Next Article in Journal
Exploring Therapeutic Avenues in Lung Cancer: The Epigenetic Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Abdominal Visceral-to-Subcutaneous Fat Volume Ratio Predicts Survival and Response to First-Line Palliative Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of the Cancer Cell Secretome in Driving Breast Cancer Progression
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Updates on Breast Cancer

Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(22), 5392; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225392
Submission received: 20 September 2023 / Accepted: 9 November 2023 / Published: 13 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates on Breast Cancer)
This collection of 18 articles, comprising 12 original studies, 1 systematic review, and 5 reviews, is a collaborative effort by distinguished experts in breast cancer research, and it has been edited by Dr. Enrico Cassano and Dr. Filippo Pesapane, who both work at an international breast cancer referral center [1].
Breast cancer, a globally prevalent malignancy primarily afflicting women [2], remains a pivotal focus of medical research and innovation. In our Special Issue, titled “Updates on Breast Cancer”, we present the latest developments in breast cancer diagnostics, treatments, and patient care, offering an in-depth exploration of the multifaceted nature of breast cancer and the way in which science is transforming this field.
Nowadays, though precision diagnosis and personalized medicine are cornerstones of effective breast cancer management, achieving consistent and reproducible diagnostic assessments remains a challenge. Cserni B. et al. [3] introduce a groundbreaking methodology known as the ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) analysis. By determining the optimal number of observers required for reliable tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte categorization, ONEST has the potential to revolutionize diagnostic accuracy, providing a more robust and consistent framework for assessing breast cancer pathology.
Precision diagnosis also allows clinicians to understand the molecular intricacies of breast cancer. Monteiro F.L. et al. [4] performed a meticulous analysis that unveils the enigmatic role played by SETD7, a lysine N-methyltransferase, in breast cancer. Among her notable findings is the correlation between high SETD7 expression and worse recurrence-free survival in the basal-like subtype, underscoring this molecule’s clinical significance as a potential treatment-predictive marker.
The study of Nicosia L. et al. [5] introduces a novel nomogram aimed at predicting the likelihood of upstaging low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ in patients who have previously undergone vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, followed by surgical excision. This innovative tool leverages radiological and pathological criteria to provide a tailored framework for making treatment decisions. By identifying patients with a low risk of upstaging to infiltrating carcinomas, this nomogram has the potential to reduce overtreatment and improve patient outcomes, once again showing that personalized medicine is increasingly paramount in breast cancer care.
Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) are also driving significant advances in precision diagnosis. Petrillo et al. [6] launch a comprehensive investigation, leveraging radiomics features derived from contrast-enhanced mammography to predict various histological outcomes.
Radiomics, the extraction and analysis of quantitative features from medical images, holds promise in terms of providing valuable information beyond what the human eye can perceive [7,8,9]. The results of Petrillo et al.’s study rested on the analysis of a staggering 837 textural metrics that demonstrate an accuracy of 88.98%, enabling the differentiation of malignant and benign lesions. Beyond this distinction, the study attempted to predict histological grading, the presence of hormone receptors, and the status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer patients.
As we continue to harness the capabilities of radiomics and AI, we move closer to developing more effective breast cancer management practices, offering hope and improved prospects for afflicted women.
Mohammad Alkhaleefah M. et al. [10] present an innovative deep learning model named Connected-SegNets. This model is engineered for the precise segmentation of breast tumors from X-ray images, incorporating skip connections between layers, thus replacing the conventional loss function with intersection over union to fortify robustness against noise during training.
These findings all highlight the immense potential of radiomics and AI in the realm of breast cancer care [7,8,9]. However, while the integration of AI into radiology is revolutionizing breast cancer diagnosis, continuing to focus on the patient and preserving the doctor–patient relationship is crucial. Derevianko et al.’s study [11] delves into the impact of AI on doctor–patient communication, particularly within the context of cancer diagnosis. Their systematic review emphasizes the need for transparent and informative communication to establish patient trust in AI-driven diagnostic processes, ultimately improving healthcare interactions. Ad it remains uncertain to what extent and under which conditions the general population will embrace the use of AI [12], this study highlights the need to conduct larger-scale research to better understand women’s demands and concerns regarding the potential applications of AI in breast cancer care.
In addition to these improvements in breast cancer diagnosis, advances in postoperative surveillance have significantly contributed to the improved survival rates identified in breast cancer patients. Yang L. et al. [13] present a multicenter real-world study conducted across medical centers in China. Their study investigates the prognostic value of intensive postoperative bone scans for patients with breast cancer and bone metastasis. The findings provide compelling evidence of the benefits of this screening method, showcasing its potential to extend both overall survival and overall survival after bone metastasis.
Despite such improvement, in a breast cancer scenario, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a formidable clinical challenge due to its limited therapeutic options. Kholod O. et al. [14] decode the immune-related gene signatures that hold the key to predicting chemoimmunotherapy outcomes in TNBC patients, analyzing a vast dataset encompassing 422 patients across 24 studies. Through an algorithmic approach, they categorize patients into 12 homogenous subgroups based on various parameters, including tumor mutational burden, relapse status, tumor cellularity, menopausal status, and tumor stage.
A comprehensive analysis of the clinical utility of genomic tests in breast cancer care is provided by Galland et al. [15], who explore the clinical utility of genomic tests evaluating homologous recombination repair deficiency in breast cancer treatment decisions. Moreover, Safe S. et al. [16] show the roles played by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and its ligands in breast cancer progression and the potentialities for homologous recombination repair deficiency in early and metastatic breast cancer. Finally, Valenzuela-Palomo et al. [17] delve into the impacts of these variants on splicing, a crucial step in gene expression regulation. Their use of minigene assays to analyze 16 PALB2 variants at intron/exon boundaries reveals that 12 of these variants disrupt splicing, with 6 variants being classified as likely pathogenic in nature. This study offers essential insights into the clinical management of carrier patients and their families, enabling tailored prevention and therapy protocols.
Our Special Issue exceeds the traditional boundaries of breast cancer research, exploring a diverse array of topics that all enrich our understanding of this complex disease. From the characterization of circulating tumor cells using cutting-edge technology like the Parsortix® PC1 System [18] to investigating the clinical landscape of HER2-Low breast cancer [19], these studies broaden our horizons. With regard to radiation therapy, which is a crucial component of breast cancer treatment, Riaz et al. [20] analyze recent advances in optimizing radiation therapy decisions for early invasive breast cancer. Their exploration of strategies to identify patients who may benefit from tailored radiation therapy regimens shows a commitment to enhancing patient care and outcomes. Lastly, Zahari et al. [21] provide a review of the role played by the cancer cell secretome in breast cancer progression, explaining how the secretome shapes the tumor microenvironment, influences treatment resistance, and offer insights into potential therapeutic strategies targeting its components.
In conclusion, our Special Issue, titled “Updates on Breast Cancer,” shows the remarkable progress taking place within the field of breast cancer research. Technological innovations like radiomics and AI, together with the collective efforts of dedicated researchers, have paved the way for precision diagnosis, enhanced treatment strategies, and more personalized patient care. As we journey through this compendium of research, we are reminded that the pursuit of knowledge and innovation is limitless. The future of breast cancer care is being shaped right now, guided by the dedication and unwavering commitment of the scientific community. We invite our readers to help us to embrace these advancements, as we look forward to a brighter and more promising future in the battle against breast cancer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pesapane, F.; Penco, S.; Rotili, A.; Nicosia, L.; Bozzini, A.; Trentin, C.; Dominelli, V.; Priolo, F.; Farina, M.; Marinucci, I.; et al. How we provided appropriate breast imaging practices in the epicentre of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Br. J. Radiol. 2020, 93, 20200679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cserni, B.; Kilmartin, D.; O’Loughlin, M.; Andreu, X.; Bago-Horvath, Z.; Bianchi, S.; Chmielik, E.; Figueiredo, P.; Floris, G.; Foschini, M.P.; et al. ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) Analysis of Stromal Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (sTILs) in Breast Cancer and Its Limitations. Cancers 2023, 15, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Monteiro, F.L.; Stepanauskaite, L.; Williams, C.; Helguero, L.A. SETD7 Expression Is Associated with Breast Cancer Survival Outcomes for Specific Molecular Subtypes: A Systematic Analysis of Publicly Available Datasets. Cancers 2022, 14, 6029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nicosia, L.; Bozzini, A.C.; Penco, S.; Trentin, C.; Pizzamiglio, M.; Lazzeroni, M.; Lissidini, G.; Veronesi, P.; Farante, G.; Frassoni, S.; et al. A Model to Predict Upstaging to Invasive Carcinoma in Patients Preoperatively Diagnosed with Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. Cancers 2022, 14, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Petrillo, A.; Fusco, R.; Di Bernardo, E.; Petrosino, T.; Barretta, M.L.; Porto, A.; Granata, V.; Di Bonito, M.; Fanizzi, A.; Massafra, R.; et al. Prediction of Breast Cancer Histological Outcome by Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography. Cancers 2022, 14, 2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pesapane, F.; De Marco, P.; Rapino, A.; Lombardo, E.; Nicosia, L.; Tantrige, P.; Rotili, A.; Bozzini, A.C.; Penco, S.; Dominelli, V.; et al. How Radiomics Can Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pesapane, F.; Rotili, A.; Agazzi, G.M.; Botta, F.; Raimondi, S.; Penco, S.; Dominelli, V.; Cremonesi, M.; Jereczek-Fossa, B.A.; Carrafiello, G.; et al. Recent Radiomics Advancements in Breast Cancer: Lessons and Pitfalls for the Next Future. Curr. Oncol. 2021, 28, 2351–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pesapane, F.; Suter, M.B.; Rotili, A.; Penco, S.; Nigro, O.; Cremonesi, M.; Bellomi, M.; Jereczek-Fossa, B.A.; Pinotti, G.; Cassano, E. Will traditional biopsy be substituted by radiomics and liquid biopsy for breast cancer diagnosis and characterisation? Med. Oncol. 2020, 37, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alkhaleefah, M.; Tan, T.H.; Chang, C.H.; Wang, T.C.; Ma, S.C.; Chang, L.; Chang, Y.L. Connected-SegNets: A Deep Learning Model for Breast Tumor Segmentation from X-ray Images. Cancers 2022, 14, 4030, Correction in Cancers 2023, 15, 2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Derevianko, A.; Pizzoli, S.F.M.; Pesapane, F.; Rotili, A.; Monzani, D.; Grasso, R.; Cassano, E.; Pravettoni, G. The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Radiology Field: What Is the State of Doctor-Patient Communication in Cancer Diagnosis? Cancers 2023, 15, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pesapane, F.; Rotili, A.; Valconi, E.; Agazzi, G.M.; Montesano, M.; Penco, S.; Nicosia, L.; Bozzini, A.; Meneghetti, L.; Latronico, A.; et al. Women’s perceptions and attitudes to the use of AI in breast cancer screening: A survey in a cancer referral centre. Br. J. Radiol. 2023, 96, 20220569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, L.; Du, W.; Hu, T.; Liu, M.; Cai, L.; Liu, Q.; Yu, Z.; Liu, G.; Wang, S. Survival in Breast Cancer Patients with Bone Metastasis: A Multicenter Real-World Study on the Prognostic Impact of Intensive Postoperative Bone Scan after Initial Diagnosis of Breast Cancer (CSBrS-023). Cancers 2022, 14, 5835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kholod, O.; Basket, W.I.; Mitchem, J.B.; Kaifi, J.T.; Hammer, R.D.; Papageorgiou, C.N.; Shyu, C.R. Immune-Related Gene Signatures to Predict the Effectiveness of Chemoimmunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Exploratory Subgroup Discovery. Cancers 2022, 14, 5806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Galland, L.; Roussot, N.; Desmoulins, I.; Mayeur, D.; Kaderbhai, C.; Ilie, S.; Hennequin, A.; Reda, M.; Albuisson, J.; Arnould, L.; et al. Clinical Utility of Genomic Tests Evaluating Homologous Recombination Repair Deficiency (HRD) for Treatment Decisions in Early and Metastatic Breast Cancer. Cancers 2023, 15, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Safe, S.; Zhang, L. The Role of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) and Its Ligands in Breast Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 5574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Valenzuela-Palomo, A.; Sanoguera-Miralles, L.; Bueno-Martinez, E.; Esteban-Sanchez, A.; Llinares-Burguet, I.; Garcia-Alvarez, A.; Perez-Segura, P.; Gomez-Barrero, S.; de la Hoya, M.; Velasco-Sampedro, E.A. Splicing Analysis of 16 PALB2 ClinVar Variants by Minigene Assays: Identification of Six Likely Pathogenic Variants. Cancers 2022, 14, 4541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cohen, E.N.; Jayachandran, G.; Moore, R.G.; Cristofanilli, M.; Lang, J.E.; Khoury, J.D.; Press, M.F.; Kim, K.K.; Khazan, N.; Zhang, Q.; et al. A Multi-Center Clinical Study to Harvest and Characterize Circulating Tumor Cells from Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Using the Parsortix® PC1 System. Cancers 2022, 14, 5328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, H.; Peng, Y. Current Biological, Pathological and Clinical Landscape of HER2-Low Breast Cancer. Cancers 2022, 15, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Riaz, N.; Jeen, T.; Whelan, T.J.; Nielsen, T.O. Recent Advances in Optimizing Radiation Therapy Decisions in Early Invasive Breast Cancer. Cancers 2023, 15, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zahari, S.; Syafruddin, S.E.; Mohtar, M.A. Impact of the Cancer Cell Secretome in Driving Breast Cancer Progression. Cancers 2023, 15, 2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pesapane, F.; Nicosia, L.; Cassano, E. Updates on Breast Cancer. Cancers 2023, 15, 5392. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225392

AMA Style

Pesapane F, Nicosia L, Cassano E. Updates on Breast Cancer. Cancers. 2023; 15(22):5392. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225392

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pesapane, Filippo, Luca Nicosia, and Enrico Cassano. 2023. "Updates on Breast Cancer" Cancers 15, no. 22: 5392. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225392

APA Style

Pesapane, F., Nicosia, L., & Cassano, E. (2023). Updates on Breast Cancer. Cancers, 15(22), 5392. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225392

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop