Next Article in Journal
Pattern of Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Individual Stations in Middle and Lower Gastric Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Accurate and Fast Deep Learning Dose Prediction for a Preclinical Microbeam Radiation Therapy Study Using Low-Statistics Monte Carlo Simulations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 7
10.3390/cancers15072138
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

miR-146a-5p Promotes Angiogenesis and Confers Trastuzumab Resistance in HER2+ Breast Cancer

by
Paula Cabello
1,2,†,
Sandra Torres-Ruiz
1,†,
Anna Adam-Artigues
1,
Jaume Forés-Martos
1,
María Teresa Martínez
1,3,
Cristina Hernando
1,3,
Sandra Zazo
4,
Juan Madoz-Gúrpide
4,
Ana Rovira
5,6,7,
Octavio Burgués
1,5,8,
Federico Rojo
4,5,
Joan Albanell
5,6,7,
Ana Lluch
1,3,5,9,
Begoña Bermejo
1,3,5,
Juan Miguel Cejalvo
1,3,5,* and
Pilar Eroles
1,5,10,11,*
1
Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, 46010 Valencia, Spain
2
International University of Valencia—VIU, 46002 Valencia, Spain
3
Department of Medical Oncology, University Clinical Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
4
Department of Pathology, Jiménez Díaz Foundation, 28040 Madrid, Spain
5
Center for Biomedical Network Research on Cancer (CIBERONC), 28040 Madrid, Spain
6
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital del Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
7
Cancer Research Program, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
8
Department of Pathology, University Clinical Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
9
Department of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
10
Department of Physiology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
11
Department of Biotechnology, Polytechnic University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2023, 15(7), 2138; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15072138
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 17 March 2023 / Accepted: 31 March 2023 / Published: 4 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Biomarkers)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Resistance to anti-HER2+ therapy remains the main clinical challenge in the management of the HER2+ breast cancer subtype. The objective of our study was to analyze the involvement of microRNAs in the resistance to trastuzumab. We identified miR-146a-5p as the major dysregulated microRNA among parental and trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ breast cancer cells. The gain- and loss-of-function of this miRNA modulates resistance to trastuzumab in vitro, and elevated levels of miR-146a-5p in the primary tumor have been associated with a poor prognosis. In addition, exosomes from trastuzumab-resistant cells contain high levels of miR-146a-5p, and may reduce the effect of trastuzumab on sensitive cancer cells, increasing the expression of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers and the capacities for migration and angiogenesis. The results of this study demonstrate for the first time the involvement of miR-146a-5p in resistance to trastuzumab, and suggest that exosomes play an important role in this process.

Abstract

Trastuzumab treatment has significantly improved the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Despite this, resistance to therapy still remains the main clinical challenge. In order to evaluate the implication of microRNAs in the trastuzumab response, we performed a microRNA array in parental and acquired trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines. Our results identified miR-146a-5p as the main dysregulated microRNA. Interestingly, high miR-146a-5p expression in primary tumor tissue significantly correlated with shorter disease-free survival in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. The gain- and loss-of-function of miR-146a-5p modulated the response to trastuzumab. Furthermore, the overexpression of miR-146a-5p increased migration and angiogenesis, and promoted cell cycle progression by reducing CDKN1A expression. Exosomes from trastuzumab-resistant cells showed a high level of miR-146a-5p expression compared with the parental cells. In addition, the co-culture with resistant cells’ exosomes was able to decrease in sensitivity and increase the migration capacities in trastuzumab-sensitive cells, as well as angiogenesis in HUVEC-2 cells. Collectively, these data support the role of miR-146a-5p in resistance to trastuzumab, and demonstrate that it can be transferred by exosomes conferring resistance properties to other cells.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer in the world, and together with lung cancer, is the main reason for why women die of cancer [1]. Around 15–20% of breast tumors overexpress the HER2 receptor, and this subtype presents a poor prognosis and a low overall survival (OS) due to its high proliferation and ability to metastasize [2,3]. The main targeted treatment for HER2-positive (HER2+) BC patients is trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody which directly neutralizes the amplified HER2 receptor and blocks its signaling [3,4]. This therapy has improved the prognosis of HER2+ BC in the last few decades. However, there is still a group of patients that experience resistance to this treatment [5,6,7]. Several genetic mutations are well-known to be related to trastuzumab resistance [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. However, the implication of epigenetics in trastuzumab resistance still needs a deeper exploration.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNAs capable of regulating gene expression, and therefore, numerous cellular processes [15,16]. In a number of cancers, miRNAs have already shown promise, both as therapeutic agents and as biomarkers for prognosis and prediction [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Similar to this, basal-like and luminal BC subtypes have been shown to present molecular signatures of differentially expressed miRNAs [24,25] that can be used to categorize the statuses of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2/neu receptor [26,27,28].
Moreover, exosomes are small extracellular vesicles of size 40–130 nm released by almost all cell types, that mediate intercellular communication. These vesicles carry different molecules from the releasing cell, mostly proteins, miRNAs, lipids, and metabolites for cell-to-cell communication. This process is dysregulated in many tumoral processes and can promote malignancy. It has been described that exosomes from tumor cells can activate angiogenesis [29,30] and alter the tumor microenvironment to increase its aggressiveness [31], or to form a metastatic niche in different types of cancer [29]. Exosomes can also mediate the horizontal transmission of resistance to chemotherapy between cells [32,33], suggesting a new and faster mechanism for transmitting resistance, other than cell division. Furthermore, exosomes can provide information about the tumor via a minimally invasive liquid biopsy procedure, and they might also be potential targets to inhibit their supporting function in the development of tumors [34,35].
This work aimed to study the miRNAs involved in trastuzumab resistance, as well as to its transmission by exosomes in HER2+ BC. To address this issue, we studied the differential expression between parental and acquired trastuzumab-resistant cell lines, and the most promising miRNA was also analyzed in HER2+ BC patients’ samples. We also evaluated its role in different pathways in order to describe its mechanism of action, as well as its presence in exosomes. The results show a new epigenetic mechanism leading resistance to trastuzumab through miR-146a-5p and its transmission by exosomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Lines and Culture

The human HER2+ BC cell lines SKBR3, BT474, and the acquired trastuzumab-resistant SKBR3 (SKBR3r) and BT474 (BT474r) were obtained from FR’s group at the Foundación Jiménez Díaz Hospital (Madrid). Cell lines were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle medium nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12) with 2.5 mM L-Glutamine and 15 mM HEPES (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/L streptomycin). SKBR3r and BT474r cells were generated via culture with 15 μg/mL trastuzumab for 6–12 months [36], and cultured with that constant concentration of trastuzumab. Cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Thermo Fisher Scientific provided BD Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC-2) (#10683493, Corning, Corning, NY, USA), which were grown in EGM-2 medium (Lonza, Durham, NC, USA).

2.2. miRNA Microarray and miRNA Target Prediction

Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Assay LabChip® and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer equipment were used to assess the integrity of total RNA (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Then, the microarray assay was carried out using an Affymetrix GeneChip™ miRNA 4.0 Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Affymetrix GeneChip™ miRNA 4.0 microarrays were prepared by the University of Valencia’s genomic and epigenetic section. Statistical analysis for evaluating differential expression was performed in R software using the samr package and applying the SAM (Significance Analysis of Microarrays) method. Significance cut-off was determined using the delta adjustment parameter, selected by the user based on the false positive rate (FDR). To analyze the specific targets of miRNAs, miRWalk2.0 software was used. These target genes were implemented in DIANA-miRPath 2.1 for showing the KEGG pathways most closely associated with them.

2.3. miRNA Mimics/Inhibitors and siRNA Transfection

A 50 nM concentration of miRNA mimic or inhibitor (hsa-miR-146a-5p mirVana® mimic #MC10722 and hsa-miR-146a-5p mirVana® inhibitor #MH10722, Ambion Inc., Austin, TX, USA) was transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions. A 50 nM concentration of scramble, a random sequence miRNA molecule, served as a miRNA negative transfection control (#4464059, Ambion). For mRNA knockdown, 100 nM of CDKN1A Silencer® siRNA (#1624, Ambion) and CDKN1A#2 Silencer® siRNA (#1531, Ambion) was transfected as explained. The transfection medium was replaced with complete medium after 6 h. All the experiments were carried out 48 or 72 h after transfection, except for the proliferation assay carried out at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h, or at 7 days for trastuzumab treatment.

2.4. Cell Viability Assay

SKBR3/SKBR3r and BT474/BT474r cells were seeded at an initial density of 3 × 103 cells in 96-well plates and treated with 15 μg/mL trastuzumab (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) for 7 days with or without the prior transfection of miRNA mimics/inhibitors, silencers, or co-culture with exosomes. Cell viability was measured using an MTT-based Cell Growth Determination Kit (#GDC1, Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm, with a background correction of 690 nm. The percentage of the number of cells from each group was referenced to the controls.

2.5. Clinical Samples

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from human HER2+ BC primary tumor tissues were selected through the Pathology Department of the Hospital Clínico de Valencia (n = 33) from the INCLIVA Biobank collection. Patients were treated with chemotherapy + anti-HER2 (trastuzumab ± pertuzumab) for 6 months prior to surgery. The clinical information is summarized in Table 1. The study was approved by the INCLIVA institutional review board (2018/077) and followed the ethical guidelines (Declaration of Helsinki). All participants provided written informed consent to take part in the study.

2.6. RNA Isolation

Total RNA from cell lines was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total RNA from tissue block samples of BC patients was isolated using the RecoverAll Total Nucleic Acid Kit (Ambion). A NanoDrop spectrophotometer was used to check the purity ratios and to measure the RNA concentrations.

2.7. miRNA and Messenger RNA (mRNA) Expression via Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

A total of 1000 ng of RNA was retrotranscribed into cDNA using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit for genes (ThermoFisher Scientific) and the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit for miRNAs (ThermoFisher Scientific). miRNA and mRNA expression levels were analyzed using specific commercial Taqman probes from Applied Biosystems (ThermoFisher Scientific) (#000468 for miR-146a-5p, #Hs00355782 for CDKN1A, #Hs01030099 for CCNB1, #Hs00958111 for VIM, and #Hs01549976 for FN1), and the commercial solution TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) and TaqMan Universal MasterMIx II, no UNG (Applied Biosystems) for mRNA and miRNA, respectively. All samples were analyzed in triplicate, and the QuantStudio Thermocycler (Applied Byosistems) was programmed specifically. The Ct of every gene or miRNA of interest were normalized to its endogenous control (ΔCt). The endogenous control for genes was GAPDH (#Hs03929097, Applied Biosystems). Nucleolar RNA RNU43 and miR-16a (#001095 and #000391, respectively, Applied Biosystems) were used as the endogenous controls of miRNAs, and only miR-16a for miRNAs present in exosomes. Relative expression was quantified using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

2.8. Exosome Isolation and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Analysis

Conditioned media was collected after 24 h, and cell debris was removed by centrifuging it at 2000× g for 30 min. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube (#355642, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C using break at deceleration. The supernatant containing exosomes was centrifuged at 100,000× g for 90 min at 4 °C using a Beckman 70 Ti Rotor into the Beckman Optima IE-80K Ultracentrifuge, and the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of 0.2 µm filtered phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Exosomes were subsequently washed at 100,000× g for 90 min, and after discarding the supernatant, the final pellet was resuspended in 100 µL of PBS and stored at −80 °C. Then, 10 µL volumes of exosome sample were immediately incubated in 4% paraformaldehyde for fixation for TEM preparation, which consisted of double staining the sample with 20 min of 0.5% uranyl acetate and 10 min of 3% lead citrate on a 400-mesh copper grid. A JEOL JEM1010 TEM was used at 80 kV, and an automatic exposure time was used to observe the grids containing the exosomes.
All experiments with exosomes were performed, adding exosomes at a concentration of 100 µg/mL to the cell cultures, and using exosome-depleted FBS (FBS was also ultracentrifuged at 100,000× g for 18 h for this purpose).

2.9. Exosome Internalization

Exosomes were labeled with DiD fluorescent lipophilic membrane dye (#D307, ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The labeled exosomes were resuspended in DMEM and added to the cell cultures at a final concentration of 100 µg/mL for 3 h. The cell cultures were previously exposed or not to 15 μg/mL of trastuzumab. The fluorescence of the cells was subsequently quantified via flow cytometry using a Flow Cytometer BD LSRFortessa™ (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Data were analyzed with BD FACSDiva X-20 software (BD Biosciences).

2.10. Western Blot

Cells were lysed using RIPA Lysis and Extraction Buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific), including anti-protease and anti-phosphatase reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific), and sonicated in 5 pulses of 10 seconds at 40% amplitude for protein extraction. Protein quantification was performed using the commercial kit Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The proteins were resolved on a 10% SDS–polyacrylamide gel using 30 µg per well, and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane, then blocked for 1 h in 5% powder milk with 1× TBS and 0.1% Tween-20 (#P9416-100ML, Sigma-Aldrich), and incubated with the antibodies CDKN1A 1:1000 (#1672947S, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), CCNB1 1:1000 (#4138S, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), CDH1 1:1000 (#610181, BD Biosciences), CDH2 1:1000 (#4061S, Cell Signaling), Fibronectin 1:1000 (#32419, Abcam), VIM 1:1000 (#550513, BD), VEGFR2 1:1000 (#ab39638, Abcam), Calnexins 1:1000 (#ab22595, Abcam), CD9 1:500 (#ab92726, Abcam), Tsg-101 1:1000 (#ab125011, Abcam), EpCAM 1:1000 (#324207, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and GAPDH 1:1000 (#MA5-15738, Invitrogen) diluted in 5% powder milk in 1× TBS-Tween (TBS-T) overnight at 4 °C with agitation. The membranes were washed in TBS-T 3 times for 5 min, and then incubated in the corresponding secondary antibody (anti-Rabbit (#1677074S, Cell Signaling) or anti-Mouse (#1677076S, Cell Signaling), diluted 1:2000 in 1% milk in TBST-T). Pierce TM ECL Western Blotting Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used for protein detection.

2.11. Cell Cycle Analysis

To analyze the cell cycle, 3 × 104 cells were seeded in 6-well plates in triplicate for each condition. At 48 h after transfection, cells were harvested with trypsin, washed twice with PBS, and later fixed with 70% cold ethanol and incubated at −20 °C overnight. The cells were resuspended in 10 μg/mL propidium iodide and incubated for 30 min at room temperature before analysis via flow cytometry using a Flow Cytometer BD LSRFortessa™ (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FlowJo V10 (FlowJo LLC, BD Biosciences).

2.12. Wound-Healing Assay

SKBR3 or SKBR3r were seeded at 100% confluence. After 16 h of serum starvation, a wound was performed with a pipette tip, and cells were washed and subsequently treated with either 50 nM miR-146a-5p mimic, 100 nM CDKN1A silencer, 100 µg/mL exosomes, or PBS in FBS-free culture medium. Cells were allowed to migrate, and pictures were taken in triplicate at 0 h and 48 h with a microscope at 5× magnification. Images were analyzed using Image J to measure the areas devoid of cells.

2.13. Angiogenesis Assay

A 120 µL volume of Matrigel (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) per well was plated in a 48-well plate. Each well was filled with 1 mL endothelial media or CM from SKBR3 miR-146a-5p mimic, siCDKN1, or scramble transfected cells, and 3 × 104 HUVEC-2 cells were seeded on top in a spiral motion for even distribution. Each condition was assayed in triplicate, and 5 pictures per well were taken after 8 h at 10× magnification. ImageJ was used for the analysis. Using the straight-line tab, the networks were traced out, and the nodes and lengths were counted and measured, subsequently adding the results from each image. The average for each well was calculated.

2.14. Survival Analysis

The prognostic value of miR-146a-5p was evaluated in a cohort of patients from the Hospital Clínico de Valencia, and in 608 HER2+ BC patients from the METABRIC database, using the Kaplan-Meier Plotter (https://kmplot.com/analysis/ (accessed on 25 March 2020)) [37]. Patients were classified based on the median miR-146a-5p expression in primary tumor samples, and Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted. The p-value was calculated using the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.

2.15. TCGA Data Analysis

The data of CDKN1A and CCNB1 expression were obtained from the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) Xena Cancer Browser database (https://xenabrowser.net (accessed on 25 January 2021)). In total, 333 TCGA BC patients were classified based on the median miR-146a-5p expression in tumor samples, and CKDN1A and CCNB1 expression were represented. The p-value was calculated using the Mann-Whitney test, and normality was verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test.

2.16. Statistical Analysis

An analysis of the results was carried out using R and GraphPad Prism 8. All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to test for normality. Mean comparisons were performed using a two-tailed Student’s t-test for normal distribution, and the Mann-Whitney U test for abnormal distribution. An ANOVA test was used to identify the miRNAs differentially expressed between SKBR3r and SKBR3, or BT474r and BT474, from the Affymetrix GeneChip™ miRNA 4.0 Array data. Every experiment was performed in technical and biological triplicate for each condition. p-values of under 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. miR-146a Is Upregulated in Trastuzumab-Resistant Cells

A total of 6631 human miRNAs/pre-miRNAs were analyzed for expression using the Affymetrix GeneChip™ miRNA 4.0 Array for SKBR3/SKBR3r and BT474/BT474r cells. RNA integrity and quality were evaluated, and every sample used showed a RIN number of higher than 8. The Kernel density estimator showed a high symmetry for our cell samples (Supplementary Figure S1A). Furthermore, box plots of the expression variability inside each array and across the samples showed excellent symmetry, with their median values being around 1. (Supplementary Figure S1B). Biological triplicates for each BC cell line presented a similar miRNA profile and clustered together in the heatmap representation. The ANOVA test evidenced significant differences in 265 miRNAs expressed between SKBR3 and SKBR3r, while 261 were differentially expressed in the case of BT474 and BT474r (p < 0.05). After adjusting for biologically significant fold-change (linear fold-change resistant versus parental > 2 and <−2) 4 and 16 miRNAs remained biologically significant in SKBR3/SKBR3r and BT474/BT474r, respectively (Figure 1A). From these significantly dysregulated miRNAs, MIMAT0000449 (miR-146a-5p) had the biggest fold-change (5.1 times higher) in SKBR3r compared to SKBR3, and was a commonly dysregulated miRNA in SKBR3 and BT474 cells (Supplementary Table S1A,B). miR-146a-5p differential expression between the parental and resistant cell lines obtained from the array (Figure 1B) was confirmed via RT-qPCR (p = 0.0002 for SKBR3 and p < 0.0001 for BT474) (Figure 1C).

3.2. High Expression of miR-146a-5p Associated with Relapse and Shorter Disease-Free Survival in HER2+ BC Patients

To test the hypothesis of the potential association of miR-146a-5p overexpression with resistance to trastuzumab, its expression was analyzed in a cohort of HER2+ BC patients’ samples from the Hospital Clínico de Valencia. Patients who relapsed after the trastuzumab-containing treatment showed significantly increased miR-146a-5p expression compared to patients who remained disease-free after therapy (p = 0.040) (Figure 2A). Kaplan-Meier curves were also assessed to analyze their prognostic value, and the results showed a significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) in HER2+ BC patients with a high expression of miR-146a-5p, compared to those with lower miR-146a-5p levels (Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.677, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.040–6.018, p = 0.043) (Figure 2B). Patients with a high expression of miR-146a-5p also showed a lower OS than patients with a low expression, although it did not reach significance (HR = 3.494, 95% CI 0.865–9.368, p = 0.086) (Supplementary Figure S2A). The OS analysis of the miRNA expression data available from the METABRIC database showed the same trend observed in our patients’ cohort. (HR = 1.31, 95% CI 0.99–1.73, p = 0.056) (Supplementary Figure S2B).

3.3. miR-146a-5p Expression Modulates the Trastuzumab Response in HER2+ BC Cell Lines

In order to evaluate trastuzumab response, we first performed proliferation curves with increasing doses of the drug in trastuzumab-resistant and parental cells. The calculated IC50 was significantly higher for SKBR3r and BT474r cells compared to their parental counterparts (p = 0.025 for SKBR3r and p = 0.014 for BT474r), thus confirming the resistance characteristics of these cells (Supplementary Figure S3).
To analyze the potential involvement of miR-146a-5p in the trastuzumab response, parental and resistant cell lines were transfected with either a miR-146a-5p mimic or inhibitor, respectively, and treated or not with 15 μg/mL trastuzumab for 7 days. The results showed that SKBR3 and BT474 cells with miR-146a-5p overexpression significantly reduced its response to trastuzumab (p = 0.011 and p = 0.009, respectively) (Figure 3A). Oppositely, SKBR3r and BT474r cell lines transfected with miR-146a-5p inhibitor significantly increased its response to trastuzumab (p = 0.027 and p = 0.018, respectively) (Figure 3B). The gain- and loss-of-function of miR-146a-5p was confirmed in each experiment (Supplementary Figure S4A) at 48 h and after 7 days (Supplementary Figure S4B).

3.4. miR-146a-5p Overexpression Increases Migration, Angiogenesis, and Proliferation

Given that the resistance to trastuzumab has been previously associated with a mesenchymal-like phenotype [38,39], we next studied the effect of the miR-146a-5p gain-of-function on the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The results showed that the transfection of the miR-146a-5p mimic was able to significantly increase the migration capacity in SKBR3 cells (p = 0.032) (Figure 3C,D). Moreover, it induced the expression of mesenchymal markers (N-cadherin, fibronectin, and vimentin) and reduced the epithelial markers (E-cadherin and EpCAM) (Figure 3E and Figure S5A). In addition, the switch to a vascular phenotype has been related to the trastuzumab resistance of HER2+ BC [40] and the combined targeting of HER2 and VEGFR2, as a potential therapy for HER2+ BC [41]. Based on that, we performed an angiogenesis assay on HUVEC-2 cells treated with conditioned media (CM) from SKBR3 previously transfected with miR-146a-5p mimic or scramble. CM from the SKBR3 cells overexpressing miR-146a-5p significantly increased in angiogenesis (formation number of branches: p = 0.011; tubular length: p = 0.04) (Figure 3F,G), and induced the glycosylation of VEGFR2 (Figure 3H and Figure S5B). Lastly, we also confirmed that miR-146a-5p gain-of-function significantly increased the cell proliferation rates of the SKBR3 and BT474 cell lines (Figure 3I), and a higher proliferation rate of SKBR3 was observed compared to the BT474 cell line (Supplementary Figure S6A). Contrarily, the results showed that miR-146a-5p loss-of-function decreased the cell proliferation rate of BT474r (Supplementary Figure S6B).

3.5. miR-146a-5p Overexpression Increases the Cell Cycle S and G2/M Phases

After analyzing the effect of miR-146a-5p on trastuzumab response and proliferation, we studied its interaction with candidate target genes in silico, in order to clarify their possible underlying mechanisms of action. Genes described as potential or already validated targets of miR-146a-5p were obtained from the miRWalk2.0 and Transcriptome Analysis Console (Affymetrix) software (Supplementary Table S2), and cell cycle was identified as one of the main interesting pathways among the miR-146a-5p described targets.
In order to confirm the effect of miR-146a-5p in the cell cycle, SKBR3 and BT474 cells were transfected with the miR-146a-5p mimic. miR-146a-5p overexpression significantly decreased the proportion of cells in the G0/G1 phase (p = 0.007 for SKBR3 and p = 0.037 for BT474), and increased the percentage of cells in the S (p = 0.042 for SKBR3 and p = 0.019 for BT474) and G2/M phases (p = 0.017 for SKBR3) (Figure 3J).
Next, we assessed the expression of CDKN1A and CCNB1 genes, both described as putative miR-146a-5p targets, and involved in cell cycle regulation. An analysis of the BC samples from the TCGA dataset, ranked using the median miR-146a-5p expression, showed an inverse correlation of CKDN1A and a positive correlation of CCNB1 expression with miRNA levels (Figure 4A). The BT474r and SKBR3r cell lines also showed lower levels of CDKN1A expression and higher levels of CCNB1 compared to BT474 and SKBR3 (Figure 4B).
The negative regulation of CDKN1A and the positive regulation of CCNB1 by miR-146a-5p were confirmed at both the gene and protein levels. In addition, CDKN1A downregulation gave rise to CCNB1 upregulation, suggesting that miR-146a-5p indirectly regulates CCNB1 through CDKN1A (Figure 4C,D and Figure S5C). In parallel, miR-146a-5p downregulation in resistant cell lines led to an increase in CDKN1A expression (Figure 4E and Figure S5D).
Moreover, CDKN1A knockdown mimicked the effect of miR-146a-5p overexpression on reducing the response to trastuzumab (p = 0.068 for SKBR3 and p = 0.030 for BT474) (Figure 4F), increasing the proliferation rate (Figure 4G), and inducing cell cycle promotion (p = 0.008 for SKBR3 and p = 0.003 for BT474) (Figure 4H). As previously shown with miR-146a-5p upregulation, CDKN1A knockdown also increased cell migration (p = 0.018) (Figure 4I,J) and angiogenesis (p = 0.019 for the number of branches and p = 0.034 for tubular length) (Figure 4K,L). The CDKN1A downregulation was confirmed for each experiment (Supplementary Figure S4C), and these results were confirmed using a second silencer (siCDKN1A#2) (Supplementary Figures S5F and S7).

3.6. miR-146a-5p Is Enriched in Exosomes from Trastuzumab-Resistant Cells

In order to study the possibility of miR-146a-5p horizontal transference between cells, and as a consequence, the dissemination of trastuzumab resistance and miRNA expression in exosomes was examined. Exosomes from SKBR3 and SKBR3r cells were extracted following the ultracentrifugation method. The presence of exosomes was confirmed via specific protein markers (Figure 5A and Figure S5E) and via visualization with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure 5B). In order to evaluate the presence of miR-146a-5p in exosomes, RNA was purified from 2 µL of extract. miR-146a-5p was demonstrated to be present in exosome samples from sensitive and resistant cell lines; however, its levels were significantly higher in exosomes from the SKBR3r cell line than from SKBR3 (p = 0.0001). miR-146a-5p showed a higher level of expression in exosomes compared to the original cell lines, being manifested as miR-146a-5p enrichment in exosomes (Figure 5C). Additionally, the expression of other miRNAs (miR-23b-3p and miR-26a-5p) as a control was also measured in exosomes without being detected (Supplementary Figure S8).

3.7. Effects of Exosomes from Resistant Cells in Response to Trastuzumab by Parental Cells

We next aimed to check if the co-culture of exosomes from SKBR3r with SKBR3 could transmit the resistance to trastuzumab. First, we confirmed equal exosome uptake among the assayed conditions. For that purpose, exosomes were labeled with fluorescent DiD dye, and exosome internalization was verified using flow cytometry. The number of cells internalizing exosomes (percentage of fluorescence detected) was similar regardless of trastuzumab treatment (Figure 5D), as well as the amount of exosome uptake (mean of fluorescence) (Figure 5E).
The proliferation rate of the SKBR3 cell line in the presence of trastuzumab was evaluated when co-culturing with exosomes from SKBR3r or CM from SKBR3r. Both conditions induced a significant decrease in the effect of trastuzumab in SKBR3 (CM p = 0.046; exosomes p = 0.020) (Figure 5F). In order to confirm that the effect of exosomes from SKBR3r in trastuzumab resistance was due to miR-146a-5p transference, the combination of exosomes and the miR-146a-5p inhibitor was assayed. The inhibition of miR-146a-5p significantly reverted the resistance to trastuzumab induced by exosomes from SKBR3r in SKBR3 (p = 0.043) (Figure 5G).

3.8. Effect of Exosomes from Resistant Cells in the Migration Capacities of Parental Cells

To evaluate if exosomes could also affect the migration capacity of the cells, we performed a wound-healing assay. Exosomes from SKBR3r were added to SKBR3 cells just after realizing the wound, and the cellular migration was evaluated after 48 h. Exosome treatment increased the migration capacity of SKBR3, as shown by a faster gap-closing compared to the non-treated cells (p = 0.0009), reaching a similar migration ability to SKBR3r (p = 0.002) (Figure 6A,B). In addition, vimentin and fibronectin mRNA expression showed a significant increase in SKBR3 after co-culturing with exosomes from the resistant cells (p = 0.018 and p = 0.035, respectively), while CDKN1A decreased significantly (p = 0.0031) (Figure 6C). These results together suggest that exosomes from resistant cells are able to transmit trastuzumab resistance to parental cells through miR-146a-5p overexpression and CDKN1A downregulation.

3.9. Effect of Exosomes in Angiogenesis

To evaluate the effects of exosomes from SKBR3 and SKBR3r in cellular angiogenesis, we performed a tube formation assay in HUVEC-2 cells co-cultured with these exosomes. Exosomes from both cell lines significantly increased HUVEC-2 angiogenesis (number of branches: p = 0.012 for SKBR3 exosomes and p = 0.035 for SKBR3r exosomes; tubular length: p = 0.028 for SKBR3 exosomes and p = 0.040 for SKBR3r exosomes). As expected, this increase was greater with exosomes from the SKBR3r cells than with exosomes from SKBR3, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. (Figure 6D,E).

4. Discussion

HER2+ breast tumors have become an entity with a favorable prognosis and high 5-year DFS rates thanks to the incorporation of anti-HER2-targeted therapies into clinical practice. However, there are still around 20% of HER2+ BC that do not respond to trastuzumab treatment due to innate resistance or the acquisition of new molecular alterations that limit the action of the drug and confer resistance [5,6]. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the expression profiles of miRNAs involved in trastuzumab resistance. miRNAs dysregulation has been described to be common in many types of human cancer [42,43,44], and has also been related to drug resistance [45,46,47]. Our results show an important correlation between high miR-146a-5p expression, and a decreased trastuzumab response in HER2+ cell lines and lower DFS in HER2+ BC patients. miR-146a has been described as an NF-kB-dependent gene [48], and these transcription factors have been found to be constitutively activated in models of trastuzumab resistance [49]. Moreover, we have demonstrated that the overexpression of miR-146a-5p in HER2+ BC cells was able to reduce their responses to trastuzumab. Furthermore, when the acquired trastuzumab-resistant cell lines were transfected with the miR-146a-5p inhibitor, the drug response was significantly increased. Those results are consistent with the described role of miR-146a-5p in carboplatin-resistant luminal BC cells [50], as well as its implication in chemotherapy resistance, as displayed by cancer stem cells [51]. There are some conflicting data in the literature that link high levels of miR-146a-5p with reduced migration and invasion. However, these studies have been performed in triple negative or luminal BC cell lines, in contrast to our HER2+ BC model [52,53]. It is important to highlight that the analysis of the available data from METABRIC using the Kaplan-Meier Plotter for luminal and triple negative BC patients showed a protective effect of miR-146a-5p, opposite to that observed in HER2+ BC. This supports the hypothesis of a different behavior of miR-146a-5p, depending on the characteristics of the tumor cells. Furthermore, to our knowledge, this is the first study describing the role of miR-146a-5p in resistance to anti-HER2 therapy.
We found that miR-146a-5p dysregulation was impacting on the cell cycle through different gene targets. This miRNA had anteriorly been described to alter the cell cycle by affecting CCND1 (cyclin D1) [54], CDKN2A [55], or the induction of the exit from the quiescent state of the mammary cancer stem cells [51]. Our results showed a significant increase in the percentage of cells in the S and G2/M phases, as well as a decrease in the G1 phase when miR-146a-5p was overexpressed. Consequently, we proposed that miR-146a-5p promotes cell cycle progression at the G1-to-S-phase transition in SKBR3r and BT474r cells as a mechanism to increase cell proliferation and resistance. This justification is coherent with our hypothesis of miR-146a-5p inducing resistance and malignancy, and it is also supported by a recent study that observes the relation between the overexpression of miR-146a-5p, increasing levels of cyclin D1, and the number of S-phase cells in cervical cancer [56].
Therefore, we analyzed CDKN1A and CCNB1, both described as putative miR-146a-5p targets. Indeed, CDKN1A has been proven to be a direct target of miR-146a via a dual-luciferase reporter gene assay [57]. CDKN1A is the gene encoding for p21, a CDK inhibitor of every cyclin/CDK complex, especially CDK2 [58]. Our findings indicate that miR-146a-5p targets CDKN1A, since we observe a significant inhibition following miRNA overexpression, while the oncogene CCNB1 showed a strong increase in its expression, possibly induced by the reduction in its regulator inhibitor, p21. We have also proven this inverse and direct correlation between miR-146a-5p expression, and CDKN1A or CCNB1 levels in a TCGA dataset. p21 is the protein that regulates G1 arrest and G2 arrest among other cell cycle checkpoints, while CCNB1 is a G2/M checkpoint. Lower p21 levels in the resistant cell lines as a consequence of the knockdown of the gene by miR-146a-5p could be avoiding cell cycle arrest in G1 and G2, thus increasing the S and M phases. However, we cannot distinguish between the G2 and M phases via flow cytometry due to CCNB1 modulation, causing discrepancies between the BT474 and SKBR3 cell lines, and also due to different proliferation rates between them. This decrease in p21 strongly increases cyclin B1 levels, which promotes cell cycle progression and the malignancy of resistant cell lines, avoiding apoptosis and generating genomic instability. Furthermore, miR-146a-5p gain-of-function increased migration and induced the expression of mesenchymal markers, as it is probably inducing malignancy through different pathways. We proved that CDKN1A loss-of-function mimicked the effect of miR-146a-5p overexpression upon reducing the response to trastuzumab, increasing proliferation and migration, and inducing cell cycle promotion on HER2+ BC cells and increasing angiogenesis in HUVEC-2 cells. These results were in agreement with the observed effects of CDKN1A silencing in hepatocellular carcinoma [59].
The data above support the implication of miR-146a-5p in trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ BC cells. However, there are no previous evidence of miR-146a-5p horizontal transmission with the consequent transference of trastuzumab resistance. Exosomes and other extracellular vesicles have been proven to be a potential mechanism for the horizontal cell-to-cell transmission of drug resistance [60,61,62,63]. One of the most common RNA types observed to be involved in the transmission of resistance through exosomes are miRNAs. It has been described to increase resistance to different chemotherapies in BC and other cancers via this mechanism [33,64,65,66,67,68,69]. Previous studies have demonstrated that resistance to trastuzumab could be disseminated through exosome communication involving RNAs, specifically lncRNA SNHG14 and lncRNA AFAP1-AS1 [70,71]. Similarly, miR-567 has been described to be packaged into exosomes and to revert trastuzumab resistance via the regulation of autophagy [72]. miR-146a-5p has formerly been identified in exosomes, presenting an important role in different diseases, including sepsis [73], myasthenia gravis [74], infection by EV71 [75], systemic lupus erythematosus [76], acute myocardial infarction [77], hypertension [78], or Alzheimer’s disease [79], as well as in several cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer [80], colorectal cancer [81], B-cell lymphoma [82], and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus [83]. Moreover, recent data showing that miR-146a-5p-enriched exosomes are able to reduce trastuzumab-induced oxidative stress in cardiomyocytes [84] point to the possibility that miR-146a-5p could also transfer its resistance effect using the same mechanism. The results of the present study showed that SKBR3r CM and SKBR3r exosomes partially induce trastuzumab resistance in SKBR3 cells, confirming the hypothesis of a horizontal cell-to-cell transmission of the resistance. Furthermore, the combination of SKBR3r exosomes with the inhibition of miR-146a-5p in BC cells reduced the trastuzumab resistance induced by the exosomes. Accordingly, we propose that the resistance transmitted by exosomes can be partially mediated by miR-146a-5p. Furthermore, the exosomes from resistant cells induced a significant increase in EMT markers expression, and in the migration capacity of trastuzumab-sensitive cells.
A recent study by Shan-Shan Yang demonstrates that miR-146a-5p can also promote invasion and metastasis by activating cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment via exosomes generated from BC cells [85]. Moreover, this miRNA has also been described to promote angiogenesis in HUVECs through different mechanisms [86,87]. miR-146a-5p inhibition impairs tube formation and migration in endothelial cells [88], and its neutralization reduces angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo in a cancer colon mouse model [89]. Since exosomes have been proven to promote angiogenesis in cancer [90], typically via miRNAs [91,92,93], we hypothesized that exosomes derived from our BC cell lines, which contain miR-146a-5p, would also be inducing angiogenesis as one of its roles. Our findings demonstrate that the angiogenic capacity of HUVEC-2 was significantly enhanced by CM enriched with miR-146a-5p in terms of branches and tube length. Furthermore, the co-culture of HUVEC-2 with exosomes reproduced this effect, and as expected, angiogenesis was higher with SKBR3r exosomes than with SKBR3 exosomes, concurring with their higher levels of miR-146a-5p. All of this is consistent with the roles of exosomes in cancer progression and aggressiveness, as previously described in the literature [94,95,96,97,98,99].
The results of this study demonstrate for the first time the implication of miR-146a-5p in trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ BC models. The gain and loss of miR-146a-5p modulates the resistance to trastuzumab through cell cycle regulators. It should be noted that patients with shorter DFS and OS present higher levels of miR-146a-5p. Our results also confirmed that exosomes have an important role in the transmission of trastuzumab resistance, partially performed by miR-146a-5p, and also suggest an effect of tumor progression via the modulation of the microenvironment.
The determination of miR-146a-5p expression in primary tumors from HER2+ BC patients could be useful for the early identification of trastuzumab resistance. Moreover, exosomes have been shown to be a valuable clinical tool, both as diagnostic biomarkers and in monitoring a treatment response [34,35]. Furthermore, the repression of miR-146a-5p by antagomir or similar technologies may be a therapeutic option for increasing the response to trastuzumab and in inhibiting the spread of drug resistance.

5. Conclusions

The overexpression of miR-146a-5p in HER2+ BC associates with trastuzumab resistance. The gain- and loss-of-function of this miRNA modulates trastuzumab resistance in vitro. Furthermore, elevated miR-146a-5p levels in the primary tumor tissues of HER2+ BC patients are associated with a worse prognosis. The accumulation of a high proportion of the cell population in the S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle, and a decrease in the expression of CDKN1A are the potential mechanisms of action, together with the increase in migration and angiogenesis. Moreover, the exosomes of SKBR3r cells contain high miR-146a-5p levels and are able to reduce the effect of trastuzumab on parental cells, increasing their expression of EMT markers and cell migration. Moreover, the exosomes of SKBR3r cells increase the angiogenic ability of HUVEC-2 cells as aggressive properties. Altogether, our data suggest miR-146a-5p levels are a potential biomarker of trastuzumab response, and a valuable target for future anti-HER2 treatment strategies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers15072138/s1, Figure S1: Logarithmic intensity distribution of probes included in the Affymetrix GeneChipTM miRNA 4.0 Array; Figure S2: Overall survival (OS) according to the expression of miRNA-146a-5p in HER2+ breast cancer patients; Figure S3: Proliferation analysis of SKBR3/SKBR3r and BT474/BT474r cell lines treated with different doses of trastuzumab; Figure S4: Analysis of transfection efficiency of miR-146a-5p mimic and inhibitor, and siCKDN1A. Figure S5: Densitometry analysis and original whole blots of Western Blot images in Figure 3E,H, Figure 4D,E, Figure 5A and Figure S7B. Figure S6: Proliferation curves after transfection. Figure S7: CDKN1A loss-of-function performed with a second siRNA. Figure S8: Analysis of miRNA expression in exosomes from SKBR3 and SKBR3r cell lines. Table S1: miRNAs significantly differentially expressed between parental and resistant cell lines. Table S2: Target genes of miR-146a-5p, predicted using Transcriptome Analysis Console software (Affymetrix).

Author Contributions

P.E., P.C. and J.M.C. conceptualized the study and contributed to the methodology, validation, investigation, data analysis, and writing: original draft. A.A.-A. and J.F.-M. performed statistical analysis, and participated in methodology and investigation. S.T.-R. contributed to the methodology and revision of the manuscript. S.Z., J.M.-G., A.R., M.T.M., C.H., B.B., J.A., O.B. and F.R. contributed to resources, and to the review and editing of the manuscript. A.L., P.E. and J.M.C. contributed to project administration, funding acquisition, supervision and review, and the editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), and FEDER funds (PI18/01219 and PI21/01351 to PE, PI18/00382 to FR, PI18/00006 and CB16/12/00241 to J.A., and CB16/12/00481 to A.L.L.). P.C., S.T.-R., and A.A.-A. were funded by Conselleria d’Educació, Investigació, Cultura i Esport, Generalitat Valenciana (ACIF/2016/031 and ACIF/2019/119), and Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (PRDVA18013LLUC), respectively. J.M.C. was funded by Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (Río Hortega-SEOM).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA (2018/077), and it followed the ethical guidelines.

Informed Consent Statement

All patients signed informed consent for the use of the extracted biological material.

Data Availability Statement

The microRNA data have been uploaded to the page: https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ (GSE197822) (accessed on 25 December 2022), with the names mi1_(miRNA-4_0) CEL to mi12_(miRNA-4_0). CEL for the data of all 12 samples and PCPE_affy_miRNA_.xls.

Acknowledgments

We especially thank the patients and healthy donors from INCLIVA who agreed to participate in this study. The authors are grateful to INCLIVA Biobank (PT17/0015/0049; B.000768 ISCIII) and Valencian Biobanking Network integrated into the Spanish National Biobanks Network and nursing staff for collaboration. We also thank the associations that contributed to INCLIVA breast cancer research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Baselga, J. Treatment of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2010, 21 (Suppl. S7), vii36–vii40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tai, W.; Mahato, R.; Cheng, K. The role of HER2 in cancer therapy and targeted drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2010, 146, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Saini, K.S.; Azim, H.A., Jr.; Metzger-Filho, O.; Loi, S.; Sotiriou, C.; de Azambuja, E.; Piccart, M. Beyond trastuzumab: New treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast 2011, 20 (Suppl. S3), S20–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. de Melo Gagliato, D.; Jardim, D.L.F.; Marchesi, M.S.P.; Hortobagyi, G.N. Mechanisms of resistance and sensitivity to anti-HER2 therapies in HER2+ breast cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 64431–64446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Fessler, S.P.; Wotkowicz, M.T.; Mahanta, S.K.; Bamdad, C. MUC1* is a determinant of trastuzumab (Herceptin) resistance in breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2009, 118, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gajria, D.; Chandarlapaty, S. HER2-amplified breast cancer: Mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance and novel targeted therapies. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2011, 11, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Arribas, J.; Baselga, J.; Pedersen, K. p95HER2 and breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 1515–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Carpten, J.D.; Faber, A.L.; Horn, C.; Donoho, G.P.; Briggs, S.L.; Robbins, C.M.; Hostetter, G.; Boguslawski, S.; Moses, T.Y.; Savage, S.; et al. A transforming mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 in cancer. Nature 2007, 448, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chakrabarty, A.; Rexer, B.N.; Wang, S.E.; Cook, R.S.; Engelman, J.A.; Arteaga, C.L. H1047R phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase mutant enhances HER2-mediated transformation by heregulin production and activation of HER3. Oncogene 2010, 29, 5193–5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Luque-Cabal, M.; García-Teijido, P.; Fernández-Pérez, Y.; Sánchez-Lorenzo, L.; Palacio-Vázquez, I. Mechanisms Behind the Resistance to Trastuzumab in HER2-Amplified Breast Cancer and Strategies to Overcome It. Clin. Med. Insights Oncol. 2016, 10 (Suppl. S1), 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Montero, J.C.; Rodríguez-Barrueco, R.; Ocaña, A.; Díaz-Rodríguez, E.; Esparís-Ogando, A.; Pandiella, A. Neuregulins and cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 3237–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Mukohara, T. Mechanisms of resistance to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 agents in breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pandolfi, P.P. Breast cancer—Loss of PTEN predicts resistance to treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 2337–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kim, V.N.; Nam, J.W. Genomics of microRNA. Trends Genet. 2006, 22, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lin, S.L.; Kim, H.; Ying, S.Y. Intron-mediated RNA interference and microRNA (miRNA). Front. Biosci. 2008, 13, 2216–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Caramuta, S.; Egyházi, S.; Rodolfo, M.; Witten, D.; Hansson, J.; Larsson, C.; Lui, W.O. MicroRNA expression profiles associated with mutational status and survival in malignant melanoma. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2010, 130, 2062–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, J.; Wu, K.; Fan, D. Survival prediction of gastric cancer by a seven-microRNA signature. Gut 2010, 59, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yanaihara, N.; Caplen, N.; Bowman, E.; Seike, M.; Kumamoto, K.; Yi, M.; Stephens, R.M.; Okamoto, A.; Yokota, J.; Tanaka, T.; et al. Unique microRNA molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer Cell 2006, 9, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Adam-Artigues, A.; Garrido-Cano, I.; Carbonell-Asins, J.A.; Lameirinhas, A.; Simón, S.; Ortega-Morillo, B.; Martínez, M.T.; Hernando, C.; Constâncio, V.; Burgues, O.; et al. Identification of a Two-MicroRNA Signature in Plasma as a Novel Biomarker for Very Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Adam-Artigues, A.; Garrido-Cano, I.; Simón, S.; Ortega, B.; Moragón, S.; Lameirinhas, A.; Constâncio, V.; Salta, S.; Burgués, O.; Bermejo, B.; et al. Circulating miR-30b-5p levels in plasma as a novel potential biomarker for early detection of breast cancer. ESMO Open 2021, 6, 100039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garrido-Cano, I.; Constâncio, V.; Adam-Artigues, A.; Lameirinhas, A.; Simón, S.; Ortega, B.; Martínez, M.T.; Hernando, C.; Bermejo, B.; Lluch, A.; et al. Circulating miR-99a-5p Expression in Plasma: A Potential Biomarker for Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Garrido-Cano, I.; Pattanayak, B.; Adam-Artigues, A.; Lameirinhas, A.; Torres-Ruiz, S.; Tormo, E.; Cervera, R.; Eroles, P. MicroRNAs as a clue to overcome breast cancer treatment resistance. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2022, 41, 77–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Blenkiron, C.; Goldstein, L.D.; Thorne, N.P.; Spiteri, I.; Chin, S.F.; Dunning, M.J.; Barbosa-Morais, N.L.; Teschendorff, A.E.; Green, A.R.; Ellis, I.O.; et al. MicroRNA expression profiling of human breast cancer identifies new markers of tumor subtype. Genome Biol. 2007, 8, R214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sempere, L.F.; Christensen, M.; Silahtaroglu, A.; Bak, M.; Heath, C.V.; Schwartz, G.; Wells, W.; Kauppinen, S.; Cole, C.N. Altered MicroRNA expression confined to specific epithelial cell subpopulations in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 11612–11620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Iorio, M.V.; Ferracin, M.; Liu, C.G.; Veronese, A.; Spizzo, R.; Sabbioni, S.; Magri, E.; Pedriali, M.; Fabbri, M.; Campiglio, M.; et al. MicroRNA gene expression deregulation in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 7065–7070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Lowery, A.J.; Miller, N.; Devaney, A.; McNeill, R.E.; Davoren, P.A.; Lemetre, C.; Benes, V.; Schmidt, S.; Blake, J.; Ball, G.; et al. MicroRNA signatures predict oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2/neu receptor status in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2009, 11, R27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mattie, M.D.; Benz, C.C.; Bowers, J.; Sensinger, K.; Wong, L.; Scott, G.K.; Fedele, V.; Ginzinger, D.; Getts, R.; Haqq, C. Optimized high-throughput microRNA expression profiling provides novel biomarker assessment of clinical prostate and breast cancer biopsies. Mol. Cancer 2006, 5, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Grange, C.; Tapparo, M.; Collino, F.; Vitillo, L.; Damasco, C.; Deregibus, M.C.; Tetta, C.; Bussolati, B.; Camussi, G. Microvesicles released from human renal cancer stem cells stimulate angiogenesis and formation of lung premetastatic niche. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 5346–5356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Janowska-Wieczorek, A.; Wysoczynski, M.; Kijowski, J.; Marquez-Curtis, L.; Machalinski, B.; Ratajczak, J.; Ratajczak, M.Z. Microvesicles derived from activated platelets induce metastasis and angiogenesis in lung cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 113, 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bobrie, A.; Krumeich, S.; Reyal, F.; Recchi, C.; Moita, L.F.; Seabra, M.C.; Ostrowski, M.; Théry, C. Rab27a supports exosome-dependent and -independent mechanisms that modify the tumor microenvironment and can promote tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 4920–4930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Chen, W.X.; Cai, Y.Q.; Lv, M.M.; Chen, L.; Zhong, S.L.; Ma, T.F.; Zhao, J.H.; Tang, J.H. Exosomes from docetaxel-resistant breast cancer cells alter chemosensitivity by delivering microRNAs. Tumour Biol. 2014, 35, 9649–9659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mao, L.; Li, J.; Chen, W.X.; Cai, Y.Q.; Yu, D.D.; Zhong, S.L.; Zhao, J.H.; Zhou, J.W.; Tang, J.H. Exosomes decrease sensitivity of breast cancer cells to adriamycin by delivering microRNAs. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 5247–5256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Corrado, C.; Raimondo, S.; Chiesi, A.; Ciccia, F.; De Leo, G.; Alessandro, R. Exosomes as intercellular signaling organelles involved in health and disease: Basic science and clinical applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 5338–5366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Rak, J. Extracellular vesicles—Biomarkers and effectors of the cellular interactome in cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2013, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Zazo, S.; González-Alonso, P.; Martín-Aparicio, E.; Chamizo, C.; Cristóbal, I.; Arpí, O.; Rovira, A.; Albanell, J.; Eroles, P.; Lluch, A.; et al. Generation, characterization, and maintenance of trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ breast cancer cell lines. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2016, 6, 2661–2678. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lánczky, A.; Nagy, Á.; Bottai, G.; Munkácsy, G.; Szabó, A.; Santarpia, L.; Győrffy, B. miRpower: A web-tool to validate survival-associated miRNAs utilizing expression data from 2178 breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016, 160, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gooding, A.J.; Schiemann, W.P. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Programs and Cancer Stem Cell Phenotypes: Mediators of Breast Cancer Therapy Resistance. Mol. Cancer Res. 2020, 18, 1257–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oliveras-Ferraros, C.; Corominas-Faja, B.; Cufí, S.; Vazquez-Martin, A.; Martin-Castillo, B.; Iglesias, J.M.; López-Bonet, E.; Martin, A.G.; Menendez, J.A. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) confers primary resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin). Cell Cycle 2012, 11, 4020–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hori, A.; Shimoda, M.; Naoi, Y.; Kagara, N.; Tanei, T.; Miyake, T.; Shimazu, K.; Kim, S.J.; Noguchi, S. Vasculogenic mimicry is associated with trastuzumab resistance of HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2019, 21, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kodack, D.P.; Chung, E.; Yamashita, H.; Incio, J.; Duyverman, A.M.; Song, Y.; Farrar, C.T.; Huang, Y.; Ager, E.; Kamoun, W.; et al. Combined targeting of HER2 and VEGFR2 for effective treatment of HER2-amplified breast cancer brain metastases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E3119–E3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hata, A.; Kashima, R. Dysregulation of microRNA biogenesis machinery in cancer. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 51, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kandettu, A.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Chakrabarty, S.; Sriharikrishnaa, S.; Kabekkodu, S.P. The emerging role of miRNA clusters in breast cancer progression. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2020, 1874, 188413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, W.T.; Han, C.; Sun, Y.M.; Chen, T.Q.; Chen, Y.Q. Noncoding RNAs in cancer therapy resistance and targeted drug development. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, X.; Lu, P.; Wu, Y.; Wang, D.D.; Zhou, S.; Yang, S.J.; Shen, H.Y.; Zhang, X.H.; Zhao, J.H.; Tang, J.H. MiRNAs-mediated cisplatin resistance in breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 12905–12913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hong, L.; Han, Y.; Lu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Q.; Wu, K.; Fan, D. Drug resistance-related microRNAs in esophageal cancer. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2012, 12, 1487–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tormo, E.; Adam-Artigues, A.; Ballester, S.; Pineda, B.; Zazo, S.; González-Alonso, P.; Albanell, J.; Rovira, A.; Rojo, F.; Lluch, A.; et al. The role of miR-26a and miR-30b in HER2+ breast cancer trastuzumab resistance and regulation of the CCNE2 gene. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Taganov, K.D.; Boldin, M.P.; Chang, K.J.; Baltimore, D. NF-kappaB-dependent induction of microRNA miR-146, an inhibitor targeted to signaling proteins of innate immune responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12481–12486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kanzaki, H.; Mukhopadhya, N.K.; Cui, X.; Ramanujan, V.K.; Murali, R. Trastuzumab-Resistant Luminal B Breast Cancer Cells Show Basal-Like Cell Growth Features Through NF-kappaB-Activation. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2016, 35, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Pogribny, I.P.; Filkowski, J.N.; Tryndyak, V.P.; Golubov, A.; Shpyleva, S.I.; Kovalchuk, O. Alterations of microRNAs and their targets are associated with acquired resistance of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to cisplatin. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 1785–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tordonato, C.; Marzi, M.J.; Giangreco, G.; Freddi, S.; Bonetti, P.; Tosoni, D.; Di Fiore, P.P.; Nicassio, F. miR-146 connects stem cell identity with metabolism and pharmacological resistance in breast cancer. J. Cell Biol. 2021, 220, e202009053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bhaumik, D.; Scott, G.K.; Schokrpur, S.; Patil, C.K.; Campisi, J.; Benz, C.C. Expression of microRNA-146 suppresses NF-kappaB activity with reduction of metastatic potential in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2008, 27, 5643–5647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hurst, D.R.; Edmonds, M.D.; Scott, G.K.; Benz, C.C.; Vaidya, K.S.; Welch, D.R. Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 up-regulates miR-146, which suppresses breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 1279–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Li, Y.L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.Y.; Shen, Y.Q.; Wang, H.M.; Ding, L.; Gu, Y.C.; Lou, J.T.; Zhao, X.T.; Ma, Z.L.; et al. MiR-146a-5p inhibits cell proliferation and cell cycle progression in NSCLC cell lines by targeting CCND1 and CCND2. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 59287–59298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Zhang, Y.; Ding, S.; Yang, J.; Chen, X.; Huang, W. Identification of miR-146a is Associated with the Aggressiveness and Suppresses Proliferation via Targeting CDKN2A in Breast Cancer. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2020, 26, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hu, Q.; Song, J.; Ding, B.; Cui, Y.; Liang, J.; Han, S. miR-146a promotes cervical cancer cell viability via targeting IRAK1 and TRAF6. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 39, 3015–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Gang, X.; Xu, H.; Si, L.; Zhu, X.; Yu, T.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, Y. Treatment effect of CDKN1A on rheumatoid arthritis by mediating proliferation and invasion of fibroblast-like synoviocytes cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2018, 194, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Harper, J.W.; Elledge, S.J.; Keyomarsi, K.; Dynlacht, B.; Tsai, L.H.; Zhang, P.; Dobrowolski, S.; Bai, C.; Connell-Crowley, L.; Swindell, E. Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases by p21. Mol. Biol. Cell 1995, 6, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Li, B.; Li, A.; You, Z.; Xu, J.; Zhu, S. Epigenetic silencing of CDKN1A and CDKN2B by SNHG1 promotes the cell cycle, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Namee, N.M.; O’Driscoll, L. Extracellular vesicles and anti-cancer drug resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2018, 1870, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Samuel, P.; Fabbri, M.; Carter, D.R.F. Mechanisms of Drug Resistance in Cancer: The Role of Extracellular Vesicles. Proteomics 2017, 17, 1600375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Yu, D.D.; Wu, Y.; Shen, H.Y.; Lv, M.M.; Chen, W.X.; Zhang, X.H.; Zhong, S.L.; Tang, J.H.; Zhao, J.H. Exosomes in development, metastasis and drug resistance of breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 2015, 106, 959–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Zhang, H.D.; Jiang, L.H.; Hou, J.C.; Zhong, S.L.; Zhu, L.P.; Wang, D.D.; Zhou, S.Y.; Yang, S.J.; Wang, J.Y.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Exosome: A novel mediator in drug resistance of cancer cells. Epigenomics 2018, 10, 1499–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bach, D.H.; Hong, J.Y.; Park, H.J.; Lee, S.K. The role of exosomes and miRNAs in drug-resistance of cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 141, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Chen, W.X.; Xu, L.Y.; Qian, Q.; He, X.; Peng, W.T.; Zhu, Y.L.; Cheng, L. Analysis of miRNA signature differentially expressed in exosomes from adriamycin-resistant and parental human breast cancer cells. Biosci. Rep. 2018, 38, BSR20181090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Najminejad, H.; Kalantar, S.M.; Abdollahpour-Alitappeh, M.; Karimi, M.H.; Seifalian, A.M.; Gholipourmalekabadi, M.; Sheikhha, M.H. Emerging roles of exosomal miRNAs in breast cancer drug resistance. IUBMB Life 2019, 71, 1672–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Pan, X.; Hong, X.; Lai, J.; Cheng, L.; Cheng, Y.; Yao, M.; Wang, R.; Hu, N. Exosomal MicroRNA-221-3p Confers Adriamycin Resistance in Breast Cancer Cells by Targeting PIK3R1. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, M.; Wu, J.; Ma, L.; Chen, H. Cisplatin-resistant MDA-MB-231 Cell-derived Exosomes Increase the Resistance of Recipient Cells in an Exosomal miR-423-5p-dependent Manner. Curr. Drug Metab. 2019, 20, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhao, L.; Liu, W.; Xiao, J.; Cao, B. The role of exosomes and “exosomal shuttle microRNA” in tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Cancer Lett. 2015, 356, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dong, H.; Wang, W.; Chen, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zou, K.; Ye, M.; He, X.; Zhang, F.; Han, J. Exosome-mediated transfer of lncRNASNHG14 promotes trastuzumab chemoresistance in breast cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 53, 1013–1026. [Google Scholar]
  71. Han, M.; Gu, Y.; Lu, P.; Li, J.; Cao, H.; Li, X.; Qian, X.; Yu, C.; Yang, Y.; Yang, X.; et al. Exosome-mediated lncRNA AFAP1-AS1 promotes trastuzumab resistance through binding with AUF1 and activating ERBB2 translation. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Han, M.; Hu, J.; Lu, P.; Cao, H.; Yu, C.; Li, X.; Qian, X.; Yang, X.; Yang, Y.; Han, N.; et al. Exosome-transmitted miR-567 reverses trastuzumab resistance by inhibiting ATG5 in breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Song, Y.; Dou, H.; Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, D.; Ji, J.; Liu, F.; Ding, L.; Ni, Y.; et al. Exosomal miR-146a Contributes to the Enhanced Therapeutic Efficacy of Interleukin-1beta-Primed Mesenchymal Stem Cells Against Sepsis. Stem Cells 2017, 35, 1208–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Yin, W.; Ouyang, S.; Luo, Z.; Zeng, Q.; Hu, B.; Xu, L.; Li, Y.; Xiao, B. Immature Exosomes Derived from MicroRNA-146a Overexpressing Dendritic Cells Act as Antigen-Specific Therapy for Myasthenia Gravis. Inflammation 2017, 40, 1460–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Fu, Y.; Zhang, L.I.; Zhang, F.; Tang, T.; Zhou, Q.; Feng, C.; Jin, Y.; Wu, Z. Exosome-mediated miR-146a transfer suppresses type I interferon response and facilitates EV71 infection. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dong, C.; Zhou, Q.; Fu, T.; Zhao, R.; Yang, J.; Kong, X.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, C.; Bao, Y.; Ge, X.; et al. Circulating Exosomes Derived-miR-146a from Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients Regulates Senescence of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 6071308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Pan, J.; Alimujiang, M.; Chen, Q.; Shi, H.; Luo, X. Exosomes derived from miR-146a-modified adipose-derived stem cells attenuate acute myocardial infarction-induced myocardial damage via downregulation of early growth response factor 1. J. Cell Biochem. 2019, 120, 4433–4443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Perez-Hernandez, J.; Olivares, D.; Forner, M.J.; Ortega, A.; Solaz, E.; Martinez, F.; Chaves, F.J.; Redon, J.; Cortes, R. Urinary exosome miR-146a is a potential marker of albuminuria in essential hypertension. J. Transl. Med. 2018, 16, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Kumar, S.; Reddy, P.H. Are circulating microRNAs peripheral biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1862, 1617–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Yuwen, D.; Sheng, B.B.; Liu, J.; Wenyu, W.; Shu, Y.Q. MiR-146a-5p level in serum exosomes predicts therapeutic effect of cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 21, 2650–2658. [Google Scholar]
  81. Cheng, W.C.; Liao, T.T.; Lin, C.C.; Yuan, L.T.E.; Lan, H.Y.; Lin, H.H.; Teng, H.W.; Chang, H.C.; Lin, C.H.; Yang, C.Y.; et al. RAB27B-activated secretion of stem-like tumor exosomes delivers the biomarker microRNA-146a-5p, which promotes tumorigenesis and associates with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 2209–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zare, N.; Eskandari, N.; Mehrzad, V.; Javanmard, S.H. The expression level of hsa-miR-146a-5p in plasma-derived exosomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2019, 2, 10. [Google Scholar]
  83. Warnecke-Eberz, U.; Chon, S.H.; Hölscher, A.H.; Drebber, U.; Bollschweiler, E. Exosomal onco-miRs from serum of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: Comparison of miRNA profiles of exosomes and matching tumor. Tumour Biol. 2015, 36, 4643–4653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Milano, G.; Biemmi, V.; Lazzarini, E.; Balbi, C.; Ciullo, A.; Bolis, S.; Ameri, P.; Di Silvestre, D.; Mauri, P.; Barile, L.; et al. Intravenous administration of cardiac progenitor cell-derived exosomes protects against doxorubicin/trastuzumab-induced cardiac toxicity. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020, 116, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yang, S.S.; Ma, S.; Dou, H.; Liu, F.; Zhang, S.Y.; Jiang, C.; Xiao, M.; Huang, Y.X. Breast cancer-derived exosomes regulate cell invasion and metastasis in breast cancer via miR-146a to activate cancer associated fibroblasts in tumor microenvironment. Exp. Cell Res. 2020, 391, 111983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Li, Y.; Zhu, H.; Wei, X.; Li, H.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, W. LPS induces HUVEC angiogenesis in vitro through miR-146a-mediated TGF-beta1 inhibition. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017, 9, 591–600. [Google Scholar]
  87. Zhu, H.Y.; Bai, W.D.; Liu, J.Q.; Zheng, Z.; Guan, H.; Zhou, Q.; Su, L.L.; Xie, S.T.; Wang, Y.C.; Li, J.; et al. Up-regulation of FGFBP1 signaling contributes to miR-146a-induced angiogenesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Heuslein, J.L.; McDonnell, S.P.; Song, J.; Annex, B.H.; Price, R.J. MicroRNA-146a Regulates Perfusion Recovery in Response to Arterial Occlusion via Arteriogenesis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Simanovich, E.; Brod, V.; Rahat, M.M.; Rahat, M.A. Function of miR-146a-5p in Tumor Cells as a Regulatory Switch between Cell Death and Angiogenesis: Macrophage Therapy Revisited. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Horie, K.; Kawakami, K.; Fujita, Y.; Sugaya, M.; Kameyama, K.; Mizutani, K.; Deguchi, T.; Ito, M. Exosomes expressing carbonic anhydrase 9 promote angiogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 492, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gong, M.; Yu, B.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Paul, C.; Millard, R.W.; Xiao, D.S.; Ashraf, M.; Xu, M. Mesenchymal stem cells release exosomes that transfer miRNAs to endothelial cells and promote angiogenesis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 45200–45212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Liang, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Han, Q.; Zhao, R.C. Exosomes secreted by mesenchymal stem cells promote endothelial cell angiogenesis by transferring miR-125a. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 2182–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Li, L.; Li, M.; Guo, C.; Yao, J.; Mi, S. Exosome and exosomal microRNA: Trafficking, sorting, and function. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2015, 13, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Azmi, A.S.; Bao, B.; Sarkar, F.H. Exosomes in cancer development, metastasis, and drug resistance: A comprehensive review. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013, 32, 623–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Guo, W.; Gao, Y.; Li, N.; Shao, F.; Wang, C.; Wang, P.; Yang, Z.; Li, R.; He, J. Exosomes: New players in cancer (Review). Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Kalluri, R. The biology and function of exosomes in cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 1208–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kim, H.; Lee, S.; Shin, E.; Seong, K.M.; Jin, Y.W.; Youn, H.; Youn, B. The Emerging Roles of Exosomes as EMT Regulators in Cancer. Cells 2020, 9, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Xiao, D.; Barry, S.; Kmetz, D.; Egger, M.; Pan, J.; Rai, S.N.; Qu, J.; McMasters, K.M.; Hao, H. Melanoma cell-derived exosomes promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition in primary melanocytes through paracrine/autocrine signaling in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Lett. 2016, 376, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Zhang, L.; Yu, D. Exosomes in cancer development, metastasis, and immunity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2019, 1871, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 15 02138 g001 550
Figure 1. miRNA differential expression between parental and trastuzumab-resistant cell lines. (A) The heat map shows significant differences in miRNA expression between SKBR3/SKBR3r and BT474/BT474r analyzed via the Affimetrix human miRNA microarray GeneChip miRNA 4.0 Array, and their hierarchical clustering. miR-146a-5p expression is highlighted with a box. Three repeated samples were used for each cell type. (B) Expression intensity of miR-146a-5p (MIMAT0000449_st) in SKBR3/SKBR3r and BT474/BT474r samples of the GeneChip miRNA 4.0 Array of the Affymetrix microarray. (C) Expression levels of miR-146a-5p in cells were measured via RT-qPCR for validation. GAPDH was used as an endogenous control. RT-qPCR was performed in technical and biological triplicates. *** p-value < 0.001.
Figure 1. miRNA differential expression between parental and trastuzumab-resistant cell lines. (A) The heat map shows significant differences in miRNA expression between SKBR3/SKBR3r and BT474/BT474r analyzed via the Affimetrix human miRNA microarray GeneChip miRNA 4.0 Array, and their hierarchical clustering. miR-146a-5p expression is highlighted with a box. Three repeated samples were used for each cell type. (B) Expression intensity of miR-146a-5p (MIMAT0000449_st) in SKBR3/SKBR3r and BT474/BT474r samples of the GeneChip miRNA 4.0 Array of the Affymetrix microarray. (C) Expression levels of miR-146a-5p in cells were measured via RT-qPCR for validation. GAPDH was used as an endogenous control. RT-qPCR was performed in technical and biological triplicates. *** p-value < 0.001.
Cancers 15 02138 g001
Cancers 15 02138 g002 550
Figure 2. Analysis of the expression of miRNA-146a-5p in HER2+ breast cancer patients. (A) Levels of miR-146a-5p expression measured in disease-free HER2+ BC patients (n = 13) and relapsed HER2+ BC patients (n = 20) via RT-qPCR. miR-16a was used as endogenous miRNA. (B) Patients (n = 33) were classified based on median miR-146a-5p expression in tumor samples, and DFS Kaplan-Meier curve was plotted (p-value = 0.043). * p-value < 0.05. HR: Hazard ratio; DFS: Disease-free survival.
Figure 2. Analysis of the expression of miRNA-146a-5p in HER2+ breast cancer patients. (A) Levels of miR-146a-5p expression measured in disease-free HER2+ BC patients (n = 13) and relapsed HER2+ BC patients (n = 20) via RT-qPCR. miR-16a was used as endogenous miRNA. (B) Patients (n = 33) were classified based on median miR-146a-5p expression in tumor samples, and DFS Kaplan-Meier curve was plotted (p-value = 0.043). * p-value < 0.05. HR: Hazard ratio; DFS: Disease-free survival.
Cancers 15 02138 g002
Cancers 15 02138 g003 550
Figure 3. Analysis of miR-146a-5p effect in response to trastuzumab, migration, angiogenesis, proliferation, and cell cycle. (A) Viability analysis of SKBR3 and BT474 transfected with 50nM miR-146a-5p mimic (B) SKBR3r and BT474r transfected with 50 mM miR-146a-5p inhibitor (B) with or without treatment with 15 µg/mL of trastuzumab for 7 days. (C) Representative images of wound-healing cell migration assay of SKBR3 transfected with 50 nM miR-146a-5p mimic. Magnification: 10×. Scale bar: 300 µm. (D) Quantification of the remaining wound area at 0 and 48 h under conditions indicated above. (E) Expression of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers (CDH1, CDH2, FN1, and VIM) and EpCAM in SKBR3 and BT474 via Western blot after 50 nM miR-146a-5p mimic transfection. GAPDH was used as loading control. (F) Representative images of in vitro angiogenesis assay of HUVEC-2 cells (10× magnification). (G) Representations of the number of branching points and the relative tubular length 8 h after addition of CM of SKBR3 transfected with miR-146a-5p or scramble control. (H) Expression of VEGFR2 in HUVEC-2 after 24 h of treatment with CM of SKBR3 transfected with miR-146a-5p mimic or scramble control. (I) Proliferation analysis of SKBR3 and BT474 transfected with 50 nM miR-146a-5p mimic or scramble at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. (J) Cell cycle distribution of SKBR3 and BT474 cells overexpressing miR-146a-5p. Propidium iodide was used for staining, and the analysis was performed via flow cytometry. Each experiment was performed in technical and biological triplicate. * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.01. CM: Conditioned medium; CDH1: E-Cadherin; CDH2: N-cadherin; FN1; Fibronectin; VIM: Vimentin; EpCAM: Epithelial cell adhesion molecule. The uncropped blots are shown in Figure S5.
Figure 3. Analysis of miR-146a-5p effect in response to trastuzumab, migration, angiogenesis, proliferation, and cell cycle. (A) Viability analysis of SKBR3 and BT474 transfected with 50nM miR-146a-5p mimic (B) SKBR3r and BT474r transfected with 50 mM miR-146a-5p inhibitor (B) with or without treatment with 15 µg/mL of trastuzumab for 7 days. (C) Representative images of wound-healing cell migration assay of SKBR3 transfected with 50 nM miR-146a-5p mimic. Magnification: 10×. Scale bar: 300 µm. (D) Quantification of the remaining wound area at 0 and 48 h under conditions indicated above. (E) Expression of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers (CDH1, CDH2, FN1, and VIM) and EpCAM in SKBR3 and BT474 via Western blot after 50 nM miR-146a-5p mimic transfection. GAPDH was used as loading control. (F) Representative images of in vitro angiogenesis assay of HUVEC-2 cells (10× magnification). (G) Representations of the number of branching points and the relative tubular length 8 h after addition of CM of SKBR3 transfected with miR-146a-5p or scramble control. (H) Expression of VEGFR2 in HUVEC-2 after 24 h of treatment with CM of SKBR3 transfected with miR-146a-5p mimic or scramble control. (I) Proliferation analysis of SKBR3 and BT474 transfected with 50 nM miR-146a-5p mimic or scramble at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. (J) Cell cycle distribution of SKBR3 and BT474 cells overexpressing miR-146a-5p. Propidium iodide was used for staining, and the analysis was performed via flow cytometry. Each experiment was performed in technical and biological triplicate. * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.01. CM: Conditioned medium; CDH1: E-Cadherin; CDH2: N-cadherin; FN1; Fibronectin; VIM: Vimentin; EpCAM: Epithelial cell adhesion molecule. The uncropped blots are shown in Figure S5.
Cancers 15 02138 g003
Cancers 15 02138 g004 550
Figure 4. CDKN1A modulates the response to trastuzumab, proliferation, cell cycle, migration, and angiogenesis. (A) Data from TCGA dataset (n = 333) were classified based on median miR-146a-5p expression in breast tumor sample, and CKDN1A and CCNB1 expression were represented. (B) An analysis via RT-qPCR of CDKN1A and CCNB1 expression in BT474/BT474r, and SKBR3/SKBR3r cell lines, (C) or in BT474 transfected with miR-146a-5p mimic. GAPDH was used as endogenous mRNA. (D) Analysis via Western blot of CDKN1A and CCNB1 in BT474 after miR-146a-5p mimic or small-interfering (siRNA) targeting CDKN1A (siCDKN1A) transfection, (E) and in BT474r and SKBR3r after miR-146a-5p inhibitor transfection. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (F) Viability analysis of SKBR3 and BT474 transfected with siCDKN1A, treated or not with 15 µg/mL of trastuzumab for 7 days. (G) Proliferation analysis of SKBR3 and BT474 cell lines after 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after siCDKN1A transfection. (H) Cell cycle distribution of SKBR3 and BT474 cells transfected with siCDKN1A. (I) Wound-healing cell migration assay of SKBR3 transfected with siCDKN1A, 5× Magnification. Scale bar: 300 µm. (J) Quantification of the wound remaining area at 0 and 48 h post-transfection. (K) Representative images of in vitro angiogenesis assay of HUVEC-2 cells 8 h after addition of CM after 24 h of SKBR3 transfected with siCDKN1A or scramble control. Magnification: 10×. Scale bar: 50 µm. (L) Representation of the number of branching points and the relative tubular length. Each experiment was performed in technical and biological triplicate. * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.01; *** p-value < 0.001, **** p-value < 0.0001. CM: Conditioned medium. The uncropped blots are shown in Figure S5.
Figure 4. CDKN1A modulates the response to trastuzumab, proliferation, cell cycle, migration, and angiogenesis. (A) Data from TCGA dataset (n = 333) were classified based on median miR-146a-5p expression in breast tumor sample, and CKDN1A and CCNB1 expression were represented. (B) An analysis via RT-qPCR of CDKN1A and CCNB1 expression in BT474/BT474r, and SKBR3/SKBR3r cell lines, (C) or in BT474 transfected with miR-146a-5p mimic. GAPDH was used as endogenous mRNA. (D) Analysis via Western blot of CDKN1A and CCNB1 in BT474 after miR-146a-5p mimic or small-interfering (siRNA) targeting CDKN1A (siCDKN1A) transfection, (E) and in BT474r and SKBR3r after miR-146a-5p inhibitor transfection. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (F) Viability analysis of SKBR3 and BT474 transfected with siCDKN1A, treated or not with 15 µg/mL of trastuzumab for 7 days. (G) Proliferation analysis of SKBR3 and BT474 cell lines after 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after siCDKN1A transfection. (H) Cell cycle distribution of SKBR3 and BT474 cells transfected with siCDKN1A. (I) Wound-healing cell migration assay of SKBR3 transfected with siCDKN1A, 5× Magnification. Scale bar: 300 µm. (J) Quantification of the wound remaining area at 0 and 48 h post-transfection. (K) Representative images of in vitro angiogenesis assay of HUVEC-2 cells 8 h after addition of CM after 24 h of SKBR3 transfected with siCDKN1A or scramble control. Magnification: 10×. Scale bar: 50 µm. (L) Representation of the number of branching points and the relative tubular length. Each experiment was performed in technical and biological triplicate. * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.01; *** p-value < 0.001, **** p-value < 0.0001. CM: Conditioned medium. The uncropped blots are shown in Figure S5.
Cancers 15 02138 g004
Cancers 15 02138 g005 550
Figure 5. Characterization of SKBR3 exosomes and their effect in trastuzumab response. (A) Western blot was performed for measuring the presence of TSG-101 and CD9 typical from exosomes, and the absence of calnexin as a cellular control. (B) Representative image of exosomes observed via TEM (microscope JEOL1010, 60,000× Magnification) (scale bar: 50 nm). (C) Analysis via RT-qPCR of miR-146a-5p expression in exosomes from SKBR3 (exo), exosomes from SKBR3r (exoR) line, and from SKBR3 and SKBR3r cell lines. miR-16a was used as endogenous miRNA. (D) Percentage of fluorescent cells detected via flow cytometry after exosome internalization assay with DMEM F-12 alone or exoR containing (E), and mean of fluorescence detected in cells treated or not with trastuzumab. (F) Viability assay of the SKBR3 cell line co-cultured with 50% of CM from SKBR3r or exoR, treated with or without 15 µg/mL trastuzumab for 7 days. (G) Viability assay of the SKBR3 cell line co-cultured with exoR after transfection with miR-146a-5p inhibitor with or without 15 µg/mL trastuzumab for 7 days. Each experiment was performed in technical and biological triplicate. * p-value < 0.05; *** p-value < 0.001. The uncropped blots are shown in Figure S5.
Figure 5. Characterization of SKBR3 exosomes and their effect in trastuzumab response. (A) Western blot was performed for measuring the presence of TSG-101 and CD9 typical from exosomes, and the absence of calnexin as a cellular control. (B) Representative image of exosomes observed via TEM (microscope JEOL1010, 60,000× Magnification) (scale bar: 50 nm). (C) Analysis via RT-qPCR of miR-146a-5p expression in exosomes from SKBR3 (exo), exosomes from SKBR3r (exoR) line, and from SKBR3 and SKBR3r cell lines. miR-16a was used as endogenous miRNA. (D) Percentage of fluorescent cells detected via flow cytometry after exosome internalization assay with DMEM F-12 alone or exoR containing (E), and mean of fluorescence detected in cells treated or not with trastuzumab. (F) Viability assay of the SKBR3 cell line co-cultured with 50% of CM from SKBR3r or exoR, treated with or without 15 µg/mL trastuzumab for 7 days. (G) Viability assay of the SKBR3 cell line co-cultured with exoR after transfection with miR-146a-5p inhibitor with or without 15 µg/mL trastuzumab for 7 days. Each experiment was performed in technical and biological triplicate. * p-value < 0.05; *** p-value < 0.001. The uncropped blots are shown in Figure S5.
Cancers 15 02138 g005
Cancers 15 02138 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of exosomes in cell migration and angiogenesis. (A) Representative images of wound-healing cell migration assay of SKBR3, SKBR3r, and SKBR3 co-cultured with exosomes from SKBR3r (exoR). Magnification: 10×. (B) Quantification of the wound remaining area at 0 and 48 h. (C) Expression of EMT markers (VIM and FN1) and miR-146a-5p target CDKN1A, measured via RT-qPCR after co-culture of SKBR3 with exoR. GAPDH was used as endogenous mRNA gene, and the expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt method. (D) Representative images of in vitro angiogenesis assay of HUVEC-2 cells 8 h after addition of exo or exoR. Magnification: 5× (scale bar: 200 µm). (E) Representations of the number of branching points and the relative tubular lengths of HUVEC-2 cells 8 h after exo or exoR addition. Each experiment was performed in technical and biological triplicate. * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.01; *** p-value < 0.001. VIM: Vimentin; FN1: Fibronectin.
Figure 6. Effects of exosomes in cell migration and angiogenesis. (A) Representative images of wound-healing cell migration assay of SKBR3, SKBR3r, and SKBR3 co-cultured with exosomes from SKBR3r (exoR). Magnification: 10×. (B) Quantification of the wound remaining area at 0 and 48 h. (C) Expression of EMT markers (VIM and FN1) and miR-146a-5p target CDKN1A, measured via RT-qPCR after co-culture of SKBR3 with exoR. GAPDH was used as endogenous mRNA gene, and the expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt method. (D) Representative images of in vitro angiogenesis assay of HUVEC-2 cells 8 h after addition of exo or exoR. Magnification: 5× (scale bar: 200 µm). (E) Representations of the number of branching points and the relative tubular lengths of HUVEC-2 cells 8 h after exo or exoR addition. Each experiment was performed in technical and biological triplicate. * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.01; *** p-value < 0.001. VIM: Vimentin; FN1: Fibronectin.
Cancers 15 02138 g006
Table
Table 1. Clinicopathological characteristics of HER2+ BC patients.
Table 1. Clinicopathological characteristics of HER2+ BC patients.
CharacteristicsHER2+ BC Patients
Number33
Median age in years (range)51.5 (35–70)
HR
HR+17 (51.52%)
HR−16 (48.48%)
Stage, N (%)
I3 (9.09%)
II23 (69.70%)
III6 (18.18%)
IV1 (3.03%)
Grade
II11 (33.33%)
III21 (63.64%)
NA1 (3.03%)
Treatment
Adjuvant18 (54.55%)
Neoadjuvant15 (45.45%)
Response
Disease-free13 (39.40%)
Relapsed20 (60.60%)
Median follow up (months)97
Median DFS49 (6–177)
Median OS96 (7–177)
NA: Not available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cabello, P.; Torres-Ruiz, S.; Adam-Artigues, A.; Forés-Martos, J.; Martínez, M.T.; Hernando, C.; Zazo, S.; Madoz-Gúrpide, J.; Rovira, A.; Burgués, O.; et al. miR-146a-5p Promotes Angiogenesis and Confers Trastuzumab Resistance in HER2+ Breast Cancer. Cancers 2023, 15, 2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15072138

AMA Style

Cabello P, Torres-Ruiz S, Adam-Artigues A, Forés-Martos J, Martínez MT, Hernando C, Zazo S, Madoz-Gúrpide J, Rovira A, Burgués O, et al. miR-146a-5p Promotes Angiogenesis and Confers Trastuzumab Resistance in HER2+ Breast Cancer. Cancers. 2023; 15(7):2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15072138

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cabello, Paula, Sandra Torres-Ruiz, Anna Adam-Artigues, Jaume Forés-Martos, María Teresa Martínez, Cristina Hernando, Sandra Zazo, Juan Madoz-Gúrpide, Ana Rovira, Octavio Burgués, and et al. 2023. "miR-146a-5p Promotes Angiogenesis and Confers Trastuzumab Resistance in HER2+ Breast Cancer" Cancers 15, no. 7: 2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15072138

APA Style

Cabello, P., Torres-Ruiz, S., Adam-Artigues, A., Forés-Martos, J., Martínez, M. T., Hernando, C., Zazo, S., Madoz-Gúrpide, J., Rovira, A., Burgués, O., Rojo, F., Albanell, J., Lluch, A., Bermejo, B., Cejalvo, J. M., & Eroles, P. (2023). miR-146a-5p Promotes Angiogenesis and Confers Trastuzumab Resistance in HER2+ Breast Cancer. Cancers, 15(7), 2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15072138

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop