cell cycle inhibitor p21 has been discovered by four independent research groups. El-Deiry et al. identified p21WAF1 (wild-type p53-activated fragment 1) as a p53-target gene [71]. p21WAF1 gene promoter contains two p53-responsive elements and its gene product suppresses cell growth. Harper et al. discovered p21CIP1 (Cdk-interacting protein) as a Cdk2 (Cyclin-dependent kinase 2)-binding protein [72]. p21CIP1 tightly binds to Cdk2 and inhibits its protein kinase activity to block the phosphorylation of tumor suppressor pRB (retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product). Xiong et al. compared the subunit composition of Cdk/cyclin complexes between normal and transformed cells, and found that p21 is frequently lost from multiprotein complex derived from transformed cells [73]. Alternatively, Noda et al. identified p21SD1 by using expression screening from senescent human diploid fibroblasts [74]. p21SD1 (senescent cell-derived inhibitor) blocks DNA synthesis and maintains the senescent phenotype. Now, we call it p21WAF1. In response to cellular stresses, p53 induces G1 cell cycle arrest through the up-regulation of p21WAF1.

Hermeking et al. described that a negative cell cycle regulator 14-3-3σ is induced in response to DNA damage in a p53-dependent manner and involved in the induction of G2/M arrest [75]. Further studies demonstrated that 14-3-3σ antagonizes Mdm2-mediated p53 degradation and p53 nuclear export [76]. Ohki et al. discovered a novel p53-target gene product termed Reprimo [77]. Reprimo is a highly glycosylated cytoplasmic protein which induces G2 arrest. Similarly, Tanaka et al. isolated p53-inducible gene product termed p53R2 with a significant sequence similarity to the ribonucleotide reductase small subunit (R2) [78]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that p53R2 is induced in response to a variety of DNA damage and causes G2/M arrest.

p53 is tightly maintained at extremely low level under normal conditions. MDM2 targets p53 for ubiquitin/proteasome-mediated degradation [6-8]. Barak et al. reported that MDM2 is one of the transcriptional target genes of p53 [79]. Thus, MDM2 participates in a negative auto-regulatory feedback loop, which controls p53 expression level.

Since p53-dependent apoptosis is mediated by mitochondrial dysfunction, p53-inducible mitochondria proteins are of particular interest. We describe here BAX (Bcl2-associated X protein), p53AIP1 (p53-regulated apoptosis-inducing protein 1), NOXA (Latin for damage) and PUMA (p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis). Selvakumaran et al. found that BAX (Bcl2-associated X protein) is an immediate early p53-responsive gene [80]. BAX is normally distributed in cytoplasm or loosely associated with mitochondrial membrane. Upon stimulation of apoptosis, BAX is induced to undergo conformational change followed by formation of membrane-inserted homo-oligomers that results in the outer mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and the releases of cytochrome c from the mitochondrial intermembrane space to cytosol [81]. Oda et al. identified p53AIP1 as one of the p53-target gene products [82]. p53AIP1 which is localized within mitochondria, promotes apoptosis through affecting the mitochondrial membrane potential, and thereby releasing cytochrome c [83]. p53-dependent up-regulation of p53AIP1 is tightly associated with p53 phosphorylatyion at Ser-46. NOXA has been rediscovered in a differential display approach [84]. NOXA is induced in response to DNA damage in a p53-dependent manner. It has been shown that two domains (BH3 domain and mitochondrial targeting domain) in Noxa are essential for the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria [85]. PUMA has been identified as one of p53-target gene products [86,87]. PUMA is detectable exclusively in mitochondria and is associated with pro-survival Bcl2 through its BH3 domain. PUMA induces apoptosis through the dysfunction of mitochondria. Jeffers et al. found that BAX is required for PUMA-mediated apoptosis, placing BAX downstream of PUMA [86].

7. Post-translational Modifications

Upon DNA damage, p53 is induced at protein level and exerts its transcriptional as well as pro-apoptotic function in association with chemical modifications such as phosphorylation and acetylation [2-5]. p53 is phosphorylated at Ser-15, Ser-20 and Ser-46 in response to DNA damage. NH2-terminal phosphorylation of p53 promotes the dissociation of MDM2 from p53/MDM2 complex, and thereby converts p53 from a latent to an active form [89]. In contrast, protein phosphatases PP-1 and PP2A dephosphorylate p53, and negatively modulates its activity [90,91]. Therefore, DNA damage-induced phosphorylation event plays a critical role in the regulation of p53 stability and also activity. Ser-15 is phosphorylated by ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) [92], ATR (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related) [93], Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1) [94], and DNA-PK (DNA-dependent protein kinase) [95]. Ser-20 is phosphorylated by Chk2 (checkpoint kinase 2) [96] and Plk3 (polo-like kinase 3) [97]. HIPK2 (homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2) and PKCdelta (protein kinase C delta) have been shown to be involved in phosphorylation of p53 at Ser-46 [98,99]. Among them, phosphorylation of p53 at Ser-46 is closely associated with its pro-apoptotic function.

In addition to NH2-terminal phosphorylation of p53, p53 is also phosphorylated within its COOH-terminal region. CKII (casein kinase II) phosphorylates p53 at Ser-392 [100] and PKC phosporylates p53 at Ser-371, Ser-376 and Ser-378 [101]. These COOH-terminal phosphorylations of p53 enhance its DNA-binding activity [2-4]. Under normal conditions, the COOH-terminal region of p53 masks its DNA-binding domain in a latent conformation, and acts as a negative regulator [102,103]. Because the treatment of anti-p53 antibody recognized the COOH-terminal portion of p53 or COOH-terminal truncation of p53 results in a significant increase in its DNA-binding activity [102]. In contrast, we have found that mitotic regulator Plk1 (polo-like kinase 1) inhibits transcriptional and pro-apoptotic activities of p53 through physical interaction and phosphorylation [104]. Thus, phosphorylation of p53 does not always act as an activation signal.

p53 is also acetylated in response to DNA damage [2-4]. DNA damage-induced acetylation is mediated by p300 which acts as a ubiquitous transcriptional co-activator [105]. p300 interacts with NH2-terminal region of p53 and mediates acetylation of a cluster of COOH-terminal Lys residues (Lys-370, Lys-372, Lys-373, Lys-392 and Lys-381) [5]. Sakaguchi et al. demonstrated that PCAF (p300/CBP-associated factor), another histone acetyltransferese, acetylates Lys-320 of p53 in response to DNA damage [106]. Of note, these COOH-terminal Lys residues are also the target sites for ubiquitin ligation. Thus, acetylation of p53 reduces its ubiquitination levels by competition between acetylation and ubiquitination. Indeed, p300-mediated acetylation of p53 leads to an increase in its stability and enhancement of its transcriptional as well as pro-apoptotic activity [107]. In accordance with this notion, Michishita et al. described that SIRT1 (silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog 1) which has an intrinsic deacetylase activity, interacts with p53 and attenuates p53-dependent cell cycle arrest, as well as apoptosis in response to DNA damage through deacetylation of Lys-382 [108]. Kawai et al. reported that p300 has a dual role in the regulation of p53 stability [109]. Based on their results, p300 stabilized p53 in the presence of lower level of MDM2, whereas p300 promoted MDM2-dependent proteasomal degradation of p53 in the presence of a higher level of MDM2. This might be due to the E4 ubiquitin protein ligase activity of p300 [57]. Further experiments should be conducted to address this issue.

8. Protein-protein Interaction

Non-catalytic protein-protein interaction is one of the regulatory mechanisms of p53 function. In this section, we describe the representative p53-binding partners which regulate p53 function.

Among 14-3-3 family members, 14-3-3σ acts as a positive regulator for p53 [76]. The expression of 14-3-3σ is undetectable in human breast cancer, gastric cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma [110-112], suggesting that loss of 14-3-3σ is crucial in the development of cancer. p53 interacts with the COOH-terminal region of 14-3-3σ (amino acid residues 153 to 248) and this interaction has a positive impact on the stability of p53 by blocking MDM2. In addition, 14-3-3σ facilitates p53 tetramer formation and enhances its transcriptional activity [76].

ASPP1 and ASPP2 which contain ankylin repeats, SH3 domain and Pro-rich domain, interact with p53 and specifically enhance pro-apoptotic activity of p53 through the inhibition of pro-survival Bcl2 [113]. Down-regulation of ASPP1 or ASPP2 results in a decrease in a sensitivity to CDDP. As expected, ASPP1 and ASPP2 increase the recruitment of p53 onto BAX promoter and enhance the transcriptional activity of p53. From a functional point of view, ASPP1 and ASPP2 significantly enhance p53-mediated transactivation of pro-apoptotic target genes such as BAX and PIG-3 (p53-inducible gene 3), whereas ASPP1 and ASPP2 enhance p53-dependent transactivation of p53-target genes implicated in cell cycle arrest to a lesser degree. Expression levels of ASPP1 and ASPP2 is significantly reduced in human breast cancers as compared with those of corresponding normal tissues. Thus, the disregulation of ASPP1 and ASPP2 contributes to the development of breast cancer.

Iwabuchi et al. identified 53BP1 as a novel p53-binding partner [114]. 53BP1 binds to the central region of p53 (amino acid residues 80-320). In contrast to wild-type p53, 53BP1 does not interact with cancer-derived p53 mutants (R175H and R273H). Subsequent studies revealed that 53BP1 enhances p53-mediated transcriptional activation [115]. Rappoid et al. found that 53BP1 is rapidly phosphorylated by ATM in response to DNA damage, and forms discrete nuclear foci containing phosphorylated histone variant H2AX (γH2AX). γH2AX localizes at the sites of DNA strand breaks. Therefore, 53BP1 is closely involved in the early DNA damage-signaling pathway [116].

We have previously identified NFBD1 (nuclear factor with BRCT domain 1)/MDC1 (mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1) with an anti-apoptotic function [117]. Further studies demonstrated that NFBD1 interacts with γH2AX through its COOH-terminal BRCT domains and recruits MRN (MRE11, Rad50 and NBS1) complex onto the sites of DNA damage to facilitate efficient DNA repair [118-120]. Like 53BP1, NFBD1 also participates in the regulation of DNA damage response. Indeed, NFBD1-deficient mice display chromosome instability, DNA repair defects and radiation sensitivity [121]. Recently, we have found that p53 interacts with NFBD1 [122]. According to our results, NFBD1 bound to NH2-terminal region of p53 and inhibited ATM-mediated phosphorylation of p53 at Ser-15 to protect cells from apoptosis during the early phase of DNA damage response. During the late phase of DNA damage response, p53 dissociated from p53/NFBD1 complex and was phosphorylated at Ser-15 to exert its pro-apoptotic function.

RUNX3 is one of Runt-related (RUNX) gene family members and has been considered to be a candidate tumor suppressor for human gastric cancer [123,124], however, it remains unclear how RUNX3 exerts its tumor suppressor function. We have found that RUNX3 interacts with p53 and enhances its transcriptional, as well as its pro-apoptotic, activity [125]. Based on our results, siRNA-mediated knockdown of RUNX3 resulted in a significant decrease in sensitivity to anti-cancer drug in p53-proficient cells but not in p53-deficient cells, suggesting that there could exist a functional interaction between RUNX3 and p53 in response to DNA damage. Of note, knockdown of RUNX3 attenuated ATM-dependent phosphorylation of p53 at Ser-15 in response to DNA damage. Thus, RUNX3 recruits phosphorylated forms of ATM to p53, and thereby activates p53 (Figure 2).

9. Variant Forms of p53

It has long been believed that human p53 encodes a single protein of 53 kDa. Yin et al. noticed the presence of the relatively smaller protein (47 kDa) which was detectable by the monoclonal anti-p53 antibody termed PAb 421 (epitope: amino acid residues 372 and 382) [126]. Further studies demonstrated that this 47 kDa protein is recognized by the monoclonal anti-p53 antibody 1801 (epitope: amino-acid residues 46 and 55), but not by the monoclonal anti-p53 antibodies DO-1 (epitope: amino acid residues 20-25) and DO-13 (epitope: amino acid residues 26-35). From close inspection of the NH2-terminal amino acid residues of p53, they found the second translation initiation site at Met-40. Thus, they concluded that this 47 kDa protein is generated by the alternative translational initiation, and termed p53/47. Because p53/47 lacks an NH2-terminal MDM2-binding site, it is not targeted for proteasomal degradation-mediated by MDM2. Additionally, p53/47 has an ability to form the homo-tetramer and hetero-tetramer with full-length p53. As mentioned above, NH2-terminal transactivation domain of p53 is divided into two sub-domains, TA 1 and TA II. p53/47 lacks TA I domain but retains TA II domain. Subsequent studies revealed that p53/47 is not able to transactivate p21WAF1, whereas it can preferentially increase the expression of MDM2, GADD45 and BAX. These observations suggest that TA I and TA II domains differentially transactivate p53-target genes.

In addition to the alternative translation product of p53, Bourdon et al. described that human p53 encodes multiple variants arising from alternative splicing and alternative promoter usage [127, 128]. According to their results, they found an internal promoter within intron 4 of human p53 by using GeneRacer PCR-based strategy. Finally, they discovered the NH2-terminally truncated variant initiated at codon 133 (Δ133p53) distinct from p53/47. Δ133p53 lacks NH2-terminal transactivation domain and Pro-rich domain. They extended their study to identify the other variant forms of p53 by RT-PCR. They found that the alternative splicing event of intron 9 leads to the generation of p53β and p53γ, which delete the COOH-terminal oligomerization domain. Collectively, human p53 encodes p53, p53β, p53γ, Δ133p53, Δ133p53β, Δ133p53γ, Δ40p53, Δ40p53β, and Δ40p53γ. Δ40p53 corresponds to p53/47 (Figure 3). Based on their results, p53β was localized largely in cell nucleus, whereas p53γ was detectable both in cell nucleus and cytoplasm. Additionally, Δ133p53β was expressed both in cell nucleus and cytoplasm; however, Δ133p53γ was detected only in cytoplasm. Extensive expression studies demonstrated that p53 variants are expressed in a wide variety of human normal tissues but in a tissue-dependent manner. In addition, DNA damage-mediated accumulation of p53β and Δ133p53β were not detectable. Intriguingly, Δ133p53 was detected in 24 out of 30 primary breast cancers. Since Δ133p53 acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor toward wild-type p53, it is possible that Δ133p53 is involved in the development of breast cancers bearing wild-type p53.

10. p53-mediated Therapy

The therapeutic efficiency of anti-cancer agents depends strongly on their ability to trigger apoptosis in target cancer cells [129]. Since p53 plays a pivotal role in the regulation of cell fate in response to DNA damage, the therapeutic strategies which activate p53-mediated pro-apoptotic pathway and/or eliminate the dominant-negative effect of mutant p53 on wild-type p53 should be required.

As mentioned above, MDM2 binds to the NH2-terminal region of p53 and inhibits its transcriptional as well as pro-apoptotic function. MDM2 also facilitates proteasomal degradation of p53. Thus, MDM2 antagonist could activate p53 and offer a novel therapeutic approach to cancer. Vassilev et al. discovered the first potent and selective low molecular weight inhibitor of p53-MDM2 binding termed Nutlin [130]. According to their results, Nutlin bound to MDM2 in the p53-binding pocket and blocked the interaction between MDM2 and p53, which resulted in the stabilization of p53 and also activation of p53-mediated pro-apoptotic pathway in cancer cells bearing wild-type p53. In addition to Nutlin, it has been shown that M1-219, which acts as an inhibitor for MDM2, might be one of the promising agents to reactivate p53 [131]. Vitali et al. described that a short peptide derived from p53 COOH-terminal region containing Parc-binding domain disrupts the interaction between Parc and p53 [132]. Treatment of this peptide caused the nuclear relocation of p53 and increased in sensitivity to anti-cancer drug in cancers such as neuroblastoma with wild-type cytoplasmic p53.

Alternatively, the re-activation of mutant p53 contributes to much more efficient treatment of cancers bearing mutant p53. After screening of a library of low-molecular-weight compounds, Bykov et al. found that one compound termed PRIMA-1 has an ability to restore wild-type function to mutant p53 such as R248Q and R175H [133]. Further studies demonstrated that PRIMA-1 binds to the DNA-binding domain of mutant p53 and covalently modifies the thiol groups in the central core DNA-binding domain, and thereby reactivates mutant p53 [134].

11. Conclusions

Since over 50% of human cancers carry p53 mutations, mutational inactivation is a major molecular mechanism behind p53 dysfunction. Cancers bearing p53 mutation sometimes display a chemo-resistant phenotype. Although the intracellular balance between the expression levels of wild-type p53 and mutant p53 might be a critical determinant of cell fate in response to DNA damage, mutant p53 acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor toward wild-type p53 and exhibits a longer half-life than wild-type p53. Thus, the development of novel strategies to re-activate mutant p53 is required to provide clues to effectively treat malignant cancers bearing p53 mutations.

Figure 1. Dominant-negative effect of mutant p53 on wild-type p53. Pro-apoptotic function of p53 is significantly inhibited by certain p53 mutants which induce malignant transformation through up-regulation of c-myc and TERT.
Figure 1. Dominant-negative effect of mutant p53 on wild-type p53. Pro-apoptotic function of p53 is significantly inhibited by certain p53 mutants which induce malignant transformation through up-regulation of c-myc and TERT.
Cancers 03 00994f1 1024
Figure 2. Functional interaction between p53 and RUNX3. Upon DNA damage, RUNX3 is associated with phosphorylated form of ATM (p-ATM) and recruits it to p53 to facilitate phosphorylation of p53 at Ser-15.
Figure 2. Functional interaction between p53 and RUNX3. Upon DNA damage, RUNX3 is associated with phosphorylated form of ATM (p-ATM) and recruits it to p53 to facilitate phosphorylation of p53 at Ser-15.
Cancers 03 00994f2 1024
Figure 3. Structure of p53 variants. TA, transactivation domain; DB, sequence-specific DNA-binding domain; OD, oligomerization domain. Estimated molecular weights are also shown.
Figure 3. Structure of p53 variants. TA, transactivation domain; DB, sequence-specific DNA-binding domain; OD, oligomerization domain. Estimated molecular weights are also shown.
Cancers 03 00994f3 1024


The authors declare no conflicts of interest in connection with the current study.


  1. Elledge, S.J. Cell cycle checkpoints: Preventing an identity crisis. Science 1996, 274, 1664–1672. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sionov, R.V.; Haupt, Y. The cellular response to p53: The decision between life and death. Oncogene 1999, 18, 6145–6157. [Google Scholar]
  3. Prives, C.; Hall, P.A. The p53 pathway. J. Pathol. 1999, 187, 112–126. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vousden, K.H.; Lu, X. Live of let die: The cell's response to p53. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 594–604. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lacroix, M.; Toillon, R.A.; Leclercq, G. p53 and breast cancer, an update. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2006, 13, 293–325. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kubbutat, M.H.; Jones, S.N.; Vousden, K.H. Regulation of p53 stability by MDM2. Nature 1997, 387, 299–303. [Google Scholar]
  7. Haupt, Y.; Maya, R.; Kazaz, A.; Oren, M. MDM2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature 1997, 387, 296–299. [Google Scholar]
  8. Honda, R.; Tanaka, H.; Yasuda, H. Oncoprotein MDM2 is a ubiquitin ligase E3 for tumor suppressor p53. FEBS Lett. 1997, 420, 25–27. [Google Scholar]
  9. El-Deiry, W.S. The role of p53 in chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity. Oncogene 2003, 22, 7486–7495. [Google Scholar]
  10. Baker, S.J.; Fearon, E.R.; Nigro, J.M.; Hamilton, S.R.; Preisinger, A.C.; Jessup, J.M.; van Tuinen, P.; Ledbetter, D.H.; Barker, D.F.; Nakamura, Y.; et al. Chromosome 17 deletions and p53 gene mutations in colorectal carcinomas. Science 1989, 244, 217–221. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nigro, J.M.; Baker, S.J.; Preisinger, A.C.; Jessup, J.M.; Hostetter, R.; Cleary, K.; Bigner, S.H.; Davidson, N.; Baylin, S.; Devilee, P.; et al. Mutations in the p53 gene occur in diverse human tumour types. Nature 1989, 342, 705–708. [Google Scholar]
  12. Takahashi, T.; Nau, M.M.; Chiba, I.; Birrer, M.J.; Rosenberg, R.K.; Vinocour, M.; Levitt, M.; Pass, H.; Gazdar, A.F.; Minna, J.D.; et al. p53: A frequent target for genetic abnormalities in lung cancer. Science 1989, 246, 491–494. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kelman, Z.; Prokocimer, M.; Peller, S.; Kahn, Y.; Rechavi, G.; Manor, Y.; Cohen, A.; Rotter, V. Rearrangements in the p53 gene in Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood 1989, 74, 2318–2324. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vogelstein, B. Cancer. A deadly inheritance. Nature 1990, 348, 681–682. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hollstein, M.C.; Metcalf, R.A.; Welsh, J.A.; Montesano, R.; Harris, C.C. Frequent mutation of the p53 gene in human esophageal cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 9958–9961. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hollstein, M.; Sidransky, D.; Vogelstein, B.; Harris, C.C. p53 mutations in human cancers. Science 1991, 253, 49–53. [Google Scholar]
  17. Vogan, K.; Bernstein, M.; Leclerc, J.M.; Brisson, L.; Brossard, J.; Brodeur, G.M.; Pelletier, J.; Gros, P. Absence of p53 gene mutations in primary neuroblastomas. Cancer Res. 1993, 53, 5269–5273. [Google Scholar]
  18. Donehower, L.A.; Harvey, M.; Slagle, B.L.; McArthur, M.J.; Montgomery, C.A., Jr.; Butel, J.S.; Bradley, A. Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature 1992, 356, 215–221. [Google Scholar]
  19. El-Deiry, W.S.; Kern, S.E.; Pietenpol, J.A. Definition of a consensus binding site for p53. Nat. Genet. 1992, 1, 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pietenpol, J.A.; Tokino, T.; Thiagalingam, S.; El-Deiry, W.S.; Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B. Sequence-specific transcriptional activation is essential for growth suppression by p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 1998–2002. [Google Scholar]
  21. Herskowitz, I. Functional inactivation of genes by dominant negative mutations. Nature 1987, 329, 219–222. [Google Scholar]
  22. Herskowitz, I. A regulatory hierarchy for cell specialization in yeast. Nature 1989, 342, 749–757. [Google Scholar]
  23. Crawford, L.V.; Pim, D.C.; Lamb, P. The cellular protein p53 in human tumours. Mol. Biol. Med. 1984, 2, 261–272. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cattoretti, G.; Rilke, F.; Andreola, S.; D'Amato, L.; Delia, D. P53 expression in breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer 1986, 41, 178–183. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen, P.L.; Chen, Y.M.; Bookstein, R.; Lee, W.H. Genetic mechanisms of tumor suppression by the human p53 gene. Science 1990, 250, 1576–80. [Google Scholar]
  26. Vogelstein, B.; Kinzler, K.W. p53 function and dysfunction. Cell 1992, 70, 523–526. [Google Scholar]
  27. Velculescu, V.E.; El-Deiry, W.S. Biological and clinical importance of the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Clin. Chem. 1996, 42, 858–868. [Google Scholar]
  28. Vogelstein, B.; Lane, D.; Levine, A.J. Surfing the p53 network. Nature 2000, 408, 307–310. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhu, J.; Zhou, W.; Jiang, J.; Chen, X. Identification of a novel p53 functional domain that is necessary for mediating apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 13030–13036. [Google Scholar]
  30. Venot, C.; Maratrat, M.; Sierra, V.; Conseiller, E.; Debussche, L. Definition of a p53 transactivation function-deficient mutant and characterization of two independent p53 transactivation subdomains. Oncogene 1999, 18, 2405–2410. [Google Scholar]
  31. Fabbro, M.; Henderson, B.R. Regulation of tumor suppressors by nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling. Exp. Cell. Res. 2003, 282, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim, I.S.; Kim, D.H.; Han, S.M.; Chin, M.U.; Nam, H.J.; Cho, H.P.; Choi, S.Y.; Song, B.J.; Kim, E.R.; Bae, Y.S.; Moon, Y.H. Truncated form of importin alpha identified in breast cancer cell inhibits nuclear import of p53. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 23139–23145. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kau, T.R.; Schroeder, F.; Ramaswamy, S.; Wojciechowski, C.L.; Zhao, J.J.; Roberts, T.M.; Clardy, J.; Sellers, W.R.; Silver, P.A. A chemical genetic screen identifies inhibitors of regulated nuclear export of a Forkhead transcription factor in PTEN-deficient tumor cells. Cancer Cell 2003, 4, 463–476. [Google Scholar]
  34. Stommel, J.M.; Marchenko, N.D.; Jimenez, G.S.; Moll, U.M.; Hope, T.J.; Wahl, G.M. A leucine-rich nuclear export signal in the p53 tetramerization domain: Regulation of subcellular localization and p53 activity by NES masking. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 1660–1672. [Google Scholar]
  35. Brooks, C.L.; Li, M.; Gu, W. Mechanistic studies of MDM2-mediated ubiquitination in p53 regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 22804–22815. [Google Scholar]
  36. Walker, K.K.; Levine, A.J. Identification of a novel p53 functional domain that is necessary for efficient growth suppression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 15335–15340. [Google Scholar]
  37. Baptiste, N.; Friedlander, P.; Chen, X.; Prives, C. The proline-rich domain of p53 is required for cooperation with anti-neoplastic agents to promote apoptosis of tumor cells. Oncogene 2002, 21, 9–21. [Google Scholar]
  38. Joerger, A.C.; Fersht, A.R. Structure-function-rescue: the diverse nature of common p53 cancer mutants. Oncogene 2007, 26, 2226–2242. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chin, K.V.; Ueda, K.; Pastan, I. Modulation of activity of the promoter of the human MDR1 gene by Ras and p53. Science 1992, 255, 459–462. [Google Scholar]
  40. Cadwell, C.; Zambetti, G.P. The effects of wild-type p53 tumor suppressor activity and mutant p53 gain-of-function on cell growth. Gene 2001, 277, 15–30. [Google Scholar]
  41. Deb, S.; Jackson, C.T.; Subler, M.L.; Martin, D.W. Modulation of cellular and viral promoters by mutant human p53 proteins found in tumor cells. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 6164–6170. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dittmer, D.; Pati, S.; Zambetti, G.; Chu, S.; Teresky, A.K.; Moore, M.; Finlay, C.; Levine, A.J. Gain of function mutations in p53. Nat. Genet. 1993, 4, 42–46. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ludes-Meyers, J.H.; Subler, M.A.; Shivakumar, C.V.; Munoz, R.M.; Jiang, P.; Bigger, J.E.; Brown, D.R.; Deb, S.P.; Deb, S. Transcriptional activation of the human epidermal growth factor receptor promoter by human p53. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16, 6009–6019. [Google Scholar]
  44. Frazier, M.W.; He, X.; Wang, J.; Gu, Z.; Cleveland, J.L.; Zambetti, G.P. Activation of c-myc gene expression by tumor-derived p53 mutants requires a discrete C-terminal domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 3735–3743. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lanyi, A.; Deb, D.; Seymour, R.C.; Ludes-Meyers, J.H.; Subler, M.A.; Deb, S. Gain of function' phenotype of tumor-derived mutant p53 requires the oligomerization/nonsequence-specific nucleic acid-binding domain. Oncogene 1998, 16, 3169–3176. [Google Scholar]
  46. Scian, M.J.; Stagliano, K.E.; Deb, D.; Ellis, M.A.; Carchman, E.H.; Das, A.; Valerie, K.; Deb, S.P.; Deb, S. Tumor-derived p53 mutants induce oncogenesis by transactivating growth-promoting genes. Oncogene 2004, 23, 4430–4443. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lomax, M.E.; Barnes, D.M.; Gilchrist, R.; Picksley, S.M.; Varley, J.M.; Camplejohn, R.S. Two functional assays employed to detect an unusual mutation in the oligomerisation domain of p53 in a Li- Fraumeni like family. Oncogene 1997, 14, 1869–1874. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lomax, M.E.; Barnes, D.M.; Hupp, T.R.; Picksley, S.M.; Camplejohn, R.S. Characterization of p53 oligomerization domain mutations isolated from Li-Fraumeni and Li-Fraumeni like family members. Oncogene 1998, 17, 643–649. [Google Scholar]
  49. DiGiammarino, E.L.; Lee, A.S.; Cadwell, C.; Zhang, W.; Bothner, B.; Ribeiro, R.C.; Zambetti, G.; Kriwacki, R.W. A novel mechanism of tumorigenesis involving pH-dependent destabilization of a mutant p53 tetramer. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nakamura, Y.; Ozaki, T.; Niizuma, H.; Ohira, M.; Kamijo, T.; Nakagawara, A. Functional characterization of a new p53 mutant generated by homozygous deletion in a neuroblastoma cell line. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 354, 892–898. [Google Scholar]
  51. Cahilly-Snyder, L.; Yang-feng, T.; Francke, U.; George, D.L. Molecular analysis and chromosomal mapping of amplified genes isolated from a transformed mouse 3T3 cell line. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 1987, 13, 235–244. [Google Scholar]
  52. Fakharzadeh, S.S.; Trusko, S.P.; George, D.L. Tumorigenic potential associated with enhanced expression of a gene that is amplified in a mouse tumor cell line. EMBO J. 1991, 10, 1565–1569. [Google Scholar]
  53. Rodriguez, M.S.; Desterro, J.M.; Lain, S.; Lane, D.P.; Hay, R.T. Multiple C-terminal lysine residues target p53 for ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 8458–8467. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lai, Z.; Ferry, K.V.; Diamond, M.A.; Wee, K.E.; Kim, Y.B.; Ma, J.; Yang, T.; Benfield, P.A.; Copeland, R.A.; Auger, K.R. Human mdm2 mediates multiple mono- ubiquitination of p53 by a mechanism requiring enzyme isomerization. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 31357–31367. [Google Scholar]
  55. Maki, C.G.; Huibregtse, J.M.; Howley, P.M. In vivo ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated degradation of p53(1). Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 2649–2654. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kulikov, R.; Letienne, J.; Kaur, M.; Grossman, S.R.; Arts, J.; Blattner, C. Mdm2 facilitates the association of p53 with the proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 10038–10043. [Google Scholar]
  57. Grossman, S.R.; Deato, M.E.; Brignone, C.; Chan, H.M.; Kung, A.L.; Tagami, H.; Nakatani, Y.; Livingston, D.M. Polyubiquitination of p53 by a ubiquitin ligase activity of p300. Science 2003, 300, 342–344. [Google Scholar]
  58. Shi, D.; Pop, M.S.; Kulikov, R.; Love, I.M.; Kung, A.L.; Grossman, S.R. CBP and p300 are cytoplasmic E4 polyubiquitin ligases for p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 16275–16280. [Google Scholar]
  59. Leng, R.P.; Lin, Y.; Ma, W.; Wu, H.; Lemmers, B.; Chung, S.; Parant, J.M.; Lozano, G.; Hakem, R.; Benchimol, S. Pirh2, a p53-induced ubiquitin-protein ligase, promotes p53 degradation. Cell 2003, 112, 779–791. [Google Scholar]
  60. Dornan, D.; Wertz, I.; Shimizu, H.; Arnott, D.; Frantz, G.D.; Dowd, P.; O'Rourke, K.; Koeppen, H.; Dixit, V.M. The ubiquitin ligase COP1 is a critical negative regulator of p53. Nature 2004, 429, 86–92. [Google Scholar]
  61. Dornan, D.; Bheddah, S.; Newton, K.; Ince, W.; Frantz, G.D.; Dowd, P.; Koeppen, H.; Dixit, V.M.; French, D.M. COP1, the negative regulator of p53, is overexpressed in breast and ovarian adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 7226–7230. [Google Scholar]
  62. Li, M.; Chen, D.; Shiloh, A.; Luo, J.; Nikolaev, A.Y.; Qin, J.; Gu, W. Deubiquitination of p53 by HAUSP is an important pathway for p53 stabilization. Nature 2002, 416, 648–653. [Google Scholar]
  63. Moll, U.M.; LaQuaglia, M.; Benard, J.; Riou, G. Wild-type p53 protein undergoes cytoplasmic sequestration in undifferentiated neuroblastomas but not in differentiated tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 4407–4411. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ostermeyer, A.G.; Runko, E.; Winkfield, B. Cytoplasmically sequestered wild- type p53 protein in neuroblastoma is relocated to the nucleus by a C-terminal peptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 15190–15194. [Google Scholar]
  65. Yamamoto, H.; Ozaki, T.; Nakanishi, M.; Kikuchi, H.; Yoshida, K.; Horie, H.; Kuwano, H.; Nakagawara, A. Oxidative stress induces p53- dependent apoptosis in hepatoblastoma cell through its nuclear translocation. Genes Cells 2007, 12, 461–471. [Google Scholar]
  66. Becker, K.; Marchenko, N.D.; Maurice, M.; Moll, U.M. Hyperubiquitylation of wild-type p53 contributes to cytoplasmic sequestration in neuroblastoma. Cell Death. Differ. 2007, 14, 1350–1360. [Google Scholar]
  67. Nikolaev, A.Y.; Li, M.; Puskas, N.; Jun Qin, J.; Gu, W. Parc: A cytoplasmic anchor for p53. Cell 2003, 112, 29–40. [Google Scholar]
  68. Mihara, M.; Erster, S.; Zaika, A.; Petrenko, O.; Chittenden, T.; Pancoska, P.; Moll, U.M. p53 has a direct apoptogenic role at the mitochondria. Mol. Cell 2003, 11, 577–590. [Google Scholar]
  69. Marchenko, N.D.; Wolff, S.; Erster, S.; Becker, K.; Moll, U.M. Monoubiquitylation promotes mitochondrial p53 translocation. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 923–934. [Google Scholar]
  70. Becker, K.; Marchenko, N.D.; Palacios, G.; Moll, U.M. A role of HAUSP in tumor suppression in a human colon carcinoma xenograft model. Cell Cycle 2008, 7, 1205–1213. [Google Scholar]
  71. El-Deiry, W.S.; Tokino, T.; Velculescu, V.E.; Levy, D.B.; Parsons, R.; Trent, J.M.; Lin, D.; Mercer, W.E.; Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B. WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 1993, 75, 817–825. [Google Scholar]
  72. Harper, J.W.; Adami, G.R.; Wei, N.; Keyomarsi, K.; Elledge, S.J. The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell 1993, 75, 805–816. [Google Scholar]
  73. Xiong, Y.; Hannon, G.J.; Zhang, H.; Casso, D.; Kobayashi, R.; Beach, D. p21 is a universal inhibitor of cyclin kinases. Nature 1993, 366, 701–704. [Google Scholar]
  74. Noda, A.; Ning, Y.; Venable, S.F.; Pereira-Smith, O.M.; Smith, J.R. Cloning of senescent cell-derived inhibitors of DNA synthesis using an expression screen. Exp. Cell Res. 1994, 211, 90–98. [Google Scholar]
  75. Hermeking, H.; Lengauer, C.; Polyak, K.; He, T.C.; Zhang, L.; Thiagalingam, S.; Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B. 14-3-3 sigma is a p53-regulated inhibitor of G2/M progression. Mol. Cell 1997, 1, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  76. Yang, H.Y.; Wen, Y.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Lozano, G.; Lee, M.H. 14-3-3 sigma positively regulates p53 and suppresses tumor growth. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 7096–7107. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ohki, R.; Nemoto, J.; Murasawa, H.; Oda, E.; Inazawa, J.; Tanaka, N.; Taniguchi, T. Reprimo, a new candidate mediator of the p53-mediated cell cycle arrest at the G2 phase. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 22627–22630. [Google Scholar]
  78. Tanaka, H.; Arakawa, H.; Yamaguchi, T.; Shiraishi, K.; Fukuda, S.; Matsui, K.; Takei, Y.; Nakamura, Y. A ribonucleotide reductase gene involved in a p53-dependent cell-cycle checkpoint for DNA damage. Nature 2000, 404, 42–49. [Google Scholar]
  79. Barak, Y.; Juven, T.; Haffner, R.; Oren, M. mdm2 expression is induced by wild type p53 activity. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 461–468. [Google Scholar]
  80. Selvakumaran, M.; Lin, H.K.; Miyashita, T.; Wang, H.G.; Krajewski, S.; Reed, J.C.; Hoffman, B.; Liebermann, D. Immediate early up-regulation of bax expression by p53 but not TGF beta 1: A paradigm for distinct apoptotic pathways. Oncogene 1994, 9, 1791–1798. [Google Scholar]
  81. Green, D.R. At the gates of death. Cancer Cell 2006, 9, 328–330. [Google Scholar]
  82. Oda, K.; Arakawa, H.; Tanaka, T.; Matsuda, K.; Tanikawa, C.; Mori, T.; Nishimori, H.; Tamai, K.; Tokino, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Taya, Y. p53AIP1, a potential mediator of p53- dependent apoptosis, and its regulation by Ser-46-phosphorylated p53. Cell 2000, 102, 849–862. [Google Scholar]
  83. Matsuda, K.; Yoshida, K.; Taya, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Arakawa, H. p53AIP1 regulates the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 2883–2889. [Google Scholar]
  84. Oda, E.; Ohki, R.; Murasawa, H.; Nemoto, J.; Shibue, T.; Yamashita, T.; Tokino, T.; Taniguchi, T.; Tanaka, N. Noxa, a BH3-only member of the Bcl-2 family and candidate mediator of p53-induced apoptosis. Science 2000, 288, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar]
  85. Seo, Y.W.; Shin, J.N.; Ko, K.H.; Cha, J.H.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, B.R.; Yun, C.W.; Kim, Y.M.; Seol, D.W.; Kim, D.W.; Yin, X.M.; Kim, T.H. The molecular mechanism of Noxa-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in p53-mediated cell death. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 48292–48199. [Google Scholar]
  86. Yu, J.; Zhang, L.; Hwang, P.M.; Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B. PUMA induces the rapid apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells. Mol. Cell 2001, 7, 673–682. [Google Scholar]
  87. Nakano, K.; Vousden, K.H. PUMA, a novel proapoptotic gene, is induced by p53. Mol. Cell 2001, 7, 683–694. [Google Scholar]
  88. Jeffers, J.R. Puma is an essential mediator of p53-dependent and - independent apoptotic pathways. Cancer Cell 2003, 4, 321–328. [Google Scholar]
  89. Piette, J.; Neel, H.; Marechal, V. Mdm2: keeping p53 under control. Oncogene 1997, 15, 1001–1010. [Google Scholar]
  90. Haneda, M.; Kojima, E.; Nishikimi, A.; Hasegawa, T.; Nakashima, I.; Isobe, K. Protein phosphatase 1, but not protein phosphatase 2A, dephosphorylates DNA-damaging stress-induced phospho-serine 15 of p53. FEBS Lett. 2004, 567, 171–174. [Google Scholar]
  91. Li, H.H.; Cai, X.; Shouse, G.P.; Piluso, L.G.; Liu, X. A specific PP2A regulatory subunit, B56gamma, mediates DNA damage-induced dephosphorylation of p53 at Thr55. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 402–411. [Google Scholar]
  92. Khanna, K.K.; Keating, K.E.; Kozlov, S.; Scott, S.; Gatei, M.; Hobson, K.; Taya, Y.; Gabrielli, B.; Chan, D.; Lees-Miller, S.P.; Lavin, M.F. ATM associates with and phosphorylates p53: Mapping the region of interaction. Nat. Genet. 1998, 20, 398–400. [Google Scholar]
  93. Tibbetts, R.S.; Brumbaugh, K.M.; Williams, J.M.; Sarkaria, J.N.; Cliby, W.A.; Shieh, S.Y.; Taya, Y.; Prives, C.; Abraham, R.T. A role for ATR in the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 152–157. [Google Scholar]
  94. Goudelock, D.M.; Jiang, K.; Pereira, E.; Russell, B.; Sanchez, Y. Regulatory interactions between the checkpoint kinase Chk1 and the proteins of the DNA-dependent protein kinase complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 29940–29947. [Google Scholar]
  95. Shieh, S.Y.; Taya, Y.; Prives, C. DNA damage-inducible phosphorylation of p53 at N-terminal sites including a novel site, Ser20, requires tetramerization. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 1815–1823. [Google Scholar]
  96. Craig, A.; Scott, M.; Burch, L.; Smith, G.; Ball, K.; Hupp, T. Allosteric effects mediate CHK2 phosphorylation of the p53 transactivation domain. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4, 787–792. [Google Scholar]
  97. Xie, S.; Wang, Q.; Wu, H.; Cogswell, J.; Lu, L.; Jhanwar-Uniyal, M.; Dai, W. Reactive oxygen species-induced phosphorylation of p53 on serine 20 is mediated in part by polo-like kinase-3. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 36194–36199. [Google Scholar]
  98. D'Orazi, G.; Cecchinelli, B.; Bruno, T.; Manni, I.; Higashimoto, Y.; Saito, S.; Gostissa, M.; Coen, S.; Marchetti, A.; Del Sal, G.; Piaggio, G.; Fanciulli, M.; Appella, E.; Soddu, S. Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser 46 and mediates apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  99. Yoshida, K.; Liu, H.; Miki, Y. Protein kinase C delta regulates Ser46 phosphorylation of p53 tumor suppressor in the apoptotic response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 5734–40. [Google Scholar]
  100. Herrmann, C.P.; Kraiss, S.; Montenarh, M. Association of casein kinase II with immunopurified p53. Oncogene 1991, 6, 877–884. [Google Scholar]
  101. Delphin, C.; Huang, K.P.; Scotto, C.; Chapel, A.; Vincon, M.; Chambaz, E.; Garin, J.; Baudier, J. The in vitro phosphorylation of p53 by calcium-dependent protein kinase C--characterization of a protein-kinase-C- binding site on p53. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997, 245, 684–692. [Google Scholar]
  102. Hupp, T.R.; Meek, D.W.; Midgley, C.A.; Lane, D.P. Regulation of the specific DNA binding function of p53. Cell 1992, 71, 875–886. [Google Scholar]
  103. Friend, S. p53: A glimpse at the puppet behind the shadow play. Science 1994, 265, 334–335. [Google Scholar]
  104. Ando, K.; Ohira, M.; Ozaki, T.; Nakagawa, A.; Akazawa, K.; Suenaga, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Koda, T.; Kamijo, T.; Murakami, Y.; Nakagawara, A. Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) inhibits p53 function by physical interaction and phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 25549–25561. [Google Scholar]
  105. Shikama, N.; Lee, C.W.; France, S.; Delavaine, L.; Lyon, J.; Krstic-Demonacos, M.; La Thangue, N.B. A novel cofactor for p300 that regulates the p53 response. Mol. Cell 1999, 4, 365–376. [Google Scholar]
  106. Sakaguchi, K.; Herrera, J.E.; Saito, S.; Miki, T.; Bustin, M.; Vassilev, A.; Anderson, C.W.; Appella, E. DNA damage activates p53 through a phosphorylation-acetylation cascade. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 2831–2841. [Google Scholar]
  107. Yuan, Z.M.; Huang, Y.; Ishiko, T.; Nakada, S.; Utsugisawa, T.; Shioya, H.; Utsugisawa, Y.; Yokoyama, K.; Weichselbaum, R.; Shi, Y.; Kufe, D. Role for p300 in stabilization of p53 in the response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 1883–1886. [Google Scholar]
  108. Michishita, E.; Park, J.Y.; Burneskis, J.M.; Barrett, J.C.; Horikawa, I. Evolutionarily conserved and nonconserved cellular localizations and functions of human SIRT proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16, 4623–4635. [Google Scholar]
  109. Kawai, H.; Nie, L.; Wiederschain, D.; Yuan, Z.M. Dual role of p300 in the regulation of p53 stability. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 45928–45932. [Google Scholar]
  110. Ferguson, A.T.; Evron, E.; Umbricht, C.B.; Pandita, T.K.; Chan, T.A.; Hermeking, H.; Marks, J.R.; Lambers, A.R.; Futreal, P.A.; Stampfer, M.R.; Sukumar, S. High frequency of hypermethylation at the 14-3-3 sigma locus leads to gene silencing in breast cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 6049–6054. [Google Scholar]
  111. Suzuki, H.; Itoh, F.; Toyota, M.; Kikuchi, T.; Kakiuchi, H.; Imai, K. Inactivation of the 14-3-3 sigma gene is associated with 5′ CpG island hypermethylation in human cancers. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 4353–4357. [Google Scholar]
  112. Iwata, N.; Yamamoto, H.; Sasaki, S.; Itoh, F.; Suzuki, H.; Kikuchi, T.; Kaneto, H.; Iku, S.; Ozeki, I.; Karino, Y.; Satoh, T.; Toyota, J.; Satoh, M.; Endo, T.; Imai, K. Frequent hypermethylation of CpG islands and loss of expression of the 14-3-3 sigma gene in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 2000, 19, 5298–5302. [Google Scholar]
  113. Samuels-Lev, Y.; O'Connor, D.J.; Bergamaschi, D.; Trigiante, G.; Hsieh, J.K.; Zhong, S.; Campargue, I.; Naumovski, L.; Crook, T.; Lu, X. ASPP proteins specifically stimulate the apoptotic function of p53. Mol. Cell 2001, 8, 781–794. [Google Scholar]
  114. Iwabuchi, K.; Bartel, P.L.; Li, B.; Marraccino, R.; Fields, S. Two cellular proteins that bind to wild-type but not mutant p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 6098–6102. [Google Scholar]
  115. Iwabuchi, K.; Li, B.; Massa, H.F.; Trask, B.J.; Date, T.; Fields, S. Stimulation of p53-mediated transcriptional activation by the p53-binding proteins, 53BP1 and 53BP2. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 26061–26061. [Google Scholar]
  116. Rappold, I.; Iwabuchi, K.; Date, T.; Chen, J. Tumor suppressor p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is involved in DNA damage-signaling pathways. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153, 613–620. [Google Scholar]
  117. Ozaki, T.; Nagase, T.; Ichimiya, S.; Seki, N.; Ohiri, M.; Nomura, N.; Takada, N.; Sakiyama, S.; Weber, B.L.; Nakagawara, A. NFBD1/KIAA0170 is a novel nuclear transcriptional transactivator with BRCT domain. DNA Cell Biol. 2000, 19, 475–485. [Google Scholar]
  118. Stewart, G.S.; Wang, B.; Bignell, C.R.; Taylor, A.M.; Elledge, S.J. MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint. Nature 2003, 421, 961–966. [Google Scholar]
  119. Goldberg, M.; Stucki, M.; Falck, J.; D'Amours, D.; Rahman, D.; Pappin, D.; Bartek, J.; Jackson, S.P. MDC1 is required for the intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint. Nature 2003, 421, 952–956. [Google Scholar]
  120. Lou, Z.; Minter-Dykhouse, K.; Wu, X.; Chen, J. MDC1 is coupled to activated CHK2 in mammalian DNA damage response pathways. Nature 2003, 421, 957–961. [Google Scholar]
  121. Lou, Z.; Minter-Dykhouse, K.; Franco, S.; Gostissa, M.; Rivera, M.A.; Celeste, A.; Manis, J.P.; van Deursen, J.; Nussenzweig, A.; Paull, T.T.; Alt, F.W.; Chen, J. MDC1 maintains genomic stability by participating in the amplification of ATM-dependent DNA damage signals. Mol. Cell 2006, 21, 187–200. [Google Scholar]
  122. Nakanishi, M.; Ozaki, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Hanamoto, T.; Kikuchi, H.; Furuya, K.; Asaka, M.; Delia, D.; Nakagawara, A. NFBD1/MDC1 associates with p53 and regulates its function at the crossroad between cell survival and death in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 22993–23004. [Google Scholar]
  123. Ito, Y. RUNX genes in development and cancer: regulation of viral gene expression and the discovery of RUNX family genes. Adv. Cancer Res. 2008, 99, 33–76. [Google Scholar]
  124. Li, Q.L.; Ito, K.; Sakakura, C.; Fukamachi, H.; Inoue, K.; Chi, X.Z.; Lee, K.Y.; Nomura, S.; Lee, C.W.; Han, S.B.; et al. Causal relationship between the loss of RUNX3 expression and gastric cancer. Cell 2002, 109, 113–124. [Google Scholar]
  125. Yamada, C.; Ozaki, T.; Ando, K.; Suenaga, Y.; Inoue, K.; Ito, Y.; Okoshi, R.; Kageyama, H.; Kimura, H.; Miyazaki, M.; Nakagawara, A. RUNX3 modulates DNA damage- mediated phosphorylation of tumor suppressor p53 at Ser-15 and acts as a co-activator for p53. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 16693–16703. [Google Scholar]
  126. Yin, Y.; Stephen, C.W.; Luciani, M.G.; Fahraeus, R. p53 Stability and activity is regulated by Mdm2-mediated induction of alternative p53 translation products. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, 462–467. [Google Scholar]
  127. Bourdon, J.C.; Fernandes, K.; Murray-Zmijewski, F.; Liu, G.; Diot, A.; Xirodimas, D.P.; Saville, M.K.; Lane, D.P. p53 isoforms can regulate p53 transcriptional activity. Genes Dev. 2005, 19, 2122–2137. [Google Scholar]
  128. Bourdon, J.C. p53 Family isoforms. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2007, 8, 332–336. [Google Scholar]
  129. Fisher, D.E. Apoptosis in cancer therapy: crossing the threshold. Cell 1994, 78, 539–542. [Google Scholar]
  130. Vassilev, L.T.; Vu, B.T.; Graves, B.; Carvajal, D.; Podlaski, F.; Filipovic, Z.; Kong, N.; Kammlott, U.; Lukacs, C.; Klein, C.; Fotouhi, N.; Liu, E.A. In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Science 2004, 303, 844–848. [Google Scholar]
  131. Azmi, A.S.; Philip, P.A.; Beck, F.W.; Wang, Z.; Banerjee, S.; Wang, S.; Yang, D.; Sarkar, F.H.; Mohammad, R.M. MI-219-zinc combination: a new paradigm in MDM2 inhibitor-based therapy. Oncogene 2011, 30, 117–126. [Google Scholar]
  132. Vitali, R.; Cesi, V.; Tanno, B.; Ferrari-Amorotti, G.; Dominici, C.; Calabretta, B.; Raschella, G. Activation of p53-dependent responses in tumor cells treated with a PARC-interacting peptide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 368, 350–356. [Google Scholar]
  133. Bykov, V.J.; Issaeva, N.; Shilov, A.; Hultcrantz, M.; Pugacheva, E.; Chumakov, P.; Bergman, J.; Wiman, K.G.; Selivanova, G. Restoration of the tumor suppressor function to mutant p53 by a low-molecular-weight compound. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 282–288. [Google Scholar]
  134. Lambert, J.M.; Gorzov, P.; Veprintsev, D.B.; Soderqvist, M.; Segelback, D.; Bergman, J.; Fersht, A.R.; Hainaut, P.; Wiman, K.G.; Bykov, V.J. PRIMA-1 reactivates mutant p53 by covalent binding to the core domain. Cancer Cell 2009, 15, 376–388. [Google Scholar]
Back to TopTop